Objective. Students will explain the historical evolution and theoretical frameworks — Bronfenbrenner's ecological model, Epstein's six types of involvement — that underpin family engagement in early childhood education.
This lesson, its worked examples and its practice questions has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
Research consistently shows that children thrive when the adults in their lives — at home and at school — work together. For preschool teachers, building strong relationships with families is not an optional extra; it is a core professional responsibility recognized by both the CDA Competency Standards and most state childcare licensing requirements. Understanding the theoretical foundations behind family engagement helps you move from guessing what families need to applying evidence-based strategies every day in your classroom.
Before the 1960s, early childhood programs in the United States largely treated families as passive recipients of information. Teachers were seen as the experts; parents were expected to support school decisions from a distance. The federally funded Head Start program, launched in 1965, marked a turning point. Head Start required family involvement as a program component — parents could serve on policy councils, volunteer in classrooms, and participate in home visits. This shift recognized that low-income families had strengths and knowledge that programs needed, not just deficits to be fixed.
Through the 1970s and 1980s, researchers began documenting the measurable benefits of family involvement: improved school readiness, stronger language development, and better social-emotional outcomes for young children. These findings pushed theorists to build formal frameworks that could guide practice.
Urie Bronfenbrenner, a developmental psychologist, proposed that child development cannot be understood by looking at the child in isolation. His bioecological model (refined throughout the 1970s–2000s) places the child at the center of a series of nested systems:
For preschool teachers, Bronfenbrenner's model has a clear practical message: the mesosystem is where your professional influence lives. When you strengthen the connection between a child's home and your classroom, you are directly supporting development.
Joyce Epstein and her colleagues at the Johns Hopkins Center on School, Family, and Community Partnerships developed a framework that translates theory into concrete teacher actions. Her typology identifies six types of involvement, each of which describes a different way that families, schools, and communities can work together:
1. Parenting — Supporting families in developing the home conditions and parenting skills that help children learn. Example: offering a workshop on age-appropriate sleep routines for toddlers.
2. Communicating — Establishing two-way communication between school and home about programs and children's progress. Example: sending a weekly family newsletter and inviting written feedback.
3. Volunteering — Recruiting and organizing family members to support the school and children. Example: inviting a grandparent to read aloud during story time.
4. Learning at Home — Providing families with ideas and materials for supporting learning in the home environment. Example: sending a literacy activity bag home each Friday.
5. Decision Making — Including families in school decisions and developing parent leaders. Example: establishing a family advisory council that reviews the preschool's curriculum calendar.
6. Collaborating with Community — Connecting the school, families, and community resources to strengthen programs. Example: partnering with a local library for a summer reading kick-off event.
Epstein's framework is important for the CDA because CDA Competency Goal II addresses families directly: candidates must demonstrate the ability to advance family well-being and build positive relationships with parents and guardians.
Bronfenbrenner explains why family engagement matters; Epstein explains what teachers can do about it. Together, they form a strong foundation for practice. When you plan a home-learning activity bag (Epstein Type 4), you are intentionally strengthening the mesosystem link between home and preschool (Bronfenbrenner). When you invite community health nurses to a family health fair (Epstein Type 6), you are drawing macrosystem and exosystem resources into the microsystem of your program.
Building family relationships requires professional boundaries and confidentiality. Child and family information you learn through your role — a parent's work situation, a child's health record, a family's immigration status — is confidential. Sharing such information without authorization may violate state privacy regulations and can damage trust irreparably. Always follow your program's written policies on communication and record-keeping. When a family discloses concerns about abuse or neglect, your legal obligation as a mandated reporter takes precedence; follow your program's reporting protocol immediately. Family engagement is built on trust, and that trust depends on you acting with integrity at every interaction.
Answer each question, then check it. Nothing is recorded; this is your own practice.
A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working. Help us build VoTechWorks. Tell us what works, what doesn’t, and what you want to learn.