🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Agriculture, Environment & Public Service › Teacher Aide / Paraprofessional › Courses
Agriculture, Environment & Public Service · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Teacher Aide / Paraprofessional

11 courses · 1,350 clock hours · 6–9 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$13,640 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
11courses
82lessons
1,350hours
39assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons82 of 82 lesson pages writtenPractice656 practice questionsResources118 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 82 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
AGR-TEAC61-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Paraprofessionals

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips teacher aide candidates with the safety knowledge, functional mathematics, communication skills, and career readiness behaviors required to work effectively and legally in K-12 educational settings. Students earn OSHA 10 and CPR/First Aid credentials, practice the literacy and numeracy tasks paraprofessionals perform daily, and build the professional portfolio entries needed for the ParaPro Assessment and state certificate applications. Every unit is mapped to ParaPro Assessment content areas and to the workplace competencies evaluated by supervising teachers during practicum and externship.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips teacher aide candidates with the safety knowledge, functional mathematics, communication skills, and career readiness behaviors required to work effectively and legally in K-12 educational settings. Students earn OSHA 10 and CPR/First Aid credentials, practice the literacy and numeracy tasks paraprofessionals perform daily, and build the professional portfolio entries needed for the ParaPro Assessment and state certificate applications. Every unit is mapped to ParaPro Assessment content areas and to the workplace competencies evaluated by supervising teachers during practicum and externship.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: School Workplace Safety and OSHA 10 Certification; CPR, First Aid, and Pediatric Emergency Response; Trade Math: Number Sense, Fractions, Decimals, Percents, and Ratios; Technical Reading: Informational Text, IEP Summaries, and Safety Data Sheets; Digital Tools for Paraprofessionals; Professional Communication and Mandatory Reporting; Career Readiness: Job Applications, Professional Portfolio, and the Paraprofessional Credential Roadmap.

What competent looks like. Complete OSHA 10 General Industry training and demonstrate correct hazard-identification and PPE-selection procedures for school and agricultural-education classroom environments. Perform adult and pediatric CPR and first-aid response to a passing standard recognized by the American Heart Association or American Red Cross. Solve whole-number, fraction, decimal, percent, ratio, and basic algebra problems at the level required by the ParaPro Assessment Reading and Mathematics content areas with at least 75% accuracy. Read, interpret, and summarize grade-level informational text, instructional manuals, IEP accommodation summaries, and workplace safety data sheets at a proficiency level sufficient for ParaPro Assessment Reading tasks. Use standard educational digital tools—including learning management systems, word processing, spreadsheet, and communication platforms—to create, organize, and submit professional documents. Demonstrate career-readiness behaviors including punctuality, mandatory-reporter obligations, professional ethics, and the preparation of a complete job-application package for a paraprofessional position.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1School Workplace Safety and OSHA 10 Certification24labStudents will identify school-site hazards, select appropriate PPE, apply lockout/tagout and emergency-action procedures, and complete the OSHA 10 General Industry curriculum to earn the OSHA 10 card.
  1. Complete all ten OSHA 10 General Industry modules (delivered through the authorized OSHA Outreach provider) covering hazard recognition, electrical safety, fire safety, ergonomics, and emergency action plans, with particular attention to science lab, shop, and agricultural-classroom environments.
  2. Conduct a structured walk-through of the school building using an OSHA hazard-identification checklist, photograph at least five actual or simulated hazards, and complete a written corrective-action form for each.
  3. Participate in a tabletop emergency-drill scenario—including a student-injury report, shelter-in-place, and evacuation—then debrief using the school's written emergency-action plan as the reference document.
OSHA 10 General Industry student packet (authorized provider), PPE samples (gloves, safety glasses, face shields, hearing protection), school emergency-action plan, hazard-identification checklist, OSHA Fact Sheet: Hazard Communication Standard, digital camera or smartphone for documentation.Passing score on the OSHA 10 provider's final assessment (minimum score set by the authorized provider, typically 70%); written hazard-identification form graded with instructor rubric—students must correctly identify and classify at least 4 of 5 hazards to pass.
2CPR, First Aid, and Pediatric Emergency Response8labStudents will perform hands-only and full CPR, use an AED, control bleeding, and manage choking in adult and pediatric scenarios to the skill standard required for American Heart Association or American Red Cross certification.
  1. Practice adult and child CPR compression-ventilation cycles on manikins, rotate through AED operation using a training defibrillator, and receive individual performance feedback from the certified instructor on compression depth and rate.
  2. Complete first-aid stations covering: controlling severe bleeding with direct pressure and tourniquet application, recognizing and responding to anaphylaxis (including epinephrine auto-injector trainer), and managing suspected head, neck, or spinal injuries in a school setting.
  3. Role-play a school-yard emergency scenario in pairs—one student acts as the paraprofessional responder, the other simulates a student in distress—then switch roles; instructor uses the AHA/Red Cross skills checklist to score each candidate.
CPR manikins (adult and child/infant), AED trainer unit, first-aid kit, tourniquet trainers, epinephrine auto-injector trainer, AHA or Red Cross BLS/First Aid course guide, skills-check checklists.Successful completion of all required skills stations on the AHA or Red Cross certification checklist; no critical skill failures (e.g., failure to call 911, failure to deliver compressions) — earn certification card upon passing.
3Trade Math: Number Sense, Fractions, Decimals, Percents, and Ratios28practiceStudents will solve whole-number operations, fraction and decimal computation, percentage problems, and ratio/proportion problems at the difficulty level represented in the ParaPro Assessment Mathematics content area with at least 75% accuracy.
  1. Work through a graduated set of 60 practice problems drawn from ParaPro-style Mathematics items—covering place value, operations, fractions, decimals, percents, and ratios—using a structured problem-solving template that requires students to write the operation chosen and check the answer; score and review each set as a class.
  2. Apply trade-context math: calculate student attendance rates as percentages, convert assessment raw scores to percent-correct, determine supply quantities using ratios (e.g., 1 set of materials per 4 students for 28 students), and read measurement tools including rulers in inches and centimeters used in project-based learning classrooms.
  3. Complete a timed 40-item mixed-skills quiz under test-like conditions, then use a gap-analysis sheet to identify which ParaPro math sub-areas need additional practice before the capstone and exam-prep modules.
ETS ParaPro Assessment Study Companion (free download from ETS website), lined paper and pencils for hand calculations, basic four-function calculators (for checking only—ParaPro does not permit calculators), ruler, grade book sample data sets.Score of at least 75% (30/40) on the 40-item timed quiz; students scoring below 75% receive a remediation assignment and must retake an equivalent alternate-form quiz before advancing.
4Technical Reading: Informational Text, IEP Summaries, and Safety Data Sheets24theoryStudents will read and accurately summarize grade-level informational text, interpret IEP accommodation language, and extract key safety information from a Safety Data Sheet, demonstrating the reading skills tested in the ParaPro Assessment Reading content area.
  1. Read three ParaPro-style reading passages (one literary, one informational/expository, one functional workplace document) and answer accompanying multiple-choice questions that mirror the ParaPro Assessment Reading item types: main idea, vocabulary in context, inference, and text structure.
  2. Study a sample IEP accommodation summary (names removed; fictional student) and complete a structured note-taking form identifying: student's reading level, specific classroom accommodations, the paraprofessional's listed responsibilities, and any assistive technology required — then discuss in small groups how they would implement each accommodation.
  3. Read the first four sections of a school-appropriate chemical Safety Data Sheet (e.g., a common classroom cleaning product), complete a plain-language summary for a hypothetical student worker, and answer a set of instructor-written comprehension questions; debrief as a class using the actual SDS as the answer key.
ETS ParaPro Assessment Study Companion, sample IEP accommodation summary (fictional, instructor-prepared), OSHA-format Safety Data Sheet for a common non-hazardous classroom product, highlighters, structured note-taking template.Score of at least 75% on the 20-item reading comprehension quiz covering the three passage types; IEP summary form graded with a rubric — must correctly identify all four required elements to pass.
5Digital Tools for Paraprofessionals22demoStudents will use a learning management system, word-processing software, a spreadsheet application, and a professional email platform to create, format, and submit documents that meet school-district professional standards.
  1. Navigate a learning management system (Google Classroom or the institution's LMS) to locate an assignment, download an attached student worksheet, annotate it with digital comments as a paraprofessional would, and re-upload the completed document — instructor demonstrates each step before students replicate it independently.
  2. Use word-processing software to format a professional behavior-observation log entry (template provided) following district document standards: correct heading, consistent font, complete sentences, no personal student identifying information in the file name; peer-review a classmate's log using a provided checklist.
  3. Build a simple class-data spreadsheet tracking five fictional students' weekly reading-fluency scores across four weeks, enter a formula to calculate each student's average, use conditional formatting to flag scores below a benchmark, and email the file as an attachment to the instructor with a professionally worded message.
Computers or tablets with internet access, Google Workspace or Microsoft 365 (word processor, spreadsheet, email, LMS), instructor-prepared behavior-observation log template, peer-review checklist, fictional student data set.All three digital tasks submitted and graded with a rubric; each task must score at least 80% (meeting all formatting and accuracy criteria) to pass — students who miss any element must correct and resubmit within one class session.
6Professional Communication and Mandatory Reporting22theoryStudents will articulate paraprofessional ethics, confidentiality requirements under FERPA, mandatory-reporter obligations, and effective verbal and written communication strategies for interactions with students, families, and supervising teachers.
  1. Review a summary of FERPA student-privacy requirements and mandatory-reporter laws (general state framework; instructor clarifies that specific code citations vary by state) through an instructor-led presentation, then analyze four case-study vignettes — deciding in each whether a report is legally required, who receives the report, and what the paraprofessional should say and not say.
  2. Practice professional spoken communication through structured role-plays: (a) explaining a student's accommodation to a parent using plain, jargon-free language, (b) respectfully declining a supervising teacher's request that falls outside the paraprofessional's legal scope of practice, and (c) de-escalating a mildly upset student using active-listening techniques; peers score using a communication rubric.
  3. Write a professional email to a supervising teacher reporting a student behavior observation, applying correct professional tone, subject line, and factual—not interpretive—language; compare drafts in a whole-class debrief against a model response.
FERPA overview fact sheet (U.S. Department of Education), state mandatory-reporter training overview handout (instructor-prepared, general framework), professional communication rubric, case-study vignette cards, model email example.Case-study vignette quiz: students must correctly classify all four scenarios (mandatory report vs. no report) and identify the correct reporting chain — 100% accuracy required on mandatory-report identification; role-play communication rubric average score of at least 80%.
7Career Readiness: Job Applications, Professional Portfolio, and the Paraprofessional Credential Roadmap20practiceStudents will complete a full paraprofessional job-application package, assemble a professional portfolio with required credential documentation, and map the steps and costs for obtaining the ParaPro Assessment score, State Paraprofessional Certificate, and CPR/First Aid certification.
  1. Complete a realistic paraprofessional job application form for a posted position (instructor-supplied posting from a local school district), draft a targeted one-page cover letter and a formatted resume emphasizing relevant coursework and any prior experience with children; conduct a mock interview in pairs using a bank of standard paraprofessional interview questions, then swap and provide written feedback.
  2. Assemble a digital professional portfolio in the LMS or a shared folder containing: resume, cover letter, OSHA 10 card (or screenshot), CPR/First Aid certification card, a sample behavior-observation log, the formatted spreadsheet from the digital-tools lesson, and a one-page personal professional statement; follow a provided portfolio checklist.
  3. Create a personal credential roadmap on a one-page planning document that lists: (a) ParaPro Assessment — registration process through ETS, testing format overview (the exam includes reading, writing, and math sections and application of skills), score-reporting procedure; (b) State Paraprofessional Certificate — the state board process, required documentation, and renewal cycle (students research their specific state requirements); (c) CPR/First Aid — issuing organizations, renewal interval; (d) a personal timeline with target exam and application dates.
Sample paraprofessional job posting, resume template, cover letter template, portfolio checklist, ETS ParaPro Assessment registration page (ets.org), state licensing board website (student-specific), credential-roadmap planning template, computers with internet access.Portfolio checklist: all seven required items present and meeting quality standards — pass requires all seven items present and instructor approval of the professional statement (evaluated with a writing rubric, minimum score 80%); credential roadmap must contain accurate, student-specific information for all three credentials to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
OSHA 10 and Workplace Safety Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%Minimum passing score set by the OSHA-authorized outreach provider (typically 70%); additionally, the instructor-administered hazard-identification written test requires 75% or higher.The OSHA 10 provider's official end-of-course assessment covers all ten General Industry modules; students who pass receive the OSHA 10 completion card. A separate 20-item instructor-written exam assesses school-specific hazard identification, PPE selection, emergency-action procedures, and first-aid scenario recognition.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
ParaPro-Aligned Math and Reading Midterm ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (38 of 50 items correct).A 50-item multiple-choice exam modeled on the format and content of the ParaPro Assessment, covering the Mathematics and Reading content areas addressed in Lessons 3 and 4; items are drawn from ETS Study Companion practice questions and instructor-written parallel items, administered under timed, test-like conditions.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Professional Portfolio ProjectProject25%All seven required portfolio items present; overall portfolio rubric score of 80% or higher; mandatory-reporter case-study quiz at 100% on report-or-no-report classification.Students submit the complete digital professional portfolio assembled across Lessons 6 and 7, including resume, cover letter, credential cards, observation log, spreadsheet, professional statement, and credential roadmap; the portfolio is evaluated with an item-by-item checklist and a holistic quality rubric, and the instructor provides written feedback aligned to employer expectations for paraprofessional hiring.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Career and Safety Oral DefenseOral / panel25%Score of 80% or higher on the oral defense rubric, with no unsatisfactory ratings in the mandatory-reporter or CPR response sections.In a 10-minute individual oral session, the instructor presents the student with two scenario prompts — one involving a workplace hazard or first-aid emergency and one involving a professional ethics or communication dilemma — and the student must verbally explain the correct response, identify relevant safety standards or legal obligations, and describe how the situation connects to their credential-roadmap goals; responses are scored on accuracy, clarity, and professional judgment.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
AGR-TEAC61-02 Trade course

Child & Adolescent Development

105 hr · $1,325 COMPLIMENTARY

This course provides teacher aides and paraprofessionals with a foundational understanding of how children and adolescents develop physically, cognitively, socially, and emotionally from birth through age 18. Students apply developmental theory to real classroom scenarios, learning to recognize typical and atypical milestones and to support students at each stage. Content maps directly to the ParaPro Assessment's reading, writing, and math application areas and supports the child development knowledge required for the State Paraprofessional Certificate.

