This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a credentialed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
10 courses · 1,350 clock hours · 9 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.
This foundational course equips learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, technical reading skills, digital literacy, and career-readiness habits required to succeed in construction management and estimating. Students complete OSHA 10-Hour Outreach training and hands-on first aid/CPR certification within the course. Every lesson is explicitly connected to the skills tested in the NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT credential exams.
OutcomesThis foundational course equips learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, technical reading skills, digital literacy, and career-readiness habits required to succeed in construction management and estimating. Students complete OSHA 10-Hour Outreach training and hands-on first aid/CPR certification within the course. Every lesson is explicitly connected to the skills tested in the NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT credential exams.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10-Hour Construction Outreach; First Aid, CPR, and AED for Construction Sites; Trade Math and Measurement for Estimating; Reading Construction Documents: Drawings, Specifications, and Standards; Digital Tools for Construction Management; Technical Reading and Professional Writing for Construction; Career Readiness and Professional Development in Construction Management.
What competent looks like. Demonstrate compliance with OSHA general industry and construction hazard recognition standards sufficient to pass the OSHA 10-Hour card requirement. Perform trade math calculations—including area, volume, unit conversion, percentage, and waste factors—accurately enough to support quantity takeoff and cost estimating tasks. Read and extract information from construction drawings, specifications, and contract documents using standard industry terminology. Use foundational digital tools—email, spreadsheets, cloud storage, and PDF markup—to organize and communicate construction management information. Produce professional written and verbal communications appropriate for a construction management workplace, including meeting minutes, RFIs, and a personal career plan. Perform hands-on CPR, AED operation, and basic first-aid procedures to current American Heart Association or Red Cross standards.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10-Hour Construction Outreach | 12 | theory | Students will identify the top construction hazards (Focus Four: falls, struck-by, caught-in/between, electrocution), explain worker rights and employer responsibilities under the OSH Act, and complete all required OSHA 10-Hour Construction content. |
| OSHA 10-Hour Construction Outreach curriculum (authorized trainer materials), OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 pocket guide, GHS/SDS sample sheets, Focus Four hazard photo set, PPE samples (hard hat, safety glasses, hi-vis vest, gloves), incident case study packets | Successful completion of all OSHA 10-Hour Outreach modules verified by authorized trainer sign-off; written hazard identification checklist scores 80% or higher (tags at least 8 of 10 planted hazards with correct standard reference). |
| 2 | First Aid, CPR, and AED for Construction Sites | 8 | lab | Students will perform adult CPR with AED operation and provide basic first-aid care for bleeding control, musculoskeletal injuries, heat illness, and chemical exposure to current American Heart Association or Red Cross Heartsaver standards. |
| Adult CPR manikins (minimum one per three students), AED trainer units, Heartsaver participant workbooks, trauma dressing and tourniquet training kit, eye-wash demonstration station, scenario cards, American Heart Association or American Red Cross Heartsaver skill evaluation checklists | Pass hands-on Heartsaver skills station evaluation administered by a certified instructor; each student must pass all required skill checkpoints without critical errors (e.g., failure to check responsiveness, failure to activate AED) to receive card. |
| 3 | Trade Math and Measurement for Estimating | 28 | practice | Students will apply arithmetic, geometry, fractions, decimals, percentages, unit conversion, and waste-factor calculations to solve quantity takeoff problems drawn from residential and light-commercial construction drawings. |
| Architectural and engineering scale rules, calculator, graph paper, simplified floor-plan and foundation-plan drawing sets (printed, half-size), Dewalt Construction Math Quick-Check reference card, Excel or Google Sheets on lab computers, NCCER Core Curriculum student workbook (math chapters) | Scored problem set: student must achieve 80% or higher on a 20-problem graded math quiz using trade drawings; all conversion, area, volume, and waste-factor question types must appear; partial credit awarded only if setup is correct. |
| 4 | Reading Construction Documents: Drawings, Specifications, and Standards | 26 | demo | Students will locate and interpret information from a complete construction document set—including architectural, structural, civil, and MEP drawings plus a Division 01 specification section—using standard drawing conventions, abbreviations, and the CSI MasterFormat organizational system. |
| Full-size or half-size sample construction document set (minimum architectural + structural + one MEP discipline; sourced from publicly available school or municipal project), CSI MasterFormat division list (current edition), sample Division 01 specification section, AIA A201 summary excerpt, drawing abbreviation reference sheet, highlighters | Document navigation quiz: student locates 15 specific data points across the drawing set and specification within 30 minutes; must score 12 of 15 (80%) correctly with sheet number and grid reference cited. |
| 5 | Digital Tools for Construction Management | 24 | lab | Students will use spreadsheet software, cloud file storage, PDF markup tools, and professional email to organize project information, mark up a drawing set, and transmit a document package following construction industry conventions. |
| Lab computers with internet access, Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets, Bluebeam Revu (trial or school license) or Adobe Acrobat, Google Drive or Microsoft OneDrive accounts, sample three-sheet PDF drawing set, submittal log template starter file, professional email rubric | Instructor evaluates completed folder structure, submittal log, marked-up PDF export, and email against a 20-point checklist; student must score 16 of 20 points; any missing naming convention or incorrect permission setting is a mandatory correction before advancement. |
| 6 | Technical Reading and Professional Writing for Construction | 26 | practice | Students will read, summarize, and respond to construction contract language, meeting minutes, and RFI forms using clear, concise prose free of ambiguity, and will produce a written communication that accurately records a technical decision. |
| Sample subcontract excerpt (two pages, commercially available form or instructor-prepared), meeting minutes template, audio file or instructor role-play script for mock meeting, RFI form (blank, industry-standard format), peer review checklist, sample drawing set from Lesson 4 | Meeting minutes graded against answer key: must capture all six action items correctly and meet formatting standard (80% rubric score); RFI form reviewed by instructor—must state a clear, unambiguous question with correct document references to pass. |
| 7 | Career Readiness and Professional Development in Construction Management | 24 | theory | Students will construct a professional resume and 30-second elevator pitch tailored to an entry-level construction management or estimating position, explain the credential pathways for NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT, and produce a written two-year career development plan. |
| Construction-industry resume template, job posting printouts (three per student), credential pathway one-pagers for NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT (instructor-prepared from official credential websites), peer critique rubric, two-year career plan worksheet, internet access | Resume scores 12 of 15 points on rubric after revision; two-year career plan includes all three credentials with a realistic sequencing rationale and at least two professional development actions (e.g., joining CMAA student chapter, completing NCCER Core) graded on a pass/fail basis by instructor. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSHA 10 and Safety Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 70% correct (28 of 40 questions); OSHA Outreach card issued only upon authorized trainer sign-off of all module completions | A 40-question multiple-choice written exam covering Focus Four hazards, PPE selection, GHS/hazard communication, worker rights and employer responsibilities, and first-aid/emergency response scenarios drawn from Lessons 1 and 2. This exam maps directly to the OSHA 30 Construction credential domain areas that will be revisited in Course 10 Exam Prep. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Trade Math and Document Reading Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% correct (32 of 40 questions); students must pass both the math sub-score (16 of 20) and the document reading sub-score (16 of 20) independently | A 40-question closed-book exam split equally between trade math problems (unit conversion, area, volume, waste factor, percentage markup) and construction document reading questions requiring students to locate data in a provided partial drawing set and specification excerpt. Results predict readiness for quantity takeoff tasks in Course 3 Estimating and map to NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT knowledge competency areas. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Digital Tools and Professional Communication Portfolio | Project | 25% | 80% overall rubric score; each of the four portfolio components must individually score at least 70% or be revised until it does | Students submit a four-component portfolio: (1) the cloud folder structure with submittal log from Lesson 5, (2) the marked-up and flattened PDF drawing set from Lesson 5, (3) the final revised resume from Lesson 7, and (4) the two-year career development plan from Lesson 7. Each component is scored against its lesson rubric; the portfolio grade is the average of the four component scores. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Oral Professional Readiness Defense | Oral / panel | 25% | Pass on all four criteria: technical accuracy, communication clarity, professional demeanor, and self-reflection; a 'needs improvement' on any single criterion requires a re-attempt within one week | A ten-minute individual oral session with the instructor and one industry guest evaluator in which the student presents their career plan, answers two impromptu scenario questions (one safety, one communication), and explains how the skills from this course connect to the NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30, and CMAA CMIT credentials. Evaluators score the student on a four-criteria rubric; this assessment simulates the professional interview and oral defense component of the CMAA CMIT application process. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
Students learn to build, read, and control construction project schedules using industry-standard methods including the Critical Path Method (CPM), Gantt charts, and resource-loaded schedules. Emphasis is placed on real project scenarios, schedule recovery, and the scheduling knowledge areas tested by the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. Students use scheduling software and hand-calculation techniques to develop schedules from scope documents and subcontractor input.
OutcomesStudents learn to build, read, and control construction project schedules using industry-standard methods including the Critical Path Method (CPM), Gantt charts, and resource-loaded schedules. Emphasis is placed on real project scenarios, schedule recovery, and the scheduling knowledge areas tested by the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. Students use scheduling software and hand-calculation techniques to develop schedules from scope documents and subcontractor input.
How the course runs. 10 blocks: Scheduling Fundamentals and the Construction Lifecycle; Work Breakdown Structure and Activity Definition; Network Logic and the Critical Path Method; Gantt Charts and Scheduling Software Basics; Resource Loading and Crew Leveling; Schedule Compression: Crashing and Fast-Tracking; Schedule Monitoring, Updates, and Earned Value; Contract Schedule Requirements and Milestone Management; Subcontractor Coordination Schedules and Look-Ahead Reports; Schedule Presentation, Defense, and NCCER/CMIT Exam Alignment.
