This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by an industry-certified professional or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
10 courses · 1,800 clock hours · 9–12 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.
This foundational course equips adult learners with the safety knowledge, technical math skills, professional communication habits, and career-readiness tools required to succeed in a cybersecurity program and enter the workforce. Students complete OSHA 10-Hour General Industry training, basic first aid and CPR awareness, and build the quantitative and literacy skills used daily in security operations. The course is explicitly mapped to the professional and analytical competency areas tested across the CompTIA Security+, CompTIA CySA+, and ISC2 CC credentials.
OutcomesThis foundational course equips adult learners with the safety knowledge, technical math skills, professional communication habits, and career-readiness tools required to succeed in a cybersecurity program and enter the workforce. Students complete OSHA 10-Hour General Industry training, basic first aid and CPR awareness, and build the quantitative and literacy skills used daily in security operations. The course is explicitly mapped to the professional and analytical competency areas tested across the CompTIA Security+, CompTIA CySA+, and ISC2 CC credentials.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Workplace Safety for IT and Data-Center Environments (OSHA 10-Hour General Industry); First Aid Awareness and CPR Fundamentals for the IT Workplace; Trade Math for Cybersecurity: Number Systems, Subnetting, and Data Metrics; Reading Technical Documentation: CVEs, RFCs, Policy Documents, and Security Bulletins; Digital Workplace Tools: Ticketing, Email, File Management, and Version Control Basics; Technical Writing and Oral Communication for Security Professionals; Career Readiness: Resume, Professional Profiles, and Entering the Cybersecurity Workforce.
What competent looks like. Demonstrate OSHA 10-Hour General Industry safety knowledge and identify electrical, ergonomic, and physical hazards common in IT and data-center environments. Apply trade mathematics — including binary/hexadecimal conversion, subnetting arithmetic, and basic statistical reasoning — to solve cybersecurity workplace problems. Read and accurately interpret technical documentation such as RFCs, CVE advisories, policy documents, and vendor security bulletins. Use standard digital workplace tools — including a ticketing system, professional email, and version-controlled file management — to organize and communicate technical work. Produce and deliver clear written and oral technical communications suited to security audiences, including incident summaries and risk briefings. Construct a career portfolio including a resume, LinkedIn profile, and 30-second professional introduction aligned to entry-level cybersecurity roles.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Workplace Safety for IT and Data-Center Environments (OSHA 10-Hour General Industry) | 24 | theory | Students will identify and explain OSHA 10-Hour General Industry hazard categories — including electrical safety, lockout/tagout, ergonomics, fire safety, and PPE selection — as they apply to server rooms, network closets, and office IT environments. |
| OSHA 10-Hour General Industry authorized course materials (print or LMS-hosted), OSHA Publication 3151 (Personal Protective Equipment), NFPA fire extinguisher class reference card, hazard-identification worksheet, data-center floor-plan diagram | Students present their completed OSHA 10-Hour card or completion certificate (issued by OSHA-authorized provider) AND score 80% or higher on instructor-administered 20-question safety knowledge quiz covering electrical hazards, PPE, lockout/tagout, and emergency procedures. |
| 2 | First Aid Awareness and CPR Fundamentals for the IT Workplace | 8 | demo | Students will describe the steps of Hands-Only CPR, the operation of an AED, and first-aid response to the most common IT-workplace injuries — electric shock, repetitive-strain injury, and slip/fall — following American Red Cross or American Heart Association guidelines. |
| American Red Cross First Aid/CPR/AED reference guide or AHA Hands-Only CPR instructional poster, CPR manikin (if available) or firm practice surface, AED trainer unit or placard, sample OSHA 300 log form, PPE (disposable gloves for manikin use) | Students correctly verbalize all steps of Hands-Only CPR in sequence AND correctly narrate AED operation in a role-play scenario with no critical steps omitted; instructor marks a pass/fail competency checklist with all critical steps required for pass. |
| 3 | Trade Math for Cybersecurity: Number Systems, Subnetting, and Data Metrics | 28 | practice | Students will convert values among binary, decimal, and hexadecimal number systems and perform basic IPv4 subnet calculations — including CIDR notation, usable host counts, and network/broadcast address identification — at the accuracy level required for Security+ and CySA+ exam questions. |
| IPv4 subnetting reference worksheet, binary/hex conversion drill sheets, calculator (for verification only after manual calculation), CompTIA Security+ Exam Objectives (current version, free download from CompTIA.org), CompTIA CySA+ Exam Objectives (current version) | Students complete a 20-question trade math quiz — 10 number-system conversions and 10 subnetting calculations — and score 80% or higher with all work shown; any score below 80% triggers a targeted remediation set before the next lesson. |
| 4 | Reading Technical Documentation: CVEs, RFCs, Policy Documents, and Security Bulletins | 20 | theory | Students will accurately extract, summarize, and apply information from four types of cybersecurity technical documents — CVE advisories, IETF RFCs, organizational security policies, and vendor security bulletins — demonstrating comprehension at a level that supports exam reading passages and real operational decisions. |
| NIST NVD website access (nvd.nist.gov), printed or PDF CVE annotation worksheet, RFC excerpt (instructor-selected), IETF RFC style guide one-pager, sample Acceptable Use Policy (instructor-created), sample vendor security bulletin (instructor-created or redacted real example), CompTIA Security+ and CySA+ Exam Objectives | Students submit their CVE annotation and operational memo; CVE annotation must correctly identify all four fields (product, CVSS score meaning, attack vector, remediation) and memo must be factually accurate relative to the source document — instructor uses a rubric with a 75% minimum score across all required elements. |
| 5 | Digital Workplace Tools: Ticketing, Email, File Management, and Version Control Basics | 18 | lab | Students will create, assign, update, and close a simulated IT security help-desk ticket; compose professional technical email; organize project files using a consistent naming convention; and use basic Git commands (init, add, commit, log) to track document revisions. |
| PC with internet access, osTicket (open source, free) or LMS-based ticket simulator, Git (open source, free download from git-scm.com), Git Cheat Sheet (GitHub Education, free PDF), sample email prompts (instructor-created), file-naming convention guide (instructor-created one-pager) | Instructor reviews the completed ticket for required fields (work note, escalation justification, resolution summary), both email replies for professionalism and accuracy, and the Git log screenshot for at least three meaningful commits — each component graded on a rubric; students must pass all three components at 75% or higher. |
| 6 | Technical Writing and Oral Communication for Security Professionals | 26 | practice | Students will write a structured one-page incident summary report and deliver a three-minute oral briefing on a security scenario, demonstrating the written and verbal communication skills evaluated in ISC2 CC, Security+, and CySA+ performance-based questions and expected by employers in entry-level security roles. |
| Incident summary report template (instructor-created, aligned to NIST SP 800-61 structure), peer-review rubric, oral briefing rubric, fictional ransomware scenario handout, NIST Special Publication 800-61 Rev. 2 (Computer Security Incident Handling Guide, free download from NIST.gov) | Incident summary scored on rubric — minimum 75% overall, with no critical fields (executive summary, timeline, recommended actions) left blank or factually incorrect; oral briefing scored on separate rubric — minimum 75%, with automatic failure if duration is under 2 minutes or the scenario facts are materially misstated. |
| 7 | Career Readiness: Resume, Professional Profiles, and Entering the Cybersecurity Workforce | 24 | field | Students will produce a complete, employer-ready cybersecurity resume, an updated LinkedIn profile aligned to entry-level security roles, and a polished 30-second professional introduction, demonstrating readiness to apply for positions such as SOC Analyst Tier 1, IT Security Technician, or Help Desk Security Specialist. |
| ATS-friendly resume template (instructor-provided, Word or Google Docs format), job-board access (LinkedIn, Indeed, or USAJobs), LinkedIn account (free tier), professional-introduction checklist, video recording device (phone or webcam), career services handout listing local and national cybersecurity professional associations (ISACA, (ISC)², CompTIA AITP) | Resume evaluated on instructor rubric — must include contact info, objective/summary, education section listing credential targets, a skills section with at least five relevant technical terms drawn from the job listings, and correct formatting (no spelling errors, consistent dates); LinkedIn profile reviewed for required sections; elevator pitch evaluated on checklist — must meet time requirement (25–35 seconds) and include all four required elements; all three components must meet rubric threshold of 75% to pass. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety and Regulatory Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% correct (16 of 20 questions) | A 20-question multiple-choice exam covering OSHA 10-Hour General Industry content — including electrical hazards, lockout/tagout procedures, PPE selection, fire extinguisher classes, ergonomics, and emergency response — as applied to IT and data-center workplaces. Students must also correctly answer at least one question on CPR sequence and one on electric-shock first-aid response; failure on either of those two questions requires a single oral make-up before the student may advance. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Trade Math and Technical Reading Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% correct (20 of 25 questions) | A 25-question written exam combining 15 trade math items (binary/hex conversion, CIDR subnetting, data-unit conversion) and 10 technical reading comprehension items drawn from excerpts similar to CVE advisories, RFC language, and policy documents; the exam is administered without open resources and is timed at 45 minutes to simulate certification exam conditions for Security+ and CySA+. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Career Portfolio Project | Project | 25% | 75% overall on rubric; all three required deliverables must be submitted | Students submit a complete career portfolio package consisting of their one-page cybersecurity resume, a documented LinkedIn profile (URL submitted for instructor review), and a video recording of their 30-second professional introduction; each component is scored on its respective rubric and an overall average of 75% or higher is required for the portfolio to be accepted as complete. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Oral Competency Defense | Oral / panel | 25% | Pass on all four required competency areas; no single area may be scored 'unsatisfactory' | A 10-minute one-on-one oral session with the instructor in which the student is asked two questions drawn from safety, one from trade math, and one from professional communication — for example, 'Walk me through how you would respond if you found an unlabeled server room circuit breaker that a colleague had taped in the ON position' or 'Convert 192.168.10.0/26 — how many usable hosts does that subnet support?'; the student must respond clearly and accurately without notes, and the instructor scores each response as satisfactory or unsatisfactory using a structured rubric. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
This course builds foundational knowledge of the threat landscape that cybersecurity professionals defend against, covering threat actor categories, attack techniques, vulnerability types, and the reconnaissance and exploitation lifecycle. Students analyze real-world attack scenarios, map threats to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, and practice identifying indicators of compromise using industry-standard tools. Content aligns directly to CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Domain 2 (Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations), CompTIA CySA+ threat and vulnerability management domains, and ISC2 CC Domain 2 (Business Continuity, Disaster Recovery, and Incident Response Concepts) and Domain 3 (Access Controls).
OutcomesThis course builds foundational knowledge of the threat landscape that cybersecurity professionals defend against, covering threat actor categories, attack techniques, vulnerability types, and the reconnaissance and exploitation lifecycle. Students analyze real-world attack scenarios, map threats to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, and practice identifying indicators of compromise using industry-standard tools. Content aligns directly to CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Domain 2 (Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations), CompTIA CySA+ threat and vulnerability management domains, and ISC2 CC Domain 2 (Business Continuity, Disaster Recovery, and Incident Response Concepts) and Domain 3 (Access Controls).
