This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
11 courses · 1,800 clock hours · 9–12 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.
This foundational course equips learners with the safety protocols, technical mathematics, communication skills, and career knowledge required to enter the crime scene forensic technician field. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry certification and First Aid/CPR credentials while developing the measurement, documentation, and professional skills that underpin every subsequent course in the program. Lesson content is directly mapped to the evidence-handling, documentation, and professional-conduct domains tested in the IAI CCSI and State Evidence Tech Cert credentialing exams.
OutcomesThis foundational course equips learners with the safety protocols, technical mathematics, communication skills, and career knowledge required to enter the crime scene forensic technician field. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry certification and First Aid/CPR credentials while developing the measurement, documentation, and professional skills that underpin every subsequent course in the program. Lesson content is directly mapped to the evidence-handling, documentation, and professional-conduct domains tested in the IAI CCSI and State Evidence Tech Cert credentialing exams.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10 for Crime Scene Environments; First Aid, CPR, and Scene Medical Emergencies; Trade Math and Measurement for Forensic Documentation; Technical Reading and Forensic Vocabulary; Objective Writing, Field Notes, and Incident Narratives; Digital Tools for Case Documentation and Data Management; Professional Ethics, Credential Pathways, and Career Readiness.
What competent looks like. Demonstrate compliance with OSHA bloodborne pathogen standards, hazard communication requirements, and correct PPE selection for crime scene environments. Apply unit conversion, scale measurement, area/volume calculation, and basic statistics to forensic documentation tasks with at least 90% accuracy. Read, interpret, and summarize technical forensic reports, chain-of-custody forms, and laboratory documents using discipline-specific vocabulary. Produce clear, objective written notes, incident narratives, and professional emails that meet law-enforcement documentation standards. Use standard digital tools—word processing, spreadsheets, and case-management software—to organize and present forensic data accurately. Identify the credential pathways (IAI CCSI, IAI Latent Print Cert, State Evidence Tech Cert), their eligibility requirements, and the ethical standards governing forensic technicians.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10 for Crime Scene Environments | 22 | theory | Students will identify physical, biological, and chemical hazards present at crime scenes and correctly apply OSHA General Industry standards—including bloodborne pathogen controls and hazard communication—to those hazards. |
| OSHA 10-Hour General Industry course materials (authorized provider), OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1030 Bloodborne Pathogens standard text, OSHA Hazard Communication standard summary, sample SDS sheets for common crime scene chemicals (luminol, fingerprint powders, cyanoacrylate), PPE display inventory, scenario cards, hierarchy-of-controls reference card. | Successful issuance of OSHA 10-Hour card (100% completion required); written hazard-mapping exercise scored with a rubric—students must correctly identify all hazard categories and select appropriate PPE for each scenario, achieving 80% or higher to pass. |
| 2 | First Aid, CPR, and Scene Medical Emergencies | 10 | lab | Students will demonstrate hands-only CPR, use of an AED, and first aid responses to trauma, chemical exposure, and bloodborne pathogen exposure incidents at a passing level required for American Heart Association or Red Cross certification. |
| CPR mannequins and AED trainer units, First Aid/CPR course materials (AHA or Red Cross authorized provider), gloves and face shields, chemical exposure first aid reference card, blank incident report forms, post-exposure control plan template. | Certification card issued by the authorized provider (pass/fail per provider standards); first aid scenario rubric scored by instructor—students must correctly execute all critical steps for at least two of three scenarios and complete the incident report with no missing required fields. |
| 3 | Trade Math and Measurement for Forensic Documentation | 26 | theory | Students will accurately perform unit conversion between US customary and metric systems, calculate area and volume for scene sketches, apply scale factors, and compute basic descriptive statistics relevant to forensic measurement tasks. |
| Scientific calculator, steel measuring tape (25 ft), laser distance meter, graph paper, ruler, protractor, pencils, unit-conversion reference card, bloodstain angle worksheet, mock scene furniture and markers, IAI CCSI Candidate Study Guide (measurement and documentation sections). | Worksheet score of 85% or higher; mock scene sketch assessed against a rubric for correct scale, labeled dimensions, north arrow, legend, and unit consistency—all five required elements must be present and accurate to pass. |
| 4 | Technical Reading and Forensic Vocabulary | 20 | theory | Students will read and accurately interpret forensic laboratory reports, chain-of-custody forms, crime scene examination reports, and court-admissible evidence logs using correct discipline-specific terminology. |
| Redacted sample forensic lab reports, sample chain-of-custody forms, sample evidence logs, vocabulary flashcard set (instructor-prepared from IAI CCSI content outline), IAI CCSI Candidate Handbook, structured annotation worksheet. | Vocabulary quiz score of 80% or higher (40 terms); chain-of-custody error identification exercise—students must correctly identify and explain all four planted errors to pass, with partial credit for three; annotation sheet reviewed for accuracy of plain-language summaries. |
| 5 | Objective Writing, Field Notes, and Incident Narratives | 24 | practice | Students will produce factual, objective, and legally defensible written field notes and incident narratives that comply with law-enforcement documentation standards and contain no opinions, unsupported conclusions, or prohibited language. |
| Staged scene walkthrough video (instructor-produced), model field notes answer key, opinion-to-fact editing worksheet, fictional crime scene field notes packet, scene photograph set (8 photos), incident narrative rubric, word processor access. | Incident narrative scored with rubric—students must score 80% or higher overall, with no score below 70% in the objectivity category, to pass; peer review feedback is formative only. |
| 6 | Digital Tools for Case Documentation and Data Management | 24 | lab | Students will use word processing, spreadsheet, and basic case-management software to create, organize, and present forensic case data accurately and in formats acceptable for evidentiary purposes. |
| Computers with word processing and spreadsheet software, agency style guide (instructor-created sample), raw incident narrative for formatting, 20-item evidence inventory data set, case-management software demo access or structured Excel/Access surrogate, model chain-of-custody report. | Formatted narrative checked against style guide—all required formatting elements must be correct (0 tolerance on page numbering and date format errors); spreadsheet evidence summary assessed for formula accuracy and correct totals (90% of cells must be error-free); chain-of-custody export compared to model—all five entries must match on every required field. |
| 7 | Professional Ethics, Credential Pathways, and Career Readiness | 22 | theory | Students will describe the eligibility requirements and exam domains for the IAI CCSI, IAI Latent Print Cert, and State Evidence Tech Cert credentials, articulate the ethical standards governing forensic technicians, and produce a career-readiness portfolio that meets professional application standards. |
| IAI CCSI Candidate Handbook, IAI Latent Print Certification information sheet, state licensing board credential requirements summary, NIST or NAS forensic science reform report excerpts, publicly documented case study readings, resume template, cover letter template, blank job application forms, IAI Code of Ethics. | Credential-comparison chart reviewed for accuracy on all required fields—no factual errors permitted on eligibility or exam domain descriptions; ethics reflection scored with a rubric (80% required, with the 'standard violated' and 'correct procedure' elements both required to be correct); career portfolio assessed for completeness—all five documents must be present and the resume and cover letter must contain no unprofessional language or formatting errors to pass. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Regulatory Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% correct (must score 100% on bloodborne pathogen and PPE selection items, which are flagged as critical safety items) | A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering OSHA 10 content, bloodborne pathogen standard requirements, hazard communication, PPE selection logic, first aid procedures, and post-exposure reporting, all contextualized to crime scene environments. This exam maps to the safety and professional practice domains of the IAI CCSI and State Evidence Tech Cert. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Math, Vocabulary, and Technical Reading Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% overall; no sub-section may fall below 70% | A 60-question exam in three sections: (1) 20 calculation problems covering unit conversion, scale, area/volume, and basic statistics; (2) 20 vocabulary matching and definition items drawn from IAI CCSI exam content areas; (3) 20 comprehension questions based on two provided forensic documents (a lab report and a chain-of-custody form). This exam maps to the documentation and evidence-handling knowledge domains of the IAI CCSI. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Integrated Documentation Project | Project | 25% | 80% on the scoring rubric; objectivity category minimum 75%; all required document components must be present | Students receive a packet of raw materials for a fictional scene (rough sketch, unformatted field notes, a 10-photo set, and an evidence inventory list) and must produce a complete case documentation package: formatted incident narrative, scaled scene sketch with legend, evidence log spreadsheet, and chain-of-custody form, all submitted as a single PDF. The rubric assesses accuracy, objectivity, formatting compliance, mathematical correctness of measurements, and completeness. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Professional Ethics and Career Oral Defense | Oral / panel | 25% | Pass on all four rubric categories: credential knowledge, ethical reasoning, communication clarity, and professional demeanor—any category scored as 'unsatisfactory' requires a single retake | Each student presents their career-readiness portfolio and credential-comparison chart to a panel of the instructor and one industry guest, then responds to five structured questions covering credential eligibility, a presented ethical dilemma scenario, and the student's personal code of ethics. The panel scores the student on accuracy of credential knowledge, quality of ethical reasoning, clarity of communication, and professional demeanor. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
Students learn to create a complete, court-admissible record of a crime scene using systematic search patterns, field notes, hand-drawn sketches, total-station and laser-distance measurement, and digital still/video photography. Emphasis is placed on accuracy, reproducibility, and the documentation standards required by IAI CCSI examination areas and state evidence technician certification. Every skill is practiced under realistic conditions so that the scene record can survive cross-examination and support downstream evidence analysis.
OutcomesStudents learn to create a complete, court-admissible record of a crime scene using systematic search patterns, field notes, hand-drawn sketches, total-station and laser-distance measurement, and digital still/video photography. Emphasis is placed on accuracy, reproducibility, and the documentation standards required by IAI CCSI examination areas and state evidence technician certification. Every skill is practiced under realistic conditions so that the scene record can survive cross-examination and support downstream evidence analysis.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Documentation Purpose, Legal Standards & Scene Safety Entry; Camera Fundamentals: Exposure, Focus & Depth of Field; The Overview–Mid-Range–Close-Up Photography Sequence; Outdoor & Low-Light Scene Photography; Field Notes: Systematic Recording & Scene Narrative; Rough Sketching: Measurement Techniques & Hand-Drawn Diagrams; Finished Scale Diagrams Using CAD-Lite or Drawing Software; Laser Distance Measurers & Entry-Level Total Station Operation; Video Documentation & Drone/Aerial Overview Awareness; Documentation Errors, Quality Control & Peer Review; Integrated Scene Documentation Exercise — Full Simulation; IAI CCSI Documentation Exam Area Review & Mock Written Assessment.
