🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Hospitality, Food & Tourism › Culinary Arts › Courses
Hospitality, Food & Tourism · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a certified food-safety manager and industry professional or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Culinary Arts

11 courses · 1,800 clock hours · 9–12 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$19,015 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
11courses
103lessons
1,800hours
39assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons103 of 103 lesson pages writtenPractice823 practice questionsResources113 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 103 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
HOS-CULI27-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Culinary Arts

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips culinary students with the safety protocols, mathematical skills, communication strategies, and career-readiness habits essential for professional kitchen work. Students complete OSHA 10-Hour General Industry training and first aid/CPR certification, practice trade math from recipe scaling to food-cost calculation, and develop the reading, digital, and workplace skills demanded by modern foodservice employers. All content is mapped to the ServSafe Food Handler exam domains and the American Culinary Federation Certified Culinarian competency areas where applicable.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips culinary students with the safety protocols, mathematical skills, communication strategies, and career-readiness habits essential for professional kitchen work. Students complete OSHA 10-Hour General Industry training and first aid/CPR certification, practice trade math from recipe scaling to food-cost calculation, and develop the reading, digital, and workplace skills demanded by modern foodservice employers. All content is mapped to the ServSafe Food Handler exam domains and the American Culinary Federation Certified Culinarian competency areas where applicable.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Kitchen Hazards and OSHA 10-Hour General Industry Certification; First Aid, CPR, and Kitchen Emergency Response; Personal Protective Equipment and Chemical Safety in the Kitchen; Culinary Trade Math: Units, Conversion, and Recipe Scaling; Food-Cost Percentage and Basic Inventory Math; Technical Reading, Digital Tools, and Professional Communication; Career Readiness: Resume, Interview Skills, and Culinary Career Pathways.

What competent looks like. Pass the OSHA 10-Hour General Industry card requirement and demonstrate correct use of personal protective equipment, lockout/tagout procedures, and emergency response protocols in a kitchen context. Apply first aid and CPR procedures for common kitchen emergencies—burns, lacerations, choking, and cardiac arrest—to the standard required for a nationally recognized first aid/CPR card. Perform trade-math calculations including unit conversion, recipe scaling, yield percentage, and food-cost percentage accurately without a calculator error greater than 2 percent. Read and interpret standardized recipes, SDS sheets, equipment manuals, and health-code postings correctly, extracting critical safety and procedural information. Use a point-of-sale system, inventory spreadsheet, and professional email to complete realistic foodservice administrative tasks with professional accuracy and tone. Construct a career portfolio containing a formatted resume, a cover letter, and a completed job application that meets employer standards for entry-level culinary positions.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Kitchen Hazards and OSHA 10-Hour General Industry Certification24theoryStudents will identify the major hazard categories present in commercial kitchens and complete all ten OSHA 10-Hour General Industry modules, earning the DOL wallet card.
  1. Work through all OSHA 10-Hour General Industry online or instructor-led modules in sequence, completing the built-in knowledge checks after each module with a score of 70 percent or higher.
  2. Map each OSHA hazard category (slips/trips/falls, struck-by, electrical, chemical, ergonomics, fire) to specific kitchen equipment and tasks using a provided kitchen-floor diagram, then present findings to a partner.
  3. Practice a full lockout/tagout procedure on a de-energized commercial mixer under instructor supervision, following written OSHA-aligned steps and verifying zero-energy state before clearing the machine.
OSHA 10-Hour General Industry course materials (authorized provider), commercial kitchen floor-plan handout, lockout/tagout kit and tags, SDS binder for common cleaning chemicals, non-slip mats, PPE samples (cut-resistant gloves, non-slip shoes, aprons)Students present the OSHA 10-Hour completion certificate or wallet card; instructor observes a correct lockout/tagout demonstration rated on a 5-point checklist (all 5 steps correct = pass); written hazard-mapping worksheet graded pass/fail with all six hazard categories correctly identified.
2First Aid, CPR, and Kitchen Emergency Response18labStudents will demonstrate correct first aid response for burns, lacerations, and choking, and perform adult CPR with AED use to the standard required for a nationally recognized first aid/CPR card.
  1. Practice adult, child, and infant CPR compressions and rescue breaths on manikins in rotation, with the instructor timing and correcting depth and rate until each student achieves two consecutive correct cycles.
  2. Use an AED trainer to locate, power on, attach pads, and respond to device prompts on a manikin while a partner records elapsed time; debrief against the chain-of-survival framework.
  3. Respond to three instructor-scripted kitchen emergency scenarios in turn—a deep grease burn, a serious laceration from a mandoline, and a conscious-choking call—using a first aid kit, and document actions on an incident report form.
CPR manikins (adult, child, infant), AED trainer units, first aid kit (commercial kitchen configuration), burn gel and sterile dressings, nitrile gloves, face shields, incident-report forms, nationally recognized first aid/CPR curriculum (e.g., American Red Cross or American Heart Association authorized materials)Students must pass the skills station evaluations required by the first aid/CPR provider to earn the card; instructor also scores each emergency-scenario response on a 10-point rubric (7 of 10 required); incident report form must include all required fields completed legibly.
3Personal Protective Equipment and Chemical Safety in the Kitchen10demoStudents will select appropriate PPE for assigned kitchen tasks and read an SDS to identify hazard class, required PPE, and correct spill-response procedure.
  1. Instructor demonstrates donning and doffing cut-resistant gloves, heat-resistant gloves, non-slip footwear, and eye protection while explaining when each is required; students replicate and self-assess against a posted PPE-selection chart.
  2. Students read three kitchen-relevant SDS sheets (a chlorine-based sanitizer, a commercial degreaser, and a CO2 fire-suppression agent) and complete a structured worksheet identifying signal word, hazard statements, first-aid measures, and required PPE for each.
  3. Role-play a sanitizer-spill scenario: student retrieves the correct SDS, selects PPE, follows containment steps, and completes a mock chemical-exposure log entry; peer evaluator uses a checklist.
Assorted PPE items (cut-resistant gloves in multiple sizes, heat-resistant gloves, non-slip clogs, safety glasses), SDS binder with at least five relevant sheets, spill-kit materials (absorbent pads, neutralizing agent, disposal bags), chemical-exposure log template, PPE-selection reference chartStudents score at least 80 percent on a 10-question SDS comprehension quiz; PPE selection checklist completed correctly for all three scenario tasks (instructor signs off); chemical-exposure log entry judged complete and accurate by instructor.
4Culinary Trade Math: Units, Conversion, and Recipe Scaling30theoryStudents will convert between U.S. customary and metric units and scale standardized recipes up or down by a given conversion factor with no more than 2 percent calculation error.
  1. Complete a progressive drill set: first convert between teaspoons, tablespoons, cups, quarts, gallons, ounces, and pounds; then convert those to metric equivalents (milliliters, liters, grams, kilograms) using reference tables and without a calculator, checking answers in pairs.
  2. Scale a provided 10-portion standardized recipe to 35 portions and to 6 portions, showing all conversion-factor arithmetic step by step; instructor checks work before students re-write the scaled recipe in correct format on a recipe card.
  3. Calculate the as-purchased (AP) cost, yield percentage, and edible-portion (EP) cost per pound for three vegetables (onions, broccoli, carrots) using real or simulated invoice prices and trim-loss data measured in class; present findings in a simple cost sheet.
Standardized recipe cards, digital kitchen scales (accurate to 1 g), liquid measuring cups (U.S. and metric), measuring spoon sets, calculators (for checking only), unit-conversion reference chart, blank recipe card templates, sample invoices and trim-loss worksheets, ACF Competency standards handoutMath drill set graded: 80 percent correct required; scaled recipe card checked by instructor—all quantities within 2 percent of correct value; cost sheet shows correct yield percentage and EP cost for all three items with work shown; errors traced and corrected in class before sign-off.
5Food-Cost Percentage and Basic Inventory Math20practiceStudents will calculate food-cost percentage for a menu item and complete a physical inventory count sheet with dollar extensions, producing results consistent with provided control figures.
  1. Given plate cost and selling price data for five menu items, students calculate food-cost percentage for each and identify which items fall within a target range set by the instructor; discuss pricing strategy adjustments in small groups.
  2. Conduct a simulated physical inventory of a storeroom set up with labeled cans, dry goods, and fresh items at assigned par values; students count, record unit of measure and quantity, extend at provided unit prices, and total by category.
  3. Enter inventory data into a pre-built spreadsheet template, use a formula to auto-calculate totals, then compare their spreadsheet total against the instructor's control figure; identify and correct any counting or extension errors.
Simulated storeroom with labeled inventory items, physical inventory count sheets, calculator, computer with spreadsheet software (e.g., Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel), menu-item cost and price data handout, food-cost percentage formula reference cardFood-cost percentage worksheet: all five items calculated correctly (within rounding); inventory count sheet extensions must match control figures within 1 percent total variance; spreadsheet submitted digitally with student name and correct formula visible in at least three cells—instructor signs off.
6Technical Reading, Digital Tools, and Professional Communication26theoryStudents will extract key procedural and safety information from standardized recipes, equipment manuals, and health-code postings, and produce a professional email and a correctly formatted digital document using standard office software.
  1. Read three documents—a standardized recipe, a commercial oven owner's manual section on cleaning, and a posted local health-code temperature log requirement—then answer 10 comprehension questions per document, underlining the evidence in the text.
  2. Compose a professional email requesting a worksite externship placement from a fictional restaurant manager, using correct subject line, salutation, body paragraphs, and signature; peer-review using a provided rubric and revise before submitting to instructor.
  3. Create a one-page daily prep list in a word processor or spreadsheet, incorporating correct par levels, mise en place tasks, and responsible staff assignments from a scenario handout; format with headings, columns, and consistent font—print and submit.
Printed standardized recipes, commercial oven manual excerpt, sample health-code temperature log posting, comprehension question worksheets, computers with word processing and spreadsheet software, professional email rubric, daily prep-list scenario handout, ServSafe Food Handler study guide (for cross-referencing temperature and labeling requirements)Reading comprehension questions: 75 percent correct on each of the three documents; professional email rated 'meets standard' or above on all five rubric categories (purpose, tone, format, grammar, completeness); prep-list document contains all required fields and is formatted consistently—instructor initials each before submission.
7Career Readiness: Resume, Interview Skills, and Culinary Career Pathways20fieldStudents will produce a complete career portfolio—resume, cover letter, and job application—and conduct a mock interview that demonstrates professional presentation aligned with culinary employer expectations.
  1. Research three culinary career pathways (line cook to executive chef, culinary to food-and-beverage management, personal chef/catering entrepreneur) using O*NET Online and ACF's career resources; summarize wage ranges, required credentials, and advancement steps in a one-page career map.
  2. Draft, peer-review, and revise a one-page chronological resume and a targeted cover letter for an entry-level cook position using a provided format guide; instructor provides written feedback and students submit a final version.
  3. Participate in a mock interview with the instructor or an invited industry volunteer, responding to at least five standard culinary-employer questions (availability, food-safety knowledge, teamwork scenarios); receive scored feedback on content, eye contact, attire, and professionalism.
Computer with internet access and word processor, O*NET Online (onetonline.org), ACF career-pathway resources, resume format guide, cover letter template, standard job-application form, mock-interview question bank, interview evaluation rubric, business-casual attire expectation handoutCareer map assessed pass/fail: all three pathways include credential requirements and wage information; resume and cover letter must earn 'meets standard' on all rubric dimensions before portfolio is accepted; mock interview scored on a 20-point rubric—14 of 20 required to pass; students who do not pass the interview complete a second attempt within one week.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Safety and Regulatory Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75 percent correct (38 of 50 questions)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering OSHA hazard categories, lockout/tagout steps, PPE selection, SDS interpretation, first aid priorities, and kitchen chemical safety; questions are drawn from OSHA 10-Hour content, the first aid/CPR curriculum, and ServSafe Food Handler exam domains on personal hygiene and contamination prevention. Students who do not reach 75 percent may re-test once after a documented remediation session.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Trade Math and Communication Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80 percent correct (24 of 30 questions), with no food-cost calculation more than 2 percent from the correct answerA 30-item exam combining unit-conversion problems, recipe-scaling calculations, yield and food-cost percentage problems, and reading-comprehension questions drawn from a standardized recipe and a mock equipment manual excerpt; a short written section requires students to identify the correct professional tone in two sample emails. This exam maps to ACF Certified Culinarian competency areas covering professionalism, communication, and culinary math. One re-test is permitted after documented remediation.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Career Portfolio ProjectProject25%All four required components submitted and each rated 'meets standard' or higher on the departmental rubric; mock interview passed at 14 of 20 or higherStudents submit a complete career portfolio containing a formatted resume, a targeted cover letter, a completed paper job application, and a one-page career map showing three culinary pathways with credential and wage information; the portfolio is evaluated against a four-category rubric (completeness, accuracy, formatting, professional language) and must include evidence of revision from peer and instructor feedback. The mock interview evaluation is attached as the final component of the portfolio.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Safety and Professionalism Oral DefenseOral / panel25%Student must answer at least 4 of 5 instructor questions correctly and receive 'satisfactory' on professional presentationIn a 10-minute one-on-one session, the instructor poses five scenario-based questions drawn from the course—for example, identifying the correct PPE for a chemical spill, explaining the lockout/tagout sequence on a piece of kitchen equipment, or calculating on the spot what yield percentage means for purchasing decisions; the student must respond without notes, demonstrating genuine understanding rather than memorized answers. This oral component reflects the ACF Certified Culinarian standard that candidates demonstrate applied knowledge, not just written recall.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
HOS-CULI27-02 Trade course

Knife Skills: Selection, Technique, and Safe Practice

146 hr · $1,925 COMPLIMENTARY

Students develop professional-level knife handling ability across the full range of classical cuts, blade types, and maintenance tasks used in commercial kitchens. Emphasis is placed on OSHA-aligned safe practices, speed and precision benchmarked to industry standards, and the consistent knife-work accuracy required for ACF Certified Culinarian practical evaluations. Upon completion, students can select, use, sharpen, and store knives safely and efficiently in a professional foodservice environment.

Outcomes
Course text

Students develop professional-level knife handling ability across the full range of classical cuts, blade types, and maintenance tasks used in commercial kitchens. Emphasis is placed on OSHA-aligned safe practices, speed and precision benchmarked to industry standards, and the consistent knife-work accuracy required for ACF Certified Culinarian practical evaluations. Upon completion, students can select, use, sharpen, and store knives safely and efficiently in a professional foodservice environment.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Knife Anatomy, Types, and Selection; Safe Handling, PPE, and OSHA Blade-Tool Standards; The Cook's Grip, Board Control, and Basic Cutting Motions; Honing and Sharpening: Steel, Whetstone, and Edge Maintenance; Precision Cuts I — Julienne, Batonnet, and Allumette; Precision Cuts II — Small, Medium, and Large Dice; Precision Cuts III — Brunoise, Chiffonade, and Paysanne; Specialty Cuts — Tourné, Oblique/Roll Cut, and Rondelle; Fabrication — Whole Chicken Breakdown; Fabrication — Fish Filleting and Skinning; Speed and Consistency Under Timed Conditions; Integration Lab — Mise en Place Production for a Complete Dish.

