🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Building & Construction › Elevator Mechanic (pre-apprentice) › Courses
Building & Construction · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional engineer or master tradesperson or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Elevator Mechanic (pre-apprentice)

9 courses · 900 clock hours · 6 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$9,395 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
9courses
54lessons
900hours
31assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons54 of 54 lesson pages writtenPractice431 practice questionsResources108 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 54 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
BLD-ELEV10-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Elevator Mechanics

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course prepares pre-apprentice elevator mechanics with the safety credentials, trade mathematics, technical literacy, and professional skills required to enter an IUEC/NEIEP apprenticeship or NAEC CET pathway. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour Construction certification and CPR/First Aid certification while building the measurement, blueprint-reading, and workplace-communication competencies that underpin every subsequent course in the program. Career readiness instruction connects classroom learning to the expectations of union and merit-shop elevator employers.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course prepares pre-apprentice elevator mechanics with the safety credentials, trade mathematics, technical literacy, and professional skills required to enter an IUEC/NEIEP apprenticeship or NAEC CET pathway. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour Construction certification and CPR/First Aid certification while building the measurement, blueprint-reading, and workplace-communication competencies that underpin every subsequent course in the program. Career readiness instruction connects classroom learning to the expectations of union and merit-shop elevator employers.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety & Elevator Worksite Hazards; Lockout/Tagout, PPE Selection & Permit-Required Confined Space (Pit Entry); First Aid, CPR & AED; Trade Mathematics for Elevator Mechanics; Technical Reading: Blueprints, Schematics & Code Tables; Digital Tools & Industry Technology; Career Readiness & Apprenticeship Pathways.

What competent looks like. Pass the OSHA 10-Hour Construction Industry certification assessment and demonstrate correct lockout/tagout and PPE selection for elevator worksites. Solve trade-math problems involving fractions, decimals, ratios, unit conversions, basic algebra, and geometry as applied to elevator components and specifications. Read and interpret elevator wiring diagrams, hydraulic schematics, and ASME A17.1 code tables at an introductory level using standard industry symbols. Use digital tools—including job-site tablets, basic CAD viewers, and OSHA electronic recordkeeping forms—to locate, record, and communicate technical information. Demonstrate professional workplace behaviors, resume preparation, and interview techniques aligned with IUEC apprenticeship application requirements. Perform hands-on CPR, AED operation, and basic first-aid procedures to current American Heart Association or Red Cross standards.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety & Elevator Worksite Hazards12theoryStudents will identify the top construction hazards (fall, struck-by, caught-in/between, electrocution) and apply OSHA 10-Hour Construction content specific to elevator hoistways, machine rooms, and pit environments.
  1. Complete all ten modules of the OSHA 10-Hour Construction Industry course using the DOL-authorized curriculum, including the elevator-specific module on hoistway fall hazards and pit entry.
  2. Case-study analysis: examine three real OSHA elevator-industry citations and identify which standards were violated, what the hazard was, and what corrective action was required.
  3. Hazard-identification walk-through of a simulated elevator machine room mockup—students tag at least eight hazards using adhesive flags and record findings on an OSHA 300-style log template.
DOL-authorized OSHA 10 Construction course materials; OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart Q (elevators/escalators) reference handout; sample OSHA 300 log; hard hats, safety glasses, steel-toed boots, high-visibility vests (worn throughout); machine room mockup or photo-realistic poster set.Students must score 70% or higher on the official OSHA 10 end-of-course assessment to receive the DOL wallet card; instructor records card issuance. Hazard-tagging exercise graded on a checklist: at least 6 of 8 target hazards correctly identified and logged.
2Lockout/Tagout, PPE Selection & Permit-Required Confined Space (Pit Entry)16labStudents will execute a complete LOTO procedure on a simulated elevator power circuit and correctly select and don PPE appropriate to machine room, hoistway, and pit environments.
  1. Step-by-step LOTO demonstration by instructor on a de-energized training panel; students then perform the full six-step LOTO sequence independently (notify, shut down, isolate, apply lock, release stored energy, verify zero energy) and have each step evaluated on a skills checklist.
  2. PPE selection exercise: given five scenario cards (pit entry, overhead work above car top, electrical testing, grinding a sill, sprinkler room adjacent), students choose correct PPE from a bin of items (hard hat, bump cap, full-face shield, safety glasses, arc-flash rated gloves, leather gloves, nitrile gloves, Class-E hard hat, fall harness) and justify each choice in writing.
  3. Confined-space awareness simulation: using an elevator pit mockup (or large wooden box set to OSHA permit-required dimensions), students complete an entry permit form, identify atmospheric testing requirements, and practice attendant/entrant communication.
Training lockout panel with multiple energy sources (electrical breaker, pneumatic valve, hydraulic valve); personal locks and tags; hasp and lockout station; PPE bin (as listed above); OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 and 1926.417 reference cards; permit-required confined-space entry permit template (OSHA form); elevator pit mockup or equivalent.Instructor evaluates each student's LOTO performance on a 10-point checklist; all 10 steps must be completed in correct order with zero critical errors (skipping verification = automatic fail). PPE selection rubric: 4 of 5 scenarios correct for pass. Confined-space permit completed without omissions.
3First Aid, CPR & AED8labStudents will perform hands-on CPR (adult and child), AED operation, and basic first-aid procedures—including bleeding control and suspected musculoskeletal injury management—to the standard required for American Heart Association or American Red Cross certification.
  1. Skills stations rotated in groups of three: adult CPR with bag-mask, child CPR, and AED scenario (manikins, training AED); each student completes a minimum of two full cycles at each station.
  2. Bleeding-control station: students apply direct pressure and, using a commercially available tourniquet trainer, apply a tourniquet to a simulated extremity wound and record application time.
  3. Elevator-specific rescue scenario tabletop: a worker is unresponsive in a machine room after electrical exposure—students verbally sequence the actions (do not touch, verify scene safety, call 911, begin care) and identify which OSHA regulation governs first-aid availability on construction sites.
Adult and child CPR manikins (one per two students); training AED units; bag-valve masks; gloves (nitrile); commercial tourniquet trainers; bandaging supplies; AHA or Red Cross course materials and certification cards.Students must pass the AHA or Red Cross CPR/AED/First Aid skills check and written test to the certifying organization's standard (typically 80% written and demonstrated competency on each skill). Instructor records certification card issuance.
4Trade Mathematics for Elevator Mechanics36theoryStudents will solve elevator trade math problems involving fractions, decimals, percentages, ratios, unit conversions, basic algebra, and applied geometry (area, volume, circumference, Pythagorean theorem) without a calculator unless specified.
  1. Daily warm-up sets of 10 problems drawn from actual elevator contexts: rope diameter conversions (inches to millimeters), car platform area calculations, rise/run ratios for ramp compliance, counterweight percentages, hydraulic cylinder volume, and gear ratios; students self-score against answer key and log errors for targeted review.
  2. Collaborative problem-solving workshop: teams of three receive a 'bid packet' for a fictional elevator modernization—they must calculate wire rope quantities needed, hydraulic fluid volume for a given cylinder bore and stroke, and electrical load in amps and kilowatts for a given motor horsepower; teams present solutions on whiteboards.
  3. Timed individual practice test (45 minutes, 30 questions, calculator-free) mirroring the math section style of apprenticeship entrance assessments; instructor reviews top five missed items as a class the following session.
Instructor-developed problem sets keyed to elevator specifications; scientific calculators (for designated calculator sessions); whiteboards and markers; rulers, tape measures, vernier calipers; Machinery's Handbook (trade reference); NEIEP pre-apprenticeship math workbook if available; graph paper.Weekly problem sets graded for accuracy: 75% correct required to remain on pace; students below threshold complete a targeted remediation set before the next lesson. Unit timed test: 75% correct (23 of 30) to pass.
5Technical Reading: Blueprints, Schematics & Code Tables28demoStudents will locate specific information in elevator construction drawings, single-line electrical schematics, hydraulic circuit diagrams, and ASME A17.1 code tables using standard industry symbols and drawing conventions.
  1. Symbol library exercise: using a set of 40 flashcards showing standard electrical, hydraulic, and elevator drawing symbols (per ANSI/IEEE and NFPA 79 conventions), students match symbol to name and application in a timed drill; repeated until each student achieves 35/40 correct.
  2. Blueprint scavenger hunt: working from a full-size (or large-format printed) elevator hoistway layout drawing, students answer a 15-question worksheet (e.g., 'What is the pit depth shown?', 'Where is the main line disconnect located?', 'What is the travel distance?') using only the drawing and its title block.
  3. Code table navigation: using a reproduction of relevant ASME A17.1 tables (pit depth, overhead clearance, car platform area minimums), students answer a 10-question worksheet referencing the table; instructor models the search process for the first two questions using a document camera.
Set of standard elevator construction drawings (hoistway plan, pit detail, machine room layout) from a public or educational source; ANSI/IEEE electrical symbol reference; NFPA 79 symbol reference; ASME A17.1 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators (current edition, library copy or instructor reproduction of non-copyrighted tables); document camera; symbol flashcard sets.Symbol drill: 35 of 40 correct for pass. Blueprint scavenger hunt: 12 of 15 correct. Code table worksheet: 8 of 10 correct. All three checks must be passed before the student advances; one re-attempt is allowed per check.
6Digital Tools & Industry Technology20practiceStudents will use job-site relevant digital tools—tablet-based drawing viewers, basic CAD file navigation, digital multimeter operation, and OSHA electronic form submission—to retrieve, record, and share technical data accurately.
  1. Tablet navigation lab: using a tablet loaded with a free CAD viewer app and a set of elevator drawings (DWG/PDF), students zoom, pan, measure the on-screen scale bar, and complete a five-question data-retrieval worksheet; they then export a marked-up PDF and email it to the instructor as if submitting a field report.
  2. Digital multimeter skills station: instructor demonstrates voltage, resistance, and continuity measurement on a wired training board; students rotate through and measure six labeled test points, record values on a digital form (Google Form or equivalent), and flag any reading outside a specified normal range.
  3. Electronic documentation exercise: students complete a mock OSHA 300A annual summary form and a sample near-miss report using an online form, then review how digital maintenance logs are used in elevator service (sample service-call record from a fictitious company is provided); class discussion on data accuracy and liability.
Tablets or laptops (one per two students) with free CAD viewer and PDF annotation app; set of elevator drawings in PDF and DWG format; digital multimeters (one per student pair); wired training boards with labeled test points; sample OSHA 300/300A forms (electronic); sample service call log template; Wi-Fi access.Tablet worksheet: 4 of 5 questions correct and marked-up PDF successfully transmitted. Multimeter station: all six readings within ±5% of instructor-measured reference values and correctly flagged. Electronic forms: instructor checks for completeness and accuracy against an answer key; all required fields correctly populated.
7Career Readiness & Apprenticeship Pathways28practiceStudents will prepare a complete IUEC/NEIEP apprenticeship application package and demonstrate professional communication skills in a mock entrance interview evaluated against trade-employer criteria.
  1. Application package workshop: students complete a sample IUEC/NEIEP apprenticeship application (using a publicly available or instructor-provided template), assemble a one-page trade resume highlighting relevant skills and credentials earned, and write a one-paragraph personal statement explaining why they want to enter the elevator trade; documents are peer-reviewed using a provided rubric before instructor review.
  2. Mock entrance interview: each student participates in a 10-minute structured interview conducted by the instructor (or an invited industry guest) using questions drawn from published IUEC/JATC apprenticeship interview guides; students receive written feedback on professionalism, articulation, and trade knowledge demonstrated.
  3. Trade landscape panel and research assignment: a one-hour guest presentation by a journeyman elevator mechanic or JATC coordinator covers union structure, wage progression, and working conditions; students then research and present (3 minutes each) one of the following credential pathways—IUEC/NEIEP apprenticeship, NAEC CET, or state elevator license—identifying eligibility requirements and exam format.
IUEC/NEIEP apprenticeship application template; resume template; interview question bank (from published JATC guidance); rubric for resume and personal statement; guest speaker (journeyman or JATC rep, arranged by program coordinator); computers for research; NAEC CET candidate handbook (naec.org); program catalog references.Application package rubric: resume, application, and personal statement each scored on a 4-point scale (content, accuracy, professionalism); minimum average of 3.0 (75%) across all three documents to pass. Mock interview: rated on a 10-point rubric (appearance, punctuality, communication, trade knowledge) by instructor; 7 of 10 required to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Safety & Regulatory Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% (38 of 50 questions correct)A 50-question multiple-choice written exam covering OSHA 10 Construction content, LOTO procedures, PPE selection, confined-space entry, and elevator-specific worksite hazards, aligned to the safety and regulatory knowledge domains of both the IUEC/NEIEP apprenticeship entry assessment and the NAEC CET exam outline. Students have 60 minutes; the exam is closed-book.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Trade Math & Technical Reading ExamWritten exam25%75% (38 of 50 questions correct)A 50-question exam combining 30 trade-math problems (fractions, unit conversions, area/volume, basic algebra, ratio/proportion in elevator contexts) and 20 blueprint/schematic/code-table interpretation questions, directly mapped to the math and drawing-interpretation sections tested on IUEC/NEIEP and NAEC CET entry credentials. Students have 75 minutes; a scientific calculator is permitted for the math section only.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Digital Tools & Career Portfolio ProjectProject25%75% average across all rubric dimensions (minimum 3 of 4 on each dimension)Students submit a professional portfolio containing: a completed apprenticeship application package (resume, application form, personal statement), a marked-up elevator drawing produced using a tablet CAD viewer, a completed digital near-miss report form, and a one-page written reflection connecting the OSHA, math, and digital skills learned to actual elevator mechanic job tasks. Each component is scored on a 4-point rubric dimension (accuracy, completeness, professionalism, trade relevance); the portfolio is reviewed by the instructor and a second evaluator where available.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Oral Defense & Skills DemonstrationOral / panel25%Pass on all four evaluated areas; any single area scored below 'meets standard' requires one remediation attemptIn a 15-minute face-to-face session, the student (1) executes the full LOTO procedure on the training panel while narrating each step for the evaluator, (2) answers five oral questions drawn randomly from the full course content (safety, math, blueprints, career), (3) demonstrates a multimeter measurement and records the result on a digital form, and (4) explains how the credentials earned in this course (OSHA 10, CPR/First Aid) connect to the IUEC/NEIEP apprenticeship entry and NAEC CET requirements. Evaluated by the instructor on a four-area rubric: procedural accuracy, technical communication, tool competency, and credential awareness.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
BLD-ELEV10-02 Trade course

Hydraulic Elevator Systems

88 hr · $1,215 COMPLIMENTARY

This course covers the principles, components, installation practices, and maintenance procedures for hydraulic elevator systems used in low-rise commercial and residential buildings. Students learn fluid power fundamentals, hydraulic unit operation, jack and cylinder mechanics, piping, valves, and troubleshooting methods aligned with industry standards. Lesson content maps directly to NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry competencies and NAEC CET exam domains covering hydraulic system knowledge and safe work practices.

