🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Business & Cross-Cutting › Construction Management / Estimating › Courses
Business & Cross-Cutting · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a credentialed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Construction Management / Estimating

10 courses · 1,350 clock hours · 9 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$12,330 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
10courses
79lessons
1,350hours
35assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons79 of 79 lesson pages writtenPractice632 practice questionsResources117 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 79 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
BUS-CONS57-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Construction Management

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, technical reading skills, digital literacy, and career-readiness habits required to succeed in construction management and estimating. Students complete OSHA 10-Hour Outreach training and hands-on first aid/CPR certification within the course. Every lesson is explicitly connected to the skills tested in the NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT credential exams.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, technical reading skills, digital literacy, and career-readiness habits required to succeed in construction management and estimating. Students complete OSHA 10-Hour Outreach training and hands-on first aid/CPR certification within the course. Every lesson is explicitly connected to the skills tested in the NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT credential exams.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10-Hour Construction Outreach; First Aid, CPR, and AED for Construction Sites; Trade Math and Measurement for Estimating; Reading Construction Documents: Drawings, Specifications, and Standards; Digital Tools for Construction Management; Technical Reading and Professional Writing for Construction; Career Readiness and Professional Development in Construction Management.

What competent looks like. Demonstrate compliance with OSHA general industry and construction hazard recognition standards sufficient to pass the OSHA 10-Hour card requirement. Perform trade math calculations—including area, volume, unit conversion, percentage, and waste factors—accurately enough to support quantity takeoff and cost estimating tasks. Read and extract information from construction drawings, specifications, and contract documents using standard industry terminology. Use foundational digital tools—email, spreadsheets, cloud storage, and PDF markup—to organize and communicate construction management information. Produce professional written and verbal communications appropriate for a construction management workplace, including meeting minutes, RFIs, and a personal career plan. Perform hands-on CPR, AED operation, and basic first-aid procedures to current American Heart Association or Red Cross standards.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10-Hour Construction Outreach12theoryStudents will identify the top construction hazards (Focus Four: falls, struck-by, caught-in/between, electrocution), explain worker rights and employer responsibilities under the OSH Act, and complete all required OSHA 10-Hour Construction content.
  1. Complete all required OSHA 10-Hour Construction Outreach modules delivered by an authorized OSHA Outreach trainer, covering Focus Four hazards, personal protective equipment selection, and hazard communication (GHS/SDS format).
  2. Analyze three real construction incident case studies—one for each of the following: a fall from elevation, an electrocution near overhead lines, and a struck-by event—and write a one-page corrective action memo for each identifying the applicable OSHA standard violated and the hierarchy of controls to apply.
  3. Participate in a classroom job-site walkthrough simulation using photographs of a framed residential structure; students use a provided hazard identification checklist to tag at least ten distinct hazards and justify each finding verbally.
OSHA 10-Hour Construction Outreach curriculum (authorized trainer materials), OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 pocket guide, GHS/SDS sample sheets, Focus Four hazard photo set, PPE samples (hard hat, safety glasses, hi-vis vest, gloves), incident case study packetsSuccessful completion of all OSHA 10-Hour Outreach modules verified by authorized trainer sign-off; written hazard identification checklist scores 80% or higher (tags at least 8 of 10 planted hazards with correct standard reference).
2First Aid, CPR, and AED for Construction Sites8labStudents will perform adult CPR with AED operation and provide basic first-aid care for bleeding control, musculoskeletal injuries, heat illness, and chemical exposure to current American Heart Association or Red Cross Heartsaver standards.
  1. Practice hands-on adult CPR cycles on manikins in groups of three, rotating the roles of compressor, ventilator, and AED operator, until each student independently completes a two-minute CPR/AED sequence meeting Heartsaver skill criteria.
  2. Demonstrate wound care and tourniquet application using training supplies and a simulated bleeding scenario card; instructor evaluates each student's technique against a published skills checklist.
  3. Work through three scenario cards representing common construction medical emergencies—heat stroke on a summer pour day, suspected spinal injury after a scaffold fall, and chemical splash to the eyes—and verbalize the correct first-aid sequence and when to call 911 for each.
Adult CPR manikins (minimum one per three students), AED trainer units, Heartsaver participant workbooks, trauma dressing and tourniquet training kit, eye-wash demonstration station, scenario cards, American Heart Association or American Red Cross Heartsaver skill evaluation checklistsPass hands-on Heartsaver skills station evaluation administered by a certified instructor; each student must pass all required skill checkpoints without critical errors (e.g., failure to check responsiveness, failure to activate AED) to receive card.
3Trade Math and Measurement for Estimating28practiceStudents will apply arithmetic, geometry, fractions, decimals, percentages, unit conversion, and waste-factor calculations to solve quantity takeoff problems drawn from residential and light-commercial construction drawings.
  1. Complete a scaffolded problem set of 40 trade math problems progressing from basic unit conversion (linear feet to board feet, cubic yards, square feet) through area and volume calculations for slabs, walls, and roofs, checking each answer with a calculation log that shows formula, substitution, and result.
  2. Using a set of simplified floor-plan drawings, students measure room dimensions with an architectural scale rule, calculate net and gross square footages, apply a stated waste factor percentage to flooring and framing materials, and compile a materials summary table in a spreadsheet.
  3. Pairs compete in a timed 'Plan Reading Math Relay' where each team receives a new drawing segment every five minutes and must calculate the correct quantity; instructor reviews every answer publicly, correcting errors and reinforcing formula selection.
Architectural and engineering scale rules, calculator, graph paper, simplified floor-plan and foundation-plan drawing sets (printed, half-size), Dewalt Construction Math Quick-Check reference card, Excel or Google Sheets on lab computers, NCCER Core Curriculum student workbook (math chapters)Scored problem set: student must achieve 80% or higher on a 20-problem graded math quiz using trade drawings; all conversion, area, volume, and waste-factor question types must appear; partial credit awarded only if setup is correct.
4Reading Construction Documents: Drawings, Specifications, and Standards26demoStudents will locate and interpret information from a complete construction document set—including architectural, structural, civil, and MEP drawings plus a Division 01 specification section—using standard drawing conventions, abbreviations, and the CSI MasterFormat organizational system.
  1. Instructor-led guided reading of a full set of sample construction documents (architectural, structural, and one MEP discipline): instructor calls out twenty specific items (beam size, finish schedule entry, door type, inspection note) and students race to locate each on the correct sheet, recording the sheet number and grid coordinate; debrief covers how to read a title block, sheet index, and revision cloud.
  2. Students read a printed Division 01 General Requirements specification section and answer a structured question set asking them to identify the submittal schedule, substitution procedure, testing requirements, and payment application format described in the section.
  3. In groups of three, students receive a discrepancy set—five intentional conflicts between a drawing note and the corresponding specification clause—and must write a one-paragraph explanation of which document governs per standard contract hierarchy and why, referencing the AIA general conditions principle that specifications govern over drawings for quality.
Full-size or half-size sample construction document set (minimum architectural + structural + one MEP discipline; sourced from publicly available school or municipal project), CSI MasterFormat division list (current edition), sample Division 01 specification section, AIA A201 summary excerpt, drawing abbreviation reference sheet, highlightersDocument navigation quiz: student locates 15 specific data points across the drawing set and specification within 30 minutes; must score 12 of 15 (80%) correctly with sheet number and grid reference cited.
5Digital Tools for Construction Management24labStudents will use spreadsheet software, cloud file storage, PDF markup tools, and professional email to organize project information, mark up a drawing set, and transmit a document package following construction industry conventions.
  1. Build a project directory folder structure in a cloud storage platform (Google Drive or Microsoft OneDrive) following a provided naming convention standard; upload a drawing set, create a submittal log spreadsheet with auto-calculated status fields, and share the folder with the instructor using appropriate permission settings.
  2. Using Bluebeam Revu or Adobe Acrobat, students mark up a three-sheet drawing excerpt: add a revision cloud to a changed dimension, place a hyperlinked callout to a specification section, stamp two sheets as 'FOR CONSTRUCTION,' and flatten the markup for distribution—then export a summary report.
  3. Draft and send a professional email to a fictitious subcontractor requesting a revised bid, attaching the marked-up drawing; the email must include a proper subject line, greeting, clear scope description, requested response deadline, and professional closing—evaluated against a provided rubric.
Lab computers with internet access, Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets, Bluebeam Revu (trial or school license) or Adobe Acrobat, Google Drive or Microsoft OneDrive accounts, sample three-sheet PDF drawing set, submittal log template starter file, professional email rubricInstructor evaluates completed folder structure, submittal log, marked-up PDF export, and email against a 20-point checklist; student must score 16 of 20 points; any missing naming convention or incorrect permission setting is a mandatory correction before advancement.
6Technical Reading and Professional Writing for Construction26practiceStudents will read, summarize, and respond to construction contract language, meeting minutes, and RFI forms using clear, concise prose free of ambiguity, and will produce a written communication that accurately records a technical decision.
  1. Read a two-page subcontract excerpt and a project meeting minutes template; answer 10 comprehension questions that require distinguishing between shall/should/may, identifying defined terms, and locating notice deadlines—then rewrite two ambiguous clauses in plain language without changing their legal intent.
  2. Working from a voice recording of a mock project meeting (provided as an audio file or instructor role-play), students produce a set of meeting minutes using a standard template: date, attendees, agenda items, decisions made, action items with owners and due dates; instructor compares student minutes to a provided answer key.
  3. Complete an RFI form for a real drawing discrepancy embedded in the sample drawing set from Lesson 4, writing a precise technical question in the description field, referencing the drawing number, detail, and specification section, and proposing a suggested resolution; peer-review swap with another student using a provided review checklist.
Sample subcontract excerpt (two pages, commercially available form or instructor-prepared), meeting minutes template, audio file or instructor role-play script for mock meeting, RFI form (blank, industry-standard format), peer review checklist, sample drawing set from Lesson 4Meeting minutes graded against answer key: must capture all six action items correctly and meet formatting standard (80% rubric score); RFI form reviewed by instructor—must state a clear, unambiguous question with correct document references to pass.
7Career Readiness and Professional Development in Construction Management24theoryStudents will construct a professional resume and 30-second elevator pitch tailored to an entry-level construction management or estimating position, explain the credential pathways for NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT, and produce a written two-year career development plan.
  1. Research three entry-level construction management job postings online; annotate each posting identifying required credentials, software skills, and education requirements; map each requirement to a course or credential in the program and write a gap analysis identifying what they still need to earn.
  2. Draft a one-page resume using a provided construction-industry resume template, then participate in a peer critique session using a 15-point rubric covering content accuracy, action verbs, quantified accomplishments, and format; revise the resume based on peer feedback before instructor review.
  3. Deliver a 30-second elevator pitch to the class introducing themselves, naming their target role, and citing two skills from the program; class scores each pitch on clarity, confidence, and relevance using a simple 1-3 rubric; students then write a two-year career plan identifying the order in which they will pursue NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT credentials and why.
Construction-industry resume template, job posting printouts (three per student), credential pathway one-pagers for NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT (instructor-prepared from official credential websites), peer critique rubric, two-year career plan worksheet, internet accessResume scores 12 of 15 points on rubric after revision; two-year career plan includes all three credentials with a realistic sequencing rationale and at least two professional development actions (e.g., joining CMAA student chapter, completing NCCER Core) graded on a pass/fail basis by instructor.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
OSHA 10 and Safety Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% correct (28 of 40 questions); OSHA Outreach card issued only upon authorized trainer sign-off of all module completionsA 40-question multiple-choice written exam covering Focus Four hazards, PPE selection, GHS/hazard communication, worker rights and employer responsibilities, and first-aid/emergency response scenarios drawn from Lessons 1 and 2. This exam maps directly to the OSHA 30 Construction credential domain areas that will be revisited in Course 10 Exam Prep.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Trade Math and Document Reading ExamWritten exam25%80% correct (32 of 40 questions); students must pass both the math sub-score (16 of 20) and the document reading sub-score (16 of 20) independentlyA 40-question closed-book exam split equally between trade math problems (unit conversion, area, volume, waste factor, percentage markup) and construction document reading questions requiring students to locate data in a provided partial drawing set and specification excerpt. Results predict readiness for quantity takeoff tasks in Course 3 Estimating and map to NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT knowledge competency areas.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Digital Tools and Professional Communication PortfolioProject25%80% overall rubric score; each of the four portfolio components must individually score at least 70% or be revised until it doesStudents submit a four-component portfolio: (1) the cloud folder structure with submittal log from Lesson 5, (2) the marked-up and flattened PDF drawing set from Lesson 5, (3) the final revised resume from Lesson 7, and (4) the two-year career development plan from Lesson 7. Each component is scored against its lesson rubric; the portfolio grade is the average of the four component scores.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Oral Professional Readiness DefenseOral / panel25%Pass on all four criteria: technical accuracy, communication clarity, professional demeanor, and self-reflection; a 'needs improvement' on any single criterion requires a re-attempt within one weekA ten-minute individual oral session with the instructor and one industry guest evaluator in which the student presents their career plan, answers two impromptu scenario questions (one safety, one communication), and explains how the skills from this course connect to the NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT credentials. Evaluators score the student on a four-criteria rubric; this assessment simulates the professional interview and oral defense component of the CMAA CMIT application process.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
BUS-CONS57-02 Trade course

Construction Project Scheduling

122 hr · $1,320 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to build, read, and control construction project schedules using industry-standard methods including the Critical Path Method (CPM), Gantt charts, and resource-loaded schedules. Emphasis is placed on real project scenarios, schedule recovery, and the scheduling knowledge areas tested by the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. Students use scheduling software and hand-calculation techniques to develop schedules from scope documents and subcontractor input.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to build, read, and control construction project schedules using industry-standard methods including the Critical Path Method (CPM), Gantt charts, and resource-loaded schedules. Emphasis is placed on real project scenarios, schedule recovery, and the scheduling knowledge areas tested by the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. Students use scheduling software and hand-calculation techniques to develop schedules from scope documents and subcontractor input.

How the course runs. 10 blocks: Scheduling Fundamentals and the Construction Lifecycle; Work Breakdown Structure and Activity Definition; Network Logic and the Critical Path Method; Gantt Charts and Scheduling Software Basics; Resource Loading and Crew Leveling; Schedule Compression: Crashing and Fast-Tracking; Schedule Monitoring, Updates, and Earned Value; Contract Schedule Requirements and Milestone Management; Subcontractor Coordination Schedules and Look-Ahead Reports; Schedule Presentation, Defense, and NCCER/CMIT Exam Alignment.

What competent looks like. Develop a complete CPM network schedule from a defined project scope, identifying the critical path and all activity durations with supporting logic. Produce a resource-loaded Gantt chart that accounts for crew availability, material lead times, and subcontractor sequencing. Perform schedule updates using earned value progress data and identify schedule variances requiring corrective action. Apply schedule compression techniques—crashing and fast-tracking—and evaluate their cost and risk trade-offs in writing. Interpret contract schedule requirements and submittal deadlines, aligning the project schedule with milestone and liquidated-damages provisions. Use scheduling software (Primavera P6 or MS Project) and Gantt-based tools to produce professional schedule deliverables suitable for owner and subcontractor distribution.