Outcomes
Course text

This course provides teacher aides and paraprofessionals with a foundational understanding of how children and adolescents develop physically, cognitively, socially, and emotionally from birth through age 18. Students apply developmental theory to real classroom scenarios, learning to recognize typical and atypical milestones and to support students at each stage. Content maps directly to the ParaPro Assessment's reading, writing, and math application areas and supports the child development knowledge required for the State Paraprofessional Certificate.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Foundations of Developmental Theory; Physical Development: Birth Through Middle Childhood; Cognitive Development: Birth Through Middle Childhood; Language Development and Literacy Acquisition; Social and Emotional Development: Early Childhood; Development in Middle Childhood: Grades 3–5; Adolescent Development: Physical, Cognitive, and Brain Science; Atypical Development, Developmental Delays, and Referral Protocol; Culture, Family, Trauma, and the Whole Child.

What competent looks like. Describe major developmental theories (Piaget, Vygotsky, Erikson, Bronfenbrenner) and apply them to observable student behavior in PreK–12 settings. Identify typical developmental milestones across physical, cognitive, language, social, and emotional domains for each major age band from birth through adolescence. Recognize signs of atypical development or developmental delay and follow school protocol for documentation and referral. Explain how family, culture, socioeconomic factors, and trauma influence child development and adjust supportive strategies accordingly. Maintain accurate, objective observational records of student development using standard tools used in school paraprofessional practice. Apply knowledge of adolescent brain development and risk behavior to select appropriate, evidence-based support strategies in secondary classroom settings.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Foundations of Developmental Theory12theoryStudents will accurately describe the core tenets of Piaget's cognitive stages, Vygotsky's zone of proximal development, Erikson's psychosocial stages, and Bronfenbrenner's ecological model and link each to paraprofessional practice.
  1. Read and annotate selected excerpts from a standard child development textbook (e.g., Berk's 'Child Development') covering each theory; complete a structured note-taking guide comparing the four theorists across a provided graphic organizer.
  2. In small groups, receive a set of classroom vignette cards describing student behavior and sort them under the correct theorist's framework, then present and defend two vignette assignments to the class.
  3. Write a one-page reflective journal entry describing one theory they believe will most influence their day-to-day work as a para, with at least two specific classroom examples.
Child development textbook (current edition, e.g., Berk or Santrock), graphic organizer worksheets, classroom vignette card set, whiteboard, markersCompleted graphic organizer scored with a rubric; minimum 75% accuracy on a 10-question matching quiz linking theorist to concept and classroom application.
2Physical Development: Birth Through Middle Childhood11theoryStudents will identify typical gross and fine motor milestones from birth through age 10 and describe how physical development affects learning readiness in early childhood and elementary classrooms.
  1. Review CDC 'Learn the Signs. Act Early.' milestone charts for infants, toddlers, and school-age children; highlight milestones that are directly observable in a classroom or childcare setting.
  2. View two short video clips of children at different ages completing age-appropriate physical tasks; complete a structured observation form noting which milestones are demonstrated and which are absent.
  3. Participate in a guided discussion comparing typical fine motor benchmarks (e.g., pencil grasp, scissor use) with common fine motor challenges seen in early elementary classrooms, noting how a para can support without replacing teacher instruction.
CDC 'Learn the Signs. Act Early.' milestone charts (free, CDC.gov), structured observation form, video clips (vetted educational sources), whiteboardCompleted observation form reviewed by instructor; student correctly identifies at least 80% of milestones shown in video clips and flags one area of potential developmental concern with a rationale.
3Cognitive Development: Birth Through Middle Childhood12theoryStudents will apply Piaget's sensorimotor, preoperational, and concrete operational stages to explain how young children think, reason, and learn, and will identify classroom practices that align with each stage.
  1. Complete a stage-mapping worksheet: given a list of 20 instructional strategies (e.g., using manipulatives, symbolic play, sorting by attributes), students assign each to the Piagetian stage it best supports and justify their choice in one sentence.
  2. Role-play in pairs: one student plays a paraprofessional guiding a 'preoperational' student through a simple math task using concrete objects, then switch roles; instructor circulates and provides real-time corrective feedback.
  3. Read a brief case study of a first-grade classroom and write three specific recommendations for how a para could scaffold learning using Vygotsky's ZPD concept, citing the theory by name.
Stage-mapping worksheet, math manipulatives (counters, blocks), case study handout, textbookStage-mapping worksheet scored at 75% or above; role-play observed by instructor using a skills checklist — student must correctly scaffold the task and avoid doing the work for the learner.
4Language Development and Literacy Acquisition11demoStudents will describe the sequence of typical language development from babbling through complex syntax and explain how a paraprofessional supports early literacy without supplanting the teacher's instructional role.
  1. Instructor demonstrates three para-appropriate language support techniques (recasting, expansion, open-ended questioning) using a puppet or role-play partner; students take structured notes and identify which technique is used in each example.
  2. Students practice each technique in triads (para, student, observer) using provided conversation prompt cards; the observer scores using a simple 3-criterion checklist and provides verbal feedback.
  3. Create a one-page reference card listing five language support strategies appropriate for PreK–2, five for grades 3–6, and a note on when to refer a concern to the teacher or speech-language pathologist.
Puppet or role-play partner, conversation prompt cards, observer checklist, reference card template, textbook chapter on language developmentObserver checklist: student correctly demonstrates all three techniques (recasting, expansion, open-ended questioning) with no more than one prompted correction per technique; reference card reviewed for accuracy.
5Social and Emotional Development: Early Childhood11theoryStudents will explain Erikson's first four psychosocial stages and Bowlby's attachment theory and describe how early social-emotional experiences shape a young child's classroom behavior and relationship with adults.
  1. Read textbook sections on trust vs. mistrust, autonomy vs. shame, initiative vs. guilt, and industry vs. inferiority; complete a T-chart for each stage listing 'what this looks like in a classroom' versus 'what can go wrong and how a para can help.'
  2. Analyze three short written case studies describing children displaying different attachment styles (secure, anxious, avoidant); identify the likely attachment pattern and suggest one para response strategy for each.
  3. Participate in a class discussion on the para's professional boundary: why forming supportive, consistent relationships matters, but also why paras must not attempt to serve as a child's primary therapeutic relationship.
Textbook, T-chart worksheet, attachment case study handouts, discussion facilitation guideT-chart scored with rubric (minimum 75%); case study responses reviewed — student must correctly identify attachment pattern and propose a strategy that is within a para's scope of practice.
6Development in Middle Childhood: Grades 3–511theoryStudents will describe the cognitive, social, and moral development characteristics of children ages 8–11 and select para support strategies that match the developmental needs of upper-elementary students.
  1. Create a developmental profile poster for an 8–11-year-old that includes typical cognitive abilities, peer relationship patterns, moral reasoning level (using Kohlberg's preconventional and conventional stages), and common stressors; present to a small group.
  2. Read a scenario about a grade-4 classroom conflict and write a brief response describing how a para should handle it, referencing at least one developmental concept (e.g., moral reasoning, industry vs. inferiority) by name.
  3. Review and discuss a list of common misconceptions teachers and paras hold about middle childhood (e.g., 'they should just know how to behave by now') and reframe each using accurate developmental knowledge.
Poster supplies or digital presentation tool, scenario handout, misconceptions list handout, textbookDevelopmental profile poster scored on a 4-point rubric across four domains (minimum 3/4 per domain); scenario response must reference at least one named developmental concept correctly.
7Adolescent Development: Physical, Cognitive, and Brain Science12theoryStudents will explain the neurological and physical changes of adolescence — including prefrontal cortex maturation, risk-taking behavior, and identity formation — and connect them to supportive paraprofessional practices in secondary schools.
  1. View an instructor-curated short video on adolescent brain development (e.g., from PBS Frontline 'Inside the Teenage Brain' or equivalent vetted source); complete a guided viewing guide identifying three key facts about prefrontal cortex development and two implications for classroom behavior.
  2. In groups of three, receive a secondary school scenario describing an adolescent making a poor decision; analyze the behavior using brain science and Erikson's identity vs. role confusion stage, then propose two para responses that are supportive rather than punitive.
  3. Individual written reflection: describe one way understanding adolescent brain development would change how you personally respond to a defiant or impulsive 15-year-old student.
Vetted video clip (PBS or equivalent), guided viewing guide, scenario cards, reflection prompt sheet, textbook chapter on adolescent developmentGuided viewing guide completed with at least 3 of 5 key facts accurate; group scenario analysis reviewed — proposed strategies must be developmentally appropriate and within para scope; reflection minimum 150 words.
8Atypical Development, Developmental Delays, and Referral Protocol12practiceStudents will distinguish between typical developmental variation and potential indicators of developmental delay or disorder across domains and correctly follow school referral and documentation protocol.
  1. Using the CDC milestone checklist and a set of six detailed student profile cards, students identify which children are showing typical development and which show potential red flags across physical, cognitive, language, and social-emotional domains, documenting their reasoning on a structured form.
  2. Instructor presents the school's general referral pathway (teacher notification → Student Support Team → specialist referral) via a flowchart; students trace three case studies through the flowchart, identifying who is notified at each step and what documentation is required.
  3. Role-play: one student plays a para who has noticed a potential delay in a student; a partner plays the lead teacher; the para must communicate the concern professionally and objectively without diagnosing or alarming the teacher — instructor scores using a communication rubric.
CDC milestone checklists, student profile cards, structured observation/documentation form, referral flowchart handout, communication rubricStructured form: 80% accuracy in identifying red flags vs. typical variation; role-play scored on communication rubric — student must use objective language, avoid diagnostic labels, and follow the correct chain of communication.
9Culture, Family, Trauma, and the Whole Child13fieldStudents will explain how culture, family structure, socioeconomic factors, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), and trauma-informed principles influence child development and apply culturally responsive, trauma-aware para practices.
  1. Read a short overview of the ACEs (Adverse Childhood Experiences) research framework and complete a reflection worksheet identifying three ways high ACE scores can manifest in classroom behavior, then list three trauma-informed responses within a para's scope.
  2. Participate in a structured fishbowl discussion on cultural and family diversity: four students discuss how cultural norms around authority, eye contact, and expression of emotion can be misread as behavioral problems; outer ring takes notes and identifies one takeaway each.
  3. Field observation activity (in a supervised campus PreK or school-partner setting if available, or via guided video observation): observe interactions between staff and students for 30 minutes, documenting on a provided form any instances of culturally responsive or trauma-informed practice and any missed opportunities, then debrief with the class.
ACEs research overview handout (CDC or peer-reviewed source), reflection worksheet, fishbowl discussion facilitation guide, field observation form, vetted video observation alternativeReflection worksheet: minimum 3 accurate ACE-to-behavior links and 3 appropriate para responses; field observation form completed with at least 4 documented, specific examples; debrief participation assessed by instructor for depth of analysis.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Developmental Foundations Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 questions)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering all nine lesson areas: developmental theories, milestones by domain and age band, language and literacy acquisition, atypical development indicators, referral protocol, adolescent brain science, and trauma-informed principles. Questions are written at the ParaPro Assessment reading comprehension and applied knowledge level to build exam readiness.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Developmental Observation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Minimum score of 18 out of 24 points on the rubric; all three required techniques demonstrated without instructor promptingStudents observe a 10-minute live or video-recorded classroom interaction (early childhood or elementary level) and complete a structured observation form in real time, identifying developmental milestones present, noting one area of potential concern, and recommending a para support strategy. Scored on accuracy of milestone identification, objectivity of language, and appropriateness of the recommended strategy.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Observation and Referral Lab LogLog15%All 6 entries submitted; minimum average score of 3 out of 4 on the log rubricStudents maintain a running lab log with a minimum of six entries completed across lessons 2 through 9, each documenting an observed or case-study-based developmental scenario. Each entry must include: the age and domain observed, the milestone or red flag identified, the theoretical framework applied, and the appropriate para response. Entries are scored for accuracy, use of professional objective language, and correct scope of practice.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Child Safety and Mandated Reporter Protocol Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% correct on the protocol checklist; must pass on first or second attempt — failure on second attempt requires remediation before course credit is awardedA non-negotiable safety checkpoint in which each student verbally and in writing demonstrates knowledge of: the para's role as a mandated reporter, the steps to take when a child discloses abuse or neglect, correct supervision ratios and sight-line requirements for age groups, and basic physical safety procedures (choking response review, allergy alert protocol) in a school setting. Aligned to CPR/First Aid credential requirements and State Paraprofessional Certificate professional conduct standards.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-TEAC61-03 Trade course

Classroom Management for Paraprofessionals

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

This course prepares teacher aides to support a well-ordered, inclusive classroom by applying evidence-based management strategies, proactive routines, and positive behavioral supports under a licensed teacher's direction. Learners study the rules, roles, and documentation practices that school districts expect of paraprofessionals and that are tested on the ParaPro Assessment. Emphasis is placed on legal and ethical boundaries, culturally responsive practice, and safe learning environments.

Outcomes
Course text

This course prepares teacher aides to support a well-ordered, inclusive classroom by applying evidence-based management strategies, proactive routines, and positive behavioral supports under a licensed teacher's direction. Learners study the rules, roles, and documentation practices that school districts expect of paraprofessionals and that are tested on the ParaPro Assessment. Emphasis is placed on legal and ethical boundaries, culturally responsive practice, and safe learning environments.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: The Paraprofessional's Role in Classroom Management; Proactive Classroom Structures: Routines, Expectations, and Physical Environment; Positive Reinforcement and Behavior-Specific Praise; Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (ABC) Data Collection; De-escalation and Low-Level Disruption Response; Culturally Responsive and Trauma-Informed Classroom Support; Classroom Emergency Procedures and Safety; ParaPro Assessment Connection: Classroom and Instructional Context; Integrated Classroom Management Simulation.