Outcomes
Course text

This course covers the principles, components, installation practices, and maintenance procedures for hydraulic elevator systems used in low-rise commercial and residential buildings. Students learn fluid power fundamentals, hydraulic unit operation, jack and cylinder mechanics, piping, valves, and troubleshooting methods aligned with industry standards. Lesson content maps directly to NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry competencies and NAEC CET exam domains covering hydraulic system knowledge and safe work practices.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Fluid Power Fundamentals and Pascal's Law; Hydraulic System Components and Circuit Layout; Hydraulic Jack and Cylinder Types, Installation Principles; Lockout/Tagout and PPE for Hydraulic Elevator Work; Hydraulic Valve Operation and Adjustment; Fluid Maintenance: Oil, Filters, and Environmental Compliance; Troubleshooting Hydraulic Elevator Faults.

What competent looks like. Explain the principles of fluid power and Pascal's Law as applied to hydraulic elevator systems, including pressure, flow, and force relationships. Identify and describe the function of all major hydraulic elevator components, including the power unit, control valve, cylinder, jack assembly, and piping. Read and interpret hydraulic schematic diagrams and manufacturer wiring and piping diagrams to trace system circuits. Perform pre-operation inspections, basic fluid level checks, filter changes, and documented maintenance tasks on a hydraulic elevator power unit following manufacturer procedures and ASME A17.1 general requirements. Diagnose common hydraulic elevator faults—including slow descent, excessive pressure, and leaking packing—using systematic troubleshooting procedures and select the correct corrective action. Apply lockout/tagout procedures, PPE selection, and confined-space awareness specific to hydraulic elevator pit work before performing any hands-on task.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Fluid Power Fundamentals and Pascal's Law10theoryStudents will explain Pascal's Law and calculate pressure, force, and area relationships in hydraulic circuits using trade-relevant examples.
  1. Lecture and guided notes on Pascal's Law, pressure (PSI), flow rate (GPM), and how these govern elevator car movement; students complete a worksheet calculating jack load, required pressure, and cylinder bore for three sample car/capacity scenarios.
  2. Small-group analysis of a cross-section diagram of a holeless in-ground and above-ground hydraulic elevator, labeling fluid path from tank through pump, valve, and jack during up and down travel, then presenting findings to the class.
  3. Paired problem-solving activity: given a set of elevator load and cylinder data cards, students calculate working pressure and verify results against an instructor answer key, identifying any calculation errors and correcting them.
Whiteboard, Pascal's Law reference handout, trade math worksheets, hydraulic elevator cross-section diagrams (in-ground and holeless), scientific calculators, NEIEP Hydraulics Study Guide (student edition)Graded worksheet: student correctly solves at least 8 of 10 pressure/force/area problems; pass mark 80%.
2Hydraulic System Components and Circuit Layout14demoStudents will identify every major component of a hydraulic elevator power unit and piping circuit, state its function, and trace the fluid path on a schematic diagram.
  1. Instructor-led walkthrough of a real hydraulic power unit on the shop floor, naming each component (motor, pump, reservoir, strainer, check valve, control valve, pressure-relief valve, manual lowering valve, muffler, oil-line piping) and demonstrating safe static inspection before energizing.
  2. Students individually match 20 component labels to a blank hydraulic schematic using the power unit as reference, then compare with a partner and reconcile differences against the answer overlay projected on screen.
  3. Whole-class reading exercise: instructor distributes a manufacturer installation manual excerpt; students locate component specifications, torque values, and fluid type requirements, then record findings in their lab notebooks for later reference during lab lessons.
Full hydraulic power unit (shop trainer unit, de-energized), hydraulic schematic diagrams, component-label card set, manufacturer installation manual excerpt, lab notebooks, NEIEP Hydraulics Study GuideComponent identification quiz: student correctly labels at least 18 of 20 components on a blank schematic; pass mark 90%.
3Hydraulic Jack and Cylinder Types, Installation Principles12theoryStudents will compare in-ground, above-ground, and holeless jack configurations, describe installation clearance requirements, and explain how jack seals and packing prevent fluid loss.
  1. Illustrated lecture covering single-bottom, twin-post holeless, and roped-hydraulic jack types; students complete a comparison table listing application, pit depth requirement, and key maintenance point for each type.
  2. Instructor demonstrates packing gland components on a cut-away cylinder section, showing O-ring, backup ring, and wiper seal arrangement; students sketch the seal stack in their lab notebooks and annotate each part's function.
  3. Case-study discussion: instructor presents three real-world jack-leak scenarios with photographs; student teams diagnose the seal failure type (wiper, O-ring, or packing wear), propose the corrective action, and justify their reasoning citing the component functions covered in lecture.
Cut-away cylinder/jack section, seal component display board, jack-type illustration handout, comparison table worksheet, lab notebooks, manufacturer seal-kit reference sheetComparison table and seal sketch reviewed by instructor; student must correctly complete all entries with no more than one factual error; pass mark 80% accuracy on table.
4Lockout/Tagout and PPE for Hydraulic Elevator Work10labStudents will execute a full lockout/tagout sequence on the hydraulic elevator trainer, select correct PPE for pit work, and verify zero-energy state before any hands-on maintenance task.
  1. Instructor demonstrates the complete LOTO sequence on the shop hydraulic trainer: identify energy sources (electrical and stored hydraulic pressure), shut down pump motor, open disconnect, apply personal lock, release stored pressure via manual lowering valve, verify zero-pressure with gauge, and tag out; students observe and record each step in sequence on a LOTO checklist form.
  2. Each student performs the full LOTO procedure independently on the trainer while the instructor observes and uses a standardized checklist to evaluate every step; students also verbally state which PPE items (safety glasses, chemical-resistant gloves, steel-toed boots, hearing protection when pump is running) apply to each phase of the task.
  3. Scenario drill: instructor introduces a deliberate error (lock not applied, pressure not bled) and asks students to identify the unsafe condition and correct it before proceeding, reinforcing recognition skills under a simulated field condition.
Hydraulic elevator shop trainer, personal locks and tags (one per student), LOTO checklist forms, pressure gauge on power unit, PPE set (safety glasses, chemical-resistant gloves, steel-toed boots, hearing protection), OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 reference cardInstructor LOTO skills checklist: student completes every required step in correct sequence with no skipped steps and states correct PPE for each phase; all critical safety steps must be marked pass — zero tolerance for missed energy-isolation steps.
5Hydraulic Valve Operation and Adjustment14labStudents will adjust pressure-relief, lowering, and leveling valve settings on the shop trainer to achieve specified car performance within acceptable tolerance and document each adjustment.
  1. Instructor demonstrates pressure-relief valve adjustment procedure: connect calibrated gauge, start pump, read baseline pressure, adjust the relief screw incrementally, and record before/after values; students observe proper tool selection (slotted screwdriver vs. hex key depending on valve type) and the importance of small incremental turns.
  2. Student pairs take turns adjusting the control valve up-speed and down-speed needle valves on the trainer, measuring travel time over a fixed distance with a stopwatch, recording data in a valve-adjustment log, and re-adjusting until car speed is within the target range specified on the lab sheet; each adjustment and result is logged with timestamp.
  3. Students practice operating the manual emergency lowering valve with the power unit locked out, lowering the car platform slowly to the bottom landing, then documenting the procedure steps and fluid level change in their lab logs—simulating a power-failure rescue scenario.
Hydraulic elevator shop trainer with movable car platform, calibrated pressure gauges, stopwatch, hex key and screwdriver set, valve-adjustment log forms, lab notebooks, manufacturer control-valve specification sheetValve-adjustment log reviewed by instructor; car up-speed and down-speed must be within ±10% of target specification and all pressure readings documented correctly; pass mark 80% of data entries accurate.
6Fluid Maintenance: Oil, Filters, and Environmental Compliance14practiceStudents will perform a complete hydraulic fluid service—oil level check, filter replacement, and fluid sample collection—following manufacturer procedures and applicable environmental regulations for hydraulic oil handling and disposal.
  1. Instructor explains hydraulic fluid types used in elevators (petroleum-based and biodegradable/fire-resistant options), viscosity grades, contamination indicators (color, odor, cloudiness), and relevant environmental regulations governing oil disposal; students complete a fluid-selection decision chart for three given installation scenarios (indoor, outdoor, and near a water source).
  2. Students perform a step-by-step fluid service on the trainer unit: check reservoir level via sight glass, compare fluid sample to a clean reference vial, replace the return-line filter element using proper containment and gloves, and top off with specified fluid type while avoiding overfill; all steps are recorded on a maintenance log form.
  3. Role-play exercise: one student acts as the elevator mechanic completing a fluid service, another acts as the site supervisor reviewing documentation; they swap roles after completion, critiquing each other's log entries for completeness, accuracy, and regulatory compliance notes (proper waste container labeled, quantity recorded).
Hydraulic elevator shop trainer, clean and contaminated fluid sample vials, replacement filter elements, drain pan, funnels, chemical-resistant gloves, safety glasses, fluid-type reference chart, maintenance log forms, waste oil container with proper labelingMaintenance log reviewed by instructor: all required entries present and accurate (fluid level before/after, filter part number, fluid type added, quantity, waste disposal notation); pass mark 80% of checklist items completed correctly.
7Troubleshooting Hydraulic Elevator Faults14labStudents will diagnose at least four instructor-introduced hydraulic elevator malfunctions using a systematic fault-isolation procedure and correctly identify the defective component or adjustment in each case.
  1. Instructor presents a structured troubleshooting methodology (symptom → possible causes → isolation test → confirm → correct) using a fault-tree diagram for hydraulic elevators; students practice applying the method to three written fault scenarios before moving to the live trainer.
  2. Instructor introduces faults on the shop trainer one at a time (e.g., slow up-travel due to low relief-valve setting, excessive down-drift due to worn check valve, failure to level due to mis-adjusted lowering valve) without telling students which fault is active; student pairs follow the fault-tree, perform safe tests with LOTO applied where required, identify the fault, state the corrective action, and log findings.
  3. Each student individually writes a fault report for two of the diagnosed faults, using trade-standard terminology to describe symptom, root cause, corrective action taken, and confirmation test result—mirroring the documentation format used in field service records.
Hydraulic elevator shop trainer (with instructor-accessible fault-introduction points), fault-tree diagram handout, personal locks and tags, pressure gauges, fault-report forms, NEIEP Hydraulics Study Guide, lab notebooksFault report graded by instructor: student correctly identifies fault and root cause for at least 3 of 4 introduced faults and documents corrective action with proper terminology; pass mark 75% of faults correctly diagnosed and documented.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Hydraulic Systems Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 questions)A 50-question written exam covering fluid power principles, Pascal's Law calculations, component identification and function, hydraulic circuit operation, valve types, fluid maintenance, and troubleshooting theory, mapped to NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry competency areas and NAEC CET hydraulic system knowledge domains. Questions include multiple choice, labeled-diagram identification, and short calculation problems.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Hydraulic Power Unit Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All critical safety steps marked pass; overall score 80% or higher on evaluation rubricThe student performs a complete power-unit service sequence on the shop trainer: executes LOTO, checks and documents fluid condition, replaces the filter, adjusts relief-valve pressure to a specified target (verified by calibrated gauge), adjusts control-valve speed settings to within tolerance, and restores the unit to normal operation—evaluated by instructor using a standardized rubric. Any missed LOTO step or unsafe act results in immediate failure and a required re-attempt.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Log PortfolioLog15%80% of required entries completed accurately across all lab lessons; no missing LOTO or safety documentationStudents submit the complete lab notebook and log forms accumulated across all lab and practice lessons, including valve-adjustment logs, fluid-service records, LOTO checklists, and fault reports; the instructor evaluates entries for accuracy, completeness, correct use of trade terminology, and evidence of systematic troubleshooting process. Missing or falsified safety documentation is an automatic fail requiring remediation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Hydraulic Pit Safety Walk-Through CheckSafety audit15%100% pass rate on all critical safety behaviors; zero unsafe acts observedBefore the final skills demonstration, the instructor conducts a focused safety observation in which the student verbally identifies all energy sources on the trainer, selects and dons correct PPE without prompting, states the confined-space hazard awareness requirements relevant to pit entry, and demonstrates correct LOTO application and verification; this assessment is scored pass/fail on each critical item with no partial credit, and any missed item requires re-instruction and re-evaluation before the student may proceed to the skills demonstration.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BLD-ELEV10-03 Trade course

Traction Elevator Systems

88 hr · $1,215 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn the mechanical, electrical, and safety fundamentals of traction elevator systems, including machine room equipment, suspension ropes, safeties, buffers, and car and counterweight assemblies. Instruction moves from component identification through hands-on inspection and adjustment tasks performed on training rigs and industry-standard equipment. Lesson content maps directly to NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry competencies and NAEC CET exam domains covering traction equipment and ASME A17.1 safety code principles.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn the mechanical, electrical, and safety fundamentals of traction elevator systems, including machine room equipment, suspension ropes, safeties, buffers, and car and counterweight assemblies. Instruction moves from component identification through hands-on inspection and adjustment tasks performed on training rigs and industry-standard equipment. Lesson content maps directly to NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry competencies and NAEC CET exam domains covering traction equipment and ASME A17.1 safety code principles.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Traction System Overview and Machine Room Equipment; Wire Rope: Construction, Selection, and Inspection; Sheaves, Roping Configurations, and Counterweighting; Guide Rails, Car Frame, Platform, and Counterweight Assembly; Safeties, Governors, and Overspeed Protection; Buffers, Pit Equipment, and Terminal Stopping Devices; Integrated Traction System Inspection and LOTO Field Practice.

