🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Agriculture, Environment & Public Service › Early Childhood Education (preschool teacher) › Courses
Agriculture, Environment & Public Service · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Early Childhood Education (preschool teacher)

10 courses · 1,800 clock hours · 9–12 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$18,410 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
10courses
91lessons
1,800hours
35assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons91 of 91 lesson pages writtenPractice720 practice questionsResources117 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 91 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
AGR-EARL54-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Early Childhood Education

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips adult learners entering preschool education with the safety knowledge, applied math skills, professional communication habits, and career-readiness tools required across all subsequent ECE coursework and the workplace. Students earn OSHA 10 recognition and pediatric first aid/CPR certification while building the numeracy, literacy, and digital competencies specific to early childhood settings. All content is mapped to the Council for Professional Recognition CDA Competency Standards and state childcare licensing expectations.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips adult learners entering preschool education with the safety knowledge, applied math skills, professional communication habits, and career-readiness tools required across all subsequent ECE coursework and the workplace. Students earn OSHA 10 recognition and pediatric first aid/CPR certification while building the numeracy, literacy, and digital competencies specific to early childhood settings. All content is mapped to the Council for Professional Recognition CDA Competency Standards and state childcare licensing expectations.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Workplace Safety in Early Childhood Settings: OSHA 10 and Childcare Hazard Awareness; Pediatric First Aid, CPR, and Emergency Response; Trade Math: Ratios, Measurement, and Budgeting for the Preschool Classroom; Reading Technical ECE Documents: Regulations, Standards, and Safety Data Sheets; Professional Written Communication and Digital Tools for ECE Professionals; Career Readiness: CDA Requirements, State Licensing, and Professional Identity; Portfolio Foundation and Professional Résumé for ECE Careers.

What competent looks like. Complete OSHA 10 General Industry training and demonstrate hazard-identification and incident-reporting procedures applicable to a licensed childcare facility. Obtain current pediatric first aid and CPR certification from an accredited provider and demonstrate the infant, toddler, and preschooler response sequences. Apply trade-specific math and measurement skills including child-to-staff ratio calculations, supply budgeting, developmental milestone age ranges, and classroom space measurement. Read, summarize, and apply technical ECE documents such as licensing regulations, health and safety policies, CDA Competency Standards, and an MSDS/SDS for cleaning products. Use standard digital tools—email, learning-management systems, word processing, and age-appropriate educational software research—to communicate professionally and maintain required program documentation. Construct a professional portfolio foundation and résumé aligned with CDA Functional Area requirements and state childcare licensing application components.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Workplace Safety in Early Childhood Settings: OSHA 10 and Childcare Hazard Awareness12theoryStudents will identify common physical, chemical, and biological hazards in a licensed preschool environment and explain OSHA general industry rights, responsibilities, and incident-reporting procedures.
  1. Complete all required OSHA 10 General Industry modules (delivered through an OSHA-authorized provider or platform) and document completion with the provider card or certificate.
  2. Conduct a guided virtual walkthrough of a sample childcare facility floor plan, flagging at least ten potential hazards (wet floors, unsecured chemicals, electrical outlets, blocked exits, pinch points on playground equipment) and recording each on a standard hazard-log form.
  3. In small groups, read a sanitized childcare incident report and role-play the chain of notification required by a typical state licensing regulation: staff → director → parent → licensing agency, discussing what information must be documented at each step.
OSHA 10 General Industry course materials (authorized provider), sample childcare facility floor plan, blank hazard-log form, sample incident-report form, state childcare licensing health and safety regulations excerpt, whiteboard markersOSHA 10 completion certificate (provider-issued); scored hazard-log identifying ≥ 8 of 10 seeded hazards with correct control recommendation; 80% or higher on a 20-question OSHA rights and hazard-identification quiz.
2Pediatric First Aid, CPR, and Emergency Response16labStudents will demonstrate infant CPR, child CPR, choking response, and basic first-aid procedures for common early-childhood emergencies according to an accredited certifying body's standards.
  1. Complete an accredited pediatric first aid and CPR course (e.g., American Red Cross or American Heart Association Heartsaver Pediatric First Aid CPR AED) with hands-on mannequin skills stations for infant and child CPR and two-rescuer scenarios.
  2. Practice the infant choking sequence and the child abdominal-thrust sequence on age-appropriate training mannequins until each student achieves the instructor's skill-check sign-off.
  3. Write a one-page Emergency Preparedness Summary for a fictional 20-child preschool room, listing: posted emergency numbers, evacuation route, first-aid kit location, allergy-alert binder, and staff roles during a medical emergency, referencing the facility's sample emergency plan.
Infant and child CPR mannequins, AED trainer, first-aid training kit, accredited pediatric first aid/CPR course materials, sample facility emergency plan, PPE (gloves, face shields for mannequin practice), sanitizing wipesValid accredited pediatric first aid and CPR certification card issued by the course provider; skill-station instructor sign-off on infant CPR, child CPR, and choking response; Emergency Preparedness Summary graded with a provided rubric, pass = 80% or higher.
3Trade Math: Ratios, Measurement, and Budgeting for the Preschool Classroom24practiceStudents will accurately calculate child-to-staff ratios, classroom square footage per child, developmental age ranges in months, and a basic classroom supply budget using arithmetic and a standard spreadsheet.
  1. Work through a set of 15 ratio and square-footage problems using actual state licensing minimums as reference values: given the number of enrolled children and room dimensions (in feet), determine required staff count and whether room size meets minimum square footage per child; show all work on a structured worksheet.
  2. Convert developmental milestone data from years to months (e.g., '2½ years = 30 months') and organize a milestone chart for ages 0–5 in a simple spreadsheet, practicing cell formulas for subtraction, average, and percentage calculations relevant to developmental screening score interpretation.
  3. Build a one-month classroom consumables budget in a spreadsheet template: enter unit costs for art supplies, snack items, and hygiene products; use SUM and simple IF formulas to flag items over a $15 unit cost; total the budget and present it to the class with a two-minute verbal explanation.
Printed ratio and square-footage worksheet, state childcare licensing minimum-ratio and space reference sheet, laptop or desktop computer with spreadsheet software, budget spreadsheet template, calculator, pencilsRatio/space worksheet graded for accuracy, pass = 13 of 15 correct; spreadsheet milestone chart and budget reviewed for correct formulas and logical values, pass = all required formulas present and totals within 5% of instructor key.
4Reading Technical ECE Documents: Regulations, Standards, and Safety Data Sheets22theoryStudents will extract and summarize specific actionable requirements from three types of technical documents used in ECE: a state childcare licensing regulation excerpt, the CDA Competency Standards overview, and a Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for a common childcare cleaning product.
  1. Read a two-to-three-page excerpt from a state childcare licensing regulation (instructor selects a publicly available regulation); annotate it by highlighting requirements, underlining deadlines or ratios, and writing marginal notes explaining each requirement in plain language.
  2. Read the CDA Competency Standards overview document (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition) and create a two-column table mapping each of the six CDA Competency Goals to one specific observable teacher behavior, using language from the standards document itself.
  3. Read the SDS for a common childcare-approved sanitizing product (e.g., a diluted bleach solution or a commercially available no-rinse sanitizer); complete a structured SDS summary form identifying: product identity, hazard pictograms, required PPE, safe storage, first-aid measures for skin/eye exposure, and proper disposal, then discuss findings in a whole-class debrief.
State childcare licensing regulation excerpt (instructor-selected, publicly available), CDA Competency Standards for Center-Based Settings (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition), SDS for an instructor-selected childcare-approved sanitizing product, annotation and SDS summary worksheets, highlighters, pensAnnotated regulation page reviewed for completeness; CDA mapping table scored with rubric (all six Competency Goals present with plausible behaviors), pass = 5 of 6 correct; SDS summary form must correctly identify all six required data points, pass = 5 of 6 correct.
5Professional Written Communication and Digital Tools for ECE Professionals30demoStudents will compose professional emails and program documentation, navigate a learning-management system, and research age-appropriate educational software using current digital tools.
  1. Given three realistic childcare communication scenarios (informing a parent of a child's minor injury, requesting a supply order from an administrator, responding to a licensing inspector's email request), draft professional email responses; instructor models correct tone, subject line, greeting, body structure, and signature before students draft their own versions.
  2. Log into the program's learning-management system (LMS), navigate to a course module, submit a sample assignment file, and post a professional reply to a discussion prompt about a classroom safety scenario; instructor demonstrates each step via screen share before students complete the task independently.
  3. Using a provided evaluation rubric aligned to NAEYC technology guidelines, research and compare two age-appropriate preschool educational apps or software platforms; write a one-page professional summary describing each tool's learning objectives, age range, cost, and one privacy/screen-time consideration relevant to ECE practice.
Laptop or desktop computer with internet access, LMS access credentials, email platform, word-processing software, instructor-created email scenario handouts, app-evaluation rubric aligned to NAEYC technology position statement, printerThree email drafts scored on a professional-communication rubric (tone, accuracy, format), pass = 80% or higher; LMS navigation task completed with confirmed submission and discussion post; app-comparison summary graded on rubric, pass = all five required elements present and factually accurate.
6Career Readiness: CDA Requirements, State Licensing, and Professional Identity24theoryStudents will explain the eligibility requirements, application components, and Functional Area structure of the CDA credential, identify the key components of state childcare licensing for individual staff, and articulate their own professional values using the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct.
  1. Using the current Council for Professional Recognition CDA candidate handbook, complete a structured gap-analysis worksheet: list each CDA eligibility requirement (education, training hours, experience hours, professional portfolio, family questionnaire, verification visit), then self-assess current status against each requirement and identify what must still be completed during the program.
  2. In pairs, compare a sample state childcare licensing staff qualification form to CDA eligibility requirements, listing two areas of overlap and one requirement unique to each credential; pairs share findings with the class and the instructor facilitates a discussion about how earning the CDA can simultaneously support the state licensing application.
  3. Read the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct summary (NAEYC, current edition); choose one of the four sections (children, families, colleagues, community/society) and write a half-page reflection describing a realistic ethical dilemma an ECE professional might face in that section, explaining how the Code guides the correct response.
CDA Candidate Handbook (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition), state childcare staff qualification form (instructor-selected, publicly available), NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct summary (NAEYC, current edition), gap-analysis worksheet, lined paper or word processorGap-analysis worksheet reviewed for completeness and accuracy against the CDA handbook, pass = all eligibility categories addressed with no invented requirements; paired licensing comparison reviewed for factual accuracy; ethics reflection graded on rubric (dilemma realistic, Code section correctly applied, half-page minimum), pass = 80% or higher.
7Portfolio Foundation and Professional Résumé for ECE Careers20practiceStudents will produce a digital professional portfolio introduction section and a trade-specific résumé that correctly incorporates CDA Functional Area language and childcare-relevant experience.
  1. Following a provided CDA portfolio section template, draft the 'Professional Philosophy Statement' component of the CDA Functional Area documentation (approximately 250 words): state beliefs about how young children learn, the teacher's role, and family engagement, using vocabulary drawn from the CDA Competency Standards.
  2. Build a professional résumé using a word-processing template: include an objective statement referencing early childhood education, education section, any prior childcare or child-related volunteer experience, first aid/CPR certification, OSHA 10 completion, and a skills section listing at least four ECE-relevant competencies; exchange résumés with a partner for peer review using a provided checklist.
  3. Compile course artifacts (OSHA completion certificate, CPR card copy, annotated regulation page, app-comparison summary, ethics reflection) into a digital folder organized by CDA Functional Area, write a one-sentence rationale for each artifact explaining which Functional Area it documents, and submit the folder via the LMS.
CDA portfolio section template, CDA Competency Standards (current edition), word-processing software, résumé template, peer-review checklist, scanner or phone camera for digitizing paper artifacts, LMS, printerPhilosophy statement graded on rubric (correct ECE vocabulary, all three required elements present, 250-word minimum), pass = 80% or higher; résumé peer-review checklist completed and résumé revised to address all flagged items; digital portfolio folder submitted with all five artifacts and rationale sentences, pass = all five rationales present and each artifact matched to a plausible Functional Area.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Safety and Regulatory Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% or higher (32 of 40 items correct)A 40-item multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering OSHA 10 general industry concepts, childcare-specific hazard identification and control, SDS interpretation, emergency-response procedures for infants and children, and state licensing health and safety requirements as introduced in Lessons 1–2 and 4. Items are written at the application level, requiring students to select the correct action or identify the relevant standard for a described scenario.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Math, Communication, and CDA Literacy ExamWritten exam25%80% or higher (24 of 30 items correct)A 30-item exam combining multiple-choice ratio and measurement problems, a short budget-calculation problem set, and reading-comprehension questions drawn from a short excerpt of CDA Competency Standards language and a sample licensing regulation paragraph, assessing skills from Lessons 3, 4, 5, and 6. Students may use a basic calculator for the math section only.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Portfolio and Résumé ProjectProject25%80% or higher on the integrated rubric (all four sections must meet threshold individually)Students submit their complete portfolio foundation folder (professional philosophy statement, five labeled artifacts with Functional Area rationales) and their finalized résumé as a single LMS package; the project is graded on a four-section rubric assessing content accuracy and ECE-specificity, correct CDA Functional Area mapping, professional writing quality, and digital organization, with each section scored separately and all four sections requiring at least 80% to pass.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Career Readiness Oral DefenseOral / panel25%Pass on all three oral-defense criteria (scored 'meets' or 'exceeds' on provided rubric for each)In a 10-minute one-on-one or small-panel session with the instructor, each student presents their portfolio folder and responds to three prompted questions: one about a safety or ethical scenario requiring them to cite a regulation or NAEYC Code section, one about their personal CDA eligibility gap and plan to address it, and one about how a specific portfolio artifact demonstrates a named CDA Competency Goal; responses are scored on factual accuracy, professional language, and ability to connect evidence to standards.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
AGR-EARL54-02 Trade course

Child Development: Foundations and Applied Practice

171 hr · $2,155 COMPLIMENTARY

This course examines the physical, cognitive, language, social, and emotional development of children from birth through age eight, grounding each domain in established developmental theory and current research. Students learn to observe and document developmental milestones, recognize atypical patterns, and apply developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) principles in planning and interaction. Content maps directly to the CDA Competency Standards (Subject Area 1: Planning a Safe, Healthy, Learning Environment and Subject Area 3: Supporting Social and Emotional Development) and to state childcare licensing requirements for staff competency in child development.

Outcomes
Course text

This course examines the physical, cognitive, language, social, and emotional development of children from birth through age eight, grounding each domain in established developmental theory and current research. Students learn to observe and document developmental milestones, recognize atypical patterns, and apply developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) principles in planning and interaction. Content maps directly to the CDA Competency Standards (Subject Area 1: Planning a Safe, Healthy, Learning Environment and Subject Area 3: Supporting Social and Emotional Development) and to state childcare licensing requirements for staff competency in child development.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Foundations of Child Development: Theories and Frameworks; Physical Development: Gross and Fine Motor Milestones; Cognitive Development: From Sensorimotor to Concrete Operations; Language and Literacy Development; Social and Emotional Development; Influences on Development: Biology, Family, Culture, and Environment; Observation Skills and Anecdotal Record Keeping; Recognizing Atypical Development and the Referral Process; Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP): Principles and Application; Brain Development and the Importance of Early Experience; Play as the Primary Vehicle for Learning; Integration Lab: Developmental Observation and Planning Portfolio.

