🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Business & Cross-Cutting › Home & Building Inspection › Courses
Business & Cross-Cutting · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a credentialed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Home & Building Inspection

11 courses · 600 clock hours · 2–4 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$5,250 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
11courses
54lessons
600hours
39assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons54 of 54 lesson pages writtenPractice432 practice questionsResources123 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 54 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
BUS-HOME77-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Home & Building Inspection

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips learners with the safety protocols, applied mathematics, technical literacy, digital tools, and professional communication skills that underpin every subsequent inspection course. Emphasis is placed on OSHA 10 construction safety, lockout/tagout, PPE selection, and first aid/CPR as non-negotiable prerequisites before any field activity. Career readiness content prepares learners to pursue state licensure, InterNACHI CPI, and ASHI ACI credentials and to present themselves professionally to employers.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips learners with the safety protocols, applied mathematics, technical literacy, digital tools, and professional communication skills that underpin every subsequent inspection course. Emphasis is placed on OSHA 10 construction safety, lockout/tagout, PPE selection, and first aid/CPR as non-negotiable prerequisites before any field activity. Career readiness content prepares learners to pursue state licensure, InterNACHI CPI, and ASHI ACI credentials and to present themselves professionally to employers.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety & PPE for Home Inspectors; First Aid, CPR & Emergency Response on Inspection Sites; Trade Math & Measurement for Home Inspectors; Reading Construction Documents, Codes & Manufacturer Specs; Digital Tools for Inspection: Software, Meters & Cameras; Professional Communication: Written Reports & Client Briefings; Career Readiness: Licensure, Credentials & Professional Identity.

What competent looks like. Complete OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety training and demonstrate correct PPE selection and lockout/tagout procedures for common home-inspection hazards. Perform and document trade-specific math calculations—including area, volume, slope, load, and unit conversion—with an accuracy rate of 90% or better. Read and interpret construction drawings, material specification sheets, and applicable sections of residential building codes without assistance. Use standard inspection digital tools—tablet-based report software, moisture meters, thermal cameras, and laser distance measurers—to collect and organize field data. Produce a professional written field note and a verbal client briefing that are clear, jargon-free, and free of material error. Develop a personalized career plan that maps program coursework to state licensure requirements and to the exam domains of the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credentials.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1OSHA 10-Hour Construction Safety & PPE for Home Inspectors24theoryGiven common home-inspection site conditions, the learner will identify applicable OSHA general industry and construction hazard categories, select correct PPE, and explain lockout/tagout and fall-protection requirements with no more than one error on a written scenario test.
  1. Complete all ten modules of the official OSHA 10-Hour Construction Industry outreach curriculum using the authorized provider materials, including quizzes at the end of each module.
  2. Participate in a table-top scenario exercise in which small groups are assigned a simulated inspection site (attic, crawl space, electrical panel room) and must identify every present hazard, assign an OSHA standard category, and specify the required PPE and control measure.
  3. Demonstrate a full lockout/tagout procedure on a training prop (simulated electrical panel with a lockable disconnect), narrating each step aloud while an instructor evaluates against the written OSHA LOTO sequence.
OSHA 10-Hour Construction Industry student workbooks (authorized provider edition); assorted PPE samples (hard hats Class E, N95 and half-face respirators, cut-resistant gloves, safety glasses, fall-arrest harness); lockout/tagout training prop with hasp and padlocks; OSHA 29 CFR 1926 quick-reference cardLearner scores 70% or higher on the OSHA 10 end-of-course assessment to earn the DOL OSHA 10 card; separately, the lockout/tagout demonstration is evaluated on a 10-step checklist and all 10 steps must be performed correctly (100% pass mark) before the learner is cleared for field activity.
2First Aid, CPR & Emergency Response on Inspection Sites8labThe learner will perform hands-only and full CPR, use an AED trainer, control bleeding, and describe the emergency response steps for the three most common inspection-site medical emergencies (cardiac arrest, fall injury, and chemical exposure) to the standard required for a recognized certification card.
  1. Complete an accredited CPR/AED/First Aid course (e.g., American Red Cross or American Heart Association) including hands-on mannequin practice for adult, child, and infant CPR sequences, and AED trainer operation.
  2. Role-play a simulated fall-injury scenario in the classroom: one learner acts as the injured worker, another as the inspector-responder who must call for help, control bleeding using direct pressure and a commercial tourniquet trainer, and position the casualty correctly until EMS arrives.
  3. Complete a written scenario card drill in which each learner receives a card describing an inspection-site emergency and must write out the correct sequence of actions within three minutes, covering scene safety, call to 911, intervention, and handoff to EMS.
CPR training mannequins (adult and infant); AED trainer units; commercial tourniquet trainers; nitrile exam gloves; face shields; scenario emergency cards; accredited CPR/AED/First Aid course materialsLearner must pass all skills stations and the written component of the accredited CPR/AED/First Aid course to receive the provider's certification card; additionally, the bleeding-control role-play is scored on a 6-step instructor checklist and all 6 steps must be completed correctly.
3Trade Math & Measurement for Home Inspectors28practiceGiven a set of residential inspection measurement problems, the learner will correctly calculate areas, volumes, roof slope (pitch ratio and degree), electrical load estimates, water-heater recovery capacity, and unit conversions to within ±5% of the reference answer on at least 9 of 10 problems.
  1. Work through a sequenced problem set covering: square footage of irregular floor plans using the addition-of-rectangles method; volume of crawl spaces and attics for ventilation ratio checks; slope expressed as X-in-12 and as a percentage; simple voltage-drop and amperage calculations; and metric-to-US unit conversions for pressure and temperature—each problem set is self-checked against an answer key before the instructor reviews errors.
  2. Use a laser distance measurer and 25-foot tape measure to measure three practice rooms of known dimensions, record all measurements in a standardized field-note form, and calculate gross area, net area (minus openings), and ceiling volume, then compare results to instructor reference measurements.
  3. Complete a timed 20-problem mixed review quiz under test conditions, then participate in an instructor-led error analysis session in which common mistakes are mapped to the specific inspection domain they affect (e.g., a ventilation-ratio error affects attic inspection findings).
Scientific calculator; laser distance measurer (Bosch GLM or equivalent); 25-foot and 100-foot tape measures; graph paper and rulers; standardized field-note forms; instructor-created problem sets with answer keys; NRCA Roofing Manual slope reference chartLearner scores 90% or higher (18 of 20 correct) on the timed mixed-review quiz to pass; learner's field measurements must be within ±2 inches of instructor reference on all three rooms before moving to the next lesson.
4Reading Construction Documents, Codes & Manufacturer Specs20theoryGiven a residential plan set, a section of the IRC, and a product installation manual, the learner will locate specified information, interpret symbols, and identify one code-compliance issue and one installation-deficiency issue with 100% correct identification of the document source for each finding.
  1. Work through an annotated set of residential construction drawings (floor plan, foundation plan, framing elevation, electrical single-line) to identify and label standard symbols; then answer a 15-question scavenger-hunt worksheet requiring them to find specific dimensions, material call-outs, and detail references within the drawings.
  2. Use an IRC (International Residential Code) quick-reference guide to look up the minimum requirements for three scenarios (stair riser height, GFCI protection locations, and attic access opening size) and write one-paragraph plain-language summaries of each requirement as if explaining to a homeowner.
  3. Compare a manufacturer's installation manual for a common roofing product against a photo set of installed conditions and identify any deviations, recording each finding on a structured deficiency log that specifies the document, the section, the observed condition, and the implication for the inspection report.
Sample residential plan set (full-size or 11×17 reproductions); IRC quick-reference guide or current adopted IRC edition; three manufacturer installation manuals (roofing, window, and water heater); deficiency log forms; highlightersLearner must correctly identify and source at least 13 of 15 items on the drawing scavenger hunt; must correctly identify the IRC basis for all three plain-language summaries; and must find both the planted code issue and the installation deficiency in the product-manual activity—partial credit is not awarded for unsourced findings.
5Digital Tools for Inspection: Software, Meters & Cameras20demoUsing tablet-based inspection report software, a moisture meter, a thermal imaging camera, and a laser distance measurer, the learner will collect simulated field data, enter it into a report template, attach annotated images, and produce a complete draft report section with no missing required fields.
  1. Follow an instructor-led walkthrough of a tablet-based home inspection report application (such as HomeGauge, Spectora, or similar industry-standard software): create a new inspection, populate the property header, navigate all inspection category sections, add a text narrative, insert a photo, and mark a finding as a deficiency—then compare the resulting PDF preview against an instructor sample.
  2. Use a pin-type and pinless moisture meter on a set of wood, drywall, and masonry samples of known moisture content; record readings in a data table; and discuss with a partner which readings would constitute a reportable finding and why, referencing the manufacturer's reference scale.
  3. Use a thermal imaging camera on an instructor-prepared demo wall section (with one area of known moisture intrusion and one area of missing insulation revealed by thermal bridging) to capture and annotate images, export them to the report software, and write a one-sentence finding narrative for each anomaly.
Tablet or laptop with licensed home inspection report software; pin-type moisture meter; pinless moisture meter; FLIR or equivalent thermal imaging camera; laser distance measurer; demo wall section with planted defects; sample completed inspection report for comparisonInstructor reviews the learner's draft report section against a 12-item completeness checklist (property header, all navigation sections opened, minimum one photo per finding, finding narrative present, severity flag set, no required fields blank); learner must meet all 12 items to pass.
6Professional Communication: Written Reports & Client Briefings24practiceThe learner will write a two-page field note summary and deliver a five-minute verbal client briefing based on a sample inspection scenario, both evaluated as clear, accurate, logically organized, and free of jargon by an instructor using a rubric, achieving a score of 75% or higher.
  1. Analyze three contrasting sample inspection report narratives (one excellent, one acceptable, one deficient) using an instructor-provided rubric focused on clarity, accuracy, appropriate technical vocabulary, and actionability; write a one-page critique of each and share findings with the class in a structured discussion.
  2. Using a provided scenario inspection data set (photos, meter readings, field notes), draft a two-page written client summary that translates technical findings into plain language, prioritizes findings by safety vs. maintenance, and recommends follow-up specialists where appropriate—then exchange drafts with a peer for structured peer review before submitting to the instructor.
  3. Prepare and deliver a five-minute mock verbal briefing to a classmate playing the role of a first-time homebuyer; use the same scenario data set, make eye contact, avoid jargon, answer two scripted follow-up questions, and receive immediate structured feedback from both the peer and the instructor.
Sample inspection report narratives (three versions, instructor-created); scenario inspection data packet (photos, meter readings, floor plan, field note); client-briefing rubric; peer-review forms; timerWritten field note summary scored on a 20-point rubric (organization 5 pts, accuracy 5 pts, clarity 5 pts, actionability 5 pts); passing score is 15/20. Verbal briefing scored on a 12-point rubric (structure 3, clarity 3, professionalism 3, Q&A accuracy 3); passing score is 9/12.
7Career Readiness: Licensure, Credentials & Professional Identity24theoryThe learner will produce a personalized career plan that correctly maps each state licensure requirement, the InterNACHI CPI exam domains, and the ASHI ACI pathway requirements to specific program courses and personal preparation steps, with no factual errors about any credential requirement.
  1. Research the specific home inspector licensing requirements for the state in which the learner intends to practice (examination, hours of training, supervised inspections, insurance, application process) using the state licensing board's official website; complete a structured research worksheet and present findings in a five-minute class briefing, with the instructor fact-checking live.
  2. Create a side-by-side comparison table of the InterNACHI CPI exam domains and the ASHI pathway requirements, identifying which of the 11 program courses addresses each domain area, and flag any domain area that requires additional self-study beyond the formal curriculum.
  3. Build a complete career readiness portfolio including: an updated resume formatted for inspection industry positions, a LinkedIn profile outline, a draft 30-second professional introduction, and a one-page career plan with target dates for completing training hours, sitting the state exam, and applying for CPI and ACI credentials—submit the portfolio for instructor review and participate in a 10-minute career advising conference.
State licensing board official website; InterNACHI CPI candidate information (InterNACHI.org); ASHI ACI pathway information (ASHI.org); resume template for trade professionals; LinkedIn setup guide; career plan template; comparison table worksheetCareer plan is evaluated on a 10-item factual accuracy checklist (state requirements correctly stated, CPI domains correctly identified, ACI pathway correctly stated, course mapping logical, dates feasible, no invented requirements); all 10 items must be accurate to pass. Resume and profile outline must contain no factual errors and must meet the formatting standard shown in the template.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
OSHA 10 & Safety Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% on the OSHA 10 provider exam; 100% (all 10 steps) on the LOTO skills checklist; valid CPR/AED/First Aid certification card obtainedLearners complete the official OSHA 10-Hour Construction Industry written assessment administered by the authorized provider, which is required to receive the DOL OSHA 10 completion card. Separately, the lockout/tagout demonstration and CPR skills station are evaluated by the instructor on pass/fail checklists; a learner who does not pass all three components is not cleared for any field-based lesson in the remaining program.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Trade Math & Technical Reading ExamWritten exam25%90% on the math section (18 of 20 problems correct); 87% on the technical reading section (13 of 15 items correct)A 45-minute closed-note written exam covering the full range of trade math problem types (area, volume, slope, load, unit conversion) and technical document interpretation (plans, code sections, manufacturer specs). Problems are drawn from a randomized bank so each learner receives a unique exam form; calculators are permitted for the math section only.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Digital Tools & Communication Portfolio ProjectProject25%Report section: 12 of 12 items on completeness checklist; Written summary: 15 of 20 rubric points; Verbal briefing: 9 of 12 rubric points; all three components must be passed independentlyLearners receive a new, unseen scenario inspection data packet and must independently: (1) enter all findings into report software and produce a complete PDF draft section, (2) write a two-page plain-language client summary, and (3) deliver a five-minute verbal briefing to an instructor playing a homebuyer role. This project integrates digital tools, technical writing, and oral communication in a single realistic task.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Career Plan Oral DefenseOral / panel25%All 10 items on the factual accuracy checklist correct; oral Q&A score of 6 of 8 points; no invented or incorrect credential requirements present in any documentEach learner presents their career readiness portfolio to an instructor panel in a 15-minute oral defense: five minutes of presentation covering their state licensure pathway, CPI and ACI preparation plan, and timeline, followed by ten minutes of panel questions probing the accuracy of their research and the realism of their plan. Learners who state any credential requirement incorrectly must correct it in writing within one week before the portfolio is accepted.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
BUS-HOME77-02 Trade course

Residential and Light Commercial Structure Inspection

35 hr · $380 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to identify, evaluate, and report on the structural components of residential and light commercial buildings, including foundations, framing, floors, walls, and rooflines as observed from safe vantage points. Emphasis is placed on recognizing deficiencies, distinguishing cosmetic issues from structural concerns, and documenting findings in language that meets InterNACHI, ASHI, and state licensing standards. This course maps directly to the structural inspection domain tested on the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI exams and required for state licensure.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to identify, evaluate, and report on the structural components of residential and light commercial buildings, including foundations, framing, floors, walls, and rooflines as observed from safe vantage points. Emphasis is placed on recognizing deficiencies, distinguishing cosmetic issues from structural concerns, and documenting findings in language that meets InterNACHI, ASHI, and state licensing standards. This course maps directly to the structural inspection domain tested on the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI exams and required for state licensure.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Building Structure Fundamentals: Components, Load Paths, and Inspection Scope; Foundation Types, Soil Movement, and Recognizing Settlement; Floor and Wall Framing: Inspection Methods and Common Deficiencies; Roof Structure, Attic Inspection, and Structural Red Flags; Integrated Structure Assessment: Mock Inspection, Deficiency Documentation, and Referral Decisions.

