🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Agriculture, Environment & Public Service › Agriculture / Horticulture / Landscaping › Courses
Agriculture, Environment & Public Service · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Agriculture / Horticulture / Landscaping

11 courses · 1,350 clock hours · 9 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$13,640 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
11courses
82lessons
1,350hours
39assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons82 of 82 lesson pages writtenPractice653 practice questionsResources120 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 82 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
AGR-HORT49-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career in Agriculture, Horticulture & Landscaping

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, technical literacy, digital skills, and professional habits required across every subsequent course in the program. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry or Construction certification and CPR/First Aid certification, establishing the safety baseline required by both the State Pesticide Applicator license and NALP Landscape Industry Certified credential. All content is contextualized to agriculture, horticulture, and landscaping worksites so that skills transfer directly to field and production environments.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, technical literacy, digital skills, and professional habits required across every subsequent course in the program. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry or Construction certification and CPR/First Aid certification, establishing the safety baseline required by both the State Pesticide Applicator license and NALP Landscape Industry Certified credential. All content is contextualized to agriculture, horticulture, and landscaping worksites so that skills transfer directly to field and production environments.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Worksite Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10-Hour Core; PPE, Lockout/Tagout, and Emergency Response; Trade Math I: Measurement, Area, and Volume; Trade Math II: Ratios, Dilutions, Rates, and Estimation; Technical Reading: Labels, SDS, Manuals, and Specifications; Digital Tools for the Green Industry; Career Readiness and Credential Pathways.

What competent looks like. Complete OSHA 10-Hour training and demonstrate knowledge of hazard recognition, lockout/tagout, PPE selection, and emergency response procedures specific to landscaping and agricultural worksites. Perform trade math calculations — including area, volume, slope, unit conversion, dilution ratios, and material estimation — accurately enough to support pesticide mixing, irrigation design, and soil amendment work. Read and interpret safety data sheets (SDS), pesticide labels, equipment manuals, and technical specifications at a level sufficient for safe daily practice. Use standard digital tools — including spreadsheets, job-management apps, and mapping/measuring software — to record data, create estimates, and communicate with supervisors and clients. Demonstrate career-readiness behaviors: professional communication, resume and portfolio preparation, and understanding of employment law basics relevant to the green-industry workforce. Identify the credential pathways, exam domains, and practical skill areas required for the State Pesticide Applicator license and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified credential.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Worksite Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10-Hour Core26theoryStudents will identify common agricultural and landscaping hazards — including struck-by, caught-in, heat illness, chemical exposure, and electrical hazards — and explain the OSHA rights, reporting duties, and citation process that apply to green-industry employers.
  1. Complete the OSHA 10-Hour General Industry (or Construction) card course using the official OSHA outreach curriculum, with all modules contextualized to landscaping and agricultural scenarios (e.g., mowing near traffic, trench work for irrigation, pesticide storage).
  2. Conduct a structured hazard walk of the school's shop, greenhouse, and outdoor lab, using a provided inspection checklist to identify and log at least ten real or simulated hazards, then present findings to the class.
  3. Role-play an incident response scenario: one student acts as the injured worker, one calls emergency services using site address protocol, and one completes a near-miss report form, then the group debriefs what OSHA recordkeeping requirements would apply.
OSHA 10-Hour outreach course materials (OSHA-authorized trainer), OSHA 300 log sample, site hazard inspection checklist, hard hats, safety glasses, hi-vis vests for walk activitySuccessful completion of all OSHA 10-Hour outreach modules with a passing score on the provider's final assessment (typically 70% or higher); instructor verification of completed hazard inspection checklist with correct identification of at least 8 of 10 planted hazards.
2PPE, Lockout/Tagout, and Emergency Response20demoStudents will select appropriate PPE for at least five landscaping and agricultural tasks, correctly demonstrate a lockout/tagout procedure on shop equipment, and perform CPR and basic first aid to current American Red Cross or American Heart Association standards.
  1. PPE selection lab: instructor presents six scenario cards (e.g., mixing liquid herbicide concentrate, operating a chainsaw, applying granular fertilizer near a water body) and students independently select PPE from a table of options — gloves (nitrile, leather, chemical-resistant), eye protection, respirators, hearing protection — justifying each choice verbally before instructor reveals the accepted answer.
  2. Lockout/tagout demonstration and return demo: instructor performs a complete LOTO sequence on a bench grinder and a riding mower blade-engagement system; each student then performs the sequence independently while an observer uses a step-by-step checklist, with instructor correcting errors in real time.
  3. American Red Cross or American Heart Association CPR/First Aid certification course (hands-on): adult CPR with AED, choking, bleeding control, heat stroke recognition and cooling, and eye-wash station use.
Assorted PPE collection (nitrile gloves, leather gloves, chemical-resistant gauntlets, safety glasses, face shield, half-face respirator with cartridges, earplugs, earmuffs, hard hat, steel-toed boots demo pair), lockout/tagout kit with hasp and tags, bench grinder, riding mower (de-fueled for LOTO practice), CPR manikins, AED trainer, first aid kit, eye-wash station100% correct completion of a six-step LOTO checklist (no partial credit — energy control is a life-safety item); CPR/First Aid card earned from authorized provider; PPE selection lab scored at 5 of 6 scenarios correct.
3Trade Math I: Measurement, Area, and Volume22practiceStudents will accurately calculate linear measurements, areas of regular and irregular shapes, and volumes of beds, tanks, and soil amendments using both US customary and metric units, achieving results within an acceptable margin for trade applications.
  1. Measurement scavenger hunt: using measuring tapes and a measuring wheel, students measure actual dimensions of the school's planting beds, turf areas, and greenhouse bays, record results in a field notebook, and convert all measurements between feet/inches and meters/centimeters.
  2. Area and volume worksheet series: students calculate the square footage of L-shaped beds and triangular turf areas, then calculate cubic yards of mulch or topsoil needed for given beds at a specified depth, checking answers against an answer key before instructor review.
  3. Estimation challenge: given a hand-drawn irregular landscape plot (approximating a real residential layout), student groups estimate total planting-bed area using the grid overlay method, then compare their estimate to the instructor's calculated value and discuss acceptable tolerance for materials ordering.
100-ft measuring tapes, measuring wheel, field notebooks, graph paper, calculators, pencils, unit-conversion reference card (US customary and metric), NALP study guide (math section), whiteboardWorksheet set scored at 80% or higher with all unit labels correct; measurement scavenger-hunt data within ±5% of instructor-measured values for at least four of six measurements.
4Trade Math II: Ratios, Dilutions, Rates, and Estimation20practiceStudents will calculate pesticide dilution ratios, fertilizer application rates per area, material cost estimates, and slope percentages using formulas standard to agriculture and landscaping practice.
  1. Dilution and mixing practice (water only, no actual pesticide): using a label excerpt for a hypothetical liquid concentrate specifying ounces per gallon, students calculate the volume of concentrate needed to fill a 25-gallon and a 100-gallon sprayer tank, measuring water with graduated cylinders to verify the proportion.
  2. Fertilizer rate calculation: given a soil test recommendation (provided as a handout in standard cooperative-extension format) calling for a specific pounds-of-nitrogen-per-1,000-square-feet rate, students calculate the weight of a specified granular fertilizer (with a given analysis number) needed for three different turf areas of varying sizes.
  3. Job-cost estimation exercise: using a provided materials price list and labor rate, student pairs prepare a simple written estimate for mulching a residential landscape bed (calculating cubic yards, bags, or bulk delivery, adding waste factor, then pricing), and compare estimates across pairs to discuss real-world variation.
Sample pesticide label excerpts (EPA format), sample soil test report (cooperative-extension format), fertilizer analysis reference chart, graduated cylinders, water, calculators, job-cost worksheet template, materials price list handout, NALP study guide (math section), State Pesticide Applicator core manual (math chapter)Dilution and fertilizer rate calculations scored at 80% or higher with correct units; job-cost estimate within 10% of instructor's model answer and all line items present.
5Technical Reading: Labels, SDS, Manuals, and Specifications20theoryStudents will locate required information — signal words, personal protective equipment requirements, first-aid instructions, re-entry intervals, and disposal directions — from a pesticide label and SDS, and extract key operational data from an equipment operator's manual.
  1. Pesticide label scavenger hunt: each student receives a full-length EPA-format pesticide label (publicly available product, printed or projected) and completes a structured worksheet requiring them to locate the signal word, active ingredient percentage, required PPE, restricted-entry interval, environmental hazards statement, and first-aid directions.
  2. SDS sixteen-section walkthrough: instructor projects a complete SDS for a common landscape chemical (e.g., a glyphosate-based product); students follow along identifying each of the sixteen sections and answer ten comprehension questions about exposure limits, spill response, and storage requirements.
  3. Equipment manual reading exercise: using the operator's manual for the school's walk-behind mower or backpack sprayer, students locate and record the oil type and capacity, blade-torque specification, and troubleshooting steps for a specified symptom, then answer three application questions about safe operation intervals.
Printed full-length pesticide labels (at least two different products), printed SDS examples (GHS-compliant, 16-section), equipment operator's manuals (mower, backpack sprayer), structured reading worksheets, highlighters, State Pesticide Applicator core manualLabel and SDS worksheets each scored at 80% or higher; equipment manual exercise: all three data points (oil type, torque spec, troubleshooting steps) correctly identified.
6Digital Tools for the Green Industry20labStudents will use a spreadsheet application to build a materials estimate, use a web-based mapping tool to measure a site area, and demonstrate professional written communication by drafting a work order and a client-facing email.
  1. Spreadsheet materials estimate: using a provided job scenario and materials price list, each student builds a spreadsheet with labeled columns (material, unit, quantity, unit cost, line total, subtotal, tax, total), applies a formula for each calculated cell, and formats it for readability — instructor checks formula logic, not just values.
  2. Site measurement with digital mapping tool: using a publicly available aerial-imagery mapping tool (such as a GIS viewer or a publicly accessible web mapping tool), students locate the school site, use the measurement/polygon tool to calculate the area of the campus turf and planting-bed zones, and compare digital measurements to their earlier physical measurements from Lesson 3.
  3. Professional communication drafting: students write a one-page work order for a hypothetical lawn maintenance job (scope, schedule, materials) and a two-paragraph client email explaining a service delay caused by weather, then peer-review each other's drafts using a checklist covering tone, accuracy, and grammar before submitting a revised version.
Computers or tablets with spreadsheet software (e.g., Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets), internet access, web-based mapping tool, work order template sample, email writing checklist, job scenario handoutSpreadsheet: all formulas functional and total within 2% of instructor model; mapping measurement within 10% of physical measurement; work order and email each scored at least 3 of 4 on a four-point rubric covering accuracy, completeness, professionalism, and grammar.
7Career Readiness and Credential Pathways20theoryStudents will describe the legal and professional requirements for the State Pesticide Applicator license and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified credential, draft a trade-specific resume, and demonstrate professional communication skills in a simulated employer interview.
  1. Credential mapping activity: using official NALP candidate handbook excerpts and the state pesticide applicator licensing agency's website (or printed handout), students complete a two-column comparison chart listing each credential's eligibility requirements, exam domains, renewal or continuing-education requirements, and the legal or professional consequences of working without it — class discusses why the pesticide license is a legal requirement while NALP LIC is a voluntary industry credential.
  2. Resume and portfolio draft: each student drafts a one-page trade-specific resume using a provided template, listing relevant coursework, any prior work or volunteer experience, and tool or equipment skills developed in this course; instructor and a peer provide written feedback using a checklist before a revised copy is submitted.
  3. Mock interview: instructor or a volunteer industry guest poses four common green-industry employer questions (e.g., experience with outdoor physical work, ability to obtain a pesticide license, availability for early-morning schedules, approach to a customer complaint); students respond and receive structured feedback on content, eye contact, and professional language.
NALP Landscape Industry Certified candidate handbook (official current edition), state pesticide applicator licensing agency informational materials, credential comparison worksheet, resume template, peer-review checklist, mock-interview question card setCredential comparison chart: all required fields completed with accurate information verified against official sources (no invented fees or exam formats); resume: all required sections present with no factual errors, scored at least 3 of 4 on rubric; mock interview: at least 3 of 4 questions answered with relevant, professional responses as judged by instructor using a four-point rubric.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Safety and Regulatory Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher; any question related to a life-safety procedure (LOTO, PPE for pesticides, emergency response) must be answered correctly or the student must remediate that section before advancing.A 50-question written exam covering OSHA hazard categories, PPE selection, lockout/tagout steps, SDS interpretation, signal words, and first-aid response scenarios drawn from Lessons 1, 2, and 5. Questions mirror the format used in state pesticide applicator core exams and OSHA outreach assessments to build familiarity with credential testing.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Trade Math and Technical Reading ExamWritten exam25%80% or higher; all unit labels must be present on numeric answers — a correct number with a missing or wrong unit is marked incorrect.A 40-question exam combining calculation problems (area, volume, dilution ratios, fertilizer rates, slope, unit conversion) and short-answer technical reading questions requiring students to locate specific information from a provided pesticide label and SDS excerpt. This exam directly maps to the mathematics and label-reading competencies tested in both the State Pesticide Applicator core exam and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified written test.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Digital Tools and Professional Communication ProjectProject25%A score of 3 or higher on all four rubric categories (accuracy, completeness, professionalism, technical correctness); any category scored 1 requires revision and resubmission before the student advances.Students submit a complete job package: a spreadsheet estimate with working formulas for a hypothetical landscape installation, a digital site map with labeled area measurements, a formal work order, and a professional client email — all for the same fictional job scenario. The package is scored on a four-point rubric in each of four categories and models the documentation expected in the Capstone Project.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Career Readiness Oral ReviewOral / panel25%Student must correctly describe both credential pathways (eligibility, exam domains, renewal basics) without inventing requirements, and receive a score of 3 or higher on the interview rubric; a score of 2 or lower on either element requires a one-week remediation and second attempt.A 15-minute oral session in which the instructor asks the student to explain the State Pesticide Applicator licensing process and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified credential pathway from memory, then poses two unexpected situational questions (e.g., 'A customer asks you to apply a product you are not licensed for — what do you do?') to assess applied understanding of legal and professional obligations. The session concludes with a brief review of the student's submitted resume.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
AGR-HORT49-02 Trade course

Soils: Properties, Health, and Management for Horticulture and Landscaping

105 hr · $1,325 COMPLIMENTARY

Students develop a working knowledge of soil science as it applies to crop production, turf management, and landscape installation, including physical and chemical properties, biological activity, and amendment practices. Emphasis is placed on field sampling, laboratory interpretation, and site-specific fertility planning that support both the State Pesticide Applicator context of safe product application and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified competencies in plant and soil management. By the end of the course, students can evaluate a soil, read a lab report, and build a written amendment and fertility plan for a real site.

Outcomes
Course text

Students develop a working knowledge of soil science as it applies to crop production, turf management, and landscape installation, including physical and chemical properties, biological activity, and amendment practices. Emphasis is placed on field sampling, laboratory interpretation, and site-specific fertility planning that support both the State Pesticide Applicator context of safe product application and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified competencies in plant and soil management. By the end of the course, students can evaluate a soil, read a lab report, and build a written amendment and fertility plan for a real site.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Soil Formation, Classification, and the Soil Profile; Soil Texture, Structure, and Physical Properties; Soil Water: Movement, Retention, and Drainage; Soil Chemistry: pH, CEC, and Nutrient Availability; Macronutrients, Micronutrients, and Deficiency Diagnosis; Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analysis; Interpreting Soil Tests and Calculating Amendment Rates; Soil Biology, Organic Matter, and Amendments; Soil Health, Conservation, and the Fertility Management Plan.