Lessons · 10 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Scheduling Fundamentals and the Construction Lifecycle10theoryStudents will define key scheduling terms and explain how scheduling fits into each phase of the construction project lifecycle.
  1. Students annotate a printed project timeline for a sample commercial building project, labeling pre-construction, procurement, construction, and closeout phases with typical scheduling milestones.
  2. Instructor-led discussion using NCCER Project Management module vocabulary: activity, duration, float, milestone, baseline; students complete a matching quiz with a minimum score of 80%.
  3. Small groups read a one-page schedule narrative from a real bid package and identify three scheduling obligations the contractor must meet, then present findings to the class.
NCCER Project Management module (current edition), sample commercial bid package with schedule spec section, whiteboard, printed project lifecycle diagramScored vocabulary quiz: students must correctly define and apply at least 16 of 20 terms (80%). Instructor observes annotation activity for completeness.
2Work Breakdown Structure and Activity Definition12theoryStudents will decompose a given project scope into a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and define schedule activities with realistic durations and resource assignments.
  1. Students receive a scope-of-work summary for a small commercial tenant improvement project and build a three-level WBS on paper, then transfer it to a digital mind-mapping or spreadsheet tool.
  2. Using RS Means or instructor-provided crew productivity tables, students estimate durations for ten defined activities by calculating quantity divided by daily crew output.
  3. Pairs review each other's WBS and duration calculations, flag discrepancies, and document corrections in a brief written justification of at least two sentences per change.
RS Means Building Construction Cost Data (current edition), spreadsheet software, sample tenant improvement scope of work, crew productivity reference sheets provided by instructorWBS deliverable graded on a rubric: correct three-level hierarchy (30 pts), all major trades represented (30 pts), duration calculations with shown math (40 pts). Passing score: 75/100.
3Network Logic and the Critical Path Method14theoryStudents will construct a Precedence Diagramming Method (PDM) network, calculate early/late start and finish times using forward and backward passes, and identify the critical path.
  1. Instructor demonstrates a forward and backward pass on a 10-activity network on the whiteboard; students replicate the calculation independently on a printed blank network template.
  2. Students build a PDM network for a 15-activity residential addition project using index cards on a tabletop, assigning Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start, and Finish-to-Finish relationships where logically appropriate.
  3. Students calculate Total Float for every activity and highlight the critical path in red; they write one paragraph explaining why that path is critical and what would happen if any critical activity slipped two days.
Blank PDM network templates, index cards, colored markers, calculator, NCCER Project Management module section on CPM, instructor-prepared 15-activity activity listCompleted network with all node values (ES, EF, LS, LF, TF) checked by instructor against answer key; all critical path activities correctly identified. Pass: no math errors on critical path nodes and at least 85% of all node values correct.
4Gantt Charts and Scheduling Software Basics14demoStudents will enter a project activity list with logic links into scheduling software and produce a formatted Gantt chart that displays the critical path and float.
  1. Instructor demonstrates creating a new project file in MS Project or Primavera P6, entering activities, assigning durations, and linking predecessors; students follow along on individual workstations.
  2. Students enter the 15-activity tenant improvement schedule from Lesson 2 into the software, link all activities per their PDM network from Lesson 3, and verify that the software-calculated critical path matches their hand calculation.
  3. Students format the Gantt chart with a project title block, timescale in weeks, critical path highlighted, and milestone diamonds for owner review dates; they export a PDF for the lab log.
Computers with MS Project or Primavera P6 (student license or school lab), projector for instructor demo, activity list from Lesson 2, PDM network from Lesson 3Exported Gantt chart PDF reviewed against a formatting checklist (title block, timescale, critical path color, milestones): pass requires all five checklist items present and critical path matching the hand-calculated answer key.
5Resource Loading and Crew Leveling12labStudents will assign labor resources to schedule activities, identify resource over-allocations, and apply leveling techniques to produce a feasible resource-loaded schedule.
  1. Students add labor resources (carpenter crew, concrete crew, MEP subcontractors) with defined availability limits to their software schedule and run the resource usage histogram to locate peak over-allocations.
  2. Students apply manual resource leveling by splitting activities or adding lag, then re-run the histogram; they document each change made and the float consumed in a written change log.
  3. Groups compare leveled schedules and discuss trade-offs: which activities shifted to non-critical paths and what overall project duration change resulted; findings recorded in a one-page summary.
Computers with scheduling software, resource availability table provided by instructor, printed resource histogram output for annotation, change log templateResource-loaded schedule file and change log: pass requires zero remaining over-allocations on any day, all changes documented, and project completion date within five days of the original baseline. Lab log entry required.
6Schedule Compression: Crashing and Fast-Tracking12theoryStudents will apply crashing and fast-tracking techniques to a schedule under a deadline constraint and evaluate the cost and risk impact of each option in writing.
  1. Students receive a scenario: the owner needs the project completed 15 days earlier than the current schedule end; instructor presents crash-cost tables for three critical activities and students calculate the minimum-cost crash solution using a cost-slope analysis.
  2. Students identify two activities suitable for fast-tracking (overlapping phases) in their tenant improvement schedule, adjust the logic in the software, and document the increased risk exposure in a risk register entry for each activity.
  3. Students write a one-page memo to the owner recommending a compression strategy, justifying the recommendation with cost data, float impact, and identified risks.
Crash-cost table (instructor-prepared), scheduling software, risk register template, sample owner memo format, calculatorCost-slope calculation checked against answer key (pass: correct methodology and answer within 5% of solution); written memo graded on rubric: cost data accuracy (40 pts), risk identification (30 pts), clear recommendation (30 pts). Pass: 75/100.
7Schedule Monitoring, Updates, and Earned Value14practiceStudents will update a baseline schedule with progress data, calculate Schedule Variance (SV) and Schedule Performance Index (SPI), and identify activities requiring corrective action.
  1. Students receive a status report with percent-complete data for each activity at the project midpoint; they enter actuals into the software and compare the updated schedule to the baseline using the variance columns.
  2. Students calculate SV (Earned Value minus Planned Value) and SPI (Earned Value divided by Planned Value) for five selected activities by hand using provided BCWP, BCWS, and ACWP data, then verify results in software.
  3. Students write a two-paragraph schedule status narrative suitable for an owner monthly report, identifying which activities are behind schedule, the impact on the critical path, and proposed recovery actions.
Baseline schedule file from previous lessons, status report data sheet (instructor-prepared), EV formula reference card, scheduling software, report narrative templateSV and SPI calculations checked against answer key (pass: all five calculations correct within rounding); status narrative graded: critical path impact identified correctly and at least one specific recovery action proposed. Pass: both components correct.
8Contract Schedule Requirements and Milestone Management10theoryStudents will interpret schedule-related provisions in a standard construction contract, including milestone dates, submittal schedules, and liquidated damages clauses, and align a project schedule accordingly.
  1. Students read the schedule specification section (Division 01) from a sample project manual; they highlight every date obligation, submittal deadline, and schedule update requirement, then list them in a compliance matrix spreadsheet.
  2. Instructor presents a scenario where the contractor has missed a contractual milestone; students identify which contract clause applies, estimate the liquidated damages exposure for a ten-day delay, and note how proper float management could have mitigated the risk.
  3. Students add all identified milestone diamonds from the compliance matrix to their software schedule and verify that the schedule logic supports on-time achievement of each milestone.
Sample project manual Division 01 schedule specification (instructor-provided, names redacted), compliance matrix template, scheduling software, construction contract reference (AIA A201 general conditions or equivalent)Compliance matrix reviewed by instructor: pass requires all contractual dates captured and correctly entered as milestones in the software schedule. Instructor spot-checks three milestones for correct placement.
9Subcontractor Coordination Schedules and Look-Ahead Reports10practiceStudents will produce a three-week look-ahead schedule and a subcontractor coordination log from a master project schedule, suitable for a weekly job-site coordination meeting.
  1. Students filter their master schedule in software to display only activities starting or in progress within the next three weeks and format the output as a look-ahead report with responsible party and required material delivery dates noted.
  2. Students role-play a subcontractor coordination meeting: one student presents the look-ahead report, two others act as subcontractor representatives raising conflicts (crew availability, long-lead materials), and the group negotiates and documents resolutions.
  3. Students update the subcontractor coordination log template recording each open item, responsible party, and required response date, then submit the log as a lab log entry.
Master schedule file, look-ahead report template, subcontractor coordination log template, projector for presentation role-playLook-ahead report: all activities in the three-week window present with correct dates and responsible parties (pass: 100% of activities in window captured). Coordination log: at least three open items recorded with responsible party and due date. Lab log entry required.
10Schedule Presentation, Defense, and NCCER/CMIT Exam Alignment14practiceStudents will present a complete, updated project schedule package to a panel, defend scheduling decisions using CPM logic and earned value data, and connect course content to NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT exam topics.
  1. Each student assembles a schedule package (WBS, CPM network, resource-loaded Gantt, updated schedule with SV/SPI, look-ahead report, milestone compliance matrix) into a professional PDF binder and submits it for grading.
  2. Students deliver a 10-minute oral presentation of their schedule package to a two-person panel (instructor plus one guest industry reviewer if available), answering at least three questions on scheduling logic, variance, and contract compliance.
  3. Students complete an exam-mapping activity: using the NCCER Project Management module table of contents and the published CMAA CMIT exam content outline, they identify which lessons and deliverables in this course address each exam topic area and note any gaps for personal study.
Completed schedule package from all prior lessons, PDF assembly software, NCCER Project Management module table of contents, CMAA CMIT exam content outline (available from CMAA website), presentation rubricSchedule package graded on rubric: completeness of all six components (40 pts), accuracy of CPM and EV data (40 pts), professional formatting (20 pts). Oral defense: pass requires clear, accurate answers to all panel questions with no uncorrected factual errors. Pass: 75/100 on package and satisfactory on defense.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Scheduling Theory Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% (38 of 50 questions correct)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering CPM calculations (forward/backward pass, float), scheduling terminology, resource leveling concepts, earned value formulas (SV, SPI), schedule compression trade-offs, and contract schedule obligations. Questions are written to mirror the difficulty and style of NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT exam items in the scheduling and project controls knowledge areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
CPM Network and Software Schedule Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All critical path nodes correct; software Gantt chart meets all five formatting checklist items; resource histogram shows zero over-allocations; pass/fail on each component, all three must passStudents are given a new 12-activity project scenario and must hand-calculate the CPM network (forward pass, backward pass, total float, critical path) within 45 minutes, then enter the schedule into software, resource-load it, level it, and produce a formatted Gantt chart PDF within an additional 60 minutes. The instructor verifies calculations against the answer key and reviews the software output against the formatting checklist.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Scheduling Lab LogLog15%At least 8 of 10 lessons have a complete entry; entries from Lessons 5, 9, and 10 must be present and graded satisfactoryStudents maintain a cumulative lab log documenting their schedule deliverables, software outputs, change logs, subcontractor coordination log, and look-ahead reports from each lesson. Each entry must include the date, lesson topic, deliverable description, a reflection sentence on one scheduling decision made, and the file name or attached document. The complete log is submitted at the end of the course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Job-Site Safety Orientation and Scheduling Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on safety identification task; signed acknowledgment of site safety plan review requiredBefore any field observation activity associated with scheduling (site visits, externship preparation), students must correctly identify all active hazard zones, access routes, and PPE requirements on a printed site plan provided by the instructor, and verbally confirm understanding of the site-specific safety plan. This check reinforces OSHA 30 content—hazard recognition, PPE selection, and fall protection awareness—and must be completed with a perfect score; any missed hazard requires immediate remediation and recheck before the student may proceed to field activities.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-CONS57-03 Trade course

Construction Cost Estimating

122 hr · $1,320 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to prepare complete, accurate cost estimates for commercial and residential construction projects using industry-standard quantity takeoff methods, pricing databases, and digital tools. The course moves from reading construction drawings and specifications through labor, material, equipment, and subcontractor pricing to producing a bid-ready estimate with markup and contingency. Lessons align with NCCER Project Management cost control competencies and CMAA CMIT knowledge areas covering project cost management.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to prepare complete, accurate cost estimates for commercial and residential construction projects using industry-standard quantity takeoff methods, pricing databases, and digital tools. The course moves from reading construction drawings and specifications through labor, material, equipment, and subcontractor pricing to producing a bid-ready estimate with markup and contingency. Lessons align with NCCER Project Management cost control competencies and CMAA CMIT knowledge areas covering project cost management.

How the course runs. 10 blocks: The Estimate Lifecycle and Bid Documents; Reading Construction Drawings for Estimating; Quantity Takeoff Methods and Units of Measure; Digital Takeoff with Bluebeam Revu; Pricing Labor: Crew Rates, Productivity, and Prevailing Wage; Pricing Materials and Equipment; Subcontractor Bids, Scope Gaps, and Bid Leveling; Indirect Costs, Overhead, Profit, and Contingency; Estimate Review, Scope Verification, and Common Errors; Complete Estimate: Integrated Takeoff and Bid Assembly.

What competent looks like. Perform a complete quantity takeoff for at least three CSI MasterFormat divisions from a set of construction drawings and specifications, with quantities within 5% of instructor key. Price direct costs—labor, material, equipment, and subcontractors—using current published unit-cost databases and local wage data to produce a detailed estimate summary sheet. Apply indirect costs, overhead, profit markup, contingency, and escalation to a direct-cost estimate and explain each line item in writing. Use Bluebeam Revu or equivalent PDF takeoff software to digitally measure and mark up a full drawing set, producing a documented quantity takeoff log. Identify and explain at least five common estimating errors and the quality-control checks used to detect them before bid submission. Interpret bid documents—including instructions to bidders, general conditions, and technical specifications—to determine scope inclusions, exclusions, and allowances that affect the estimate.