What competent looks like. Develop a complete CPM network schedule from a defined project scope, identifying the critical path and all activity durations with supporting logic. Produce a resource-loaded Gantt chart that accounts for crew availability, material lead times, and subcontractor sequencing. Perform schedule updates using earned value progress data and identify schedule variances requiring corrective action. Apply schedule compression techniques—crashing and fast-tracking—and evaluate their cost and risk trade-offs in writing. Interpret contract schedule requirements and submittal deadlines, aligning the project schedule with milestone and liquidated-damages provisions. Use scheduling software (Primavera P6 or MS Project) and Gantt-based tools to produce professional schedule deliverables suitable for owner and subcontractor distribution.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scheduling Fundamentals and the Construction Lifecycle | 10 | theory | Students will define key scheduling terms and explain how scheduling fits into each phase of the construction project lifecycle. |
| NCCER Project Management module (current edition), sample commercial bid package with schedule spec section, whiteboard, printed project lifecycle diagram | Scored vocabulary quiz: students must correctly define and apply at least 16 of 20 terms (80%). Instructor observes annotation activity for completeness. |
| 2 | Work Breakdown Structure and Activity Definition | 12 | theory | Students will decompose a given project scope into a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and define schedule activities with realistic durations and resource assignments. |
| RS Means Building Construction Cost Data (current edition), spreadsheet software, sample tenant improvement scope of work, crew productivity reference sheets provided by instructor | WBS deliverable graded on a rubric: correct three-level hierarchy (30 pts), all major trades represented (30 pts), duration calculations with shown math (40 pts). Passing score: 75/100. |
| 3 | Network Logic and the Critical Path Method | 14 | theory | Students will construct a Precedence Diagramming Method (PDM) network, calculate early/late start and finish times using forward and backward passes, and identify the critical path. |
| Blank PDM network templates, index cards, colored markers, calculator, NCCER Project Management module section on CPM, instructor-prepared 15-activity activity list | Completed network with all node values (ES, EF, LS, LF, TF) checked by instructor against answer key; all critical path activities correctly identified. Pass: no math errors on critical path nodes and at least 85% of all node values correct. |
| 4 | Gantt Charts and Scheduling Software Basics | 14 | demo | Students will enter a project activity list with logic links into scheduling software and produce a formatted Gantt chart that displays the critical path and float. |
| Computers with MS Project or Primavera P6 (student license or school lab), projector for instructor demo, activity list from Lesson 2, PDM network from Lesson 3 | Exported Gantt chart PDF reviewed against a formatting checklist (title block, timescale, critical path color, milestones): pass requires all five checklist items present and critical path matching the hand-calculated answer key. |
| 5 | Resource Loading and Crew Leveling | 12 | lab | Students will assign labor resources to schedule activities, identify resource over-allocations, and apply leveling techniques to produce a feasible resource-loaded schedule. |
| Computers with scheduling software, resource availability table provided by instructor, printed resource histogram output for annotation, change log template | Resource-loaded schedule file and change log: pass requires zero remaining over-allocations on any day, all changes documented, and project completion date within five days of the original baseline. Lab log entry required. |
| 6 | Schedule Compression: Crashing and Fast-Tracking | 12 | theory | Students will apply crashing and fast-tracking techniques to a schedule under a deadline constraint and evaluate the cost and risk impact of each option in writing. |
| Crash-cost table (instructor-prepared), scheduling software, risk register template, sample owner memo format, calculator | Cost-slope calculation checked against answer key (pass: correct methodology and answer within 5% of solution); written memo graded on rubric: cost data accuracy (40 pts), risk identification (30 pts), clear recommendation (30 pts). Pass: 75/100. |
| 7 | Schedule Monitoring, Updates, and Earned Value | 14 | practice | Students will update a baseline schedule with progress data, calculate Schedule Variance (SV) and Schedule Performance Index (SPI), and identify activities requiring corrective action. |
| Baseline schedule file from previous lessons, status report data sheet (instructor-prepared), EV formula reference card, scheduling software, report narrative template | SV and SPI calculations checked against answer key (pass: all five calculations correct within rounding); status narrative graded: critical path impact identified correctly and at least one specific recovery action proposed. Pass: both components correct. |
| 8 | Contract Schedule Requirements and Milestone Management | 10 | theory | Students will interpret schedule-related provisions in a standard construction contract, including milestone dates, submittal schedules, and liquidated damages clauses, and align a project schedule accordingly. |
| Sample project manual Division 01 schedule specification (instructor-provided, names redacted), compliance matrix template, scheduling software, construction contract reference (AIA A201 general conditions or equivalent) | Compliance matrix reviewed by instructor: pass requires all contractual dates captured and correctly entered as milestones in the software schedule. Instructor spot-checks three milestones for correct placement. |
| 9 | Subcontractor Coordination Schedules and Look-Ahead Reports | 10 | practice | Students will produce a three-week look-ahead schedule and a subcontractor coordination log from a master project schedule, suitable for a weekly job-site coordination meeting. |
| Master schedule file, look-ahead report template, subcontractor coordination log template, projector for presentation role-play | Look-ahead report: all activities in the three-week window present with correct dates and responsible parties (pass: 100% of activities in window captured). Coordination log: at least three open items recorded with responsible party and due date. Lab log entry required. |
| 10 | Schedule Presentation, Defense, and NCCER/CMIT Exam Alignment | 14 | practice | Students will present a complete, updated project schedule package to a panel, defend scheduling decisions using CPM logic and earned value data, and connect course content to NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT exam topics. |
| Completed schedule package from all prior lessons, PDF assembly software, NCCER Project Management module table of contents, CMAA CMIT exam content outline (available from CMAA website), presentation rubric | Schedule package graded on rubric: completeness of all six components (40 pts), accuracy of CPM and EV data (40 pts), professional formatting (20 pts). Oral defense: pass requires clear, accurate answers to all panel questions with no uncorrected factual errors. Pass: 75/100 on package and satisfactory on defense. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheduling Theory Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% (38 of 50 questions correct) | A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering CPM calculations (forward/backward pass, float), scheduling terminology, resource leveling concepts, earned value formulas (SV, SPI), schedule compression trade-offs, and contract schedule obligations. Questions are written to mirror the difficulty and style of NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT exam items in the scheduling and project controls knowledge areas. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| CPM Network and Software Schedule Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All critical path nodes correct; software Gantt chart meets all five formatting checklist items; resource histogram shows zero over-allocations; pass/fail on each component, all three must pass | Students are given a new 12-activity project scenario and must hand-calculate the CPM network (forward pass, backward pass, total float, critical path) within 45 minutes, then enter the schedule into software, resource-load it, level it, and produce a formatted Gantt chart PDF within an additional 60 minutes. The instructor verifies calculations against the answer key and reviews the software output against the formatting checklist. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Scheduling Lab Log | Log | 15% | At least 8 of 10 lessons have a complete entry; entries from Lessons 5, 9, and 10 must be present and graded satisfactory | Students maintain a cumulative lab log documenting their schedule deliverables, software outputs, change logs, subcontractor coordination log, and look-ahead reports from each lesson. Each entry must include the date, lesson topic, deliverable description, a reflection sentence on one scheduling decision made, and the file name or attached document. The complete log is submitted at the end of the course. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Job-Site Safety Orientation and Scheduling Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% on safety identification task; signed acknowledgment of site safety plan review required | Before any field observation activity associated with scheduling (site visits, externship preparation), students must correctly identify all active hazard zones, access routes, and PPE requirements on a printed site plan provided by the instructor, and verbally confirm understanding of the site-specific safety plan. This check reinforces OSHA 30 content—hazard recognition, PPE selection, and fall protection awareness—and must be completed with a perfect score; any missed hazard requires immediate remediation and recheck before the student may proceed to field activities. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students learn to prepare complete, accurate cost estimates for commercial and residential construction projects using industry-standard quantity takeoff methods, pricing databases, and digital tools. The course moves from reading construction drawings and specifications through labor, material, equipment, and subcontractor pricing to producing a bid-ready estimate with markup and contingency. Lessons align with NCCER Project Management cost control competencies and CMAA CMIT knowledge areas covering project cost management.
OutcomesStudents learn to prepare complete, accurate cost estimates for commercial and residential construction projects using industry-standard quantity takeoff methods, pricing databases, and digital tools. The course moves from reading construction drawings and specifications through labor, material, equipment, and subcontractor pricing to producing a bid-ready estimate with markup and contingency. Lessons align with NCCER Project Management cost control competencies and CMAA CMIT knowledge areas covering project cost management.
How the course runs. 10 blocks: The Estimate Lifecycle and Bid Documents; Reading Construction Drawings for Estimating; Quantity Takeoff Methods and Units of Measure; Digital Takeoff with Bluebeam Revu; Pricing Labor: Crew Rates, Productivity, and Prevailing Wage; Pricing Materials and Equipment; Subcontractor Bids, Scope Gaps, and Bid Leveling; Indirect Costs, Overhead, Profit, and Contingency; Estimate Review, Scope Verification, and Common Errors; Complete Estimate: Integrated Takeoff and Bid Assembly.