What competent looks like. Describe the physical properties of soil—texture, structure, bulk density, pore space, and drainage class—and explain how each affects plant growth and landscape performance. Collect a representative soil sample using proper technique, submit it for analysis, and accurately interpret a standard soil test report including pH, organic matter, and macronutrient levels. Calculate lime and fertilizer application rates from soil test recommendations using unit conversions and area math, and calibrate a spreader to deliver the target rate within an acceptable tolerance. Identify signs of nutrient deficiency and toxicity in common landscape and horticultural plants and match them to corrective soil or foliar amendments. Describe the role of soil biology—bacteria, fungi, earthworms, and the soil food web—and explain how compaction, tillage, and chemical inputs affect microbial communities. Develop a written soil amendment and seasonal fertility management plan for an assigned site that meets agronomic, environmental, and regulatory requirements.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Soil Formation, Classification, and the Soil Profile10theoryStudents will correctly identify and describe the major soil horizons in a profile diagram and explain how parent material, climate, organisms, topography, and time produce different soil orders common to their region.
  1. Label a blank soil profile diagram with horizon designations (O, A, E, B, C, R) and write a two-sentence description of each horizon's characteristics and importance to plant roots.
  2. Compare two USDA Web Soil Survey printouts for local agricultural and urban soils, identifying differences in series name, drainage class, and typical land use limitations.
  3. Group activity: match laminated soil sample cards (differing color, texture, and structure) to USDA Soil Taxonomy order descriptions using a simplified key, then justify each match in a brief class discussion.
USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey access, USDA Soil Taxonomy simplified key handout, soil horizon profile poster, soil sample cards, colored pencils, local county soil survey publicationStudents correctly label at least 5 of 6 horizons on an exit diagram and answer 4 of 5 short-answer questions about local soil formation factors; pass mark is 80%.
2Soil Texture, Structure, and Physical Properties14labStudents will determine the textural class of three unknown soil samples using the USDA textural triangle and the jar-settling method, and will measure bulk density and infiltration rate in the field.
  1. Perform the ribbon-and-feel test on three numbered soil samples following the USDA field-texture flowchart; record results, then confirm with hydrometer or jar-settling data and plot percentages on a textural triangle.
  2. Measure bulk density of a compacted and an uncompacted sample using the core method: weigh cores before and after oven-drying, calculate bulk density in g/cm³, and compare to optimal ranges for turfgrass and vegetable crops.
  3. Conduct a double-ring infiltrometer test on two contrasting outdoor sites (lawn vs. landscape bed); record water level at timed intervals, calculate infiltration rate in inches per hour, and write a one-paragraph interpretation linking texture, structure, and drainage class.
USDA textural triangle chart, soil samples (sandy loam, clay loam, silt), 1-liter settling jars, dispersing agent, meter sticks, soil core sampler, balance scale, drying oven, double-ring infiltrometers, stopwatch, field notebooksCorrect textural class on at least 2 of 3 samples (within one class of instructor answer); bulk density calculation within 0.05 g/cm³ of instructor calculation; infiltration rate table complete and interpretation paragraph submitted — all three elements required to pass.
3Soil Water: Movement, Retention, and Drainage10theoryStudents will explain the concepts of field capacity, permanent wilting point, and plant-available water, and will describe how soil texture and organic matter content influence each.
  1. Graph plant-available water vs. soil texture using a provided data table (sand through clay), annotate the graph with field capacity and permanent wilting point lines, and write two conclusions relevant to irrigation scheduling.
  2. Case-study analysis: given a landscape scenario with a heavy clay soil and a client complaint of standing water, students identify drainage problems using soil property descriptions and propose three corrective measures ranked by cost.
  3. Capillary rise demonstration: place soil columns of sand, loam, and clay (in clear tubes) in colored water trays; observe and record rise height and rate over 30 minutes, then relate observations to irrigation interval recommendations for each texture class.
Graph paper or spreadsheet, clear acrylic soil columns, food-dye water, ruler, timer, case-study handout, Soil Science Society of America reference cards, whiteboardGraph is accurately plotted and annotated; two valid conclusions drawn; case-study response includes at least two technically correct corrective measures — assessed on a rubric, pass mark 75%.
4Soil Chemistry: pH, CEC, and Nutrient Availability12theoryStudents will explain how soil pH affects nutrient availability and cation exchange capacity, and will identify the pH ranges optimal for common landscape plants and agronomic crops.
  1. Use a nutrient availability chart (Troug diagram) to answer scenario questions: for a soil at pH 5.0, 6.5, and 7.5, identify which nutrients are most available and which are locked up, and predict likely deficiency symptoms for a given crop.
  2. Measure pH of five classroom soil samples with a calibrated pH meter and with a colorimetric test kit; compare readings, record discrepancies, and discuss which method is more accurate and why.
  3. Build a reference table of 20 common landscape and horticultural plants (including turfgrasses, shrubs, and vegetables) showing preferred pH range and one key symptom of pH-induced deficiency; use extension publications as sources.
pH meters (calibrated), colorimetric pH test kits, buffer solutions, soil samples at varying pH, Troug nutrient availability diagram, state cooperative extension plant pH reference, lab notebookspH meter readings within 0.2 units of instructor reference values for 4 of 5 samples; nutrient chart scenario answers at least 80% correct on an in-class quiz.
5Macronutrients, Micronutrients, and Deficiency Diagnosis12demoStudents will match visual deficiency symptoms of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, iron, and magnesium to the correct nutrient and explain the physiological reason each symptom appears where it does on the plant.
  1. Instructor-led walkthrough of a deficiency photo library (projected) covering the 16 essential nutrients; students take structured notes using a symptoms table template recording affected plant part, color change, and mobility of each nutrient.
  2. Students examine five potted greenhouse specimens with induced or natural deficiencies; complete a written diagnosis form for each plant, citing symptom location, color description, and probable nutrient cause.
  3. Role-play: student pairs receive a written client complaint describing plant symptoms; they question each other using a diagnostic checklist (soil pH, recent fertilization, irrigation, species), record findings, and propose a corrective action with justification.
Deficiency photo library (extension service publication or university digital resource), potted specimens with visible symptoms, diagnostic checklist handout, nutrient function and mobility reference card, colored pencils for diagrammingDiagnosis form for each of 5 specimens: minimum 4 of 5 correct nutrient identifications with a valid physiological explanation; role-play documented on checklist and submitted — pass mark 80%.
6Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analysis12fieldStudents will collect a composite soil sample from an assigned outdoor site using correct depth, grid, and labeling protocol, and will complete a submission form appropriate for their intended land use.
  1. Pre-field preparation: divide a campus map into a sampling grid; assign each student a zone; review state extension soil sampling guidelines specifying sample depth (typically 0–4 inches for turf, 0–6 inches for beds), number of sub-samples per composite, and container requirements.
  2. Field collection: each student collects 12–15 sub-samples from their zone using a soil probe, combines them in a clean bucket, removes debris, mixes thoroughly, and fills a labeled sample bag to the fill line; complete the submission information form specifying crop/turf use and lime history.
  3. Post-field: class compares results from two contrasting campus zones (e.g., maintained lawn vs. landscape bed) when reports return from the lab; students annotate their own report identifying every value, its unit, and the sufficiency range for the target plant.
Soil probes or push-tube samplers, clean plastic buckets, soil sample bags and mailers, campus site map, state cooperative extension soil sampling guide, submission forms, PPE (gloves, boots), field notebooksCorrectly filled submission form with all required fields; proper composite technique observed by instructor on a field checklist (pass/fail, all critical steps must be completed correctly); annotated report returned within one class period of receiving results.
7Interpreting Soil Tests and Calculating Amendment Rates15practiceStudents will read a standard soil test report, determine lime and fertilizer needs, and calculate the quantity of product required for a defined area, converting units correctly and calibrating a rotary spreader.
  1. Work through three printed soil test reports (representing turf, vegetable garden, and ornamental bed scenarios) using state extension interpretation guidelines; for each, identify pH status, organic matter rating, and macronutrient sufficiency levels, and record the specific recommendations in pounds per 1,000 sq ft.
  2. Math practice set: convert the extension recommendations to total pounds of product for areas of 500, 2,500, and 10,000 sq ft; calculate active ingredient quantities when given fertilizer grade labels (e.g., 10-10-10); check work with a partner before instructor review.
  3. Spreader calibration: weigh product caught in a collection tarp over a measured test strip with a rotary spreader set to three different settings; calculate actual delivery rate in lb/1,000 sq ft, compare to target rate, and adjust setting until within ±10% of target.
Sample soil test reports (three scenarios), state extension interpretation tables, fertilizer bags with grade labels, calculator, graph paper, rotary broadcast spreader, collection tarp, scale, measuring tape, safety glassesMath practice set: at least 8 of 10 calculations correct; spreader calibration: final setting delivers target rate within ±10% verified by instructor weighing — both elements required to pass. Maps to NALP LIC plant and soil management and integrated pest management competency areas.
8Soil Biology, Organic Matter, and Amendments12labStudents will describe the roles of bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and earthworms in nutrient cycling and will evaluate the quality of a compost sample using physical and chemical indicators.
  1. Soil food web mapping: using a provided food web diagram, students trace the path of a nitrogen atom from organic matter through decomposer bacteria to plant uptake; annotate each step with the process name (mineralization, nitrification, etc.) and one factor that speeds or slows it.
  2. Compost quality assessment: evaluate three compost/amendment samples (finished compost, raw manure, and a peat-based mix) for color, odor, moisture, particle size, and pH; record a pass/fail against industry quality criteria and discuss which is most appropriate for a new landscape bed vs. a vegetable garden.
  3. Amendment trial design: given a scenario of a compacted, low-organic-matter clay soil, student groups propose an amendment plan specifying product type, application rate (from published extension guidelines), timing, and incorporation method; groups present findings to class for peer critique.
Soil food web diagram (USDA NRCS Soil Biology Primer or equivalent), compost and amendment samples, pH meter, moisture meter, odor and visual assessment rubric, extension guidelines for organic amendment rates, lab notebooksNitrogen pathway diagram complete and accurate (at least 4 of 5 steps correct); compost assessment form complete with justification; amendment plan contains product, rate, timing, and method — rubric score 75% or higher to pass.
9Soil Health, Conservation, and the Fertility Management Plan8practiceStudents will synthesize all course content to produce a written site-specific soil fertility and amendment management plan for a real or simulated landscape or horticultural site, including environmental stewardship considerations.
  1. Students review their own soil test report and site notes gathered during Lesson 6, then draft a one-page site description including current soil health indicators (pH, organic matter %, drainage class, compaction observations) and site goals.
  2. Draft the management plan using a provided template: sections include amendment recommendations with rates and timing, fertilization schedule for one growing season, erosion and runoff risk assessment, and one practice to improve long-term soil health (cover crop, mulch layer, reduced tillage).
  3. Peer review workshop: exchange completed draft plans with a partner; use a checklist to verify that all sections are present, math is correct, and environmental considerations address nutrient runoff to waterways; return annotated drafts and revise before submission.
Student soil test reports, site notes, fertility plan template, state nutrient management guidelines, calculator, extension publication on cover crops and mulching, peer review checklistFinal fertility plan submitted with all required sections; amendment rates correctly calculated and consistent with soil test recommendations; environmental stewardship section addresses at least one runoff or leaching risk — rubric score 80% or higher to pass. Directly maps to NALP LIC integrated landscape management competency.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Soils Knowledge ExaminationWritten exam25%75% or higher (minimum 38 of 50 points)A 50-question written exam covering soil formation, physical and chemical properties, nutrient cycling, soil biology, and interpretation of soil test data, drawn from all nine lessons. Questions include multiple choice, matching (nutrient deficiency symptoms to nutrients), and short-answer calculations of amendment rates; this exam maps to the NALP Landscape Industry Certified plant and soil management content domain and reinforces the agronomic knowledge base underlying safe pesticide use for the State Pesticide Applicator credential.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Soil Sampling and Amendment Calculation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass on all critical steps of the field checklist AND math calculations within ±10% of correct answerThe student independently collects a composite soil sample from a designated outdoor plot using correct depth, sub-sample count, mixing, labeling, and submission-form completion, observed by the instructor against a critical-step checklist; the student then receives a printed soil test report for the site and, within 20 minutes, calculates the lime and fertilizer quantities required for a stated area. This demonstration directly addresses the NALP LIC competency in soil sampling and fertility management and reinforces the precision-measurement skills introduced in the Universal Core course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Laboratory and Field LogLog15%Complete entries for all 9 lessons with rubric score of 75% or higher; any missing critical safety observation entry must be corrected before a passing grade is awardedStudents maintain a continuous lab and field notebook throughout the course, recording procedures, raw data, calculations, observations, and written interpretations for every lab, field, and practice lesson; instructors review entries at three checkpoints (after Lessons 3, 6, and 9) and evaluate accuracy of data, completeness of interpretation, and correctness of calculations using a standard rubric. The log functions as a portfolio artifact demonstrating ongoing applied competence and is aligned with NALP LIC documentation practices.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety Practices Check: Soil Amendment and Spreader OperationsSafety audit15%100% on all critical safety behaviors; any critical failure requires immediate remediation and re-check before the student may continue field workDuring the spreader calibration activity in Lesson 7, the instructor uses a binary (observed/not observed) safety checklist to verify that the student selects and wears appropriate PPE for granular fertilizer handling, reads the product label before loading, keeps bystanders clear of the spreader path, and correctly disposes of or stores excess product; this check reinforces OSHA general industry safety principles from the Universal Core course and directly supports the environmental stewardship requirements embedded in the State Pesticide Applicator licensing framework.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-HORT49-03 Trade course

Crop Production: Principles and Field Practices

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn the science and hands-on management of field and specialty crops grown in commercial horticulture and agricultural settings, covering plant physiology, planting systems, fertility, pest scouting, and harvest. Lessons integrate soil knowledge from Course 2 and prepare students for the crop and plant identification components of the NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam and the agronomic knowledge base required for the State Pesticide Applicator license. By course end, students can plan, establish, monitor, and document a production cycle for a selected crop.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn the science and hands-on management of field and specialty crops grown in commercial horticulture and agricultural settings, covering plant physiology, planting systems, fertility, pest scouting, and harvest. Lessons integrate soil knowledge from Course 2 and prepare students for the crop and plant identification components of the NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam and the agronomic knowledge base required for the State Pesticide Applicator license. By course end, students can plan, establish, monitor, and document a production cycle for a selected crop.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Plant Physiology and Crop Growth Stages; Seed Selection, Seeding Rates, and Plant Population Math; Planting Methods, Equipment, and Field Setup; Crop Nutrition and Fertilizer Application; Irrigation Scheduling and Water Management for Crops; Integrated Pest Management and Crop Scouting; Weed Identification and Cultural Weed Control; Harvest, Post-Harvest Handling, and Crop Quality Standards; Crop Production Planning and Documentation.