Lessons · 10 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Estimate Lifecycle and Bid Documents10theoryStudents will identify the five types of estimates used across a project lifecycle, explain how bid documents define scope, and locate key estimating information within a complete set of construction documents.
  1. Instructor-led overview of estimate types (order-of-magnitude through definitive/bid estimate) with real project examples showing how accuracy ranges change; students record definitions and accuracy ranges in a reference notebook.
  2. Divide into pairs and dissect a real bid package (drawings, project manual, addenda, instructions to bidders): each pair creates a checklist of scope items, allowances, alternates, and unit prices found in the documents.
  3. Class discussion and debrief comparing checklists; students revise their own list and write a one-paragraph scope narrative for the sample project.
Sample bid package (drawings + project manual with Division 00 and 01 front-end documents), CSI MasterFormat division list, instructor-prepared estimate-type comparison chart, student reference notebooksExit quiz: 8 short-answer questions on estimate types, document hierarchy, and scope terminology; pass = 75% correct.
2Reading Construction Drawings for Estimating12demoStudents will interpret plan, elevation, section, and detail drawings—including scale, symbols, and schedules—to extract the dimensional data needed for quantity takeoff.
  1. Instructor demonstrates how to read sheet index, title block, and drawing scales using a projected full drawing set; students follow along and annotate a printed sheet set with scale confirmations and north arrow.
  2. Students use an architectural scale and an engineer's scale to measure ten dimensions on floor plans and verify against dimension strings; discrepancies are flagged and discussed.
  3. Students locate and cross-reference a door schedule, window schedule, and finish schedule to corresponding plan locations, then list quantities for each item on a blank takeoff form.
Full-size printed drawing set (architectural and structural), architectural and engineer's scales, colored highlighters, blank takeoff forms, Bluebeam Revu student licenses on lab computersDimension accuracy check: students submit measured dimensions for 10 specified items; pass = 9 of 10 within 2% of key dimensions.
3Quantity Takeoff Methods and Units of Measure14labStudents will apply linear, area, volume, and count takeoff methods to at least four CSI MasterFormat divisions and record quantities using standard industry units on a formatted takeoff sheet.
  1. Instructor-led demonstration of takeoff for concrete footings (volume in cubic yards), masonry walls (area in square feet, count in block), and framing lumber (linear feet and board feet) using a projected drawing set; students take notes and ask questions.
  2. Students independently complete a structured quantity takeoff for Division 03 (concrete), Division 04 (masonry), Division 06 (wood framing), and Division 09 (drywall) on a provided drawing set, entering quantities on formatted spreadsheet takeoff sheets.
  3. Peer-review session: partners exchange takeoff sheets and check arithmetic, unit consistency, and completeness against a scope checklist; discrepancies are documented and corrected.
Lab computers with Excel or Google Sheets takeoff templates, printed drawing set, CSI MasterFormat reference list, calculator, architect's scale, Bluebeam Revu for verificationInstructor-graded takeoff sheet: quantities for all four divisions within 5% of answer key and all units correctly labeled; pass = 80% of line items accurate.
4Digital Takeoff with Bluebeam Revu12labStudents will use Bluebeam Revu's measurement and markup tools to perform a complete digital quantity takeoff for a building's floor plan, documenting calibrated measurements in a markups list export.
  1. Instructor-led walkthrough of Bluebeam Revu: setting scale calibration, using the linear, area, and count measurement tools, assigning phases/layers by trade, and exporting the markups summary to a spreadsheet.
  2. Students individually calibrate a provided PDF drawing set to the correct scale, then complete a digital takeoff for perimeter walls, floor area, door count, and window count, color-coding each trade.
  3. Students export the markups list to Excel, organize quantities by CSI division, and compare digital results against the hand takeoff completed in Lesson 3; differences of more than 5% are investigated and explained in a short written note.
Lab computers with Bluebeam Revu (licensed), PDF drawing set, Bluebeam quick-reference card, Excel/Google SheetsExported markups list and reconciliation note submitted; pass = all measurements calibrated correctly, quantities within 5% of instructor key, and at least one written explanation for any discrepancy over 2%.
5Pricing Labor: Crew Rates, Productivity, and Prevailing Wage12theoryStudents will calculate all-in crew labor costs for a given task by combining bare wage rates, labor burden, crew composition, and productivity data from a published cost reference.
  1. Instructor explains labor burden components (FICA, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, fringe benefits) and demonstrates how to convert bare wage to all-in hourly rate using a sample calculation on the whiteboard.
  2. Using RSMeans or an equivalent current cost database, students look up crew compositions and productivity rates for three tasks (concrete forming, framing, and drywall hanging) and calculate total labor cost per unit using a structured worksheet.
  3. Class discussion on prevailing wage: instructor explains the Davis-Bacon Act applicability on federal and federally assisted projects; students identify whether a provided project description triggers prevailing wage and adjust a labor rate accordingly.
RSMeans Building Construction Costs (current edition) or equivalent cost database, labor burden worksheet, whiteboard, calculator, student notebooksCompleted worksheet with three crew labor cost calculations; pass = all-in crew rate and total labor cost within 3% of instructor answer for at least two of three tasks.
6Pricing Materials and Equipment12theoryStudents will determine material unit prices using at least two sources (published cost data and a vendor quote) and calculate equipment cost for a task using ownership/operating cost or rental rate methods.
  1. Students obtain a mock vendor quote for lumber and concrete block (instructor-prepared quote sheet simulating a supplier response) and compare prices to RSMeans material costs; they document price source, unit, and any local adjustment.
  2. Instructor demonstrates equipment cost calculation using both a daily rental rate and a simplified ownership-plus-operating cost approach for a small excavator; students replicate the calculation for a concrete pump.
  3. Students build a material and equipment cost summary for the Division 03 concrete scope from Lesson 3 takeoff, combining their quantities with the pricing sources discussed.
RSMeans cost database, mock vendor quote sheets, equipment rental rate sheet (instructor-prepared), Excel pricing template, calculatorsMaterial and equipment cost summary reviewed by instructor; pass = correct unit prices sourced from at least two references, quantities correctly extended, and totals within 5% of key.
7Subcontractor Bids, Scope Gaps, and Bid Leveling10demoStudents will evaluate a set of three subcontractor bids for the same scope, identify inclusions and exclusions, and produce a bid-leveling matrix that supports a documented award recommendation.
  1. Instructor presents three mock subcontractor bids for a mechanical scope with intentionally different inclusions/exclusions; class reads each bid aloud and marks differences with colored highlighters.
  2. Students complete a bid-leveling matrix spreadsheet that adds missing scope items to each bid to make them comparable on a level basis, then rank the bids by adjusted total.
  3. Students write a one-page award recommendation memo citing scope coverage, price, and any clarification questions they would ask before awarding.
Three instructor-prepared mock subcontractor bid proposals, bid-leveling matrix template (Excel), memo writing guide, whiteboardBid-leveling matrix and memo reviewed by instructor; pass = all scope gaps correctly identified, adjusted totals mathematically correct, and memo includes at least two substantive clarification questions.
8Indirect Costs, Overhead, Profit, and Contingency12theoryStudents will assemble a complete estimate summary by adding indirect project costs, company overhead, profit markup, and contingency to a direct-cost subtotal, and explain each component in a written cost narrative.
  1. Instructor-led lecture and example: categories of indirect/general conditions costs (superintendent, temporary utilities, site safety, insurance, bonding); students list each category and discuss how to price it (lump sum vs. duration-based vs. percentage).
  2. Students receive a direct-cost subtotal from a sample project and apply general conditions, home-office overhead, profit, and contingency using a structured summary sheet, trying two markup scenarios (competitive bid vs. negotiated).
  3. Students write a two-paragraph cost narrative explaining each markup line and the reasoning behind the contingency percentage selected, then present to a partner for peer feedback.
Sample project direct-cost summary, estimate summary sheet template (Excel), instructor markup-guidance handout, student notebooksEstimate summary sheet and cost narrative submitted; pass = all components present, arithmetic correct, contingency percentage justified in writing, and narrative reviewed for completeness by instructor.
9Estimate Review, Scope Verification, and Common Errors10practiceStudents will apply a systematic quality-control checklist to a completed estimate, identify at least three seeded errors in scope, arithmetic, or pricing, and document corrections before a simulated bid deadline.
  1. Instructor presents a deliberately flawed complete estimate (seeded with errors such as wrong unit conversions, duplicate items, missing a division, and an incorrect crew rate); students work individually to find errors using a QC checklist.
  2. Students correct each error, document what was wrong and how it was fixed in a punch-list log, and recalculate the corrected total.
  3. Timed exercise: students receive a second flawed estimate and must complete QC and correction within 30 minutes, simulating a pre-bid deadline review.
Two instructor-prepared flawed estimate packages (printed and digital), QC checklist template, Excel, timerPunch-list log and corrected totals submitted; pass = at least 4 of 5 seeded errors identified and corrected, corrected total within 2% of instructor key.
10Complete Estimate: Integrated Takeoff and Bid Assembly18labStudents will independently produce a complete bid estimate—including digital takeoff, priced direct costs for at least five divisions, subcontractor bid leveling, and a fully marked-up summary—for a provided project, ready for a simulated bid submission.
  1. Students receive a new, unseen drawing set and project manual; they spend the first session reading documents, identifying scope, flagging RFI questions, and building a takeoff plan by CSI division.
  2. Students execute the full digital takeoff in Bluebeam Revu, price labor, material, and equipment using RSMeans and the provided mock vendor/subcontractor bids, and complete bid leveling for two subcontract scopes.
  3. Students assemble the final estimate summary with indirect costs, markup, and contingency; they prepare a one-page executive summary and submit the complete package as a simulated sealed bid by a stated deadline.
Full unseen drawing set and project manual (printed and PDF), Bluebeam Revu, RSMeans cost database, mock subcontractor bid packages, Excel estimate templates, bid submission checklistComplete estimate package evaluated by instructor against a detailed rubric: takeoff quantities within 5% of key for at least four of five divisions, pricing sources documented, markup components present, and executive summary clearly written; pass = 80% rubric score.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Estimating Concepts Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 questions)A 50-question written exam covering estimate types, bid document interpretation, CSI MasterFormat divisions, labor burden components, markup terminology, and the Davis-Bacon Act; questions are drawn from NCCER Project Management cost-control and CMAA CMIT cost-management knowledge areas. Students have 75 minutes and may not use references.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Live Quantity Takeoff Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All four divisions within 5% of instructor key; presentation judged satisfactory by instructorEach student receives an unseen two-page drawing set and 45 minutes to complete a hand-and-digital combined takeoff for four assigned CSI divisions, then presents their takeoff sheet to the instructor in a five-minute oral defense explaining methodology and any assumptions made.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Estimate Lab LogLog15%Log complete for all 10 lessons with no more than one missing entry; instructor signs off as accurateThroughout the course, each student maintains a running lab log documenting takeoff quantities, pricing sources, markup decisions, software settings, and QC findings from every lesson activity; the log is reviewed at mid-course and collected at course end as evidence of progressive skill development aligned with CMAA CMIT documentation competencies.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Bid Document and Scope Safety CheckSafety audit15%Pass: all five scenario questions answered correctly; one incorrect = remediation and recheck requiredA five-question scenario check in which students review a provided bid document excerpt and identify safety-related scope items (temporary protection, hazardous material allowances, site-specific OSHA compliance costs) that must be included in an estimate; this reinforces OSHA 30 awareness that safety compliance is a direct project cost, not an afterthought.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-CONS57-04 Trade course

Construction Contracts: Types, Risk, and Administration

122 hr · $1,320 COMPLIMENTARY

This course develops students' ability to read, interpret, and administer the full range of construction contracts used in commercial and residential project delivery. Students analyze contract language, allocate risk, draft routine contract documents, and manage changes, claims, and close-out in compliance with standard industry practice. Content maps directly to the NCCER Project Management module on contract administration and the CMAA CMIT exam domain covering project delivery and contract management.

Outcomes
Course text

This course develops students' ability to read, interpret, and administer the full range of construction contracts used in commercial and residential project delivery. Students analyze contract language, allocate risk, draft routine contract documents, and manage changes, claims, and close-out in compliance with standard industry practice. Content maps directly to the NCCER Project Management module on contract administration and the CMAA CMIT exam domain covering project delivery and contract management.

How the course runs. 10 blocks: Construction Contract Fundamentals and Project Delivery Methods; Contract Types: Lump-Sum, Unit-Price, Cost-Plus, and GMP; Reading Standard Contract Documents: AIA and ConsensusDocs; Contract Risk: Indemnification, Insurance, and Bonds; Key Contract Clauses: Liquidated Damages, Force Majeure, Notice, and Differing Site Conditions; Change Orders and Constructive Changes; Payment Applications, Retainage, and Pay-When-Paid Clauses; Dispute Resolution: Claims, Mediation, and Arbitration; Subcontracts and Flow-Down Clauses; Contract Close-Out: Substantial Completion, Punch Lists, and Final Payment.

What competent looks like. Identify and compare the major construction contract types—lump-sum, cost-plus, GMP, unit-price, and design-build—and select the appropriate type for a given project scenario. Read and interpret standard contract documents including AIA A101/A201 and ConsensusDocs general conditions, locating key clauses on scope, payment, changes, disputes, and termination. Draft a complete change order package, including a time-impact analysis and cost justification, that meets owner and contractor signature requirements. Explain the legal concepts of indemnification, liquidated damages, differing site conditions, force majeure, and notice requirements as they apply to construction contracts. Administer contract close-out by preparing a punch-list, tracking substantial completion, assembling warranties, and processing final payment applications. Apply risk-identification techniques to a sample contract and propose mitigation strategies that protect the contractor's schedule and budget.

Lessons · 10 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Construction Contract Fundamentals and Project Delivery Methods10theoryStudents will distinguish among the primary project delivery methods—design-bid-build, design-build, CM-at-risk, and integrated project delivery—and explain how each method shapes contract structure and risk allocation.
  1. Lecture and structured note-taking on the four delivery methods using a side-by-side comparison matrix; students complete the matrix individually and discuss in pairs.
  2. Case-study reading: students review two real project summaries (one design-bid-build school project, one design-build highway project) and identify which delivery method was used and why based on the project narrative.
  3. Small-group discussion: each group is assigned a project type (hospital, warehouse, single-family home, public road) and must defend which delivery method they would recommend and present a three-minute rationale to the class.
AIA Practice Guide 'Project Delivery Methods' (current edition), ConsensusDocs white paper on IPD, instructor-prepared comparison matrix worksheet, whiteboardExit ticket: five short-answer questions matching delivery method to project scenario; students must correctly classify at least four of five to demonstrate mastery.
2Contract Types: Lump-Sum, Unit-Price, Cost-Plus, and GMP12theoryStudents will calculate the contractor's price and profit exposure under lump-sum, unit-price, cost-plus-fee, and guaranteed maximum price contract structures given identical scope and cost data.
  1. Instructor-led worked examples: using a sample concrete flatwork project with defined quantities and unit costs, students compute total contract value under each of the four contract types and compare results.
  2. Risk heat-map activity: students mark a printed risk register with who bears cost risk (owner or contractor) under each contract type for items such as material escalation, quantity overrun, and productivity loss.
  3. Partner calculation drill: each pair receives a different set of hypothetical project cost data and must produce a written price summary in all four formats, then trade papers with another pair for peer review.
Instructor-prepared cost data worksheets, four-function calculators, blank risk register templates, National Construction Estimator (current edition) for reference unit costsGraded calculation quiz: four problems (one per contract type) requiring a correct price, identification of who bears cost risk, and one sentence explaining why; passing score is 75%.
3Reading Standard Contract Documents: AIA and ConsensusDocs14theoryStudents will locate and paraphrase the purpose of at least ten key clauses in the AIA A201 General Conditions, including scope, payment, changes, disputes, and termination provisions.
  1. Guided document walk: instructor projects AIA A201 and leads the class article by article through the structure, stopping at Articles 3, 7, 9, 12, and 14 for detailed annotation; students annotate their own printed copies.
  2. Clause scavenger hunt: students receive a list of fifteen plain-language questions ('Where does the contract define Substantial Completion?') and must locate and record the article and section number for each answer.
  3. Compare-and-contrast: students place AIA A201 and a ConsensusDocs 200 side by side and identify three clauses where the language materially differs; they write a one-paragraph summary of the practical impact of each difference.
Printed AIA A201 General Conditions (current edition), ConsensusDocs 200 (current edition), highlighters, annotation guide handoutOpen-document quiz: ten clause-location questions answered with article/section reference and a one-sentence paraphrase; passing score is 75% (at least eight correct references with accurate paraphrases).
4Contract Risk: Indemnification, Insurance, and Bonds12theoryStudents will explain how broad-form, intermediate-form, and limited indemnification clauses shift liability, and describe the role of commercial general liability insurance and performance and payment bonds in protecting project stakeholders.
  1. Lecture on indemnification forms: instructor presents three annotated contract excerpts representing each indemnification type; students label which party bears liability for third-party bodily injury in each scenario.
  2. Insurance certificate exercise: students examine a sample ACORD certificate of insurance, identify the required coverage types and limits typically requested on a commercial project, and flag any gaps against a mock project specification.
  3. Bonds role-play: students work in trios assigned as owner, surety, and contractor; they walk through a scenario where a contractor defaults mid-project and narrate the surety's obligations under a performance bond, then write a one-page summary.
Annotated contract excerpts (instructor-prepared), sample ACORD 25 certificate, sample AIA A312 Performance Bond form, Construction Law textbook chapter on suretyship (instructor-selected current edition)Scenario analysis: students read a two-paragraph fact pattern and answer five questions identifying the applicable indemnification form, which party's insurer responds, and what the surety must do; passing score is 75%.
5Key Contract Clauses: Liquidated Damages, Force Majeure, Notice, and Differing Site Conditions12theoryStudents will apply the legal requirements for a valid liquidated-damages clause, a timely notice of claim, and a differing-site-conditions claim to construction fact patterns and determine whether each claim has merit.
  1. Lecture and class discussion on each clause type with real-world construction examples; students draft a one-paragraph definition of each clause in plain language for their course reference binder.
  2. Notice requirement drill: students are given a timeline of project events and a contract notice provision specifying written notice within a defined number of days; they identify which events require notice, calculate the deadline, and draft a sample notice letter.
  3. Mock claim analysis: in small groups, students read a DSC scenario (contractor encounters unexpected rock where soil borings showed clay) and determine whether the claim meets the Type I or Type II DSC test under standard federal and AIA language, then present their conclusion.
Instructor-prepared fact patterns, sample notice letter template, federal FAR DSC clause reference, AIA A201 relevant articles, blank notice log formWritten claim memo: students independently analyze a new fact pattern, identify which clause applies, and write a structured one-page memo with a yes/no conclusion and supporting reasoning; graded on accuracy of clause application and completeness of reasoning (passing: instructor rubric score of 75% or higher).
6Change Orders and Constructive Changes14demoStudents will prepare a complete change order request package—including written description of changed work, detailed cost breakdown, and time-impact analysis—that satisfies the requirements of a standard AIA A201 contract.
  1. Instructor demonstration: using a projected sample project, the instructor walks through preparing a change order request step by step, narrating each required element (RFI origin, scope description, labor and material cost backup, schedule impact days, markup calculation).
  2. Cost breakdown practice: students receive a set of changed-work field notes and a cost code structure; they organize costs into direct labor, material, equipment, subcontractor, and overhead-and-profit line items using a standard change order form.
  3. Time-impact analysis exercise: students receive a simplified baseline schedule and a change event; they insert the new activity, identify the critical path impact, and calculate the number of compensable delay days, documenting their analysis on a TIA worksheet.
AIA G701 Change Order form, AIA G702/G703 Application for Payment forms, instructor-prepared cost backup worksheets, printed baseline schedule bar chart, TIA worksheet templateInstructor review of completed change order package: the package must include a properly filled G701, an itemized cost breakdown with correct markup, and a written TIA narrative; passing requires all three components to be present and arithmetically correct with no material omissions.
7Payment Applications, Retainage, and Pay-When-Paid Clauses12practiceStudents will complete an AIA G702/G703 Continuation Sheet application for payment for a multi-line construction project, correctly calculating work in place, stored materials, retainage withheld, and net amount due.
  1. Walkthrough of a completed G702/G703 set: instructor projects and narrates each line of the form, explaining how schedule-of-values percentages translate to dollar amounts and how retainage accumulates and is eventually released.
  2. Pay-app calculation lab: each student receives a unique schedule-of-values with ten cost codes and a set of percentage-complete values for the current period; they complete the G703 continuation sheet and G702 summary, then cross-check arithmetic with a partner.
  3. Pay-when-paid discussion and clause comparison: students read two subcontract payment clause excerpts—one pay-when-paid and one pay-if-paid—and write a half-page analysis of the risk difference for a subcontractor, referencing current general contractor practice.
Blank AIA G702 and G703 forms, instructor-prepared schedule-of-values data sets, four-function calculators, Construction Financial Management Association (CFMA) reference on retainage practicesGraded G702/G703 submission: the completed pay application must show correct arithmetic on all line items, correct retainage calculation at the specified rate, and the correct net amount due; passing score is 80% (arithmetic errors reduce score proportionally).
8Dispute Resolution: Claims, Mediation, and Arbitration10theoryStudents will explain the standard multi-step dispute resolution process in AIA contracts—initial decision maker, mediation, and arbitration or litigation—and prepare a written claim submission that meets the notice and documentation requirements of a standard general conditions.
  1. Lecture on the dispute resolution ladder: instructor maps out each step with timelines and required documentation; students annotate a flow chart showing which party acts at each stage and what the outcome options are.
  2. Mediation role-play: class divides into owner team and contractor team; each receives a one-page dispute summary (delayed owner-furnished equipment causing contractor impact costs); teams prepare a five-minute position statement and present in a structured mediation simulation.
  3. Claim document assembly: students compile a mock formal claim package for the same scenario—cover letter, chronology of events, entitlement argument citing contract clause, and quantum (cost and time) support—using a standard claim outline format.
AIA A201 Article 15 (dispute resolution), AAA Construction Industry Mediation Rules summary (AAA website, current), instructor-prepared dispute scenario handout, claim outline templatePeer and instructor evaluation of role-play position statement and written claim package against a rubric: claim must include entitlement argument with clause citation, a factual chronology, and a quantified cost/time request; passing rubric score is 75% or higher.
9Subcontracts and Flow-Down Clauses10practiceStudents will review a sample subcontract against the prime contract it flows from, identify required flow-down clauses, and mark any provisions that conflict with or fail to incorporate prime contract obligations.
  1. Side-by-side comparison exercise: students receive excerpts from an AIA A401 subcontract alongside the corresponding AIA A201 prime contract articles; they highlight where flow-down language mirrors the prime and mark gaps where key obligations are absent.
  2. Subcontract redline drill: students use a red pen (or track-changes in a word processor) to annotate a deficient sample subcontract, inserting missing flow-down clauses (indemnification, insurance requirements, dispute resolution, notice periods) using language from the prime contract.
  3. Discussion on scope gaps and overlaps: instructor presents a scenario where two subcontract scopes have a gray area (e.g., who furnishes blocking for HVAC equipment); students draft clear scope language to close the gap and share with the class for critique.
Printed AIA A401 Subcontract form, printed AIA A201 General Conditions, red pens and word-processor workstations, instructor-prepared deficient subcontract documentInstructor review of redlined subcontract: student must correctly identify and insert at least five of six planted flow-down deficiencies; passing requires five of six correct insertions with accurate clause language.
10Contract Close-Out: Substantial Completion, Punch Lists, and Final Payment16labStudents will execute a complete contract close-out sequence—issuing a certificate of substantial completion, preparing a punch list, tracking warranty submissions, and processing a final pay application with retainage release—for a simulated construction project.
  1. Close-out document assembly lab: students work through a packet of simulated close-out deliverables for a hypothetical commercial interior build-out, organizing as-built drawings, O&M manuals, warranty letters, test reports, and lien waivers into a properly indexed close-out binder.
  2. Punch list field simulation: using an instructor-prepared set of annotated room photos showing incomplete or deficient work items, students create a formatted punch list with location, deficiency description, responsible subcontractor, and required completion date for each item.
  3. Final pay application and lien waiver exercise: students prepare the final G702/G703 showing retainage release, attach a conditional waiver and release on final payment form for the general contractor and one subcontractor, and write a one-paragraph certificate of substantial completion narrative for the architect's signature.
AIA G704 Certificate of Substantial Completion, AIA G706 Contractor's Affidavit of Release of Liens, blank G702/G703 forms, sample conditional lien waiver forms, annotated room photos (instructor-prepared), tabbed close-out binder templateCompleted close-out binder graded against a ten-item checklist: binder must include all required documents correctly labeled and sequenced, punch list with complete entries, and a mathematically correct final pay application; passing requires eight of ten checklist items fully satisfied.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Contracts Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 questions)A 50-question written exam covering contract types, delivery methods, key AIA A201 clauses, indemnification forms, insurance and bond requirements, liquidated damages, notice requirements, differing site conditions, and dispute resolution procedures. Questions are multiple-choice and short-answer, drawn from lesson content and mapped to the CMAA CMIT 'Project Delivery and Contract Management' domain and NCCER Project Management module objectives.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Change Order Package Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Instructor rubric score of 75% or higher across all four rubric categories; all arithmetic must be correctEach student independently prepares a complete change order request package for an instructor-provided scenario, including a written scope description, an itemized cost breakdown with appropriate markup, a time-impact analysis narrative, and a properly completed AIA G701 form. The instructor evaluates the package against a four-category rubric assessing completeness, accuracy of cost calculation, validity of schedule analysis, and professional formatting.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Contract Administration Lab LogLog15%Eight of ten checklist items fully satisfied in the close-out binder; all forms arithmetically correctStudents submit the close-out lab binder assembled during Lesson 10, containing a certificate of substantial completion narrative, a formatted punch list, a final G702/G703 pay application with retainage release, and properly completed lien waiver forms. The log is graded against a ten-item instructor checklist that verifies presence, correct sequencing, accurate labeling, and arithmetic accuracy of each required document.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Contract Hazard and Notice Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on safety-critical items; 75% overall on the scenario analysisStudents review a two-page project scenario that includes several contract-related safety triggers—delayed safety submittals, missing OSHA compliance language in a subcontract, and an unclaimed differing-site-conditions hazard (unexpected underground utilities)—and must identify every safety-critical contractual failure, cite the relevant OSHA general duty or specific standard implicated, and describe the required contractual notice action. Any missed safety-critical item is an automatic non-pass requiring remediation before the student may proceed.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-CONS57-05 Trade course