What competent looks like. Identify and name the primary structural components of a residential building — foundation types, floor systems, wall framing, roof structure, and load path — from direct observation and reference drawings. Recognize and describe common structural deficiencies such as settlement cracks, deflection, rot, pest damage, improper spans, and missing connectors using accepted inspection terminology. Apply safe inspection practices including proper ladder use, PPE selection, and hazard recognition before entering crawlspaces, attics, or any structurally suspect area. Distinguish conditions that require a specialist referral (licensed structural engineer or pest control operator) from conditions that are maintenance items or within normal tolerances. Document structural findings accurately using field notes, photos, and a written narrative that meets the descriptive requirements of InterNACHI Standards of Practice and ASHI Standards of Practice. Demonstrate correct use of a four-foot level, moisture meter, flashlight, and probe in a supervised field exercise and record measurements that support a written deficiency finding.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Building Structure Fundamentals: Components, Load Paths, and Inspection Scope7theoryGiven a cross-section diagram and a set of reference photos, the student will correctly label and describe the function of at least 18 of 20 structural components and trace the load path from roof to foundation.
  1. Illustrated lecture using annotated cross-section drawings of platform-frame, balloon-frame, and masonry-bearing-wall construction; students label components on a blank diagram and compare answers with a partner before group review.
  2. Guided reading of the structural sections of the InterNACHI Standards of Practice and the ASHI Standards of Practice side by side; students highlight what each standard requires the inspector to inspect, report, and exclude, then compile a one-page comparison chart.
  3. Case-study discussion using a set of 20 field photographs (inspector-taken images of joists, beams, columns, foundation walls, and roof rafters); students write one sentence per photo identifying the component and its role in the load path, then self-score against a provided answer key.
Annotated cross-section diagrams (platform, balloon, masonry), InterNACHI Standards of Practice (current edition, free at internachi.org), ASHI Standards of Practice (current edition, ashi.org), set of 20 structural reference photos, blank component-labeling worksheets, highlightersStudents complete the 20-component labeling diagram independently; pass requires correct identification and function description for at least 18 of 20 items (90%). Instructor reviews charts for accuracy before Lesson 2.
2Foundation Types, Soil Movement, and Recognizing Settlement8demoThe student will inspect three simulated foundation scenarios, correctly classify crack patterns as shrinkage, differential settlement, or structural movement, and state whether each scenario warrants monitoring, maintenance, or specialist referral.
  1. Instructor-led demonstration using a tabletop model showing how differential settlement, expansive soil, and inadequate drainage produce characteristic crack patterns in concrete block, poured concrete, and brick veneer; students sketch and annotate each crack type in their field notebook.
  2. Photo analysis exercise: students examine a packet of 30 foundation photographs representing slab-on-grade, crawlspace pier-and-beam, full basement, and cinder-block foundation types; for each photo they record foundation type, observed condition, severity rating (monitor / repair / refer to engineer), and the observable evidence supporting that rating.
  3. Paired role-play inspection of a classroom mock-up panel showing stair-step cracking in block, horizontal bowing with efflorescence, and shrinkage hairline cracks; one student acts as inspector calling out findings aloud while the partner records field notes, then roles swap for a second scenario.
Tabletop differential-settlement model or instructor-built foam demonstration panel, 30-photo foundation condition packet, field notebooks, pen and pencil, four-foot level, flashlight, moisture meter (pin-type), steel probe or screwdriver (for probing soft material demonstrations), magnifying loupeStudents submit completed field notes for all three role-play scenarios; instructor scores using a rubric: correct foundation type (10 pts), accurate crack classification (30 pts), appropriate severity rating with stated evidence (40 pts), legibility and completeness (20 pts). Pass = 70 of 100 points.
3Floor and Wall Framing: Inspection Methods and Common Deficiencies8labWorking in a framing mock-up or accessible crawlspace, the student will locate, probe, measure, and record at least five of six seeded deficiencies in floor and wall framing using a standardized field-inspection checklist.
  1. Pre-lab safety briefing covering PPE requirements for crawlspace entry (hard hat, knee pads, Tyvek suit or disposable coveralls, N95 respirator, gloves, eye protection), proper body position to avoid contact with sharp fasteners or electrical components, and the decision rule for refusing entry when clearance is insufficient or hazards are uncontrolled; students sign a hazard-acknowledgment card before entering the lab space.
  2. Hands-on lab in a framing mock-up or program-arranged crawlspace with six seeded deficiencies (examples: notched joist exceeding allowable depth, missing rim joist blocking, rot at a sill plate, improperly cut beam bearing, absent hurricane tie, stacked cripple wall without proper nailing); students work individually to probe, photograph, measure with a tape and level, and complete a field checklist.
  3. Post-lab debrief: students compare checklists in small groups, discuss any missed deficiencies, and each student drafts two field-report sentences per deficiency found — one describing the observation and one stating the recommended action — using the narrative style modeled in the InterNACHI report-writing guide.
Framing mock-up or crawlspace access area with seeded defects, hard hats, knee pads, disposable coveralls, N95 respirators, safety glasses, nitrile gloves, flashlights (high-lumen headlamps), steel probes, tape measures, four-foot level, digital camera or smartphone, standardized framing-inspection checklist, field notebooks, InterNACHI report-writing style guideInstructor verifies each student's checklist and narrative sentences against the seeded-defect answer key. Pass = correctly identifying and accurately describing at least 5 of 6 seeded deficiencies (83%) with at least one appropriate recommended action per finding. Students who score below 5 of 6 repeat the lab before advancing.
4Roof Structure, Attic Inspection, and Structural Red Flags7fieldDuring a supervised exterior and attic-access inspection at a training structure, the student will identify the roof framing system type, detect at least three observable structural conditions, and complete a field-inspection form that meets InterNACHI and ASHI documentation standards.
  1. Exterior walk-around of the training structure led by the instructor: students practice reading roofline geometry to infer framing below (ridge beam vs. ridge board, hip vs. gable vs. shed), spot visible sagging, racking, or uneven ridge lines, and record observations using cardinal directions and measurement references before any attic entry.
  2. Supervised attic inspection in rotating pairs: each pair enters the attic access, identifies rafter or truss system, checks for proper collar ties or rafter ties, looks for cut or notched structural members, checks for signs of water infiltration at sheathing, and photographs at least two conditions — one acceptable and one deficient — then exits safely; instructor evaluates entry technique, PPE compliance, and time on task.
  3. Individual completion of a structured field-inspection form that requires: framing system type, span direction, observed ventilation, three condition entries with location described by compass direction and distance from access hatch, severity rating, and referral decision; students then peer-review a classmate's form against a provided rubric before instructor final review.
Training structure with accessible attic, high-lumen headlamps, hard hats, N95 respirators, safety glasses, gloves, knee pads, tape measures, four-foot level, moisture meter, digital camera or smartphone, structured field-inspection form, InterNACHI Standards of Practice, ASHI Standards of Practice, pencilsInstructor scores the completed field-inspection form on a 100-point rubric: correct framing system identification (15 pts), accurate location descriptions (20 pts), three condition entries with severity and action (45 pts), compliance with documentation standards (20 pts). Pass = 70 of 100. PPE non-compliance during attic entry is an automatic fail requiring immediate remediation and reassessment.
5Integrated Structure Assessment: Mock Inspection, Deficiency Documentation, and Referral Decisions5practiceWorking independently, the student will complete a timed mock structural inspection of a pre-set training scenario, produce a written findings narrative, and correctly classify each finding by severity and referral type at a level meeting InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI exam expectations.
  1. Timed 60-minute mock inspection of a classroom or training-site scenario with at least eight seeded conditions across foundation, floor framing, wall framing, and roof structure; students use all tools and their completed checklists from prior lessons — no instructor coaching during the timed period — to replicate real exam and real-work conditions.
  2. Findings-narrative writing period (45 minutes): students draft a short written structural section of a home-inspection report, organizing findings by system, using neutral descriptive language, correctly applying the terms 'monitor,' 'repair,' 'further evaluation by a qualified structural engineer,' and 'no deficiency observed,' and attaching photo references by number.
  3. Structured self-assessment and instructor debrief: students score their own narratives against the InterNACHI report-writing rubric, then the instructor leads a whole-group review of each seeded condition, correct classification, and the specific InterNACHI or ASHI exam domains each condition maps to (foundation systems, structural components, crawlspaces, attics), reinforcing exam vocabulary students will see on certification assessments.
Training scenario with eight seeded structural conditions, all personal inspection tools (flashlight, probe, tape, level, moisture meter, camera), blank report-narrative template, InterNACHI report-writing rubric, InterNACHI Standards of Practice, ASHI Standards of Practice, exam-domain mapping handout cross-referencing lesson content to InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI structural inspection exam areasInstructor scores the narrative using the InterNACHI report-writing rubric: identification of at least 6 of 8 conditions (60 pts possible at 10 pts each) plus narrative language and classification accuracy (40 pts). Pass = 70 of 100. Any student who misclassifies a life-safety structural concern (e.g., failing to recommend engineer evaluation for a compromised bearing wall) receives mandatory one-on-one remediation regardless of total score.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Structural Systems Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% or higher (28 of 40 questions correct)A 40-question multiple-choice and matching exam covering foundation types, framing terminology, load-path concepts, common deficiencies, severity classification, and referral decisions, mapped to the structural inspection domains of the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI exams. Students who score below 70% complete a targeted review and retake an alternate form within five business days.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Supervised Structural Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Instructor rubric score of 70 of 100 points; zero tolerance for PPE non-compliance or failure to refer an observable life-safety structural concernEach student independently conducts a 30-minute structural inspection of an assigned training structure or mock-up while the instructor observes and scores on a standardized rubric covering tool use, inspection sequence, hazard recognition, verbal finding communication, and accurate identification of at least four of five seeded deficiencies. The demonstration is performed without coaching; students may use their own checklist and tools.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Field Inspection Lab LogLog15%Complete entries for all four lab and field exercises with an average rubric score of 70% or higher across all entriesStudents maintain a cumulative lab log compiled from field notes, completed checklists, and written narratives produced during Lessons 2, 3, 4, and 5; the log is submitted at course end and evaluated for completeness, accuracy of findings documentation, appropriate use of inspection terminology, and consistency with InterNACHI and ASHI documentation standards. Incomplete or missing entries must be remediated before the log is accepted.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pre-Entry Safety and Hazard Recognition CheckSafety audit15%100% correct on all six safety decision items; any incorrect safety decision is a non-pass requiring immediate remediation before continued lab or field participationBefore the Lesson 3 crawlspace lab and again before the Lesson 4 attic field exercise, the instructor administers a six-item oral or written safety check covering correct PPE selection for the environment, the go/no-go entry decision criteria, emergency exit procedure, and the specific OSHA general industry standards applicable to confined-space awareness in inspection work. This check is graded pass/fail with no partial credit.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-HOME77-03 Trade course

Roofing Systems Inspection

35 hr · $380 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to inspect and evaluate all common residential and light-commercial roofing systems, including materials, structure, drainage, flashings, and penetrations, using established home inspection standards of practice. The course develops the systematic observation, defect recognition, and documentation skills required for professional roof inspections. Lesson content maps directly to the roofing sections of the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exams and to state licensing competency requirements.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to inspect and evaluate all common residential and light-commercial roofing systems, including materials, structure, drainage, flashings, and penetrations, using established home inspection standards of practice. The course develops the systematic observation, defect recognition, and documentation skills required for professional roof inspections. Lesson content maps directly to the roofing sections of the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exams and to state licensing competency requirements.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Roof Safety, Access, and Field Math; Asphalt Shingles and Wood Roofing Materials; Flashings, Drainage, and Roof Penetrations; Flat, Low-Slope, and Alternative Roofing Systems; Full Roof Inspection Simulation and Documentation.