What competent looks like. Identify the growth stages of at least five commercially grown crops and explain how each stage drives management decisions. Calculate seeding rates, row spacing, and plant population targets for a given field plot using standard agronomic formulas. Scout a crop planting for insect pests, diseases, and weeds, record findings on a standardized scouting form, and recommend an integrated pest management response. Select and apply appropriate fertilizer type and rate based on a soil test report and crop nutrient requirements without exceeding label or regulatory limits. Operate common crop production equipment — including hand seeders, irrigation headers, and spreaders — safely and correctly, following lockout/tagout and PPE protocols. Produce a written crop production plan and post-harvest log that meets industry documentation standards used in NALP and pesticide license record-keeping.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Plant Physiology and Crop Growth Stages10theoryStudents will identify the principal growth stages of at least five commercially grown crops and explain the physiological processes — germination, vegetative growth, reproductive development, and senescence — that define each stage.
  1. Instructor-led lecture using labeled crop growth-stage diagrams (corn, soybean, tomato, lettuce, turf grass); students annotate personal copies and add to a running crop notebook kept throughout the course.
  2. Small-group card-sort: teams match growth-stage descriptions, photographs, and management implications for three assigned crops, then present findings to the class for peer critique.
  3. Exit-ticket quiz: students write one key management decision triggered by a specific growth stage for each of the five crops covered, submitting on paper or a shared digital form.
Whiteboard, crop growth-stage wall charts, USDA NRCS crop guides, annotated diagram handouts, student crop notebooks, projectorExit-ticket quiz scored against an answer key; students must correctly identify the growth stage and associated management action for at least 4 of 5 crops to pass (80%).
2Seed Selection, Seeding Rates, and Plant Population Math10theoryStudents will calculate seeding rate, seed per acre, and target plant population for at least three crops using germination percentage, seed count, and row-spacing formulas.
  1. Direct instruction on the seeding-rate formula (seeds per acre = target population ÷ germination% ÷ emergence%) with worked examples on the board; students repeat calculations with instructor coaching.
  2. Partner worksheet: each pair receives a scenario card (crop species, field acreage, target stand, seed tag data) and must compute pounds of seed to purchase, show all unit conversions, and check each other's arithmetic.
  3. Whole-class error-analysis: instructor presents three common calculation mistakes (forgetting to convert germination fraction, wrong row-spacing divisor) on a projector; students identify and correct each error.
Calculators, ruler, seed-company catalogs or handouts with seed count per pound data, scenario cards, graph paper for spacing diagrams, trade math reference sheet from Course 1Worksheet scored by instructor; students must complete all three scenario calculations with correct setup and answer within 10% of the key value to pass.
3Planting Methods, Equipment, and Field Setup12demoStudents will demonstrate safe setup and operation of a hand-push plate seeder and a broadcast spreader, and describe the correct sequence for laying out row spacing and transplant spacing in a production plot.
  1. Instructor demonstration of hand seeder plate selection, hopper loading, and calibration check on a tarp; students observe, ask questions, then take turns operating the seeder on the tarp while instructor coaches grip and pace.
  2. Hands-on field layout exercise: in teams of three, students use stakes, string, and a measuring tape to lay out four rows at instructor-specified spacing in the program's practice plot, recording actual vs. target spacing.
  3. Lockout/tagout and PPE briefing specific to powered tillers and spreaders — instructor walks through the equipment hazard sheet, students don gloves and eye protection before any contact with equipment, and sign a PPE verification log.
Hand-push plate seeder, broadcast spreader, inert fill material (sand) for calibration, stakes, string, 100-ft measuring tape, PPE (gloves, safety glasses, steel-toed boots), lockout/tagout tags, equipment hazard sheetsInstructor checklist: each student must correctly install the plate, load the hopper, calibrate coverage on the tarp, and lay out one row within 2 inches of target spacing; any PPE omission is an automatic restart.
4Crop Nutrition and Fertilizer Application12labStudents will read a soil test report, identify nutrient deficiencies, and calculate fertilizer type and rate needed to meet crop requirements without exceeding recommended application levels.
  1. Lab station: each student receives a real or realistic soil test printout (pH, N-P-K, organic matter, micronutrients) and a crop nutrient requirement table; students complete a fertilizer prescription worksheet, showing N-P-K gap calculation and product selection.
  2. Hands-on mixing and weighing: students weigh out a calculated amount of granular fertilizer (using a scale) into labeled bags for a simulated 500-square-foot bed, converting bulk recommendations to small-plot quantities.
  3. Group discussion on slow-release vs. quick-release forms, organic amendments vs. synthetic, and how fertilizer records connect to State Pesticide Applicator record-keeping requirements — instructor facilitates using label examples.
Sample soil test reports, nutrient requirement reference tables (Cooperative Extension publications), granular fertilizer samples (labeled containers), digital scale, measuring cups, safety gloves, dust mask, fertilizer prescription worksheetsFertilizer prescription worksheet scored by instructor: correct identification of at least two deficiencies, correct rate calculation within 10% of key, and correct product selected; all PPE worn during weighing — 80% overall to pass.
5Irrigation Scheduling and Water Management for Crops10theoryStudents will explain evapotranspiration-based irrigation scheduling and calculate a basic weekly water requirement for a named crop given ET rate and rainfall data.
  1. Instructor presentation on evapotranspiration (ET), crop coefficients, and the concept of field capacity and permanent wilting point; students add key terms and formula to crop notebook.
  2. Worked-example worksheet: students use a provided weekly ET value and crop coefficient to calculate net irrigation need, subtract recorded rainfall, and determine minutes of run-time for a drip system at a known flow rate.
  3. Class debate on furrow irrigation vs. drip vs. overhead sprinkler for three assigned crops — teams defend their method using efficiency data from a Cooperative Extension irrigation guide, then discuss water conservation implications.
Cooperative Extension irrigation scheduling guides, ET data tables, crop coefficient tables, calculators, irrigation run-time worksheet, projector for ET concept diagramsIrrigation worksheet: students must correctly compute net irrigation need and run-time for two crop scenarios; passing score is both answers within 15% of key value.
6Integrated Pest Management and Crop Scouting14fieldStudents will conduct a structured IPM scout of an assigned crop plot, correctly identify at least three pest or disease signs using a diagnostic key, complete a standardized scouting form, and recommend a control threshold-based response.
  1. Pre-scout classroom session: instructor reviews economic threshold concept, introduces common crop insects (aphids, thrips, caterpillars), diseases (powdery mildew, damping-off, blight), and weeds using photo cards and specimen vials; students practice using a dichotomous key.
  2. Field scouting exercise: in pairs, students walk assigned rows of the practice plot using the W-pattern scouting route, record pest counts and damage ratings on scouting forms, photograph findings with a tablet or phone, and calculate pest density per row-foot.
  3. Classroom debrief: each pair presents scouting results; class compares counts to published economic threshold guidelines and votes on IPM response (cultural, biological, or chemical), discussing how this decision connects to the pesticide applicator license scope.
Standardized scouting forms (program-developed), hand lenses (10×), insect specimen vials, disease photo reference cards, dichotomous identification key, tablet or phone for photos, PPE (closed-toe shoes, long sleeves, gloves), Cooperative Extension IPM guidesCompleted scouting form reviewed by instructor: correct identification of at least 3 of 4 planted pest signs, accurate density calculation, and a defensible IPM recommendation aligned to threshold data — 80% of rubric points to pass.
7Weed Identification and Cultural Weed Control10labStudents will identify ten common crop-field weeds by common and scientific name and select appropriate cultural control methods — cultivation timing, mulching, cover crops — for each.
  1. Weed ID lab: instructor sets up ten labeled stations, each with a pressed herbarium specimen or live potted weed; students rotate through stations, sketch the plant, record key ID features (leaf shape, venation, growth habit), and enter common and scientific name on an ID sheet.
  2. Cultivation timing exercise: using a phenology chart showing weed germination windows, students determine the optimal cultivation date for a spring vegetable crop scenario and explain how the critical weed-free period concept guided their decision.
  3. Cover crop comparison: students read two short Cooperative Extension fact sheets on cover crops used for weed suppression, then complete a T-chart comparing two species on establishment cost, suppression effectiveness, and termination method.
Pressed herbarium specimens or potted weed specimens (10 species), weed ID reference (regional Cooperative Extension weed guide), hand lenses, weed phenology charts, cover crop fact sheets, student ID sheetsWeed ID sheet: students must correctly identify at least 8 of 10 weeds by common name and 6 of 10 by scientific name; cultivation timing and cover crop T-chart reviewed for logical reasoning — 80% overall to pass.
8Harvest, Post-Harvest Handling, and Crop Quality Standards10practiceStudents will apply correct harvest maturity indicators for two assigned crops, harvest a sample from the practice plot using proper technique, and complete a post-harvest quality log meeting commercial grading criteria.
  1. Instructor demonstration of harvest maturity indicators (color charts, refractometer for Brix, firmness test) for a fruit/vegetable and a grain crop; students practice using the refractometer on juice samples and record Brix readings.
  2. Hands-on harvest: each student harvests an assigned row section of the practice plot crop using appropriate tools (harvest knife, picking bucket, pruning shears), selects marketable vs. cull product by grade standard, and weighs each category.
  3. Post-harvest log completion: students record variety, harvest date, yield weight, quality grade percentages, and storage temperature recommendation on a formatted log sheet that mirrors the record-keeping format referenced in pesticide applicator license requirements.
Refractometer, color reference charts (USDA produce grading guides), harvest knives, pruning shears, picking buckets, digital scale, post-harvest log forms, PPE (cut-resistant gloves, closed-toe boots), produce grading standards referencePost-harvest log reviewed by instructor: all required fields completed, yield and grade percentages calculated correctly, and Brix reading recorded within ±0.5 of instructor standard — 80% of rubric to pass.
9Crop Production Planning and Documentation16practiceStudents will produce a complete, written crop production plan for a self-selected crop that includes site assessment, variety selection, planting schedule, fertility plan, IPM monitoring schedule, irrigation schedule, and projected harvest log, formatted to industry documentation standards.
  1. Guided planning workshop: instructor walks students through a blank production plan template section by section, modeling how to fill in site conditions, crop calendar, and input lists using information gathered across Lessons 1–8; students draft their own plan in class with instructor feedback rounds.
  2. Peer review session: students exchange completed plans, use a structured rubric to critique completeness, calculation accuracy, and IPM logic, then return written comments; authors revise based on feedback before final submission.
  3. Plan presentation: each student gives a 5-minute verbal summary of their production plan to a small group (3–4 peers), fields one clarifying question per peer, and explains how their plan documentation connects to the record-keeping expected under a State Pesticide Applicator license.
Crop production plan template (program-developed), peer review rubric, all previous course reference materials, calculators, laptop or paper for drafting, projector for model exampleInstructor scores final written plan on the rubric: all eight sections present, at least three calculations correct within 10%, IPM schedule tied to scouting thresholds, presentation delivered within time — 80% of rubric points to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Crop Science Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (75 of 100 points)A 50-item written exam covering plant growth stages, seeding-rate math, nutrient deficiency identification, ET-based irrigation scheduling, pest economic thresholds, weed ID, and harvest maturity indicators, aligned to the agronomic knowledge domains tested in the NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam and the core science content of the State Pesticide Applicator license. Items include multiple choice, short calculation, and label-the-diagram formats.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Field Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass all critical tasks; 80% of rubric points overallIn a live, timed field evaluation, each student sets up and calibrates a hand seeder, lays out a four-row plot to specified spacing, conducts a W-pattern IPM scout on an assigned bed, completes a scouting form, and harvests and grades a sample — assessed by the instructor on a task-by-task rubric. Any critical safety failure (missing PPE, unsafe equipment operation) results in an immediate stop and requires a full re-demonstration before a passing grade can be awarded.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Crop Production Lab LogLog15%80% of rubric points; no missing required entriesStudents submit their cumulative crop notebook containing completed activities from all nine lessons: annotated growth-stage diagrams, seeding-rate worksheets, fertilizer prescription, irrigation calculations, scouting forms with pest counts, weed ID sheets, post-harvest quality log, and the final crop production plan. The log is evaluated for completeness, calculation accuracy, and the quality of written observations, and serves as the documentation artifact that mirrors real-world grower record-keeping and State Pesticide Applicator record requirements.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Equipment and Chemical Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on all mandatory safety steps; no re-attempt on final check-offA structured, one-on-one safety check-off in which the instructor observes each student correctly don full PPE for a simulated fertilizer application (gloves, eye protection, dust mask), perform a pre-operation inspection of the broadcast spreader, recite the lockout/tagout sequence for a powered tiller, and locate the SDS for a sample input product. Every listed safety step is mandatory; any missed step requires corrective instruction and a complete re-check before the student may continue in the program.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-HORT49-04 Trade course

Irrigation Systems: Design, Installation, and Maintenance

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to design, install, troubleshoot, and maintain residential and commercial irrigation systems, including drip, spray, and rotor technologies, with emphasis on water conservation and regulatory compliance. Lessons integrate hydraulic principles, system layout math, controller programming, and hands-on pipe assembly. Mapped lessons support NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam competencies in irrigation.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to design, install, troubleshoot, and maintain residential and commercial irrigation systems, including drip, spray, and rotor technologies, with emphasis on water conservation and regulatory compliance. Lessons integrate hydraulic principles, system layout math, controller programming, and hands-on pipe assembly. Mapped lessons support NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam competencies in irrigation.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Water Basics and Irrigation Fundamentals; Safety on the Irrigation Job Site; Hydraulics and System Math; Reading Plans, Specifications, and Codes; System Design and Layout; Pipe, Fittings, and Component Installation; Valves, Controllers, and Sensors; Troubleshooting and System Auditing; Water Conservation, Regulations, and Professional Practice.

What competent looks like. Calculate static and dynamic water pressure, flow rate, and pipe friction loss to size components for a simple irrigation system. Design a zone layout using scaled drawings that matches precipitation rates, plant water needs, and site hydrology. Install, splice, and pressure-test PVC and polyethylene mainline and lateral pipe using manufacturer-specified methods. Program a multi-zone irrigation controller and a rain/soil-moisture sensor to meet an ET-based irrigation schedule. Diagnose and repair common irrigation failures including broken heads, valve leaks, and controller faults using systematic troubleshooting. Apply all relevant personal protective equipment and safe excavation practices while complying with Dig Safe/811 call requirements before any ground disturbance.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Water Basics and Irrigation Fundamentals10theoryStudents explain the water cycle, evapotranspiration, and the relationship between water pressure, flow rate, and pipe diameter as they apply to landscape irrigation.
  1. Lecture and illustrated note-taking on PSI, GPM, GPH, and ET concepts using the NALP Landscape Industry Certified study guide irrigation section as the primary reference.
  2. Paired worksheet: students convert between PSI and feet of head, calculate flow rates from given orifice data, and answer scenario questions about pressure loss across elevation changes.
  3. Class discussion comparing drip, spray, and rotor systems using manufacturer cut sheets; students match each type to three real-world planting scenarios and justify their choices in writing.
Whiteboard, projector, NALP LIC study guide (irrigation module), manufacturer spec sheets (Hunter, Rain Bird, or equivalent), scientific calculators, student notebooks10-question written quiz on ET, pressure/flow relationships, and system type selection; pass mark 70%.
2Safety on the Irrigation Job Site8theoryStudents identify and apply OSHA excavation safety rules, Dig Safe/811 underground utility notification requirements, PPE selection, and tool-specific hazards before performing any ground disturbance.
  1. Instructor-led review of OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P (excavation) key requirements: classification of soil, protective systems, competent person role; students complete a hazard-identification worksheet for a sample trench drawing.
  2. Role-play the 811 call process using a mock utility map; students mark a practice site layout identifying electrical, gas, water, and communication lines before planning a trench route.
  3. PPE station rotation: students don and inspect safety glasses, gloves, steel-toed boots, high-visibility vest, and hearing protection appropriate to trenching, pipe cutting, and solvent cementing tasks; instructor checks each student against a PPE checklist.
OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P reference card, 811 awareness handout, sample utility maps, PPE inventory (glasses, gloves, boots, vest, hearing protection), PPE inspection checklistInstructor signs off PPE checklist for each student (100% correct donning required); verbal quiz on three excavation hazards and corrective actions — all three must be answered correctly before student may participate in field lessons.
3Hydraulics and System Math12theoryStudents apply friction-loss tables, the continuity equation, and precipitation-rate formulas to size pipe, select heads, and balance zones for a given site.
  1. Worked examples: instructor walks through a pipe-sizing problem using a friction-loss table (Hazen-Williams method, standard C-factors for PVC and PE), then students solve three progressively longer practice problems in pairs.
  2. Precipitation-rate calculation lab: given spacing and GPM data for spray heads and rotors, students calculate precipitation rate (in/hr) for four different head configurations using the standard industry formula (96.25 × GPM / spacing²) and compare results to manufacturer data.
  3. Zone-balancing exercise: students receive a site plan with four proposed zones and a known meter supply (GPM and static pressure); they reconfigure the zones so each stays within supply capacity and records a written rationale for every change.
Scientific calculators, friction-loss tables (PVC and PE pipe), manufacturer head-performance charts (Rain Bird or Hunter), printed site plans, rulers, graph paperGraded math problem set (10 items covering friction loss, precipitation rate, and zone balancing); pass mark 75%; errors on safety-critical sizing steps (undersized main, pressure below head minimum) reviewed individually before advancing.
4Reading Plans, Specifications, and Codes8theoryStudents interpret a scaled irrigation plan, a written specification, and applicable local backflow-prevention requirements to identify components and sequence of work.
  1. Symbol identification exercise: students label 20 standard irrigation symbols on a sample plan (valves, heads, controllers, backflow preventers, sleeves) using a symbol legend.
  2. Specification scavenger hunt: working from a sample project specification section, students answer 10 questions about required pipe schedules, head spacing tolerances, controller brand, and testing pressure — locating the exact spec paragraph for each answer.
  3. Instructor-led overview of cross-connection control: why backflow preventers are required, common device types (pressure vacuum breaker, double-check valve assembly, reduced-pressure principle assembly) and where local health or plumbing codes typically mandate each; students annotate a plan to show correct placement.
Sample scaled irrigation plan (instructor-prepared or from a public project), sample specification section, irrigation symbol legend, backflow preventer reference handout, colored pencilsSymbol identification scored out of 20 (pass 16/20); specification scavenger hunt graded for accuracy (pass 8/10); instructor reviews backflow annotation before student proceeds to design lesson.
5System Design and Layout14labStudents produce a complete, dimensioned, zone-by-zone irrigation design on graph paper for an assigned residential site, including a component schedule and precipitation-rate calculations.
  1. Students receive a residential site plan (scaled, showing property lines, structures, planting beds, turf areas, trees, and meter location) and use a design checklist to identify hydrozones, then sketch a preliminary head layout by hand.
  2. Head spacing and zone layout: using manufacturer spacing recommendations and the precipitation-rate formula from Lesson 3, students finalize head positions, draw pipe routing (main and laterals), and assign each zone a calculated precipitation rate that matches within the same zone.
  3. Component schedule completion: students fill in a table listing every head type, quantity, GPM, nozzle size, operating pressure, valve size, and total zone flow; instructor reviews the schedule against the plan for consistency before the student draws the controller wiring diagram.
Graph paper (1/8-inch grid), scaled site plans, ruler, compass, colored pencils, manufacturer catalog pages, design checklist, scientific calculatorCompleted design package reviewed against a rubric: hydrozones correctly identified, precipitation rates balanced within 15% across heads in each zone, all components scheduled, pipe sized correctly — pass requires 80% rubric score with no unsized main or unprotected water supply.
6Pipe, Fittings, and Component Installation18practiceStudents cut, prime, solvent-cement, and pressure-test PVC pipe and fittings, and install polyethylene drip tubing using barbed fittings and compression connections to manufacturer specifications.
  1. Instructor demo followed by guided practice: students cut Schedule 40 PVC with a ratchet cutter or hacksaw, deburr, apply primer and cement following the two-step cold-weather or warm-weather procedure on the can label, assemble tee and elbow fittings, and allow proper cure time before handling.
  2. Drip system assembly station: students install emitters, punch barbed tees and elbows into polyethylene tubing, attach figure-8 end caps, and connect a pressure-compensating emitter to a stake at a potted plant — instructor checks for leaks at operating pressure.
  3. Pressure test: assembled PVC sub-assemblies are capped and pressurized to a test pressure using a hand pump and gauge; students record pressure, hold time, and any pressure drop, then locate and repair any leak before re-testing and documenting in their lab log.
Schedule 40 PVC pipe (various diameters), PVC fittings, PVC primer and cement, ratchet pipe cutters, hacksaw, deburring tool, polyethylene drip tubing, barbed fittings, end caps, pressure-compensating emitters, hand pump pressure test kit with gauge, safety glasses, nitrile gloves, manufacturer installation instructionsEach student's assembly holds test pressure with zero drop over the required hold time (instructor-specified); lab log entry includes material list, pressure readings, and any repair made — both must be satisfactory to pass.
7Valves, Controllers, and Sensors14demoStudents wire a solenoid valve to a multi-zone irrigation controller, program a water-budget schedule, and verify correct operation using a rain sensor and a soil-moisture sensor.
  1. Instructor-led wiring demo: students follow along wiring two solenoid valves (24 VAC) to a multi-zone controller using valve zone terminals and a common wire, referencing the wiring diagram in the controller manual; students then wire their own assigned zone on the shop training board and verify continuity with a multimeter.
  2. Controller programming exercise: given an ET-based schedule (run times, start times, and days per week for each zone), students enter the program into a timer, activate a system test, and confirm each valve opens and closes in sequence, recording actual run time versus programmed run time.
  3. Sensor integration: students wire a rain sensor in series with the controller common and adjust the rain-threshold setting; then connect a soil-moisture sensor, set the moisture threshold, and simulate a wet-soil condition to demonstrate override; students document sensor settings and observed controller behavior in their lab log.
Multi-zone irrigation controllers (2-wire or traditional multi-conductor, instructor-selected brand), 24 VAC solenoid valves, 18-gauge valve wire, wire strippers, multimeter, rain sensor, soil-moisture sensor, controller manuals, shop training board with simulated valve loads, lab log sheetsWiring checked for correct terminal connections and no short circuits (instructor signs off); programmed schedule verified: all zones activate, run to correct time, and sensors override correctly — pass requires 100% functional check with no wiring errors.
8Troubleshooting and System Auditing12fieldStudents diagnose and repair five seeded faults in a functioning training-yard irrigation system and calculate distribution uniformity from catch-can audit data.
  1. Fault-finding exercise: the instructor pre-seeds five faults (e.g., clogged nozzle, cracked lateral, stuck-open valve, misaligned rotor, broken wire) in the training-yard system; students use a systematic diagnosis procedure — visual check, zone-by-zone activation, pressure gauge readings — to locate and document each fault before making the repair.
  2. Catch-can audit: students place catch cans in a grid pattern across an active spray zone, run the zone for a measured time, collect and measure water depth in each can, and calculate the distribution uniformity coefficient (DU) using the standard formula (lowest-quarter average ÷ overall average × 100).
  3. Written audit report: students record DU result, identify low-coverage areas, propose specific corrective actions (nozzle swap, head repositioning, pressure adjustment), and estimate the water savings if DU is improved to a target value — reviewed by instructor for technical accuracy.
Training-yard irrigation system with planted zones, pressure gauge with Schrader valve adapter, catch cans (minimum 16), measuring cups, ruler, stopwatch, multimeter, replacement nozzles and heads, pipe repair couplings, shovels, PPE (gloves, safety glasses, boots), fault-finding worksheet, audit report templateAll five faults correctly identified and repaired (instructor confirms each repair holds); DU calculated correctly within ±5 percentage points of instructor's measurement; audit report earns at least 75% on the accuracy rubric.
9Water Conservation, Regulations, and Professional Practice8theoryStudents explain ET-based scheduling, water-budget restrictions, and the professional standards that govern irrigation contractor work, including licensing and cross-connection requirements.
  1. Case study comparison: students examine two landscape water bills — one from an unaudited system and one post-audit — and calculate estimated water and cost savings attributable to improved DU and an ET-adjusted schedule; they present findings in a short written summary.
  2. Regulatory research activity: students use state extension resources and local water authority websites to identify any water-use restrictions, required permits for backflow prevention device installation, and whether their state requires an irrigation contractor license separate from a general landscape contractor license — findings recorded in a one-page summary.
  3. Career and professionalism discussion: instructor reviews NALP LIC irrigation exam competency areas, discusses how irrigation skills map to the credential, and guides students through a self-assessment gap analysis comparing their lesson outcomes to the published exam blueprint — students create a personal study plan for exam preparation.
Sample water bills, ET reference charts (state extension or NOAA climate data), state water authority website access, computers or tablets, NALP LIC exam blueprint (irrigation section), self-assessment worksheetWritten water-savings summary graded for correct arithmetic and logical recommendations (pass 70%); regulatory research summary reviewed for accuracy by instructor before submission; self-assessment gap analysis completed and signed by instructor.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Irrigation Systems Written ExamWritten exam25%70% correct (28 of 40 questions)A 40-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering hydraulic principles, friction-loss calculations, precipitation-rate math, system design rules, controller programming, troubleshooting logic, backflow-prevention requirements, and water-conservation concepts. Questions are aligned to NALP Landscape Industry Certified irrigation competency areas to support credential readiness.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Irrigation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Instructor signs off all critical steps; overall rubric score of 80% or higher; any safety or code violation requires immediate stop and remediation before re-attemptEach student independently designs a two-zone system for an assigned site, installs and pressure-tests a PVC lateral with two spray heads, wires and programs a controller, and performs a catch-can audit — all evaluated against a standardized rubric with weighted criteria for accuracy, workmanship, and safety compliance. This demonstration directly mirrors NALP LIC hands-on skill areas for irrigation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Irrigation Lab LogLog15%80% of entries scored satisfactory; all pressure-test records and sensor-setting entries must be present and accurateStudents maintain a running lab log throughout the course documenting each hands-on activity: materials used, measurements taken, pressure-test readings, controller settings, fault-finding notes, and audit calculations. The log is collected at the end of the course and scored for completeness, accuracy of recorded data, and correct units.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Job-Site Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% compliance on all critical items; any critical failure (missing PPE, unlocated utilities, unsupported trench wall) requires immediate correction and a full re-check before the student may continue field workBefore the first field lesson and again before the fault-finding field activity, the instructor administers a structured safety observation checklist covering PPE donning, 811 call confirmation, excavation hazard identification, solvent-cement ventilation, and electrical safety for low-voltage wiring. The checklist is binary — each item is either compliant or non-compliant — and 100% compliance on all critical items is required to pass.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-HORT49-05 Trade course