What competent looks like. Identify and select the appropriate knife or cutting tool for a given task and explain the rationale for that selection. Execute all classical French vegetable cuts—julienne, brunoise, small/medium/large dice, chiffonade, tourné, and paysanne—within industry-standard size tolerances. Demonstrate safe knife-handling practices including proper grip, board stabilization, cutting-motion control, and carry/pass/storage protocols that meet OSHA General Industry guidelines for hand-tool safety. Maintain a knife's edge using a honing steel and whetstone, returning a blade to a working edge acceptable for professional service. Break down fabricated proteins (poultry, fish fillet) and produce items using the correct blade and cutting technique with no avoidable waste. Complete timed precision-cut exercises that meet or exceed ACF Certified Culinarian practical exam benchmarks for uniformity and yield.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Knife Anatomy, Types, and Selection10.5theoryStudents correctly name every major part of a knife and match at least eight blade types to their primary professional applications with 80% accuracy on a written quiz.
  1. Labeled-diagram worksheet: students label tang, spine, bolster, heel, edge bevel, tip, and rivets on a chef's knife cross-section, then self-check against an answer key.
  2. Blade-type matching gallery: a set of twelve knives (chef's, boning, fillet, paring, serrated bread, slicing/carving, tourné, cleaver, Santoku, nakiri, oyster, clam) is laid out; students match each to a task card describing a specific kitchen job.
  3. Group discussion: compare Western/German vs. Japanese blade geometry, steel hardness (Rockwell scale concept without fabricated values), and how those differences affect edge retention, sharpening method, and best use case.
Knife display set (minimum 12 blade types), labeled-diagram worksheets, task cards, ACF Culinary Fundamentals textbook (Pearson), dry-erase boardWritten identification quiz: 20 items (parts + blade-to-task matching); passing score 80% (16/20).
2Safe Handling, PPE, and OSHA Blade-Tool Standards10.5theoryStudents recite and demonstrate all required safe-handling protocols for edged tools—including cut-resistant glove use, safe carry, passing, and storage—with zero critical errors on a safety-check observation form.
  1. OSHA General Industry hand-tool safety reading and guided annotation: students highlight the rules most applicable to knives, then paraphrase each rule in their own words in a safety notebook.
  2. Scenario cards: pairs of students receive a card describing a unsafe knife action (e.g., reaching into a soaking sink, carrying a blade point-out) and must identify the hazard, the likely injury, and the correct practice.
  3. Live demonstration and return demonstration: instructor models correct one-knife carry, the safe knife-pass ('set it down, let them pick it up') rule, and in-rack/in-roll storage; each student performs each behavior once while instructor checks with the safety-check rubric.
Cut-resistant gloves (ANSI/ISEA 105 rated), knife rolls and magnetic strips, knife guards/sheaths, OSHA hand-tool reference handout, safety-check observation rubricInstructor safety-check observation rubric (12 behaviors); all 12 must be performed correctly—any single critical error (e.g., unsheeted blade pointed at another person) requires immediate re-instruction and re-check before the student may proceed to cutting labs.
3The Cook's Grip, Board Control, and Basic Cutting Motions12.5demoStudents apply the pinch grip and the guiding-hand 'bear claw' position to produce consistent, parallel slices from a whole carrot, maintaining blade contact with the guiding-hand knuckle at all times as verified by instructor observation.
  1. Slow-motion instructor demonstration of the pinch grip and bear-claw, projected via document camera; students shadow the motion with an unloaded chef's knife (no food, no cutting surface) and receive corrective feedback.
  2. Guided cutting practice: students slice five carrots into uniform rounds using only the push-cut motion, then switch to the rocking motion; instructor circulates and corrects grip and guiding-hand position in real time.
  3. Peer observation pair: one partner cuts while the other uses a checklist (pinch grip secure? guiding-hand knuckle touching blade? board stable on damp towel?) then roles switch; pairs compare findings.
8–10 inch chef's knives, cutting boards, damp towels for board stabilization, whole carrots (5 per student), peer-observation checklists, document cameraInstructor observes each student complete a set of 12 uniform carrot rounds; pass requires: pinch grip maintained throughout, bear-claw guiding hand in contact with blade at all times, board does not slip—all three criteria must be met.
4Honing and Sharpening: Steel, Whetstone, and Edge Maintenance10.5demoStudents hone a chef's knife on a honing steel and restore an intentionally dulled blade on a two-sided whetstone, producing an edge that cleanly slices a sheet of printer paper without tearing.
  1. Instructor demonstration of honing steel technique (edge-leading vs. edge-trailing strokes, consistent angle) followed by immediate student return demonstration, each student completing 10 strokes per side under observation.
  2. Whetstone progression lab: instructor dulls a set of practice knives using a leather strop dragged backward; students work through coarse-then-fine grit sequence, counting strokes and maintaining a consistent angle aided by an angle guide until the paper-slice test is passed.
  3. Maintenance log entry: students record the date, starting condition of the blade (rough, dull, nicked), steps taken, and results in their knife-skills lab log, creating a maintenance record they will continue throughout the course.
Honing steels (ceramic and ribbed), two-sided whetstones (coarse/fine), angle guides, printer paper for edge-test, honing oil or water (per stone manufacturer), practice chef's knives, lab logsStudent performs paper-slice test after sharpening; blade must slice cleanly through a single sheet without tearing or deflecting—if it tears, student repeats whetstone work and retests. Instructor also checks that the student maintained a safe, consistent angle throughout.
5Precision Cuts I — Julienne, Batonnet, and Allumette14.5labStudents produce a minimum 100 g yield of each cut—allumette (1/8″ × 1/8″ × 2–2½″), julienne (1/8″ × 1/8″ × 2–2½″), and batonnet (¼″ × ¼″ × 2–2½″)—from carrots and zucchini within industry-standard dimensional tolerances measured with a ruler and pass/fail template.
  1. Instructor demonstrates the square-up sequence (top, bottom, four sides) to create a rectangular block, then cuts allumette planks and stacks them for the final stick cut; students replicate the sequence on one carrot before moving to independent practice.
  2. Timed production exercise: students produce 200 g of julienne from carrots in 20 minutes; finished product is measured with a template ruler and any pieces outside tolerance are separated and weighed to calculate a precision percentage.
  3. Error-analysis journaling: students photograph their cuts alongside a ruler, identify the three most common dimensional errors in their own work, hypothesize the cause (e.g., inconsistent plank thickness, wandering guiding hand), and write a one-paragraph correction plan in their lab log.
Chef's knives, cutting boards, rulers and cut-size templates, carrots and zucchini (500 g per student), scale, smartphones or cameras, lab logsInstructor measures a random sample of 20 pieces from each cut; 85% must fall within stated tolerances. Yield must meet or exceed 100 g per cut. Below standard = student re-cuts a second set before the next lesson.
6Precision Cuts II — Small, Medium, and Large Dice14.5labStudents produce all three standard dice sizes—small (¼″ cube), medium (½″ cube), and large (¾″ cube)—from potatoes and onions, with 85% of pieces within stated tolerances and consistent flat-faced cubes (no wedges or trapezoids).
  1. Step-build demonstration: instructor shows how each dice size derives directly from the matching batonnet or stick cut produced in the previous lesson, reinforcing the dimensional hierarchy; students follow along on their own potato.
  2. Triplicate dice production lab: students square up and dice two potatoes into all three sizes sequentially, keeping each size in a labeled container for measurement; instructor gives real-time feedback on cube geometry.
  3. Mise en place efficiency drill: students organize trimmed scraps into a 'trim bowl' and calculate approximate trim percentage by weight; they compare results with a partner and discuss implications for food cost—connecting knife skills to kitchen-operations math.
Chef's knives, paring knives, cutting boards, potatoes (2 per student), onions (1 per student), three labeled containers per student, scale, cut-size templates, lab logsInstructor measures 20-piece sample per size; 85% within tolerance. Cubes must have six flat faces—visible wedges or trapezoids automatically fail that size and require a re-cut set.
7Precision Cuts III — Brunoise, Chiffonade, and Paysanne12.5labStudents produce 60 g each of fine brunoise (1/8″ cube), large brunoise (¼″ cube), chiffonade from basil and spinach (uniform ribbons no wider than 1/8″), and paysanne (½″ × 1/8″ flat pieces) within stated tolerances.
  1. Brunoise micro-precision drill: instructor demonstrates starting from julienne to reach fine brunoise; students cut a small batch, then use a loupe or phone macro lens to check uniformity, recut any outliers, and record observations in their lab log.
  2. Chiffonade technique station: students stack, roll, and slice basil leaves to produce uniform ribbons, checking that ribbons are separated (not clumped) and consistent in width; they repeat with spinach, noting how leaf size affects technique.
  3. Paysanne shape study: students compare paysanne to other flat cuts (rondelle, oblique) using a shape-reference card; they produce each shape from a turnip then plate all four for a side-by-side visual assessment with the instructor.
Chef's knives, paring knives, cutting boards, carrots (brunoise), fresh basil and baby spinach (chiffonade), turnips (paysanne), scale, loupe magnifier or smartphones, shape-reference cards, lab logsInstructor spot-measures 15 pieces per cut; 85% within tolerance. Chiffonade ribbons must be fully separated—a clumped mass counts as a fail for that product and must be redone.
8Specialty Cuts — Tourné, Oblique/Roll Cut, and Rondelle12.5labStudents produce a set of seven tourné-cut vegetables conforming to the classical football shape with seven faces and standard length, and complete oblique and rondelle cuts from a root vegetable with uniform surface area and angle.
  1. Tourné foundation: instructor demonstrates the seven-sided barrel shape on a carrot and potato, emphasizing the wrist rotation required for each face; students practice the motion with a paring knife on foam or potato halves before attempting full cuts.
  2. Tourné production set: each student fabricates seven tourné pieces from potatoes; pieces are lined up and compared side-by-side for height uniformity, shape symmetry, and face count (all seven faces must be present and smooth).
  3. Oblique and rondelle station rotation: students move between two stations, cutting oblique pieces from parsnips (consistent 45° angle, turned between cuts) and rondelles from zucchini (uniform thickness checked with a template); they swap stations at the midpoint.
Paring knives and chef's knives, cutting boards, potatoes (2 per student for tourné), parsnips, zucchini, thickness templates, ruler, lab logsInstructor evaluates tourné set: all 7 pieces must show 7 clean faces, consistent length (within ¼″ of each other), and barrel symmetry. Oblique and rondelle cuts: 85% of 20-piece sample within stated angle and thickness tolerance.
9Fabrication — Whole Chicken Breakdown14.5practiceStudents break down a whole raw chicken into eight standard pieces (2 wings, 2 drumsticks, 2 thighs, 2 bone-in breasts) using a boning knife and chef's knife, meeting a minimum usable-yield percentage consistent with industry standards.
  1. Instructor live breakdown with narrated technique: instructor breaks down one chicken at full speed, then a second time at slow speed with commentary on joint location, blade angle, and where the knife should never be directed (toward the guiding hand); students take notes.
  2. Student breakdown with yield tracking: each student breaks down one chicken, weighing the whole bird before and usable parts after; they calculate yield percentage on a provided worksheet and compare to the class average.
  3. Sanitation reset drill: immediately after fabrication, students perform a full sanitization of their cutting board, knife, and work surface per ServSafe cross-contamination prevention protocol, then inspect each other's stations for compliance before the next student's turn.
Boning knives, chef's knives, whole raw chickens (1 per student, refrigerated), cutting boards (designated raw-poultry boards, color-coded), scale, yield worksheets, food-safe sanitizing solution, paper towels, lab logsInstructor evaluates the eight pieces: joints must be fully separated at the cartilage (no hacked bone), skin intact, yield percentage at or above the industry-standard benchmark for an untrimmed whole bird. Yield below benchmark requires instructor debrief and a second bird if available.
10Fabrication — Fish Filleting and Skinning12.5practiceStudents fillet a whole round fish (e.g., trout or bass) into two boneless, skin-on fillets and then remove the skin from one fillet using correct blade angle and pulling tension, achieving a usable yield consistent with industry expectations for that species.
  1. Fillet-knife orientation: instructor identifies the fillet knife's flex characteristics and demonstrates how flex is used to follow the spine and rib cage; students flex an unloaded fillet knife by hand to develop tactile awareness of blade behavior.
  2. Whole-fish breakdown lab: students score behind the gill plate, run the blade along the backbone, and lift two fillets from one whole fish; instructor checks that the backbone is visibly clean (minimal meat left) before students proceed to skinning.
  3. Skinning technique and pin-bone check: students skin one fillet using the correct grip (skin held taut, blade angled slightly downward), then run fingertips along the fillet to locate and remove pin bones with fish tweezers; they record yield and note any technique issues in their lab log.
Fillet knives, chef's knives, whole round fish (1 per student, refrigerated), designated raw-fish cutting boards, fish tweezers, scale, yield worksheets, lab logs, sanitizing solutionInstructor inspects each fillet: backbone must be visibly clean, fillet skin unbroken on skin-on piece, no pin bones detectable by finger-sweep on the skinned fillet. Yield at or above species benchmark. Any missed pin bones = re-check and removal required before sign-off.
11Speed and Consistency Under Timed Conditions10.5practiceStudents complete a standardized timed cutting exercise—producing small dice, julienne, and chiffonade from a mixed vegetable set—within a professional time standard while maintaining 80% precision compliance, simulating ACF practical exam conditions.
  1. Benchmark run with video review: students complete the full timed set once while being filmed on a tablet; they watch their own footage and annotate a self-assessment form identifying one grip issue, one motion inefficiency, and one precision error to target in the next attempt.
  2. Deliberate practice rounds: students repeat the timed set twice more, each time applying one specific correction identified in self-assessment; instructor circulates and gives 30-second targeted coaching between rounds rather than full intervention.
  3. Mock-exam simulation: under silent, exam-like conditions (no coaching, timer visible), students complete the full set a final time; products are measured and timed simultaneously to generate a combined speed-and-precision score.
Chef's knives, paring knives, cutting boards, mixed vegetables (carrots, zucchini, basil — pre-weighed sets per student), kitchen timers, tablets or smartphones for video, cut-size templates, self-assessment forms, lab logsProducts measured by instructor: 80% precision compliance across all three cuts within the stated time window. Below standard on either metric = student repeats the mock-exam set at the next available lab session before the final skills demonstration.
12Integration Lab — Mise en Place Production for a Complete Dish10.5labStudents independently produce a complete mise en place comprising at least four different classical cuts from a provided recipe specification card within a set time, demonstrating selection, technique, maintenance, and sanitation skills together without instructor prompting.
  1. Recipe-card analysis: students receive a spec card for a composed dish (e.g., a vegetable minestrone with brunoise aromatics, julienne garnish, chiffonade herb finish, and large-dice potato) and write a cut plan listing each knife they will use, the sequence of cuts, and any sharpening or honing needed before starting.
  2. Full mise en place production: students execute their plan independently, setting up their station with damp board towel, proper PPE, and organized trim bowls before the timer starts; instructor observes without intervening except for safety.
  3. Station debrief and portfolio entry: after production, students photograph their finished mise en place, weigh each cut container, complete a yield and self-assessment form, and add photographs, weight data, and reflections to their lab log as a capstone entry for the course.
Chef's knives, paring knives, boning knife (if proteins included in spec), honing steel, cutting boards, damp towels, full vegetable set per student per recipe spec card, scale, labeled containers, camera or smartphone, lab logs, sanitizing suppliesInstructor uses a holistic rubric covering: correct knife selection (all four cuts), precision (85% of measured pieces in tolerance), sanitation protocol followed throughout, time on task (within stated window), and lab log entry complete. All five criteria must be rated 'meets standard' for a pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Knife Knowledge Written ExamWritten exam25%80% (40/50 points)A 50-question written exam covering knife anatomy, blade-type identification and selection, honing and sharpening procedures, OSHA hand-tool safety rules, cross-contamination prevention for raw proteins, and the dimensional specifications of all classical cuts studied in the course. Questions are drawn from theory lessons 1, 2, and 4 and map to the ACF Certified Culinarian knowledge domain covering tools, equipment, and food safety.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Precision Cuts Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%85% precision compliance on each of four required cuts; all five rubric criteria rated 'meets standard'Under timed, exam-like conditions the student produces small dice, julienne, chiffonade, and tourné from a specified vegetable set; the instructor measures a 20-piece sample from each cut against dimensional templates and evaluates knife grip, guiding-hand position, honing before starting, and safe station setup. This assessment directly mirrors the hands-on practical component of the ACF Certified Culinarian evaluation and serves as the primary performance gate for the course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Log PortfolioLog15%All 12 lesson entries present and complete; average self-assessment quality score of 3/4 or higher across entriesStudents submit their cumulative lab log containing dated entries for all 12 lessons, including photographs or sketches of finished cuts, yield weights, maintenance records from honing and sharpening work, yield calculations for protein fabrication, and written reflections on errors and corrections. The log demonstrates habit of documentation and reflective practice—skills reinforced throughout the ACF credentialing framework and required for the capstone project in a later course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety and Sanitation Observation CheckSafety audit15%12/12 safety behaviors correct; zero critical violations; any critical violation requires immediate remediation and re-checkUsing a standardized 12-item observation rubric, the instructor evaluates each student's live performance of the full safety protocol: pinch grip, bear-claw guiding hand, board stabilization, safe carry, knife-pass protocol, PPE use, color-coded board selection for raw proteins, sanitizing sequence after raw-protein contact, and correct knife storage. This check is aligned with ServSafe Food Handler cross-contamination and personal hygiene standards and must be passed before the student may receive a course completion signature.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-CULI27-03 Trade course

Stocks, Sauces, and Classical Sauce Work

146 hr · $1,925 COMPLIMENTARY

Students master the preparation of professional-quality stocks and the five French mother sauces, then extend those foundations into small sauces, pan sauces, and contemporary reductions used in commercial kitchens. Lessons integrate food-safety temperature control, mise en place discipline, and yield mathematics aligned with ServSafe and ACF Certified Culinarian exam content.

Outcomes
Course text

Students master the preparation of professional-quality stocks and the five French mother sauces, then extend those foundations into small sauces, pan sauces, and contemporary reductions used in commercial kitchens. Lessons integrate food-safety temperature control, mise en place discipline, and yield mathematics aligned with ServSafe and ACF Certified Culinarian exam content.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Stock Fundamentals: Ingredients, Function, and Food Safety; White Stocks: Chicken and Fish Fumét; Brown Stocks: Veal and Brown Chicken (Fond Brun); Vegetable Stock and Remouillage; Espagnole and Demi-Glace; Béchamel and Velouté: White Mother Sauces; Sauce Tomat and Contemporary Tomato Sauces; Hollandaise and Emulsified Butter Sauces; Small Sauces Derived from Mother Sauces; Pan Sauces, Deglazing, and Modern Reductions; Culinary Math for Stocks and Sauces: Yield, Cost, and Scaling; Production Integration, Quality Control, and Practical Review.

What competent looks like. Produce clear brown and white stocks meeting professional clarity, flavor, and yield standards from raw bones and aromatics. Prepare each of the five classical mother sauces—béchamel, velouté, espagnole, sauce tomat, and hollandaise—to textbook consistency and flavor. Derive at least six classical small sauces from appropriate mother sauces, demonstrating correct finish techniques. Apply HACCP temperature controls throughout stock and sauce production, including safe cooling of large-volume liquids. Calculate recipe yield, cost per portion, and scaling conversions using standard culinary math for stocks and sauces. Demonstrate proper mise en place, labeling, dating, and storage of stocks and sauces in compliance with food-safety regulations.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Stock Fundamentals: Ingredients, Function, and Food Safety10theoryStudents will identify the four components of a stock, explain their culinary function, and state the HACCP rules for cooling and storing large-volume liquids.
  1. Annotated diagram exercise: students label bones, mirepoix, bouquet garni, and liquid on a printed stock-component chart and write one sentence per component explaining its role.
  2. Group review of ServSafe temperature danger zone rules applied to stocks, including the two-stage cooling method; students fill in a cooling-log template with required time-temperature checkpoints.
  3. Reading and Q&A using a standard culinary textbook chapter (e.g., On Cooking or Professional Cooking) covering stock classification, with a 15-question guided-reading quiz.
Culinary textbook (On Cooking or Professional Cooking), printed stock-component diagrams, ServSafe Manager textbook, blank HACCP cooling log templates, whiteboardGuided-reading quiz scored at 75% or higher; cooling-log template completed correctly with all time-temperature checkpoints filled in.
2White Stocks: Chicken and Fish Fumét14labStudents will produce a clear, flavorful chicken white stock and a fish fumét, each meeting standard clarity, aroma, and volume-yield targets.
  1. Mise en place drill: students scale and cut mirepoix, blanch chicken bones, and assemble bouquet garni before the instructor demo begins.
  2. Supervised production of chicken white stock and fish fumét in small groups; students monitor simmering temperature with thermometers every 30 minutes and record readings on a production log.
  3. Clarity and flavor evaluation: students strain finished stocks, hold a ladle to light to assess clarity, taste against instructor benchmark, and record observations on a sensory rubric.
Chicken frames, fish bones, mirepoix vegetables, bouquet garni components, stockpots (12 qt and 20 qt), china caps, cheesecloth, ladles, probe thermometers, production log sheets, storage containers, labelsStock passes visual clarity check (instructor holds sample to light with no visible cloudiness) and instructor taste evaluation; cooling log shows product reached safe temperature within required timeframes; pass requires meeting all three criteria.
3Brown Stocks: Veal and Brown Chicken (Fond Brun)14labStudents will roast bones and aromatics to develop fond and produce a rich, mahogany-colored brown veal or chicken stock to professional flavor and clarity standards.
  1. Roasting technique demo and practice: students roast bones at proper oven temperature, monitor for golden-to-mahogany color, and deglaze roasting pans to capture fond.
  2. Full brown stock production: students build the stock, skim scum during the first 30 minutes, maintain a gentle simmer, and record temperatures and observations every 45 minutes.
  3. Yield calculation exercise: students measure starting liquid volume and finished volume, calculate percent yield, and compare against the textbook benchmark for brown stock.
Veal knuckle bones or chicken backs, mirepoix, tomato paste, bouquet garni, sheet pans, roasting pans, stockpots, probe thermometers, sheet of fat-skimming instructions, graduated pitchers, yield calculation worksheetBrown stock achieves instructor-assessed rich brown color and deep flavor; yield calculation worksheet is accurate within 5% of actual measured yield; pass requires both criteria met.
4Vegetable Stock and Remouillage8labStudents will produce a balanced vegetable stock and a remouillage from spent bones, explaining the cost and sustainability rationale for each.
  1. Ingredient selection activity: from a provided list of vegetables, students identify which should be avoided in vegetable stock (e.g., starchy or cruciferous vegetables that cloud or bitter the liquid) and justify each choice in writing.
  2. Supervised production of vegetable stock with attention to simmer time limits to prevent bitterness; students also make a remouillage from the brown-stock bones from the previous lesson.
  3. Side-by-side tasting and cost comparison: students taste primary stock vs. remouillage, document flavor differences on a sensory sheet, and calculate cost-per-quart for each.
Assorted vegetables (onion, leek, celery, carrot, mushroom stems, parsley), stockpots, spent brown stock bones, probe thermometers, cost-per-unit ingredient price list, sensory evaluation sheetsVegetable stock is assessed as clear and balanced (no bitterness) by instructor tasting; cost calculation is mathematically accurate; pass requires both met.
5Espagnole and Demi-Glace14labStudents will prepare sauce espagnole and reduce it with remouillage to produce demi-glace that coats a spoon and passes instructor flavor evaluation.
  1. Brown roux production: students make a brown roux in a heavy saucepan, monitoring color stages from blonde to peanut butter to brick using a color reference card, and discuss the effect of roux color on thickening power.
  2. Espagnole assembly: students combine brown roux, brown stock, tomato product, and mirepoix; students skim, strain, and taste against instructor benchmark at the 90-minute mark.
  3. Demi-glace reduction: students combine espagnole with remouillage in equal parts and reduce by half; nappe test performed with a spoon; students document start and finish volumes to calculate percent reduction.
Brown stock (from prior labs), remouillage, clarified butter, bread flour, tomato paste or purée, mirepoix, bouquet garni, heavy-bottomed saucepans, wooden spoons, ladles, china cap, cheesecloth, spoons for nappe test, reduction log worksheetDemi-glace coats the back of a spoon cleanly (nappe test), has deep savory flavor per instructor evaluation, and reduction percentage is documented; pass requires all three criteria.
6Béchamel and Velouté: White Mother Sauces12labStudents will prepare béchamel and a chicken velouté, demonstrating correct roux ratio, lump-free texture, and proper seasoning.
  1. Roux ratio drill: using a recipe card, students calculate the correct weight of butter and flour for one quart of each sauce and check their math with the instructor before beginning production.
  2. Parallel production: student pairs produce béchamel and chicken velouté simultaneously, tempering hot milk or stock into roux to prevent lumps; students taste, adjust seasoning, and strain.
  3. Consistency and texture evaluation: students ladle each sauce onto a cold white plate, observe coating and flow, and score themselves against a written rubric covering color, body, and flavor; instructor validates scores.
Whole milk, chicken white stock, unsalted butter, bread flour, onion piqué (for béchamel), salt, white pepper, nutmeg, heavy-bottomed saucepans, balloon whisks, ladles, fine-mesh strainer, white plates, recipe cards, sensory rubric sheetsBoth sauces are smooth and lump-free (visual and palate check by instructor), correctly seasoned, and student self-evaluation rubric is completed; pass requires instructor confirmation of smooth texture and acceptable seasoning on both sauces.
7Sauce Tomat and Contemporary Tomato Sauces10labStudents will prepare the classical sauce tomat and compare it to an uncooked modern tomato coulis, analyzing how technique affects flavor, color, and texture.
  1. Classical sauce tomat production: students render salt pork, sweat aromatics, add tomatoes and white stock, simmer, then pass through a food mill; students monitor consistency and season to taste.
  2. Modern tomato coulis preparation: students blanch, peel, seed, and purée fresh tomatoes; season; and serve uncooked alongside the classical sauce for side-by-side tasting.
  3. Written reflection: students complete a one-page comparison worksheet documenting differences in color, texture, acidity, body, and appropriate menu applications for each sauce.
Canned whole tomatoes, fresh plum tomatoes, salt pork or rendered lard, mirepoix, garlic, white stock or water, olive oil, food mill, blender or immersion blender, fine-mesh strainer, saucepans, tasting spoons, comparison worksheetClassical sauce tomat passes instructor nappe and flavor check; comparison worksheet addresses all five criteria with plausible reasoning; pass requires both criteria met.
8Hollandaise and Emulsified Butter Sauces12demoStudents will prepare hollandaise and a béarnaise derivative using correct tempering and emulsification technique, identifying and correcting a broken sauce.
  1. Instructor demo: step-by-step hollandaise preparation with narrated explanation of egg-yolk protein coagulation and emulsification; students take structured notes using a provided outline.
  2. Supervised student production of hollandaise in pairs over double boilers; each pair intentionally breaks their sauce and then re-emulsifies it using a cold-bowl or warm-water correction method.
  3. Béarnaise derivative: students prepare a tarragon-shallot reduction and fold into hollandaise base to produce béarnaise; students identify two menu pairings for each sauce on a pairing card.
Egg yolks, clarified butter, lemon juice, white wine, tarragon, shallots, white peppercorns, double boilers or bain-marie, balloon whisks, probe thermometers, ladles, cheesecloth, ice bath, pairing cardsHollandaise and béarnaise hold emulsification for at least 10 minutes, coat a spoon, and pass instructor flavor evaluation; student demonstrates intentional break and successful re-emulsification; pass requires all three criteria.
9Small Sauces Derived from Mother Sauces16practiceStudents will derive at least six classical small sauces from the correct mother sauces, applying correct flavoring ingredients and finishing techniques.
  1. Sauce family mapping activity: working from a provided derivative chart, students identify the mother sauce and required additions for suprême, allemande, mornay, bordelaise, chasseur, and sauce Robert, then state the finishing technique (reduction, addition, straining) for each.
  2. Station rotation production: students rotate through three stations over two class sessions producing two small sauces each; instructor evaluates each sauce before student moves to the next station.
  3. Plated tasting panel: all six small sauces are presented simultaneously on labeled ramekins; students and instructor taste, and students complete a written self-assessment noting what they would adjust and why.
Pre-made mother sauces (from prior labs or freshly produced), finishing ingredients (mushrooms, cream, sherry, red wine, herbs, Dijon mustard, Gruyère, tarragon, shallots), saucepans, fine-mesh strainer, ladles, ramekins, derivative chart handout, self-assessment formAt least five of six small sauces pass instructor flavor and consistency evaluation; self-assessment form completed with specific, accurate adjustment notes; pass requires five of six sauces approved.
10Pan Sauces, Deglazing, and Modern Reductions12labStudents will build a pan sauce by deglazing fond, mounting with butter, and reducing to nappe consistency without the use of starch thickeners.
  1. Fond identification exercise: students sauté chicken thighs, remove protein, and observe fond development; instructor explains the Maillard reaction and its flavor contribution to pan sauces.
  2. Pan sauce production: students deglaze the pan with wine, add shallots and stock, reduce to nappe, and monte au beurre; they document the volume at each reduction stage on a reduction log.
  3. Variation practice: students repeat the process using a second protein (pork or duck breast) and a different deglazing liquid (brandy or cider), then present both sauces to the instructor with verbal explanation of technique choices.
Chicken thighs, pork loin or duck breast, white and red wine, brandy or hard cider, shallots, unsalted butter (cold, cubed), brown or chicken stock, sauté pans, reduction log worksheet, probe thermometers, ladlesBoth pan sauces coat a spoon cleanly with no starchy mouthfeel; student accurately describes deglazing and butter-mounting steps verbally to instructor; pass requires sauce texture approval and correct verbal explanation.
11Culinary Math for Stocks and Sauces: Yield, Cost, and Scaling10theoryStudents will calculate recipe cost per portion, percent yield, and scaled recipe quantities for stocks and sauces accurate to within 5%.
  1. Worked example walkthrough: instructor demonstrates calculating food cost per quart of brown stock using a provided ingredient price sheet; students repeat the calculation independently for chicken white stock.
  2. Yield percent worksheet: students weigh raw mirepoix, trim, and cut, then calculate yield percentage; they apply the formula to determine how much raw vegetable to order for a 50-quart batch.
  3. Scaling exercise: given a base recipe for béchamel that yields two quarts, students scale up to 12 quarts and down to one pint, show all conversion factors, and verify units (oz, lb, qt, gal).
Printed ingredient price sheets, kitchen scales, yield calculation formula reference card, scaling worksheet, calculators, culinary math textbook reference chapterAll three worksheet tasks completed with calculations accurate to within 5% of instructor answer key; pass requires 75% of total points on the combined worksheet.
12Production Integration, Quality Control, and Practical Review14labStudents will independently plan and execute a full sauce station producing two mother sauces and two small sauces within a timed service window, meeting quality and food-safety standards.
  1. Mise en place planning: each student writes a production timeline covering all four sauces, identifying which stocks are needed, roux ratios, and HACCP checkpoints, before any cooking begins; instructor approves plan before student proceeds.
  2. Timed independent production: students execute their plan alone within a 90-minute window, producing two mother sauces and two small sauces of their choice; instructor observes without intervening except for safety issues.
  3. Formal tasting and debrief: instructor evaluates all four sauces against a standardized rubric covering flavor, consistency, color, and seasoning; student verbally defends technique choices and proposes corrections for any sauce that falls short.
All stocks (pre-labeled from prior labs or freshly produced), full sauce station mise en place, probe thermometers, timer, cooling racks, HACCP logs, standardized tasting rubric, production timeline templateAt least three of four sauces score passing marks on the standardized rubric; all HACCP checkpoints documented correctly; production timeline was followed with no safety violations; pass requires all three criteria met.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Stocks and Sauces Written ExamWritten exam25%75% or higherA 50-question written exam covering stock classification, mother sauce families, derivative sauce identification, HACCP temperature rules for stocks, and culinary math including yield and cost calculations. Questions include multiple choice, matching, and short-answer items drawn from lesson content and mapped to ACF Certified Culinarian exam topic areas for cooking theory and food science.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Mother Sauce Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Score of at least 70 out of 100 on the standardized rubric, with no critical food-safety failuresEach student independently produces two assigned mother sauces and one small-sauce derivative within a set time window; the instructor evaluates flavor, consistency, color, seasoning, and correct technique using a standardized 100-point rubric. Any critical food-safety failure (temperature abuse, cross-contamination) results in automatic failure regardless of overall score, directly supporting ACF Certified Culinarian practical competency requirements.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Production Lab Log PortfolioLog15%All 10 production lab entries submitted; average score of 75% or higher across entriesStudents maintain a lab log for every production lesson, recording mise en place lists, time-temperature readings, yield calculations, sensory observations, and corrective actions taken. Entries are evaluated for completeness, accuracy of recorded data, and quality of written reflection; the portfolio is submitted at the end of the course and serves as evidence of consistent professional practice.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Food Safety and Sanitation Compliance CheckSafety audit15%Zero critical violations; all items scored satisfactoryDuring the final integration lab, the instructor completes a standardized food-safety observation checklist covering personal hygiene, proper use of probe thermometers, two-stage cooling procedure, correct labeling and dating of stored stocks and sauces, and handwashing compliance. Any critical violation (temperature abuse, bare-hand contact with ready-to-eat food) requires the student to repeat the practical portion; this assessment is directly aligned with ServSafe Food Handler certification competencies.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-CULI27-04 Trade course

