AGR-EARL54-06 · Lesson 11 · 14 clock hours · lab
Evaluating and Improving Family Engagement
Objective. Students will design a family feedback survey, analyze mock survey data, and write a program improvement recommendation based on findings.
⚠ Pending professional review
This lesson, its worked examples and its practice questions has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
Why Evaluating Family Engagement Matters
A preschool program cannot improve what it does not measure. Families are the most important partners in a young child's education, and their honest feedback tells you whether your communication, cultural responsiveness, and involvement opportunities are actually working. Both the Child Development Associate (CDA) credential and state childcare licensing standards expect programs to demonstrate ongoing, systematic outreach to families — not just occasional newsletters. A well-designed feedback survey is one of the most practical tools you have for meeting that expectation and for building the trust families need before they will share concerns openly.
Principles of Good Survey Design
Before you write a single question, keep these principles in mind.
Use plain language. Families come from many educational backgrounds and may speak English as a second language. Write at a 5th-to-6th-grade reading level. Avoid jargon such as "developmentally appropriate practice" unless you define it.
Ask one thing per question. Double-barreled questions — "Do you feel the staff communicates well and respects your culture?" — force respondents to answer two issues at once. Split them.
Avoid leading questions. A leading question steers the respondent toward a particular answer: "Don't you agree that our events are convenient?" Replace it with a neutral version: "How convenient are our family events for your schedule?"
Use Likert scales consistently. A Likert scale asks respondents to rate agreement or satisfaction on a numbered range, typically 1 to 5 (e.g., 1 = Very Dissatisfied, 5 = Very Satisfied). Using the same scale throughout makes data easier to compare across items.
Include open-ended items. Numbers tell you how many families feel a certain way; open-ended comments tell you why. Aim for two to three open-ended questions at the end so respondents are not exhausted before they reach them.
Keep it short. Eight to ten items is a practical limit for a family satisfaction survey. Longer surveys reduce completion rates.
Pilot before you launch. Ask one or two colleagues to read the draft and flag any confusing wording before families see it.
Building Your Survey: Four Content Areas
A comprehensive family engagement survey should cover at least four areas.
1. Communication quality — Do families receive timely updates about their child's progress and program events? Are messages clear and available in the family's home language when needed?
2. Cultural responsiveness — Does the program reflect diverse family backgrounds in the curriculum, classroom materials, and events? Do families feel welcomed and respected?
3. Involvement opportunities — Are families given meaningful chances to participate — volunteering, attending workshops, serving on advisory committees?
4. Overall satisfaction — A single global item ("Overall, how satisfied are you with this program?") gives you a quick benchmark to track over time.
Reading a Mock Data Set
Once surveys are collected, you analyze the results. For each Likert item, calculate the percentage of satisfied responses — typically the share of respondents who chose the top two positive options ("Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on a 5-point scale, or equivalent).
Formula: % Satisfied = (Number of Satisfied + Very Satisfied responses) ÷ Total respondents × 100
Round to one decimal place. You do not need advanced statistics — percentages alone reveal where the program is strong and where it needs work.
Open-ended comments require a different approach. Read each comment, look for recurring themes, and note whether themes are positive, negative, or mixed. Even three comments can surface a pattern — for example, two families independently mentioning that event times conflict with work schedules is a finding worth reporting.
Writing a Recommendation Memo
A recommendation memo translates data into action. Use this structure.
- Purpose (one sentence): State that you are summarizing survey results and making recommendations.
- Strength identified: Name the area with the highest satisfaction percentage and briefly explain what the data show.
- Areas for improvement: Identify two items with the lowest satisfaction rates or the most negative comments. For each, propose a specific, feasible action step — something the program can realistically do within a semester or program year. Vague statements such as "do better at communication" are not action steps. Specific steps sound like: "Send a bilingual weekly email digest every Friday by 3:00 p.m. and post it on the program's digital family board."
- Data reference: Cite the actual percentages so readers can see the evidence.
Keep the memo to one page. Use professional, respectful language; remember that your colleagues will carry out whatever you recommend.
Accuracy and Ethical Responsibility
Survey data directly influences how a program serves children and families. Arithmetic errors in percentages can make a weak area look acceptable or a strength look like a crisis. Double-check every calculation. Protect respondent confidentiality — never share individual responses with anyone outside program leadership, and report only aggregate results in the memo. If your program serves families who speak languages other than English, surveys should be translated or read aloud; collecting data only from English-speaking families skews results and could lead to decisions that harm non-English-speaking children.
Connecting to Your Credentials
The CDA credential assessment evaluates your ability to involve families as partners. Demonstrating that you can design a survey, analyze results, and recommend improvements shows competency in that area. State childcare licensing inspectors may also review evidence of family feedback systems as part of program quality reviews. Building these skills now prepares you for both credentials and for the real expectations of every licensed preschool setting you will work in.