How the course runs. 12 blocks: The Threat Landscape: Actors, Motivations, and the Security Mindset; Social Engineering: Phishing, Pretexting, and Human-Layer Attacks; Malware Types: Viruses, Worms, Trojans, Ransomware, Spyware, and Rootkits; Network-Based Attacks: DoS, DDoS, Man-in-the-Middle, and Replay Attacks; Application-Layer Attacks: Injection, XSS, CSRF, and Buffer Overflow; The Cyber Kill Chain and Attack Lifecycle; MITRE ATT&CK Framework: Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures; Reconnaissance: OSINT, Scanning, and Enumeration Techniques; Vulnerability Scanning and CVSS Scoring; Threat Intelligence: IOCs, Feeds, and Sharing Standards; Insider Threats and Supply Chain Risks; Threat Scenario Capstone: Attack Analysis and Defensive Briefing.
What competent looks like. Classify threat actors by motivation, capability, and typical attack vector, distinguishing nation-state, cybercriminal, hacktivist, insider, and script-kiddie profiles. Identify and explain the stages of the Cyber Kill Chain and MITRE ATT&CK framework tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) for a given attack scenario. Recognize common attack types including phishing, social engineering, malware variants, injection attacks, man-in-the-middle, denial-of-service, and supply-chain attacks. Perform a basic vulnerability scan using an industry-standard tool, interpret the output, and prioritize findings by CVSS score. Analyze indicators of compromise (IOCs) from logs, network captures, and file artifacts to determine likely attack type and affected systems. Document threat intelligence findings in a structured report using standard templates aligned to professional SOC workflows.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Threat Landscape: Actors, Motivations, and the Security Mindset | 12 | theory | Students will categorize at least five distinct threat actor types by motivation, resources, and typical targeting behavior with at least 80% accuracy on a written assessment. |
| Verizon DBIR (current edition, publicly available PDF), CISA threat advisories, CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-701) Chapter on Threats, whiteboard, printed actor profile cards | Graded threat actor classification worksheet; students must correctly categorize at least 4 of 5 scenarios and provide accurate written justifications — pass mark 80%. |
| 2 | Social Engineering: Phishing, Pretexting, and Human-Layer Attacks | 15 | demo | Students will identify social engineering techniques in simulated communications and explain the psychological principles that make each technique effective. |
| Sample phishing email corpus (instructor-created or from PhishTank archives), MXToolbox web tool, email header analysis worksheet, social engineering principles reference card, CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 objectives section on social engineering | Students submit a completed email analysis checklist for all 10 samples; pass mark is correct identification of at least 8 of 10 with at least one supporting indicator cited per answer — 80% correct. |
| 3 | Malware Types: Viruses, Worms, Trojans, Ransomware, Spyware, and Rootkits | 15 | theory | Students will distinguish among six categories of malware by mechanism of infection, persistence method, and payload behavior, and match each to a real-world example. |
| CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study guide, VirusTotal web tool (sandbox results view), printed incident description handouts sourced from public CISA advisories, malware taxonomy comparison matrix worksheet | Completed comparison matrix graded for accuracy; pass mark is 80% of cells correct. Group activity write-up must include all three required evidence points — pass requires all three present and accurately linked to the malware type. |
| 4 | Network-Based Attacks: DoS, DDoS, Man-in-the-Middle, and Replay Attacks | 14 | demo | Students will explain the mechanism, traffic characteristics, and defensive countermeasures for denial-of-service, distributed denial-of-service, man-in-the-middle, and replay attack types. |
| Wireshark (open-source, installed on isolated lab VMs), pre-captured .pcap files (instructor-created on isolated network), printed packet diagram handouts, lab notebook, CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study guide — network attacks chapter | Graded guided question sheet from the ARP poisoning .pcap exercise; students must correctly identify attacker MAC, victim IP, interception point, and recommend one countermeasure — pass mark 75%. Diagram from memory checked against instructor key — all five labeled components required to pass. |
| 5 | Application-Layer Attacks: Injection, XSS, CSRF, and Buffer Overflow | 15 | lab | Students will execute and document SQL injection and cross-site scripting attacks against a deliberately vulnerable web application in an isolated lab environment, explaining the mechanism of each. |
| DVWA (open-source, installed on isolated VM — no internet connectivity), VirtualBox or VMware Workstation Player, lab log template, CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 and CySA+ study guides — application attacks sections, OWASP Top 10 reference (owasp.org) | Completed lab log with at least three distinct SQL injection payloads documented with responses, plus XSS screenshot and written explanation; instructor confirms VM network isolation before grading. Pass requires all entries present, network isolation confirmed, and explanation meeting minimum length with accurate mechanism description — 80% rubric score. |
| 6 | The Cyber Kill Chain and Attack Lifecycle | 14 | theory | Students will map the seven stages of the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain to a given attack narrative and identify what defensive action could disrupt each stage. |
| Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain white paper (publicly available PDF), instructor-authored attack narrative handout, Kill Chain mapping worksheet, CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study guide — threat intelligence chapter, MITRE ATT&CK website (attack.mitre.org) | Kill Chain mapping worksheet graded against instructor answer key; students must correctly place attacker actions in at least six of seven stages and provide a plausible disruption strategy for each — pass mark 80%. |
| 7 | MITRE ATT&CK Framework: Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures | 14 | practice | Students will navigate the MITRE ATT&CK framework to look up at least five techniques for a given tactic and map them to a realistic threat scenario with documented evidence. |
| MITRE ATT&CK Navigator (web-based, attack.mitre.org/resources/attack-navigator/), instructor-authored incident timeline handout, ATT&CK layer mapping worksheet, CompTIA CySA+ study guide — threat intelligence and threat hunting chapters | Submitted ATT&CK mapping worksheet and Navigator layer file; pass requires all attacker actions mapped to a technique ID with the correct tactic parent, and co-authored threat actor profile uses ATT&CK terminology accurately — 80% rubric score. |
| 8 | Reconnaissance: OSINT, Scanning, and Enumeration Techniques | 14 | lab | Students will conduct passive OSINT reconnaissance on an instructor-designated practice target and active scanning on an isolated lab target, documenting findings in a structured reconnaissance report. |
| Nmap (open-source), Metasploitable2 VM (isolated subnet — no internet routing), WHOIS web tool, Shodan.io (instructor account for class use, scoped to authorized targets only), NVD (nvd.nist.gov), reconnaissance report template, CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 and CySA+ study guides | Submitted reconnaissance report reviewed by instructor; pass requires active scan performed only on isolated lab VM (instructor verifies network logs), passive OSINT sources documented, at least three CVEs cross-referenced, and attack surface assessment present — 80% rubric score. Any evidence of scanning unauthorized targets is an automatic fail and academic integrity referral. |
| 9 | Vulnerability Scanning and CVSS Scoring | 15 | lab | Students will run a credentialed vulnerability scan against an isolated lab target using OpenVAS or a comparable open-source scanner, interpret the results, and prioritize findings by CVSS score. |
| OpenVAS / Greenbone Community Edition (open-source, installed on lab VM), Metasploitable2 VM (isolated subnet), CVSS v3.1 calculator (first.org), CVSS scoring worksheet, NVD (nvd.nist.gov) for reference, CompTIA CySA+ study guide — vulnerability management chapter | Submitted scan report export and completed CVSS worksheet; pass requires scan scope confirmed to isolated subnet (instructor verifies), top five findings listed with correct CVSS scores, and manual CVSS scores within 0.5 of instructor key for at least 2 of 3 worksheet items — 80% rubric score. |
| 10 | Threat Intelligence: IOCs, Feeds, and Sharing Standards | 14 | practice | Students will identify indicators of compromise from a provided log set and encode them in STIX format using a basic template, demonstrating understanding of structured threat intelligence sharing. |
| Printed annotated log worksheet (instructor-created), STIX 2.1 JSON template (instructor-provided), text editor (VS Code or Notepad++), AlienVault OTX (otx.alienvault.com), CISA KEV catalog (cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog), Abuse.ch, CompTIA CySA+ study guide — threat intelligence chapter | Submitted annotated log worksheet and STIX JSON file; pass requires at least five IOCs correctly identified in the log with type labeled, and STIX JSON file is syntactically valid with at least three IOC objects correctly populated — 80% rubric score. |
| 11 | Insider Threats and Supply Chain Risks | 14 | theory | Students will analyze insider threat and supply chain attack scenarios and recommend at least three specific technical or administrative controls to reduce risk in each case. |
| Instructor-selected public post-incident analysis documents, Kill Chain mapping worksheet, NIST SP 800-161 summary handout (instructor-prepared from nist.gov), NIST SP 800-53 control family reference card (instructor-prepared), CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study guide — threat actors and supply chain chapter | Two submitted recommendation memos graded by rubric; each memo must name at least three specific, actionable controls (not vague recommendations), cite a NIST reference for each, and correctly identify the threat category — pass mark 80% rubric score. |
| 12 | Threat Scenario Capstone: Attack Analysis and Defensive Briefing | 15 | practice | Students will independently analyze a multi-stage attack scenario, produce a complete threat analysis report mapped to the ATT&CK framework, and deliver a five-minute defensive briefing to the class. |
| Instructor-authored incident package (printed), ATT&CK Navigator (web), MITRE ATT&CK website, CVSS calculator (first.org), slide deck software (LibreOffice Impress or Google Slides), threat analysis report template, CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 and CySA+ study guides | Graded on written report rubric (ATT&CK mapping accuracy, IOC identification, remediation quality) and presentation rubric (clarity, accuracy, response to questions); pass requires 80% on both rubrics independently. Missing ATT&CK IDs or absent remediation section results in automatic revision required before credit. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Threats Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% correct (38 of 50 questions) | A 50-question multiple-choice and scenario-based exam covering threat actor types, malware categories, attack techniques, the Cyber Kill Chain, MITRE ATT&CK framework, CVSS scoring, IOC identification, and insider and supply chain threats, aligned to CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Domain 2 objectives and ISC2 CC Domain 2 and 3 knowledge areas. Students complete the exam individually without notes in a timed 90-minute sitting. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Vulnerability Scan and ATT&CK Mapping Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Pass on all three rubric categories (setup, scan accuracy, ATT&CK mapping) each at 75% or higher | Students independently configure and run a vulnerability scan against an instructor-assigned isolated lab target, export and interpret the report, and map the top five findings to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, presenting results verbally to the instructor. The demonstration assesses hands-on tool proficiency and the ability to communicate findings clearly, aligned to CompTIA CySA+ threat and vulnerability management performance-based objectives. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Lab Log Portfolio | Log | 15% | All five required lab entries present and meeting minimum documentation standard; average rubric score 80% or higher | Students submit a compiled lab log portfolio containing completed documentation from the five lab and practice lessons (application attacks, reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, IOC and STIX encoding, and the capstone scenario analysis), demonstrating progressive skill development and adherence to professional documentation standards. Each entry is evaluated for accuracy, completeness, and correct tool use; entries showing evidence of scanning unauthorized targets or falsified results result in automatic failure and academic integrity review. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Ethical and Safe Lab Conduct Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | Pass all four criteria; any single failure requires remediation before further lab access is granted | Before receiving unsupervised lab access, each student is evaluated by the instructor on four behavioral safety criteria: (1) correctly verifying network isolation of lab VMs before any active scanning activity, (2) confirming OSINT and scanning activity is limited to authorized targets only, (3) demonstrating proper handling and disposal of sensitive data artifacts (log files, scan exports) per class data handling policy, and (4) accurately stating the legal and ethical boundaries of authorized penetration testing activity under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) general framework. This check aligns to ISC2 CC Domain 1 (Security Principles) ethics requirements and CompTIA Security+ professional ethics objectives. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
This course builds the hands-on skills needed to operate a security-conscious IT environment, covering network defense, access control, cryptography, vulnerability management, and security monitoring. Students configure and test real controls on live systems and virtual labs, interpreting results against industry frameworks. Lessons map directly to CompTIA Security+ and ISC2 CC exam domains, reinforcing the threat knowledge gained in Course 2.
