newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Building & Construction › Nuclear Power Plant Technician / Operator Prep › Courses
Building & Construction · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review
This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional engineer or master tradesperson or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
Nuclear Power Plant Technician / Operator Prep
11 courses · 3,600 clock hours · 12–24 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.
11courses
103lessons
3,600hours
39assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons103 of 103 lesson pages writtenPractice820 practice questionsResources117 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 103 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
BLD-NUCL84-01 Universal core
Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Nuclear Power Plant Technicians
148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY
This foundational course equips adult learners with the safety protocols, technical mathematics, communication skills, and career readiness knowledge required to enter nuclear power plant training programs and succeed in subsequent coursework. Students earn OSHA 10 certification and first aid/CPR credentials while building the quantitative and literacy skills demanded by NRC-regulated worksites. All content is calibrated to the nuclear utility environment, from radiation-aware PPE decisions to reading plant technical specifications.
Outcomes- Complete OSHA 10 General Industry training and demonstrate correct hazard identification, lockout/tagout procedures, and PPE selection for nuclear plant environments.
- Apply arithmetic, algebra, unit conversion, and basic statistics to solve plant-relevant measurement and calculation problems with at least 80% accuracy.
- Read and interpret technical documents—including procedures, material safety data sheets, and simplified plant drawings—using active-reading strategies appropriate to nuclear operations.
- Use standard digital tools (spreadsheets, plant computerized maintenance management system concepts, and electronic work orders) to record, organize, and communicate technical data.
- Demonstrate professional communication in written reports, verbal briefings, and three-way communication drills consistent with nuclear safety culture expectations.
- Articulate the career pathways from non-licensed operator to licensed Reactor Operator, identify the credentials required at each stage, and construct a personal career development plan.
Course text
This foundational course equips adult learners with the safety protocols, technical mathematics, communication skills, and career readiness knowledge required to enter nuclear power plant training programs and succeed in subsequent coursework. Students earn OSHA 10 certification and first aid/CPR credentials while building the quantitative and literacy skills demanded by NRC-regulated worksites. All content is calibrated to the nuclear utility environment, from radiation-aware PPE decisions to reading plant technical specifications.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Nuclear Workplace Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10 General Industry; Lockout/Tagout, PPE Selection, and First Aid/CPR; Technical Mathematics for Nuclear Plant Work; Reading Technical Documents: Procedures, Drawings, and Specifications; Digital Tools for Nuclear Plant Technicians; Nuclear Safety Culture and Professional Communication; Career Pathways, Credentials, and Personal Development Planning.
What competent looks like. Complete OSHA 10 General Industry training and demonstrate correct hazard identification, lockout/tagout procedures, and PPE selection for nuclear plant environments. Apply arithmetic, algebra, unit conversion, and basic statistics to solve plant-relevant measurement and calculation problems with at least 80% accuracy. Read and interpret technical documents—including procedures, material safety data sheets, and simplified plant drawings—using active-reading strategies appropriate to nuclear operations. Use standard digital tools (spreadsheets, plant computerized maintenance management system concepts, and electronic work orders) to record, organize, and communicate technical data. Demonstrate professional communication in written reports, verbal briefings, and three-way communication drills consistent with nuclear safety culture expectations. Articulate the career pathways from non-licensed operator to licensed Reactor Operator, identify the credentials required at each stage, and construct a personal career development plan.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nuclear Workplace Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10 General Industry | 12 | theory | Students will identify the major OSHA General Industry hazard categories present on a nuclear power plant site and complete all OSHA 10 Outreach Program modules required for card issuance. |
| OSHA 10 General Industry student booklets (authorized trainer-supplied), plant site map handout, OSHA 29 CFR 1910 reference summary card, whiteboard, projector. | Completion of all OSHA 10 modules with attendance verified by authorized trainer; students pass the OSHA 10 final assessment at the threshold set by the Outreach program to qualify for card submission. Classroom worksheet scores 80% or higher. |
| 2 | Lockout/Tagout, PPE Selection, and First Aid/CPR | 16 | lab | Students will correctly perform a six-step lockout/tagout sequence on a simulated multi-energy-source equipment station and demonstrate first aid and CPR skills to the standard required for certification. |
| LOTO training board with multiple energy isolation points, assorted locks and tags, LOTO procedure instruction card, PPE selection scenario cards, full PPE kit samples, CPR mannequins, AED trainer, first aid kit, AHA or ARC Heartsaver course materials. | LOTO checklist: all six steps performed in correct sequence with zero critical errors (skipping verification step = automatic fail); PPE scenario justification scored on rubric, 80% minimum; CPR/First Aid: pass skills station to AHA/ARC certification standard. |
| 3 | Technical Mathematics for Nuclear Plant Work | 30 | practice | Students will solve problems involving unit conversion, scientific notation, algebraic equations, ratios, percentages, and basic statistics as applied to nuclear plant instrumentation readings, flow rates, and dose calculations. |
| Scientific calculators (non-programmable), unit conversion reference card, instructor-prepared problem sets aligned to NEI NUCP mathematics competency areas, graph paper, plant operations context examples handout. | Scored problem set: 80% overall with no more than one error in unit-conversion problems (unit errors in plant work can have safety consequences). Statistics summary paragraph evaluated on rubric for numerical accuracy and clear written explanation. |
| 4 | Reading Technical Documents: Procedures, Drawings, and Specifications | 24 | theory | Students will apply active-reading strategies to extract specific technical information from nuclear plant operating procedures, one-line electrical diagrams, piping and instrumentation diagram symbols, and equipment specification sheets. |
| Sample nuclear plant operating procedure (training version, cleared for classroom use), P&ID symbol legend reference (ISA standard symbols overview), training P&ID excerpt, two equipment specification sheet handouts, active-reading annotation guide. | Procedure comprehension quiz: 80% minimum. P&ID symbol exercise: 85% symbol identification accuracy. Spec-sheet extraction form: all required fields completed with accurate values; any blank field is flagged for review with instructor before lesson close. |
| 5 | Digital Tools for Nuclear Plant Technicians | 20 | demo | Students will use spreadsheet software to organize equipment data and perform calculations, and describe the purpose and basic workflow of a computerized work-order and maintenance-management system as used in nuclear plant operations. |
| Computers or tablets with spreadsheet software, instructor-prepared spreadsheet exercise file, CMMS training interface or realistic simulator screen captures, electronic work-order template, projector for demonstration. | Spreadsheet exercise checked against answer key: correct formulas and chart type, 80% accuracy. CMMS note template: all five major sections correctly identified and described. Condition-report draft: evaluated on rubric for completeness, factual accuracy, and use of neutral/precise language; must meet all required fields. |
| 6 | Nuclear Safety Culture and Professional Communication | 30 | practice | Students will demonstrate three-way communication, pre-job briefing participation, and a written shift-log entry consistent with the NRC's safety culture framework and nuclear industry communication standards. |
| NRC Safety Culture Policy Statement summary handout, INPO safety culture traits reference, scenario analysis cards, three-way communication drill cards, pre-job briefing checklist template, shift-log entry template. | Scenario analysis: group written responses evaluated on rubric—correct trait identification and evidence-based justification, 80% minimum. Three-way communication drill: instructor observes and marks pass/fail per exchange; must achieve two consecutive error-free exchanges. Pre-job briefing and shift-log entry: rubric-scored on completeness and safety-culture alignment, 80% minimum. |
| 7 | Career Pathways, Credentials, and Personal Development Planning | 16 | field | Students will construct a written personal career development plan that maps the credentials required for advancement from non-licensed operator to NRC-licensed Reactor Operator, identifying the utility-sponsorship requirement and the role of each program credential. |
| Career pathway timeline handout, credential-mapping worksheet, panel guest contact arrangements, notepad for panel notes, personal career plan template, program credential fact sheets. | Credential-mapping worksheet: all five credentials correctly placed on timeline with accurate annotations, instructor-verified. Personal career plan: evaluated on four-point rubric (goal clarity, credential accuracy, actionability, professional tone); minimum score of 3 out of 4 on each dimension to pass. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSHA 10 and Workplace Safety Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | Score of 70% or higher on the OSHA Outreach program's required assessment to qualify for card submission; 80% or higher on the supplemental nuclear site safety quiz. | A two-part written examination covering OSHA General Industry hazard categories, LOTO procedures, PPE selection rationale, and nuclear-specific posting and access requirements. Part one is administered by the authorized OSHA Outreach trainer per program requirements; part two is a 25-item instructor-written quiz on nuclear site safety context. Maps to the OSHA 10 credential requirement. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Technical Math and Document Literacy Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% overall; unit-conversion section requires 80% with no more than one error; document comprehension section requires 80%. | A 50-item written exam covering unit conversion, scientific notation, algebraic problem-solving, basic statistics, and reading comprehension of a short operating procedure excerpt and a P&ID symbol set. Problems are drawn from nuclear plant contexts and are representative of the mathematics and literacy demands in the NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum competency framework. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Digital Tools and Communication Portfolio Project | Project | 25% | Rubric total of 80% or higher across all four sections; any section scoring below 60% must be revised and resubmitted within one week. | Students submit a portfolio containing: a completed and accurately formatted spreadsheet log with chart, a filled-in CMMS workflow summary, a drafted condition-report document, and a written shift-log entry. The portfolio demonstrates integration of digital tool skills with nuclear safety-culture communication standards and is evaluated by the instructor using a four-section rubric. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Career Plan Oral Defense | Oral / panel | 25% | Score of 3 out of 4 or higher on each of the four rubric dimensions (goal clarity, credential knowledge, personal action steps, communication professionalism); any dimension scored 1 requires a remediation meeting and revised submission. | Each student presents their personal career development plan to the instructor and one peer in a 10-minute structured oral defense, explaining the credential pathway from non-licensed operator to licensed Reactor Operator, justifying their target role, and responding to at least two follow-up questions. This assessment measures the oral communication, safety-culture, and career-readiness outcomes of the course. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
BLD-NUCL84-02 Trade course
Reactor Physics & Thermodynamics
314 hr · $6,500 COMPLIMENTARY
This course builds the foundational nuclear science and thermodynamic principles that govern commercial light-water reactor operation. Students progress from atomic structure and neutron behavior through reactor kinetics, heat transfer, and the thermodynamic cycles used in pressurized-water and boiling-water reactor plants. Mastery of these principles is required for NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license preparation, the NUCP Uniform Curriculum, and NRRPT radiation protection fundamentals.
Outcomes- Explain nuclear fission, chain reaction criticality, and the six-factor formula in terms that predict reactor behavior during power changes.
- Apply reactor kinetics concepts—including reactivity coefficients, delayed neutrons, and reactor period—to describe transient plant conditions qualitatively and quantitatively.
- Describe the thermodynamic cycle (Rankine cycle) of a light-water reactor plant, tracing energy conversion from fuel to turbine-generator output.
- Calculate basic heat transfer quantities (conduction, convection, heat flux) relevant to fuel cladding integrity and primary coolant behavior.
- Identify how moderator temperature, void fraction, fuel temperature, and boron concentration affect reactivity, and state the safety significance of each.
- Interpret plant parameter trends on simplified reactor diagrams and predict the direction and magnitude of reactivity change for normal and off-normal events.
Course text
This course builds the foundational nuclear science and thermodynamic principles that govern commercial light-water reactor operation. Students progress from atomic structure and neutron behavior through reactor kinetics, heat transfer, and the thermodynamic cycles used in pressurized-water and boiling-water reactor plants. Mastery of these principles is required for NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license preparation, the NUCP Uniform Curriculum, and NRRPT radiation protection fundamentals.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Atomic Structure, Radioactive Decay, and Nuclear Reactions; Neutron Interactions and Cross Sections; Fission Chain Reaction and Criticality — The Six-Factor Formula; Reactor Kinetics: Prompt and Delayed Neutrons, Reactor Period; Reactivity Coefficients and Feedback Mechanisms; Control Rods, Chemical Shim, and Reactivity Control Systems; Xenon and Samarium Poisoning — Fission Product Effects; Heat Transfer Fundamentals — Conduction and Convection in Reactor Systems; Reactor Coolant System Thermodynamics — Pressure, Temperature, and Phase Behavior of Water; The Rankine Cycle and Nuclear Plant Power Conversion; Integrated Plant Behavior — Coupling Neutronics and Thermal-Hydraulics; Reactor Physics & Thermodynamics Review and NRC Exam Alignment.