What competent looks like. Identify and describe the condition of at least six roofing material types—including asphalt shingles, wood shakes, metal panels, tile, flat/low-slope membranes, and built-up roofing—using correct trade terminology. Inspect roof structure, decking, flashings, drainage components, and penetrations for defects, safety hazards, and deferred maintenance using a systematic, standards-of-practice approach. Apply appropriate personal protective equipment and fall-protection procedures before and during every roof-access scenario in compliance with OSHA general industry and construction fall-protection requirements. Measure roof area, slope, and drainage gradient using field math and record findings in a format suitable for a written home inspection report. Distinguish conditions that require immediate safety reporting from conditions that warrant monitoring or routine maintenance, using accepted inspector terminology. Produce accurate, complete roof-section field notes and a draft report narrative that would satisfy InterNACHI, ASHI, and typical state standards of practice.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Roof Safety, Access, and Field Math7labStudents set up and use fall-protection equipment correctly and calculate roof pitch, slope ratio, and surface area from field measurements before ascending any roof surface.
  1. PPE station rotation: students don hard hats, non-slip footwear, and safety harnesses; instructor evaluates fit and anchor-point selection on a practice wall before any rooftop access is permitted.
  2. Slope math workshop: given a set of six roofing scenarios with varying run and rise measurements, students calculate pitch (x-in-12 notation), slope percentage, and total square footage using a speed square, measuring tape, and hand calculator, then check answers against an answer key.
  3. Controlled roof-walk drill on the program's practice structure: students practice three-point contact on ladder, safe heel-to-toe walking on a 4-in-12 slope, proper body positioning near eaves, and verbal hazard calls; instructor grades each student individually on a pass/fail safety checklist.
Full-body harnesses, lanyards, ANSI-rated anchor points, 6-ft and extension ladders, speed squares, 25-ft tape measures, hand calculators, OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart M fall-protection quick reference, InterNACHI SOP printed reference, program practice roof structure.Student passes instructor safety checklist (all critical items correct = pass; any critical item failed = repeat drill before proceeding). Slope and area math worksheet scored at 80% or higher.
2Asphalt Shingles and Wood Roofing Materials7demoStudents identify the components of a standard asphalt shingle roof assembly and a wood shake/shingle roof, locate and name at least ten common defects in each material type, and record findings using correct inspection terminology.
  1. Instructor-led teardown demonstration on a sample roof panel: student observers label a cross-section diagram showing underlayment, starter course, field shingles, ridge cap, and decking as each layer is described and pointed to; completed diagrams are peer-reviewed.
  2. Defect identification card sort: students match 20 laminated photo cards of asphalt shingle defects (granule loss, cupping, blistering, fishmouthing, improper nail placement, exposed fasteners, missing tabs, improper overhang, hail damage patterns, algae/moss) to their correct defect name and the likely cause; instructor reviews group answers.
  3. Hands-on inspection walk on a prepared sample roof section with deliberately installed defects: each student independently writes field notes listing every defect found, its location using clock-position and slope-face references, and a recommended action; notes are compared to an instructor master list.
Sample roof panels with installed defects, asphalt shingle samples (3-tab and architectural/laminated), wood shake and shingle samples, cross-section diagram handout, defect photo card set, field note forms, InterNACHI Roofing Inspection Standards reference, manufacturer installation guides (generic).Field note exercise: student identifies at least 80% of planted defects on the master list and correctly names each one; zero critical safety defects may be missed for a pass.
3Flashings, Drainage, and Roof Penetrations7practiceStudents trace the path of water across a roof surface, inspect all flashing types and drainage components for installation and condition defects, and document penetration details (chimneys, vents, skylights, pipes) using a systematic inspection sequence.
  1. Water-path tracing exercise: on a scale diagram of a residential roof, students draw arrows showing water flow from ridge to eave across multiple hips, valleys, and dormers, then circle every location where flashing is required and label the flashing type (step, counter, valley, drip edge, pipe boot, chimney saddle/cricket).
  2. Flashing condition assessment at the practice structure: students examine real installed flashings—some correctly installed, some with planted defects (missing sealant, open laps, improper step flashing overlap, rusted metal, separated boot collars)—and complete a standardized checklist for each flashing location.
  3. Penetration documentation drill: instructor presents five penetration scenarios (two chimneys, one skylight, two plumbing vent stacks) via high-resolution photos on a projector; students write a one-paragraph report narrative for each scenario using correct inspector language ('evidence of,' 'recommend evaluation by a qualified roofing contractor,' etc.) and read their narratives aloud for group critique.
Roof scale diagram handout, flashing sample set (aluminum step, lead pipe boots, rubber collars, drip edge, valley metal), practice structure with installed flashings, penetration photo slide set, standardized flashing checklist form, report narrative writing guide, InterNACHI and ASHI SOP references.Flashing checklist: all planted defects identified (80% threshold); no critical water-entry defects missed. Narrative exercise graded by instructor on terminology accuracy and completeness — pass requires correct use of disclaimer and recommendation language on all five scenarios.
4Flat, Low-Slope, and Alternative Roofing Systems7theoryStudents describe the construction, inspection methods, and common defect patterns of built-up roofing (BUR), single-ply membranes (TPO, EPDM, PVC), modified bitumen, metal panels, clay/concrete tile, and slate, explaining why each system requires a distinct inspection approach.
  1. Comparative material analysis: students examine physical samples of each roofing material at a classroom display table, complete a comparison chart (material name, typical substrate, lifespan range, key failure modes, inspector safety considerations, inspection limitations), and use the chart to answer five short-answer questions.
  2. Drainage math for low-slope roofs: using a scenario with roof deck dimensions and specified minimum slope requirements, students calculate whether installed slope meets general industry guidance for positive drainage and identify ponding-risk zones on a plan drawing.
  3. Case study discussion of three real inspection reports (redacted) involving flat-roof failures—one BUR, one EPDM membrane, one metal panel system; small groups identify what the inspector reported correctly, what was missed, and what additional specialist referral would have been appropriate, then present findings to the class.
Material sample display set (BUR gravel cap sheet, EPDM membrane, TPO membrane, PVC membrane, modified bitumen, standing-seam metal, clay tile, concrete tile, slate), comparison chart handout, plan drawing for drainage math, three redacted sample inspection reports, projector.Comparison chart and short-answer questions scored at 80% or higher. Drainage math: correct identification of adequate vs. inadequate slope and ponding zones on all scenario zones.
5Full Roof Inspection Simulation and Documentation7fieldStudents conduct a complete, unsupervised (but observed) roof inspection of the program's practice structure, applying all prior lesson skills to produce a finished roof-section report narrative and a completed inspection field form that meets InterNACHI and ASHI standards of practice requirements.
  1. Pre-inspection setup: each student independently selects appropriate PPE and fall-protection equipment, performs a pre-use ladder and harness inspection, sets up access, and verbally states a hazard assessment to the observing instructor before beginning; any critical safety omission requires correction before the student proceeds.
  2. Timed full roof inspection (approximately 30–40 minutes): student walks the entire roof using a consistent sequence (ground observation, then roof surface by elevation), completes a standardized field form covering all required SOP elements—roofing material type and condition, visible structure, flashings, penetrations, drainage, ventilation terminations—and takes annotated photos with a tablet or camera.
  3. Report draft and defense: student converts field notes and photos into a typed roof-section report narrative using program report-writing template; report is submitted and then orally defended in a five-minute Q&A with the instructor, who asks the student to justify two specific findings and explain two inspection limitations noted in the report.
Full PPE and fall-protection kit (per student), ladders, tablet or digital camera, standardized field inspection form, report-writing template, program practice structure with mixed planted defects, InterNACHI SOP and ASHI SOP printed references available for student use during prep only.Pass requires: (1) all pre-inspection safety steps completed correctly on instructor safety checklist with no critical omissions; (2) field form identifies at least 80% of planted defects and zero critical safety defects are missed; (3) report narrative uses correct terminology and includes proper limitation disclaimers; (4) oral defense demonstrates the student can justify findings without contradicting field form. Any critical safety failure = automatic repeat.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Roofing Systems Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% or higher (40 of 50 items correct)A 50-item multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering roofing material types, defect identification, flashing requirements, drainage principles, inspection sequence, and report-writing terminology, mapped to the roofing competency domains tested on the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exams. Students may retake once after remediation; a second failure requires repeat of relevant lessons before a second retake.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Practical Roof Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass on all critical-safety checklist items AND 80% or higher on defect identification rubricThe instructor observes each student conducting a complete roof inspection of the practice structure under simulated field conditions; the student is scored on fall-protection setup, inspection sequence, defect identification accuracy, and proper use of limitation language when documenting findings. Any critical safety omission (e.g., uncoupled harness lanyard while on roof) is an automatic failure regardless of other scores.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Inspection Field LogLog15%All five entries complete and accurate; no entry with a missed critical defectStudents submit a compiled log of five field inspection forms completed during lab and field lessons throughout the course, each accompanied by at least three annotated photos and a matching one-paragraph report narrative; the log is evaluated for completeness, correct terminology, systematic coverage of all SOP-required elements, and evidence of improvement across entries.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Roofing Safety Pre-Access Checklist VerificationSafety audit15%100% on all critical items; no roof access granted or recorded until pass is achievedBefore the final field simulation lesson, the instructor administers a live safety verification: the student selects equipment, performs pre-use inspections, establishes anchor points, and states the site hazard assessment aloud while the instructor scores each step against a critical-items checklist derived from OSHA fall-protection requirements. This assessment must be passed before the student participates in any subsequent roof-access activity.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-HOME77-04 Trade course

Residential Electrical Systems Inspection

35 hr · $380 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to visually inspect and evaluate residential electrical systems from the service entrance through branch circuits, identifying defects, safety hazards, and code-significant conditions in accordance with InterNACHI and ASHI standards of practice. The course covers service panels, wiring methods, outlets, fixtures, and grounding, emphasizing the inspector's scope: visual observation only, no testing of concealed conductors or energized components beyond approved instruments. Lessons integrate documentation practices and defect reporting language used on real inspection reports.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to visually inspect and evaluate residential electrical systems from the service entrance through branch circuits, identifying defects, safety hazards, and code-significant conditions in accordance with InterNACHI and ASHI standards of practice. The course covers service panels, wiring methods, outlets, fixtures, and grounding, emphasizing the inspector's scope: visual observation only, no testing of concealed conductors or energized components beyond approved instruments. Lessons integrate documentation practices and defect reporting language used on real inspection reports.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Electrical Fundamentals and Inspector Scope; Service Entrance, Meter Base, and Service Panel; Wiring Methods, Branch Circuits, and Devices; Grounding, Bonding, GFCI, AFCI, and Safety Devices; Full Residential Electrical Inspection Simulation.

What competent looks like. Identify the components of a residential electrical service entrance, service panel, and subpanel and describe the function of each. Recognize common wiring methods, conductor types, and installation defects visible during a standard residential inspection. Use a non-contact voltage tester and a three-light receptacle tester safely and correctly to report circuit conditions. Identify grounding, bonding, and overcurrent protection deficiencies that represent safety hazards to occupants. Document electrical defects using clear, non-alarmist report language aligned with InterNACHI and ASHI reporting standards. Perform a complete visual electrical inspection of a residential panel and accessible branch-circuit components within the defined scope of practice.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Electrical Fundamentals and Inspector Scope6theoryStudents will explain voltage, current, resistance, and circuit concepts at the level needed to interpret residential inspection findings and accurately describe the legal and ethical boundaries of the home inspector's electrical scope.
  1. Lecture and illustrated slide review of basic electricity concepts (voltage, amperage, wattage, AC vs. DC) using a residential wiring diagram; students label each component and write a one-sentence function description.
  2. Small-group case-study analysis of three inspection scenarios where the inspector exceeded scope (e.g., removing panel cover with power on, probing outlets with leads); groups identify the hazard and rewrite the inspector's actions to match accepted scope.
  3. Standards reading: students read the electrical sections of the InterNACHI Standards of Practice and the ASHI Standards of Practice side-by-side, then create a two-column chart listing what the inspector must inspect, what is excluded, and what must be reported.
InterNACHI Standards of Practice (current edition, free PDF), ASHI Standards of Practice (current edition), residential wiring diagrams (handout), whiteboard, projectorExit quiz: 10 multiple-choice questions on electrical fundamentals and scope limits; pass mark 80%. Instructor reviews chart for accuracy before Lesson 2.
2Service Entrance, Meter Base, and Service Panel8demoStudents will identify every major component of a residential service entrance and main panel, recognize defects visible to a non-specialist inspector, and describe each defect using standard report language.
  1. Instructor live demonstration on a de-energized training panel: point-by-point identification of service conductors, weatherhead or underground lateral, meter base, main disconnect, bus bars, neutral bar, grounding electrode conductor, and bonding jumper; students follow along with a labeled diagram worksheet.
  2. Defect identification drill: instructor presents 20 photographs of real panels (double-tapped breakers, oversized breakers, missing knockouts, corrosion, improper wire gauge for breaker size, missing cover screws, evidence of overheating) and students write the defect name and a one-line report narrative for each.
  3. Panel labeling exercise: in pairs, students examine a second de-energized training panel, physically locate each component from the worksheet, and fill in a blank panel-inspection checklist; instructor checks each pair's completed form before they move on.
Two de-energized training panels (mounted on plywood boards, breakers present), panel-inspection checklist (instructor-prepared), 20-image defect photo set, non-contact voltage tester (one per pair), safety glasses, InterNACHI electrical inspection course reference guideCompleted panel-inspection checklist: student must correctly identify at least 90% of components and flag all 5 seeded defects on the training panel; instructor initials each checklist. Photo drill graded: 16 of 20 correct narratives required to pass.
3Wiring Methods, Branch Circuits, and Devices8labStudents will distinguish accepted residential wiring methods (NM cable, armored cable, conduit), identify wiring-age indicators, and use a receptacle tester and non-contact voltage tester to evaluate outlets and switches within the inspector's approved scope.
  1. Wiring-type identification station: students rotate through six samples of conductor and cable types (NM-B, knob-and-tube artifacts, aluminum branch wiring, BX/AC cable, conduit with THHN, SE cable) and record the type name, typical installation era, and one common defect associated with each.
  2. Safe tester use lab: with an energized practice wall station (GFCI-protected, instructor-supervised), students use a non-contact voltage tester to confirm power presence before touching devices, then use a three-light receptacle tester on outlets in correct, open-ground, reversed-polarity, and open-neutral configurations; students record readings and write report narrative for each.
  3. Branch-circuit scavenger hunt: in a mock inspection room wired with six seeded defects (double-tapped circuit, exposed Romex in a living area, missing cover plate, reverse-polarity outlet, missing GFCI where required, improper splicing outside a box), students inspect and document every defect on their report form.
Wiring-sample display board, three-light receptacle testers (one per student), non-contact voltage testers (one per student), energized GFCI-protected practice wall station, mock inspection room with seeded defects, safety glasses, insulated gloves (class 00 minimum), lab report formsLab report form reviewed by instructor: all six seeded defects must be found and correctly described (pass = 6 of 6 found; failure of any life-safety defect triggers immediate remediation). Receptacle tester documentation: all four outlet conditions correctly read and narrated.
4Grounding, Bonding, GFCI, AFCI, and Safety Devices7theoryStudents will explain the purpose of grounding and bonding in residential systems, identify locations where GFCI and AFCI protection is required by current and historical practice, and recognize the absence or failure of these safety devices as reportable conditions.
  1. Illustrated lecture on grounding vs. bonding: students draw a simple one-line diagram showing the grounding electrode system, equipment grounding conductor, and neutral-to-ground bond at the main panel only; common errors (double neutrals under one screw, sub-panel bonding errors) are shown with photographs.
  2. GFCI/AFCI location mapping exercise: students are given floor plans of a typical three-bedroom house and must mark every location where GFCI protection is currently required (bathrooms, kitchen countertop circuits, garage, exterior, crawl space, unfinished basement, boathouse) and discuss how the required locations have evolved over decades, affecting what an inspector reports in older homes.
  3. Failure recognition role-play: in pairs, one student plays the inspector and one plays the client; the inspector tests a GFCI receptacle using the test/reset button and a plug-in tester on a practice station, narrates findings aloud, and then explains to the 'client' in plain language why a non-resetting GFCI is a safety defect requiring correction.
House floor-plan worksheets, GFCI/AFCI reference summary (instructor-prepared, citing NEC historical context without specific section numbers that vary by edition), plug-in GFCI testers, energized GFCI practice station (instructor-supervised), projector, whiteboardFloor-plan mapping exercise: scored by instructor; student must correctly place GFCI requirements at all currently required locations (pass = 90% of locations correct). Role-play observed by instructor using a four-point rubric (accuracy, safety language, client communication, report narrative); pass = 3 of 4 points on each criterion.
5Full Residential Electrical Inspection Simulation6fieldStudents will conduct a complete simulated residential electrical inspection from service entrance to branch-circuit devices, documenting all findings on a professional inspection report form, within the time and scope constraints of actual practice.
  1. Pre-inspection setup and PPE check: each student dons safety glasses and ensures non-contact voltage tester is functioning before entering the simulated inspection house; instructor verifies PPE compliance and equipment operation for every student before the inspection begins.
  2. Timed solo inspection: each student conducts a 45-minute simulated inspection of the training house (exterior service entrance, main panel, one subpanel, and all accessible outlets, switches, fixtures, and visible wiring in five rooms), completing a full electrical section of an InterNACHI-format inspection report; eight defects have been seeded by the instructor.
  3. Report debrief and peer review: students exchange completed reports; using an answer key provided by the instructor, pairs score each other's reports for defect identification, accuracy of description, and appropriate client-facing language, then discuss discrepancies as a class.
Training inspection house or fully staged lab space, seeded defect list (instructor copy only), InterNACHI-format inspection report forms, non-contact voltage testers, receptacle testers, flashlights, safety glasses, gloves, ASHI and InterNACHI standards references, timerInspection report scored by instructor against seeded-defect answer key: pass requires identification of at least 7 of 8 seeded defects with correct, professional report language; any missed life-safety defect (e.g., missing GFCI at required location, exposed energized conductors) triggers immediate one-on-one remediation before the student may sit the skills demonstration assessment.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Electrical Systems Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (30 of 40 questions)A 40-question multiple-choice exam covering electrical fundamentals, service entrance and panel components, wiring methods and defects, grounding and bonding concepts, and GFCI/AFCI requirements; questions are written to match the format and content areas tested by the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exams. Students have 60 minutes and may not use notes or references.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Panel and Device Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Student must correctly identify all components on a checklist, flag every life-safety defect, and earn a score of at least 80% on the instructor rubric (16 of 20 rubric points)Each student individually inspects a de-energized training panel and an energized device station under direct instructor observation; the instructor uses a 20-point rubric assessing component identification, defect recognition, safe tool use, PPE compliance, and verbal report narrative. Any unsafe act (reaching into an energized panel without authorization, skipping voltage-tester verification) results in automatic failure and mandatory remediation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Electrical Inspection Lab LogLog15%All five lesson lab forms submitted, complete, and earning an average score of 80% or higher across all scored itemsStudents maintain a cumulative lab log of all inspection checklists, defect-identification worksheets, report forms, and tester-reading records completed across the five lessons; the log is reviewed for completeness, accuracy of defect descriptions, and quality of report language aligned with InterNACHI and ASHI reporting expectations.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Electrical Safety Compliance CheckSafety audit15%Pass/Fail — all six safety behaviors must be observed; a single failure requires immediate remediation before the student may continue fieldwork in any courseDuring the full inspection simulation in Lesson 5, the instructor completes a six-item safety observation checklist for each student, verifying: (1) PPE donned before entering the panel area, (2) non-contact voltage tester verified functional before each use, (3) no reaching into an energized panel or opening not within the visual scope of a home inspector, (4) safe ladder or stepping posture if elevated access is used, (5) immediate verbal report of any unexpected hazard discovered, and (6) correct lockout awareness — student verbally states which components are outside inspector scope due to energized risk.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-HOME77-05 Trade course