OutcomesThis course builds the hands-on skills needed to operate a security-conscious IT environment, covering network defense, access control, cryptography, vulnerability management, and security monitoring. Students configure and test real controls on live systems and virtual labs, interpreting results against industry frameworks. Lessons map directly to CompTIA Security+ and ISC2 CC exam domains, reinforcing the threat knowledge gained in Course 2.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Security Operations Foundations and the Defense-in-Depth Model; Identity and Access Management: Concepts and Policies; Authentication Technologies and Multi-Factor Authentication Lab; Cryptography Fundamentals: Encryption, Hashing, and Key Management; PKI and Certificate Management Lab; Network Security Architecture: Firewalls, VLANs, and DMZ Design; Secure Network Protocols and Protocol Hardening; Endpoint Hardening and Patch Management; Physical Security Controls and Environmental Safeguards; Vulnerability Scanning and CVSS-Based Prioritization; Security Monitoring: Logs, Alerts, and Baseline Behavior; Security Operations Capstone Lab: Hardening, Scanning, and Reporting.
What competent looks like. Configure and verify access control mechanisms including authentication, authorization, and account management policies on a live system. Implement and evaluate cryptographic controls such as symmetric/asymmetric encryption, hashing, and PKI certificate management. Perform a structured vulnerability scan, interpret the output, and prioritize remediation using a recognized scoring system such as CVSS. Apply network security controls including firewalls, VLANs, DMZ architecture, and secure network protocols to a lab environment. Demonstrate physical security and endpoint hardening measures consistent with a defense-in-depth strategy. Document security operations activities — including scan results, control configurations, and change records — to a professional standard.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Security Operations Foundations and the Defense-in-Depth Model | 12 | theory | Students will explain the defense-in-depth model, identify the major security control categories (preventive, detective, corrective, compensating), and map them to real operational roles. |
| CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (current exam version), ISC2 CC Official Study Guide, whiteboard/diagramming software (draw.io or equivalent), case study handouts from publicly available breach reports (e.g., Verizon DBIR summary). | Students score at least 75% on a 20-question multiple-choice quiz covering control categories and defense-in-depth layers; diagram must correctly label a minimum of five distinct layers. |
| 2 | Identity and Access Management: Concepts and Policies | 14 | theory | Students will define identification, authentication, authorization, and accounting (IAAA) and distinguish among access control models including DAC, MAC, RBAC, and ABAC. |
| CompTIA Security+ Study Guide, NIST SP 800-63 (digital identity guidelines — publicly available), sample access control policy templates, spreadsheet software for RBAC matrix. | Written RBAC matrix is complete and enforces least privilege; scenario analysis identifies at least 80% of planted policy gaps; quiz score of 75% or higher on IAM concepts. |
| 3 | Authentication Technologies and Multi-Factor Authentication Lab | 15 | lab | Students will configure multi-factor authentication (MFA) on a test system and compare the security trade-offs of password-based, token-based, biometric, and certificate-based authentication methods. |
| Lab workstations or VMs (Windows Server or Linux with an MFA-capable service configured by instructor), software authenticator app, lab guide, screenshot capture tool. | Lab report shows successful MFA configuration with annotated screenshots; student correctly explains the lockout behavior observed; comparison table is complete and technically accurate; lab report graded at 75% or higher. |
| 4 | Cryptography Fundamentals: Encryption, Hashing, and Key Management | 15 | theory | Students will explain symmetric encryption, asymmetric encryption, and hashing, identify common algorithms in each category, and describe proper key management practices. |
| CompTIA Security+ Study Guide, NIST SP 800-57 (key management guidelines — publicly available), algorithm reference handout, diagramming software. | Algorithm classification table is accurate; diagram correctly depicts the asymmetric process including both encryption and signature steps; policy evaluation identifies planted gaps at a rate of 75% or higher; quiz score 75% or higher. |
| 5 | PKI and Certificate Management Lab | 14 | lab | Students will generate a certificate signing request (CSR), issue a certificate from a lab certificate authority (CA), install it on a test web server, and verify the trust chain. |
| Linux VMs with OpenSSL installed, lab CA (e.g., easy-rsa or a simple internal CA configured by instructor), Apache or Nginx web server packages, browser for inspection, lab guide. | Certificate is correctly issued and trusted by the lab browser with no errors; lab report includes correct interpretation of all certificate fields; expired-certificate scenario is correctly explained; score 75% or higher. |
| 6 | Network Security Architecture: Firewalls, VLANs, and DMZ Design | 15 | demo | Students will describe how firewalls, VLANs, and DMZ architecture reduce the attack surface of a network and configure basic firewall rules on a lab firewall appliance or software equivalent. |
| pfSense VM or equivalent firewall software, Cisco Packet Tracer or GNS3 for VLAN simulation, Nmap for port scanning, network diagramming tool. | Firewall rule set correctly blocks unauthorized traffic as verified by Nmap scan output; VLAN configuration prevents inter-VLAN communication as specified; network diagram is architecturally sound; instructor evaluates against a rubric with 75% pass mark. |
| 7 | Secure Network Protocols and Protocol Hardening | 13 | lab | Students will replace or disable insecure protocols on a lab system and verify that only approved secure protocols are in use, documenting the before-and-after configuration. |
| Linux VM with Telnet, FTP, and SNMP services pre-installed for the exercise, Wireshark, Nmap, SSH client, lab guide. | Wireshark annotation correctly identifies cleartext credentials; Nmap output confirms only secure services are running; hardening checklist is complete and accurate; lab report scored at 75% or higher. |
| 8 | Endpoint Hardening and Patch Management | 14 | lab | Students will apply a CIS Benchmark-based hardening checklist to a lab workstation, disable unnecessary services, apply available patches, and document the change record. |
| Windows or Linux VM (snapshot taken before hardening), CIS Benchmark PDF (publicly available from CIS), OpenVAS or equivalent scanner, change record template, screenshot tool. | At least 80% of assigned CIS Benchmark items are correctly applied and verified; scanner comparison shows measurable reduction in findings; change record is complete and professionally formatted; score 75% or higher on lab rubric. |
| 9 | Physical Security Controls and Environmental Safeguards | 10 | theory | Students will identify physical security controls relevant to a data center or office environment and explain how environmental threats such as fire, flood, and power failure are mitigated. |
| Data center floor plan handout, physical security control checklist, reference text (CompTIA Security+ Study Guide chapter on physical security), one-page brief template. | Floor plan audit identifies at least eight of ten planted deficiencies; technical brief is accurate and uses correct terminology; badge audit correctly identifies all unauthorized access holders; quiz score 75% or higher. |
| 10 | Vulnerability Scanning and CVSS-Based Prioritization | 16 | lab | Students will run a credentialed vulnerability scan against a lab target, interpret the results using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), and produce a prioritized remediation plan. |
| OpenVAS / Greenbone Community Edition, Metasploitable or equivalent deliberately vulnerable VM, CVSS v3.1 scoring calculator (publicly available at NIST NVD), report template. | Scan is successfully completed and report exported; CVSS prioritization is correctly ordered with accurate score references; executive summary is clear, accurate, and professionally written; lab graded at 75% or higher. |
| 11 | Security Monitoring: Logs, Alerts, and Baseline Behavior | 15 | lab | Students will collect and review system and network logs, identify anomalous events indicating a potential security issue, and generate a structured alert summary. |
| Linux VMs, syslog-ng or instructor-configured ELK Lite instance, pre-generated log files (instructor-created), alert summary template. | Log forwarding is verified as working; student correctly identifies at least 80% of planted suspicious events with accurate explanations; alert summary is complete and uses the correct fields; score 75% or higher. |
| 12 | Security Operations Capstone Lab: Hardening, Scanning, and Reporting | 18 | practice | Students will independently apply the full security operations workflow — access control configuration, endpoint hardening, vulnerability scanning, and log review — to a provided lab environment and deliver a professional security posture report. |
| Full lab environment (VMs pre-configured with deliberate weaknesses), all tools used in prior lessons (OpenVAS, pfSense, OpenSSL, Wireshark, Nmap, log collector), change log template, report template. | All required controls are correctly configured and verified; vulnerability scan output is accurately interpreted; report is technically accurate, professionally written, and includes all required sections; verbal summary is clear and demonstrates understanding; overall rubric score of 75% or higher required to pass the course capstone lab. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security Operations Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (38 of 50 questions correct) | A 50-question multiple-choice and scenario-based written exam covering all theory content from the course: defense-in-depth, IAM models, cryptography and PKI, network architecture, physical security, vulnerability scoring, and log analysis. Questions are written to the cognitive level of CompTIA Security+ and ISC2 CC exam objectives so students practice exam-style reasoning. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Practical Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Instructor rates all five task areas at Competent or above on the rubric; any Needs Improvement rating requires a repeat of that task | The student is given 90 minutes to complete five timed tasks on a fresh lab environment: configure MFA on a user account, write and test a firewall rule set, generate and install a TLS certificate, harden at least five OS settings from a CIS Benchmark checklist, and interpret a provided vulnerability scan finding using CVSS. The instructor observes and scores each task against a standardized rubric. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Lab Log Portfolio | Log | 15% | Eight of twelve lab reports submitted and each passing report scores 75% or higher on the lab report rubric; missing or failing reports must be resubmitted | Students maintain a running portfolio of lab reports for each hands-on lesson, including screenshots, configuration details, test results, and written analysis. The portfolio is reviewed at midpoint and at course end to ensure documentation is professional, technically accurate, and complete, reflecting the kind of records kept by security operations practitioners. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safety and Professional Conduct Check | Safety audit | 15% | All critical items marked Satisfactory; any Unsatisfactory on a critical item (e.g., unauthorized access attempt, improper data handling, failure to follow lab rules) results in immediate remediation and re-check before the student may continue lab work | The instructor completes a structured observation checklist at three points in the course (beginning, midpoint, end) evaluating whether the student follows lab safety rules, handles credentials and sensitive data appropriately, operates only within the authorized scope of lab exercises, respects shared equipment, and maintains professional conduct consistent with workplace expectations in a security operations role. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students develop hands-on proficiency with the Linux command line, file system, user management, and network configuration as applied to cybersecurity roles. Lessons cover hardening, log analysis, permissions, and scripting foundations that directly support Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC exam objectives. By course end, students can administer and secure a Linux system in a professional security-operations environment.
OutcomesStudents develop hands-on proficiency with the Linux command line, file system, user management, and network configuration as applied to cybersecurity roles. Lessons cover hardening, log analysis, permissions, and scripting foundations that directly support Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC exam objectives. By course end, students can administer and secure a Linux system in a professional security-operations environment.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Linux Landscape and Lab Environment Setup; The Linux Command Line: Navigation and File Management; Linux File System Hierarchy and Permissions; User and Group Management; Linux Networking Fundamentals; SSH, Remote Access, and Encryption in Transit; Linux Firewall Configuration with iptables and ufw; System Services, the Boot Process, and Attack Surface Reduction; Linux Log Management and Analysis; Linux Hardening: CIS Benchmark Implementation; Introduction to Bash Scripting for Security Automation; Capstone Lab: Securing and Investigating a Linux Server.