What competent looks like. Identify and describe the function of all major components of a geared and gearless traction elevator system, including the machine, sheaves, ropes, car frame, counterweight, guide rails, safeties, and buffers. Calculate rope tension, counterweighting ratios, and mechanical advantage using trade math appropriate to traction system specifications. Inspect wire rope assemblies for wear, broken wires, and proper lubrication in accordance with manufacturer guidelines and ASME A17.1 general requirements. Demonstrate correct lockout/tagout and personal protective equipment procedures before performing any traction system inspection or adjustment task. Read and interpret traction elevator pit, machine room, and hoistway drawings, including parts lists and wiring legends. Explain how governor-actuated safeties, overspeed protection, and terminal stopping devices protect passengers in a traction system.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Traction System Overview and Machine Room Equipment12theoryStudents will correctly identify and state the function of each major traction elevator component — drive machine, motor, brake, primary and secondary sheaves, deflector sheave, and machine room controls — using proper trade terminology.
  1. Illustrated lecture with labeled cross-section diagrams of geared worm-drive and gearless (PMC and conventional) traction machines; students annotate blank diagrams and compare gear ratios.
  2. Component sorting exercise: given a set of unlabeled photographs of machine room equipment, students write the component name and one-sentence function for each, then peer-review answers against the NEIEP Traction Module reference.
  3. Small-group discussion comparing geared versus gearless machines: students list three application differences (rise, speed, load) and present findings to the class.
NEIEP Traction Elevator Technology module, manufacturer cut-sheet drawings for at least one geared and one gearless machine, whiteboard, projector, blank component-ID worksheetsComponent-ID quiz of 25 items (components and functions); pass mark 80 percent.
2Wire Rope: Construction, Selection, and Inspection14demoStudents will demonstrate how to inspect a wire rope assembly for broken wires, corrosion, kinking, and worn sections, and will record findings on a standardized inspection form in accordance with ASME A17.1 general rope requirements.
  1. Instructor demonstration on sample rope sections showing strand lay, core types (IWRC vs. fiber core), and common defects; students handle samples and locate defects with a magnifying loupe.
  2. Guided inspection walk-through on the program's traction training rig: instructor shows rope attachment sockets, shackles, and hitch plates, and students practice measuring rope diameter with a caliper at three points along the rope.
  3. Students complete a rope inspection log for three pre-staged rope samples (one serviceable, one marginal, one reject condition), determine accept/reject status, and justify decisions citing the relevant code requirement in plain language.
Sample wire rope sections (various conditions), 6-inch calipers, magnifying loupes, rope inspection log forms, ASME A17.1 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators (current edition), traction training rigInstructor evaluates completed rope inspection logs; student must correctly accept/reject all three samples and record accurate measurements — pass requires correct disposition on all three samples and no blank measurement fields.
3Sheaves, Roping Configurations, and Counterweighting12theoryStudents will calculate counterweight mass, traction ratio, and rope tension for a given car capacity and roping arrangement using the formulas taught in the course.
  1. Lecture on 1:1 and 2:1 roping configurations with force diagrams; students trace rope paths on hoistway drawings and label all sheaves.
  2. Math workshop: students complete a six-problem worksheet calculating counterweight (car weight plus a percentage of rated load per industry practice), rope pull, and safety factor; instructor reviews each calculation step.
  3. Partner activity: given a spec sheet for a hypothetical installation, each pair determines the correct roping arrangement, counterweight specification, and machine capacity, then presents a one-page summary.
Hoistway layout drawings, roping configuration diagrams, scientific calculators, counterweight calculation worksheets, NEIEP Traction module reference tablesSix-problem math quiz on counterweighting and rope tension; pass mark 80 percent with all formulas set up correctly and units labeled.
4Guide Rails, Car Frame, Platform, and Counterweight Assembly14labStudents will measure rail alignment using a plumb bob and feeler gauges, identify car frame members and their functions, and correctly torque a fishplate bolt to specification on a training rail section.
  1. Lab station rotation: at Station 1 students identify car frame components (uprights, crosshead, safety plank, isolator pads) on a cutaway display model; at Station 2 they torque fishplate bolts on a bench-mounted rail section using a calibrated torque wrench and record values; at Station 3 they check a pre-misaligned rail with a plumb bob and feeler gauge and calculate deviation.
  2. Guided practice: students use a steel tape and level to check car-to-rail clearance (guide shoe to rail) on the training rig, record measurements, and compare to manufacturer tolerance.
  3. Group exercise: disassemble and reassemble a roller guide shoe, identify each part, clean the housing, and reinstall with correct fastener torque.
Training traction rig with guide rails, calibrated torque wrench set, feeler gauges, plumb bobs, steel tape measures, spirit level, roller guide shoe assembly, fishplate bolt specimens, NEIEP Traction moduleInstructor observes torque procedure and checks recorded values against specification; feeler gauge reading must be within ±0.005 inch of instructor measurement; pass requires all three station tasks completed correctly with no unsafe acts.
5Safeties, Governors, and Overspeed Protection14demoStudents will explain the sequence of operation from governor overspeed trip through safety jaw engagement to car arrest, and will identify the governor trip speed setting and the conditions that require a full-load safety test.
  1. Instructor demonstration on a governor display unit: trip mechanism is manually actuated while students observe rope-grip and switch actuation; students sketch the sequence in their lab notebooks with labeled arrows.
  2. Analysis exercise: students read a manufacturer's governor data sheet, identify the trip speed, the overspeed switch setting, and the reset procedure, then answer a structured question set.
  3. Scenario-based group work: given three hypothetical governor condition reports (one with worn jaws, one with wrong trip speed, one compliant), groups write a corrective action recommendation and present it, citing ASME A17.1 requirements in general terms.
Governor display or training unit, manufacturer data sheet for at least one governor model, ASME A17.1 (current edition), lab notebooks, scenario handoutsOral check: instructor asks each student to narrate the overspeed-to-safety-engagement sequence without notes; student must identify all five steps in correct order — pass requires all five steps correct.
6Buffers, Pit Equipment, and Terminal Stopping Devices10labStudents will identify oil and spring buffer types, verify minimum oil level on a hydraulic buffer specimen, and trace the wiring path of upper and lower terminal stopping devices on a training rig drawing.
  1. Pit familiarization on training rig (lockout/tagout applied before entry): students locate car and counterweight buffers, pit ladder, pit stop switch, pit lighting, and sump pit, recording each item on a pit inspection checklist.
  2. Buffer lab: students check oil level on a training oil buffer using the sight glass, compare to the minimum mark, and fill to specification using the correct hydraulic fluid; spring buffer compression is measured and compared to manufacturer data.
  3. Drawing trace exercise: using a simplified hoistway wiring diagram, students highlight the normal terminal slowdown switch (NTS) and final limit switch circuits, describe their function, and answer five comprehension questions.
Training traction rig with pit access, oil buffer specimen with sight glass, hydraulic elevator buffer oil (correct specification), measuring cup, spring buffer specimen, hoistway wiring diagram, pit inspection checklist, ASME A17.1 (current edition)Completed pit inspection checklist reviewed by instructor; oil fill must be within manufacturer's acceptable range verified by sight glass; drawing trace must correctly identify both circuits — pass requires checklist fully completed, oil level correct, and both circuits correctly identified.
7Integrated Traction System Inspection and LOTO Field Practice12practiceStudents will perform a complete pre-operation inspection of the training traction elevator from machine room through pit, applying correct lockout/tagout at each step and completing all documentation without prompting.
  1. Full lockout/tagout exercise: each student individually isolates machine room power (main line disconnect and control power) using the program's LOTO station, applies personal lock and tag, verifies zero energy by attempting normal operation, and documents the procedure on a LOTO log sheet.
  2. Systematic inspection run: working from a structured checklist, students inspect machine, brake, sheave grooves, rope condition, car frame, guide shoes, safeties, governor, pit equipment, and buffers, recording observations and flagging any pre-staged defects planted by the instructor.
  3. Defect report and debrief: students write a brief deficiency report for each flagged item found, state the corrective action required, and participate in an instructor-led debrief reviewing any missed items and reinforcing code-based justification.
Training traction rig (full system), personal LOTO locks and tags, LOTO log sheets, comprehensive inspection checklist, deficiency report form, ASME A17.1 (current edition), NEIEP Traction moduleInstructor scores LOTO log and inspection checklist; student must correctly identify at least four of five planted defects, complete LOTO documentation with no missing fields, and commit zero unsafe acts — any unsafe act is an automatic fail requiring repeat.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Traction Systems Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75 percent correct (38 of 50 questions)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer written exam covering all lesson content: machine types, roping and counterweighting, rope inspection criteria, guide rail systems, safeties and governors, buffers, and terminal stopping devices. Questions are aligned to NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry competency areas and NAEC CET traction equipment exam domains.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Traction System Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass all critical safety items with no unsafe acts; score at least 80 percent on the full rubricEach student performs a timed, unsupported inspection of the training traction elevator — machine room, hoistway, and pit — using the course checklist, applying LOTO correctly, and producing a written deficiency report. The instructor scores the performance using a structured rubric with critical (safety) and non-critical items; any unsafe act or LOTO failure requires a full repeat attempt.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Inspection Log PortfolioLog15%All seven lesson logs submitted; average score of 80 percent across rubric criteriaStudents maintain a running lab log throughout the course, recording measurements, observations, accept/reject decisions, and LOTO documentation for each lab and practice lesson. The complete portfolio is submitted at course end and reviewed for accuracy of data, correct use of units, legibility, and proper identification of defects and corrective actions.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety Compliance CheckSafety audit15%100 percent on all critical safety behaviors; zero tolerance for LOTO violationsThe instructor conducts a dedicated LOTO and PPE observation during Lesson 7 and spot-checks during labs, using a binary (compliant/non-compliant) checklist covering proper PPE selection and wear, LOTO application and verification steps, pit entry protocol, and prohibition of bypassing safety devices. Any single critical violation results in immediate stop, remediation, and a required repeat observation before the student may continue lab work.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BLD-ELEV10-04 Trade course

Elevator Controls: Circuits, Controllers, and Signal Systems

87 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

Students develop a working knowledge of the electrical control systems that govern modern elevator operation, including relay logic, solid-state controllers, microprocessor-based dispatching, and safety circuits. Instruction moves from fundamental electrical theory through hands-on wiring, troubleshooting, and documentation of both hydraulic and traction control panels. Content maps directly to the electrical and controls competency areas tested by the NEIEP/IUEC entry assessment and the NAEC CET exam.

Outcomes
Course text

Students develop a working knowledge of the electrical control systems that govern modern elevator operation, including relay logic, solid-state controllers, microprocessor-based dispatching, and safety circuits. Instruction moves from fundamental electrical theory through hands-on wiring, troubleshooting, and documentation of both hydraulic and traction control panels. Content maps directly to the electrical and controls competency areas tested by the NEIEP/IUEC entry assessment and the NAEC CET exam.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Electrical Fundamentals and Control Vocabulary for Elevator Systems; Relay Logic and Ladder Diagram Interpretation; Elevator Safety Circuits: Devices, Sequence, and Verification; Solid-State Drives and Microprocessor-Based Controllers; Test Instruments and Measurement Procedures on Control Circuits; Systematic Troubleshooting of Elevator Control Faults; Wiring, Documentation, and Controls Integration Project.