Plumbing Systems Inspection

35 hr · $380 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to visually inspect residential and light-commercial plumbing systems — supply, drain-waste-vent, water heating, and fixtures — in accordance with InterNACHI and ASHI standards of practice. Emphasis is placed on identifying deficiencies, safety hazards, and conditions requiring further evaluation by a licensed plumber. Students practice documenting findings accurately and communicating them in plain language to a client.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to visually inspect residential and light-commercial plumbing systems — supply, drain-waste-vent, water heating, and fixtures — in accordance with InterNACHI and ASHI standards of practice. Emphasis is placed on identifying deficiencies, safety hazards, and conditions requiring further evaluation by a licensed plumber. Students practice documenting findings accurately and communicating them in plain language to a client.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Plumbing Fundamentals: Systems, Materials, and Safety; Water Supply Inspection: Distribution, Pressure, and Shutoffs; Drain-Waste-Vent Inspection: DWV Layout, Traps, and Venting; Water Heater and Fuel-Gas Line Inspection; Full Residential Plumbing Walkthrough: Field Simulation and Reporting.

What competent looks like. Identify and describe the components of a residential water supply, drain-waste-vent, and fixture system using correct trade terminology. Inspect plumbing systems for visible defects, improper materials, inadequate support, and functional concerns following InterNACHI and ASHI standards of practice. Evaluate water heater installations for safety devices, venting, fuel connections, and manufacturer clearances. Recognize plumbing conditions that exceed the inspector's scope and require referral to a licensed plumber. Document plumbing inspection findings with accurate field notes, photographs, and deficiency descriptions suitable for a formal report. Apply appropriate PPE and lockout/tagout awareness when working near water supply shutoffs, gas lines, and confined spaces during an inspection.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Plumbing Fundamentals: Systems, Materials, and Safety7theoryStudents will identify the major subsystems of a residential plumbing installation, name common pipe materials and their applications, and state the PPE and hazard-awareness requirements specific to plumbing inspection.
  1. Guided reading and annotation of the InterNACHI Standards of Practice plumbing section and the ASHI Standards of Practice plumbing section; students create a side-by-side comparison table of what each standard requires the inspector to inspect and report.
  2. Instructor-led lecture with labeled diagrams covering potable water supply (municipal and well), drain-waste-vent (DWV) layout, fixture branches, and the separation between the two systems; students label a blank residential plumbing schematic from memory.
  3. Small-group material identification exercise: students handle labeled pipe and fitting samples (copper, CPVC, PVC, PEX, galvanized steel, cast iron, ABS, polybutylene) and record the material name, typical application, color/appearance cues, and any known durability concerns noted in the InterNACHI and ASHI inspection literature.
Pipe and fitting sample kit (copper, CPVC, PVC, PEX, galvanized, cast iron, ABS, polybutylene), InterNACHI Standards of Practice (current edition), ASHI Standards of Practice (current edition), blank residential plumbing schematics, PPE (safety glasses, nitrile gloves, N95 for mold/mildew risk), student inspection field notebookStudents score at least 75% on a 20-question written quiz covering system components, pipe material identification, and PPE/hazard requirements; instructor spot-checks labeled schematics for completeness.
2Water Supply Inspection: Distribution, Pressure, and Shutoffs7demoStudents will demonstrate how to trace and evaluate a residential water supply system — from the main shutoff through distribution piping to fixtures — and identify deficiencies including leaks, improper materials, inadequate support, and pressure concerns.
  1. Instructor live demonstration on the program's plumbing training mock-up: locating the main water shutoff, tracing hot and cold supply lines, operating fixture valves, and probing exposed pipe insulation and supports; students take structured field notes using a provided inspection checklist.
  2. Paired practice inspection of the training mock-up: each pair traces the supply system, operates shutoffs, runs water at multiple fixtures simultaneously to check flow and pressure, and records findings on the checklist; instructor circulates and coaches technique.
  3. Deficiency card exercise: instructor presents a set of photographs depicting 15 common supply-side defects (polybutylene pipe, galvanized corrosion, cross-connections, missing main shutoff label, inadequate pipe support, evidence of prior leak repair); students write a one-sentence deficiency description for each as it would appear in a client report.
Plumbing training mock-up with shutoffs, pressure gauge (0–100 psi range), flashlight and headlamp, mirror, moisture meter, inspection checklist forms, deficiency photograph card set, field notebook, PPE (safety glasses, nitrile gloves)Students correctly locate and describe at least 8 of 10 planted defects on the training mock-up during paired practice; instructor verifies each deficiency description is accurate, non-alarmist, and written in plain language.
3Drain-Waste-Vent Inspection: DWV Layout, Traps, and Venting7labStudents will inspect a drain-waste-vent system for improper slope, missing or inadequate traps, blocked or improperly terminated vents, and evidence of sewage backup or leakage.
  1. Lab station rotation: students use a digital level/slope app and a 4-foot level to verify drain pitch on exposed horizontal drain runs in the mock-up, recording measurements and flagging runs that fall outside the generally accepted range for proper drainage; instructor debriefs findings as a group.
  2. Trap and vent identification exercise on the mock-up and cutaway display board: students locate every trap (P-trap, S-trap, drum trap) and every vent penetration visible from the inspector's accessible vantage points, sketch their locations on a floor-plan worksheet, and note any missing traps or S-trap configurations flagged in InterNACHI literature.
  3. Simulated sewage odor and staining scenario: instructor introduces safe indicator (wintergreen extract at a floor drain) to demonstrate odor travel; students use their senses and moisture meter to locate the source drain, document the finding, and write the referral statement recommending a licensed plumber evaluate for sewer gas risk.
Plumbing training mock-up with exposed DWV runs, digital level / slope app, 4-foot level, moisture meter, flashlight, drain-line cutaway display board, floor-plan worksheets, wintergreen extract (odor demonstration only), PPE (safety glasses, nitrile gloves, N95 when odor present), field notebookStudents submit a completed lab log for all three stations; log must correctly identify pipe slope status, all visible trap types, and at least one vent deficiency; instructor grades log using a rubric — pass is 75% of rubric points earned.
4Water Heater and Fuel-Gas Line Inspection7practiceStudents will inspect gas and electric water heaters and associated fuel-gas piping for proper installation, safety device function, venting adequacy, and conditions requiring referral — without operating controls beyond the inspector's scope.
  1. Instructor demonstration on a gas water heater training unit: identifying the T&P (temperature and pressure) relief valve and its discharge pipe termination, checking for proper venting (draft hood, flue pipe slope, clearances, termination), locating the gas shutoff, inspecting the area for evidence of combustion spillage (soot, rust, staining), and checking the manufacturer's label for capacity and age; students record findings on a water heater inspection form.
  2. Paired practice on both a gas and an electric water heater training unit: students work through a structured checklist (age, capacity, T&P valve and discharge pipe, anode rod access, seismic strapping where required, energy factor label, clearances, signs of leakage or corrosion) and photograph each finding; instructor provides immediate feedback.
  3. Fuel-gas line visual inspection exercise on the mock-up: students visually trace accessible gas piping from the meter to appliances, identify pipe material and fittings, note the presence of shutoffs at appliances, use a combustible gas detector in demonstration mode to understand its role, and write a finding statement for a deliberately installed unapproved flexible connector used past its rated length.
Gas water heater training unit with T&P valve and draft hood, electric water heater training unit, water heater inspection checklist, combustible gas detector (demonstration unit), flashlight, mirror, PPE (safety glasses, nitrile gloves — no open flames during gas line exercise), field notebook, camera or smartphone for photo documentationEach student independently completes a water heater inspection form on the gas training unit; pass requires correct identification of at least 6 of 8 checklist items and an accurate, appropriately worded referral statement for any safety-related finding.
5Full Residential Plumbing Walkthrough: Field Simulation and Reporting7fieldStudents will independently conduct a complete plumbing inspection of a simulated residential structure, document all findings with notes and photographs, and produce a professional-quality plumbing section of an inspection report.
  1. Solo plumbing inspection of the program's full-scale residential mock house or an approved partner property: students follow the InterNACHI and ASHI scope, systematically inspecting supply, DWV, water heater, fuel-gas piping, and all accessible fixtures; instructor observes from a distance without coaching and records a competency observation checklist.
  2. Post-inspection photograph and note review session: students organize their field photographs and raw notes into logical categories (supply, DWV, water heater, fixtures) and draft deficiency descriptions for every condition found, distinguishing safety hazards, defects requiring repair, and items for monitoring.
  3. Report writing workshop: students use a digital inspection report template (e.g., an InterNACHI-compatible platform or provided word-processing template) to complete the plumbing section, embed photographs with captions, and write an executive summary paragraph; completed reports are peer-reviewed against the InterNACHI SOP checklist before submission to the instructor.
Full-scale residential mock house or approved inspection property, InterNACHI SOP checklist, ASHI SOP checklist, digital inspection report template, smartphone or digital camera, moisture meter, flashlight, mirror, combustible gas detector (if gas present), PPE (safety glasses, nitrile gloves, work boots), field notebook, laptop or tablet for report completionInstructor scores the submitted plumbing report against a 30-point rubric covering scope completeness, accuracy of findings, clarity of deficiency descriptions, appropriate use of referral language, and photograph quality; pass is 23 of 30 points (approximately 75%), and zero critical safety findings may be missed.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Plumbing Systems Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 questions)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering pipe materials, system components, DWV principles, water heater requirements, fuel-gas inspection scope, and InterNACHI/ASHI standards of practice for plumbing. Questions are written at the same cognitive level as InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exam items.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Plumbing Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass requires no missed safety-critical findings and a score of 75% or higher on the instructor observation rubricThe student conducts a timed, unassisted plumbing inspection of the residential mock house while the instructor scores performance on a structured observation rubric covering inspection sequence, tool use, defect identification, professional demeanor, and appropriate scope limits. Any undetected safety-critical condition (active gas leak indicator, missing T&P discharge pipe, active sewage backup) results in an automatic retest.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Plumbing Inspection Lab LogLog15%75% of rubric points across all three lab stations; no station may score below 60%The cumulative lab log from Lesson 3 (DWV lab) is reviewed against a rubric assessing accuracy of slope measurements, completeness of trap and vent identification, quality of deficiency write-ups, and proper use of referral language. Students who fall below the station minimum must repeat that station before the skills demonstration.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Plumbing Inspection Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% compliance required; any single failure requires immediate remediation and recheck before the student may re-enter field activitiesA non-negotiable behavioral checklist completed by the instructor during field activities verifying that the student consistently wears required PPE, never operates gas shutoffs or electrical disconnects beyond inspector scope, correctly identifies and verbally reports any condition suggesting active gas presence, and demonstrates awareness of confined-space and slip-trip-fall hazards during crawlspace and basement inspections.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-HOME77-06 Trade course

HVAC Systems Inspection

34 hr · $365 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to inspect, evaluate, and report on residential and light-commercial heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems using industry standards of practice. The course covers forced-air furnaces, heat pumps, central air conditioning, ductwork, combustion safety, and ventilation requirements as they apply to home inspection. Lessons map directly to HVAC-related content areas tested on the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exams and required for state home inspector licensure.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to inspect, evaluate, and report on residential and light-commercial heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems using industry standards of practice. The course covers forced-air furnaces, heat pumps, central air conditioning, ductwork, combustion safety, and ventilation requirements as they apply to home inspection. Lessons map directly to HVAC-related content areas tested on the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exams and required for state home inspector licensure.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: HVAC Fundamentals and Inspection Safety; Heating Systems: Gas, Oil, and Electric Furnaces; Cooling Systems, Heat Pumps, and Refrigerant Safety; Ductwork, Ventilation, and Indoor Air Quality; Integrated HVAC Inspection Practice and Reporting.