What competent looks like. Navigate the Linux file system and execute essential shell commands to locate, inspect, and manipulate files relevant to security investigations. Configure and enforce Linux user accounts, groups, and file permissions to implement least-privilege access controls. Harden a Linux server by disabling unnecessary services, applying firewall rules with iptables/nftables, and configuring SSH securely. Analyze system logs and use standard Linux tools to detect indicators of compromise on a live host. Write and execute basic Bash scripts to automate repetitive security-administration tasks. Document system configuration and security findings in professional written reports that meet industry standards.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linux Landscape and Lab Environment Setup | 10.5 | lab | Students install and configure a Linux virtual machine and explain the role of Linux in enterprise cybersecurity environments. |
| Workstation with VT-x/AMD-V enabled, VirtualBox 7.x or VMware Workstation Player, Ubuntu Server 22.04 LTS ISO, CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (Sybex), lab journal template | Student's VM boots successfully, instructor verifies uname output and lab journal entries are accurate; pass = all three scavenger-hunt items correctly identified and explained in writing. |
| 2 | The Linux Command Line: Navigation and File Management | 14.5 | lab | Students use core shell commands to navigate the directory tree, manage files, and read file contents accurately. |
| Linux VM, terminal emulator, GNU Coreutils man pages, CompTIA Linux+ Study Guide (Sybex) chapters on file management | Instructor reviews script session log; student must execute each core command correctly with no unrecoverable errors; pass = 90% of commands produce expected output. |
| 3 | Linux File System Hierarchy and Permissions | 14.5 | theory | Students explain the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard and configure file ownership and permissions using chmod, chown, and ACLs to enforce least privilege. |
| Linux VM, Linux man pages (chmod, chown, setfacl), NIST SP 800-123 (Guide to General Server Security), CompTIA Security+ exam objective list (domain: Implementation) | Lab worksheet requiring students to predict and verify permission bits before and after changes; pass = 85% of permission scenarios correctly resolved and documented. |
| 4 | User and Group Management | 14.5 | lab | Students create, modify, lock, and delete Linux user accounts and groups using standard command-line tools to support access-control policies. |
| Linux VM, man pages (useradd, usermod, userdel, chage, passwd), CIS Ubuntu Linux Benchmark (Center for Internet Security), ISC2 CC domain notes on access control | Instructor audits /etc/passwd and /etc/group after each scenario; pass = all accounts match the specified policy with no extraneous privileges, and the runbook is complete and accurate. |
| 5 | Linux Networking Fundamentals | 14.5 | demo | Students configure network interfaces, test connectivity, and use Linux networking tools to enumerate hosts and inspect traffic. |
| Linux VM with two virtual NICs, Wireshark installed on host, tcpdump, ip-suite tools, CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (network fundamentals chapters), ISC2 CC network concepts notes | Instructor verifies static IP configuration persists after reboot and reviews annotated Wireshark screenshot report; pass = correct IP assignment, at least two open ports correctly attributed to processes, and both packet patterns correctly identified. |
| 6 | SSH, Remote Access, and Encryption in Transit | 14.5 | lab | Students configure OpenSSH with key-based authentication and harden the SSH daemon against common attacks to protect remote administrative access. |
| Two Linux VMs on the same virtual network, OpenSSH server, fail2ban, text editor (nano/vim), CIS SSH Benchmark, CompTIA Security+ objective list (Cryptography and PKI domain) | Instructor attempts password login and root login after hardening; both must fail; fail2ban jail must block the attack IP within the configured threshold; pass = all three hardening controls verified functional and /etc/ssh/sshd_config changes documented. |
| 7 | Linux Firewall Configuration with iptables and ufw | 14.5 | lab | Students write and apply firewall rules using ufw and iptables to control inbound and outbound traffic based on a defined security policy. |
| Two Linux VMs, ufw, iptables, iptables-save/restore, nmap, CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (Network Security domain), NIST SP 800-41 Rev 1 (Guidelines on Firewalls) | nmap scan results from the second VM must match only the allowed ports; partner must identify and correct both violations; pass = nmap output matches policy exactly and both violations documented and remediated. |
| 8 | System Services, the Boot Process, and Attack Surface Reduction | 14.5 | theory | Students use systemd to manage services and reduce the attack surface of a Linux server by disabling unnecessary daemons and applying CIS Benchmark controls. |
| Linux VM, systemctl, CIS Ubuntu Linux Benchmark PDF, MITRE ATT&CK website (attack.mitre.org), CompTIA CySA+ Study Guide (Threat and Vulnerability Management chapters) | Instructor reviews the services table and systemctl output after reboot; pass = at least five unnecessary services correctly disabled and still off after reboot, and MITRE ATT&CK mappings are accurate. |
| 9 | Linux Log Management and Analysis | 14.5 | lab | Students locate, read, and analyze key Linux log files to identify security events and indicators of compromise. |
| Two Linux VMs, rsyslog, journalctl, grep, awk, cut, sort, CompTIA CySA+ Study Guide (Security Operations and Monitoring domain), ISC2 CC domain notes on incident response | Students submit the incident narrative with a timestamped event timeline; pass = at least four distinct events correctly identified in sequence, each linked to the correct log source. |
| 10 | Linux Hardening: CIS Benchmark Implementation | 14.5 | lab | Students apply a structured subset of CIS Benchmark controls to harden a stock Ubuntu Server installation and verify compliance using a manual audit checklist. |
| Two Linux VMs (one stock, one being hardened), CIS Ubuntu Linux Benchmark, text editors, diff utility, NIST SP 800-123, CompTIA Security+ exam objective list (Implementation domain) | Post-hardening checklist score reviewed by instructor; pass = 80% or more of the 20 controls passing, and hardening report covers all remediated controls with accurate explanations. |
| 11 | Introduction to Bash Scripting for Security Automation | 14.5 | lab | Students write Bash scripts that automate common security-administration tasks including user auditing, log parsing, and system health checks. |
| Linux VM, bash, text editor (nano/vim), sample auth.log provided by instructor, CompTIA CySA+ Study Guide (scripting and automation sections), GNU Bash Reference Manual | Instructor runs each script against a reference test set and reviews the code for logic errors and safe variable quoting; pass = scripts produce correct output on all three test cases with no syntax errors. |
| 12 | Capstone Lab: Securing and Investigating a Linux Server | 14.5 | lab | Students independently harden a misconfigured Linux server, investigate a simulated intrusion scenario embedded within it, and produce a professional security report. |
| Misconfigured Ubuntu Server VM image provided by instructor, all tools covered in prior lessons, report template, CompTIA Security+ and CySA+ exam objective checklists used as self-review criteria | Instructor scores report and live VM state against a rubric: vulnerability discovery (40%), correct remediation (30%), report clarity and accuracy (20%), and professional presentation (10%); pass = 75% overall with no critical vulnerability left unaddressed. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linux Security Concepts Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (75 of 100 points) | A 60-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering Linux file-system hierarchy, permissions, user management, networking, SSH hardening, firewall concepts, log files, and Bash scripting fundamentals. Questions are mapped to CompTIA Security+ (Implementation and Architecture domains), CompTIA CySA+ (Security Operations and Monitoring), and ISC2 CC (Access Controls and Network Security domains). Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Hands-On Hardening Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Instructor checklist: 80% of required tasks completed correctly within 90 minutes | The student receives a freshly deployed Ubuntu Server VM and a one-page security policy; within 90 minutes they must configure SSH key authentication, disable password login, enable and configure ufw to match the policy, disable at least three unnecessary services, and set correct permissions on a specified directory — all without external reference materials beyond man pages. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Lab Journal and Runbook Portfolio | Log | 15% | All 12 lesson lab journals submitted; average rubric score of 80% across clarity, accuracy, and completeness dimensions | Students maintain a running lab journal throughout the course documenting commands used, observed output, errors encountered, and security inferences drawn in each lesson. The portfolio is reviewed at course end for accuracy, professional writing quality, and evidence that the student connected practical steps to relevant Security+, CySA+, or ISC2 CC exam objectives. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Workplace Safety and Physical Security Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% on all critical safety items; no critical item may be marked unsatisfactory | Instructor observes the student's workstation setup and work practices against a checklist drawn from OSHA General Industry standards and lab safety guidelines: proper cable management to prevent trip hazards, correct ergonomic monitor and keyboard positioning, awareness of electrical hazards when handling server hardware, and ability to locate and describe the lab's emergency shut-off and first-aid kit. All critical items must be satisfied; any critical failure requires immediate correction and recheck before the student may continue lab work. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students learn to write, read, and adapt scripts in Bash and Python to automate security tasks, parse logs, enumerate systems, and respond to threats. Lessons progress from syntax fundamentals through real-world security automation scenarios encountered in SOC and incident-response roles. Scripting competencies support the automation and threat-intelligence objectives tested in CompTIA Security+ and CompTIA CySA+.
OutcomesStudents learn to write, read, and adapt scripts in Bash and Python to automate security tasks, parse logs, enumerate systems, and respond to threats. Lessons progress from syntax fundamentals through real-world security automation scenarios encountered in SOC and incident-response roles. Scripting competencies support the automation and threat-intelligence objectives tested in CompTIA Security+ and CompTIA CySA+.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Scripting in a Security Context: Purpose, Risk, and Environment Setup; Bash Fundamentals: Variables, Control Flow, and File Operations; Bash for Security: Log Parsing and User Auditing; Python Fundamentals: Syntax, Data Types, and Functions; Python File and String Handling for Log Analysis; Secure Scripting Practices: Input Validation, Least Privilege, and Credential Handling; Python Networking: Sockets, Requests, and Service Interrogation; Automating Nmap and Other CLI Security Tools with Python and Bash; Version Control with Git: Tracking and Collaborating on Security Scripts; Scripting Incident-Response Tasks: Triage Automation; Scripting for Threat Intelligence: IOC Extraction and Feed Parsing; Capstone Script Project: Automated Security Monitoring Tool.