What competent looks like. Photograph an outdoor and indoor crime scene using the overview-mid-range-close-up sequence, producing images that meet IAI CCSI documentation standards with correct exposure, focus, and scale markers. Produce a hand-drawn rough sketch and a finished scale diagram of a crime scene containing at least five items of evidence, using triangulation and baseline measurement accurate to ±0.1 ft. Operate a laser distance measurer and an entry-level total station to collect coordinate data and generate a simple scene plot. Write a complete scene examination report — including agency information, date/time, weather, personnel, narrative, and itemized evidence list — free of ambiguity and consistent with the photographic and sketch record. Apply all scene-entry safety protocols, including PPE donning sequence, contamination-avoidance paths, and biohazard scene controls, before touching any documentation equipment. Identify and correct at least five common documentation errors (missing scale, unlabeled north arrow, broken photo sequence, measurement transposition, incomplete chain-of-custody notation) during a simulated peer-review exercise.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Documentation Purpose, Legal Standards & Scene Safety Entry | 10.5 | theory | Students will explain why scene documentation must be objective, reproducible, and tamper-evident, and will correctly don full PPE before entering a simulated scene. |
| IAI CCSI Candidate Study Guide; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.132 PPE standard handout; Tyvek suits, nitrile gloves (two layers), boot covers, N95 respirators; contamination-avoidance path tape; whiteboard and projector. | Exit ticket: five short-answer questions on documentation purpose and legal standards (80% correct required); instructor initialing a PPE-donning checklist with zero sequence errors. |
| 2 | Camera Fundamentals: Exposure, Focus & Depth of Field | 13 | demo | Students will adjust aperture, shutter speed, and ISO on a DSLR to produce a correctly exposed, sharp image of a small evidence item under three different lighting conditions. |
| DSLR cameras (one per two students); 50 mm and 18–55 mm lenses; external flash units; light stands with daylight, fluorescent, and tungsten bulbs; evidence placards; HDMI cable and projector; camera settings log sheet. | Instructor reviews three submitted images (one per lighting condition) against an exposure rubric: histogram within mid-tones, subject in focus across full depth, no motion blur — all three images must pass to receive credit. |
| 3 | The Overview–Mid-Range–Close-Up Photography Sequence | 13 | practice | Students will photograph a staged indoor scene using the complete overview–mid-range–close-up sequence, producing a logically ordered image set that allows a viewer who was never present to understand the scene layout and the position of every item. |
| DSLR cameras; scale markers (ABFO No. 2 scales); numbered evidence placards (1–5); staged indoor scene room or equivalent space; photography plan worksheet; photo log template; lab computers with image-import software. | Photo log and image folder reviewed against a 15-point checklist (compass overviews present, each item has a contextual mid-range, paired close-ups with and without scale, no out-of-focus close-ups, correct naming convention) — 13 of 15 points required to pass. |
| 4 | Outdoor & Low-Light Scene Photography | 10.5 | field | Students will photograph a simulated outdoor scene at dusk or in low-light conditions using fill flash, painting-with-light, or high-ISO technique and produce a complete, usable image set. |
| DSLR cameras; tripods; external flash units; remote shutter releases; high-lumen flashlights; portable battery-powered projector; ABFO scales; after-action reflection sheet; PPE (hi-vis vests for outdoor work area). | Instructor selects three random images from each student's set and scores against exposure, focus, and sequence rubric — all three must be usable (histogram acceptable, subject in focus, scale visible in close-ups) to pass. |
| 5 | Field Notes: Systematic Recording & Scene Narrative | 10.5 | theory | Students will write a complete, time-stamped field note entry for a simulated scene — including agency header, personnel log, weather, scene description narrative, and itemized evidence list — that matches a provided photographic record with no factual contradictions. |
| Printed 20-image photo sets (same staged scene used in Lesson 3); agency field note forms; contradiction-check checklist; pens (non-erasable blue or black ink per field standard); instructor annotated example notes (good and bad). | Instructor scores final revised notes against a 12-item rubric (header complete, timestamps present, narrative in active voice, north orientation stated, every photo-documented item listed) — 10 of 12 required. |
| 6 | Rough Sketching: Measurement Techniques & Hand-Drawn Diagrams | 13 | practice | Students will produce a complete rough sketch of a staged indoor scene using baseline and triangulation measurements accurate to ±0.1 ft, with a north arrow, title block, legend, and all five evidence items correctly located. |
| 100 ft fiberglass tape measures; 25 ft steel tape measures; rough sketch forms with title block; pencils and erasers; numbered evidence markers; staged indoor room; instructor measurement key; rulers. | Rough sketch scored on 10-item checklist (title block, north arrow, legend, room dimensions, five evidence items located, two measurement methods used, readable scale notation) — 9 of 10 required; any measurement error >0.1 ft requires a re-measure. |
| 7 | Finished Scale Diagrams Using CAD-Lite or Drawing Software | 13 | lab | Students will convert their Lesson 6 rough sketch into a finished scale diagram using digital drawing software, producing a print-ready plan view accurate to the original measurements that could be submitted as a court exhibit. |
| Lab computers with free or low-cost 2-D drawing software (e.g., RoomSketcher, SketchUp Free, or agency-standard CAD-lite); printed rough sketches from Lesson 6; self-audit comparison form; printer; scale rulers for verification. | Finished diagram compared by instructor against Lesson 6 rough sketch on an 8-item accuracy checklist — all room dimensions within ±0.05 ft of rough sketch, all five evidence items within ±0.1 ft of rough-sketch location, north arrow and scale bar present; all 8 items must pass. |
| 8 | Laser Distance Measurers & Entry-Level Total Station Operation | 13 | demo | Students will collect distance and coordinate data for at least six points in an outdoor scene using a laser distance measurer and entry-level total station, then transfer the data to a plot diagram. |
| Laser distance measurers (one per two students); entry-level total station (one unit, shared rotation); prism poles; tripod; laptop with data-transfer cable; spreadsheet template; graph paper; steel tape for verification; outdoor practice lot. | Instructor compares student-collected distances against key measurements — all six laser distances within ±0.05 ft, and the three total-station coordinates plot within ±0.1 ft of known positions on the instructor's reference plot. |
| 9 | Video Documentation & Drone/Aerial Overview Awareness | 10.5 | demo | Students will produce a narrated walk-through video of a staged indoor scene that follows a systematic path, keeps the camera steady, and provides clear verbal identification of every item documented. |
| Smartphones or camcorders; tripod or stabilizer; staged indoor scene; self-review video checklist; projector for good/bad example playback; FAA Part 107 overview handout. | Instructor reviews each student's video using a 10-item checklist (entry narration complete, clockwise path maintained, no uncontrolled camera shake, each numbered item verbally identified and briefly zoomed) — 9 of 10 required. |
| 10 | Documentation Errors, Quality Control & Peer Review | 10.5 | practice | Students will identify and document at least five distinct documentation errors in a deliberately flawed scene-record package (photos, sketch, notes) and propose specific corrections for each. |
| Printed flawed scene packages (one per student); annotation pens (red); consolidated error report form; projector for group presentations; IAI CCSI documentation standards reference sheet. | Each student's independent annotation must identify at least 5 of the 8 planted errors before the group discussion begins — students who identify fewer than 5 individually must complete a corrective annotation exercise on a second flawed package. |
| 11 | Integrated Scene Documentation Exercise — Full Simulation | 19.5 | field | Students will independently document a full simulated crime scene — producing a complete photo log and image set, rough sketch with measurements, finished scale diagram, and scene narrative — within a realistic time limit and without instructor prompting. |
| All documentation equipment from prior lessons (cameras, scales, tape measures, laser measurer, sketch forms, lab computers); staged combined indoor/outdoor scene with eight numbered evidence items; dispatch sheet template; pre-scene checklist; PPE. | Package scored on a 20-point integrated rubric (photos: 8 points; sketch/diagram: 6 points; notes: 6 points) — 16 of 20 points required to pass; any critical omission (no north arrow, no scale in close-ups, evidence item missing from notes and diagram simultaneously) requires a repeat simulation. |
| 12 | IAI CCSI Documentation Exam Area Review & Mock Written Assessment | 9 | theory | Students will correctly answer at least 80% of practice questions covering IAI CCSI examination areas related to scene documentation and photography, identifying their individual weak areas before the formal course assessment. |
| IAI CCSI content-area matrix handout; 40-question mock exam (printed); answer key; targeted study plan form; whiteboard for Q&A. | Students scoring below 80% on the mock exam must meet individually with the instructor before the formal knowledge exam to review flagged items — passing the mock exam at ≥80% is tracked but not a course grade; it is a readiness indicator. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scene Documentation Written Examination | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (30 of 40 questions correct) | A 40-question closed-book examination covering photography exposure and sequence standards, measurement and sketching methods, field note requirements, legal admissibility principles, and common documentation errors, mapped to IAI CCSI examination content areas for documentation and photography. Questions are multiple-choice and short-answer; students have 60 minutes. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Full Scene Documentation Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | 16 of 20 points on the integrated rubric; no critical omissions | Students independently document a staged scene (minimum eight evidence items, mixed indoor/outdoor) within a set time limit, submitting a complete photo log and image set, rough sketch, finished scale diagram, and scene narrative — scored against the same 20-point rubric used in Lesson 11, with any critical omission (missing scale in all close-ups, evidence item absent from both notes and diagram) resulting in an automatic retest. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Documentation Lab Log | Log | 15% | All 12 lessons logged with instructor initials; average rubric score ≥75% across logged activities | Students maintain a running lab log throughout the course, entering the date, lesson title, equipment used, measurements taken, images captured, and a brief reflection on what was learned and what needs improvement for each hands-on lesson; the instructor initials each entry at the end of the lesson, and the log is submitted as a complete bound or digital record at the end of the course. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Scene Entry & PPE Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | Zero critical errors on the safety checklist; completed before Lesson 3 begins | A pass/fail practical safety check conducted by the instructor: the student dons full PPE (Tyvek suit, double nitrile gloves, boot covers, appropriate respiratory protection) in correct sequence, enters a simulated scene along the designated contamination-avoidance path without touching any evidence, and then doffs PPE in the correct sequence without self-contamination — any breach of sequence or scene contact is a critical error requiring an immediate repeat attempt. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students learn the systematic methods for recognizing, documenting, collecting, packaging, and preserving physical evidence at crime scenes in accordance with accepted forensic standards. The course covers legal and scientific chain-of-custody requirements from first contact with evidence through laboratory submission and courtroom presentation. Competencies directly support the IAI CCSI exam domains for evidence handling and the State Evidence Tech Cert legal requirements.
OutcomesStudents learn the systematic methods for recognizing, documenting, collecting, packaging, and preserving physical evidence at crime scenes in accordance with accepted forensic standards. The course covers legal and scientific chain-of-custody requirements from first contact with evidence through laboratory submission and courtroom presentation. Competencies directly support the IAI CCSI exam domains for evidence handling and the State Evidence Tech Cert legal requirements.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Legal Foundations of Evidence and the Fourth Amendment; Chain of Custody: Principles, Documentation, and Legal Weight; PPE, Contamination Control, and Scene Safety for Evidence Collectors; Crime Scene Search Patterns and Evidence Prioritization; Evidence Recognition and Prioritization by Category; Collection Techniques for Biological Evidence; Collection and Packaging of Trace, Impression, and Toolmark Evidence; Collection of Digital and Electronic Evidence; Packaging, Sealing, and Labeling Standards; Evidence Submission, Property Room Procedures, and Lab Intake; Courtroom Admissibility, Daubert/Frye Standards, and Testimony Foundations; Integrated Evidence Collection Practical: Full Scene Simulation.
What competent looks like. Demonstrate proper recognition, prioritization, and collection of at least eight classes of physical evidence using agency-standard techniques without contaminating the sample. Complete legally defensible chain-of-custody documentation for every item collected, traceable from scene to lab, with zero unaccounted transfers. Select and apply the correct packaging material and preservation method for biological, chemical, trace, and digital evidence in accordance with current forensic guidelines. Explain the legal basis for evidence admissibility, including Fourth Amendment considerations, and articulate how improper collection or custody breaks can render evidence inadmissible. Perform scene search patterns (grid, spiral, zone, strip) and justify pattern selection based on scene type, size, and evidence distribution. Apply required personal protective equipment and decontamination procedures for each evidence category to prevent cross-contamination and protect personal safety.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legal Foundations of Evidence and the Fourth Amendment | 10.5 | theory | Students will explain how the Fourth Amendment, search warrants, consent, and plain-view doctrine govern evidence collection and will identify at least five scenarios in which improperly obtained evidence may be suppressed. |
| Textbook: Fisher, B.A.J. & Fisher, D.R., Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation (8th ed.); U.S. Constitution Fourth Amendment text; printed scenario cards; legal decision-tree handout; whiteboard. | Written scenario-analysis quiz: 10 scenarios scored by instructor; pass = 70% correct identification of admissibility status with correct legal rationale cited. |
| 2 | Chain of Custody: Principles, Documentation, and Legal Weight | 13 | theory | Students will complete a chain-of-custody form for a mock set of evidence items, accurately recording every transfer with no missing fields, and explain how a broken chain affects courtroom admissibility. |
| Standard agency chain-of-custody forms (blank); evidence log sheets; scenario packets; peer-review rubric; IAI CCSI study guide excerpts; ballpoint pens (no erasable ink). | Instructor reviews each student's completed chain-of-custody form against a 15-point checklist (date, time, item number, description, collector, every transfer signed); pass = zero missing required fields and zero inaccurate item descriptions. |
| 3 | PPE, Contamination Control, and Scene Safety for Evidence Collectors | 10.5 | demo | Students will don and doff a full evidence-collection PPE ensemble (gloves, Tyvek suit, booties, mask) correctly, explain the rationale for each layer, and describe decontamination procedures that prevent cross-contamination between items. |
| Nitrile gloves (multiple sizes), Tyvek suits, N95 respirators, boot covers, safety glasses; UV lamp; fluorescent contamination powder; PPE donning/doffing checklist; masking tape for zone demarcation; biohazard bags. | Instructor observes each student's donning/doffing sequence using a 10-step checklist; pass = no steps out of order and no simulated self-contamination detected under UV inspection. |
| 4 | Crime Scene Search Patterns and Evidence Prioritization | 13 | practice | Students will execute at least three scene-search patterns (grid, zone, spiral) on a simulated outdoor and indoor scene, justify their pattern choice in writing, and correctly identify and flag all planted evidence items. |
| Measuring tape (100 ft); numbered evidence flags; sketch paper and pencils; clipboard; printed search-pattern handouts; cones for grid corners; outdoor practice area. | Team recovers at least 10 of 12 planted items (83%) and each individual student submits a written justification earning at least 4 of 5 points on the rubric (clarity, pattern selected, rationale, scene factors addressed, grammar). |
| 5 | Evidence Recognition and Prioritization by Category | 10.5 | theory | Students will correctly classify a set of 20 photographic evidence samples into at least seven recognized forensic evidence categories and rank collection priority based on fragility and environmental risk. |
| Projected slideshow (20 scene images); printed answer sheets; whiteboard and markers; scene narrative handouts; Fisher & Fisher textbook chapters on evidence classification. | Individual written classification quiz on 20 images plus a five-item priority-ranking exercise; pass = 75% accuracy on classification and correct top-three priority items identified with valid rationale. |
| 6 | Collection Techniques for Biological Evidence | 15 | lab | Students will collect simulated biological evidence (dried bloodstains, saliva swabs, hair) using accepted swabbing, cutting, and tape-lift techniques without contaminating the sample, and package each specimen correctly for laboratory submission. |
| Cotton swabs; sterile distilled water; simulated bloodstain fabric swatches (dye-based); paper envelopes and bags; desiccant packets; forceps; clear tape; acetate backing; evidence submission forms; evidence tape; permanent markers; nitrile gloves; Tyvek suits. | Instructor evaluates each student's packaged biological evidence set against a 12-point packaging rubric (correct container type, desiccant present, sealed with initialed tape, all label fields complete, no cross-contamination visible); pass = 10 of 12 points. |
| 7 | Collection and Packaging of Trace, Impression, and Toolmark Evidence | 15 | lab | Students will recover trace evidence using tape lifts, electrostatic lifting devices (ESDA), and vacuum collection; cast a two-dimensional impression in dental stone; and package toolmark evidence without altering the mark. |
| Electrostatic lifting device (ESDA); dental stone powder; mixing bowls; water; shoe-impression forms in sand trays; rubber spatulas; toolmark coupons (soft aluminum); camera with macro lens; photo scales; rigid evidence containers; foam padding; evidence forms. | Each student submits one ESDA lift, one dental stone cast, and one packaged toolmark coupon with completed forms; instructor checks against a 15-point rubric covering documentation accuracy, packaging integrity, and absence of damage to evidence; pass = 12 of 15 points. |
| 8 | Collection of Digital and Electronic Evidence | 10.5 | demo | Students will describe first-responder protocols for digital evidence (phones, computers, storage media) and demonstrate correct collection, packaging, and documentation steps that preserve electronic data integrity without powering devices on or off improperly. |
| Faraday bags (various sizes); dummy mobile phones; anti-static bags; printed scenario handout; digital evidence submission forms; camera; permanent markers; SWGDE best-practice reference handout. | Instructor observes each student place a dummy phone in a Faraday bag and complete the label; graded with a 6-point checklist (bag sealed, label complete, rationale explained verbally); plus scenario written response graded for completeness; pass = 5 of 6 points on bag procedure and 75% on scenario. |
| 9 | Packaging, Sealing, and Labeling Standards | 10.5 | practice | Students will package and label a mixed set of eight evidence items—spanning biological, trace, impression, and digital categories—using the correct container type for each, with all required label fields completed and tamper-evident sealing applied. |
| Paper bags and envelopes (assorted sizes); rigid cardboard evidence boxes; Faraday bags; anti-static bags; desiccant; evidence tape; permanent markers; printed packaging decision matrix; peer-audit checklist; mixed simulated evidence items from prior labs. | Instructor audits each student's eight-item packaged set against the 10-point checklist per item (80 points total); pass = 72 of 80 points (90%) with no item using a categorically wrong container type. |
| 10 | Evidence Submission, Property Room Procedures, and Lab Intake | 10.5 | field | Students will complete a simulated property-room evidence submission workflow—including intake forms, locker assignment, refrigeration for biologicals, and temporary release documentation—demonstrating compliance with standard property-room protocols. |
| Simulated property room (or partner agency); evidence intake forms; storage logs; refrigerator/freezer for biological storage; temporary-release forms; pre-packaged mock evidence sets; guided observation form; case folders. | Instructor evaluates submission paperwork completeness (intake form, receipt, case-folder copy) using an 8-point checklist; pass = all 8 fields correct and verbal hand-off observed to include item count confirmation and condition statement. |
| 11 | Courtroom Admissibility, Daubert/Frye Standards, and Testimony Foundations | 8.5 | theory | Students will explain the Daubert and Frye standards for scientific evidence admissibility and describe how collection and chain-of-custody documentation directly supports or undermines an expert's ability to testify about physical evidence. |
| Daubert/Frye summary handout; compare-contrast worksheet; mock suppression motion document; mock direct-examination script; Fisher & Fisher textbook chapter on admissibility. | Written 10-question quiz on Daubert/Frye criteria and chain-of-custody admissibility concepts; pass = 70%; plus instructor rates mock testimony on a 5-point rubric (accuracy, documentation reference, composure, clarity, responsiveness); pass = 4 of 5. |
| 12 | Integrated Evidence Collection Practical: Full Scene Simulation | 18.5 | lab | Working individually, students will process a staged multi-evidence crime scene from arrival through evidence submission, producing a complete, legally defensible evidence package—search pattern documentation, collection notes, chain-of-custody forms, and packaged items—with no critical errors. |
| Staged scene with planted evidence (biological swatches, trace fibers, shoe impression, digital dummy device, documentary evidence, toolmark coupon); full PPE kit; evidence collection toolkit; chain-of-custody forms; packaging materials; property-room intake forms; self-assessment checklist; camera. | Instructor scores using a 40-point integrated rubric: PPE compliance (5 pts), search pattern execution and documentation (5 pts), correct collection technique per item (10 pts), correct packaging and labeling per item (10 pts), chain-of-custody completeness (10 pts); pass = 32 of 40 points (80%) with no critical error (wrong container for biological evidence, missing seal, or undocumented transfer). |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence Law and Chain-of-Custody Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 70% correct (42 of 60 points) | A 60-question written exam covering Fourth Amendment doctrine, chain-of-custody legal requirements, evidence categories and classification, Daubert/Frye admissibility standards, and packaging selection rationale. Questions are multiple choice and short answer; the exam maps directly to IAI CCSI exam domain areas covering evidence collection principles and legal foundations. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Integrated Scene Processing Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | 80% on the 40-point rubric with zero critical errors | Students individually process the Lesson 12 staged crime scene, and the instructor scores the complete workflow—PPE compliance, search pattern execution, collection technique, packaging and labeling, and chain-of-custody documentation—using the 40-point rubric. This performance assessment maps to the IAI CCSI practical competency domain and the State Evidence Tech Cert requirement for demonstrated collection proficiency. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Evidence Collection Lab Log | Log | 15% | All 12 lesson entries complete; average entry score of 80% on the 5-point entry rubric | Students maintain a running lab log throughout the course documenting their procedures, observations, packaging decisions, and chain-of-custody entries for every hands-on lesson. Each entry is scored on accuracy, completeness, correct terminology, chain-of-custody correctness, and legibility; the log is reviewed at mid-course and at course end. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| PPE and Decontamination Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% on critical safety steps; overall 90% on 10-point checklist | Instructor administers an unannounced observation during one of the lab lessons in which students must correctly don full PPE, collect evidence from a UV-powder-contaminated surface, and doff without self-contaminating, using a 10-point checklist. Any failure on the three critical steps (glove integrity, doffing sequence, biohazard bag disposal) requires immediate remediation and retest before the student may continue lab work. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students develop hands-on competency in the full latent-print workflow: developing and recovering prints from a wide range of substrates using physical and chemical methods, documenting and lifting results, and performing ACE-V comparison to link or exclude a suspect print. The course maps directly to the IAI Certified Crime Scene Investigator (CCSI) and IAI Latent Print Certification exam domains, with safety and chain-of-custody discipline integrated throughout every lab session.