What competent looks like. Describe major developmental milestones across physical, cognitive, language, social, and emotional domains for children birth through age eight, citing at least three established theoretical frameworks. Observe a child in a classroom or video scenario and record anecdotal notes that accurately identify developmental stage and domain with at least 80% agreement with an instructor rubric. Distinguish developmentally appropriate from developmentally inappropriate practice in written case studies and live classroom scenarios, achieving a score of 80% or higher on evaluations. Explain how biological, environmental, cultural, and family factors influence child development and articulate at least two implications for daily classroom practice. Recognize indicators of atypical development and developmental delays across all five domains and describe the correct referral pathway used in early childhood settings. Apply knowledge of child development theory to evaluate and modify a sample activity plan so that it meets the developmental needs of children across a mixed-age preschool group.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Foundations of Child Development: Theories and Frameworks14theoryStudents will compare and contrast at least four major developmental theories—Piaget, Vygotsky, Erikson, and Bronfenbrenner—and explain how each informs preschool practice.
  1. Guided reading of primary-source excerpts from Piaget, Vygotsky, Erikson, and Bronfenbrenner, followed by a structured note-taking exercise using a four-column comparison chart.
  2. Small-group jigsaw: each group becomes the expert on one theorist, creates a one-page visual summary, and teaches the rest of the class.
  3. Whole-class case study analysis: given a scenario of a four-year-old refusing to share toys, students apply each theory to explain the behavior and suggest a teacher response.
Textbook: Berk, L.E. Child Development (any current edition); printed theory-comparison chart; whiteboard; projector; index cards for exit ticketsExit-ticket quiz: students match five behavioral scenarios to the correct theoretical lens and explain one implication for practice; pass mark is 80% (4 of 5 correct with explanation).
2Physical Development: Gross and Fine Motor Milestones14theoryStudents will identify typical gross and fine motor milestones for each age band from birth through age eight and distinguish typical variation from potential delay.
  1. Lecture-and-annotate: students read the CDC Developmental Milestones reference for birth–8 years and annotate with their own examples of classroom activities that support each milestone.
  2. Milestone sorting activity: students receive a set of 30 printed milestone cards and sort them into correct age bands on a large timeline posted on the wall.
  3. Partner discussion: review two case-study children, one with typical motor development and one with signs of possible gross-motor delay, and draft a referral note for the second case.
CDC 'Learn the Signs. Act Early.' developmental milestone materials; milestone card sets (instructor-prepared); Berk textbook chapters on physical development; referral-note templateWritten milestone timeline submitted by each student; graded against CDC reference for accuracy; pass mark is correctly placing at least 24 of 30 milestones (80%) in the right age band with no more than two errors involving delay indicators.
3Cognitive Development: From Sensorimotor to Concrete Operations15theoryStudents will explain Piaget's four stages of cognitive development and connect each stage to at least two specific classroom practices or material choices appropriate for preschool-age children.
  1. Instructor-led lecture using video clips of children demonstrating object permanence, egocentrism, conservation, and classification tasks; students record observations in a structured viewing guide.
  2. Lab simulation: students attempt classic Piagetian tasks (conservation of liquid volume, class inclusion) in pairs to experience the cognitive challenge firsthand, then debrief how this informs their teaching.
  3. Lesson-plan annotation task: students receive a sample preschool lesson plan and identify where the activities do or do not align with preoperational cognitive capabilities, adding written justifications.
Projector and internet access for video clips; conservation task materials (clear containers, water, clay, counters); sample preschool lesson plan handout; Berk textbookOne-page written response connecting each Piagetian stage to a classroom example; graded with a four-criterion rubric (accuracy of stage description, accuracy of example, reasoning, writing clarity); pass mark is 80% across all criteria.
4Language and Literacy Development15theoryStudents will trace the sequence of language acquisition from cooing to early literacy and identify at least three evidence-based strategies that promote language development in preschool settings.
  1. Timeline construction: students build a personal language-development timeline from birth through age six using their textbook and the ASHA developmental norms, then share in pairs.
  2. Video observation: watch and annotate two short classroom videos—one featuring rich language interaction (dialogic reading, open-ended questions) and one with limited interaction—and compare outcomes for children.
  3. Strategy poster project: small groups research one evidence-based language strategy (e.g., dialogic reading, language expansion, parallel talk) and create a classroom-ready reference poster.
ASHA Language Development milestones reference; Berk textbook; projector and video clips; poster board and markers; sample children's picture booksCompleted language-development timeline with accurate age ranges (graded against ASHA norms, 80% accuracy) plus a short reflection paragraph explaining two teaching strategies, assessed with an instructor rubric.
5Social and Emotional Development15theoryStudents will describe Erikson's psychosocial stages relevant to early childhood and explain how secure attachment, self-regulation, and social competence develop and interact.
  1. Attachment theory mini-lecture followed by a structured reading on Mary Ainsworth's Strange Situation work; students complete a graphic organizer linking attachment types to classroom behaviors teachers may observe.
  2. Role-play debrief: instructor models two teacher responses to a child's tantrum (one attuned, one dismissive); students discuss how each response affects emotional regulation development using Erikson's framework.
  3. Case-study analysis: students read three short child profiles and identify the likely Erikson stage, the social-emotional challenge present, and two teacher strategies to support healthy resolution; submitted as written work.
Berk textbook; CASEL social-emotional learning framework overview (free download); role-play scenario cards; graphic organizer handout; case-study handoutWritten case-study analysis scored on a rubric covering stage identification, challenge identification, and quality of strategies; pass mark is 80%; instructor checks that no student recommends a strategy that would undermine secure attachment.
6Influences on Development: Biology, Family, Culture, and Environment14theoryStudents will analyze how genetic, family, cultural, socioeconomic, and community factors interact to shape child development, using Bronfenbrenner's ecological model as an organizing framework.
  1. Ecological model mapping: students draw their own Bronfenbrenner ecological diagram for a fictitious child, populating each system (microsystem through chronosystem) with realistic influences and then presenting to a partner.
  2. Structured discussion on culturally sustaining practice: students read a short article on cultural funds of knowledge in early childhood settings and discuss three ways they would honor diverse family backgrounds in their classroom.
  3. Poverty and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) overview: instructor presents research summary on ACEs and toxic stress (CDC-Kaiser ACE Study framework); students write a reflection on one classroom-level protective factor.
Berk textbook; CDC ACEs resource summary handout; Moll et al. 'Funds of Knowledge' article excerpt; blank ecological-model diagram template; projectorCompleted ecological model diagram with at least three influences correctly placed in each of four systems, plus a two-paragraph reflection; pass mark is correct placement of 80% of elements and a reflection that cites at least two course concepts.
7Observation Skills and Anecdotal Record Keeping14demoStudents will write objective, factual anecdotal observations of child behavior that accurately identify the developmental domain and milestone being demonstrated, achieving at least 80% agreement with an instructor coding key.
  1. Instructor demonstration: instructor narrates and writes a live anecdotal record while showing a classroom video clip, modeling the distinction between objective description and interpretation; students compare their notes to the instructor's.
  2. Guided practice: students watch two additional video clips and independently write anecdotal records, then swap with a partner to check for inference language and correct domain labeling using a provided checklist.
  3. Running-record lab: using a longer uninterrupted video of a preschool free-play session, students complete a five-minute running record, then identify three developmental milestones observed and cite the theoretical framework that explains each.
Classroom observation video clips (commercially available ECE observation training sets or instructor-sourced); anecdotal record forms; running-record template; objective-versus-inference language checklist; coding keyRunning-record submission scored against instructor coding key: pass requires 80% match on domain identification, milestone accuracy, and absence of inference language in the observation column.
8Recognizing Atypical Development and the Referral Process14theoryStudents will identify red-flag indicators of developmental delay or disorder across all five domains and describe the legally appropriate referral pathway, including the role of IDEA Part C and Part B in early childhood.
  1. Lecture and case review: instructor presents red-flag indicators by domain using CDC's 'Learn the Signs. Act Early.' campaign; students complete a two-column chart listing typical versus atypical indicators for each domain.
  2. Guest speaker or recorded interview (early interventionist or school psychologist) describing how referrals are made, what happens during an evaluation, and the teacher's role before and after; students prepare and submit two questions in advance.
  3. Scenario decision-making: students receive five child profiles and must decide for each whether to (a) continue observing, (b) consult with the director, or (c) initiate a referral conversation with the family, then defend their reasoning in writing.
CDC 'Learn the Signs. Act Early.' milestone checklist; IDEA overview fact sheet (U.S. Department of Education); two-column chart handout; case-profile handout; referral conversation script templateWritten scenario decision-making worksheet: pass requires correct action identified in at least 4 of 5 scenarios (80%) with a written justification that references both the developmental indicator and the appropriate next step.
9Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP): Principles and Application14demoStudents will evaluate classroom activities and teacher interactions against NAEYC's DAP framework and revise a sample activity so that it is fully developmentally appropriate for the intended age group.
  1. Close reading of NAEYC's Developmentally Appropriate Practice position statement (current edition overview); students annotate three core principles and generate one classroom example for each.
  2. DAP/DIP sorting activity: students receive 20 scenario cards describing classroom activities or teacher behaviors and sort them into 'DAP' or 'Developmentally Inappropriate Practice (DIP)' categories, discussing reasoning in small groups before instructor reveals the answer key.
  3. Activity revision workshop: each student receives a sample preschool activity that is developmentally inappropriate (e.g., rote worksheet drill for three-year-olds); they rewrite it to be DAP and submit with a brief written rationale citing specific NAEYC principles.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice position statement (free download); DAP/DIP scenario card set (instructor-prepared); sample inappropriate activity handout; activity revision templateActivity revision assignment scored on a rubric: accuracy of DAP alignment (50%), quality of rationale citing NAEYC principles (30%), and practical feasibility (20%); pass mark is 80%.
10Brain Development and the Importance of Early Experience14theoryStudents will explain key concepts in early brain development—including sensitive periods, serve-and-return interaction, and the effects of toxic stress—and connect these to at least two classroom strategies that promote healthy neurodevelopment.
  1. Lecture using diagrams of synaptogenesis, pruning, and myelination; students annotate a simple brain-development timeline and identify which classroom ages correspond to which developmental processes.
  2. Video analysis: students watch the 'Serve and Return' explainer from the Harvard Center on the Developing Child, take notes using a guided worksheet, and identify three specific teacher behaviors that constitute serve-and-return interaction.
  3. Reflection journal: students write a half-page entry responding to the prompt 'How does what I now know about brain development change how I would interact with an infant, a toddler, and a preschooler?' and share key ideas in a class discussion.
Harvard Center on the Developing Child online resources and videos (free); brain-development timeline diagram handout; guided viewing worksheet; projector and internet access; student reflection journalGuided worksheet scored for accuracy of serve-and-return identification (at least 3 correct behaviors identified) and reflection journal reviewed for evidence of applying brain-development concepts to at least two age groups; both components must meet expectations to pass.
11Play as the Primary Vehicle for Learning14practiceStudents will classify types of play using Parten's social-play continuum and Smilansky's cognitive-play hierarchy, then design a play environment that supports progression across play levels.
  1. Lecture and media review: instructor presents Parten's six categories (unoccupied through cooperative) and Smilansky's four levels (functional through games with rules) side by side; students complete a dual-classification chart using video clip examples.
  2. Classroom environment design exercise: in pairs, students receive a floor plan template and a materials catalog and arrange a preschool classroom environment with at least five defined play areas that each support a different level of play; pairs present their designs to the class for peer feedback.
  3. Reflection and connection: students write a short essay (one to two pages) arguing why play is developmentally essential, using at least three pieces of evidence drawn from course content on cognitive, language, and social-emotional development.
Berk textbook chapters on play; classroom floor-plan template; materials catalog (instructor-prepared or from a commercial ECE supplier); dual-classification chart handout; projectorPlay-environment design reviewed against a checklist: pass requires five distinct play areas, each correctly labeled with Parten category and Smilansky level supported, plus peer and instructor confirmation that materials listed are age-appropriate; essay scored on evidence quality, pass mark 80%.
12Integration Lab: Developmental Observation and Planning Portfolio14labStudents will synthesize course content by producing a developmental portfolio for a target child (real or case-study) that includes observation records, domain analysis, a play-environment recommendation, and a family communication summary.
  1. Portfolio work session 1: students complete two formal anecdotal observations (or analyze two provided video clips for distance learners), label developmental domains and milestones, and draft a domain summary using the five-domain framework from the course.
  2. Portfolio work session 2: students write a play-environment recommendation section explaining how the proposed environment addresses the child's current developmental stage and areas for growth, citing at least two theoretical frameworks.
  3. Portfolio work session 3: students draft a family-communication summary written in plain, culturally respectful language that describes the child's strengths and one area of focus, avoiding deficit language; peers provide written feedback using a provided rubric before final submission.
Observation record forms; domain-summary template; play-environment recommendation template; family-communication template; peer-feedback rubric; Berk textbook; CDC milestone referencesCompleted portfolio scored on a four-section rubric: observation accuracy (80% match to instructor coding key), domain analysis completeness (all five domains addressed), play-environment rationale (two theories cited correctly), and family communication quality (plain language, asset-based tone); all four sections must reach 80% to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Child Development Theory Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% (40 of 50 points)A 50-item written exam covering developmental theories (Piaget, Vygotsky, Erikson, Bronfenbrenner), milestone sequences across all five domains, brain development concepts, and DAP principles, using multiple-choice, matching, and short-answer formats. This exam maps to CDA Subject Area 3 (Supporting Social and Emotional Development) and CDA Subject Area 1 competency knowledge requirements, as well as state childcare licensing staff-knowledge standards.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Observation and Anecdotal Record Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%80% agreement with instructor coding key across all scored elementsStudents watch a ten-minute unedited video of children in a preschool free-play setting and independently produce an anecdotal record, a running record excerpt, and a written domain analysis that identifies developmental stage and at least one red-flag indicator if present. The submission is scored against a detailed coding key for objectivity of language, accuracy of milestone identification, and correctness of domain labeling, directly reflecting the observational documentation competencies assessed in the CDA Competency Standards.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Developmental Observation Portfolio Lab LogLog15%80% or higher on the four-section portfolio rubric; all four sections must individually meet the 80% thresholdThe portfolio lab log is the cumulative product of Lesson 12's three work sessions and includes two formal observation records, a five-domain developmental analysis, a play-environment recommendation with theoretical rationale, and a family communication summary written in plain, asset-based language. This integrated artifact maps to CDA Competency Standard 3 (supporting social and emotional development), Standard 4 (ensuring a well-run purposeful program), and Standard 6 (maintaining a commitment to professionalism), and demonstrates the documentation habits required for state childcare licensing inspections.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Developmentally Appropriate Practice Safety and Equity CheckSafety audit15%All five critical indicators must be marked 'Met'; any 'Not Met' item requires revision and resubmission within one weekAn instructor-conducted checklist review of each student's portfolio and revised activity plan assesses five non-negotiable safety and equity indicators: (1) no activity or material recommendation poses an identified choking, toxicity, or injury risk for the target age group; (2) all observation language is objective and free of bias or deficit labeling; (3) family communication uses plain language accessible at an eighth-grade reading level or below; (4) at least one cultural or linguistic diversity consideration is explicitly addressed; and (5) the referral pathway described for any atypical development indicator matches the legally required process under applicable federal early intervention law. This check reflects both CDA Competency Standard 1 (safe healthy learning environment) and state childcare licensing health and safety requirements.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-EARL54-03 Trade course

Curriculum Design for Preschool Classrooms

171 hr · $2,155 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to plan, build, and evaluate developmentally appropriate curricula for children ages birth through five, integrating play-based learning, learning-environment design, and subject-area integration across literacy, math, science, and the arts. The course connects directly to CDA Competency Standards I and II (safe, healthy learning environments and advancing children's development) and to state childcare licensing requirements for written lesson plans and room arrangement. Students produce a complete four-week curriculum unit ready for classroom use.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to plan, build, and evaluate developmentally appropriate curricula for children ages birth through five, integrating play-based learning, learning-environment design, and subject-area integration across literacy, math, science, and the arts. The course connects directly to CDA Competency Standards I and II (safe, healthy learning environments and advancing children's development) and to state childcare licensing requirements for written lesson plans and room arrangement. Students produce a complete four-week curriculum unit ready for classroom use.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Foundations of Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP); Early Learning Standards and Curriculum Frameworks; Domains of Child Development and Curriculum Integration; Writing Clear, Measurable Learning Objectives; Lesson Plan Formats and Components; Designing Learning Centers and the Physical Environment; Thematic and Project-Based Curriculum Planning; Literacy and Language Integration Across the Curriculum; Math and Science Curriculum for Young Children; Cultural Responsiveness, Equity, and Inclusion in Curriculum; Differentiating Instruction for Diverse Learners; Building and Presenting the Four-Week Curriculum Unit.