Procurement in Construction Management

121 hr · $1,305 COMPLIMENTARY

This course teaches students the complete procurement cycle for construction projects, from scope packaging and bid solicitation through vendor selection, purchase order administration, and close-out. Students apply estimating and contract knowledge to real bid packages, subcontractor evaluations, and material buyout strategies used daily by project managers and owners' representatives. Lessons map directly to NCCER Project Management procurement competencies and CMAA CMIT knowledge areas covering project delivery and cost management.

Outcomes
Course text

This course teaches students the complete procurement cycle for construction projects, from scope packaging and bid solicitation through vendor selection, purchase order administration, and close-out. Students apply estimating and contract knowledge to real bid packages, subcontractor evaluations, and material buyout strategies used daily by project managers and owners' representatives. Lessons map directly to NCCER Project Management procurement competencies and CMAA CMIT knowledge areas covering project delivery and cost management.

How the course runs. 10 blocks: The Procurement Cycle and Project Delivery Context; Scope Packaging and Work Breakdown for Procurement; Solicitation Documents: RFQ, RFP, and Invitation to Bid; Prequalification and the Bidders List; Public Procurement Rules and Small-Business Requirements; Bid Leveling and Best-Value Analysis; Purchase Orders, Subcontracts, and Change Order Administration; Expediting, Submittals, and the Material Procurement Schedule; Procurement Close-Out and Record Management; Procurement Safety: Deliveries, Material Handling, and Hazard Control.

What competent looks like. Develop a complete bid package including scope of work, drawings list, general conditions, and bid form for a defined construction scope. Evaluate subcontractor and supplier bids using a standardized bid-leveling matrix and select the best-value proposal with written justification. Draft and administer a purchase order and subcontract change order in compliance with project contract requirements. Apply public and private procurement regulations, including minority and small-business requirements, to a simulated project procurement plan. Track procurement status using a material-and-subcontractor log, identify schedule impacts, and communicate expediting actions to the project team. Identify procurement-related hazards during site delivery and material handling and specify required PPE and OSHA-compliant safety controls.

Lessons · 10 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Procurement Cycle and Project Delivery Context11theoryStudents will be able to sequence all phases of the construction procurement cycle and explain how delivery method (design-bid-build, design-build, CM at Risk) shapes procurement strategy.
  1. Read and annotate a project delivery comparison chart covering DBB, DB, and CMR; answer guided questions linking each method to who holds subcontracts and who manages buyout
  2. Map a real project timeline (provided case study) onto a generic procurement flowchart, labeling each gate: scope package, RFQ/RFP, bid period, award, PO/subcontract, expediting, close-out
  3. Small-group discussion: compare two provided owner bid packages—one public agency, one private developer—and list three procurement rule differences each group must present to the class
CMAA Owner's Representation Manual excerpts, NCCER Project Management module readings, sample public agency and private bid packages, whiteboard, procurement flowchart templateExit ticket: students label a blank procurement flowchart with correct phase names and identify which delivery method applies to a described scenario; 80% of labels correct to pass
2Scope Packaging and Work Breakdown for Procurement14labStudents will divide a given set of project drawings and specifications into logical bid packages and write a scope-of-work narrative for at least three packages that eliminates gaps and overlaps.
  1. Using a provided set of commercial project drawings (architectural, structural, MEP), students individually list all work items, then sort them into trade bid packages using a provided CSI MasterFormat template
  2. Write a one-page scope-of-work narrative for the concrete, framing, and MEP packages, explicitly stating what is included, what is excluded, and what the interface responsibilities are at each boundary
  3. Peer-review swap: exchange narratives with another student, mark any gap or overlap found using a color-code key, and give written feedback before instructor debrief
Commercial project drawing set (reduced scale), project specifications sections 01–16 excerpts, CSI MasterFormat 2016 division list, scope narrative template, highlightersScored scope narrative rubric: correct CSI division assignment (25%), no substantive gaps or overlaps (40%), clear interface language (35%); minimum score 80% to pass
3Solicitation Documents: RFQ, RFP, and Invitation to Bid13demoStudents will draft an invitation-to-bid package for a concrete subcontract that includes all required components—instructions to bidders, bid form, scope, drawings list, and bid bond requirement—modeled on industry-standard formats.
  1. Instructor demonstrates side-by-side comparison of a public-sector ITB and a private-sector RFP, narrating each section's purpose and legal weight while students annotate their own copies
  2. Students draft a bid form for a concrete scope using a provided template, filling in unit-price lines, allowance lines, addendum acknowledgment, and signature block
  3. Compile a complete ITB package for the concrete scope by assembling scope narrative (from Lesson 2), bid form, drawings list, and instructions to bidders; submit for instructor markup before final revision
Sample public ITB and private RFP documents, bid form template, AGC document reference guides, word-processing software, printer for physical reviewCompleted ITB package reviewed against a 10-item checklist (instructions, bid form, scope, drawings list, schedule, bond requirement, insurance requirement, questions deadline, bid deadline, award criteria); 9 of 10 items present and correct to pass
4Prequalification and the Bidders List11theoryStudents will evaluate three contractor prequalification submissions against a defined scoring matrix and produce a ranked bidders-list recommendation with written justification.
  1. Review a standard prequalification questionnaire (financial statements, EMR, bonding capacity, similar-project references, safety record) and discuss each criterion's weight in class
  2. Score three fabricated but realistic prequalification packages using a provided weighted scoring matrix; calculate numerical scores and rank contractors
  3. Write a one-paragraph recommendation memo to the project owner identifying the recommended bidders list and flagging one contractor whose EMR or bonding capacity raises a concern
Three sample prequalification packages, weighted scoring matrix template, CMAA CM Standards of Practice reference, memo templateScoring matrix submitted with arithmetic verified and recommendation memo present; scores within ±5 points of instructor key and memo clearly tied to scoring data to pass
5Public Procurement Rules and Small-Business Requirements11theoryStudents will identify the public competitive-bidding thresholds, DBE/MBE/WBE outreach requirements, and prevailing-wage obligations that apply to a described publicly funded construction project and incorporate them into a procurement checklist.
  1. Read excerpts from a state public works procurement statute and a federal DBE program description; students annotate required steps and note which steps carry legal penalties for omission
  2. Case study: given a $4 million publicly funded school addition, students identify which procurement rules apply, what small-business outreach documentation is required, and whether prevailing wage applies
  3. Build a project-specific procurement compliance checklist for the case-study project, organizing tasks by phase (pre-bid, bid, award, construction) and noting the responsible party for each
State public procurement statute excerpts (generic/model), U.S. DOT DBE program summary document, prevailing wage overview handout, compliance checklist templateProcurement compliance checklist reviewed by instructor; all legally required steps present and correctly assigned to the right phase and party; no required step missing to pass
6Bid Leveling and Best-Value Analysis15.5labStudents will complete a bid-leveling spreadsheet for five competing masonry subcontractor bids, adjust for scope differences, and select the best-value bidder with a written award recommendation.
  1. Receive five fictional masonry bids that deliberately include scope differences (one excludes sealant, one adds an allowance for scaffolding, one lists an alternate unit price); identify every line-item discrepancy using a color-coded comparison grid
  2. Add or subtract dollar adjustments to normalize each bid to an apples-to-apples scope, using the project's own unit prices from the estimating course reference data as adjustment sources
  3. Prepare a one-page best-value recommendation memo that presents the leveled bid tab, names the recommended subcontractor, and addresses any risk items (schedule, bonding, references) noted in the evaluation
Five fictional bid packages, blank bid-leveling spreadsheet (Excel), unit-price reference sheet from estimating course, award recommendation memo templateLeveled bid tab with all adjustments arithmetic-verified by instructor; adjustments within ±3% of instructor key; recommendation memo present with reasoning tied to data; 80% accuracy to pass
7Purchase Orders, Subcontracts, and Change Order Administration15.5practiceStudents will issue a purchase order for a structural steel package, process one change order to that PO, and log both transactions in a procurement tracking log consistent with project record-keeping requirements.
  1. Using a provided PO template and the steel scope from earlier lessons, complete a purchase order—filling in all fields: vendor, scope reference, price, delivery date, payment terms, insurance requirements, and submittal requirements
  2. Receive a fictional change-order request from the steel fabricator (material price increase and revised delivery date); evaluate it against the contract unit prices and schedule, approve or reject with written rationale, and issue a revised PO or change order document
  3. Enter the original PO and the change order into a procurement tracking log spreadsheet, updating committed cost, approved changes, and revised delivery date columns; verify that the log reconciles to the project budget line
PO template (Word/Excel), subcontract change order form, procurement tracking log spreadsheet template, project budget extract, sample steel fabricator change-order requestPO and change order documents complete and all fields populated; log arithmetic reconciles to budget within $0; instructor signs off on document accuracy to pass
8Expediting, Submittals, and the Material Procurement Schedule13practiceStudents will build a material procurement schedule that integrates submittal review time, fabrication lead time, and delivery with the project master schedule, and identify one item on the critical path requiring expediting action.
  1. Given a simplified project master schedule (bar chart) and a list of eight material packages with lead times, students back-calculate required order dates for each package and enter them into a material procurement schedule template
  2. Identify which material is on or closest to the critical path; draft a one-paragraph expediting memo to the supplier requesting a revised delivery commitment and a weekly status update
  3. Role-play: one student acts as the project manager calling a supplier to expedite a delayed steel delivery; the other student acts as the supplier representative; class observes and provides structured feedback using a provided communication rubric
Simplified project bar-chart schedule, material lead-time list, material procurement schedule template (Excel), expediting memo template, communication rubricMaterial procurement schedule submitted with all order dates calculated correctly; critical-path item correctly identified; expediting memo present and professional in tone; 80% of schedule dates within one week of instructor key to pass
9Procurement Close-Out and Record Management8.5practiceStudents will assemble a procurement close-out package for a completed subcontract that includes lien releases, final pay application verification, warranty documentation, and O&M manual receipt confirmation.
  1. Review a fictional project's close-out checklist and identify which of the listed items (final change order, conditional lien release, unconditional lien release, as-builts, O&M manuals, warranty letters) are missing from the provided incomplete close-out file
  2. Complete a final pay application review: verify that the subcontractor's final billing matches the approved contract value plus change orders, that lien waivers match the payment amount, and flag any discrepancy
  3. Organize the complete close-out package into a logical filing structure (paper or digital folder), write a transmittal letter to the owner confirming all close-out deliverables have been received
Fictional close-out file (incomplete), close-out checklist template, final pay application form, lien waiver samples (conditional and unconditional), transmittal letter templateClose-out package complete against checklist with no missing required items; payment arithmetic verified and any discrepancy flagged; transmittal letter present; instructor confirms all required documents present to pass
10Procurement Safety: Deliveries, Material Handling, and Hazard Control8.5fieldStudents will conduct a simulated site delivery inspection, identify material-handling hazards, specify required PPE and OSHA-compliant controls, and complete a delivery acceptance checklist.
  1. Walk a staged delivery area (school loading dock or mock site) and identify at least five material-handling hazards—including struck-by risk from forklifts, improper stacking, blocked emergency egress, and missing labels on hazardous materials—recording findings on a hazard identification form
  2. For each hazard found, write a corrective action using the hierarchy of controls (elimination, substitution, engineering, administrative, PPE), referencing the appropriate OSHA general industry or construction standard category without fabricating specific section numbers
  3. Complete a delivery acceptance checklist for a staged steel delivery: verify quantities against the PO, check for visible damage, confirm material certifications are present, and sign or reject the delivery ticket with written reason
Staged delivery area or field site, hazard identification form, hierarchy-of-controls reference card, hard hat, high-visibility vest, steel-toed boots, gloves, delivery acceptance checklist, sample mill certificationsMinimum five hazards correctly identified; all corrective actions use the correct level of the hierarchy; delivery checklist fully completed; student wears all required PPE throughout the field activity; instructor field sign-off required to pass
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Procurement Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% or higherA 50-question written exam covering procurement cycle phases, solicitation document types, public procurement and small-business rules, bid-leveling principles, PO and change-order concepts, close-out requirements, and material-handling safety. Questions are mapped to NCCER Project Management procurement competencies and CMAA CMIT cost and procurement knowledge areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Bid Package Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%80% on the evaluation rubric across all four componentsEach student independently assembles a complete bid package—scope of work, bid form, drawings list, instructions to bidders—for an assigned trade scope from a provided drawing set, then verbally defends their award recommendation after leveling three fictional bids; the rubric scores scope completeness, document accuracy, bid-leveling math, and quality of verbal justification.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Procurement Tracking Lab LogLog15%All entries present, arithmetic reconciled to zero variance, and instructor-signedStudents submit the cumulative procurement tracking log maintained across Lessons 7 and 8, showing original PO, change order, revised committed cost, submittal status, and delivery date for each material or subcontract package; the log must reconcile exactly to the provided project budget extract with no arithmetic errors.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Delivery Safety Inspection CheckSafety audit15%Minimum five hazards correctly identified, all corrective actions at the correct hierarchy level, full PPE worn, and instructor field sign-off obtainedDrawn directly from the Lesson 10 field activity, the instructor evaluates the student's completed hazard identification form and delivery acceptance checklist on the day of the field exercise; any student who does not wear required PPE or misses a life-safety hazard must repeat the inspection before a passing sign-off is issued.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-CONS57-06 Trade course