What competent looks like. Explain the paraprofessional's role and legal limits in classroom management as defined by school district policy and IDEA guidelines. Implement at least three evidence-based proactive management strategies—including clear expectations, structured transitions, and positive reinforcement—as directed by the supervising teacher. Identify and respond appropriately to low-level disruptions using de-escalation techniques that preserve student dignity and minimize instructional loss. Maintain accurate, objective written records of student behavior using antecedent-behavior-consequence (ABC) notation. Apply culturally responsive and trauma-informed principles when supporting diverse learners in a supervised classroom setting. Demonstrate safe emergency response procedures, including evacuation, lockdown, and first-aid activation, within a classroom context.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Paraprofessional's Role in Classroom Management10theoryStudents will accurately describe the legal scope of a paraprofessional's authority in classroom management, distinguishing it from the supervising teacher's responsibilities.
  1. Read and annotate excerpts from IDEA reauthorization language and a sample district paraprofessional job description; highlight tasks that are within versus outside their authority.
  2. Participate in a structured discussion comparing two case vignettes—one in which a para oversteps their role and one where they respond appropriately—and identify the consequences of each.
  3. Complete a 'role boundary' sorting card activity, placing 20 classroom tasks into columns: 'Para does alone,' 'Para does under teacher direction,' and 'Teacher only.'
Sample district paraprofessional job descriptions, IDEA overview fact sheet (NICHCY/NCPIE), role-boundary sorting cards, student notebookExit ticket: students correctly classify at least 8 of 10 role-boundary scenarios; scored by instructor against answer key; pass = 80%.
2Proactive Classroom Structures: Routines, Expectations, and Physical Environment12demoStudents will demonstrate how to teach and reinforce three classroom routines—entering the room, transitions between activities, and dismissal—using explicit modeling and practice.
  1. Observe a video demonstration of a teacher establishing daily routines and then identify which specific steps the paraprofessional supported; record observations on a structured note-taking form.
  2. In pairs, script and rehearse verbal and nonverbal cues for each of the three target routines, incorporating a visual schedule and a timer, then perform for the group.
  3. Diagram a sample classroom's physical layout, annotating high-traffic zones, proximity positions for the para, and placement of behavior visual supports such as a posted rules chart.
Short classroom video clips (commercially licensed or public domain), routine script template, blank classroom floor-plan grid, visual schedule examples, dry-erase markersChecklist observation during pair rehearsal: instructor marks each routine step present or absent; pass = all critical steps present for at least 2 of 3 routines.
3Positive Reinforcement and Behavior-Specific Praise12practiceStudents will deliver behavior-specific praise statements and apply a simple positive reinforcement system accurately in a simulated classroom setting.
  1. Review research summary on behavior-specific praise (BSP) versus general praise; complete a written comparison noting why BSP is more effective for behavior change.
  2. Role-play in groups of three (para, student, observer): the 'para' delivers at least five BSP statements during a five-minute simulated math period while the observer tallies correct and incorrect praise attempts using a tally sheet.
  3. Design a simple token economy chart appropriate for an elementary or middle-school classroom, specifying target behaviors, token delivery rules, and a menu of classroom-based reinforcers; present to class for peer feedback.
BSP research summary handout, tally observation forms, blank token economy templates, sample reinforcer menus from published PBIS resourcesObserver tally sheet: student delivers BSP correctly in at least 4 of 5 attempts during role-play; pass = 80% accuracy on tally; instructor verifies.
4Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (ABC) Data Collection12labStudents will record objective, complete ABC behavior data entries for at least five behavioral events observed in a video scenario, using standard district documentation format.
  1. Review annotated examples of well-written versus poorly written ABC entries; identify three errors in the poor examples and correct them in writing.
  2. Watch a ten-minute classroom scenario video and independently complete an ABC data sheet for every behavioral event observed, using objective, non-judgmental language.
  3. Pair-share completed ABC sheets; partners check each other's entries for objectivity, completeness (antecedent, behavior, consequence all recorded), and absence of interpretive language; revise as needed.
ABC data recording form (district-standard format), classroom scenario video (licensed/public domain), red and green highlighters for peer review, sample completed ABC logsInstructor reviews each student's ABC data sheet: pass = 5 of 5 events recorded, behavior column contains only observable description (no interpretive words), antecedent and consequence present for each entry.
5De-escalation and Low-Level Disruption Response12practiceStudents will apply at least four de-escalation strategies—including proximity, calm voice, redirection, and choice-offering—appropriately in response to simulated classroom disruptions.
  1. Study a reference card listing a continuum of de-escalation strategies from least to most intrusive; rank-order ten disruption scenarios by severity and select the least-intrusive appropriate response for each.
  2. Participate in fishbowl role-plays: one student plays a disruptive student (using a scripted scenario card), another plays the para using de-escalation; the class observes and completes a feedback form noting which strategies were used.
  3. Debrief in small groups: for each role-play, discuss what worked, what might escalate the situation, and how the para should report the incident to the supervising teacher afterward.
De-escalation strategy reference card, disruption scenario cards, observer feedback forms, reflection worksheetInstructor observation checklist during fishbowl: student correctly applies at least 4 of 6 target strategies without using punitive language or physical contact; pass = 4/6 strategies observed.
6Culturally Responsive and Trauma-Informed Classroom Support12theoryStudents will analyze two classroom scenarios and identify at least three ways cultural or trauma-related factors may influence student behavior, proposing culturally responsive adjustments to the paraprofessional's approach.
  1. Read a brief overview of trauma-informed care principles in school settings and culturally responsive teaching; annotate for key definitions and three practical classroom applications.
  2. Analyze two written case studies—one involving a student who recently experienced a disruptive home event, one involving a student from a cultural background with different behavioral norms—and complete a structured analysis form noting behavioral triggers, inappropriate responses to avoid, and supportive alternatives.
  3. Small-group discussion: share analysis findings, reach consensus on the top three adjustments the para should make in each case, and present a two-minute summary to the class.
Trauma-informed care overview handout (from a published source such as SAMHSA's school-based resources), culturally responsive teaching summary, case study handouts, structured analysis formStructured analysis form: student identifies at least 3 valid culturally responsive or trauma-sensitive adjustments per case; scored by instructor against model answers; pass = 3/3 per case.
7Classroom Emergency Procedures and Safety12fieldStudents will correctly execute the paraprofessional's steps in a classroom fire evacuation, lockdown, and medical emergency (first-aid activation) drill, meeting school-district procedural standards.
  1. Review the school's standard emergency response procedures for evacuation, lockdown, and medical emergencies; map the para's specific responsibilities at each stage on a three-column chart.
  2. Participate in a timed practice drill: instructor calls each emergency type in sequence; students perform their para role (accounting for students, leading to exit or lockdown position, activating first aid) while the instructor records steps on an observation checklist.
  3. Post-drill debrief: identify two steps that were missed or performed incorrectly, write a corrective action statement for each, and rehearse the corrected procedure once more.
Sample school emergency procedure handbook, three-column chart template, instructor observation checklist, first-aid kit (for activation practice), stopwatchInstructor observation checklist: student completes all critical steps (student accounting, correct position, correct activation call) for at least 2 of 3 emergency types; pass = all critical steps correct for 2/3 types; safety check criterion also feeds into the safety_check assessment.
8ParaPro Assessment Connection: Classroom and Instructional Context10theoryStudents will correctly answer practice questions mapped to the ParaPro Assessment's instructional support and classroom assistance competency areas at a rate of 75% or higher.
  1. Review the ETS ParaPro Assessment content framework for the areas covering assisting with instruction and classroom support; map each content area to topics already studied in this course.
  2. Complete a 30-question practice set drawn from or aligned with published ParaPro preparation materials; self-score using an answer key.
  3. For every incorrect answer, write a one-sentence explanation of the correct concept and identify which lesson in this course covers that content, creating a personal study gap list.
ETS ParaPro Assessment overview (ets.org), published or instructor-created ParaPro-aligned practice questions, answer key, gap-analysis worksheetPractice set score: pass = 75% (23/30) correct; gap-analysis worksheet completed for all incorrect items.
9Integrated Classroom Management Simulation12labStudents will independently manage a 20-minute simulated classroom period by applying proactive routines, positive reinforcement, de-escalation, and ABC data collection simultaneously under observation.
  1. Plan the simulation in writing: outline routines to implement, reinforcement system to use, two likely disruption scenarios and planned responses, and set up the ABC data sheet in advance.
  2. Conduct the 20-minute simulation with peers acting as students following disruption script cards; the student playing the para implements their plan while the instructor and one peer observer complete separate observation checklists.
  3. Complete a written self-assessment immediately after the simulation: rate own performance on each skill domain on a 1-4 rubric, identify two strengths and two specific improvements, and propose revised strategies for a second attempt.
Simulation planning template, disruption script cards, instructor and peer observation checklists, ABC data sheets, self-assessment rubricInstructor observation checklist: student earns a passing score on all four skill domains (routines, reinforcement, de-escalation, data collection) on the rubric; pass = score of 3 or 4 on each domain (no domain scored below 3).
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Classroom Management Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% (38/50 items correct)A 50-item multiple-choice and short-answer written exam covering the paraprofessional's legal role, proactive management strategies, positive reinforcement principles, ABC data collection, de-escalation, culturally responsive practice, and emergency procedures. Items are aligned to ParaPro Assessment competency areas for assisting with instruction and supporting classroom management.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Integrated Classroom Management Simulation PerformanceSkills demonstration45%Score of 3 or 4 (out of 4) on all four rubric domains with no domain below 3Students conduct a 20-minute supervised classroom simulation in which they implement proactive routines, deliver behavior-specific praise, respond to at least two scripted disruptions using de-escalation, and complete an ABC data sheet. The instructor scores performance using a four-domain rubric; students must pass all domains.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
ABC Data Log PortfolioLog15%All entries meet objectivity, completeness, and format standards; at least 10 valid entries across lessons 4 and 9Students compile a portfolio of ABC data recording sheets completed during lessons 4 and 9, including video-based and simulation-based entries. Each entry is reviewed for observable and non-interpretive language, complete antecedent-behavior-consequence notation, and correct use of the district-standard form.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Classroom Emergency Safety CheckSafety audit15%All critical steps correct for at least 2 of 3 emergency types; zero critical steps omitted for the medical emergency typeDrawn from lesson 7, the instructor uses a structured observation checklist to verify that each student correctly executes the paraprofessional's specific responsibilities during evacuation, lockdown, and medical emergency scenarios. The medical emergency activation step (calling for adult help, initiating first aid if trained) is a mandatory pass item with no omissions permitted.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-TEAC61-04 Trade course

Instructional Support for Paraprofessionals

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

This course prepares teacher aides to deliver effective, evidence-aligned instructional support under the direction of a licensed teacher in K–12 classrooms. Students learn scaffolding techniques, guided practice strategies, small-group facilitation, and the use of instructional materials and assistive technology. Content maps directly to the Reading, Mathematics, and Writing skill areas tested on the ParaPro Assessment.

Outcomes
Course text

This course prepares teacher aides to deliver effective, evidence-aligned instructional support under the direction of a licensed teacher in K–12 classrooms. Students learn scaffolding techniques, guided practice strategies, small-group facilitation, and the use of instructional materials and assistive technology. Content maps directly to the Reading, Mathematics, and Writing skill areas tested on the ParaPro Assessment.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: The Paraprofessional's Instructional Role and Legal Boundaries; How Students Learn: Instructional Theory for Paraprofessionals; Reading Instruction Support: Decoding, Fluency, and Comprehension; Mathematics Instruction Support: Concept Development and Problem Solving; Writing Instruction Support: Process Writing and Mechanics Reinforcement; Small-Group Facilitation and Differentiation Techniques; Assistive Technology and Digital Instructional Tools; Formative Assessment and Progress Monitoring for Paraprofessionals; Integrated Instructional Support Lab: Full-Cycle Simulation.