What competent looks like. Design written lesson plans that align with at least one recognized developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) framework and address all five domains of early childhood development. Arrange and document a preschool learning environment—including indoor centers and outdoor space—that meets state licensing room-arrangement standards and CDA Functional Area 2 (Learning Environment). Integrate literacy, mathematics, science, and creative arts into thematic or project-based curriculum units appropriate for children ages three through five. Select, adapt, and cite at least three evidence-based instructional strategies (e.g., scaffolding, open-ended questioning, intentional teaching) and apply them in written and demonstrated lesson delivery. Evaluate existing curriculum materials for cultural responsiveness, equity, and inclusion, documenting findings in a structured written analysis. Construct and present a complete four-week curriculum unit—including goals, standards alignment, lesson plans, materials list, family communication, and assessment plan—that earns a passing score on the program rubric.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Foundations of Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP)11.5theoryStudents will define the three core considerations of DAP (knowledge of child development, individual children, and cultural context) and explain how each shapes curriculum decisions.
  1. Read and annotate selected sections of NAEYC's 'Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs' (4th edition position statement); complete a guided reading guide identifying the three DAP considerations in each section.
  2. Case-study pairs: each pair receives a vignette describing a preschool classroom and identifies two DAP-aligned and two non-DAP-aligned practices, then shares findings with the class.
  3. Whole-class Socratic discussion: 'How does knowing a child's cultural background change what you put in a lesson plan?' Students post a 150-word written reflection in the course LMS.
NAEYC DAP position statement (4th ed., free PDF); guided reading guide handout; LMS discussion board; whiteboard.Scored reading guide: students must correctly identify and explain all three DAP considerations with a classroom example for each; pass = 70% or higher on the 10-point guide rubric.
2Early Learning Standards and Curriculum Frameworks11.5theoryStudents will locate their state's early learning standards and align at least five standards across three developmental domains to sample lesson objectives.
  1. Instructor-led walkthrough of the state's early learning standards document and the Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework (ELOF); students highlight connections between the two documents.
  2. Standards-mapping exercise: given five pre-written lesson objectives, students find the matching state standard and ELOF goal, record them in a two-column table, and explain the match in one sentence.
  3. Small-group debate: groups argue whether a detailed standards-alignment requirement helps or hinders creative, child-led curriculum, then write a half-page position statement citing at least one source.
State early learning standards document (print or PDF); Head Start ELOF (free PDF at eclkc.hhs.gov); standards-mapping worksheet; highlighters.Standards-mapping table graded by instructor: all five objectives correctly matched to both a state standard and an ELOF goal with accurate explanations; pass = 80% accuracy (4 of 5 correct).
3Domains of Child Development and Curriculum Integration13theoryStudents will describe how a single classroom activity can simultaneously address cognitive, language, social-emotional, physical, and creative development, producing a five-domain activity analysis.
  1. Instructor-led lecture with visual diagram: the five domains mapped onto a wheel; students label a blank domain wheel from memory at the end of the lecture.
  2. Video analysis: students watch a 10-minute recorded preschool activity (e.g., building with blocks during free play) and use a structured observation form to tally evidence of each domain.
  3. Collaborative activity design: groups of three design one original activity and complete a five-domain analysis chart showing at least one observable behavior per domain, then present the chart to the class for peer feedback.
Domain-wheel diagram handout; observation tally form; recorded classroom video clip (YouTube or instructor-sourced); chart paper; markers.Five-domain activity analysis chart: pass = at least one accurate, observable behavior cited per domain with correct domain label; instructor checks all five domains are present and plausible (pass = 5/5 domains addressed).
4Writing Clear, Measurable Learning Objectives9.5theoryStudents will write preschool lesson objectives using observable action verbs that meet Bloom's Taxonomy lower-order levels appropriate for ages three through five.
  1. Mini-lecture: 'What makes an objective measurable?' Students receive a list of weak versus strong objectives and must label each and rewrite the weak ones.
  2. Bloom's sorting card game (pairs): each pair receives 20 objective cards and sorts them into Bloom's levels, then identifies which levels are developmentally appropriate for preschool and explains why.
  3. Individual writing practice: each student writes six original objectives (two per domain area: language/literacy, math, social-emotional) and trades with a partner for peer editing using the class checklist (action verb + observable behavior + condition).
Bloom's Taxonomy chart (preschool-adapted); objective card set (instructor-prepared); objective-writing checklist handout.Student-written six objectives checked against the three-part checklist: pass = five of six objectives contain all three required elements (action verb, observable behavior, condition).
5Lesson Plan Formats and Components13demoStudents will complete a full single-session preschool lesson plan using the program's required template, including all required components: objective, materials, procedure, differentiation, and assessment.
  1. Instructor models completing a lesson plan template on the projector for a sample activity ('exploring sink and float'); students follow along on blank templates and ask questions at each step.
  2. Deconstruction exercise: students receive two completed lesson plans (one strong, one weak) and use a components checklist to identify missing or inadequate sections, writing improvement notes in the margins.
  3. Independent practice: each student selects an age-appropriate activity from a provided activity idea bank and writes a complete lesson plan from scratch, submitting it digitally at the end of class.
Program lesson plan template (paper and LMS digital version); two sample lesson plans (instructor-prepared); activity idea bank handout; LMS submission portal.Completed lesson plan scored with the five-component rubric (objective, materials, procedure, differentiation, assessment): pass = all five components present and each rated 'adequate' or higher; minimum 70% overall rubric score.
6Designing Learning Centers and the Physical Environment15labStudents will create a scaled floor-plan sketch of a preschool classroom that includes at least five distinct learning centers and meets general state licensing room-arrangement principles for space per child and clear sight lines.
  1. Lecture and photo gallery walk: instructor presents state licensing room-arrangement requirements (minimum square footage per child, clear pathways, adult sight lines); students tour posted photos of compliant and non-compliant rooms and label issues on a printed checklist.
  2. Hands-on measurement lab: using tape measures in the program's simulated classroom space, student pairs measure the room, record dimensions, calculate total square footage, divide by the licensed child capacity, and compare to the state minimum.
  3. Scaled floor-plan design: each student uses graph paper (or a free online room-design tool such as Canva or Floorplanner) to draw a classroom layout with at least five labeled centers (e.g., blocks, dramatic play, library, art, science/sensory) and annotates the plan with safety and sight-line notes.
Tape measures; graph paper; rulers; state licensing room-arrangement requirements handout; colored pencils; optional: computer with Canva or Floorplanner (free accounts).Scored floor-plan rubric: plan must show at least five labeled centers, correct room dimensions, calculated square footage per child at or above the state minimum, and at least two sight-line annotations; pass = 75% or higher on 12-point rubric.
7Thematic and Project-Based Curriculum Planning15practiceStudents will build a one-week thematic curriculum web that connects a central theme to at least four subject areas and includes one child-initiated inquiry extension.
  1. Instructor-led comparison: side-by-side analysis of a traditional thematic unit versus a Reggio-inspired project; class creates a T-chart of similarities and differences and discusses when each approach is appropriate.
  2. Curriculum web construction (small groups): groups choose a theme appropriate for three-to-five-year-olds (e.g., 'our neighborhood,' 'seeds and plants') and brainstorm center activities, read-alouds, math activities, science explorations, and art projects on a large web poster.
  3. Individual refinement and written rationale: each student refines the group web into a personal version, adds one child-initiated inquiry extension (a question children might ask and a planned response), and writes a one-page rationale explaining how the theme is developmentally appropriate and culturally responsive.
Large paper for web posters; markers; sample thematic unit and sample project documentation (instructor-provided); rubric handout.Curriculum web and one-page rationale: pass = web covers at least four subject areas with at least two activities each, includes one inquiry extension, and rationale addresses DAP and cultural responsiveness; scored on the four-criterion rubric with a 70% minimum.
8Literacy and Language Integration Across the Curriculum13theoryStudents will plan and demonstrate at least two evidence-based early literacy strategies (e.g., dialogic reading, environmental print, phonological awareness games) embedded within a non-literacy content lesson.
  1. Lecture and video: instructor presents the five components of early literacy (print awareness, phonological awareness, vocabulary, background knowledge, narrative skills) with video examples from real preschool classrooms.
  2. Strategy practice stations: four stations, each featuring a different literacy strategy (dialogic reading, alphabet song variation, environmental-print scavenger hunt setup, rhyme basket); students rotate and practice facilitating each for five minutes with a peer as the 'child.'
  3. Integration planning: each student selects a science or social studies lesson plan written in a previous lesson and rewrites it to embed at least two of the four literacy strategies from the stations, annotating changes in a different color.
Picture books for dialogic reading practice; environmental print samples (food boxes, signs); rhyme basket props; student's previously written lesson plan; annotation highlighters.Annotated revised lesson plan: pass = two distinct evidence-based literacy strategies are accurately embedded and clearly labeled, with a one-sentence rationale for each; instructor checks for correctness of strategy name and implementation description; pass = both strategies present and correctly described.
9Math and Science Curriculum for Young Children14practiceStudents will design two inquiry-based preschool activities—one mathematics and one science—that use concrete manipulatives and align with NAEYC/NCTM early math recommendations or NGSS kindergarten readiness concepts.
  1. Hands-on math exploration: students cycle through four manipulative stations (pattern blocks, counting bears, balance scales, measurement tools) and for each write one open-ended question a teacher could ask to extend mathematical thinking.
  2. Simple science experiment design: instructor models the steps of a preschool-appropriate inquiry cycle (wonder → explore → discuss → record); student pairs design a simple experiment (e.g., comparing how different objects roll, mixing colors) and write it in inquiry-cycle format.
  3. Lesson plan drafting: each student independently writes a complete lesson plan for one math activity and one science activity, including the manipulatives needed, open-ended questions, and a simple recording method appropriate for preschoolers (drawing, tally marks, photo).
Pattern blocks, counting bears, balance scales, rulers, magnifying glasses, color-mixing materials; NAEYC/NCTM position statement excerpt on early mathematics (free PDF); inquiry-cycle template handout.Two completed lesson plans (math and science) scored on six-point rubric each: must include manipulatives, at least two open-ended questions, and a child-appropriate recording method; pass = 70% or higher on each plan.
10Cultural Responsiveness, Equity, and Inclusion in Curriculum13theoryStudents will evaluate a published preschool curriculum unit for cultural responsiveness and inclusion using a structured analysis tool, and propose at least three specific modifications to improve equity.
  1. Guided reading and discussion: students read a two-page excerpt on anti-bias curriculum principles (adapted from Derman-Sparks & Edwards, 'Anti-Bias Education for Young Children and Ourselves'); class discusses four anti-bias goals and what they look like in lesson plans.
  2. Curriculum audit: small groups receive the same published curriculum unit (instructor-selected) and use a provided cultural-responsiveness rubric to score it for representation, language inclusivity, family diversity, and ability inclusion.
  3. Written modification memo: each student individually writes a one-to-two-page memo to a fictional curriculum director listing three specific modifications (e.g., replace a holiday-centric activity with a family-traditions activity, add dual-language labeling to the book corner) and explaining the equity rationale for each.
Excerpt from Derman-Sparks & Edwards 'Anti-Bias Education for Young Children and Ourselves' (2nd ed.); published curriculum unit (instructor-provided photocopy); cultural-responsiveness rubric; memo template.Written modification memo scored on three-criterion rubric (clarity of identification, accuracy of anti-bias rationale, feasibility of modification): pass = all three modifications present with a clear and accurate equity rationale; minimum 70% rubric score.
11Differentiating Instruction for Diverse Learners13demoStudents will modify a standard lesson plan to include at least three differentiation strategies that address children with varying ability levels, English language proficiency, and learning styles.
  1. Instructor models live differentiation: instructor takes one base lesson plan and walks through three versions of the same activity (challenge, on-level, scaffold) using real materials, narrating reasoning aloud; students take notes on a T-chart.
  2. Case-study differentiation: student pairs receive a child profile (e.g., a child with a speech delay, a dual-language learner, a child who is advanced in fine-motor skills) and adapt the instructor's base lesson plan for their assigned child, documenting three specific changes.
  3. Gallery walk: pairs post their adapted plans; all students circulate with sticky notes to leave one 'strength' and one 'suggestion' on each posted plan; pairs revise their plan based on at least one peer suggestion before submitting.
Base lesson plan (instructor-provided); child profile cards; T-chart note guide; sticky notes; chart paper.Revised adapted lesson plan: pass = three documented differentiation strategies each correctly matched to the child profile's specific need, with a one-sentence rationale; instructor confirms all three are accurate and feasible; pass = 70% on four-point rubric.
12Building and Presenting the Four-Week Curriculum Unit29.5practiceStudents will assemble, document, and orally present a complete four-week preschool curriculum unit that integrates all prior course content and earns a passing score on the unit rubric.
  1. Unit assembly work sessions (two class sessions): students compile all required components—unit theme rationale, standards alignment table, twenty lesson plans (five per week), learning-environment floor plan, family newsletter, and assessment plan—using a provided organization checklist; instructor circulates for formative feedback.
  2. Peer review protocol: each student exchanges their draft unit binder with a peer who uses the unit rubric to score one week of lesson plans and the floor plan, then provides written feedback; students use feedback to make final revisions before submission.
  3. Oral presentation (10 minutes per student): each student presents their unit to a panel of the instructor and one peer evaluator, explains the design rationale, demonstrates how one lesson addresses DAP and one state standard, and responds to at least two evaluator questions.
Program four-week unit rubric; organization checklist; unit binder or digital folder; peer-review scoring sheet; state early learning standards; presentation timer.Four-week curriculum unit binder scored on the program's 10-criterion rubric (theme rationale, standards alignment, lesson-plan quality × 4 weeks, floor plan, family newsletter, assessment plan, cultural responsiveness, oral presentation); pass = 75% or higher overall with no single criterion below 50%.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Curriculum Design Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% correct (35 of 50 questions)A 50-item written exam covering DAP principles, early learning standards, the five developmental domains, Bloom's Taxonomy as applied to preschool objectives, early literacy components, early math and science concepts, anti-bias curriculum principles, and differentiation strategies. Items include multiple choice, matching, and short answer; exam maps directly to CDA Competency Standards I (Safe, Healthy Learning Environments) and II (Advancing Children's Learning and Development).
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lesson Plan Delivery Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Score of 75% or higher on the six-criterion observation rubric, with no criterion rated below 'developing'Each student delivers a 15-minute preschool lesson to peers (acting as children) using one of the lesson plans from their four-week unit; the instructor scores delivery on objective clarity, use of open-ended questions, embedded literacy or math strategy, differentiation move, transitions, and materials management using the program's six-criterion rubric.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Curriculum Design Lab LogLog15%All 12 lesson lab logs submitted; average score of 70% or higher across all log entriesStudents maintain a running lab log throughout the course, submitting a structured entry after each lesson that includes the date, learning activity completed, one key concept learned, one question still remaining, and a photo or scan of any physical work product (e.g., floor-plan sketch, curriculum web, annotated lesson plan); entries are reviewed by the instructor bi-weekly for accuracy and completeness.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Learning Environment Safety and Compliance CheckSafety audit15%Pass = zero critical violations; minor items corrected within one class sessionUsing a checklist drawn from general state childcare licensing room-arrangement requirements and NAEYC health and safety guidelines, the instructor inspects each student's floor-plan design and, during the lab session, their physical arrangement of the simulated classroom space for hazards (blocked exits, unsecured shelving, non-visible areas, age-inappropriate materials within reach); critical violations (blocked exit, no visible diaper/bathroom area for required ratios) result in an automatic hold on the unit submission until corrected.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-EARL54-04 Trade course

Assessment of Young Children

170 hr · $2,140 COMPLIMENTARY

This course teaches early childhood educators how to observe, document, and interpret children's development using valid, ethical, and culturally responsive assessment practices. Students learn to use formal and informal tools, analyze data to individualize instruction, and communicate findings to families and colleagues. Content maps directly to the CDA Competency Standard VI (maintaining a commitment to professionalism) and the functional area of Self (observation and documentation).

Outcomes
Course text

This course teaches early childhood educators how to observe, document, and interpret children's development using valid, ethical, and culturally responsive assessment practices. Students learn to use formal and informal tools, analyze data to individualize instruction, and communicate findings to families and colleagues. Content maps directly to the CDA Competency Standard VI (maintaining a commitment to professionalism) and the functional area of Self (observation and documentation).

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Purposes and Principles of Early Childhood Assessment; Developmental Domains and Observation Readiness; Observation Methods: Anecdotal Records and Running Records; Observation Methods: Checklists, Rating Scales, and Time Sampling; Standardized Screening Tools and Referral Processes; Portfolio Documentation: Collecting and Organizing Evidence; Analyzing Assessment Data to Inform Instruction; Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Assessment; Communicating Assessment Results to Families; Confidentiality, Legal Requirements, and Digital Record-Keeping; Program-Level Assessment and Using Data for Program Improvement; Integrated Assessment Practicum: Full Portfolio and Conference Simulation.