Construction Safety Management

121 hr · $1,305 COMPLIMENTARY

This course develops the safety management knowledge and skills that construction project managers and estimators apply daily on active jobsites and in the office. Learners study OSHA construction standards, hazard identification, incident investigation, safety program administration, and cost integration so they can protect workers and keep projects compliant. Lesson content maps directly to OSHA 30-hour Construction Outreach topics and to the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT safety competency domains.

Outcomes
Course text

This course develops the safety management knowledge and skills that construction project managers and estimators apply daily on active jobsites and in the office. Learners study OSHA construction standards, hazard identification, incident investigation, safety program administration, and cost integration so they can protect workers and keep projects compliant. Lesson content maps directly to OSHA 30-hour Construction Outreach topics and to the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT safety competency domains.

How the course runs. 10 blocks: OSHA Construction Standards Framework and Employer Duties; Hazard Identification and the Hierarchy of Controls; Fall Protection — Standards, Systems, and Inspection; Electrical Safety, Lockout/Tagout, and Temporary Power; Scaffolding, Excavation/Trenching, and Confined Space Safety; Hazard Communication, SDS Management, and PPE Selection; Incident Investigation, Recordkeeping, and Incident Rate Calculation; Developing and Administering a Site Safety Program; Safety Cost Integration into Estimates and Schedules; Subcontractor Safety Plan Evaluation and Compliance Reporting.

What competent looks like. Identify, evaluate, and document construction site hazards in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 subpart requirements and prescribe appropriate controls using the hierarchy of controls. Develop and administer a written site-specific safety program including emergency action plan, hazard communication plan, and toolbox-talk schedule. Conduct a formal incident investigation, complete standard recordkeeping forms (OSHA 300/300A/301), and calculate incident rates used in contractor pre-qualification. Apply lockout/tagout procedures and scaffold, fall protection, electrical safety, and confined-space entry requirements to realistic construction scenarios. Integrate safety costs—personal protective equipment, training, inspections, and incident reserves—into a project estimate and schedule. Evaluate a subcontractor safety plan against owner and regulatory requirements and produce a written compliance report suitable for a project file.

Lessons · 10 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1OSHA Construction Standards Framework and Employer Duties12theoryStudents will correctly identify the structure of 29 CFR Part 1926, employer General Duty Clause obligations, and worker rights under OSHA, scoring at least 80% on a mapped written quiz.
  1. Read and annotate the General Duty Clause and selected Part 1926 subparts using the printed CFR or eCFR; students mark penalty triggers and note the difference between a general industry and construction standard.
  2. Analyze three real OSHA citation summaries (publicly available on OSHA's website) and classify each violation as willful, serious, other-than-serious, or repeat, then explain the classification to a partner.
  3. Complete a structured note-taking exercise on worker rights—the right to request an inspection, access exposure records, and refuse imminent-danger work—and role-play a scenario where a worker reports an unsafe condition to the instructor acting as supervisor.
29 CFR Part 1926 (eCFR or printed excerpts), OSHA publication 3151 (Worker Rights), OSHA citation summaries from osha.gov, student notebooks, highlighters10-question multiple-choice quiz on CFR structure, General Duty Clause elements, violation classifications, and worker rights; pass = 80% (8/10)
2Hazard Identification and the Hierarchy of Controls13demoStudents will conduct a walkthrough of a simulated construction area and produce a written hazard log that categorizes each hazard and assigns a control from the hierarchy, with at least 85% of identified hazards correctly categorized by the instructor review.
  1. Watch instructor demonstration of a pre-task hazard assessment on a mock work area (or video of an active site), then discuss how elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls, and PPE are sequenced and why cost rises as you move down the hierarchy.
  2. In teams of two, conduct a timed 15-minute walk of a campus area or mock site set up with planted hazards (tripping hazards, unlabeled containers, missing guardrail on a platform, unguarded extension cord); record findings on a standard hazard log form.
  3. Each team presents their hazard log to the class; instructor and peers evaluate completeness and control selection; teams revise their log based on feedback before submitting.
Blank hazard log forms, campus or mock site with planted hazards, hard hats, safety glasses, hi-vis vests (student PPE), OSHA 3151 quick card, hierarchy of controls posterInstructor review of submitted hazard log: minimum 85% of planted hazards identified and each assigned a control at the correct or more protective hierarchy level; any hazard mis-classified as PPE-only when engineering control is feasible earns resubmission
3Fall Protection — Standards, Systems, and Inspection13labStudents will inspect, don, and correctly anchor a full-body harness and demonstrate understanding of fall-clearance calculations and leading-edge requirements consistent with OSHA Part 1926 Subpart M.
  1. Review Subpart M trigger heights, anchorage strength requirements, and the three acceptable fall protection systems (guardrail, safety net, personal fall arrest); students complete a guided reading worksheet and identify which system applies to each of five given scenarios.
  2. Instructor demonstrates a point-by-point harness inspection (chest strap, D-ring, leg straps, stitching, hardware); each student then inspects an assigned harness, tags any defects found, and records findings on an inspection form.
  3. Students practice donning harnesses and connecting to a static line or fixed anchor point set up in the lab; they calculate required fall clearance given their height, lanyard length, deceleration distance, and a safety factor, then verify the anchor point meets requirements.
Full-body harnesses (one per student or pair), lanyards, static anchor point or horizontal lifeline rigged in lab, inspection tag kit, Part 1926 Subpart M text, fall-clearance calculation worksheet, tape measureSkills checklist: student must complete all 12 inspection points in correct order AND calculate fall clearance within 6 inches of instructor answer AND demonstrate correct donning sequence; any single critical step missed (D-ring position, anchorage verification) = must repeat before passing
4Electrical Safety, Lockout/Tagout, and Temporary Power12labStudents will write and execute a machine-specific lockout/tagout procedure for a training apparatus and identify at minimum four electrical hazards present in a mock temporary power panel setup.
  1. Study OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart K requirements for temporary wiring, GFCI protection, and extension cord use on construction sites; students answer scenario questions identifying whether GFCI is required and which cord gauge is appropriate for a given circuit.
  2. Instructor demonstrates the six-step lockout/tagout procedure on a training apparatus (de-energize, notify, isolate, apply lock, release stored energy, verify zero energy state); students then write their own machine-specific LOTO procedure following a provided template.
  3. Students execute their written LOTO procedure on the training apparatus under instructor observation; a peer acting as affected employee attempts to operate the machine after locks are applied to verify isolation.
LOTO training apparatus with practice locks and tags, practice lockout station with hasp, LOTO procedure template, mock temporary power panel (de-energized training unit), Part 1926 Subpart K excerpts, GFCI plug-in testerWritten LOTO procedure scored on a 10-point rubric (all six steps present, energy source identified, verification step included, worker notification noted); pass = 9/10; lab execution observed by instructor — any step out of sequence or verification step skipped = repeat required
5Scaffolding, Excavation/Trenching, and Confined Space Safety12theoryStudents will match the correct OSHA standard requirements to scaffold type, soil classification, and confined space classification scenarios, achieving at least 80% on a scenario-based quiz.
  1. Using Part 1926 Subparts P and Q excerpts, students classify five soil samples described in written scenarios (type A, B, or C) and determine the maximum allowable slope or required shoring method; they sketch a simple trench cross-section with dimensions labeled.
  2. Watch a training video on permit-required confined spaces; students then complete a permit-required confined space entry permit for a given scenario (a below-grade utility vault), identifying hazards, required monitoring, rescue means, and attendant duties.
  3. Using manufacturer data and Subpart L excerpts, students determine the maximum intended load and required fall protection for three described scaffold types (tube-and-coupler, system scaffold, pump-jack); answers are discussed as a class with instructor correction.
29 CFR 1926 Subparts L, P, Q excerpts, blank confined space entry permit forms, scaffold load/capacity tables, soil classification field guide card, training video on confined space entry, calculator15-question scenario quiz covering scaffolding, trenching, and confined space topics; pass = 80% (12/15); any question involving permit-required confined space entry permit elements must be answered correctly or the section is retaught
6Hazard Communication, SDS Management, and PPE Selection12demoStudents will locate required information on a Safety Data Sheet, select appropriate PPE for a given chemical hazard, and verify a mock job-site HazCom program contains all required elements per OSHA HazCom standard.
  1. Instructor walks through the 16-section SDS format for a common construction chemical (concrete curing compound); students use a real SDS to answer guided questions identifying health hazards, first aid measures, required PPE, and proper storage requirements.
  2. Students are given five chemical exposure scenarios (solvent adhesive, silica dust, lead paint disturbance, hydraulic fluid, concrete dust) and must select appropriate gloves, respiratory protection, and eye protection from a reference chart, justifying each choice in writing.
  3. Teams audit a mock HazCom program binder for completeness against the OSHA HazCom standard checklist (written program, SDS availability, container labeling, employee training records) and write a one-paragraph compliance summary identifying any gaps.
Printed SDS for four or five common construction chemicals, PPE selection reference chart, mock HazCom program binder with intentional gaps, HazCom standard checklist, sample gloves/respirators/goggles for demonstrationSDS worksheet scored for accuracy on eight required data points (pass = 7/8 correct); PPE selection table reviewed by instructor — any missing respiratory protection for a respirable hazard = automatic resubmission; HazCom audit summary evaluated for identification of all planted gaps
7Incident Investigation, Recordkeeping, and Incident Rate Calculation12theoryStudents will complete OSHA 300, 300A, and 301 forms for a simulated incident and calculate the Total Recordable Incident Rate and Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred rate correctly.
  1. Using a written incident narrative (a simulated scaffold fall causing a lost-time injury), students complete all three OSHA recordkeeping forms (300 log, 300A summary, 301 incident report) following OSHA recordkeeping rule criteria for what is recordable and what is exempt.
  2. Students are given full-year incident data for a hypothetical 250-worker contractor and calculate TRIR and DART rate using the standard OSHA formulas; they compare the results to industry average benchmarks and discuss how high incident rates affect contractor pre-qualification scoring.
  3. Small groups analyze a provided incident investigation report with the root cause section left blank; they identify direct causes, contributing factors, and system failures using a simple root-cause analysis framework, then write a corrective action plan with responsible parties and target dates.
Blank OSHA 300, 300A, 301 forms, incident narrative handout, TRIR/DART formula reference card, industry benchmark data (AGC or BLS published averages), sample incident investigation report, root-cause analysis worksheetInstructor checks all three recordkeeping forms for completeness and correct recordability determination (pass = no critical field blank, recordability decision correct); TRIR and DART calculations must be mathematically correct to pass; any error in recordability determination or rate formula requires correction and resubmission
8Developing and Administering a Site Safety Program13practiceStudents will draft a written site-specific safety program including an emergency action plan, toolbox-talk schedule, and subcontractor safety requirements section for an assigned hypothetical project.
  1. Using a provided project description (a four-story wood-frame apartment building), students outline the required elements of a site safety program by cross-referencing the OSHA Part 1926 requirements, the CMAA CM Standards of Practice safety section, and a sample owner-furnished safety specification.
  2. Each student drafts the emergency action plan section (evacuation routes, assembly point, fire extinguisher locations, emergency contacts, notification chain) and presents it to a partner who evaluates it against a provided 12-item checklist.
  3. Students build a four-week toolbox-talk calendar selecting appropriate topics from a published topic library (NCCER or OSHA resources) matched to the project phase, and write one complete toolbox talk script on a topic of their choice using a standard format (topic, hazard, controls, questions).
Project description handout, OSHA Part 1926 references, CMAA Standards of Practice (safety section), sample owner safety specification, emergency action plan checklist, toolbox-talk topic library, word processorCompleted safety program draft evaluated with a rubric: emergency action plan (12 required elements, pass = 11/12 present), toolbox-talk calendar (4 weeks with topics matching project phase), toolbox-talk script (uses standard format and correctly identifies hazard and control); any emergency action plan element related to evacuation or notification missing = resubmission required
9Safety Cost Integration into Estimates and Schedules12practiceStudents will identify and quantify safety-related line items within a project estimate and schedule and defend their cost selections using industry references, with all required categories included and quantities supported by calculation.
  1. Review a provided partial estimate for a commercial concrete structure and identify which line items contain embedded safety costs versus which safety items (fall protection systems, temporary barriers, safety signage, first-aid station, daily inspection labor) are missing; students add the missing items with placeholder quantities.
  2. Using supplier catalogs or published unit prices (RSMeans or instructor-provided data), students price the missing safety line items for the given project scope and duration, showing quantity calculations for each item (e.g., linear feet of guardrail at given floor perimeter, number of harnesses for crew size).
  3. Students add a safety mobilization and ongoing safety labor line (safety manager hours per week for a given project duration) to a simple Gantt-style schedule and explain to the class how incident costs — even estimated ones — affect a contractor's contingency reserve and bid competitiveness.
Partial project estimate handout, RSMeans cost data (current edition or instructor-provided extracts), safety equipment supplier catalog pages, blank estimate worksheet, simple Gantt chart template, calculator or spreadsheet softwareCompleted estimate reviewed by instructor: all six required safety cost categories present, quantities supported by written calculation, unit prices sourced and documented; pass = all categories included with defensible quantities; any category left at zero with no written justification = revision required
10Subcontractor Safety Plan Evaluation and Compliance Reporting10practiceStudents will audit a provided subcontractor safety plan against a defined compliance matrix and produce a written compliance report that identifies deficiencies and assigns corrective action priority ratings.
  1. Using a compliance matrix derived from OSHA Part 1926, project contract safety specification, and CMAA pre-qualification criteria, students evaluate a provided subcontractor safety plan (a realistic document with intentional gaps) section by section and mark each element as compliant, partially compliant, or non-compliant.
  2. Students write a formal compliance report (one to two pages) organized by category, summarizing findings, citing the specific standard or specification clause each deficiency violates, and rating each deficiency as critical (stop-work potential), major, or minor based on provided rating criteria.
  3. Students present their compliance report findings in a structured three-minute oral summary simulating a pre-construction safety meeting; classmates role-play as subcontractor representatives and ask one question each; instructor evaluates both the written report and the oral defense.
Subcontractor safety plan (realistic mock document with planted deficiencies), compliance matrix template, contract safety specification excerpt, rating criteria reference card, word processor, presentation timerWritten compliance report evaluated on rubric: all planted deficiencies identified (pass = at least 80% found), each deficiency linked to a specific standard or specification clause, priority ratings applied consistently; oral summary assessed for clarity and accuracy — failure to identify a critical deficiency in either the written or oral portion requires resubmission
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Midterm Knowledge Exam — OSHA Standards and Safety ManagementWritten exam25%75% (38 of 50 questions correct); any section covering permit-required confined space or LOTO must be answered at 80% or better within that sectionA 50-question written exam covering OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 subpart requirements, hazard classification, HazCom, recordkeeping rules, incident rate formulas, and safety program elements; question types include multiple choice, scenario-based selection, and short calculation problems. Exam content is mapped to the OSHA 30-hour Construction Outreach topic list and the NCCER Project Management safety module competencies.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Integrated Safety Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass on all four stations; any station marked Fail must be remediated and re-demonstrated within five school daysStudents rotate through four timed stations: (1) harness inspection and donning, (2) lockout/tagout procedure execution on the training apparatus, (3) confined space entry permit completion for a given scenario, and (4) oral delivery of a toolbox talk to the class. A standardized skills checklist is used at each station; critical safety steps (verification of zero energy state, anchorage confirmation, permit hazard identification) are mandatory-pass items.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety Program and Estimate Portfolio LogLog15%Portfolio earns a minimum of 80% on the cumulative rubric; all seven required documents must be present and any document related to emergency action planning must score at least 90% on its sub-rubricStudents submit a compiled portfolio containing: the site-specific safety program draft (including emergency action plan and toolbox-talk calendar), the written toolbox-talk script, the completed subcontractor safety compliance report, the safety cost estimate worksheet with quantity calculations, and the OSHA recordkeeping forms from the incident investigation exercise. Each document is scored against its lesson rubric, and a cumulative portfolio score is calculated.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Jobsite Safety Walk — Final Safety CheckSafety audit15%Student must identify at least 85% of planted hazards AND correctly assign a hierarchy-of-controls response to each identified hazard; failure to identify any life-safety hazard (fall hazard at unprotected edge, energized-equipment hazard) results in automatic failure and immediate remediationIn a proctored 20-minute walkthrough of the campus mock site or a designated outdoor area reset with new hazard conditions, each student independently conducts a pre-shift safety inspection, completes a hazard log, and verbally debriefs the instructor on their three highest-priority findings and recommended controls. This final check mirrors the field competency required by OSHA 30 and assessed in the NCCER and CMAA CMIT safety domains.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-CONS57-07 Trade course