What competent looks like. Identify and describe the major components of gas, oil, and electric forced-air heating systems, heat pumps, and central air-conditioning systems and explain how each component functions. Perform a systematic visual inspection of an HVAC system following InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice, documenting deficiencies using correct trade terminology. Use an IR thermometer, combustible-gas detector, and flue-draft gauge safely and correctly to gather field data during an inspection without creating hazardous conditions. Recognize safety-critical defects—including improper flue venting, cracked heat exchangers, inadequate combustion air, and refrigerant leaks—and determine the appropriate reporting action. Apply OSHA lockout/tagout principles and proper PPE selection when working around energized HVAC equipment during an inspection. Produce a clear, defensible written narrative and checklist report section for HVAC findings that meets InterNACHI and ASHI reporting standards.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1HVAC Fundamentals and Inspection Safety6theoryStudents will identify the main HVAC system types found in residential buildings, explain how each moves heat, and apply OSHA lockout/tagout and PPE requirements before approaching energized equipment.
  1. Labeled diagram exercise: students receive a blank cross-section of a forced-air gas furnace and a split-system air conditioner and label every major component (heat exchanger, burner assembly, flue, evaporator coil, condenser, refrigerant lines, filter, blower) using a reference card, then peer-check against an answer key.
  2. Short lecture and discussion comparing heating systems side by side—gas/oil forced-air, electric furnace, heat pump (air-source and ground-source), hydronic baseboard, and mini-split—focusing on what an inspector can and cannot observe without opening sealed components.
  3. Safety scenario roleplay: instructor presents three pre-inspection scenarios (live panel near HVAC disconnect, gas odor detected, system running during inspection) and small groups use the OSHA lockout/tagout decision flowchart and PPE selection guide to decide their approach before any inspection begins, then debrief as a class.
Labeled HVAC diagram worksheets; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 lockout/tagout summary card; InterNACHI Standards of Practice (current edition); ASHI Standards of Practice (current edition); PPE kit (safety glasses, nitrile gloves, dust mask); whiteboard and projector.5-question oral or written exit quiz on system types, component functions, and lockout/tagout steps; students must score 80% or higher to advance; any missed safety step requires immediate re-instruction before the next lesson.
2Heating Systems: Gas, Oil, and Electric Furnaces8demoStudents will observe and then independently walk through an instructor-led inspection of a gas forced-air furnace, identifying the heat exchanger, flue venting, burner operation, controls, and combustion-air provisions, and flag at least five common defects.
  1. Instructor live demonstration on a training furnace (or high-resolution video with pause-and-discuss for off-site): step-by-step operation check—set thermostat to call for heat, observe ignition sequence, listen for delayed ignition sounds, check burner flame color and pattern, verify flue draft at the draft diverter with a piece of tissue or a draft gauge, and confirm the heat exchanger access panel seal is intact.
  2. Crack-the-heat-exchanger drill: students examine a set of photographs and a physical sectioned furnace heat exchanger (or resin cast replica showing cracks) and use a flashlight and mirror to attempt to locate defects, recording findings on an HVAC inspection field form; instructor confirms findings.
  3. Combustion-air calculation exercise: using a simplified residential rule-of-thumb method from manufacturer guidelines, students calculate whether a given utility room has adequate combustion-air openings for a listed furnace BTU input, then decide whether to recommend further evaluation by a licensed HVAC technician.
Training gas furnace or sectioned furnace prop; flashlight; inspection mirror; combustible-gas leak detector (calibrated); tissue strip or magnehelic draft gauge; IR non-contact thermometer; HVAC inspection field checklist form; ACCA Manual J reference for combustion-air guidance; nitrile gloves; safety glasses.Completed HVAC field checklist for the training furnace with correct entries for at least 10 of 12 inspection points; student must correctly flag any deliberately introduced defects (minimum 80% detection rate); instructor initials form to confirm competence.
3Cooling Systems, Heat Pumps, and Refrigerant Safety7demoStudents will inspect a central air-conditioning split system and a heat pump, measure supply and return air temperatures to assess approximate system performance, and explain why inspectors do not open refrigerant lines or service refrigerant.
  1. Hands-on temperature-differential measurement: in pairs, students use an IR thermometer to measure supply-air temperature at a register and return-air temperature at the air handler, calculate the difference, and compare against the general acceptable range cited in InterNACHI standards; they document findings on a field form and determine whether further evaluation is warranted.
  2. Condenser and evaporator coil inspection walkthrough: with the system off and appropriate PPE on, students inspect the outdoor condenser for fin damage, refrigerant line insulation condition, clearances, electrical disconnect accessibility, and evidence of refrigerant leaks (oil staining); they then locate the evaporator coil access and assess drain pan and condensate line condition without removing sealed components.
  3. Regulatory boundary discussion and EPA Section 608 awareness: instructor presents the scope of what a home inspector reports versus what a licensed HVAC technician must do (refrigerant handling, pressure testing); students read an InterNACHI scope-of-inspection excerpt and write a one-paragraph report narrative correctly scoping the inspector's role and recommending further evaluation where appropriate.
Split-system air conditioner or heat pump training unit (or high-quality demonstration video); IR non-contact thermometer; flashlight; HVAC field checklist; condensate drain inspection mirror; EPA Section 608 summary handout; InterNACHI Standards of Practice; safety glasses; nitrile gloves.Students submit a completed field checklist and a written temperature-differential calculation with interpretation; both must be accurate and the narrative must correctly limit inspector scope; 80% accuracy on checklist points required to pass.
4Ductwork, Ventilation, and Indoor Air Quality7labStudents will evaluate a ductwork system and building ventilation components for installation defects, leakage indicators, and blocked pathways, and connect findings to health and energy-efficiency impacts.
  1. Duct defect identification lab: students move through a set of stations in the lab area, each displaying a segment of duct or a photograph showing a specific defect (disconnected flex duct, missing duct insulation in unconditioned space, crimped flex duct, blocked return-air grille, improperly terminated bath exhaust fan, clothes-dryer duct terminated in attic space); students record the defect, its location, and recommended action on a lab worksheet.
  2. Filter and IAQ component inspection: students inspect and document condition of air filters at varying stages of loading, electronic air cleaners, humidifiers, and UV systems installed in a training air handler, noting manufacturer maintenance indicators and visible soiling or biological growth, and practice writing report language that does not overstate or understate findings.
  3. Ventilation adequacy walkthrough: using an ASHRAE 62.2 summary reference and a floor plan, students identify required exhaust ventilation locations (bathrooms, kitchen range hood), trace duct paths on the diagram, confirm proper termination through the building envelope, and note any deficiencies; they record findings in the format required for the report-writing course that follows.
Duct defect station props (flex duct, sheet metal sections, tape, mastic); air handler training unit with filter rack; range of used filters; ASHRAE 62.2 residential ventilation summary reference; lab worksheet; inspection mirror; flashlight; safety glasses; pen.Lab worksheet graded by instructor: students must correctly identify and describe at least 80% of defects across all stations and provide a defensible report action (monitor, recommend repair, recommend licensed evaluation) for each; log is signed by instructor as evidence of lab completion.
5Integrated HVAC Inspection Practice and Reporting6practiceStudents will conduct an end-to-end simulated HVAC inspection on a full training system or residential host site, complete a professional field report section, and receive structured feedback mapped to credential exam competency areas.
  1. Full simulated HVAC inspection: each student independently inspects a training system (heating unit, cooling unit, thermostat, ductwork visible sections, and ventilation terminations) using their field checklist without instructor prompting; the instructor has pre-introduced at least six defects of varying severity and records which defects each student identifies.
  2. Report narrative drafting: immediately after the inspection, students draft the HVAC section of a home inspection report—using the format and terminology introduced in course previews and required by InterNACHI and ASHI standards—including system description, observed defects with locations, photos or sketch references, and recommended actions; they have 45 minutes to complete the draft.
  3. Credential-mapped debrief: instructor uses a scoring rubric aligned to HVAC content areas from the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI exam blueprints to review each student's inspection findings and report narrative as a class, pointing out correct and incorrect entries and explaining how each topic area appears in licensing and credential exams.
Training HVAC system with pre-introduced defects; HVAC inspection field checklist; blank report template (InterNACHI or ASHI format); digital camera or smartphone for documentation; credential exam competency rubric; IR thermometer; flashlight; inspection mirror; combustible-gas detector; safety glasses; nitrile gloves.Instructor scores the inspection using the defect detection rubric (student must find at least 5 of 6 planted defects, 83%) and the report narrative rubric (correct scope, terminology, and recommended actions for at least 80% of entries); any safety protocol failure—such as touching live components or skipping PPE—results in an automatic retest of the full lesson.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
HVAC Systems Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% correct (40 of 50 questions)A 50-question multiple-choice written exam covering system types, component functions, combustion principles, refrigeration basics, ductwork and ventilation standards, and defect identification; questions are written to mirror the style and content areas of the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exams. Students who score below 80% complete a targeted review and retake an equivalent form within one week.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Live HVAC Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Student detects at least 83% of planted defects and receives no critical safety deductionsThe instructor prepares a training HVAC system with a minimum of six defects spanning heating, cooling, ductwork, and ventilation; each student conducts a timed solo inspection, narrates findings aloud, and submits a completed field checklist. Any critical safety failure—bypassing lockout/tagout, touching energized components, or failing to report a CO-risk defect—results in an automatic fail and mandatory remediation before retesting.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HVAC Inspection Lab LogLog15%All five lab and demo session logs submitted and 80% of entries judged accurate and complete by instructorStudents maintain a running lab log across all five lessons, recording objectives, tools used, defects observed, and reflections on how each activity connects to credential exam content areas; each entry is signed by the instructor at the end of the session to confirm attendance and participation. The compiled log is submitted at the end of the course and evaluated for accuracy, completeness, and professional documentation quality.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HVAC Safety Protocol CheckSafety audit15%100% correct on all critical safety steps; no partial credit for lockout/tagout or CO-risk itemsA practical safety checklist evaluation administered during the skills demonstration: the evaluator observes and scores the student on PPE selection and use, application of lockout/tagout procedure at the HVAC disconnect, response to a simulated gas-odor scenario, and correct reporting language for a combustion-safety defect. All critical items must be performed correctly; any missed critical step requires immediate re-instruction and a full retake of the safety evaluation before the student may advance.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-HOME77-07 Trade course

Home Inspection Report Writing

34 hr · $365 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to produce clear, accurate, legally defensible written inspection reports that satisfy InterNACHI, ASHI, and state licensing standards of practice. Emphasis is placed on objective language, systematic organization, defect classification, photo documentation, and digital report software used in professional practice. Graduates can deliver a complete written report that communicates findings to clients and withstands regulatory and legal scrutiny.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to produce clear, accurate, legally defensible written inspection reports that satisfy InterNACHI, ASHI, and state licensing standards of practice. Emphasis is placed on objective language, systematic organization, defect classification, photo documentation, and digital report software used in professional practice. Graduates can deliver a complete written report that communicates findings to clients and withstands regulatory and legal scrutiny.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Anatomy of a Professional Inspection Report; Writing Clear, Objective, and Defensible Defect Descriptions; Photo Documentation and Digital Report Software; Legal Language, Liability, and Report Delivery; Full Report Production and Quality-Control Review.