What competent looks like. Write functional Bash and Python scripts that automate at least three distinct security tasks such as log parsing, user auditing, and network scanning. Read and explain unfamiliar scripts, identifying logic flow, data handling, and potential security risks within the code. Use Python libraries including os, subprocess, re, and requests to collect, filter, and report security-relevant data from a live Linux system. Apply safe scripting practices including input validation, least-privilege execution, and secure credential handling to all scripts produced in the course. Integrate scripts with command-line security tools such as nmap, grep, awk, and curl to build automated reconnaissance and monitoring workflows. Produce documented, version-controlled scripts stored in a local Git repository with clear README files and inline comments.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scripting in a Security Context: Purpose, Risk, and Environment Setup | 10 | theory | Students explain why scripting is a core SOC skill and configure a safe, isolated lab environment for all course exercises. |
| Ubuntu 22.04 LTS ISO, VirtualBox or VMware Workstation Player, CompTIA CySA+ exam objectives document (publicly available from CompTIA website), course lab guide chapter 1 | Students submit a completed environment-setup checklist with screenshots showing correct Python and Bash versions; instructor verifies all VMs are isolated from production networks before proceeding — 100% checklist completion required to continue. |
| 2 | Bash Fundamentals: Variables, Control Flow, and File Operations | 14 | lab | Students write Bash scripts that use variables, conditionals, loops, and file I/O to perform basic system tasks. |
| Ubuntu VM, Bash reference manual (GNU.org), VS Code editor, course lab guide chapter 2 | All three practice scripts execute without errors, produce correct output verified against an answer key, and include comments on every control-flow block; pass mark is 3 of 3 scripts functional with comments present. |
| 3 | Bash for Security: Log Parsing and User Auditing | 14 | lab | Students write Bash scripts that parse system and auth logs to extract security-relevant events and generate a plain-text audit report. |
| Ubuntu VM, sample auth.log files provided by instructor, grep/awk/sort man pages, course lab guide chapter 3, CompTIA CySA+ objectives (log analysis domain) | Script correctly identifies all flagged IPs in instructor's answer-key log file, produces a readable report, and cross-references the block-list without errors; pass mark is correct identification of at least 90% of flagged IPs. |
| 4 | Python Fundamentals: Syntax, Data Types, and Functions | 14 | theory | Students write Python 3 functions that accept parameters, handle common data types, and return values, demonstrating readable code style consistent with PEP 8. |
| Ubuntu VM, Python 3 documentation (docs.python.org), PEP 8 style guide, VS Code with Pylint extension, course lab guide chapter 4 | Students pass all 10 automated assert tests and submit a refactored script with docstrings and PEP 8-compliant formatting confirmed by Pylint score of 7.0 or higher; both conditions required to pass. |
| 5 | Python File and String Handling for Log Analysis | 14 | lab | Students use Python's built-in file I/O and the re module to parse structured and semi-structured log files and extract indicators of compromise. |
| Ubuntu VM, Python 3 re and argparse module documentation, sample Apache access log files, VS Code, course lab guide chapter 5 | Script produces a CSV that matches the instructor answer-key CSV within a 5% margin on counts (accounting for tie-breaking sort differences), accepts command-line arguments, and exits cleanly on a missing file with an informative error message; all three criteria required to pass. |
| 6 | Secure Scripting Practices: Input Validation, Least Privilege, and Credential Handling | 12 | theory | Students identify insecure scripting patterns and rewrite vulnerable code snippets to eliminate command injection, hard-coded credentials, and overly broad file permissions. |
| Flawed script handouts (instructor-prepared), Python subprocess and os module docs, OSHA 29 CFR 1910 General Industry standards (general reference), course lab guide chapter 6 | All three remediated scripts pass a manual instructor code review confirming no shell=True on user-supplied input, no plaintext credentials in source, and no unnecessary root execution; all three must pass for credit. |
| 7 | Python Networking: Sockets, Requests, and Service Interrogation | 14 | lab | Students write Python scripts that use the socket and requests libraries to probe network services and retrieve HTTP-based threat-intelligence data within an isolated lab network. |
| Ubuntu VM, isolated lab network with designated target VM, Python 3 socket and requests documentation, free AbuseIPDB API account, course lab guide chapter 7, CompTIA CySA+ objectives (threat intelligence domain) | Port scanner correctly identifies all open ports on the lab target (verified against instructor's known-open-ports list), saves valid JSON, and the API script appends scores without crashing on an unreachable IP; 100% of known-open ports must be found, API script must handle errors gracefully. |
| 8 | Automating Nmap and Other CLI Security Tools with Python and Bash | 14 | lab | Students write scripts that invoke nmap and other CLI security tools as subprocesses, parse their output, and produce structured reports. |
| Ubuntu VM, nmap, nikto, Git, VS Code, Python xml.etree.ElementTree docs, course lab guide chapter 8, CompTIA Security+ objectives (network scanning and enumeration) | Python script correctly extracts host and port data from nmap XML matching instructor answer key; Bash wrapper produces the indexed directory structure; Git log shows at least three commits; pass requires all three elements. |
| 9 | Version Control with Git: Tracking and Collaborating on Security Scripts | 10 | demo | Students use Git from the command line to initialize repositories, commit changes, create branches, and resolve a simulated merge conflict in a security-script project. |
| Ubuntu VM, Git documentation (git-scm.com), course lab guide chapter 9 | Student repository has at least five commits with non-trivial commit messages, a correct .gitignore, and the resolved-conflict commit produces a runnable script confirmed by instructor; all three required to pass. |
| 10 | Scripting Incident-Response Tasks: Triage Automation | 16 | lab | Students write a Python triage script that collects volatile system data from a live Linux host — running processes, active network connections, logged-in users, and recent auth events — and writes a time-stamped forensic snapshot report. |
| Ubuntu lab VM (with planted netcat listener), Python 3 docs, ss/ps/who man pages, course lab guide chapter 10, CompTIA CySA+ objectives (incident response domain) | Report file is produced with UTC timestamps, contains output from all four commands, and correctly includes the planted netcat listener in the network-connections section; all three criteria required to pass. |
| 11 | Scripting for Threat Intelligence: IOC Extraction and Feed Parsing | 16 | lab | Students write a Python script that extracts indicators of compromise (IP addresses, domains, and file hashes) from unstructured threat-report text using regular expressions and enriches each IOC with data from a public threat-intelligence feed. |
| Ubuntu VM, Python 3 re and json module docs, sample threat-report text files provided by instructor, free AbuseIPDB API account, course lab guide chapter 11, CompTIA CySA+ objectives (threat intelligence domain) | JSON output matches instructor answer key for all three IOC types with correct deduplication, and the enrichment function handles a simulated rate-limit error (HTTP 429) without crashing; both required to pass. |
| 12 | Capstone Script Project: Automated Security Monitoring Tool | 22 | practice | Students design, build, test, document, and present an integrated Python or Bash security-monitoring tool that combines at least four skills from the course into a single working program. |
| Ubuntu VM, all course lab tools and libraries, Git, VS Code, screen-recording software (OBS or equivalent), course lab guide chapter 12, rubric provided to students at project start | Tool meets all rubric criteria: runs without errors on instructor's test data, integrates at least four course skills, repository has meaningful commits and a complete README, and student can answer three instructor questions about the code during the defense; all criteria must be met to pass. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scripting Concepts Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 70% or higher on all sections; no individual section below 60% | A 50-question written exam covering Bash and Python syntax, secure scripting principles, regular expressions, file I/O, networking concepts, and version control, with multiple-choice and short-answer questions mapped to CompTIA Security+ (automation and scripting) and CompTIA CySA+ (threat intelligence and security operations) exam objective areas. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Live Scripting Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Student must complete at least 3 of 4 tasks fully within 90 minutes with no critical errors such as shell injection vulnerabilities or hard-coded credentials | In a proctored lab session, each student receives four scripting tasks they have not seen before — drawn from the categories of log parsing, network interrogation, IOC extraction, and triage automation — and must produce working, commented, secure scripts for each task on their Ubuntu VM. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Course Lab Log Portfolio | Log | 15% | All 10 required lab entries present, each with objective, script code, sample output, and a 2–3 sentence reflection; average reflection quality rated Meets Standard or above on rubric | Students maintain a running lab log throughout the course documenting each major lab exercise, including the script they wrote, sample output, any errors encountered and how they fixed them, and a brief reflection on what the skill means in a real SOC role — submitted as a single PDF or Markdown document from their Git repository. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safe Scripting and Lab Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | Zero critical failures (hard-coded credentials, shell injection, or running scripts with unnecessary root on the assessment tasks); minor findings must be corrected within 10 minutes | Instructor performs a targeted code review and lab observation checksheet evaluating whether the student consistently applies input validation, avoids shell=True with user-supplied data, stores credentials outside source code, and follows physical lab safety practices including proper cable management and ergonomic workstation setup as introduced in course 1. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students learn to deploy, configure, and operate SIEM platforms to collect, normalize, correlate, and alert on security events across an enterprise environment. Hands-on labs use industry-representative tooling to build dashboards, tune detection rules, and investigate alerts through a structured analyst workflow. Lesson content maps directly to CompTIA Security+ (domain: Security Operations) and CompTIA CySA+ (domains: Security Operations, Vulnerability Management, Incident Response) exam objectives.
OutcomesStudents learn to deploy, configure, and operate SIEM platforms to collect, normalize, correlate, and alert on security events across an enterprise environment. Hands-on labs use industry-representative tooling to build dashboards, tune detection rules, and investigate alerts through a structured analyst workflow. Lesson content maps directly to CompTIA Security+ (domain: Security Operations) and CompTIA CySA+ (domains: Security Operations, Vulnerability Management, Incident Response) exam objectives.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: SIEM Fundamentals and the Security Operations Workflow; Log Sources, Data Collection, and Normalization; Searching, Filtering, and Query Languages; Dashboards, Visualizations, and Reporting; Correlation Rules and Use-Case Development; MITRE ATT&CK Framework and Alert Mapping; Threat Intelligence Integration; Alert Triage and Investigation Workflow; Log Retention, Data Privacy, and Responsible Handling; SIEM Health Monitoring and Performance Tuning; Capstone Scenario: End-to-End SIEM Investigation; Exam Alignment Review: SIEM Topics in Security+ and CySA+.
