🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Manufacturing & Marine › Shipbuilding / Marine Fabrication › Steel & Aluminum Welding for Marine Fabrication › Lesson 9
MFG-SHIP13-03 · Lesson 9 · 14 clock hours · theory

Weld Inspection: Visual Testing, NDE Introduction, and AWS Acceptance Criteria

Objective. Students will perform a thorough visual weld inspection (VT) per AWS D1.1 acceptance criteria, correctly classify discontinuities as acceptable or rejectable, and describe the purpose and basic principles of liquid penetrant (PT), magnetic particle (MT), and ultrasonic (UT) testing methods used in shipyard QA.

Why Weld Inspection Matters in Shipbuilding

A weld that looks clean on the surface can hide defects that fail under the cyclic loading, vibration, and corrosive environment a vessel endures at sea. Classification societies such as the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) and the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) require documented weld quality on every certified vessel. AWS D1.1, the Structural Welding Code—Steel, sets the acceptance criteria most shipyards use as their baseline for steel work. Understanding how to inspect welds and how to read those criteria is a core skill for every shipfitter and welder in a certified yard.

Visual Testing (VT): The First and Most Common Method

Visual testing is performed before, during, and after welding. It requires no special equipment beyond good lighting (minimum 50 foot-candles at the weld surface is a common benchmark), a 10× magnifier for close examination, calibrated weld gauges, and an undercut gauge. Because VT is fast and low-cost, it is the first line of quality assurance in every shipyard.

Before welding: Check fit-up, root opening, joint angle, cleanliness, and that base metal is free of laminations, cracks, and mill scale in the weld zone.

During welding: Inspect each pass for cracking, porosity, and proper bead profile before depositing the next layer.

After welding: Perform the full acceptance-criteria inspection described below.

AWS D1.1 Visual Acceptance Criteria

AWS D1.1 Table 6.1 (Statically Loaded Nontubular Connections) and related tables list specific limits. The following are the major categories you will judge during the coupon rotation:

Always record the AWS table or clause you are using when you call an accept or reject decision—that documentation is part of a proper inspection record.

Safety During Inspection

Before touching any coupon, confirm it has cooled to a safe handling temperature (below 120 °F / ~49 °C is a common guideline for bare-hand contact) or use insulated gloves. Freshly ground or wire-brushed steel edges are sharp—wear cut-resistant gloves and safety glasses. When working near active welding, wear appropriate eye protection and hearing protection. During NDE activities, additional PPE applies as described below.

Introduction to Nondestructive Examination (NDE)

When VT cannot confirm internal soundness, NDE methods are used. The shipbuilding industry uses several methods; three are introduced here.

Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT)

PT detects surface-breaking discontinuities in any non-porous material. The process: clean the surface, apply a colored or fluorescent penetrant, allow dwell time, remove excess penetrant, apply developer, and examine. Trapped penetrant bleeds back out and is visible against the developer background. PT works on steel, aluminum, stainless, and non-magnetic materials alike. It cannot detect subsurface defects.

Safety: PT chemicals are flammable and irritating. Use in a ventilated area, wear nitrile gloves, chemical splash goggles, and follow the SDS for each product. Do not use aerosol cans near open flames or hot metal.

Magnetic Particle Testing (MT)

MT detects surface and near-surface discontinuities in ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel and low-alloy steel). A magnetic yoke induces a field in the part; iron particles (wet or dry) gather at flux leakage points where a discontinuity interrupts the field. MT is faster than PT on steel and can reveal shallow subsurface flaws. It cannot be used on aluminum, austenitic stainless steel, or other non-magnetic materials.

Safety: Yoke probes carry electrical current—inspect cords for damage before use and keep the work area dry. Dry magnetic powder is a respiratory irritant; wear an N95 respirator or use wet-bath equipment with appropriate ventilation.

Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

UT uses high-frequency sound waves introduced into the material by a transducer. Reflections from internal discontinuities return to the transducer and appear as indications on a screen. UT can detect internal flaws such as lack of fusion, cracks, and laminations, and it can measure material thickness—important for corrosion monitoring on ship plating. UT requires a certified operator (typically AWS CWI or ASNT Level II) and careful calibration. It is the primary volumetric method used by ABS and USCG surveyors on hull welds.