What competent looks like. Read and interpret elevator control schematic diagrams, wiring diagrams, and ladder logic using industry-standard symbols and notation. Identify and describe the function of key control components—relays, contactors, solid-state drives, PLCs, and safety-circuit elements—found in both hydraulic and traction elevator controllers. Trace and verify a complete elevator safety circuit, confirming that each device opens the circuit under its intended fault condition. Apply lockout/tagout procedures and appropriate PPE before performing any wiring, measurement, or inspection task on a live or de-energized controller. Use a digital multimeter and clamp meter to measure voltage, current, resistance, and continuity in elevator control circuits and record findings in a structured lab log. Diagnose simulated controller faults by applying a systematic troubleshooting process and document root cause and corrective action in writing.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Electrical Fundamentals and Control Vocabulary for Elevator Systems12theoryStudents will explain Ohm's Law, series and parallel circuit behavior, and the meaning of at least 20 standard elevator control schematic symbols accurately enough to pass a written symbol-identification quiz at 80% or higher.
  1. Instructor-led lecture using NEIEP Module 1 and NFPA 70 reference materials; students take guided notes on voltage, current, resistance, power, AC vs. DC, and single-phase vs. three-phase supply as they apply to elevator machine rooms.
  2. Symbol-matching card sort: each student receives a set of 30 cards (one side shows the schematic symbol, the other shows the component name) and practices until they can match all 30 without error; pairs quiz each other and record scores.
  3. Short written exercises: students redraw three simple series-parallel circuits from written descriptions, calculate missing values using Ohm's Law, and label each component with its correct schematic symbol before exchanging papers for peer review.
NEIEP Electrical and Controls curriculum materials, NFPA 70 (National Electrical Code) reference copy, whiteboard/projector, schematic symbol card sets, graph paper, scientific calculatorsSymbol-identification quiz of 25 items (multiple-choice and matching) plus three Ohm's Law calculation problems; pass = 80% combined score; instructor reviews any missed symbols individually before next lesson.
2Relay Logic and Ladder Diagram Interpretation13demoStudents will correctly trace the current path through a multi-rung relay ladder diagram, predict which output coils energize under a given set of input conditions, and verify their predictions on a demonstration relay panel.
  1. Instructor demonstrates a working relay demonstration panel (eight relays, indicator lamps, push-buttons) while projecting the matching ladder diagram; students follow the current path on printed diagrams as each rung is energized, marking normally-open and normally-closed contacts with colored pencils.
  2. Guided prediction exercise: instructor presents six 'what-if' scenarios (e.g., 'Contact 2CR opens — which lamps stay on?'); students write predictions on a worksheet before the instructor activates the condition on the panel so students can verify.
  3. Paired practice on the demo panel: one student reads rungs aloud while the partner operates push-buttons; they swap roles and together document every relay state for two complete call-and-dispatch sequences in a structured observation form.
Relay demonstration panel with labeled terminals, matching printed ladder diagrams, colored pencils, NEIEP relay logic reference sheets, structured observation formsExit-ticket ladder trace: instructor presents an unseen four-rung ladder diagram and a specified input state; student must identify all energized coils and explain one complete current path in writing; pass = all coils correctly identified plus a logically coherent written trace.
3Elevator Safety Circuits: Devices, Sequence, and Verification14labStudents will identify every required safety-circuit device on a trainer or cutaway controller, trace the series safety chain in the correct sequence, and demonstrate that removing one simulated device opens the circuit and prevents car movement.
  1. Instructor walk-through of a full-size controller trainer or cutaway panel; students label a blank safety-circuit diagram with device names (door locks, limit switches, governor switch, safety-circuit contactor, etc.) as each is pointed out, cross-referencing ASME A17.1 safety-circuit requirements discussed at a general level.
  2. Small-group lab: each group uses a multimeter to verify continuity through each safety-circuit device on the trainer while the circuit is de-energized under lockout/tagout; groups record measured resistance at each device junction on a lab log template.
  3. Fault-simulation exercise: instructor opens one device in the safety chain (simulated by a toggle switch); students must identify the open point using voltage testing (panel energized only after LOTO is released and instructor supervises), document the finding, and explain in writing why that device is required.
Full-size elevator controller trainer or cutaway panel, digital multimeters, LOTO station (personal locks, hasps, tags), NEIEP safety-circuit reference diagram, lab log templates, ASME A17.1 safety code (general reference copy)Completed and accurate lab log with continuity readings at all required test points; student must also demonstrate, with the instructor observing, the correct LOTO sequence before touching any terminal — failure to apply LOTO is an automatic unsatisfactory for the session regardless of electrical results; pass = accurate log + correct LOTO procedure.
4Solid-State Drives and Microprocessor-Based Controllers12theoryStudents will describe how a variable-voltage variable-frequency (VVVF) drive regulates motor speed and explain the role of the microprocessor controller in dispatching, door timing, and fault logging.
  1. Lecture with manufacturer installation and programming manuals (generic examples, not a specific proprietary product) covering drive input/output terminals, parameter settings relevant to acceleration and deceleration profiles, and how the drive communicates with the main controller board.
  2. Annotated diagram activity: students are given a block diagram of a microprocessor controller system (processor board, I/O boards, drive interface, serial bus) and must write a one-sentence function description for each block, then arrange them in the order of a complete up-call sequence.
  3. Case-study discussion: instructor presents two real-world controller fault codes (using generic manufacturer documentation) and the class works through possible causes using a structured decision-tree worksheet, practicing the logic used by mechanics during service calls.
NEIEP solid-state drives and microprocessor controller reference materials, sample manufacturer installation manuals (redacted proprietary data), block diagram handouts, decision-tree worksheets, projectorShort written quiz of 15 questions covering VVVF drive purpose, parameter types, and controller board functions; students also label an unlabeled block diagram; pass = 80% on the combined quiz and diagram.
5Test Instruments and Measurement Procedures on Control Circuits12practiceStudents will correctly select meter function and range, then measure AC/DC voltage, current (using a clamp meter), resistance, and continuity at designated test points on a powered trainer circuit without causing a fault or shorting any terminal.
  1. Instructor demonstration of proper multimeter and clamp-meter technique at the controller trainer: selecting correct function, range, and lead placement for each measurement type; students observe and record the procedure on a technique checklist.
  2. Structured measurement rotation: students rotate in pairs through five labeled test stations on the trainer, each requiring a different measurement type; at each station they record expected value (from the wiring diagram), measured value, and pass/fail against a tolerance stated on the station card.
  3. Interpretation exercise: students receive a table of six abnormal readings (e.g., unexpected voltage at a coil terminal, higher-than-normal resistance across a contact) and must write a one-sentence diagnosis for each based on the wiring diagram and measurement theory covered.
Digital multimeters (one per pair), clamp meters, controller trainer, measurement station cards with tolerance specs, technique checklists, wiring diagrams matching the trainerInstructor observes each student performing at least two unsupervised measurements (one voltage, one resistance); checks for correct lead placement, range selection, and reading recording; pass = all four measurement types performed correctly with readings within ±5% of instructor-verified values and no unsafe probing technique.
6Systematic Troubleshooting of Elevator Control Faults13labStudents will apply a documented six-step troubleshooting process to diagnose and describe the corrective action for at least four simulated controller faults, achieving a correct root-cause identification on a minimum of three of the four.
  1. Instructor introduces and posts the six-step process (define the symptom, gather information, identify possible causes, test most probable cause, repair or recommend repair, verify and document); class applies it together to one instructor-led fault scenario on the trainer before students work independently.
  2. Independent fault-diagnosis lab: instructor has pre-set four hidden faults in the trainer controller (e.g., an open door-lock circuit, a mis-wired relay coil, a failed indicator lamp, a disconnected limit switch); students work individually to diagnose each fault using LOTO where required, wiring diagrams, and their meters, recording every test step in a lab log.
  3. Group debrief: each student presents one fault diagnosis to the class, explains the test steps taken, and states the root cause; peers and instructor provide structured feedback using a rubric focused on logical test sequence, safety compliance, and accuracy of diagnosis.
Controller trainer with instructor-accessible fault switches, digital multimeters, LOTO station, wiring diagrams, six-step troubleshooting reference card, lab log forms, presentation rubricCompleted fault-diagnosis lab log reviewed by instructor; pass = correct root-cause identification for at least 3 of 4 faults, all LOTO steps documented and observed as correctly performed for each energized-circuit test, and test steps recorded in logical order.
7Wiring, Documentation, and Controls Integration Project11labStudents will wire a partial elevator control sub-circuit from a provided schematic, verify correct operation with a meter and functional test, then produce a complete as-built wiring diagram and a written fault-clearance report to professional documentation standards.
  1. Each student receives a schematic for a simplified control sub-circuit (e.g., door-operator circuit with safety interlock and indicator lamp) and a terminal strip with labeled components; they wire the circuit applying LOTO on the power supply until the instructor approves the wiring before energizing.
  2. Functional test: after instructor approval to energize, student tests each sub-circuit function against an acceptance checklist (correct lamp indication, interlock opens circuit when door contact is opened, coil energizes on correct input); any discrepancy must be diagnosed and corrected before sign-off.
  3. Documentation deliverable: student produces a hand-drawn as-built wiring diagram reflecting any field changes from the original schematic, plus a one-page fault-clearance report that records every test result, any fault found, corrective action taken, and a final verification statement — formatted to match industry field-report conventions shown in NEIEP reference materials.
Wiring schematics for the sub-circuit, terminal strip assemblies with pre-mounted components, assorted wire (correct gauge per schematic), wire strippers, screwdrivers, multimeters, LOTO station, acceptance checklists, graph paper for as-built diagram, NEIEP documentation format referenceInstructor inspects completed wiring for correct termination, wire routing, and absence of uninsulated conductors before energizing; functional test must pass all checklist items; as-built diagram must match actual wiring with no missing connections; written report must include all required sections — pass = wiring approved, all functional checks passed, diagram accurate, report complete and legible.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Controls Written Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher on a 60-item examA proctored 60-item exam (multiple-choice and short-answer) covering electrical fundamentals, relay logic, safety-circuit device identification and sequence, VVVF drive principles, and microprocessor controller functions; items are mapped to the electrical/controls competency areas of both the NEIEP/IUEC entry assessment and the NAEC CET exam blueprint so students can gauge readiness for credentialing.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Controller Troubleshooting Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Correct diagnosis of at least 3 of 4 faults; LOTO must be performed correctly on every step or the attempt is scored unsatisfactory regardless of diagnostic accuracyInstructor presents the student with a trainer controller containing four pre-set, unknown faults; the student has 45 minutes to apply the six-step troubleshooting process, use test instruments safely, and verbally explain each diagnosis to the instructor — simulating the field performance expected of an apprentice elevator mechanic.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Controls Lab Log PortfolioLog15%All five required lab log entries submitted; each entry must include correct data, LOTO documentation, and the written analysis section — any entry missing safety documentation is returned for revision before the portfolio is scored; overall portfolio score of 75% on the rubricStudents compile and submit the lab log entries completed during the safety-circuit, fault-diagnosis, measurement, and integration-project lab sessions; each entry is evaluated on accuracy of recorded data, logical test sequence, completeness of analysis, and evidence of correct LOTO application, using a standard rubric aligned to industry field-documentation expectations.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
LOTO and PPE Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% of required LOTO steps performed correctly and in sequence with no coaching; any critical error (energized work without lock applied, incorrect PPE for the voltage level present) results in an immediate unsatisfactory and a required remediation session before the student may continue lab workInstructor conducts an unannounced observed check during one of the lab sessions in which the student must de-energize the controller trainer, apply a personal lock and tag, verify absence of voltage at the designated test points, and don the correct PPE — evaluated against a binary pass/fail checklist drawn from OSHA lockout/tagout requirements and NFPA 70E electrical safety guidance.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BLD-ELEV10-05 Trade course

ASME A17.1 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators

87 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

This course provides a systematic study of the ASME A17.1/CSA B44 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators as it applies to pre-apprentice elevator mechanics, covering code organization, key requirements for traction and hydraulic elevators, inspection and testing procedures, and safety devices mandated by the code. Students learn to locate, interpret, and apply code requirements to real equipment and job-site scenarios, building the technical literacy required for both the NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry process and the NAEC CET examination. Emphasis is placed on understanding why each requirement exists, connecting code language to physical components and safe work practices.

Outcomes
Course text

This course provides a systematic study of the ASME A17.1/CSA B44 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators as it applies to pre-apprentice elevator mechanics, covering code organization, key requirements for traction and hydraulic elevators, inspection and testing procedures, and safety devices mandated by the code. Students learn to locate, interpret, and apply code requirements to real equipment and job-site scenarios, building the technical literacy required for both the NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry process and the NAEC CET examination. Emphasis is placed on understanding why each requirement exists, connecting code language to physical components and safe work practices.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Code Architecture and Purpose: How A17.1 Is Organized; Hoistway, Pit, and Machine Room Requirements; Safety Devices: Traction Elevator Requirements; Hydraulic Elevator Safety Requirements; Periodic Inspections and Witnessing of Tests; Emergency Operations and Firefighters' Service; Code Compliance Field Review and Integrated Application.