Procore & Bluebeam for Construction Management

121 hr · $1,305 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to use Procore's cloud-based construction management platform and Bluebeam Revu to manage project documentation, drawings, RFIs, submittals, budgets, and field observations throughout a project lifecycle. Instruction connects each tool's features to real CM workflows covered in earlier courses and to the documentation and communication competencies tested by the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. By course end, students can set up a project, mark up and issue drawings, track cost and schedule data, and produce the audit-ready records required on commercial jobsites.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to use Procore's cloud-based construction management platform and Bluebeam Revu to manage project documentation, drawings, RFIs, submittals, budgets, and field observations throughout a project lifecycle. Instruction connects each tool's features to real CM workflows covered in earlier courses and to the documentation and communication competencies tested by the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. By course end, students can set up a project, mark up and issue drawings, track cost and schedule data, and produce the audit-ready records required on commercial jobsites.

How the course runs. 10 blocks: Construction Technology Landscape and Course Orientation; Procore Project Setup and Directory Management; Drawing Management and Plan Distribution in Procore; Bluebeam Revu Fundamentals: Markup and Annotation; Bluebeam Quantity Takeoff and Measurement Tools; RFI and Submittal Management in Procore; Budget Tracking and Change Management in Procore; Field Observations, Daily Logs, and Inspection Reports; Document Control, Close-Out Package, and Transmittals; Integrated Project Simulation: Full Workflow Capstone Lab.

What competent looks like. Configure a new Procore project with the correct directory, permissions, and folder structure required for a commercial construction project. Create, distribute, and close out RFIs and submittals in Procore following the response-time and routing requirements typical of commercial contracts. Use Bluebeam Revu to mark up construction drawings, perform quantity takeoffs linked to the estimate, and publish a marked-up drawing package with a summary report. Track budget line items, commitments, and change events in Procore's budget tool and reconcile variances against the baseline estimate. Produce a Procore daily log and inspection report that meets OSHA recordkeeping expectations and project-specific safety documentation requirements. Integrate Procore and Bluebeam outputs into a coherent project documentation package suitable for owner reporting and later use in the Capstone course.

Lessons · 10 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Construction Technology Landscape and Course Orientation8theoryStudents explain how cloud-based project management and PDF markup tools fit into the overall CM information workflow and identify the specific Procore modules and Bluebeam features used in this course.
  1. Annotated diagram exercise: students draw and label a project information-flow map showing how RFIs, submittals, drawings, and cost data move between owner, CM, subcontractors, and design team, then identify which software tool handles each flow.
  2. Guided tour of a live Procore training sandbox: instructor navigates every module while students record the purpose and typical user role for each in a structured note sheet.
  3. Small-group comparison: groups research one alternative platform (e.g., Autodesk Construction Cloud or PlanGrid) and present a two-minute summary of one feature difference versus Procore, reinforcing why standardization matters for interoperability.
Procore Training Sandbox (free educator account), Bluebeam Revu 30-day trial or Vu free viewer, CMAA CM Standards of Practice (current edition), projected display, structured note sheet handoutExit ticket: students correctly label at least 8 of 10 items on a blank information-flow diagram and identify the correct software module for each; 80% accuracy required.
2Procore Project Setup and Directory Management12labStudents configure a complete Procore project shell—including company directory, user permissions, project stages, and custom folder structure—from a provided project brief.
  1. Step-by-step lab: using a fictional commercial project brief, students create a new project in the Procore training sandbox, enter all required metadata (project type, address, square footage, value, dates), and configure the WBS-aligned folder structure for drawings and documents.
  2. Permission-role exercise: students assign at least five user roles (owner, CM, GC superintendent, structural sub, architect) with appropriate tool permissions and document the rationale for each restriction in a one-page permission matrix.
  3. Peer audit: partners swap sandbox projects and use a provided checklist to verify correct setup, then write one corrective action note for any missing item, mirroring real QA practices.
Procore Training Sandbox, project brief handout (fictional commercial office building), Procore Help Center documentation, permission matrix template, peer audit checklistInstructor reviews completed sandbox project against a 15-point setup rubric; students must score 12 of 15 points, with zero deficiencies in permission settings.
3Drawing Management and Plan Distribution in Procore12labStudents upload, version-control, and distribute a multi-discipline drawing set in Procore's Drawings tool so that all project team members receive the current revision and superseded sheets are clearly archived.
  1. Upload exercise: students import a sample PDF drawing set (architectural, structural, MEP sheets provided by instructor) into Procore Drawings, apply correct discipline tags, sheet numbers, and revision codes, and resolve any duplicate-sheet conflicts.
  2. Revision workflow drill: instructor issues a revised structural sheet; students upload the new revision, confirm that Procore automatically supersedes the prior version, and send a drawing distribution notice to the project team using Procore's built-in email function.
  3. Drawing log export: students export the current drawing log as a PDF and cross-check it against the sample transmittal provided, identifying and correcting any discrepancies—reinforcing the document-control habits expected by NCCER Project Management standards.
Procore Training Sandbox, sample PDF drawing set (20–30 sheets minimum, instructor-prepared), sample transmittal form, Procore Drawings help documentationInstructor spot-checks three sheets for correct revision code, discipline tag, and distribution list; students must pass all three checks plus produce an accurate drawing log; any missing current revision is an automatic resubmit.
4Bluebeam Revu Fundamentals: Markup and Annotation14demoStudents apply Bluebeam Revu markup tools—including clouds, callouts, stamps, layers, and the Markups List—to annotate a construction drawing set for a design review and produce a summary report.
  1. Instructor-led demo followed by mirrored practice: instructor demonstrates the Revu interface, tool chest, and markup tools on a projected drawing; students immediately replicate each action on the same drawing in Revu on their own machines.
  2. Design review simulation: students receive a drawing set with five intentional errors or coordination conflicts (instructor-seeded); they mark up each issue using clouds and callouts on separate layers by discipline, then flatten and publish a marked-up PDF package.
  3. Markups List report: students export the Markups List to a CSV summary, sort by layer, and write a one-paragraph RFI-style description for two of the five issues, bridging to the RFI workflow in the next lesson.
Bluebeam Revu (student trial or lab license), instructor-prepared drawing set with seeded coordination conflicts, Bluebeam University tutorial references, Markups List export templateRubric assessment: all five conflicts marked up on correct layers (5 pts), markups include required cloud + callout + description (5 pts), published PDF package is legible and layers are intact (5 pts); minimum 12 of 15 points to pass.
5Bluebeam Quantity Takeoff and Measurement Tools14labStudents use Bluebeam Revu's measurement and dynamic fill tools to perform a digital quantity takeoff of a concrete flatwork scope from a site plan and record quantities in a formatted takeoff sheet linked to the Estimating course format.
  1. Calibration drill: students set the drawing scale in Revu using a known dimension on the site plan, then verify accuracy by measuring a reference element; any calibration error over 2% must be corrected before proceeding.
  2. Flatwork takeoff: students measure slab areas and perimeter linear footage using Revu's area and length tools, assign custom columns (material, unit, quantity) in the Markups List, and sum results by pour zone.
  3. Takeoff reconciliation: students compare their Revu-generated quantities to a pre-prepared manual takeoff provided by the instructor, calculate the percentage variance for each item, and write a one-sentence explanation for any variance above 3%—reinforcing estimating accuracy standards from Course 3.
Bluebeam Revu, instructor-prepared site plan PDF with known dimensions, takeoff sheet template (Excel or CSV), manual takeoff answer key for reconciliation exerciseQuantities for all five takeoff items must be within ±5% of the instructor answer key; takeoff sheet must have correct units and labels; students who miss more than one item must redo the calibration and measurement steps.
6RFI and Submittal Management in Procore14practiceStudents create, route, respond to, and close out both an RFI and a submittal in Procore, following a realistic review schedule and documenting the complete communication record.
  1. RFI lifecycle exercise: using a scenario drawn from the sample project, students draft an RFI describing a coordination conflict (tied to the Bluebeam markup exercise), assign it to the design team with a due date, log a mock response from the architect, and formally close the RFI—capturing the full audit trail.
  2. Submittal log setup and routing: students build a submittal log for five items (concrete mix design, structural steel shop drawings, window submittals, roofing system, and MEP equipment data) based on the project specification index provided, assign reviewers, and set required-on-site dates working backward from the schedule.
  3. Status reporting drill: students run Procore's RFI and submittal reports, export them as PDFs, and prepare a one-page owner-report summary identifying any open items past due—connecting to the CMAA CMIT competency of proactive communication management.
Procore Training Sandbox, scenario packet (coordination conflict description and specification index), Procore RFI and Submittal help documentation, owner-report summary templateInstructor evaluates RFI and submittal log against a checklist: correct fields completed, realistic dates, proper routing, and closed RFI with response attached; students must pass 9 of 11 checklist items.
7Budget Tracking and Change Management in Procore14labStudents load a project budget into Procore's Budget tool, enter a subcontractor commitment, process a change event and potential change order, and produce a cost report showing budget versus actual variance.
  1. Budget load exercise: students import a simplified 15-line budget (instructor-prepared CSV based on Course 3 estimating format) into Procore's Budget tool, verify line-item totals, and configure the budget view to show original budget, commitments, and projected cost columns.
  2. Change event drill: instructor presents a scope change scenario (owner-requested addition); students create a change event, link it to the affected budget line, generate a potential change order to the subcontractor, and record the owner change order—tracing the full cost impact path.
  3. Variance report: students export the budget snapshot, calculate the percentage variance on three flagged line items, and write a two-sentence cost narrative suitable for an owner progress report, reinforcing the reporting skills tested in the CMAA CMIT exam.
Procore Training Sandbox, budget CSV import file (instructor-prepared), change event scenario handout, Procore Budget and Change Management help documentation, Excel or Google Sheets for variance calculationBudget import must balance to the contract sum (zero tolerance); change event must be linked to the correct budget line; variance report must accurately reflect the change; students who have an unbalanced budget must correct it before receiving credit.
8Field Observations, Daily Logs, and Inspection Reports12fieldStudents complete a Procore daily log and a formal inspection report for a simulated field condition, including weather, manpower, equipment, work completed, and a safety observation, consistent with OSHA recordkeeping expectations.
  1. Daily log simulation: working from a scenario card describing a day's field activities (weather, crew counts, equipment, work installed, and one near-miss event), students complete a full Procore Daily Log entry, attach a photo (stock photo provided), and submit it for review.
  2. Inspection template build: students create a custom Procore Inspection template for a concrete pour pre-pour checklist (at least eight items covering formwork, rebar, embed placement, and safety), assign it to a responsible party, and complete a mock inspection marking three items as deficient.
  3. Safety observation documentation: students document the near-miss from the scenario as a Procore Observation, assign corrective action to the superintendent with a due date, and explain in a one-paragraph note how this entry supports the OSHA 300 log recordkeeping process—connecting to the OSHA 30 credential content covered in Course 6.
Procore Training Sandbox, scenario cards, stock jobsite photos (royalty-free), Procore Observations and Inspections help documentation, OSHA recordkeeping overview reference (OSHA.gov)Daily log must have all required fields complete; inspection must have at least eight checkpoints with three deficiencies correctly flagged; safety observation must include corrective action and responsible party; any missing safety observation entry is an automatic resubmit.
9Document Control, Close-Out Package, and Transmittals10practiceStudents assemble a project close-out package in Procore and Bluebeam—including as-built drawings, O&M manuals, warranty log, and a final transmittal—organized to meet owner turnover requirements.
  1. Close-out checklist development: students draft a project close-out checklist based on a sample contract's general conditions section, identifying required deliverables, responsible parties, and due dates, then enter the items as Procore Action Items.
  2. As-built markup in Bluebeam: students apply as-built revision clouds and delta tags to three drawing sheets using a field-change log provided by the instructor, flatten the markups, and export a stamped as-built PDF package.
  3. Transmittal assembly: students compile the close-out documents into a Procore transmittal, attach the Bluebeam as-built package and a mock warranty summary, and send it to the simulated owner contact—producing the audit-ready record required for project completion.
Procore Training Sandbox, Bluebeam Revu, sample contract general conditions excerpt, field-change log handout, warranty summary template, close-out checklist templateTransmittal must include all items from the checklist (100% completion); as-built PDFs must have revision clouds on all three changed sheets; any missing mandatory close-out document requires resubmission of the full package.
10Integrated Project Simulation: Full Workflow Capstone Lab11labStudents execute a complete mini-project lifecycle in Procore and Bluebeam—from project setup through close-out—demonstrating mastery of all prior lessons in an integrated, timed scenario.
  1. Timed simulation: students receive a new project brief and complete, in sequence: project setup, drawing upload and distribution, one RFI, one submittal, a budget load with one change event, a daily log, an inspection, and a transmittal—all within the class period, simulating real CM time pressure.
  2. Bluebeam deliverable: students mark up one drawing sheet from the simulation project with a coordination conflict, export the Markups List report, and attach it to the Procore RFI they created—demonstrating cross-tool integration.
  3. Self-assessment debrief: students complete a structured reflection form scoring their own work against the course rubric, identify the two workflow steps where they were least efficient, and write a one-paragraph improvement plan—building the reflective practice expected in professional CM roles and assessed in the CMAA CMIT application.
Procore Training Sandbox, Bluebeam Revu, new project brief packet (not used in prior lessons), integrated simulation rubric, self-assessment reflection formInstructor scores the completed simulation against the integrated rubric (30 points total across all workflow steps); students must earn 24 of 30 points and must have zero incomplete safety observation entries to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Procore & Bluebeam Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (38 of 50 points)A 50-question written exam covering Procore module purposes and navigation, Bluebeam tool functions, document control procedures, RFI and submittal workflow steps, budget tracking concepts, and OSHA recordkeeping requirements relevant to daily logs and observations. Questions are formatted as multiple-choice and short-answer to reflect the written-component style used in the NCCER and CMAA CMIT credential exams.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Skills Demonstration: Live Project WorkflowSkills demonstration45%Pass all five required tasks; any failed task must be retried once within one weekThe student receives an unseen project brief and, working live in the Procore training sandbox and Bluebeam Revu, must complete five timed tasks: (1) configure project directory and permissions, (2) upload and distribute a drawing revision, (3) create and route an RFI, (4) enter a budget change event and produce a cost report, and (5) complete a daily log with a safety observation. Each task is scored pass/fail by the instructor using a defined checklist.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Log: Lesson Documentation PortfolioLog15%Minimum 8 of 10 lesson lab submissions rated Complete on the rubric; no safety-related submission may be rated IncompleteStudents maintain a cumulative digital portfolio of all lab outputs produced during the ten lessons—including sandbox screenshots, exported PDFs, takeoff sheets, transmittals, markups, and self-assessment forms. Each submission is evaluated for completeness, accuracy, and professional formatting using a consistent four-point rubric (Incomplete / Developing / Meets Standard / Exceeds Standard); a rating of Meets Standard or higher counts as Complete.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety Check: Digital Safety Documentation ReviewSafety audit15%100% of required safety documentation items present and correctly formatted; any deficiency must be corrected before the student advances to Course 8Instructor audits the student's Procore safety observation entries, near-miss documentation, and inspection deficiency records produced during Lesson 8 and the Lesson 10 simulation against a safety documentation checklist aligned to OSHA recordkeeping expectations and the safety management principles from Course 6. The check confirms that every hazard identified in the simulation has an assigned corrective action, a responsible party, and a documented status—habits directly reinforced by the OSHA 30 credential content.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-CONS57-08 Capstone

Capstone Project: Construction Management & Estimating Integration

162 hr · $1,620 COMPLIMENTARY

Students apply every competency developed across the program—scheduling, estimating, contracts, procurement, safety management, and digital documentation—to a single, realistic commercial construction scenario from bid package through closeout. Each student produces a complete project delivery package and defends it before a panel of industry evaluators, replicating the professional standard required for NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credential holders.