What competent looks like. Explain nuclear fission, chain reaction criticality, and the six-factor formula in terms that predict reactor behavior during power changes. Apply reactor kinetics concepts—including reactivity coefficients, delayed neutrons, and reactor period—to describe transient plant conditions qualitatively and quantitatively. Describe the thermodynamic cycle (Rankine cycle) of a light-water reactor plant, tracing energy conversion from fuel to turbine-generator output. Calculate basic heat transfer quantities (conduction, convection, heat flux) relevant to fuel cladding integrity and primary coolant behavior. Identify how moderator temperature, void fraction, fuel temperature, and boron concentration affect reactivity, and state the safety significance of each. Interpret plant parameter trends on simplified reactor diagrams and predict the direction and magnitude of reactivity change for normal and off-normal events.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atomic Structure, Radioactive Decay, and Nuclear Reactions | 20 | theory | Students will describe the structure of the atom, distinguish the major decay modes, write balanced nuclear reactions, and explain how fission releases energy. |
| Nuclide chart (Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory edition or equivalent), Lamarsh & Baratta 'Introduction to Nuclear Engineering' (3rd ed.), scientific calculators, whiteboard, decay-mode reference cards | Scored 10-question quiz on atomic notation and decay modes; pass mark 80%. Students must correctly balance at least 5 of 6 nuclear equations to advance. |
| 2 | Neutron Interactions and Cross Sections | 24 | theory | Students will explain how neutrons interact with matter (scatter, absorption, fission), define macroscopic and microscopic cross sections, and use the concept to compare moderator and fuel neutron behavior. |
| Printed thermal cross-section tables (ENDF/B data, instructor-summarized), graph paper, scientific calculators, Lamarsh & Baratta textbook, whiteboard | Two-part check: (1) students correctly define and distinguish microscopic vs. macroscopic cross section in writing; (2) correctly calculate mean free path for at least 3 of 4 given scenarios. Pass mark 80%. |
| 3 | Fission Chain Reaction and Criticality — The Six-Factor Formula | 28 | theory | Students will define each factor in the six-factor formula (η, ε, p, f, P_TNL, P_FNL), state how each is controlled in a light-water reactor, and calculate the effective multiplication factor k-eff for simplified cases. |
| Instructor-provided spreadsheet (Excel or Google Sheets), scientific calculators, printed six-factor formula reference sheet, whiteboard, Lamarsh & Baratta textbook | Written scenario analysis: given two reactor conditions, student must correctly classify k-eff state and identify the dominant contributing factor. Pass mark 80% (at least 4 of 5 questions correct). |
| 4 | Reactor Kinetics: Prompt and Delayed Neutrons, Reactor Period | 28 | theory | Students will distinguish prompt from delayed neutrons, explain why delayed neutrons make reactor control possible, and calculate approximate reactor period from reactivity insertion using the inhour equation in simplified form. |
| Delayed neutron group data table (U-235, Keepin values), semi-log graph paper, scientific calculators, Lamarsh & Baratta textbook, whiteboard | Problem set of five reactor period calculations; students must correctly compute period and classify reactor behavior (stable, period alarm, prompt critical approach) for each. Pass mark 80%. |
| 5 | Reactivity Coefficients and Feedback Mechanisms | 28 | theory | Students will define and apply the moderator temperature coefficient, void coefficient, and fuel temperature (Doppler) coefficient, and explain why a negative overall power coefficient is required for safe reactor operation. |
| BWR and PWR simplified system diagrams (NEI or plant-generic training materials), printed worksheet, whiteboard, scientific calculators, Lamarsh & Baratta textbook | Oral check: each student must verbally explain one assigned coefficient, give the sign for a standard LWR, and state its safety significance to instructor satisfaction. Written backup: 10-question quiz at 80% pass mark. |
| 6 | Control Rods, Chemical Shim, and Reactivity Control Systems | 22 | demo | Students will describe how control rods and boron chemical shim (PWR) or control rods alone (BWR) are used to control reactor power and shutdown margin, and identify the reactivity worth concepts involved. |
| PC-based reactor simulator (IAEA PCTRAN or equivalent educational tool), printed control rod worth data table, graph paper, scientific calculators, generic PWR/BWR training manuals | Lab data table reviewed by instructor: all observations correctly recorded and all three boron calculations within 10% of instructor answer. Students must correctly interpret one simulator transient in writing. Pass mark 80%. |
| 7 | Xenon and Samarium Poisoning — Fission Product Effects | 24 | theory | Students will explain how xenon-135 and samarium-149 build up and decay in an operating reactor, predict xenon oscillation behavior after a power reduction, and state the operational significance of xenon peak after shutdown. |
| Printed xenon transient data tables, semi-log graph paper, scientific calculators, generic nuclear plant operations training text (Westinghouse AP1000 or generic PWR training manual excerpt), whiteboard | Written response: student must correctly draw a xenon peak curve after shutdown, label time to peak, and explain in two sentences why the reactor cannot be restarted during the peak. Plus 5-question quiz at 80% pass mark. |
| 8 | Heat Transfer Fundamentals — Conduction and Convection in Reactor Systems | 28 | theory | Students will apply Fourier's law of conduction and Newton's law of cooling to calculate temperature gradients across fuel pellets, cladding, and coolant, and explain how these gradients determine fuel centerline temperature limits. |
| Printed thermal property tables (conductivity, specific heat for UO₂, Zircaloy, water at operating conditions), scientific calculators, ruler, pencils, generic nuclear plant thermal analysis reference (Todreas & Kazimi 'Nuclear Systems' or instructor excerpts) | Problem set of four fuel rod temperature calculation problems; students must set up and solve each correctly, with final temperatures within 5% of answer key. Pass mark: 3 of 4 correct (75% minimum, rounded to 80% with partial credit rubric). |
| 9 | Reactor Coolant System Thermodynamics — Pressure, Temperature, and Phase Behavior of Water | 28 | theory | Students will use steam tables and the pressure-temperature saturation curve to determine the state of reactor coolant, explain subcooled margin, and describe what happens to primary coolant if pressure drops unexpectedly. |
| Printed steam tables (International Steam Tables or equivalent), printed blank P-T saturation curve template, scientific calculators, whiteboard, generic PWR/BWR thermal-hydraulics training manual | Steam table quiz: 8 lookup and calculation questions; students must correctly determine saturation temperature, enthalpy, or subcooled margin for each. Pass mark 80%. Instructor checks phase-state reasoning on two scenarios verbally. |
| 10 | The Rankine Cycle and Nuclear Plant Power Conversion | 30 | theory | Students will trace the complete Rankine thermodynamic cycle for a nuclear steam supply system, calculate thermal efficiency for a simplified cycle using given enthalpies, and describe the function of each major component (steam generator/reactor, turbine, condenser, feedwater heaters, pumps). |
| Printed steam tables, Rankine cycle blank T-s and h-s diagram templates, scientific calculators, whiteboard, generic PWR and BWR power conversion system diagrams (NEI NUCP training materials or plant-generic) | Completed Rankine cycle diagram with correct labels and one numerical efficiency calculation checked against answer key within 3%. Pass mark: diagram 80% complete and efficiency within acceptable tolerance. |
| 11 | Integrated Plant Behavior — Coupling Neutronics and Thermal-Hydraulics | 34 | lab | Students will use a PC-based educational reactor simulator to demonstrate how changes in coolant temperature, pressure, and flow interact with neutron flux and reactivity feedback in real time, and document observed plant responses in a structured lab log. |
| PC workstations with IAEA PCTRAN or equivalent educational nuclear simulator installed, printed lab log template, scientific calculators, student notes from lessons 1–9 | Instructor reviews completed lab log against answer guide: data tables complete, at least 80% of analysis questions answered correctly with correct physical reasoning, no unsupported conclusions. Simulator performance observed in real time; students must correctly predict transient direction before running each scenario. |
| 12 | Reactor Physics & Thermodynamics Review and NRC Exam Alignment | 20 | practice | Students will identify gaps in their knowledge across all course topics, practice NRC-style multiple choice and written response questions mapped to the Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator exam content areas, and develop a personal study plan for certification exam preparation. |
| Instructor-prepared NRC-style question bank (aligned to NUCP Uniform Curriculum and NRC exam content outlines), formula reference sheet, student notes and lab logs, whiteboard, printed study plan template | Practice exam score recorded as a formative baseline (no minimum pass required at this stage, but scores below 70% trigger mandatory instructor conference and study plan review). Personal study plan submitted and reviewed by instructor for completeness. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactor Physics & Thermodynamics Knowledge Examination | Written exam | 25% | 80% or higher on a 50-question written examination; any question involving a safety-critical calculation (DNBR margin, subcooled margin, prompt critical boundary) must be answered correctly regardless of overall score. | A closed-book, timed written examination covering atomic structure, neutron interactions, the six-factor formula, reactor kinetics, reactivity coefficients, fission product poisoning, heat transfer, steam tables, and the Rankine cycle. Questions include multiple-choice, fill-in, and short calculation items aligned to NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license content areas and the NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum domains. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Simulator Transient Analysis Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Student must correctly predict the direction of all key parameter changes before each transient run, execute the procedure without safety limit violations on the simulator, and provide an acceptable verbal explanation (judged by instructor using a standardized rubric) of all observed feedback mechanisms; rubric requires 80% of criteria met. | Each student individually operates the educational reactor simulator to execute a prescribed transient (power ramp or reactivity insertion), records data, and provides a real-time verbal explanation of neutron kinetics and thermal-hydraulic feedback to the instructor. The demonstration directly maps to NRC Reactor Operator license competency areas for understanding plant response to reactivity changes. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Laboratory Log Portfolio | Log | 15% | All required lab log entries submitted; each entry must achieve 80% or higher on the instructor scoring rubric covering data completeness, accuracy of analysis questions, correct application of physical principles, and quality of conclusions. | Students submit a complete portfolio of their structured lab log entries from the integrated plant behavior simulator lab (Lesson 11) and all calculation worksheets from heat transfer and steam table lessons. The portfolio demonstrates the student's ability to collect, record, and interpret quantitative plant data — a skill directly required for non-licensed operator daily logs and supporting NRRPT documentation practices. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Reactivity Control and Thermal Margin Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% correct identification of all safety-critical conditions presented; any missed unsafe condition (subcooling loss, prompt critical approach, DNBR limit exceedance) results in automatic failure and mandatory remediation before course credit is awarded. | The instructor presents five written plant-parameter scenarios; the student must classify each as safe, requiring operator action, or requiring immediate shutdown (scram), citing the specific physical principle (subcooled margin, prompt critical boundary, fuel temperature limit, or DNBR) that governs the decision. This safety check confirms that students can correctly apply course content to protect plant safety — a non-negotiable competency for NRC-licensed and non-licensed operator roles. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
BLD-NUCL84-03 Trade course
Nuclear Plant Systems
313 hr · $6,480 COMPLIMENTARY
This course provides a comprehensive study of the major mechanical, fluid, electrical, and auxiliary systems found in light-water reactor nuclear power plants, including pressurized-water reactor (PWR) and boiling-water reactor (BWR) configurations. Students trace energy flow from the reactor core through the primary and secondary systems to the turbine-generator and balance-of-plant equipment, learning normal operating parameters, system interactions, and failure modes. Content directly supports the NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license exam areas, the NUCP Uniform Curriculum plant systems modules, and the NRRPT knowledge base for system-related radiological hazards.
Outcomes- Describe the function, major components, and normal operating parameters of the primary coolant system for both PWR and BWR plant designs.
- Trace the flow path of the secondary system from steam generator or reactor steam dome through turbine, condenser, and feedwater heaters back to the steam generator or reactor vessel.
- Identify the purpose and operating principles of each engineered safety feature system, including emergency core cooling, containment spray, and auxiliary feedwater systems.
- Read and interpret plant system drawings including Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs), one-line electrical diagrams, and system flow diagrams to verify system lineup.
- Apply lockout/tagout procedures and appropriate PPE requirements before performing simulated system lineup and valve manipulation tasks.
- Recognize and explain off-normal system indications, including high/low pressure alarms, high/low temperature alarms, and flow anomalies, and describe the correct operator response.
Course text
This course provides a comprehensive study of the major mechanical, fluid, electrical, and auxiliary systems found in light-water reactor nuclear power plants, including pressurized-water reactor (PWR) and boiling-water reactor (BWR) configurations. Students trace energy flow from the reactor core through the primary and secondary systems to the turbine-generator and balance-of-plant equipment, learning normal operating parameters, system interactions, and failure modes. Content directly supports the NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license exam areas, the NUCP Uniform Curriculum plant systems modules, and the NRRPT knowledge base for system-related radiological hazards.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Introduction to Plant Systems Architecture and Energy Flow; Reactor Coolant System: PWR Primary Loop; Reactor Coolant System: BWR Primary System and Recirculation; Secondary System: Steam, Turbine, and Condenser; Feedwater and Condensate Systems; Engineered Safety Feature Systems: Emergency Core Cooling; Containment Systems and Containment Isolation; Electrical Power Systems: Normal and Emergency AC/DC; Auxiliary Systems: Component Cooling Water, Service Water, and HVAC; Plant System Drawings and P&ID Interpretation Lab; Normal and Off-Normal System Evolutions: Operator Response; Integrated System Interactions and Plant Transient Analysis.
What competent looks like. Describe the function, major components, and normal operating parameters of the primary coolant system for both PWR and BWR plant designs. Trace the flow path of the secondary system from steam generator or reactor steam dome through turbine, condenser, and feedwater heaters back to the steam generator or reactor vessel. Identify the purpose and operating principles of each engineered safety feature system, including emergency core cooling, containment spray, and auxiliary feedwater systems. Read and interpret plant system drawings including Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs), one-line electrical diagrams, and system flow diagrams to verify system lineup. Apply lockout/tagout procedures and appropriate PPE requirements before performing simulated system lineup and valve manipulation tasks. Recognize and explain off-normal system indications, including high/low pressure alarms, high/low temperature alarms, and flow anomalies, and describe the correct operator response.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction to Plant Systems Architecture and Energy Flow | 20 | theory | Students will describe the overall energy conversion pathway from nuclear fission heat to electrical output and identify the major system boundaries in both PWR and BWR plants. |
| NRC Reactor Concepts Manual (NUREG-1082 or current equivalent), NEI NUCP curriculum plant systems module, PWR and BWR cutaway posters, energy balance worksheet, whiteboard | Students correctly label all major system boundaries on a blank plant diagram and complete the energy balance worksheet with no more than one error; pass mark 80%. |
| 2 | Reactor Coolant System: PWR Primary Loop | 28 | theory | Students will identify the components of the PWR reactor coolant system (RCS), including reactor vessel, reactor coolant pumps, steam generators, and pressurizer, and explain how each component maintains coolant pressure and temperature within licensed limits. |
| Generic PWR RCS P&ID (instructor-prepared, not plant-specific proprietary), NUREG-1082, parameter cards, pressure-temperature curve handout, engineering calculator | Students trace the correct flow path on an unmarked RCS P&ID and answer a 20-question quiz on component functions and normal parameters; pass mark 80%. |
| 3 | Reactor Coolant System: BWR Primary System and Recirculation | 22 | theory | Students will explain the BWR single-loop primary system design, describe the function of jet pumps and recirculation pumps, and compare core flow control methods to the PWR approach. |
| Generic BWR vessel cutaway diagram, BWR flow diagram, NRC Reactor Concepts Manual, scenario worksheet | Students correctly complete the BWR flow path trace and answer the scenario worksheet with written responses scored against an answer key; pass mark 80%. |
| 4 | Secondary System: Steam, Turbine, and Condenser | 26 | theory | Students will trace the secondary-side fluid path from the steam generator (or BWR steam dome) through the high-pressure turbine, moisture separator-reheater, low-pressure turbine, and condenser, and describe the thermodynamic function of each component. |
| Generic secondary system flow diagram, turbine startup procedure outline, condenser scenario data set, steam tables, engineering calculator | Students reproduce the secondary flow diagram with all major components labeled correctly and score 80% or higher on a 15-question multiple-choice quiz covering thermodynamic functions and operating parameters. |
| 5 | Feedwater and Condensate Systems | 22 | demo | Students will describe the flow path and function of feedwater heaters, deaerator, condensate pumps, and feedwater pumps, and explain how feedwater temperature and flow rate affect reactor power and steam generator level control. |
| Generic feedwater system P&ID, enthalpy worksheet, steam tables, alarm response card template, projector | Students correctly identify all labeled components on the marked-up P&ID and complete the enthalpy worksheet within 10% of the instructor answer key; pass mark 80% combined. |
| 6 | Engineered Safety Feature Systems: Emergency Core Cooling | 30 | theory | Students will explain the design basis and actuation logic of emergency core cooling systems (ECCS) including high-pressure injection, low-pressure injection, and accumulator/core flood tank systems for both PWR and BWR designs. |
| Generic ECCS system description (instructor-prepared), actuation logic chart template, LOCA timeline scenario worksheet, NRC Reactor Concepts Manual | Students complete the LOCA timeline annotation with no critical safety steps missing and score 80% on a 20-question quiz covering ECCS subsystem functions, actuation signals, and single-failure criterion. |
| 7 | Containment Systems and Containment Isolation | 22 | theory | Students will describe the design and function of containment structures for PWR (large dry, ice condenser, sub-atmospheric) and BWR (Mark I, II, III) containment types, and explain how containment isolation valves and containment spray systems limit radiological release. |
| Containment design comparison handout, containment isolation scenario worksheet, generic post-accident monitoring system description, NUREG-0737 overview (as supplemental reading) | Students produce correctly labeled containment sketches and score 80% on a 15-question quiz covering containment types, isolation logic, and post-accident control systems. |
| 8 | Electrical Power Systems: Normal and Emergency AC/DC | 26 | theory | Students will trace the normal offsite and onsite electrical power distribution path from the generator through the main transformer, switchyard, and safety buses, and describe the function of emergency diesel generators and station batteries in a loss of offsite power event. |
| Generic nuclear plant one-line electrical diagram, LOOP timeline scenario, protective device worksheet, projector | Students correctly trace and label the one-line diagram and score 80% on a 20-question quiz covering normal and emergency power distribution, diesel generator loading sequence, and battery system function. |