What competent looks like. Produce a complete, organized inspection report using professional report-writing software that documents all inspected systems and components in the order required by applicable standards of practice. Classify and describe defects using objective, non-alarmist language that distinguishes safety hazards, major defects, and maintenance items without exceeding the inspector's scope of practice. Integrate field photographs with written narrative so that each image is captioned, located by system and component, and directly supports the written finding. Apply correct legal and liability-limiting language, including scope limitations, exclusions, and referral recommendations, consistent with InterNACHI and ASHI standards and state licensing requirements. Review and self-edit a draft report against a quality-control checklist to eliminate ambiguous language, unsupported conclusions, and omissions before delivery. Deliver a finalized digital report to a simulated client within the timeframe required by typical state licensing rules and professional practice standards.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Anatomy of a Professional Inspection Report6theoryStudents identify every required section of a home inspection report and explain how InterNACHI and ASHI standards of practice define what must be reported, how it must be described, and what the inspector is not required to report.
  1. Students read and annotate a published InterNACHI Standards of Practice report-content section and an ASHI Standards of Practice report-content section side by side, then complete a two-column comparison chart identifying matching and differing requirements.
  2. Instructor walks through a completed sample report projected on screen, pausing at each section (cover page, scope, systems narratives, summary page, photos, limitations) while students label a blank report outline with the section's purpose and the standard that requires it.
  3. In pairs, students receive three redacted real-world reports of varying quality and rank them from best to weakest using a provided evaluation rubric, then justify their ranking in a short oral discussion with the class.
InterNACHI Standards of Practice (current edition, free at internachi.org); ASHI Standards of Practice (current edition, free at ashi.org); three sample inspection reports (provided by instructor); blank report outline worksheet; two-column comparison chart template; evaluation rubricStudents complete the blank report outline with all required sections correctly labeled and write a two-sentence explanation for each section's legal or professional purpose; pass = 80% of sections correctly labeled and explained.
2Writing Clear, Objective, and Defensible Defect Descriptions8theoryStudents write defect narratives for at least ten different conditions using the condition-location-consequence-recommendation structure, using objective language free of opinion, alarm, or diagnostic conclusions beyond the inspector's scope.
  1. Instructor models the four-part writing formula (Condition – Location – Consequence – Recommendation) using five projected photos of real defects, writing a narrative for each one aloud and explaining each word choice, then students rewrite three poorly written sample narratives using the formula.
  2. Students work through a 'word swap' exercise: they receive a list of 20 problematic phrases (e.g., 'catastrophic failure,' 'the seller hid,' 'structurally unsound') and replace each with a compliant, objective alternative, referencing an instructor-supplied approved-language guide.
  3. Each student writes complete defect narratives for a set of ten defect photographs (covering at least four different systems), self-checks against the formula checklist, then exchanges with a peer for written feedback before submitting to the instructor.
Set of 30 defect photographs (instructor-prepared from public-domain or permission-granted inspection images); four-part writing formula reference card; problematic-phrase list and approved-language guide; peer-review feedback form; word-processor or report-software accessInstructor scores each of the ten submitted defect narratives on a 4-point rubric (condition stated, location stated, consequence noted, recommendation given, language objective); pass = average score of 3 out of 4 across all ten narratives with no narrative scoring 0 on any element.
3Photo Documentation and Digital Report Software8demoStudents capture, organize, and embed inspection photographs into a digital report using professional report-writing software so that each photo is captioned, linked to the correct system, and supports the written finding.
  1. Instructor demonstrates the full workflow in a live screen-share: importing photos from a mobile device into the report software, dragging them into the correct system section, writing captions using the condition-location-consequence formula, and checking that the summary page auto-populates; students follow along on their own devices with a provided practice report file.
  2. Students conduct a 30-minute structured photo walk of a school building or inspection training mockup, capturing at least 20 photographs of assigned conditions (minimum four systems represented), applying consistent framing, lighting, and scale techniques taught in the demonstration.
  3. Students build a complete photo-supported digital report section for one assigned system (e.g., roofing or electrical panel) by embedding their field photos, writing captions and narratives, setting defect-severity ratings in the software, and generating a PDF preview for peer review.
Smartphones or digital cameras; laptop or tablet per student with report-writing software installed (e.g., HomeGauge, Spectora, or equivalent; instructor selects one platform); practice report template file; photo-technique reference sheet; training mockup or accessible building for photo walk; PDF viewerThe completed single-system report section is graded on a checklist: every photo is captioned with all four formula elements, photos are placed in the correct system section, severity ratings are assigned and consistent with the narrative, and the PDF exports without errors; pass = all checklist items met with no uncaptioned photos and no misplaced images.
4Legal Language, Liability, and Report Delivery6theoryStudents correctly apply scope limitations, exclusions, referral language, and pre-inspection agreement references within a report, and explain the inspector's legal obligations regarding report delivery timelines under typical state licensing requirements.
  1. Students read and mark up a sample pre-inspection agreement and a state licensing statute excerpt on report delivery timelines, then answer a guided reading worksheet that asks them to identify: what is excluded from inspection, under what conditions the inspector must refer to a specialist, and what the delivery deadline is.
  2. Instructor presents six scenario cards describing situations where the inspector encountered a condition outside scope (e.g., active mold remediation, buried oil tank indicator, asbestos-suspect material); in small groups, students draft the exact language they would write in the report—referral recommendation, limitation statement, or both—then groups compare and discuss.
  3. Each student writes the 'limitations and exclusions' section and the 'recommendations for further evaluation' section for a partially completed practice report, then checks their language against an instructor-supplied compliant model before submitting.
Sample pre-inspection agreement (InterNACHI template or equivalent); state licensing statute excerpt on report delivery (generic/representative example provided by instructor); six scenario cards; limitations-and-exclusions model language document; word-processor accessStudents submit their drafted limitations, exclusions, and referral sections; instructor checks that every out-of-scope item is acknowledged with a compliant referral recommendation, no diagnostic conclusion exceeds the inspector's role, and delivery-timeline obligations are correctly stated; pass = 80% of checklist items correct.
5Full Report Production and Quality-Control Review6practiceStudents produce a complete, multi-system inspection report from a set of field notes, defect photographs, and a scenario brief, then self-edit and peer-review the report against a professional quality-control checklist before final submission.
  1. Each student receives a comprehensive scenario packet containing handwritten field notes, 25 photographs with metadata, and a property description; working independently, students organize the materials, build the full report in the report-writing software, and write all sections from cover page through summary within a two-hour timed session that mirrors real-world delivery pressure.
  2. Students apply a provided 20-point QC checklist to their own draft report (checking: all systems addressed, every photo captioned, summary matches body, no alarmist language, limitation statements present, referral recommendations for out-of-scope items, client-ready formatting) and produce a written self-assessment noting any corrections made.
  3. Students exchange completed reports with a partner for a structured peer review using the same QC checklist, write specific written feedback for at least five checklist categories, then meet in a brief conference to discuss the reviewer's findings and agree on final revisions before both students submit their finalized PDFs.
Scenario packet per student (field notes, 25 photographs, property description brief); report-writing software; 20-point QC checklist; peer-review written feedback form; PDF export capability; printer (optional, for hard-copy review)Instructor scores the finalized submitted report using a detailed rubric covering completeness (all required sections present), accuracy of defect descriptions (four-part formula), photo-narrative alignment, legal language compliance, and QC self-assessment quality; pass = score of 80% or higher on the rubric with no section entirely missing and no narrative that makes an out-of-scope diagnostic conclusion.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Report Standards Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% correct (40 of 50 questions)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer written exam covering InterNACHI and ASHI report-content requirements, the four-part defect-description formula, categories of defect severity, legal and liability language, exclusions, referral obligations, and state licensing report-delivery requirements. Questions are drawn from lesson objectives across all five lessons and are mapped to the report-writing competency areas tested on the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credential exams.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Live Report Production Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Score of 80% or higher on the instructor rubric with zero uncaptioned photos and zero out-of-scope diagnostic conclusionsStudents complete a full inspection report from a fresh scenario packet (new photographs and field notes not used in lessons) within a timed session, producing a client-ready PDF that is evaluated by the instructor against the same 20-point rubric used in Lesson 5; the student must also briefly defend two report decisions verbally to demonstrate understanding rather than chance accuracy.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Report Writing Lab LogLog15%All five lesson entries present and signed off by instructor; average activity score of 75% or higher across graded in-class activitiesStudents maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course containing their annotated comparison chart (Lesson 1), ten defect narratives with peer feedback (Lesson 2), single-system photo-report PDF (Lesson 3), limitations-and-referral language drafts (Lesson 4), and QC self-assessment with peer review form (Lesson 5); the log demonstrates progressive skill development and is reviewed by the instructor at the end of the course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Professional and Legal Language Safety CheckSafety audit15%Zero instances of out-of-scope diagnostic conclusions, zero alarmist or opinion-based phrases, and all required limitation and referral statements present; any failure requires a full report revision and re-check before course completionThe instructor performs a targeted review of every report submitted during the course—lesson activities, the skills demonstration report, and the lab log—specifically scanning for language that exceeds inspector scope, diagnoses cause or assigns fault, omits required referrals for observable out-of-scope conditions, or could expose the inspector to liability; this check is pass/fail and must be cleared independently of the percentage-based rubric scores.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-HOME77-08 Trade course

Standards of Practice for Home & Building Inspection

34 hr · $365 COMPLIMENTARY

This course teaches students to apply the InterNACHI Standards of Practice and ASHI Standards of Practice as the governing frameworks for every residential inspection, defining what must be inspected, what may be excluded, and how findings must be communicated. Students analyze real inspection scenarios to distinguish required observations from optional services, practice applying limitation and exclusion language correctly, and learn how state licensing law layers on top of industry standards. By the end of the course, students can conduct and document a compliant inspection under both major SOP frameworks and explain their legal and ethical obligations to clients and regulators.

Outcomes
Course text

This course teaches students to apply the InterNACHI Standards of Practice and ASHI Standards of Practice as the governing frameworks for every residential inspection, defining what must be inspected, what may be excluded, and how findings must be communicated. Students analyze real inspection scenarios to distinguish required observations from optional services, practice applying limitation and exclusion language correctly, and learn how state licensing law layers on top of industry standards. By the end of the course, students can conduct and document a compliant inspection under both major SOP frameworks and explain their legal and ethical obligations to clients and regulators.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Anatomy of an SOP: Structure, Purpose, and Legal Standing; Required Scope: What Must Be Inspected and How It Must Be Reported; Limitations, Exclusions, and Specialist Referrals; Codes of Ethics, Conflicts of Interest, and Professional Conduct; Simulated Full-Scope SOP Compliance Inspection.

What competent looks like. Apply the InterNACHI Standards of Practice and ASHI Standards of Practice to identify the required scope of a residential inspection, including systems and components that must be inspected, reported, and described. Distinguish correctly between items that are outside the scope of an inspection, items the inspector may exclude with written notice, and items that are deferred for a specialist, using SOP language precisely. Explain how state home inspector licensing statutes and administrative rules interact with and sometimes expand or restrict industry SOP requirements, and identify the controlling document in cases of conflict. Apply the InterNACHI and ASHI Codes of Ethics to realistic scenarios involving conflicts of interest, fee splitting, referral relationships, and inspector conduct. Recognize conditions that trigger safety-related reporting obligations under both SOPs and communicate those findings to clients in compliant, plain-language report language. Complete a compliant inspection scope checklist for a single-family residential inspection that satisfies the minimum requirements of both the InterNACHI SOP and the ASHI SOP simultaneously.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Anatomy of an SOP: Structure, Purpose, and Legal Standing7theoryStudents will identify and explain every major section of both the InterNACHI Standards of Practice and the ASHI Standards of Practice, state the legal status of each, and describe how state licensing law can modify inspector obligations.
  1. Side-by-side markup exercise: students receive printed copies of both SOPs, highlight parallel sections with two colors, and annotate three differences in scope language between the two documents, then share findings in a class discussion.
  2. State law layering exercise: using the instructor-supplied excerpt from the relevant state home inspector licensing statute and administrative rules, students complete a three-column table showing (1) the SOP requirement, (2) the state rule requirement, and (3) which is more stringent and therefore controls.
  3. Mock client FAQ role-play: in pairs, one student plays a client asking 'Why didn't you inspect the septic tank?' and the other must cite the specific SOP exclusion language and the corresponding state rule to justify the scope limitation, then switch roles.
Printed and digital copies of InterNACHI Standards of Practice (current edition), ASHI Standards of Practice (current edition), state home inspector licensing statute and administrative rule excerpts, three-column comparison worksheet, highlighters.Students complete the three-column table with at least 10 correctly classified requirements and zero misidentifications of which document controls; pass mark is 80% accuracy on a 10-item written quiz on SOP structure and legal hierarchy.
2Required Scope: What Must Be Inspected and How It Must Be Reported8demoStudents will walk through each required system and component category in both SOPs, demonstrate correct identification of included items versus excluded items in sample floor plans and photos, and draft compliant scope-of-inspection summary language for a written report.
  1. Instructor-led walkthrough demo using a set of 40 annotated inspection photographs: instructor projects each photo, identifies the system or component category, cites the controlling SOP section, and shows the compliant report language; students take structured notes on a provided SOP-section-keyed outline.
  2. Scope boundary sorting activity: students receive 30 component cards (e.g., 'underground oil tank,' 'main electrical panel,' 'skylight flashing,' 'private well pump,' 'attached garage door opener') and sort them into three bins — Required, Excluded by Default, and Inspector-Discretion — citing SOP language for each placement, then compare against the answer key and discuss discrepancies.
  3. Compliant summary drafting: students draft a one-paragraph 'Scope of Inspection' section for a sample single-family residence using only SOP-approved terminology, then exchange drafts with a partner for peer review against an instructor-provided SOP compliance checklist.
40-photograph inspection image set (instructor-prepared), 30 laminated component cards, three labeled sorting bins, SOP compliance checklist, sample report template, InterNACHI and ASHI SOPs.Scope boundary sort scored against answer key — pass is 27 of 30 cards correctly classified with correct SOP citation; compliant summary draft earns pass if it contains zero excluded terminology per the peer-review checklist, confirmed by instructor sign-off.
3Limitations, Exclusions, and Specialist Referrals6practiceStudents will correctly apply SOP limitation and exclusion language to complex inspection scenarios, write defensible limitation statements in report format, and determine when a specialist referral is required versus recommended.
  1. Scenario-based decision tree exercise: students work through eight written inspection scenarios (e.g., snow-covered roof, locked electrical panel, crawlspace with standing water, finished basement hiding structure) and complete a decision tree for each — inspectable as-is, limited with documented reason, excluded with client notice, or deferred to specialist — citing SOP and, where applicable, state rule.
  2. Limitation language drafting workshop: using the results from the decision tree exercise, students write a compliant limitation or exclusion statement for each of the eight scenarios in report-ready language, referencing both the InterNACHI and ASHI model language examples provided by the instructor.
  3. Peer arbitration: two student pairs swap their eight drafted statements, attempt to identify any statement that could expose the inspector to a scope-of-practice complaint, and present their findings to the class with SOP citations; instructor facilitates correction of disputed items.
Eight printed scenario cards, decision tree worksheet, model limitation-language reference sheet (instructor-prepared from SOP text), InterNACHI and ASHI SOPs, state licensing rule excerpts.Decision trees scored for correctness — pass is 7 of 8 correct classifications; limitation statements assessed by instructor for SOP compliance and defensibility — pass requires zero statements that misrepresent or omit required disclosure language.
4Codes of Ethics, Conflicts of Interest, and Professional Conduct7theoryStudents will analyze the InterNACHI Code of Ethics and the ASHI Code of Ethics, apply both to realistic professional dilemmas involving conflicts of interest and referral relationships, and identify conduct that would constitute a license violation under typical state rules.
  1. Code of ethics annotation: students read both codes and annotate a printed copy with margin notes linking each provision to a real-world inspector situation described on a companion scenario card set (12 scenarios covering fee splitting, inspector-contractor referral relationships, client confidentiality, and inspector interest in the property).
  2. Ethics tribunal simulation: the class is divided into panels of three; each panel receives two dilemma cases in writing, deliberates on whether the inspector's conduct violated the InterNACHI code, the ASHI code, or both, and delivers a verbal ruling with code citations; the instructor then presents the model ruling and facilitates debrief.
  3. State licensing consequence mapping: students research (using provided state licensing statute excerpts) what formal consequences — reprimand, suspension, revocation — apply to three specific ethics violations and complete a one-page consequence-mapping worksheet comparing state enforcement authority to the professional association's disciplinary process.
Printed InterNACHI Code of Ethics, printed ASHI Code of Ethics, 12 scenario cards, consequence-mapping worksheet, state licensing statute excerpts, pen and highlighter.Ethics tribunal rulings assessed for correct code citation — each panel must correctly cite the violated provision in at least 3 of 4 presented cases to pass; consequence-mapping worksheet graded for accuracy — pass is 80% of consequences correctly matched to their legal authority.
5Simulated Full-Scope SOP Compliance Inspection6labStudents will conduct a complete residential inspection of the program's practice structure following both the InterNACHI SOP and the ASHI SOP simultaneously, documenting every required system, applying correct limitation language where access is restricted, and producing a compliant scope checklist that can be verified against both standards.
  1. Pre-inspection SOP scope planning: before entering the practice structure, each student completes a pre-inspection checklist itemizing every system and component category required by both SOPs and noting any anticipated limitations (e.g., known inaccessible crawlspace hatch), then reviews with the instructor for approval before proceeding.
  2. Timed SOP-compliant walkthrough: students conduct a full inspection of the program's practice house or lab structure, working through all required categories in a systematic order of their choice, marking each completed category on their scope checklist with brief field notes, and writing a limitation statement for each item that cannot be fully inspected, all within a defined time block to simulate real-world pacing.
  3. Post-inspection scope reconciliation: immediately after the walkthrough, students compare their completed checklist against an instructor-held master SOP compliance matrix; any required category missed or any incorrect limitation statement is flagged, and students write a one-sentence corrective note explaining how they would address the gap if the inspection were real.
InterNACHI SOP and ASHI SOP (pocket reference or tablet), pre-inspection scope checklist (student-prepared), instructor master SOP compliance matrix, flashlight, personal PPE (hard hat, safety glasses, gloves as site conditions require), ladder (6-foot minimum), moisture meter, practice structure access.Completed scope checklist verified against master matrix — pass requires all required SOP system categories documented with no more than two missing items and all access limitations accompanied by compliant written limitation language; instructor signs off on the checklist as the lab completion record.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
SOP Knowledge ExaminationWritten exam25%75% or higher (minimum 38 of 50 questions correct)A 50-question closed-book written examination covering both the InterNACHI Standards of Practice and the ASHI Standards of Practice, including required scope, default exclusions, limitation language, reporting obligations, code of ethics provisions, and the relationship between industry SOPs and state licensing law. Questions are drawn from the content areas tested on the InterNACHI CPI exam and the ASHI exam, mapped to the specific SOP sections addressed in each lesson.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
SOP Compliance Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Instructor checklist signed off with no more than 2 deductions; any critical omission (failure to inspect or report a required safety-related item) is an automatic fail requiring re-demonstrationEach student conducts an unassisted 90-minute inspection of the practice structure, completing a scope checklist that must satisfy both the InterNACHI SOP and the ASHI SOP simultaneously; the instructor observes and scores the student on systematic sequencing, correct limitation language use, component identification accuracy, and professional conduct using a rubric tied directly to SOP section requirements.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
SOP Scenario Lab LogLog15%All 8 scenarios completed with correct SOP citations; 6 of 8 limitation or exclusion statements rated 'compliant' by instructor; overall score 75% or higherA cumulative log compiled from the scenario-based activities in Lessons 3 and 4, submitted as a single organized document; each entry must include the scenario description, the student's classification decision (required, limited, excluded, or deferred), the specific SOP section and subsection cited, the compliant report language drafted, and a brief note on any applicable state rule that modifies the SOP requirement.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Professional Conduct and Ethics Safety CheckSafety audit15%Zero critical failures; critical failure defined as any scenario response that recommends or accepts a conduct that would constitute a license violation or a clear breach of either code of ethics; non-critical items require 80% correct for passAn instructor-administered oral and written safety check in which the student is presented with four previously unseen professional conduct scenarios — one involving a conflict of interest, one involving a referral relationship, one involving client confidentiality, and one involving a safety-related reporting obligation — and must identify the applicable code of ethics provision, state what the inspector must do, and state what the inspector must not do, demonstrating that they can protect the public, the client, and their license simultaneously.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
BUS-HOME77-09 Capstone