What competent looks like. Configure a SIEM platform to ingest and parse log sources including Windows event logs, Linux syslogs, firewall logs, and web server logs. Write and tune correlation rules to detect common attack patterns such as brute-force, lateral movement, and data exfiltration with a measurable reduction in false positives. Build dashboards and scheduled reports that communicate security posture to both technical and non-technical audiences. Investigate a SIEM-generated alert end-to-end using a repeatable triage workflow, document findings, and escalate or close the ticket with written justification. Demonstrate safe and responsible handling of sensitive log data in compliance with data-retention and least-privilege principles. Map SIEM alert categories to the MITRE ATT&CK framework and identify relevant tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SIEM Fundamentals and the Security Operations Workflow | 10 | theory | Students explain the architecture and core functions of a SIEM platform and describe how SIEM fits within a security operations center (SOC) workflow. |
| Whiteboard/projection, annotated SIEM architecture handout, SOC analyst job posting printouts, Splunk or Elastic Security free-tier documentation, CompTIA CySA+ official study guide (Security Operations chapter) | Exit quiz of 10 multiple-choice questions covering SIEM components, SOC tiers, and alert lifecycle; pass mark 70%. |
| 2 | Log Sources, Data Collection, and Normalization | 16 | lab | Students configure at least four distinct log sources to forward data to a SIEM instance and verify that each source is parsed and normalized correctly. |
| Virtual lab environment (VirtualBox or VMware Workstation), Windows Server 2019 VM, Ubuntu Server VM, pfSense VM, Apache web server, Splunk Free or Elastic Stack (free tier), Elastic Beats or Splunk Universal Forwarder installers, CySA+ study guide (log management chapter) | Instructor verifies all four log sources appear in the SIEM with correct field parsing; students submit a one-page configuration log documenting each source and the verification search used. Pass = all four sources ingesting with zero unparsed critical fields. |
| 3 | Searching, Filtering, and Query Languages | 14 | lab | Students write targeted SIEM queries using the platform's search language to retrieve specific event sets, filter noise, and calculate basic statistics. |
| SIEM instance with pre-loaded sample dataset (BOTS dataset v3 or equivalent open-source security dataset), query language reference card (SPL or KQL/Lucene depending on platform), lab workbook | Students submit the query log with all eight investigative queries returning correct results; instructor spot-checks three queries live. Pass = 6 of 8 queries return accurate, relevant results. |
| 4 | Dashboards, Visualizations, and Reporting | 12 | practice | Students build a multi-panel SIEM dashboard with at least five visualizations and generate a scheduled summary report suitable for a SOC manager audience. |
| SIEM instance, sample security dataset, dashboard/report rubric handout, lab notebook (digital or paper) | Instructor reviews completed dashboard against rubric: five panels present, data accurate, labels clear, report scheduled. Pass = 4 of 5 panels meet rubric criteria with no data errors. |
| 5 | Correlation Rules and Use-Case Development | 16 | lab | Students write, test, and document three correlation rules that detect defined attack behaviors and generate actionable alerts without excessive false positives. |
| SIEM instance, sample attack traffic PCAP replayed via a log injector, threat intelligence IP list (open-source, e.g., abuse.ch), rule-writing worksheet, CySA+ study guide (detection and analytics chapter) | Each of three submitted rules fires on injected attack traffic and does NOT fire on the injected benign traffic; documentation complete. Pass = all three rules meet both criteria with written tuning notes. |
| 6 | MITRE ATT&CK Framework and Alert Mapping | 12 | theory | Students map at least ten SIEM alert types to specific MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques and explain how the framework guides detection strategy. |
| MITRE ATT&CK Navigator (att&ck.mitre.org, online), ATT&CK mapping worksheet, projector for instructor demo, CySA+ official study guide (threat intelligence chapter) | Completed mapping table reviewed by instructor; at least 8 of 10 mappings correct, detection gap brief submitted. Pass = 80% mapping accuracy plus submitted brief. |
| 7 | Threat Intelligence Integration | 12 | lab | Students integrate an open-source threat intelligence feed into the SIEM and configure an alert rule that fires when internal hosts communicate with indicators of compromise (IOCs) from that feed. |
| SIEM instance, abuse.ch Feodo Tracker CSV (public, free), firewall log sample dataset, lab workbook, CySA+ study guide (threat intelligence and vulnerability management chapters) | Rule fires on injected IOC log entry; rule does not fire on clean log entries; lookup table shows current feed date. Written response submitted. Pass = rule functions correctly AND written response addresses feed refresh and expiry. |
| 8 | Alert Triage and Investigation Workflow | 16 | practice | Students follow a defined triage workflow to investigate a SIEM alert from initial notification through containment recommendation, producing a structured investigation ticket. |
| SIEM instance with pre-staged multi-event scenario dataset, triage template (provided), investigation ticket template (modeled on a simple ticketing system form), CySA+ study guide (incident response chapter) | Instructor reviews completed triage ticket for the guided investigation: all five steps present, at least three supporting evidence items cited from SIEM searches, and a clear containment recommendation. Pass = all five steps completed with cited evidence. |
| 9 | Log Retention, Data Privacy, and Responsible Handling | 10 | theory | Students describe legal and organizational considerations for log data retention, access control, and privacy and apply least-privilege principles to a SIEM role configuration. |
| SIEM instance with user management module, case study handout (instructor-prepared from public sources), retention policy worksheet template, CompTIA Security+ study guide (governance and compliance chapter) | RBAC configuration verified by instructor test login for each role; retention policy worksheet submitted and reviewed for completeness. Pass = all three roles configured correctly AND policy addresses all four required fields. |
| 10 | SIEM Health Monitoring and Performance Tuning | 12 | lab | Students monitor SIEM platform health metrics, identify an ingestion bottleneck in a simulated scenario, and apply a documented fix to restore normal indexing rates. |
| SIEM instance with monitoring module enabled, virtual lab environment, lab notebook, change record template | Students submit the change record; instructor confirms indexing rate returned to baseline and the change record includes all four required fields. Pass = rate restored AND all four fields completed. |
| 11 | Capstone Scenario: End-to-End SIEM Investigation | 24 | lab | Students independently configure a SIEM environment, detect a multi-stage simulated attack using correlation rules and manual investigation, and produce a complete analyst report documenting the incident. |
| SIEM instance, capstone attack dataset (instructor-prepared), analyst report template, ATT&CK Navigator, triage template | Report graded against rubric: all five stages of the attack identified, each stage supported by at least one cited SIEM query, ATT&CK IDs correct, recommendations actionable. Pass = 4 of 5 stages correctly identified with cited evidence AND report submitted on time. |
| 12 | Exam Alignment Review: SIEM Topics in Security+ and CySA+ | 16 | theory | Students connect each major SIEM skill practiced in the course to the corresponding Security+ and CySA+ exam objective and complete a timed practice question set at or above passing standard. |
| CompTIA Security+ and CySA+ official exam objective lists (downloaded from CompTIA.org), practice question bank (instructor-curated or commercial exam prep resource), vocabulary matching worksheet | Practice question set scored immediately; students scoring below 75% must schedule a review session with the instructor before the course knowledge exam. Pass threshold noted for transition to Course 10 exam prep. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIEM Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 70% correct (28 of 40 questions) | A 40-question multiple-choice and scenario-based exam covering SIEM architecture, log normalization, query language concepts, correlation rule logic, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, threat intelligence integration, data retention principles, and platform health monitoring. Questions are written to Security+ and CySA+ exam-style difficulty and format. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Alert Triage Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All five triage steps completed with cited SIEM evidence; containment recommendation rated as reasonable by instructor | The student receives a live SIEM alert in a fresh scenario not used during instruction and must complete the five-step triage workflow within 45 minutes, producing a filled investigation ticket and delivering a two-minute verbal summary of findings. The instructor uses a scored rubric covering completeness, evidence quality, accuracy of ATT&CK mapping, and appropriateness of the recommended action. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Lab Log Portfolio | Log | 15% | At least 10 of 12 lessons represented with complete entries; all three correlation rules documented and functional | Students maintain a running lab log (digital or paper) throughout the course capturing configuration steps, query syntax used, screenshots of key results, tuning decisions, and change records. The complete portfolio is submitted at the end of the course and reviewed for accuracy, completeness, and evidence that the student independently performed each lab task. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Data Handling and Access Control Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | All four RBAC roles verified correct; retention policy contains all required fields; student can verbally explain the purpose of each control without prompting | The instructor conducts a brief practical check by logging into the SIEM as each of the three user roles the student configured and confirming permitted and restricted actions match the defined role; the student's written retention policy is reviewed for completeness; and the instructor asks three oral questions about why these controls matter for privacy and compliance. This check must be passed before the student may proceed to the Incident Response course. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students learn to detect, contain, eradicate, and recover from cybersecurity incidents using industry-standard frameworks and tools. The course covers the full incident response lifecycle, digital forensics fundamentals, and post-incident reporting aligned to CompTIA Security+ and CySA+ exam domains. Hands-on labs simulate realistic breach scenarios so students can practice triage, evidence handling, and stakeholder communication under time pressure.
OutcomesStudents learn to detect, contain, eradicate, and recover from cybersecurity incidents using industry-standard frameworks and tools. The course covers the full incident response lifecycle, digital forensics fundamentals, and post-incident reporting aligned to CompTIA Security+ and CySA+ exam domains. Hands-on labs simulate realistic breach scenarios so students can practice triage, evidence handling, and stakeholder communication under time pressure.
How the course runs. 12 blocks: Incident Response Fundamentals and NIST SP 800-61 Lifecycle; Preparation: Building an Incident Response Plan and Team; Detection and Analysis: Log Review and Alert Triage; Digital Forensics Principles and Evidence Handling; Memory and Disk Imaging Lab; Containment Strategies: Network Isolation and System Quarantine; Malware Analysis Basics and Eradication; Recovery Procedures and System Restoration; Legal, Regulatory, and Notification Requirements; Incident Documentation and Post-Incident Reporting; Threat Intelligence Integration and IOC Sharing; Full Incident Response Simulation Capstone Lab.
What competent looks like. Execute a structured incident response process following the NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle phases: preparation, detection and analysis, containment/eradication/recovery, and post-incident activity. Collect and preserve digital evidence using accepted forensic procedures that maintain chain of custody. Use SIEM alerts, log analysis, and endpoint telemetry to classify and prioritize security incidents. Apply containment and eradication techniques—including network isolation, malware removal, and credential resets—without destroying evidence. Produce a complete incident report and lessons-learned document suitable for technical and executive audiences. Identify legal, regulatory, and notification obligations that apply when a breach involves personal or regulated data.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Incident Response Fundamentals and NIST SP 800-61 Lifecycle | 12 | theory | Students will be able to describe each phase of the NIST SP 800-61 incident response lifecycle and explain how it maps to real-world security events. |
| NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2 (free PDF), SANS Incident Handler's Handbook, whiteboard, slide deck, student notebooks | Quiz of 20 multiple-choice questions covering lifecycle phases, definitions, and roles; passing score 75%. |
| 2 | Preparation: Building an Incident Response Plan and Team | 14 | theory | Students will draft a functional incident response plan (IRP) that defines roles, communication channels, escalation paths, and asset inventory requirements. |
| Sample IRP documents, NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2, role cards, RACI matrix template, word processor | Instructor evaluation of completed IRP draft against a 10-point rubric; minimum score 7/10, covering scope, roles, escalation, and communication matrix. |
| 3 | Detection and Analysis: Log Review and Alert Triage | 16 | lab | Students will analyze firewall, endpoint, and authentication logs to identify indicators of compromise (IOCs) and correctly classify incident severity. |
| Splunk Free or Elastic Stack (lab VMs), sample log files (Windows Event, Syslog, firewall), IOC reference list, triage worksheet template, severity classification matrix | Triage worksheet scored by instructor: correctly classify at least 12 of 15 alerts (80%) with written justification; oral severity defense rated satisfactory or above. |
| 4 | Digital Forensics Principles and Evidence Handling | 14 | theory | Students will explain the legal and procedural requirements for collecting, preserving, and documenting digital evidence so that chain of custody is maintained. |
| NIST SP 800-86 (free PDF), blank chain-of-custody forms, sample case study handouts, whiteboard | Completed chain-of-custody form evaluated against a checklist of 8 required fields; all 8 fields must be correctly completed to pass. |
| 5 | Memory and Disk Imaging Lab | 16 | lab | Students will perform a live memory capture and a bit-for-bit disk image on a lab virtual machine using industry-standard forensic tools, then verify image integrity with a hash. |
| Volatility 3, Autopsy (open-source), FTK Imager Lite, lab VMs (Windows 10/11), USB drives for image storage, acquisition log template | Instructor reviews acquisition log and hash verification output; image hash must match original and log must contain all required fields; pass = all fields complete and hashes match. |
| 6 | Containment Strategies: Network Isolation and System Quarantine | 14 | demo | Students will demonstrate at least three containment techniques—network isolation, firewall rule insertion, and endpoint quarantine—without destroying forensic evidence. |
| VMware Workstation Player or VirtualBox, Windows Server lab VM, pfSense or simulated firewall console, student lab guides, documentation template | Step-by-step competency checklist signed off by instructor: student must successfully complete isolation, rule insertion, and quarantine steps with no evidence destruction; all three steps must pass. |