OutcomesStudents develop hands-on competency in the full latent-print workflow: developing and recovering prints from a wide range of substrates using physical and chemical methods, documenting and lifting results, and performing ACE-V comparison to link or exclude a suspect print. The course maps directly to the IAI Certified Crime Scene Investigator (CCSI) and IAI Latent Print Certification exam domains, with safety and chain-of-custody discipline integrated throughout every lab session.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Friction Ridge Skin: Anatomy, Formation, and Persistence; Safety, PPE, and Chemical Hygiene for Latent-Print Work; Fingerprint Classification, Terminology, and Level-Detail Analysis; Powder Development: Techniques and Substrate Selection; Lifting Techniques and Evidence Packaging; Chemical Development: Cyanoacrylate Fuming; Chemical Development: Amino-Acid Reagents on Porous Surfaces; Alternate Light Source (ALS) and Fingerprint Photography; ACE-V Methodology: Principles and Controlled Practice; AFIS: Entry, Searching, and Candidate Evaluation; Integrated Scene Simulation: Full Latent-Print Workflow; Review, Competency Self-Assessment, and Exam Mapping.
What competent looks like. Select and apply the correct development technique—powder, chemical, or alternate light source—based on substrate type and contamination conditions. Lift, package, label, and submit latent-print evidence in strict compliance with chain-of-custody requirements. Photograph developed latent prints with scale and oblique lighting to produce court-admissible images. Apply the ACE-V methodology (Analysis, Comparison, Evaluation, Verification) to reach a documented, defensible conclusion on print identification or exclusion. Operate an AFIS terminal to enter an unknown print and interpret candidate matches for follow-up manual comparison. Work safely with all chemical developers—cyanoacrylate, ninhydrin, DFO, physical developer—using required PPE, ventilation controls, and chemical hygiene procedures consistent with OSHA and laboratory safety standards.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Friction Ridge Skin: Anatomy, Formation, and Persistence | 10 | theory | Students will explain how friction ridge skin forms, why ridge detail is permanent after fetal development, and how three print types (latent, patent, plastic) differ in recovery approach. |
| Friction ridge anatomy diagrams, SWGFAST glossary of friction ridge terminology (archived reference), Ashbaugh 'Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis' Chapter 1–2, substrate sample set, whiteboard | 15-question identification quiz on anatomy, print types, and substrate suitability; pass mark 80% (12/15 correct). |
| 2 | Safety, PPE, and Chemical Hygiene for Latent-Print Work | 10 | theory | Students will identify the health hazards of each major latent-print chemical and demonstrate correct PPE selection, ventilation requirements, spill response, and SDS interpretation before handling any chemical in subsequent labs. |
| SDS packets for CA glue, ninhydrin, DFO, physical developer; nitrile gloves (powder-free), safety glasses, half-face respirators with OV cartridges, lab coats, PPE donning/doffing checklist, OSHA Hazard Communication standard summary | SDS worksheet graded for accuracy on all four chemicals; PPE donning/doffing observed by instructor with zero critical errors allowed; scenario responses must correctly cite SDS sections—all three components must pass (100% on safety items) before student may enter the chemical lab. |
| 3 | Fingerprint Classification, Terminology, and Level-Detail Analysis | 12 | theory | Students will classify a set of 20 fingerprint images by pattern type (loop, whorl, arch) and correctly identify a minimum of eight Level 2 detail features (ridge endings, bifurcations, dots, short ridges, enclosures, spurs) per print using standard SWGFAST terminology. |
| Sets of inked exemplar print cards, printed latent-print enlargements, SWGFAST glossary, colored pencils, classification chart worksheets, NCIC fingerprint classification reference card | Classification drill: 85% accuracy (17/20 correct patterns); minutiae mapping: minimum 8 correctly labeled features per print verified by instructor overlay; vocabulary quiz: 80% (24/30). |
| 4 | Powder Development: Techniques and Substrate Selection | 14 | lab | Students will develop latent prints on five different substrate types using the correct powder (black, white, magnetic, fluorescent) and brush technique, achieving a minimum of three identifiable prints per substrate set. |
| Black fingerprint powder, white fingerprint powder, magnetic powder, fluorescent powder, fiberglass brush, magnetic wand brush, camel-hair brush, substrate sets (glass plates, aluminum beverage cans, plastic containers, painted wood panels, glossy paper), scale cards, DSLR camera with macro lens, ring flash and oblique light source, lab log forms | Lab log reviewed for correct powder selection and reasoning on all 15 substrates (80% correct choices); minimum three identifiable prints developed per five substrate types; photographs pass quality checklist (ridge detail visible, scale present, no motion blur)—instructor signs off. |
| 5 | Lifting Techniques and Evidence Packaging | 10 | lab | Students will lift developed latent prints using rubber, gel, and hinged lifters without distortion, mount or package each lift correctly, and complete all chain-of-custody documentation with zero omissions. |
| Rubber lifters (black and white), gel lifters, hinged lifters, backing cards, evidence envelopes, evidence tape, evidence labels, chain-of-custody forms, evidence submission forms, mock evidence locker, marker pens | All 12 lifts assessed: no print distortion (instructor compares lift to photograph), all labels complete and legible, chain-of-custody form error-free—any missing field on a CoC form is an automatic resubmit; overall pass requires 10/12 lifts meeting quality standard and zero CoC errors. |
| 6 | Chemical Development: Cyanoacrylate Fuming | 12 | lab | Students will safely conduct a cyanoacrylate (superglue) fuming session in a ventilated chamber, produce polymerized ridge detail on at least four non-porous items, and document results with proper photography and chain-of-custody entries. |
| CA fuming cabinet with ventilation, cyanoacrylate (ethyl or methyl), CA reservoir dishes, heat source, hygrometer/thermometer, nitrile gloves, safety glasses, half-face respirator with OV cartridge, prepared non-porous substrate set, Rhodamine 6G dye stain (or equivalent), alternate light source (ALS), lab log forms, DSLR camera, scale cards | Pre-lab safety quiz: 100% correct required to proceed; fuming lab log complete with all environmental data; minimum four fumed items with visible ridge detail confirmed by instructor; photographs meet quality checklist—all components must pass. |
| 7 | Chemical Development: Amino-Acid Reagents on Porous Surfaces | 14 | lab | Students will apply ninhydrin and DFO reagents to porous substrates in the correct sequence, use heat and humidity appropriately to develop color, and photograph results under white light and alternate light source to produce admissible-quality images. |
| Ninhydrin solution, DFO solution, fume hood or spray booth, safety glasses, nitrile gloves, chemical-resistant apron, heat gun or steam iron, porous substrate set (white paper, newsprint, brown paper bag, cardboard), ALS unit (blue-green wavelength), orange barrier filter goggles, DSLR camera, lab log forms, SWGMAT guidelines for chemical development | Sequencing worksheet 80% correct; lab log entries complete for both reagents on all substrates; at least three identifiable prints developed under each method; photographs show ridge detail under both white light and ALS—instructor sign-off required. |
| 8 | Alternate Light Source (ALS) and Fingerprint Photography | 12 | demo | Students will configure an ALS unit at the correct wavelength and select the matching barrier filter to maximize print contrast, then produce a complete photographic series of a latent print that meets court-admissible documentation standards. |
| ALS unit with multiple wavelength outputs, barrier filter goggle set, DSLR camera, tripod, cable shutter release, ABFO No. 2 scale cards, darkened room or blackout curtain, prints developed with CA + Rhodamine, DFO, fluorescent powder, and physical developer, worksheet for wavelength selection | Wavelength/filter selection worksheet 80% correct; full documentation series reviewed against a 10-point checklist (orientation shot, mid-range shot, close-up with scale, close-up without scale, ALS images with and without scale, case label visible, sharp focus, correct white balance, no blown highlights, adequate ridge contrast)—8 of 10 criteria met to pass. |
| 9 | ACE-V Methodology: Principles and Controlled Practice | 14 | practice | Students will apply each step of the ACE-V process—Analysis of the latent unknown, Comparison to an exemplar, Evaluation to a conclusion (identification, exclusion, or inconclusive), and Verification notation—and document their reasoning in a structured case worksheet. |
| Printed latent-print comparison packets (10 pairs), ACE-V structured worksheet forms, print enlargement sheets, colored pencils for feature annotation, IAI and SWGFAST position statements on friction ridge analysis and ACE-V, projector | ACE-V worksheets graded: correct conclusion on at least 8 of 10 pairs (80%); each worksheet must show documented feature comparison with minimum five comparison points noted; peer verification discrepancies must be resolved in writing—instructor reviews all worksheets before final sign-off. |
| 10 | AFIS: Entry, Searching, and Candidate Evaluation | 12 | practice | Students will enter an unknown latent print into an AFIS training terminal, evaluate the system-generated candidate list using manual ACE-V comparison, and document a preliminary identification or no-match conclusion with supporting notes. |
| AFIS training workstation (state-provided training access or NIST/NIST-recommended simulation), unknown latent print images, candidate list printouts, ACE-V report form, AFIS user guide or training manual, SWGFAST documentation of latent print examination guidelines | AFIS entry assessed for correct minutiae placement (instructor compares to reference encoding; 80% agreement required); candidate evaluation report must include a stated conclusion, minimum four documented comparison points, and a verification recommendation—all three elements present to pass. |
| 11 | Integrated Scene Simulation: Full Latent-Print Workflow | 12 | field | Students will independently execute the complete latent-print workflow—scene approach, surface assessment, technique selection, development, photography, lifting, packaging, chain-of-custody documentation, and a written preliminary comparison report—in a realistic simulated crime scene without instructor prompting. |
| Simulated crime scene room with preloaded latent prints on mixed surfaces, full powder and chemical development kit, CA fuming cabinet, ALS unit, DSLR camera with macro lens, full lifting kit, evidence packaging materials, chain-of-custody forms, surface assessment worksheets, comparison report forms | Scene processing evaluated on a 20-point rubric (surface assessment complete, correct technique selected for each surface, prints developed without contamination, photographs meet quality checklist, all lifts labeled and packaged, CoC forms complete and error-free, comparison report includes documented features and stated conclusion)—16/20 points required to pass; any CoC error triggers an automatic resubmission of that form. |
| 12 | Review, Competency Self-Assessment, and Exam Mapping | 14 | theory | Students will identify any remaining knowledge or skill gaps by completing a mapped self-assessment aligned to IAI CCSI and IAI Latent Print Certification exam domains, then create a targeted study plan addressing weak areas before the course knowledge exam. |
| Domain mapping chart (IAI CCSI exam outline, IAI Latent Print exam outline), self-assessment forms, instructor review slide deck, 50-question mock exam with answer key, gap-analysis worksheet, all course handouts and lab log forms available for reference during review | Mock exam score recorded as a formative indicator; score below 75% triggers a required instructor conference and targeted remediation plan before the graded knowledge exam; gap-analysis worksheet must be completed and submitted regardless of score. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latent Prints Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% (38/50 correct) | A 50-question multiple-choice examination covering all course domains—friction ridge anatomy and permanence, print type identification, substrate and technique selection, chemical developer properties and sequencing, ALS operation, ACE-V principles, AFIS limitations, and chain-of-custody requirements. Questions are written at the application and analysis level to reflect IAI CCSI and IAI Latent Print Certification exam rigor; students may not use notes or references. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Practical Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | 80% on a 25-point instructor rubric with zero critical errors on safety or chain-of-custody items | Each student independently processes a fresh set of six prepared substrates (three non-porous, three porous), selecting and applying the correct development technique for each, photographing all results with scale and lighting, lifting and packaging three identified prints, and completing all chain-of-custody documentation. A critical error—unsafe chemical handling, missing CoC entry, or print contamination—requires an immediate repeat of that station before the overall score is recorded. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Laboratory Log Portfolio | Log | 15% | All 12 lessons' log entries present and complete; average entry quality score of 3 out of 4 on the scoring rubric | Students submit their complete lab log portfolio covering every hands-on lesson, including substrate assessments, technique selections and rationale, environmental data for chemical sessions, photograph inventories, and ACE-V comparison worksheets. Each entry is scored on a 4-point rubric (1 = incomplete, 2 = partial, 3 = complete with minor errors, 4 = complete and accurate); missing entries score 0 and must be reconstructed with instructor supervision before the portfolio is accepted. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Chemical Safety and PPE Compliance Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% on all safety-critical items; any single critical failure requires immediate remediation and recheck before the student may continue in the chemical labs | Conducted at the start of the chemical development unit (Lessons 6–7) and repeated during the integrated simulation (Lesson 11), this observed checklist confirms that each student can correctly don full PPE, identify the correct respirator cartridge for organic vapors, locate and interpret the relevant SDS sections, state the emergency procedures for a CA fume hood failure, and dispose of chemical waste in the designated container. This assessment maps directly to the safety and legal standards required for state Evidence Tech Cert compliance. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students learn to recognize, document, collect, and package bloodstain pattern evidence and trace materials—including hair, fiber, glass, and soil—using established forensic science principles and chain-of-custody procedures. Emphasis is placed on scene safety when working with biological hazards, accurate field notation, and defensible laboratory submission practices. Lesson content maps directly to the IAI CCSI examination domains covering physical evidence recognition and processing.