Capstone Project: Full Residential Inspection with Report and Defense

72 hr · $720 COMPLIMENTARY

Students conduct a complete, unsupervised mock inspection of a residential property, produce a professional-grade written report that meets InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice, and defend their findings and methodology before an instructor panel. This capstone integrates every technical domain covered in the program — structure, roofing, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and safety — into a single documented deliverable that mirrors real-world professional practice.

Outcomes
Course text

Students conduct a complete, unsupervised mock inspection of a residential property, produce a professional-grade written report that meets InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice, and defend their findings and methodology before an instructor panel. This capstone integrates every technical domain covered in the program — structure, roofing, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, and safety — into a single documented deliverable that mirrors real-world professional practice.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Capstone Orientation, Scope Planning, and Pre-Inspection Preparation; Integrated Field Inspection on Capstone Property; Report Writing, Editing, and Client-Ready Document Production; Oral Defense: Findings Presentation and Client-Simulation Q&A.

What competent looks like. Conduct a full residential inspection following InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice, identifying and correctly classifying deficiencies across all major systems without instructor prompting. Produce a complete, narrative-style inspection report with photographs, deficiency descriptions, and recommended actions that meets the documentation standards required for state licensure applications. Apply job-site safety protocols — including PPE selection, hazard identification, and OSHA 10 general-industry principles — throughout the inspection without violation. Defend inspection findings, explain the reasoning behind deficiency classifications, and respond accurately to client-simulation questions during a formal oral examination. Accurately use digital inspection software to generate a formatted, client-ready report within the time constraints typical of professional practice. Demonstrate adherence to the InterNACHI and ASHI Codes of Ethics, including conflict-of-interest avoidance and scope-of-inspection limitations, in all capstone activities.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Capstone Orientation, Scope Planning, and Pre-Inspection Preparation10theoryStudents will create a complete pre-inspection plan — including a scoped checklist, safety assessment, equipment list, and client communication template — that satisfies InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice scope requirements.
  1. Using the InterNACHI Standards of Practice and the ASHI Standards of Practice side by side, students draft a master scope checklist covering all inspectable systems (foundation, structure, roofing, exterior, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, insulation, interior) and annotate each line item with the relevant standard section concept.
  2. Students complete a pre-inspection hazard-identification worksheet for a sample property profile (two-story wood-frame, 1970s construction, gas heat, unfinished basement), identifying required PPE for each area, potential OSHA-recognized hazards such as confined spaces, electrical arc risk, and fall hazards, and the corresponding control measures.
  3. In pairs, students role-play the pre-inspection client phone call using a provided scenario card: they practice explaining scope limitations, scheduling, fee discussion protocol, and conflict-of-interest disclosures per the InterNACHI and ASHI Codes of Ethics, then receive peer feedback on accuracy and professionalism.
InterNACHI Standards of Practice (current edition, internachi.org), ASHI Standards of Practice (current edition, ashi.org), InterNACHI and ASHI Codes of Ethics, OSHA 10 reference card (from Course 1), blank field checklist templates, PPE inventory list, sample client intake form, whiteboard for group annotationInstructor reviews each student's completed scope checklist and hazard worksheet against a rubric; all 9 system categories must be present, PPE selections must match identified hazards with no critical omissions, and the client-call role-play must include all required disclosure elements — pass requires a score of 80% or higher on the rubric.
2Integrated Field Inspection on Capstone Property28fieldStudents will independently conduct a full residential inspection on the program's designated capstone property, systematically examining all accessible systems and components, documenting findings with photographs and field notes sufficient to produce a complete report.
  1. Each student performs a timed, solo inspection of the capstone property (a real or high-fidelity mock residence prepared by the instructor with a minimum of 20 seeded deficiencies spanning all systems); students use their pre-inspection checklist, calibrated tools — including a non-contact voltage tester, moisture meter, infrared thermometer, and flashlight — and document every finding with at minimum one photograph and a written field note describing location, observed condition, and preliminary classification (safety hazard, major defect, or maintenance item).
  2. At the mid-inspection point, students complete a structured safety pause: they re-assess the attic or crawl space entry hazard using the confined-space and fall-protection criteria from the OSHA 10 module, decide whether conditions permit entry, and document their decision with a written rationale — instructors observe this decision point and intervene only if an actual safety violation is imminent.
  3. After completing the field inspection, students compile their raw field notes and photographs on-site into an organized digital folder using the program's inspection software, tag each finding to the correct system and location within the report template, and perform a self-audit against their scope checklist to verify no inspectable area was omitted before leaving the property.
Capstone property (school-owned, rental, or partnered donated property with seeded deficiencies), non-contact voltage tester, moisture meter, infrared thermometer, flashlight and headlamp, 6-foot ladder, inspection mirror, screwdriver set, digital camera or smartphone with inspection app, PPE kit (hard hat, safety glasses, nitrile gloves, N95 respirator, knee pads), field checklist from Lesson 1, digital inspection software (e.g., HomeGauge, Spectora, or equivalent), InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice for field referenceInstructor reviews each student's field-note packet and tagged digital photo set immediately after the inspection; to pass, students must have documented at least 16 of the 20 seeded deficiencies (80%), must not have entered any area deemed unsafe without proper documentation of their decision, and must have a complete photo for every documented finding — any uninspected mandatory system category without a documented reason results in automatic remediation.
3Report Writing, Editing, and Client-Ready Document Production22labStudents will convert their field notes and photographs into a complete, professionally formatted, narrative inspection report that accurately describes every finding, assigns correct severity classifications, and meets the written-report requirements of InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice.
  1. Using their tagged field data from Lesson 2, each student builds the full report in the digital inspection software: they write a narrative description for every finding (not just checkbox entries), embed and caption photographs, classify each deficiency as a safety hazard, major defect, or maintenance/monitoring item consistent with the terminology conventions in the InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice, and include recommended action language (repair, evaluate by a licensed specialist, or monitor) without making cost estimates.
  2. Students participate in a structured peer-review workshop: each student exchanges draft reports with a partner who uses an instructor-provided editorial rubric to mark unclear language, missing photo captions, inconsistent severity classifications, report sections that overstate or understate the inspector's role, or any language that implies a warranty — partners give written feedback and students revise their reports accordingly.
  3. Students finalize the report using the Code of Ethics compliance checklist — verifying that the report does not include any disqualifying statements (such as passing judgment on cosmetic items outside scope, diagnosing causes that require destructive testing, or recommending specific contractors) — then export the report to PDF, verify that the document is complete per a final checklist of required elements (summary page, property information, all system sections, limitation statements, inspector signature block), and submit it to the instructor.
Digital inspection software with student licenses, field notes and photographs from Lesson 2, instructor-provided editorial rubric, InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice, InterNACHI and ASHI Codes of Ethics, sample professional reports (annotated by instructor for exemplary and deficient examples), laptop or desktop computer, printer for draft copiesInstructor scores the final submitted PDF report against a 100-point rubric: completeness of system coverage (25 pts), accuracy of deficiency identification compared to the seeded defect key (25 pts), clarity and professionalism of written narrative (20 pts), correct severity classification of all findings (15 pts), compliance with Standards of Practice scope and limitation language (10 pts), Code of Ethics compliance (5 pts) — passing score is 80 out of 100; any report containing a fabricated finding or a finding omitting a seeded safety hazard requires mandatory remediation before oral defense.
4Oral Defense: Findings Presentation and Client-Simulation Q&A12practiceStudents will present their inspection findings to an instructor panel in a structured oral defense, accurately explaining deficiency classifications, supporting their conclusions with observed evidence, and responding appropriately to client-simulation questions that probe depth of knowledge, ethical judgment, and professional communication.
  1. Each student delivers a structured 10-minute presentation of their report to a two-person instructor panel: they walk through the summary of findings, identify the three most significant safety or major-defect items and explain the evidence and reasoning that led to each classification, and describe the recommended client action for each — presentations are recorded for the student's portfolio.
  2. The instructor panel conducts a 15-minute client-simulation Q&A in which they role-play as a concerned home buyer asking follow-up questions such as 'Is this house safe to buy?', 'How much will this cost to fix?', 'Did you go into the attic?', and 'Why didn't you find this defect?' — students must answer accurately within the scope of an inspector's role, decline to provide cost estimates or contractor referrals per ethical standards, and acknowledge any documented scope limitation honestly.
  3. Following the Q&A, instructors deliver a structured debrief: they reveal the complete seeded-defect key, discuss any missed findings without assigning new point deductions (defects were scored in Lesson 3), and guide the student in a self-assessment comparing their field performance to the InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice — students document two specific professional development goals based on the debrief and submit them in writing as part of their portfolio.
Student's finalized PDF report (submitted in Lesson 3), presentation display (projector or monitor), seeded-defect answer key (instructor use only until debrief), oral defense scoring rubric, recording device for portfolio video, InterNACHI and ASHI Codes of Ethics (available for reference if student requests), written self-assessment formInstructors score the oral defense on a 50-point rubric: technical accuracy of finding explanations (20 pts), appropriate responses to client-simulation questions including ethical and scope-limitation compliance (15 pts), clarity and professionalism of communication (10 pts), quality of self-assessment and goal statements (5 pts) — passing score is 40 out of 50; a student who advises a client on purchase decision, provides a cost estimate, or refers a specific contractor during the simulation must receive mandatory ethics remediation regardless of overall score.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Capstone Inspection ReportProject60%Score of 80 out of 100 on the instructor rubric; no fabricated findings; no uninspected mandatory system category without documented justification; any seeded safety-hazard omission triggers mandatory remediation before other assessments proceed.The complete, client-ready PDF inspection report produced from the student's solo field inspection of the capstone property, evaluated against a 100-point rubric covering completeness, deficiency-identification accuracy, narrative clarity, severity classification, Standards of Practice compliance, and Code of Ethics compliance. This is the primary project deliverable and must be passed before the oral defense is scheduled.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Capstone PortfolioPortfolio20%All five required artifacts must be present and complete; each artifact is scored on its own rubric with a minimum of 75% on each; any missing artifact is incomplete and must be submitted before a final grade is awarded.A digital portfolio package submitted by the student containing: (1) the pre-inspection scope checklist and hazard worksheet from Lesson 1, (2) the organized field-note and photograph archive from Lesson 2, (3) the peer-review editorial feedback received and the student's revision notes from Lesson 3, (4) the video recording of the oral defense presentation from Lesson 4, and (5) the written two-goal professional development self-assessment from the debrief. The portfolio demonstrates the student's full process from planning through professional reflection and serves as a work sample for employment and credentialing applications.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Oral DefenseOral / panel20%Score of 40 out of 50 on the instructor rubric; no ethics violation during client simulation; any referral of a specific contractor, cost estimate, or purchase recommendation during the simulation requires mandatory ethics remediation regardless of numerical score.A formal 25-minute oral examination before a two-person instructor panel in which the student presents inspection findings, defends deficiency classifications with field evidence, and responds to client-simulation questions that test technical knowledge, ethical judgment, and professional communication within the scope defined by InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice and Codes of Ethics.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
BUS-HOME77-10 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement

108 hr · $430 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 108 supervised hours alongside a licensed home inspector at an approved inspection firm, applying classroom knowledge to real residential and light-commercial inspections under direct professional mentorship. Each student documents every inspection attended, receives structured feedback from the site supervisor, and builds a professional portfolio that demonstrates readiness for independent practice. Placement hours and employer evaluations satisfy externship requirements tied to InterNACHI CPI, ASHI ACI, and most state licensing boards.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 108 supervised hours alongside a licensed home inspector at an approved inspection firm, applying classroom knowledge to real residential and light-commercial inspections under direct professional mentorship. Each student documents every inspection attended, receives structured feedback from the site supervisor, and builds a professional portfolio that demonstrates readiness for independent practice. Placement hours and employer evaluations satisfy externship requirements tied to InterNACHI CPI, ASHI ACI, and most state licensing boards.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Externship Orientation and Site Readiness; Supervised Shadow Inspections; Assisted and Lead Inspections; Portfolio Compilation and Employer Final Evaluation.