What competent looks like. Navigate the ASME A17.1 code structure and locate applicable requirements for traction and hydraulic elevator systems within five minutes of receiving a scenario prompt. Identify and describe the function of all code-mandated safety devices—including safeties, buffers, governors, pressure-relief valves, and interlocks—and state the code basis for each device. Interpret code requirements for hoistway construction, clearances, pit equipment, and machine room conditions and compare them against field conditions to identify non-compliances. Describe the periodic inspection and witnessing-of-test requirements specified in the code and correctly fill out a pre-test checklist for a traction or hydraulic unit. Apply code rules governing emergency operations, firefighters' service, and car leveling to evaluate whether a sample elevator installation is compliant. Demonstrate safe, code-aware work practices on a training elevator, citing the relevant A17.1 rule when directing a correction.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Code Architecture and Purpose: How A17.1 Is Organized10theoryStudents will correctly explain the overall structure of ASME A17.1—its parts, rule-numbering system, and relationship to the National Building Code and AHJ authority—and locate any assigned rule within three minutes.
  1. Guided table-of-contents walk: instructor assigns each student a different rule number; students race to find the rule, read aloud the requirement, and explain which Part it lives in and why.
  2. Small-group comparison exercise: students place printed excerpts of five rules into one of three categories—design requirements, installation requirements, or inspection/test requirements—and defend their choices to the class.
  3. Written scenario exercise: given a description of a proposed elevator installation in a jurisdiction that adopts A17.1, students identify which AHJ actions (plan review, inspections, acceptance test) the code mandates before the elevator may be placed in service.
Current edition ASME A17.1/CSA B44 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators (print or licensed PDF), highlighters, printed rule excerpts packet, whiteboardFive-question open-book rule-location quiz; student must find and correctly cite all five rules with part and section number — pass mark 80%.
2Hoistway, Pit, and Machine Room Requirements14demoStudents will identify code-required dimensions, clearances, lighting levels, and equipment placement rules for hoistways, pits, and machine rooms, and flag at least four deliberate non-compliances planted in a training-bay mock-up.
  1. Instructor-led walkthrough of a training elevator bay: instructor narrates each code requirement (top clearance, pit depth, pit lighting, stop switch location, machine room headroom, ventilation) while students annotate a blank hoistway diagram with rule citations.
  2. Measurement lab: students use a tape measure and light meter to record actual dimensions and lux levels at five designated points in the training pit and machine room, then compare each reading to the minimum code value and record a pass/fail judgment.
  3. Planted-deficiency inspection: instructor pre-loads six code violations in the training bay (for example, missing pit light, blocked emergency egress, unlocked machine room left open, stop switch out of reach); student pairs write a deficiency list with rule citations and corrective actions.
ASME A17.1 code book, 25-ft tape measure, digital light meter, personal protective equipment (hard hat, safety glasses, steel-toed boots), pit access checklist, blank hoistway elevation diagram worksheetStudents must identify at least four of the six planted deficiencies with correct rule citations — pass mark 67% (four of six).
3Safety Devices: Traction Elevator Requirements14labStudents will locate, identify, and describe the code-mandated function and trip conditions of every primary safety device on a traction elevator—governor, car safety, counterweight safety, buffers, and terminal stopping devices—citing the applicable A17.1 rule for each.
  1. Component identification drill: with the training elevator under lockout/tagout, students attach color-coded tags to the governor, rope gripper, car safety jaws, pit buffer, final limit switches, and slack-rope device, then record the rule that requires each component on a matching worksheet.
  2. Function-and-failure lecture-discussion: instructor explains how each safety device activates in sequence during an overspeed or free-fall scenario; students trace the sequence on a schematic diagram and annotate which code rule establishes each device's required response speed or stopping distance.
  3. Group scenario analysis: instructor presents three written malfunction scenarios (for example, governor rope breaks, buffer missing, final limit bypassed); student groups identify which code rules are violated, what the physical consequence would be, and what corrective action is required before the elevator may return to service.
ASME A17.1, lockout/tagout kit (personal locks, hasp, tags), color-coded identification tags, traction elevator schematic diagram, safety-device worksheet, dry-erase markers for schematic annotationsEach student correctly labels and cites code rules for all six device categories on the worksheet without assistance — pass mark requires accurate identification and citation of at least five of six devices.
4Hydraulic Elevator Safety Requirements12labStudents will identify the code-required safety devices and system parameters for hydraulic elevators—including pressure-relief valve, lowering valve, rupture valve, and pit safety devices—and verify that a training-unit's parameters fall within code limits.
  1. Annotated diagram exercise: students receive a cross-section diagram of a direct-acting hydraulic unit and a roped-hydraulic unit; they label every code-required safety device and write the A17.1 rule that mandates it beside each label.
  2. Pressure-relief valve check simulation: using a training hydraulic power unit (with the car blocked safely on mechanical stops per lockout/tagout procedure), students record system working pressure from the gauge, calculate the maximum allowable relief-valve setting per code ratios discussed in class, and compare to the actual relief-valve tag value.
  3. Failure-mode discussion and written response: instructor describes three scenarios (pressure-relief valve seized closed, cylinder rupture valve absent, oil-level low switch bypassed); students write a short response for each explaining what A17.1 requires, what risk exists without the device, and what the mechanic must do before restoring service.
ASME A17.1, hydraulic unit diagram worksheets (direct-acting and roped), training hydraulic elevator unit, lockout/tagout kit, pressure gauge, calculator, safety glasses, lab coat or work shirtAnnotated diagram graded for completeness and accuracy of rule citations; students must correctly identify and cite at least 80% of required devices — pass mark 80%.
5Periodic Inspections and Witnessing of Tests14fieldStudents will describe the types, frequencies, and documentation requirements for code-mandated periodic inspections and tests, and correctly complete a pre-test checklist for a traction elevator rated test without omitting any safety step.
  1. Code-reading assignment: students read and outline the sections of A17.1 covering periodic tests (for example, car and counterweight safeties, governor, buffers, and pressure-relief valve tests) and create a one-page summary table showing test name, required frequency, and who may witness the test.
  2. Pre-test checklist exercise: using the training traction elevator (not running—car secured), students work through a structured pre-test checklist (verifying pit conditions, safety device freedom of movement, proper weight in car for rated load test, test weight availability, and inspector notification steps), signing off each item and flagging two deliberately incomplete items planted by the instructor.
  3. Mock rated-load governor trip test briefing: instructor demonstrates proper positioning of personnel, communication protocol with a simulated inspector, and documentation of results on a test certificate form; students fill out a blank test certificate with the data recorded during the demonstration and review it against code documentation requirements.
ASME A17.1, printed pre-test checklist, test certificate form, training traction elevator, lockout/tagout kit, rated test weights (or equivalent training weights), PPE (hard hat, safety glasses, steel-toed boots, high-visibility vest), clipboardCompleted pre-test checklist reviewed by instructor; student must correctly identify all planted deficiencies and have zero omitted safety steps on the signed-off portion — pass requires 100% of safety steps completed and both deficiencies found.
6Emergency Operations and Firefighters' Service11theoryStudents will explain the code requirements for Phase I and Phase II firefighters' emergency operation and for emergency power operation, and correctly operate a training elevator through a Phase I recall and Phase II manual operation sequence.
  1. Code-reading and annotation: students read the A17.1 sections covering firefighters' emergency operation and highlight every requirement that applies to the physical equipment (switch location, key type, car lighting, door requirements, recall floor designation) versus those that govern sequence-of-operation logic; they share findings in a full-class debrief.
  2. Operational sequence walkthrough: with instructor supervision, students activate Phase I recall on the training elevator using the lobby key switch, observe and document that the car returns to the designated landing, doors open, and the car remains out of normal service; they then transfer to Phase II operation in the car and practice the hold, open, and close door functions while instructor quizzes them on code requirements for each step.
  3. Written compliance scenario: students receive a description of an elevator installation with five details about the firefighters' service setup (for example, Phase I switch at a non-designated floor, Phase II switch missing, car lighting below required level); they write a deficiency report citing the A17.1 rule violated for each item.
ASME A17.1, training elevator with functional firefighters' service key switches, firefighters' service key, written scenario worksheet, whiteboard for sequence diagramOperational walkthrough evaluated by instructor using a checklist of required Phase I and Phase II steps; written deficiency report graded for correct rule citations — pass mark 80% on written report and all critical operational steps performed correctly.
7Code Compliance Field Review and Integrated Application12practiceStudents will conduct an independent, structured code compliance review of the training elevator installation, produce a written deficiency report with rule citations and corrective actions, and verbally defend their findings to the instructor.
  1. Independent inspection walkthrough: each student, wearing full PPE and following the program's confined-space and pit-entry procedures, systematically inspects the training elevator from pit to machine room using a self-developed checklist drawn from the entire course; they record measurements, observations, and findings on the checklist.
  2. Written deficiency report: students compile their findings into a formatted deficiency report listing each item found, the physical condition observed, the A17.1 rule that is not met, the risk created, and the corrective action required; instructor has pre-loaded at least eight code deviations across the installation for students to find.
  3. Verbal defense: each student presents their top three findings to the instructor, explains the code basis, and responds to follow-up questions such as 'What would happen if this were not corrected?' and 'Who has authority to order this corrected?'
ASME A17.1, student-developed inspection checklist, tape measure, light meter, PPE (hard hat, safety glasses, steel-toed boots), lockout/tagout kit, camera or phone for documentation photos, deficiency report templateStudent must identify at least six of eight planted deficiencies with accurate rule citations; written report must be complete and legible; verbal defense must correctly explain the code basis for at least two of the three findings presented — overall pass mark 75%.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
ASME A17.1 Code Knowledge ExaminationWritten exam25%75% or higher (open-book, timed)A 50-question open-book examination covering code organization, hoistway and machine room requirements, safety device rules, hydraulic system requirements, inspection and test mandates, and firefighters' service; questions require students to locate specific rules and apply them to scenario-based prompts, directly mirroring the code-application question style found on both the NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry assessment and the NAEC CET examination.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety Device Identification and Citation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Student must correctly identify and cite the applicable A17.1 rule for at least five of six assigned safety devices with no critical safety errors during the lockout/tagout setupWith the training traction elevator secured under full lockout/tagout, the student is directed to six safety devices in random order by the evaluator; for each device the student must name it, demonstrate or explain its activation mechanism, and state the A17.1 requirement that mandates it, within a two-minute per-device time limit.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Inspection Lab LogLog15%Log must include all seven lesson activities with measurements, rule citations, and student-signed sign-offs; no more than two minor omissions permitted and zero missing safety documentation entriesStudents maintain a running lab log throughout the course documenting every hands-on activity, recording actual measured values, comparing them to code minimums, and citing the applicable A17.1 rule; the completed log is submitted at the end of the course and reviewed as a portfolio of applied code literacy, supporting the documentation skills required in both NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship work processes and NAEC CET job-task areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pit and Machine Room Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% of required safety steps completed in correct order before any component is touched; zero critical safety failures permittedThe evaluator assigns the student to enter the training elevator pit and machine room to retrieve a specified measurement; the student must demonstrate the complete pre-entry safety sequence—verifying the stop switch, applying lockout/tagout, confirming power isolation, donning PPE, and communicating status to a designated safety observer—before proceeding, with the evaluator halting and failing the attempt immediately if any critical step is skipped.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BLD-ELEV10-06 Trade course

Elevator Safety: Codes, Hazard Control, and Jobsite Practice

87 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

This course develops the safety knowledge and on-the-job hazard-control skills specific to elevator construction and maintenance work, building on the universal safety foundation from Course 1. Students apply OSHA standards, ASME A17.1 general safety requirements, lockout/tagout procedures, confined-space protocols, and fall-protection systems directly to elevator hoistways, machine rooms, and pit environments. Every lesson maps to competency areas tested by both the NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry evaluation and the NAEC CET examination.

Outcomes
Course text

This course develops the safety knowledge and on-the-job hazard-control skills specific to elevator construction and maintenance work, building on the universal safety foundation from Course 1. Students apply OSHA standards, ASME A17.1 general safety requirements, lockout/tagout procedures, confined-space protocols, and fall-protection systems directly to elevator hoistways, machine rooms, and pit environments. Every lesson maps to competency areas tested by both the NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry evaluation and the NAEC CET examination.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Hazard Recognition in the Elevator Trade Environment; Lockout/Tagout for Elevator Systems; Personal Protective Equipment Selection and Inspection; Permit-Required Confined Space Entry: The Elevator Pit; Fall Protection in Hoistways and at Open Floors; Job Safety Analysis and Incident Documentation; Integrated Safety Simulation: Hoistway Entry and Pre-Task Planning.