What competent looks like. Select and apply age-appropriate formal and informal assessment tools to document the development of children ages birth through 5 across all developmental domains. Record objective, bias-free anecdotal notes, running records, and checklists during live child observation sessions with at least 90% accuracy as rated on a scoring rubric. Analyze a child's portfolio of documentation evidence to identify developmental strengths, areas of growth, and next instructional steps. Communicate assessment findings clearly and respectfully to families in written and verbal formats, using plain language free of jargon. Apply ethical guidelines from the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct to protect child and family confidentiality in all assessment records. Align assessment data with curriculum planning by creating a written instructional response that addresses at least two identified developmental needs.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Purposes and Principles of Early Childhood Assessment12theoryStudents will explain the four primary purposes of early childhood assessment and describe at least three ethical principles that guide ethical practice.
  1. Read and annotate selected sections of the NAEYC position statement 'Developmentally Appropriate Practice' and the joint NAEYC/NAECS-SDE position statement on early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation; identify key principles in a structured note-taking guide.
  2. Participate in a Socratic seminar discussing the difference between assessment for learning, assessment of learning, screening, and program evaluation using real-world case vignettes of a Head Start classroom.
  3. In pairs, sort 20 assessment scenario cards into ethical or unethical practice categories, citing the relevant NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct principle, then debrief as a class.
NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct (current edition), NAEYC/NAECS-SDE joint position statement, scenario card set, highlighters, structured note guideExit ticket: students write a 150-word response identifying the purpose of a given assessment scenario and the ethical principle at stake; pass = correctly identifies purpose and cites an applicable ethical principle with explanation (score 3/4 on a 4-point rubric).
2Developmental Domains and Observation Readiness14theoryStudents will define the six developmental domains (cognitive, language, social-emotional, physical/motor, adaptive, and creative) and identify observable behaviors associated with each domain for children ages birth through 5.
  1. Use a developmental milestone reference (CDC 'Learn the Signs. Act Early.' materials) to complete a domain-by-domain checklist for three different age groups (12 months, 3 years, 5 years) and compare findings with a partner.
  2. Watch three short video clips of children in play situations; students independently list every observable behavior seen, then classify each behavior by developmental domain using a color-coded chart.
  3. Play a 'Behavior Bingo' game in which the instructor calls out observed behaviors and students match them to developmental domain squares, discussing borderline cases as a group.
CDC 'Learn the Signs. Act Early.' milestone cards (current edition), domain classification chart, colored markers, video clips of child play (minimum 5 minutes each), Behavior Bingo cardsDomain Sorting Quiz: 20-item matching and short-answer quiz requiring students to classify observed behaviors by domain and describe one typical and one atypical behavior example per domain; pass = 80% (16/20 correct).
3Observation Methods: Anecdotal Records and Running Records16demoStudents will write objective, detailed anecdotal records and a five-minute running record from a live or video observation, avoiding interpretive or biased language.
  1. Instructor models writing an anecdotal record live while a video clip plays, narrating the difference between objective description ('Emma picked up the red block and placed it on top of the tower') and interpretation ('Emma was proud of her work'); students critique the model using a checklist.
  2. Students practice writing anecdotal records independently from two additional video clips and then peer-review each other's notes using the Objective Language Checklist, flagging any evaluative words.
  3. Students conduct a five-minute running record from a live role-play scenario staged by classmates, then self-score their record against the Running Record Rubric and identify two areas for improvement.
Anecdotal record forms, Running Record Rubric, Objective Language Checklist, video clips (minimum 10 minutes each), timer, role-play scenario cardsInstructor scores one anecdotal record and one running record produced during class using the Running Record Rubric (objectivity, detail, completeness, format); pass = score of 12/16 or higher on the rubric with zero evaluative/biased statements.
4Observation Methods: Checklists, Rating Scales, and Time Sampling14demoStudents will correctly administer a developmental checklist, a Likert-style rating scale, and a time-sampling observation and record results accurately.
  1. Instructor demonstrates completing the ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionnaires) sample item set for a fictional child profile; students complete the same profile independently and compare scores, discussing scoring rules.
  2. Students complete a time-sampling observation of a video of a group of children (10 intervals of 30 seconds each), recording target behaviors on a prepared interval recording form, then calculate the percentage of intervals in which each behavior occurred.
  3. Small groups each select a different published rating scale (e.g., a motor skills rating scale, a social-skills rating scale) from the course resource binder, read the administration instructions, and teach the format and scoring rules to the class in a five-minute presentation.
ASQ-3 sample questionnaire (Paul H. Brookes Publishing), interval recording forms, timer, video clips, published rating scale samples, resource binderAccuracy check: instructor reviews time-sampling interval recording form; pass = interval tallies within ±1 of instructor key and percentage calculations correct on at least 8 of 10 intervals.
5Standardized Screening Tools and Referral Processes12theoryStudents will explain the difference between developmental screening and diagnostic assessment and describe the steps of an appropriate referral process when a screening indicates concern.
  1. Read and annotate the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement on developmental surveillance and screening; complete a T-chart comparing screening versus diagnostic assessment on purpose, who administers, and what decisions follow.
  2. Case study analysis: review four fictional child screening reports (one typical result, one borderline, one indicating concern, one with incomplete data) and, in groups, determine appropriate next steps and draft a one-paragraph rationale for each.
  3. Invite a licensed school psychologist or early intervention specialist (in person or via recorded interview) to explain the referral pathway under IDEA Part C and Part B; students prepare and submit three written questions in advance and complete a structured listening guide during the presentation.
AAP developmental surveillance policy statement, T-chart template, four fictional screening report packets, IDEA Part C/Part B overview one-pager, structured listening guide, guest speaker or recorded interviewReferral Scenario Quiz: four-scenario short-answer quiz; pass = correctly identifies appropriate action (screen, monitor, refer, gather more information) for all four scenarios and provides a justified rationale rated 2/2 on a holistic rubric for at least three of four scenarios.
6Portfolio Documentation: Collecting and Organizing Evidence15practiceStudents will compile a legally compliant, organized child portfolio containing at least five types of documentation evidence linked to developmental domain and learning standards.
  1. Using a fictional child file packet (photographs of artwork, teacher observation notes, work samples, anecdotal records, and a checklist), students physically organize a portfolio using a provided tab system, labeling each artifact with a sticky annotation that names the developmental domain and one relevant early learning standard.
  2. Students draft a portfolio cover sheet for their fictional child that includes the child's age, observation dates, contributing educators, and a confidentiality statement aligned with FERPA and program policy; instructor gives written feedback before students revise.
  3. Peer audit: partners swap completed portfolios and use the Portfolio Audit Checklist to verify that all five evidence types are present, artifacts are properly labeled, and confidentiality language is included; discrepancies are discussed and corrected.
Fictional child file packet, portfolio binders with tab dividers, sticky annotation cards, early learning standards document for the state, Portfolio Audit Checklist, FERPA overview one-pagerPortfolio Audit Checklist scored by instructor; pass = all five evidence types present, each artifact annotated with correct domain and a valid standard, confidentiality statement present and accurate (score 9/12 or higher on checklist).
7Analyzing Assessment Data to Inform Instruction15practiceStudents will analyze a complete child portfolio data set, identify developmental strengths and needs, and write a written instructional response addressing at least two identified needs.
  1. Using the fictional child portfolio built in Lesson 6, students complete a Data Summary Form: listing three documented strengths, two areas needing growth, and the evidence source for each claim.
  2. Students use the Data Summary Form to write a one-page Individualized Instructional Response (IIR) that describes two planned learning experiences, names the materials required, explains how the activity addresses the identified need, and identifies how progress will be measured.
  3. In triads, students present their IIR orally (three minutes each), while peers use a feedback protocol to name one strength and one specific improvement; students revise their IIR based on peer feedback.
Fictional child portfolio (from Lesson 6), Data Summary Form, IIR template, peer feedback protocol cards, early learning standards referenceIIR scored with the Instructional Response Rubric (evidence alignment, specificity of activities, measurement plan, standards connection); pass = score of 18/24 or higher with no category scoring 0.
8Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Assessment12theoryStudents will identify at least three sources of cultural or linguistic bias in common early childhood assessment tools and describe one adaptation strategy for each.
  1. Read a selected chapter on culturally responsive assessment from a current early childhood text; annotate for examples of norm-group bias, language bias, and examiner bias, then share annotations in a think-pair-share.
  2. Analyze two published assessment instruments side by side using a Bias Review Guide (norm group described, languages available, cultural assumptions in item content); write a one-paragraph evaluation of each instrument's appropriateness for a bilingual Spanish-English preschool population.
  3. Small groups create a two-page 'Assessment Adaptation Brief' for a given child profile (e.g., dual language learner, child with a motor disability) that recommends at least two accommodations supported by the NAEYC DAP position statement, then share with the class.
Current early childhood assessment textbook chapter, Bias Review Guide, two published assessment instruments (sample/demo versions), NAEYC DAP position statement, Assessment Adaptation Brief templateBias Review paragraph scored by instructor on a 3-point rubric (identification of bias, specificity of adaptation, reference to source); pass = score of 2/3 or higher on both instruments (total 4/6).
9Communicating Assessment Results to Families14practiceStudents will conduct a simulated family conference in which they present child assessment findings clearly, use plain language, respond to family questions, and document the conference in writing.
  1. Review a sample family conference script and identify jargon terms; replace each jargon term with plain-language alternatives using a glossary-building activity, then compare lists as a class.
  2. Prepare a one-page Family-Friendly Assessment Summary for the fictional child portfolio, converting technical developmental language into accessible statements about what the child can do and what the program will do next; instructor provides written feedback.
  3. Role-play a 10-minute family conference: one student plays the teacher, one plays a skeptical parent (using a scenario card), and one observes using the Family Conference Observation Checklist; roles rotate so all three students experience each role.
Sample conference script, jargon glossary worksheet, Family-Friendly Assessment Summary template, scenario cards (skeptical parent, non-English-speaking parent, parent in denial), Family Conference Observation ChecklistFamily Conference Observation Checklist scored by the observing peer and instructor during role-play; pass = score of 14/18 or higher, with no score of 0 on the 'plain language' or 'family question response' items.
10Confidentiality, Legal Requirements, and Digital Record-Keeping12theoryStudents will explain how FERPA and applicable child privacy requirements govern early childhood assessment records and demonstrate correct procedures for storing and sharing digital documentation.
  1. Read an overview of FERPA as it applies to early childhood programs and a program confidentiality policy sample; complete a Scenario Sort activity matching 15 situations (e.g., sharing a child's portfolio photo on social media, emailing a checklist to a speech therapist) to 'allowed,' 'requires consent,' or 'prohibited.'
  2. Guided lab: students practice setting up a password-protected digital folder structure for a hypothetical classroom using available classroom computers, following a step-by-step Digital Records Protocol handout; instructor observes and checks each student's folder setup.
  3. Draft a one-page written policy summary explaining confidentiality rules for documentation to a new classroom volunteer; the summary must address physical records, digital records, social media, and who may access records.
FERPA overview document, sample program confidentiality policy, Scenario Sort cards, Digital Records Protocol handout, classroom computers with standard software, policy summary templateScenario Sort scored by instructor; pass = 13/15 scenarios correctly classified. Policy summary scored pass/fail: pass requires all four topics addressed with no factually incorrect statements about FERPA.
11Program-Level Assessment and Using Data for Program Improvement14labStudents will interpret a sample program-level assessment data report, identify one area of program strength and one area needing improvement, and propose one evidence-based program change.
  1. Analyze a fictional program's aggregated child outcome data report (presented as charts and tables); complete a guided Data Interpretation Worksheet identifying what the data shows across each developmental domain and what is unknown or missing.
  2. In small groups, compare the fictional program's outcome data against a state quality rating and improvement system (QRIS) benchmark document; identify which QRIS indicators the program appears to meet and which it does not, citing data evidence.
  3. Each student writes a one-page Program Improvement Memo addressed to a fictional director that names one specific area for improvement supported by data, proposes one evidence-based change (citing a source), and describes how success would be measured over the next 90 days.
Fictional aggregated outcome data report, Data Interpretation Worksheet, state QRIS benchmark document (current version from state agency website), Program Improvement Memo templateProgram Improvement Memo scored on a 4-point rubric (data evidence cited, specificity of proposed change, measurement plan, professional writing); pass = score of 12/16 or higher.
12Integrated Assessment Practicum: Full Portfolio and Conference Simulation20fieldStudents will complete and defend a full, original child assessment portfolio including a written instructional response and a simulated family conference, demonstrating integration of all course competencies.
  1. Using observation data collected during a minimum of two live or supervised video observations, students compile a complete original portfolio with five or more evidence types, each annotated by domain and standard, and write a cover summary, Data Summary Form, and Individualized Instructional Response.
  2. Students present their portfolio to a two-person panel (instructor and one peer acting as a second reviewer) in a structured 15-minute defense: five minutes of presentation, five minutes of questions about the evidence and instructional decisions, and five minutes of evaluator feedback.
  3. Immediately following the defense, students complete a one-page written reflection addressing what the assessment process taught them about the child, how cultural responsiveness was applied, one ethical decision made during documentation, and how they would approach assessment differently next time.
Portfolio binder (from earlier lessons, expanded with original observations), original observation forms and anecdotal records, Integrated Portfolio Rubric, panel question bank, written reflection prompt, early learning standards referenceIntegrated Portfolio Rubric scored by the instructor panel (evidence quality, annotation accuracy, IIR alignment, conference communication, reflection depth); pass = score of 40/56 or higher with no category scoring 0, and a minimum score of 3/8 on the family communication category.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Assessment Principles and Tools Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% (40/50 items correct)A 50-item written exam covering the purposes of assessment, developmental domains and milestones, types of observation and documentation methods, characteristics of screening tools, referral processes, confidentiality requirements under FERPA, and culturally responsive assessment principles. Items include multiple choice, matching, and two short-answer questions requiring students to apply ethical guidelines from the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct to realistic scenarios. Maps to CDA Subject Area 5 (to ensure a well-run, purposeful program responsive to participant needs).
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Live Observation and Documentation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Score of 24/32 or higher on the Observation Demonstration Rubric, with no score of 0 on the objectivity or bias indicatorsThe instructor assigns each student a 10-minute live observation session in a structured role-play or, where available, a supervised observation of an actual child or classroom. The student writes one anecdotal record, one five-minute running record, and completes one developmental checklist in real time; the instructor scores all three documents using the Observation Demonstration Rubric for objectivity, detail, format, and domain accuracy. Maps to CDA Functional Area: Observation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Assessment Portfolio Lab LogLog15%Score of 36/48 or higher on the Portfolio Lab Log Rubric with all required entry types presentStudents maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course documenting each hands-on activity: every observation form completed, each portfolio artifact annotated, the Data Summary Form, the Individualized Instructional Response, the Family-Friendly Assessment Summary, and the Program Improvement Memo. Each entry includes the date, the task, the developmental domain addressed, a self-assessment of confidence (1–4 scale), and one question generated by the activity. The completed log is submitted at the end of the course and scored on completeness, accuracy of domain annotations, quality of self-assessments, and evidence of growth over time. Maps to CDA Competency Standard VI (maintaining a commitment to professionalism).
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Confidentiality and Ethical Practice Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on the non-negotiable items (no prohibited disclosures, correct FERPA application, zero personally identifiable information exposed); overall score of 9/12 on the full checklistA structured safety check administered by the instructor using a 12-item Ethical Practice Checklist applied to the student's complete portfolio and written products from the course. Non-negotiable items include: no child's real name or image used without documented consent, no assessment data shared outside approved channels, confidentiality statement present on all family-facing documents, and all digital files stored per the Digital Records Protocol. Failure of any single non-negotiable item requires immediate remediation and resubmission before a course grade is awarded. Maps to NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct Principle 2 (responsibilities to families) and CDA Subject Area 5.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-EARL54-05 Trade course

Health, Safety, and Supervision in Early Childhood Settings

170 hr · $2,140 COMPLIMENTARY

This course prepares preschool teachers to maintain safe, healthy environments for young children by applying child safety regulations, universal precautions, emergency response procedures, and developmentally appropriate supervision practices. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry training and pediatric first aid/CPR certification as embedded credentials. Content maps directly to the CDA Functional Area 1 (Safe) and Functional Area 2 (Healthy) competency standards.

Outcomes
Course text

This course prepares preschool teachers to maintain safe, healthy environments for young children by applying child safety regulations, universal precautions, emergency response procedures, and developmentally appropriate supervision practices. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry training and pediatric first aid/CPR certification as embedded credentials. Content maps directly to the CDA Functional Area 1 (Safe) and Functional Area 2 (Healthy) competency standards.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Introduction to Child Safety Frameworks and Licensing Requirements; OSHA 10 Module 1: Hazard Recognition and Worker Rights in Early Childhood Workplaces; OSHA 10 Module 2: Personal Protective Equipment, Bloodborne Pathogens, and Universal Precautions; Hand Hygiene, Illness Exclusion, and Infectious Disease Prevention; Environmental Safety: Indoor and Outdoor Hazard Inspection; Supervision Ratios, Active Supervision, and Sight-Line Management; Pediatric First Aid: Wound Care, Choking, Allergic Reactions, and Seizures; Pediatric CPR and AED for Preschool Educators; Emergency Action Plans: Fire Evacuation, Lockdown, and Medical Emergencies; Child Abuse and Neglect: Recognition, Mandatory Reporting, and Trauma-Informed Practice; Safe Sleep, Nutrition Safety, and Medication Administration Records; Safety Documentation, Digital Reporting Tools, and CDA Portfolio Connection.