| 7 | Malware Analysis Basics and Eradication | 14 | lab | Students will perform static and basic dynamic analysis of a provided malware sample in an isolated sandbox environment and produce an eradication plan. |
| Cuckoo Sandbox or Any.Run (free tier), Sysinternals Suite, pre-staged lab VMs with simulated infection artifacts, malware analysis worksheet, student guides | Analysis worksheet and eradication plan reviewed by instructor; must correctly identify at least 4 of 5 planted artifacts and provide a logically ordered eradication sequence to pass. |
| 8 | Recovery Procedures and System Restoration | 12 | practice | Students will restore an affected system to a known-good state following an eradication, verify integrity, and document the recovery process. |
| Lab VMs with snapshots, OpenVAS or Nmap, patch management lab guide, recovery checklist template, student notebooks | Instructor reviews completed recovery checklist and scan output; all checklist items must be marked complete and scan must show no critical open vulnerabilities on the restored system to pass. |
| 9 | Legal, Regulatory, and Notification Requirements | 10 | theory | Students will identify the legal and regulatory notification obligations that apply when a breach involves personal, financial, or health-related data in at least two US regulatory contexts. |
| HHS HIPAA breach notification rule summary, FTC guidance documents, sample state breach notification law summaries (generic), case study handout, student notebooks | Short-answer assessment of 5 scenario questions about notification triggers and general timelines; passing score 80% (4 of 5 correct). |
| 10 | Incident Documentation and Post-Incident Reporting | 14 | practice | Students will produce a complete incident report—including executive summary, technical timeline, root cause analysis, and corrective actions—for a simulated incident scenario. |
| Incident scenario packet, incident report template, timeline worksheet, presentation slides, student notebooks | Incident report evaluated against a 15-point rubric covering timeline accuracy, executive summary clarity, root cause analysis depth, and corrective actions; passing score 11/15. |
| 11 | Threat Intelligence Integration and IOC Sharing | 14 | lab | Students will ingest structured threat intelligence feeds into a SIEM or threat intelligence platform and use IOCs to enrich an active incident investigation. |
| MISP (open-source), MITRE ATT&CK Navigator (browser-based, free), sample STIX/TAXII feed files, lab SIEM instance, ATT&CK worksheet | Instructor verifies ATT&CK mapping worksheet covers at least 5 correctly identified techniques with corresponding mitigations; SIEM correlation rule must fire on a test IOC match to pass. |
| 12 | Full Incident Response Simulation Capstone Lab | 20 | lab | Students will execute a complete, timed incident response from detection through post-incident report for a multi-stage simulated breach, demonstrating competency across all lifecycle phases. |
| Full lab environment (SIEM, VMs, forensic tools, sandbox), incident scenario packet, case log template, incident report template, timing clock | Holistic rubric scored by instructor across five domains: detection accuracy, evidence integrity, containment without evidence loss, eradication completeness, and report quality; minimum 75% overall with no domain scored below 60%. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incident Response Lifecycle Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (38 of 50 questions correct) | A 50-question multiple-choice exam covering NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle phases, incident classification, forensic principles, legal notification requirements, and threat intelligence concepts. Questions are aligned to CompTIA Security+ Domain 4 (Security Operations) and CompTIA CySA+ incident response and vulnerability management objectives. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Forensic Evidence Collection and Incident Containment Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | All critical steps on a 20-point performance checklist completed correctly; no critical step may be failed | The student is given a live lab VM with an active simulated infection and must capture memory, create a verified disk image, isolate the system from the network, and begin an eradication sequence—all while maintaining chain of custody. The instructor observes and scores each step in real time using a standardized checklist. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Incident Response Lab Log Portfolio | Log | 15% | At least 10 of 12 lessons have a complete, accurate lab log entry; overall portfolio score of 80% on the scoring rubric | Students maintain a structured lab log throughout the course recording objectives, tools used, commands executed, results observed, and brief analysis for each hands-on lesson. The portfolio is submitted at course end and evaluated for completeness, technical accuracy, and quality of analysis. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Evidence Handling and Safe Practices Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | All six critical safety and legal handling items marked satisfactory; any unsatisfactory item requires immediate remediation and recheck | The instructor observes the student performing an evidence intake procedure, verifying that chain-of-custody documentation is completed before handling media, no evidence containers are left unattended, hashes are verified before and after imaging, and all sensitive data is stored in a secured location per the lab policy. This check also confirms students follow proper ergonomic and electrical safety practices when handling lab hardware. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students design, build, and defend a comprehensive cybersecurity solution for a simulated small-to-medium enterprise environment, integrating skills from networking, Linux administration, scripting, SIEM configuration, and incident response. The project culminates in a formal technical documentation package and an oral defense panel review, mirroring real-world security analyst deliverables. All work is mapped to CompTIA Security+, CompTIA CySA+, and ISC2 CC competency domains.
OutcomesStudents design, build, and defend a comprehensive cybersecurity solution for a simulated small-to-medium enterprise environment, integrating skills from networking, Linux administration, scripting, SIEM configuration, and incident response. The project culminates in a formal technical documentation package and an oral defense panel review, mirroring real-world security analyst deliverables. All work is mapped to CompTIA Security+, CompTIA CySA+, and ISC2 CC competency domains.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Capstone Scoping, Architecture Design, and Risk Planning; Environment Build, Hardening, and Automation; Vulnerability Assessment, Incident Simulation, and After-Action Documentation; Capstone Defense Preparation and Oral Presentation.
What competent looks like. Design a layered enterprise security architecture that addresses confidentiality, integrity, and availability for a given threat scenario, documenting all design decisions with rationale aligned to recognized security frameworks. Implement and harden a multi-component lab environment including a Linux server, firewall rules, and a SIEM instance, demonstrating configuration accuracy verified by instructor review and automated scan results. Develop and execute a Python or Bash automation script that ingests log data, detects at least two simulated attack patterns, and generates an alert report requiring no manual correction to run. Produce a professional documentation package including a network diagram, security policy, risk register, incident response runbook, and after-action report that meets the formatting and content standards of a junior security analyst role. Conduct and document a structured vulnerability assessment of the capstone environment using an industry-standard scanner, correctly classifying findings by severity and recommending prioritized remediation steps. Present and defend all design and implementation decisions to a panel of evaluators, responding accurately to technical follow-up questions and demonstrating understanding of the credential domains covered throughout the program.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capstone Scoping, Architecture Design, and Risk Planning | 48 | theory | Students produce a complete project scope document and network security architecture plan for a given enterprise scenario, including a risk register with likelihood and impact ratings for at least eight identified threats. |
| Scenario brief handout, STRIDE threat-modeling worksheet, draw.io (free web tool), NIST Cybersecurity Framework summary document, CompTIA Security+ exam objectives (current version), risk register spreadsheet template, word processor | Instructor reviews the scope document and risk register using a rubric; passing standard requires the risk register to contain at least eight threats each rated for likelihood and impact, the network diagram to include at least four distinct security control layers with correct placement, and the scope document to identify measurable success criteria. Score of 80% or higher on the rubric is required to proceed. |
| 2 | Environment Build, Hardening, and Automation | 72 | lab | Students build and harden the virtualized enterprise environment defined in their architecture plan, configure a SIEM to ingest logs from at least three sources, and deliver a working automation script that detects at least two attack signatures in sample log data. |
| Lab workstations with virtualization capability, VirtualBox (free), Ubuntu Server LTS ISO, pfSense or OPNsense ISO, Windows evaluation ISO, Splunk Free or Wazuh OVA, Python 3 interpreter, VS Code or nano, CIS Benchmarks for Linux and Windows (free PDF download from CIS), sample log file set provided by instructor, hardening log template | Instructor runs a checklist-based live verification: firewall must block a test scan from an attacker VM, at least four SIEM rules must fire correctly against the sample log set, and the automation script must produce the correct alert report with zero runtime errors. All three checks must pass, and the hardening log must document at least ten applied controls with control references, to earn a passing mark of 80% on the lab rubric. |
| 3 | Vulnerability Assessment, Incident Simulation, and After-Action Documentation | 54 | practice | Students conduct a structured vulnerability scan of their capstone environment, respond to two instructor-injected simulated incidents using their runbook, and produce a complete documentation package including findings report, incident tickets, and an after-action report. |
| OpenVAS Greenbone Community Edition or Nessus Essentials (free tier), CVSS scoring guide (FIRST.org), incident ticket template from Course 7, vulnerability findings report template, after-action report template, security policy template, PDF export tool, instructor-prepared incident injection scripts | Instructor scores the vulnerability findings report on a rubric requiring correct severity classification of at least 90% of flagged findings and a remediation recommendation for every Critical and High item. Both simulated incidents must be documented in completed tickets with correct timeline, containment actions, and evidence references. The full documentation package must include all seven required documents. A composite score of 80% or higher across the rubric sections is required to sit the oral defense. |
| 4 | Capstone Defense Preparation and Oral Presentation | 42 | demo | Students prepare and deliver a structured 30-minute technical defense of their capstone project to a panel of evaluators, demonstrating the live environment and accurately answering follow-up questions on design decisions, implementation details, and credential domain concepts. |
| Presentation software (LibreOffice Impress or Google Slides), defense rubric, question bank document organized by Security+/CySA+/ISC2 CC domain, live capstone lab environment, projector or large monitor, timer, peer feedback form | Panel scores the defense using the rubric across five categories: presentation clarity and organization, technical accuracy of design decisions, live demonstration success, quality of documentation package (previously graded, confirmed complete), and correctness of responses to panel questions. Each category is scored 1 to 4; a total score of at least 80% is required to pass the defense. A student who scores below 80% may request one remediation opportunity within five business days. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capstone Project: Enterprise Security Build and Documentation Package | Project | 60% | Composite rubric score of 80% or higher across all graded components: architecture plan, hardening log, SIEM configuration verification, automation script, vulnerability findings report, incident tickets, and after-action report | The project assessment evaluates the complete technical deliverable set produced across Lessons 1 through 3, treating the student's virtualized enterprise environment and its accompanying documentation as a unified work product. Evaluators use a criterion-referenced rubric that weights implementation accuracy, documentation completeness, and professional formatting, with any Critical or High vulnerability left unremediated and undocumented counting as an automatic deduction. Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation |
| Professional Portfolio: Integrated Security Documentation Set | Portfolio | 20% | All seven required documents present, correctly formatted, and internally consistent; no document may score below 70% on its individual rubric section, and the overall portfolio must average 80% or higher | The portfolio is the single organized PDF package assembled in Lesson 3, containing the network diagram, security policy, risk register, incident response runbook, two completed incident tickets, and the after-action report. It is evaluated for professional quality, logical consistency across documents, and alignment with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework categories referenced in the scope document, demonstrating that the student can produce work-ready analyst documentation. Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality |
| Oral Defense Panel Review | Oral / panel | 20% | Total panel rubric score of 80% or higher across the five scoring categories; a single live demonstration failure (SIEM or script does not execute) reduces the demonstration category score to zero and requires a remediation attempt | The oral defense is evaluated by a panel of at least two evaluators using the structured rubric during the student's 30-minute formal presentation in Lesson 4. The panel scores presentation quality, technical accuracy of design justifications, success of the live demonstration, portfolio confirmation, and correctness of responses to domain-mapped questions from the Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC question bank, ensuring the student can explain and defend professional-level work under realistic conditions. Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication |
Students complete 324 supervised hours at an approved employer site in a cybersecurity-related role, applying classroom knowledge to live or near-live environments under the direct guidance of a credentialed industry mentor. Work may include security operations center (SOC) support, IT security administration, vulnerability management, or incident response assistance. A structured employer evaluation and a reflective log document professional growth and technical competency across all externship phases.
OutcomesStudents complete 324 supervised hours at an approved employer site in a cybersecurity-related role, applying classroom knowledge to live or near-live environments under the direct guidance of a credentialed industry mentor. Work may include security operations center (SOC) support, IT security administration, vulnerability management, or incident response assistance. A structured employer evaluation and a reflective log document professional growth and technical competency across all externship phases.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Externship Orientation and Site Integration; Operational Security Support Tasks; Applied Security Project or Assigned Initiative; Externship Completion, Employer Evaluation, and Professional Debrief.
