🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Building & Construction › Nuclear Power Plant Technician / Operator Prep › Nuclear Plant Maintenance: Procedures, Equipment, and Reliability › Lesson 2
BLD-NUCL84-08 · Lesson 2 · 20.5 clock hours · demo

Human Performance Tools in Maintenance: Procedure Use, Pre-Job Briefing, and Self-Checking

Objective. Students will demonstrate proper procedure-use techniques including place-keeping, self-check (STAR), peer check, and two-person verification, and conduct a compliant pre-job briefing for a simulated maintenance task.

⚠ Pending professional review

This lesson, its worked examples and its practice questions has not yet been verified by a licensed professional engineer or master tradesperson or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Why Human Performance Tools Matter in Nuclear Maintenance

Nuclear power plants operate under strict regulatory oversight because errors in maintenance can have consequences far beyond a single system failure. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) have documented that the majority of significant plant events trace back to human error — not equipment failure alone. Human performance tools are the structured habits and techniques that reduce the chance of those errors reaching the plant. Using them correctly is not optional; it is a condition of employment and, for licensed activities, a condition of your license.

Procedure Use and Place-Keeping

Maintenance procedures in a nuclear plant are controlled documents. They are written, reviewed, and approved through a formal process precisely because every step matters. Your job as a technician or operator is to follow the procedure as written, in sequence, without improvising — even when a step seems obvious or you have done the task many times.

Place-keeping is the physical technique that proves you are following the procedure step by step. You use a place-keeping marker — a physical pointer, highlighter card, or movable flag — to mark the last completed step. You do not move the marker until the step is fully finished and verified. This prevents skipped steps, repeated steps, and loss of position, especially during interruptions. If you are called away from a task, you note the exact step number, secure the marker, and brief your relief before walking away.

Procedures must be used continuously at the work location, not read in the break room and then carried out from memory. If a procedure contains a note or caution before a step, you stop and read it before performing the action. Cautions warn of equipment damage; notes provide important information. Both are there for a reason.

STAR: Stop, Think, Act, Review

STAR is the core self-checking technique used across the nuclear industry. It applies to any critical action — turning a valve, pressing a pushbutton, entering a setpoint, or signing a document.

STAR takes only a few seconds per step, but it interrupts the complacency that causes most maintenance errors.

Peer Check and Two-Person Verification

Some steps carry enough risk that self-checking alone is insufficient. Peer check means a qualified co-worker independently verifies the component, position, and action before or after you perform a step. The peer uses the same procedure and independently reaches the same conclusion — they do not simply agree with you.

Two-person verification (2PV) is a more formal requirement, often procedure-specified, where two qualified individuals both observe the action and both sign the procedure. Two-person verification is commonly required for steps involving radioactive material handling, safety-related valve lineups, and electrical switching on energized equipment. Never shortcut 2PV; the procedure will specify when it is required.

Pre-Job Briefing

Before any significant maintenance task begins, the work team conducts a pre-job briefing. This is a structured conversation — not a casual chat — that ensures everyone on the team understands the job before tools are touched. A compliant briefing covers:

1. Scope: What work is being done, on which system and components, with which procedure and revision.

2. Hazards: Radiological, electrical, thermal, mechanical, or chemical hazards present. Required PPE and dosimetry.

3. Roles and responsibilities: Who is the lead? Who performs which steps? Who is the independent verifier?

4. Stop-work authority: Every team member has the right and the responsibility to stop work if something does not look right. No one needs permission to call a stop. Reinforce this explicitly.

5. Contingencies: What do we do if the valve will not seat, if a torque value cannot be reached, if an unexpected condition is found?

The briefing checklist is your tool. Work through it completely. Shortcuts in the briefing room become problems at the work site.

Condition Reports and Error Trapping

When you find an error in a procedure — a wrong tag number, a missing value, a reversed sequence — you do not cross it out and proceed on your best guess. You stop work, notify your supervisor, and initiate a condition report (CR). The CR documents the discrepancy so the corrective action program can address it. Procedure errors are significant findings; they may indicate the procedure has never been used correctly, or that a similar error exists elsewhere. Identifying and reporting errors is a professional obligation, not a sign of weakness.