What competent looks like. Implement teacher-directed instructional plans using scaffolding, modeling, and guided practice with fidelity in reading, mathematics, and writing contexts. Facilitate small-group and one-on-one instruction using research-supported strategies that align with grade-level standards. Select, adapt, and use instructional materials—including assistive technology and digital tools—to support diverse learners. Apply formative checking techniques to monitor student understanding and report progress accurately to the supervising teacher. Maintain appropriate professional boundaries and collaborative communication with the lead teacher throughout the instructional cycle. Demonstrate content-area knowledge in reading, mathematics, and writing at the level required to pass the ParaPro Assessment.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Paraprofessional's Instructional Role and Legal Boundaries10theoryStudents will describe the legal and ethical boundaries of the paraprofessional's instructional role and distinguish tasks that require a licensed teacher from those a paraeducator may perform independently.
  1. Read and annotate the ESSA Title I paraprofessional qualification requirements (general language, no specific code citation) and a sample district job description; discuss which instructional tasks appear in each document.
  2. Case-study analysis: given six vignettes of paraprofessional actions (e.g., modifying a grade, designing the unit plan, leading a small reading group), students classify each as within or outside scope of role and justify their decision in writing.
  3. Role-play paired exercise: one student plays the paraeducator, one the lead teacher; practice receiving and clarifying instructional directions, asking clarifying questions, and documenting the interaction on a communication log.
ESSA paraprofessional qualification summary (government summary document), sample district job description, role-boundary case-study packet, blank communication log templateExit ticket: students correctly classify 5 of 6 role-boundary scenarios and write one sentence explaining the legal rationale; 83% accuracy required to pass.
2How Students Learn: Instructional Theory for Paraprofessionals10theoryStudents will explain how key learning principles—including scaffolding, the gradual release of responsibility model, and zone of proximal development—inform the paraprofessional's instructional decisions.
  1. Lecture and annotated diagram: instructor introduces I Do / We Do / You Do (gradual release) and zone of proximal development with classroom examples; students map a sample reading lesson onto the framework.
  2. Small-group discussion using three short video clips of paraprofessional-led reading groups; students identify which phase of gradual release is visible and what the paraeducator does to scaffold.
  3. Individual written reflection: students describe a learning task from their own schooling and explain, using scaffolding vocabulary, what support helped or would have helped them succeed.
Gradual release of responsibility diagram, three short instructional video clips (public domain or licensed), zone of proximal development reference card, reflection templateShort written analysis (one paragraph) correctly applying gradual release and scaffolding vocabulary to a new sample lesson scenario; instructor evaluates using a 4-point rubric, minimum score of 3 required.
3Reading Instruction Support: Decoding, Fluency, and Comprehension14demoStudents will demonstrate evidence-aligned techniques for supporting student reading—including phonics reinforcement, fluency practice, and comprehension questioning—in a small-group simulation.
  1. Instructor models a 15-minute small-group guided reading session using a decodable text, narrating each instructional move (error correction, wait time, praise); students complete an observation protocol noting specific techniques.
  2. Students practice delivering a 10-minute fluency session in triads (paraeducator, two student-actors), using repeated oral reading with corrective feedback; peers score fidelity using a structured checklist.
  3. Comprehension questioning drill: students generate a set of 6 questions (2 literal, 2 inferential, 2 text-to-world) for a grade 3 passage, then practice asking and following up on student responses in a fishbowl role-play.
Decodable readers (grade 1–3 level samples), fluency checklist, comprehension question stems card, observation protocol, ParaPro Assessment Reading skill area reference sheetSkills checklist scored during triad practice: student must demonstrate correct error-correction technique, appropriate wait time (3+ seconds), and at least one inferential question in a 10-minute session; all three criteria must be met to pass. Maps to ParaPro Reading skill area.
4Mathematics Instruction Support: Concept Development and Problem Solving14demoStudents will facilitate a concrete-pictorial-abstract (CPA) math lesson segment using manipulatives and worked examples, accurately representing the mathematical concept being taught.
  1. Instructor demonstrates a CPA sequence for multi-digit addition using base-ten blocks (concrete), a place-value chart drawing (pictorial), and the standard algorithm (abstract); students replicate each stage at their own workspace.
  2. Students work in pairs to co-plan a 10-minute CPA mini-lesson for one of three assigned topics (fractions, geometry vocabulary, or basic algebra concepts); they rehearse the lesson and peer-evaluate using a content-accuracy checklist.
  3. Error analysis activity: students receive five student work samples with common math errors; they identify the error type, describe the likely misconception, and write a script of what they would say to guide the student without simply giving the answer.
Base-ten blocks, fraction tiles, geometric shape sets, place-value charts, error-analysis work samples, ParaPro Assessment Mathematics skill area reference sheet, content-accuracy checklistInstructor observes each student's CPA mini-lesson; student must correctly represent the mathematical concept at all three levels and avoid introducing mathematical errors; content-accuracy checklist must be passed with no critical errors. Maps to ParaPro Mathematics skill area.
5Writing Instruction Support: Process Writing and Mechanics Reinforcement10practiceStudents will support student writing at each stage of the writing process (prewriting, drafting, revising, editing, publishing) using conferencing techniques and targeted grammar and mechanics prompts.
  1. Workshop overview: instructor explains the five-stage writing process and the paraeducator's role at each stage; students annotate a writing conference transcript, identifying the strategies the paraeducator used and evaluating their effectiveness.
  2. Writing conference simulation: students practice conducting a brief (5-minute) writing conference with a peer acting as a struggling writer; the focus alternates between idea development (revision) and sentence-level editing; debrief using the conference protocol checklist.
  3. Grammar and mechanics reference practice: using a standard grammar handbook, students locate rules for comma use, subject-verb agreement, and capitalization, then correctly mark and explain three errors in a student writing sample, writing feedback in student-friendly language.
Writing process anchor chart, writing conference protocol checklist, annotated conference transcript, student writing samples, standard grammar handbook (e.g., the Handbook of Current English or equivalent), ParaPro Assessment Writing skill area reference sheetStudents submit a written feedback note based on one student writing sample; note must correctly identify at least two specific writing issues (one content-level, one mechanics-level) and phrase feedback in student-friendly, non-evaluative language; evaluated by instructor with a pass/fail rubric. Maps to ParaPro Writing skill area.
6Small-Group Facilitation and Differentiation Techniques12practiceStudents will facilitate a differentiated small-group lesson segment that adjusts content, process, or product for at least two different learner readiness levels using materials prepared in advance.
  1. Reading and discussion: students read a professional summary of differentiation by readiness, interest, and learning profile and then sort 12 instructional strategy cards into the correct differentiation category.
  2. Planning lab: each student selects a grade band (K–2, 3–5, 6–8) and a subject area, then drafts a 15-minute small-group lesson with two differentiated versions of the practice task—one for students who need more support and one extension task—using a provided planning template.
  3. Live facilitation round: students facilitate their planned lesson with a small group of classmates (4–5 people role-playing students); instructor observes and completes a facilitation rubric focusing on task clarity, pacing, equitable participation, and responsiveness to confusion.
Differentiation summary article, strategy sorting cards, lesson planning template, facilitation rubric, grade-level standard reference sheets (state standards summary)Facilitation rubric scored by instructor: student must score 3 of 4 or higher on all four domains (task clarity, pacing, equitable participation, responsiveness); any domain scored 1 requires remediation before next unit.
7Assistive Technology and Digital Instructional Tools10labStudents will select and demonstrate appropriate use of at least two assistive or instructional technology tools that support student learning, citing the purpose and limitations of each tool.
  1. Technology survey lab: students rotate through six workstations featuring different tool categories (text-to-speech, speech-to-text, visual supports/AAC apps, digital flashcard platforms, educational video resources, digital graphic organizers); at each station they complete a one-paragraph tool evaluation card.
  2. Scenario-based selection task: given three student profiles (a student with dyslexia, an English language learner, a student with fine-motor challenges), students select and justify the most appropriate tech tool for each and describe how they would introduce it to the student.
  3. Supervised practice: students use a school-appropriate text-to-speech tool and a digital graphic organizer with a partner; they document the setup steps, accessibility settings adjusted, and any data-privacy considerations in a technology use log.
Classroom computers or tablets with accessibility features enabled, text-to-speech software (system built-in or free equivalent), digital graphic organizer platform, technology evaluation cards, technology use log template, student privacy overview handout (FERPA general principles)Completed technology use log reviewed by instructor: log must correctly document setup steps, at least one accessibility setting, and a student privacy consideration for each tool demonstrated; all three components must be present to pass.
8Formative Assessment and Progress Monitoring for Paraprofessionals10practiceStudents will collect, record, and communicate accurate formative assessment data using at least three monitoring techniques, and summarize findings in a written progress note for the supervising teacher.
  1. Demonstration and practice: instructor shows three data-collection methods (frequency tally, anecdotal note, running record) using simulated student interactions; students practice each method by observing a 5-minute instructional video clip and recording data simultaneously.
  2. Data summary exercise: students compile their collected data into a brief written progress note using a structured template (date, context, observation, data, next-step recommendation for the teacher) and peer-review each other's notes for accuracy and professional language.
  3. Role-play communication: students practice verbally summarizing progress data to a supervising teacher (played by a classmate), staying within the paraeducator's scope (reporting observable data, not making diagnostic conclusions); debrief on professional communication norms.
Frequency tally sheets, anecdotal note template, running record form, progress note template, instructional video clips, professional communication norms reference cardSubmitted progress note scored against a 3-point rubric: must include accurate data from at least two collection methods, use professional non-diagnostic language, and contain a clear next-step recommendation for the teacher; minimum score of 2 on all three criteria required to pass.
9Integrated Instructional Support Lab: Full-Cycle Simulation14labStudents will plan, deliver, monitor, and document a complete 20-minute instructional support session in reading or mathematics, demonstrating integration of all course skills from role boundaries through progress monitoring.
  1. Planning phase (individual, in class): each student receives a teacher-prepared lesson plan and a student profile; they prepare a small-group support session aligned to the plan, completing a materials checklist, a session plan form, and selecting one formative monitoring tool.
  2. Delivery phase: students deliver their 20-minute session to a group of three to four classmates role-playing students; instructor and one peer evaluator observe and score using the integrated facilitation rubric covering scaffolding use, content accuracy, facilitation quality, and monitoring.
  3. Debrief and documentation phase: immediately after delivery, students complete a self-evaluation form and write a one-page reflective progress note summarizing student performance data, instructional decisions made during the session, and recommended next steps for the teacher.
Prepared teacher lesson plans (reading and mathematics, grades 2–6 samples), student profile cards, session plan form, materials checklist, formative monitoring tools (tally, anecdotal, running record), integrated facilitation rubric, self-evaluation form, progress note templateIntegrated facilitation rubric (instructor-scored): student must score 3 or higher on each of four domains (scaffolding, content accuracy, facilitation, monitoring); progress note must meet the standard from Lesson 8; both components must pass to earn a passing grade for the lesson. Maps to ParaPro Reading, Mathematics, and Writing skill areas.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Instructional Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 items)A 50-item multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering the paraprofessional's instructional role, gradual release of responsibility, reading/mathematics/writing support strategies, differentiation, assistive technology, and progress monitoring. Items are directly aligned to the ParaPro Assessment content areas in Reading, Mathematics, and Writing skills application, giving students practice with the format and content of the credential exam.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Small-Group Instructional Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Score of 3 or higher on all five rubric domains (no domain below 3)The student facilitates a live 20-minute small-group instructional support session observed by the instructor; the session is scored on five domains—role-boundary adherence, content accuracy, scaffolding technique, equitable facilitation, and formative monitoring—using a standardized rubric. A submitted session plan and post-session progress note are evaluated alongside the live performance.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Instructional Planning and Monitoring Lab LogLog15%All eight required log entries complete and accurate; no more than one entry rated below standardThroughout the course, students maintain a running lab log documenting their work in each practice and lab lesson: lesson plans, tool evaluation cards, formative data sheets, progress notes, and self-evaluations. The complete log is submitted at the end of the course and reviewed by the instructor for completeness, accuracy of instructional content, professional language, and appropriate scope of role.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Professional Boundaries and Safe Practice Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on role-boundary items; 100% on student data privacy items; 80% overallA targeted scenario-based safety check assessing two non-negotiable competency areas: correctly identifying the legal limits of the paraprofessional's instructional role (including situations requiring immediate referral to the licensed teacher) and demonstrating knowledge of student data privacy principles (FERPA general requirements) when collecting and reporting instructional progress data. Any failure on role-boundary or privacy items requires immediate remediation and recheck before the student may continue to the next course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-TEAC61-05 Trade course

Special Education Basics

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

This course introduces paraprofessionals to the foundational legal framework, disability categories, individualized education program processes, and inclusive instructional strategies used in special education settings. Students learn how to support students with disabilities alongside certified teachers in compliance with federal law and school district policy. Emphasis is placed on professional boundaries, confidentiality, and the paraprofessional's specific role within the IEP team.

Outcomes
Course text

This course introduces paraprofessionals to the foundational legal framework, disability categories, individualized education program processes, and inclusive instructional strategies used in special education settings. Students learn how to support students with disabilities alongside certified teachers in compliance with federal law and school district policy. Emphasis is placed on professional boundaries, confidentiality, and the paraprofessional's specific role within the IEP team.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Federal Law and the Paraprofessional's Role in Special Education; Disability Categories Under IDEA: Characteristics and Classroom Implications; The IEP Document: Reading and Understanding Your Role; Inclusive Classrooms: Co-Teaching Models and the Paraprofessional's Position; Accommodations and Modifications in Practice; Communication Disorders and Augmentative/Alternative Communication (AAC) Awareness; Behavior Support Basics and De-escalation for Paraprofessionals; Confidentiality, Ethics, and Professional Boundaries in Special Education; Putting It Together: Simulated IEP Support Day and Documentation.

