Objective. Students will distinguish among the primary project delivery methods—design-bid-build, design-build, CM-at-risk, and integrated project delivery—and explain how each method shapes contract structure and risk allocation.
This lesson, its worked examples and its practice questions has not yet been verified by a credentialed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
A project delivery method is the contractual and organizational framework that defines who does what on a construction project, in what order, and who bears the risk when something goes wrong. Before a single drawing is produced or a shovel breaks ground, the owner must choose a delivery method. That choice shapes every contract that follows, determines how risk is shared among owner, designer, and contractor, and influences schedule, cost control, and communication throughout the project life cycle.
Four methods dominate the US construction market: Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Design-Build (DB), Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR), and Integrated Project Delivery (IPD). Each is introduced below.
---
Design-Bid-Build is the oldest and most widely used method in both public and private construction. The process moves in three sequential phases:
1. Design – The owner hires a designer (architect or engineer) under a separate contract. The designer produces construction documents.
2. Bid – The completed documents are advertised; general contractors submit competitive bids.
3. Build – The owner awards a separate contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, who then constructs the project.
The owner holds two separate contracts: one with the designer and one with the contractor. Because these two parties have no direct contractual relationship with each other, disputes about design errors or changed conditions often land back on the owner to resolve. Risk profile: the owner retains significant risk, especially when design documents contain errors or when unforeseen site conditions arise. The contractor's price is fixed (lump-sum), which limits the owner's cost risk after award—provided the drawings are complete.
DBB is frequently required by law on publicly funded projects because competitive bidding promotes transparency and fairness with taxpayer dollars.
---
In Design-Build, the owner signs a single contract with one entity—the design-builder—who is responsible for both design and construction. The design-builder may be a contractor who employs in-house designers, or a joint venture between a contractor and a design firm.
Key advantage: a single point of responsibility. If a design error causes a construction problem, the owner does not have to arbitrate between separate parties. Risk profile: the design-builder carries both design and construction risk, which is reflected in the contract price. The owner's risk is lower for coordination failures, but the owner must define the project's requirements clearly (called a Request for Proposal or Performance Specification) before the contract is signed, because the owner has less control over design details once work begins.
DB is common on transportation projects (highways, bridges), industrial facilities, and fast-track commercial projects where speed to completion is critical.
---
In CMAR (also called CM/GC), the owner hires a Construction Manager (CM) early in the design phase as a consultant. As design progresses, the CM provides cost estimates, schedule input, and constructability reviews. At an agreed milestone—often 60–100% design completion—the CM converts its role and provides the owner a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). If actual costs exceed the GMP, the CM absorbs the overrun.
The owner retains the designer under a separate contract, similar to DBB, but the CM is in the room during design—reducing surprises during construction. Risk profile: the GMP shifts cost overrun risk to the CM while preserving the owner's design control. The owner still holds two separate contracts (designer and CM), so coordination is more complex than DB but better managed than traditional DBB.
CMAR is popular for complex, schedule-sensitive projects such as hospitals, schools, and large municipal facilities.
---
IPD is the newest of the four methods. It uses a multi-party agreement that binds the owner, designer, and key contractors into a single contract with shared financial incentives and shared risk. If the project finishes under budget, all parties share the savings. If it runs over, all parties share the pain—within defined limits.
IPD relies heavily on collaborative tools such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), co-location of team members, and open-book accounting. It was formalized as a delivery method with guidance documents from the American Institute of Architects (AIA).
Risk profile: risk is distributed across all parties rather than pushed to the lowest tier. This can reduce adversarial behavior and claims, but it requires a high level of trust, sophisticated contracting, and all parties' willingness to be transparent about costs.
IPD is still relatively uncommon but is growing in use on healthcare and research facilities where early cost certainty and design innovation are both critical.
---
| Factor | DBB | DB | CMAR | IPD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of owner contracts | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 multi-party |
| Owner design control | High | Low-Moderate | High | High |
| Cost certainty at award | High (lump sum) | Moderate | High (GMP) | Shared target |
| Speed (design-to-occupy) | Slowest | Fastest | Moderate | Moderate |
| Who bears design-construction risk | Owner | Design-builder | CM (after GMP) | All parties |
---
Delivery method affects safety accountability. In DBB, the general contractor controls the means and methods of construction and is primarily responsible for jobsite safety under OSHA regulations. In DB, the single entity controls both design and field operations, so safety in design (eliminating hazards before they are built in) is more achievable. In CMAR, the CM's early involvement allows safety planning to be integrated during design—a best practice endorsed by OSHA's Prevention through Design initiative. In IPD, all parties share responsibility, which can strengthen safety culture when structured correctly.
Regardless of delivery method, OSHA requirements apply to all workers on the jobsite. Personal protective equipment (PPE), hazard communication, fall protection, and lockout/tagout procedures are governed by OSHA standards and are not negotiated away by contract language. No contract clause can transfer or waive a contractor's obligation to comply with OSHA.
---
As a construction manager or estimator, you will be asked to prepare bids, GMP proposals, or target-cost estimates depending on which delivery method applies. Understanding the method tells you how much design information will be available when you price the work, who owns the risk of design gaps, and how change orders will be handled. Getting this wrong at the start of a project is one of the most expensive mistakes in the industry.
Answer each question, then check it. Nothing is recorded; this is your own practice.
A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working. Help us build VoTechWorks. Tell us what works, what doesn’t, and what you want to learn.