Greenhouse Production and Environment Management

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to operate and maintain a commercial or educational greenhouse, covering structure systems, environmental controls, propagation, growing media, crop scheduling, and integrated pest management. Lessons connect hands-on bench work with the science behind plant response to light, temperature, humidity, CO2, water, and nutrition. Coursework maps directly to NALP Landscape Industry Certified horticulture knowledge areas and reinforces pesticide-label literacy required for the State Pesticide Applicator license.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to operate and maintain a commercial or educational greenhouse, covering structure systems, environmental controls, propagation, growing media, crop scheduling, and integrated pest management. Lessons connect hands-on bench work with the science behind plant response to light, temperature, humidity, CO2, water, and nutrition. Coursework maps directly to NALP Landscape Industry Certified horticulture knowledge areas and reinforces pesticide-label literacy required for the State Pesticide Applicator license.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Greenhouse Structures, Covering Materials, and Safety Orientation; Environmental Controls: Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, and CO2; Supplemental Lighting: HPS, LED, and Photoperiod Control; Growing Media: Components, Formulation, and Testing; Plant Propagation: Seed, Cuttings, and Division; Fertility and Irrigation Management; Integrated Pest Management in the Greenhouse; Crop Scheduling and Production Planning; Record Keeping, Compliance, and Greenhouse Business Essentials.

What competent looks like. Identify and operate greenhouse structural systems—covering materials, ventilation, heating, cooling, and supplemental lighting—and adjust set points to maintain target growing conditions. Prepare growing media formulations appropriate for container production and propagation, interpreting soil-less media labels and pH/EC test results to make corrective amendments. Propagate plants from seed, cuttings, and division using sanitary technique, appropriate rooting media, and mist or humidity management, achieving documented germination or rooting rates. Develop and follow a crop production schedule that coordinates seeding or liner dates, transplanting, spacing, pinching, and finish dates to meet a specified market or program deadline. Apply integrated pest management principles in the greenhouse setting: scout systematically, identify common greenhouse pests and diseases to genus level, select and apply control measures in compliance with pesticide label requirements and PPE standards. Maintain accurate production records—including environmental logs, fertility records, and spray records—and communicate findings in a written crop-status report.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Greenhouse Structures, Covering Materials, and Safety Orientation10theoryStudents identify the major structural types (gutter-connected, freestanding, hoop house) and covering materials (glass, double-wall polycarbonate, polyethylene film) and state the safety rules—fall protection, glass handling, chemical storage—governing greenhouse work.
  1. Labeled diagram exercise: students match structural components (purlin, gutter, ridge vent, end wall, baseboard heat pipe) to a cross-section drawing of three greenhouse types and write one function for each part.
  2. Covering-material comparison lab: instructor provides cut samples of glass, twin-wall polycarbonate, and woven poly film; students measure light transmission with a basic lux meter, record results, and rank materials for diffusion, insulation (R-value concept), and cost.
  3. Safety walk-through of the program greenhouse: students complete a pre-use inspection checklist (exit signs, fire extinguisher tags, chemical storage cabinet, first-aid kit, emergency shut-off locations) and identify two hazards to report.
Greenhouse cross-section diagrams, covering-material samples, lux meter, safety inspection checklist, OSHA Greenhouse Worker Safety fact sheet, tape measureStudents score 80% or higher on a 20-question written quiz identifying structural components, covering materials, and matching each safety rule to its hazard; instructor verifies each student can locate and operate the emergency ventilation shut-off.
2Environmental Controls: Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, and CO212demoStudents explain how temperature differentials (DIF), relative humidity, air circulation, and CO2 concentration influence plant growth rate and quality, and demonstrate how to read and adjust a greenhouse controller to reach an instructor-specified set point.
  1. DIF demonstration: instructor shows paired seedling flats grown under positive DIF (+10 °F day/night) vs. negative DIF; students measure internode length, record data in a table, and write a two-sentence explanation of the relationship.
  2. Controller set-point exercise: working in pairs at the greenhouse environmental controller (thermostat/humidity sensor panel or digital controller), students receive a target temperature and humidity range, adjust heat, pad-and-fan, and vent set points, then monitor conditions for 15 minutes and record readings every 3 minutes on a data sheet.
  3. Humidity and disease risk discussion: students calculate vapor pressure deficit (VPD) using a provided chart for three temperature/humidity scenarios and rank each scenario's risk for Botrytis development, citing how to reduce risk through ventilation timing.
Greenhouse environmental controller, thermometers (dry-bulb and wet-bulb or digital RH sensor), VPD reference chart, data recording sheets, paired DIF demonstration flats, rulerStudents correctly adjust controller set points and record environmental data within ±2 °F and ±5% RH of target for all three monitoring periods; pass mark is accurate readings on all three intervals plus a correct written VPD calculation for one scenario.
3Supplemental Lighting: HPS, LED, and Photoperiod Control8theoryStudents distinguish between photosynthetic (DLI-based grow lighting) and photoperiodic (day-length control) lighting strategies and calculate daily light integral (DLI) for a given crop and location.
  1. DLI calculation practice: students are given average natural light values (mol·m⁻²·d⁻¹) for two seasons and a crop DLI requirement; they calculate how many hours of supplemental HPS or LED lighting are needed to meet the target, using the formula DLI = PPFD × hours × 0.0036.
  2. Lamp comparison chart: students complete a structured comparison table for high-pressure sodium (HPS) and full-spectrum LED fixtures covering efficacy (μmol·J⁻¹), heat output, lamp life, and initial cost, using manufacturer spec sheets provided by the instructor.
  3. Photoperiod control scenario: given a list of five crops (poinsettia, chrysanthemum, petunia, pansy, kalanchoe), students classify each as short-day, long-day, or day-neutral and write the lighting or black-cloth schedule needed to achieve flowering for two crops on a specified date.
PPFD/DLI calculation worksheet, HPS and LED spec sheets, photoperiod classification reference (e.g., Greenhouse Crop Production textbook), calculator, black cloth sampleStudents complete DLI calculations with no mathematical errors and classify all five crops correctly; pass mark is 80% on a combined 10-question quiz covering DLI math and photoperiod classification.
4Growing Media: Components, Formulation, and Testing12labStudents blend a peat-based soilless mix and a bark-based mix to instructor specifications, then measure and interpret pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of both mixes and a leachate sample using the pour-through extraction method.
  1. Media blending lab: students weigh and combine peat moss, perlite, vermiculite, and dolomitic limestone according to two provided formulas (general-purpose and propagation mix), mix thoroughly, and record actual weights and volumes on a formulation log sheet.
  2. pH and EC measurement: students wet each blended mix to field capacity, perform the pour-through extraction procedure, collect leachate, and measure pH with a calibrated pH meter and EC with a conductivity meter; results are recorded and compared to published optimal ranges for bedding plants.
  3. Amendment decision exercise: students receive three 'problem scenario' cards (low pH, high EC, high pH) with sample leachate data and write a corrective action for each, citing the amendment (lime, sulfur, leaching) and explaining the mechanism.
Peat moss, perlite, vermiculite, bark fines, dolomitic limestone, scale (0.1 g resolution), measuring buckets, pH meter with buffer solution, EC meter, distilled water, formulation log sheets, pots (6-inch), published media pH/EC target ranges chartEach student's blended mix pH falls within ±0.3 of target range and EC within ±0.5 dS/m of target; amendment decisions on all three scenario cards are correct and mechanistically justified; pass requires all three criteria met.
5Plant Propagation: Seed, Cuttings, and Division14practiceStudents propagate plants by three methods—direct seeding, stem-tip cuttings, and crown division—following sanitary protocol, and achieve a germination or rooting result documented in a propagation log.
  1. Seed propagation: students fill 72-cell plug trays with propagation mix, sow seeds of two species at the correct depth and spacing (per seed packet instructions), label trays with crop name and sow date, and place trays in a germination chamber or misted bench; germination percentage is recorded at 7 and 14 days.
  2. Stem-tip cutting propagation: students take 10 cuttings from stock plants (e.g., impatiens, coleus, or geranium), make a clean basal cut below a node with a sanitized blade, dip in rooting hormone (appropriate concentration for the species), stick in moistened propagation medium in cell trays, and tent with clear poly; rooting percentage is evaluated at 14–21 days.
  3. Crown division: students divide one herbaceous perennial (e.g., hosta or daylily) into a minimum of four viable divisions, ensuring each has roots and at least one growth point, then pot and label each division; viability is assessed at 2 weeks by new shoot emergence.
72-cell plug trays, 50-cell propagation trays, propagation mix, seeds (two species), stock plants for cuttings, rooting hormone powder or gel (IBA-based), sanitized cutting blades, isopropyl alcohol (70%), herbaceous perennial divisions, 4-inch pots, clear poly film, misting nozzle, propagation log sheets, plant labels, permanent markersStudent achieves minimum 70% germination for seeded trays by Day 14, minimum 70% rooting on cuttings by Day 21, and all four divisions show new shoot emergence by Day 14; propagation log is complete with dates, species, method, and percentage outcomes.
6Fertility and Irrigation Management14labStudents calculate fertilizer injection rates using a concentrate stock-tank method, calibrate a proportioner (injector), and apply a fertility program that matches crop nutritional requirements at documented target ppm N.
  1. Stock solution math: students use a provided fertilizer label (guaranteed analysis, solubility) and an injector ratio to calculate grams of fertilizer needed to prepare a stock solution that delivers a target N concentration (e.g., 200 ppm N) at the diluted rate; calculations are shown step-by-step on a worksheet.
  2. Injector calibration: students verify injector ratio by collecting a sample of diluted solution, measuring EC, and back-calculating ppm N against the expected value using a conversion factor; they record actual vs. target ppm and adjust concentrate if needed.
  3. Crop fertigation application: students apply the calibrated fertilizer solution to a bench of plants, record application volume, check for runoff and drainage from containers (verifying leaching fraction), then collect a pour-through leachate sample and confirm EC is within the acceptable range for the crop stage.
Water-soluble fertilizer (20-20-20 or similar), mixing containers, gram scale, proportioner/injector, EC meter, pH meter, graduated cylinder, fertigation log sheet, crop EC target range chart, safety glasses, chemical-resistant glovesCalculated stock solution delivers ppm N within ±10% of target as confirmed by EC measurement; leachate EC is within published acceptable range for the crop stage; fertigation log is complete; pass requires both numerical checks met and log completed.
7Integrated Pest Management in the Greenhouse16fieldStudents conduct a systematic IPM scout of an active greenhouse, identify pest and disease specimens to genus level using a hand lens and dichotomous key, and produce a written spray recommendation that complies with pesticide label requirements and specifies correct PPE.
  1. Systematic scouting exercise: students follow a predetermined scouting pattern (every third row, inspecting upper and lower leaf surfaces, stems, and growing tips) in the program greenhouse, recording pest type, crop, location, and severity rating (0–3 scale) on a standardized scouting form for a minimum of 20 plants.
  2. Specimen identification: students use a 10× hand lens to examine live or preserved specimens of at least four common greenhouse pests (e.g., two-spotted spider mite, fungus gnat larva, aphid, whitefly) and two diseases (e.g., powdery mildew, Botrytis gray mold) and match each to a dichotomous key, recording distinguishing characteristics.
  3. Pesticide label reading and recommendation: students receive two pesticide labels and a scouting summary showing threshold-level infestation; they identify the registered crop, registered pest, re-entry interval (REI), personal protective equipment requirements, and mixing rate, then write a one-page spray recommendation specifying product, rate, water volume, PPE, REI, and disposal instructions.
Scouting forms, 10× hand lens, dichotomous pest/disease identification key (e.g., Identifying Greenhouse Pests and Diseases, Agrios or equivalent), preserved or live pest specimens, pesticide labels (two products), calculator, PPE: gloves (chemical-resistant), safety glasses, respirator (appropriate cartridge for product), scouting map of greenhouseStudents correctly identify at least 5 of 6 pest/disease specimens; scouting form is complete for all 20 plants; spray recommendation includes all required label elements with no safety omissions; pass requires 80% identification accuracy and a complete, label-compliant recommendation.
8Crop Scheduling and Production Planning10theoryStudents backward-schedule a bedding plant or potted flowering crop from a specified finish (sale) date, identifying all crop stages with calendar dates, space requirements, and cultural tasks.
  1. Backward scheduling exercise: given a finish date and a published crop time for two species (e.g., petunia plugs and poinsettia), students count back through transplant, pinch, and seed/liner dates on a calendar template, accounting for average weekly temperature (degree-days concept) and day-length requirements.
  2. Space planning: students calculate bench space needed for a 500-unit crop at final spacing (using containers per linear foot at two spacings), sketch a bench layout to scale on graph paper, and determine how many weeks plants must be at each spacing to stay on schedule.
  3. Production record review: students examine a sample production record from a previous crop cycle (provided by instructor), identify one cultural problem indicated by the data (e.g., delayed finish due to low night temperature), and write a two-sentence corrective recommendation.
Calendar templates, crop time references (ball seed catalog or equivalent published crop culture guide), graph paper, ruler, calculator, sample production records, degree-day explanation handoutBackward schedule is mathematically correct with all stage dates within ±3 days; space calculation is accurate; corrective recommendation is biologically sound; pass mark is 80% on a rubric evaluating schedule accuracy, space math, and recommendation quality.
9Record Keeping, Compliance, and Greenhouse Business Essentials8theoryStudents compile a complete production file for one crop cycle—including environmental logs, irrigation and fertility records, spray records, and a crop-status report—and explain the legal record-keeping requirements associated with pesticide applications relevant to the State Pesticide Applicator license.
  1. Production file assembly: students organize all field data sheets collected during previous lessons (environmental log, propagation log, fertigation log, scouting form) into a single crop file, add a cover sheet with crop name, variety, start date, finish date, and total inputs, and verify all entries are legible and complete.
  2. Pesticide application record: students complete a sample pesticide application record form (applicator name, date, location, crop treated, pest targeted, product name, EPA registration number, rate, area treated, REI, applicator license number field) for a scenario provided by the instructor, verifying every required field is filled.
  3. Cost of production estimate: students use a provided price list for seed, media, fertilizer, pesticide, and labor to calculate the cost per finished unit for a 200-unit flat crop, then discuss how the estimate relates to pricing and profitability in small business or farm enterprise contexts.
All previously completed field data sheets, crop production file folders, sample pesticide application record form, price list for inputs, calculator, State Pesticide Applicator record-keeping requirement summary (state extension publication)Production file is complete (all six required documents present and internally consistent); pesticide application record has no missing required fields; cost-per-unit calculation is arithmetically correct; pass requires all three elements fully correct.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Greenhouse Systems and Crop Production Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (minimum 38 of 50 items)A 50-item written exam covering greenhouse structure and covering materials, environmental control principles, lighting and photoperiod, soilless media formulation and testing, fertilizer calculations, pest and disease identification, and crop scheduling concepts. Items include multiple-choice, matching, and short-answer calculation problems drawn from all nine lessons.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Propagation and IPM Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass on all four criteria of the standardized rubric; any 'fail' criterion requires one repeat attempt within one weekStudents demonstrate four skills in sequence before the instructor: (1) take and stick three stem-tip cuttings using sanitary technique and correct rooting hormone application, (2) perform a greenhouse scout of a 10-plant section and complete the scouting form, (3) identify two unknown pest specimens with a hand lens, and (4) read a pesticide label aloud and state the required PPE and REI. Each criterion is scored pass/fail on the rubric.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Greenhouse Production Lab LogLog15%80% of possible points on the lab log rubric; entries for all nine lessons must be presentStudents maintain a bound lab log throughout the course documenting each hands-on lesson: objectives, procedures followed, data recorded (measurements, calculations, observations), results, and a brief interpretation or corrective action statement. The instructor reviews the log at midpoint and at the end of the course, scoring completeness, data accuracy, interpretation quality, and legibility.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pesticide Handling and PPE Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on all required safety steps; any missed critical safety step results in immediate stop and a mandatory repeat before the student handles pesticides againThe instructor observes each student select, don, and doff PPE appropriate for a simulated pesticide mixing scenario (gloves, eye protection, and additional items per a provided label), read the label to confirm crop, rate, and REI, prepare a dilute solution at the correct rate in a sprayer, and dispose of rinsate appropriately. A critical-step checklist with no-fail items (correct PPE on before contact, correct rate, safe disposal) is used; all critical steps must be completed correctly.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-HORT49-06 Trade course