What competent looks like. Perform a complete quantity takeoff for at least three CSI MasterFormat divisions from a set of construction drawings and specifications, with quantities within 5% of instructor key. Price direct costs—labor, material, equipment, and subcontractors—using current published unit-cost databases and local wage data to produce a detailed estimate summary sheet. Apply indirect costs, overhead, profit markup, contingency, and escalation to a direct-cost estimate and explain each line item in writing. Use Bluebeam Revu or equivalent PDF takeoff software to digitally measure and mark up a full drawing set, producing a documented quantity takeoff log. Identify and explain at least five common estimating errors and the quality-control checks used to detect them before bid submission. Interpret bid documents—including instructions to bidders, general conditions, and technical specifications—to determine scope inclusions, exclusions, and allowances that affect the estimate.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Estimate Lifecycle and Bid Documents | 10 | theory | Students will identify the five types of estimates used across a project lifecycle, explain how bid documents define scope, and locate key estimating information within a complete set of construction documents. |
| Sample bid package (drawings + project manual with Division 00 and 01 front-end documents), CSI MasterFormat division list, instructor-prepared estimate-type comparison chart, student reference notebooks | Exit quiz: 8 short-answer questions on estimate types, document hierarchy, and scope terminology; pass = 75% correct. |
| 2 | Reading Construction Drawings for Estimating | 12 | demo | Students will interpret plan, elevation, section, and detail drawings—including scale, symbols, and schedules—to extract the dimensional data needed for quantity takeoff. |
| Full-size printed drawing set (architectural and structural), architectural and engineer's scales, colored highlighters, blank takeoff forms, Bluebeam Revu student licenses on lab computers | Dimension accuracy check: students submit measured dimensions for 10 specified items; pass = 9 of 10 within 2% of key dimensions. |
| 3 | Quantity Takeoff Methods and Units of Measure | 14 | lab | Students will apply linear, area, volume, and count takeoff methods to at least four CSI MasterFormat divisions and record quantities using standard industry units on a formatted takeoff sheet. |
| Lab computers with Excel or Google Sheets takeoff templates, printed drawing set, CSI MasterFormat reference list, calculator, architect's scale, Bluebeam Revu for verification | Instructor-graded takeoff sheet: quantities for all four divisions within 5% of answer key and all units correctly labeled; pass = 80% of line items accurate. |
| 4 | Digital Takeoff with Bluebeam Revu | 12 | lab | Students will use Bluebeam Revu's measurement and markup tools to perform a complete digital quantity takeoff for a building's floor plan, documenting calibrated measurements in a markups list export. |
| Lab computers with Bluebeam Revu (licensed), PDF drawing set, Bluebeam quick-reference card, Excel/Google Sheets | Exported markups list and reconciliation note submitted; pass = all measurements calibrated correctly, quantities within 5% of instructor key, and at least one written explanation for any discrepancy over 2%. |
| 5 | Pricing Labor: Crew Rates, Productivity, and Prevailing Wage | 12 | theory | Students will calculate all-in crew labor costs for a given task by combining bare wage rates, labor burden, crew composition, and productivity data from a published cost reference. |
| RSMeans Building Construction Costs (current edition) or equivalent cost database, labor burden worksheet, whiteboard, calculator, student notebooks | Completed worksheet with three crew labor cost calculations; pass = all-in crew rate and total labor cost within 3% of instructor answer for at least two of three tasks. |
| 6 | Pricing Materials and Equipment | 12 | theory | Students will determine material unit prices using at least two sources (published cost data and a vendor quote) and calculate equipment cost for a task using ownership/operating cost or rental rate methods. |
| RSMeans cost database, mock vendor quote sheets, equipment rental rate sheet (instructor-prepared), Excel pricing template, calculators | Material and equipment cost summary reviewed by instructor; pass = correct unit prices sourced from at least two references, quantities correctly extended, and totals within 5% of key. |
| 7 | Subcontractor Bids, Scope Gaps, and Bid Leveling | 10 | demo | Students will evaluate a set of three subcontractor bids for the same scope, identify inclusions and exclusions, and produce a bid-leveling matrix that supports a documented award recommendation. |
| Three instructor-prepared mock subcontractor bid proposals, bid-leveling matrix template (Excel), memo writing guide, whiteboard | Bid-leveling matrix and memo reviewed by instructor; pass = all scope gaps correctly identified, adjusted totals mathematically correct, and memo includes at least two substantive clarification questions. |
| 8 | Indirect Costs, Overhead, Profit, and Contingency | 12 | theory | Students will assemble a complete estimate summary by adding indirect project costs, company overhead, profit markup, and contingency to a direct-cost subtotal, and explain each component in a written cost narrative. |
| Sample project direct-cost summary, estimate summary sheet template (Excel), instructor markup-guidance handout, student notebooks | Estimate summary sheet and cost narrative submitted; pass = all components present, arithmetic correct, contingency percentage justified in writing, and narrative reviewed for completeness by instructor. |
| 9 | Estimate Review, Scope Verification, and Common Errors | 10 | practice | Students will apply a systematic quality-control checklist to a completed estimate, identify at least three seeded errors in scope, arithmetic, or pricing, and document corrections before a simulated bid deadline. |
| Two instructor-prepared flawed estimate packages (printed and digital), QC checklist template, Excel, timer | Punch-list log and corrected totals submitted; pass = at least 4 of 5 seeded errors identified and corrected, corrected total within 2% of instructor key. |
| 10 | Complete Estimate: Integrated Takeoff and Bid Assembly | 18 | lab | Students will independently produce a complete bid estimate—including digital takeoff, priced direct costs for at least five divisions, subcontractor bid leveling, and a fully marked-up summary—for a provided project, ready for a simulated bid submission. |
| Full unseen drawing set and project manual (printed and PDF), Bluebeam Revu, RSMeans cost database, mock subcontractor bid packages, Excel estimate templates, bid submission checklist | Complete estimate package evaluated by instructor against a detailed rubric: takeoff quantities within 5% of key for at least four of five divisions, pricing sources documented, markup components present, and executive summary clearly written; pass = 80% rubric score. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimating Concepts Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% correct (38 of 50 questions) | A 50-question written exam covering estimate types, bid document interpretation, CSI MasterFormat divisions, labor burden components, markup terminology, and the Davis-Bacon Act; questions are drawn from NCCER Project Management cost-control and CMAA CMIT cost-management knowledge areas. Students have 75 minutes and may not use references. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Live Quantity Takeoff Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All four divisions within 5% of instructor key; presentation judged satisfactory by instructor | Each student receives an unseen two-page drawing set and 45 minutes to complete a hand-and-digital combined takeoff for four assigned CSI divisions, then presents their takeoff sheet to the instructor in a five-minute oral defense explaining methodology and any assumptions made. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Estimate Lab Log | Log | 15% | Log complete for all 10 lessons with no more than one missing entry; instructor signs off as accurate | Throughout the course, each student maintains a running lab log documenting takeoff quantities, pricing sources, markup decisions, software settings, and QC findings from every lesson activity; the log is reviewed at mid-course and collected at course end as evidence of progressive skill development aligned with CMAA CMIT documentation competencies. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Bid Document and Scope Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | Pass: all five scenario questions answered correctly; one incorrect = remediation and recheck required | A five-question scenario check in which students review a provided bid document excerpt and identify safety-related scope items (temporary protection, hazardous material allowances, site-specific OSHA compliance costs) that must be included in an estimate; this reinforces OSHA 30 awareness that safety compliance is a direct project cost, not an afterthought. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
This course develops students' ability to read, interpret, and administer the full range of construction contracts used in commercial and residential project delivery. Students analyze contract language, allocate risk, draft routine contract documents, and manage changes, claims, and close-out in compliance with standard industry practice. Content maps directly to the NCCER Project Management module on contract administration and the CMAA CMIT exam domain covering project delivery and contract management.
OutcomesThis course develops students' ability to read, interpret, and administer the full range of construction contracts used in commercial and residential project delivery. Students analyze contract language, allocate risk, draft routine contract documents, and manage changes, claims, and close-out in compliance with standard industry practice. Content maps directly to the NCCER Project Management module on contract administration and the CMAA CMIT exam domain covering project delivery and contract management.
How the course runs. 10 blocks: Construction Contract Fundamentals and Project Delivery Methods; Contract Types: Lump-Sum, Unit-Price, Cost-Plus, and GMP; Reading Standard Contract Documents: AIA and ConsensusDocs; Contract Risk: Indemnification, Insurance, and Bonds; Key Contract Clauses: Liquidated Damages, Force Majeure, Notice, and Differing Site Conditions; Change Orders and Constructive Changes; Payment Applications, Retainage, and Pay-When-Paid Clauses; Dispute Resolution: Claims, Mediation, and Arbitration; Subcontracts and Flow-Down Clauses; Contract Close-Out: Substantial Completion, Punch Lists, and Final Payment.
What competent looks like. Identify and compare the major construction contract types—lump-sum, cost-plus, GMP, unit-price, and design-build—and select the appropriate type for a given project scenario. Read and interpret standard contract documents including AIA A101/A201 and ConsensusDocs general conditions, locating key clauses on scope, payment, changes, disputes, and termination. Draft a complete change order package, including a time-impact analysis and cost justification, that meets owner and contractor signature requirements. Explain the legal concepts of indemnification, liquidated damages, differing site conditions, force majeure, and notice requirements as they apply to construction contracts. Administer contract close-out by preparing a punch-list, tracking substantial completion, assembling warranties, and processing final payment applications. Apply risk-identification techniques to a sample contract and propose mitigation strategies that protect the contractor's schedule and budget.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Construction Contract Fundamentals and Project Delivery Methods | 10 | theory | Students will distinguish among the primary project delivery methods—design-bid-build, design-build, CM-at-risk, and integrated project delivery—and explain how each method shapes contract structure and risk allocation. |
| AIA Practice Guide 'Project Delivery Methods' (current edition), ConsensusDocs white paper on IPD, instructor-prepared comparison matrix worksheet, whiteboard | Exit ticket: five short-answer questions matching delivery method to project scenario; students must correctly classify at least four of five to demonstrate mastery. |
| 2 | Contract Types: Lump-Sum, Unit-Price, Cost-Plus, and GMP | 12 | theory | Students will calculate the contractor's price and profit exposure under lump-sum, unit-price, cost-plus-fee, and guaranteed maximum price contract structures given identical scope and cost data. |
| Instructor-prepared cost data worksheets, four-function calculators, blank risk register templates, National Construction Estimator (current edition) for reference unit costs | Graded calculation quiz: four problems (one per contract type) requiring a correct price, identification of who bears cost risk, and one sentence explaining why; passing score is 75%. |
| 3 | Reading Standard Contract Documents: AIA and ConsensusDocs | 14 | theory | Students will locate and paraphrase the purpose of at least ten key clauses in the AIA A201 General Conditions, including scope, payment, changes, disputes, and termination provisions. |
| Printed AIA A201 General Conditions (current edition), ConsensusDocs 200 (current edition), highlighters, annotation guide handout | Open-document quiz: ten clause-location questions answered with article/section reference and a one-sentence paraphrase; passing score is 75% (at least eight correct references with accurate paraphrases). |
| 4 | Contract Risk: Indemnification, Insurance, and Bonds | 12 | theory | Students will explain how broad-form, intermediate-form, and limited indemnification clauses shift liability, and describe the role of commercial general liability insurance and performance and payment bonds in protecting project stakeholders. |
| Annotated contract excerpts (instructor-prepared), sample ACORD 25 certificate, sample AIA A312 Performance Bond form, Construction Law textbook chapter on suretyship (instructor-selected current edition) | Scenario analysis: students read a two-paragraph fact pattern and answer five questions identifying the applicable indemnification form, which party's insurer responds, and what the surety must do; passing score is 75%. |
| 5 | Key Contract Clauses: Liquidated Damages, Force Majeure, Notice, and Differing Site Conditions | 12 | theory | Students will apply the legal requirements for a valid liquidated-damages clause, a timely notice of claim, and a differing-site-conditions claim to construction fact patterns and determine whether each claim has merit. |
| Instructor-prepared fact patterns, sample notice letter template, federal FAR DSC clause reference, AIA A201 relevant articles, blank notice log form | Written claim memo: students independently analyze a new fact pattern, identify which clause applies, and write a structured one-page memo with a yes/no conclusion and supporting reasoning; graded on accuracy of clause application and completeness of reasoning (passing: instructor rubric score of 75% or higher). |
| 6 | Change Orders and Constructive Changes | 14 | demo | Students will prepare a complete change order request package—including written description of changed work, detailed cost breakdown, and time-impact analysis—that satisfies the requirements of a standard AIA A201 contract. |
| AIA G701 Change Order form, AIA G702/G703 Application for Payment forms, instructor-prepared cost backup worksheets, printed baseline schedule bar chart, TIA worksheet template | Instructor review of completed change order package: the package must include a properly filled G701, an itemized cost breakdown with correct markup, and a written TIA narrative; passing requires all three components to be present and arithmetically correct with no material omissions. |
| 7 | Payment Applications, Retainage, and Pay-When-Paid Clauses | 12 | practice | Students will complete an AIA G702/G703 Continuation Sheet application for payment for a multi-line construction project, correctly calculating work in place, stored materials, retainage withheld, and net amount due. |
| Blank AIA G702 and G703 forms, instructor-prepared schedule-of-values data sets, four-function calculators, Construction Financial Management Association (CFMA) reference on retainage practices | Graded G702/G703 submission: the completed pay application must show correct arithmetic on all line items, correct retainage calculation at the specified rate, and the correct net amount due; passing score is 80% (arithmetic errors reduce score proportionally). |