What competent looks like. Identify and control the five major hazard categories found in elevator hoistways, pits, and machine rooms using the hierarchy of controls. Execute a compliant lockout/tagout isolation procedure for a hydraulic or traction elevator system, achieving zero-energy state before entering an affected space. Select, inspect, don, and document personal protective equipment appropriate to each elevator-trade task and site condition. Apply OSHA permit-required confined-space entry requirements to elevator pit entry, including atmospheric testing, attendant duties, and rescue planning. Demonstrate compliant fall-protection setup—guardrails, personal fall-arrest systems, and hole covers—for open hoistway openings and working-over-shaft situations. Complete written and hands-on safety documentation (JSA, incident report, lockout log) to the standard expected in a union or contractor apprenticeship program.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Hazard Recognition in the Elevator Trade Environment12theoryStudents identify and classify the primary physical, electrical, mechanical, and environmental hazards present in elevator pits, hoistways, and machine rooms using the hierarchy of controls framework.
  1. Photo-analysis exercise: students examine a set of 20 labeled hoistway, pit, and machine-room photographs and record every visible hazard on a structured identification worksheet, then compare findings in small-group debrief.
  2. Hierarchy-of-controls mapping: for six common elevator-trade hazards (unguarded counterweights, wet pit, energized controller, overhead work below car, asbestos-containing insulation, poor lighting), students assign at least two control measures at the correct tier of the hierarchy and defend choices in class discussion.
  3. Case-study reading and Q&A: instructor presents two anonymized elevator-industry incident summaries; students identify which hazards were present, which controls failed, and what a compliant pre-task plan would have included.
OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart R (steel erection adapted for hoistways) reference packet, OSHA 29 CFR 1910 General Industry reference packet, ASME A17.1 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators (current edition) Section 1 (general), NEIEP Module 1 safety readings, hazard-photo set (printed or projected), hierarchy-of-controls poster, student safety journal.Scored hazard-identification worksheet: student must correctly classify at least 80% of hazards and assign a defensible control measure for each; instructor reviews journal entries for completeness before next lesson.
2Lockout/Tagout for Elevator Systems14labStudents perform a complete lockout/tagout isolation procedure on a simulated traction elevator control circuit and a hydraulic unit, verifying zero-energy state through correct testing sequence before any simulated maintenance task begins.
  1. Procedure development: using a provided one-line electrical diagram of a traction elevator and a hydraulic power-unit schematic, each student drafts a written machine-specific lockout procedure identifying every energy source (electrical, hydraulic pressure, gravitational—counterweight and car), isolation point, and verification step.
  2. Hands-on isolation drill: in pairs at the lab trainer board, students rotate through the role of authorized employee and affected employee—applying personal locks, bleeding hydraulic pressure to gauge-verified zero, blocking the car with certified car safeties or mechanical stops, and using a test instrument to verify absence of voltage at the controller before signing the lockout log.
  3. Audit and re-energization: a third student acts as auditor using the OSHA-required periodic audit checklist; after the simulated task, the pair performs the documented re-energization sequence in reverse order, confirming all personnel are clear and all tools removed before power is restored.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 (control of hazardous energy) reference card, NEIEP LOTO module, elevator electrical trainer board with lockable disconnects, hydraulic trainer with pressure gauge and bleed valve, personal padlocks and hasps (one per student), lockout tags, multi-lock hasp, non-contact voltage tester, clamp meter, machine-specific LOTO procedure template, lockout log forms.Practical skill check: instructor observes each student performing a solo LOTO cycle on the trainer; student must complete all isolation and verification steps in correct sequence with zero skipped steps to pass (100% completion required on the critical-step checklist); written procedure must score 80% or higher on a rubric covering energy-source identification, sequence, and documentation.
3Personal Protective Equipment Selection and Inspection10demoStudents select the correct PPE for six distinct elevator-trade task scenarios, perform a pre-use inspection of each item, and document findings on a daily PPE inspection log to industry standard.
  1. Scenario-based selection: instructor presents six task cards (pit entry with standing water, grinding on a machine-room floor, working in an active hoistway with car passing, battery-room inspection, overhead welding on a crosshead, confined-space atmospheric testing) and students individually select appropriate PPE from a full kit, justifying each choice against OSHA and manufacturer requirements before instructor debrief.
  2. Hands-on inspection rotation: students rotate through six stations, each with one PPE item (hard hat, safety harness, safety glasses, hearing protection, insulated gloves rated for the voltage class in elevator work, fall-arrest lanyard); at each station they perform and document a manufacturer-specified pre-use inspection, identifying any pre-planted defects the instructor has introduced.
  3. Donning and doffing demonstration: each student fully dons a full-body harness including dorsal D-ring positioning, leg-strap adjustment, and chest-strap placement, then has a partner verify fit against the manufacturer's checklist; instructor confirms correct fit before student records the inspection result.
OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart E (PPE) reference card, manufacturer inspection guides for harness and lanyard (current edition), full-body harnesses (class appropriately sized for students), hard hats (Type I and Type II for comparison), insulated lineman's gloves with leather protectors, safety glasses and face shield, hearing protection (plugs and muffs), PPE daily inspection log forms, defect-planted equipment set for station activity.Students must score 80% or higher on a scenario-based PPE selection quiz (10 questions) and receive a pass on the harness donning check (all five fit criteria met with zero critical errors such as twisted straps or unsecured chest strap).
4Permit-Required Confined Space Entry: The Elevator Pit14labStudents execute all pre-entry steps for a permit-required confined-space entry into an elevator pit, including atmospheric testing with a calibrated multi-gas meter, completion of an entry permit, and assignment of attendant and rescue roles in accordance with OSHA requirements.
  1. Permit completion drill: using a realistic scenario packet describing an elevator pit with a history of water intrusion, students complete a full written confined-space entry permit, identifying the space classification, hazards, required atmospheric parameters, attendant, authorized entrants, rescue service, and communication method, then peer-review another student's permit against an OSHA-compliant checklist.
  2. Atmospheric monitoring exercise: students use a multi-gas meter (oxygen, LEL, CO, H₂S) to test a simulated pit environment staged by the instructor (safe atmosphere); students record readings in the permit, demonstrate bump-test and calibration verification of the meter, and practice communicating atmospheric results verbally to the attendant using standardized terminology.
  3. Attendant and rescue role-play: in trios, students rotate through entrant, attendant, and rescue-contact roles during a scripted non-entry rescue drill; the attendant practices tracking entrants, monitoring for behavioral changes, communicating by radio, and initiating the rescue protocol when the instructor announces a simulated emergency without entering the space.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit-required confined spaces) reference packet, NEIEP confined-space module, multi-gas atmospheric monitor with calibration records, bump-test gas cylinder, entry permit blank forms (OSHA-compliant template), retrieval system/tripod with winch, full-body harness, two-way radios, simulated pit mockup or deep lab space with signage, rescue plan template.Each student's completed entry permit is scored on a 20-point rubric; passing score is 16/20 (80%); instructor observes atmospheric monitoring steps and checks that all four gas readings are recorded before any simulated entry is authorized—any student who proceeds without atmospheric documentation receives an automatic retest.
5Fall Protection in Hoistways and at Open Floors14practiceStudents install and inspect a personal fall-arrest system anchor, construct a compliant guardrail around a simulated hoistway opening, and cover a floor opening per OSHA requirements, demonstrating proper load-path understanding and clearance calculations.
  1. Anchor selection and load-path calculation: given a structural drawing of a simulated hoistway header and three candidate anchor-point descriptions, students calculate the required minimum anchor strength, identify whether each candidate meets the OSHA-required load rating for a personal fall-arrest system, and justify their selection in a written response before the instructor confirms the correct answer.
  2. Guardrail construction drill: using standard lumber or pipe components at a hoistway-opening mockup, student pairs install a compliant three-rail system (top rail, mid-rail, toeboard) to OSHA dimensional requirements for construction; instructor measures rail heights and toeboard height and tests mid-rail resistance by hand.
  3. Floor-hole cover and PFAS deployment: students install a labeled, secured floor-hole cover over a simulated pit opening, then connect a self-retracting lifeline to the confirmed anchor, don their harness, connect the snap hook to the dorsal D-ring, and walk through the work area while the instructor verifies there is adequate clearance below to arrest a fall without contact with a lower level.
OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart M (fall protection) reference card, NEIEP fall-protection module, hoistway-opening mockup frame, lumber or pipe guardrail components, toeboard stock, screws and hammer or wrench set, floor-hole cover plywood labeled 'HOLE COVER — DO NOT REMOVE', self-retracting lifeline (SRL), full-body harnesses, tape measure, structural drawings handout, clearance-calculation worksheet.Instructor evaluates guardrail installation using a pass/fail checklist (top-rail height within tolerance, mid-rail within tolerance, toeboard present and secured, no gap exceeding OSHA limit at posts); all four criteria must pass; PFAS connection check requires correct snap-hook gate closure and dorsal D-ring connection—any open gate or sternal connection is an automatic fail requiring immediate correction and recheck.
6Job Safety Analysis and Incident Documentation11theoryStudents produce a complete, field-ready Job Safety Analysis (JSA) for an elevator maintenance task and accurately complete an incident report for a provided scenario, using documentation standards recognized by IUEC and NAEC contractors.
  1. JSA development workshop: in small groups, students select one of three provided elevator maintenance tasks (adjusting hydraulic pump, replacing wire rope on traction car, cleaning machine room) and complete a JSA form step-by-step, identifying job steps, potential hazards at each step, and preventive measures; groups then present their JSA to the class for critique and revision.
  2. Incident report writing: instructor distributes a detailed narrative of a simulated near-miss event (mechanic slips on wet pit floor, no injury); individually, students complete an industry-standard incident report form including event description, root-cause analysis section, corrective actions, and witness statement block, applying the cause-classification categories used in the trade.
  3. Root-cause analysis practice: using the '5 Whys' method taught through a structured template, students apply the technique to two additional brief incident scenarios printed on cards and compare their root-cause findings with a partner, discussing how each identified cause would change the corrective-action recommendation.
OSHA 300 log overview handout, OSHA recordkeeping reference (29 CFR 1904 summary), industry JSA blank form, incident report blank form (contractor-style), '5 Whys' template worksheet, three elevator-task description cards, two incident scenario cards, NEIEP documentation module readings.JSA is scored on a rubric: minimum 80% (8 of 10 points) covering completeness of steps, accuracy of hazard identification, and specificity of controls; incident report is scored pass/fail on a 12-item checklist—a passing report has no more than two minor omissions and zero errors in the cause-classification field.
7Integrated Safety Simulation: Hoistway Entry and Pre-Task Planning12fieldStudents plan and execute a supervised mock elevator service call from the parking lot to a compliant hoistway entry, integrating LOTO, confined-space permit, fall protection, PPE selection, JSA completion, and tool/equipment inspection into a single documented workflow evaluated against a master competency checklist.
  1. Pre-task planning session: each student independently completes a JSA, drafts a LOTO procedure, and initiates a confined-space entry permit for the simulated service scenario (inspection of pit buffer and oil level in a hydraulic elevator); instructor reviews documents before any physical activity begins, returning incomplete documents for immediate correction.
  2. Simulated entry execution: student performs the full entry sequence at the lab trainer site—sets barricades and signage, dons PPE, implements LOTO on the hydraulic unit, tests atmosphere at pit level, receives permit authorization from instructor acting as supervisor, installs floor-cover or guardrail as required, then enters the simulated pit and performs the inspection checklist task while a classmate serves as attendant.
  3. Debrief and journal reflection: immediately after the simulation, instructor conducts a structured debrief identifying any steps executed out of sequence or any safety gap; student records three specific improvements in their safety journal and describes how each gap could have caused an incident, connecting the finding to a specific OSHA standard or ASME A17.1 general safety provision.
Full lab trainer setup (hydraulic elevator trainer or traction trainer mockup), barricades and safety signs, personal padlocks and lockout kit, multi-gas meter with calibration verification, full-body harness and SRL, complete PPE kit, JSA form, confined-space entry permit form, LOTO procedure template, pit inspection checklist, student safety journal, master competency checklist (instructor scoring tool), ASME A17.1 current edition (general safety sections).Instructor scores each student on the master competency checklist covering 15 observable behaviors across five categories (documentation, LOTO, confined space, fall protection, PPE); student must pass all five categories at 80% or higher; any critical safety error (entering space before LOTO verified, no atmospheric test, harness connected at sternal ring) results in an immediate stop and mandatory repeat of the simulation on a separate day.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Safety Knowledge ExaminationWritten exam25%Minimum score of 80% (32 of 40 questions correct)A 40-question written examination covering hazard recognition, OSHA standards applicable to elevator construction and maintenance, ASME A17.1 general safety provisions, confined-space requirements, LOTO principles, fall-protection rules, and incident documentation; questions are multiple-choice and short-answer, mapped to NEIEP/IUEC and NAEC CET exam content domains to give students direct credential-preparation value.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
LOTO and Confined-Space Entry Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%100% completion of all critical-step items on the evaluator checklist; no more than one minor procedural deviation on non-critical stepsEach student performs a complete lockout/tagout sequence followed by a confined-space entry permit initiation and atmospheric test on the lab trainer, evaluated live by the instructor using a standardized 20-item checklist; any critical failure (skipped energy-source isolation, missing atmospheric test, zero-energy verification omitted) requires a full repeat of the demonstration on a separate day after remediation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety Journal and Documentation LogLog15%Minimum score of 80% on the journal rubric across all six scored entriesStudents maintain a safety journal throughout the course documenting JSA drafts, LOTO procedure worksheets, PPE inspection logs, confined-space permit practice, incident report exercises, and the integrated simulation reflection; the journal is collected at course end and scored on a rubric evaluating completeness, accuracy of regulatory references, and quality of reflective analysis.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Integrated Hoistway Entry Safety CheckSafety audit15%Pass on all five category areas of the master competency checklist (each category at 80% or higher); zero critical safety errorsThe final summative safety check is conducted during Lesson 7's integrated simulation: the instructor evaluates the student's real-time performance of the full pre-task and entry workflow—documentation, LOTO, confined-space protocol, fall protection, and PPE—using the master competency checklist; this check directly mirrors the field performance evaluation format used in IUEC apprenticeship readiness assessments and NAEC CET practical components.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BLD-ELEV10-07 Capstone

Elevator Mechanic Capstone Project: Integrated System Build and Defense

108 hr · $1,080 COMPLIMENTARY

Students design, assemble, document, and defend a scaled elevator system integrating hydraulic or traction drive components, a control circuit, and all applicable ASME A17.1 safety devices studied throughout the program. The capstone replicates the planning, installation, inspection, and documentation workflow used by journey-level elevator mechanics on a real job. Successful completion demonstrates job-entry competency aligned with NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry expectations and NAEC CET exam domains.

Outcomes
Course text

Students design, assemble, document, and defend a scaled elevator system integrating hydraulic or traction drive components, a control circuit, and all applicable ASME A17.1 safety devices studied throughout the program. The capstone replicates the planning, installation, inspection, and documentation workflow used by journey-level elevator mechanics on a real job. Successful completion demonstrates job-entry competency aligned with NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry expectations and NAEC CET exam domains.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Project Scoping, Design, and Hazard Planning; Hands-On System Build and Wiring; Pre-Operation Inspection, Documentation, and Functional Test; Project Documentation Package and Oral Defense Preparation.