Outcomes
Course text

Students apply every competency developed across the program—scheduling, estimating, contracts, procurement, safety management, and digital documentation—to a single, realistic commercial construction scenario from bid package through closeout. Each student produces a complete project delivery package and defends it before a panel of industry evaluators, replicating the professional standard required for NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credential holders.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Project Kickoff: Interpreting the Owner's Program and Assembling the Delivery Framework; Integrated Estimating, Scheduling, and Procurement Planning; Safety Plan, Change Management, and Project Controls Documentation; Portfolio Compilation and Capstone Defense Preparation.

What competent looks like. Produce a complete bid package for an assigned commercial project including a fully itemized quantity takeoff, trade-by-trade cost estimate within ±10% of instructor benchmark, and a written basis-of-estimate narrative. Develop a CPM schedule in Primavera P6 or equivalent that identifies the critical path, incorporates owner milestones, and sequences all major trade packages for the assigned project. Draft a project execution plan that integrates a site-specific safety and health plan (compliant with OSHA general industry and construction standards), a procurement log with RFQ timelines, and a contract administration workflow. Use Procore and Bluebeam Revu to manage, mark up, and transmit all project documents—RFIs, submittals, meeting minutes, change-order logs—in formats consistent with industry practice. Evaluate project performance against baseline cost and schedule using earned-value metrics, identify variances, and propose corrective actions in a written project status report. Defend all project deliverables before a panel of industry and faculty evaluators, responding to technical questions and demonstrating professional communication skills aligned with CMAA CMIT competency standards.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Project Kickoff: Interpreting the Owner's Program and Assembling the Delivery Framework36labGiven a complete set of bid documents for a mid-size commercial project, the student will perform a thorough document review, identify scope, site, and contract-type requirements, and produce a written project execution plan outline that organizes all subsequent capstone deliverables.
  1. Students receive a full bid package (drawings, specifications, geotechnical summary, draft owner-contractor agreement) and conduct a structured document review using a standardized plan-reading checklist; they flag ambiguities and prepare a written list of clarifying questions formatted as formal RFIs in Procore.
  2. Using the project's Division 01 General Requirements and the draft contract, students complete a contract summary matrix identifying owner milestones, liquidated-damages provisions, required submittals, insurance minimums, and safety-plan submission deadlines, then compare findings in a peer-review workshop.
  3. Students draft a Project Execution Plan (PEP) outline that includes: project description and scope statement, contract delivery method, key stakeholder contact list, communication protocol, document-control procedure, and a master deliverables schedule listing every capstone submission with its due date—submitted in Procore as a controlled document.
Full commercial bid package (drawings in PDF and DWG format, CSI MasterFormat specifications), Procore training environment, Bluebeam Revu, CMAA CM Standards of Practice (current edition), AIA A201 General Conditions reference, plan-reading checklist template, RFI log templateInstructor reviews the PEP outline and RFI list using a scored rubric (clarity of scope statement, accuracy of contract summary, completeness of deliverables schedule, professional formatting); minimum passing score is 80 out of 100. Peer reviewers flag any missed contract provision; unresolved misses are corrected before Lesson 2 begins.
2Integrated Estimating, Scheduling, and Procurement Planning54labThe student will produce a trade-by-trade quantity takeoff, a detailed cost estimate with contingency and markup, a CPM schedule that sequences all major work packages, and a procurement log with RFQ milestones—all linked and internally consistent for the assigned project.
  1. Students perform a manual and Bluebeam Revu–assisted quantity takeoff for at least four CSI MasterFormat divisions assigned to their project (e.g., concrete, masonry, structural steel, mechanical rough-in), recording quantities on standardized takeoff sheets; they then price each line item using current RS Means unit cost data (adjusted for local market conditions with an instructor-provided factor) and assemble a summary estimate with subcontractor allowances, general conditions costs, contingency, overhead, and profit, targeting a final GMP or lump-sum bid number.
  2. Using Primavera P6 (or equivalent CPM software available in the lab), students build a logic-tied schedule of at least 40 activities, assign durations based on crew productivity standards from their estimate, identify the critical path, insert owner milestone constraints, and produce a baseline Gantt chart and network diagram exported to PDF and uploaded to Procore.
  3. Students create a Procurement Log in Excel or Procore that lists every major subcontracted scope and material package, identifies long-lead items, sets RFQ issue dates, bid-due dates, award dates, and submittals-required dates that align with the CPM schedule; they then draft one complete RFQ letter for the longest-lead trade package, including scope narrative, drawing list, bid-form requirements, and bond requirements.
Bluebeam Revu with calibrated takeoff tools, Primavera P6 or equivalent CPM software, RS Means Building Construction Costs (current year, print or online subscription), Excel or Google Sheets, Procore training environment, CSI MasterFormat division list, crew productivity reference tables from prior Estimating course, local market adjustment factor sheet provided by instructorEstimate is benchmarked against instructor's independent quantity takeoff and priced estimate; student total must fall within ±10% of benchmark to pass. CPM schedule is reviewed for logic errors, missing activities, and critical-path accuracy—zero dangling activities and correct identification of critical path required. Procurement log completeness and RFQ letter quality are scored on a rubric (scope accuracy, format, schedule alignment); minimum 80/100 on rubric. Any estimate variance greater than 10% triggers a mandatory revision session before the portfolio is assembled.
3Safety Plan, Change Management, and Project Controls Documentation44labThe student will develop a site-specific safety and health plan consistent with OSHA construction standards, administer a simulated change-order cycle from RFI through executed amendment, and prepare an earned-value project status report that compares actual versus planned cost and schedule performance.
  1. Students produce a written Site-Specific Safety and Health Plan for the capstone project that includes: project hazard identification (excavation, fall protection, crane/hoisting, electrical, confined space as applicable to the assigned project scope), required PPE matrix by task, emergency action plan with site-specific evacuation routes, incident-reporting procedure, toolbox-talk schedule, and subcontractor safety compliance requirements—all formatted as a controlled document uploaded and version-tracked in Procore; instructor reviews against OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 requirements at a high level (no specific section numbers required, just alignment with recognized construction safety standards).
  2. Instructor issues a set of three simulated owner-directed changes mid-project (scope additions, design revision, differing site condition); students process each change through a complete paper trail: updated RFI, proposed change order (PCO) with re-priced quantities and schedule impact analysis, change-order log update in Procore, and a draft executed change-order document using an AIA G701 equivalent form, then update their estimate and CPM schedule to reflect the approved changes.
  3. Using instructor-provided 'actuals' data at a simulated project midpoint (percent complete by activity, costs incurred by cost code), students calculate Earned Value metrics—Planned Value, Earned Value, Actual Cost, Schedule Performance Index, and Cost Performance Index—populate a project status report template, interpret the variances in plain language, and propose two specific corrective actions with quantified impact on forecast cost at completion.
OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 Construction Standards (online reference), Procore training environment, AIA G701 Change Order form (sample), site hazard identification checklist, PPE selection guide, earned-value worksheet template, CPM schedule from Lesson 2, estimate from Lesson 2, instructor-issued change directive packages and actuals data setSafety plan is scored on a rubric checking presence and adequacy of all required plan elements (hazard ID, PPE matrix, emergency action plan, incident reporting, toolbox schedule, subcontractor compliance section)—minimum 80/100; any missing required element is a mandatory fix. Change-order trail is reviewed for math accuracy and completeness of documentation—all three changes must be fully processed with no missing form. EVM calculations are verified for formula accuracy; SPI and CPI must be arithmetically correct and narrative must logically match the numbers. Any arithmetic error triggers correction before portfolio submission.
4Portfolio Compilation and Capstone Defense Preparation28practiceThe student will assemble all capstone deliverables into a professionally organized digital project portfolio, prepare and deliver a structured oral defense presentation, and respond to panel questions demonstrating command of all technical decisions made throughout the project.
  1. Students organize their complete project portfolio in a logical, tabbed digital format (PDF binder via Bluebeam Revu or equivalent): cover sheet and project summary, Project Execution Plan, quantity takeoff sheets, final cost estimate with basis-of-estimate narrative, CPM schedule (Gantt and network), procurement log and sample RFQ, site-specific safety and health plan, change-order documentation set, and earned-value status report—each section has a version-controlled transmittal sheet confirming it is final; portfolio is submitted to the instructor for completeness review at least five days before the defense date.
  2. Students prepare a 20-minute defense presentation (slide deck plus printed executive summary handout) that walks the panel through: project overview and delivery strategy, key estimating assumptions and how they managed risk, critical-path logic and procurement strategy, safety highlights, a summary of the change-order impacts, and EVM findings with corrective actions recommended; two in-class dress-rehearsal sessions are conducted with peer and instructor feedback, with at least one round of revisions required.
  3. Students participate in a formal mock defense with a different classmate acting as 'owner's representative' asking adversarial questions about cost overruns, schedule slippage, and safety compliance; feedback is recorded on a structured critique form and students revise any weak areas of their presentation or documentation before the official panel defense.
Bluebeam Revu (portfolio assembly), presentation software (PowerPoint or equivalent), defense evaluation rubric, peer critique form, printer for executive summary handouts, projector and screen for presentations, all deliverables from Lessons 1–3Portfolio completeness is verified against a 20-item checklist—all 20 items must be present and version-controlled to proceed to defense. Defense presentation is scored by the panel on a rubric covering technical accuracy, logical organization, response quality under questioning, and professional communication—minimum passing score is 80/100 across all rubric categories. A score below 80 requires a documented remediation plan and a second defense opportunity within two weeks.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Integrated Project Delivery PackageProject60%All required deliverables submitted and complete; cost estimate within ±10% of instructor benchmark; CPM schedule free of logic errors with correct critical path identified; safety plan contains all required sections; change-order documentation complete and arithmetically accurate; EVM calculations correct; minimum composite rubric score of 80/100 across all deliverable-specific rubrics.The complete, professionally formatted digital project portfolio assembled across all four lessons—including the Project Execution Plan, quantity takeoff and cost estimate, CPM schedule, procurement log, site-specific safety and health plan, change-order file, and earned-value status report—represents the primary project assessment. Each component is evaluated against the rubric criteria established in each lesson, and the composite score determines whether the student has demonstrated integrated professional competence at the level expected of an entry-level construction manager or estimator pursuing NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Capstone Portfolio: Document Control and Professional Standards ReviewPortfolio20%All 20 checklist items present with version-control transmittals; no section submitted without a basis-of-estimate or supporting rationale; document formatting consistent with industry professional standards throughout; minimum portfolio organization score of 80/100 on the portfolio-standards rubric.A faculty evaluator and an industry-professional reviewer independently assess the complete portfolio against a 20-item completeness checklist and a formatting and professional-standards rubric, verifying that every document is organized, version-controlled, internally consistent, and transmittable to an owner or surety as a professional work product. This assessment mirrors the document-management expectations of the CMAA CMIT competency framework and the NCCER Project Management credential, ensuring students can produce jobsite-ready documentation.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Capstone Defense: Oral Examination Before Industry PanelOral / panel20%Minimum score of 80/100 on the panel evaluation rubric across all four categories: technical accuracy of content, logical and clear presentation structure, quality and accuracy of responses to panel questions, and professional communication demeanor. Scores below 80 require a remediation plan and a second defense within two weeks; a second failure results in course non-completion.The student presents and defends the complete project delivery package before a panel that includes at least one industry professional (owner, CM, or general contractor representative) and one faculty evaluator in a formal 20-minute presentation followed by a minimum 15-minute question-and-answer session. The panel probes the student's technical decisions, risk assumptions, safety judgment, and ability to communicate project status clearly—directly replicating the professional communication and leadership competencies assessed in the CMAA CMIT credential and valued by employers hiring NCCER-credentialed project managers.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
BUS-CONS57-09 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement

243 hr · $970 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 243 supervised hours at a construction management, general contracting, or specialty subcontracting employer site, applying estimating, scheduling, procurement, and project controls skills learned in the classroom to live projects. A credentialed site supervisor evaluates professional conduct, technical competence, and safety compliance at mid-term and final intervals. This course bridges academic preparation to employment and directly reinforces NCCER Project Management field-application competencies and CMAA CMIT professional-practice domains.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 243 supervised hours at a construction management, general contracting, or specialty subcontracting employer site, applying estimating, scheduling, procurement, and project controls skills learned in the classroom to live projects. A credentialed site supervisor evaluates professional conduct, technical competence, and safety compliance at mid-term and final intervals. This course bridges academic preparation to employment and directly reinforces NCCER Project Management field-application competencies and CMAA CMIT professional-practice domains.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Placement Orientation and Site Safety Integration; Estimating and Quantity Takeoff on a Live Project; Scheduling, Procurement, and Project Controls Support; Final Supervisor Evaluation and Externship Reflection.