| 9 | Auxiliary Systems: Component Cooling Water, Service Water, and HVAC | 20 | demo | Students will explain the role of component cooling water (CCW), essential service water (ESW), and safety-related HVAC systems as support systems for primary and safety equipment, and describe what happens to supported components if these systems are lost. |
| Generic CCW/ESW system flow diagram, heat rejection chain worksheet, alarm response card, HVAC system description handout | Students correctly complete the heat rejection chain map and score 80% on a 10-question quiz on auxiliary system functions, dependencies, and consequences of system loss. |
| 10 | Plant System Drawings and P&ID Interpretation Lab | 30 | lab | Students will correctly interpret Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams, one-line electrical diagrams, and system flow diagrams to verify a required system lineup before a simulated evolution, applying lockout/tagout principles to any isolated component. |
| Generic nuclear plant P&ID packet (five segments), ISA symbol legend, RHR system lineup checklist, LOTO demonstration station (hasp, multiple locks, danger tags, LOTO log), OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 reference | Students identify all valve and instrument symbols correctly on at least four of five P&ID segments (80% accuracy) and complete the LOTO exercise with zero safety-critical errors; any missed energy isolation point is an automatic fail requiring immediate repeat. |
| 11 | Normal and Off-Normal System Evolutions: Operator Response | 35 | practice | Students will demonstrate correct use of generic operating procedures and alarm response cards to walk through a normal plant startup evolution and respond to three simulated off-normal system indications without prompting. |
| Generic reactor startup procedure outline, alarm response cards (three scenarios), model system board or table-top simulator interface, procedure use and adherence policy handout, NEI 09-07 (safety culture) overview | Students complete all startup procedure steps in correct sequence with no out-of-order actions and respond to all three alarm cards with at least 80% of required actions correctly sequenced; any skipped immediate action is flagged for remediation. |
| 12 | Integrated System Interactions and Plant Transient Analysis | 32 | practice | Students will analyze a complex plant transient involving simultaneous off-normal conditions in two or more systems, identify the correct priority order of operator actions, and document findings in a written transient analysis report that meets nuclear quality-writing standards. |
| Two-system transient scenario packet, blank plant diagram, transient analysis report template, technical writing standards checklist, NEI NUCP plant systems exam objective list | Transient analysis report scored against a rubric (accuracy of system responses 40%, correct action priority 40%, technical writing quality 20%); pass mark 80% overall with no critical safety actions omitted or inverted. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Systems Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% correct (40 of 50 questions) | A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer examination covering all major plant systems: primary and secondary coolant systems, ECCS, containment, electrical distribution, and auxiliary systems. Questions are written at the NRC Generic Fundamentals Examination (GFES) cognitive level and mapped to the NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license exam content areas, as well as the NEI NUCP plant systems module learning objectives. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| P&ID and System Lineup Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All safety-critical valve positions correct; overall lineup accuracy 90% or higher; LOTO permit complete and correct with zero energy isolation errors | Students receive an unfamiliar generic P&ID segment and a written system lineup checklist, then independently verify the lineup by tracing each valve and instrument against the checklist, documenting discrepancies, and completing a lockout/tagout permit for one isolated component. The evaluator observes the entire exercise and scores using a standardized checklist; any missed energy isolation point results in an automatic fail and mandatory remediation before reassessment. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Lab Log: System Tracing and Transient Analysis Portfolio | Log | 15% | All six required entries present and complete; average technical accuracy score of 80% across all entries; no entries with critical safety errors | Students maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course containing six required entries: (1) PWR RCS flow path annotation, (2) BWR primary system comparison, (3) secondary system flow diagram, (4) ECCS actuation logic chart, (5) CCW/ESW heat rejection chain map, and (6) the two-system transient analysis report. Each entry is reviewed by the instructor at the time of completion for immediate corrective feedback; the complete portfolio is evaluated at course end for accuracy, completeness, and technical writing quality. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safety and Procedure Compliance Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% compliance on all safety-critical steps; no LOTO errors; PPE donned correctly before any simulated equipment contact; procedure use score 90% or higher | An unannounced or end-of-course evaluator observation during one of the system evolution practice sessions in which students must demonstrate correct PPE selection and donning, proper use of procedures (no skipped steps, no steps performed from memory without procedure in hand), and complete compliance with lockout/tagout requirements per OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147. Any critical safety deviation (skipped LOTO step, incorrect PPE for the hazard, out-of-sequence safety action) constitutes a failure and requires remediation and re-evaluation before the student may proceed to the next course. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
BLD-NUCL84-04 Trade course
Instrumentation & Control for Nuclear Power Plant Operations
313 hr · $6,480 COMPLIMENTARY
This course develops the knowledge and hands-on skills required to install, calibrate, troubleshoot, and maintain the instrumentation and control (I&C) systems found in commercial nuclear power plants. Students work with pressure, temperature, flow, and neutron-flux sensors; analog and digital control loops; and plant protection system logic in accordance with applicable industry standards and NRC requirements. Lessons align with the NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum I&C competency areas and support preparation for the NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license examinations.
Outcomes- Calibrate and functionally test nuclear-grade process instruments—pressure, differential-pressure, temperature, flow, and level transmitters—to within manufacturer and technical specification tolerances.
- Trace and interpret I&C loop diagrams, instrument index sheets, and P&IDs using ISA symbology and plant documentation standards.
- Analyze analog and digital control loop behavior, identify common failure modes, and recommend corrective actions consistent with plant procedures.
- Describe the design bases, channel independence requirements, and operability testing of a nuclear plant protection system and its engineered safety feature actuation logic.
- Apply OSHA lockout/tagout, nuclear I&C work clearance, and electrostatic-discharge precautions when performing instrument maintenance tasks.
- Produce complete calibration data sheets and corrective-maintenance work orders that meet the documentation requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B quality assurance.
Course text
This course develops the knowledge and hands-on skills required to install, calibrate, troubleshoot, and maintain the instrumentation and control (I&C) systems found in commercial nuclear power plants. Students work with pressure, temperature, flow, and neutron-flux sensors; analog and digital control loops; and plant protection system logic in accordance with applicable industry standards and NRC requirements. Lessons align with the NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum I&C competency areas and support preparation for the NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license examinations.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: I&C Fundamentals: Signals, Standards, and Documentation; Measurement Principles: Pressure, Differential Pressure, and Level; Temperature and Flow Measurement; Neutron Flux Instrumentation and Reactor Power Measurement; Analog Control Loops: PID Controllers and Final Control Elements; Digital I&C Systems and Programmable Logic in Nuclear Applications; Reactor Protection System and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation Logic; Lockout/Tagout and I&C Work Clearance Procedures; Instrument Calibration: Procedure, Data Recording, and As-Found/As-Left Documentation; Troubleshooting I&C Loops: Fault Isolation and Corrective Maintenance; Instrument Surveillance Testing and Technical Specification Compliance; Integrated I&C System Review and Credential Exam Alignment.
What competent looks like. Calibrate and functionally test nuclear-grade process instruments—pressure, differential-pressure, temperature, flow, and level transmitters—to within manufacturer and technical specification tolerances. Trace and interpret I&C loop diagrams, instrument index sheets, and P&IDs using ISA symbology and plant documentation standards. Analyze analog and digital control loop behavior, identify common failure modes, and recommend corrective actions consistent with plant procedures. Describe the design bases, channel independence requirements, and operability testing of a nuclear plant protection system and its engineered safety feature actuation logic. Apply OSHA lockout/tagout, nuclear I&C work clearance, and electrostatic-discharge precautions when performing instrument maintenance tasks. Produce complete calibration data sheets and corrective-maintenance work orders that meet the documentation requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B quality assurance.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | I&C Fundamentals: Signals, Standards, and Documentation | 19 | theory | Students will correctly interpret ISA 5.1 instrument symbols, identify the four standard analog signal ranges used in nuclear plant I&C loops, and locate required information on an instrument data sheet. |
| ISA 5.1 standard (current edition), sample nuclear plant P&IDs, instrument data sheets, scientific calculators, whiteboard | Written quiz: 80% or higher on 25 questions covering ISA symbology, signal ranges, and datasheet interpretation; instructor reviews each student's annotated P&ID for correct tag identification. |
| 2 | Measurement Principles: Pressure, Differential Pressure, and Level | 26.5 | theory | Students will explain the operating principles of Bourdon-tube, bellows, and capacitance-cell pressure transmitters and calculate reactor coolant system level from differential-pressure measurements. |
| Training-grade capacitance-cell DP transmitter, calibration bench, dead-weight tester or precision pressure calibrator, manufacturer manual, engineering paper | Practical check: student correctly identifies all major transmitter components (100% required for safety-critical parts) and solves at least 8 of 10 DP-level calculation problems correctly before advancing. |
| 3 | Temperature and Flow Measurement | 24.5 | theory | Students will describe the operating principles of RTDs, thermocouples, and orifice-plate flow elements and explain how each is applied in nuclear plant primary and secondary coolant circuits. |
| RTD reference tables (IEC 60751 or ASTM equivalent), thermocouple reference tables, sample P&IDs, orifice-plate cutaway model or diagram, whiteboard | Written quiz: 80% or higher on 20 questions covering sensor principles, signal conversion calculations, and loop tracing; instructor spot-checks two calculation problems per student. |
| 4 | Neutron Flux Instrumentation and Reactor Power Measurement | 26.5 | theory | Students will identify the three nuclear power ranges monitored by in-core and ex-core neutron detectors and explain how flux signals feed into reactor trip and power-level control functions. |
| Plant-generic neutron flux instrumentation training manual, reactor trip logic diagram, startup curve chart, case study handout (NRC-published generic communication or training scenario) | Oral questioning by instructor: student correctly explains detector range overlap and trip logic path with no major errors; written summary of the case study must identify the correct failure mode and response. |
| 5 | Analog Control Loops: PID Controllers and Final Control Elements | 26.5 | demo | Students will configure proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller parameters on a training process loop simulator and observe the effect of each parameter on loop stability and setpoint response. |
| PC-based or bench-top PID process loop trainer (e.g., Feedback Instruments or equivalent), student procedure sheets, graph paper or data-logging software, sample plant operating procedure for controller transfer | Skills demonstration: student correctly transfers controller to manual and back to auto without process excursion (pass/fail per procedure checklist) and achieves stable setpoint response within ±5% of target after PID adjustment. |
| 6 | Digital I&C Systems and Programmable Logic in Nuclear Applications | 24.5 | theory | Students will describe the architecture of a typical nuclear digital I&C platform, explain the role of software quality assurance under 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B, and identify common cybersecurity boundary requirements. |
| Generic digital I&C platform training guide (Westinghouse Common Q or AREVA Teleperm reference material as available), 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B summary, NRC Regulatory Guide 1.152 overview handout, whiteboard | Written quiz: 80% or higher on 20 questions covering digital I&C architecture, software QA tiers, voting logic, and isolation requirements. |
| 7 | Reactor Protection System and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation Logic | 26.5 | theory | Students will explain the design bases for a nuclear plant protection system, describe the two-out-of-four voting logic common in pressurized-water reactors, and trace an engineered safety feature actuation signal from initiating sensor to final actuator. |
| Generic RPS logic diagram, 2-of-4 coincidence logic training worksheet, sample nuclear surveillance procedure (de-identified plant document or NRC training material), NRC NUREG training guides as applicable | Written quiz: 80% or higher on 25 questions covering trip logic, channel independence, and ESFAS actuation paths; logic-trace exercise graded for correct signal path with no missed nodes. |
| 8 | Lockout/Tagout and I&C Work Clearance Procedures | 19 | lab | Students will correctly execute a nuclear plant I&C work clearance and OSHA-compliant lockout/tagout sequence on a training board, isolating a simulated instrument loop before performing maintenance. |
| Training instrument panel with lockable isolation valves and electrical disconnects, LOTO locks and tags, clearance form templates, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 reference card, multimeter | Skills checklist (pass/fail): all six LOTO steps completed in correct order with zero safety steps skipped; clearance form complete and legible; instructor must observe the student independently; any skipped safety step is an automatic retest. |
| 9 | Instrument Calibration: Procedure, Data Recording, and As-Found/As-Left Documentation | 30 | lab | Students will perform a five-point calibration on a pressure transmitter following a written procedure, record as-found and as-left data, and determine whether the instrument passes its technical specification tolerance. |
| Training-grade 4–20 mA pressure transmitter, precision pressure calibrator or deadweight tester, NIST-traceable reference standard, digital multimeter, calibration data sheet forms, procedure sheet, Fluke or equivalent calibrator | Calibration data sheet reviewed by instructor: as-left errors must be within the stated tolerance at all five calibration points; data sheet must be complete, legible, and signed; any out-of-tolerance as-left result requires rework and re-check. |
| 10 | Troubleshooting I&C Loops: Fault Isolation and Corrective Maintenance | 30 | practice | Students will systematically isolate an instructor-introduced fault in a complete 4–20 mA instrument loop using a half-split troubleshooting method and document the corrective maintenance action taken. |
| Training instrument loop panels with instructor-introduced faults (open wire, shorted sensor, failed transmitter, misconfigured controller), multimeter, 4–20 mA loop calibrator, loop drawings, corrective maintenance work-order forms | Instructor observation: student correctly identifies the faulted component within the allotted time using documented half-split logic (no random part swapping allowed); completed work order must describe all required fields; pass requires correct fault isolation and complete documentation. |
| 11 | Instrument Surveillance Testing and Technical Specification Compliance | 28 | field | Students will perform a simulated instrument channel operability check following a surveillance test procedure, evaluate results against technical specification acceptance criteria, and determine the required action if a channel fails. |
| Lab training panel configured as a safety-related channel, sample surveillance test procedure (de-identified or generic), technical specification action level reference sheet, surveillance data sheet forms | Completed surveillance data sheet reviewed by instructor: all steps performed in order, results recorded correctly, correct determination of pass or fail, and correct action level identified; 100% of safety-critical decision points must be correct. |
| 12 | Integrated I&C System Review and Credential Exam Alignment | 32 | practice | Students will integrate knowledge from all prior lessons by solving multi-system I&C scenarios drawn from NRC RO license exam question formats and NUCP competency areas, demonstrating readiness for credentialing. |
| NRC-style practice question bank (instructor-developed or commercial RO exam prep resource), plant system I&C diagrams used throughout the course, presentation materials, scoring rubric | Practice exam scored at 80% or higher; one-page system summary graded against rubric for technical accuracy, correct setpoint identification, and clear explanation of protection system connections—must meet all rubric criteria to pass. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I&C Systems Written Examination | Written exam | 25% | 80% or higher (40 of 50 questions correct) | A 50-question closed-book written exam covering ISA symbology, measurement principles (pressure, temperature, flow, level, neutron flux), analog and digital control loop theory, reactor protection system logic, and technical specification application. Questions are written in NRC RO license exam format to provide authentic credentialing practice aligned with both the NRC Non-Licensed Operator Prep and RO License exam areas. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Instrument Calibration Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All as-left calibration points within stated tolerance; data sheet complete and signed; all procedural steps completed in correct order without instructor prompting | The student independently performs a five-point calibration on an assigned training-grade transmitter using the course calibration procedure, records as-found and as-left data, and determines instrument acceptability against the technical specification tolerance. The evaluator uses a standardized skill checklist; any missed safety step or out-of-tolerance as-left result requires a documented retest before the student may progress. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Calibration and Maintenance Laboratory Log | Log | 15% | All required entries present; technical accuracy verified by instructor; no falsified or blank data fields; submitted within one class day of each lab completion | Students maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course documenting every calibration exercise, fault-isolation activity, and surveillance test, including as-found data, calculations, results, corrective actions, and post-work verifications. The log is evaluated as a quality assurance record consistent with 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B documentation standards and serves as evidence of the NUCP I&C practical competency requirements. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Lockout/Tagout and Work Clearance Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | Pass/fail: all six LOTO steps completed in correct sequence with zero safety steps omitted; any skipped safety-critical step is an automatic failure requiring full retest | The instructor observes the student independently executing a complete OSHA-compliant lockout/tagout and nuclear I&C work clearance sequence on the training panel, from notifying the operator through verification of zero energy state and restoration to service. This assessment maps directly to OSHA 10 hazardous energy control competencies and to the NRC Non-Licensed Operator task area for safe instrument maintenance. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
BLD-NUCL84-05 Trade course
Radiation Protection & Dosimetry
313 hr · $6,480 COMPLIMENTARY
This course develops the knowledge and hands-on skills required to monitor, quantify, and control ionizing radiation hazards in a nuclear power plant environment. Students learn the physics of radiation, biological effects, detection instrument operation, dose calculation, and the regulatory framework governing worker radiation protection. Lessons are mapped to the NRRPT examination content areas, the NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum radiation protection modules, and the NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license preparation objectives.