Key terms8
Likert scaleA rating scale — commonly 1 to 5 — used in surveys to measure the degree of agreement or satisfaction; using the same scale across items makes results easier to compare.
leading questionA survey question worded in a way that steers respondents toward a particular answer, which biases the data and makes results unreliable.
double-barreled questionA single survey item that asks about two separate issues at once, making it impossible for respondents to answer each issue accurately.
percentage of satisfied responsesA calculated statistic showing the share of respondents who selected positive options on a survey item; computed as (satisfied + very satisfied) ÷ total respondents × 100.
open-ended itemA survey question that invites a written response in the respondent's own words, providing qualitative context that numerical ratings cannot capture.
recommendation memoA brief professional document that summarizes survey findings, identifies one program strength and at least two areas for improvement, and proposes specific, feasible action steps.
cultural responsivenessThe extent to which a program acknowledges, values, and incorporates the diverse cultural backgrounds of the families it serves in its curriculum, environment, and communications.
aggregate resultsSurvey data reported as group totals or percentages rather than individual responses, protecting the confidentiality of each respondent.
Worked examples4
1. A survey item asks families to rate communication quality on a 5-point scale (1 = Very Dissatisfied … 5 = Very Satisfied). Of 40 respondents, 14 chose 'Very Satisfied,' 18 chose 'Satisfied,' 5 chose 'Neutral,' 2 chose 'Dissatisfied,' and 1 chose 'Very Dissatisfied.' What percentage of respondents were satisfied (top two options)?
- Step 1 — Add the top two positive responses: 14 (Very Satisfied) + 18 (Satisfied) = 32 satisfied respondents.
- Step 2 — Divide by total respondents: 32 ÷ 40 = 0.80.
- Step 3 — Multiply by 100 to convert to a percentage: 0.80 × 100 = 80.0%.
Answer: 80.0% of respondents were satisfied with communication quality.
2. On an involvement-opportunities item, 7 out of 35 respondents chose 'Very Satisfied' and 9 chose 'Satisfied.' What is the percentage of satisfied responses?
- Step 1 — Add the top two responses: 7 + 9 = 16 satisfied respondents.
- Step 2 — Divide by total respondents: 16 ÷ 35 = 0.4571… .
- Step 3 — Multiply by 100: 0.4571 × 100 = 45.7% (rounded to one decimal place).
Answer: 45.7% of respondents were satisfied with involvement opportunities.
3. A mock data set has three survey items. Item A: 32 of 40 satisfied. Item B: 16 of 35 satisfied. Item C: 28 of 40 satisfied. Which item is the program's greatest strength, and which is its top priority for improvement?
- Step 1 — Calculate each percentage. Item A: 32 ÷ 40 × 100 = 80.0%. Item B: 16 ÷ 35 × 100 = 45.7%. Item C: 28 ÷ 40 × 100 = 70.0%.
- Step 2 — Rank the percentages: Item A (80.0%) > Item C (70.0%) > Item B (45.7%).
- Step 3 — Identify the highest as the strength (Item A) and the lowest as the top improvement priority (Item B).
Answer: Item A (80.0%) is the program's greatest strength; Item B (45.7%) is the top priority for improvement.
4. You are checking a classmate's memo. They report Item C as '7.0%' satisfied from 28 satisfied out of 40 respondents. Is that correct? What is the right figure?
- Step 1 — Recalculate: 28 ÷ 40 = 0.70.
- Step 2 — Multiply by 100: 0.70 × 100 = 70.0%.
- Step 3 — Compare to the reported figure of 7.0%. The classmate forgot to multiply by 100 (or misplaced the decimal point).
Answer: The correct percentage is 70.0%, not 7.0%. The error was failing to multiply the decimal by 100.
The math in this lesson1
Learners compute the percent of 40 survey respondents who were satisfied with communication.
7.RP.3
In class: Instructor models survey design principles (clear questions, Likert scales, open-ended items, avoiding leading questions, plain language) using a live demonstration on a free survey tool (Google Forms or SurveyMonkey); students identify three design errors in a poorly written sample survey. · Students design a short family satisfaction survey (8–10 items) for a hypothetical program covering communication quality, cultural responsiveness, involvement opportunities, and overall satisfaction; peers review using the survey design checklist. · Students receive a mock data set (instructor-prepared frequency counts and three open-ended comments) and analyze results: they calculate the percentage of satisfied responses per item and write a one-page recommendation memo identifying one strength and two program improvements with specific action steps.
Materials: Computers with internet access and Google Forms or SurveyMonkey access, survey design checklist (instructor-prepared), poorly written sample survey, mock data set (instructor-prepared), memo template.
Check: Recommendation memo is scored with a rubric: must correctly calculate at least 80% of percentages, identify one genuine strength, propose two specific and feasible action steps — pass = all three rubric elements met.
Practice check8
Answer each question, then check it. Nothing is recorded; this is your own practice.
Record this lesson on my transcript. Sign in with your key and enrollment email to record lessons (enroll free if you have no key). This page stays open to read and practise.