| 8 | Dispute Resolution: Claims, Mediation, and Arbitration | 10 | theory | Students will explain the standard multi-step dispute resolution process in AIA contracts—initial decision maker, mediation, and arbitration or litigation—and prepare a written claim submission that meets the notice and documentation requirements of a standard general conditions. |
| AIA A201 Article 15 (dispute resolution), AAA Construction Industry Mediation Rules summary (AAA website, current), instructor-prepared dispute scenario handout, claim outline template | Peer and instructor evaluation of role-play position statement and written claim package against a rubric: claim must include entitlement argument with clause citation, a factual chronology, and a quantified cost/time request; passing rubric score is 75% or higher. |
| 9 | Subcontracts and Flow-Down Clauses | 10 | practice | Students will review a sample subcontract against the prime contract it flows from, identify required flow-down clauses, and mark any provisions that conflict with or fail to incorporate prime contract obligations. |
| Printed AIA A401 Subcontract form, printed AIA A201 General Conditions, red pens and word-processor workstations, instructor-prepared deficient subcontract document | Instructor review of redlined subcontract: student must correctly identify and insert at least five of six planted flow-down deficiencies; passing requires five of six correct insertions with accurate clause language. |
| 10 | Contract Close-Out: Substantial Completion, Punch Lists, and Final Payment | 16 | lab | Students will execute a complete contract close-out sequence—issuing a certificate of substantial completion, preparing a punch list, tracking warranty submissions, and processing a final pay application with retainage release—for a simulated construction project. |
| AIA G704 Certificate of Substantial Completion, AIA G706 Contractor's Affidavit of Release of Liens, blank G702/G703 forms, sample conditional lien waiver forms, annotated room photos (instructor-prepared), tabbed close-out binder template | Completed close-out binder graded against a ten-item checklist: binder must include all required documents correctly labeled and sequenced, punch list with complete entries, and a mathematically correct final pay application; passing requires eight of ten checklist items fully satisfied. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contracts Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% correct (38 of 50 questions) | A 50-question written exam covering contract types, delivery methods, key AIA A201 clauses, indemnification forms, insurance and bond requirements, liquidated damages, notice requirements, differing site conditions, and dispute resolution procedures. Questions are multiple-choice and short-answer, drawn from lesson content and mapped to the CMAA CMIT 'Project Delivery and Contract Management' domain and NCCER Project Management module objectives. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Change Order Package Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Instructor rubric score of 75% or higher across all four rubric categories; all arithmetic must be correct | Each student independently prepares a complete change order request package for an instructor-provided scenario, including a written scope description, an itemized cost breakdown with appropriate markup, a time-impact analysis narrative, and a properly completed AIA G701 form. The instructor evaluates the package against a four-category rubric assessing completeness, accuracy of cost calculation, validity of schedule analysis, and professional formatting. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Contract Administration Lab Log | Log | 15% | Eight of ten checklist items fully satisfied in the close-out binder; all forms arithmetically correct | Students submit the close-out lab binder assembled during Lesson 10, containing a certificate of substantial completion narrative, a formatted punch list, a final G702/G703 pay application with retainage release, and properly completed lien waiver forms. The log is graded against a ten-item instructor checklist that verifies presence, correct sequencing, accurate labeling, and arithmetic accuracy of each required document. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Contract Hazard and Notice Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% on safety-critical items; 75% overall on the scenario analysis | Students review a two-page project scenario that includes several contract-related safety triggers—delayed safety submittals, missing OSHA compliance language in a subcontract, and an unclaimed differing-site-conditions hazard (unexpected underground utilities)—and must identify every safety-critical contractual failure, cite the relevant OSHA general duty or specific standard implicated, and describe the required contractual notice action. Any missed safety-critical item is an automatic non-pass requiring remediation before the student may proceed. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
This course teaches students the complete procurement cycle for construction projects, from scope packaging and bid solicitation through vendor selection, purchase order administration, and close-out. Students apply estimating and contract knowledge to real bid packages, subcontractor evaluations, and material buyout strategies used daily by project managers and owners' representatives. Lessons map directly to NCCER Project Management procurement competencies and CMAA CMIT knowledge areas covering project delivery and cost management.
OutcomesThis course teaches students the complete procurement cycle for construction projects, from scope packaging and bid solicitation through vendor selection, purchase order administration, and close-out. Students apply estimating and contract knowledge to real bid packages, subcontractor evaluations, and material buyout strategies used daily by project managers and owners' representatives. Lessons map directly to NCCER Project Management procurement competencies and CMAA CMIT knowledge areas covering project delivery and cost management.
How the course runs. 10 blocks: The Procurement Cycle and Project Delivery Context; Scope Packaging and Work Breakdown for Procurement; Solicitation Documents: RFQ, RFP, and Invitation to Bid; Prequalification and the Bidders List; Public Procurement Rules and Small-Business Requirements; Bid Leveling and Best-Value Analysis; Purchase Orders, Subcontracts, and Change Order Administration; Expediting, Submittals, and the Material Procurement Schedule; Procurement Close-Out and Record Management; Procurement Safety: Deliveries, Material Handling, and Hazard Control.
What competent looks like. Develop a complete bid package including scope of work, drawings list, general conditions, and bid form for a defined construction scope. Evaluate subcontractor and supplier bids using a standardized bid-leveling matrix and select the best-value proposal with written justification. Draft and administer a purchase order and subcontract change order in compliance with project contract requirements. Apply public and private procurement regulations, including minority and small-business requirements, to a simulated project procurement plan. Track procurement status using a material-and-subcontractor log, identify schedule impacts, and communicate expediting actions to the project team. Identify procurement-related hazards during site delivery and material handling and specify required PPE and OSHA-compliant safety controls.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Procurement Cycle and Project Delivery Context | 11 | theory | Students will be able to sequence all phases of the construction procurement cycle and explain how delivery method (design-bid-build, design-build, CM at Risk) shapes procurement strategy. |
| CMAA Owner's Representation Manual excerpts, NCCER Project Management module readings, sample public agency and private bid packages, whiteboard, procurement flowchart template | Exit ticket: students label a blank procurement flowchart with correct phase names and identify which delivery method applies to a described scenario; 80% of labels correct to pass |
| 2 | Scope Packaging and Work Breakdown for Procurement | 14 | lab | Students will divide a given set of project drawings and specifications into logical bid packages and write a scope-of-work narrative for at least three packages that eliminates gaps and overlaps. |
| Commercial project drawing set (reduced scale), project specifications sections 01–16 excerpts, CSI MasterFormat 2016 division list, scope narrative template, highlighters | Scored scope narrative rubric: correct CSI division assignment (25%), no substantive gaps or overlaps (40%), clear interface language (35%); minimum score 80% to pass |
| 3 | Solicitation Documents: RFQ, RFP, and Invitation to Bid | 13 | demo | Students will draft an invitation-to-bid package for a concrete subcontract that includes all required components—instructions to bidders, bid form, scope, drawings list, and bid bond requirement—modeled on industry-standard formats. |
| Sample public ITB and private RFP documents, bid form template, AGC document reference guides, word-processing software, printer for physical review | Completed ITB package reviewed against a 10-item checklist (instructions, bid form, scope, drawings list, schedule, bond requirement, insurance requirement, questions deadline, bid deadline, award criteria); 9 of 10 items present and correct to pass |
| 4 | Prequalification and the Bidders List | 11 | theory | Students will evaluate three contractor prequalification submissions against a defined scoring matrix and produce a ranked bidders-list recommendation with written justification. |
| Three sample prequalification packages, weighted scoring matrix template, CMAA CM Standards of Practice reference, memo template | Scoring matrix submitted with arithmetic verified and recommendation memo present; scores within ±5 points of instructor key and memo clearly tied to scoring data to pass |
| 5 | Public Procurement Rules and Small-Business Requirements | 11 | theory | Students will identify the public competitive-bidding thresholds, DBE/MBE/WBE outreach requirements, and prevailing-wage obligations that apply to a described publicly funded construction project and incorporate them into a procurement checklist. |
| State public procurement statute excerpts (generic/model), U.S. DOT DBE program summary document, prevailing wage overview handout, compliance checklist template | Procurement compliance checklist reviewed by instructor; all legally required steps present and correctly assigned to the right phase and party; no required step missing to pass |
| 6 | Bid Leveling and Best-Value Analysis | 15.5 | lab | Students will complete a bid-leveling spreadsheet for five competing masonry subcontractor bids, adjust for scope differences, and select the best-value bidder with a written award recommendation. |
| Five fictional bid packages, blank bid-leveling spreadsheet (Excel), unit-price reference sheet from estimating course, award recommendation memo template | Leveled bid tab with all adjustments arithmetic-verified by instructor; adjustments within ±3% of instructor key; recommendation memo present with reasoning tied to data; 80% accuracy to pass |
| 7 | Purchase Orders, Subcontracts, and Change Order Administration | 15.5 | practice | Students will issue a purchase order for a structural steel package, process one change order to that PO, and log both transactions in a procurement tracking log consistent with project record-keeping requirements. |
| PO template (Word/Excel), subcontract change order form, procurement tracking log spreadsheet template, project budget extract, sample steel fabricator change-order request | PO and change order documents complete and all fields populated; log arithmetic reconciles to budget within $0; instructor signs off on document accuracy to pass |
| 8 | Expediting, Submittals, and the Material Procurement Schedule | 13 | practice | Students will build a material procurement schedule that integrates submittal review time, fabrication lead time, and delivery with the project master schedule, and identify one item on the critical path requiring expediting action. |
| Simplified project bar-chart schedule, material lead-time list, material procurement schedule template (Excel), expediting memo template, communication rubric | Material procurement schedule submitted with all order dates calculated correctly; critical-path item correctly identified; expediting memo present and professional in tone; 80% of schedule dates within one week of instructor key to pass |
| 9 | Procurement Close-Out and Record Management | 8.5 | practice | Students will assemble a procurement close-out package for a completed subcontract that includes lien releases, final pay application verification, warranty documentation, and O&M manual receipt confirmation. |
| Fictional close-out file (incomplete), close-out checklist template, final pay application form, lien waiver samples (conditional and unconditional), transmittal letter template | Close-out package complete against checklist with no missing required items; payment arithmetic verified and any discrepancy flagged; transmittal letter present; instructor confirms all required documents present to pass |
| 10 | Procurement Safety: Deliveries, Material Handling, and Hazard Control | 8.5 | field | Students will conduct a simulated site delivery inspection, identify material-handling hazards, specify required PPE and OSHA-compliant controls, and complete a delivery acceptance checklist. |
| Staged delivery area or field site, hazard identification form, hierarchy-of-controls reference card, hard hat, high-visibility vest, steel-toed boots, gloves, delivery acceptance checklist, sample mill certifications | Minimum five hazards correctly identified; all corrective actions use the correct level of the hierarchy; delivery checklist fully completed; student wears all required PPE throughout the field activity; instructor field sign-off required to pass |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procurement Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 70% or higher | A 50-question written exam covering procurement cycle phases, solicitation document types, public procurement and small-business rules, bid-leveling principles, PO and change-order concepts, close-out requirements, and material-handling safety. Questions are mapped to NCCER Project Management procurement competencies and CMAA CMIT cost and procurement knowledge areas. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Bid Package Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | 80% on the evaluation rubric across all four components | Each student independently assembles a complete bid package—scope of work, bid form, drawings list, instructions to bidders—for an assigned trade scope from a provided drawing set, then verbally defends their award recommendation after leveling three fictional bids; the rubric scores scope completeness, document accuracy, bid-leveling math, and quality of verbal justification. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Procurement Tracking Lab Log | Log | 15% | All entries present, arithmetic reconciled to zero variance, and instructor-signed | Students submit the cumulative procurement tracking log maintained across Lessons 7 and 8, showing original PO, change order, revised committed cost, submittal status, and delivery date for each material or subcontract package; the log must reconcile exactly to the provided project budget extract with no arithmetic errors. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Delivery Safety Inspection Check | Safety audit | 15% | Minimum five hazards correctly identified, all corrective actions at the correct hierarchy level, full PPE worn, and instructor field sign-off obtained | Drawn directly from the Lesson 10 field activity, the instructor evaluates the student's completed hazard identification form and delivery acceptance checklist on the day of the field exercise; any student who does not wear required PPE or misses a life-safety hazard must repeat the inspection before a passing sign-off is issued. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
This course develops the safety management knowledge and skills that construction project managers and estimators apply daily on active jobsites and in the office. Learners study OSHA construction standards, hazard identification, incident investigation, safety program administration, and cost integration so they can protect workers and keep projects compliant. Lesson content maps directly to OSHA 30-hour Construction Outreach topics and to the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT safety competency domains.