OutcomesStudents learn to recognize, document, collect, and package bloodstain pattern evidence and trace materials—including hair, fiber, glass, and soil—using established forensic science principles and chain-of-custody procedures. Emphasis is placed on scene safety when working with biological hazards, accurate field notation, and defensible laboratory submission practices. Lesson content maps directly to the IAI CCSI examination domains covering physical evidence recognition and processing.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Biological Hazard Safety and Bloodborne-Pathogen PPE; Donning, Doffing, and Decontamination Drill; Introduction to Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Terminology and Classification; The Physics of Blood Droplets: Shape, Angle, and Directionality; Area of Origin: Stringing and Trigonometric Methods; Transfer, Wipe, Swipe, and Void Patterns: Interpretation and Documentation; Biological Evidence Collection: Swabbing, Cutting, and Packaging; Hair and Fiber Evidence: Recognition, Collection, and Microscopic Characteristics; Glass Fracture Analysis and Collection; Soil and Paint Transfer Evidence; Scene Integration: Bloodstain and Trace Evidence in a Mock Scene; Report Writing, Courtroom Standards, and IAI CCSI Exam Mapping.
What competent looks like. Identify and classify bloodstain patterns (passive, projected, transfer) using accepted BPA terminology and communicate findings in written scene notes. Demonstrate proper bloodborne-pathogen PPE selection, donning/doffing, and decontamination procedures in compliance with OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030). Collect, package, and label biological and trace evidence samples following chain-of-custody protocols that satisfy State Evidence Tech Cert and IAI CCSI standards. Apply basic trigonometric and geometric methods to determine area of origin for convergent bloodstain patterns. Recognize, collect, and preserve trace evidence categories—hair, synthetic fiber, glass fractures, soil, and paint transfer—without contamination. Complete accurate examination-quality field sketches, scene notes, and evidence submission forms for bloodstain and trace evidence scenes.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Biological Hazard Safety and Bloodborne-Pathogen PPE | 10.5 | theory | Students will correctly identify the regulatory requirements of OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1030 and select appropriate PPE for scenes containing blood or other potentially infectious materials (OPIM) |
| OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1030 text, NIOSH PPE guidance for first responders, disposable gloves (nitrile, various mil thicknesses), Tyvek suits, N95 respirators, face shields, boot covers, PPE selection reference card | Written PPE selection quiz: 10 scenario items; students must score 80% or higher and must correctly identify full ensemble for the blood-pool and aerosolized-reagent scenarios as non-negotiable safety items |
| 2 | Donning, Doffing, and Decontamination Drill | 8.5 | demo | Students will don and doff a full biological-hazard PPE ensemble without self-contamination, following a documented step-by-step procedure |
| Tyvek suits, nitrile gloves (inner and outer), face shields, boot covers, UV-reactive lotion, UV lamp, 10% sodium hypochlorite solution, spray bottles, disposable towels, exposure-control log forms | Practical pass/fail checklist: instructor observes each don-and-doff; zero UV lotion transfer to skin or personal clothing required to pass; any transfer = immediate remediation and retest |
| 3 | Introduction to Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Terminology and Classification | 13 | theory | Students will define the standard bloodstain pattern terminology adopted by the International Association of Bloodstain Pattern Analysts (IABPA) and correctly classify stain types from photographs |
| IABPA glossary of bloodstain pattern terminology, crime-scene photograph packet (minimum 30 images representing all major pattern types), classification worksheet, projector | Pattern classification quiz: 20 photograph items; students must correctly classify and name the pattern type with 75% accuracy overall and must correctly identify all projected-pattern items (gunshot/arterial) as these carry the most courtroom significance |
| 4 | The Physics of Blood Droplets: Shape, Angle, and Directionality | 13 | lab | Students will calculate the impact angle of individual bloodstains from measured stain width-to-length ratios using the arcsine formula and confirm findings by comparing results to known drop angles |
| Red water-based simulated blood (non-biohazard lab substitute), pipettes or dropper bulbs, protractor jigs for controlled angle drops, white card stock, ruler (mm scale), calipers, calculator, graph paper, camera or smartphone for documentation | Lab data table review: calculated impact angles must be within ±5° of known angles for at least 8 of 10 test stains; percent error table and directional annotations must be complete to receive a passing lab score |
| 5 | Area of Origin: Stringing and Trigonometric Methods | 13 | lab | Students will use convergent stringing and basic trigonometry to determine the two-dimensional area of convergence and estimated height of origin for a simulated blood-spatter scene |
| Pre-set simulated spatter scene (card-stock stains affixed to floor and wall), colored string (minimum 50 ft), tape, tape measure, protractor, calculator, field sketch paper, camera | Instructor compares student-mapped convergence zone to the known origin point; zone must encompass the true origin point; height calculation must be within 20% of the known drop height; written interpretation must reference specific measurements to pass |
| 6 | Transfer, Wipe, Swipe, and Void Patterns: Interpretation and Documentation | 10.5 | practice | Students will correctly interpret transfer, wipe, swipe, and void bloodstain patterns in mock-scene photographs and produce a written pattern narrative meeting courtroom documentation standards |
| Photograph packet (15 images), simulated blood, nitrile gloves, shoe sole prop, fabric swatches, card stock, camera, IABPA terminology reference, field notebook | Written pattern narratives reviewed by instructor against a rubric: narrative must use correct IABPA terminology, state what each pattern indicates, and contain no unsupported conclusions; students must score 75% on rubric across all 15 descriptions |
| 7 | Biological Evidence Collection: Swabbing, Cutting, and Packaging | 15 | lab | Students will collect wet and dried simulated bloodstain samples using double-swab, single-swab, and cutting methods, then package and label each sample correctly for laboratory submission |
| Sterile cotton swabs, sterile scalpel handles and blades, forceps, paper coin envelopes, paper bags, evidence tape, permanent markers, chain-of-custody tags, property/evidence submission forms, desiccant packets, simulated blood on fabric swatches and ceramic tiles, camera | Instructor evaluates completed samples using a packaging checklist: all samples must be in paper (not plastic), chain-of-custody tag must be complete and unbroken, swabs must be air-dried before final packaging, and submission form must have zero blank required fields; any packaging error that could degrade DNA is an automatic fail |
| 8 | Hair and Fiber Evidence: Recognition, Collection, and Microscopic Characteristics | 13 | theory | Students will identify the microscopic characteristics used to distinguish human from animal hair and natural from synthetic fiber, and select the correct collection method for each substrate |
| Compound microscopes (minimum 400x), prepared reference slides (human and animal hair, natural and synthetic fiber), blank slide templates for student drawings, FBI Laboratory Handbook or equivalent reference, scenario cards, forceps, glassine envelopes, trace evidence collection tape | Labeled microscope drawings graded against reference images: students must correctly identify and label medulla type, cuticle scale pattern, and fiber structure for at least 4 of 6 specimens; collection-method scenario card answers must be 80% correct |
| 9 | Glass Fracture Analysis and Collection | 10.5 | demo | Students will explain radial and concentric fracture patterns in glass, determine direction of force and sequence of impacts, and collect glass fragment evidence without cross-contamination |
| Pre-broken glass panels (tempered or pre-fractured safety glass for controlled demonstration), protective barrier and face shields, forceps, rigid pillboxes or vials, cotton padding, evidence tape, chain-of-custody tags, trace evidence tape lifts, eye protection, heavy-duty gloves for glass handling | Students complete a fracture-analysis worksheet: direction-of-force determination must be correct; multi-impact sequence must be correctly ordered with written rationale citing fracture termination as evidence; glass packaging must be in a rigid container to receive a passing score |
| 10 | Soil and Paint Transfer Evidence | 10.5 | practice | Students will collect soil and paint transfer samples in a manner that preserves their forensic value for class comparison and submit them with correctly completed documentation |
| Wooden depressors, paper druggist fold sheets, glassine envelopes, rigid vials, clean scalpels, forceps, GPS device or phone with GPS, Munsell soil color chart or color reference, mock vehicle panel with paint transfer, camera, evidence submission forms | Instructor reviews collected samples and submission forms: soil sample must be in paper (not plastic) and GPS coordinates must be recorded; paint chips must be packaged to prevent layer mixing; submission forms must describe the evidence using physical observation terms only (not conclusions); all three items must meet standard to pass |
| 11 | Scene Integration: Bloodstain and Trace Evidence in a Mock Scene | 15 | field | Students will process a complete mock indoor crime scene containing bloodstain patterns and multiple trace evidence types, producing a full documentation and collection package |
| Mock indoor scene setup (simulated blood patterns, planted hair and fiber, glass fragments, soil sample, paint smear), full PPE for each student, camera, measuring tape, field sketch paper, evidence bags and packaging materials (assorted, all paper), item-numbered evidence tags, chain-of-custody log, scene narrative form | Instructor evaluates the complete documentation package using a 20-point rubric: photography coverage (5 pts), sketch accuracy and completeness (5 pts), chain-of-custody log with no gaps (5 pts), and written pattern narrative using correct terminology without unsupported conclusions (5 pts); minimum passing score is 14 of 20 |
| 12 | Report Writing, Courtroom Standards, and IAI CCSI Exam Mapping | 13.5 | theory | Students will write a complete bloodstain and trace evidence report in the format required for court submission and identify which report elements directly correspond to IAI CCSI examination content areas |
| Sample forensic field report (court-submitted format), report-writing checklist, IAI CCSI candidate information bulletin (current edition), peer review checklist, student documentation packages from Lesson 11 | Completed field report graded against a 10-point rubric: all required components present (4 pts), findings statements supported by specific measurements or observations (3 pts), no speculative conclusions (3 pts); minimum passing score is 7 of 10; the CCSI mapping table must match at least 80% of domains correctly |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloodstain Pattern and Trace Evidence Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% (38 of 50 items correct); students who score below 75% complete a targeted review and retake a parallel form within one week | A 50-item written exam covering bloodstain pattern classification and IABPA terminology, physics of blood droplet formation, area-of-origin trigonometry, trace evidence characteristics (hair, fiber, glass, soil, paint), OSHA bloodborne-pathogen requirements, and chain-of-custody principles. Questions are written at the application and analysis levels to reflect the IAI CCSI examination style. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Mock Scene Processing Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Pass requires a minimum score of 14 of 20 on the scene rubric AND zero critical safety violations (ungloved contact with simulated biological material, doffing error resulting in simulated self-contamination, or broken chain-of-custody are automatic fails); one retake of the full practical permitted | Students independently process a fresh mock scene that contains at least three bloodstain pattern types and two trace evidence categories not previously seen in practice; they must complete all photography, sketching, evidence collection, packaging, labeling, and chain-of-custody documentation within a set time window. The evaluating instructor uses the 20-point rubric from Lesson 11 and a separate safety-compliance checklist. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Laboratory and Field Notebook Log | Log | 15% | All 12 lesson lab entries must be present; a minimum of 10 entries must be rated Satisfactory or above on the completeness rubric; entries rated Unsatisfactory may be corrected and resubmitted once within the course term | Students maintain a running lab and field notebook throughout the course, recording data tables, measurements, sketches, packaging records, and reflective notes for every hands-on lesson. The notebook is reviewed at mid-course (after Lesson 6) and again at course end; entries are evaluated for completeness, accuracy of recorded measurements, correct use of terminology, and clear chain-of-custody notation. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Biological Hazard Safety Compliance Check | Safety audit | 15% | Pass requires 100% compliance on all non-negotiable PPE and decontamination checklist items across three observed opportunities during the course (Lessons 2, 7, and 11); any single critical failure (skin exposure to simulated biological material or failure to complete decontamination before removing PPE) requires immediate remediation and a successful re-observation before the student may continue course lab work | Instructor or lab supervisor observes each student during the three designated lab lessons using a standardized safety checklist that covers correct donning sequence, integrity of PPE during work, correct doffing sequence without self-contamination, and equipment decontamination procedures. The checklist is aligned with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1030 requirements and reflects the safety standards assessed under the State Evidence Tech Cert licensure. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
This course introduces crime scene and forensic technicians to the recognition, documentation, collection, and preservation of digital evidence found at crime scenes, including mobile devices, computers, storage media, and surveillance systems. Students learn first-responder protocols that protect digital evidence integrity and maintain an unbroken chain of custody without conducting in-depth forensic analysis, which is the domain of certified digital forensic examiners. Lesson content maps directly to the digital evidence handling competencies tested in the IAI CCSI exam and to state evidence technician certification requirements.