What competent looks like. Identify the major federal laws governing special education, including IDEA and Section 504, and explain how each affects paraprofessional responsibilities in the classroom. Describe the thirteen disability categories under IDEA and explain general characteristics and common instructional accommodations associated with each. Read and interpret the paraprofessional's role within an Individualized Education Program (IEP) document, including goals, accommodations, and behavior support plans. Implement assigned accommodations and modifications under teacher direction using at least three evidence-based instructional strategies appropriate to diverse learners. Apply confidentiality rules and professional boundaries consistent with FERPA and school district policy when handling student records and communicating with families and staff. Demonstrate safe, respectful crisis-prevention and de-escalation techniques appropriate to the paraprofessional's supportive role when a student displays distress.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Federal Law and the Paraprofessional's Role in Special Education10theoryStudents will accurately explain the key provisions of IDEA, Section 504, and ADA as they apply to the daily duties of a paraprofessional.
  1. Guided reading of plain-language summaries of IDEA disability categories and Section 504 eligibility criteria, followed by a whole-class annotation and Q&A session.
  2. Case-study analysis: students review three fictional student profiles and identify which law covers each student, what rights are triggered, and what the paraprofessional may and may not do.
  3. Small-group discussion on the 'highly qualified paraprofessional' requirement under IDEA Title I, comparing state requirements to federal minimums and connecting to ParaPro Assessment eligibility.
Printed plain-language IDEA summary (NICHCY/Center for Parent Information and Resources), Section 504 fact sheet (U.S. Dept. of Education Office for Civil Rights), whiteboard, student notebooksExit ticket: students correctly match five legal scenarios to the correct law and list two paraprofessional duties the law either requires or prohibits; 80% accuracy required.
2Disability Categories Under IDEA: Characteristics and Classroom Implications12theoryStudents will describe the defining characteristics of each of the thirteen IDEA disability categories and identify at least one common instructional accommodation for each.
  1. Instructor-led slide presentation on each of the thirteen categories, pausing after each cluster (sensory, physical, cognitive, behavioral/emotional, communication) for a 'Turn and Talk' where pairs summarize what they heard.
  2. Students create a double-sided reference card for each disability cluster: one side lists observable characteristics, the other lists paraprofessional-appropriate support strategies, using textbook chapter readings as sources.
  3. Jigsaw activity: small groups become 'experts' on two or three categories and teach the rest of the class using their reference cards, receiving peer feedback scored against an instructor rubric.
Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education (Hallahan, Kauffman & Pullen, current edition) Chapters 1–14, printed jigsaw rubric, index cards, markersCompleted reference cards scored on rubric (accuracy of characteristics, appropriateness of strategies): minimum 80% of categories correct; peer-teach rated satisfactory by instructor.
3The IEP Document: Reading and Understanding Your Role12demoStudents will locate and interpret the sections of a sample IEP that directly govern the paraprofessional's daily actions, including goals, accommodations, modifications, and related services.
  1. Instructor models reading a redacted sample IEP aloud, pausing to explain each section—present levels, annual goals, measurement criteria, accommodations list, placement statement—and highlighting where paraprofessional duties appear.
  2. Students work in pairs with a second sample IEP to complete a structured 'IEP Scavenger Hunt' worksheet identifying: the student's three annual goals, the accommodations the paraprofessional must provide, and any behavior support plan components.
  3. Class debrief: pairs share findings; instructor corrects misconceptions and leads discussion on confidentiality obligations under FERPA when handling IEP documents.
Two redacted sample IEPs (school district training documents or state education agency sample), IEP Scavenger Hunt worksheet, FERPA fact sheet (U.S. Dept. of Education)Completed scavenger hunt worksheet: students correctly identify all required elements with 80% accuracy; verbal confirmation that student can state two FERPA obligations before leaving class.
4Inclusive Classrooms: Co-Teaching Models and the Paraprofessional's Position10theoryStudents will distinguish among the major co-teaching models and accurately describe the paraprofessional's subordinate, supportive role within each model.
  1. Instructor presents the six co-teaching models (one teach/one assist, station teaching, parallel teaching, alternative teaching, team teaching, one teach/one observe) using short video clips from a district training library or role-play demonstrations.
  2. Students complete a T-chart for each model comparing what the lead teacher does to what the paraprofessional does, using the Friend & Cook co-teaching framework as reference.
  3. Small-group scenario cards: groups read a classroom situation and decide which co-teaching model is in use, what the paraprofessional should be doing, and one thing the paraprofessional should NOT do independently; groups present to class.
Co-teaching model handout (adapted from Friend & Cook, Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School Professionals), scenario cards (instructor-prepared), whiteboard T-chart templateScenario card presentation scored on rubric: group correctly identifies model, paraprofessional role, and one boundary; instructor rates each group satisfactory or needs revision with one retry opportunity.
5Accommodations and Modifications in Practice12practiceStudents will implement at least three teacher-directed accommodations and modifications with a partner in simulated classroom activities, demonstrating correct technique and appropriate professional boundaries.
  1. Instructor demonstrates five common accommodation types—extended time administration, preferential seating setup, graphic organizer use, simplified directions, and text read-aloud—explaining the rationale and legal authority (IEP or 504 plan) for each.
  2. Role-play pairs: one student plays the paraprofessional and one plays the student; they rotate through five stations, each requiring a different accommodation type; instructor circulates and gives real-time corrective feedback.
  3. Debrief reflection: each student writes a brief journal entry identifying which accommodation felt most natural, which felt awkward, and one professional boundary they had to be conscious of during the role-play.
Graphic organizer templates, sample text passages (grade 3–8 reading level range), timer, role-play scenario cards, student journal/notebook, instructor feedback checklistInstructor observation checklist during role-play stations: student correctly implements the accommodation without overstepping (e.g., not providing answers), rated satisfactory on at least 4 of 5 stations.
6Communication Disorders and Augmentative/Alternative Communication (AAC) Awareness10demoStudents will recognize common communication disorders and describe how to support a student who uses an augmentative or alternative communication device or system under teacher direction.
  1. Instructor-led demonstration of three categories of AAC—no-tech (picture boards, PECS), low-tech (communication books), and high-tech (speech-generating devices)—with live handling of sample materials and a brief video of a student using an SGD in class.
  2. Students practice using a simple PECS-style picture exchange sequence with a partner, following a teacher-directed prompt script to understand how a paraprofessional facilitates without replacing the student's communication attempt.
  3. Guided discussion: What is the paraprofessional's role when the SLP has programmed a device? Students draft a short protocol for what to do if a device malfunctions or a student becomes frustrated.
Sample PECS picture cards, printed AAC communication board, video clip of AAC use in inclusive classroom (ASHA or district-approved source), prompt script handout, student notebooksPartner practice observed by instructor: student correctly follows the prompt hierarchy (wait, gesture, model) without providing verbal answers for the 'student'; rated satisfactory by instructor checklist.
7Behavior Support Basics and De-escalation for Paraprofessionals14practiceStudents will demonstrate at least four verbal and non-verbal de-escalation strategies appropriate to the paraprofessional's supportive role and explain when to involve the classroom teacher or administrator.
  1. Instructor presents the behavior escalation cycle (calm, trigger, agitation, acceleration, peak, de-escalation, recovery) using a visual diagram, explaining observable signs at each stage and corresponding paraprofessional responses that remain within role boundaries.
  2. Structured role-play: students rotate through three escalation scenarios (refusal, verbal outburst, withdrawal/shutdown); the 'paraprofessional' student practices specific strategies—neutral tone, personal space, limited language, offering choice—while the instructor coaches in real time.
  3. Written reflection: students document each scenario, the strategies used, the point at which they would call for teacher/administrator support, and how they would record the incident in a factual behavior log entry.
Escalation cycle diagram (instructor-prepared based on CPI or district model), role-play scenario cards, behavior log template (blank), student notebooksInstructor observation during role-play: student demonstrates at least 4 of 6 targeted strategies accurately and correctly identifies the handoff point to the teacher in all three scenarios; written reflection rated satisfactory.
8Confidentiality, Ethics, and Professional Boundaries in Special Education10theoryStudents will apply FERPA confidentiality rules and professional ethics standards to realistic scenarios involving student records, parent communication, and social media use.
  1. Case study analysis: instructor presents five short vignettes (parent asks paraprofessional about another student's diagnosis; paraprofessional posts a class photo on social media; colleague asks paraprofessional to share IEP details) and students identify the violation, the law or policy breached, and the correct action.
  2. Small group role-play of a parent-paraprofessional hallway conversation where the parent demands information outside the paraprofessional's role; students practice redirecting to the teacher professionally without disclosing confidential information.
  3. Individual written reflection connecting ParaPro Assessment skill area III (supporting the teacher) to professional ethics: students list three boundaries they will maintain and explain why each matters legally and professionally.
FERPA fact sheet (U.S. Dept. of Education), district code of ethics sample document, vignette handout (instructor-prepared), student notebooksCase study analysis scored on rubric: student correctly identifies violation and appropriate response in at least 4 of 5 vignettes (80%); role-play rated satisfactory by instructor.
9Putting It Together: Simulated IEP Support Day and Documentation14labStudents will perform an integrated simulation of a full support cycle—reviewing an IEP section, implementing an assigned accommodation, recording a behavior observation, and completing a factual daily log—demonstrating competence across all course skill areas.
  1. Each student receives a new redacted sample IEP; they have 20 minutes to identify their assigned accommodations, student goals, and any behavior plan notes before the simulation begins—replicating a real morning prep task.
  2. Thirty-minute structured simulation: student rotates through three mini-stations (academic support using an accommodation, communication support using a picture board, and a low-level behavior prompt scenario), with instructor and a trained peer playing the 'student' role; instructor scores each station on an observation checklist.
  3. Post-simulation documentation: student completes a factual daily log entry and a brief incident note (if behavior occurred), then participates in a five-minute verbal debrief with the instructor reviewing what went well and what to improve before practicum.
Redacted sample IEP (new from previous lessons), graphic organizer, PECS board, behavior log template, daily log template, instructor observation checklist, timerInstructor observation checklist across all three stations: satisfactory rating on at least 8 of 10 criteria; daily log entry factual, professional, and free of opinion language; verbal debrief demonstrates self-reflection.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Special Education Law and Disability Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 items)A 50-item multiple-choice and short-answer written exam covering federal laws (IDEA, Section 504, ADA), the thirteen disability categories, IEP components, and FERPA confidentiality rules, mapped to ParaPro Assessment Skill Areas I (reading), II (mathematics), and III (supporting the teacher). Students who score below 75% complete a targeted review and retake once within one week.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Accommodation and De-escalation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Satisfactory on at least 8 of 10 checklist criteria across both skill areasStudents individually demonstrate two assigned accommodations from a sample IEP and one de-escalation technique in a structured role-play observed by the instructor using a standardized checklist; performance is rated on accuracy, professional language, maintenance of boundaries, and correct handoff to the teacher when required.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Log: IEP Reading, Accommodation Planning, and Behavior Documentation PortfolioLog15%All five entries rated satisfactory; no incomplete or opinion-based documentation acceptedStudents submit a portfolio of five dated lab log entries completed across the simulation and practice lessons, each containing an IEP section analysis, the accommodation or strategy they implemented, a factual behavior observation note, and a reflection; entries are evaluated for factual accuracy, professional tone, and alignment with the assigned IEP goals.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Confidentiality and Professional Boundaries Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% correct on all five scenarios; any incorrect response requires immediate remediation and recheck before course completionA pass/fail oral and written check in which the instructor presents five realistic scenarios involving student records, parent communication, and social media; the student must correctly identify the confidentiality rule, state the correct action, and name the authority (FERPA or district policy) for each scenario, with no errors permitted given the legal and child-safety stakes.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-TEAC61-06 Trade course

Literacy & Numeracy Support

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

This course prepares teacher aides to deliver structured, research-aligned reading and mathematics support to PreK–12 students under the direction of a licensed teacher. Learners practice evidence-based literacy strategies (phonics, fluency, comprehension) and numeracy techniques (number sense, computation, word problems) while using data tools to track student progress. Lesson content maps directly to the Reading and Mathematics instruction domains of the ParaPro Assessment.

Outcomes
Course text

This course prepares teacher aides to deliver structured, research-aligned reading and mathematics support to PreK–12 students under the direction of a licensed teacher. Learners practice evidence-based literacy strategies (phonics, fluency, comprehension) and numeracy techniques (number sense, computation, word problems) while using data tools to track student progress. Lesson content maps directly to the Reading and Mathematics instruction domains of the ParaPro Assessment.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: The Paraprofessional's Role in Literacy and Numeracy Instruction; Foundations of Reading: Phonemic Awareness and Phonics; Fluency and Comprehension Support Strategies; Vocabulary and Academic Language Development; Number Sense and Foundational Numeracy; Computation Fluency and Math Fact Support; Math Word Problems and Problem-Solving Scaffolds; Progress Monitoring and Data-Driven Communication; Differentiation, Scaffolding, and Inclusive Practice in Literacy and Numeracy.