OutcomesThis course develops the safety management knowledge and skills that construction project managers and estimators apply daily on active jobsites and in the office. Learners study OSHA construction standards, hazard identification, incident investigation, safety program administration, and cost integration so they can protect workers and keep projects compliant. Lesson content maps directly to OSHA 30-hour Construction Outreach topics and to the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT safety competency domains.
How the course runs. 10 blocks: OSHA Construction Standards Framework and Employer Duties; Hazard Identification and the Hierarchy of Controls; Fall Protection — Standards, Systems, and Inspection; Electrical Safety, Lockout/Tagout, and Temporary Power; Scaffolding, Excavation/Trenching, and Confined Space Safety; Hazard Communication, SDS Management, and PPE Selection; Incident Investigation, Recordkeeping, and Incident Rate Calculation; Developing and Administering a Site Safety Program; Safety Cost Integration into Estimates and Schedules; Subcontractor Safety Plan Evaluation and Compliance Reporting.
What competent looks like. Identify, evaluate, and document construction site hazards in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 subpart requirements and prescribe appropriate controls using the hierarchy of controls. Develop and administer a written site-specific safety program including emergency action plan, hazard communication plan, and toolbox-talk schedule. Conduct a formal incident investigation, complete standard recordkeeping forms (OSHA 300/300A/301), and calculate incident rates used in contractor pre-qualification. Apply lockout/tagout procedures and scaffold, fall protection, electrical safety, and confined-space entry requirements to realistic construction scenarios. Integrate safety costs—personal protective equipment, training, inspections, and incident reserves—into a project estimate and schedule. Evaluate a subcontractor safety plan against owner and regulatory requirements and produce a written compliance report suitable for a project file.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OSHA Construction Standards Framework and Employer Duties | 12 | theory | Students will correctly identify the structure of 29 CFR Part 1926, employer General Duty Clause obligations, and worker rights under OSHA, scoring at least 80% on a mapped written quiz. |
| 29 CFR Part 1926 (eCFR or printed excerpts), OSHA publication 3151 (Worker Rights), OSHA citation summaries from osha.gov, student notebooks, highlighters | 10-question multiple-choice quiz on CFR structure, General Duty Clause elements, violation classifications, and worker rights; pass = 80% (8/10) |
| 2 | Hazard Identification and the Hierarchy of Controls | 13 | demo | Students will conduct a walkthrough of a simulated construction area and produce a written hazard log that categorizes each hazard and assigns a control from the hierarchy, with at least 85% of identified hazards correctly categorized by the instructor review. |
| Blank hazard log forms, campus or mock site with planted hazards, hard hats, safety glasses, hi-vis vests (student PPE), OSHA 3151 quick card, hierarchy of controls poster | Instructor review of submitted hazard log: minimum 85% of planted hazards identified and each assigned a control at the correct or more protective hierarchy level; any hazard mis-classified as PPE-only when engineering control is feasible earns resubmission |
| 3 | Fall Protection — Standards, Systems, and Inspection | 13 | lab | Students will inspect, don, and correctly anchor a full-body harness and demonstrate understanding of fall-clearance calculations and leading-edge requirements consistent with OSHA Part 1926 Subpart M. |
| Full-body harnesses (one per student or pair), lanyards, static anchor point or horizontal lifeline rigged in lab, inspection tag kit, Part 1926 Subpart M text, fall-clearance calculation worksheet, tape measure | Skills checklist: student must complete all 12 inspection points in correct order AND calculate fall clearance within 6 inches of instructor answer AND demonstrate correct donning sequence; any single critical step missed (D-ring position, anchorage verification) = must repeat before passing |
| 4 | Electrical Safety, Lockout/Tagout, and Temporary Power | 12 | lab | Students will write and execute a machine-specific lockout/tagout procedure for a training apparatus and identify at minimum four electrical hazards present in a mock temporary power panel setup. |
| LOTO training apparatus with practice locks and tags, practice lockout station with hasp, LOTO procedure template, mock temporary power panel (de-energized training unit), Part 1926 Subpart K excerpts, GFCI plug-in tester | Written LOTO procedure scored on a 10-point rubric (all six steps present, energy source identified, verification step included, worker notification noted); pass = 9/10; lab execution observed by instructor — any step out of sequence or verification step skipped = repeat required |
| 5 | Scaffolding, Excavation/Trenching, and Confined Space Safety | 12 | theory | Students will match the correct OSHA standard requirements to scaffold type, soil classification, and confined space classification scenarios, achieving at least 80% on a scenario-based quiz. |
| 29 CFR 1926 Subparts L, P, Q excerpts, blank confined space entry permit forms, scaffold load/capacity tables, soil classification field guide card, training video on confined space entry, calculator | 15-question scenario quiz covering scaffolding, trenching, and confined space topics; pass = 80% (12/15); any question involving permit-required confined space entry permit elements must be answered correctly or the section is retaught |
| 6 | Hazard Communication, SDS Management, and PPE Selection | 12 | demo | Students will locate required information on a Safety Data Sheet, select appropriate PPE for a given chemical hazard, and verify a mock job-site HazCom program contains all required elements per OSHA HazCom standard. |
| Printed SDS for four or five common construction chemicals, PPE selection reference chart, mock HazCom program binder with intentional gaps, HazCom standard checklist, sample gloves/respirators/goggles for demonstration | SDS worksheet scored for accuracy on eight required data points (pass = 7/8 correct); PPE selection table reviewed by instructor — any missing respiratory protection for a respirable hazard = automatic resubmission; HazCom audit summary evaluated for identification of all planted gaps |
| 7 | Incident Investigation, Recordkeeping, and Incident Rate Calculation | 12 | theory | Students will complete OSHA 300, 300A, and 301 forms for a simulated incident and calculate the Total Recordable Incident Rate and Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred rate correctly. |
| Blank OSHA 300, 300A, 301 forms, incident narrative handout, TRIR/DART formula reference card, industry benchmark data (AGC or BLS published averages), sample incident investigation report, root-cause analysis worksheet | Instructor checks all three recordkeeping forms for completeness and correct recordability determination (pass = no critical field blank, recordability decision correct); TRIR and DART calculations must be mathematically correct to pass; any error in recordability determination or rate formula requires correction and resubmission |
| 8 | Developing and Administering a Site Safety Program | 13 | practice | Students will draft a written site-specific safety program including an emergency action plan, toolbox-talk schedule, and subcontractor safety requirements section for an assigned hypothetical project. |
| Project description handout, OSHA Part 1926 references, CMAA Standards of Practice (safety section), sample owner safety specification, emergency action plan checklist, toolbox-talk topic library, word processor | Completed safety program draft evaluated with a rubric: emergency action plan (12 required elements, pass = 11/12 present), toolbox-talk calendar (4 weeks with topics matching project phase), toolbox-talk script (uses standard format and correctly identifies hazard and control); any emergency action plan element related to evacuation or notification missing = resubmission required |
| 9 | Safety Cost Integration into Estimates and Schedules | 12 | practice | Students will identify and quantify safety-related line items within a project estimate and schedule and defend their cost selections using industry references, with all required categories included and quantities supported by calculation. |
| Partial project estimate handout, RSMeans cost data (current edition or instructor-provided extracts), safety equipment supplier catalog pages, blank estimate worksheet, simple Gantt chart template, calculator or spreadsheet software | Completed estimate reviewed by instructor: all six required safety cost categories present, quantities supported by written calculation, unit prices sourced and documented; pass = all categories included with defensible quantities; any category left at zero with no written justification = revision required |
| 10 | Subcontractor Safety Plan Evaluation and Compliance Reporting | 10 | practice | Students will audit a provided subcontractor safety plan against a defined compliance matrix and produce a written compliance report that identifies deficiencies and assigns corrective action priority ratings. |
| Subcontractor safety plan (realistic mock document with planted deficiencies), compliance matrix template, contract safety specification excerpt, rating criteria reference card, word processor, presentation timer | Written compliance report evaluated on rubric: all planted deficiencies identified (pass = at least 80% found), each deficiency linked to a specific standard or specification clause, priority ratings applied consistently; oral summary assessed for clarity and accuracy — failure to identify a critical deficiency in either the written or oral portion requires resubmission |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midterm Knowledge Exam — OSHA Standards and Safety Management | Written exam | 25% | 75% (38 of 50 questions correct); any section covering permit-required confined space or LOTO must be answered at 80% or better within that section | A 50-question written exam covering OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 subpart requirements, hazard classification, HazCom, recordkeeping rules, incident rate formulas, and safety program elements; question types include multiple choice, scenario-based selection, and short calculation problems. Exam content is mapped to the OSHA 30-hour Construction Outreach topic list and the NCCER Project Management safety module competencies. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Integrated Safety Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Pass on all four stations; any station marked Fail must be remediated and re-demonstrated within five school days | Students rotate through four timed stations: (1) harness inspection and donning, (2) lockout/tagout procedure execution on the training apparatus, (3) confined space entry permit completion for a given scenario, and (4) oral delivery of a toolbox talk to the class. A standardized skills checklist is used at each station; critical safety steps (verification of zero energy state, anchorage confirmation, permit hazard identification) are mandatory-pass items. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safety Program and Estimate Portfolio Log | Log | 15% | Portfolio earns a minimum of 80% on the cumulative rubric; all seven required documents must be present and any document related to emergency action planning must score at least 90% on its sub-rubric | Students submit a compiled portfolio containing: the site-specific safety program draft (including emergency action plan and toolbox-talk calendar), the written toolbox-talk script, the completed subcontractor safety compliance report, the safety cost estimate worksheet with quantity calculations, and the OSHA recordkeeping forms from the incident investigation exercise. Each document is scored against its lesson rubric, and a cumulative portfolio score is calculated. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Jobsite Safety Walk — Final Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | Student must identify at least 85% of planted hazards AND correctly assign a hierarchy-of-controls response to each identified hazard; failure to identify any life-safety hazard (fall hazard at unprotected edge, energized-equipment hazard) results in automatic failure and immediate remediation | In a proctored 20-minute walkthrough of the campus mock site or a designated outdoor area reset with new hazard conditions, each student independently conducts a pre-shift safety inspection, completes a hazard log, and verbally debriefs the instructor on their three highest-priority findings and recommended controls. This final check mirrors the field competency required by OSHA 30 and assessed in the NCCER and CMAA CMIT safety domains. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students learn to use Procore's cloud-based construction management platform and Bluebeam Revu to manage project documentation, drawings, RFIs, submittals, budgets, and field observations throughout a project lifecycle. Instruction connects each tool's features to real CM workflows covered in earlier courses and to the documentation and communication competencies tested by the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. By course end, students can set up a project, mark up and issue drawings, track cost and schedule data, and produce the audit-ready records required on commercial jobsites.