What competent looks like. Identify and eliminate or mitigate physical, biological, and environmental hazards in indoor and outdoor early childhood settings using a systematic inspection process. Demonstrate pediatric first aid and CPR procedures, including response to choking, allergic reaction, and seizure, to a standard required for certification. Apply state childcare licensing health and safety regulations—including child-to-staff ratios, supervision requirements, and mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect—to real and simulated scenarios. Design and document an emergency action plan (fire evacuation, lockdown, and medical emergency) appropriate for a licensed preschool classroom. Implement universal precautions, proper hand hygiene, diapering and toileting procedures, and safe medication administration record-keeping in compliance with licensing standards. Complete OSHA 10-Hour General Industry training requirements and articulate how workplace safety principles apply to the early childhood profession.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Introduction to Child Safety Frameworks and Licensing Requirements13theoryStudents will explain the federal and state regulatory framework governing health and safety in licensed preschool settings, including the role of the state childcare licensing agency and CDA Functional Area 1 (Safe) competency standards.
  1. Read excerpts from Caring for Our Children: National Health and Safety Performance Standards (CFOC4) introduction and compare to the state childcare licensing handbook; annotate key differences and similarities.
  2. Create a two-column chart mapping CDA Competency Goal II (Safe, Healthy Environment) sub-competencies to specific state licensing regulations, noting which rules are stricter.
  3. Participate in a structured discussion: 'What happens to a center when a licensing violation is cited?' using a case study drawn from publicly available state licensing inspection records.
Caring for Our Children 4th ed. (CFOC4), state childcare licensing regulations (current version), CDA Competency Standards (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition), highlighters, chart paperStudents submit the two-column regulatory mapping chart; pass requires correct identification of at least 8 of 10 matched regulation pairs and a written paragraph explaining mandatory reporting obligations — graded with a provided rubric, 80% or higher to pass.
2OSHA 10 Module 1: Hazard Recognition and Worker Rights in Early Childhood Workplaces15theoryStudents will identify the four main categories of workplace hazards (physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic) as they specifically appear in preschool settings and describe OSHA worker rights and employer obligations under the General Duty Clause.
  1. Complete the OSHA 10-Hour General Industry online or instructor-led modules covering introduction to OSHA, hazard recognition, and workers' rights; record completion in the course log.
  2. Walk through a photographic virtual tour of a preschool classroom and label at least 12 distinct hazards by category (physical, biological, chemical, ergonomic) on a printed floor plan.
  3. Role-play an employee reporting a safety concern to a supervisor using the OSHA complaint process, then debrief on anti-retaliation protections.
OSHA 10-Hour General Industry course materials (authorized trainer content), printed classroom floor-plan handout, hazard photo cards, OSHA poster 'Job Safety and Health: It's the Law'OSHA 10 Module 1 quiz (administered by authorized trainer or embedded course quiz): 70% or higher required; students also submit annotated floor plan with at least 12 correctly labeled hazards — instructor spot-checks during debrief.
3OSHA 10 Module 2: Personal Protective Equipment, Bloodborne Pathogens, and Universal Precautions13demoStudents will select and correctly don and doff PPE appropriate for diapering, wound care, and cleaning of body-fluid spills, and explain the chain of infection and universal precautions as required by OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens standard principles.
  1. Watch instructor demonstrate correct glove selection (disposable nitrile), donning, doff-and-dispose sequence without self-contamination; students then repeat the demonstration in pairs and provide peer feedback using a checklist.
  2. Practice a diapering procedure on a doll using the 10-step CFOC4 diapering procedure, noting each PPE and sanitation step aloud while a partner checks against the CFOC4 reference.
  3. Prepare a dilute bleach solution for surface disinfection following label and CFOC4 concentration guidance, label the container correctly, and explain proper storage away from children.
Nitrile gloves (various sizes), disposable aprons, goggles, doll or mannequin for diapering, diapering changing paper, CFOC4 diapering procedure chart, unscented bleach, measuring tools, labeled spray bottles, OSHA 10 bloodborne pathogens module handoutsSkills checklist: instructor observes each student complete the full diapering procedure and a body-fluid spill cleanup; all critical steps (PPE on before contact, correct disinfectant concentration, hand hygiene before and after) must be demonstrated correctly — zero critical errors allowed to pass this safety-check item.
4Hand Hygiene, Illness Exclusion, and Infectious Disease Prevention10.5labStudents will perform medically correct hand-washing technique, apply CFOC4 and licensing standards for illness exclusion criteria, and create a daily health check log template for a preschool classroom.
  1. Use GlitterBug or similar UV lotion to simulate germ spread; wash hands using the CDC 20-second technique, then check under UV light for missed areas and document findings in the lab log.
  2. Review a set of six child symptom scenario cards (fever, vomiting, pink eye, rash, lice, runny nose) and determine for each whether exclusion is required under CFOC4 Appendix guidelines, citing the standard.
  3. Design a one-page daily health check and illness exclusion log template with fields required by common state licensing standards; share with a partner for accuracy review.
GlitterBug Potion or equivalent UV lotion, UV flashlight, soap, paper towels, sink access, illness scenario cards, CFOC4, blank log template, printer or computer accessLab log entry for this lesson must include UV hand-wash results diagram, completed scenario card responses with citations (4 of 6 correct citations minimum = pass), and a completed log template — instructor reviews lab log at next class meeting; 75% of elements correct to pass lesson check.
5Environmental Safety: Indoor and Outdoor Hazard Inspection15fieldStudents will conduct a systematic indoor and outdoor safety inspection of a real or simulated preschool environment using a standardized checklist aligned to state licensing requirements, identifying hazards and proposing corrective actions.
  1. Complete the Walk-Around Environmental Rating safety items from a simplified ECERS-3–informed checklist (or state licensing inspection checklist) in the campus lab classroom, marking each item pass/fail with written notes.
  2. Inspect the outdoor play area (campus playground or arranged site visit) for fall-hazard surfaces, equipment condition, sun safety, perimeter security, and age-appropriate equipment, documenting findings with photos on a mobile device.
  3. Write a one-page corrective action memo addressed to a fictitious center director identifying the three highest-priority hazards found, the regulation violated, and a specific remediation step with a realistic timeline.
State childcare licensing environmental safety checklist (printed), ECERS-3 reference sheet for safety items, mobile device or camera, clipboard, corrective action memo template, hard hat and closed-toe shoes (required for outdoor inspection)Corrective action memo graded with rubric: must identify at least 3 real hazards found during inspection, cite a specific regulation for each, and propose a feasible correction — 80% rubric score to pass; field inspection checklist reviewed by instructor for completeness (all items addressed).
6Supervision Ratios, Active Supervision, and Sight-Line Management13theoryStudents will explain state-required child-to-staff ratios and group-size limits for preschool-age children, and demonstrate active supervision positioning techniques that maintain unobstructed sight lines to all children in a classroom layout.
  1. Given three classroom floor plans with furniture arranged differently, students use a ruler and colored pencil to draw supervision sight lines from two teacher positions, identifying blind spots and recommending furniture repositioning.
  2. Analyze three short video clips of classroom supervision and rate each using the 'active supervision' criteria (position, scan, move, interact, anticipate) from the Head Start safety framework, recording ratings on a structured observation form.
  3. Calculate whether a given scenario (number of children, number of staff, ages) meets the state ratio requirement and whether a substitute arrangement during a break is compliant — complete five ratio calculation problems in writing.
State childcare ratio regulation chart, classroom floor plan handouts (3 versions), rulers, colored pencils, video clips (licensed training videos or Head Start training media), active supervision observation form, ratio calculation worksheetRatio calculation worksheet: 4 of 5 correct to pass; floor-plan sight-line activity reviewed by instructor — all blind spots must be correctly identified (instructor key used); video observation form scores reviewed for consistency with answer key within one rating point.
7Pediatric First Aid: Wound Care, Choking, Allergic Reactions, and Seizures17demoStudents will perform pediatric first aid procedures for minor wounds, choking (conscious and unconscious infant and child), anaphylaxis recognition and epinephrine auto-injector training device use, and seizure response, to the standard required by the certification course.
  1. Instructor demonstrates each procedure on mannequins and training devices; students practice abdominal thrusts and back blows on infant and child mannequins in groups of three, rotating until each achieves correct technique observed by instructor.
  2. Simulate an anaphylaxis scenario: student identifies signs from a role-play script, retrieves a training epinephrine auto-injector (EpiPen trainer), administers it to the lateral thigh of a mannequin in the correct position, and calls for EMS — timed at under 3 minutes.
  3. Complete the first aid skills station rotation (wound care, seizure response positioning, choking) as structured by the pediatric first aid certification provider's curriculum, with instructor sign-off at each station.
Infant and child CPR/first aid mannequins, EpiPen trainer devices, latex-free gloves, wound care supplies (gauze, bandages — training use), pediatric first aid certification course student manual, AED trainer unit, skills check-off sheets from certification providerEach student must pass all skills stations as required by the pediatric first aid/CPR certification provider — 100% of critical steps performed correctly on final attempt (maximum 2 attempts per station per certification standard); instructor documents pass/fail on certification provider forms.
8Pediatric CPR and AED for Preschool Educators15labStudents will perform high-quality infant and child CPR (compression depth, rate, and ratio) and operate a pediatric AED trainer according to the certification provider's standard until each student achieves certification.
  1. Practice 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio on infant and child mannequins with immediate feedback from a CPR feedback device, adjusting compression depth and rate until the device signals correct technique for two consecutive cycles.
  2. Complete a two-rescuer CPR scenario with a partner: one performs compressions while the other manages airway and AED trainer pads, then switch roles — instructor evaluates hand placement, rate, depth, and communication.
  3. Complete the written knowledge check required by the certification provider covering recognition of cardiac arrest, activation of EMS, and AED use — score and review answers immediately for remediation.
Infant and child CPR mannequins with feedback devices, AED trainer unit with pediatric pad adapter, barrier devices (face shields), certification provider student manual, written knowledge check from providerCertification provider's pass standard for pediatric CPR/AED skills and written test — typically 100% of critical skills steps and a passing score on the written test as defined by the provider (American Red Cross, American Heart Association, or equivalent); instructor documents completion; students who do not pass on first attempt receive immediate remediation and retest within the lab period.
9Emergency Action Plans: Fire Evacuation, Lockdown, and Medical Emergencies15practiceStudents will write a complete emergency action plan for a preschool classroom that includes a fire evacuation procedure with a posted escape route, a lockdown protocol, and a medical emergency response sequence, meeting minimum state licensing documentation requirements.
  1. Examine two sample emergency action plans (one compliant, one with intentional gaps) and use a licensing compliance checklist to identify the deficiencies in the non-compliant plan, writing corrective notes for each gap found.
  2. Draw a to-scale evacuation route map for a provided classroom floor plan, marking primary and secondary exits, assembly point, location of emergency contact binder, and first aid kit — label all elements using standard emergency symbols.
  3. Draft a full Emergency Action Plan document for a fictitious 20-child preschool classroom using a provided template aligned to state licensing requirements; include fire, lockdown, and medical emergency sections with staff role assignments.
Sample emergency action plans (compliant and deficient versions), state licensing emergency plan requirements, floor plan with dimensions, ruler, emergency symbol key, EAP document template, colored pencilsEmergency Action Plan document graded with a 15-item compliance rubric derived from state licensing requirements; must score at least 12 of 15 items fully correct — any item relating to evacuation routes or medical emergency contact must be correct to pass (critical items).
10Child Abuse and Neglect: Recognition, Mandatory Reporting, and Trauma-Informed Practice15theoryStudents will identify behavioral and physical indicators of abuse and neglect across four types (physical, sexual, emotional, neglect), describe the mandatory reporter obligations of preschool teachers under their state's law, and explain one trauma-informed classroom strategy.
  1. Read the state's mandatory reporting statute summary and CDA Competency Standard on safe environments; complete a T-chart listing what information must be included in a report and to which agency it is made in the state.
  2. Review a set of eight child scenario vignettes and classify each as possible physical abuse, neglect, emotional abuse, sexual abuse, or no concern — justify each classification with a specific observable indicator, not an assumption.
  3. Watch a training video or read a case study on trauma-informed care (e.g., from the National Child Traumatic Stress Network) and write a 200-word reflection identifying two concrete classroom strategies that support a child who has experienced trauma.
State mandatory reporting statute summary (from state child welfare agency website), CDA Competency Standards, scenario vignette cards, trauma-informed care training resource (NCTSN or equivalent), reflection templateScenario classification exercise: 6 of 8 correct classifications with written justification = pass; T-chart reviewed by instructor for accuracy of reporting procedure (all required elements of a report must be listed to pass this item); reflection graded pass/fail on inclusion of two specific strategies.
11Safe Sleep, Nutrition Safety, and Medication Administration Records15practiceStudents will apply AAP safe sleep guidelines and CFOC4 nutrition safety standards to classroom scenarios, and correctly complete a medication authorization and administration log that meets state licensing documentation requirements.
  1. Set up an infant sleep environment using a crib and materials kit; identify and remove all unsafe items (soft bedding, positioners, bumpers) using the AAP safe sleep guidelines and CFOC4 standards, documenting each correction on a checklist.
  2. Analyze three child allergy scenario cards (tree nut, dairy, bee sting) and create a one-page Individual Care Plan summary for one child, listing the allergen, symptoms, emergency action, and foods to avoid — format to meet state licensing requirements.
  3. Complete a blank medication authorization form and medication administration log for a scenario child who requires a prescribed antihistamine, entering all fields (prescriber, dose, route, time, parent signature line) correctly and identifying two common documentation errors to avoid.
Infant crib with mattress, soft items (to be removed), AAP safe sleep guidelines (current), CFOC4 nutrition and sleep chapters, allergy scenario cards, Individual Care Plan template, medication authorization and administration log forms (state-required format or equivalent)Safe sleep setup: all unsafe items removed with no prompting from instructor = pass (any missed unsafe item = fail; student corrects and retries once). Medication log: all required fields completed correctly with no falsified information = pass; any critical field (dose, child name, time) blank or incorrect = fail requiring redo.
12Safety Documentation, Digital Reporting Tools, and CDA Portfolio Connection13.5labStudents will organize and complete the safety and health documentation required for CDA Professional Portfolio Competency Statement II, using digital tools (word processor, spreadsheet, digital portfolio platform) to produce professional-quality records.
  1. Use a word processor to draft CDA Competency Statement II (Safe and Healthy Learning Environments) in the student's own words, citing at least two specific practices from this course as supporting evidence — minimum 150 words, professional tone.
  2. Build a digital incident/accident report log in a spreadsheet, entering five simulated incidents, sorting by date and type, and generating a summary row — export as PDF, demonstrating basic data management for licensing compliance.
  3. Compile a digital folder of safety documentation artifacts produced throughout this course (evacuation plan, inspection checklist, medication log sample, health check log) and organize them with a table of contents; present the folder to a peer for a two-minute informal review using provided feedback criteria.
Computer or tablet with word processing and spreadsheet software, digital portfolio platform (program-designated), USB drive or cloud storage, CDA Competency Standards (current edition), printer access, peer review feedback formCompetency Statement II draft: meets minimum 150 words, cites two specific course practices correctly, no plagiarism (run through similarity tool) — pass at 80% rubric score; digital incident log: all five entries complete and correctly sorted = pass; portfolio folder: all four required artifact categories present = pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Safety Regulations and Scenario Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (28 of 37 items correct); no partial credit on mandatory reporting and ratio calculation items — those must each be fully correctA 37-item written exam covering state childcare licensing safety regulations, OSHA 10 core concepts, illness exclusion criteria, mandatory reporting obligations, child-to-staff ratios, safe sleep guidelines, and CDA Functional Area 1 and 2 competency knowledge. Items include multiple choice, short-answer scenario analysis, and ratio calculation problems drawn directly from lesson content.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pediatric First Aid, CPR, and Emergency Response Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All certification provider critical steps performed correctly on each skill (per provider standard); Emergency Action Plan presentation scores 12 of 15 on compliance rubric with all critical items correctStudents demonstrate pediatric first aid, infant and child CPR, and AED operation before an authorized instructor and receive or confirm their certification. Students also present their completed Emergency Action Plan to the instructor in a five-minute oral defense, answering at least two scenario-based follow-up questions about how they would implement the plan.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Course Lab LogLog15%At least 10 of 12 lesson lab log entries completed and scoring 75% or higher on each entry's rubric; all safety-critical entries (PPE/diapering, safe sleep, medication log) must be complete and correctStudents maintain a running lab log (physical binder or digital folder) documenting activities, data, reflections, and completed forms for each of the 12 lessons. The lab log is collected at the end of the course and scored entry by entry against a rubric; it also serves as the primary evidence source for the CDA Portfolio Competency Statement II artifact collection.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Comprehensive Classroom Safety Inspection Safety CheckSafety audit15%Scores 'Compliant' on all critical safety items (ratios, supervision sight lines, hazardous-material storage, emergency exits unobstructed, first aid kit stocked) with zero unresolved critical violations; overall inspection checklist at least 90% complete and accurateStudents independently conduct a full safety inspection of the campus preschool lab or an arranged site, using a state licensing–aligned checklist, and submit a typed corrective action report within 48 hours. An instructor simultaneously scores the inspection using the same checklist; final pass/fail is based on the student's ability to identify all critical violations without instructor prompting.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-EARL54-06 Trade course

Family Engagement in Early Childhood Education

170 hr · $2,140 COMPLIMENTARY

This course prepares preschool teachers to build respectful, culturally responsive partnerships with families as a core component of high-quality early childhood practice. Students learn communication strategies, family involvement planning, and community resource coordination aligned with CDA Competency Standards and state childcare licensing requirements. Emphasis is placed on practical skills: conducting family conferences, creating welcoming environments, and navigating sensitive conversations professionally.

Outcomes
Course text

This course prepares preschool teachers to build respectful, culturally responsive partnerships with families as a core component of high-quality early childhood practice. Students learn communication strategies, family involvement planning, and community resource coordination aligned with CDA Competency Standards and state childcare licensing requirements. Emphasis is placed on practical skills: conducting family conferences, creating welcoming environments, and navigating sensitive conversations professionally.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Foundations of Family-Centered Practice; Legal and Ethical Obligations to Families; Cultural Responsiveness and Linguistic Access; Communication Tools: Written and Digital; Verbal Communication and Active Listening Skills; Conducting Effective Family Conferences; Handling Difficult Conversations Professionally; Designing a Family Engagement Plan; Community Resources and Referral Pathways; Family Involvement Activities and Volunteer Programs; Evaluating and Improving Family Engagement; CDA Competency Goal VI Review and Family Engagement Portfolio.