ABS/USCG Relevance

ABS surveyors witness weld testing and review NDE reports as part of vessel classification. USCG regulations require certified welds on inspected vessels. A complete quality record includes the welder's qualification records, the inspection method used, the acceptance criteria applied, and the inspector's signature. Your ability to produce a clear, accurate inspection report is as important as the inspection itself.

Key terms10

DiscontinuityAn interruption in the physical structure of a weld or base metal; a discontinuity becomes a defect only when it exceeds the acceptance criteria of the applicable code.
UndercutA groove melted into the base metal along the weld toe or root that is left unfilled by weld metal; measured in depth and evaluated against AWS D1.1 table limits.
Overlap (Cold Lap)Weld metal that extends beyond the weld toe onto the base metal surface without fusion; always rejectable under AWS D1.1 because it forms a sharp notch.
Incomplete FusionA condition where weld metal has not fused completely with the base metal or the preceding weld pass; rejectable under AWS D1.1 regardless of size.
Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT)An NDE method that uses a dye penetrant and developer to reveal surface-breaking discontinuities; applicable to any non-porous material including aluminum.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT)An NDE method that uses a magnetic field and iron particles to detect surface and near-surface discontinuities; limited to ferromagnetic materials such as carbon steel.
Ultrasonic Testing (UT)An NDE method that uses high-frequency sound waves to detect internal discontinuities and measure thickness; requires a certified operator and careful calibration.
Visual Testing (VT)The most fundamental NDE method; uses the naked eye, magnifiers, and calibrated gauges to evaluate weld geometry and surface condition against code acceptance criteria.
Fillet Weld GaugeA calibrated tool used to measure the leg length and throat of a fillet weld to confirm it meets the required minimum size.
AWS D1.1The American Welding Society's Structural Welding Code—Steel; the primary code governing welding workmanship, procedure qualification, and welder qualification for structural steel applications including marine fabrication.

Worked examples3

1. A fillet weld on a coupon is specified as a 5/16 in. fillet. You measure the weld leg with a fillet weld gauge and find one leg is 5/16 in. and the other leg is 1/4 in. Is this weld acceptable or rejectable, and what is the effective throat?
  1. Step 1 – Check weld size: Both legs must meet or exceed the specified 5/16 in. minimum. One leg measures 1/4 in. (0.250 in.), which is less than 5/16 in. (0.3125 in.). The weld is undersized on that leg.
  2. Step 2 – Call the accept/reject decision: Because one leg is below the minimum specified size, the weld is REJECTABLE per AWS D1.1 workmanship requirements regardless of the other leg measurement.
  3. Step 3 – Calculate effective throat for reference: For an equal-leg fillet weld the theoretical throat = leg × 0.707. Using the smaller leg: 0.250 in. × 0.707 = 0.177 in. The required throat for a 5/16 in. fillet would be 0.3125 × 0.707 = 0.221 in. This confirms the throat is also deficient.
Answer: REJECTABLE. The 1/4 in. leg is undersized (required 5/16 in.). Effective throat on the short leg is approximately 0.177 in., below the required 0.221 in.
2. You are measuring undercut on a groove weld in a statically loaded connection using an undercut gauge. The gauge reads 1/32 in. (approximately 0.8 mm) depth. AWS D1.1 limits undercut to 1/32 in. for most statically loaded members. Is this acceptable?
  1. Step 1 – Identify the applicable limit: For statically loaded nontubular connections, AWS D1.1 permits undercut up to 1/32 in. (approximately 0.8 mm) in depth for welds parallel to primary stress, and a stricter limit for welds transverse to primary stress. Assume this weld is parallel to primary stress.
  2. Step 2 – Compare measurement to limit: Measured depth = 1/32 in. Permitted depth = 1/32 in. The measurement equals, but does not exceed, the limit.
  3. Step 3 – Call the accept/reject decision: A measurement equal to the permitted maximum is at the boundary; AWS D1.1 states 'shall not exceed' the limit. A reading of exactly 1/32 in. is at the limit and is therefore ACCEPTABLE. Any depth greater than 1/32 in. would be rejectable.
Answer: ACCEPTABLE at exactly 1/32 in. (the limit). Document the measurement and the clause applied. Any reading greater than 1/32 in. would require rejection and repair.
3. A groove weld coupon shows three isolated spherical pores visible on the surface. Each pore measures 1/16 in. (1.6 mm) diameter. AWS D1.1 limits individual surface pore diameter to 3/16 in. maximum and states the sum of diameters in any linear inch of weld shall not exceed 3/8 in. All three pores fall within a 1-inch length of weld. Are they acceptable?
  1. Step 1 – Check individual pore size: Each pore is 1/16 in. diameter. The limit is 3/16 in. per pore. 1/16 in. < 3/16 in. — each individual pore is within the size limit.
  2. Step 2 – Check cumulative diameter in one inch of weld: Three pores × 1/16 in. each = 3/16 in. total. The limit for sum of diameters in any linear inch is 3/8 in. (6/16 in.). 3/16 in. < 6/16 in. — the cumulative limit is not exceeded.
  3. Step 3 – Call the accept/reject decision: Both the individual size criterion and the cumulative criterion are satisfied.
Answer: ACCEPTABLE. Individual pores (1/16 in.) are below the 3/16 in. limit, and the cumulative diameter (3/16 in.) is below the 3/8 in. per-inch limit. Document findings.