OutcomesStudents learn to use Procore's cloud-based construction management platform and Bluebeam Revu to manage project documentation, drawings, RFIs, submittals, budgets, and field observations throughout a project lifecycle. Instruction connects each tool's features to real CM workflows covered in earlier courses and to the documentation and communication competencies tested by the NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. By course end, students can set up a project, mark up and issue drawings, track cost and schedule data, and produce the audit-ready records required on commercial jobsites.
How the course runs. 10 blocks: Construction Technology Landscape and Course Orientation; Procore Project Setup and Directory Management; Drawing Management and Plan Distribution in Procore; Bluebeam Revu Fundamentals: Markup and Annotation; Bluebeam Quantity Takeoff and Measurement Tools; RFI and Submittal Management in Procore; Budget Tracking and Change Management in Procore; Field Observations, Daily Logs, and Inspection Reports; Document Control, Close-Out Package, and Transmittals; Integrated Project Simulation: Full Workflow Capstone Lab.
What competent looks like. Configure a new Procore project with the correct directory, permissions, and folder structure required for a commercial construction project. Create, distribute, and close out RFIs and submittals in Procore following the response-time and routing requirements typical of commercial contracts. Use Bluebeam Revu to mark up construction drawings, perform quantity takeoffs linked to the estimate, and publish a marked-up drawing package with a summary report. Track budget line items, commitments, and change events in Procore's budget tool and reconcile variances against the baseline estimate. Produce a Procore daily log and inspection report that meets OSHA recordkeeping expectations and project-specific safety documentation requirements. Integrate Procore and Bluebeam outputs into a coherent project documentation package suitable for owner reporting and later use in the Capstone course.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Construction Technology Landscape and Course Orientation | 8 | theory | Students explain how cloud-based project management and PDF markup tools fit into the overall CM information workflow and identify the specific Procore modules and Bluebeam features used in this course. |
| Procore Training Sandbox (free educator account), Bluebeam Revu 30-day trial or Vu free viewer, CMAA CM Standards of Practice (current edition), projected display, structured note sheet handout | Exit ticket: students correctly label at least 8 of 10 items on a blank information-flow diagram and identify the correct software module for each; 80% accuracy required. |
| 2 | Procore Project Setup and Directory Management | 12 | lab | Students configure a complete Procore project shell—including company directory, user permissions, project stages, and custom folder structure—from a provided project brief. |
| Procore Training Sandbox, project brief handout (fictional commercial office building), Procore Help Center documentation, permission matrix template, peer audit checklist | Instructor reviews completed sandbox project against a 15-point setup rubric; students must score 12 of 15 points, with zero deficiencies in permission settings. |
| 3 | Drawing Management and Plan Distribution in Procore | 12 | lab | Students upload, version-control, and distribute a multi-discipline drawing set in Procore's Drawings tool so that all project team members receive the current revision and superseded sheets are clearly archived. |
| Procore Training Sandbox, sample PDF drawing set (20–30 sheets minimum, instructor-prepared), sample transmittal form, Procore Drawings help documentation | Instructor spot-checks three sheets for correct revision code, discipline tag, and distribution list; students must pass all three checks plus produce an accurate drawing log; any missing current revision is an automatic resubmit. |
| 4 | Bluebeam Revu Fundamentals: Markup and Annotation | 14 | demo | Students apply Bluebeam Revu markup tools—including clouds, callouts, stamps, layers, and the Markups List—to annotate a construction drawing set for a design review and produce a summary report. |
| Bluebeam Revu (student trial or lab license), instructor-prepared drawing set with seeded coordination conflicts, Bluebeam University tutorial references, Markups List export template | Rubric assessment: all five conflicts marked up on correct layers (5 pts), markups include required cloud + callout + description (5 pts), published PDF package is legible and layers are intact (5 pts); minimum 12 of 15 points to pass. |
| 5 | Bluebeam Quantity Takeoff and Measurement Tools | 14 | lab | Students use Bluebeam Revu's measurement and dynamic fill tools to perform a digital quantity takeoff of a concrete flatwork scope from a site plan and record quantities in a formatted takeoff sheet linked to the Estimating course format. |
| Bluebeam Revu, instructor-prepared site plan PDF with known dimensions, takeoff sheet template (Excel or CSV), manual takeoff answer key for reconciliation exercise | Quantities for all five takeoff items must be within ±5% of the instructor answer key; takeoff sheet must have correct units and labels; students who miss more than one item must redo the calibration and measurement steps. |
| 6 | RFI and Submittal Management in Procore | 14 | practice | Students create, route, respond to, and close out both an RFI and a submittal in Procore, following a realistic review schedule and documenting the complete communication record. |
| Procore Training Sandbox, scenario packet (coordination conflict description and specification index), Procore RFI and Submittal help documentation, owner-report summary template | Instructor evaluates RFI and submittal log against a checklist: correct fields completed, realistic dates, proper routing, and closed RFI with response attached; students must pass 9 of 11 checklist items. |
| 7 | Budget Tracking and Change Management in Procore | 14 | lab | Students load a project budget into Procore's Budget tool, enter a subcontractor commitment, process a change event and potential change order, and produce a cost report showing budget versus actual variance. |
| Procore Training Sandbox, budget CSV import file (instructor-prepared), change event scenario handout, Procore Budget and Change Management help documentation, Excel or Google Sheets for variance calculation | Budget import must balance to the contract sum (zero tolerance); change event must be linked to the correct budget line; variance report must accurately reflect the change; students who have an unbalanced budget must correct it before receiving credit. |
| 8 | Field Observations, Daily Logs, and Inspection Reports | 12 | field | Students complete a Procore daily log and a formal inspection report for a simulated field condition, including weather, manpower, equipment, work completed, and a safety observation, consistent with OSHA recordkeeping expectations. |
| Procore Training Sandbox, scenario cards, stock jobsite photos (royalty-free), Procore Observations and Inspections help documentation, OSHA recordkeeping overview reference (OSHA.gov) | Daily log must have all required fields complete; inspection must have at least eight checkpoints with three deficiencies correctly flagged; safety observation must include corrective action and responsible party; any missing safety observation entry is an automatic resubmit. |
| 9 | Document Control, Close-Out Package, and Transmittals | 10 | practice | Students assemble a project close-out package in Procore and Bluebeam—including as-built drawings, O&M manuals, warranty log, and a final transmittal—organized to meet owner turnover requirements. |
| Procore Training Sandbox, Bluebeam Revu, sample contract general conditions excerpt, field-change log handout, warranty summary template, close-out checklist template | Transmittal must include all items from the checklist (100% completion); as-built PDFs must have revision clouds on all three changed sheets; any missing mandatory close-out document requires resubmission of the full package. |
| 10 | Integrated Project Simulation: Full Workflow Capstone Lab | 11 | lab | Students execute a complete mini-project lifecycle in Procore and Bluebeam—from project setup through close-out—demonstrating mastery of all prior lessons in an integrated, timed scenario. |
| Procore Training Sandbox, Bluebeam Revu, new project brief packet (not used in prior lessons), integrated simulation rubric, self-assessment reflection form | Instructor scores the completed simulation against the integrated rubric (30 points total across all workflow steps); students must earn 24 of 30 points and must have zero incomplete safety observation entries to pass. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procore & Bluebeam Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (38 of 50 points) | A 50-question written exam covering Procore module purposes and navigation, Bluebeam tool functions, document control procedures, RFI and submittal workflow steps, budget tracking concepts, and OSHA recordkeeping requirements relevant to daily logs and observations. Questions are formatted as multiple-choice and short-answer to reflect the written-component style used in the NCCER and CMAA CMIT credential exams. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Skills Demonstration: Live Project Workflow | Skills demonstration | 45% | Pass all five required tasks; any failed task must be retried once within one week | The student receives an unseen project brief and, working live in the Procore training sandbox and Bluebeam Revu, must complete five timed tasks: (1) configure project directory and permissions, (2) upload and distribute a drawing revision, (3) create and route an RFI, (4) enter a budget change event and produce a cost report, and (5) complete a daily log with a safety observation. Each task is scored pass/fail by the instructor using a defined checklist. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Lab Log: Lesson Documentation Portfolio | Log | 15% | Minimum 8 of 10 lesson lab submissions rated Complete on the rubric; no safety-related submission may be rated Incomplete | Students maintain a cumulative digital portfolio of all lab outputs produced during the ten lessons—including sandbox screenshots, exported PDFs, takeoff sheets, transmittals, markups, and self-assessment forms. Each submission is evaluated for completeness, accuracy, and professional formatting using a consistent four-point rubric (Incomplete / Developing / Meets Standard / Exceeds Standard); a rating of Meets Standard or higher counts as Complete. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safety Check: Digital Safety Documentation Review | Safety audit | 15% | 100% of required safety documentation items present and correctly formatted; any deficiency must be corrected before the student advances to Course 8 | Instructor audits the student's Procore safety observation entries, near-miss documentation, and inspection deficiency records produced during Lesson 8 and the Lesson 10 simulation against a safety documentation checklist aligned to OSHA recordkeeping expectations and the safety management principles from Course 6. The check confirms that every hazard identified in the simulation has an assigned corrective action, a responsible party, and a documented status—habits directly reinforced by the OSHA 30 credential content. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students apply every competency developed across the program—scheduling, estimating, contracts, procurement, safety management, and digital documentation—to a single, realistic commercial construction scenario from bid package through closeout. Each student produces a complete project delivery package and defends it before a panel of industry evaluators, replicating the professional standard required for NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credential holders.