OutcomesThis course introduces crime scene and forensic technicians to the recognition, documentation, collection, and preservation of digital evidence found at crime scenes, including mobile devices, computers, storage media, and surveillance systems. Students learn first-responder protocols that protect digital evidence integrity and maintain an unbroken chain of custody without conducting in-depth forensic analysis, which is the domain of certified digital forensic examiners. Lesson content maps directly to the digital evidence handling competencies tested in the IAI CCSI exam and to state evidence technician certification requirements.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: What Is Digital Evidence: Types, Sources, and Legal Context; Safety and Legal Boundaries at Digital Evidence Scenes; First-Responder Protocols: Computers and Storage Media; First-Responder Protocols: Mobile Devices; Surveillance Systems and Vehicle Telematics as Evidence; Chain of Custody for Digital Evidence; Packaging and Transportation of Digital Evidence; Photography and Documentation of Digital Evidence In Situ; Cloud Evidence, Social Media, and Networked Devices; Anti-Forensic Awareness: Recognizing Tampering and Destruction; Report Writing for Digital Evidence; Integrated Digital Evidence Scene Exercise.
What competent looks like. Identify and classify common types of digital evidence (computers, mobile devices, removable storage, surveillance systems, and networked devices) found at crime scenes and articulate the legal and evidentiary significance of each. Apply first-responder protocols—including device isolation, Faraday shielding, and power-state decisions—to preserve digital evidence in a forensically sound condition before submission to a digital forensics laboratory. Document digital evidence completely using photography, sketching, notes, and chain-of-custody forms in accordance with department policy and accepted forensic standards. Package and transport digital evidence using appropriate anti-static, anti-electromagnetic containers and materials while maintaining an unbroken, court-defensible chain of custody. Recognize the legal authorities—including search warrants, consent, and exigent circumstances—required to seize digital evidence, and describe when to stop and consult legal counsel or a supervisor. Explain testimony fundamentals related to digital evidence, including articulating first-responder actions taken, limitations of field handling, and the role of the laboratory examiner, in plain language suitable for a jury.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What Is Digital Evidence: Types, Sources, and Legal Context | 10.5 | theory | Students will categorize at least six types of digital evidence and explain the legal authorities required to seize each in a given scenario. |
| SWGDE Best Practices for First Responders (current edition), NIJ Electronic Crime Scene Investigation guide, printed scenario cards, student notebooks, whiteboard | Written scenario classification exercise scored on a 20-point rubric; students must correctly classify at least 16 of 20 scenarios and provide an accurate legal-authority statement for each to pass. |
| 2 | Safety and Legal Boundaries at Digital Evidence Scenes | 10.5 | theory | Students will apply OSHA electrical-hazard precautions and identify at least three legal boundaries—warrant, consent, exigency—that control when a technician may touch or seize digital evidence. |
| Anti-static wrist straps, nitrile gloves, safety glasses, printed legal-boundary worksheets, printed role-play scripts, selected court-decision excerpt (instructor-provided), OSHA 29 CFR 1910 electrical safety reference card | PPE donning/doffing checklist (pass = zero critical errors, defined as touching powered equipment without grounding protection) and legal-boundary worksheet scored at 80% or higher. |
| 3 | First-Responder Protocols: Computers and Storage Media | 15 | demo | Students will demonstrate the correct first-responder power-state decision (leave on vs. shut down) and isolation steps for a desktop computer and an external hard drive, with no actions that alter stored data. |
| Sanitized desktop computers (training units), external USB hard drives (training units), power strips, field notes forms, decision tree job aid (laminated), NIJ Electronic Crime Scene Investigation guide | Instructor observation checklist: student must perform all six mandated isolation steps in correct order with no data-altering errors (pass = zero critical errors); field notes form must include all required fields with accurate information. |
| 4 | First-Responder Protocols: Mobile Devices | 15 | demo | Students will isolate a powered-on mobile phone from network communications using a Faraday bag and airplane-mode procedure, and document the device without unlocking or browsing its contents. |
| Faraday bags (various sizes), RF-shielded evidence boxes, aluminum foil, anti-static bags, training smartphones and tablets (no SIM, Wi-Fi disabled by default), DSLR cameras, ABFO No. 2 scale cards, signal-indicator app on instructor device | Signal-blockage verification (phone shows no bars or Wi-Fi symbol inside container = pass); photographic documentation checklist scored at 80% or higher; no instance of screen-browsing or unlocking without authorization. |
| 5 | Surveillance Systems and Vehicle Telematics as Evidence | 10.5 | theory | Students will describe the correct steps to preserve and request footage from a digital video recorder (DVR), network video recorder (NVR), and vehicle event data recorder (EDR) without altering original data. |
| Mock DVR/NVR training unit (disconnected from network), printed surveillance-system diagrams, NHTSA EDR guidance excerpt, footage-request form template, whiteboard, calculator | Footage-request form assessed against a 10-point rubric (all required fields completed, accurate date/time range, correct chain-of-custody transfer method described); minimum passing score 80%. |
| 6 | Chain of Custody for Digital Evidence | 13 | lab | Students will complete an unbroken, legally defensible chain-of-custody record for three digital items from scene collection through packaging, labeling, and simulated submission to a laboratory. |
| Training USB drives, training smartphones, training laptops (all sanitized), chain-of-custody forms, tamper-evident evidence bags, permanent markers, evidence labels, anti-static packaging, evidence locker (or locked cabinet), SWGDE COC guidance | Student-completed chain-of-custody forms reviewed against checklist: all fields present, signatures obtained at every transfer, no time gaps, correct item descriptions; pass = zero critical omissions (defined as missing signature or unaccounted transfer). |
| 7 | Packaging and Transportation of Digital Evidence | 10.5 | lab | Students will select and apply correct packaging materials for five categories of digital evidence and explain the rationale for each choice to prevent data loss, electrostatic discharge, or electromagnetic interference during transport. |
| Faraday bags, anti-static bags, tamper-evident evidence bags, cardboard boxes, bubble wrap, tamper-evident seals, permanent markers, evidence labels, chain-of-custody forms, temperature/humidity data handout | Packaging selection rubric (correct material chosen for each device type, label complete, seal intact, written rationale accurate); pass = 80% or higher across all five stations. |
| 8 | Photography and Documentation of Digital Evidence In Situ | 13 | practice | Students will produce a complete photographic and written record of digital evidence at a staged scene that meets the documentation standards required by the IAI CCSI competency area for scene documentation. |
| DSLR cameras, ABFO No. 2 scale cards, photo log forms, graph paper, pencils, rulers, evidence number placards, sanitized training devices as scene props, IAI scene documentation standards reference | Photo set, sketch, notes, and photo log evaluated on a 25-point rubric aligned to IAI CCSI documentation competencies; pass = 20/25 or higher, with no critical omissions (defined as a device not appearing in any documentation format). |
| 9 | Cloud Evidence, Social Media, and Networked Devices | 10.5 | theory | Students will explain the legal process (preservation letter, court order, subpoena) required to obtain cloud-stored and social-media evidence and identify the limits of a field technician's role in that process. |
| DOJ Searching and Seizing Computers guide (current edition, printed excerpts), printed IoT device photo cards, two-column chart worksheet, student notebooks | One-paragraph summary scored on accuracy (must correctly distinguish preservation request from disclosure order); role-boundary chart assessed for zero misclassifications of authorized vs. unauthorized technician actions; IoT exercise scored at 80% or higher. |
| 10 | Anti-Forensic Awareness: Recognizing Tampering and Destruction | 10.5 | theory | Students will identify at least five indicators of potential anti-forensic activity or evidence destruction at a crime scene and document observations appropriately for the examining digital forensic specialist. |
| Published case summaries (instructor-provided, redacted), DSLR camera, damaged prop devices (decommissioned, non-functional), container of water as prop, field notes forms, SWGDE guidance on handling damaged media | Field notes from indicator identification drill reviewed for completeness and accuracy; must identify and document all three staged anti-forensic conditions with appropriate specialist-referral notation; personal policy statement assessed for alignment with SWGDE guidance. |
| 11 | Report Writing for Digital Evidence | 10.5 | practice | Students will draft a complete, factual first-responder digital evidence report for a mock scene that uses plain language, avoids interpretive conclusions, and contains all required administrative and descriptive elements. |
| Model first-responder report (instructor-created), report checklist, student notes and photos from prior labs, computers or legal pads for drafting, plain-language style guide excerpt | Final revised report scored on 20-point rubric: all required sections present (10 points), no interpretive conclusions (4 points), factually consistent with source documentation (4 points), legible and plainly written (2 points); pass = 16/20 or higher. |
| 12 | Integrated Digital Evidence Scene Exercise | 16.5 | field | Students will manage a full simulated digital evidence scene from initial approach through final evidence submission, demonstrating all first-responder competencies in sequence with no critical errors. |
| Multi-room training lab configured as mock scene, sanitized prop devices (desktop, smartphone, tablet, external drives), mock DVR unit, vehicle EDR reference card (no actual vehicle required), all prior course documentation tools, competency evaluation checklist, evidence locker | Competency evaluation checklist completed by instructor: 30 observable steps across safety, documentation, isolation, packaging, and chain-of-custody; pass = 27/30 or higher with zero critical errors (defined as data-altering action, missing chain-of-custody signature, or failure to apply grounding protection on powered equipment). |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Evidence Fundamentals Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (30 of 40 items correct) | A 40-item multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering device classification, legal authorities for seizure, first-responder protocols, chain-of-custody principles, cloud and social-media evidence process, and anti-forensic indicators; questions are written to the IAI CCSI digital evidence competency areas and state evidence tech certification knowledge domains. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| First-Responder Device Isolation Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Zero critical errors; 90% or higher on full checklist (27 of 30 steps correct) | Working from a cold-start staged scene, the student isolates and documents a desktop computer, a mobile phone, and a USB drive within a set time limit while an evaluator scores each step on a 30-point competency checklist; the demonstration mirrors the practical skill expectations of the IAI CCSI examination and state evidence technician skills verification. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Digital Evidence Lab Log | Log | 15% | All 12 lab entries present and scored at 80% or higher on the lab-log rubric | Students maintain a structured lab log throughout the course, recording objective, materials used, procedures followed, observations, and self-assessed accuracy for each hands-on lesson; the completed log is submitted at course end and evaluated for consistency, completeness, and honest self-reflection, demonstrating the documentation habits required of a practicing evidence technician. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Digital Evidence Safety and Legal Boundary Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% on critical safety items; 80% or higher on full checklist | A structured observation checklist administered during the integrated scene exercise (Lesson 12) that specifically scores electrical-hazard PPE use, anti-static precautions, correct power-state decisions, and accurate identification of legal authority before touching any device; any failure on a critical safety item requires immediate remediation and a re-check before the student may continue in the program. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
This course prepares forensic technicians to present physical evidence, written reports, and expert opinions in criminal and civil proceedings with accuracy, clarity, and professional credibility. Students learn the legal framework governing expert witnesses, practice direct and cross-examination, and develop the documentation habits that withstand judicial scrutiny. Lesson content maps directly to the courtroom-testimony and report-writing competency areas tested in the IAI CCSI and State Evidence Tech Cert examinations.
OutcomesThis course prepares forensic technicians to present physical evidence, written reports, and expert opinions in criminal and civil proceedings with accuracy, clarity, and professional credibility. Students learn the legal framework governing expert witnesses, practice direct and cross-examination, and develop the documentation habits that withstand judicial scrutiny. Lesson content maps directly to the courtroom-testimony and report-writing competency areas tested in the IAI CCSI and State Evidence Tech Cert examinations.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: The Legal System and the Forensic Technician's Role; Rules of Evidence Governing Physical and Demonstrative Exhibits; Writing the Court-Ready Forensic Report; Preparing to Testify: Review, Coordination, and Pre-Trial Meetings; Direct Examination Techniques; Cross-Examination: Tactics, Challenges, and Staying Credible; Presenting and Authenticating Forensic Photographs in Court; Testifying About Latent Prints and Scientific Methodology; Bloodstain Pattern and Trace Evidence Testimony; Digital Evidence Testimony and Chain of Custody for Electronic Items; Professional Conduct, Demeanor, and Ethics in Court; Full Simulated Trial: Integrated Testimony Capstone.