The math in this lesson1

Learners compare undercut and pore sizes in fractional inches and millimeters to AWS D1.1 limits.
N-Q.1
Brush up in the math halls at newSchoolWorks.com:
In class: Visual inspection station rotation: students rotate through eight pre-welded sample coupons containing seeded defects (undercut, overlap, porosity, cracks, incomplete fusion, excessive reinforcement) and complete a standardized inspection form for each, recording accept/reject and the specific criterion violated. · NDE methods comparison: students watch instructor-led demonstrations of liquid penetrant and magnetic particle testing on prepared samples, then complete a T-chart comparing each method's capabilities, limitations, base material compatibility, and USCG/ABS relevance. · Mock inspector role play: each student receives an unmarked coupon, performs a full VT using gauges and a 10x magnifier, completes an ABS-style inspection report, and submits it; instructor reveals actual defect list and students score their own detection rate.
Materials: Set of 8 seeded-defect weld coupons, fillet weld gauges, undercut gauges, ruler, 10x magnifier, AWS D1.1 Table 6.1 visual acceptance criteria (laminated), liquid penetrant testing kit (penetrant, developer, cleaner), magnetic particle yoke with iron powder, ABS inspection report forms, NDE reference posters or Lincoln Electric NDE reference guide excerpts
Check: Students correctly classify at least 12 of 16 accept/reject decisions across the coupon rotation (75%) and submit a complete mock inspection report with all required fields filled; incomplete reports are returned for correction before credit is granted.

Practice check8

Answer each question, then check it. Nothing is recorded; this is your own practice.

AWS D1.1 Certified Welder – Weld Quality and Acceptance Criteria
1. Under AWS D1.1, which weld discontinuity is ALWAYS rejectable, regardless of its size or location?
AWS D1.1 Certified Welder – Weld Quality and Acceptance Criteria
2. A welder produces a fillet weld with a smooth, convex bead profile and a leg length that meets the drawing requirement. The inspector finds overlap (cold lap) at the weld toe on one side. What is the correct call?
NCCER Shipfitting / NCCER Maritime Welding – NDE Methods
3. Which nondestructive examination method can ONLY detect surface-breaking discontinuities and is equally applicable to both carbon steel and aluminum?
NCCER Maritime Welding – NDE Methods
4. A technician wants to inspect a carbon steel hull plate weld for near-surface lack-of-fusion defects without cutting the weld open. Which method is most appropriate?
NCCER Maritime Welding – NDE Methods
5. During a PT inspection, the inspector applies penetrant and waits the required dwell time, then immediately applies developer without removing the excess penetrant first. What is the likely result?
AWS D1.1 Certified Welder – Visual Inspection Tools and Procedure
6. When performing visual inspection of a fillet weld on a coupon, which tool is used to confirm that the weld leg meets the minimum specified size?
ABS/USCG Weld Test – Documentation and Certification Requirements
7. An ABS surveyor reviewing a shipyard's quality records asks for the documentation that proves each production welder was qualified to perform the welds on a specific vessel joint. What document satisfies this requirement?
AWS D1.1 Certified Welder – Weld Discontinuity Classification
8. A student inspecting a groove weld coupon finds a region where the weld metal did not bond to the side wall of the joint. The surface of the weld looks acceptable but the edge of the joint shows an unfused line when viewed at an angle. How should this be classified?
Record this lesson on my transcript. Sign in with your key and enrollment email to record lessons (enroll free if you have no key). This page stays open to read and practise.