What competent looks like. Perform assigned cybersecurity tasks—such as log monitoring, alert triage, user account administration, or vulnerability scanning—under employer supervision, meeting the quality standards set by the host site. Demonstrate professional conduct, punctuality, and communication skills consistent with cybersecurity workplace norms across all 324 externship hours. Apply security policies, access-control principles, and data-handling procedures that align with the host organization's security program. Identify and report potential security incidents or anomalies through the proper escalation channels established by the host employer. Maintain a detailed reflective work log that documents tasks completed, tools used, and lessons learned during each externship phase. Receive a satisfactory or above rating on the employer's end-of-externship evaluation rubric covering technical skills, professionalism, and readiness for entry-level employment.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Externship Orientation and Site Integration | 40 | field | The student will successfully complete all onboarding requirements at the host employer site, demonstrate understanding of site-specific policies and escalation procedures, and begin contributing to assigned tasks within the first 40 hours. |
| Employer onboarding packet; site security policy documents; OSHA general-industry safety guidance for office/data-center environments; work log template (provided by program); individualized learning plan (ILP) form; personal protective equipment if required by site (safety glasses, ESD wrist strap for hardware areas). | Completed and signed ILP submitted to the school coordinator; mentor observation checklist signed by site supervisor confirming student attended all required onboarding sessions; first 40 hours of work log entries reviewed—pass requires legible, accurate daily entries covering tasks observed, tools encountered, and questions raised. |
| 2 | Operational Security Support Tasks | 120 | lab | The student will execute assigned security support tasks—such as monitoring SIEM dashboards, triaging helpdesk security tickets, running credentialed vulnerability scans, reviewing firewall or access logs, or assisting with user provisioning and de-provisioning—accurately and on schedule as directed by the site supervisor. |
| Employer-provisioned workstation and credentials; SIEM platform (site-specific, e.g., Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, or equivalent); vulnerability scanner (e.g., Nessus, Tenable.io, or equivalent) if used at site; ticketing system (e.g., ServiceNow, Jira, or equivalent); work log; one-page meeting summary template. | Site supervisor mid-externship evaluation form completed and returned to school coordinator by hour 160—pass requires a rating of 'Satisfactory' or above in task accuracy, dependability, and communication; work log entries for all 120 hours reviewed for completeness; one-page meeting summary on file. |
| 3 | Applied Security Project or Assigned Initiative | 120 | practice | The student will complete a defined security project or initiative assigned by the host employer—such as drafting or updating a security procedure, conducting a phishing simulation review, building a dashboard, or supporting an internal audit—and deliver a documented output that meets the employer's acceptance criteria. |
| Employer-provisioned tools appropriate to the project (documentation software, SIEM, scanning tools, spreadsheet/reporting tools); project brief template; project journal; CompTIA Security+ and CySA+ exam objectives documents (current versions from CompTIA website) used as reference for domain alignment; ISC2 CC candidate handbook for domain reference. | Employer acceptance of project deliverable confirmed in writing (email or signed form); project journal reviewed by school coordinator—pass requires entries covering at least 80% of working days in this phase; written project summary submitted and reviewed—pass requires clear description of deliverable, honest self-assessment, and accurate mapping to at least two credential exam domain areas. |
| 4 | Externship Completion, Employer Evaluation, and Professional Debrief | 44 | field | The student will finalize all assigned tasks, obtain a completed employer evaluation, return all site-issued equipment and credentials following proper offboarding procedures, and participate in a school-led professional debrief that connects externship experience to career readiness and upcoming certification exam preparation. |
| Employer offboarding checklist; employer final evaluation rubric (school-provided form completed by site supervisor); complete compiled work log (all phases); debrief reflection guide; CompTIA Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC exam objectives documents for domain gap mapping. | Employer final evaluation rubric received with an overall rating of 'Satisfactory' or above—this is the primary pass condition; offboarding checklist signed by site supervisor confirming clean departure; complete work log (all 324 hours) submitted and approved by coordinator; oral debrief completed with documented gap list accepted by coordinator. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employer Worksite Skills Demonstration Evaluation | Skills demonstration | 70% | An overall rating of 'Satisfactory' or above on all major rubric categories (technical task performance, professionalism and conduct, communication, and reliability) as scored by the host site supervisor on the school's standardized employer evaluation form; a single 'Unsatisfactory' rating in any category requires a documented remediation plan and coordinator review before credit is awarded. | The host employer's designated supervisor completes the school's standardized final evaluation rubric at the conclusion of the externship, rating the student across technical skills, professionalism, communication, and employment readiness. This evaluation reflects the full 324-hour placement period and is the primary competency determination for externship credit. Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative |
| Externship Work Log and Project Documentation Portfolio | Log | 30% | All 324 hours of work log entries present, legible, and covering required elements (date, hours, tasks, tools, reflections); project journal covering at least 80% of project-phase working days; project brief, written project summary, and written meeting summary all submitted; oral debrief completed with an accepted gap analysis—any missing component must be remediated and resubmitted within 10 business days of the final externship day. | The student submits the complete work log spanning all four externship phases, together with the project journal, project brief, project written summary, meeting summary, and the debrief gap-analysis document, assembled as a portfolio reviewed by the school externship coordinator. The portfolio provides a verifiable record of hours, tasks, professional growth, and the student's ability to connect workplace experience to credential exam knowledge domains. Complete · Verified |
This course systematically reviews every exam domain covered by the CompTIA Security+, CompTIA CySA+, and ISC2 CC credentials, closing knowledge gaps identified through diagnostic testing and spaced-repetition practice. Learners work through mapped domain content, timed question sets, and full-length simulated exams that mirror the format, item types, and difficulty of each actual certification exam. The course ends with a comprehensive mock-exam session and a personalized final study plan so every student enters the testing center prepared and confident.
OutcomesThis course systematically reviews every exam domain covered by the CompTIA Security+, CompTIA CySA+, and ISC2 CC credentials, closing knowledge gaps identified through diagnostic testing and spaced-repetition practice. Learners work through mapped domain content, timed question sets, and full-length simulated exams that mirror the format, item types, and difficulty of each actual certification exam. The course ends with a comprehensive mock-exam session and a personalized final study plan so every student enters the testing center prepared and confident.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Diagnostic Assessment and Domain Mapping; Domain-by-Domain Content Review: Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC; Performance-Based Questions, Test Strategy, and Exam Logistics; Full Mock Exam Day: Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC Simulation.
What competent looks like. Correctly answer practice questions drawn from all domains of the CompTIA Security+ exam at or above the minimum passing standard on at least two consecutive timed practice sets. Correctly answer practice questions drawn from all domains of the CompTIA CySA+ exam at or above the minimum passing standard on at least two consecutive timed practice sets. Correctly answer practice questions drawn from all domains of the ISC2 CC exam at or above the minimum passing standard on at least two consecutive timed practice sets. Demonstrate test-taking strategies—including elimination technique, performance-based question (PBQ) approach, and time management—by completing a full-length timed mock exam within the allotted window for each credential. Produce a personalized gap-analysis study plan that maps weak domains to targeted resources for continued self-study after the course ends. Complete a cumulative full mock-exam day simulating real testing-center conditions for all three credentials and score at or above the passing threshold on each.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diagnostic Assessment and Domain Mapping | 12 | practice | Learners complete a timed diagnostic practice exam for each of the three credentials and use scored results to produce a personal domain gap-analysis chart that prioritizes their remaining study time. |
| Laptop with internet access; CompTIA CertMaster Practice or equivalent reputable question-bank subscription; ISC2 CC practice question sets (ISC2 official study materials); blank gap-analysis spreadsheet template; timer or online exam simulator with built-in timer. | Instructor reviews each learner's completed gap-analysis chart and study schedule for accuracy and realistic time allocation; pass standard is a submitted, domain-complete chart with at least one priority action listed per flagged domain. |
| 2 | Domain-by-Domain Content Review: Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC | 42 | theory | Learners review all exam domains across the three credentials—covering topics such as threats and vulnerabilities, security architecture, identity management, incident response, security operations, compliance, and risk management—and correctly answer targeted practice questions at the close of each domain block. |
| CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (current exam version, Sybex or Mike Chapple/David Seidl edition); CompTIA CySA+ Study Guide (current exam version); ISC2 CC official candidate resources; Professor Messer free study notes and practice exams (professormesser.com); Jason Dion Udemy practice exams or equivalent; whiteboard; printed domain-objective checklists from CompTIA and ISC2 websites. | Each domain quiz must score 75% or higher; learners who score below 75% on any domain quiz receive a targeted remediation reading assignment and must retest on a fresh 20-question set before the course advances; instructor spot-checks error logs for completeness. |
| 3 | Performance-Based Questions, Test Strategy, and Exam Logistics | 18 | demo | Learners apply structured test-taking strategies—including answer elimination, performance-based question (PBQ) lab simulation navigation, and pacing—to correctly complete mixed-format practice sets under timed, exam-like conditions. |
| CompTIA official demo exam interface (comptia.org); Pearson VUE candidate handbook; ISC2 exam policies page; printed pacing worksheet; exam-day checklist handout (acceptable ID, arrival time, prohibited items, what to expect at check-in); whiteboard for strategy diagrams. | Learners must complete the 30-item timed practice set with a score of 75% or higher and demonstrate appropriate pacing (no more than 25% of items flagged); instructor reviews pacing sheets and discusses any student who flagged more than eight items for time-management coaching. |
| 4 | Full Mock Exam Day: Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC Simulation | 18 | practice | Learners sit three separate full-length timed mock exams—one per credential—under testing-center conditions and produce a final gap-analysis update and personalized post-course study plan based on scores. |
| Exam-simulator platform with full-length tests for all three credentials (e.g., CompTIA CertMaster Practice, Jason Dion practice exams on Udemy, ISC2 official practice questions); blank answer sheets as backup; gap-analysis spreadsheet (updated version from Lesson 1); timer; post-course study plan template. | Pass standard for the mock exam day is a score at or above the published passing threshold (or equivalent percentage benchmark set by the instructor where exact scaled scores are unavailable) on all three full mock exams, or a completed, instructor-approved remediation plan for any exam below threshold; the post-course study plan must be submitted and approved before the learner is cleared as exam-ready. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Mock Certification Exam — Security+, CySA+, and ISC2 CC | Mock certification exam | 100% | Score at or above the instructor-set passing benchmark (aligned to each credential's published passing standard) on all three full-length mock exams, and submit a complete, instructor-approved post-course study plan; learners who fall below threshold on one or two exams may retest on a parallel question set within one week and must score at or above benchmark on the retake to be cleared as exam-ready. | Learners complete three full-length, timed, closed-book mock exams—one each for CompTIA Security+, CompTIA CySA+, and ISC2 CC—administered consecutively under conditions that replicate an actual Pearson VUE or testing-center environment. Scores are reviewed by domain in a one-on-one debrief, and each learner must demonstrate overall readiness through both their exam performance and a written post-course study plan that addresses any remaining weak domains before their scheduled real exam dates. Score · Time management |
Students prepare for and sit the CompTIA Security+, CompTIA CySA+, and ISC2 CC certification exams, administered by Computing Technology Industry Association (CompTIA) and ISC2 respectively at authorized testing centers. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.
Back to Cybersecurity · How the school gets authority to award these credentials
A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working. Help us build VoTechWorks. Tell us what works, what doesn’t, and what you want to learn.