What competent looks like. Explain the theoretical and legal basis for family-centered practice in licensed preschool settings, including IDEA parental rights and state licensing family notification requirements. Design and implement a written Family Engagement Plan that includes multiple communication methods, family volunteer opportunities, and culturally and linguistically responsive strategies. Conduct a structured family conference using active listening, strength-based language, and documented follow-up consistent with CDA Competency Goal VI. Identify and connect families to community resources — including health, nutrition, social services, and special-needs referral pathways — appropriate to the geographic service area. Demonstrate professional written communication (newsletters, digital updates, translated notices) that meets plain-language standards and protects family confidentiality under applicable privacy requirements. Evaluate family engagement practices using observational data and family feedback, then revise the program plan to improve partnership quality.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Foundations of Family-Centered Practice12theoryStudents will explain the historical evolution and theoretical frameworks — Bronfenbrenner's ecological model, Epstein's six types of involvement — that underpin family engagement in early childhood education.
  1. Annotated reading of excerpts from Bronfenbrenner's bioecological model and Epstein's framework, followed by a graphic-organizer comparison of both theories and how each applies to a preschool setting.
  2. Small-group case analysis: review three scenarios of varying family involvement levels and map each to Epstein's typology, discussing implications for teacher practice.
  3. Reflective journal entry (minimum 300 words) connecting personal family-school experiences to course frameworks, submitted to the course learning management system.
Bronfenbrenner ecological model readings (instructor-provided excerpts), Epstein et al. 'School, Family, and Community Partnerships' framework summary, CDA Competency Standards booklet (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition), whiteboard, graphic organizer handout, LMS access.Students correctly label all six Epstein involvement types with preschool-specific examples on a 10-item matching quiz; pass = 70% or higher.
2Legal and Ethical Obligations to Families12theoryStudents will identify state childcare licensing requirements for family notification, records access, and grievance procedures, and explain confidentiality obligations under applicable federal privacy law.
  1. Instructor-led review of the state childcare licensing regulations related to family rights (enrollment agreements, posted notices, complaint procedures); students annotate a printed regulation excerpt and flag three obligations relevant to daily classroom practice.
  2. Role-play: one student plays a parent requesting their child's file; partner plays the teacher — students practice explaining what records are available, who may access them, and what the center's process is, then debrief as a class.
  3. Written scenario response: given a vignette where a staff member shares child information with an unauthorized party, students write a corrective action memo identifying the violation and the proper procedure.
State childcare licensing regulations (printed excerpts, current version from state licensing board website), NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct (current edition), scenario handouts, lined paper or word-processing access.Scenario response memo correctly identifies the confidentiality violation and cites the applicable regulation or ethical code; graded with a rubric requiring all three elements (identification, citation, correction) — pass = all three elements present and accurate.
3Cultural Responsiveness and Linguistic Access15theoryStudents will describe strategies for honoring family cultural backgrounds and ensuring meaningful communication with families whose home language is not English.
  1. Demographic mapping activity: students research the top home languages spoken in a provided hypothetical community profile and list at least five practical accommodations a preschool program should provide (interpreter services, translated materials, multilingual signage).
  2. Analysis of two sample welcome packets — one culturally generic and one culturally responsive — using a provided rubric; students identify specific differences and rewrite one section of the generic packet for a target cultural community.
  3. Guest speaker (local family liaison, interpreter, or community health worker) discusses real barriers families face; students write three actionable takeaways for their own future classroom.
Community demographic profile handout, sample welcome packets (two versions, instructor-prepared), cultural responsiveness rubric, NAEYC position statement on linguistic and cultural diversity (current), guest speaker materials.Rewritten welcome-packet section demonstrates at least three specific culturally responsive elements identified in the rubric; peer and instructor review — pass = rubric score of 75% or higher.
4Communication Tools: Written and Digital15demoStudents will produce professional early childhood communications — including a parent newsletter, a digital update post, and a translated one-page notice — that meet plain-language standards and protect family privacy.
  1. Instructor models drafting a classroom newsletter using a word processor, demonstrating plain-language principles (6th-grade reading level target, active voice, no jargon), then students critique the draft using a provided checklist.
  2. Students draft their own one-page newsletter for a hypothetical preschool classroom, incorporating an upcoming theme, a developmental tip, a volunteer request, and a program reminder; peer editing using the plain-language checklist follows.
  3. Students use a free translation tool (e.g., Google Translate) under instructor guidance to produce a one-page translated notice, then discuss limitations and the importance of having a bilingual reviewer verify accuracy before sending to families.
Computer lab or laptops with word-processing and internet access, plain-language checklist (instructor-prepared based on federal plain language guidelines), sample newsletters (good and poor examples), translation tool access, printer.Finished newsletter reviewed against the plain-language checklist (10 criteria); pass = meets 8 of 10 criteria with no privacy violations (no child's last name, no confidential information).
5Verbal Communication and Active Listening Skills14demoStudents will demonstrate active listening techniques — paraphrasing, open-ended questioning, and non-judgmental body language — in a simulated family conversation.
  1. Mini-lecture and video analysis: instructor shows a short video clip of a teacher-family conversation (instructor-selected from professional development library or YouTube ECE channels); students identify examples of active listening and missed opportunities using a coding sheet.
  2. Triads practice: one student is the 'parent,' one is the 'teacher,' one is the observer with a checklist; they rotate through three short scenarios (a routine check-in, a concern about biting, a language delay worry) and debrief after each rotation.
  3. Individual written reflection: students identify their strongest and weakest active listening skill from the triad practice and write a specific improvement goal.
Video clip (instructor-selected, ECE-relevant), active listening coding sheet, triad scenario cards (instructor-prepared), observer checklist, reflection handout.Observer checklist from final triad rotation: student demonstrates at least 4 of 5 active listening behaviors (paraphrase, open-ended question, appropriate eye contact, non-judgmental language, reflecting feeling); pass = 4 of 5 behaviors observed.
6Conducting Effective Family Conferences15practiceStudents will plan and conduct a structured family conference using a strength-based approach, covering child progress, goals, and documented follow-up steps.
  1. Students review a sample completed conference planning form and identify how child portfolio evidence, developmental milestone data, and parent input are incorporated; instructor debriefs common errors.
  2. Students complete a conference planning form for a hypothetical child using a provided child profile and portfolio sample, identifying two child strengths, one area of growth, one family-shared goal, and two teacher strategies.
  3. Paired role-play of a full conference (15 minutes); one student is the teacher, one is the parent (using a role card); instructor or peer observes with a conference quality rubric; students then swap roles with a different scenario.
Conference planning form template, sample completed conference form, child profile and portfolio sample (instructor-prepared), conference quality rubric, role-play scenario cards, timer.Conference quality rubric scored by instructor during role-play observation: student meets all five required elements (strength-based opening, evidence cited, goal co-constructed, follow-up documented, professional tone); pass = 4 of 5 elements met.
7Handling Difficult Conversations Professionally14practiceStudents will apply a structured protocol to navigate sensitive family conversations — including suspected developmental delay, behavior concerns, and mandatory reporting context — while maintaining professionalism and family trust.
  1. Case study analysis in small groups: each group receives a difficult-conversation scenario (e.g., telling a parent their child may need a developmental evaluation, or a parent who is hostile about a biting incident) and maps the conversation to a four-step protocol: prepare, open with empathy, present facts, plan together.
  2. Students script a two-minute opening statement for their assigned scenario using strength-based, non-diagnostic language, then share with the class for peer feedback.
  3. Full-class debrief on mandatory reporting: instructor explains that teachers are mandated reporters, that the report goes to the appropriate state agency (not parents first), and that maintaining professional neutrality with the family after reporting is essential — students write three 'dos' and three 'don'ts' for post-report family interaction.
Difficult-conversation scenario cards (instructor-prepared), four-step protocol handout, mandatory reporting overview fact sheet (state-specific, current), dos/don'ts worksheet.Written opening statement reviewed by instructor: uses at least two strength-based phrases, contains no diagnostic labels, and correctly applies the first two steps of the protocol — pass = all three criteria met.
8Designing a Family Engagement Plan16labStudents will draft a comprehensive written Family Engagement Plan for a hypothetical preschool classroom that specifies communication methods, volunteer opportunities, and family education events aligned with Epstein's typology.
  1. Template introduction: instructor walks through each section of the Family Engagement Plan template (communication calendar, volunteer menu, family workshop schedule, cultural celebrations acknowledgment, home-learning extension ideas) and students ask clarifying questions before drafting.
  2. Students draft all sections of the plan for a provided hypothetical classroom (25 students, diverse home languages, mixed income levels); they must include at least one strategy per Epstein type and note how each is culturally adapted.
  3. Peer review pairs exchange drafts and use a provided checklist to verify completeness, cultural responsiveness, and feasibility; written peer feedback is attached to the draft before submission.
Family Engagement Plan template (instructor-prepared), Epstein typology quick-reference card, cultural responsiveness checklist, peer review checklist, word-processing access.Instructor scores completed plan with a rubric (10 criteria, 2 points each); pass = 14 of 20 points, with mandatory coverage of all six Epstein types and at least two linguistic-access strategies.
9Community Resources and Referral Pathways14fieldStudents will compile a local community resource directory and demonstrate the ability to make a warm referral connecting a family to a specific service appropriate to a described need.
  1. Field research (in-class with internet access or library visit): students research and record at least 15 community resources across five categories — health/medical, nutrition/food assistance, developmental/special-needs evaluation, family counseling, and emergency services — including agency name, contact information, eligibility, and languages served.
  2. Instructor presents the concept of a 'warm referral' versus a cold referral; students practice in pairs using a scenario where a parent mentions housing instability — the 'teacher' must identify an appropriate resource from their directory and role-play the referral conversation.
  3. Students add their resource directories to a shared class document (Google Doc or LMS wiki) so all students build a collective regional resource bank; each student reviews two classmates' entries and flags any outdated or inaccurate information.
Computers with internet access, community resource directory template, warm-referral script guide (instructor-prepared), scenario cards, shared collaborative document (Google Docs or LMS).Completed directory reviewed for accuracy and completeness: must contain at least 15 verified entries across all five categories with current contact information and language-access notation — pass = 15 entries meeting all criteria.
10Family Involvement Activities and Volunteer Programs14practiceStudents will design a structured classroom volunteer program that includes orientation materials, clearly defined roles, and safety and confidentiality guidelines for family volunteers.
  1. Students review a sample volunteer handbook from a model preschool program (instructor-provided) and identify the essential components: orientation overview, classroom rules, confidentiality agreement, emergency procedures, and role descriptions.
  2. Each student drafts a two-page volunteer orientation guide for their hypothetical classroom, including a confidentiality reminder, a list of volunteer tasks appropriate for untrained adults (reading aloud, material preparation, event support), and a brief summary of classroom safety rules.
  3. Small groups create a volunteer recruitment flyer using word-processing or simple design tools, ensuring the flyer is welcoming, plain-language, available in at least two languages, and lists a clear point of contact.
Sample volunteer handbook (instructor-provided), volunteer orientation guide template, plain-language checklist, computers with word-processing or design tool access, translation tool access, printer.Volunteer orientation guide assessed with a rubric (8 criteria); pass = 6 of 8 criteria met, and the confidentiality section is accurate and complete.
11Evaluating and Improving Family Engagement14labStudents will design a family feedback survey, analyze mock survey data, and write a program improvement recommendation based on findings.
  1. Instructor models survey design principles (clear questions, Likert scales, open-ended items, avoiding leading questions, plain language) using a live demonstration on a free survey tool (Google Forms or SurveyMonkey); students identify three design errors in a poorly written sample survey.
  2. Students design a short family satisfaction survey (8–10 items) for a hypothetical program covering communication quality, cultural responsiveness, involvement opportunities, and overall satisfaction; peers review using the survey design checklist.
  3. Students receive a mock data set (instructor-prepared frequency counts and three open-ended comments) and analyze results: they calculate the percentage of satisfied responses per item and write a one-page recommendation memo identifying one strength and two program improvements with specific action steps.
Computers with internet access and Google Forms or SurveyMonkey access, survey design checklist (instructor-prepared), poorly written sample survey, mock data set (instructor-prepared), memo template.Recommendation memo is scored with a rubric: must correctly calculate at least 80% of percentages, identify one genuine strength, propose two specific and feasible action steps — pass = all three rubric elements met.
12CDA Competency Goal VI Review and Family Engagement Portfolio15practiceStudents will organize a professional portfolio section demonstrating mastery of CDA Competency Goal VI (maintaining a commitment to professionalism and family partnerships) and self-assess readiness for the CDA credentialing process.
  1. Instructor presents the CDA Family Questionnaire process and the role of the Family Child Care Rating Scale or classroom observation in the CDA assessment; students map their course work products to the CDA Competency Standards functional areas covered by Goal VI.
  2. Students assemble a portfolio section that includes: their Family Engagement Plan, a sample newsletter, the conference planning form, a completed resource directory excerpt, and a personal philosophy statement (200–300 words) on family partnerships — each artifact labeled with the CDA competency it addresses.
  3. Self-assessment: students complete the CDA self-study reflection questions for Competency Goal VI, identifying two areas of strength and one area requiring continued growth, then share in a structured small-group discussion.
CDA Competency Standards booklet (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition), CDA self-study reflection questions (from Council for Professional Recognition materials), portfolio binder or digital folder, all prior course work products, personal philosophy statement template.Portfolio section reviewed by instructor against a completeness checklist: all five required artifacts present, each labeled with the correct CDA competency functional area, and philosophy statement meets 200-word minimum and reflects course concepts — pass = all criteria met.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Family Engagement Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% or higher (35 of 50 items correct)A 50-item written exam covering theoretical frameworks (Bronfenbrenner, Epstein), legal and ethical obligations, cultural responsiveness principles, communication best practices, mandatory reporting context, and community referral pathways, mapped to CDA Competency Goal VI functional areas. Items include multiple-choice, true/false, and short-answer questions drawn from lesson content.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Family Conference Role-Play Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass = 80% on the conference quality rubric (16 of 20 points), with no score of zero on professionalism or confidentiality criteriaEach student conducts a 15-minute simulated family conference with the instructor or a trained evaluator acting as the parent, using a previously unseen child profile and portfolio sample. The student is scored on strength-based language, use of evidence, co-construction of goals, documented follow-up, and professional conduct, directly aligned with CDA Competency Goal VI observable behaviors.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Family Engagement Plan Lab LogLog15%14 of 20 rubric points, with mandatory coverage of all six Epstein involvement types and at least two linguistic-access strategiesThe completed, revised Family Engagement Plan (drafted in Lesson 8 and refined after peer and instructor feedback) is submitted as the primary lab log artifact, accompanied by the peer review sheet and a one-page reflection describing two revisions made based on feedback and the rationale for each change.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Confidentiality and Safety Procedures CheckSafety audit15%Pass = 100% on confidentiality items; 80% overall (16 of 20 points on the full checklist)An observed or written safety check in which students demonstrate correct handling of a simulated sensitive situation: they receive a scenario (an unauthorized adult requesting child information and a separate scenario involving a family volunteer present during an emergency drill) and must correctly apply confidentiality rules, identify the authorized procedure, and describe the emergency action steps. Confidentiality items are scored pass/fail with no partial credit; any confidentiality failure results in an overall failing grade regardless of total score.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-EARL54-07 Trade course

Practicum: Supervised Early Childhood Teaching

170 hr · $2,140 COMPLIMENTARY

Students apply child development theory, curriculum design, assessment, and family engagement skills in a real or simulated preschool classroom under direct instructor supervision. Across 170 hours of structured practice, learners plan and deliver lessons, manage routines, observe children, and document their work to build the professional portfolio required for the CDA credential. Emphasis is placed on reflective practice, child safety, and meeting the diverse needs of children ages birth through five.

Outcomes
Course text

Students apply child development theory, curriculum design, assessment, and family engagement skills in a real or simulated preschool classroom under direct instructor supervision. Across 170 hours of structured practice, learners plan and deliver lessons, manage routines, observe children, and document their work to build the professional portfolio required for the CDA credential. Emphasis is placed on reflective practice, child safety, and meeting the diverse needs of children ages birth through five.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Orientation: Practicum Standards, Professionalism, and Safety in the Classroom; Reviewing Child Development Principles Through Classroom Observation; Lesson Planning: Developmentally Appropriate Practice and Learning Centers; Teaching a Small-Group Activity: Delivery and Classroom Management; Inclusive Practice: Supporting Children with Diverse Needs and Backgrounds; Child Safety, First Aid, and Emergency Response Procedures; Designing and Setting Up Learning Environments; Family Communication: Conferences, Newsletters, and Documentation; Building the CDA Professional Portfolio; Reflective Practice: Using Feedback to Improve Teaching; Professionalism, Ethics, and Advocacy in Early Childhood Education; Final Teaching Demonstration and Portfolio Defense Preparation.