Safety Reminders

Lockout/tagout (LOTO) must be verified before any maintenance on energized or pressurized systems — verify isolation yourself; never assume someone else completed it. Confirm your dosimetry is calibrated and worn before entering radiological areas. If PPE requirements change mid-task, stop and re-equip before continuing. Stop-work authority is absolute: if it does not feel right, stop.

Key terms9

Place-keepingA physical technique in which a marker tracks the last completed procedure step, preventing skipped or repeated steps during maintenance.
STARA self-checking method standing for Stop, Think, Act, Review; applied before and after each critical action to verify the right component, right action, and correct result.
Peer checkAn independent verification by a qualified co-worker who reviews the component, position, and intended action without being prompted by the performer's conclusion.
Two-person verification (2PV)A procedure-specified requirement where two qualified individuals both observe and sign off on a critical step, used for high-consequence actions such as safety-related valve lineups.
Pre-job briefingA structured team discussion held before maintenance begins, covering scope, hazards, roles, stop-work authority, and contingencies using a formal checklist.
Stop-work authorityThe right and responsibility of any team member to halt work immediately when an unsafe, unexpected, or unclear condition is identified, without needing supervisory approval.
Condition report (CR)A formal document used to record and enter a discrepancy, error, or adverse condition into the plant's corrective action program for evaluation and resolution.
Human performance toolsA set of structured behaviors and techniques — including STAR, peer check, pre-job briefing, and place-keeping — designed to prevent human error from causing plant events.
Controlled documentA procedure or technical document managed under a formal configuration control process, ensuring only the current approved revision is used in the field.
In class: Instructor demonstrates correct procedure use with place-keeping marker on a printed maintenance procedure while narrating each STAR (Stop, Think, Act, Review) step; students then replicate the technique on a second procedure at their workstations. · In pairs, students role-play a pre-job briefing for a valve packing replacement task using a provided briefing checklist covering scope, hazards, roles, stop-work authority, and contingencies; instructor evaluates and provides structured feedback. · Students intentionally identify and flag five deliberate errors embedded in a printed procedure (wrong valve tag number, missing torque value, reversed sequence step, omitted sign-off block, incorrect tool specification) and document corrections using a condition report form.
Materials: Sample maintenance procedures (valve and pump focus), place-keeping markers, pre-job briefing checklist, condition report forms, embedded-error procedure handouts, INPO AP-928 human performance reference (or equivalent industry document)
Check: Instructor observation checklist: student correctly performs STAR on at least three consecutive procedure steps without prompting, and pre-job briefing covers all required checklist elements; both items must be marked satisfactory to pass.

Practice check8

Answer each question, then check it. Nothing is recorded; this is your own practice.

Human Performance / Procedure Use
1. A technician is replacing valve packing and is called away to answer a supervisor's question. What is the correct action before leaving the work site?
Human Performance / STAR Technique
2. Which element of STAR is being applied when a technician pauses before pressing a pushbutton to ask, 'Is this the correct component and the correct action per the procedure?'
Human Performance / Pre-Job Briefing
3. During a pre-job briefing for a pump maintenance task, the team lead skips the contingencies section because 'this is a routine job.' Which risk does this create?
Corrective Action Program / Procedure Control
4. A technician reviewing a maintenance procedure finds that the valve tag number listed in Step 6 does not match the tag number in the system drawing attached to the work order. What should the technician do?
Human Performance / Verification Practices
5. Two-person verification (2PV) is most likely to be required by procedure for which of the following steps?
Human Performance / Stop-Work Authority
6. A junior technician notices that the team is about to open the wrong drain valve because the procedure tag number and the physical tag do not match. The senior technician is about to act. What should the junior technician do?
Human Performance / STAR Technique
7. During the Review step of STAR after actuating a valve, the technician observes that the system pressure indication did not change as the procedure stated it would. What is the correct next action?
Human Performance / Verification Practices
8. Which of the following BEST distinguishes a peer check from two-person verification?
Record this lesson on my transcript. Sign in with your key and enrollment email to record lessons (enroll free if you have no key). This page stays open to read and practise.