Garde Manger: Cold Kitchen Fundamentals

146 hr · $1,925 COMPLIMENTARY

Students master the classical and contemporary cold kitchen, covering charcuterie, salads, forcemeats, cold sauces, cured and smoked proteins, cheese service, and buffet presentation. Instruction integrates food-safety principles aligned with ServSafe standards and production skills that support the ACF Certified Culinarian exam competencies in cold-food preparation and professional presentation.

Outcomes
Course text

Students master the classical and contemporary cold kitchen, covering charcuterie, salads, forcemeats, cold sauces, cured and smoked proteins, cheese service, and buffet presentation. Instruction integrates food-safety principles aligned with ServSafe standards and production skills that support the ACF Certified Culinarian exam competencies in cold-food preparation and professional presentation.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Introduction to the Cold Kitchen: History, Organization, and Safety; Cold-Kitchen Math: Yield, Scaling, and Recipe Costing; Salads, Dressings, and Cold Emulsified Sauces; Curing Fundamentals: Salt, Sugar, and Dry-Cure Principles; Forcemeats: Straight, Country-Style, and Mousseline; Terrines, Pâtés, and Galantines; Smoking and Cured Proteins: Hot and Cold Techniques; Cheese: Selection, Service, and Pairing; Canapés, Hors d'Oeuvres, and Finger Foods; Buffet Centerpieces and Display Principles; Integrated Garde Manger Production: Cold Station Simulation; Credential Review: Garde Manger Competencies for ACF CC and ServSafe.

What competent looks like. Fabricate and present a minimum of four classical charcuterie items—including a terrine, pâté, and cured or smoked protein—meeting ACF professional standards for flavor, texture, and appearance. Prepare a minimum of six cold sauces and emulsified dressings, correctly identifying the role of emulsifiers and adjusting seasoning to a passing score on a blind tasting rubric. Apply HACCP-based temperature and time controls throughout cold-kitchen production, consistently keeping cold foods at or below 41 °F (5 °C) and documenting compliance in a daily production log. Construct a composed buffet display—including a centerpiece, charcuterie board, canapés, and salads—that meets a written presentation rubric scored by the lead instructor. Demonstrate safe operation of all garde manger equipment (slicers, vacuum sealers, smokers, mandolines) including proper guarding, cleaning, and lockout procedures before each practical exam. Accurately cost and scale garde manger recipes using yield percentages and batch-conversion math, producing written recipe cards with correct EP/AP weights and per-portion costs.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Introduction to the Cold Kitchen: History, Organization, and Safety10.5theoryStudents explain the garde manger station's role, classical brigade structure, and OSHA-required safety practices specific to cold-kitchen equipment.
  1. Guided reading and class discussion of the garde manger chapter in a professional culinary textbook, followed by a written comparison of the classical brigade to a modern cold-kitchen team.
  2. Instructor-led walkthrough of the cold kitchen identifying every piece of equipment, its hazard class, required PPE, and the lockout/tagout point; students complete a hazard identification worksheet.
  3. Small-group scenario exercise: students receive a mock health-department inspection report with cold-storage and cross-contamination violations and propose corrective actions tied to ServSafe principles.
Culinary textbook (e.g., Professional Cooking, Gisslen, current edition), OSHA lockout/tagout poster, ServSafe Manager handbook, garde manger equipment list, hazard identification worksheetScore ≥ 75% on a 20-question written quiz covering brigade roles, equipment hazards, OSHA lockout/tagout steps, and ServSafe cold-holding temperatures.
2Cold-Kitchen Math: Yield, Scaling, and Recipe Costing8.5theoryStudents calculate yield percentage, EP/AP weights, batch conversions, and per-portion cost for garde manger recipes with ≥ 90% arithmetic accuracy.
  1. Instructor demonstration of yield-percentage calculation using a whole prosciutto leg; students weigh AP and EP samples, record data, and compute yield percentage on a structured worksheet.
  2. Paired practice: students receive four raw garde manger recipes and convert each to a different batch size, showing all conversion factors and adjusted ingredient weights.
  3. Individual costing exercise using a provided price list; students calculate total recipe cost and per-portion cost for a composed salad, a terrine, and a canapé tray and enter results in a formatted recipe card.
Digital portion scale, calculator, Excel or Google Sheets template, price list handout, blank recipe card forms, culinary math reference (e.g., Math for the Professional Kitchen, Dreesen et al.)Score ≥ 90% on a 15-problem math quiz covering yield percentage, batch conversion, and per-portion costing; any error that would cause a food-safety or financial loss greater than 10% triggers a mandatory retake.
3Salads, Dressings, and Cold Emulsified Sauces13labStudents prepare and correctly dress a minimum of four salad styles and three emulsified sauces—including mayonnaise and vinaigrette—that pass a tasting rubric for flavor balance, texture, and temperature.
  1. Instructor demo of permanent emulsion (mayonnaise) and temporary emulsion (vinaigrette) side-by-side; students identify each emulsifier, ratio, and breaking point through guided questioning.
  2. Lab production: each student independently produces hand-made mayonnaise, a broken-and-rescued vinaigrette, Caesar dressing, and one composed salad (e.g., Niçoise or Waldorf), plating each for evaluation.
  3. Blind tasting rotation: students evaluate each other's dressings against a four-criterion rubric (seasoning, emulsion stability, coating consistency, temperature) and record scored feedback.
Mixing bowls, whisk, immersion blender, salad spinner, cutting board, digital thermometer, whole eggs, oils (neutral and olive), acids (vinegar, lemon), greens and salad components, tasting rubricTasting rubric score ≥ 75% on all four criteria; mayo must hold emulsion for at least 10 minutes at 41 °F; any item held above 41 °F at service is an automatic failure requiring redo.
4Curing Fundamentals: Salt, Sugar, and Dry-Cure Principles10.5demoStudents explain the science of osmosis in curing, accurately calculate a dry-cure formula for a given protein weight, and apply a cure blend under instructor supervision.
  1. Instructor lecture with whiteboard diagrams on osmosis, water activity, and how salt concentration inhibits microbial growth; students take structured notes and answer guided questions.
  2. Instructor demo: preparation and application of a dry cure for salmon gravlax and a pork belly; students record the formula ratios, cure-application technique, and expected curing time based on protein thickness.
  3. Students calculate a scaled dry-cure formula for a 3 lb (1.36 kg) salmon fillet, weigh cure ingredients on a digital scale to ± 1 g, apply the cure, wrap, label with date/time/expected finish, and store under HACCP monitoring.
Kosher salt, curing salt (as appropriate to recipe), sugar, digital scale (± 1 g), vacuum bags or plastic wrap, refrigerator with thermometer, HACCP log sheets, ServSafe handbook (curing section)Cure formula calculation checked by instructor for ≥ 95% accuracy; product labeled correctly (item, date, time, expected completion, student name); refrigerator temperature documented at 38–40 °F at time of storage.
5Forcemeats: Straight, Country-Style, and Mousseline15labStudents independently produce one straight forcemeat and one mousseline that achieve correct bind, seasoning, and texture as evaluated on a standardized rubric.
  1. Instructor demo of three forcemeat types—straight-method pork, country-style with garnish, and mousseline—highlighting fat-to-protein ratios, temperature control (keeping all components below 40 °F), and the quenelle test.
  2. Lab: students produce a straight-method chicken forcemeat using chilled grinder plates and bowl, perform a quenelle test, adjust seasoning, and document fat percentage and processing temperatures on a production sheet.
  3. Lab continuation: students convert the straight forcemeat into a mousseline by folding in cream over ice; students perform a second quenelle test, plate a 2 oz portion for instructor tasting, and clean grinder following the manufacturer's lockout procedure.
Meat grinder with chilled plates and dies, food processor, mixing bowl over ice bath, digital instant-read thermometer, pork or chicken and pork fatback, heavy cream, binder (eggs, bread), seasoning, quenelle spoons, production sheet, sanitation solutionQuenelle holds shape without crumbling or excess moisture; seasoning rated ≥ 3/5 on blind tasting; processing temperature log shows product stayed ≤ 40 °F throughout; grinder lockout procedure observed by instructor before cleaning.
6Terrines, Pâtés, and Galantines15labStudents assemble, bake en bain-marie, and unmold a country-style terrine that slices cleanly, holds its shape, and earns a score of ≥ 75% on a four-criterion evaluation rubric.
  1. Instructor demo of terrine assembly: lining the mold with fatback or plastic wrap, layering forcemeat and garnish, pressing, and sealing; students diagram the cross-section showing each layer and its function.
  2. Lab: each student lines a terrine mold, fills with pre-made country-style forcemeat (from Lesson 5), adds a garnish inlay, covers, bakes en bain-marie to an internal temperature of 160 °F, weights, chills overnight, and documents temperatures at 30-minute intervals.
  3. Unmolding, slicing, and plating session: students unmold and slice the chilled terrine, plate two portions with condiment accompaniments, photograph the cross-section, and present for tasting and visual evaluation.
Terrine mold (ceramic or metal), fatback or plastic film liner, bain-marie pan, probe thermometer, oven, sheet pan, weights for pressing, refrigerator, slicing knife, cutting board, plating vessels, camera or phone for documentation, evaluation rubricInternal temp log shows 160 °F achieved; slice holds shape without crumbling; rubric score ≥ 75% across appearance, texture, seasoning, and cross-section layer definition.
7Smoking and Cured Proteins: Hot and Cold Techniques13labStudents hot-smoke a protein to USDA safe internal temperature and produce a cold-smoked item under instructor supervision, correctly operating the smoker and documenting all temperatures.
  1. Instructor demonstration of hot smoker and cold smoker setup, airflow management, wood chip selection, temperature calibration, and equipment cleaning including lockout/tagout; students complete a smoker safety checklist.
  2. Lab: students apply a pre-made cure or rub to a chicken breast or pork chop, load the hot smoker, and monitor internal temperature with a probe thermometer every 15 minutes until the USDA safe endpoint is reached, recording all readings on a log sheet.
  3. Cold-smoke demonstration (instructor-led with student assistance): students assist in cold-smoking pre-cured gravlax, recording smoker temperature (kept below 90 °F) and duration, then compare flavor, texture, and color of hot-smoked vs. cold-smoked samples.
Commercial or countertop smoker, wood chips (applewood, hickory, alder), probe thermometer, instant-read thermometer, cure/rub ingredients, HACCP temperature log, smoker safety checklist, PPE (heat-resistant gloves, eye protection), lockout/tagout tagsHot-smoked protein reaches USDA-specified safe internal temperature documented on log; smoker lockout/tagout procedure observed by instructor before cleaning; written smoker safety checklist signed off by instructor.
8Cheese: Selection, Service, and Pairing8.5demoStudents identify a minimum of ten cheeses by category, describe their flavor profiles and production method, and assemble a correctly composed cheese board with appropriate accompaniments.
  1. Instructor-led tasting flight of ten cheeses representing fresh, soft-ripened, washed-rind, semi-firm, firm, and blue categories; students complete a sensory evaluation card (appearance, aroma, texture, flavor, finish) for each.
  2. Guided research activity: pairs use a culinary reference or instructor-provided fact sheets to map each cheese to its milk source, region of origin, and one classic pairing (bread, fruit, charcuterie, or beverage).
  3. Lab: each student builds a five-cheese board to a $15 cost limit, selecting contrasting textures and flavors, adding labeled accompaniments, and presenting to the class with a 2-minute verbal explanation of selection rationale.
Assorted cheeses (minimum 10 varieties), cheese knives, cutting boards, wooden or slate boards, accompaniments (crackers, bread, fruit, nuts, honey, charcuterie), sensory evaluation cards, cheese reference (e.g., Cheese & Wine, World Cheese Book, or instructor-provided fact sheets), price listSensory evaluation cards completed for all 10 cheeses; cheese board earns ≥ 75% on a four-criterion rubric (variety/contrast, accompaniment logic, labeling, verbal explanation); cost documented within ± $1 of budget.
9Canapés, Hors d'Oeuvres, and Finger Foods13labStudents produce a minimum of four distinct canapé varieties—including at least one cold and one hot passed item—plated uniformly at ≥ 90% consistency across a 24-piece tray.
  1. Instructor demo of canapé architecture: base selection, spread, main topping, garnish, and bite-size portioning; students sketch diagrams of four planned canapés with labeled components before production begins.
  2. Timed lab production: each student produces four canapé varieties, 6 pieces each (24 total), applying consistent portion size, garnish placement, and temperature control; instructor circulates with a ruler and thermometer.
  3. Plating and critique: students arrange the completed tray, photograph it, and peer-evaluate one classmate's tray against a consistency rubric before instructor delivers scored feedback.
Bread, blini, endive, cucumber, cracker bases, assorted spreads (compound butter, cream cheese, rillette), cold and hot toppings, piping bags, offset spatulas, bench scraper, sheet pans, digital thermometer, ruler, camera or phone, 24-portion tray, consistency rubricTray rubric score ≥ 90% for portion uniformity (each piece within ± 5 g and ± 0.25 inch of stated size); cold items plated at ≤ 41 °F; visual appearance score ≥ 75%.
10Buffet Centerpieces and Display Principles10.5demoStudents plan and execute a buffet layout diagram that meets food-safety, traffic-flow, and visual-balance principles and earns ≥ 75% on a planning rubric evaluated by the instructor.
  1. Instructor presentation with photographs of classical buffet centerpieces (ice carving, tallow work, vegetable displays, charcuterie boards) discussing height, color, proportion, and the triangle/odd-number rule; students take structured notes.
  2. Small-group planning exercise: teams receive a buffet scenario (e.g., corporate reception, 80 guests) and produce a scaled floor-plan diagram with labeled stations, traffic flow arrows, chafing dish placement, and cold-display zones.
  3. Mock buffet setup in the lab: each group sets their cold station with available food items, labels, ice beds where needed, and a simple centerpiece (fruit sculpture or charcuterie board arrangement); instructor evaluates against a planning rubric.
Butcher paper and markers for floor-plan diagrams, ruler, buffet tables, risers, serving platters, ice beds or sheet pans over ice, thermometers, labels and tent cards, centerpiece materials (fruit, charcuterie items, greens), planning rubricPlanning diagram includes all required elements (traffic flow, cold zones, labels) and earns ≥ 75% on the rubric; all cold items on the physical setup are verified at ≤ 41 °F by the instructor with a calibrated thermometer.
11Integrated Garde Manger Production: Cold Station Simulation19.5practiceStudents independently manage a cold-station production schedule—producing a terrine, composed salad, canapé tray, and cured-protein platter within a four-hour service window—meeting quality, temperature, and timing benchmarks.
  1. Pre-production planning session (1 hour): each student writes a mise en place list, time-action schedule, and HACCP temperature log template for the four-hour production block, reviewed and signed off by the instructor before production begins.
  2. Timed cold-station production (3 hours): students execute their plan, producing all four required items, maintaining running HACCP logs, and calling out temperatures aloud when checked; instructor observes and records deviations without intervening unless a food-safety violation occurs.
  3. Post-service debrief (30 minutes): each student presents their finished items to the instructor, reviews their HACCP log for compliance, and completes a written self-evaluation comparing planned vs. actual time management.
Full cold-kitchen setup (refrigerators, slicer, mandoline, grinder, mixing equipment), all ingredients per student mise en place list, HACCP log sheets, probe thermometers, timer, plating vessels, instructor observation checklist, self-evaluation formAll four items completed within the four-hour window; HACCP log shows cold items at ≤ 41 °F at all documented checks; instructor observation checklist rates ≥ 75% on quality criteria for each item; zero unaddressed food-safety violations.
12Credential Review: Garde Manger Competencies for ACF CC and ServSafe9theoryStudents map every garde manger technique practiced in the course to its corresponding ACF Certified Culinarian knowledge domain and relevant ServSafe food-safety principle, achieving ≥ 75% on a cumulative review quiz.
  1. Instructor-facilitated whole-class review matching course skills (terrines, forcemeats, curing, emulsified sauces, cold-holding) to ACF CC exam domain language and ServSafe temperature/HACCP requirements, using a side-by-side comparison chart.
  2. Jigsaw activity: small groups are each assigned one credential domain area, locate the relevant lessons and lab logs from their own portfolios as evidence, and briefly present their evidence map to the class.
  3. Individual practice with ACF-style multiple-choice and short-answer questions on cold-food production and ServSafe scenario questions on HACCP in the cold kitchen; students score themselves using an answer key and flag weak areas for exam-prep course review.
ACF Certified Culinarian exam content outline (current version, available at acfchefs.org), ServSafe Food Handler study guide, course lesson learning objectives handout, credential domain comparison chart, practice question set, answer keyScore ≥ 75% on a 30-question cumulative review quiz covering ACF cold-kitchen domains and ServSafe cold-food safety; students identify at least three personal knowledge gaps in writing for follow-up during Course 11 exam prep.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Garde Manger Written Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38/50 questions)A 50-question closed-book exam covering garde manger theory: forcemeat types and fat ratios, curing science, emulsion chemistry, ServSafe cold-holding and HACCP requirements, cheese categories, buffet design principles, and ACF terminology. Questions are multiple choice and short answer; the exam is administered at the end of Lesson 11 and mapped directly to ACF Certified Culinarian cold-kitchen knowledge domains.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Practical Skills Demonstration: Composed Cold PlateSkills demonstration45%75% overall on the rubric, with no criterion scoring below 2 of 5Each student independently produces, within a three-hour window, a composed cold plate consisting of a sliced terrine portion, an emulsified-sauce-dressed salad, and three identical canapés; the plate is evaluated by the lead instructor on a five-criterion rubric (flavor, texture, visual presentation, temperature compliance, and portion accuracy). Any cold item held above 41 °F at the time of judging results in an automatic criterion score of zero for temperature compliance.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Production Log PortfolioLog15%Minimum 10 of 12 lessons documented; each entry scores ≥ 75% on the entry rubricStudents maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course, submitting a dated entry for every lab and practice lesson that includes: mise en place list, HACCP temperature records, yield/cost calculations, self-assessed quality notes, and a photo of the finished product. The portfolio is collected at the end of the course and graded on completeness, accuracy of HACCP data, and quality of written reflection using a standardized four-criterion entry rubric.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Cold-Kitchen Equipment Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% of all required safety steps completed correctly; any missed critical step (lockout/tagout omission, unguarded blade) requires immediate redo before the student continues lab workIn a one-on-one 15-minute observational check administered at the start of Lesson 7 (Smoking) or Lesson 11 (Simulation), the instructor uses a printed checklist to verify that the student can correctly demonstrate: slicer blade guard engagement and lockout/tagout, mandoline hand-guard use and blade storage, smoker temperature-calibration and shutdown, and grinder disassembly for cleaning in the correct safe sequence. The checklist is signed by both the instructor and student and kept in the student's file.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-CULI27-05 Trade course