What competent looks like. Plan, implement, and evaluate at least three developmentally appropriate activity plans aligned to state early learning standards and CDA Competency Standards. Demonstrate safe supervision of children during indoor and outdoor routines, responding correctly to a simulated emergency using current pediatric first aid and CPR techniques. Use structured observation tools to document individual child behavior and communicate findings clearly to a supervising teacher and family member. Create and maintain a CDA Professional Portfolio section that includes a personal philosophy statement, three completed activity plans with reflections, and required documentation logs. Apply inclusive, culturally responsive strategies that support children with varying abilities, language backgrounds, and developmental levels during group and individual activities. Receive and apply constructive feedback from a supervising instructor, revising lesson plans and classroom practices to improve child outcomes across at least two observation cycles.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Orientation: Practicum Standards, Professionalism, and Safety in the Classroom9.5theoryStudents will identify the professional conduct standards, mandatory reporting obligations, and daily safety routines required in a licensed preschool setting.
  1. Review the CDA Competency Standards document and annotate which Functional Areas align to practicum tasks; create a personal tracking checklist.
  2. Discuss mandatory reporter laws (general framework), child-to-staff ratio requirements, and emergency evacuation procedures using a state childcare licensing handbook as a reference.
  3. Complete a classroom safety walkthrough checklist on a sample floor plan, identifying hazards, labeling emergency exits, and verifying first-aid kit contents against a standard inventory list.
CDA Competency Standards for Preschool (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition), state childcare licensing handbook, sample classroom floor plan, blank safety walkthrough checklist, first-aid kit inventory formStudents correctly identify at least 8 of 10 safety or compliance items on the walkthrough checklist and can state the mandatory reporting process in their own words; 80% correct on a 10-question short quiz.
2Reviewing Child Development Principles Through Classroom Observation11.5fieldStudents will use a structured anecdotal observation form to record and interpret children's developmental behaviors across at least two developmental domains.
  1. Observe a live or video-recorded preschool classroom for 45 minutes and record three separate anecdotal notes using the ABC (Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence) format.
  2. Categorize each observation by developmental domain (physical, cognitive, language, social-emotional) and connect it to a milestone reference such as the CDC's developmental milestones or a state early learning standard.
  3. Share observations in a small group, discuss how the same behavior can reflect multiple domains, and revise notes based on peer and instructor feedback.
Blank ABC observation forms, CDC Developmental Milestones reference cards, state early learning standards document, laptop or tablet for digital notes, video-recorded classroom footage (if live placement not yet available)Each of three anecdotal notes includes a complete ABC entry, is linked to a named developmental domain and a specific milestone or standard, and contains no identifying information about the child; instructor rates each note as proficient using a 4-point rubric (pass = 3/4 or higher on all three notes).
3Lesson Planning: Developmentally Appropriate Practice and Learning Centers13theoryStudents will write one complete activity plan for a learning-center activity that includes an objective, materials list, step-by-step procedure, differentiation strategy, and assessment method.
  1. Analyze three sample activity plans rated poor, adequate, and strong using a provided rubric; identify what specific elements raise or lower quality.
  2. Draft an activity plan for a designated learning center (art, science, literacy, or math) using a required template that aligns to the CDA Functional Area of Learning/Knowledge and a state early learning standard.
  3. Peer-review a partner's plan using the rubric, give written feedback on one strength and one required revision, then revise own plan accordingly.
CDA activity plan template, sample activity plans (three levels), activity plan rubric, state early learning standards, NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP) position statement (current edition)Completed activity plan earns a score of 80% or higher on the activity plan rubric, which assesses objective clarity, developmental appropriateness, inclusion of a differentiation strategy, and alignment to a named standard.
4Teaching a Small-Group Activity: Delivery and Classroom Management15practiceStudents will implement their approved activity plan with a small group of peers or children, using at least two positive guidance strategies and one differentiation technique.
  1. Deliver the lesson planned in Lesson 3 to a small group (peers role-playing as preschoolers or actual children in a lab school or placement site) while the instructor uses a live observation form.
  2. Practice two positive guidance strategies (e.g., redirection, specific praise, choice-giving) and document one instance of each on a self-reflection card immediately after the activity.
  3. Watch a 5-minute video clip of the teaching session (if recorded) or review instructor notes; identify one moment to celebrate and one specific change to make in the next plan.
Approved activity plan, activity materials and supplies, instructor live observation form, self-reflection card template, video recording device (if available and permitted by placement site), positive guidance strategy reference sheetInstructor observation form shows at least 14 of 18 indicators marked 'observed' or 'proficient,' including child safety maintained at all times, at least two positive guidance strategies used, and the activity ending with a transition cue; any safety lapse requires immediate remediation and repeat.
5Inclusive Practice: Supporting Children with Diverse Needs and Backgrounds13theoryStudents will describe and apply at least three specific strategies to make a preschool activity accessible and culturally responsive for children with varying abilities and language backgrounds.
  1. Read and annotate two short case studies (one child with a developmental delay, one dual-language learner) and list two modifications to a standard activity for each child using NAEYC DAP and DEC Recommended Practices as guides.
  2. Revise an existing activity plan from Lesson 3 to include UDL (Universal Design for Learning) modifications: multiple means of representation, engagement, and expression for at least one identified child need.
  3. Participate in a gallery walk displaying peer-modified plans; use sticky notes to identify one strong inclusion strategy in each displayed plan.
Case study handouts, UDL guidelines (CAST, current version), DEC Recommended Practices summary, revised activity plan template, sticky notes, NAEYC DAP position statementRevised activity plan includes at least three UDL modifications explicitly labeled, each linked to an identified child need; evaluated at 80% or higher on the inclusion rubric.
6Child Safety, First Aid, and Emergency Response Procedures13labStudents will correctly demonstrate pediatric CPR, rescue breathing, and response to a choking emergency on a training manikin, and complete a classroom emergency drill according to site protocols.
  1. Review the current pediatric first aid and CPR sequence using an approved CPR/AED training program (e.g., American Red Cross or American Heart Association Pediatric First Aid CPR AED); practice compressions and rescue breaths on an infant and child manikin under instructor supervision.
  2. Simulate a choking emergency using a training protocol: identify signs, deliver back blows and abdominal thrusts on a training manikin, and call for help using scripted language.
  3. Participate in a timed classroom evacuation drill using the site's emergency action plan; record evacuation time and verify all roster names are accounted for on the attendance/accountability form.
Pediatric CPR/AED training kit (infant and child manikins, face shields, AED trainer), pediatric first aid reference card, choking response poster, site emergency action plan, classroom roster/accountability form, stopwatchEach student achieves a pass score on the hands-on skills check sheet for CPR (correct rate, depth, and ratio) and choking response as determined by a certified instructor; evacuation drill is completed with all children accounted for within the time specified in the site plan. Any failed skill station must be retried within the same session.
7Designing and Setting Up Learning Environments13labStudents will arrange and evaluate a preschool classroom learning environment using an environment rating scale to identify areas that support child safety, independence, and learning.
  1. Study the principles of the ECERS-3 (Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale, Third Edition) and identify five subscale areas relevant to a preschool classroom; record definitions and example indicators for each.
  2. Set up or rearrange a lab classroom (or create a scaled floor plan) to address identified weaknesses in space, materials, and daily schedule; justify each change in a written rationale tied to a specific ECERS-3 indicator.
  3. Conduct a mock ECERS-3 subscale score of the rearranged classroom with a partner and compare scores; discuss any scoring disagreements with the instructor to calibrate reliability.
ECERS-3 manual and scoring forms (Harms, Clifford, & Cryer), lab classroom or large-scale floor plan printout, furniture cutouts or actual furniture, classroom materials checklist, pencils, rulersWritten rationale correctly links at least five physical changes to named ECERS-3 indicators; mock score shows agreement within one point on at least four of five rated subscale items when compared to instructor's score.
8Family Communication: Conferences, Newsletters, and Documentation13practiceStudents will produce two professional family communication products—a classroom newsletter and a brief conference summary—that are clear, accurate, and respectful of family diversity.
  1. Draft a one-page classroom newsletter for a hypothetical preschool class that includes an upcoming learning theme, two family engagement activities, a community resource referral, and an inclusive greeting in at least two languages or with a visual support.
  2. Role-play a parent-teacher conference using a scripted scenario; practice sharing a child's strength and one area of growth using specific observational language without jargon, then write a one-paragraph conference summary.
  3. Exchange newsletter and conference summary drafts with a peer; evaluate each using a professionalism checklist (correct spelling, no deficit language, actionable take-aways for families) and return written feedback.
Newsletter template, family communication rubric, conference scenario cards, professionalism checklist, dictionary/spell-check tool, bilingual phrase reference list or translation resourceNewsletter earns 80% or higher on the family communication rubric; conference summary uses only observational language (no jargon or deficit terms) as confirmed by instructor review.
9Building the CDA Professional Portfolio15practiceStudents will assemble and organize the required sections of a CDA Professional Portfolio, including a philosophy statement, family questionnaires, and documentation of competency evidence.
  1. Draft a personal philosophy statement of 300–500 words that addresses how children learn, the role of the teacher, and the importance of family and community partnerships; use the CDA Competency Standards as an organizational framework.
  2. Organize previously completed activity plans, observation logs, and family communication samples into the correct portfolio sections using the CDA Portfolio Checklist from the Council for Professional Recognition.
  3. Conduct a peer portfolio review using the CDA Portfolio Checklist: identify any missing required elements and create an action plan with specific deadlines to complete gaps before the credential verification visit.
CDA Professional Portfolio Checklist (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition), all previously completed activity plans and observation logs, philosophy statement template, three-ring binder or digital portfolio platform, divider tabs labeled by CDA Functional AreaPortfolio contains all required sections per the CDA Portfolio Checklist with no missing components; philosophy statement addresses all three required topics and is free of grammatical errors; peer and instructor both confirm checklist completion at 100%.
10Reflective Practice: Using Feedback to Improve Teaching13practiceStudents will analyze written instructor feedback from at least two teaching observations and produce a revised lesson plan and written self-reflection that demonstrates measurable improvement.
  1. Read two completed instructor observation forms from Lessons 4 and a subsequent teaching session; highlight every specific actionable suggestion and categorize each by CDA Competency Standard area.
  2. Write a structured self-reflection using a provided template: identify one specific teaching moment that went well (with evidence), one moment to change, and a concrete revision to the activity plan that addresses the feedback.
  3. Deliver a 5-minute revised activity to a small group and invite the instructor to use the same observation form; compare scores from both sessions to document growth on at least two indicators.
Two completed instructor observation forms, self-reflection template, CDA Competency Standards, revised activity plan, scoring comparison chartSelf-reflection accurately references specific feedback from both observation forms and proposes a concrete, implementable revision; revised delivery score on the observation form improves by at least two indicators compared to the first session.
11Professionalism, Ethics, and Advocacy in Early Childhood Education13theoryStudents will apply the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct to at least two realistic dilemma scenarios and articulate the responsibilities of an early childhood professional as an advocate for children and families.
  1. Read the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct (current edition) and identify the four sections (children, families, colleagues, community); annotate three ideals and three principles that are most relevant to daily classroom practice.
  2. Work in pairs to analyze two written ethical dilemma scenarios using a structured decision-making framework: identify the ethical issue, locate the relevant code section, list possible responses, and choose a defensible course of action with a written rationale.
  3. Participate in a whole-class Socratic discussion on the professional advocate role; write a 200-word position statement on one policy or practice issue affecting preschool children or families (e.g., access to quality childcare, adequate wages for ECE workers).
NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct (current edition, free download from naeyc.org), ethical dilemma scenario cards, decision-making framework handout, position statement templateEach ethical dilemma response correctly names a specific code section or principle, provides a defensible rationale, and prioritizes child well-being; evaluated at 80% or higher on the ethics analysis rubric.
12Final Teaching Demonstration and Portfolio Defense Preparation28fieldStudents will independently plan, implement, and evaluate a complete 20-minute preschool learning experience and present their CDA Professional Portfolio in a structured verbal defense with an instructor panel.
  1. Plan and deliver a complete 20-minute learning activity for a small group (minimum four children or peers), including a welcoming transition, developmentally appropriate instruction, embedded assessment moment, and a closing transition; instructor uses the formal competency observation rubric.
  2. Prepare and deliver a 10-minute verbal portfolio defense in which the student explains the content of three CDA portfolio sections, provides specific examples of their growth across the practicum, and answers two impromptu follow-up questions from the instructor panel.
  3. Complete a final written self-evaluation using the CDA Competency Goals as a framework, rating personal readiness in each of the six competency areas on a 4-point scale and identifying one professional development goal for the externship.
Approved final activity plan and all materials, formal competency observation rubric, CDA Professional Portfolio (complete), defense presentation outline, self-evaluation form with 6 CDA Competency Goal areasTeaching observation rubric score of 80% or higher with no unresolved safety indicators; portfolio defense judged proficient by both panelists on at least 3 of 3 sections presented; self-evaluation submitted and complete.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Practicum Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (30 of 40 questions)A 40-question written exam covering the CDA Competency Standards (all six areas), developmentally appropriate practice principles, inclusive strategies, mandatory reporting obligations, and positive guidance techniques, directly mapped to the CDA credential exam content areas. Students who score below 75% may retake one alternate-form exam after completing instructor-directed remediation within five school days.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Final Teaching Competency Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%80% or higher on the formal competency observation rubric (no safety indicator may be rated 'not observed')The instructor observes the student's complete 20-minute teaching delivery from Lesson 12 using a structured rubric aligned to the CDA Functional Areas: Safe, Healthy, Learning Environment, Self, Social, Communication, Guidance, Families, Program Management, and Professionalism. Any indicator marked as a safety concern must be remediated before the student advances to the Capstone course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Practicum Documentation LogLog15%All required entries complete and rated 'proficient' or above on the rubric; no more than one entry rated 'developing' with a documented revisionA compiled log submitted at the end of the practicum containing: three fully completed activity plans with post-activity reflections, six anecdotal observation notes in ABC format (two per developmental domain covered), two family communication products, and the instructor observation forms from all teaching sessions. The log becomes a core section of the student's CDA Professional Portfolio.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pediatric First Aid and CPR Skills CheckSafety audit15%Pass on all required skill stations (compression rate and depth, rescue breaths, choking response) as determined by a certified first aid/CPR instructor; no skill station may remain failedEach student completes a hands-on skills verification on infant and child manikins using the sequence from the approved pediatric first aid and CPR training program; the check is administered by a certified instructor and must be passed before the student is cleared for any externship placement involving unsupervised contact with children. Students who do not pass a station receive immediate corrective coaching and must demonstrate the skill correctly before leaving the session.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-EARL54-08 Capstone

Capstone Project: Integrated Early Childhood Education Program Design

216 hr · $2,160 COMPLIMENTARY

Students synthesize learning from all prior courses by independently designing, documenting, and defending a complete, developmentally appropriate preschool classroom program for a specific age band (3–5 years). The capstone integrates child development theory, curriculum planning, family engagement, safety compliance, and authentic assessment into a cohesive professional portfolio and a formal oral defense before a panel of instructors and an early childhood professional.

Outcomes
Course text

Students synthesize learning from all prior courses by independently designing, documenting, and defending a complete, developmentally appropriate preschool classroom program for a specific age band (3–5 years). The capstone integrates child development theory, curriculum planning, family engagement, safety compliance, and authentic assessment into a cohesive professional portfolio and a formal oral defense before a panel of instructors and an early childhood professional.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Program Blueprint and Professional Documentation Standards; Curriculum Unit and Classroom Environment Design; Assessment Tools, Family Engagement Plan, and Portfolio Assembly; Capstone Defense: Oral Presentation and Panel Review.

What competent looks like. Design a semester-long, developmentally appropriate curriculum unit for preschool-aged children that integrates all five CDA Competency Goal areas and meets applicable state licensing standards. Create a complete classroom environment plan—including layout, safety checklist, and inclusive accommodation documentation—that demonstrates compliance with health, safety, and supervision requirements covered in program coursework. Develop and document at least three authentic child assessment tools (observation record, portfolio entry, anecdotal note) aligned to early learning standards and explain their use in reporting to families. Produce a written family engagement plan that includes a communication strategy, a family event design, and culturally responsive resources appropriate to a diverse community. Present and orally defend the completed capstone portfolio to a review panel, responding to evaluator questions with evidence-based rationale drawn from course content and field experience. Reflect in writing on personal professional growth across the program, identifying specific CDA functional areas in which skills advanced and articulating a continuing professional development plan.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Program Blueprint and Professional Documentation Standards48theoryStudents will draft a detailed capstone project plan—including scope, timeline, target age band, and alignment to CDA Competency Goals and state licensing requirements—and receive instructor approval before proceeding.
  1. Review the six CDA Competency Goals and thirteen Functional Areas using the CDA Competency Standards book; annotate which goals each planned capstone component will address, then share annotations in a small-group critique.
  2. Complete a Capstone Planning Template that specifies the chosen age band, classroom context (center-based or family childcare), program philosophy statement, and a week-by-week production schedule with internal deadlines; submit for instructor feedback.
  3. Conduct a peer review of two classmates' planning templates using a structured checklist that flags missing CDA alignments, unsafe classroom design elements, and gaps in family engagement or assessment planning; incorporate feedback into a revised plan.
CDA Competency Standards book (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition); state licensing regulations handbook; Capstone Planning Template (program-provided); alignment checklist; word processing softwareInstructor approves the revised Capstone Planning Template, confirming coverage of all six CDA Competency Goals, a realistic timeline, and no safety or compliance gaps; plan must receive a score of at least 80% on the alignment rubric to advance.
2Curriculum Unit and Classroom Environment Design72labStudents will produce a complete four-week thematic curriculum unit—including lesson plans, learning center designs, an inclusive accommodations memo, and a room-arrangement diagram with a safety and supervision checklist—ready for portfolio assembly.
  1. Write eight developmentally appropriate lesson plans (two per week) using the program's standard template; each plan must identify a learning objective tied to the state's early learning standards, list materials, describe the instructional sequence, and note how the activity is adapted for at least one child with a developmental difference.
  2. Draft a classroom floor-plan diagram (hand-drawn or using free diagramming software) to scale for a standard classroom square footage; annotate the diagram to show traffic flow, required supervision sight lines, emergency exit paths, fire extinguisher location, first aid kit placement, and labeled learning centers that align to the curriculum unit theme.
  3. Complete a 40-item Health, Safety, and Supervision Checklist drawn from state licensing standards and course Safety content; for every item marked non-compliant in the draft environment plan, write a corrective action note and revise the floor plan accordingly.
State early learning standards document; program lesson plan template; graph paper or free diagramming tool (e.g., Floorplanner); Health, Safety, and Supervision Checklist (program-provided); CDA Competency Standards book; colored pencils or digital drawing toolsAll eight lesson plans score at least 80% on the lesson plan rubric (objectives measurable, materials listed, adaptation present); floor plan includes all required safety annotations; checklist shows zero unresolved non-compliant items before portfolio submission.
3Assessment Tools, Family Engagement Plan, and Portfolio Assembly60practiceStudents will develop a complete child assessment package and a written family engagement plan, then assemble the full capstone portfolio with a reflective introduction and professional development goal statement.
  1. Create three original assessment tools for the curriculum unit: a structured observation record with a narrative field and a developmental domain rating scale; a portfolio entry guide that tells families what the artifact shows about their child's learning; and a completed sample anecdotal note modeled on a realistic classroom scenario; annotate each tool to explain how results would be shared with families in plain, jargon-free language.
  2. Write a Family Engagement Plan (minimum three pages) that includes: a monthly family communication calendar showing newsletters, conferences, and digital updates; a design for one family workshop tied to the curriculum unit theme (agenda, supplies list, childcare provision note); and a bibliography of at least five culturally responsive resources in at least two languages represented in a hypothetical class roster.
  3. Assemble the complete capstone portfolio in a professional binder or digital format with tabbed sections: (1) Professional Philosophy Statement, (2) Curriculum Unit, (3) Classroom Environment Plan and Safety Checklist, (4) Assessment Tools, (5) Family Engagement Plan, (6) Professional Development Plan listing at least three specific continuing education goals tied to named CDA Functional Areas; write a two-page reflective introduction linking each section to program learning outcomes.
CDA Competency Standards book; program assessment tool templates; word processing and presentation software; family engagement plan guide (program-provided); bilingual resource list (program library); three-ring binder with dividers or e-portfolio platformPortfolio is scored with the program's 60-point Portfolio Rubric; students must score at least 48 out of 60 (80%) with no section scoring below 50% individually; reflective introduction explicitly cites at least four CDA Competency Goals.
4Capstone Defense: Oral Presentation and Panel Review36fieldStudents will present and orally defend their completed capstone portfolio to a two- or three-member review panel—including at least one practicing early childhood professional—demonstrating the ability to explain instructional decisions, safety rationale, and assessment choices with evidence-based responses.
  1. Deliver a 15-minute structured presentation using slides or a guided portfolio walk-through that covers: program philosophy, one sample lesson plan with rationale, the classroom environment safety design, one assessment tool and how results would be communicated to a family, and one highlight from the family engagement plan; practice the presentation at least twice in timed peer-rehearsal sessions before the panel date.
  2. Respond to a minimum of 10 minutes of questions from the review panel; questions are drawn from a bank covering CDA Competency Goal areas, state licensing safety requirements, developmentally appropriate practice, and inclusive strategies; students may reference their portfolio during questioning.
  3. Complete a structured self-assessment form immediately after the defense rating their own preparedness, communication clarity, and evidence-based reasoning on a 1–4 scale for each dimension; submit the form to the instructor alongside the panel's completed scoring sheet for final grade calculation.
Completed capstone portfolio; presentation slides or portfolio binder; panel question bank (instructor-held); self-assessment form (program-provided); projector or screen for slide display; timerPanel scores the defense using the program's Defense Rubric (presentation clarity, depth of knowledge, safety and compliance accuracy, responsiveness to questions, professionalism); students must score at least 80% overall with no category below 60% to pass the capstone course.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Capstone Portfolio (Project)Project60%At least 48 out of 60 points (80%) on the Portfolio Rubric with no individual section below 50%The complete, tabbed capstone portfolio—containing the professional philosophy statement, four-week curriculum unit with eight lesson plans, classroom floor plan and safety checklist, three assessment tools, family engagement plan, and professional development goal statement—is evaluated by the course instructor using a six-section rubric aligned to CDA Competency Goals. The portfolio must demonstrate integration of child development principles, developmentally appropriate practice, safety compliance, and culturally responsive family communication across all sections.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Reflective Professional Portfolio Binder Review (Portfolio)Portfolio20%All six portfolio sections present and complete; reflective introduction earns at least 16 out of 20 points on the reflection rubric, explicitly citing at least four CDA Competency Goals with specific evidenceA second, focused review of the portfolio's reflective introduction and professional development plan is conducted by a second instructor to ensure the student has meaningfully synthesized program-wide learning—not merely assembled artifacts. The reviewer checks that the student's narrative connects practical capstone products to theory from Child Development, Assessment, and Family Engagement coursework, and that continuing education goals are specific, actionable, and tied to named CDA Functional Areas.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Capstone Oral Defense (Oral)Oral / panel20%At least 80% overall on the Defense Rubric with no single category below 60%; panel includes at least one practicing early childhood professionalThe student delivers a 15-minute portfolio presentation followed by a minimum 10-minute panel question session; the two- or three-member panel scores the student on presentation clarity, depth of content knowledge across CDA Competency Goal areas, accuracy of safety and licensing rationale, quality of responses to probing questions, and professional demeanor. Students who do not pass on the first attempt may request one remediation conference with the instructor and reschedule a defense within two weeks.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
AGR-EARL54-09 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement in Early Childhood Education

324 hr · $1,295 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 324 supervised hours in a licensed preschool or childcare setting, applying child development theory, curriculum planning, family engagement, and safety practices under the direct guidance of a cooperating teacher and site supervisor. The externship bridges classroom learning and professional practice, providing the documented field experience required for the CDA credential application and state childcare licensure. Students maintain a reflective field log and receive formal employer evaluations aligned to CDA Competency Standards.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 324 supervised hours in a licensed preschool or childcare setting, applying child development theory, curriculum planning, family engagement, and safety practices under the direct guidance of a cooperating teacher and site supervisor. The externship bridges classroom learning and professional practice, providing the documented field experience required for the CDA credential application and state childcare licensure. Students maintain a reflective field log and receive formal employer evaluations aligned to CDA Competency Standards.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Externship Orientation and Site Integration; Supported Teaching Practice — Routines and Small-Group Activities; Professional Responsibilities — Documentation, Safety, and Family Engagement; Mid-Point and Final Employer Evaluations with Portfolio Compilation.