OutcomesStudents apply every competency developed across the program—scheduling, estimating, contracts, procurement, safety management, and digital documentation—to a single, realistic commercial construction scenario from bid package through closeout. Each student produces a complete project delivery package and defends it before a panel of industry evaluators, replicating the professional standard required for NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credential holders.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Project Kickoff: Interpreting the Owner's Program and Assembling the Delivery Framework; Integrated Estimating, Scheduling, and Procurement Planning; Safety Plan, Change Management, and Project Controls Documentation; Portfolio Compilation and Capstone Defense Preparation.
What competent looks like. Produce a complete bid package for an assigned commercial project including a fully itemized quantity takeoff, trade-by-trade cost estimate within ±10% of instructor benchmark, and a written basis-of-estimate narrative. Develop a CPM schedule in Primavera P6 or equivalent that identifies the critical path, incorporates owner milestones, and sequences all major trade packages for the assigned project. Draft a project execution plan that integrates a site-specific safety and health plan (compliant with OSHA general industry and construction standards), a procurement log with RFQ timelines, and a contract administration workflow. Use Procore and Bluebeam Revu to manage, mark up, and transmit all project documents—RFIs, submittals, meeting minutes, change-order logs—in formats consistent with industry practice. Evaluate project performance against baseline cost and schedule using earned-value metrics, identify variances, and propose corrective actions in a written project status report. Defend all project deliverables before a panel of industry and faculty evaluators, responding to technical questions and demonstrating professional communication skills aligned with CMAA CMIT competency standards.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Project Kickoff: Interpreting the Owner's Program and Assembling the Delivery Framework | 36 | lab | Given a complete set of bid documents for a mid-size commercial project, the student will perform a thorough document review, identify scope, site, and contract-type requirements, and produce a written project execution plan outline that organizes all subsequent capstone deliverables. |
| Full commercial bid package (drawings in PDF and DWG format, CSI MasterFormat specifications), Procore training environment, Bluebeam Revu, CMAA CM Standards of Practice (current edition), AIA A201 General Conditions reference, plan-reading checklist template, RFI log template | Instructor reviews the PEP outline and RFI list using a scored rubric (clarity of scope statement, accuracy of contract summary, completeness of deliverables schedule, professional formatting); minimum passing score is 80 out of 100. Peer reviewers flag any missed contract provision; unresolved misses are corrected before Lesson 2 begins. |
| 2 | Integrated Estimating, Scheduling, and Procurement Planning | 54 | lab | The student will produce a trade-by-trade quantity takeoff, a detailed cost estimate with contingency and markup, a CPM schedule that sequences all major work packages, and a procurement log with RFQ milestones—all linked and internally consistent for the assigned project. |
| Bluebeam Revu with calibrated takeoff tools, Primavera P6 or equivalent CPM software, RS Means Building Construction Costs (current year, print or online subscription), Excel or Google Sheets, Procore training environment, CSI MasterFormat division list, crew productivity reference tables from prior Estimating course, local market adjustment factor sheet provided by instructor | Estimate is benchmarked against instructor's independent quantity takeoff and priced estimate; student total must fall within ±10% of benchmark to pass. CPM schedule is reviewed for logic errors, missing activities, and critical-path accuracy—zero dangling activities and correct identification of critical path required. Procurement log completeness and RFQ letter quality are scored on a rubric (scope accuracy, format, schedule alignment); minimum 80/100 on rubric. Any estimate variance greater than 10% triggers a mandatory revision session before the portfolio is assembled. |
| 3 | Safety Plan, Change Management, and Project Controls Documentation | 44 | lab | The student will develop a site-specific safety and health plan consistent with OSHA construction standards, administer a simulated change-order cycle from RFI through executed amendment, and prepare an earned-value project status report that compares actual versus planned cost and schedule performance. |
| OSHA 29 CFR Part 1926 Construction Standards (online reference), Procore training environment, AIA G701 Change Order form (sample), site hazard identification checklist, PPE selection guide, earned-value worksheet template, CPM schedule from Lesson 2, estimate from Lesson 2, instructor-issued change directive packages and actuals data set | Safety plan is scored on a rubric checking presence and adequacy of all required plan elements (hazard ID, PPE matrix, emergency action plan, incident reporting, toolbox schedule, subcontractor compliance section)—minimum 80/100; any missing required element is a mandatory fix. Change-order trail is reviewed for math accuracy and completeness of documentation—all three changes must be fully processed with no missing form. EVM calculations are verified for formula accuracy; SPI and CPI must be arithmetically correct and narrative must logically match the numbers. Any arithmetic error triggers correction before portfolio submission. |
| 4 | Portfolio Compilation and Capstone Defense Preparation | 28 | practice | The student will assemble all capstone deliverables into a professionally organized digital project portfolio, prepare and deliver a structured oral defense presentation, and respond to panel questions demonstrating command of all technical decisions made throughout the project. |
| Bluebeam Revu (portfolio assembly), presentation software (PowerPoint or equivalent), defense evaluation rubric, peer critique form, printer for executive summary handouts, projector and screen for presentations, all deliverables from Lessons 1–3 | Portfolio completeness is verified against a 20-item checklist—all 20 items must be present and version-controlled to proceed to defense. Defense presentation is scored by the panel on a rubric covering technical accuracy, logical organization, response quality under questioning, and professional communication—minimum passing score is 80/100 across all rubric categories. A score below 80 requires a documented remediation plan and a second defense opportunity within two weeks. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrated Project Delivery Package | Project | 60% | All required deliverables submitted and complete; cost estimate within ±10% of instructor benchmark; CPM schedule free of logic errors with correct critical path identified; safety plan contains all required sections; change-order documentation complete and arithmetically accurate; EVM calculations correct; minimum composite rubric score of 80/100 across all deliverable-specific rubrics. | The complete, professionally formatted digital project portfolio assembled across all four lessons—including the Project Execution Plan, quantity takeoff and cost estimate, CPM schedule, procurement log, site-specific safety and health plan, change-order file, and earned-value status report—represents the primary project assessment. Each component is evaluated against the rubric criteria established in each lesson, and the composite score determines whether the student has demonstrated integrated professional competence at the level expected of an entry-level construction manager or estimator pursuing NCCER Project Management and CMAA CMIT credentials. Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation |
| Capstone Portfolio: Document Control and Professional Standards Review | Portfolio | 20% | All 20 checklist items present with version-control transmittals; no section submitted without a basis-of-estimate or supporting rationale; document formatting consistent with industry professional standards throughout; minimum portfolio organization score of 80/100 on the portfolio-standards rubric. | A faculty evaluator and an industry-professional reviewer independently assess the complete portfolio against a 20-item completeness checklist and a formatting and professional-standards rubric, verifying that every document is organized, version-controlled, internally consistent, and transmittable to an owner or surety as a professional work product. This assessment mirrors the document-management expectations of the CMAA CMIT competency framework and the NCCER Project Management credential, ensuring students can produce jobsite-ready documentation. Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality |
| Capstone Defense: Oral Examination Before Industry Panel | Oral / panel | 20% | Minimum score of 80/100 on the panel evaluation rubric across all four categories: technical accuracy of content, logical and clear presentation structure, quality and accuracy of responses to panel questions, and professional communication demeanor. Scores below 80 require a remediation plan and a second defense within two weeks; a second failure results in course non-completion. | The student presents and defends the complete project delivery package before a panel that includes at least one industry professional (owner, CM, or general contractor representative) and one faculty evaluator in a formal 20-minute presentation followed by a minimum 15-minute question-and-answer session. The panel probes the student's technical decisions, risk assumptions, safety judgment, and ability to communicate project status clearly—directly replicating the professional communication and leadership competencies assessed in the CMAA CMIT credential and valued by employers hiring NCCER-credentialed project managers. Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication |
Students complete 243 supervised hours at a construction management, general contracting, or specialty subcontracting employer site, applying estimating, scheduling, procurement, and project controls skills learned in the classroom to live projects. A credentialed site supervisor evaluates professional conduct, technical competence, and safety compliance at mid-term and final intervals. This course bridges academic preparation to employment and directly reinforces NCCER Project Management field-application competencies and CMAA CMIT professional-practice domains.
OutcomesStudents complete 243 supervised hours at a construction management, general contracting, or specialty subcontracting employer site, applying estimating, scheduling, procurement, and project controls skills learned in the classroom to live projects. A credentialed site supervisor evaluates professional conduct, technical competence, and safety compliance at mid-term and final intervals. This course bridges academic preparation to employment and directly reinforces NCCER Project Management field-application competencies and CMAA CMIT professional-practice domains.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Placement Orientation and Site Safety Integration; Estimating and Quantity Takeoff on a Live Project; Scheduling, Procurement, and Project Controls Support; Final Supervisor Evaluation and Externship Reflection.