Turfgrass Science and Management

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn the identification, establishment, maintenance, and renovation of cool-season and warm-season turfgrasses used in lawns, athletic fields, and commercial landscapes. The course integrates soil science, irrigation principles, pest and disease management, and equipment operation to produce healthy, sustainable turf. Lessons map directly to NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam content areas and reinforce pesticide applicator license prerequisites.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn the identification, establishment, maintenance, and renovation of cool-season and warm-season turfgrasses used in lawns, athletic fields, and commercial landscapes. The course integrates soil science, irrigation principles, pest and disease management, and equipment operation to produce healthy, sustainable turf. Lessons map directly to NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam content areas and reinforce pesticide applicator license prerequisites.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Turfgrass Identification and Adaptation Zones; Turf Establishment: Seeding, Sodding, and Sprigging; Soil Testing, Fertilization Programs, and Nutrient Math; Mowing Principles and Equipment Safety; Irrigation Scheduling and Water Management for Turf; Thatch, Compaction, Aeration, and Overseeding; Turf Pest, Disease, and Weed Identification and IPM; Athletic Field and Commercial Turf Maintenance Practices; Turf Renovation Planning and Credential Exam Review.

What competent looks like. Identify the major cool-season and warm-season turfgrass species by leaf texture, growth habit, and adaptation zone and match each to appropriate use and maintenance level. Develop and justify a seasonal turf maintenance calendar that includes mowing, fertilization, aeration, overseeding, and irrigation scheduling based on soil test results and local climate. Operate and perform pre-use safety inspections on walk-behind mowers, riding mowers, aerators, and spreaders following manufacturer and OSHA guidelines. Diagnose common turf problems—including nutrient deficiencies, thatch, compaction, weeds, and fungal diseases—and prescribe integrated pest management (IPM) solutions. Calculate fertilizer application rates, lime requirements, and seeding rates from a soil test report using trade math, and calibrate a rotary spreader to deliver those rates accurately. Prepare and present a written turf renovation plan, including a site assessment, soil test interpretation, product selection, and phased work schedule.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Turfgrass Identification and Adaptation Zones10labStudents correctly identify at least eight common turf species from live specimens and clippings using morphological keys and match each species to its climate adaptation zone and primary use.
  1. Examine and sketch leaf blade, sheath, ligule, auricle, and vernation of at least ten turfgrass specimens using hand lenses and the Turfgrass Management reference; record findings in a labeled identification chart.
  2. Use a US hardiness and transition-zone map to place each species in its appropriate adaptation region, then debate in small groups which species would be selected for three regional scenario sites presented by the instructor.
  3. Conduct a campus turf walk, photographing ten turf areas, identifying species present, and noting site conditions such as sun exposure, slope, and wear; compile findings in a field notebook entry.
Live turfgrass plugs and clippings, hand lenses, stereoscope (if available), USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map, Duble's Turfgrasses: Their Management and Use in the Southern Zone and Christians et al. Fundamentals of Turfgrass Management, field notebooks, smartphones for photo documentation.Students correctly identify 8 of 10 unknown turfgrass specimens on a labeled-specimen practical quiz; pass mark is 80%.
2Turf Establishment: Seeding, Sodding, and Sprigging12fieldStudents prepare a seedbed and establish a designated turf plot using at least two establishment methods—seeding and sodding—following industry specifications for site prep, grade, and material placement.
  1. Calculate seed quantity needed for a 500 sq ft practice plot using germination percentage and pure live seed (PLS) formula; weigh seed on a digital scale and calibrate a drop spreader by the catch-pan method before applying seed to the prepared plot.
  2. Install sod on a second adjacent plot, cutting sod to fit, staggering joints in a brick pattern, tamping seams, and applying a starter fertilizer at the rate calculated from a provided soil test; document each step with dated photographs.
  3. Compare establishment costs for seeding vs. sodding the same area by building a simple materials-and-labor cost estimate table using local supplier price lists provided by the instructor.
Rototiller or spade, landscape rake, drop spreader, digital scale, turfgrass seed (species selected for local climate), sod pallets, sod knife, starter fertilizer, stakes, string line, catch pan, calculator, cost-estimate worksheet, PPE (safety glasses, gloves, steel-toed boots).Instructor scores the completed plots against a rubric covering grade uniformity, seam quality, spreader calibration accuracy (within ±10% of target rate), and documentation completeness; pass mark is 75% of rubric points.
3Soil Testing, Fertilization Programs, and Nutrient Math12theoryStudents interpret a standard soil test report, calculate lime and fertilizer application rates for a given turf area, and design a four-application annual fertilization program consistent with state nutrient management guidelines.
  1. Work through three provided soil test reports in small groups, identifying pH, buffer pH, organic matter percentage, and macro- and micronutrient levels; flag values outside acceptable turf ranges and list corrective actions.
  2. Using the formula pounds of nutrient needed = (area in sq ft ÷ 1,000) × rate per 1,000 sq ft ÷ (nutrient decimal from label), calculate the weight of three different fertilizer products needed to deliver instructor-specified nitrogen rates to a 12,000 sq ft lawn; check work against an answer key.
  3. Draft a four-season fertilization calendar for a cool-season lawn in the transition zone, specifying timing windows, fertilizer analysis, and application rate for each event; justify timing choices using turfgrass growth curve concepts.
Printed soil test reports (sample set from state extension service), fertilizer label examples, calculators, Christians et al. Fundamentals of Turfgrass Management (fertilization chapters), state extension nutrient management publications, graph paper for growth curve sketching.A written math worksheet requiring correct calculation of fertilizer quantities for five scenarios, plus a labeled annual fertilization calendar; pass mark is 80% of total points, with no calculation error exceeding 15% of target rate.
4Mowing Principles and Equipment Safety12demoStudents perform a documented pre-operation safety inspection on a walk-behind mower and a riding mower, operate both on a live turf area at the correct cutting height and pattern, and demonstrate blade-height adjustment and blade-engagement procedures without instructor prompting.
  1. Complete the manufacturer-supplied pre-operation checklist on both machines—checking oil, fuel, air filter, blade condition, safety interlocks, and tire pressure—and note any deficiencies found; discuss findings with the class before operating.
  2. Mow a marked 2,000 sq ft turf plot using three different mowing patterns (straight parallel, diagonal, and perimeter then striping) to understand directional wear and stripe aesthetics; compare results by walking the plot and discussing with the instructor.
  3. Demonstrate blade-height adjustment to achieve a target cutting height specified by the instructor, then sharpen or swap a demonstration blade using proper lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedure and personal protective equipment (PPE) including eye protection and gloves, with each step narrated aloud for peer observation.
Walk-behind rotary mower, riding mower, manufacturer operator manuals, pre-operation inspection checklists, blade-height gauge, blade wrench, blade balancer, LOTO locks and tags, eye protection, hearing protection, gloves, steel-toed boots, first aid kit at worksite.Instructor observes each student completing a pre-op inspection and a mowing run independently; a skills checklist is scored pass/fail for each safety-critical step (PPE on before start, LOTO before blade work, correct height set); all safety steps must be completed correctly—no safety-critical failures allowed for pass.
5Irrigation Scheduling and Water Management for Turf10theoryStudents calculate weekly irrigation run times for a turf zone using evapotranspiration data and sprinkler precipitation rate, and adjust a controller schedule to reflect a seasonal change or a rain-sensor override.
  1. Using a provided weekly ET value and the formula run time = (ET inches ÷ precipitation rate in inches per hour) × 60 minutes, calculate required run times for three irrigation zones with different sprinkler heads; compare results in pairs and reconcile any differences.
  2. Program an instructor-provided irrigation controller with start times, run times, and a seasonal adjust percentage for summer and winter scenarios, then demonstrate how a rain sensor or soil moisture sensor bypass functions.
  3. Conduct a catch-cup test on the campus irrigation system to measure actual precipitation rate and distribution uniformity; calculate distribution uniformity (DU) from the catch-cup data and compare to the manufacturer's specification.
Irrigation controller (clock-style or smart-type), catch cups (minimum 12), measuring tape, graduated cylinders, ET reference data from state extension or NOAA, calculator, irrigation specification sheet, field notebook.A calculation worksheet with five ET-based run-time problems and a controller-programming practical check; written work scored at 80% correct; programming check is pass/fail with all programmed values within ±5% of target.
6Thatch, Compaction, Aeration, and Overseeding12labStudents measure thatch depth and soil penetration resistance on a designated turf plot, determine whether mechanical aeration and overseeding are warranted, and operate a core aerator to renovate the plot following industry standards.
  1. Collect five soil cores from a designated plot using a soil probe; measure thatch layer thickness in millimeters for each core, calculate the average, and record results in a data table; compare average to the threshold commonly cited in turfgrass literature (approximately 1/2 inch) to justify or decline aeration.
  2. Take penetrometer readings at ten random locations on the same plot, record compaction values, map results on a grid sketch of the plot, and identify high-compaction zones where aeration priority is highest.
  3. Operate a walk-behind core aerator across the plot in two passes at right angles, collect and examine cores, calculate approximate hole spacing and aeration percentage for the plot, then broadcast overseeding at the rate calculated in a prior lesson and topdress with compost.
Soil probe, ruler, penetrometer, walk-behind core aerator, drop or rotary spreader, turfgrass seed, compost topdressing, shovel, data recording sheets, PPE (eye protection, gloves, boots), manufacturer aerator safety checklist.Lab report including thatch measurements, penetrometer map, decision justification, and aeration/overseeding documentation with photographs; scored on a rubric—pass mark is 75% of points; aerator must be operated with all safety guards in place or the student is stopped and must re-demonstrate.
7Turf Pest, Disease, and Weed Identification and IPM14labStudents diagnose five turf problem scenarios—encompassing at least one insect pest, one fungal disease, one broadleaf weed, one grassy weed, and one abiotic disorder—and prescribe a written IPM strategy for each that prioritizes cultural and mechanical controls before chemical options.
  1. Examine five prepared sample stations set up by the instructor (each containing turf plugs, photos, or preserved specimens representing a specific problem); use dichotomous keys, extension diagnostic guides, and physical symptoms to identify the cause and record findings on a diagnostic worksheet.
  2. For each diagnosed problem, complete an IPM decision matrix that lists the economic or aesthetic threshold, cultural controls (mowing height, irrigation changes), biological options, and chemical controls as a last resort—specifying pesticide mode of action group and personal protective equipment required.
  3. Role-play a client consultation: one student plays a homeowner describing turf symptoms; the other plays the technician who asks diagnostic questions, inspects the sample station prop, and delivers an oral IPM recommendation; roles are then reversed for a different scenario.
Preserved or pressed weed specimens, insect pest specimens or high-resolution photographs, diseased turf plugs or photographs (dollar spot, brown patch, pythium, etc.), extension diagnostic keys (state extension publications and NALP study materials), IPM decision matrix worksheet, field notebook.Diagnostic worksheet and written IPM matrix for all five scenarios; pass mark is correctly identifying cause and prescribing a defensible IPM strategy for at least 4 of 5 scenarios (80%); any recommendation that skips threshold evaluation is marked incomplete regardless of score.
8Athletic Field and Commercial Turf Maintenance Practices12fieldStudents execute a multi-step maintenance visit on a sports turf or commercial lawn site—including mowing, edging, blowing, spot-treating, and a written condition report—to the production standard expected of an entry-level turf technician.
  1. Perform a complete site walk-through before starting any equipment, recording turf condition, identifying hazards (irrigation heads, field markings, spectator areas), and completing a pre-task safety brief for the group that names PPE requirements and emergency contact location.
  2. Execute the full maintenance sequence—mowing at the prescribed height, line-trimming edges, operating a backpack blower to clear clippings from hard surfaces, and performing hand-pulling or spot-treatment of weeds within scope—while the instructor evaluates technique, pattern consistency, and safety behavior using a production checklist.
  3. Complete a written site condition report at the end of the visit documenting areas of concern (pest pressure, irrigation dry spots, worn areas), recommended follow-up actions, and estimated next-service date; share the report in a brief verbal debrief with the instructor.
Commercial walk-behind or stand-on mower, line trimmer, backpack blower, hand tools, pre-task safety brief form, site condition report template, PPE (eye protection, hearing protection, gloves, boots), first aid kit.Instructor production checklist scored during the maintenance visit (technique, pattern, safety) plus written site condition report; combined rubric pass mark is 75%; any unsafe act observed results in an immediate stop and mandatory safety review before the student may continue.
9Turf Renovation Planning and Credential Exam Review10theoryStudents produce a written turf renovation plan for a provided case-study site and complete a 50-question practice exam covering all NALP Landscape Industry Certified turf content areas and key pesticide applicator license topic areas relevant to turf.
  1. Analyze a written case study describing a degraded turf site (poor soil test results, high weed pressure, compaction, patchy stand) and draft a phased renovation plan that specifies site assessment steps, cultural and chemical renovation options, establishment method, and a maintenance calendar for the first year; cite at least three references.
  2. Exchange renovation plans with a peer for a structured written critique using a provided rubric—checking for completeness, math accuracy, IPM compliance, and safety considerations—then revise the plan based on feedback before submitting to the instructor.
  3. Complete a 50-question multiple-choice practice exam drawn from NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam content areas (turfgrass identification and culture, equipment, pest management, soils, and professionalism) and state pesticide applicator general standards categories; review each incorrect answer against reference materials in a whole-class debrief.
Case study packet, renovation plan template, peer-review rubric, practice exam question set (instructor-developed from NALP Landscape Industry Certified study guide and state pesticide applicator study materials), calculator, state extension turfgrass publications, Christians et al. Fundamentals of Turfgrass Management.Renovation plan scored on rubric—pass mark 75%; practice exam scored immediately—students who score below 70% receive a targeted review list and must complete a second 25-question targeted quiz before the course concludes, passing at 70%.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Turfgrass Science Written ExamWritten exam25%70% or higher on a 60-question multiple-choice and short-answer examA closed-book written exam covering turfgrass identification, plant physiology, soil fertility and nutrient math, irrigation scheduling calculations, pest and disease diagnosis, and IPM principles. Questions are mapped to NALP Landscape Industry Certified turfgrass content areas and reinforce the foundational science tested on the state pesticide applicator general standards exam.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Equipment Operation and Maintenance Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All safety-critical checklist items passed with no omissions; overall rubric score 75% or higherEach student independently performs a pre-operation inspection, operates a walk-behind mower and a core aerator on a live turf area, and demonstrates a blade change using lockout/tagout procedure while naming each step aloud. The instructor scores using a standardized skills checklist; any safety-critical failure (missing PPE, bypassing LOTO, removing guards) results in an automatic incomplete and requires remediation before re-evaluation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Field and Lab Notebook LogLog15%75% of total rubric points across all nine lesson entriesStudents maintain a chronological field and lab notebook throughout the course recording observations, measurements, calculations, and dated photographs from every hands-on lesson. The notebook is evaluated for accuracy of data, completeness of entries, quality of sketches or photo documentation, and evidence of reflective notes connecting observations to course theory.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Turf Renovation Plan Safety and Compliance ReviewSafety audit15%All mandatory safety and regulatory items marked compliant; no critical deficiency allowedThe instructor reviews the renovation plan submitted in Lesson 9 for compliance with a safety and regulatory checklist that includes: correct PPE specified for all chemical applications, pesticide products listed with valid registration use for the turf site type, nutrient application rates within state guidelines, and equipment LOTO references for maintenance steps. A plan with any critical deficiency—such as recommending an unregistered pesticide use or omitting required PPE—is returned for immediate correction and must pass re-review before the student receives a course completion.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-HORT49-07 Trade course

Landscape Design & Installation

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to read and produce residential landscape plans, select and source appropriate plants and hardscape materials, and install planting beds, walkways, edging, and basic landscape features to professional standards. Emphasis is placed on client communication, site analysis, and sequencing installation tasks safely and efficiently. Lessons map to NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam competencies in horticulture, landscape installation, and plant identification.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to read and produce residential landscape plans, select and source appropriate plants and hardscape materials, and install planting beds, walkways, edging, and basic landscape features to professional standards. Emphasis is placed on client communication, site analysis, and sequencing installation tasks safely and efficiently. Lessons map to NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam competencies in horticulture, landscape installation, and plant identification.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Site Analysis and Landscape Design Principles; Plant Identification and Selection; Reading and Drawing Landscape Plans; Material Estimation and Job Costing; Tool Safety and Equipment Operation; Planting Bed Installation; Hardscape: Unit Paver and Edging Installation; Landscape Maintenance Fundamentals and Plant Health; Client Communication, Professional Presentation, and Project Documentation.