What competent looks like. Implement at least three evidence-based literacy interventions—including phonemic awareness, guided oral reading, and vocabulary building—with fidelity under teacher supervision. Apply at least three research-supported numeracy strategies—including concrete-representational-abstract sequencing, fact fluency practice, and math word-problem scaffolding—appropriate to assigned grade bands. Collect, record, and communicate student progress data using running records, timed fluency probes, and basic computation checks in formats required by the supervising teacher. Select and adapt instructional materials and scaffolds for students with diverse learning needs, including English Language Learners and students receiving special education services. Demonstrate professional boundaries by operating within the paraprofessional role—supporting teacher-designed instruction rather than independently designing curriculum. Correctly answer literacy- and mathematics-content items at the level assessed by the ParaPro Assessment, including identifying errors in student work and explaining instructional next steps.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Paraprofessional's Role in Literacy and Numeracy Instruction10theoryStudents will distinguish the legal and ethical boundaries of the paraprofessional role in literacy and numeracy support from the role of the licensed teacher, citing IDEA and NCLB/ESSA paraprofessional qualification requirements.
  1. Read and annotate excerpts from ESSA Title I paraprofessional qualification provisions; identify three tasks paraprofessionals may perform independently versus three that require teacher oversight, then share findings in a class discussion.
  2. Analyze two contrasting case vignettes—one depicting role boundaries upheld correctly, one depicting overreach—and write a one-page reflection identifying the problem and the appropriate response.
  3. Role-play a brief team meeting between a teacher and aide in which the aide asks clarifying questions about a literacy small-group assignment, practicing professional communication and note-taking.
ESSA Title I paraprofessional provisions (print or PDF), IDEA overview handout, case vignette packet, student notebooks, ParaPro Assessment official study guide (ETS)Exit ticket: students correctly classify eight role-boundary scenarios as 'within scope' or 'outside scope' with at least 7/8 correct; instructor reviews written reflection for accurate identification of the overreach.
2Foundations of Reading: Phonemic Awareness and Phonics12theoryStudents will explain the five components of reading identified by the National Reading Panel and demonstrate how to deliver a phonemic awareness warm-up and a systematic phonics lesson segment to elementary-age learners.
  1. Complete a guided note-taking activity on the five components of reading (phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension) using teacher lecture and a graphic organizer; pair-share examples of each from a sample K–2 curriculum.
  2. Practice segmenting and blending CVC, CVCC, and multisyllabic words using Elkonin sound boxes and letter tiles, first as the 'student' then switching to the 'aide' role, receiving peer feedback on pacing and prompting language.
  3. Observe a video model of a systematic phonics lesson segment, complete an observation checklist noting the aide's scripted prompts, corrective feedback moves, and pacing, then discuss findings as a class.
Elkonin sound-box templates, letter tiles or sound cards, decodable readers (K–2 level), observation checklist, National Reading Panel summary document, ParaPro study guide reading sectionStudents score at least 80% on a 15-item written quiz covering the five components of reading and correct phonemic awareness prompting sequences; instructor observes each student delivering a 3-minute phonics segment and checks for accurate modeling and corrective feedback.
3Fluency and Comprehension Support Strategies12demoStudents will conduct a one-minute oral reading fluency probe, score it accurately using words-correct-per-minute (WCPM) procedures, and apply at least two evidence-based comprehension scaffolds (graphic organizer, think-aloud) with a peer.
  1. Instructor demonstrates the full fluency probe administration sequence—timed reading, marking errors, calculating WCPM, recording on a progress-monitoring graph—then each student administers a probe to a classmate and scores it, comparing results to the instructor's key.
  2. Practice three comprehension scaffolds (story map graphic organizer, reciprocal teaching think-aloud, question-answer relationships) using a leveled passage; students rotate facilitator and student roles and log which scaffold matched which text type.
  3. Using a sample set of three student fluency graphs, students write a brief (one paragraph) data summary in plain language suitable for sharing with a supervising teacher, identifying trend, goal status, and a suggested next instructional step.
Leveled reading passages (Grades 2–5), stopwatch or timer, fluency scoring sheets, WCPM progress-monitoring graph template, story map and QAR graphic organizers, ParaPro study guide reading sectionWCPM scoring accuracy: student's calculated score is within ±2 words of instructor's verified count on two consecutive probes (pass = both within range); written data summary is evaluated on a four-point rubric with a minimum score of 3/4 for accuracy and professional language.
4Vocabulary and Academic Language Development10practiceStudents will apply the Frayer Model and context-clue instruction to pre-teach three Tier 2 academic vocabulary words from a content-area passage, adjusting language supports for English Language Learners.
  1. Select six vocabulary words from a Grade 4 science passage; sort them into Tier 1, 2, and 3 categories using Isabel Beck's tiered-vocabulary framework, justifying each placement in writing.
  2. Complete Frayer Model cards for three Tier 2 words and practice delivering a brief vocabulary introduction using the 'say it, define it, show it, use it' routine with a partner, then receive checklist-based peer feedback.
  3. Review a student-work sample from an ELL showing vocabulary confusions; in small groups, propose two scaffolded supports (visual glossary, sentence frame, cognate connection) and present rationale to the class.
Grade 4 science or social studies passage, Frayer Model blank templates, Beck tier-vocabulary framework handout, ELL student-work sample packet, sentence frame examples, bilingual picture dictionaries (sample)Frayer Model cards are scored on a rubric (definition, example, non-example, picture all accurate) with a minimum score of 8/12 points; vocabulary introduction role-play is observed by instructor using a 5-item checklist with at least 4/5 behaviors demonstrated.
5Number Sense and Foundational Numeracy12theoryStudents will explain the concrete-representational-abstract (CRA) instructional sequence and use manipulatives to model place value, addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division for elementary-grade learners.
  1. Complete a guided lecture and note-taking activity on the CRA sequence; match six student-work samples to the correct CRA stage and justify each match in a brief written explanation.
  2. Use base-ten blocks, counters, and number lines to model multi-digit addition and subtraction at the concrete stage, then draw representational diagrams and connect to the standard algorithm, rotating materials among partners.
  3. Create a three-column CRA lesson card for a multiplication concept (e.g., 3×4 using equal groups) that a paraprofessional could use during small-group support; trade cards with a partner and provide written feedback using a supplied checklist.
Base-ten blocks, counters, two-color chips, number lines (printed), graph paper, ParaPro study guide mathematics section, CRA framework handoutStudents score at least 80% on a 20-item written quiz covering place value, basic operations, and CRA stage identification; CRA lesson card is evaluated by instructor for mathematical accuracy and correct stage labeling (pass = all three stages present and accurate).
6Computation Fluency and Math Fact Support10practiceStudents will administer and score a timed math-fact fluency probe and select at least two appropriate fluency-building interventions matched to a student's fact-acquisition stage.
  1. Administer a two-minute addition fact fluency probe to a classmate, score for correct digits per minute and error patterns, and record data on a progress-monitoring chart, then compare scoring with the instructor key.
  2. Review four fluency-building strategies (flashcard drill, cover-copy-compare, fact family triangles, incremental rehearsal) using demonstration videos and written descriptions; rank each by evidence level using a provided research summary handout.
  3. Given three fictional student fluency profiles at different acquisition stages (counting strategies, derived facts, automatic recall), select the most appropriate intervention for each and write a rationale paragraph per student.
Timed fact fluency probe sheets (addition, subtraction, multiplication), stopwatch, progress-monitoring graph template, flashcards, fact family triangle templates, research summary handout on fluency interventionsScoring accuracy: student's probe score is within ±3 correct digits of instructor's verified count (pass = within range on both a practice and a verification probe); written rationales are reviewed for alignment between student profile and selected intervention, with all three rationales rated as 'appropriate match' by instructor.
7Math Word Problems and Problem-Solving Scaffolds10demoStudents will guide a peer through at least two structured problem-solving frameworks (CUBES strategy and bar model/tape diagram) to solve addition/subtraction and multiplication/division word problems at Grades 3–5 level.
  1. Instructor models the CUBES strategy (Circle numbers, Underline the question, Box key words, Eliminate unnecessary info, Solve and check) on three word problems displayed on a whiteboard; students annotate copies of the same problems and compare annotations.
  2. In pairs, students take turns playing aide and student while using bar models to set up and solve a multi-step word problem; the 'aide' must use prompting questions only (no solving for the student), recorded on a prompt-language checklist.
  3. Identify errors in four solved student word-problem samples—labeling each error as computational, reading/language, or strategy-selection—and write one corrective prompting question per error that a paraprofessional could ask without giving away the answer.
Word problem sets (Grades 3–5, mixed operations), CUBES strategy reference card, bar model/tape diagram templates, whiteboard or chart paper, markers, error-analysis student work samplesRole-play observed by instructor: student playing aide uses at least four prompting questions without solving for the partner, confirmed by checklist (pass = 4/5 checklist items met); error-analysis worksheet is graded for correct error categorization with a minimum of 3/4 errors correctly identified and accompanied by an appropriate prompting question.
8Progress Monitoring and Data-Driven Communication10labStudents will compile a one-week simulated progress-monitoring data set for a fictional student in both reading fluency and math computation, graph the data accurately, and produce a written summary appropriate for sharing with the supervising teacher.
  1. Enter five days of simulated WCPM fluency probe scores and five days of math computation probe scores into a provided spreadsheet template; generate line graphs with a goal line and label axes correctly, troubleshooting any formula or formatting errors with peer support.
  2. Compare two students' graphs side by side and write a comparative data note (one paragraph each) identifying trend (improving, flat, declining), current performance relative to goal, and one instructional recommendation for the teacher to consider.
  3. Participate in a structured 'data meeting' role-play in which one student acts as the aide presenting data and another acts as the supervising teacher asking clarifying questions; debrief on professional language, accuracy, and appropriate role limits.
Simulated probe data sets (print and digital), spreadsheet software (Google Sheets or Excel), graph template, progress-monitoring graph examples, role-play debrief checklistGraphs are checked for accurate data entry, correct goal-line placement, and proper axis labeling (pass = zero data-entry errors and all required graph elements present); written data summaries are evaluated on a four-point rubric for accuracy, professional tone, and appropriate role boundaries (minimum 3/4).
9Differentiation, Scaffolding, and Inclusive Practice in Literacy and Numeracy18practiceStudents will design and deliver a 15-minute differentiated small-group literacy or numeracy support session that incorporates at least one scaffold for a student with an IEP or ELL designation, and self-assess performance using a structured reflection tool.
  1. Review three teacher-provided lesson plans and a set of fictional student profiles (including one student with a reading IEP goal and one ELL at an intermediate proficiency level); annotate each plan to insert two paraprofessional-appropriate scaffolds (e.g., sentence frames, manipulative substitution, visual supports) with written justification.
  2. Deliver a 15-minute small-group literacy or numeracy support session to three to four classmates using a teacher-provided lesson framework; peers use an observation checklist to record evidence of the five target behaviors: clear instructions, corrective feedback, scaffolding use, pace management, and data recording.
  3. Complete a structured self-assessment form immediately after delivery, rating each of the five target behaviors and writing one specific improvement goal; compare self-assessment ratings to peer-checklist results and discuss discrepancies with the instructor during a brief one-on-one conference.
Teacher-provided lesson plan templates (literacy and numeracy), fictional student profile cards, scaffold menu reference sheet, 15-item peer observation checklist, self-assessment form, timer, manipulatives and leveled materials used in earlier lessonsPeer observation checklist: at least 4/5 target behaviors rated as 'demonstrated' by at least two of three observing peers; instructor confirms rating by reviewing video or direct observation; self-assessment conference must include a written, specific improvement goal to earn credit.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
ParaPro-Aligned Content Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% (24/30 items correct)A 30-item multiple-choice exam modeled on the reading and mathematics content and application sections of the ParaPro Assessment; items require students to identify correct literacy and numeracy concepts, recognize errors in student work, and select appropriate instructional responses, directly mirroring the item types and content domains tested by ETS.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Small-Group Instructional Delivery Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Minimum score of 18/25 on the observation rubric with no critical behavior rated 0Each student delivers a live 15-minute small-group literacy or numeracy support session to three peers using a teacher-provided lesson framework; the instructor scores performance on a 25-point rubric covering clarity of instructions, corrective feedback accuracy, scaffold use, pacing, and data recording, with any critical safety or boundary violation resulting in automatic resubmission.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Progress-Monitoring Lab LogLog15%Total score of 15/20 points with no section scoring below 3/5Students submit a completed lab log documenting all data-collection and graphing activities from Lesson 8, including accurately entered probe data, two correctly formatted line graphs, two written data summaries, and a reflection on role boundaries during the data-meeting role-play; the log is scored on a 20-point rubric across four sections: data accuracy, graph quality, written communication, and professional role.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety and Professional Boundaries CheckSafety audit15%100% correct on all five critical safety and boundary scenarios; no retake allowed until remediation is completeA structured scenario-response check in which students are presented with five real-world situations involving student safety (allergic reaction, behavioral crisis, physical injury requiring first aid), mandatory reporting obligations, and role-boundary decisions; each response is evaluated by the instructor as 'correct action' or 'incorrect action' with no partial credit, reflecting the zero-tolerance standard for safety and legal compliance in school settings.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-TEAC61-07 Trade course

Behavior Intervention for Paraprofessionals

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn evidence-based strategies for understanding, preventing, and responding to challenging student behaviors in K–12 classroom and school settings. The course covers positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS), functional behavior assessment basics, crisis de-escalation, and the paraprofessional's legal and ethical role in behavior intervention plans. Lessons prepare students for ParaPro Assessment competencies in instructional support and student behavior, and for state certification requirements.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn evidence-based strategies for understanding, preventing, and responding to challenging student behaviors in K–12 classroom and school settings. The course covers positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS), functional behavior assessment basics, crisis de-escalation, and the paraprofessional's legal and ethical role in behavior intervention plans. Lessons prepare students for ParaPro Assessment competencies in instructional support and student behavior, and for state certification requirements.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Why Behavior Happens: Function, PBIS Tiers, and the Paraprofessional's Role; Reading and Following a Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP); ABC Data Collection and Objective Observation; Reinforcement, Prompting Hierarchies, and Replacement Behaviors; Trauma-Informed Practice and De-escalation Techniques; Crisis Protocols, Restraint Law, and Mandatory Reporting; Behavior Documentation, Incident Reports, and Communication with the IEP Team; First Aid, CPR, and Emergency Response in Behavioral Crises; Integrated Behavior Plan Simulation and Portfolio Review.