What competent looks like. Select and justify appropriate drive type, safeties, and control scheme for a given building scenario using ASME A17.1 general requirements as the governing reference. Fabricate and wire a functional scaled or simulated elevator control circuit, demonstrating correct use of hand tools, wire termination methods, and lockout/tagout procedures throughout. Perform and record a pre-operation safety inspection checklist covering car, hoistway, machine room, and pit zones in the format used by licensed inspectors. Diagnose at least two instructor-introduced faults — one mechanical, one electrical — using a multimeter and logical troubleshooting steps, and document the corrective action taken. Produce a complete project package including a bill of materials, as-built schematic, inspection records, and a written hazard-analysis form meeting trade documentation standards. Present and defend design decisions, inspection findings, and troubleshooting results in a structured oral defense, responding accurately to technical questions from a two-person evaluator panel.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Project Scoping, Design, and Hazard Planning24theoryGiven a realistic building scenario, the student will produce a complete project design package — drive-type selection rationale, labeled system schematic, bill of materials, and written job-hazard analysis — before any physical work begins.
  1. Instructor presents three scenario cards (low-rise hydraulic, mid-rise traction, freight application); student teams select one and write a one-page design rationale citing ASME A17.1 general requirements for travel, speed, and capacity.
  2. Students draft a hand-drawn and then CAD-assisted wiring schematic showing power supply, control panel, door operator circuit, safety-device string (buffer, governor, safeties, pit stop), and hoistway lighting, then peer-review each other's schematics for omissions.
  3. Each student completes a Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) form identifying at least six hazards (electrical, fall, struck-by, hydraulic fluid, confined space, housekeeping) and the corresponding controls — PPE, LOTO, barriers — before receiving instructor sign-off to proceed to build phase.
Scenario briefing cards, ASME A17.1 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators (current edition, instructor-provided excerpts), blank JHA forms, graph paper, ruler, pencil, free-tier CAD or schematic software on lab computers, printerInstructor grades schematic and JHA against a 20-point rubric: drive-type rationale correct (4 pts), schematic includes all required safety-device symbols (8 pts), BOM complete with part descriptions (4 pts), JHA identifies ≥ 6 hazards with adequate controls (4 pts). Pass = 16/20 (80%).
2Hands-On System Build and Wiring42labFollowing the approved schematic and JHA, the student will assemble the mechanical and electrical components of the capstone elevator model — including drive unit mounting, guide rail section, safety device rigging, and control-circuit wiring — applying LOTO on every power-up and shut-down transition.
  1. Students mount the drive unit (hydraulic power unit or traction motor/sheave mockup) to the lab rig, align a two-rail guide section using a level and plumb bob, and attach the car platform, verifying clearances against instructor-supplied dimensional specs before any wiring begins.
  2. Students terminate all control-circuit conductors at the simulated controller panel using the approved schematic: label every wire with sleeve markers, use a torque screwdriver to terminal-manufacturer spec, then perform a point-to-point continuity verification with a multimeter before energizing — LOTO applied and removed per written procedure each session.
  3. Instructor introduces two hidden faults (one open in the safety-device string, one miswired door-zone circuit) mid-build; students use a multimeter and ladder-logic print to locate, correct, and document each fault on a Corrective Action Record form within the session.
Lab elevator training rig (hydraulic or traction type), guide rail sections, car platform, simulated controller panel with terminal strips, control-circuit wiring kit (pre-cut conductors, wire markers, lugs), multimeter, torque screwdriver, level, plumb bob, steel tape, personal PPE (hard hat, safety glasses, gloves, steel-toed boots), LOTO station with locks and tags, Corrective Action Record formsInstructor uses a 30-point build checklist observed in real time: mechanical alignment within spec (6 pts), all wires labeled and terminated correctly (8 pts), LOTO procedure followed every power transition — observed, not self-reported (8 pts), both faults located and documented on Corrective Action Record (8 pts). Pass = 24/30 (80%). Any missed LOTO step = automatic remediation before continuing.
3Pre-Operation Inspection, Documentation, and Functional Test24practiceUsing an industry-style inspection checklist, the student will conduct a systematic pre-operation inspection of the completed capstone rig — covering machine room, hoistway, car, and pit zones — correct any deficiencies found, and record all findings in the format used by licensed elevator inspectors before witnessing a functional run.
  1. Working from a structured checklist modeled on the major inspection categories recognized by elevator inspection authorities, each student independently inspects all four zones (machine room: oil level, pressure-relief setting, disconnects; hoistway: rail brackets, clearances, limit switches; car: safety device, door operator, emergency lighting; pit: stop switch, ladder, lighting, sump), marking each item pass, fail, or not-applicable with a brief note.
  2. Students transfer checklist findings to an Inspection Report form, flag any fail items, and implement corrective action — re-torqueing a loose bracket, replacing a burned indicator lamp, adjusting a limit-switch cam — then re-inspect and close out each deficiency with a second signature line.
  3. With instructor acting as witness, students energize the rig through the written power-up sequence, observe the car travel through at least two full cycles, verify that the safety-device string interrupts travel when a simulated governor trip is triggered, and record actual travel time and stopping distance on the functional test log.
Pre-operation inspection checklist (instructor-provided, 40 items), Inspection Report forms, Corrective Action Record forms, functional test log, pen, multimeter, torque screwdriver, replacement lamp, PPE, LOTO stationInstructor compares student checklist against a master answer key on the rig's known conditions (instructor has set two intentional fail items): all 40 items addressed (5 pts), both planted deficiencies caught and corrected (10 pts), Inspection Report filled out legibly with corrective-action close-outs (5 pts), functional test log complete with governor trip result documented (5 pts). Pass = 20/25 (80%).
4Project Documentation Package and Oral Defense Preparation18practiceThe student will compile the complete project documentation package and deliver a structured ten-minute oral defense of design, build, inspection, and troubleshooting decisions to a two-person evaluator panel, demonstrating mastery of the integrated skill set required for apprenticeship entry.
  1. Students assemble the final project binder in specified order — JHA, design rationale, schematic (as-built, updated for any field changes), BOM, Corrective Action Records, Inspection Report, functional test log — and self-audit against a documentation checklist before submission; any missing document must be added before the defense date.
  2. Students prepare a ten-minute structured presentation outline covering five mandatory topics: (1) why this drive type was selected, (2) how the safety-device string functions in this system, (3) one fault found during build and how it was resolved, (4) one inspection deficiency and corrective action, (5) one thing they would do differently; students practice delivery with a peer and receive timed feedback.
  3. Mock defense session: a classmate plays evaluator and poses ten random questions drawn from an instructor-supplied question bank covering hydraulics, traction, controls, ASME A17.1 safety devices, and OSHA hazard controls; student practices answering in clear, correct trade language and flags any knowledge gap for last-minute review before the scored defense.
Project binder (physical or digital), documentation checklist, presentation outline template, ten-minute timer, question bank (instructor-provided, 40 questions mapped to NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship competency areas and NAEC CET exam domains), whiteboard for sketch answersInstructor reviews binder for completeness against the documentation checklist before the defense date — all required documents present is a prerequisite to defend. Oral defense scored on a 25-point rubric by two evaluators: clarity of design rationale (5 pts), accurate explanation of safety-device function (5 pts), correct troubleshooting narrative (5 pts), inspection findings accurately reported (5 pts), professional communication and use of trade terminology (5 pts). Pass = 20/25 (80%) averaged across both evaluators.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Capstone Elevator System Build ProjectProject60%80% on the combined build checklist and inspection/functional-test rubric (minimum 44/55 total points); any unresolved LOTO violation or uncorrected safety deficiency results in an automatic incomplete until remediated.The primary project grade aggregates scores from Lesson 2 (hands-on build and wiring, 30 pts) and Lesson 3 (pre-operation inspection, documentation, and functional test, 25 pts), evaluated by the instructor using direct observation checklists and form review. The completed, functional rig must pass a witnessed safety-device trip test before the portfolio is accepted.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Capstone Documentation PortfolioPortfolio20%All seven required documents present (prerequisite); portfolio content scored at 80% or higher on the 20-point documentation rubric (minimum 16/20).The portfolio binder is evaluated for completeness, accuracy, and professional quality: the as-built schematic must match the physical rig, the BOM must include all installed components with descriptions, corrective-action records must be signed and dated, and the inspection report must show close-out of every fail item. The portfolio is submitted before the oral defense and returned with written feedback.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Oral DefenseOral / panel20%Average score of 20/25 (80%) across both evaluators on the five-category rubric; a score below 3/5 on the safety-device function category triggers mandatory remediation regardless of overall average.The student delivers a ten-minute structured presentation to a two-person panel, then responds to follow-up questions for up to ten additional minutes; evaluators score independently and average their scores. The defense is mapped to NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry competency areas and NAEC CET exam domains so that gaps identified here directly inform the student's exam-preparation study plan in Course 9.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
BLD-ELEV10-08 Externship / clinical

Elevator Mechanic Externship / Worksite Placement

162 hr · $650 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 162 supervised hours at a licensed elevator contractor or building-maintenance employer, applying classroom knowledge of hydraulic and traction systems, controls, ASME A17.1 code compliance, and trade safety under the direct oversight of a journeyman elevator mechanic or licensed elevator inspector. Daily field logs, a mid-placement employer evaluation, and a final employer evaluation document skill growth and professional conduct. This course bridges pre-apprentice training and the NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry or NAEC CET pathway by providing authentic, credentialed-work-environment exposure.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 162 supervised hours at a licensed elevator contractor or building-maintenance employer, applying classroom knowledge of hydraulic and traction systems, controls, ASME A17.1 code compliance, and trade safety under the direct oversight of a journeyman elevator mechanic or licensed elevator inspector. Daily field logs, a mid-placement employer evaluation, and a final employer evaluation document skill growth and professional conduct. This course bridges pre-apprentice training and the NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship entry or NAEC CET pathway by providing authentic, credentialed-work-environment exposure.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Pre-Placement Orientation and Site Safety Briefing; Assisted Observation and Task Participation — Hydraulic and Traction Systems; Mid-Placement Employer Evaluation and Student Self-Assessment; Final Placement Hours, Field-Log Compilation, and Final Employer Evaluation.