What competent looks like. Produce a dimensionally accurate hand-drawn or digital residential landscape plan that includes a plant list, legend, and scale. Identify a minimum of 40 regionally common landscape plants by botanical and common name, growth habit, and site requirements. Safely operate and maintain hand and power tools used in landscape installation, applying lockout/tagout and PPE protocols. Install a planting bed including bed preparation, edging, plant placement, mulching, and initial irrigation to plan specifications. Lay a simple unit-paver or flagstone walkway on a compacted aggregate base within accepted tolerances for level and joint width. Prepare a written installation estimate including material takeoff, labor hours, and a phased installation sequence for a residential site.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Site Analysis and Landscape Design Principles10theoryStudents analyze a residential site for sun exposure, drainage, soil type, utilities, and existing vegetation and apply basic design principles—unity, balance, focalization, and simplicity—to a concept sketch.
  1. Walk an actual or simulated site with a checklist, recording sun angles at two times of day, drainage patterns, overhead and underground utility locations, and existing plant inventory.
  2. Complete a structured worksheet matching design principles to photographic examples of residential landscapes, identifying where each principle is and is not met.
  3. Produce a freehand bubble diagram of a 50-by-80-foot residential lot that locates use zones (entry, recreation, service, planting) and notes site constraints.
Site analysis checklist, measuring tape, compass, graph paper, pencils, landscape design textbook (e.g., Principles of Landscape Design, Ingels), site photographs, MISS DIG / 811 call-before-you-dig referenceCompleted site analysis checklist with all required categories addressed and a bubble diagram that accurately reflects at least four identified site constraints; instructor reviews for completeness — all categories present earns pass.
2Plant Identification and Selection14labStudents identify 40 regionally common landscape plants by botanical and common name and match each to appropriate hardiness zone, light, moisture, and soil requirements for a given site scenario.
  1. Use a plant ID station with 40 labeled specimens or high-resolution herbarium cards; students write botanical name, common name, and one key identifying feature for each in a plant ID log.
  2. Given three fictional site scenarios with different soil pH, sun exposure, and water availability, select and justify a palette of eight plants per scenario from an approved regional plant list, citing hardiness zone and mature size.
  3. Participate in a timed outdoor plant walk where the instructor holds up unlabeled specimens and students record names and two distinguishing traits on an answer sheet.
Regional plant specimens or herbarium cards (40 minimum), USDA Plant Hardiness Zone map, regional extension plant selection guides, plant ID log notebooks, hand lensesPlant ID log is complete for all 40 specimens; on the timed plant walk quiz students correctly name and describe at least 34 of 40 plants (85%) — 85% correct earns pass. Maps to NALP Horticulture exam area.
3Reading and Drawing Landscape Plans12theoryStudents read a professionally drawn landscape plan including symbols, scale, legend, and plant schedule, and produce their own scaled plan for a small residential front yard.
  1. Decode a provided professional landscape plan by completing a guided worksheet: identify scale, locate each symbol in the legend, count plants per species, and calculate total bed square footage using the plan scale.
  2. Practice drafting standard plan symbols (deciduous tree, evergreen shrub, groundcover, hardscape edge, north arrow) with drafting pencils on vellum, then transfer to graph paper at 1 inch equals 8 feet scale.
  3. Draft a complete scaled plan for the course's reference residential lot (50 by 80 feet), including plant schedule, legend, north arrow, scale bar, and property lines, using measurements taken during Lesson 1.
Sample professional landscape plans, architect's scale rule, graph paper (1/8-inch grid), vellum, drafting pencils (H and 2H), circle template, plant symbol template, ruler; optional: free-tier landscape CAD or SketchUp web appStudent-drawn plan includes all required elements (scale, north arrow, legend, plant schedule, property lines) at correct scale with no dimension error greater than 5%; instructor checks three spot dimensions against the reference — all present and within tolerance earns pass.
4Material Estimation and Job Costing10theoryStudents calculate material quantities (plants, mulch, edging, aggregate, pavers) and prepare a written cost estimate with labor hours for a defined residential landscape installation.
  1. Given a completed landscape plan and a materials price list, calculate the cubic yards of mulch needed for all beds at a specified depth, the linear feet of steel edging, and the number of plants per species, showing all work.
  2. Using a provided labor productivity table (square feet of bed prep per crew-hour, plants installed per crew-hour by container size), estimate total labor hours for the project and compute a total job cost at a given labor rate.
  3. Compare two student estimates for the same plan, identify discrepancies, and write a one-paragraph explanation of which is more accurate and why.
Completed residential landscape plan from Lesson 3, materials price list (instructor-prepared), labor productivity reference table, calculator, spreadsheet template (Excel or Google Sheets), pencil paperMaterial quantities are within 10% of instructor key values and the written estimate includes all line items (plants, mulch, edging, labor, and a labeled subtotal); all items present and quantities within tolerance earns pass.
5Tool Safety and Equipment Operation10demoStudents safely start, operate, and shut down landscape installation power tools—walk-behind sod cutter, plate compactor, rotary tiller, and power edger—applying OSHA hazard controls, PPE, and lockout/tagout procedures before each service task.
  1. Complete a pre-operation inspection checklist for each machine, identifying any safety defects; practice the manufacturer lockout/tagout sequence (disconnect spark plug wire or engage lockout pin) on each machine before simulated blade changes.
  2. Under direct instructor supervision, each student starts each machine, makes one operational pass on a designated practice area, and shuts it down using the correct procedure.
  3. Complete a written hazard ID worksheet for each machine listing the top three hazards, the required PPE (minimum: safety glasses, hearing protection, steel-toed boots, gloves), and the OSHA general industry or construction hazard control that applies.
Walk-behind sod cutter, plate compactor, rotary tiller, power edger; PPE kit per student (safety glasses, hearing protection, gloves, steel-toed boots); manufacturer operator manuals; OSHA tool-safety reference cards; lockout/tagout tagsStudent completes pre-operation checklist correctly, performs lockout/tagout without prompting before any simulated service, and operates each machine without instructor intervention for a safety correction — any unsafe act results in immediate recheck and must be corrected before pass is awarded.
6Planting Bed Installation16fieldStudents install a planting bed—including layout, edging, soil amendment, plant placement, and mulching—to plan specifications and industry-standard quality benchmarks.
  1. Using the course reference plan, stake and spray-paint bed outlines on the practice site, then install steel edging to the designated lines, cutting corners cleanly and driving stakes at correct spacing.
  2. Amend the bed soil per a basic soil test result (instructor-provided), incorporating compost or other amendment to the specified depth using a tiller, then grade smooth.
  3. Place balled-and-burlapped and container plants at plan-specified locations, adjust spacing for mature spread, set planting depth with root flare at grade, backfill, firm soil, and apply mulch at the specified depth keeping mulch off stems.
Landscape plan, marking paint, sod cutter, steel edging and stakes, mallet, hand tamper, rotary tiller, compost, transplant spade, digging fork, hand trowel, level, tape measure, container and B&B plant specimens, hardwood mulch, wheelbarrow, hoseEdging is within 2 inches of plan line with no visible gaps; plant root flares are at or within 1 inch above grade; mulch depth is within the specified range and pulled back from stems; spacing matches plan within 10%; instructor walks bed with a checklist — all criteria met earns pass. Maps to NALP Installation exam area.
7Hardscape: Unit Paver and Edging Installation14fieldStudents construct a unit-paver walkway section on a compacted aggregate base, maintaining consistent slope for drainage, acceptable joint width, and a secure restraining edge.
  1. Excavate and grade a 4-by-8-foot walkway section to the specified depth, compact a base course of crushed aggregate with the plate compactor in two lifts, check for slope (minimum 1% cross-slope for drainage) with a level and slope gauge.
  2. Screed a bedding sand layer to a consistent depth, set pavers in the specified pattern (running bond or herringbone) using a rubber mallet and spacers, maintaining joint width within accepted range.
  3. Install plastic or aluminum paver restraint edging on both sides, sweep dry polymeric sand into joints, compact lightly, and do a final visual and level check of the finished surface.
Pavers (concrete unit pavers), crushed aggregate base material, coarse bedding sand, polymeric joint sand, plate compactor, excavation spade, rake, screed board, rubber mallet, level, slope gauge, tape measure, paver restraint edging and stakes, safety glasses, gloves, hearing protection, knee padsBase is compacted in two lifts; cross-slope measures at least 1% with no reverse pitch; pavers are in correct pattern with no joint wider than specified; surface is within 3/16 inch of flat across a 10-foot straightedge; edging is fully staked — all criteria met earns pass. Maps to NALP Installation exam area.
8Landscape Maintenance Fundamentals and Plant Health10demoStudents demonstrate correct pruning cuts, mulch refreshing, fertilizer application, and post-install irrigation checks for a newly installed residential landscape, explaining the horticultural rationale for each practice.
  1. Demonstrate and then practice the three-cut method for removing a limb on a demonstration tree or large shrub, making each cut at the correct location; also practice heading and thinning cuts on shrubs, checking that all cuts are clean with no bark tear.
  2. Calculate the amount of a granular slow-release fertilizer needed for a defined bed area using the label rate, apply it with a hand spreader at the calculated rate, and water in; record application on a maintenance log sheet.
  3. Conduct a post-installation irrigation check: inspect each emitter or head in the bed for clogging or misdirection, adjust any that are off-target, confirm each plant's root zone receives water, and note findings on the maintenance log.
Hand pruners, loppers, pruning saw, demonstration tree or large shrub, granular slow-release fertilizer, fertilizer label, hand broadcast spreader, scale or measuring cups, maintenance log forms, irrigation system with drip or spray heads, hose, safety glasses, glovesPruning cuts are made at correct location with no stub longer than 1/4 inch and no bark tear; fertilizer rate calculation matches label rate within 5%; all irrigation emitters are functional and on-target after adjustment — all criteria correct earns pass.
9Client Communication, Professional Presentation, and Project Documentation8theoryStudents prepare a complete residential project package—final plan, plant schedule, estimate, and installation sequence—and present it verbally as if to a client, demonstrating professional communication skills.
  1. Assemble all documents from the course (site analysis, plant selections, scaled plan, estimate) into a single project binder with a cover sheet, table of contents, and professional formatting.
  2. Prepare a five-minute verbal client presentation using the plan as a visual aid, explaining plant choices, installation sequence, estimated timeline, cost summary, and post-install care recommendations.
  3. Role-play a client Q&A: a classmate or instructor asks three unscripted questions about plant alternatives, cost changes, or maintenance; student responds using trade knowledge from the course.
All course documents (site analysis, plans, plant ID log, estimate), project binders, printer or plotter for final plan, rubric for professional presentation (instructor-prepared), trade references for plant careProject binder contains all required documents with professional formatting; verbal presentation covers all five required topics; student responds correctly to at least two of three Q&A questions — all criteria met earns pass. Maps to NALP exam's professional skills area.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Landscape Design Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% correct (35 of 50 questions)A 50-question written exam covering design principles, plant identification (botanical and common names), site analysis concepts, material estimation calculations, and maintenance fundamentals drawn from all lesson content. Questions include multiple choice, matching plant names to descriptions, and short calculation problems. Maps to NALP Landscape Industry Certified horticulture and installation knowledge areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Installation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All critical criteria rated Meets Standard on the rubric; no more than two non-critical items rated Needs ImprovementEach student installs a 6-by-6-foot planting bed section and a 4-foot paver segment on the course practice site, assessed by the instructor using a structured rubric covering layout accuracy, edging installation, plant placement and depth, mulch application, base compaction, paver pattern, and slope. The student must also perform a pre-task tool inspection and lockout/tagout procedure without prompting. Maps to NALP Installation skills exam areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Project Documentation Lab LogLog15%Complete entries for all nine lessons; scaled plan and estimate meet accuracy tolerances defined in Lessons 3 and 4; instructor signs offStudents submit their course project binder containing the site analysis checklist, bubble diagram, plant ID log, scaled residential landscape plan, material and labor estimate, installation sequence, maintenance log from Lesson 7, and final client presentation notes. Each entry is checked for accuracy, completeness, and professional presentation as defined in lesson rubrics.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Tool and Site Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on all critical safety behaviors; any critical failure requires immediate remediation and recheck before course credit is awardedThe instructor uses a binary (observed / not observed) checklist to verify that each student independently selects correct PPE for four assigned tasks, performs lockout/tagout before a simulated blade change on the plate compactor, identifies the 811 call requirement before any simulated excavation, and disposes of an empty pesticide-adjacent container (from Lesson 8 reference) following label directions. All items must be observed to pass.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-HORT49-08 Trade course

Pesticide Safety: Selection, Handling, and Legal Application

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

Students develop the knowledge and hands-on skills required to select, handle, mix, apply, and dispose of pesticides safely and legally in agricultural, horticultural, and landscape settings. Emphasis is placed on reading and interpreting pesticide labels, understanding federal and state regulatory frameworks, and using personal protective equipment and engineering controls to protect workers, clients, and the environment. Lesson content is directly aligned with the competency areas tested on the State Pesticide Applicator licensing examination.

Outcomes
Course text

Students develop the knowledge and hands-on skills required to select, handle, mix, apply, and dispose of pesticides safely and legally in agricultural, horticultural, and landscape settings. Emphasis is placed on reading and interpreting pesticide labels, understanding federal and state regulatory frameworks, and using personal protective equipment and engineering controls to protect workers, clients, and the environment. Lesson content is directly aligned with the competency areas tested on the State Pesticide Applicator licensing examination.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Pesticide Law, Regulation, and the Licensing Framework; Pesticide Labels and Safety Data Sheets; Pesticide Formulations, Toxicity, and Environmental Fate; Personal Protective Equipment and Engineering Controls; Pesticide Exposure, First Aid, and Emergency Response; Integrated Pest Management and Pesticide Selection; Calibration, Mixing, and Application Equipment; Safe Storage, Transportation, Container Handling, and Disposal; Record Keeping, Posting, Notification, and Applicator Ethics.