Outcomes- Identify the types of ionizing radiation, their properties, and the appropriate shielding and PPE for each hazard encountered in a nuclear power plant.
- Operate and calibrate common radiation detection instruments—including Geiger-Müller detectors, ionization chambers, and proportional counters—and interpret their readings accurately.
- Apply the ALARA principle and time-distance-shielding controls to plan work in radiologically controlled areas and document dose in accordance with 10 CFR Part 20 requirements.
- Calculate absorbed dose, dose equivalent, effective dose equivalent, and annual dose limits using standard dosimetry equations and conversion factors.
- Perform radiological surveys, set up contamination controls, and execute proper entry and exit procedures for high-radiation and contamination areas.
- Interpret personnel dosimetry data, recognize dose trends that require supervisory action, and communicate radiological conditions using correct NRC/ANSI terminology.
Course text
This course develops the knowledge and hands-on skills required to monitor, quantify, and control ionizing radiation hazards in a nuclear power plant environment. Students learn the physics of radiation, biological effects, detection instrument operation, dose calculation, and the regulatory framework governing worker radiation protection. Lessons are mapped to the NRRPT examination content areas, the NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum radiation protection modules, and the NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license preparation objectives.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Atomic Structure, Radioactive Decay, and Radiation Types; Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation; Dose Quantities, Units, and 10 CFR Part 20 Limits; ALARA Principle and Radiological Work Planning; Radiation Detection Principles and Instrument Types; Radiation Detection Instrument Operation and Field Calibration; Radiological Surveys: Techniques and Documentation; Personnel Dosimetry: TLDs, OSLs, and Electronic Dosimeters; Contamination Control: Entry, Exit, and Decontamination Procedures; Airborne Radioactivity: Sampling, Action Levels, and Respiratory Protection; Dose Records, Reporting, and Radiological Event Response; Integrated Radiation Protection Practical Examination.
What competent looks like. Identify the types of ionizing radiation, their properties, and the appropriate shielding and PPE for each hazard encountered in a nuclear power plant. Operate and calibrate common radiation detection instruments—including Geiger-Müller detectors, ionization chambers, and proportional counters—and interpret their readings accurately. Apply the ALARA principle and time-distance-shielding controls to plan work in radiologically controlled areas and document dose in accordance with 10 CFR Part 20 requirements. Calculate absorbed dose, dose equivalent, effective dose equivalent, and annual dose limits using standard dosimetry equations and conversion factors. Perform radiological surveys, set up contamination controls, and execute proper entry and exit procedures for high-radiation and contamination areas. Interpret personnel dosimetry data, recognize dose trends that require supervisory action, and communicate radiological conditions using correct NRC/ANSI terminology.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atomic Structure, Radioactive Decay, and Radiation Types | 24 | theory | Students will identify the four major types of ionizing radiation, describe their decay mechanisms, and state the penetrating power and shielding requirements of each. |
| Nuclide chart (Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory edition), whiteboard, scientific calculators, NRC Regulatory Guide 8.29 (Instruction Concerning Risks from Occupational Radiation Exposure), Chart of the Nuclides | Written 20-question quiz on radiation types, decay equations, and shielding; passing score 70% or higher. |
| 2 | Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation | 22 | theory | Students will explain stochastic and deterministic effects of radiation exposure and correlate dose quantities (absorbed dose, dose equivalent, effective dose equivalent) with human health risk. |
| ICRP Publication 103 excerpts, NRC NUREG/CR-6459 selected chapters, dose-unit conversion reference sheet, calculator | Concept-map assessment where students connect dose quantity to biological endpoint and regulatory limit; instructor evaluates for accuracy of all connections; 70% of connections must be correct to pass. |
| 3 | Dose Quantities, Units, and 10 CFR Part 20 Limits | 26 | theory | Students will state the occupational and public dose limits from 10 CFR Part 20 and correctly apply dose quantity definitions to calculate whether a worker's dose is within regulatory limits. |
| 10 CFR Part 20 (current edition, printed or online), NRC Regulatory Guide 8.13, dose-limit reference card, calculator | Written scenario exam: five multi-part dose-limit problems; students must correctly identify the applicable limit, perform the calculation, and state the required action; 70% overall score required to pass. |
| 4 | ALARA Principle and Radiological Work Planning | 26 | theory | Students will apply the ALARA principle by using time, distance, and shielding controls to develop a written radiological work plan that reduces projected dose to a level as low as reasonably achievable. |
| Sample plant RWP forms, NRC Regulatory Guide 8.8 (Information Relevant to Ensuring that Occupational Radiation Exposures at Nuclear Power Stations Will Be ALARA), inverse-square-law reference, calculator | Instructor scores the team RWP against a 15-point rubric covering ALARA controls, PPE selection, stay-time calculation, emergency procedures, and documentation completeness; 11 of 15 points required to pass. |
| 5 | Radiation Detection Principles and Instrument Types | 28 | theory | Students will explain the operating principles of gas-filled detectors (ionization chamber, proportional counter, Geiger-Müller), scintillation detectors, and electronic dosimeters, and select the correct instrument for a given radiation type and measurement range. |
| Detector reference charts, Knoll Radiation Detection and Measurement (4th ed.) selected chapters, instrument manufacturer specification sheets (ion chamber, GM survey meter, scintillation probe), projector | Written 25-question matching and short-answer quiz on detector principles and instrument selection; 70% passing score. |
| 6 | Radiation Detection Instrument Operation and Field Calibration | 30 | lab | Students will perform a source check, operability check, and field calibration verification on a GM survey meter and an ionization chamber survey meter following written procedures, and correctly document results. |
| Calibrated GM survey meters (class set), calibrated ion chamber survey meters, certified check sources (low-activity, licensed), instrument calibration record forms, written operability-check procedures, PPE (lab coat, safety glasses) | Instructor observes each student completing the full operability check sequence independently; student must complete all steps in correct order, record readings within ±10% of expected check-source response, and produce a complete log entry; all three criteria must be met to pass. |
| 7 | Radiological Surveys: Techniques and Documentation | 28 | practice | Students will conduct a systematic area radiation survey and a surface contamination survey in a simulated radiological work area using correct scan speeds, geometries, and instrument settings, and produce a completed survey map. |
| GM meters with thin-window probes, ion chamber meters, approved sealed demonstration sources or simulated contamination materials per RSO authorization, area-survey map templates, radiological posting signs, PPE (lab coat, safety glasses, gloves), written survey procedure | Instructor uses a 12-point observation checklist (correct probe distance, adequate scan speed, systematic coverage, correct instrument setting, accurate map transfer, correct posting placement); students must achieve 10 of 12 points to pass. |
| 8 | Personnel Dosimetry: TLDs, OSLs, and Electronic Dosimeters | 24 | theory | Students will describe the operating principles of thermoluminescent dosimeters, optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters, and electronic personal dosimeters, and correctly assign, wear, and exchange dosimetry according to plant access control procedures. |
| Sample TLD and OSL badge assemblies (non-activated or training units), electronic personal dosimeters or training simulators, 10 CFR Part 20 subpart C reference, sample plant access-control procedure, dosimetry assignment log forms | Written 15-question quiz on dosimeter principles, wearing requirements, and regulatory basis for assignment decisions; 70% passing score required. |
| 9 | Contamination Control: Entry, Exit, and Decontamination Procedures | 28 | practice | Students will demonstrate correct step-off pad procedure, anti-contamination clothing donning and doffing sequence, and basic personnel decontamination technique while maintaining their own skin and clothing free of detectable contamination. |
| Anti-contamination clothing (coveralls, boot covers, gloves, hoods), step-off pad, GM thin-window frisker meters, contamination control procedure, PPE, simulated step-off pad boundary tape | Instructor evaluates each student's independent doffing and self-frisk using an 8-point checklist; all 8 steps must be performed correctly (100% required for this safety-critical skill) or the student repeats with remediation. |
| 10 | Airborne Radioactivity: Sampling, Action Levels, and Respiratory Protection | 26 | demo | Students will set up an air sampling train to measure airborne radioactivity concentration, compare results to derived air concentration values, and select the correct respiratory protection based on the calculated dose potential. |
| Air sampling pump and filter holder assembly, calibrated flow meter, 10 CFR Part 20 Appendix B DAC tables, training half-face respirators, written airborne sampling procedure, calculator, PPE | Students submit completed DAC calculation worksheet for three scenarios (must be arithmetically correct and include the correct action recommendation) and demonstrate the seal check; both components must be satisfactory to pass. |
| 11 | Dose Records, Reporting, and Radiological Event Response | 26 | theory | Students will interpret a worker dose record, identify when regulatory reporting thresholds under 10 CFR Part 20 are met or approached, and describe the immediate actions required upon a radiological event such as an inadvertent high-radiation area entry. |
| 10 CFR Part 20 Subparts L and M (printed excerpt), simulated worker dose history printouts, reporting timeline reference chart, scenario handout | Short-answer written assessment on dose record interpretation and reporting requirements; students must correctly identify all reportable conditions in the five records and list correct notification actions; 70% score required to pass. |
| 12 | Integrated Radiation Protection Practical Examination | 25 | lab | Students will independently complete a full radiological work scenario—from pre-job briefing through survey, anti-C donning, simulated task execution, frisk, doffing, and documentation—demonstrating all major course competencies without prompting. |
| Full mock RCA setup with boundary tape, radiological postings, sealed demonstration sources or simulated contamination per RSO authorization, anti-C clothing, GM meters, ion chambers, EPDs, step-off pad, RWP forms, survey map templates, dosimetry log | Instructor scores each student on a 20-point integrated performance rubric covering pre-job brief accuracy (4 pts), survey technique (4 pts), anti-C donning/doffing (4 pts), dosimetry monitoring (4 pts), and documentation completeness (4 pts); 16 of 20 points required to pass; any safety-critical error (e.g., leaving the RCA without frisking) results in automatic remediation regardless of total score. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radiation Protection Written Knowledge Examination | Written exam | 25% | 70% or higher (105 of 150 points) | A 150-question written examination covering radiation physics, biological effects, dose quantities and units, 10 CFR Part 20 limits, ALARA principles, detector theory, dosimetry systems, contamination control, airborne radioactivity, and regulatory reporting. Questions are drawn from NRRPT examination content domains and NEI NUCP radiation protection module objectives, using multiple-choice, matching, and calculation formats. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Instrument Operation and Radiological Survey Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All safety-critical steps performed correctly; 85% overall on the scored checklist | The student independently performs a GM meter operability check, conducts an area radiation survey and surface contamination survey of a mock RCA, and correctly documents all results. An instructor scores performance on a detailed observation checklist aligned to plant HP technician task qualification standards. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Laboratory Procedure Log | Log | 15% | All six required lab entries present, complete, and accurate; no blank data fields; any calculation error corrected and initialed | Students maintain a bound laboratory log throughout the course recording procedures, raw data, calculated results, and conclusions for each of the six laboratory and practice sessions (instrument operability, area survey, contamination survey, dosimeter assignment, air sampling, and integrated practical). The log is reviewed by the instructor for completeness, data integrity, and correct unit usage at the end of the course. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Radiological Safety Behavior Observation Checklist | Safety audit | 15% | 100% compliance on all eight non-negotiable safety behaviors; any single failure requires documented remediation and re-observation | The instructor conducts a final safety-behavior observation during the integrated practical lesson, verifying eight non-negotiable behaviors: correct dosimeter worn before entering RCA, stay time respected, self-frisk completed at step-off pad, anti-C doffing performed with roll-away technique, no eating or drinking in the RCA, correct PPE selected for hazard, RWP reviewed before entry, and emergency exit route identified at pre-job brief. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
BLD-NUCL84-06 Trade course
NRC Regulations & Safety Culture
313 hr · $6,480 COMPLIMENTARY
This course develops the regulatory knowledge and professional safety-culture behaviors required of nuclear plant technicians and operators operating under NRC oversight. Students study the Atomic Energy Act, 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, 50, and 55, the NRC inspection and enforcement process, and the industry safety-culture framework established in NRC Policy Statement and INPO guidelines. Emphasis is placed on applying regulations to realistic plant scenarios, recognizing regulatory violations, and demonstrating the safety-conscious work environment (SCWE) behaviors expected by both the NRC and utility employers.
Outcomes- Correctly interpret and apply the key requirements of 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, 50, and 55 to plant technician and operator duties.
- Explain the NRC's regulatory framework including the Atomic Energy Act authority, the licensing process, inspection program, and enforcement process including levels of violation.
- Describe the nine safety-culture traits identified in the NRC Safety Culture Policy Statement and provide plant-scenario examples demonstrating each trait.
- Identify a nuclear safety-conscious work environment (SCWE) violation and demonstrate the proper adverse-condition reporting pathway including the corrective action program (CAP).
- Interpret a Technical Specification limiting condition for operation (LCO), its required actions, and its completion times using a sample plant Technical Specifications document.
- Complete a simulated NRC pre-job brief, post-job review, and condition report accurately and in the format required by plant administrative procedures.
Course text
This course develops the regulatory knowledge and professional safety-culture behaviors required of nuclear plant technicians and operators operating under NRC oversight. Students study the Atomic Energy Act, 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, 50, and 55, the NRC inspection and enforcement process, and the industry safety-culture framework established in NRC Policy Statement and INPO guidelines. Emphasis is placed on applying regulations to realistic plant scenarios, recognizing regulatory violations, and demonstrating the safety-conscious work environment (SCWE) behaviors expected by both the NRC and utility employers.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Foundation of Nuclear Law: Atomic Energy Act & NRC Authority; 10 CFR Part 19: Notices, Instructions & Reports to Workers; 10 CFR Part 20: Radiation Protection Standards; 10 CFR Part 50: Domestic Licensing of Production & Utilization Facilities; 10 CFR Part 55: Operator Licensing Requirements; Technical Specifications: LCOs, Required Actions & Surveillance Requirements; NRC Inspection Program & Reactor Oversight Process; NRC Enforcement Policy: Violations, Civil Penalties & Orders; NRC Safety Culture Policy Statement & the Nine Traits; Safety-Conscious Work Environment (SCWE) & Corrective Action Program; Human Performance Tools & Pre-Job Briefs; Integrated Regulatory Compliance Scenarios.