What competent looks like. Demonstrate age-appropriate instructional and caregiving routines with preschool-age children across a full program day under cooperating teacher supervision. Plan and implement at least four observed activity sessions aligned to developmental domains and the CDA Competency Standards. Maintain accurate daily field logs documenting hours, observed practices, and personal reflections that meet CDA Professional Portfolio evidence requirements. Apply safe supervision strategies, emergency procedures, and mandated reporter obligations in a licensed childcare environment without prompting. Receive a passing employer evaluation score on all professional practice dimensions including communication, reliability, child interaction, and classroom management. Compile and submit a complete externship documentation packet sufficient to support CDA credential application and state licensing verification.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Externship Orientation and Site Integration40fieldStudents establish a professional working relationship at their placement site, learn site-specific policies and emergency procedures, and begin documented observation hours under cooperating teacher guidance.
  1. Complete site orientation checklist covering sign-in/out procedures, emergency exit routes, allergy and medication protocols, mandated reporter contact chain, and daily schedule; submit signed checklist to program coordinator.
  2. Shadow the cooperating teacher across morning arrival, free play, structured group time, meals, and dismissal for the first five shifts, writing a one-page observation note for each shift describing teacher strategies and child responses.
  3. Meet with site supervisor at the end of week two for a 30-minute goal-setting conference; document three professional growth goals in the field log using SMART format and share with college externship coordinator.
Site orientation checklist (program-supplied), field log binder, CDA Competency Standards (6th ed., Council for Professional Recognition), cooperating teacher assignment form, mandated reporter reference card (state-issued)Signed orientation checklist returned within the first week; five shadow observation notes on file, each at least one page; SMART goal form signed by site supervisor and coordinator. All three items present = pass; any item missing = additional orientation shift required before progressing.
2Supported Teaching Practice — Routines and Small-Group Activities120fieldStudents independently lead daily routines and facilitate at least eight planned small-group or large-group activity sessions observed and rated by the cooperating teacher.
  1. Independently lead at least two recurring daily routines (e.g., morning meeting, hand-washing transition, read-aloud) each week, with the cooperating teacher completing a structured observation form rating child engagement, pacing, language use, and safety supervision on a four-point scale.
  2. Plan and deliver eight activity sessions across the placement (minimum two per developmental domain: language/literacy, math/science, creative arts, gross/fine motor); for each session, submit a one-page lesson plan before delivery and a written reflection within 48 hours of delivery.
  3. Participate in at least two informal family communication interactions per week (e.g., greeting at drop-off, sharing a child observation verbally at pickup, contributing to a bulletin board update); log each interaction with date, family, and topic in the field log.
Cooperating teacher observation form (program-supplied, four-point rubric), lesson plan template aligned to CDA Competency Goal II (advancing children's physical and intellectual development), field log binder, developmentally appropriate materials available at siteCooperating teacher observation forms for all routine observations on file; eight lesson plans and eight reflections submitted; family communication log showing at minimum two entries per week. Average cooperating teacher rating of 3.0 out of 4.0 or higher across all observation forms = pass; below 3.0 triggers a mid-placement improvement plan with weekly check-ins.
3Professional Responsibilities — Documentation, Safety, and Family Engagement100fieldStudents demonstrate consistent professional conduct including accurate child observation recording, execution of site emergency drills, and meaningful participation in at least one family engagement event.
  1. Write a minimum of six dated anecdotal child observation records during the placement, each focusing on a different child and a different developmental domain; observations are reviewed by the cooperating teacher for accuracy and factual, non-judgmental language before being filed.
  2. Participate in at least one fire drill or emergency evacuation drill conducted at the site; immediately afterward write a one-page debrief documenting the procedure followed, the student's role, any issues observed, and how the site's response compared to the safety standards studied in Course 5.
  3. Attend or actively contribute to one family engagement activity (e.g., parent night, family literacy event, home visit, newsletter production); write a one-page reflection connecting the experience to the CDA Competency Goal VI (maintaining a commitment to professionalism) and share it with the externship coordinator.
Anecdotal record form (program-supplied), CDA Competency Standards Goal VI, site emergency procedures manual, field log binder, family engagement reflection templateSix completed anecdotal records with cooperating teacher initials confirming review; written emergency drill debrief submitted within one week of drill; family engagement reflection submitted within one week of event. All three deliverables present and cooperating teacher confirms records use objective language = pass; subjective or evaluative language in records requires revision before credit is awarded.
4Mid-Point and Final Employer Evaluations with Portfolio Compilation64fieldStudents complete a formal mid-point self-assessment and employer evaluation conference, address any identified areas for growth, and assemble a complete externship documentation packet for submission to the college and for use in the CDA credential application.
  1. Complete the program's externship self-evaluation form at the mid-point (approximately week 8), rating personal performance on each CDA Competency Goal area; bring the completed form to a 45-minute mid-point conference with the cooperating teacher and externship coordinator, discuss discrepancies between self-ratings and supervisor ratings, and produce a written action plan for the remaining weeks.
  2. Compile the externship documentation packet: field log with all hours verified and initialed by the site supervisor (total 324 hours), all lesson plans and reflections, all observation records, family communication log, and a two-page written summary of professional growth mapped explicitly to the eight CDA Competency Goals.
  3. Participate in the final employer evaluation conference in the last week of placement; the cooperating teacher and site supervisor jointly complete the employer evaluation rubric, the student presents the documentation packet, and the externship coordinator reviews it for completeness and CDA alignment before issuing a placement completion letter.
Externship self-evaluation form (program-supplied, aligned to CDA Competency Goals I–VIII), employer evaluation rubric (four-point scale, program-supplied), field log binder with all prior materials, CDA Competency Standards (6th ed.), placement completion letter templateMid-point action plan on file signed by all three parties; documentation packet containing all required items with 324 verified hours; final employer evaluation with an average score of 3.0 out of 4.0 or higher across all competency areas; coordinator sign-off on CDA alignment of the professional growth summary. All criteria met = pass and placement completion letter issued; any employer dimension scored below 2.0 requires a remediation plan and possible extended placement hours approved by the coordinator.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Observed Teaching Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration70%Cooperating teacher rates the student at an average of 3.0 out of 4.0 or higher across all completed observation forms for routine leadership and planned activity delivery, with no single CDA Competency Goal area averaging below 2.0.The cooperating teacher completes a structured four-point observation form for each observed routine and each of the eight planned activity sessions throughout the placement, rating child engagement, developmental appropriateness, language use, guidance strategies, and safety supervision. The externship coordinator reviews all forms at the mid-point and final conferences to confirm consistent, satisfactory performance aligned to CDA Competency Goals I through V.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Externship Field Log and Documentation PacketLog30%All 324 hours verified and initialed by the site supervisor; all required documents present and complete; professional growth summary explicitly addresses all eight CDA Competency Goals; final employer evaluation average at or above 3.0 out of 4.0; coordinator certifies packet is suitable to support CDA application.The student submits the complete externship documentation packet including the verified field log, all lesson plans and post-session reflections, six or more anecdotal child observation records, family communication log, emergency drill debrief, family engagement reflection, mid-point action plan, and the two-page professional growth summary. The externship coordinator reviews every component for completeness, professional writing quality, and alignment to CDA Competency Standards before issuing the placement completion letter required for credential application.
Complete · Verified
AGR-EARL54-10 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: CDA and State Childcare Licensure

90 hr · $900 COMPLIMENTARY

This course prepares adult learners to sit and pass the Child Development Associate (CDA) credentialing exam and to meet state childcare licensing requirements by systematically reviewing all CDA Competency Standards, practicing with realistic exam-format questions, and completing full timed mock exams under test conditions. Learners identify personal knowledge gaps, build test-taking stamina, and assemble the documentation packages required by both the Council for Professional Recognition and their state licensing board.

Outcomes
Course text

This course prepares adult learners to sit and pass the Child Development Associate (CDA) credentialing exam and to meet state childcare licensing requirements by systematically reviewing all CDA Competency Standards, practicing with realistic exam-format questions, and completing full timed mock exams under test conditions. Learners identify personal knowledge gaps, build test-taking stamina, and assemble the documentation packages required by both the Council for Professional Recognition and their state licensing board.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: CDA Competency Standards Deep Dive and Diagnostic Assessment; Competency-by-Competency Review and CDA Portfolio Completion; Full-Length Mock CDA Exams and Targeted Remediation; Test-Day Logistics, State Licensing Application Walkthrough, and Final Readiness Check.

What competent looks like. Accurately explain all six CDA Competency Standards and thirteen Functional Areas and connect each to required preschool teacher knowledge and practice. Score 80% or higher on timed practice question sets mapped to each CDA Competency Standard before sitting the credentialing exam. Demonstrate correct test-taking strategies—including time management, elimination of distractors, and flagging uncertain items—on full-length mock CDA exams. Compile a complete CDA Professional Portfolio including a personal philosophy statement, Family Questionnaires, competency statements, and supporting documentation meeting Council for Professional Recognition requirements. Identify and gather the specific background check, training hour, and health-clearance documents required by their state childcare licensing board. Create and follow a personalized remediation study plan targeting weak competency areas identified through diagnostic and mock exam data.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1CDA Competency Standards Deep Dive and Diagnostic Assessment20theoryLearners will correctly match each of the six CDA Competency Standards and thirteen Functional Areas to concrete classroom scenarios and identify their individual knowledge gaps using a scored diagnostic practice exam.
  1. Learners receive a printed CDA Competency Standards card set; working in pairs they sort 39 scenario cards into the correct Functional Area, then compare their sort to the Council for Professional Recognition's official framework and discuss any misplacements as a class
  2. Each learner completes a 65-question diagnostic practice exam formatted to mirror CDA exam style—timed at 90 minutes—then scores it using an answer key and plots their percentage correct for each Competency Standard on a personal gap-analysis radar chart
  3. Using their gap-analysis chart, each learner drafts a two-page written study plan specifying which Competency Standards need the most review hours, what resources they will use (e.g., Essentials for Working with Young Children textbook, Council for Professional Recognition study guide), and a week-by-week schedule through exam day
Council for Professional Recognition CDA Competency Standards printed framework; Essentials for Working with Young Children (Council for Professional Recognition, current edition); 65-question diagnostic practice exam (instructor-developed, aligned to official exam blueprint); answer key with rationale sheet; radar-chart template; timerLearner correctly categorizes at least 34 of 39 scenario cards (87%) into the correct Functional Area during the sort activity; diagnostic exam score is recorded as baseline and the written study plan is submitted—evaluated on completeness (includes all 6 Standards, specific resources, and a realistic weekly schedule) earning a pass/needs-revision rating from the instructor
2Competency-by-Competency Review and CDA Portfolio Completion30practiceLearners will review content for all six CDA Competency Standards through targeted practice question sets and complete every required section of their CDA Professional Portfolio to Council for Professional Recognition submission standards.
  1. The class works through six rotating review stations (one per Competency Standard) over multiple sessions; at each station learners answer a 20-question practice set, check answers against rationale sheets, and record error patterns—any Standard with a station score below 75% triggers a required instructor conference before the next lesson
  2. Learners draft and peer-review their CDA Competency Statements for all six standards using the Council for Professional Recognition's official Competency Statement prompts, incorporating specific examples from their Externship experience; instructors provide written feedback using a CDA Portfolio rubric before final submission
  3. Learners also review their state childcare licensing checklist (provided by the instructor for the applicable state), assemble copies of required documents (CPR/first aid certificates, health clearance, background check receipt, training-hour transcripts), and complete a mock state licensing application packet, flagging any missing items for resolution before the real application
Six 20-question station practice sets (mapped to CDA Competency Standards); rationale answer keys; Council for Professional Recognition CDA portfolio section guides and Competency Statement prompts; CDA Portfolio peer-review rubric; state childcare licensing checklist (state-specific, current); CPR/first aid certification cards from prior coursework; blank mock state licensing applicationEach of the six station practice sets scored at 75% or above before moving to mock exams; all six Competency Statements rated 'meets standard' on the portfolio rubric (clear claim, specific evidence from practicum, connection to child outcomes); mock licensing packet marked complete with no missing required documents
3Full-Length Mock CDA Exams and Targeted Remediation30labLearners will complete two full-length timed mock CDA exams under realistic test conditions, analyze their results to identify remaining weak areas, and complete focused remediation activities before the final mock exam.
  1. Learners sit Mock Exam 1: 65 scenario-based multiple-choice questions, 90-minute time limit, no notes, phones off, in a rearranged classroom that mirrors a testing center; after time is called, learners self-score using a detailed answer key with rationale explanations and update their gap-analysis radar chart
  2. Based on Mock Exam 1 results, each learner selects their two lowest-scoring Competency Standards and completes a guided remediation packet for each—packets include a two-page content summary, eight additional practice questions with rationales, and a written reflection prompt connecting the content to a specific moment from their Externship; remediation packets are reviewed by the instructor before Mock Exam 2
  3. Learners sit Mock Exam 2: a second 65-question timed mock exam (different question pool, same format and conditions); learners compare Mock Exam 1 and Mock Exam 2 scores by Competency Standard, write a one-page reflection on score changes and remaining concerns, and set a final preparation goal for the days before their scheduled CDA exam appointment
Mock Exam 1 question set (65 items, instructor-developed or licensed exam prep bank); Mock Exam 2 question set (65 items, different pool); detailed answer keys with rationale; stopwatch or classroom timer; testing-center-style seating arrangement; remediation packets for each of the six Competency Standards; gap-analysis radar chart (updated copy)Mock Exam 1 score recorded as baseline (no minimum to continue, but scores below 70% trigger mandatory instructor conference); remediation packets scored complete with written reflections rated 'adequate' or above; Mock Exam 2 passing benchmark is 80% overall with no individual Competency Standard below 70%—learners who do not meet this benchmark receive an individualized remediation plan and instructor-scheduled retake of the mock before sitting the real exam
4Test-Day Logistics, State Licensing Application Walkthrough, and Final Readiness Check10demoLearners will demonstrate readiness to sit the CDA credentialing exam by passing a final 30-question timed readiness check, correctly completing the CDA online application steps, and articulating the exact documents and steps required to apply for their state childcare license.
  1. Instructor demonstrates the Council for Professional Recognition online CDA application portal step by step using a projected screen; each learner then navigates a practice run on their own device, uploading a sample document and confirming application fields—common errors (mismatched legal name, missing verification form) are identified and corrected in real time
  2. The class reviews test-day logistics: acceptable ID requirements, what to bring and what to leave home, check-in procedures at a Pearson VUE or proctored test center, exam interface navigation (flagging, reviewing, time display), and strategies for managing test anxiety; learners role-play the check-in scenario in pairs and practice a two-minute deep-breathing reset technique
  3. Each learner completes a 30-question final readiness check (timed, 45 minutes, no notes) drawn from across all six Competency Standards; after scoring, learners complete a brief written exit reflection stating their exam appointment date, their strongest and weakest area, and one concrete action they will take in the 48 hours before the exam
Devices with internet access (laptop or tablet); Council for Professional Recognition online application portal or instructor-prepared demo walkthrough; sample application documents for upload practice; Pearson VUE candidate handbook (printed or PDF); 30-question final readiness check question set with answer key; state childcare licensing step-by-step checklist; whiteboard for group logistics reviewLearner successfully completes all application portal steps without instructor intervention during the practice run (rated complete/incomplete by instructor observation); final 30-question readiness check scored at 80% or above—learners who score below 80% receive an instructor conference with a written action plan before their exam date; exit reflection submitted and reviewed by instructor for accuracy of logistics information
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Full-Length Mock CDA Credentialing ExamMock certification exam100%80% overall (52 of 65 items correct) with no individual CDA Competency Standard scoring below 70%; learners who do not meet the benchmark complete a documented remediation plan and sit a retake mock before their official exam appointment is confirmedLearners complete a 65-question scenario-based multiple-choice mock exam administered under timed, closed-note, testing-center conditions that replicate the actual CDA credentialing exam experience, with questions proportionally distributed across all six CDA Competency Standards per the Council for Professional Recognition's published exam blueprint. Results are used both as a summative program readiness indicator and as a formative tool—each learner receives a score report by Competency Standard and a written instructor recommendation confirming readiness to sit or specifying required remediation steps before scheduling their official exam appointment.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: CDA; State Childcare License

Students prepare for and sit the Council for Professional Recognition's Child Development Associate (CDA) credentialing examination, which includes a written professional development (PD) seminar, a family questionnaire, a professional portfolio, and a verification visit; students also complete the application and competency requirements for their state's childcare staff or director license as determined by the applicable state licensing board. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Early Childhood Education (preschool teacher) · How the school gets authority to award these credentials