What competent looks like. Interpret a pesticide label and Safety Data Sheet to determine legal use sites, target pests, application rates, restricted-entry intervals, and required PPE. Select the appropriate pesticide formulation and application equipment for a given pest problem, site, and environmental condition while minimizing risk to non-target organisms. Demonstrate safe procedures for measuring, mixing, loading, applying, and disposing of pesticides and their containers in compliance with federal and state regulations. Identify signs and symptoms of pesticide exposure and implement correct first-aid and emergency response procedures. Explain the principles of Integrated Pest Management and incorporate them into a written pest management recommendation that reduces reliance on chemical control. Complete all required pre-application records, application logs, and post-application notifications as required by law.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Pesticide Law, Regulation, and the Licensing Framework10theoryStudents will explain the federal and state regulatory structure governing pesticide use, identify the categories of pesticide users, and state the legal consequences of misuse.
  1. Guided reading and annotation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) overview document, followed by a class discussion identifying what each major provision requires of applicators.
  2. Case-study analysis of three documented pesticide misuse incidents; students identify which FIFRA provisions were violated and what penalties resulted.
  3. Role-play exercise in which students are given applicator scenarios (private, commercial, public) and must determine whether a license is required, which category applies, and what record-keeping the law demands.
EPA FIFRA plain-language summary, state department of agriculture pesticide program website printouts, state applicator category descriptions, whiteboard, case-study handouts.10-question written quiz on regulatory definitions, applicator categories, restricted-use pesticide rules, and penalties; passing score 75%.
2Pesticide Labels and Safety Data Sheets12theoryStudents will locate and correctly interpret every required section of a pesticide label and a Safety Data Sheet to determine legal use, required PPE, first-aid measures, and environmental precautions.
  1. Label dissection exercise: each student receives a full commercial pesticide label (herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide examples rotated across the class) and highlights the signal word, active ingredient, EPA registration number, directions for use, precautionary statements, restricted-entry interval, and pre-harvest interval.
  2. SDS scavenger hunt: students answer 15 instructor-prepared questions about a given SDS — health hazards, exposure limits, firefighting measures, and disposal — using only the SDS document.
  3. Paired comparison activity in which students contrast a general-use label with a restricted-use label and present two key differences to the class, reinforcing why some products require a license.
Printed full pesticide labels (minimum three different product types), printed SDSs, EPA label guide, highlighters, student notebooks.Label interpretation worksheet requiring students to answer 20 questions drawn from an unfamiliar label they have not previously seen; passing score 80%.
3Pesticide Formulations, Toxicity, and Environmental Fate10theoryStudents will classify common pesticide formulations by physical form and carrier, explain the signal-word toxicity scale, and describe how pesticides move through and break down in the environment.
  1. Formulation identification lab: instructor displays sealed, labeled containers of emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, granule, dust, and ready-to-use products; students record formulation type, mixing requirements, and PPE for each.
  2. Toxicity ranking exercise: students receive LD50 data for five common pesticides and rank them from most to least acutely toxic, then explain why LD50 alone does not determine applicator risk.
  3. Environmental fate mapping: using a simple watershed diagram, students trace the potential path of a pesticide applied to a lawn — volatilization, runoff, leaching, adsorption, and degradation — and identify which site characteristics increase groundwater contamination risk.
Sealed labeled pesticide containers (for display only), LD50 data table handout, watershed diagram worksheet, EPA pesticide environmental fate factsheets.Written quiz (15 questions) on formulation types, signal words, LD50 interpretation, and environmental fate terms; passing score 75%.
4Personal Protective Equipment and Engineering Controls10demoStudents will select, don, doff, inspect, and maintain the PPE required by a pesticide label and explain how engineering controls on application equipment reduce exposure.
  1. Instructor demonstration of the correct donning and doffing sequence for chemical-resistant gloves, apron, coveralls, eye protection, and respirator; students then repeat the sequence individually while instructor checks each step against a checklist.
  2. Glove permeability discussion: students review a chemical-resistance chart for nitrile, neoprene, and natural rubber gloves and select the appropriate glove material for three different pesticide scenarios described on label excerpts.
  3. Engineering controls station tour: instructor demonstrates closed-system mixing/loading equipment, cab air-filtration on a tractor sprayer (diagram or video if equipment unavailable), and backpack sprayer pressure-relief valve, explaining how each reduces dermal and inhalation exposure.
Chemical-resistant gloves (multiple materials and sizes), chemical-resistant apron, Tyvek coveralls, safety glasses, face shield, half-face respirator with cartridges, chemical-resistance chart, PPE donning/doffing checklist, closed-system loading adapter (or diagram).Instructor-scored PPE donning/doffing performance checklist; student must correctly execute all critical steps (glove sequence, respirator seal check, doffing without self-contamination) with zero critical errors on a single attempt.
5Pesticide Exposure, First Aid, and Emergency Response10theoryStudents will identify routes of pesticide entry into the body, recognize early and advanced signs of pesticide poisoning, and demonstrate the correct first-aid response for each exposure route.
  1. Scenario-based recognition exercise: students read six written scenarios describing a worker with specific symptoms and must identify the most likely exposure route (dermal, inhalation, ocular, oral) and the appropriate first-aid step using the pesticide label and SDS.
  2. Role-play calling Poison Control: using a practice script, students take turns playing the applicator calling the Poison Control hotline, providing product name, EPA registration number, symptoms, and patient information — information located on a sample label.
  3. Eyewash station drill: students practice flushing eyes at the eyewash station for the label-required duration and locate the emergency eyewash and shower locations in the shop, recording them on a site emergency map.
Poison Control reference card, sample pesticide labels and SDSs, scenario handouts, eyewash station, stopwatch, site emergency map template.Written scenario quiz (10 questions) requiring correct identification of exposure route and first-aid action for each; passing score 80%. Eyewash flush drill observed by instructor with pass/fail on correct duration.
6Integrated Pest Management and Pesticide Selection12theoryStudents will apply IPM principles to a landscape or turf scenario by identifying the pest, establishing an action threshold, evaluating all control tactics, and selecting the least-risk pesticide as a last resort.
  1. IPM decision tree activity: given a scenario with pest ID, damage photos, site map, and population data, student groups work through a structured decision tree (monitoring → threshold → cultural/biological/mechanical controls → chemical controls) and present their recommendation.
  2. Pesticide selection comparison: using three labeled products registered for the same target pest, students compare toxicity, environmental fate, resistance management group (IRAC/FRAC/HRAC numbering explained), pre-harvest or restricted-entry intervals, and cost to select the most appropriate option and justify in writing.
  3. Resistance management case study: students read a brief article on a documented resistance case (e.g., herbicide-resistant weed or insecticide-resistant pest) and write a one-page plan explaining how rotating mode-of-action groups would have reduced resistance development.
IPM decision tree handout, pest scenario packets with photos and population data, three comparison pesticide labels, IRAC/FRAC/HRAC mode-of-action chart, resistance case-study article.Written IPM recommendation for an assigned scenario, graded on a rubric requiring correct pest ID, justified threshold, at least two non-chemical tactics, and defensible pesticide selection; passing score 75% on rubric.
7Calibration, Mixing, and Application Equipment16labStudents will calibrate a backpack sprayer and a boom sprayer to deliver a specified application rate, calculate the quantity of pesticide concentrate needed for a measured area, and mix that quantity correctly while wearing required PPE.
  1. Backpack sprayer calibration: each student calibrates their assigned sprayer using the time-and-distance or catch-jar method, records nozzle output in ounces per minute, calculates gallons per acre delivered at their walking speed, and adjusts pressure or nozzle type to hit the target rate within 5%.
  2. Label math and mixing exercise: students receive a pesticide label specifying ounces of concentrate per gallon of water for a given area; they calculate concentrate needed for three tank sizes (1 gal, 3 gal, 50 gal), measure concentrate using a graduated cylinder, and mix water-first in the correct sequence while wearing full PPE, supervised by instructor.
  3. Nozzle selection and maintenance station: students match nozzle types (flat fan, hollow cone, flood) to application scenarios on a worksheet, then disassemble, clean, inspect, and reassemble a set of flat-fan nozzles, checking for wear using a nozzle output test.
Backpack sprayers (one per two students), boom sprayer or diagram, graduated cylinders, calibration catch jars, stopwatch, measuring tape, colored water for mixing practice, nozzle set, nozzle output chart, PPE full set, pesticide label for math exercise.Calibration calculation sheet checked for accuracy (within 5% of target rate = pass); instructor-observed mixing procedure scored on PPE compliance, water-first sequence, and correct measurement — all three criteria must be met to pass.
8Safe Storage, Transportation, Container Handling, and Disposal10fieldStudents will set up a compliant pesticide storage area, demonstrate safe loading and transport practices, and perform pesticide container triple-rinse and puncture procedures in accordance with label and regulatory requirements.
  1. Storage area audit: students use a regulatory checklist to inspect the program's pesticide storage room, identifying any deficiencies (missing secondary containment, improper segregation of herbicides from other pesticides, unlocked restricted-use product cabinet, missing fire extinguisher) and documenting findings in writing.
  2. Simulated spill response: instructor stages a small colored-water spill representing a pesticide release; students don PPE, contain the spill using absorbent material, decontaminate the area, and complete a simulated spill report form.
  3. Triple-rinse and container puncture drill: each student triple-rinses an empty pesticide container (using water), adds rinse water to the spray tank, punctures the container to prevent reuse, and identifies the correct disposal route (recycling program, landfill, hazardous waste) based on the label.
Pesticide storage room (or simulated area), storage audit checklist, PPE full set, absorbent spill kit (clay-based or other compatible material), colored water, empty pesticide containers, container puncture tool, spill report form, disposal guidance sheet.Storage audit checklist must correctly identify all pre-planted deficiencies (minimum 5 of 6 = pass); triple-rinse procedure observed by instructor and scored pass/fail on correct number of rinses, rinse addition to tank, and container puncture.
9Record Keeping, Posting, Notification, and Applicator Ethics14practiceStudents will complete legally required pre-application and post-application pesticide records, draft a proper posting/notification plan for a commercial landscape job, and explain the applicator's ethical and legal obligations to workers, clients, and neighbors.
  1. Record-keeping simulation: each student receives a scenario card with site details, product information, application dates, and rates; they complete a multi-day pesticide application log matching the fields required by state law, including applicator license number placeholder, product EPA number, target pest, and location description.
  2. Posting and notification planning: given a scenario in which a pesticide with a specified restricted-entry interval will be applied to a commercial landscape surrounding an occupied office building, students draft a notification plan — signage language and placement, timing, and neighbor notification — then peer-review each other's plans against a regulatory checklist.
  3. Ethics case discussion: class examines three short scenarios (applicator pressured by customer to use higher-than-label rate; unlicensed worker asked to mix product; applicator skips the restricted-entry interval to finish a job on time) and identifies the ethical violation, legal consequence, and correct professional response in writing.
State pesticide application record form, scenario cards, posting sign templates, restricted-entry interval reference table, notification checklist, ethics scenario handouts.Completed pesticide application log reviewed by instructor; all required fields must be accurately filled and the application rate calculation must be correct (passing: zero missing required fields, rate calculation within acceptable rounding). Ethics scenario responses graded on identification of all three violations and correct professional responses; passing score 75%.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Pesticide Applicator Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (state licensing exams typically require a score in this range; students must meet the actual cut score set by their state board)A 60-question multiple-choice examination covering the full range of state pesticide applicator core competency areas: federal and state law, label interpretation, toxicology, environmental fate, pest management principles, application equipment, safety, and record keeping. Questions are drawn from the same content domains tested on the state licensing examination, providing direct preparation for the credential.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Practical Application Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All critical safety steps passed with zero critical errors; overall rubric score of 75% or higherEach student independently completes a scenario-based task sequence: selects correct PPE from an assortment based on a given pesticide label, dons PPE correctly, calibrates a backpack sprayer to a specified rate, calculates and measures the required concentrate, mixes the simulated product (colored water), performs a mock application following label directions, and cleans the sprayer and properly manages the empty container. A trained evaluator scores each step using a standardized rubric aligned to NALP Landscape Industry Certified competency areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pesticide Safety Lab LogLog15%All required entries present and accurate; minimum score of 75% on rubric evaluating completeness, accuracy of calculations, and quality of written observationsStudents maintain a running lab log throughout the course documenting calibration calculations, mixing records, storage audit findings, spill response steps, and container disposal procedures for each hands-on lesson. Entries must include date, product (or surrogate) used, PPE worn, calculations shown with units, and a brief reflection on any procedural error corrected. The complete log is submitted at the end of the course and evaluated for accuracy of math, regulatory compliance of documented procedures, and thoroughness of observations.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety and Compliance CheckSafety audit15%Pass on all four critical items (no critical errors); any single critical failure requires immediate remediation and re-check before the student may continue handling pesticidesAn unannounced or minimally announced observation conducted by the instructor during one of the later practical lessons; the instructor uses a standardized four-item critical checklist — (1) correct PPE donned before any pesticide contact, (2) water added to tank before concentrate, (3) product used only on label-specified site at no more than the label rate, and (4) completed application record begun before leaving the site. This check mirrors the compliance inspection a state pesticide inspector would conduct in the field and serves as a direct readiness indicator for the State Pesticide Applicator license.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-HORT49-09 Capstone

Capstone Project: Integrated Landscape & Horticulture Build

162 hr · $1,620 COMPLIMENTARY

Students plan, install, and document a complete landscape or horticulture project that integrates soil science, irrigation, turf, plant science, pesticide safety, and design skills learned throughout the program. Each student produces a professional project package—site analysis, design drawings, materials list, installation records, and a maintenance plan—and defends their work before an instructor panel. The capstone serves as the program's summative performance assessment and produces a portfolio artifact usable in job applications and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified examination process.

Outcomes
Course text

Students plan, install, and document a complete landscape or horticulture project that integrates soil science, irrigation, turf, plant science, pesticide safety, and design skills learned throughout the program. Each student produces a professional project package—site analysis, design drawings, materials list, installation records, and a maintenance plan—and defends their work before an instructor panel. The capstone serves as the program's summative performance assessment and produces a portfolio artifact usable in job applications and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified examination process.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Site Analysis and Project Planning; Design Development and Documentation Package; Site Installation and Field Execution; Portfolio Finalization and Oral Defense Preparation.

What competent looks like. Conduct a site analysis including soil texture evaluation, drainage observation, sun/shade mapping, and measurement using standard horticultural methods, and compile findings in a written report. Produce a scaled landscape plan with plant list, irrigation layout, and grading notes that meets client or site criteria and reflects sound horticultural and design principles. Execute installation tasks—bed preparation, plant placement and installation, hardscape or edging elements, and basic irrigation hook-up—following OSHA safety standards and manufacturer specifications. Apply integrated pest management decision-making and, where applicable, demonstrate correct pesticide label reading and PPE selection consistent with State Pesticide Applicator licensing requirements. Compile a complete project portfolio including site analysis, design drawings, material specifications, installation log, cost estimate, and a seasonal maintenance calendar. Deliver a structured oral defense of project decisions, justify plant and material choices using trade references, and respond to panel questions demonstrating program-level competency.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Site Analysis and Project Planning36fieldStudents complete a professional-level site analysis—including soil sampling, drainage assessment, sun mapping, and client interview—and translate findings into a written scope of work and preliminary concept plan.
  1. Conduct a measured site survey of the assigned project site using measuring tape and/or measuring wheel; sketch a base plan to scale on graph paper and transfer it to a digital drawing tool (landscape design software or CAD-lite application).
  2. Collect soil samples from at least three locations, perform ribbon and jar texture tests on-site, and submit one composite sample to the lab or use an in-class soil test kit; record pH, texture class, and drainage rating on a standardized site-analysis form.
  3. Interview the instructor acting as 'client' using a prepared questionnaire, then draft a written scope of work that lists site constraints, client priorities, budget range, plant hardiness zone requirements, and a preliminary plant palette drawn from regional extension plant lists.
Measuring tape (100 ft), measuring wheel, graph paper, ruler, compass, soil sample bags, soil test kit or lab submission forms, site-analysis worksheet, laptop with landscape design or drawing software, regional extension plant-selection guides, USDA Plant Hardiness Zone map, client-interview formInstructor reviews the completed site-analysis form and scope-of-work document against a 20-point rubric covering accuracy of measurements (within 5% of actual), completeness of soil data, identification of at least three site constraints, and a plant palette of at least eight species appropriate to zone and conditions; students must score 14/20 (70%) to proceed.
2Design Development and Documentation Package40labStudents produce a complete, professional documentation package—scaled planting and irrigation plan, plant schedule, materials quantity take-off, cost estimate, and seasonal maintenance calendar—that could be submitted to a client or used as a NALP portfolio artifact.
  1. Develop a final scaled planting plan (minimum 1 inch = 10 feet) showing bed outlines, hardscape or edging features, plant placement symbols keyed to a plant schedule that lists botanical name, common name, size at installation, spacing, and quantity; verify that all selections meet site-analysis constraints identified in Lesson 1.
  2. Overlay a basic irrigation layout on a second plan sheet showing head or emitter placement, zone boundaries, and water source connection point; calculate the total area irrigated per zone and select appropriate emitter or head type from manufacturer spec sheets, documenting choices in writing.
  3. Build a materials quantity take-off spreadsheet listing all plants, mulch (calculated in cubic yards for the planned bed areas at a standard depth), edging linear footage, irrigation components, and any hardscape materials; apply local supplier price estimates to produce a line-item cost estimate and a simple gross-margin calculation.
Laptop with drawing or design software, scaled base plan from Lesson 1, plant schedule template, irrigation layout worksheet, manufacturer irrigation spec sheets, mulch/material quantity calculation worksheet, spreadsheet software, regional supplier price lists or extension cost-of-production guides, NALP Landscape Industry Certified study referenceDocumentation package is evaluated against a rubric covering drafting accuracy (plan is legible and correctly scaled), botanical name accuracy (no more than one error per ten plants), irrigation zone logic (each zone limited to one precipitation-rate category), and math accuracy on the take-off and cost estimate (all calculations within 10% of instructor key); minimum passing score is 70% across all rubric categories before moving to installation.
3Site Installation and Field Execution60practiceStudents install the approved project according to their documentation package—completing bed preparation, plant installation, mulching, edging, and irrigation connection—while maintaining an installation log, applying correct PPE and OSHA work-site safety practices throughout.
  1. Hold a pre-installation safety tailgate meeting: students identify site hazards (underground utilities, slope, power equipment), assign spotter roles for equipment use, confirm PPE requirements (gloves, safety glasses, steel-toed boots, hearing protection when using power equipment), and review lockout/tagout procedure for any powered irrigation tools; instructor signs off on the safety checklist before groundbreaking.
  2. Execute bed preparation (edging, soil amendment incorporation per soil-test recommendations, grading to positive drainage), plant installation following the approved plan layout, backfill and water-in procedure, mulch application at specified depth keeping mulch away from plant stems, and installation of edging or hardscape elements; students photograph each phase and record start/finish times, materials used, and any field changes with written justification in the installation log.
  3. Connect and test the irrigation system: open the water supply, run each zone, observe coverage, adjust heads or emitters as needed, and record operating pressure and run-time settings; if pesticide application is required for the site (instructor-determined scenario), students read the product label aloud, identify required PPE, calculate application rate for the treated area, and demonstrate mixing and application technique in compliance with State Pesticide Applicator label-following requirements—all under direct instructor supervision.
Hand tools (shovels, trowels, edging spade, hand pruners), power edger, wheelbarrow, mulch, soil amendments per test results, approved plant material, edging material, irrigation components per design, personal protective equipment (gloves, safety glasses, steel-toed boots, hearing protection), installation log forms, camera or smartphone, OSHA 10 hazard-identification checklist, pesticide label for demonstration product, measuring cup and backpack or pump sprayer, first-aid kit on siteInstructor evaluates installation against the approved plan using a field performance rubric: plant placement within 6 inches of plan location, correct planting depth (root flare at or slightly above grade), mulch depth and clearance from stems, edging alignment, irrigation coverage with no dry spots observed during zone test, and safety compliance throughout (zero PPE violations recorded); students must pass the safety checklist 100% and score at least 70% on the installation rubric to qualify for the oral defense.
4Portfolio Finalization and Oral Defense Preparation26theoryStudents assemble a complete, polished project portfolio and rehearse a structured oral defense in which they explain and justify every major project decision using trade references and program knowledge.
  1. Compile and organize the full portfolio binder or digital folder in professional sequence: cover page, table of contents, site-analysis report, final design drawings, plant schedule, irrigation layout, materials take-off and cost estimate, installation log with photos, maintenance calendar, and a one-page project reflection discussing what was changed from plan to field and why; instructor reviews draft portfolio for completeness and professional presentation before the defense date.
  2. Conduct a peer mock-defense in groups of three: each student presents their project summary (approximately 10 minutes) while partners ask at least four prepared challenge questions drawn from a question bank covering soils, plant selection, irrigation decisions, pesticide safety, and IPM; students record feedback on a peer-review form and revise their talking points accordingly.
  3. Complete a written self-evaluation mapping each portfolio section to the relevant NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam domain and, where applicable, to the State Pesticide Applicator core competency areas (pest identification, label reading, environmental protection, safety); this mapping document is included as the final portfolio tab and reviewed by the instructor for accuracy before the panel defense.
Completed project documentation from Lessons 1–3, portfolio binder or digital folder, dividers and labels, peer mock-defense question bank, self-evaluation/credential-mapping form, NALP Landscape Industry Certified candidate handbook, State Pesticide Applicator study guide, laptop or tablet for digital portfolio version, printer for hard-copy submissionPortfolio completeness checklist (all nine required sections present and in order) must score 100% complete; credential-mapping document must correctly identify at least five NALP exam domain connections and at least two State Pesticide Applicator competency connections, verified by instructor before the student is cleared for the panel oral defense.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Integrated Project Build and Installation LogProject60%70% on the combined installation rubric (field performance + safety compliance with zero PPE violations) and submission of a complete installation log with photographs documenting all installation phasesThe student's physical installation is evaluated against the approved design documents using a field-performance rubric assessing plant placement accuracy, planting technique, irrigation function, mulching, and continuous safety compliance; the installation log is reviewed for completeness and honest documentation of any field deviations from the plan.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Professional Project PortfolioPortfolio20%70% on the portfolio rubric, with all nine required sections present and the credential-mapping document approved by the instructor prior to the defenseThe portfolio is scored on a rubric covering professional presentation, technical accuracy of drawings and calculations, completeness of all required documents, quality of the maintenance calendar, and the accuracy of the self-evaluation mapping each section to NALP and State Pesticide Applicator exam competency areas.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Oral Defense Before Instructor PanelOral / panel20%70% overall on the oral-defense rubric, with no critical safety question answered incorrectly (a wrong answer to a pesticide safety or OSHA question triggers one retest opportunity before a final grade is assigned)The student presents a 10-minute structured overview of their project to a two- or three-person instructor panel, then responds to approximately 15 minutes of questions drawn from all program content areas including soils, plant science, irrigation, turf, design, and pesticide safety; the panel scores content accuracy, quality of justification using trade references, professional communication, and the ability to acknowledge and explain field deviations from the original plan.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
AGR-HORT49-10 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement

243 hr · $970 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 243 supervised hours with a licensed landscape, horticulture, or agricultural employer, applying classroom knowledge in real production and service environments. A site supervisor evaluates technical performance, professionalism, and safety compliance using a structured rubric. This placement bridges academic preparation with entry-level employment and generates documented evidence of industry-ready competence.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 243 supervised hours with a licensed landscape, horticulture, or agricultural employer, applying classroom knowledge in real production and service environments. A site supervisor evaluates technical performance, professionalism, and safety compliance using a structured rubric. This placement bridges academic preparation with entry-level employment and generates documented evidence of industry-ready competence.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Externship Orientation, Site Agreements, and Safety Protocols; Supervised Production Rotations — Core Trade Tasks; Independent Task Execution and Employer Final Evaluation; Worksite Journal Completion and Externship Debrief.