Meats: Fabrication, Cookery, and Practical Application

146 hr · $1,925 COMPLIMENTARY

Students develop professional competency in the identification, fabrication, and cookery of beef, pork, lamb, veal, and poultry using industry-standard techniques aligned with ACF Certified Culinarian standards. Emphasis is placed on safe meat-handling practices consistent with ServSafe principles, accurate yield costing, and producing finished dishes to commercial quality. Students move from whole-muscle and subprimal work through dry- and moist-heat methods to plated, service-ready product.

Outcomes
Course text

Students develop professional competency in the identification, fabrication, and cookery of beef, pork, lamb, veal, and poultry using industry-standard techniques aligned with ACF Certified Culinarian standards. Emphasis is placed on safe meat-handling practices consistent with ServSafe principles, accurate yield costing, and producing finished dishes to commercial quality. Students move from whole-muscle and subprimal work through dry- and moist-heat methods to plated, service-ready product.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Meat Science Fundamentals and Industry Standards; Safe Meat Handling: Receiving, Storage, and Cold-Chain Control; Knife and Saw Safety; PPE for Meat Fabrication; Beef Primal Fabrication: From Subprimal to Portion Cut; Pork and Lamb Fabrication: Boning, Frenching, and Trussing; Poultry Fabrication: Whole-Bird Breakdown and Trussing; Dry-Heat Cookery: Roasting and Grilling; Dry-Heat Cookery: Sautéing and Pan Sauces; Moist-Heat Cookery: Braising and Stewing; Yield Costing and Menu Pricing for Meat Proteins; Plated Meat Entrée: Integration Lab; Meat Course Review, Mock Practical, and Credential Mapping.

What competent looks like. Identify primal, subprimal, and retail cuts of beef, pork, lamb, veal, and poultry using NAMP/IMPS nomenclature and correctly select each for appropriate cooking method. Fabricate whole-muscle proteins — including butchering, boning, trussing, and portioning — within a ±5% yield tolerance using correct knife and saw technique. Apply dry-heat methods (roasting, grilling, sautéing, pan-frying, broiling) and moist-heat methods (braising, stewing, poaching) to achieve safe internal temperatures and specified doneness levels. Maintain cold-chain integrity and cross-contamination controls throughout receiving, storage, thawing, fabrication, and service in accordance with ServSafe food-safety principles. Calculate as-purchased cost, edible-portion cost, and yield percentage for a given meat item using standard food-costing formulas. Produce plated meat entrées that meet professional standards for flavor, texture, color, and safe internal temperature, verified by probe thermometer.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Meat Science Fundamentals and Industry Standards10theoryStudents will correctly classify the five major protein categories, explain muscle fiber and connective tissue behavior during cooking, and identify USDA quality and yield grades for beef, pork, lamb, veal, and poultry.
  1. Annotate a primal-cut poster for each species and match cuts to NAMP/IMPS item numbers using the Meat Buyers Guide; quiz peer on three assigned cuts.
  2. Compare side-by-side photos of USDA Select, Choice, and Prime beef and list visible marbling differences in a structured observation log.
  3. Read and discuss a USDA FSIS fact sheet on inspection marks, then answer guided questions distinguishing inspection from grading.
NAMP Meat Buyers Guide (current edition), USDA FSIS primal-cut charts, dry-erase cut diagrams, observation log worksheetsWritten 20-question identification quiz matching cut names, NAMP numbers, and species; pass at 75% or higher. ACF CC exam area: product knowledge.
2Safe Meat Handling: Receiving, Storage, and Cold-Chain Control10theoryStudents will demonstrate receiving inspection procedures, state correct refrigeration and freezer temperature ranges for raw proteins, and apply FIFO rotation to a simulated walk-in cooler scenario without error.
  1. Role-play a receiving scenario: inspect sample invoices and simulated meat packages for correct temperature (using probe thermometers), labeling, and packaging integrity; flag two planted defects.
  2. Set up a mock walk-in cooler shelf diagram on a tabletop, place protein cards in correct species-separation and vertical-storage order, then justify placements citing ServSafe hierarchy.
  3. Complete a thawing-methods decision chart comparing refrigerator, cold-water, and microwave thawing; calculate time needed to thaw a 10-lb roast under refrigeration.
Probe thermometers (calibrated), ServSafe Manager textbook (current edition), sample receiving invoices, protein storage hierarchy reference cardPractical checklist: student correctly sequences receiving steps, records accurate temperatures, and stages proteins in proper walk-in order; all critical items (temperature, cross-contamination prevention) must be correct — zero critical errors to pass. ServSafe exam area: safe food handling and storage.
3Knife and Saw Safety; PPE for Meat Fabrication8demoStudents will select and don required PPE (cut-resistant glove, chain-mail or equivalent, apron), demonstrate safe band-saw startup and shutdown per manufacturer lockout procedures, and sharpen and hone a boning knife to a functional edge.
  1. Instructor demonstrates band-saw blade inspection, guard adjustment, and the power-off/lockout sequence; students narrate each step back to instructor before touching the machine.
  2. Students practice the steel-and-stone sharpening sequence on a boning knife, then test edge on paper; peer evaluates angle consistency using a goniometer guide.
  3. Conduct a fabrication-station hazard walk: identify and correct five planted hazards (exposed blade, missing glove, blocked aisle, improper PPE placement, unsecured cutting board) and document corrective actions.
Cut-resistant gloves (ANSI A4 or higher), chain-mail glove, boning knives, sharpening stones, honing steels, band saw with manufacturer safety guide, non-slip cutting boards, hazard checklistInstructor safety observation checklist: student dons PPE correctly, executes lockout sequence in correct order, and achieves a sharpened edge; any missed lockout step requires repeat demonstration before progressing. OSHA general-industry machine-guarding principles apply.
4Beef Primal Fabrication: From Subprimal to Portion Cut14labStudents will break down a beef subprimal (strip loin or rib) into uniform portion cuts, record actual yield, and calculate yield percentage and edible-portion cost within ±5% of instructor benchmark.
  1. Trim a NAMP 180 strip loin: remove fat cap to ¼-inch, clean chain, and portion into 8-oz steaks; weigh each portion and record on yield sheet.
  2. Calculate yield percentage (edible weight ÷ as-purchased weight × 100) and edible-portion cost using the day's AP price; compare results with instructor's reference yield and discuss variance.
  3. Vacuum-seal and label fabricated portions with species, cut name, weight, and date; store in proper cooler position per ServSafe hierarchy.
NAMP 180 NY strip loin or rib subprimal, boning knives, breaking knife, scale (digital, ±0.1 oz), yield calculation worksheets, vacuum sealer, date labels, cooler accessYield log reviewed by instructor: portions within ±5% of target weight, yield percentage calculated correctly, and storage labels complete; math errors on cost calculation require correction before sign-off. ACF CC exam area: product fabrication and food costing.
5Pork and Lamb Fabrication: Boning, Frenching, and Trussing14labStudents will bone a pork loin and french a rack of lamb to produce restaurant-ready portions, demonstrating clean knife work with no score marks on bone and uniform rib-bone exposure of at least 1.5 inches.
  1. Follow step-by-step instructor demo to bone a center-cut pork loin; roll and truss the resulting boneless roast with butcher's twine at equal 1-inch intervals.
  2. French a domestic lamb rack: remove fat cap, scrape each rib bone clean, and trim the eye of meat to a uniform silverskin-free surface; photograph and compare to reference image.
  3. Pair-evaluate fabricated items using a quality rubric (bone cleanliness, truss tightness, fat trim consistency) and provide written peer feedback.
Center-cut pork loin, domestic lamb rack (NAMP 204), boning knives, paring knife, butcher's twine, kitchen shears, quality rubric, reference photographsInstructor evaluates finished rack and trussed roast using quality rubric; pass requires clean bones (no score marks), rib exposure ≥1.5 inches, and evenly spaced truss — any single critical defect (e.g., scored bone exposing marrow) requires a repeat fabrication exercise. ACF CC exam area: fabrication.
6Poultry Fabrication: Whole-Bird Breakdown and Trussing12labStudents will break down a whole chicken into eight standard parts (two breasts, two wings, two thighs, two drumsticks) and truss a whole bird for roasting, achieving clean joint separation and skin integrity on all pieces.
  1. Instructor demos whole-chicken breakdown in real time; students replicate immediately on their own bird, calling out joint names as cuts are made.
  2. Debone a chicken breast supreme (airline breast) — leaving the first wing joint — and pound to uniform ½-inch thickness for scaloppine; measure thickness at three points.
  3. Practice the classic roasting truss on a second whole bird using butcher's twine; ensure legs are secured tightly and wings are tucked before instructor review.
Whole USDA Grade A chickens (2 per student), boning knives, chef's knife, plastic-wrapped cutting boards (color-coded for poultry), butcher's twine, ruler, probe thermometersInstructor uses part-breakdown checklist: eight parts present, joints cleanly severed (no bone splinters), skin intact on all pieces, and truss secure; skin tear on more than one piece or splintered bone requires repeat. ServSafe exam area: cross-contamination prevention with poultry. ACF CC exam area: poultry fabrication.
7Dry-Heat Cookery: Roasting and Grilling14labStudents will roast a beef rib roast and grill portioned steaks to ordered internal temperatures, verified by probe thermometer, with a final plated temperature variance of no more than ±5°F from target.
  1. Season and sear a beef rib roast, transfer to oven, and monitor internal temperature using a leave-in probe thermometer; rest the roast correctly and carve to order for three doneness levels (medium-rare 130–135°F, medium 140–145°F, well-done 160°F+) following USDA guidelines.
  2. Grill NY strip steaks to four doneness levels on a commercial chargrill; use the probe thermometer to verify each and compare with finger-poke tactile test, recording both results.
  3. Plate sliced roast with appropriate sauce and garnish; instructor evaluates color, crust, juiciness, and temperature simultaneously within a 3-minute window.
Beef rib roast, NY strip steaks, commercial convection oven, chargrill, leave-in and instant-read probe thermometers, roasting pan with rack, carving knife, plating dishes, ServSafe temperature reference cardThermometer reading at time of plating must fall within ±5°F of ordered target; color and juiciness evaluated against USDA safe minimum temperatures; any item served below USDA minimum safe temperature (145°F for whole muscle with 3-minute rest) fails and must be recooled and recooked. ACF CC exam area: cooking methods and temperatures.
8Dry-Heat Cookery: Sautéing and Pan Sauces12labStudents will sauté a chicken supreme and execute a pan sauce (fond-based) to yield a properly reduced, correctly seasoned sauce with a nappe consistency, served plated within 8 minutes of order.
  1. Dredge, sauté, and finish chicken supremes in a commercial sauté pan; monitor color, moisture retention, and internal temperature (165°F for poultry per USDA) using an instant-read thermometer.
  2. Deglaze pan with wine or stock, reduce, add finishing fat (butter monté), and adjust seasoning; check sauce consistency using the nappe spoon test and adjust reduction as needed.
  3. Execute a timed plate-up: protein, sauce, and two accompaniments plated and presented within 8 minutes from receiving the order ticket; instructor scores using a five-point rubric.
Chicken supremes, clarified butter and whole butter, sauté pans (commercial range), stock, wine or vinegar, saucepans, instant-read thermometer, ladles, plating dishes, 5-point timed rubricChicken internal temperature ≥165°F verified by probe; sauce passes nappe test; plate presented within 8-minute window; any undercooked poultry is an automatic fail requiring immediate corrective action. ACF CC exam area: sauté and sauce cookery.
9Moist-Heat Cookery: Braising and Stewing14labStudents will execute a classic braise and a white stew (blanquette) using appropriate tough cuts, demonstrating correct sear, mirepoix, liquid ratio, and oven or stovetop temperature management to produce fork-tender product.
  1. Sear bone-in beef short ribs to develop a deep fond; build a braise with mirepoix, tomato paste, stock, and aromatics; braise covered at 325°F until fork-tender (probe slides in without resistance), recording time and temperature at 30-minute intervals.
  2. Fabricate veal shoulder into 1.5-inch cubes, blanch, and execute a blanquette de veau to a velouté-based sauce finish; verify meat is fully cooked and sauce coats the back of a spoon.
  3. Compare both finished dishes side by side: evaluate tenderness, sauce color and consistency, and seasoning using a structured sensory evaluation form; write a 150-word reflection on how connective tissue breakdown (collagen to gelatin) affected texture.
Bone-in beef short ribs, veal shoulder, mirepoix vegetables, tomato paste, veal stock, aromatics, Dutch ovens or hotel pans with lids, commercial oven, instant-read thermometers, sensory evaluation formsFork-tender test confirmed by instructor probe check; sauce consistency and color assessed against reference standard; reflection submitted and demonstrates understanding of collagen conversion. ACF CC exam area: moist-heat methods and protein cookery science.
10Yield Costing and Menu Pricing for Meat Proteins10theoryStudents will calculate as-purchased cost, edible-portion cost, and plate cost for at least three protein items and apply a standard food-cost percentage formula to derive a target menu selling price.
  1. Using real or instructor-supplied invoice prices, complete a yield-cost worksheet for beef tenderloin, pork loin, and chicken: calculate AP cost per pound, yield percentage, and EP cost per pound for each.
  2. Build a plate-cost card for a filet mignon entrée including protein, sauce, and two sides; sum all costs and apply a target food-cost percentage to calculate the menu price.
  3. Participate in a small-group scenario: the AP price of beef rises 15% — recalculate EP cost and menu price, then present two alternative cuts that could maintain food-cost percentage, justifying substitution with quality and customer-expectation reasoning.
Calculator, yield-cost worksheets, sample supplier invoices, plate-cost card templates, food-cost percentage formula reference sheetCompleted worksheet checked for math accuracy: all three EP cost calculations correct within ±$0.05/lb; plate cost and menu price calculated correctly; group scenario rationale assessed by instructor for logic — any arithmetic error on EP cost requires correction and resubmission. ACF CC exam area: food costing and menu pricing.
11Plated Meat Entrée: Integration Lab14labStudents will produce a complete three-component plated meat entrée (fabricated protein, appropriate sauce or jus, and two accompaniments) to restaurant standards within a 45-minute production window.
  1. Receive a protein, sauce, and accompaniment specification sheet; write a brief mise en place plan listing all fabrication, cookery, and plating steps with estimated timing before beginning any production.
  2. Execute all fabrication and cookery from raw product to plated dish within the 45-minute window; use probe thermometer to verify every protein's internal temperature before plating.
  3. Present finished plate to a two-instructor panel; respond to questions about technique decisions and temperature verification; panel scores using the ACF-style practical evaluation rubric.
Assigned protein (varied by student — beef, pork, lamb, veal, or poultry), sauce components, accompaniment ingredients, full commercial kitchen equipment, instant-read and leave-in probe thermometers, ACF practical evaluation rubric, mise en place planning sheetPanel scores plate on flavor (30%), technique/cookery method (30%), temperature accuracy (25%), and presentation (15%); pass requires 75% overall with no zero-score on temperature — any protein served below USDA minimum safe temperature is an automatic fail. ACF CC exam area: practical cooking and professional standards.
12Meat Course Review, Mock Practical, and Credential Mapping14practiceStudents will self-identify knowledge gaps across all meat-cookery and food-safety topics, complete a timed mock practical task, and map course competencies to ACF Certified Culinarian and ServSafe exam domains.
  1. Complete a 40-question multiple-choice review covering cuts, NAMP numbers, temperatures, cooking methods, costing formulas, and food-safety controls; review answers in class and note missed items for targeted study.
  2. Execute a 30-minute timed mock practical: fabricate and cook an assigned protein cut to a specified doneness, with instructor scoring on technique, temperature, and safety practices using the standard rubric.
  3. In pairs, map at least ten lesson objectives to specific ACF CC exam content areas (product knowledge, fabrication, cooking methods, food safety, costing) and three objectives to ServSafe exam categories using a provided crosswalk template; present mapping to class for peer review.
40-question review bank, standard kitchen equipment, probe thermometers, ACF CC candidate guide (current edition), ServSafe Manager textbook, credential crosswalk templateMock practical scored ≥75% on rubric with no temperature safety fail; crosswalk template reviewed by instructor for accuracy — mapping must correctly place at least 9 of 10 objectives to confirm readiness for Lesson 11 (Certification Exam Prep). ACF CC and ServSafe exam areas: full course review.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Meat Identification and Food-Safety Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (30 of 40 questions correct)A 40-question written exam covering NAMP/IMPS cut identification, USDA grade and inspection standards, correct internal temperatures per USDA guidelines, moist- and dry-heat cooking method selection, ServSafe cold-chain and storage principles, and food-costing formulas. Maps directly to ACF Certified Culinarian product knowledge and food-safety domains and to ServSafe Food Handler safe-handling content.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Practical Fabrication and Cookery Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%75% or higher on the ACF-style rubric with no zero-score on the temperature criterionStudents receive an unannounced protein assignment and must fabricate from subprimal or whole bird, apply the correct cooking method, verify internal temperature with a probe thermometer, and present a plated entrée to a two-instructor panel within a 45-minute window. Scored on technique, flavor, temperature accuracy, and presentation; any protein plated below the USDA minimum safe internal temperature is an automatic fail regardless of overall score, directly reflecting ACF Certified Culinarian practical exam standards.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Yield and Production LogLog15%All entries complete and accurate; yield calculations within ±5% of benchmark; no missing temperature recordsA running log maintained across all fabrication and cookery labs documenting as-purchased weights, trimmed weights, yield percentages, EP costs, cooking temperatures and times, and a brief post-lab reflection for each session. Reviewed by the instructor after Lessons 4, 6, 9, and at course end; incomplete or inaccurate temperature entries must be corrected before the final skills demonstration is scheduled. Supports ACF CC costing competencies and ServSafe temperature-monitoring requirements.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Meat Fabrication Safety CheckSafety audit15%Zero critical errors; all critical items must be marked compliantAn unannounced observation conducted by the instructor during any fabrication lab using a standardized checklist covering: correct PPE donned before handling product, band-saw lockout procedure followed correctly, color-coded cutting boards in use for the correct protein, probe thermometer calibrated and used at correct checkpoints, and fabricated proteins labeled and stored in proper ServSafe hierarchy order. Any single critical failure (e.g., missing cut-resistant glove while operating saw, protein stored above ready-to-eat items) results in an immediate stop of work, corrective instruction, and a required repeat observation before the student may continue independent fabrication.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-CULI27-06 Trade course

International Cuisine: Classical and Contemporary World Cooking

146 hr · $1,925 COMPLIMENTARY

Students execute authentic dishes from major global culinary traditions—European, Latin American, Asian, Middle Eastern, and African—applying classical technique to culturally specific ingredients, flavor profiles, and cooking methods. Lessons integrate food safety, knife work, stock and sauce theory, and mise en place discipline developed in earlier courses, while building the cultural literacy and menu versatility that ACF Certified Culinarian candidates must demonstrate. By course end, each student can plan, produce, and plate a multicultural menu to professional standards.