What competent looks like. Explain the roles and obligations of a fact witness versus an expert witness under the Federal Rules of Evidence and articulate how state rules may differ. Prepare a court-ready forensic report that is accurate, objective, free of jargon, and fully supported by chain-of-custody documentation. Testify clearly and accurately on direct examination, answering only what is asked without volunteering unsupported conclusions. Respond to cross-examination tactics—including hypotheticals, leading questions, and challenges to methodology—without becoming defensive or changing truthful testimony. Lay proper foundation for the admission of photographs, physical evidence, and demonstrative exhibits following applicable rules of evidence. Demonstrate professional courtroom conduct, appearance, and demeanor that upholds the neutrality and credibility of the forensic technician role.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Legal System and the Forensic Technician's Role | 10.5 | theory | Students will correctly distinguish between criminal and civil court structures, identify where forensic testimony fits in each, and explain the difference between a fact witness and an expert witness. |
| Federal Rules of Evidence overview handout (plain-language summary), state court structure diagram, sample trial transcripts (public domain or redacted), whiteboard. | Written identification quiz: students correctly classify 10 witness-role scenarios as fact or expert witness and give one-sentence rationale for each; 8 of 10 correct to pass. |
| 2 | Rules of Evidence Governing Physical and Demonstrative Exhibits | 12.5 | theory | Students will explain the foundational requirements for admitting physical evidence, photographs, and demonstrative exhibits in court and apply those requirements to sample evidence items. |
| Federal Rules of Evidence §§ 401, 901, 1001 plain-language handouts, sample evidence packets (photographs, chain-of-custody forms, latent-print cards), foundation-laying checklist. | Written short-answer quiz: given three new evidence scenarios, student correctly identifies all required foundational steps; full credit requires identification of chain-of-custody link for each item; 75% or higher to pass. |
| 3 | Writing the Court-Ready Forensic Report | 14.5 | practice | Students will produce a complete, court-ready forensic report for a simulated crime scene that is factually accurate, written in objective language, free of unsupported conclusions, and internally consistent with all attached chain-of-custody records. |
| Agency report template, simulated scene packet (photos, field notes, chain-of-custody forms), report-writing rubric, red pens, word-processing software. | Instructor-graded report rubric: all required sections present, no unsupported conclusions, no first-person opinion language, all evidence items traceable to chain-of-custody log; score of 75% or higher on rubric to pass. |
| 4 | Preparing to Testify: Review, Coordination, and Pre-Trial Meetings | 10.5 | theory | Students will describe the steps a forensic technician takes between receiving a subpoena and taking the witness stand, including reviewing notes, meeting with the attorney, and understanding the scope of expected testimony. |
| Mock case file, subpoena sample document, blank pre-trial timeline handout, self-briefing memo template. | Self-briefing memo assessed by instructor: includes case number, list of exhibits the technician will authenticate, key factual points, and any limitations or caveats; complete and accurate to pass (checklist, all 4 elements present). |
| 5 | Direct Examination Techniques | 14.5 | demo | Students will demonstrate competent direct-examination testimony by answering open-ended questions accurately, in plain language, without volunteering unsupported conclusions, using their report and exhibits as reference. |
| Training video (IAI or NFSTC approved resource), observation and peer-evaluation forms, simulated case file and exhibits, witness chair setup, audio recorder for self-review. | Instructor observation form: student answers all questions accurately, uses plain language on at least 80% of responses, correctly references exhibits by number, and volunteers no unsupported opinions; all four criteria met to pass. |
| 6 | Cross-Examination: Tactics, Challenges, and Staying Credible | 14.5 | practice | Students will respond to common cross-examination tactics—leading questions, hypotheticals, methodology challenges, and attempts to impeach with prior statements—without altering truthful testimony or becoming combative. |
| Cross-examination tactic handout with transcript excerpts, audio recorder, self-evaluation checklist, simulated case file. | Instructor real-time evaluation form: student maintains consistent testimony, does not argue with questioner, corrects any error spontaneously and clearly, and uses 'I don't know' or 'I don't recall' appropriately when applicable; 4 of 5 tactic scenarios handled correctly to pass. |
| 7 | Presenting and Authenticating Forensic Photographs in Court | 12.5 | lab | Students will lay complete foundation for a series of crime-scene photographs, explain the photographic log, and correctly answer questions about camera settings, perspective, and authenticity. |
| Printed crime-scene photo series, photographic log form, annotation markers, projector or monitor for exhibit display, camera metadata reference sheet. | Lab checklist: correct presentation order, accurate log cross-references for all six photos, foundation script covers photographer identity, date, time, unaltered condition, and log-photo match; all six checklist elements present to pass. |
| 8 | Testifying About Latent Prints and Scientific Methodology | 12.5 | practice | Students will accurately explain latent-print collection and comparison methodology in plain language, apply the ACE-V framework verbally on the stand, and respond to Daubert-style methodology challenges without misrepresenting the science. |
| ACE-V methodology reference (SWGFAST or current OSAC guidance summary), Daubert factor checklist, latent-print comparison worksheets from Course 4, plain-language handout drafted by student. | Instructor evaluation during simulated examination: student correctly names all four ACE-V steps with accurate descriptions, identifies at least two legitimate limitations of the methodology, and does not overstate the certainty of conclusions; all three criteria met to pass. |
| 9 | Bloodstain Pattern and Trace Evidence Testimony | 10.5 | practice | Students will testify about bloodstain pattern observations and trace evidence findings using only terminology and conclusions supported by their documentation, correctly distinguishing observation from interpretation. |
| Simulated bloodstain-pattern report, trace-evidence worksheet, two-color highlighters, flawed sample report, observation-vs.-interpretation reference guide. | Instructor review of rewritten sentences: all three sentences are observation-based, contain no interpretive language, and accurately reflect what physical evidence documentation would support; all three correct to pass. |
| 10 | Digital Evidence Testimony and Chain of Custody for Electronic Items | 10.5 | theory | Students will explain how digital evidence is collected, hashed, and preserved, and testify accurately about chain-of-custody procedures for electronic devices using correct terminology without misrepresenting the technical processes. |
| Digital evidence terminology glossary template, sample hash-value log, write-blocker reference sheet, chain-of-custody form for electronic items, transcript excerpt. | Oral check during simulated examination: student correctly defines hash value and its purpose, confirms write-blocking procedure, and references the chain-of-custody log to account for all handling steps; all three elements accurate to pass. |
| 11 | Professional Conduct, Demeanor, and Ethics in Court | 10.5 | theory | Students will articulate the ethical obligations of the forensic technician as a neutral, objective witness and demonstrate professional courtroom demeanor including appearance, composure, and appropriate language. |
| IAI Code of Ethics (publicly available document), demeanor observation checklist, role-play scenario cards, video clip, peer scoring forms. | Peer and instructor demeanor checklist: student maintains professional tone throughout the scenario, does not argue, does not use sarcasm, and answers factually; score of 80% or higher on combined checklist items to pass. |
| 12 | Full Simulated Trial: Integrated Testimony Capstone | 12.5 | lab | Students will testify through a complete simulated trial proceeding—including direct examination, cross-examination, redirect, and exhibit authentication—for the full simulated case file developed throughout the course, demonstrating all course competencies in an integrated performance. |
| Complete simulated case file, all accumulated course exhibits, courtroom setup (witness stand, counsel tables, evidence table), master evaluation rubric, audio or video recorder for student self-review. | Master evaluation rubric scored by instructor panel: student achieves a passing score of 75% or higher across all rubric domains (accuracy, foundation laying, demeanor, cross-examination handling, exhibit presentation); any domain below 60% requires a reassessment on that domain. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rules of Evidence and Witness Roles Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (38 of 50 points) | A 50-question written exam covering the legal framework for forensic testimony: fact versus expert witness distinction, foundational requirements for evidence admission, the Daubert standard, chain-of-custody documentation requirements, and the technician's ethical obligations as a neutral witness. Questions are multiple-choice and short-answer drawn from lesson content and mapped to the report-writing and testimony competency areas of the IAI CCSI exam blueprint. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Direct and Cross-Examination Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | 75% or higher on the master evaluation rubric; no domain below 60% | Each student undergoes a 20-minute simulated examination (direct plus cross) conducted by the instructor using a case file the student has not seen before, requiring application of all testimony skills taught in the course. A panel of at least two evaluators scores the student on accuracy, plain-language communication, exhibit handling, composure under cross-examination, and ethical conduct using the master evaluation rubric developed for Lesson 12. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Court-Ready Report and Documentation Log | Log | 15% | 75% or higher on the report rubric; all chain-of-custody elements present | Students submit the final version of the court-ready forensic report produced in Lesson 3, revised throughout the course, together with all supporting chain-of-custody documentation, the photographic log, and the digital evidence hash log. The instructor evaluates the complete package for accuracy, internal consistency, absence of unsupported conclusions, and readiness to serve as a courtroom exhibit, using a detailed rubric aligned to IAI CCSI report-writing competency requirements. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Professional Conduct and Ethics Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | All critical items marked 'met'; overall score of 80% or higher | Instructor completes a non-negotiable safety and ethics checklist during the Lesson 12 simulated trial, verifying that the student never fabricated testimony, never misrepresented a scientific limitation, never allowed coaching from outside the record, and maintained the neutrality obligations of the forensic technician role throughout the entire course. Critical items (fabrication, misrepresentation of methodology) are automatic failures regardless of overall score; this check directly addresses the ethics competency domain of the IAI CCSI and State Evidence Tech Cert examinations. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students apply the evidence collection, latent print, bloodstain, trace, and digital evidence skills learned in earlier courses inside a controlled laboratory setting, processing simulated and real case materials from intake through written findings. Emphasis is placed on validated methods, documented chain of custody, quality-assurance protocols, and the production of lab reports that meet court admissibility standards. This course bridges classroom knowledge and the externship by requiring students to perform full processing workflows independently under instructor supervision.
OutcomesStudents apply the evidence collection, latent print, bloodstain, trace, and digital evidence skills learned in earlier courses inside a controlled laboratory setting, processing simulated and real case materials from intake through written findings. Emphasis is placed on validated methods, documented chain of custody, quality-assurance protocols, and the production of lab reports that meet court admissibility standards. This course bridges classroom knowledge and the externship by requiring students to perform full processing workflows independently under instructor supervision.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Laboratory Orientation, Safety Rules, and Chemical Hygiene; Evidence Intake, Packaging Standards, and Chain of Custody in the Lab; Laboratory Documentation: Notes, Worksheets, and Report Writing; Latent Print Development — Porous Surfaces; Latent Print Development — Non-Porous and Challenging Surfaces; Biological Evidence: Presumptive and Confirmatory Screening; Trace Evidence: Collection, Preparation, and Microscopic Examination; Bloodstain Pattern Analysis in the Lab Setting; Digital Evidence Handling and Forensic Imaging in the Lab; Quality Assurance, Proficiency Testing, and Error Identification; Integrated Case Processing: Full Workflow Simulation; Lab Practicum Final Review and Credential Mapping.
What competent looks like. Process submitted items of physical evidence from intake through final disposition using documented chain-of-custody procedures with zero unaccounted transfers. Apply at least four validated latent-print development techniques and correctly document each result with scale photography and comparison notes. Prepare quantitative and qualitative examination notes and a formal lab report that conforms to current SWGMAT/OSAC documentation guidelines. Perform presumptive biological and chemical screening tests following laboratory standard operating procedures and record results with appropriate limitations language. Demonstrate safe handling, storage, and disposal of laboratory chemicals and biohazardous materials in full compliance with OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen and Chemical Hygiene Plan standards. Identify and correct at least three common sources of contamination or procedural error in a mock quality-assurance review exercise.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laboratory Orientation, Safety Rules, and Chemical Hygiene | 10 | theory | Students will identify all laboratory hazards, locate emergency equipment, and correctly interpret SDS sheets for every chemical used in the course before handling any reagent. |
| Lab coat, nitrile gloves (multiple sizes), safety glasses, face shield, SDS binder for all course reagents, OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen standard (29 CFR 1910.1030) handout, laboratory Chemical Hygiene Plan, floor plan worksheet | Students score 80% or higher on a 25-question written safety quiz covering SDS interpretation, PPE selection, spill response, and emergency procedures; and correctly identify all emergency equipment locations on the labeled floor plan. |
| 2 | Evidence Intake, Packaging Standards, and Chain of Custody in the Lab | 10 | theory | Students will receive simulated evidence submissions, verify packaging integrity, complete laboratory intake forms, and enter items into a manual evidence log without chain-of-custody breaks. |
| Pre-packaged simulated evidence items, laboratory intake forms, chain-of-custody forms, evidence seals and tamper-evident tape, permanent markers, barcode scanner (if available), evidence storage lockers, ASTM E1492 packaging standard reference | Student's intake paperwork for all five items is error-free on accession number, item description, date/time, and transfer signatures; zero unaccounted transfers; graded pass/fail by instructor using a 10-point rubric with a minimum of 9/10 correct fields. |
| 3 | Laboratory Documentation: Notes, Worksheets, and Report Writing | 10 | theory | Students will produce complete, contemporaneous examination notes and a formatted forensic lab report for a sample case that meet OSAC documentation guidelines. |
| Sample case files, OSAC Forensic Document Examination Standards reference, report template (instructor-developed), red-pen peer-review rubric, word processing software | Final lab report is graded on a 20-point rubric: completeness of item description (4 pts), accuracy of method description (4 pts), correct results notation (4 pts), qualified conclusion language (4 pts), format and grammar (4 pts); passing score is 16/20. |
| 4 | Latent Print Development — Porous Surfaces | 14 | lab | Students will apply ninhydrin, DFO, and 1,2-indanedione processing techniques to porous substrates, photograph results under appropriate lighting, and document each step on a processing worksheet. |
| Ninhydrin solution, DFO reagent, 1,2-indanedione solution, paper substrates (newsprint, bond paper, cardboard), fume hood, heat gun, UV/laser alternate light source, macro lens DSLR camera, scale rulers, processing worksheets, PPE (lab coat, nitrile gloves, safety glasses) | All three worksheets are complete and accurate; at least two of three developed prints earn a ridge-detail quality rating of 2 or higher; photographs include scale, label, and correct white balance; graded by instructor on a 15-point lab rubric with a minimum passing score of 12/15. |
| 5 | Latent Print Development — Non-Porous and Challenging Surfaces | 14 | lab | Students will select and apply appropriate powder, cyanoacrylate fuming, and small particle reagent techniques to non-porous items and document results with photography and comparison notes. |
| Cyanoacrylate fuming chamber, cyanoacrylate adhesive, fluorescent dye stain (Rhodamine 6G or equivalent), fingerprint powders (black, white, magnetic, fluorescent), small particle reagent, brushes, alternate light source with goggles, DSLR camera with macro lens, non-porous substrate items, ACE comparison worksheet, PPE | Student completes the decision matrix with at least 8/10 correct technique selections; all five fumed items are photographed with scale; written ACE comparison uses correct terminology and reaches a documented conclusion; instructor grades on a 20-point rubric, passing at 16/20. |
| 6 | Biological Evidence: Presumptive and Confirmatory Screening | 14 | lab | Students will perform presumptive tests for blood, semen, and saliva on prepared substrates, correctly interpret results, and document findings with appropriate limitation statements. |
| Phenolphthalein reagent, hydrogen peroxide, acid phosphatase reagent, amylase test strips, positive and negative control samples, coded blind swabs, swab collection tubes, disposable pipettes, timing device, PPE (gloves, eye protection, lab coat), biohazard waste bags, SWGDAM guidelines reference | Student correctly identifies at least 4/5 blind samples; written results form uses proper limitation language; disposal of all biohazardous materials is observed and confirmed correct by instructor; graded pass/fail with 80% accuracy on identification and mandatory correct disposal procedure. |
| 7 | Trace Evidence: Collection, Preparation, and Microscopic Examination | 12 | lab | Students will collect trace materials (fiber, hair, glass fragments, soil) from simulated items, prepare mounts, and conduct microscopic examination with documented findings. |