What competent looks like. Correctly interpret and apply the key requirements of 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, 50, and 55 to plant technician and operator duties. Explain the NRC's regulatory framework including the Atomic Energy Act authority, the licensing process, inspection program, and enforcement process including levels of violation. Describe the nine safety-culture traits identified in the NRC Safety Culture Policy Statement and provide plant-scenario examples demonstrating each trait. Identify a nuclear safety-conscious work environment (SCWE) violation and demonstrate the proper adverse-condition reporting pathway including the corrective action program (CAP). Interpret a Technical Specification limiting condition for operation (LCO), its required actions, and its completion times using a sample plant Technical Specifications document. Complete a simulated NRC pre-job brief, post-job review, and condition report accurately and in the format required by plant administrative procedures.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foundation of Nuclear Law: Atomic Energy Act & NRC Authority | 20 | theory | Students will explain how the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, establishes the NRC's legal authority to regulate civilian nuclear power and will identify the organizational divisions of the NRC that affect plant operations. |
| Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (public domain text), Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, NRC public website org-chart, regional-office boundary map, scenario cards, whiteboard | Short written quiz of 15 multiple-choice questions covering AEA authority, NRC structure, and regional jurisdiction; pass mark 80%. |
| 2 | 10 CFR Part 19: Notices, Instructions & Reports to Workers | 22 | theory | Students will accurately describe the rights and responsibilities that 10 CFR Part 19 grants to radiation workers and will draft a compliant worker-notification posting. |
| 10 CFR Part 19 (NRC Electronic Code of Federal Regulations), NRC Form 3 sample, structured-notes worksheet, peer-review checklist | Instructor reviews each student's drafted worker-notification memo against a Part 19 compliance rubric; all required elements present and no inaccuracies = pass. |
| 3 | 10 CFR Part 20: Radiation Protection Standards | 30 | theory | Students will apply occupational dose limits, ALARAprinciples, and controlled/restricted area requirements from 10 CFR Part 20 to given exposure scenarios and determine compliance. |
| 10 CFR Part 20 (current edition), scenario dose-record cards, comparison-table worksheet, sample dosimetry printouts (simulated) | Written exam of 20 questions requiring limit calculations and compliance determinations; pass mark 80%. |
| 4 | 10 CFR Part 50: Domestic Licensing of Production & Utilization Facilities | 35 | theory | Students will identify the key licensing requirements, technical specifications, quality assurance appendix, and emergency planning requirements contained in 10 CFR Part 50 that directly affect daily plant technician and operator work. |
| 10 CFR Part 50 (NRC eCFR), sample 50.59 screening form, Appendix B QA poster template, concept-map template | Instructor-evaluated concept map and 50.59 screening-form analysis; concept map must correctly identify all five targeted sections; 50.59 determination must be correct with supporting citation. |
| 5 | 10 CFR Part 55: Operator Licensing Requirements | 25 | theory | Students will describe the NRC operator licensing process under 10 CFR Part 55, including the requirements for initial licensing, requalification, medical fitness, and conditions under which a license may be suspended or revoked. |
| 10 CFR Part 55, sample operator license (NRC public document), requalification-record worksheet, NRC enforcement-case summary (public), process-flow diagram template | Oral Q&A with instructor: student must correctly answer 4 of 5 questions on the Part 55 lifecycle, medical requirements, and requalification obligations. |
| 6 | Technical Specifications: LCOs, Required Actions & Surveillance Requirements | 30 | demo | Students will correctly interpret a Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO), identify the applicable required actions and completion times, and determine when a plant must enter or exit an action level, using a sample set of Technical Specifications. |
| NRC Standard Technical Specifications (publicly available for reference reactor type), sample shift log, TS scenario worksheet, timer | All five scenario worksheets graded; student must correctly identify the LCO entry condition, required action, and completion time on at least 4 of 5 scenarios to pass. |
| 7 | NRC Inspection Program & Reactor Oversight Process | 22 | theory | Students will describe how the NRC Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) uses performance indicators and inspection findings to categorize plant performance and will explain what a finding of White, Yellow, or Red significance level means for a plant's operating status. |
| NRC Reactor Oversight Process description (public NRC document), ROP action matrix, NRC plant performance dashboard (internet access), SDP flowchart (public NRC document) | Written short-answer quiz: 10 questions on ROP structure and significance levels; pass mark 80%. |
| 8 | NRC Enforcement Policy: Violations, Civil Penalties & Orders | 20 | theory | Students will classify a described regulatory violation into the NRC Enforcement Policy's severity-level scheme and predict the likely enforcement response for licensees and for individuals. |
| NRC Enforcement Policy (public document), three sample NRC enforcement letters (public), violation-classification table worksheet | Instructor-evaluated classification table: all four severity levels correctly characterized and enforcement responses accurate = pass. |
| 9 | NRC Safety Culture Policy Statement & the Nine Traits | 28 | theory | Students will define each of the nine safety-culture traits from the NRC Safety Culture Policy Statement and provide a workplace example demonstrating either a healthy or degraded expression of each trait. |
| NRC Safety Culture Policy Statement (Federal Register, public), NRC safety-culture outreach videos or case summaries (NRC.gov), behavior-description card set, Policy Statement summary handout | Students must correctly sort at least 16 of 18 behavior cards with accurate justifications; each student's two-minute trait summary must include accurate definition and both examples. |
| 10 | Safety-Conscious Work Environment (SCWE) & Corrective Action Program | 30 | practice | Students will demonstrate the proper pathway for identifying, documenting, and escalating a nuclear safety concern through the plant corrective action program (CAP) without fear of retaliation, in compliance with 10 CFR 50.7 and NRC guidance. |
| Simulated CR forms, 10 CFR 50.7, 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73 (NRC eCFR), CAP workflow template, scenario cards, INPO ACAD guidance summary | All three CR forms reviewed by instructor: threshold correctly identified, all required data fields complete, and appropriate escalation path chosen on at least 2 of 3 CRs = pass. |
| 11 | Human Performance Tools & Pre-Job Briefs | 30 | practice | Students will conduct a structured pre-job brief and a post-job review for a simulated maintenance or operations task using the INPO-recommended human-performance tools and demonstrate error-prevention behaviors throughout. |
| Pre-job brief format checklist (INPO ACAD-based), sample procedure cards for three tasks, post-job review template, simulated unexpected-condition scenario card | Instructor observes one live pre-job brief per student and scores against the checklist; student must hit all required content elements with no safety-significant omissions to pass. |
| 12 | Integrated Regulatory Compliance Scenarios | 21 | lab | Students will apply 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, 50, and 55, Technical Specifications, and safety-culture principles together to analyze a complex, multi-issue plant scenario and produce a written compliance determination. |
| Multi-issue scenario packet, 10 CFR Parts 19/20/50/55 references, TS sample document, compliance-determination report template, peer-review scoring sheet | Written compliance-determination report graded by instructor: all regulatory issues identified, correct regulation cited, and required plant action accurately described for at least 4 of the 5 embedded issues = pass. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRC Regulations Written Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% correct (40 of 50 questions) | A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, 50, and 55; the NRC Reactor Oversight Process; NRC enforcement policy; and the safety-culture policy statement. Questions are mapped to NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license exam topic areas so that performance on this assessment predicts readiness for those credential exams. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Pre-Job Brief & Compliance Determination Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All required pre-job brief content elements present with no safety-significant omissions; compliance-determination report identifies all embedded regulatory issues with correct citation | The student conducts a live pre-job brief for an instructor-selected simulated plant task and then submits a written compliance-determination report for a multi-issue regulatory scenario. The instructor evaluates both products using standardized rubrics aligned to NUCP Uniform Curriculum and NRC inspection expectations. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Condition Report & Regulatory Scenario Lab Log | Log | 15% | At least 80% of entries complete and accurate across all submitted CR forms and scenario worksheets | Students submit a compiled lab log containing all completed condition report forms, TS scenario worksheets, 50.59 screening forms, and the CAP workflow diagram produced during the course. The log is reviewed for accuracy, completeness, and correct regulatory citation, demonstrating the documentation habits expected on the job. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safety Culture Behavior Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | No degraded safety-culture behaviors observed during any assessed activity; SCWE and human-performance tool use must be demonstrated correctly in at least three separate observed exercises | Throughout the skills demonstration and lab activities, the instructor uses a safety-culture behavior observation checklist aligned to the nine NRC Policy Statement traits to verify that the student consistently demonstrates a safety-conscious work environment: raising concerns without hesitation, using human-performance tools correctly, completing condition reports accurately, and never bypassing a required stop condition. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
BLD-NUCL84-07 Trade course
Simulator Training for Nuclear Plant Operations
313 hr · $6,480 COMPLIMENTARY
Students develop hands-on proficiency in nuclear plant operations through progressive simulator exercises that replicate actual control room environments, normal operating procedures, and emergency response scenarios. Using full-scope and part-task simulators, students practice procedure adherence, team communication, and critical system control under realistic plant conditions. Lesson content directly supports NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license exam areas, NUCP Uniform Curriculum competencies, and NRRPT scenario-based radiation protection decision-making.
Outcomes- Execute normal operating procedures for reactor startup, power ascension, steady-state operation, and controlled shutdown on a nuclear plant simulator with 100% procedural compliance verified by a licensed instructor.
- Respond to simulated abnormal and emergency operating procedure (AOP/EOP) activations—including loss-of-coolant, loss-of-feedwater, and station blackout scenarios—following approved procedure steps in correct sequence.
- Apply conservative decision-making and nuclear safety culture principles during simulator exercises, demonstrating adherence to the three-way communication standard and procedure-use requirements.
- Monitor and control simulated plant parameters—reactor power, coolant temperature, pressure, and flow—within technical specification limits using panel instrumentation and computerized displays.
- Demonstrate correct lockout/tagout initiation, radiation work permit compliance, and emergency communication protocols during simulator-integrated safety drills.
- Document post-exercise critiques with specific identification of procedure deviations, human performance errors, and corrective actions in a structured shift-log format.
Course text
Students develop hands-on proficiency in nuclear plant operations through progressive simulator exercises that replicate actual control room environments, normal operating procedures, and emergency response scenarios. Using full-scope and part-task simulators, students practice procedure adherence, team communication, and critical system control under realistic plant conditions. Lesson content directly supports NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator license exam areas, NUCP Uniform Curriculum competencies, and NRRPT scenario-based radiation protection decision-making.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Simulator Familiarization and Control Room Layout; Simulator Operating Procedures and Procedure-Use Standards; Nuclear Safety Culture and Human Performance Tools in the Control Room; Normal Plant Startup Procedures on the Simulator; Power Ascension, Steady-State Operations, and Flux Monitoring; Controlled Shutdown and Cooldown Operations; Abnormal Operating Procedures — Instrument Failures and Off-Normal Conditions; Emergency Operating Procedures — Loss-of-Coolant Accident Response; Station Blackout and Loss-of-Feedwater Emergency Response; Radiation Protection Integration in Simulator Operations; Lockout/Tagout Coordination from the Control Room; Integrated Full-Scope Simulator Practical and Post-Shift Critique.