Outcomes
Course text

Students execute authentic dishes from major global culinary traditions—European, Latin American, Asian, Middle Eastern, and African—applying classical technique to culturally specific ingredients, flavor profiles, and cooking methods. Lessons integrate food safety, knife work, stock and sauce theory, and mise en place discipline developed in earlier courses, while building the cultural literacy and menu versatility that ACF Certified Culinarian candidates must demonstrate. By course end, each student can plan, produce, and plate a multicultural menu to professional standards.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: World Culinary Geography and Flavor-Profile Framework; Food Safety for Global Ingredients and Equipment Setup; French and Spanish Classical Traditions; Italian Regional Cooking: Fresh Pasta, Risotto, and Sugo; Mexican and Latin American Traditions: Mole, Salsas, and Masa; Chinese Regional Cooking: Wok Technique, Dim Sum, and Braises; Japanese Cuisine: Dashi, Sushi Rice, and Knife Precision; Indian Subcontinent: Spice Tempering, Dal, and Bread; Middle Eastern and North African Cuisine: Tagine, Mezze, and Grain Cookery; Sub-Saharan African and Caribbean Traditions: Jerk, Stews, and Fermented Flavors; Menu Planning, Costing, and Cultural Context Documentation; Multicultural Tasting Menu Execution: Full Production Simulation.

What competent looks like. Identify the defining flavor profiles, staple ingredients, and classic preparations of at least six world culinary traditions and explain their cultural and historical context. Apply appropriate cooking techniques—including braising, stir-frying, dry-spice roasting, clay-pot cooking, and fresh pasta production—to produce dishes authentic to their region of origin. Demonstrate safe food-handling and cross-contamination prevention practices specific to international ingredients such as raw fermented products, high-acid marinades, whole spice toasting, and allergen-heavy cuisines. Select and use region-specific tools (wok, tagine, molcajete, mandoline, rice cooker, pasta machine) safely and correctly, applying lockout/tagout and PPE protocols for shared equipment. Scale international recipes using baker's percentage, metric conversion, and yield-factor calculations to meet a specified number of covers. Produce a fully documented multicultural tasting menu—including recipe cards, costing sheets, and cultural context notes—to the standard required in the ACF Certified Culinarian practical examination.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1World Culinary Geography and Flavor-Profile Framework10theoryStudents classify at least six world culinary regions by their defining staple starches, fat sources, aromatics, and seasoning logic, and explain how geography and trade shaped each cuisine.
  1. Complete a guided reading on culinary geography using excerpts from 'On Food and Cooking' (Harold McGee) and ACF study materials; annotate a blank world map with staple crops, protein sources, and signature spices for each region covered.
  2. Participate in a structured flavor-profile matching exercise: taste ten unlabeled spice blends (ras el hanout, garam masala, five-spice, jerk seasoning, herbes de Provence, mole base, za'atar, sofrito base, curry powder, berbere) and write a sensory description before identifying each.
  3. In small groups, research one assigned culinary region and present a five-minute verbal summary covering geography, historical trade influences, dietary laws or taboos, and three iconic dishes; peers use a rubric to give structured feedback.
World political map printouts, ten labeled spice kits, 'On Food and Cooking' (McGee), ACF Culinary Fundamentals textbook, whiteboard, markers, presentation rubricEach student correctly classifies all six regions on an in-class written quiz (minimum 75% correct) and receives a peer-rubric score of at least 3/4 on presentation content accuracy.
2Food Safety for Global Ingredients and Equipment Setup10theoryStudents identify food-safety and allergen risks specific to international ingredients—including raw fermented foods, high-sodium pastes, shellfish-based sauces, nuts, and gluten-containing starches—and demonstrate correct labeling, storage, and cross-contact prevention protocols.
  1. Review ServSafe Food Handler material on allergen management; complete a scenario worksheet where students identify the top-eight allergens hidden in ten international pantry items (fish sauce, tahini, soy-marinated protein, mole, harissa) and write corrective storage and labeling actions.
  2. Conduct a lab walkthrough to establish station setups for the semester: students assign cutting-board color codes to protein categories used across world cuisines, verify refrigerator placement by food type, and record temperatures of all cold storage units in a log.
  3. Participate in a demonstration of lockout/tagout procedure for the commercial wok range and the pasta machine before hands-on use begins; each student performs the procedure once on an unpowered machine while the instructor verifies each step.
ServSafe Food Handler textbook and allergen charts, cutting boards (color-coded set), probe thermometers, refrigerator log sheets, lockout/tagout devices and tags, personal protective equipment (heat-resistant gloves, nonslip shoes, chef coat)Student correctly identifies all eight major allergens in scenario worksheet with zero missed items on a pass/fail safety check; lockout/tagout demonstration performed correctly in correct sequence—any missed step requires immediate repeat before lab access is granted.
3French and Spanish Classical Traditions12labStudents produce two classical French dishes (boeuf bourguignon and ratatouille) and one Spanish dish (paella Valenciana) to recipe specification, demonstrating correct mirepoix ratios, bouquet garni construction, and saffron-bloom technique.
  1. Review recipe cards and scale each recipe to serve eight covers using metric weight; calculate yield factors for bone-in short rib and calculate the cost per portion using current market prices provided by the instructor.
  2. Execute boeuf bourguignon from mise en place through service, including proper searing of protein, deglazing with Burgundy wine, and monitoring a low covered braise to an internal temperature verified by probe thermometer; record time and temperature data on a production sheet.
  3. Produce paella Valenciana in a carbon-steel paella pan over the gas range, managing the socarrat (caramelized bottom crust) by sound and visual cues; plate all three dishes for instructor evaluation against a provided rubric covering flavor, texture, color, and portion accuracy.
Carbon-steel paella pan, Dutch oven, probe thermometers, kitchen scale (metric/US), saffron, Burgundy wine (cooking quality), bone-in short rib, seasonal vegetables, bouquet garni ingredients, recipe cards, production log sheets, plating rubricFinished dishes score at least 70/100 on the plating rubric (flavor 30 pts, texture 25 pts, appearance 25 pts, portion accuracy 20 pts); internal temperature of braised beef verified at or above the safe minimum on the production log.
4Italian Regional Cooking: Fresh Pasta, Risotto, and Sugo12labStudents produce fresh egg pasta dough, roll it to uniform thickness using a hand-crank pasta machine, fabricate two pasta shapes, and finish each with an appropriate sauce—demonstrating gluten development, emulsification, and starchy pasta water technique.
  1. Mix fresh pasta dough by hand using the 00-flour-to-egg ratio from the recipe card; rest dough, then roll sheets on the pasta machine progressing through thickness settings, fabricating pappardelle and hand-shaped orecchiette; record dough hydration percentage using baker's percentage formula.
  2. Prepare Bolognese ragù using the low, slow soffritto-and-meat method, monitoring total cook time and tasting for seasoning balance; prepare a separate Genovese basil pesto in the mortar and pestle, then emulsify with pasta cooking water before tossing with orecchiette.
  3. Produce a classic risotto alla Milanese, adding warm chicken stock in increments while maintaining constant agitation and finishing with butter (mantecatura) to check for correct wave consistency (all'onda); compare finished texture with over-stirred and under-rested control samples.
Tipo 00 flour, eggs, hand-crank pasta machine, mortar and pestle, heavy-bottomed rondeau, ladle, probe thermometer, kitchen scale, fresh basil, Parmigiano-Reggiano, saffron, arborio rice, recipe cards, lab logFresh pasta sheets pass a visual uniformity check (instructor measures thickness at three points—variance less than 0.5 mm is a pass); risotto texture confirmed as all'onda by instructor observation; lab log completed with hydration calculation—minimum 75% accuracy on math entries.
5Mexican and Latin American Traditions: Mole, Salsas, and Masa12labStudents toast and grind dried chiles, prepare a simplified mole negro, nixtamalize dried corn to produce fresh masa, and press and cook corn tortillas—explaining how each step affects flavor and texture.
  1. Toast and rehydrate three dried chile varieties (ancho, mulato, pasilla) while recording color change, aroma shift, and rehydration yield; blend with toasted spices, charred aromatics, and a small quantity of Mexican chocolate into a mole paste using an industrial blender, observing safety protocols for hot liquids in a sealed blender.
  2. Simmer finished mole with poultry stock to service consistency and pair with braised chicken thigh; taste and adjust seasoning, documenting each adjustment in the lab log with a reason (acid, salt, fat, heat) mapped to the flavor-balance framework from Lesson 1.
  3. Prepare fresh masa from dried field corn soaked overnight in a lime-water (cal) solution; drain, rinse, and grind on the table grinder or process in the food processor to the correct masa texture; press and cook corn tortillas on a dry comal, evaluating puff and char.
Dried chiles (ancho, mulato, pasilla), Mexican chocolate, cal (food-grade calcium hydroxide), dried field corn or masa harina (backup), tortilla press, comal, industrial blender, heavy-bottomed cazuela, food processor, lab log, recipe cards, gloves (capsaicin hazard notice posted)Mole scores at least 70/100 on flavor rubric; tortillas pass a visual and texture check (even browning, puff present, pliable—no cracks); lab log entry for mole seasoning adjustments complete with correct flavor-balance vocabulary.
6Chinese Regional Cooking: Wok Technique, Dim Sum, and Braises12demoStudents demonstrate correct wok seasoning, high-heat stir-fry sequencing (mise en place order, smoking point management, tossing motion), and produce a red-braised pork belly (hong shao rou) and two steamed dim sum items.
  1. Watch and replicate instructor demonstration of wok seasoning using high-smoke-point oil; practice the stir-fry tossing motion with dry rice in an unheated wok before executing a vegetable stir-fry at temperature, verifying wok hei development by color and aroma.
  2. Braise pork belly in a combination of soy sauce, Shaoxing wine, sugar, and aromatics, managing caramelization with low heat and monitoring glaze viscosity; calculate the reduction percentage of the braising liquid from start to finish using volume measurements recorded at 30-minute intervals.
  3. Prepare har gow (shrimp dumpling) wrappers by scalding wheat starch with boiling water; pleat each dumpling to a minimum of seven pleats and steam to order in a bamboo steamer; evaluate translucency, seal integrity, and filling texture against the ACF practical skills standard for precision fabrication.
Carbon-steel wok (14-inch), wok spatula and ladle, bamboo steamers, high-smoke-point oil (peanut or canola), pork belly, wheat starch, shrimp, Shaoxing rice wine, soy sauce, rock sugar, graduated measuring cylinders for reduction tracking, recipe cards, PPE (burn hazard: long sleeves, heat-resistant gloves nearby)Stir-fry shows visible wok hei (smoky aroma, light char) confirmed by instructor; har gow pleats counted—minimum seven per dumpling required to pass; reduction percentage calculation accurate within 5% of instructor reference value.
7Japanese Cuisine: Dashi, Sushi Rice, and Knife Precision12labStudents prepare ichiban dashi from kombu and katsuobushi to correct flavor clarity, season sushi rice to specification, and fabricate three styles of sushi (nigiri, hosomaki, temaki) with fish cut to the required thickness and presentation standard.
  1. Prepare ichiban dashi by cold-steeping kombu and bringing to just below a simmer (instructor demonstrates temperature control using a probe thermometer), adding katsuobushi and steeping without boiling; strain and evaluate clarity against a white paper background; record time, temperature, and sensory notes in the lab log.
  2. Season cooked Japanese short-grain rice with a prepared sushi-su (rice vinegar, sugar, salt) mixture while folding with a rice paddle over a hangiri wooden tub; fan to cool and evaluate seasoning and texture (each grain separate, slight sheen, mild tang) before proceeding.
  3. Using a yanagiba or sujihiki slicer checked for sharpness, fabricate salmon and tuna into nigiri slices at the correct angle and thickness; form nigiri by hand, roll hosomaki with a bamboo mat applying even pressure, and assemble temaki hand rolls; plate a three-piece set for instructor evaluation.
Kombu, katsuobushi, Japanese short-grain rice, hangiri wooden tub, rice paddle, bamboo rolling mat, yanagiba or sujihiki knife, probe thermometer, sushi-grade salmon and tuna (previously frozen per FDA guidelines for parasite destruction), nori, rice vinegar, recipe cards, lab log, cutting glovesDashi passes clarity check (no visible particles, golden color); sushi rice seasoning confirmed by instructor taste test (pass/fail); nigiri slice thickness within 2 mm of specification measured by instructor; three-piece plated set scores at least 70/100 on precision and appearance rubric.
8Indian Subcontinent: Spice Tempering, Dal, and Bread12labStudents execute a tadka (tempering whole spices in fat) correctly, produce a dal makhani and a chicken tikka masala using a tomato-cream base, and bake naan in a cast-iron skillet—explaining how Maillard browning and fat solubility affect flavor extraction.
  1. Dry-toast cumin, coriander, cardamom, and cloves in sequence; grind in a spice grinder; separately perform a tadka by blooming whole mustard seeds and curry leaves in ghee over medium-high heat until popping—observe and document the sequence of sensory changes (color, aroma, sound) in the lab log.
  2. Build the tikka masala base (onion, ginger-garlic paste, tomato, spice blend, cream) in stages, adding each ingredient only after the previous stage is cooked out; taste and document flavor development at each stage; add oven-roasted marinated chicken and reduce to service consistency.
  3. Prepare naan dough using yogurt and a leavening agent; portion, roll, and cook on a dry preheated cast-iron skillet until charred bubbles appear on both sides; brush with ghee and garlic; compare leavening and chew against a control naan made without yogurt.
Whole spice set (mustard seeds, cumin, coriander, cardamom, cloves, curry leaves), spice grinder, ghee, cast-iron skillet, Dutch oven, dried black lentils, kidney beans, tomato base, heavy cream, chicken thigh, yogurt, recipe cards, lab log, ventilation check (mustard seed tempering produces sharp fumes—range hood on)Tadka sequence performed correctly (no burnt spices—instructor confirms color and aroma at pass/fail check); dal makhani and tikka masala score at least 70/100 on flavor and consistency rubric; naan charred-bubble pattern and pliability confirmed by instructor inspection.
9Middle Eastern and North African Cuisine: Tagine, Mezze, and Grain Cookery12labStudents braise a lamb tagine with preserved lemon and olives in a clay tagine vessel, prepare three mezze components (hummus, baba ghanoush, tabbouleh), and cook couscous and freekeh to correct texture—demonstrating layered spice building and acid-balance technique.
  1. Season lamb shoulder pieces with chermoula marinade (cilantro, parsley, cumin, paprika, saffron, olive oil, lemon) and rest for 30 minutes; build the tagine in layers (onion base, meat, preserved lemon, olives, stock) and braise covered at low heat on the range or in the oven, monitoring liquid level every 30 minutes.
  2. Prepare hummus using dried chickpeas cooked from scratch (rather than canned) and blend with tahini, lemon juice, and garlic, adjusting consistency with ice water; roast eggplant directly over a gas flame for baba ghanoush, monitoring char level; chop flat-leaf parsley and tomato for tabbouleh with correct bulgur-to-herb ratio.
  3. Cook couscous by the absorption-steam method and freekeh using the pilaf method; compare the textural and flavor differences in a structured tasting, recording notes on grain chew, nuttiness, and moisture retention in the lab log.
Clay tagine pot (seasoned), lamb shoulder, preserved lemon, Castelvetrano or similar green olives, dried chickpeas, tahini, eggplant, bulgur wheat, freekeh, couscous, saffron, chermoula spices, recipe cards, lab log, oven mitts (clay tagine retains heat—burn hazard noted)Lamb tagine sauce coats a spoon (nappe) and lamb is fork-tender—instructor probes texture; hummus and baba ghanoush score at least 70/100 on flavor and texture rubric; freekeh and couscous grain-texture check: each grain separate on plate, confirmed by instructor inspection.
10Sub-Saharan African and Caribbean Traditions: Jerk, Stews, and Fermented Flavors12labStudents produce Jamaican jerk chicken using a traditional allspice-Scotch bonnet marinade and smoke-roast method, a West African groundnut stew (maafe), and a rice and peas dish—demonstrating dry-rub application, coconut milk cookery, and peanut-thickening technique.
  1. Blend jerk marinade (allspice, Scotch bonnet, thyme, scallion, garlic, soy sauce, cider vinegar, brown sugar) in a food processor wearing gloves and eye protection (capsaicin hazard); score chicken thighs, apply marinade, and marinate a minimum of two hours; smoke-roast on a rack over a sheet pan with soaked wood chips in a covered hotel pan in the oven, monitoring internal temperature with a probe thermometer to a safe endpoint.
  2. Build maafe by browning chicken pieces, sautéing a tomato-onion base, and incorporating peanut butter thinned with chicken stock; simmer until oil separates to the surface (a sign of correct emulsion break in this dish), stirring to prevent scorching; adjust heat and seasoning.
  3. Cook Jamaican rice and peas using kidney beans and coconut milk; evaluate the finished rice texture (separate grains, coconut aroma) and plate a complete plate—jerk chicken, maafe, and rice and peas—for a full Sub-Saharan/Caribbean tasting evaluation.
Scotch bonnet peppers (gloves and safety goggles required at station), allspice berries (ground and whole), chicken thighs, peanut butter (natural, no additives), coconut milk, dried kidney beans, soaked wood chips (hickory or allspice wood), probe thermometer, hotel pan with rack, food processor, recipe cards, lab log, allergen notice (peanuts—posted)Jerk chicken internal temperature verified at safe minimum on lab log; maafe peanut sauce scores at least 70/100 on flavor and texture rubric; allergen notice for peanuts present at station before any food preparation begins—absence is an automatic safety fail requiring remediation before continuing.
11Menu Planning, Costing, and Cultural Context Documentation12practiceStudents design a cohesive five-course tasting menu drawing from at least four world regions covered in the course, complete with standardized recipe cards, yield-factor calculations, cost-per-portion analysis, and a one-paragraph cultural context note for each dish.
  1. Draft a five-course tasting menu on the provided template, selecting dishes from at least four regions; write brief rationale for menu flow (flavor arc, textural contrast, allergen considerations); submit draft to instructor for feedback before finalizing.
  2. Complete a full costing spreadsheet for all five dishes: convert recipe quantities to yield-adjusted purchase quantities using yield percentages provided in the ACF Culinary Fundamentals textbook; calculate cost per portion and food cost percentage using current simulated market prices supplied by the instructor.
  3. Write a one-paragraph cultural context note for each of the five dishes (150–200 words each), citing at least one primary or secondary source per dish; compile all recipe cards, costing sheets, and cultural notes into a bound menu portfolio to be used in the Capstone defense.
Menu planning templates, costing spreadsheet (Excel or Google Sheets), ACF Culinary Fundamentals textbook (yield percentage tables), simulated market price list, word processor, citation guide (MLA or APA), binder and dividers for portfolio assemblyCosting spreadsheet checked for math accuracy—yield calculations within 3% of instructor reference values; cultural context notes meet 150-word minimum and include at least one correctly formatted citation per dish; menu portfolio assembled in correct order—incomplete portfolios are returned for correction before the next lesson.
12Multicultural Tasting Menu Execution: Full Production Simulation18labStudents independently execute their designed five-course multicultural tasting menu for a panel of at least two evaluators, meeting plating, timing, temperature, flavor, and food-safety standards consistent with the ACF Certified Culinarian practical examination framework.
  1. Prepare a complete mise en place checklist and production timeline for all five courses the day before service; submit to instructor for review; arrive the following session and set up the station, verifying all temperatures and completing the pre-service safety walkthrough before the first course is started.
  2. Execute all five courses in sequence against the agreed production timeline, with evaluators scoring each course on the plating rubric (flavor, texture, appearance, portion accuracy, temperature at service) and recording timed intervals between courses—no course may exceed a five-minute variance from the stated timeline.
  3. After service, break down and sanitize the station to ServSafe standards; complete a written self-evaluation (one page) identifying two strengths and two areas for improvement, with specific reference to technique terminology from the course; submit self-evaluation with the menu portfolio at the end of the session.
All mise en place supplies per student's own finalized recipe cards, plating rubric (100-point scale), production timeline template, probe thermometers, service plates warmed in the oven, heat lamps, sanitizer solution buckets, ServSafe cleaning checklist, self-evaluation formAll five courses score an average of at least 70/100 on the plating rubric; at least one cold dish served at or below 41°F and at least one hot dish served at or above 135°F—verified by evaluator probe and recorded; any temperature failure requires an immediate corrective action explanation from the student before the session concludes.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
World Cuisines Written Knowledge ExaminationWritten exam25%75% or higher (75 of 100 points)A 100-question written examination covering regional flavor profiles, staple ingredients, classical dishes, cultural and historical context, allergen identification in international pantry items, and trade-math problems (metric conversion, yield factor, cost per portion) drawn directly from ACF Certified Culinarian exam content areas. Students have 90 minutes to complete the exam under closed-book conditions; any student scoring below 75% must complete targeted review and retake a parallel form within five school days.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
International Techniques Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%70/100 on rubric; all food-safety and temperature checks must be passing regardless of rubric totalEach student draws one region at random and has two hours to produce two dishes from that region using a recipe card provided at the start of the assessment; an ACF-aligned rubric scores flavor (30 pts), texture (25 pts), appearance (25 pts), and portion accuracy (20 pts). A probed internal temperature check and a station sanitation inspection are conducted by the instructor—a failure on either safety check overrides the rubric score and requires a full retake on a new date.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Log and Menu PortfolioLog15%Portfolio average of 75% across all rubric categories; costing math within 3% of reference values; all lab logs submitted and completeThe graded portfolio includes all 12 session lab logs (sensory notes, temperature records, yield calculations, and seasoning-decision rationale), the five-course menu portfolio produced in Lesson 11 (standardized recipe cards, costing spreadsheet, and cultural context notes), and the Lesson 12 post-service self-evaluation. Incomplete lab logs (missing entries or unsigned temperature records) are returned for correction and capped at 80% of their point value; the costing math is graded for accuracy against instructor reference values.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Food Safety and Equipment Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on all critical items (allergen labeling, temperature logging, lockout/tagout sequence, PPE compliance); non-critical items at 90% or higherA structured pass/fail safety audit conducted across two unannounced spot-checks during the course and one final formal check at the start of the Lesson 12 tasting menu execution: evaluator verifies allergen labels on all containers, confirms color-coded cutting board use, checks that lockout/tagout was performed on the pasta machine and wok range before cleaning, and inspects PPE compliance (nonslip shoes, chef coat, hair restraint). Any single critical item failure stops lab activity immediately and requires documented remediation before the student may continue; the check is then repeated in full.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-CULI27-07 Trade course

Plating: Composition, Presentation, and Finishing Techniques

146 hr · $1,925 COMPLIMENTARY

Students apply the principles of classical and contemporary plate presentation—balance, color, texture, portion control, and sauce work—to produce finished dishes that meet professional restaurant standards. Lessons integrate ServSafe safe-handling practices at every production step and build the visual presentation competencies tested in the ACF Certified Culinarian credential. By course end, students compose, execute, and critically evaluate complete plated dishes across multiple menu categories under timed, industry-realistic conditions.