What competent looks like. Apply job-site safety protocols—including PPE selection, hazard identification, and OSHA 30 regulatory knowledge—consistently throughout all 243 placement hours with zero safety violations recorded by the site supervisor. Perform at least two real estimating or quantity-takeoff tasks (material, labor, or equipment) on an active project, producing documented calculations that the supervising project manager reviews and signs off as accurate. Update or assist in maintaining a project schedule using CPM logic (Primavera P6, MS Project, or employer's chosen tool) for a minimum of one active project, demonstrating ability to flag critical-path variances. Participate in at least three formal project-management processes—such as a subcontractor bid review, RFI response, submittal log update, or owner progress meeting—and document each in the externship journal. Demonstrate professional communication standards by drafting or contributing to at least two project documents (meeting minutes, cost report, change-order log, or procurement summary) that are accepted into the project record by the supervisor. Receive a passing composite score on the employer's mid-term and final evaluation rubric, confirming readiness for entry-level construction management employment.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Placement Orientation and Site Safety Integration | 24 | field | The student completes the employer's site-specific safety orientation, identifies active hazards on the assigned project, and documents compliance with OSHA 30-level requirements before performing any other worksite tasks. |
| OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart C (general safety) reference card; host employer site-specific safety manual; PPE (hard hat, safety glasses, high-visibility vest, steel-toed boots, gloves—student-supplied per program requirements); SDS binder or digital library access; externship journal (student-maintained Google Doc or paper log); hazard-log template (program-provided). | Supervisor-signed safety orientation acknowledgment form on file; hazard log contains at least five entries with photograph, hazard type, applicable OSHA standard (general reference), and recommended control; SDS memo accepted by supervisor without major corrections. Pass = all three items complete and supervisor marks safety compliance 'Satisfactory' or above on the orientation checklist. |
| 2 | Estimating and Quantity Takeoff on a Live Project | 60 | practice | The student performs material and/or labor quantity takeoffs for at least two scope items on an active project using the employer's takeoff method and software, producing documented calculations that are verified by the supervising estimator or project manager. |
| Active project drawing set (full-size prints or digital access via Procore or Bluebeam); employer's cost-code structure and unit-price database; Bluebeam Revu or employer takeoff software (workstation or laptop with valid license); estimating spreadsheet template (employer-provided or program-standard Excel template); RSMeans data (online or print edition, current year) for unit-cost benchmarking if employer permits. | Two completed takeoff spreadsheets on file, each bearing the supervisor's review signature and notation of 'Acceptable' or corrections incorporated; change-order cost estimate draft reviewed and accepted into project file. Pass = both takeoffs are within a reasonable variance accepted by the supervisor, and the supervisor rates technical accuracy 'Satisfactory' or above on the mid-term evaluation rubric. |
| 3 | Scheduling, Procurement, and Project Controls Support | 99 | field | The student actively assists in maintaining the project schedule and procurement log, participates in at least three formal project-management processes, and produces or contributes to at least two accepted project documents across the bulk of the placement period. |
| Employer scheduling software (Primavera P6, MS Project, or equivalent) with active project file; Procore or employer document-management platform (student granted appropriate access level); externship journal; meeting minutes template (program-provided); procurement/submittal log template (employer-provided or program-standard). | Four weekly schedule updates on file, each with supervisor sign-off; submittal/RFI log entries verified as complete by supervisor; three sets of approved meeting minutes filed in the project record; supervisor rates professional communication and technical contribution 'Satisfactory' or above on the final evaluation rubric. Pass = all deliverables complete and final rubric composite score ≥ 70 out of 100. |
| 4 | Final Supervisor Evaluation and Externship Reflection | 60 | field | The student compiles a complete externship portfolio, participates in a formal final evaluation meeting with the site supervisor, and delivers a structured reflection presentation to the program instructor demonstrating professional growth and readiness for entry-level employment. |
| Externship portfolio (digital folder, student-compiled); program standardized employer evaluation rubric (PDF, completed by supervisor); reflection presentation slide deck (student-created, minimum eight slides); video conferencing platform if remote (Zoom or Teams); externship hours log signed by supervisor documenting total hours completed. | Portfolio is complete (all required document types present, table of contents accurate, submitted on time); supervisor's final evaluation rubric composite score ≥ 70/100; reflection presentation addresses all four required topics and student answers instructor questions accurately. Pass = all three criteria met; any rubric score below 70 requires a remediation plan co-signed by the instructor and employer before a grade of passing is awarded. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site Supervisor Skills Demonstration Evaluation | Skills demonstration | 70% | Composite score of 70 or higher out of 100 on the standardized employer evaluation rubric, with no individual domain (safety, technical skill, professionalism, communication, reliability) rated below 'Needs Improvement' at the final evaluation; any domain rated 'Unsatisfactory' requires a documented remediation plan. | The host employer's supervising project manager or superintendent completes the program's standardized employer evaluation rubric at mid-term (approximately 120 hours) and again at the conclusion of the placement (243 hours), rating the student across five domains on a four-point scale. The instructor reviews both rubrics, contacts the supervisor to clarify any marginal ratings, and uses the final rubric as the primary skills-demonstration assessment for the course. Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative |
| Externship Journal and Portfolio Log | Log | 30% | Portfolio contains all required document types (signed hazard log, two takeoff spreadsheets with supervisor sign-off, four weekly schedule updates with supervisor sign-off, submittal/RFI log excerpts, three sets of approved meeting minutes, and signed hours log totaling 243 hours); journal entries are present for each week of placement; instructor rates overall documentation quality 'Satisfactory' or above. | The student maintains a weekly externship journal documenting activities, decisions, safety observations, and professional interactions throughout all 243 hours, then compiles every produced or contributed project document into a final portfolio submitted to the instructor before the reflection presentation. The instructor reviews the portfolio against a completeness checklist and evaluates journal entries for specificity, accuracy, and professional tone, ensuring the log provides verifiable evidence that required competencies were practiced on a live project. Complete · Verified |
This capstone review course systematically covers every knowledge domain tested on the NCCER Project Management credential, OSHA 30 Outreach completion requirements, and CMAA Constructor Manager-in-Training (CMIT) examination so that students enter each exam with demonstrated competency. Lessons rotate between targeted content review, timed practice questions, and full-length mock exams with instructor-led debrief to close remaining gaps. Test-taking strategy, time management, and documentation of eligibility requirements are also addressed.
OutcomesThis capstone review course systematically covers every knowledge domain tested on the NCCER Project Management credential, OSHA 30 Outreach completion requirements, and CMAA Constructor Manager-in-Training (CMIT) examination so that students enter each exam with demonstrated competency. Lessons rotate between targeted content review, timed practice questions, and full-length mock exams with instructor-led debrief to close remaining gaps. Test-taking strategy, time management, and documentation of eligibility requirements are also addressed.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: NCCER Project Management Domain Review and Practice; OSHA 30 Construction Content Review and Scenario Practice; CMAA CMIT Examination Domain Review and Practice; Full Mock Examinations and Exam-Readiness Debrief.
What competent looks like. Demonstrate mastery of NCCER Project Management core knowledge areas—project planning, scheduling, cost control, procurement, and leadership—by scoring 70% or higher on timed practice sets drawn from each domain. Correctly apply OSHA 30 Construction Outreach content including hazard recognition, fall protection, electrical safety, scaffolding, excavation, PPE selection, and rights and responsibilities, achieving 70% or higher on domain-specific practice questions. Apply CMAA CMIT examination content across cost management, time management, quality, safety, risk, and professional practice domains, scoring 70% or higher on representative practice items. Complete a full-length timed mock examination for each credential under simulated test conditions, achieving the program benchmark of 75% or higher on each mock before sitting the live exam. Organize and submit all required eligibility documentation—training records, NCCER Registry enrollment, OSHA 30 sign-in sheets, and CMAA CMIT application materials—accurately and on time. Apply proven test-taking strategies including question parsing, elimination, time-per-item pacing, and educated guessing protocol to maximize performance on multiple-choice certification exams.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NCCER Project Management Domain Review and Practice | 18 | theory | Students will correctly answer practice questions across all NCCER Project Management knowledge domains—project planning and initiation, scheduling, cost control, procurement, subcontract management, and leadership—at a rate of 70% or higher on each domain quiz. |
| NCCER Project Management module textbooks (student copies), NCCER Project Management knowledge-area outline prepared by instructor, domain-organized practice question bank (instructor-prepared, NCCER-style items), personal gap-tracking worksheet, whiteboard, projector | Students complete a 50-question timed domain quiz (10 questions per major domain) and must score 70% or higher overall with no single domain below 60%; any student below threshold completes targeted re-study and retakes an alternate 25-question version before the next lesson. |
| 2 | OSHA 30 Construction Content Review and Scenario Practice | 16 | practice | Students will correctly identify hazard types, applicable OSHA standards, required controls, and employer/worker rights and responsibilities across the major OSHA 30 Construction topic areas by achieving 70% or higher on a comprehensive scenario-based quiz. |
| OSHA 30 Construction Outreach topic outline, hazard-recognition photo card set (instructor-prepared), three generic accident investigation case studies, OSHA 30 Construction practice question bank, hierarchy-of-controls reference poster, student answer sheets, timer | Students score the 40-question timed quiz and must reach 70% or higher; any student below threshold identifies their weakest two topic areas and completes a targeted 15-question mini-quiz on those areas before Lesson 3; instructor records results to confirm OSHA 30 training-hour completion documentation is in order. |
| 3 | CMAA CMIT Examination Domain Review and Practice | 16 | theory | Students will demonstrate familiarity with CMAA CMIT examination domains—project management process, cost management, time management, quality management, contract administration, safety management, and professional practice—by achieving 70% or higher on a domain-balanced practice item set. |
| CMAA CMIT Candidate Handbook (current edition, downloaded from CMAA website), student course notes from Courses 2–6, CMIT-style practice question bank (instructor-prepared), earned value formula reference card, calculator, projector, partner prompt card set | Students score the 45-question CMIT practice exam and must reach 70% or higher; students who score below threshold meet individually with instructor to build a 48-hour self-study plan targeting weak domains; instructor also confirms each student has reviewed CMAA CMIT eligibility requirements and begun or completed their application. |
| 4 | Full Mock Examinations and Exam-Readiness Debrief | 18 | practice | Students will complete one full-length timed mock examination for each of the three target credentials under simulated test conditions and achieve the program benchmark of 75% or higher on each mock, while demonstrating correct application of time management and question-strategy techniques. |
| Full-length mock exam packets for NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30 Construction, and CMIT (instructor-assembled from practice item banks), individual answer sheets, timer, confidence-accuracy matrix worksheet, personal study action plan template, exam registration checklist for each credential, quiet examination room | Students must score 75% or higher on each of the three full mock exams to meet program completion standard; any student below 75% on one or more mocks receives a documented remediation plan, completes targeted review, and takes an alternate 30-question mock for that credential—scoring 70% or higher on the alternate to clear the requirement; all three mock scores are recorded in the student's program file. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three-Credential Full Mock Examination Suite | Mock certification exam | 100% | 75% or higher on each of the three full-length mock exams (NCCER Project Management, OSHA 30 Construction, CMIT); students who fall below 75% on any single mock complete documented remediation and must score 70% or higher on an alternate mock for that credential to meet program completion requirements. | Students sit three sequential full-length mock exams under timed, closed-note, simulated test conditions covering the complete knowledge domains of the NCCER Project Management credential, OSHA 30 Construction Outreach, and the CMAA CMIT examination. Results are analyzed individually, a confidence-accuracy debrief is conducted, and each student produces a personal study action plan addressing remaining gaps before sitting the live credentialing exams. Score · Time management |
Students sit three industry credential exams: the NCCER Project Management assessment administered through the National Center for Construction Education and Research registry system, the OSHA 30-Hour Construction Outreach training completion issued through an OSHA-authorized trainer, and the CMAA Construction Manager-in-Training (CMIT) examination administered by the Construction Management Association of America. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.
Back to Construction Management / Estimating · How the school gets authority to award these credentials
A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working. Help us build VoTechWorks. Tell us what works, what doesn’t, and what you want to learn.