What competent looks like. Execute normal operating procedures for reactor startup, power ascension, steady-state operation, and controlled shutdown on a nuclear plant simulator with 100% procedural compliance verified by a licensed instructor. Respond to simulated abnormal and emergency operating procedure (AOP/EOP) activations—including loss-of-coolant, loss-of-feedwater, and station blackout scenarios—following approved procedure steps in correct sequence. Apply conservative decision-making and nuclear safety culture principles during simulator exercises, demonstrating adherence to the three-way communication standard and procedure-use requirements. Monitor and control simulated plant parameters—reactor power, coolant temperature, pressure, and flow—within technical specification limits using panel instrumentation and computerized displays. Demonstrate correct lockout/tagout initiation, radiation work permit compliance, and emergency communication protocols during simulator-integrated safety drills. Document post-exercise critiques with specific identification of procedure deviations, human performance errors, and corrective actions in a structured shift-log format.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simulator Familiarization and Control Room Layout | 20 | demo | Students identify and locate every major panel, control station, and annunciator grouping in the simulated control room and explain the purpose of each section. |
| Full-scope or representative plant simulator, control room layout drawings, panel identification checklist, simulator operating manual (plant-specific or training replica), pencils and graph paper for mapping | Students correctly identify at least 36 of 40 called components (90%) on the timed panel ID quiz; instructor verifies layout map completion and accuracy. |
| 2 | Simulator Operating Procedures and Procedure-Use Standards | 22 | theory | Students explain the hierarchy of plant procedures—normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures—and demonstrate correct continuous-use procedure technique at the simulator. |
| Sample normal operating procedures (NOPs) and emergency operating procedures (EOPs) from training manuals, procedure-use standards reference guide (INPO-aligned), event case-study handouts, simulator panels (non-powered review mode) | Written 20-question quiz on procedure hierarchy and use standards; passing score 80%; instructor observes at least one continuous-use procedure run and marks a behavioral checklist (all critical steps must be demonstrated correctly). |
| 3 | Nuclear Safety Culture and Human Performance Tools in the Control Room | 18 | theory | Students apply INPO and NRC safety culture traits—including conservative decision-making, questioning attitude, and three-way communication—during simulated shift activities. |
| NRC safety culture policy statement document (public), INPO nuclear safety culture traits reference handout, three-way communication evaluation checklist, video vignettes (training library), student critique worksheets | Three-way communication checklist: 9 of 10 practice actions executed correctly (90%); written quiz on safety culture traits scores at least 80%. |
| 4 | Normal Plant Startup Procedures on the Simulator | 30 | practice | Students conduct a complete reactor startup from cold shutdown to initial criticality following the plant normal operating procedure, maintaining all parameters within specified limits. |
| Simulator configured for cold-shutdown initial conditions, plant normal startup NOP (training version), parameter limit reference cards, startup checklist, shift-log forms, stopwatch for timing hold points | Instructor evaluates each student's operator role using a step-by-step performance checklist; all critical steps must be completed in correct sequence with no skipped cautions; post-exercise critique shift-log entry graded pass/fail (pass = all required entries present and accurate). |
| 5 | Power Ascension, Steady-State Operations, and Flux Monitoring | 28 | practice | Students control reactor power from initial criticality to full-power steady state while monitoring axial flux distribution, coolant parameters, and Technical Specification limits throughout the ascension. |
| Simulator at post-criticality initial conditions, power ascension NOP, flux monitoring procedure, Technical Specification limit reference sheets, data-recording worksheets, graph paper or spreadsheet access, shift-log forms | Data table graded for completeness and accuracy (all required parameter recordings present, values within logged ±2% of simulator actual); out-of-limit response checklist: correct identification and conservative action within 2 minutes of annunciator alarm (pass/fail). |
| 6 | Controlled Shutdown and Cooldown Operations | 25 | practice | Students execute a planned controlled reactor shutdown from full power to cold shutdown, maintaining cooldown rate within procedural limits and completing all required hold points. |
| Simulator at full-power steady-state initial conditions, shutdown and cooldown NOP, cooldown rate limit reference, communication log forms, simulator playback capability, technical narrative template | Cooldown rate must remain within procedural limits throughout the evolution (any exceedance = automatic fail requiring repeat); procedural step completion checklist graded by instructor—95% of steps completed correctly in sequence required to pass. |
| 7 | Abnormal Operating Procedures — Instrument Failures and Off-Normal Conditions | 28 | lab | Students diagnose simulated instrument failures and off-normal plant conditions, enter the correct abnormal operating procedure, and restore or stabilize the plant within the required response time. |
| Simulator with AOP injection capability, annunciator response procedures, abnormal operating procedures set, diagnostic worksheets, communication script for field operator role, stopwatch, evaluation checklists | Each student must correctly diagnose at least 4 of 5 injected failures (80%) and enter the correct AOP; time-to-first-correct-action must not exceed procedure specified response time; team communication checklist evaluated by instructor—pass requires correct crew roles and no missed critical communications. |
| 8 | Emergency Operating Procedures — Loss-of-Coolant Accident Response | 30 | lab | Students enter and execute the Emergency Operating Procedure for a simulated loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), verifying automatic safety system actuation and completing manual backup actions per procedure. |
| Simulator with LOCA injection capability, Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) training version, safety function status tree references, pre-brief written quiz, hot-wash structured debrief form, evaluation checklist for critical tasks | Instructor-graded critical task checklist: all safety-critical EOP actions must be completed correctly and in procedure sequence (any missed critical task = fail requiring immediate repeat); pre-brief quiz minimum score 80%. |
| 9 | Station Blackout and Loss-of-Feedwater Emergency Response | 28 | lab | Students manage simulated station blackout and loss-of-feedwater events simultaneously, prioritizing safety function restoration actions per emergency procedure while coordinating with simulated plant staff. |
| Simulator with multi-failure injection, one-line electrical diagrams (training version), station blackout EOP and loss-of-feedwater EOP, simulator trend printouts, scenario analysis worksheets, communication log forms | Crew evaluation checklist: correct entry into both EOPs and correct priority assignment of safety functions (pass requires all safety-critical tasks completed correctly); individual trend-strip annotation scored on a rubric—80% of identified restoration points correctly labeled and explained. |
| 10 | Radiation Protection Integration in Simulator Operations | 24 | lab | Students apply radiation work permit requirements, dose-rate monitoring, and ALARA decision-making during simulator scenarios that require simulated entry into radiologically controlled areas as part of plant operations. |
| Simulator with HP computer display integration (or stand-alone RP workstation linked to simulator), simulated radiation work permit forms, simulated survey data maps, PPE reference chart, ALARA evaluation worksheet, dosimetry reference handout | RWP initiation checklist: all required fields correctly completed and consistent with simulated radiological conditions (pass/fail—any omitted required field = fail); ALARA evaluation rubric: correct ranking and at least two dose-reduction measures identified for each task (80% of evaluation criteria met to pass). |
| 11 | Lockout/Tagout Coordination from the Control Room | 24 | practice | Students coordinate a control room-initiated lockout/tagout sequence for a simulated equipment clearance order, verifying equipment isolation in the correct sequence and completing all associated simulator panel changes. |
| Simulator with tagout representation capability (physical or digital tag placards), sample equipment clearance order forms, OSHA LOTO general industry standard reference (29 CFR 1910.147 summary handout), shift-log forms, communication evaluation checklist | Clearance order form graded for completeness and accuracy (all isolation points verified, correct status indicated)—pass requires zero missed isolation verifications; conservative decision scenario evaluated pass/fail by instructor based on whether student chose the more conservative path and documented it correctly. |
| 12 | Integrated Full-Scope Simulator Practical and Post-Shift Critique | 36 | lab | Students demonstrate integrated competency across a complete simulated operating shift that includes a normal power maneuver, one AOP activation, and one EOP entry, completing all associated documentation to shift-turnover standard. |
| Full-scope simulator, all NOP/AOP/EOP procedures used in prior lessons, shift-log forms, simulator recording/playback capability, post-shift critique evaluation rubric, crew evaluation checklist for each role | Shift-log graded on completeness rubric—pass requires all required entries present, times accurate, and event narratives factually consistent with simulator data (80% of rubric criteria met); crew evaluation checklist: no missed critical tasks in AOP or EOP phases; verbal defense evaluated pass/fail—student must correctly cite procedure basis for every challenged decision. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simulator Operations Knowledge Examination | Written exam | 25% | Minimum score of 80% (48 of 60 questions correct); any question addressing a safety-critical topic (EOP entry conditions, critical task identification, LOTO sequence) must be answered correctly—failure on any three safety-critical items requires full exam retake. | A 60-question written examination covering procedure hierarchy, NOP/AOP/EOP entry conditions, safety culture traits, Technical Specification parameter limits, LOCA and station blackout response sequences, and ALARA decision-making principles. Questions are mapped to NRC Non-Licensed Operator exam content areas and NUCP Uniform Curriculum knowledge competencies. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Full-Scope Simulator Practical Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All critical tasks on the instructor evaluation checklist must be completed correctly and in procedure sequence (100% of critical tasks); non-critical procedural steps require 90% completion; any missed critical task requires the specific evolution to be repeated in full before a passing grade is awarded. | Each student individually demonstrates a complete reactor startup to initial criticality and a separate EOP response evolution (LOCA or station blackout, selected by the instructor) on the full-scope simulator, with an NRC-qualified or utility-licensed training instructor evaluating performance against a standardized critical task checklist consistent with NRC license examination standards for Reactor Operator candidates. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Simulator Exercise Lab Log Portfolio | Log | 15% | Portfolio must include completed documentation from at least 10 of the 12 lessons; each shift-log entry or exercise worksheet must score 80% or higher on its individual grading rubric; any entry with a missed safety-critical item (incorrect parameter limit, wrong EOP entry condition recorded) must be corrected and resubmitted within 48 hours. | Students submit a compiled portfolio of all shift-log entries, diagnostic worksheets, ALARA evaluation forms, clearance order records, and post-exercise written analyses completed across the course; the portfolio is reviewed holistically for completeness, technical accuracy, and professional documentation quality consistent with plant administrative procedure standards. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Integrated Safety Compliance Check | Safety audit | 15% | Pass requires 100% compliance on all safety-critical behavioral items (three-way communication, PPE use, conservative decision when prompted, and LOTO verification sequence); a single failure on any safety-critical item is a fail and requires remediation and re-check before the student may proceed to the Maintenance course. | A structured behavioral observation conducted by the instructor during the Lesson 12 integrated shift exercise, using a standardized safety compliance checklist that evaluates three-way communication adherence, correct PPE identification for simulated radiological conditions, LOTO coordination sequence accuracy, and at least one conservative decision-making demonstration when the instructor presents an ambiguous plant condition. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
BLD-NUCL84-08 Trade course
Nuclear Plant Maintenance: Procedures, Equipment, and Reliability
313 hr · $6,480 COMPLIMENTARY
This course develops the knowledge and hands-on skills required to perform corrective, preventive, and predictive maintenance on nuclear power plant systems and components in compliance with NRC regulations, plant technical specifications, and quality assurance requirements. Students practice work order execution, equipment alignment, valve and pump maintenance, electrical and instrumentation work, and post-maintenance testing using industry-standard procedures. Emphasis throughout is on human performance tools, radiological work controls, lockout/tagout, and the conservative decision-making culture mandated by NRC safety culture policy.
Outcomes- Execute a plant maintenance work order from initiation through post-maintenance testing while following written procedures step-by-step and documenting all steps accurately.
- Apply lockout/tagout and clearance order procedures to isolate mechanical, electrical, and radiological hazards before beginning maintenance on plant equipment.
- Perform preventive and corrective maintenance tasks on valves, pumps, heat exchangers, motors, and instrument loops using correct tools, torque specifications, and manufacturer guidance.
- Interpret maintenance-related plant drawings including P&IDs, electrical one-line diagrams, and isometric piping drawings to locate, identify, and return equipment to its correct configuration.
- Conduct basic predictive maintenance data collection including vibration readings, thermographic inspection, and oil analysis sampling, and explain how results trigger work orders.
- Apply NUCP Uniform Curriculum competency areas related to maintenance and demonstrate radiation protection controls (ALARA, RWP compliance) during all simulated maintenance evolutions.
Course text
This course develops the knowledge and hands-on skills required to perform corrective, preventive, and predictive maintenance on nuclear power plant systems and components in compliance with NRC regulations, plant technical specifications, and quality assurance requirements. Students practice work order execution, equipment alignment, valve and pump maintenance, electrical and instrumentation work, and post-maintenance testing using industry-standard procedures. Emphasis throughout is on human performance tools, radiological work controls, lockout/tagout, and the conservative decision-making culture mandated by NRC safety culture policy.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Maintenance Philosophy, Work Management, and the Nuclear Work Order Process; Human Performance Tools in Maintenance: Procedure Use, Pre-Job Briefing, and Self-Checking; Lockout/Tagout and Nuclear Plant Clearance Order Procedures; Reading and Using Maintenance Drawings: P&IDs, One-Lines, and Isometrics; Valve Maintenance: Types, Disassembly, Inspection, Packing, and Reassembly; Pump Maintenance: Alignment, Mechanical Seals, Bearing Inspection, and Lubrication; Electrical Maintenance: Motor Testing, Cable and Termination Inspection, and MCC Work; Predictive Maintenance: Vibration Analysis, Thermography, and Oil Sampling; Radiological Work Permits and ALARA Maintenance Planning; Post-Maintenance Testing: Restoration, Functional Testing, and Returning Equipment to Operable Status; Maintenance Quality Assurance, Condition Reports, and Continuous Improvement; Integrated Maintenance Evolution: Full Work Package Execution on a Plant System Mock-Up.
What competent looks like. Execute a plant maintenance work order from initiation through post-maintenance testing while following written procedures step-by-step and documenting all steps accurately. Apply lockout/tagout and clearance order procedures to isolate mechanical, electrical, and radiological hazards before beginning maintenance on plant equipment. Perform preventive and corrective maintenance tasks on valves, pumps, heat exchangers, motors, and instrument loops using correct tools, torque specifications, and manufacturer guidance. Interpret maintenance-related plant drawings including P&IDs, electrical one-line diagrams, and isometric piping drawings to locate, identify, and return equipment to its correct configuration. Conduct basic predictive maintenance data collection including vibration readings, thermographic inspection, and oil analysis sampling, and explain how results trigger work orders. Apply NUCP Uniform Curriculum competency areas related to maintenance and demonstrate radiation protection controls (ALARA, RWP compliance) during all simulated maintenance evolutions.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maintenance Philosophy, Work Management, and the Nuclear Work Order Process | 22.5 | theory | Students will explain the corrective, preventive, and predictive maintenance categories, describe the plant work order lifecycle from identification to closeout, and identify how each step supports operability and NRC compliance. |
| Sample nuclear plant work order package (redacted or training version), NRC inspection report excerpts (publicly available from NRC.gov), 10 CFR 50 Appendix B quality assurance criteria reference, whiteboard, student workbooks | Written quiz requiring students to correctly sequence and label all major work order lifecycle steps and identify the QA basis for at least four steps; passing score 75% or higher. |
| 2 | Human Performance Tools in Maintenance: Procedure Use, Pre-Job Briefing, and Self-Checking | 20.5 | demo | Students will demonstrate proper procedure-use techniques including place-keeping, self-check (STAR), peer check, and two-person verification, and conduct a compliant pre-job briefing for a simulated maintenance task. |
| Sample maintenance procedures (valve and pump focus), place-keeping markers, pre-job briefing checklist, condition report forms, embedded-error procedure handouts, INPO AP-928 human performance reference (or equivalent industry document) | Instructor observation checklist: student correctly performs STAR on at least three consecutive procedure steps without prompting, and pre-job briefing covers all required checklist elements; both items must be marked satisfactory to pass. |
| 3 | Lockout/Tagout and Nuclear Plant Clearance Order Procedures | 26.5 | lab | Students will prepare, apply, and release a lockout/tagout clearance order on a simulated plant electrical and mechanical system, verifying zero energy state before performing a mock maintenance task. |
| Training-room motor-driven pump mock-up, lockout hasps, personal safety padlocks, danger tags, blanks, clearance order forms, multimeter (for zero-voltage verification step), OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 reference card, plant clearance procedure (training version) | Student completes the full clearance order correctly with no isolated energy sources missed, confirms zero energy state with documented evidence, and releases the clearance in correct order; any missed isolation point is an automatic fail requiring full repeat. |
| 4 | Reading and Using Maintenance Drawings: P&IDs, One-Lines, and Isometrics | 22.5 | theory | Students will locate and identify components, trace flow paths, and determine correct post-maintenance valve lineups using piping and instrumentation diagrams, electrical one-line diagrams, and isometric piping drawings. |
| Training P&ID sets (generic PWR or training reactor), electrical one-line diagram training set, isometric piping drawing examples, component location worksheets, drawing symbol legend reference, ASME/ANSI drawing standards reference | Drawing interpretation worksheet scored against answer key; student must correctly identify at least 80% of components, flow paths, and specifications across all three drawing types to pass. |
| 5 | Valve Maintenance: Types, Disassembly, Inspection, Packing, and Reassembly | 28 | lab | Students will disassemble, inspect, repack, and reassemble a gate valve and a globe valve using a written maintenance procedure, applying correct torque values and documenting all steps on a maintenance data sheet. |
| 2-inch gate valve (training use), 2-inch globe valve (training use), graphite packing rings, calibrated torque wrench, calipers, maintenance procedure (valve specific, training version), maintenance data sheet, hydrostatic bench test rig, pipe wrenches, assorted hand tools, PPE (safety glasses, gloves) | Instructor inspects final valve assembly, reviews torque values on data sheet, and observes hydrostatic test; no visible packing leak at test pressure and all data sheet sign-offs complete; any untorqued fastener or undocumented step is a fail. |