Outcomes
Course text

Students apply the principles of classical and contemporary plate presentation—balance, color, texture, portion control, and sauce work—to produce finished dishes that meet professional restaurant standards. Lessons integrate ServSafe safe-handling practices at every production step and build the visual presentation competencies tested in the ACF Certified Culinarian credential. By course end, students compose, execute, and critically evaluate complete plated dishes across multiple menu categories under timed, industry-realistic conditions.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: Elements and Principles of Plate Design; Color Theory and Flavor Pairing for the Plate; Plateware, Tools, and Equipment Selection; Sauce Application Techniques; Garnish Selection, Preparation, and Placement; Portion Control, Yield, and Plate Cost Math; Temperature Management and ServSafe Plating-Line Practices; Classical Plating Styles: French Brigade and Nouvelle Cuisine; Contemporary and Modernist Plating Techniques; Dessert Plating and Pastry Finishing; Peer Critique, Self-Evaluation, and Plating Journal; Timed Three-Course Plating Practical.

What competent looks like. Apply the elements and principles of plate design—balance, color, contrast, height, negative space, and focal point—to compose visually professional dishes across at least four menu categories. Execute a minimum of six sauce-finishing and garnish techniques (nappe, quenelle, coulis drag, gel dot, herb oil pool, micro-green placement) with correct flavor pairing and safe food-handling practices. Portion proteins, starches, and vegetables to within ±0.5 oz of specification using scales and standard portioning tools, documenting yield and plate cost on a standardized form. Identify and correct plating faults—smearing, improper temperature, inconsistent portion, color clash—through structured peer critique using an industry rubric. Demonstrate ServSafe-aligned hot-hold and cold-hold temperature practices during plating line service, verifying finished plate temperatures with a calibrated thermometer. Produce a timed three-course plate sequence (appetizer, entrée, dessert) that meets ACF practical-evaluation criteria for appearance, technique, and professionalism.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Elements and Principles of Plate Design10.5theoryStudents will identify and explain the seven visual elements of plate design (line, shape, color, texture, height, negative space, focal point) by labeling annotated photographs of professional dishes.
  1. Instructor-led slide presentation comparing classical French plating, nouvelle cuisine, and contemporary Nordic styles with printed reference plates from ACF competition archives.
  2. Students sort a set of 30 professional dish photographs into 'effective' and 'ineffective' categories and write a two-sentence rationale for each decision using the seven-element vocabulary.
  3. Small groups sketch three original plate compositions on blank circle templates (10-inch plate outline) for an assigned menu item, then present and defend one sketch to the class.
Projected slide deck, printed dish-photo card set, blank plate-outline worksheets, colored pencils, On Cooking (Labensky et al.) Chapter on presentation, ACF Culinary Competition rules bookletStudents correctly label all seven elements on five annotated photographs and score at least 80% on a 20-question identification quiz administered at lesson end.
2Color Theory and Flavor Pairing for the Plate10.5theoryStudents will predict color harmony and contrast outcomes on a plate by applying a culinary color wheel and matching color choices to complementary flavor profiles.
  1. Instructor demonstration: build three identical protein-and-vegetable plates swapping garnish and sauce colors to show complementary, analogous, and monochromatic schemes; students photograph and annotate results.
  2. Paired exercise using a printed culinary color wheel: students map seasonal vegetables and sauces to color positions and propose two contrasting and two harmonious plate palettes in writing.
  3. Class tasting of color-matched versus color-clashing small plates (e.g., golden beet purée with saffron sauce vs. golden beet purée with roasted red pepper coulis); students record flavor and visual impression on a structured sensory form.
Printed culinary color wheels, seasonal produce, pre-made coulis and purées, sensory evaluation forms, digital camera or smartphone, On Cooking (Labensky et al.)Each student submits two complete plate-palette proposals with written flavor justification; instructor scores against a 10-point rubric (color harmony, flavor logic, completeness); passing score 8/10.
3Plateware, Tools, and Equipment Selection8.5demoStudents will select appropriate plateware and finishing tools for a given dish style and explain how plate shape, size, and material affect perceived portion and visual appeal.
  1. Instructor-led tour of the program's plateware inventory; students handle round, square, rectangular, and coupe plates of varied sizes and materials and complete a reference chart noting ideal use, standard portion diameter, and cleaning requirements.
  2. Demo: instructor plates the same entrée on five different plate sizes and shapes, photographs each, and projects images for a structured class comparison discussion on perceived portion size and white-space ratios.
  3. Students complete a matching exercise pairing 12 dish descriptions (fine dining appetizer, casual pasta, plated dessert, etc.) with the most appropriate plateware and two finishing tools from a provided equipment list.
Full plateware inventory (round, square, rectangular, coupe; 6-in through 12-in), squeeze bottles, offset spatulas, tweezers/plating tongs, ring molds, quenelle spoons, bench scraper, ServSafe Food Handler manual (temperature and sanitation references)Matching exercise scored by instructor; students must correctly pair at least 10 of 12 dishes (83%) to pass and must correctly identify appropriate safe-handling tool (single-use gloves vs. tongs) for cold items.
4Sauce Application Techniques15demoStudents will execute five sauce-placement techniques—nappe, pool, drag, streak, and dot—on a plate, achieving clean edges and consistent coverage as defined on the course rubric.
  1. Instructor step-by-step demo of each technique using coulis, jus, and cream sauce; students take real-time notes on spoon angle, viscosity requirements, and plate-temperature considerations.
  2. Supervised practice round: each student executes all five techniques on cold plates using food-safe colored water to isolate technique without wasted product; instructor circulates and gives immediate corrective feedback.
  3. Production round using actual sauces (tomato coulis, demi-glace, beurre blanc); students plate, photograph, and self-assess against the five-point rubric before instructor evaluates.
Squeeze bottles, ladles, offset spoons, coulis, jus, beurre blanc, demi-glace, food-safe coloring, cold and warm plates, calibrated infrared plate thermometer, plating rubric, ServSafe Food Handler manualInstructor scores each student's five sauced plates on the rubric (cleanliness of edge, consistency, correct technique name applied); passing average of 3.5/5 per technique across all five plates.
5Garnish Selection, Preparation, and Placement13labStudents will prepare and place edible garnishes—micro-greens, herb oils, vegetable chips, quenelles, and citrus tuiles—that are proportionate, flavorful, and structurally stable on a finished plate.
  1. Instructor demo of garnish prep: herb oil, citrus tuile, quenelle from cream or sorbet, and a micro-green crown; students shadow and record mise en place steps and plating sequence.
  2. Lab production: each student prepares all five garnish types from raw ingredients, following standardized recipes; yield is weighed and recorded on a portion-cost form.
  3. Plating integration: students compose a complete entrée plate incorporating at least three garnishes from the day's production and present for peer critique using the class visual rubric.
Micro-greens, herbs, citrus, tuile batter, heavy cream, sheet pans, Silpats, dehydrator (if available), quenelle spoons, tweezers, scale, portion-cost worksheet, digital cameraGarnishes are tasted and visually evaluated by instructor: flavor appropriateness pass/fail (garnish must complement dish flavor), structural stability assessed at 5 minutes post-plate; overall rubric score ≥ 3.5/5.
6Portion Control, Yield, and Plate Cost Math10.5theoryStudents will calculate as-purchased cost, edible-portion cost, and per-plate cost for a three-item entrée using yield percentages and current market prices, achieving results within 5% of instructor's verified answer.
  1. Instructor-led worked example on whiteboard: butcher a 5-lb beef tenderloin, weigh trim and usable yield, calculate yield percentage, then compute cost per edible ounce and per plate at a stated portion weight.
  2. Students complete three independent yield-and-cost problems using provided market price sheets for protein, starch, and vegetable components; work shown on structured calculation forms.
  3. Peer review: student pairs exchange completed forms, verify arithmetic, and flag discrepancies; instructor resolves disputes with class; students correct and resubmit.
Scales (digital, 0.1-oz resolution), butchered yield example proteins (pre-trimmed), market price sheets, portion-cost calculation forms, calculators, On Cooking appendix on food costingThree-problem calculation worksheet graded by instructor; all three final plate-cost figures must fall within 5% of verified answer; students who miss must redo with a parallel problem set before advancing to Lesson 7.
7Temperature Management and ServSafe Plating-Line Practices10.5theoryStudents will state correct hot-hold and cold-hold temperatures for plated dishes, demonstrate thermometer calibration, and identify the ServSafe temperature danger zone as it applies to plating-line timing.
  1. Instructor presentation on the ServSafe temperature danger zone, hot-hold minimums for proteins and sauces, cold-hold maximums for salad and dessert plates, and the time limits for food in the danger zone during plating.
  2. Calibration practice: each student ice-calibrates and boiling-water-calibrates a digital probe thermometer, records readings on a log sheet, and adjusts if needed per ServSafe calibration protocol.
  3. Scenario exercise: students are given six plating-line scenarios (e.g., soup held on a heat lamp for 45 minutes, cold seafood appetizer assembled 30 minutes before service) and write a corrective action for each, citing temperature and time parameters.
Digital probe thermometers, ice baths, calibration log forms, ServSafe Food Handler manual, projected ServSafe temperature chart, scenario cardsStudents must calibrate thermometer to within ±2°F of reference and score at least 5 of 6 scenario responses correctly with an acceptable corrective action; mapped to ServSafe Food Handler exam area: Temperature Control for Safety.
8Classical Plating Styles: French Brigade and Nouvelle Cuisine10.5demoStudents will reproduce a classical French brigade-style plate (protein at six o'clock, starch at ten, vegetable at two) and a nouvelle cuisine-style plate for the same entrée, articulating the historical and aesthetic differences between the two.
  1. Instructor lecture and demo: prepare a sautéed chicken breast entrée plated in classical brigade style, then replate the identical components in a nouvelle presentation; students photograph both and annotate differences.
  2. Students research one classical French chef (e.g., Escoffier) and one nouvelle cuisine chef (e.g., Bocuse) using provided reference materials and write a 150-word comparison of their plating philosophies.
  3. Supervised replication: students plate the same chicken entrée twice using both styles; instructor evaluates side-by-side for accuracy of component placement and cleanliness.
Sautéed chicken breasts (pre-cooked to save lab time), starch and vegetable accompaniments, 10-in round plates, printed brigade and nouvelle reference photos, digital camera, On Cooking (Labensky et al.) culinary history chapterBoth completed plates evaluated by instructor on a 10-point rubric (5 points each: correct component placement, clean execution); passing score ≥ 7/10 combined; written comparison graded pass/fail for factual accuracy.
9Contemporary and Modernist Plating Techniques13labStudents will apply at least three contemporary or modernist finishing techniques—gel dots, foam, soil/crumble, smear, or dehydrated accent—to a plated dish that meets ACF practical-evaluation visual standards.
  1. Instructor demo of five techniques: agar gel dot, lecithin foam, maltodextrin soil, purée smear with back of spoon, and dehydrated citrus or beet crisp; students record ingredient ratios and technique notes.
  2. Mise en place lab: students prepare gel, foam base, and crumble from provided standardized recipes; yield is recorded on portion-cost log.
  3. Free-composition plate: each student selects a protein prepared in advance and composes a contemporary plate using at least three of the five demonstrated techniques; plates are photographed, critiqued by a peer, and then evaluated by the instructor.
Agar-agar, soy lecithin, tapioca maltodextrin, dehydrator or low oven, immersion blender, squeeze bottles, tweezers, pre-cooked proteins, sauces, herbs, scale, portion-cost log, ACF Culinary Competition scoring sheet (for reference)Instructor evaluates completed plate against ACF-style rubric (visual balance, technique accuracy, flavor logic, professionalism of finish); passing score ≥ 70%; at least three distinct techniques must be identifiable.
10Dessert Plating and Pastry Finishing13labStudents will plate a composed dessert—incorporating a primary element, sauce, textural contrast, and garnish—that meets restaurant plating standards for balance and portion accuracy within the specified weight.
  1. Instructor demo: plate a chocolate lava cake with crème anglaise pool, tuile garnish, and berry coulis drag; discuss cold plate vs. warm plate considerations, sugar work safety, and portion weight specification.
  2. Students prepare and plate their own dessert set (pre-baked components provided) using at least three finishing elements; portions are weighed before plating and final plate weight verified against spec.
  3. Peer critique session using a structured verbal protocol: each student describes one strength and one specific improvement for a classmate's plate, using visual-element vocabulary from Lesson 1.
Pre-baked chocolate lava cakes, crème anglaise, berry coulis, tuile batter or pre-made tuiles, cocoa soil, powdered sugar, stencils, squeeze bottles, tweezer, scale, warm and cold plates, ServSafe Food Handler manual (allergen and temperature references)Plate must contain primary element, sauce, textural element, and garnish; portion weight within ±0.5 oz of spec; instructor rubric score ≥ 3.5/5 for visual balance and technique cleanliness; allergen identification question answered correctly (pass/fail).
11Peer Critique, Self-Evaluation, and Plating Journal10.5practiceStudents will evaluate three of their own plated dishes against a standardized rubric, write a corrective-action plan for each identified fault, and demonstrate measurable improvement on a re-plate.
  1. Students retrieve photographs and instructor-scored rubrics from three previous lab lessons; individually complete a self-evaluation form identifying the lowest-scoring element on each plate and proposing one specific corrective action.
  2. Facilitated peer-critique round: groups of three exchange plates, complete the rubric for each classmate's dish, and deliver structured verbal feedback; instructor monitors language for specificity and professionalism.
  3. Re-plate session: each student re-executes their lowest-scoring dish from the three reviewed, incorporating stated corrective action; instructor compares original and re-plate rubric scores for documented improvement.
Printed rubric from previous lab sessions, student photograph portfolios (digital or printed), self-evaluation forms, corrective-action plan template, ingredients for re-plate (student chooses dish from inventory), digital cameraSelf-evaluation form must identify at least one specific fault per dish (pass/fail for completeness); re-plate rubric score must show improvement of at least 0.5 points on the previously lowest-scoring element compared to original plate score.
12Timed Three-Course Plating Practical20.5labStudents will produce and present a complete appetizer, entrée, and dessert plate sequence within a set service window, meeting ACF practical-evaluation criteria for appearance, food safety, portion accuracy, and technique.
  1. Pre-production planning session (Day 1, 2 hours): each student submits a written mise en place timeline, plate diagram for each course, and temperature-check plan; instructor approves or requires revision before production begins.
  2. Timed production and plating (Day 1–2, 14 hours total): students cook, finish, and plate all three courses on the station following their approved plan; instructor and a designated peer observer document technique, plate appearance, and temperature readings at pickup.
  3. Post-production debrief and documentation (Day 2, 2 hours): students complete a written self-assessment comparing planned vs. actual execution, photograph all three plates, and attach final rubric scores to their plating journal portfolio.
Full kitchen station, all proteins, produce, pantry items per student-written mise en place list, calibrated probe thermometers, scales, plateware selected by student with instructor approval, ACF practical-evaluation scoring rubric, ServSafe temperature log forms, digital cameraAll three plates scored by instructor on ACF-style rubric (appearance, technique, portion accuracy, temperature compliance, timing); each course must score ≥ 70%; food safety temperature log must show no violations; mapped to ACF Certified Culinarian practical-competency areas: cookery, presentation, and professionalism.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Plating Principles Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% (38 of 50 points)A 50-question written exam covering plate design elements and principles, sauce terminology, garnish selection rationale, color theory, portion-cost calculation, ServSafe temperature danger zone parameters, and historical plating styles. Questions include multiple choice, matching, short-answer, and one yield-calculation problem; mapped to ACF Certified Culinarian written exam content areas (culinary principles, sanitation) and ServSafe Food Handler temperature control topic.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Timed Three-Course Plating Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Each of the three courses must score ≥ 70% on the ACF-style rubric; no food-safety temperature violations permittedStudents produce and present a full appetizer, entrée, and dessert plate sequence under timed service conditions (as executed in Lesson 12); instructor scores each course on appearance, technique accuracy, portion control, and professional finish using an ACF practical-evaluation rubric, and records temperature readings at pickup on a ServSafe-format temperature log. This assessment directly mirrors the practical component evaluated under ACF Certified Culinarian candidacy requirements.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Plating Lab Log PortfolioLog15%Pass: all 8 required lab entries submitted with photos, rubric scores, and signed corrective-action plans; average rubric score across entries ≥ 3.0/5.0Students maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course documenting each major plating lab (Lessons 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 production days plus one self-selected additional entry), including pre-production plate diagrams, dated photographs of finished plates, instructor-scored rubrics, portion-cost calculations, and written corrective-action plans; the portfolio demonstrates progression and supports the reflective documentation skill required in ACF certification application records.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Food Safety and Plating-Line Safety CheckSafety audit15%Pass: zero critical violations; all four observable behaviors demonstrated correctly; any minor violation corrected within 60 seconds of promptDuring a scheduled unannounced observation within the final three lab sessions, the instructor evaluates four observable safe-handling behaviors at the plating station: (1) thermometer calibration and use at correct check points, (2) hot-hold and cold-hold temperature maintenance with documented log, (3) proper hand-washing and glove protocol when handling ready-to-eat garnishes, and (4) clean-as-you-go sanitation of plating tools between plates; mapped to ServSafe Food Handler exam areas: personal hygiene, temperature control for safety, and preventing cross-contamination.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-CULI27-08 Trade course

Kitchen Operations: Workflow, Equipment & Culinary Management

146 hr · $1,925 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to run a professional kitchen efficiently and safely, covering station organization, equipment operation and maintenance, production planning, cost control, and team communication. Lessons integrate ServSafe food-safety principles into every operational system and prepare students for the workflow and professionalism standards tested by the ACF Certified Culinarian credential. By the end of the course students can manage a full shift from prep through service and breakdown with documented accuracy.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to run a professional kitchen efficiently and safely, covering station organization, equipment operation and maintenance, production planning, cost control, and team communication. Lessons integrate ServSafe food-safety principles into every operational system and prepare students for the workflow and professionalism standards tested by the ACF Certified Culinarian credential. By the end of the course students can manage a full shift from prep through service and breakdown with documented accuracy.

How the course runs. 12 blocks: The Professional Kitchen: Layout, Brigade, and Chain of Command; Mise en Place: Prep Lists, Station Setup, and Time Management; Food Safety in Kitchen Operations: ServSafe Principles Applied; Commercial Equipment: Operation, Safety, and Lockout/Tagout; Refrigeration, Storage Systems, and FIFO; Production Planning: Scheduling, Batch Cooking, and Par Levels; Food Cost, Yield, and Portion Control; Standardized Recipes, Recipe Costing, and Menu Engineering Basics; Ordering, Receiving, and Inventory Control; Sanitation Systems: Cleaning Schedules, Chemicals, and Pest Prevention; Shift Management: Opening, Service, and Closing Procedures; Professionalism, Team Communication, and ACF Standards Review.