What competent looks like. Explain the principles of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) and apply tier-one universal strategies to prevent challenging behavior in a classroom setting. Identify the four common functions of behavior (attention, escape, access to tangibles, sensory) and use simple ABC (Antecedent–Behavior–Consequence) data collection tools accurately. Implement a student's behavior intervention plan (BIP) under teacher direction, using reinforcement, prompting hierarchies, and planned ignoring as specified. Demonstrate at least two trauma-informed, nonviolent verbal de-escalation techniques when presented with a simulated escalating student scenario. Document behavior incidents completely, objectively, and on time using school-standard forms, distinguishing observable facts from interpretation. Describe the paraprofessional's legal boundaries under IDEA and school policy regarding restraint, seclusion, and mandatory reporting of suspected abuse or neglect.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Why Behavior Happens: Function, PBIS Tiers, and the Paraprofessional's Role10theoryStudents will explain the four functions of behavior and describe how PBIS tier-one, tier-two, and tier-three supports differ and where a paraprofessional fits in each.
  1. Lecture and guided notes on the four functions of behavior (attention, escape, access, sensory) using real-world school scenario cards; students sort 20 scenario cards by probable function in pairs.
  2. Watch a short, narrated video overview of a school-wide PBIS model, then create a labeled diagram showing the three tiers and list two paraprofessional responsibilities at each tier.
  3. Small-group discussion: students read a one-page vignette of a paraprofessional acting outside her role during a BIP and identify three boundary violations, citing IDEA general principles.
PBIS.org overview resources, scenario card set (instructor-prepared), IDEA paraprofessional guidance summary (NASDSE), whiteboard, guided-note handoutExit ticket: students correctly match all four functions to definitions and list one tier-appropriate strategy for each tier; 80% accuracy required.
2Reading and Following a Behavior Intervention Plan (BIP)11theoryGiven a sample BIP, students will identify all required components and explain each implementation step they are responsible for carrying out.
  1. Instructor models reading a sample BIP aloud, annotating each section (target behavior definition, replacement behavior, antecedent strategies, consequence strategies, data collection method) on a projected copy.
  2. Students work in triads to read a second sample BIP, complete a structured analysis worksheet identifying the same components, then share findings with the class for error correction.
  3. Role-play in pairs: one student acts as the teacher briefly explaining a BIP; the other practices asking the three clarifying questions a paraprofessional should always ask before implementation begins.
Two sanitized sample BIPs (instructor-prepared, student names removed), BIP analysis worksheet, ParaPro Assessment content guide (ETS, current edition)Students correctly complete the BIP analysis worksheet with at least 80% accuracy on all components identified; instructor reviews each worksheet before next lesson.
3ABC Data Collection and Objective Observation12labStudents will record Antecedent–Behavior–Consequence data from a live simulated scenario using a standard ABC log, distinguishing observable descriptions from interpretations with at least 80% accuracy.
  1. Instructor demonstrates the difference between objective behavioral language ('Student pushed papers off desk') and interpretive language ('Student was angry') using ten written examples; students categorize each on a T-chart.
  2. Simulated classroom scenario: two student volunteers and instructor enact a scripted 10-minute class segment with four embedded behavioral events; students independently complete an ABC log form in real time.
  3. Partners swap ABC logs and use a calibration checklist to identify any interpretive language or missing antecedent/consequence entries, then provide written peer feedback.
ABC log forms (standard format), calibration checklist, scripted scenario script (instructor-prepared), timer, pencilsCompleted ABC log reviewed by instructor: all four events captured, behavior descriptions are observable and measurable, fewer than two interpretive phrases present; 80% accuracy required to pass.
4Reinforcement, Prompting Hierarchies, and Replacement Behaviors11demoStudents will demonstrate the correct use of verbal praise, token economy delivery, and a least-to-most prompting hierarchy during a structured practice activity.
  1. Instructor demonstrates four types of reinforcement delivery (specific verbal praise, proximity, tangible, preferred activity access) using a student volunteer, then students rate each example on a fidelity checklist.
  2. Lecture and demonstration on least-to-most prompting hierarchy (verbal → gestural → model → physical); students practice the sequence in triads using an academic task (e.g., pencil pickup) and rotate roles.
  3. Students script and rehearse a 3-minute interaction in which they deliver a token and labeled praise for a replacement behavior, then receive instructor feedback using a 10-point fidelity rubric.
Token board examples, fidelity checklist (instructor-prepared), prompting hierarchy reference card, dry-erase markers, rubricInstructor rates each student's scripted interaction using the 10-point fidelity rubric; passing score is 8/10 with no critical errors (no physical prompt without consent, no sarcasm).
5Trauma-Informed Practice and De-escalation Techniques12demoStudents will apply at least two verbal de-escalation strategies—including regulated voice and offering limited choices—during a simulated escalating student interaction without any unsafe physical contact.
  1. Instructor presents core concepts of trauma-informed education: what adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are, how trauma affects behavior and the nervous system, and why punitive responses alone are ineffective; students complete a reflection prompt.
  2. Instructor models the de-escalation cycle (calm → trigger → agitation → acceleration → peak → de-escalation) using a dramatic read-aloud of a scripted scenario, pausing to name each stage and the corresponding paraprofessional response.
  3. Pairs practice two scripted de-escalation dialogues from a scenario bank, focusing on regulated voice tone, non-threatening body positioning, and offering two limited choices; instructor circulates and provides real-time corrective feedback.
ACEs overview handout (CDC public resource), de-escalation stage diagram, scenario bank (instructor-prepared), rubricInstructor observation checklist during practice dialogues: student uses calm voice, does not block exits, offers a genuine choice, and does not issue ultimatums; all four observable criteria must be met to pass.
6Crisis Protocols, Restraint Law, and Mandatory Reporting12theoryStudents will accurately describe the paraprofessional's legal obligations regarding physical restraint limits, seclusion prohibitions, and mandated reporter duties under their state's general statutory framework.
  1. Instructor-led lecture on federal guidance on restraint and seclusion in schools (U.S. Department of Education guidance document framework) and state statutory framework overview; students annotate a summary handout marking what paraprofessionals may and may not do.
  2. Case study analysis in small groups: three brief case studies describing restraint incidents; groups determine whether the paraprofessional acted within or outside legal limits and explain their reasoning in writing.
  3. Mandatory reporting scenario activity: instructor reads five situations aloud; students write on index cards whether the situation requires a report, to whom, and within what general timeframe, then the class debriefs each card together.
U.S. Department of Education restraint/seclusion guidance summary (public document), state mandated reporter overview (instructor-sourced from state agency), case study packetWritten case study responses: students correctly identify legal/illegal action and cite the correct principle in all three cases; mandatory reporting index cards scored pass/fail—must correctly identify all reportable situations.
7Behavior Documentation, Incident Reports, and Communication with the IEP Team12practiceStudents will complete a school-style incident report and a brief communication note to the supervising teacher from a scenario, using objective language, within a standard time limit, with no missing required fields.
  1. Instructor distributes a blank incident report form and walks through each field explaining purpose and common errors (e.g., vague language, missing time stamps, opinion statements); students annotate the form.
  2. Timed practice: students read a one-page behavior scenario description and independently complete an incident report form in 20 minutes; instructor collects and returns with coded feedback marks.
  3. Students revise their incident reports based on feedback, then draft a 3–5 sentence communication note to the supervising teacher summarizing the event and noting any follow-up needed, practicing the professional, collaborative tone expected of a paraprofessional.
Blank incident report form (generic school format), scenario description sheet, instructor feedback coding guide, lined paperRevised incident report: all required fields complete, all language observable and objective, time sequence logical; passing standard is zero missing required fields and zero interpretive statements.
8First Aid, CPR, and Emergency Response in Behavioral Crises12labStudents will perform hands-only CPR compressions at the correct rate and depth on a training manikin and describe the school emergency response steps following a student injury during a behavioral crisis.
  1. CPR and first aid skills station practice (aligned with American Heart Association or American Red Cross guidelines): students rotate through compressions on adult and child manikins, AED trainer use, and rescue breathing review with an instructor-certified facilitator.
  2. Scenario walk-through: instructor narrates a behavioral crisis that results in a student head injury; students in groups sequence the correct emergency response steps on index cards (call for help, do not move student, contact nurse, complete incident report, notify parents) and justify each step.
  3. Students complete a written emergency scenario response: given a hypothetical in which a student bites and breaks skin on a paraprofessional's hand, they list first aid steps for themselves and the steps for reporting the exposure, referencing universal precautions and school protocol.
CPR training manikins (adult and child), AED trainer, gloves, first aid kit (training), American Heart Association or American Red Cross student reference card, scenario handoutCPR skills check by certified instructor: compressions at correct rate (approximately 100–120/min) and adequate depth on manikin, correct AED pad placement; pass/fail per AHA or Red Cross skills checklist. Written emergency response scored: all critical steps present.
9Integrated Behavior Plan Simulation and Portfolio Review12practiceStudents will implement a full behavior intervention cycle—ABC data collection, BIP strategy delivery, incident documentation, and post-incident communication—across a 45-minute simulated school day, meeting fidelity standards on all components.
  1. Full simulation: instructor and two student volunteers enact a scripted classroom session with three behavioral events embedded; each remaining student independently collects ABC data, implements one BIP strategy on cue, and completes an incident report for the most significant event.
  2. Students self-assess their completed simulation artifacts (ABC log, incident report, communication note) against the course fidelity rubrics and write a one-paragraph reflection identifying their strongest area and one area for improvement before practicum.
  3. Portfolio review: students assemble all lesson artifacts (ABC logs, BIP analysis worksheet, de-escalation checklist, incident reports) in a labeled folder and present a 5-minute verbal summary of their learning to a partner who uses a structured listening guide to provide feedback.
Scripted simulation scenario, ABC log, BIP strategy cue cards, incident report form, course rubrics, portfolio folder, structured listening guideInstructor scores simulation artifacts using course rubrics: ABC log ≥ 80% accuracy, incident report zero missing fields, BIP strategy delivered with ≥ 8/10 fidelity; all three components must meet standard to pass this lesson.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Behavior Intervention Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% correct (28/40 items)A 40-item multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering PBIS tiers, functions of behavior, BIP components, reinforcement types, prompting hierarchies, de-escalation principles, restraint and seclusion law, and mandatory reporting obligations. Items are written at the level of the ParaPro Assessment (ETS) instructional support and student behavior domains.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
De-escalation and BIP Implementation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Meets all four non-negotiable safety criteria AND scores ≥ 80% on the fidelity rubricEach student completes a 10-minute observed simulation in which they respond to an escalating student scenario and then deliver one BIP reinforcement strategy; instructors score using a standardized fidelity rubric. Non-negotiable safety criteria include no unsafe physical contact, no exit-blocking, and no threats or ultimatums.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Behavior Documentation Lab LogLog15%All eight required log entries complete and objective; fewer than two interpretive statements across the full logStudents submit a lab log containing all ABC data collection sheets, one completed incident report, and one teacher communication note produced across the lab and practice lessons. The log is reviewed for completeness, objectivity of language, and correct form use.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Emergency and Safety Protocols CheckSafety audit15%Pass on CPR skills checklist (per AHA or Red Cross standard) AND 100% correct identification of all mandatory-report situations on the written checkA two-part safety check: a hands-on CPR compressions and AED trainer skills verification rated by the CPR-certified instructor, and a written scenario set in which students identify all situations legally requiring a mandated report and list the first-aid steps for a bodily-fluid exposure. Both parts must be passed; a failed part may be retaken once.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-TEAC61-08 Trade course

Practicum: Supervised Classroom Application

104 hr · $1,310 COMPLIMENTARY

Students apply skills from all prior coursework in real or simulated K–12 classroom settings under direct supervision, integrating instructional support, behavior intervention, literacy and numeracy scaffolding, and professional conduct. Candidates build a documented practice portfolio that demonstrates readiness for the externship and aligns with ParaPro Assessment competency areas in reading, mathematics, and writing instructional support. Emphasis is placed on reflective practice, professional ethics, and collaborative communication with lead teachers.

Outcomes
Course text

Students apply skills from all prior coursework in real or simulated K–12 classroom settings under direct supervision, integrating instructional support, behavior intervention, literacy and numeracy scaffolding, and professional conduct. Candidates build a documented practice portfolio that demonstrates readiness for the externship and aligns with ParaPro Assessment competency areas in reading, mathematics, and writing instructional support. Emphasis is placed on reflective practice, professional ethics, and collaborative communication with lead teachers.

How the course runs. 9 blocks: Practicum Orientation: Roles, Ethics, and Site Protocols; Observation and Anecdotal Recording Techniques; Co-Teaching Models and Task Alignment with the Lead Teacher; Small-Group Literacy Support in Practice; Small-Group Numeracy Support in Practice; Behavior Intervention in Context: Live Application; Documentation, Confidentiality, and Progress Reporting; Self-Assessment and Reflective Practice; Portfolio Completion and Practicum Readiness Review.

What competent looks like. Deliver supervised small-group and one-on-one instructional support aligned to teacher lesson plans and IEP goals with at least 80% accuracy on observer checklists. Apply evidence-based behavior intervention strategies correctly in a live or simulated classroom setting, documented across a minimum of four observed sessions. Demonstrate safe, compliant classroom practice including emergency procedures, proper body mechanics, and mandatory reporting obligations without prompting. Complete and maintain a practicum portfolio containing lesson observation logs, student support notes, and supervisor feedback forms that meet program documentation standards. Communicate professionally with cooperating teachers and supervisors, responding to corrective feedback and adjusting practice within the same or next observed session. Self-assess personal instructional support performance using structured reflection tools and identify at least two specific areas for continued professional growth.