| 6 | Pump Maintenance: Alignment, Mechanical Seals, Bearing Inspection, and Lubrication | 28 | lab | Students will perform a dial-indicator shaft alignment check on a motor-pump coupling, inspect and replace a mechanical seal, check bearing clearances, and lubricate bearings per the manufacturer's procedure. |
| Training centrifugal pump and motor set with flexible coupling, magnetic-base dial indicator set, feeler gauge set, mechanical seal cartridge (replacement), compatible O-ring lubricant, calibrated torque wrench, grease gun, compatible bearing grease, alignment data sheet, PM checklist, manufacturer's manual excerpts, PPE | Alignment readings within acceptable tolerance and documented on data sheet; seal installation verified visually by instructor with no pinched O-ring; bearing clearance and lubrication quantity recorded correctly; all PM checklist sign-offs present; failing any single item requires the task to be repeated. |
| 7 | Electrical Maintenance: Motor Testing, Cable and Termination Inspection, and MCC Work | 26.5 | demo | Students will use a megohmmeter and clamp-on ammeter to perform insulation resistance and load current tests on a training motor, inspect cable terminations in a mock motor control center, and document results on a PM data sheet. |
| Training three-phase motor, megohmmeter (appropriate voltage range for motor class), clamp-on ammeter, mock MCC cubicle with training connections, calibrated torque wrench, PM data sheet, condition report forms, electrical safety PPE (insulated gloves rated to voltage class, safety glasses, arc flash face shield for applicable steps), NFPA 70E reference | Instructor reviews completed PM data sheet for correct megohmmeter readings, current measurements, and phase imbalance calculation; all ten termination findings are entered correctly; condition report initiated for any deficiency; 80% accuracy on data sheet values required to pass. |
| 8 | Predictive Maintenance: Vibration Analysis, Thermography, and Oil Sampling | 20.5 | demo | Students will collect vibration data on a rotating equipment training stand, perform a thermal scan on a training electrical panel, and take an oil sample from a training gear box, then interpret each data set using provided acceptance criteria. |
| Portable vibration data collector with accelerometer, training motor-pump stand, thermal imaging camera, training electrical panel with warm connection fault, vacuum oil sampling pump, clean sampling tubing, sample bottles, sample submittal forms, ISO vibration severity standard reference (general), thermographic inspection guideline, predictive maintenance data log forms | Vibration readings within 10% of instructor-measured baseline values and correctly zoned; thermal anomaly correctly identified and temperature differential recorded; oil sample bottle filled and labeled without contamination as confirmed by instructor observation; all three tasks must be satisfactory to pass. |
| 9 | Radiological Work Permits and ALARA Maintenance Planning | 22.5 | theory | Students will write and review a radiological work permit for a simulated maintenance task in a controlled radiological area, applying ALARA principles including dose estimates, stay times, shielding options, and remote tooling alternatives. |
| RWP forms (training versions), ALARA planning worksheet, dose rate scenario cards, 10 CFR 20 general reference, plant radiation protection procedure excerpts (training versions), RWP example sets (correct and deficient), student workbooks | Student's completed RWP is scored against a grading rubric covering all required fields; stay time calculation must be correct within 5%; at least four of five deficiencies must be identified in the review exercise; overall score 75% or higher to pass. |
| 10 | Post-Maintenance Testing: Restoration, Functional Testing, and Returning Equipment to Operable Status | 22.5 | practice | Students will restore a simulated plant system to its correct valve lineup following a maintenance evolution, perform required functional tests per a written procedure, and declare the component operable using the criteria defined in the maintenance work order. |
| Training pump system with instrumentation, normal system lineup sheet, post-maintenance test procedure (training version), post-maintenance test data sheet, work order closeout package forms, calibrated pressure gauge, clamp-on ammeter, infrared thermometer, PPE | All valve positions verified against lineup sheet with no missed item; all required test parameter readings recorded and within acceptance bands; operability determination statement contains all required elements; any missed isolation point restoration or out-of-band test parameter not flagged is an automatic fail. |
| 11 | Maintenance Quality Assurance, Condition Reports, and Continuous Improvement | 28 | practice | Students will initiate a condition report for a maintenance-related deficiency, perform an apparent cause evaluation, and develop a corrective action that addresses the root cause using a structured cause analysis method. |
| Condition report form (training version), cause evaluation worksheet, 'five whys' reference guide, sample completed condition reports for comparison, student workbooks, whiteboard for group discussion | Condition report is complete with all required fields; causal chain correctly identifies at least two contributing causes and the apparent cause; corrective action directly addresses the apparent cause; peer group and instructor must both agree the corrective action is plausible; 75% score on instructor rubric to pass. |
| 12 | Integrated Maintenance Evolution: Full Work Package Execution on a Plant System Mock-Up | 45 | lab | Students will execute a complete maintenance work package—from pre-job briefing through post-maintenance testing and closeout—on a multi-component plant system training mock-up, demonstrating all competencies developed in the course. |
| Multi-component plant system training mock-up (pump, valves, motor, instrumentation), complete maintenance work order package (training version), LOTO equipment, calibrated torque wrench, dial indicator set, calipers, replacement packing and seals, clamp-on ammeter, infrared thermometer, pressure gauges, all required PPE, condition report forms, post-maintenance test data sheets | Instructor uses a standardized evaluation rubric covering 10 categories: pre-job briefing completeness, LOTO application correctness, procedure adherence (no skipped steps), torque values documented, human performance tool use observed, radiological control compliance, post-maintenance test data complete and within acceptance bands, operability determination written, work order package complete, no unresolved deficiencies; student must score satisfactory in at least 8 of 10 categories to pass. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maintenance Knowledge Examination | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher on a 80-question written exam | A proctored written exam covering work order lifecycle, maintenance categories, LOTO principles, P&ID and one-line diagram interpretation, valve and pump maintenance theory, predictive maintenance data interpretation, post-maintenance testing requirements, and condition reporting and corrective action processes; questions are drawn from all lesson topics and mapped to NUCP Uniform Curriculum maintenance competency areas and NRC Non-Licensed Operator preparation knowledge areas. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Practical Maintenance Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Satisfactory rating on all critical steps; any critical step failure requires a full repeat of that task | Each student individually performs three timed practical tasks drawn by lot from the course lab evolutions (valve repack, pump alignment check, LOTO application, or motor megohmmeter test); the instructor evaluates each task using a standardized critical-step checklist, and the student must complete all steps in correct procedural order, apply correct torque or measurement technique, and complete the associated data sheet without coaching. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Maintenance Lab Log | Log | 15% | Complete entries for all 12 lessons with satisfactory rating on 90% of entries; any safety documentation deficiency requires correction before passing | Students maintain a bound lab log throughout the course recording the objective, procedure steps performed, all measured data, acceptance criteria comparisons, any condition found out of specification, corrective actions taken, and a brief reflection on human performance tool use for every lab and practice lesson; the log is reviewed at lessons 6 and 12 and must demonstrate procedural rigor, accurate data recording, and complete sign-off documentation consistent with nuclear quality assurance standards. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safety and Radiological Controls Compliance Check | Safety audit | 15% | Zero critical safety violations observed; one non-critical finding allowed with documented corrective action | The course safety officer and lead instructor conduct a formal observation of each student during the integrated maintenance evolution (Lesson 12), evaluating correct PPE selection and use, LOTO application with no missed energy sources, radiological work permit adherence, proper contamination control (no spreading contamination outside the designated work area), and correct use of stop-work authority when an unexpected condition is introduced by the instructor; any critical safety violation (missing energy isolation, PPE removal in a radiological area, or bypassing a procedure step) results in an immediate task stop and automatic fail requiring full remediation. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
BLD-NUCL84-09 Capstone
Capstone Project: Integrated Nuclear Plant Systems Analysis & Defense
432 hr · $4,320 COMPLIMENTARY
Students synthesize all prior coursework by completing a full-scope, documented plant systems analysis project centered on a realistic nuclear power plant scenario, integrating reactor physics, radiation protection, instrumentation and control, maintenance planning, and NRC regulatory compliance. The capstone culminates in a formal written technical report and an oral defense before a panel of instructors and, where available, an industry subject-matter expert. Successful completion demonstrates readiness for the NRC Non-Licensed Operator pathway, the NUCP credential, NRRPT eligibility requirements, and supervised RO license candidacy.
Outcomes- Produce a complete, NRC-compliant plant system analysis package—including system descriptions, P&ID mark-ups, and abnormal operating procedure (AOP) walk-throughs—for an assigned plant system or scenario to a professional technical-writing standard.
- Apply radiation protection principles, dose calculations, and ALARA planning to the assigned scenario, demonstrating competency areas aligned with NRRPT exam domains.
- Develop and justify a lockout/tagout and work-order package for a maintenance task within the scenario, meeting OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 requirements and plant technical specification constraints.
- Evaluate the assigned scenario against applicable NRC regulatory requirements and document any identified nonconformances with a corrective action recommendation consistent with 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B quality assurance principles.
- Defend all technical decisions verbally before a review panel, responding accurately to examiner questions on reactor physics, system interactions, and safety culture principles.
- Demonstrate professional documentation practices by submitting a final project binder that meets NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum formatting and completeness standards.
Course text
Students synthesize all prior coursework by completing a full-scope, documented plant systems analysis project centered on a realistic nuclear power plant scenario, integrating reactor physics, radiation protection, instrumentation and control, maintenance planning, and NRC regulatory compliance. The capstone culminates in a formal written technical report and an oral defense before a panel of instructors and, where available, an industry subject-matter expert. Successful completion demonstrates readiness for the NRC Non-Licensed Operator pathway, the NUCP credential, NRRPT eligibility requirements, and supervised RO license candidacy.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Scenario Assignment, Scoping, and Project Planning; Technical Analysis: Systems, Radiation Protection, and Maintenance Package Development; Report Compilation, Corrective Action Write-Up, and Defense Preparation; Final Defense, Panel Review, and Reflection.
What competent looks like. Produce a complete, NRC-compliant plant system analysis package—including system descriptions, P&ID mark-ups, and abnormal operating procedure (AOP) walk-throughs—for an assigned plant system or scenario to a professional technical-writing standard. Apply radiation protection principles, dose calculations, and ALARA planning to the assigned scenario, demonstrating competency areas aligned with NRRPT exam domains. Develop and justify a lockout/tagout and work-order package for a maintenance task within the scenario, meeting OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 requirements and plant technical specification constraints. Evaluate the assigned scenario against applicable NRC regulatory requirements and document any identified nonconformances with a corrective action recommendation consistent with 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B quality assurance principles. Defend all technical decisions verbally before a review panel, responding accurately to examiner questions on reactor physics, system interactions, and safety culture principles. Demonstrate professional documentation practices by submitting a final project binder that meets NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum formatting and completeness standards.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scenario Assignment, Scoping, and Project Planning | 80 | theory | Given an assigned plant scenario, the student will produce a documented project plan that identifies the affected systems, applicable regulatory requirements, radiation zones, and a realistic work breakdown structure with milestones. |
| Instructor-prepared scenario packet, sample P&IDs and system description excerpts, 10 CFR Part 50 (publicly available NRC source), NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum reference binder, plant technical specification excerpts, project planning software or spreadsheet application, NRRPT Candidate Handbook (for domain cross-reference) | Instructor approves the scope statement and regulatory compliance matrix; pass requires all primary systems correctly identified, at least five regulatory touchpoints documented with accurate CFR citations, and a Gantt chart with realistic milestone dates. Incomplete or inaccurate scope requires revision before Lesson 2 begins. |
| 2 | Technical Analysis: Systems, Radiation Protection, and Maintenance Package Development | 192 | lab | The student will complete the full technical body of the capstone—system functional analysis, ALARA dose planning, and a compliant LOTO/work-order package—to a standard that could serve as a training document in a licensed nuclear facility. |
| Scenario P&IDs (instructor-prepared, generic plant-model based), radiological survey data sheets, 10 CFR Part 20 dose limit tables, NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum reference binder, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 standard (publicly available), sample RWP and LOTO forms, scientific calculator, dose-rate calculation worksheets from Course 5, peer-review checklist, word-processing and spreadsheet software | Instructor grades each subsection using a rubric with three domains—technical accuracy, regulatory compliance, and professional formatting—each scored 0–4; a total score of 30 out of 36 (83%) or higher is required to proceed. LOTO packages missing any energy source or lacking a verification step are automatically returned for correction regardless of overall score. ALARA dose calculations must be within ±20% of the instructor's reference solution. |
| 3 | Report Compilation, Corrective Action Write-Up, and Defense Preparation | 100 | practice | The student will assemble the complete technical report, write a 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B-based corrective action document for a seeded deficiency in the scenario, and rehearse the oral defense to the point of confident, accurate response to panel questions. |
| Complete draft report from Lesson 2, instructor red-line markup, NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum formatting guide, 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B text (publicly available), five-whys worksheet, oral defense rubric (instructor-supplied), question bank covering Courses 1–8 key topics, word-processing software, presentation slides (optional, student's choice), recording device (optional) | Instructor approves the complete draft report as 'ready to defend' only if all six sections are present, the executive summary accurately reflects the body, and no unresolved red-line comments remain on safety-critical items (LOTO isolation steps, dose limit compliance, or regulatory citations). Students who fail the mock defense by scoring below 70% on the question bank must complete an additional coached session before the graded defense. |
| 4 | Final Defense, Panel Review, and Reflection | 60 | field | The student will present and defend the completed capstone project before a panel, respond accurately to technical questions across all program subject areas, and produce a written professional reflection connecting the project to career readiness and lifelong learning in the nuclear industry. |
| Final bound technical report (one copy per panel member), oral defense rubric, panel scoring sheets, presentation materials (student-prepared), NEI NUCP competency checklist (for panel reference), reflection prompt handout, 10 CFR Part 50 reference copy available at the defense table | Panel scores the defense on a rubric with five categories: technical accuracy of report content (25 points), regulatory and safety compliance (25 points), quality of oral communication and question responses (20 points), document professionalism and completeness (20 points), and corrective action quality (10 points); passing score is 75 out of 100. A score of 65–74 earns a conditional pass requiring written corrections. A score below 65 requires a re-defense scheduled within 30 days. The reflection document is graded pass/fail on completeness; all four required elements must be present. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capstone Technical Report | Project | 60% | 83% (30/36 on the section rubric) with no unresolved safety-critical deficiencies; LOTO and dose-calculation sections must individually meet minimum accuracy thresholds before overall score is computed | A complete, six-section technical report produced individually by the student that includes a system functional analysis with marked-up P&ID, an ALARA radiation work permit analog with supporting dose calculations, a full LOTO isolation and restoration package compliant with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147, and a corrective action document referencing 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix B; the report is formatted to NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum standards and serves as the primary project deliverable evaluated for technical depth, regulatory accuracy, and professional documentation quality. Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation |
| Capstone Project Portfolio | Portfolio | 20% | All six report sections present and complete; no outstanding instructor red-line comments on safety-critical items; reflection document addresses all four required elements; overall portfolio rated 'complete' by instructor before defense date | The portfolio is the assembled binder submitted to the review panel and contains the final technical report, the peer-review checklist from the ALARA section, the mock-defense self-evaluation forms, the instructor red-line markup with documented student responses, and the professional reflection document; it demonstrates the student's growth across the entire program and readiness for the externship and credential examinations. Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality |
| Oral Defense | Oral / panel | 20% | 75 out of 100 points on the panel rubric; conditional pass (65–74) requires written corrections within five business days; below 65 requires re-defense within 30 days | A 20–30 minute presentation followed by a minimum 15-minute technical question session conducted before a panel of at least two instructors and, where available, an industry subject-matter expert; the panel evaluates technical accuracy, regulatory and safety compliance, communication clarity, document quality, and corrective action reasoning using a standardized rubric, providing written feedback that directly informs the student's exam preparation and externship readiness. Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication |
BLD-NUCL84-10 Externship / clinical
Externship / Worksite Placement at a Nuclear Facility
648 hr · $2,590 COMPLIMENTARY
Students complete 648 supervised hours at a licensed nuclear power plant or related nuclear facility, applying classroom knowledge under the direct oversight of qualified nuclear professionals. Rotations cover plant operations, radiation protection, instrumentation and control, and maintenance activities, mirroring the job duties assessed by the NRC Non-Licensed Operator, NRRPT, and NUCP credentials. A utility-assigned supervisor evaluates performance against industry competency standards throughout the placement.
Outcomes- Perform assigned non-licensed operator duties on a licensed nuclear plant site under qualified supervision, following all NRC and plant technical specifications.
- Apply radiation protection principles — including dosimetry, contamination surveys, and ALARA practices — in a live radiological work environment.