What competent looks like. Organize and execute a complete production schedule for a multi-course kitchen service, meeting mise en place deadlines within a real or simulated shift timeline. Operate, clean, and perform basic preventive maintenance on major commercial kitchen equipment including ranges, convection ovens, fryers, slicers, and refrigeration units, following manufacturer guidelines and OSHA lockout/tagout procedures. Apply food-safety and sanitation standards consistently across receiving, storage, prep, holding, and service stages, meeting ServSafe Food Handler competency benchmarks. Calculate food cost percentage, recipe yield, and portion cost from raw data, and use those figures to make basic production and purchasing decisions. Communicate station responsibilities, priority tasks, and handoffs clearly using standard kitchen terminology and brigade-system conventions. Complete and interpret standard kitchen documentation including prep lists, temperature logs, waste logs, and equipment inspection checklists.

Lessons · 12 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Professional Kitchen: Layout, Brigade, and Chain of Command10.5theoryStudents identify classical and contemporary kitchen brigade roles, explain the flow of a professional kitchen floor plan, and describe how communication moves up and down the chain of command during service.
  1. Annotate a printed commercial kitchen floor plan, labeling each station, traffic flow path, and fire-exit route, then compare layouts with a partner and discuss one improvement each would make.
  2. Role-play a short service sequence in which students rotate through the positions of executive chef, sous chef, and line cook, calling and acknowledging tickets using standard 'oui, chef' and ticket-repetition protocol.
  3. Read and discuss a short case study describing a service breakdown caused by poor communication, identify the root cause, and write a one-paragraph corrective action memo using correct kitchen terminology.
Commercial kitchen floor-plan diagrams (instructor-provided), Escoffier brigade reference chart, whiteboard, printed ticket slips, culinary arts textbook chapter on kitchen organization (e.g., ProStart or On Cooking)Students correctly label at least 9 of 10 stations on a blank floor plan and score 80% or higher on a 20-question written quiz on brigade titles and communication flow.
2Mise en Place: Prep Lists, Station Setup, and Time Management15labStudents build a written prep list from a given menu, set up a station to culinary-school standards within a timed window, and complete assigned prep tasks in priority order.
  1. Given a four-item dinner menu and a two-hour service window, students reverse-engineer a written prep list with task names, quantities, responsible station, and target completion times.
  2. Set up an assigned station (sauté, grill, or garde manger) from a cold start, including sanitizing the surface, gathering mise en place containers, labeling all items with product name, date, and time, and arranging tools ergonomically — instructor times and evaluates against a rubric.
  3. Execute the prep list under realistic time pressure, then debrief by comparing actual completion times to planned times and identifying two adjustments for the next service.
Sample menus, prep-list templates, date-label tape and markers, hotel pans, mise en place containers, sanitizer solution and cloths, kitchen timer, station setup rubricStudent's prep list includes all required components (task, quantity, station, time) for every menu item; station passes inspection rubric at 80% or higher; all items are correctly labeled.
3Food Safety in Kitchen Operations: ServSafe Principles Applied13theoryStudents apply ServSafe food-handler principles — including temperature control for safety (TCS), cross-contamination prevention, personal hygiene, and proper receiving and storage — to realistic kitchen-operations scenarios.
  1. Complete a temperature audit exercise: students use calibrated thermometers to check the temperature of ten labeled food items staged by the instructor at various correct and incorrect temperatures, record results on a temperature log, and flag items that require corrective action.
  2. Trace a fictional contamination scenario (raw chicken stored above ready-to-eat produce) through a kitchen workflow diagram, identify every point where cross-contamination could occur, and propose a corrective procedure for each point.
  3. Review a set of receiving invoices and inspect mock deliveries for signs of improper temperature, damaged packaging, and missing labels; accept or reject each item and document the decision with a reason.
Calibrated probe thermometers, temperature logs, mock delivery items (sealed or clearly staged), ServSafe Food Handler study guide, cross-contamination scenario handout, receiving-inspection checklistStudents score 75% or higher on a 30-question ServSafe-style written quiz; temperature log entries are complete and corrective actions are correctly identified for all out-of-range items.
4Commercial Equipment: Operation, Safety, and Lockout/Tagout15demoStudents demonstrate safe startup, operation, and shutdown of commercial ranges, convection ovens, flat-top griddles, deep fryers, and dish machines, and correctly apply OSHA lockout/tagout procedure before any cleaning or jam-clearing task.
  1. Instructor demonstrates full lockout/tagout sequence on a commercial slicer; students then each perform the same sequence on the slicer while being observed, verbalizing each step aloud.
  2. Rotate through four equipment stations (range/oven, fryer, griddle, dish machine) in small groups: at each station students read the posted manufacturer quick-reference card, perform startup, run a brief operational check, then execute a safe shutdown and exterior wipe-down.
  3. Complete a written equipment incident scenario — a fryer fire caused by a full vat and wet product — and answer questions about what PPE was required, which OSHA standard applies to the lockout, and what the correct response sequence is.
Commercial range, convection oven, flat-top griddle, deep fryer, dish machine, commercial slicer, lockout/tagout kits (padlocks and hasp tags), manufacturer quick-reference cards, heat-resistant gloves, eye protection, OSHA lockout/tagout reference (29 CFR 1910.147 summary sheet)Each student completes the lockout/tagout demonstration on the slicer with zero procedural errors observed by the instructor; equipment-startup checklists are completed correctly for all four stations.
5Refrigeration, Storage Systems, and FIFO10.5labStudents organize a walk-in cooler and dry-storage area using FIFO rotation, correct shelving hierarchy (raw meats below ready-to-eat), and proper labeling, then log temperatures and identify deficiencies.
  1. Reorganize a walk-in cooler that has been intentionally stocked with labeling errors, wrong shelf placement, and expired items; remove hazards, relabel items correctly, and document every corrective action on a storage-audit form.
  2. Perform FIFO rotation on a dry-storage rack stocked with canned goods and dry staples dated over multiple weeks, restock a new delivery in correct order, and verify dates are visible from the front.
  3. Record cooler and freezer temperatures at the start of lab, mid-lab, and end of lab on a standard temperature log, identify any reading outside the safe range, and write the corrective action that should follow.
Walk-in cooler (or reach-in refrigerator for simulation), dry-storage shelving, assorted labeled food items including some with intentional errors, date-label tape, markers, calibrated thermometers, storage-audit form, temperature log, ServSafe storage hierarchy referenceWalk-in passes re-inspection with 100% correct shelving hierarchy and all items properly dated; FIFO rotation is verified correct; temperature log is fully completed with units and corrective actions noted where applicable.
6Production Planning: Scheduling, Batch Cooking, and Par Levels13theoryStudents create a production schedule that assigns batch-cooking tasks to stations, sets par levels based on a projected cover count, and sequences cooking times to deliver all items service-ready simultaneously.
  1. Given a projected cover count and a restaurant menu with cook times listed, students calculate how many batches of each item are needed to reach par, build a written production schedule with station assignments and start times, and identify the critical path.
  2. Compare two pre-written production schedules — one efficient and one with sequencing errors — and write a short analysis explaining why one will cause a service bottleneck.
  3. In groups, present a production schedule to the class as if briefing the kitchen crew at the start of a shift; peers evaluate clarity and completeness using a peer-review checklist.
Sample menu with cook times, projected cover count worksheet, production schedule template, two pre-written comparison schedules, peer-review checklist, whiteboard or projectorStudent production schedule correctly calculates par quantities, assigns all stations, and sequences tasks so all items are service-ready within the given window; instructor evaluates against a rubric, passing at 80% or higher.
7Food Cost, Yield, and Portion Control13theoryStudents calculate as-purchased cost, edible-portion cost, yield percentage, and food cost percentage for a set of raw ingredients, and adjust recipe quantities using a conversion factor.
  1. Given invoiced prices and trim-test data for three proteins (chicken breast, beef tenderloin, fish fillet), students calculate yield percentage and edible-portion cost for each using the standard formula: EP cost = AP price ÷ yield %.
  2. Scale a standardized recipe from 10 portions to 75 portions using a conversion factor, recalculate the ingredient quantities, and estimate the total recipe cost using provided unit prices.
  3. Work through a food cost percentage scenario: given total food sales and total cost of goods used for a week, calculate food cost percentage, compare it to a target range, and identify one operational change that could improve it.
Calculator, recipe cost worksheets, trim-test data sheets, sample invoices, standardized recipe cards (instructor-provided), food cost percentage formula reference card, culinary math textbook (e.g., Math for the Professional Kitchen)All calculations on the food cost worksheet are correct within a 2% rounding tolerance; recipe scaling is accurate for all ingredients; students score 80% or higher on a short applied-math quiz.
8Standardized Recipes, Recipe Costing, and Menu Engineering Basics10.5demoStudents write a complete standardized recipe card, cost it using current unit prices, and explain how menu item contribution margin informs placement and pricing decisions.
  1. Observe instructor demonstrate how to convert a narrative restaurant recipe into a formatted standardized recipe card with yield, portion size, ingredient quantities in weight and volume, method steps, plating note, and HACCP critical control points noted.
  2. Each student selects one dish taught earlier in the program, writes a full standardized recipe card following the demonstrated format, and costs each ingredient using a provided price list.
  3. In a guided discussion, students place four sample menu items on a simple menu-engineering matrix (star, plow-horse, puzzle, dog) based on provided popularity and contribution-margin data, and suggest one action for each category.
Standardized recipe card template, sample narrative recipes, ingredient price list, menu-engineering matrix handout, projector for instructor demo, calculatorStandardized recipe card includes all required fields; costing is accurate within 2% rounding tolerance; student can correctly categorize two of two practice items on the menu-engineering matrix when checked verbally.
9Ordering, Receiving, and Inventory Control10.5labStudents complete a par-based order, receive a simulated delivery against a purchase order, inspect items for quality and temperature, and update a running inventory count.
  1. Using a par level sheet and a current inventory count, students calculate what quantity of each item needs to be ordered to reach par, fill out a simulated purchase order form, and verify the math is correct.
  2. Receive a mock delivery: check each item against the purchase order for quantity and description, inspect packaging condition and product temperature with a probe thermometer, and either accept or reject each item with a documented reason.
  3. Conduct a physical inventory count of a stocked shelf area, record quantities on an inventory sheet, compare counts to the previous theoretical inventory, and calculate a variance percentage.
Par level sheet, inventory count sheet, purchase order form, mock delivery items with invoices, probe thermometer, receiving inspection checklist, calculatorPurchase order quantities are mathematically correct for all items; at least one rejection is correctly documented with a valid reason; inventory variance calculation is accurate within 1 unit.
10Sanitation Systems: Cleaning Schedules, Chemicals, and Pest Prevention10.5labStudents build a master cleaning schedule for a commercial kitchen, correctly mix sanitizing solutions to required concentrations, and identify pest-entry points and prevention measures that meet health-department standards.
  1. Using a blank kitchen floor plan and a list of surfaces and equipment, students build a master cleaning schedule that assigns each item a cleaning frequency (daily, weekly, monthly), responsible party, and method.
  2. Mix chlorine and quaternary ammonium sanitizer solutions following label dilution directions, test each with the appropriate test strip, and record concentration results; adjust and retest any solution outside the accepted range.
  3. Walk through the kitchen (or review a photo set of a commercial kitchen) and identify and document at least five potential pest-entry or harborage points, then match each to a corrective action from the ServSafe pest prevention guidelines.
Blank kitchen floor plan, master cleaning schedule template, chlorine sanitizer, quaternary ammonium sanitizer, sanitizer test strips, spray bottles, gloves, eye protection, ServSafe Food Handler pest prevention section, pest-inspection checklistCleaning schedule covers all required surfaces at correct frequencies; sanitizer concentration is within the accepted range on first or corrected mix and verified by test strip; at least five pest points are correctly identified and matched to valid corrective actions.
11Shift Management: Opening, Service, and Closing Procedures13practiceStudents execute a complete simulated shift from opening setup through service to closing breakdown, following checklists for each phase and documenting food-safety temperatures throughout.
  1. Complete a timed opening checklist independently: turn on and verify equipment, confirm cooler temperatures, review the production schedule, set up stations, and sign off the opening log before a designated 'service start' time set by the instructor.
  2. Run a 45-minute simulated service using ticket-based ordering, rotating through expeditor and line-cook roles, calling tickets, plating to standard, and managing time-temperature during holding.
  3. Execute a complete closing procedure: cool and properly store all remaining food using the two-stage cooling method, sanitize all surfaces following the master cleaning schedule, complete the closing temperature log, and shut down equipment in correct sequence.
Opening and closing checklists, ticket slips, production schedule, probe thermometers, temperature logs, sanitizer solution, cleaning cloths, mise en place containers, food products per the simulated menuOpening checklist is completed with all temperatures in safe range before service start; closing log shows two-stage cooling documented for all TCS items; station passes a post-close sanitation inspection at 85% or higher on the rubric.
12Professionalism, Team Communication, and ACF Standards Review11.5theoryStudents articulate ACF Certified Culinarian professional standards, demonstrate respectful and efficient team communication in a kitchen context, and evaluate their own readiness against ACF competency areas covered in this course.
  1. Review the ACF Code of Professional Ethics and the ACF Certified Culinarian competency areas; students map each major topic from Kitchen Operations to the ACF competency it supports, completing a two-column alignment chart.
  2. Participate in a structured role-play exercise simulating a conflict between two line cooks over station prep during a rush; practice de-escalation, redirecting to the task, and communicating with the chef in professional language.
  3. Complete a written self-assessment rubric rating their own competency in each course outcome area (prep planning, food safety, equipment, cost control, documentation) and identify two specific skills to strengthen before the ACF exam.
ACF Certified Culinarian competency area summary (from ACF website), ACF Code of Professional Ethics handout, alignment chart template, self-assessment rubric, course-outcomes reference sheetAlignment chart correctly maps at least 8 of 10 course topics to a valid ACF competency area; self-assessment is complete and includes two specific, realistic improvement goals; role-play debrief demonstrates appropriate professional language.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Kitchen Operations Written ExamWritten exam25%80% or higher (40 of 50 questions correct)A 50-question written exam covering brigade structure, production planning, food cost and yield calculations, FIFO and storage hierarchy, equipment safety and lockout/tagout procedure, sanitation chemical concentrations, and shift documentation; questions are formatted to mirror ACF Certified Culinarian and ServSafe Food Handler question styles, including multiple choice and short applied-math problems.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Full-Shift Operations Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%85% or higher on the instructor rubric across all four phases; any critical food-safety error (temperature violation, cross-contamination, unlabeled TCS item) results in automatic retestEach student independently executes a complete simulated shift — opening setup, production to a prep list, a 30-minute ticket-based service, and full closing breakdown — while the instructor evaluates mise en place organization, communication, temperature documentation, sanitation compliance, and food quality against a scored rubric aligned to ACF Certified Culinarian practical competencies.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Operations Lab LogLog15%All 10 required lab entries submitted; each entry scores 3 of 4 or higher on the completeness rubric (objective, procedure, data/results, reflection present and accurate)Students maintain a running lab log across all hands-on lessons, recording the objective, what they did, measured data (temperatures, costs, concentrations, times), and a brief reflection on what they would do differently; the log is collected at the end of the course and evaluated for accuracy, completeness, and evidence of growth in food-safety and operational reasoning.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Equipment Safety and Sanitation CheckSafety audit15%Zero critical errors permitted; any missed lockout/tagout step or incorrect sanitizer concentration requires an immediate supervised retest before the student may continue using equipmentA practical point-in-time safety check conducted by the instructor in which each student must demonstrate correct lockout/tagout on an assigned piece of equipment, mix a sanitizing solution and verify concentration with a test strip, and correctly identify the PPE required for the task; this check is conducted unannounced during a lab session and is mapped to both OSHA lockout/tagout requirements and ServSafe sanitation standards.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-CULI27-09 Capstone

Culinary Arts Capstone Project

216 hr · $2,160 COMPLIMENTARY

Students design, execute, and defend an original multi-course dining experience that integrates skills from every prior course in the program, including food safety, knife work, stocks and sauces, garde manger, meat fabrication, international technique, and professional plating. The capstone requires written documentation—concept statement, standardized recipes, costing sheets, and a production timeline—submitted as a professional portfolio. A formal oral defense before a panel of culinary faculty and an industry evaluator serves as the culminating assessment.

Outcomes
Course text

Students design, execute, and defend an original multi-course dining experience that integrates skills from every prior course in the program, including food safety, knife work, stocks and sauces, garde manger, meat fabrication, international technique, and professional plating. The capstone requires written documentation—concept statement, standardized recipes, costing sheets, and a production timeline—submitted as a professional portfolio. A formal oral defense before a panel of culinary faculty and an industry evaluator serves as the culminating assessment.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Menu Concept Development and Recipe Standardization; Production Planning, HACCP Documentation, and Practice Service; Revised Final Execution and Portfolio Compilation; Oral Defense and Professional Presentation.

What competent looks like. Design a cohesive three-course menu with written concept statement, standardized recipes scaled for a defined cover count, and food-cost analysis completed to industry standards. Execute all menu components safely and on schedule in a live kitchen setting, demonstrating correct temperature control, knife technique, sauce work, and plate presentation as measured by ACF Certified Culinarian competency standards. Apply HACCP principles and ServSafe food-safety practices throughout production, including proper receiving, storage, cross-contamination prevention, and end-point cooking temperatures. Produce a complete capstone portfolio containing the menu concept, standardized recipe cards, costing and yield worksheets, production timeline, and a written self-evaluation. Defend menu decisions, technique choices, and food-safety practices verbally before an industry panel, demonstrating professional communication skills appropriate for a working culinary environment. Receive and incorporate constructive critique from faculty and peers during the practice service, revising at least one recipe or process before the final execution.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Menu Concept Development and Recipe Standardization54theoryStudents will produce a fully written three-course menu concept—including a concept statement, standardized recipes for each dish scaled to a specified cover count, and a preliminary food-cost analysis—that meets ACF Certified Culinarian documentation standards.
  1. Draft a one-page concept statement explaining the cuisine style, target guest, seasonal ingredient rationale, and how each course connects thematically; share with a peer for written feedback before revising.
  2. Convert each personal recipe into a standardized recipe card using the program's template, including ingredient weights in both US customary and metric units, preparation steps numbered in sequence, cooking temperatures, yield, and portion size.
  3. Build a food-cost spreadsheet for each dish using current local supplier price sheets, calculating as-purchased cost, edible-portion cost, portion cost, and food-cost percentage; flag any item exceeding a 35 percent food-cost target and propose a substitution.
ACF standardized recipe card template, program food-cost worksheet, current produce and protein price lists from at least two local distributors, culinary math textbook, computer with spreadsheet software, kitchen scale, ServSafe Manager textbook (food-safety reference for temperature and storage standards)Instructor reviews each standardized recipe card and cost sheet using a 20-point rubric; passing score is 14 out of 20. Recipe must include correct temperatures, complete ingredient list with weights, and food-cost percentage calculated within five percent of instructor's independent calculation.
2Production Planning, HACCP Documentation, and Practice Service54labStudents will write a complete production timeline with HACCP-based food-safety checkpoints and execute a full practice service of their three-course menu for a live peer audience, receiving written faculty feedback on technique, timing, and food safety.
  1. Construct a backward-planning production timeline from plating time, listing each prep task, its duration, responsible station, required equipment, and the critical control point (CCP) associated with that step—such as internal temperature for protein cookery or cold-hold temperature for garde manger components.
  2. Conduct a full mise en place walk-through in the teaching kitchen: set up stations, confirm all tools and PPE are present, verify refrigeration is holding at or below 41°F, and complete a pre-service safety checklist covering knife storage, wet-floor signage, fire extinguisher access, and first-aid kit location.
  3. Execute the complete three-course practice service with classmates as guests; faculty use the ACF cooking competency rubric to score each course on flavor, technique, temperature, presentation, and timing, and deliver a written critique sheet the same day.
Student's own standardized recipe cards and production timeline, kitchen knife kit, all required cooking equipment and smallwares, HACCP temperature log forms, calibrated probe thermometers, ACF cooking competency rubric, ServSafe Food Handler reference card, PPE (non-slip shoes, apron, hair restraint), fire extinguisher, first-aid kitFaculty score the practice service on the ACF cooking competency rubric (100-point scale); students must score at least 70 to proceed to the final execution. Any critical food-safety failure—such as a protein served below safe internal temperature or cross-contamination observed—requires an immediate corrective action and a documented re-check before the lesson concludes.
3Revised Final Execution and Portfolio Compilation54practiceStudents will incorporate faculty critique from the practice service to revise at least one recipe or production step, then execute the final three-course dining experience for a panel of faculty and an invited industry evaluator, plating all courses to the standard expected of an entry-level professional cook.
  1. Write a one-page revision memo documenting what changed from the practice service—ingredient substitution, technique adjustment, or timing correction—and explaining why the change improves the dish; attach it to the portfolio as evidence of reflective practice.
  2. Execute the final service in real time: fabricate proteins, prepare stocks or sauces from scratch, compose garde manger components, and plate all courses within the production timeline, maintaining HACCP logs throughout and calling out temperatures aloud so the panel can observe compliance.
  3. After service, compile the complete capstone portfolio in a professional binder or digital folder: concept statement, all standardized recipe cards, costing worksheets, production timeline with HACCP log, faculty critique sheet from practice service, revision memo, and a one-page written self-evaluation scored against the ACF Certified Culinarian competency areas.
All ingredients for final menu, full knife kit and station equipment, calibrated probe thermometers, HACCP temperature logs, plating tools (offset spatula, squeeze bottles, ring molds as needed), service ware appropriate to menu concept, ACF Certified Culinarian competency checklist, portfolio binder or digital submission folder, ServSafe reference for temperature verificationIndustry evaluator and lead faculty score the final execution independently on the ACF cooking competency rubric (100-point scale); the two scores are averaged, and students must achieve a combined average of 75 or higher to pass. Portfolio must be submitted complete—missing any required document is an automatic incomplete until the document is received.
4Oral Defense and Professional Presentation54fieldStudents will present and verbally defend their capstone menu, documentation, and food-safety decisions before a panel of culinary faculty and an industry professional, demonstrating the communication skills and technical knowledge expected of a Certified Culinarian candidate.
  1. Deliver a structured 10-minute oral presentation to the panel covering: the menu concept and cuisine rationale, at least one technique drawn from each major program course area, key food-safety controls applied during production, and the food-cost outcome compared to the target; use the portfolio documents as visual references.
  2. Respond to a minimum of five panel questions drawn from ACF Certified Culinarian knowledge areas, including cooking methods, sauce classification, safe food handling, sanitation, and professionalism; answers are scored in real time on a standardized question rubric.
  3. Conduct a post-defense self-assessment by completing the program's professional readiness checklist—rating personal strengths and areas for continued development across technique, organization, communication, and food safety—and submit it as the final page of the portfolio.
Completed capstone portfolio (physical binder or projected digital version), ACF Certified Culinarian candidate task list (current edition, available at acfchefs.org), oral defense rubric, panel question bank developed from ACF CC knowledge domains, professional attire per program dress codePanel scores the oral defense on a 40-point rubric: 20 points for content accuracy and depth, 10 points for professional communication, and 10 points for ability to answer panel questions correctly. Passing score is 28 out of 40. Any answer involving food safety that is factually incorrect must be corrected verbally by the student before the session ends; failure to self-correct after one prompt results in a mandatory remediation meeting before the course grade is finalized.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Final Culinary Execution ProjectProject60%Combined average score of 75 out of 100 on the ACF cooking competency rubric, scored independently by the industry evaluator and lead faculty, with no unresolved critical food-safety violations observed during service.Students execute their complete, revised three-course menu in a live kitchen environment for a panel that includes an industry professional, demonstrating integrated mastery of technique, food safety, timing, and presentation. The execution is scored using the ACF Certified Culinarian cooking competency rubric, which maps directly to the knowledge and skill areas assessed in the CC credentialing process.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Capstone PortfolioPortfolio20%All seven required documents submitted and complete; overall portfolio rubric score of 70 out of 100, with no section scoring below 50 percent of its allocated points.The portfolio is a professional dossier containing the menu concept statement, standardized recipe cards, food-cost and yield worksheets, HACCP-documented production timeline, faculty practice-service critique, revision memo, and written self-evaluation scored against ACF CC competency areas. It serves as tangible evidence that the student can produce the written documentation required in professional kitchen management and expected of Certified Culinarian candidates.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Oral Defense Before Industry PanelOral / panel20%Score of 28 out of 40 on the oral defense rubric, with all food-safety errors self-corrected during the session; failure to self-correct after one prompt requires remediation.Students present their capstone work in a 10-minute structured presentation and then answer a minimum of five panel questions drawn from ACF Certified Culinarian knowledge domains covering cooking methods, sanitation, sauce and stock fundamentals, professionalism, and costing. The oral defense mirrors the verbal knowledge component evaluated in ACF certification and develops the professional communication skills expected by industry employers.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
HOS-CULI27-10 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement

324 hr · $1,295 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete a minimum of 324 supervised hours in a professional kitchen or food-service operation approved by the program, applying all technical and workplace skills acquired in prior coursework under the direct mentorship of an on-site supervisor. Performance is evaluated through employer observation, a structured skills checklist, and a reflective daily log that documents tasks performed, professional behaviors, and connections to ACF Certified Culinarian competency areas. Successful completion satisfies the practical work-experience component required for program completion and strengthens the student's professional portfolio.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete a minimum of 324 supervised hours in a professional kitchen or food-service operation approved by the program, applying all technical and workplace skills acquired in prior coursework under the direct mentorship of an on-site supervisor. Performance is evaluated through employer observation, a structured skills checklist, and a reflective daily log that documents tasks performed, professional behaviors, and connections to ACF Certified Culinarian competency areas. Successful completion satisfies the practical work-experience component required for program completion and strengthens the student's professional portfolio.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Pre-Placement Orientation and Site Agreement; Weeks 1–6: Foundational Production Shifts; Weeks 7–14: Advanced Station Responsibility and Leadership; Exit Evaluation, Portfolio Completion, and Debrief.

What competent looks like. Perform line-cook and prep-cook duties—including mise en place, stocks, sauces, fabrication, and plating—at a professional pace and quality standard acceptable to the host employer. Demonstrate safe food-handling practices consistent with ServSafe Food Handler standards throughout every shift, including proper temperature control, cross-contamination prevention, and personal hygiene. Follow all workplace safety procedures—including chemical handling, equipment lockout protocols, and PPE use—without prompting from a supervisor. Communicate professionally with kitchen teammates, supervisors, and front-of-house staff using industry terminology and respectful workplace conduct. Complete a reflective daily log that connects each shift's tasks to ACF Certified Culinarian competency domains and ServSafe principles, demonstrating analytical growth over the placement period. Receive a passing employer evaluation rating on professionalism, technical skill, and reliability at the conclusion of the externship.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Pre-Placement Orientation and Site Agreement12theoryStudents will identify the roles, responsibilities, legal expectations, and documentation requirements of the externship before their first shift.
  1. Review and sign the three-party externship agreement (student, employer, school) and discuss each party's obligations, confidentiality expectations, and grievance procedures.
  2. Complete a site-specific hazard walkthrough using a standardized safety checklist—covering emergency exits, fire suppression locations, chemical storage, first-aid kit, and PPE requirements—and submit a written summary.
  3. Attend a school-facilitated orientation session where students set three measurable personal goals for the placement period, tied to specific ACF Certified Culinarian competency areas, and present them to the class for peer feedback.
Three-party externship agreement form, site safety checklist template, ACF Certified Culinarian competency domain list, ServSafe Food Handler quick-reference card, student goal-setting worksheet, program student handbookInstructor verifies signed agreement is on file; written hazard-walk summary earns a pass if it correctly identifies all required safety features at the site; goal-setting worksheet is reviewed by instructor and returned with written approval before the student may begin shifts — all three elements must be complete and approved (pass/fail).
2Weeks 1–6: Foundational Production Shifts120fieldStudents will execute fundamental kitchen tasks—including mise en place, stock and sauce production, cold-food prep, and basic protein fabrication—at an entry-level professional pace under supervisor guidance.
  1. Complete scheduled kitchen shifts performing assigned duties; at the end of each shift, fill out the daily log entry documenting: tasks performed, one ServSafe principle applied, and one ACF competency area connected to the day's work.
  2. Participate in at least two documented feedback sessions with the on-site supervisor during this block, using the mid-point feedback form to identify one technical strength and one area for focused improvement.
  3. Photograph or sketch one plated dish or station setup each week (where employer permits), annotate it with temperature, technique, and food-safety notes, and add it to the growing portfolio section of the daily log binder.
Daily log binder with pre-printed entry forms, mid-point employer feedback form, ACF competency domain checklist, ServSafe Food Handler reference card, school-issued knife roll (or site-provided equipment), appropriate PPE including cut-resistant glove, non-slip shoes, and chef uniformProgram coordinator reviews daily log entries at the end of Week 6; pass requires legible, complete entries for at least 90% of shifts worked, with each entry referencing at least one ACF domain and one ServSafe principle; mid-point feedback form must be completed and signed by supervisor.
3Weeks 7–14: Advanced Station Responsibility and Leadership168fieldStudents will manage an assigned station or multi-task across stations with minimal supervisor prompting, demonstrating consistent professional quality, speed, and food-safety compliance over an extended production period.
  1. Rotate through at least two distinct stations (e.g., sauté, grill, garde manger, or pastry depending on site) as scheduled by the employer; document station-specific techniques, challenges overcome, and quality standards in the daily log for each rotation.
  2. Lead or actively assist with one mise en place briefing, prep-list review, or end-of-shift breakdown per week, and record what was communicated, how feedback was given or received, and any food-safety decisions made.
  3. Conduct a self-evaluation at the end of Weeks 10 and 14 using the program's competency rubric, rating their own performance in the same categories the employer will use on the final evaluation form, then compare ratings with the supervisor in a brief one-on-one conversation.
Daily log binder continued, self-evaluation rubric, final employer evaluation form (provided in advance for self-assessment), ACF competency domain checklist, site equipment and uniform per employer standards, school coordinator check-in scheduleProgram coordinator conducts one on-site visit or video call with supervisor during this block to confirm student attendance, conduct, and progress; pass requires daily log entries for at least 90% of shifts, documented completion of at least two station rotations, and at least one self-evaluation submitted on time.
4Exit Evaluation, Portfolio Completion, and Debrief24theoryStudents will compile a complete externship portfolio, receive and discuss the employer's final evaluation, and reflect in writing on how the placement advanced their readiness for the ACF Certified Culinarian credential.
  1. Organize the daily log binder into a finalized externship portfolio: complete a table of contents, verify all entry forms are signed, insert the mid-point and final employer evaluation forms, and attach the annotated dish photographs or sketches collected during the placement.
  2. Attend a school debrief session where each student presents a five-minute verbal summary of their externship experience, identifying two technical skills strengthened, one professional-behavior improvement, and one gap they will address in Certification Exam Preparation.
  3. Write a two-page reflective essay mapping at least five specific externship experiences to named ACF Certified Culinarian competency domains, and noting where ServSafe Food Handler principles were applied or observed in a real commercial kitchen environment.
Completed daily log binder, final employer evaluation form (signed by supervisor), portfolio assembly checklist, ACF Certified Culinarian competency domain list, ServSafe Food Handler reference card, word-processing software or notebook for reflective essayPortfolio is reviewed by program coordinator; pass requires all entry forms present and at least 90% completed, both feedback forms signed by supervisor, and the reflective essay scoring at least 70% on a program rubric that assesses accuracy of ACF and ServSafe domain mapping, clarity of writing, and depth of self-reflection.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Employer Final Evaluation (Skills Demonstration)Skills demonstration70%A score of satisfactory or above on all rated categories of the program's standardized employer evaluation form, with no category rated unsatisfactory.The host-site supervisor completes the program's standardized employer evaluation form at the conclusion of the placement, rating the student on technical skill execution, food-safety compliance, professionalism, communication, reliability, and readiness for continued kitchen employment. The completed, signed form is submitted to the school and becomes part of the student's permanent externship record.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Daily Log and Portfolio (Lab Log)Log30%Complete, legible daily log entries for at least 90% of all shifts worked, portfolio checklist fully satisfied, and reflective essay scoring at least 70% on the program rubric.The student submits the fully assembled externship portfolio containing all daily log entries, annotated visual documentation, mid-point and final employer feedback forms, and the two-page reflective essay mapping externship experiences to ACF Certified Culinarian competency domains and ServSafe Food Handler principles. The portfolio is evaluated by the program coordinator as evidence of analytical reflection, professional documentation habits, and credential-readiness across the full placement period.
Complete · Verified
HOS-CULI27-11 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: ACF Certified Culinarian & ServSafe

90 hr · $900 COMPLIMENTARY

This course systematically reviews every exam domain covered by the ACF Certified Culinarian and ServSafe Food Handler credentials, building test-taking confidence through structured content review, timed practice questions, and full-length mock exams. Students identify personal knowledge gaps, reinforce fundamental culinary theory and food-safety principles, and practice the recall and application skills required to pass both credentialing exams. The course culminates in a simulated exam day experience that mirrors the actual testing conditions for each credential.

Outcomes
Course text

This course systematically reviews every exam domain covered by the ACF Certified Culinarian and ServSafe Food Handler credentials, building test-taking confidence through structured content review, timed practice questions, and full-length mock exams. Students identify personal knowledge gaps, reinforce fundamental culinary theory and food-safety principles, and practice the recall and application skills required to pass both credentialing exams. The course culminates in a simulated exam day experience that mirrors the actual testing conditions for each credential.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Diagnostic Assessment & Exam Blueprint Orientation; Targeted Content Review — Culinary Fundamentals & Food Science; Targeted Content Review — Food Safety, Sanitation & HACCP; Full Mock Certification Exams & Post-Exam Debrief.

What competent looks like. Correctly answer questions across all ACF Certified Culinarian exam content domains—including culinary fundamentals, nutrition, sanitation, and professional knowledge—at a passing rate of 75% or higher on timed practice sets. Demonstrate mastery of all ServSafe Food Handler exam domains—including personal hygiene, time-temperature control, cross-contamination prevention, cleaning and sanitizing, and foodborne illness—scoring 75% or higher on practice assessments. Analyze personal diagnostic results to identify weak content areas and execute a targeted self-study plan before the mock exam. Apply professional culinary terminology, food-science concepts, and HACCP principles accurately in written selected-response and short-answer practice items. Complete a full-length, timed mock ServSafe Food Handler exam and a full-length, timed ACF Certified Culinarian practice exam under proctored conditions, meeting or exceeding the published passing threshold for each credential. Assemble a personal exam-ready reference card summarizing key temperatures, weights and measures conversions, mother sauces, cooking methods, and food-safety critical limits for last-minute review.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Diagnostic Assessment & Exam Blueprint Orientation10theoryStudents map both credential exam blueprints to their own prior learning, complete a timed diagnostic practice test for each credential, and produce a written gap-analysis that names at least five priority review topics per exam.
  1. Guided walkthrough of the official ACF Certified Culinarian candidate handbook and the ServSafe Food Handler exam outline: students annotate each domain with a self-rating (strong / shaky / unfamiliar) to create a personal readiness profile.
  2. Complete a 50-question timed diagnostic for ServSafe Food Handler content and a 60-question timed diagnostic for ACF Certified Culinarian content; instructor scores results and returns annotated answer keys explaining the rationale for every correct answer.
  3. Individual gap-analysis writing activity: students use their scored diagnostics to draft a one-page prioritized study plan listing specific topics to revisit, the lessons in previous courses where that content was taught, and a daily review schedule for the remaining weeks.
ACF Certified Culinarian candidate handbook (ACF website); ServSafe Food Handler exam outline (National Restaurant Association); diagnostic practice-question banks (instructor-compiled from publicly available sample questions); pencils, answer sheets; student notebooks; course schedule handoutCompleted, scored diagnostic for both credentials returned to instructor; written gap-analysis reviewed by instructor for specificity—pass requires the student to have named at least five concrete review topics per exam and submitted a realistic daily study schedule.
2Targeted Content Review — Culinary Fundamentals & Food Science30theoryStudents review and correctly explain, at 75% accuracy on embedded checks, the ACF Certified Culinarian exam domains covering culinary terminology, classical cooking methods, stocks and sauces, garde manger, meat fabrication, nutrition basics, and weights-and-measures conversion.
  1. Rotating station review sessions (each 45–60 minutes) covering one ACF domain per session: instructor presents a concise visual summary of key facts, students complete a 15-question multiple-choice drill, then pairs compare answers and correct errors using the Professional Cooking textbook and ACF Study Guide as references—domains covered include culinary fundamentals, cooking methods, stocks and classical sauces, garde manger and charcuterie, meat/poultry/seafood identification and fabrication, baking and pastry basics, nutrition and menu planning, and professional knowledge (history, ethics, career pathways).
  2. Weights, measures, and recipe-conversion math workshop: students work through a packet of 20 word-problem style questions requiring them to scale recipes, convert between US customary and metric units, calculate food cost percentage, and determine yield percentage—skills tested on the ACF exam; instructor reviews common errors on a whiteboard.
  3. Personal reference card construction: each student builds a laminated quick-reference card listing the five French mother sauces and their derivatives, the USDA recommended internal temperatures for common proteins, standard small-unit equivalents (teaspoon to tablespoon to cup to quart), the standard breading procedure steps, and the classical brigade hierarchy—card is used in all subsequent lessons and kept for exam day.
Wayne Gisslen, Professional Cooking (current edition); ACF Study Guide for Certified Culinarian (ACF Education Foundation); instructor-prepared domain review packets and drill sheets; conversion chart handouts; blank laminated card stock and fine-point markers; whiteboard and markersScore of 75% or higher on each 15-question domain drill (8 drills total); completed personal reference card reviewed by instructor for accuracy—any temperature, conversion, or sauce derivative error must be corrected before the card is approved for use.
3Targeted Content Review — Food Safety, Sanitation & HACCP20theoryStudents review and correctly apply ServSafe Food Handler exam domains—personal hygiene, time-temperature control, cross-contamination prevention, proper cleaning and sanitizing procedures, and foodborne illness causes and prevention—scoring 75% or higher on all embedded practice checks.
  1. Instructor-led content review of each ServSafe Food Handler domain using the ServSafe Food Handler Guide as the primary text: for each domain, instructor presents three to five high-yield facts, works two to three sample exam questions aloud, and calls on students to explain the reasoning—students annotate their guides with mnemonics and highlights; domains include identifying major foodborne pathogens and their associated foods, the temperature danger zone and time-temperature abuse, correct handwashing and personal hygiene standards, preventing cross-contamination through proper storage order and color-coded cutting boards, chemical and heat sanitizing requirements, and correct procedures for receiving and storing deliveries.
  2. HACCP flow-of-food mapping activity: small groups receive a printed menu item (e.g., chicken soup, Caesar salad, beef burger) and trace the food from receiving through service, identifying each step where a CCP exists, the critical limit, and the corrective action if the limit is violated—groups present their HACCP charts and receive peer and instructor critique.
  3. Timed ServSafe-format practice exam: 40 questions, 60 minutes, completed individually under quiet conditions; instructor scores and reviews every incorrect answer explaining the regulatory or scientific basis; students update their gap-analysis plan with any new weak areas identified.
ServSafe Food Handler Guide (National Restaurant Association Education Foundation, current edition); color-coded cutting board diagram handout; HACCP flow-of-food worksheet; food-storage temperature and shelf-life reference chart; thermometer (for demonstration); 40-question timed practice exam packet; pencils and answer sheets75% or higher on the 40-question timed ServSafe practice exam (30 of 40 correct); completed HACCP chart for assigned menu item graded by instructor using a rubric that requires correct identification of at least three CCPs with accurate critical limits—students below 75% on the practice exam complete a mandatory 2-hour self-study session with a follow-up 20-question recheck before advancing.
4Full Mock Certification Exams & Post-Exam Debrief30labStudents sit a full-length proctored mock ServSafe Food Handler exam and a full-length proctored mock ACF Certified Culinarian practice exam under timed, testing-center conditions, achieving a score that meets or exceeds the published passing threshold for each credential, then complete a written self-reflection identifying areas of remaining uncertainty and a concrete plan for any additional preparation before the official exam date.
  1. Proctored mock ServSafe Food Handler exam: administered under strict testing conditions (no notes except the approved reference card, timed per the credential's standard allotment, no phones); instructor acts as proctor; exams are collected, scored, and results returned with a full answer key and domain-level score breakdown so students can see exactly where points were lost.
  2. Proctored mock ACF Certified Culinarian practice exam: administered back-to-back on the same day after a scheduled break, using the ACF's published number of items and time limit as the model; same proctoring rules apply; instructor scores and returns with a domain-level breakdown cross-referenced to the ACF exam blueprint.
  3. Scored-exam debrief and self-reflection: whole-class review of the five most-missed questions from each mock exam using Socratic questioning (instructor asks 'what would you need to know to answer this correctly?' rather than simply restating the answer); each student then writes a one-page post-exam reflection naming their two weakest domains per exam, three specific facts or concepts they will review before the real exam, and a statement confirming their scheduled exam appointment or the steps they will take to register.
Full-length mock ServSafe Food Handler exam packet (instructor-compiled to mirror official format and domain distribution); full-length mock ACF Certified Culinarian practice exam packet; pencils; analog timers or wall clock; approved personal reference cards (from Lesson 2); ACF exam blueprint and ServSafe domain outline for debrief comparison; self-reflection worksheetPass mark for mock ServSafe Food Handler exam: 75% or higher (matching the published passing standard); pass mark for mock ACF Certified Culinarian exam: 75% or higher; completed written self-reflection submitted to instructor and reviewed for specificity—students who do not meet 75% on either mock exam receive a remediation plan with targeted practice questions and a second mock sitting scheduled before the official exam registration deadline.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Full Mock Certification Exam — ServSafe Food Handler & ACF Certified CulinarianMock certification exam100%75% or higher on each mock exam, administered and scored separately; students must meet the threshold on both exams to be marked complete for the course; students below threshold on either exam receive one remediation attempt with targeted review before the official exam date.Students sit two full-length, proctored mock exams in a single exam-day session—one replicating the ServSafe Food Handler format and one replicating the ACF Certified Culinarian format—under timed, testing-center conditions with no unauthorized references. Scores are reported by domain so each student receives actionable feedback on residual gaps before sitting the official credentialing exams with the American Culinary Federation and the National Restaurant Association.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: ACF Certified Culinarian; ServSafe Food Handler

Students sit the ServSafe Food Handler exam administered by the National Restaurant Association and the ACF Certified Culinarian written and practical exams administered by the American Culinary Federation. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Culinary Arts · How the school gets authority to award these credentials