What competent looks like. Conduct a full residential inspection from arrival to client debrief under the supervision of a licensed inspector, following InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice. Identify and correctly document at least four major system deficiencies per inspection using industry-standard terminology and field notes. Apply PPE protocols, ladder safety, and lockout/tagout awareness on every live worksite without a safety prompt from the supervisor. Produce complete, professional inspection field notes that a supervising inspector can use to generate a final report with no material corrections. Demonstrate professional communication skills with homeowners, buyers, real estate agents, and supervising inspectors across a variety of inspection scenarios. Compile a portfolio of a minimum of ten documented inspections that records systems inspected, deficiencies found, and supervisor feedback received.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Externship Orientation and Site Readiness9theoryStudents will correctly identify externship requirements, site safety expectations, documentation protocols, and professional conduct standards before attending their first inspection.
  1. Review and sign the externship agreement, liability waiver, and site-conduct policy; discuss confidentiality obligations regarding client properties.
  2. Complete a pre-placement checklist covering required PPE (hard-toe boots, safety glasses, gloves, respirator for attics and crawlspaces), tools (flashlight, ladder, moisture meter, electrical tester), and digital field-note software setup.
  3. Role-play three client interaction scenarios—greeting a nervous first-time buyer, delivering a significant deficiency finding, and responding to a hostile agent—using the communication framework from Course 1.
Externship agreement packet, PPE checklist, InterNACHI Standards of Practice, ASHI Standards of Practice, field-note app (e.g., Spectora or similar), student inspection toolkitStudent passes a written pre-placement quiz covering safety rules, documentation requirements, and professional conduct expectations with a score of 80% or higher before the first site day is scheduled.
2Supervised Shadow Inspections45fieldStudents will observe a licensed supervising inspector conduct complete residential inspections and record accurate field notes for every major system inspected.
  1. Shadow the supervising inspector through a minimum of eight full inspections across varied property types (single-family, townhouse, older construction, newer construction); take independent field notes on each system—structure, roofing, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, interior—then compare with the inspector's completed report and document discrepancies.
  2. After each inspection, complete a structured debrief form identifying one deficiency the student caught independently, one deficiency missed, and one communication technique observed; submit forms to the program coordinator within 24 hours.
  3. Maintain a running deficiency log cataloguing every finding by system, severity (safety hazard, major defect, maintenance item), and recommended action, using the InterNACHI Defect Recognition framework.
Student inspection toolkit (flashlight, ladder, moisture meter, non-contact voltage tester, outlet tester, binoculars, screwdriver set), field-note app, debrief form template, InterNACHI defect severity guide, ASHI reporting guidelinesSupervising inspector signs off each debrief form; student field notes must capture at least 80% of deficiencies documented in the inspector's final report across the first eight inspections, verified by side-by-side comparison.
3Assisted and Lead Inspections45practiceStudents will independently inspect assigned systems during live inspections and, for a minimum of two inspections, lead the full inspection sequence from pre-inspection setup through client debrief while the supervisor observes.
  1. For at least six inspections, the supervisor assigns the student one complete system (e.g., all electrical) to inspect and document without prompting; the supervisor verifies findings and provides real-time corrective feedback recorded on the employer evaluation rubric.
  2. Complete a minimum of two full lead inspections: student conducts the entire inspection, writes field notes, delivers verbal findings to the client, and presents the drafted report outline to the supervisor for review; supervisor scores the student on the employer evaluation rubric.
  3. After each lead inspection, perform a documented self-assessment comparing personal performance against InterNACHI's Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice, noting at least one area for improvement and one demonstrated strength.
Student inspection toolkit, employer evaluation rubric, field-note app, InterNACHI Standards of Practice, ASHI Standards of Practice, state license law summary sheetSupervisor scores each lead inspection on the employer evaluation rubric; student must score 'meets expectations' or higher on all five rubric categories (safety, thoroughness, documentation, client communication, professionalism) for both lead inspections to satisfy this lesson.
4Portfolio Compilation and Employer Final Evaluation9labStudents will assemble a complete externship portfolio and receive a formal employer final evaluation that documents readiness for entry-level independent practice.
  1. Compile the externship portfolio: organize a minimum of ten debrief forms, the deficiency log, field notes from all inspections, two lead-inspection report drafts, and a one-page reflective summary describing growth across the placement; submit the portfolio to the program coordinator.
  2. Meet with the supervising inspector for a formal exit interview: review the completed employer evaluation form, discuss strengths and areas for continued development, and set three professional goals for the first year of practice.
  3. Complete the InterNACHI or ASHI externship hours verification form (as applicable to each credential pathway), confirm total hours logged meet or exceed program and any applicable state licensing board minimums, and file documentation with the program coordinator.
Portfolio binder or digital folder, employer evaluation form, externship hours verification form (InterNACHI and ASHI versions), reflective summary template, state licensing board hours documentation requirementsPortfolio is complete (all required documents present and organized), the employer evaluation form is signed by the supervising inspector with an overall rating of 'satisfactory' or higher, and total verified hours meet the 108-hour program requirement.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Lead Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration70%Student scores 'meets expectations' or higher on all five categories of the employer evaluation rubric for both required lead inspections; any category scored 'below expectations' requires one additional supervised lead inspection before the externship is considered complete.The supervising inspector observes the student conduct two complete, unassisted residential inspections from pre-inspection setup through client debrief and scores each on a standardized five-category rubric covering safety practices, inspection thoroughness, field documentation accuracy, client communication, and professional conduct. This assessment directly maps to the practical competency areas evaluated in state licensing board field-hour requirements and reflects the on-the-job performance standards expected by InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI credentialing pathways.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Externship Field Log and PortfolioLog30%Portfolio must include all required documents for a minimum of ten inspections, debrief forms must show supervisor sign-off, the deficiency log must contain entries from every inspection, the reflective summary must be present, and the employer hours verification form must confirm at least 108 hours; any missing component must be remediated before the student advances to Course 11.The student submits a complete externship portfolio containing debrief forms, a running deficiency log, field-note samples, two lead-inspection report drafts, a reflective summary, and a supervisor-signed hours verification form. The program coordinator reviews the portfolio for completeness and the supervising inspector's overall final evaluation rating, confirming that the student has met the documented field experience required for program completion and credential application eligibility.
Complete · Verified
BUS-HOME77-11 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: InterNACHI CPI, ASHI ACI, and State Licensing

30 hr · $300 COMPLIMENTARY

This course systematically reviews every major content domain tested on the InterNACHI CPI, ASHI ACI, and state home inspector licensing exams through targeted lessons, timed practice sets, and two full-length mock exams. Students identify personal weak areas, apply focused remediation, and develop test-taking strategies so they enter each credentialing exam with confidence and verified readiness. Passing the mock exams at or above each credential's published passing threshold is required to complete the course.

Outcomes
Course text

This course systematically reviews every major content domain tested on the InterNACHI CPI, ASHI ACI, and state home inspector licensing exams through targeted lessons, timed practice sets, and two full-length mock exams. Students identify personal weak areas, apply focused remediation, and develop test-taking strategies so they enter each credentialing exam with confidence and verified readiness. Passing the mock exams at or above each credential's published passing threshold is required to complete the course.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Domain Mapping and Diagnostic Assessment; Focused Domain Review: Systems, Structure, and Site; Standards of Practice, Ethics, Report Writing, and Credential Application Procedures; Full-Length Mock Exams and Final Remediation.

What competent looks like. Correctly answer practice questions covering all major exam content domains—structure, roofing, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, interiors, site, and standards of practice—at a passing rate consistent with each credential's published benchmark. Identify and remediate personal knowledge gaps by analyzing practice-set results and returning to authoritative references such as InterNACHI's Standards of Practice, ASHI Standards of Practice, and applicable state statutes. Apply test-taking strategies—question parsing, process of elimination, time management—to complete timed mock exams within the allotted time without sacrificing accuracy. Demonstrate command of home-inspection standards of practice and code of ethics language as tested on both the InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI exams. Complete two full-length mock exams that replicate the format, length, and passing threshold of the target credentials and earn a passing score on at least one before sitting the live exam. Organize and submit all required documentation—training hours, proof of completed inspections, and application materials—for the credential applications and state licensing board.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Domain Mapping and Diagnostic Assessment6theoryStudents will map the content domains of the InterNACHI CPI, ASHI ACI, and state licensing exam to the courses already completed and pinpoint individual weak areas by scoring at least 70% on a 100-question diagnostic.
  1. Instructor leads a side-by-side comparison of the published exam content outlines for InterNACHI CPI, ASHI ACI, and the state licensing exam, annotating which program course covers each domain so students see the full picture before drilling.
  2. Students complete a 100-question timed diagnostic exam drawn from all major domains—structure, roofing, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, interiors, report writing, and standards of practice—then self-score and categorize every missed item by domain using a provided tracking spreadsheet.
  3. Each student writes a one-page personal study plan listing their three lowest-scoring domains, the specific InterNACHI or ASHI reference sections they will re-read, and a daily review schedule for the remaining three weeks of the course.
100-question diagnostic question bank (instructor-prepared, drawn from InterNACHI and ASHI published study guides); InterNACHI Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics (current edition, free at internachi.org); ASHI Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics (current edition, free at homeinspector.org); state licensing exam candidate handbook; domain-tracking spreadsheet; timer.Student scores the 100-question diagnostic and correctly categorizes all missed items by domain on the tracking spreadsheet; a completed personal study plan is submitted. Pass mark: 70% on the diagnostic or, if below 70%, a detailed remediation plan approved by the instructor before moving to Lesson 2.
2Focused Domain Review: Systems, Structure, and Site10practiceStudents will answer timed, domain-specific practice sets for structure, roofing, electrical, plumbing, HVAC, interiors, and site/grounds at a rate of 75% or better per domain, demonstrating mastery of the technical content most heavily weighted on all three exams.
  1. Instructor delivers rapid-fire mini-lectures (10–15 minutes each) on the highest-yield topics within each system domain—common defects, inspection scope and limitations, required reporting language—using real inspection photos and sample report excerpts from prior coursework; students annotate domain reference sheets as the lecture proceeds.
  2. Students work through six 25-question timed practice sets (one per major system domain), score each set immediately, and enter results in the domain tracker; any domain scoring below 75% triggers a targeted re-read of the corresponding InterNACHI or ASHI standards section before the next set.
  3. Small groups of two to three students quiz each other using flashcard decks they create during the session, focusing on terminology, inspection sequence, and reportable-vs.-not-reportable distinctions likely to appear as exam distractors.
Domain-specific practice question banks (instructor-prepared); InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice; IRC overview handout (general residential code concepts, no specific section numbers memorized); inspection photo library from earlier courses; blank flashcard stock or digital flashcard app (e.g., Anki, free); domain-tracking spreadsheet; timer.Students must score 75% or better on each of the six 25-question domain practice sets; any domain below threshold requires a second attempt after a focused 20-minute re-read. The instructor reviews all domain trackers at the end of the lesson and signs off before Lesson 3. All six domains must be at or above 75% to proceed.
3Standards of Practice, Ethics, Report Writing, and Credential Application Procedures6theoryStudents will correctly answer practice questions on InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice, code of ethics scenarios, and report-writing requirements at 80% accuracy, and will complete a draft credential application package ready for instructor review.
  1. Instructor reads aloud key passages from both the InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics, pausing to contrast wording differences that create common exam traps (for example, what each standard says an inspector 'shall' versus 'should' do); students annotate their own copies and highlight language that has appeared in published sample questions.
  2. Students work through a 40-question practice set focused exclusively on standards, ethics, and report-writing scenarios—situations such as conflicts of interest, scope limitations, client confidentiality, and required versus optional report elements—then debrief each wrong answer as a class, citing the exact standards language that supports the correct choice.
  3. Each student assembles a draft credential application folder containing documented training hours, a log of any required practice inspections, a copy of the state licensing candidate handbook checklist, and a completed application form draft; instructor reviews each folder and marks any missing items the student must resolve before the final mock exam day.
InterNACHI Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics (printed and digital); ASHI Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics (printed and digital); state licensing candidate handbook and application forms; published sample ethics scenarios from InterNACHI and ASHI study materials; completed practice inspection logs from earlier courses; 40-question ethics/standards practice set.Students score 80% or better on the 40-question standards and ethics practice set; any student below 80% completes a second focused reading and a 20-question remediation set before proceeding. The credential application folder is reviewed and initialed by the instructor, confirming all required items are present or assigned a resolution deadline.
4Full-Length Mock Exams and Final Remediation8practiceStudents will complete two full-length, timed mock exams that mirror the format and passing threshold of their target credential exam and will score at or above the passing benchmark on at least one, demonstrating exam readiness.
  1. Students sit Mock Exam 1 under strict testing conditions: phones away, a single timer set for the published time limit of the target credential exam, no reference materials, questions covering all domains in proportion to the published content outline; immediately after time, students self-score and complete a detailed wrong-answer analysis by domain.
  2. Instructor facilitates a 45-minute group debrief of Mock Exam 1, walking through the most-missed questions, explaining the standards-based reasoning behind each correct answer, and giving each student a written remediation assignment targeting their two lowest-performing domains from the results.
  3. After a short break for individual remediation review, students sit Mock Exam 2 under the same strict conditions as Exam 1; scores are recorded, final domain trackers are completed, and each student meets individually with the instructor for a five-minute readiness conference to confirm exam registration status, logistics, and any remaining application steps.
Two full-length mock exams (100 questions each, instructor-prepared to reflect published domain weightings for InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI); answer sheets; timer; domain-tracking spreadsheet; InterNACHI and ASHI Standards of Practice (available only during post-exam debrief, not during timed exam); state licensing candidate handbook.Each student must score at or above the passing benchmark established by the target credential (consult the current InterNACHI CPI and ASHI ACI candidate handbooks for current passing scores, as these are set by the respective organizations and subject to change) on at least one of the two mock exams. Any student who does not meet this threshold on either exam receives a written remediation plan, completes an additional targeted practice set, and retakes one mock exam before the instructor signs off on course completion.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Dual Full-Length Mock Certification ExamMock certification exam100%Score at or above the passing benchmark published by the target credential organization (InterNACHI CPI or ASHI ACI) on at least one of the two timed mock exams, with all exam-domain tracking sheets completed and a credential application folder approved by the instructor.Students complete two full-length mock exams administered under conditions that replicate the actual credentialing exams—timed, closed-book, and weighted across all published content domains—to give a realistic prediction of live exam performance. The instructor reviews all results, conducts individual readiness conferences, and certifies course completion only when the student has demonstrated passing-level mastery on at least one mock and has a complete, accurate credential application package ready to submit.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: ASHI ACI; InterNACHI CPI; State Home Inspector License

Students sit the InterNACHI Certified Professional Inspector (CPI) exam administered by InterNACHI and the ASHI Associate Inspector or ACI examination administered by the American Society of Home Inspectors, as well as any required state home inspector licensing examination administered by the applicable state licensing board. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Home & Building Inspection · How the school gets authority to award these credentials