What competent looks like. Perform assigned landscape, horticultural, or agricultural tasks to employer quality standards under direct and indirect supervision for a minimum of 243 clock hours. Demonstrate safe work habits on every shift, including correct PPE selection, equipment lockout/tagout procedures, and pesticide handling practices consistent with state applicator license requirements. Apply trade math skills — area calculation, material estimation, irrigation run-time math, and mix ratios — to solve real job-site problems without instructor assistance. Receive a passing composite score on the employer mid-term and final evaluation rubrics covering technical skill, communication, attendance, and safety. Maintain a complete, accurate worksite journal documenting tasks, equipment used, observations, and reflective notes for every shift. Identify at least two areas of professional growth through a written self-evaluation submitted at externship completion.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Externship Orientation, Site Agreements, and Safety Protocols15theoryStudents will identify site-specific hazards, review their employer's safety policies, and complete all placement paperwork before their first production shift.
  1. Site walkthrough with supervisor: students complete a hazard-identification checklist covering equipment, chemicals, traffic, and environmental conditions specific to the employer's operation.
  2. Review and sign the three-party externship agreement (student, school, employer) and discuss attendance, conduct, and evaluation expectations with both the site supervisor and the program coordinator.
  3. Complete site-specific safety orientation required by the employer (e.g., equipment sign-off sheets, pesticide storage location, emergency exit routes, first-aid kit locations) and record the information in the worksite journal.
Three-party externship agreement forms, site hazard-identification checklist, OSHA 10 wallet card (earned in Course 1), employer safety handbook, worksite journal (bound or digital), PPE issued by employerAll placement paperwork signed and on file with the program coordinator; completed hazard checklist reviewed and signed by site supervisor; first journal entry present — pass requires all three items complete before shift 2 begins.
2Supervised Production Rotations — Core Trade Tasks168fieldStudents will execute assigned landscape, horticulture, or agricultural tasks — including planting, pruning, irrigation operation, turf maintenance, soil amendment, or greenhouse production — to the employer's quality and efficiency standards across a full range of shifts.
  1. Complete daily assigned tasks under supervisor direction (examples: install plant material to specification, operate and adjust irrigation zones, mow and edge turf areas, apply fertilizers or pesticides under a licensed applicator's direct oversight, propagate or transplant greenhouse crops) and log each task with time, equipment, and outcome in the worksite journal.
  2. At the mid-point of the rotation (approximately 84 hours in), meet with the site supervisor for a structured mid-term check-in using the program evaluation rubric; identify one technical skill to improve and write a one-paragraph improvement plan in the journal.
  3. Participate in at least two problem-solving scenarios initiated by the supervisor — such as diagnosing an irrigation leak, identifying a pest or disease on a crop, or calculating the amount of mulch needed for a bed — and document the diagnosis, solution chosen, and outcome.
Employer-supplied tools and equipment (mowers, hand tools, pruners, irrigation controllers, sprayers, tractors, or greenhouse equipment as applicable), PPE (gloves, safety glasses, hearing protection, steel-toed boots, respiratory protection as required), worksite journal, program mid-term evaluation rubric, tape measure, calculatorCompleted mid-term evaluation rubric scored by site supervisor — pass requires an average score of 70% or higher across all rubric domains (technical skill, safety, communication, attendance, professionalism); improvement plan present in journal.
3Independent Task Execution and Employer Final Evaluation45practiceStudents will complete assigned tasks with reduced direct supervision, demonstrating that they can self-manage workflow, maintain quality, and make safe decisions independently.
  1. Supervisor assigns progressively less-supervised tasks during the final third of the placement (examples: solo mowing route, irrigation scheduling adjustment, material mixing and spot application under license, independent transplant production cycle) while spot-checking quality at completion; student logs each task and any decisions made without direct instruction.
  2. Student drafts a two-page written self-evaluation reflecting on skills gained, areas still needing development, how classroom content (soils, irrigation, turf, pest management) connected to real work, and career goals — submitted to the program coordinator before the final evaluation meeting.
  3. Supervisor completes the final employer evaluation rubric in a face-to-face meeting with the student; both parties discuss ratings, sign the form, and the student receives a copy.
Final employer evaluation rubric, student self-evaluation template, worksite journal (all entries complete), employer-supplied tools and PPEFinal employer evaluation rubric average score of 70% or higher across all domains; self-evaluation submitted and at least two pages in length — both required to pass this lesson segment.
4Worksite Journal Completion and Externship Debrief15theoryStudents will compile a complete, organized worksite journal and present a structured oral debrief to the program coordinator summarizing their hours, key experiences, and professional growth.
  1. Review and finalize all journal entries to ensure every shift is recorded with date, hours, tasks, equipment or products used, and a brief reflection; total hours are tallied and verified against the 243-hour requirement.
  2. Prepare and deliver a 10-minute oral debrief to the program coordinator covering: three specific tasks mastered, one safety situation handled correctly, one connection to the pesticide applicator or NALP credential content, and one goal for continuing professional development.
  3. Complete the student evaluation of the externship site form, rating supervision quality, relevance of tasks, and safety culture, to help the program maintain or improve employer partnerships.
Completed worksite journal, hour-log summary sheet, student evaluation of site form, oral debrief outline templateJournal contains an entry for every shift with all required fields completed, hours total 243 or more, and oral debrief delivered — pass requires all three criteria met and debrief rated satisfactory by coordinator (addresses all four required topics).
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Employer Evaluation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration70%Composite average of 70% or higher on the program's standardized employer evaluation rubric, combining mid-term and final scores across the domains of technical skill, safety compliance, communication, attendance, and professionalism; any domain score below 50% requires a documented remediation plan.The site supervisor scores the student at mid-placement and at completion using the program's standardized rubric, observing real task performance over the full 243 hours. This skills demonstration assessment captures evidence that the student can perform trade tasks safely and to industry quality standards in an authentic employment setting, directly aligning with the hands-on performance components of the NALP Landscape Industry Certified credential and the safe-handling expectations of the State Pesticide Applicator license.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Worksite Journal and Reflective LogLog30%Journal must contain a complete entry for every scheduled shift (date, hours, tasks, equipment or materials, brief reflection), hours must sum to 243 or more, and the final self-evaluation must be at least two pages addressing skills gained, content connections, and career goals; missing more than two shift entries or failing to submit the self-evaluation results in an incomplete grade until remediated.The bound or digital worksite journal serves as the student's primary written record of the externship, functioning as a lab log for the field placement. Reviewed by the program coordinator at the debrief meeting, it documents the breadth of tasks performed, safe-work decisions made, and professional growth over the placement period, providing written evidence suitable for a credential portfolio.
Complete · Verified
AGR-HORT49-11 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: State Pesticide Applicator & NALP Landscape Industry Certified

68 hr · $680 COMPLIMENTARY

This capstone review course systematically maps every major content domain of the State Pesticide Applicator license exam and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam to the knowledge and skills students have built across the program. Students complete timed, full-length mock exams under realistic conditions, analyze their performance by domain, and close remaining gaps through targeted drill sessions. The course ends with every student exam-ready and in possession of a completed application packet for each credential.

Outcomes
Course text

This capstone review course systematically maps every major content domain of the State Pesticide Applicator license exam and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam to the knowledge and skills students have built across the program. Students complete timed, full-length mock exams under realistic conditions, analyze their performance by domain, and close remaining gaps through targeted drill sessions. The course ends with every student exam-ready and in possession of a completed application packet for each credential.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Credential Roadmap: Exam Formats, Applications & Test-Taking Strategy; State Pesticide Applicator Exam Domain Review; NALP Landscape Industry Certified Exam Domain Review; Full Mock Certification Exams & Personal Remediation Debrief.

What competent looks like. Demonstrate exam-passing command of pesticide laws, safety, label reading, pest identification, and integrated pest management as tested on the State Pesticide Applicator licensing exam. Demonstrate exam-passing command of NALP Landscape Industry Certified content areas including plant identification, landscape installation, turf management, irrigation, and horticulture practices. Complete and submit a fully accurate State Pesticide Applicator license application, including required documentation, fees, and any state-mandated prerequisites. Complete and submit a fully accurate NALP Landscape Industry Certified candidate application with supporting program documentation. Analyze personal mock-exam results by domain, identify deficient areas, and execute a self-directed remediation plan before the final mock. Apply test-taking strategies — time management, process of elimination, label and reference use where permitted — to maximize score on timed multiple-choice licensing exams.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Credential Roadmap: Exam Formats, Applications & Test-Taking Strategy8theoryStudents will accurately describe the structure, domain weighting, eligibility requirements, and application process for both the State Pesticide Applicator license exam and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam, and will submit a complete draft application for each credential.
  1. Guided walkthrough of each credential's official candidate handbook: students annotate domain lists, note point weights, and build a personal study-priority matrix based on self-assessed weak areas from earlier coursework.
  2. Step-by-step completion of both credential application forms (state pesticide applicator and NALP LIC) using actual state agency and NALP templates; instructor reviews each form for accuracy and completeness before students finalize.
  3. Small-group discussion and note-taking on test-taking strategies specific to timed multiple-choice licensing exams: reading stems carefully, eliminating clearly wrong distractors, managing time per question, and flagging items for review — followed by a 20-question low-stakes practice quiz applying those strategies.
Official state pesticide applicator candidate handbook and application form (state agency website); NALP Landscape Industry Certified candidate guide and application (NALP.org); program transcripts and externship hour logs; highlighters, annotation worksheets; computers with internet access; instructor-prepared study-priority matrix template.Each student submits a completed draft application for both credentials with all required fields filled and supporting documents identified; instructor verifies accuracy — pass requires zero critical omissions (missing signature, wrong fee category, absent prerequisite documentation flagged).
2State Pesticide Applicator Exam Domain Review20theoryStudents will correctly answer practice questions drawn from each core domain of the State Pesticide Applicator exam — including federal and state pesticide law, label and labeling interpretation, pesticide chemistry and formulations, pest identification, integrated pest management, application equipment, environmental protection, and safety — at a rate consistent with a passing score.
  1. Domain-by-domain lecture and discussion sessions using the EPA's Pesticide Applicator Competency Framework and the current edition of the state's core pesticide applicator study manual as the primary references; students complete a 10–15 question domain quiz after each major topic and score it immediately for self-assessment.
  2. Label-reading lab: instructor provides six actual registered pesticide labels (herbicide, insecticide, fungicide, rodenticide, and two general-use products); students work in pairs to locate signal words, PPE requirements, REI, PHI, first-aid statements, storage and disposal instructions, and application rates — answering a structured question set that mirrors exam item types.
  3. Pest-identification picture round: using USDA extension photo reference sheets, students individually identify 30 common pest, disease, and weed specimens (insects, fungal symptoms, broadleaf and grassy weeds) by common and scientific name and select the correct pesticide mode-of-action group for each — scored immediately and reviewed as a class.
Current state core pesticide applicator study manual; EPA Pesticide Applicator Competency document; six actual registered pesticide product labels; USDA Cooperative Extension pest and weed identification reference sheets; instructor-authored domain quizzes; answer keys; whiteboard; projector.Cumulative score across all domain quizzes: student must average 75% or higher across all domains to be marked ready for the mock exam; students below 75% in any single domain receive a targeted remediation assignment before Lesson 4.
3NALP Landscape Industry Certified Exam Domain Review20theoryStudents will correctly answer practice questions and perform hands-on identification tasks covering all NALP Landscape Industry Certified written exam domains — plant identification, landscape installation and construction, turf and ornamental maintenance, irrigation principles, and horticulture science — at a rate consistent with a passing score.
  1. Structured review sessions for each NALP LIC written exam domain using the NALP study guide and program course notes as references; after each domain, students complete a 10-question practice set and compare answers with a partner before whole-class debrief, with instructor clarifying persistent misconceptions.
  2. Plant identification speed drill: using a set of 50 plant specimens (or high-quality photographs where live specimens are unavailable), students rotate through stations identifying woody ornamentals, herbaceous perennials, turfgrasses, and common landscape annuals by common and scientific name — recording answers on a score sheet that mirrors the identification component of the NALP exam.
  3. Scenario-based problem sets: students individually work through six written landscape scenarios (e.g., diagnosing a turf disease from symptoms, sizing a drip irrigation zone, selecting the correct soil amendment for a planting bed, interpreting a grading plan) and write short justified answers — answers are discussed as a class with emphasis on why distractors are wrong.
NALP Landscape Industry Certified study guide (current edition, nalp.org); 50-specimen plant ID kit or high-resolution plant photo cards; program course notes from Courses 2–8; instructor-authored scenario problem sets; answer keys; tape measures, calculators; whiteboard and projector.Cumulative score across domain quizzes and the plant ID drill: student must achieve 75% or higher overall and correctly identify at least 70% of plant specimens to be marked ready for the mock exam; students below threshold in any area receive a targeted remediation assignment before Lesson 4.
4Full Mock Certification Exams & Personal Remediation Debrief20practiceStudents will complete full-length, timed mock exams for both the State Pesticide Applicator license and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified exam under realistic test conditions, score their results by domain, and produce a written remediation summary identifying remaining gaps and next-step study actions before sitting the official exams.
  1. Timed Mock Exam Block 1 — State Pesticide Applicator: students complete an instructor-authored full-length multiple-choice mock exam under exam conditions (no notes, timed to match the state exam's time limit, answers on a bubble sheet); exams are exchanged and scored immediately using the answer key, then each student calculates their score by domain on a provided scoring grid.
  2. Timed Mock Exam Block 2 — NALP Landscape Industry Certified: students complete an instructor-authored full-length mock exam (written knowledge section and a timed plant-identification practical component) under exam conditions; exams are scored and domain scores recorded on the same scoring grid, giving each student a complete two-credential performance profile.
  3. Individual remediation debrief: each student meets with the instructor for a 10-minute review of their two scoring grids, identifies their lowest two domains per exam, and completes a written Personal Exam Readiness Plan — listing the specific topics to re-study, the reference page or resource to use, and the date by which review will be complete before their official exam appointment.
Instructor-authored full-length mock exams for both credentials (minimum 50 questions each for written components); bubble-sheet answer forms; two-credential domain scoring grid worksheet; timers; no-calculator and calculator sections as appropriate to each exam's rules; Personal Exam Readiness Plan template; pens.Pass standard for course completion: student must score 75% or higher on each full mock exam AND submit a complete, specific Personal Exam Readiness Plan; students who score below 75% on either mock may complete one instructor-supervised remediation session and a second sitting of the relevant mock before the course end date — second mock score is recorded as the final mark.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Dual Credential Full Mock ExaminationMock certification exam100%75% or higher on each mock exam (State Pesticide Applicator and NALP Landscape Industry Certified) plus a complete, instructor-approved Personal Exam Readiness Plan; one remediation resit is permitted per exam if the first attempt falls below 75%.Students sit two full-length, timed mock exams — one mirroring the State Pesticide Applicator license exam and one mirroring the NALP Landscape Industry Certified written and plant-identification exam — under realistic, closed-note exam conditions. Scores are analyzed by domain, and each student produces a Personal Exam Readiness Plan documenting specific remaining gaps and a concrete self-study schedule before sitting the official credentialing exams.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: NALP Landscape Industry Certified; State Pesticide Applicator

Students sit the State Pesticide Applicator licensing examination administered by their state department of agriculture, and the NALP Landscape Industry Certified examination administered by the National Association of Landscape Professionals. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Agriculture / Horticulture / Landscaping · How the school gets authority to award these credentials