- Read, interpret, and execute plant procedures, work orders, and surveillance test instructions correctly on at least 90% of assigned tasks as rated by the site supervisor.
- Demonstrate proper lockout/tagout, PPE selection, and industrial safety practices in compliance with OSHA standards and plant radiation work permit requirements on every task.
- Communicate plant status, equipment anomalies, and radiological findings accurately in verbal shift turnover briefings and written log entries.
- Compile a professional externship portfolio documenting rotations, competency demonstrations, supervisor evaluations, and a personal reflection that maps experience to NUCP and NRRPT exam domains.
Course text
Students complete 648 supervised hours at a licensed nuclear power plant or related nuclear facility, applying classroom knowledge under the direct oversight of qualified nuclear professionals. Rotations cover plant operations, radiation protection, instrumentation and control, and maintenance activities, mirroring the job duties assessed by the NRC Non-Licensed Operator, NRRPT, and NUCP credentials. A utility-assigned supervisor evaluates performance against industry competency standards throughout the placement.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Site Orientation, Badging, and Radiological Access Qualification; Radiation Protection and Plant Operations Rotations; Maintenance, Procedure Compliance, and Lockout/Tagout Application; Portfolio Completion, Supervisor Evaluation, and End-of-Placement Debrief.
What competent looks like. Perform assigned non-licensed operator duties on a licensed nuclear plant site under qualified supervision, following all NRC and plant technical specifications. Apply radiation protection principles — including dosimetry, contamination surveys, and ALARA practices — in a live radiological work environment. Read, interpret, and execute plant procedures, work orders, and surveillance test instructions correctly on at least 90% of assigned tasks as rated by the site supervisor. Demonstrate proper lockout/tagout, PPE selection, and industrial safety practices in compliance with OSHA standards and plant radiation work permit requirements on every task. Communicate plant status, equipment anomalies, and radiological findings accurately in verbal shift turnover briefings and written log entries. Compile a professional externship portfolio documenting rotations, competency demonstrations, supervisor evaluations, and a personal reflection that maps experience to NUCP and NRRPT exam domains.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Site Orientation, Badging, and Radiological Access Qualification | 80 | field | The student will complete all site-required access training, obtain a radiation worker badge, and demonstrate knowledge of site emergency action levels and emergency response organization roles before entering any radiologically controlled area. |
| Host utility new-worker orientation materials; site-issued TLD/dosimeter badge and electronic personal dosimeter (EPD); radiation worker training records; plant emergency plan (site-specific); OSHA 10 card (prerequisite); PPE kit including anti-contamination clothing, safety glasses, hard hat, steel-toed boots; facility map. | Student receives unescorted radiation worker access authorization from the host utility (pass/fail — access granted equals pass); site quiz scores meet or exceed the plant's own passing threshold; drill critique form shows satisfactory performance in all evaluated actions. |
| 2 | Radiation Protection and Plant Operations Rotations | 280 | field | The student will perform assigned radiation protection surveys, contamination controls, and non-licensed operator round-taking and surveillance tasks across at least three distinct plant departments under qualified supervision, meeting plant procedure requirements on each task. |
| Calibrated portable radiation survey instruments (Geiger-Mueller and ionization chamber types) supplied by the host facility; plant-issued electronic personal dosimeter; anti-contamination clothing and respiratory protection (as required by radiological work permit); plant operating procedures and surveillance test procedures (site-specific); externship daily log binder; site competency checklist forms; NEI NUCP competency framework reference. | Supervisor competency checklist shows a satisfactory or above rating (site-defined scale) on at least 90% of evaluated task line items; all survey forms are signed off by a qualified health physics technician; daily log is current within 48 hours and reviewed by program instructor biweekly — any unsatisfactory rating triggers a documented remediation plan within five business days. |
| 3 | Maintenance, Procedure Compliance, and Lockout/Tagout Application | 208 | field | The student will assist qualified maintenance or operations personnel in executing corrective and preventive maintenance tasks using approved work orders, correctly applying plant lockout/tagout and clearance-order processes on every assignment, with zero procedural violations as rated by the site supervisor. |
| Plant work order management system access (read-level); approved plant maintenance and surveillance procedures; plant equipment control / clearance-order forms; calibrated test equipment as specified in work orders (multimeters, pressure gauges — site-supplied); personal PPE per plant radiation work permit; site work observation forms; OSHA lockout/tagout standard reference (29 CFR 1910.147 concept — specific plant procedure governs); externship daily log. | Site work observation forms for all four work orders show no procedural violations and at least a satisfactory rating on hazard identification and procedure adherence; both clearance order records are signed by the operations supervisor confirming correct execution; PMT debrief is rated satisfactory by the supervising engineer on the site verbal communication rubric — any procedural violation is treated as a critical failure requiring immediate supervisor notification and documented corrective action. |
| 4 | Portfolio Completion, Supervisor Evaluation, and End-of-Placement Debrief | 80 | field | The student will compile and present a complete externship portfolio documenting all rotations, competency demonstrations, and credential-domain mappings, and will participate in a formal end-of-placement evaluation conference with the site supervisor and program instructor. |
| Externship portfolio binder or digital folder (organized per program template); program Employer Evaluation Form (four-point scale); NUCP Uniform Curriculum competency framework (NEI); NRRPT exam content outline; updated resume template; debrief rubric (program-issued); video conferencing access if remote. | Portfolio is complete with no missing documents and personal reflection references at least six distinct NUCP or NRRPT competency areas — rated complete or incomplete by program instructor; Employer Evaluation Form averages 3.0 or higher out of 4.0 across all categories (any single category rated 1.0 triggers a remediation meeting); debrief rubric score of 75% or higher on all sections — scores below 75% require a written remediation reflection submitted within one week. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Site Supervisor Skills Demonstration Evaluation | Skills demonstration | 70% | Average score of 3.0 or higher out of 4.0 on the program Employer Evaluation Form across all five competency categories (safety behavior, procedure compliance, teamwork, communication, technical knowledge), with no individual category scoring below 2.0; a score of 1.0 in any single category in any rotation disqualifies the student from passing until a documented remediation plan is completed and the supervisor re-rates that category. | The host-site supervisor completes the program's standardized Employer Evaluation Form at the midpoint and at the conclusion of the placement, rating the student's real-time performance on safety compliance, procedure adherence, radiation protection practices, communication, and technical job knowledge observed during all rotation activities. Scores from both evaluation points are averaged; this assessment directly maps to NRC Non-Licensed Operator readiness standards and the NUCP uniform curriculum competency framework. Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative |
| Externship Field Log and Portfolio Review | Log | 30% | Portfolio is rated Complete by the program instructor (all required documents present, no unsigned forms, personal reflection addresses a minimum of six credential-domain areas with specific examples); debrief rubric score of 75% or higher; any Incomplete rating on the portfolio document checklist gives the student five business days to correct deficiencies before a final pass or fail determination is recorded. | The program instructor reviews the student's externship daily log entries (submitted weekly throughout the placement) and the final assembled portfolio for completeness, accuracy of credential-domain mapping, and professionalism; the instructor also scores the end-of-placement debrief presentation using the program rubric. Together the log and portfolio constitute the documentary evidence that the student has met the supervised-hours requirement and has connected field experience to the NUCP, NRRPT, and NRC Non-Licensed Operator credential exam domains. Complete · Verified |
BLD-NUCL84-11 Exam prep
Certification Exam Preparation: NRC, NRRPT, NUCP, and OSHA Credentials
180 hr · $1,800 COMPLIMENTARY
This course systematically reviews every domain tested on the NRC Non-Licensed Operator written examination, the NRC Reactor Operator License examination, the NRRPT certification examination, the NEI NUCP competency assessment, and the OSHA 10 final quiz, using mapped content review, timed practice sets, and full-length mock exams. Students identify personal knowledge gaps through diagnostic testing, complete targeted remediation in weak areas, and build the test-taking stamina and strategy required to pass high-stakes nuclear industry credentialing exams. All practice questions are drawn from publicly available NRC examination guidance, NUREG study materials, NRRPT content outlines, and NEI curriculum frameworks.
Outcomes- Correctly answer at least 80 percent of practice questions in each NRC written examination content area, including reactor theory, plant systems, instrumentation and control, and emergency operating procedures.
- Demonstrate mastery of NRRPT examination domains—radiation physics, instrumentation, dosimetry, regulatory requirements, and radiation protection program administration—by scoring at or above the NRRPT published passing standard on a full-length mock examination.
- Complete a timed NUCP competency practice assessment covering all NEI Uniform Curriculum competency areas and achieve a score sufficient to meet employer qualification standards.
- Apply OSHA 10 general industry and construction safety concepts accurately on a timed closed-book practice quiz, earning the minimum score required for card issuance.
- Construct and execute a personalized remediation plan that targets identified weak domains, documents study hours, and tracks score improvement across successive practice sets.
- Perform successfully on full-length, timed mock examinations that simulate the format, time limits, and content weighting of each target credential, demonstrating readiness to sit the actual credentialing examinations.
Course text
This course systematically reviews every domain tested on the NRC Non-Licensed Operator written examination, the NRC Reactor Operator License examination, the NRRPT certification examination, the NEI NUCP competency assessment, and the OSHA 10 final quiz, using mapped content review, timed practice sets, and full-length mock exams. Students identify personal knowledge gaps through diagnostic testing, complete targeted remediation in weak areas, and build the test-taking stamina and strategy required to pass high-stakes nuclear industry credentialing exams. All practice questions are drawn from publicly available NRC examination guidance, NUREG study materials, NRRPT content outlines, and NEI curriculum frameworks.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Diagnostic Assessment and Personalized Study Planning; Targeted Domain Review: NRC Written Exam and OSHA 10 Content; Targeted Domain Review: NRRPT and NUCP Competency Areas; Full-Length Mock Examinations and Final Remediation.
What competent looks like. Correctly answer at least 80 percent of practice questions in each NRC written examination content area, including reactor theory, plant systems, instrumentation and control, and emergency operating procedures. Demonstrate mastery of NRRPT examination domains—radiation physics, instrumentation, dosimetry, regulatory requirements, and radiation protection program administration—by scoring at or above the NRRPT published passing standard on a full-length mock examination. Complete a timed NUCP competency practice assessment covering all NEI Uniform Curriculum competency areas and achieve a score sufficient to meet employer qualification standards. Apply OSHA 10 general industry and construction safety concepts accurately on a timed closed-book practice quiz, earning the minimum score required for card issuance. Construct and execute a personalized remediation plan that targets identified weak domains, documents study hours, and tracks score improvement across successive practice sets. Perform successfully on full-length, timed mock examinations that simulate the format, time limits, and content weighting of each target credential, demonstrating readiness to sit the actual credentialing examinations.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diagnostic Assessment and Personalized Study Planning | 30 | practice | Each student administers a timed diagnostic practice test in each credential content area, analyzes the results by domain, and produces a written remediation plan that prioritizes topics by deficiency severity. |
| Printed and digital diagnostic practice question sets (drawn from NRC NUREG examination guidance and publicly released sample questions), NRRPT candidate handbook and content outline, NEI NUCP competency list, domain-tracking spreadsheet template, calculator, scratch paper, course textbooks from Courses 2–8 | Instructor reviews each student's completed domain-tracking spreadsheet and written study plan; plan must correctly identify all domains below 75 percent accuracy and include a specific resource and schedule entry for each deficient domain — pass requires all low-scoring domains addressed and instructor sign-off on the plan |
| 2 | Targeted Domain Review: NRC Written Exam and OSHA 10 Content | 60 | theory | Students review and apply the technical content areas most heavily weighted on the NRC Non-Licensed Operator and Reactor Operator written examinations and the OSHA 10 assessment, with emphasis on reactor fundamentals, plant systems, instrumentation logic, technical specifications, emergency operating procedures, and OSHA general safety regulations. |
| NUREG-1021 (Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors) for exam structure guidance, plant system diagrams from Courses 3 and 4, NRC inspection report excerpts (public domain), OSHA 10 outreach curriculum materials, OSHA 29 CFR 1910 and 1926 quick-reference summaries, personal study notebooks, domain tracking spreadsheet | Student must score at least 75 percent on each domain practice question set before moving on; any domain below 75 percent triggers mandatory re-study and a second attempt on an alternate question set before the next lesson begins — instructor initials the tracking spreadsheet for each passed domain |
| 3 | Targeted Domain Review: NRRPT and NUCP Competency Areas | 45 | theory | Students review and apply all content domains on the NRRPT certification examination content outline and the NEI NUCP competency framework, achieving consistent practice-question accuracy that meets or exceeds the NRRPT and NUCP published or equivalent passing standards. |
| NRRPT candidate handbook and content outline (available from nrrpt.org), NEI NUCP competency document, 10 CFR Parts 19, 20, and 50 excerpts, radiation protection textbook from Course 5, dosimetry calculation reference cards, scientific calculator, whiteboard and markers | Student scores at least 75 percent on domain practice question sets for all NRRPT domains and peer-teaching mini-lesson produces a group quiz average of at least 75 percent — both requirements must be met; instructor records results on the tracking spreadsheet |
| 4 | Full-Length Mock Examinations and Final Remediation | 45 | practice | Students complete full-length, timed mock examinations that replicate the format, length, and content weighting of each target credential, analyze performance reports to confirm readiness or complete final targeted remediation, and demonstrate sustained exam-taking stamina and strategy. |
| Full-length mock examination booklets (NRC content-aligned, NRRPT content-aligned, NUCP-aligned), answer sheets, official-style timer, scientific calculator (same model allowed in actual exams), domain tracking spreadsheet, scratch paper, NUREG reference documents, NRRPT candidate handbook | Student must score at least 80 percent on the full-length NRC mock exam and at least 75 percent on the NRRPT mock exam (consistent with general NRRPT passing standards) to be certified as exam-ready by the instructor; any student below these thresholds receives a written remediation assignment and must complete a second mock session with documented improvement before course completion is awarded |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Mock Certification Examination Battery | Mock certification exam | 100% | Minimum 80 percent on the NRC written exam mock; minimum 75 percent on the NRRPT mock; satisfactory (pass) on the NUCP competency mock and the OSHA 10 practice quiz; all four mock exams must be passed to receive a course completion certificate | Students sit a sequenced battery of four full-length, timed, closed-book mock examinations — NRC written (non-licensed operator format), NRRPT (all domains in published proportion), NUCP competency assessment, and OSHA 10 practice quiz — each administered under authentic examination conditions with no instructor assistance; scores are recorded on each student's cumulative domain tracking document, and the instructor certifies in writing that the student has demonstrated the knowledge and test-taking readiness required to sit the actual credentialing examinations. Score · Time management |
Program completion
External credential: NRC Non-Licensed Operator Prep; NRC Reactor Operator (RO) License (utility-sponsored); NRRPT Radiation Protection Tech; NUCP Uniform Curriculum (NEI); OSHA 10
Students prepare for and sit the NRC Non-Licensed Operator written qualification process, the NRC Reactor Operator license examination (administered through a utility-sponsored program under NRC oversight), the NRRPT certification examination, the NEI NUCP Uniform Curriculum assessment, and the OSHA 10 Outreach completion assessment, all conducted by their respective issuing bodies. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.
Back to Nuclear Power Plant Technician / Operator Prep · How the school gets authority to award these credentials