What competent looks like. Apply job-site safety protocols—including PPE selection, hazard identification, and OSHA 30 regulatory knowledge—consistently throughout all 243 placement hours with zero safety violations recorded by the site supervisor. Perform at least two real estimating or quantity-takeoff tasks (material, labor, or equipment) on an active project, producing documented calculations that the supervising project manager reviews and signs off as accurate. Update or assist in maintaining a project schedule using CPM logic (Primavera P6, MS Project, or employer's chosen tool) for a minimum of one active project, demonstrating ability to flag critical-path variances. Participate in at least three formal project-management processes—such as a subcontractor bid review, RFI response, submittal log update, or owner progress meeting—and document each in the externship journal. Demonstrate professional communication standards by drafting or contributing to at least two project documents (meeting minutes, cost report, change-order log, or procurement summary) that are accepted into the project record by the supervisor. Receive a passing composite score on the employer's mid-term and final evaluation rubric, confirming readiness for entry-level construction management employment.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Placement Orientation and Site Safety Integration24fieldThe student completes the employer's site-specific safety orientation, identifies active hazards on the assigned project, and documents compliance with OSHA 30-level requirements before performing any other worksite tasks.
  1. Complete the host employer's new-worker safety orientation (site rules, emergency action plan, PPE requirements, lock-out/tag-out procedures, and site layout walkthrough) and obtain the supervisor's sign-off on the safety acknowledgment form.
  2. Conduct a guided hazard-identification walk of the active site with the supervising project manager, photographing and logging at least five existing or potential hazards (fall protection, electrical, struck-by, caught-in, housekeeping) in the externship journal using a provided hazard-log template.
  3. Review the project's current safety data sheets (SDS) binder or digital library for the top five materials in use, summarize relevant hazard and PPE information in a one-page memo, and submit it to the supervisor for review.
OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart C (general safety) reference card; host employer site-specific safety manual; PPE (hard hat, safety glasses, high-visibility vest, steel-toed boots, gloves—student-supplied per program requirements); SDS binder or digital library access; externship journal (student-maintained Google Doc or paper log); hazard-log template (program-provided).Supervisor-signed safety orientation acknowledgment form on file; hazard log contains at least five entries with photograph, hazard type, applicable OSHA standard (general reference), and recommended control; SDS memo accepted by supervisor without major corrections. Pass = all three items complete and supervisor marks safety compliance 'Satisfactory' or above on the orientation checklist.
2Estimating and Quantity Takeoff on a Live Project60practiceThe student performs material and/or labor quantity takeoffs for at least two scope items on an active project using the employer's takeoff method and software, producing documented calculations that are verified by the supervising estimator or project manager.
  1. Shadow the lead estimator or project manager during a plan review session; then independently perform a quantity takeoff for one assigned scope division (concrete, framing, mechanical rough-in, or similar) using Bluebeam Revu, Procore, or the employer's preferred tool, annotating drawings with measurements and summarizing quantities in a formatted spreadsheet.
  2. Compare your takeoff results to the awarded contract quantities or budget line items; document variances greater than five percent, identify likely causes (drawing interpretation, waste factor, unit-of-measure difference), and present findings in a brief written summary reviewed by the supervisor.
  3. Assist in preparing or updating a material-cost estimate for a pending change order or a new bid item—gathering current supplier quotes by phone or email, entering unit costs, and calculating a total—then route the draft to the supervisor for approval.
Active project drawing set (full-size prints or digital access via Procore or Bluebeam); employer's cost-code structure and unit-price database; Bluebeam Revu or employer takeoff software (workstation or laptop with valid license); estimating spreadsheet template (employer-provided or program-standard Excel template); RSMeans data (online or print edition, current year) for unit-cost benchmarking if employer permits.Two completed takeoff spreadsheets on file, each bearing the supervisor's review signature and notation of 'Acceptable' or corrections incorporated; change-order cost estimate draft reviewed and accepted into project file. Pass = both takeoffs are within a reasonable variance accepted by the supervisor, and the supervisor rates technical accuracy 'Satisfactory' or above on the mid-term evaluation rubric.
3Scheduling, Procurement, and Project Controls Support99fieldThe student actively assists in maintaining the project schedule and procurement log, participates in at least three formal project-management processes, and produces or contributes to at least two accepted project documents across the bulk of the placement period.
  1. Work with the project manager or scheduler to update the master CPM schedule weekly for a minimum of four consecutive weeks: enter actual start/finish dates, identify activities on the critical path, flag any float erosion or delays, and attach a written status note to each weekly update saved in the externship journal.
  2. Maintain or assist in maintaining the submittal and RFI logs in Procore (or the employer's document-control system) for at least four consecutive weeks: log new items, track review-cycle status, send follow-up reminders to the responsible party when deadlines approach, and report overdue items to the project manager.
  3. Attend and take minutes for at least three project meetings (owner-architect-contractor, subcontractor coordination, or internal project review); distribute draft minutes to the supervisor within 24 hours of each meeting for review, incorporate corrections, and file the approved version in the project record.
Employer scheduling software (Primavera P6, MS Project, or equivalent) with active project file; Procore or employer document-management platform (student granted appropriate access level); externship journal; meeting minutes template (program-provided); procurement/submittal log template (employer-provided or program-standard).Four weekly schedule updates on file, each with supervisor sign-off; submittal/RFI log entries verified as complete by supervisor; three sets of approved meeting minutes filed in the project record; supervisor rates professional communication and technical contribution 'Satisfactory' or above on the final evaluation rubric. Pass = all deliverables complete and final rubric composite score ≥ 70 out of 100.
4Final Supervisor Evaluation and Externship Reflection60fieldThe student compiles a complete externship portfolio, participates in a formal final evaluation meeting with the site supervisor, and delivers a structured reflection presentation to the program instructor demonstrating professional growth and readiness for entry-level employment.
  1. Assemble the externship portfolio: organize all journal entries, hazard logs, takeoff spreadsheets, schedule updates, procurement log excerpts, meeting minutes, and any additional project documents into a single digital folder with a table of contents; submit to the program instructor at least five business days before the final evaluation meeting.
  2. Participate in the formal final evaluation meeting with the site supervisor using the program's standardized employer evaluation rubric (covering safety compliance, technical skills, professionalism, communication, and reliability); receive and review scored rubric; discuss areas of strength and any recommended improvement with the supervisor before the meeting closes.
  3. Deliver a 15-to-20-minute structured reflection presentation via video call or in person to the program instructor, covering: two technical tasks you performed and their project impact, one safety situation you observed or managed and how you responded, one professional skill you developed, and your career action steps—then answer the instructor's questions for up to ten minutes.
Externship portfolio (digital folder, student-compiled); program standardized employer evaluation rubric (PDF, completed by supervisor); reflection presentation slide deck (student-created, minimum eight slides); video conferencing platform if remote (Zoom or Teams); externship hours log signed by supervisor documenting total hours completed.Portfolio is complete (all required document types present, table of contents accurate, submitted on time); supervisor's final evaluation rubric composite score ≥ 70/100; reflection presentation addresses all four required topics and student answers instructor questions accurately. Pass = all three criteria met; any rubric score below 70 requires a remediation plan co-signed by the instructor and employer before a grade of passing is awarded.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Site Supervisor Skills Demonstration EvaluationSkills demonstration70%Composite score of 70 or higher out of 100 on the standardized employer evaluation rubric, with no individual domain (safety, technical skill, professionalism, communication, reliability) rated below 'Needs Improvement' at the final evaluation; any domain rated 'Unsatisfactory' requires a documented remediation plan.The host employer's supervising project manager or superintendent completes the program's standardized employer evaluation rubric at mid-term (approximately 120 hours) and again at the conclusion of the placement (243 hours), rating the student across five domains on a four-point scale. The instructor reviews both rubrics, contacts the supervisor to clarify any marginal ratings, and uses the final rubric as the primary skills-demonstration assessment for the course.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Externship Journal and Portfolio LogLog30%Portfolio contains all required document types (signed hazard log, two takeoff spreadsheets with supervisor sign-off, four weekly schedule updates with supervisor sign-off, submittal/RFI log excerpts, three sets of approved meeting minutes, and signed hours log totaling 243 hours); journal entries are present for each week of placement; instructor rates overall documentation quality 'Satisfactory' or above.The student maintains a weekly externship journal documenting activities, decisions, safety observations, and professional interactions throughout all 243 hours, then compiles every produced or contributed project document into a final portfolio submitted to the instructor before the reflection presentation. The instructor reviews the portfolio against a completeness checklist and evaluates journal entries for specificity, accuracy, and professional tone, ensuring the log provides verifiable evidence that required competencies were practiced on a live project.
Complete · Verified
BUS-CONS57-10 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30 & CMAA CMIT

68 hr · $680 COMPLIMENTARY

This capstone review course systematically covers every knowledge domain tested on the NCCER Project Management credential, OSHA 30 Outreach completion requirements, and CMAA Constructor Manager-in-Training (CMIT) examination so that students enter each exam with demonstrated competency. Lessons rotate between targeted content review, timed practice questions, and full-length mock exams with instructor-led debrief to close remaining gaps. Test-taking strategy, time management, and documentation of eligibility requirements are also addressed.

Outcomes
Course text

This capstone review course systematically covers every knowledge domain tested on the NCCER Project Management credential, OSHA 30 Outreach completion requirements, and CMAA Constructor Manager-in-Training (CMIT) examination so that students enter each exam with demonstrated competency. Lessons rotate between targeted content review, timed practice questions, and full-length mock exams with instructor-led debrief to close remaining gaps. Test-taking strategy, time management, and documentation of eligibility requirements are also addressed.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: NCCER Project Management Domain Review and Practice; OSHA 30 Construction Content Review and Scenario Practice; CMAA CMIT Examination Domain Review and Practice; Full Mock Examinations and Exam-Readiness Debrief.

What competent looks like. Demonstrate mastery of NCCER Project Management core knowledge areas—project planning, scheduling, cost control, procurement, and leadership—by scoring 70% or higher on timed practice sets drawn from each domain. Correctly apply OSHA 30 Construction Outreach content including hazard recognition, fall protection, electrical safety, scaffolding, excavation, PPE selection, and rights and responsibilities, achieving 70% or higher on domain-specific practice questions. Apply CMAA CMIT examination content across cost management, time management, quality, safety, risk, and professional practice domains, scoring 70% or higher on representative practice items. Complete a full-length timed mock examination for each credential under simulated test conditions, achieving the program benchmark of 75% or higher on each mock before sitting the live exam. Organize and submit all required eligibility documentation—training records, NCCER Registry enrollment, OSHA 30 sign-in sheets, and CMAA CMIT application materials—accurately and on time. Apply proven test-taking strategies including question parsing, elimination, time-per-item pacing, and educated guessing protocol to maximize performance on multiple-choice certification exams.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1NCCER Project Management Domain Review and Practice18theoryStudents will correctly answer practice questions across all NCCER Project Management knowledge domains—project planning and initiation, scheduling, cost control, procurement, subcontract management, and leadership—at a rate of 70% or higher on each domain quiz.
  1. Instructor-led domain mapping session: students receive a printed outline of NCCER Project Management knowledge areas and locate corresponding content in their NCCER Project Management module books, flagging weak areas for priority review.
  2. Rotating small-group stations (one per domain) where groups work through 15 timed practice questions per station drawn from NCCER-style multiple-choice item banks, then rotate; each group records missed items on a personal gap-tracking sheet.
  3. Whole-class debrief of the top ten most-missed items per domain: instructor projects each question, students vote on answer before reveal, and instructor explains the reasoning using code language and standard construction management definitions.
NCCER Project Management module textbooks (student copies), NCCER Project Management knowledge-area outline prepared by instructor, domain-organized practice question bank (instructor-prepared, NCCER-style items), personal gap-tracking worksheet, whiteboard, projectorStudents complete a 50-question timed domain quiz (10 questions per major domain) and must score 70% or higher overall with no single domain below 60%; any student below threshold completes targeted re-study and retakes an alternate 25-question version before the next lesson.
2OSHA 30 Construction Content Review and Scenario Practice16practiceStudents will correctly identify hazard types, applicable OSHA standards, required controls, and employer/worker rights and responsibilities across the major OSHA 30 Construction topic areas by achieving 70% or higher on a comprehensive scenario-based quiz.
  1. Hazard-recognition card sort: instructor distributes 40 photo cards depicting construction site conditions (fall hazards, unguarded excavations, missing lockout/tagout, improper scaffold planking, electrical hazards, etc.); students sort cards into hazard categories, identify the applicable OSHA standard area, and state the required control measure—pairs compare and debate disagreements before class review.
  2. Case-study analysis: small groups receive three one-page accident investigation summaries (generic, instructor-written); groups identify what OSHA violations contributed, what the employer should have done, and what PPE or engineering control would have prevented injury, then present findings to class.
  3. Timed 40-question OSHA 30 Construction practice quiz administered individually under quiet conditions; students flag items they guessed on; instructor conducts answer-by-answer debrief focusing on OSHA hierarchy of controls, PPE selection logic, and the difference between employer obligations and worker rights.
OSHA 30 Construction Outreach topic outline, hazard-recognition photo card set (instructor-prepared), three generic accident investigation case studies, OSHA 30 Construction practice question bank, hierarchy-of-controls reference poster, student answer sheets, timerStudents score the 40-question timed quiz and must reach 70% or higher; any student below threshold identifies their weakest two topic areas and completes a targeted 15-question mini-quiz on those areas before Lesson 3; instructor records results to confirm OSHA 30 training-hour completion documentation is in order.
3CMAA CMIT Examination Domain Review and Practice16theoryStudents will demonstrate familiarity with CMAA CMIT examination domains—project management process, cost management, time management, quality management, contract administration, safety management, and professional practice—by achieving 70% or higher on a domain-balanced practice item set.
  1. CMAA CMIT domain orientation: instructor distributes the publicly available CMAA CMIT Candidate Handbook and students annotate their copies, identifying the percentage weight of each domain and cross-referencing content covered in earlier program courses (Contracts, Estimating, Scheduling, Safety Management) so they understand which prior learning transfers directly.
  2. Structured self-study and partner quiz: students independently read their annotated notes and course materials for 30 minutes targeting their two lowest CMIT domains identified from a brief pre-diagnostic; partners then quiz each other verbally using a prompt card set covering definitions, formulas (schedule variance, cost variance, earned value), and contract administration milestones.
  3. Instructor-facilitated 45-question CMIT-style practice exam administered individually, timed at approximately one minute per question to simulate real pacing; debrief focuses on earned value analysis calculations, professional responsibility scenarios, and quality control versus quality assurance distinctions, with worked solutions shown on projector.
CMAA CMIT Candidate Handbook (current edition, downloaded from CMAA website), student course notes from Courses 2–6, CMIT-style practice question bank (instructor-prepared), earned value formula reference card, calculator, projector, partner prompt card setStudents score the 45-question CMIT practice exam and must reach 70% or higher; students who score below threshold meet individually with instructor to build a 48-hour self-study plan targeting weak domains; instructor also confirms each student has reviewed CMAA CMIT eligibility requirements and begun or completed their application.
4Full Mock Examinations and Exam-Readiness Debrief18practiceStudents will complete one full-length timed mock examination for each of the three target credentials under simulated test conditions and achieve the program benchmark of 75% or higher on each mock, while demonstrating correct application of time management and question-strategy techniques.
  1. Three sequential full mock exams administered across two days under strict test-simulation conditions: no notes, individual seating, timer visible, phones secured; Mock 1 is NCCER Project Management format (multiple-choice, instructor-determined length matching the credential's published format as closely as available); Mock 2 is OSHA 30 Construction topic coverage exam; Mock 3 is CMIT-format exam; students mark confidence level (sure / unsure / guess) beside each answer for later analysis.
  2. Individual score analysis session: students receive scored answer keys and complete a 'confidence vs. accuracy' matrix—tallying items they were sure of but got wrong (knowledge gap), unsure of and got right (lucky guess needing reinforcement), and unsure of and got wrong (priority study); students write a one-page personal study action plan identifying remaining gaps and the specific resource (module, OSHA topic, CMIT domain) they will review before sitting the live exam.
  3. Group debrief and test-strategy clinic: instructor reviews the 15 most-missed items across all three mocks; class practices the ERASE method (Eliminate clearly wrong answers, Read the stem again, Answer based on what you know, Skip and Star if stuck, End by reviewing starred items) on projected sample items; students also verify all exam registration steps, photo ID requirements, and scheduling deadlines for their chosen testing windows.
Full-length mock exam packets for NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30 Construction, and CMIT (instructor-assembled from practice item banks), individual answer sheets, timer, confidence-accuracy matrix worksheet, personal study action plan template, exam registration checklist for each credential, quiet examination roomStudents must score 75% or higher on each of the three full mock exams to meet program completion standard; any student below 75% on one or more mocks receives a documented remediation plan, completes targeted review, and takes an alternate 30-question mock for that credential—scoring 70% or higher on the alternate to clear the requirement; all three mock scores are recorded in the student's program file.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Three-Credential Full Mock Examination SuiteMock certification exam100%75% or higher on each of the three full-length mock exams (NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30 Construction, CMIT); students who fall below 75% on any single mock complete documented remediation and must score 70% or higher on an alternate mock for that credential to meet program completion requirements.Students sit three sequential full-length mock exams under timed, closed-note, simulated test conditions covering the complete knowledge domains of the NCCER Project Management credential, OSHA 30 Construction Outreach, and the CMAA CMIT examination. Results are analyzed individually, a confidence-accuracy debrief is conducted, and each student produces a personal study action plan addressing remaining gaps before sitting the live credentialing exams.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: CMAA CMIT; NCCER Project Management; OSHA 30

Students sit three industry credential exams: the NCCER Project Management assessment administered through the National Center for Construction Education and Research registry system, the OSHA 30-Hour Construction Outreach training completion issued through an OSHA-authorized trainer, and the CMAA Construction Manager-in-Training (CMIT) examination administered by the Construction Management Association of America. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Construction Management / Estimating · How the school gets authority to award these credentials