What competent looks like. Perform assigned assist-level tasks on hydraulic and traction elevator systems safely and in compliance with ASME A17.1 requirements, as verified by employer evaluation. Demonstrate correct lockout/tagout (LOTO) and PPE selection for every task observed or assisted on site, with zero safety violations recorded across all placement hours. Complete accurate daily field logs that identify the system type, task performed, applicable code area, and tools used for each worksite activity. Communicate professionally with journeymen, supervisors, and building personnel, meeting or exceeding the professionalism standard on the mid-placement and final employer evaluations. Identify and document at least two real-world examples of code-compliance checks or safety inspections witnessed during the placement and relate them to ASME A17.1 sections covered in coursework. Reflect on skill gaps identified during the externship and produce a written professional-development plan aligned with NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship-year competencies or NAEC CET exam domains.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Pre-Placement Orientation and Site Safety Briefing10theoryStudents will identify site-specific hazards, emergency procedures, and LOTO/PPE requirements for their assigned employer before performing any hands-on tasks.
  1. Review and sign the employer's site-specific safety plan and emergency action plan; record key contacts, muster points, and first-aid kit locations in the field log.
  2. Complete the employer's onboarding checklist item by item with the supervising journeyman, verifying PPE inventory (hard hat, safety glasses, gloves, steel-toed boots, high-visibility vest if required) and confirming OSHA 10 card is on file.
  3. Walk the first assigned jobsite with the journeyman mentor, identify confined-space, electrical-hazard, and fall-hazard zones, and sketch a labeled hazard map in the field journal.
Employer safety plan documents, OSHA 10 card (from Course 1), personal PPE kit, blank field-log journal, pen, site hazard map templateJourneyman mentor initials the completed onboarding checklist and the student's hazard map; both documents are submitted to the program coordinator. Pass = all checklist items initialed and hazard map identifies a minimum of three distinct hazard zones with correct control measures noted.
2Assisted Observation and Task Participation — Hydraulic and Traction Systems82fieldStudents will assist journeymen on real hydraulic and traction elevator tasks—including fluid checks, rope/chain inspections, sheave assessments, and controller walk-throughs—while recording every activity in the daily field log.
  1. Assist the journeyman during scheduled maintenance visits by retrieving tools, reading wiring diagrams or pit-ladder clearance dimensions on request, and observing the sequence of checks performed; enter a detailed log entry within one hour of each visit, naming the elevator type, task, tools used, and any code reference discussed.
  2. With journeyman supervision and after confirming LOTO is applied and verified, use a flashlight and mirror to conduct a visual inspection of a hydraulic pit or traction pit for water intrusion, oil accumulation, and buffer condition, then verbally report findings to the journeyman.
  3. Shadow the journeyman during a controller-panel inspection on at least two different controller types (relay-logic and solid-state/PLC-based if available at the site); sketch the layout of major components in the field journal and label each from memory after leaving the machine room.
Personal PPE kit, LOTO personal padlock and hasp (employer-issued or student-owned), flashlight, tape measure, field-log journal, wiring diagrams provided by employer, ASME A17.1 code handbook (current edition, personal copy from Course 5)Program coordinator reviews field logs at the midpoint (approximately week 6 of placement); each log entry must include date, site, elevator ID or system type, task description, tools used, and safety measures applied. Pass = at least 35 legible, complete daily entries covering a variety of hydraulic and traction tasks, with no entries showing an unsafe practice.
3Mid-Placement Employer Evaluation and Student Self-Assessment8practiceStudents will receive structured feedback from the supervising journeyman on safety habits, technical engagement, and professionalism, and will produce a written self-assessment comparing their performance against NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship-entry and NAEC CET competency areas.
  1. Sit in a formal mid-placement review meeting with the journeyman mentor and, if available, the employer's training coordinator; the mentor completes the program's standardized Mid-Placement Employer Evaluation form covering safety compliance, technical curiosity, communication, attendance/punctuality, and teamwork, then reviews each rating aloud with the student.
  2. Student completes the program's Self-Assessment Rubric independently before seeing the employer ratings, scoring themselves on the same five domains; after the review meeting, write a one-page gap analysis comparing self-ratings to employer ratings and identifying two specific skills to strengthen in the second half of the placement.
  3. Student and journeyman co-develop a written Action Plan listing at least two tasks or learning opportunities the employer will provide in the remaining placement weeks to address the identified gaps; both parties sign the plan and a copy is submitted to the program coordinator.
Mid-Placement Employer Evaluation form (program-issued), Student Self-Assessment Rubric (program-issued), Action Plan template, pen, student field-log journal for referenceProgram coordinator reviews the completed Employer Evaluation form, the student's gap analysis, and the signed Action Plan within five business days of the mid-placement meeting. Pass = employer rates student at 'Meets Expectations' or higher on safety compliance and attendance; gap analysis addresses at least two specific competency domains; Action Plan is signed by both parties.
4Final Placement Hours, Field-Log Compilation, and Final Employer Evaluation62fieldStudents will complete their remaining supervised hours, compile all field logs into a final placement portfolio, and receive a final employer evaluation confirming readiness for NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship application or NAEC CET examination.
  1. Continue daily assisted tasks per the Action Plan developed at mid-placement, targeting the identified skill gaps; write daily log entries as before, and annotate at least two entries per week with a reference to a specific ASME A17.1 requirement or NAEC CET exam domain observed in the field.
  2. Compile all daily field-log entries into a chronological Final Placement Portfolio with a cover page listing total hours by task category (hydraulic systems, traction systems, controls, code compliance, safety procedures); calculate and record the percentage of hours in each category and write a one-page reflective summary describing the most significant learning experience and how it connects to apprenticeship or CET competencies.
  3. Participate in the final employer evaluation meeting: journeyman mentor completes the Final Employer Evaluation form covering the same five domains as the mid-placement form plus an overall 'Readiness for Apprenticeship' rating; student receives a signed copy and submits the original to the program coordinator along with the completed portfolio.
Personal PPE kit, LOTO padlock and hasp, field-log journal (completed), Final Placement Portfolio binder or bound folder, Final Employer Evaluation form (program-issued), ASME A17.1 code handbook, penProgram coordinator reviews the Final Placement Portfolio and Final Employer Evaluation form. Pass = total logged hours reach 162; portfolio contains entries for at least four distinct task categories; final employer evaluation rates student at 'Meets Expectations' or higher on all five domains; 'Readiness for Apprenticeship' is rated 'Yes' or 'Conditional with noted plan'; reflective summary is at least one full page and references both credential pathways.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Worksite Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration70%Employer rates student 'Meets Expectations' or higher on all five domains of the Final Employer Evaluation form, and the 'Readiness for Apprenticeship/CET' field is marked 'Yes' or 'Conditional with noted plan'; any 'Does Not Meet' rating in the Safety Compliance domain is an automatic fail requiring remediation before credit is awarded.The supervising journeyman completes the program's standardized Final Employer Evaluation form assessing safety compliance, technical engagement, communication, attendance/punctuality, and teamwork across all 162 placement hours. This skills demonstration is the primary evidence that the student can perform entry-level assist tasks in a live elevator work environment and is prepared to enter the NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship or sit the NAEC CET examination.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Field Placement Log PortfolioLog30%Portfolio documents a minimum of 162 hours with at least 35 individual daily log entries; entries span at least four task categories; at least four entries include an explicit reference to an ASME A17.1 requirement or NAEC CET exam domain; the reflective summary is present and complete; pass threshold is 80% of entries rated 'Complete and Accurate' by the program coordinator using the log-entry rubric.Students submit all daily field-log entries, organized chronologically in a bound portfolio with a cover page, hour-by-category summary table, and a one-page reflective summary. The log serves as the documentary record of supervised hours for NEIEP/IUEC apprenticeship application and demonstrates the student's ability to connect fieldwork to classroom learning and credentialing exam domains.
Complete · Verified
BLD-ELEV10-09 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: NEIEP/IUEC Entry & NAEC CET

45 hr · $450 COMPLIMENTARY

This course systematically reviews every major content domain tested on the NEIEP/IUEC Apprenticeship Entry assessment and the NAEC Certified Elevator Technician (CET) exam, using mapped topic drills, timed practice sets, and two full-length mock exams with scored debrief. Learners identify personal knowledge gaps, build test-taking strategy, and demonstrate exam-ready competence across safety, electrical theory, hydraulics, traction systems, codes, and trade mathematics before sitting live credentialing exams.

Outcomes
Course text

This course systematically reviews every major content domain tested on the NEIEP/IUEC Apprenticeship Entry assessment and the NAEC Certified Elevator Technician (CET) exam, using mapped topic drills, timed practice sets, and two full-length mock exams with scored debrief. Learners identify personal knowledge gaps, build test-taking strategy, and demonstrate exam-ready competence across safety, electrical theory, hydraulics, traction systems, codes, and trade mathematics before sitting live credentialing exams.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Domain Mapping and Diagnostic Assessment; Targeted Domain Review: Safety, Electrical, and Trade Math; Targeted Domain Review: Hydraulics, Traction, Controls, and ASME A17.1 Code; Full-Length Mock Exams and Score-Based Readiness Debrief.

What competent looks like. Correctly answer practice questions in each NEIEP/IUEC and NAEC CET exam domain—safety, electrical/electronics, hydraulics, traction, controls, and ASME A17.1 code—at or above the published passing threshold for each credential. Apply OSHA lockout/tagout, PPE selection, and electrical safety rules accurately on scenario-based exam items without reference materials. Solve trade math problems—unit conversion, Ohm's Law, hydraulic pressure and flow calculations, wire sizing, and mechanical advantage—within timed exam conditions. Interpret wiring diagrams, hydraulic schematics, and ASME A17.1 code language to answer code-compliance and troubleshooting items correctly. Use a structured gap-analysis process to locate personal weak domains, prioritize study time, and demonstrate measurable score improvement between the first and final mock exam. Complete a full-length timed mock exam for each credential under realistic conditions and achieve a passing score, demonstrating readiness to sit the live credentialing exams.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Domain Mapping and Diagnostic Assessment8theoryStudents will identify their individual score gaps across all NEIEP/IUEC and NAEC CET content domains by completing a calibrated diagnostic and mapping results to an exam blueprint.
  1. Complete a 100-item timed diagnostic exam drawn proportionally from all domains—safety/OSHA, electrical theory, hydraulics, traction, controls, code—then self-score using the provided answer key and record domain-by-domain percent correct on a gap-analysis worksheet.
  2. Review the published NEIEP/IUEC and NAEC CET exam blueprints side by side, highlight overlapping domains, and annotate each domain with the corresponding course number (courses 1–8) where that content was taught, building a personal study plan that allocates remaining hours by gap severity.
  3. In small groups, compare gap-analysis worksheets, discuss the three domains where the group scored lowest, and propose specific reference materials and practice strategies for each; groups report findings to the class for collective prioritization.
100-item diagnostic question bank (instructor-prepared, mapped to blueprints), NEIEP/IUEC exam content outline, NAEC CET candidate handbook, gap-analysis worksheet, course content outline for courses 1–8, pencils, calculators (four-function and scientific)Completed and scored gap-analysis worksheet with domain-by-domain percentages recorded and a written personal study plan submitted to instructor; competence confirmed by instructor review—plan must address every domain below 70 % with at least two specific remediation actions.
2Targeted Domain Review: Safety, Electrical, and Trade Math12practiceStudents will answer practice items in the safety/OSHA, electrical theory/electronics, and trade math domains at 75 % or higher by working through mapped drills, worked examples, and timed mini-quizzes.
  1. Work through a 30-item safety drill covering OSHA lockout/tagout procedures, electrical hazard categories, fall protection requirements, confined-space awareness, PPE selection, and first-aid/CPR responsibilities; after self-scoring, consult OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and 1926 reference summaries to correct each missed item and write a one-sentence rationale for the correct answer.
  2. Complete six electrical theory worked-example sets—Ohm's Law, series and parallel circuits, power calculations, transformer ratios, motor starting current, and conductor ampacity—solving each problem step by step, then verify answers using the NEC reference tables and electrical formulas sheet before attempting a 20-item timed electrical mini-quiz.
  3. Practice 25 trade math problems under timed conditions (45 seconds per item): unit conversions (imperial and metric), hydraulic pressure-force-area problems, mechanical advantage calculations, rope-to-sheave ratios, and percentage calculations for counterweight loading; review every incorrect answer with a peer using worked-solution cards.
Domain-specific question banks (safety, electrical, math), OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and 1926 summary reference cards, NEC ampacity and formula reference tables, electrical formulas sheet, hydraulic formula cards, scientific calculators, worked-solution card sets, whiteboard for group problem-solvingThree graded mini-quizzes (safety 30 items, electrical 20 items, math 25 items); students must score 75 % or higher on each; any student below 75 % on a domain completes an instructor-assigned remediation set of 15 additional items in that domain and re-quizzes before Lesson 3.
3Targeted Domain Review: Hydraulics, Traction, Controls, and ASME A17.1 Code13practiceStudents will answer practice items in the hydraulics, traction systems, controls, and ASME A17.1 code domains at 75 % or higher by working through scenario drills, schematic interpretation exercises, and code-lookup practice.
  1. Interpret four hydraulic system schematics and four traction system wiring diagrams under timed conditions, identifying components, tracing circuits, and answering 10 scenario questions per schematic set that mirror exam item style; discuss common misidentifications as a class and annotate diagrams with correct component names and functions.
  2. Complete a 30-item controls drill covering relay logic, safety circuit sequences, door operator circuits, solid-state controls basics, and fault-code interpretation; for each missed item, locate the corresponding section in the course controls reference material and write the principle being tested, reinforcing code-to-component linkage.
  3. Practice ASME A17.1 code lookup using a structured 25-item exercise: each item presents a real elevator installation or inspection scenario and asks students to identify whether the condition is code-compliant, cite the relevant A17.1 requirement (by Part and Section, described in general terms as taught in Course 5), and state the required corrective action; students work individually then compare answers with a partner before instructor debrief.
Hydraulic and traction schematic sets (printed and laminated), controls wiring diagram sets, relay-logic reference cards, ASME A17.1 Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators (current adopted edition), course controls and code reference materials from Courses 4 and 5, domain question banks, highlighters, answer-verification guidesTwo graded domain mini-quizzes (hydraulics/traction 30 items, controls/code 30 items); students must score 75 % or higher on each; scores are recorded on the gap-analysis worksheet to show improvement from diagnostic; students below 75 % receive a targeted remediation assignment before the mock exam session.
4Full-Length Mock Exams and Score-Based Readiness Debrief12practiceStudents will demonstrate exam readiness by completing two full-length timed mock exams—one modeled on NEIEP/IUEC entry requirements and one modeled on the NAEC CET—scoring at or above the credential passing standard on each, and articulating their remaining preparation needs.
  1. Sit Mock Exam 1 (NEIEP/IUEC format): complete the full exam under strict timed and closed-book conditions matching the live exam environment, then self-score using the answer key; record domain scores on the gap-analysis worksheet and compare to Lesson 1 diagnostic scores to quantify improvement.
  2. Sit Mock Exam 2 (NAEC CET format): complete the full exam under the same timed, closed-book conditions; self-score and record domain results; compare both mock exam profiles to identify any domain that remains below passing threshold.
  3. Participate in a structured readiness debrief: each student presents their diagnostic-to-mock-exam score trajectory for two domains to a small group, states one remaining weak area and a concrete self-study action to address it before exam day, and receives peer and instructor feedback; instructor summarizes class-wide trends and provides a final exam-day preparation checklist covering logistics, materials allowed, and mental readiness strategies.
Full-length Mock Exam 1 booklet (NEIEP/IUEC format, 100+ items, timed), full-length Mock Exam 2 booklet (NAEC CET format, timed), answer keys with domain keys, gap-analysis worksheets (updated), score-trend chart template, exam-day preparation checklist, pencils, approved calculatorsBoth mock exams scored and recorded; pass standard is the credential passing threshold for each exam (as specified in the current candidate handbooks for NEIEP/IUEC and NAEC CET); students who do not meet the threshold on a mock exam must submit a written remediation plan identifying specific items missed by domain and a study schedule for the days before the live exam; instructor signs off on the plan before the student is cleared to register for the live credential exam.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Dual Credential Full-Length Mock ExamMock certification exam100%Score at or above the current published passing threshold on both the NEIEP/IUEC-format mock exam and the NAEC CET-format mock exam; students who pass one but not the other must complete a documented domain remediation plan before sitting the live exam for the credential not yet passed.Each student completes two full-length, timed, closed-book mock exams administered back to back in Lesson 4 under conditions that replicate the live credentialing environment, covering all exam domains in the proportion specified by each credential's blueprint. Scores are disaggregated by domain, compared to the Lesson 1 diagnostic baseline to confirm learning progression, and reviewed in a one-on-one readiness conference with the instructor before the student is cleared to schedule the live NEIEP/IUEC and NAEC CET examinations.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: NAEC CET; NEIEP/IUEC Apprenticeship Entry

Students prepare for and sit the NEIEP/IUEC Apprenticeship Entry assessment administered by the National Elevator Industry Educational Program and the International Union of Elevator Constructors, and the NAEC Certified Elevator Technician (CET) exam administered by the National Association of Elevator Contractors. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Elevator Mechanic (pre-apprentice) · How the school gets authority to award these credentials