| Tape lift rolls, fine-tipped forceps, microscope slides, cover slips, mounting medium, compound microscope, comparison microscope (or photomicrography adapter), hair and fiber reference collection, glass fragment samples, immersion oil set, hair examination worksheet, PPE | All mounts are correctly labeled; hair worksheet is complete with all required morphological descriptors; glass fragment grouping matches the instructor key with at least 80% accuracy; instructor evaluates the worksheet and mounts on a 15-point rubric, passing at 12/15. |
| 8 | Bloodstain Pattern Analysis in the Lab Setting | 12 | lab | Students will analyze bloodstain patterns on prepared lab panels, calculate area of origin using stringing or trigonometric method, and produce a written analysis report. |
| Prepared bloodstain panels (simulated blood or approved training substitute), bloodstain classification worksheet, metric rulers, protractors, string and pins (for stringing method), calculator, graph paper, SWGSTAIN guidelines reference, camera, PPE | Classification worksheet scores at least 16/20 correct; area-of-origin calculation is within an instructor-defined acceptable tolerance (±10 cm in the vertical dimension); written report includes all required sections and uses qualified language; graded on a 20-point rubric, passing at 16/20. |
| 9 | Digital Evidence Handling and Forensic Imaging in the Lab | 12 | lab | Students will acquire a forensic image of a provided storage device using a write blocker, verify image integrity with a hash value, and document the process on a chain-of-custody and examination worksheet. |
| Practice USB drives pre-loaded with sample files, hardware write blocker, forensic workstation with FTK Imager or equivalent open-source forensic imaging tool, examination worksheets, chain-of-custody forms, SWGDE best practices reference | Hash values are correctly recorded and pre/post hashes match; chain-of-custody form is fully complete with zero missing fields; examination summary correctly describes the acquisition method and hash result; instructor confirms write protection was maintained; graded pass/fail with all three criteria required to pass. |
| 10 | Quality Assurance, Proficiency Testing, and Error Identification | 12 | practice | Students will conduct a simulated laboratory quality-assurance review, identify procedural errors and documentation deficiencies in a provided case file, and propose corrective actions. |
| Flawed mock case files, QA audit checklist, root-cause analysis worksheet, latent print and biological swab materials for proficiency exercise, PPE | Student identifies at least 8/10 errors in the case file audit with correct categorization; proficiency exercise documentation is complete and contemporaneous; instructor reviews both products and scores on a combined 25-point rubric, passing at 20/25. |
| 11 | Integrated Case Processing: Full Workflow Simulation | 14 | lab | Working individually, students will process a complete simulated case from evidence intake through final report, applying all laboratory techniques covered in the course without step-by-step guidance. |
| Unique simulated case packages (instructor-prepared), all reagents and equipment from previous labs, camera, processing worksheets, chain-of-custody forms, report template, PPE | Case file is complete with all required documents; chain of custody has zero breaks; at least three different examination techniques are correctly applied and documented; report uses qualified language throughout; graded on a 30-point integrated rubric (documentation 10 pts, technique application 10 pts, report quality 10 pts), passing at 24/30. |
| 12 | Lab Practicum Final Review and Credential Mapping | 12 | theory | Students will map each laboratory competency practiced in the course to the relevant IAI CCSI and Latent Print certification exam domains and identify personal areas requiring additional study before the externship. |
| IAI CCSI exam content outline (current edition, available from IAI website), IAI Latent Print certification exam content outline, crosswalk worksheet, self-assessment form, personal study plan template | Crosswalk table correctly maps all 11 lessons to at least one exam domain with no blank rows; personal study plan identifies at least two specific skills and a concrete action for each; peer teaching presentation is evaluated by instructor on a 10-point rubric (accuracy 5 pts, clarity 3 pts, response to questions 2 pts), passing at 8/10. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory Procedures Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (30/40 questions correct) | A 40-question written exam covering laboratory safety, chemical hygiene, chain-of-custody requirements, documentation standards, reagent selection rationale, quality-assurance principles, and the limitations of presumptive tests; questions are mapped to IAI CCSI exam content areas for crime scene and evidence processing, and to IAI Latent Print certification content for print development topics. Students must achieve 75% to demonstrate readiness for independent laboratory work in the externship. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Practical Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Achieve a minimum of 80% on the instructor scoring rubric (24/30 points) with no critical safety violations | The instructor assigns the student one unknown latent print substrate and one biological swab; the student selects appropriate techniques, processes both items, photographs results, and produces a brief findings report within a set time limit, all without coaching. Any critical safety error (improper PPE, unauthorized disposal of biohazardous material, chain-of-custody break) results in automatic failure regardless of rubric score, consistent with real laboratory quality standards. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Laboratory Log and Case File Portfolio | Log | 15% | 90% of required entries present and accurate; zero unaccounted chain-of-custody transfers | Students submit the complete set of processing worksheets, chain-of-custody forms, photographs, and reports produced during the integrated case processing lesson (Lesson 11) and at least four additional selected lab sessions, compiled into a single organized case file portfolio. The portfolio is evaluated for completeness, contemporaneous documentation, correct qualified language in conclusions, and photographic quality with scale; this mirrors the documentation standards assessed under IAI CCSI certification and State Evidence Tech Cert requirements. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Laboratory Safety Compliance Check | Safety audit | 15% | Pass all five observable criteria; any single failure requires remediation and recheck before the student may continue | An instructor conducts a structured observation during an active lab session using a five-criterion safety checklist: correct PPE selection and use, proper chemical handling and fume-hood use, correct biohazardous waste disposal, accurate SDS reference for any reagent used during the session, and complete and immediate incident documentation if any spill or exposure occurs. This check directly supports the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen and Chemical Hygiene Plan compliance requirements embedded in the State Evidence Tech Cert standards. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students conduct a full end-to-end simulated crime scene investigation — from scene security and documentation through evidence collection, latent print processing, bloodstain pattern observation, chain of custody management, and final case report — demonstrating every competency built across the program. The capstone culminates in a formal oral defense before a panel of instructors and, where available, a working practitioner, mirroring the professional accountability required of a certified crime scene technician. Performance on each deliverable is mapped to IAI CCSI and Latent Print certification exam domains and to State Evidence Technician standards.
OutcomesStudents conduct a full end-to-end simulated crime scene investigation — from scene security and documentation through evidence collection, latent print processing, bloodstain pattern observation, chain of custody management, and final case report — demonstrating every competency built across the program. The capstone culminates in a formal oral defense before a panel of instructors and, where available, a working practitioner, mirroring the professional accountability required of a certified crime scene technician. Performance on each deliverable is mapped to IAI CCSI and Latent Print certification exam domains and to State Evidence Technician standards.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Case Planning and Scene Security: Pre-Investigation Protocol; Scene Execution: Documentation, Evidence Collection, and Latent Print Processing; Case File Assembly, Quality Review, and Error Correction; Oral Defense: Case Presentation and Expert Testimony Simulation.
What competent looks like. Plan, execute, and document a multi-area simulated crime scene investigation that meets IAI CCSI examination standards for scene processing methodology. Produce a complete, legally defensible case file — including scene sketches, photographic logs, evidence inventories, chain-of-custody records, and a written final report — with no critical chain-of-custody breaks. Apply latent print detection, development, lifting, and comparison techniques to unknown samples and document findings in a format consistent with IAI Latent Print certification requirements. Analyze and accurately document bloodstain patterns and trace evidence observations using accepted terminology and scientific principles covered in Courses 4 and 5. Deliver a structured oral defense of case findings, methodology, and conclusions to a review panel, responding competently to technical and legal challenge questions. Identify and correct errors in a deliberately flawed case file, demonstrating quality-assurance and peer-review skills needed in professional crime scene units.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Case Planning and Scene Security: Pre-Investigation Protocol | 40 | theory | Given a written scene scenario packet, the student will produce a complete pre-investigation plan — including hazard assessment, PPE selection, inner/outer perimeter design, personnel log template, and a scene-entry priority list — that satisfies all OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standard and IAI CCSI domain requirements for scene management. |
| Fictional scenario packet (instructor-authored); OSHA Bloodborne Pathogen Standard (29 CFR 1910.1030) reference handout; OSHA Hazard Communication Standard reference handout; IAI CCSI candidate handbook (current edition); scene-management checklist (instructor-developed, OSAC-aligned); perimeter design templates; PPE selection guide; whiteboard and markers; student lab notebooks | Written Scene Management Plan scored on a 50-point rubric (scene hazard ID 10 pts, PPE selection 10 pts, perimeter diagram 15 pts, personnel log completeness 10 pts, priority entry rationale 5 pts); passing score is 40/50 (80%). Hazard-identification exercise scored pass/fail on a 25-item checklist; student must correctly identify hazard and PPE for at least 20 of 25 items (80%) before proceeding. |
| 2 | Scene Execution: Documentation, Evidence Collection, and Latent Print Processing | 80 | lab | Working individually under real-time instructor observation, the student will process a simulated indoor crime scene — completing systematic photography, sketching, evidence mapping, packaging, and chain-of-custody paperwork, plus latent print detection and lifting on at least four different substrate types — within the time limit and with no critical procedural errors as defined by the IAI CCSI and Latent Print exam domains. |
| Simulated crime scene lab with staged evidence; fingerprint powder kit (black, white, magnetic); cyanoacrylate fuming chamber; gelatin lifters; lifting tape and backing cards; UV/alternate light source (ALS); numbered evidence placards and flags; evidence packaging (paper bags, plastic bags, boxes, bindles); tamper-evident tape and evidence seals; chain-of-custody forms; photographic log forms; 35mm-equivalent DSLR cameras (program-supplied) and tripods; measuring tapes, rulers, and protractors; graph paper and drafting pencils; CAD/diagramming software workstations; latent print comparison worksheets; nitrile gloves, Tyvek suits, eye protection, N95 respirators; reference: current SWGFAST/OSAC latent print processing guidelines; IAI CCSI and Latent Print candidate handbooks | Scene processing evaluated by instructor using a 100-point Critical Task Checklist: photography sequence and exposure log (20 pts), sketch accuracy ± 6 inches on all measurements (15 pts), evidence log completeness with no unbroken chain-of-custody (20 pts), latent print technique selection appropriateness for each substrate (15 pts), lift quality and labeling (15 pts), PPE compliance throughout (15 pts). Minimum passing score: 80/100 with a score of zero on any PPE or chain-of-custody critical item requiring immediate remediation before the student may continue. Latent comparison exercise: at least 4 of 5 pairs rendered with a correct conclusion and written ridge-detail rationale (80% pass). |
| 3 | Case File Assembly, Quality Review, and Error Correction | 56 | practice | The student will compile a complete, logically organized case file from their scene investigation, conduct a structured quality-assurance review of a peer's deliberately flawed case file identifying all critical and non-critical errors, and produce a final written report that is accurate, objective, and formatted to court-ready standards. |
| Student case files from Lesson 2; program case file table of contents template; pre-prepared flawed case file (instructor-authored, one per student); error log worksheet; peer-editing rubric; word processing software; laser printer and printer paper for final hard-copy submission; two-pocket folders or binders for case file assembly; IAI CCSI candidate handbook (exam domain cross-reference); OSAC/SWGMAT report-writing guidelines handout | Case file graded on a 100-point rubric: completeness of all required documents (25 pts), chain-of-custody integrity — zero breaks required (25 pts), narrative report objectivity and accuracy (25 pts), sketch and measurement accuracy (15 pts), formatting and organization (10 pts); passing score 80/100 with zero chain-of-custody breaks (non-negotiable). Flawed case file exercise: student must identify at least 10 of 12 planted errors (83%) with correct critical/non-critical classification on at least 9 of those 10; failure requires one remediation attempt before oral defense. |
| 4 | Oral Defense: Case Presentation and Expert Testimony Simulation | 40 | field | The student will deliver a structured 20-minute oral presentation of their completed case file to a review panel — responding accurately and professionally to a minimum of 15 minutes of direct and cross-examination-style questions — demonstrating the courtroom testimony standards from Course 7 and the technical knowledge mapped to IAI CCSI and Latent Print certification exam domains. |
| Completed student case files; presentation software (PowerPoint, Google Slides, or equivalent) and projector; printed copies of case file for panel members (three copies minimum); oral defense rubric (instructor-developed, aligned to IAI CCSI and Latent Print exam domains and OSAC competency framework); self-evaluation form; scoring sheets for panel; timer; professional attire required (students briefed in advance); student career readiness portfolio initiated in Course 1 | Oral defense scored by panel on a 100-point rubric: technical accuracy of content (30 pts), methodology explanation clarity (20 pts), appropriate use of terminology (15 pts), composure and professionalism (15 pts), quality of responses to challenge questions (20 pts); passing score is 80/100 with unanimous panel agreement; a score below 70 or a factually critical error (e.g., testifying to a conclusion not supported by the evidence) triggers a single remediation opportunity within 5 business days. Self-evaluation reflection graded pass/fail on completion and specificity of three identified development areas. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrated Crime Scene Case File (Project Assessment) | Project | 60% | 80/100 on the case file rubric with zero chain-of-custody breaks; chain-of-custody integrity is a non-negotiable critical requirement — any unresolved break earns an automatic incomplete regardless of overall score, requiring remediation before portfolio or oral defense may proceed. | The student submits the complete, court-ready case file produced during Lessons 2 and 3, including all scene documentation, evidence records, chain-of-custody forms, latent print processing and comparison records, and a final written narrative report; this is the primary project artifact of the capstone and is evaluated against a 100-point rubric mapped to IAI CCSI exam domains for scene processing, evidence handling, and documentation standards, as well as State Evidence Tech certification requirements for legally defensible records. Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation |
| Professional Portfolio (Portfolio Assessment) | Portfolio | 20% | Pass requires submission of all eight mandatory portfolio sections with at least six sections rated 'meets standard' or above on the portfolio rubric; any section rated 'does not meet standard' must be revised and resubmitted within five business days. | Students assemble a professional portfolio compiling representative artifacts from all nine courses completed through the capstone: a career readiness statement and updated resume (Course 1), a photographic documentation sample with exposure log (Course 2), an annotated chain-of-custody record (Course 3), latent print comparison worksheets with ACE documentation (Course 4), a bloodstain and trace evidence observation log (Course 5), a digital evidence intake form (Course 6), a courtroom testimony preparation checklist and reflection (Course 7), a lab practicum skills checklist signed by an instructor (Course 8), and the capstone self-evaluation reflection (Course 9); the portfolio demonstrates cumulative competency growth and readiness for the externship and certification examinations. Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality |
| Capstone Oral Defense (Oral Assessment) | Oral / panel | 20% | 80/100 on the panel rubric with unanimous panel agreement that the student demonstrated scientific objectivity and professional composure; a single critical factual error or a score below 70 triggers one remediation attempt within five business days. | The student presents and defends their completed case investigation before a minimum two-member review panel in a 35-minute session — 20 minutes of structured presentation followed by at least 15 minutes of examination-style questioning — demonstrating technical mastery, professional communication, and the ability to maintain accurate, objective testimony under challenge, consistent with competencies assessed in IAI CCSI and Latent Print certification examinations and the courtroom testimony standards required by State Evidence Technician credentialing. Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication |
Students complete 324 supervised hours at an approved law enforcement agency, forensic laboratory, or medical examiner's office, applying all program skills under the direct oversight of a credentialed field supervisor. Rotations expose students to real casework documentation, evidence handling, latent print processing, and courtroom support tasks. A structured employer evaluation and a reflective log provide evidence of professional readiness for the IAI CCSI, IAI Latent Print Cert, and State Evidence Tech Cert.
OutcomesStudents complete 324 supervised hours at an approved law enforcement agency, forensic laboratory, or medical examiner's office, applying all program skills under the direct oversight of a credentialed field supervisor. Rotations expose students to real casework documentation, evidence handling, latent print processing, and courtroom support tasks. A structured employer evaluation and a reflective log provide evidence of professional readiness for the IAI CCSI, IAI Latent Print Cert, and State Evidence Tech Cert.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Orientation, Safety Compliance, and Agency Protocol Review; Rotation 1 – Scene Documentation, Photography, and Evidence Collection; Rotation 2 – Latent Print Processing, Trace Evidence Support, and Digital Evidence Handling; Integrated Performance Review and Professional Portfolio Completion.
What competent looks like. Perform crime scene documentation, photography, and sketching on actual or simulated casework under supervisor direction, meeting agency quality standards. Collect, package, label, and transfer physical and digital evidence following agency chain-of-custody protocols without supervisor correction. Process latent prints using agency-approved powders, chemical reagents, or alternate light sources and document results in the case file. Communicate professionally in written reports and verbal briefings consistent with evidentiary and courtroom admissibility standards. Comply with agency safety, PPE, and biohazard protocols throughout all rotations without a recorded safety violation. Receive a passing composite score on the employer midpoint and final evaluation forms, demonstrating entry-level professional competence.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orientation, Safety Compliance, and Agency Protocol Review | 40 | field | The student will identify and correctly follow all agency-specific safety, chain-of-command, confidentiality, and evidence-handling protocols before beginning independent assignments. |
| Agency orientation packet, PPE kit (nitrile gloves, safety glasses, Tyvek suit, shoe covers, N95 respirators), externship journal (bound, numbered pages), program course binders for reference, supervisor evaluation rubric | Supervisor confirms in writing that the student has completed orientation requirements and passed the agency policy quiz at 80% or higher; no safety or confidentiality violations recorded during the shadow phase. |
| 2 | Rotation 1 – Scene Documentation, Photography, and Evidence Collection | 120 | field | The student will independently or co-operatively document at least five scenes or evidence submissions using photography, sketching, and written notes that meet agency and IAI CCSI competency standards. |
| Agency-issued DSLR or mirrorless camera, tripod, scale rulers, measuring tape, total station or measuring wheel (if available), sketch paper or CAD software, evidence packaging supplies (paper bags, plastic bags, bindle paper, evidence tape, tamper-evident seals), chain-of-custody forms, agency case management software, IAI CCSI certification candidate handbook | Supervisor scores each documentation set using the agency photo and sketch checklist; all five scene documentation packages must receive a 'meets standard' rating (equivalent to 80% on a 10-point rubric) with no chain-of-custody errors; errors require corrected resubmission before rotation ends. |
| 3 | Rotation 2 – Latent Print Processing, Trace Evidence Support, and Digital Evidence Handling | 120 | field | The student will process latent print evidence using at least two agency-approved development techniques, support trace evidence packaging, and handle digital evidence according to agency protocols, meeting IAI Latent Print Cert competency benchmarks. |
| Fingerprint powders (aluminum, black, magnetic), fingerprint brushes (fiberglass, camel hair, magna-brush), ninhydrin solution or commercial spray (if agency-authorized), cyanoacrylate fuming chamber (agency-provided), alternate light source (agency-provided), goggles and chemical-resistant gloves, lifting tape and backing cards, ABFO scale, trace evidence collection kit, write-blocker (hardware), agency digital evidence intake forms, IAI Latent Print Cert candidate handbook | Supervisor scores each latent print worksheet and digital evidence intake form against the agency quality-assurance checklist; student must achieve 'meets standard' on at least six of eight print submissions and both digital evidence forms with no write-blocker bypass incidents; any critical error (contamination, write-blocker omission) triggers immediate corrective review before the student continues. |
| 4 | Integrated Performance Review and Professional Portfolio Completion | 44 | field | The student will consolidate externship documentation into a professional portfolio, receive a structured supervisor evaluation, and demonstrate entry-level professional competency across all externship rotation areas. |
| Externship portfolio binder or digital equivalent, program employer evaluation form, supervisor signature pages, reflective summary template, video conferencing platform (if remote debrief), instructor debrief rubric | Employer evaluation composite score must be 80% or higher across all six domains on the final evaluation form; instructor debrief rubric must score 80% or higher; incomplete portfolio (missing supervisor signatures or unsigned checklists) requires remediation before the externship grade is awarded. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employer Skills Evaluation (Skills Demonstration) | Skills demonstration | 70% | Composite score of 80% or higher on the program's standardized employer evaluation form, with no domain rated below 'developing' and no unresolved safety or chain-of-custody violations on record. | The supervising officer or examiner completes the program's structured employer evaluation form at the midpoint and at the conclusion of the externship, rating the student across six domains: scene documentation and photography, evidence collection and chain of custody, latent print processing, digital evidence handling, safety and PPE compliance, and professional communication. The final composite score from the end-of-externship form is the primary skills demonstration grade; the midpoint score is used for formative feedback and corrective planning only. Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative |
| Externship Field Journal and Portfolio Log | Log | 30% | Portfolio accepted as complete when all lessons' supervisor sign-offs are present, the reflective summary addresses all required elements, and the instructor rates the written documentation quality at 80% or higher on the portfolio rubric. | The student maintains a bound, consecutively numbered externship journal throughout all 324 hours, recording daily tasks, techniques observed or performed, equipment used, and connections to program course content; entries must be legible, dated, and initialed by the supervisor for each shift. At externship conclusion the journal and all supporting artifacts (photo logs, chain-of-custody copies, latent print worksheets, digital evidence intake forms, and the signed employer evaluation forms) are assembled into the professional portfolio, which the instructor reviews for completeness, accuracy, and professional presentation. Complete · Verified |
This course systematically reviews every domain tested on the IAI Certified Crime Scene Investigator exam, the IAI Latent Print Certification exam, and the State Evidence Technician Certification, using timed practice sets, case-based drills, and full-length mock exams to build both content mastery and test-taking stamina. Learners identify personal weak areas early, complete targeted remediation, and finish the course having sat at least two full simulated exams under proctored conditions. Emphasis is placed on exam strategy, precise technical vocabulary, and the ability to apply classroom and externship experience to multiple-choice and performance-based question formats.
OutcomesThis course systematically reviews every domain tested on the IAI Certified Crime Scene Investigator exam, the IAI Latent Print Certification exam, and the State Evidence Technician Certification, using timed practice sets, case-based drills, and full-length mock exams to build both content mastery and test-taking stamina. Learners identify personal weak areas early, complete targeted remediation, and finish the course having sat at least two full simulated exams under proctored conditions. Emphasis is placed on exam strategy, precise technical vocabulary, and the ability to apply classroom and externship experience to multiple-choice and performance-based question formats.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Domain Mapping and Diagnostic Assessment; Targeted Domain Review: CCSI and Evidence Tech Content; Targeted Domain Review: IAI Latent Print Certification Content; Full Mock Certification Exams and Final Readiness Debrief.
What competent looks like. Correctly answer practice questions at or above the IAI CCSI passing standard across all published exam content domains, including scene documentation, evidence collection, photography, and courtroom procedures. Correctly answer practice questions at or above the IAI Latent Print Certification passing standard across domains covering fingerprint science, comparison methodology, AFIS concepts, and court presentation. Demonstrate command of State Evidence Technician Certification content areas, including chain-of-custody law, evidence packaging standards, and agency documentation requirements. Apply structured test-taking strategies—time management, elimination of distractors, flagging uncertain items—to full-length timed mock exams without external assistance. Produce a personal exam-readiness plan that schedules remaining self-study, identifies two to three weak content areas with specific remediation resources, and lists all registration deadlines and required documentation for each credential. Score at or above the target passing threshold on a full-length proctored mock exam for each of the three credentials before the program end date.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Domain Mapping and Diagnostic Assessment | 15 | theory | Given published IAI CCSI, IAI Latent Print, and State Evidence Tech content outlines, the learner will correctly identify the weight and scope of each exam domain and use a timed diagnostic quiz to rank personal strengths and gaps across all three credentials. |
| IAI CCSI Candidate Handbook (current edition), IAI Latent Print Certification Candidate Handbook (current edition), State Evidence Technician Certification candidate bulletin, diagnostic quiz packet, domain matrix worksheet, personal gap analysis chart template, program textbooks from Courses 1–10, learner externship journals | Completed and accurate three-credential domain matrix with no blank cells; diagnostic score calculated correctly per domain; personal study schedule signed off by instructor. Pass mark: gap analysis chart submitted and study schedule approved by instructor before proceeding to Lesson 2. |
| 2 | Targeted Domain Review: CCSI and Evidence Tech Content | 25 | practice | Working through every CCSI and State Evidence Tech exam domain in weighted order, the learner will answer domain-specific practice question sets and correctly explain the reasoning behind each answer at a rate of 75 percent or higher before moving to the next domain. |
| Domain-specific practice question bank (CCSI and Evidence Tech), case-file reconstruction packets, evidence packaging samples (paper bags, manila envelopes, heat-seal pouches, evidence tape, tamper-evident seals), chain-of-custody form set, program Courses 2–3 and 7 textbooks and handouts, IAI CCSI Candidate Handbook, dry-erase boards for group work | Score on each domain-specific practice set recorded and reviewed; any domain below 75 percent triggers a second practice set completed before end of lesson. Pass mark: 75 percent or higher on each of the six domain station sets, with instructor sign-off on the case-file reconstruction drill showing correct citation of domain and standard at eight of ten decision points. |
| 3 | Targeted Domain Review: IAI Latent Print Certification Content | 20 | lab | Working through every domain of the IAI Latent Print Certification exam, the learner will answer written practice questions and complete hands-on comparison exercises at a rate of 75 percent or higher, demonstrating both theoretical knowledge and applied skill in fingerprint science. |
| Latent print practice card sets (varied quality), latent print comparison worksheets, magnifying loupes, fingerprint charts showing ridge detail and Galton characteristics, AFIS concept diagram, IAI Latent Print Certification Candidate Handbook, domain-specific practice question bank, expert witness testimony rubric, program Course 4 textbook and lab notes | Score on each domain practice question set recorded; ACE-V worksheets reviewed by instructor for correct terminology and logical documentation; role-play evaluated against rubric. Pass mark: 75 percent or higher on each domain written set; ACE-V worksheets accepted with correct identification of the analysis, comparison, and evaluation steps on at least five of six card pairs; role-play rubric score of satisfactory or higher. |
| 4 | Full Mock Certification Exams and Final Readiness Debrief | 30 | practice | Under simulated proctored conditions, the learner will complete a full-length mock exam for each of the three credentials and score at or above the target passing threshold on at least two of three exams, then use a structured debrief to finalize their personal exam-readiness plan. |
| Full-length mock exam packets for CCSI, Latent Print, and State Evidence Tech (aligned to current candidate handbooks), answer sheets, timers, proctor sign-in log, domain-level score breakdown sheets, one-page reflection worksheet, exam registration checklist for each credential, IAI candidate handbooks, state certification bulletin | Mock exam scores recorded per domain; written reflections submitted within 48 hours of each exam return; exam registration checklist completed and signed off. Pass mark: score at or above the program-established target passing threshold (aligned to the actual passing standard published in each credential's candidate handbook) on at least two of three full mock exams; registration checklist approved by instructor. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three-Credential Full Mock Examination | Mock certification exam | 100% | Score at or above the target passing threshold aligned to the published passing standard for each credential on at least two of the three full-length mock exams (CCSI, Latent Print, State Evidence Tech); learners who score below threshold on any single exam must complete documented remediation and a second sitting of that mock exam before program completion. | Each learner sits a full-length, timed, proctored mock exam for all three credentials under conditions that replicate the actual testing environment described in each IAI and state candidate handbook. Scores are broken down by domain and compared against the learner's initial diagnostic results to confirm measurable growth and readiness to sit the real credentialing exams. Score · Time management |
Students prepare for the IAI Certified Crime Scene Investigator (CCSI) examination and the IAI Latent Print certification examination, both administered by the International Association for Identification; students also prepare for their applicable State Evidence Technician Certification through the relevant state licensing authority. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.
Back to Crime Scene / Forensic Technician · How the school gets authority to award these credentials
A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working. Help us build VoTechWorks. Tell us what works, what doesn’t, and what you want to learn.