Lessons · 9 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Practicum Orientation: Roles, Ethics, and Site Protocols10theoryStudents will accurately describe the legal and ethical boundaries of the paraprofessional role, site-specific emergency procedures, and mandatory reporting obligations before entering any placement setting.
  1. Review and sign a practicum agreement that outlines confidentiality, professional conduct, and mandatory reporting requirements; discuss real-world scenarios in small groups.
  2. Map the paraprofessional's scope of practice against the lead teacher's responsibilities using a T-chart, identifying five tasks that are always the lead teacher's sole responsibility.
  3. Walk through the host site's emergency action plan (fire, lockdown, medical emergency) using a step-by-step procedure card and practice role assignments aloud.
Practicum agreement form, FERPA plain-language summary, site emergency action plan, professional ethics case-study cards, student handbookWritten quiz on FERPA basics, mandatory reporting triggers, and scope-of-practice boundaries; pass mark 80% (8/10 items correct).
2Observation and Anecdotal Recording Techniques10demoStudents will conduct structured classroom observations and produce accurate, objective anecdotal notes that distinguish observable behavior from interpretation.
  1. Watch two recorded classroom video clips and complete a standardized observation form; instructor debriefs differences between objective description and evaluative language.
  2. Practice the ABC (Antecedent–Behavior–Consequence) recording method on a second video clip, then compare notes with a partner and reconcile discrepancies.
  3. Conduct a 20-minute live or site-visit observation using a provided running-record template, then type up notes and submit for instructor review.
Classroom observation video clips (instructor-sourced), ABC recording form, running-record template, laptop or tablet, instructor feedback rubricSubmitted observation notes scored on a 4-point rubric (objectivity, completeness, ABC accuracy, format); pass mark average score of 3/4 per criterion.
3Co-Teaching Models and Task Alignment with the Lead Teacher10theoryStudents will identify at least four co-teaching models and correctly match paraprofessional support tasks to each model based on a written lesson plan.
  1. Read and annotate a one-page summary of common co-teaching models (one teach/one assist, station teaching, parallel teaching, team teaching); create a visual reference card.
  2. Given three sample lesson plans, highlight paraprofessional duties in each and justify choices verbally to a partner before class-wide discussion.
  3. Role-play a three-minute pre-lesson check-in with a simulated lead teacher using a structured communication template, practicing how to confirm student goals and task assignments.
Co-teaching model summary handout, three sample lesson plans, communication template, role-play scenario cards, visual reference card templateWritten matching exercise (models to tasks) plus evaluation of role-play by instructor using a 5-item checklist; pass mark 80% on both components.
4Small-Group Literacy Support in Practice14practiceStudents will facilitate a 15-minute teacher-planned small-group reading or writing activity, using correct scaffolding techniques and recording student responses accurately.
  1. Receive a prepared lesson plan from the instructor; plan aloud how to present the vocabulary pre-teach, guided reading prompt, and comprehension check using the scaffolding steps practiced in Course 6.
  2. Facilitate the small-group activity with three to five peers acting as students; the instructor observes and uses a fidelity checklist to track adherence to the lesson plan.
  3. Write a brief post-session note (one paragraph per student) documenting each simulated student's participation, any accommodations used, and next steps; exchange with a partner for peer review.
Prepared lesson plan (instructor-provided), leveled reading passages, vocabulary cards, fidelity checklist, student progress note template, pencils or laptopInstructor fidelity checklist (12 observable steps); pass mark 10/12 steps executed correctly plus satisfactory post-session notes rated complete and objective by instructor.
5Small-Group Numeracy Support in Practice14practiceStudents will facilitate a 15-minute teacher-planned small-group mathematics activity, using manipulatives correctly and asking guiding questions rather than providing direct answers.
  1. Review the assigned mathematics lesson plan and rehearse the sequence of concrete–representational–abstract steps, predicting common student errors and planning prompts to address them.
  2. Facilitate the small-group math activity with peers as students while the instructor uses a question-quality checklist to record whether prompts guided thinking or gave away answers.
  3. Graph each simulated student's correct responses on a simple paper data sheet and interpret the data to identify which student needs the most additional support, reporting findings aloud.
Prepared math lesson plan, base-ten blocks, fraction tiles or counters, number lines, question-quality checklist, data recording sheet, graph paper or laptop spreadsheetQuestion-quality checklist score (10 items) plus accuracy of data recording; pass mark 8/10 on checklist and 100% accurate data entry.
6Behavior Intervention in Context: Live Application12labStudents will implement at least three proactive behavior support strategies from a student's behavior intervention plan during a simulated classroom activity without prompting from the instructor.
  1. Review a sample (fictional) behavior intervention plan and identify the three most frequently needed strategies; mark them on a quick-reference cue card to keep during the simulation.
  2. Participate in a structured role-play scenario in which one peer simulates escalating off-task behavior; the student implements prevention, redirection, and reinforcement strategies in sequence.
  3. Complete a behavior incident log for the simulated event, documenting antecedent, behavior, consequence, and paraprofessional response; compare with instructor's parallel notes.
Sample fictional behavior intervention plan, cue card template, role-play scenario cards, behavior incident log form, instructor comparison notesInstructor observation rubric (5 strategy items, each scored 0–2); pass mark 8/10 plus behavior incident log rated complete and factually consistent with observed events.
7Documentation, Confidentiality, and Progress Reporting10theoryStudents will complete three types of paraprofessional documentation forms accurately and demonstrate correct procedures for storing and sharing student information in compliance with confidentiality requirements.
  1. Sort a set of 20 sample data points into three categories — appropriate to share with the lead teacher, appropriate to include in a formal note, requires administrator involvement — and defend choices.
  2. Complete a sample daily student progress note, an attendance/participation log, and an accommodation tracking form using fictional student data; instructor checks each for accuracy and appropriate language.
  3. Participate in a scenario in which a peer playing a parent asks for detailed student information in the hallway; practice the correct professional response and explain which data may and may not be shared informally.
Sample data-sort cards, progress note template, attendance log form, accommodation tracking form, FERPA plain-language reference card, scenario scriptAll three completed forms reviewed by instructor; pass mark is zero privacy violations and fewer than two formatting errors across all three documents.
8Self-Assessment and Reflective Practice12practiceStudents will evaluate a video recording of their own facilitated activity using a structured reflection protocol and produce a written self-assessment that identifies two strengths and two growth areas with supporting evidence.
  1. Watch a five-minute instructor-selected video clip of a model paraprofessional and practice using the program's structured reflection protocol (What? So What? Now What?), then share conclusions.
  2. Review a video of their own small-group session recorded in Lesson 4 or 5; independently complete the reflection protocol and draft a self-assessment document.
  3. Share the self-assessment in a structured peer-feedback triad, using sentence starters provided; revise the document based on at least one substantive peer comment before submitting.
Model video clip, student's own recorded session video, structured reflection protocol worksheet, peer feedback sentence-starter card, laptop or tablet for writingSubmitted self-assessment scored on a 4-criterion rubric (evidence-based claims, specificity, growth orientation, professional language); pass mark 3/4 on all four criteria.
9Portfolio Completion and Practicum Readiness Review12fieldStudents will assemble a complete practicum portfolio containing all required artifacts and pass a readiness checklist reviewed by the instructor, confirming preparedness to begin the externship.
  1. Organize all practicum artifacts — observation logs, lesson facilitation notes, behavior incident log, documentation forms, self-assessment — into a physical or digital portfolio using the required section order and table of contents.
  2. Conduct a ten-minute portfolio walk-through with a peer reviewer, explaining how each artifact demonstrates a specific program outcome; the peer reviewer completes a provided feedback form.
  3. Participate in a one-on-one readiness conference with the instructor; respond to three instructor-selected questions drawn from the portfolio and discuss placement goals for the externship.
Portfolio template with section tabs, all prior lesson artifacts, peer review feedback form, readiness conference question bank, binder or digital folderInstructor-scored portfolio checklist (all required artifacts present, each meeting minimum quality standard) plus readiness conference pass/refer decision; all artifacts must meet minimum quality; conference responses must demonstrate understanding of role without major misconceptions.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Practicum Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% (40/50 items correct)A 50-item written exam covering paraprofessional scope of practice, FERPA and confidentiality basics, observation and documentation procedures, co-teaching models, and behavior support strategies as addressed in this course and mapped to the ParaPro Assessment's reading, mathematics, and writing assistance competency domains. Items are multiple-choice and short-answer; students have 75 minutes.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Facilitated Small-Group Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Score of 42/50 (84%) on the instructor observation rubric, with no score below 3/5 on any single criterionStudents lead a 15-minute small-group instructional activity (reading or mathematics) assigned by the instructor, evaluated live on five criteria: use of scaffolding, question quality, behavior support, accuracy of student data collection, and professional communication. This demonstration directly aligns with ParaPro Assessment competency areas addressing how paraprofessionals assist with instruction in reading and mathematics.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Practicum Portfolio LogLog15%All required artifacts present and each rated at least Satisfactory (3/4) on the portfolio rubric; zero confidentiality violationsStudents submit their complete practicum portfolio including session observation logs, small-group facilitation notes, behavior incident documentation, accommodation tracking forms, and a final written self-assessment. The portfolio is scored for completeness, accuracy, objectivity of language, and evidence of professional growth, and serves as the primary documentation artifact for the practicum experience.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety and Professional Conduct CheckSafety audit15%Pass on all five non-negotiable items; overall checklist score of 8/10A direct observation checklist administered during one of the student's facilitated activities or role-play sessions, covering: correct emergency procedure knowledge, appropriate physical proximity and body mechanics with students, confidentiality behaviors, mandatory reporting awareness, and professional communication with supervising personnel. Any failure on a non-negotiable item (emergency procedure, mandatory reporting, confidentiality) requires remediation and recheck before the student may advance to the externship.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-TEAC61-09 Capstone

Capstone Project: Integrated Paraprofessional Practice

162 hr · $1,620 COMPLIMENTARY

Students synthesize learning from all prior courses by designing, implementing, and defending a comprehensive instructional support project grounded in real classroom contexts. The capstone requires students to plan differentiated lessons, apply behavior and literacy support strategies, document their work professionally, and present findings to a panel of instructors and a working paraprofessional. Successful completion demonstrates readiness for the practicum site, the ParaPro Assessment, and state certification.

Outcomes
Course text

Students synthesize learning from all prior courses by designing, implementing, and defending a comprehensive instructional support project grounded in real classroom contexts. The capstone requires students to plan differentiated lessons, apply behavior and literacy support strategies, document their work professionally, and present findings to a panel of instructors and a working paraprofessional. Successful completion demonstrates readiness for the practicum site, the ParaPro Assessment, and state certification.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Project Launch: Needs Assessment, Planning, and Safety Review; Developing and Teaching Instructional Support Materials; Portfolio Compilation, Data Documentation, and Digital Presentation; Oral Defense and Professional Readiness Demonstration.

What competent looks like. Design a complete instructional support plan for a diverse K–12 caseload that incorporates differentiated strategies for students with IEPs, English language learners, and grade-level learners. Produce a professional capstone portfolio that includes lesson co-planning documents, behavior support records, literacy and numeracy activity samples, and reflective journal entries meeting program documentation standards. Demonstrate correct use of safe classroom practices, mandatory-reporter obligations, and CPR/First Aid protocols by accurately responding to two scenario-based safety simulations. Evaluate student work samples using district-style rubrics and translate findings into written instructional recommendations aligned with ParaPro Assessment competency areas. Deliver a structured oral defense of the capstone project—explaining rationale, evidence of student impact, and professional-growth goals—to a mixed panel, scoring at least 80 percent on the defense rubric. Integrate digital tools (word processing, spreadsheet gradebooks, and presentation software) to create polished, accessible instructional materials and data displays.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Project Launch: Needs Assessment, Planning, and Safety Review36theoryStudents will conduct a structured classroom needs assessment, draft a capstone project proposal with measurable goals, and accurately identify safety and mandatory-reporting obligations relevant to their chosen grade-band context.
  1. Students read a two-page anonymized student-profile packet (including one student with an IEP, one English language learner, and two grade-level learners) and complete a written needs-assessment form identifying each student's instructional level, behavioral notes, and support priorities using frameworks from Courses 2–7.
  2. Using a provided proposal template, each student drafts a one-to-two page capstone project proposal specifying the grade band, subject focus (literacy or numeracy or both), at least three instructional strategies to be applied, a behavior support component, and a timeline aligned to the remaining capstone hours; instructor provides written feedback within one class session.
  3. In small groups, students work through three written scenario cards covering (a) a student allergic reaction requiring CPR/First Aid readiness, (b) a suspected child-abuse mandatory-reporting situation, and (c) a classroom chemical-exposure near-miss; groups record the correct response sequence and cite the relevant policy source, then debrief whole-class.
Anonymized student profile packets (instructor-prepared), capstone proposal template, project rubric, Course 1–7 course notes, state mandatory-reporter guidelines (publicly available state education agency document), CPR/First Aid quick-reference card (AHA or Red Cross), scenario cards, lined paper and pens, laptop or desktop computer with word processorInstructor scores the written proposal using a 20-point checklist: goal clarity (5 pts), strategy alignment to course content (5 pts), inclusion of behavior support plan (5 pts), realistic timeline (5 pts). Pass = 16/20 (80%). Safety scenario debrief: students must correctly sequence all steps for at least 2 of 3 scenarios to proceed; any incorrect mandatory-reporting response triggers a one-on-one remediation meeting before the student advances.
2Developing and Teaching Instructional Support Materials54practiceStudents will create, pilot, and revise a minimum of four instructional support activities—spanning literacy, numeracy, and differentiation for diverse learners—and document each activity with a standard co-planning form and reflection.
  1. Each student develops four complete instructional support activities (minimum one literacy, one numeracy, one differentiated for a student with an IEP or 504, one behavior-support check-in tool). Each activity uses the program's co-planning form and must include the learning objective, materials list, step-by-step paraprofessional role notes, formative check question, and accommodation notes; peer partners review each other's drafts against the co-planning rubric before the instructor review.
  2. Students pilot at least two of their activities in structured role-play sessions with classmates acting as K–12 students; a third classmate uses the observation checklist (adapted from the practicum evaluation form used in Course 8) to record whether the paraprofessional delivered clear directions, used appropriate wait time, responded correctly to a simulated behavior incident, and maintained a safe, organized workspace. Roles rotate so every student is observed at least twice.
  3. After each pilot, the teaching student completes a one-page written reflection answering: What went well and what evidence supports that? What would you change and why? How does this activity address the ParaPro Assessment competency areas of reading, mathematics, or writing? Reflections are added to the developing portfolio and reviewed by the instructor for depth and accuracy of self-assessment.
Co-planning form (program template), observation checklist (adapted from Course 8 practicum form), literacy manipulatives (letter tiles, decodable readers—program supplies), base-ten blocks and fraction tiles for numeracy activities, behavior check-in chart template, printer access for student-made worksheets, laptop or desktop, ParaPro Assessment Official Study Companion (ETS, free download), course textbooks from Courses 2–7Instructor scores all four co-planning forms using the 25-point activity rubric: objective clarity and alignment (5 pts), step-by-step accuracy (5 pts), appropriate differentiation (5 pts), behavior or accommodation component (5 pts), materials list complete and safe (5 pts). Pass = 20/25 (80%) per activity; any activity below 80% is revised and resubmitted within one week. Peer observation scores must average at least 80% across both observed pilots; instructor validates scores.
3Portfolio Compilation, Data Documentation, and Digital Presentation36labStudents will assemble a complete capstone portfolio using a structured digital format, create a data display of simulated student-progress data using spreadsheet software, and produce a slide deck summarizing their project for the oral defense.
  1. Using the program's digital portfolio checklist, students organize all capstone documents into a clearly labeled folder structure (proposal, four co-planning forms, four activity reflections, safety scenario responses, behavior support record, and a two-page professional self-assessment) and export or print a table of contents; the instructor verifies completeness against the checklist in a brief one-on-one conference.
  2. Students receive a spreadsheet template pre-loaded with six weeks of simulated formative-assessment data for their four fictional students. They calculate each student's percent correct by week, enter a simple formula for the class average, create a line graph showing each student's progress over time, and write a three-to-five sentence interpretation paragraph explaining what the data suggest for next instructional steps—mirroring the data-literacy skills tested in the ParaPro Assessment mathematics section.
  3. Students build a seven-to-ten slide presentation covering: project overview and student needs; instructional strategies used and rationale; one highlighted activity with evidence of effectiveness; behavior support strategy; data display and interpretation; and professional-growth goals. Slides must meet basic accessibility standards (minimum 24-point font, sufficient color contrast, no more than six bullet points per slide); a classmate peer-reviews using the accessibility checklist before instructor review.
Program digital portfolio checklist, laptop or desktop with word processor, spreadsheet software (e.g., Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel), presentation software (e.g., Google Slides or Microsoft PowerPoint), USB drive or cloud-storage access, printer, accessibility checklist (instructor-prepared), ParaPro Assessment Official Study Companion (ETS)Portfolio checklist conference: all required documents present = pass; any missing document must be submitted before the defense date. Spreadsheet and data display scored on a 15-point rubric: formula accuracy (5 pts), graph readability and correct labels (5 pts), interpretation paragraph accuracy (5 pts). Pass = 12/15 (80%). Slide deck reviewed on 10-point rubric: content coverage (4 pts), clarity and accuracy (3 pts), accessibility (3 pts). Pass = 8/10 (80%). Any section below 80% is revised before the defense.
4Oral Defense and Professional Readiness Demonstration36fieldStudents will deliver a structured 20-minute oral defense of their capstone project to a panel, accurately answering follow-up questions on instructional rationale, student data, safety obligations, and credential exam content, scoring at least 80 percent on the defense rubric.
  1. Each student presents their slide deck to a panel of two (one program instructor and one invited working paraprofessional or cooperating teacher) in a 20-minute structured defense: 12 minutes of presentation, 8 minutes of panel questions. Questions are drawn from a bank covering instructional strategy rationale, behavior support decisions, data interpretation, safety/CPR protocol, mandatory-reporting steps, and ParaPro Assessment subject-area content; students respond without notes except for their portfolio, which may be referenced.
  2. Immediately after the defense, the student completes a 15-minute written post-defense reflection responding to two prompts: (a) Identify one aspect of your project you would change based on panel feedback and explain how; (b) Describe one specific professional-development action you will take in your first year as a paraprofessional and connect it to a ParaPro Assessment or state certification competency area. The reflection is submitted before leaving the defense session.
  3. Students complete a professional-readiness self-checklist covering: valid CPR/First Aid card on file, completed state certification application materials reviewed with advisor, ParaPro Assessment registration confirmed or scheduled, resume and cover letter on file in portfolio, and externship placement confirmed. Any incomplete item generates an advisor action plan with a resolution deadline.
Completed capstone portfolio (digital and printed copy), slide deck, defense rubric (instructor-prepared, 25-point scale), panel question bank (instructor-prepared), post-defense reflection prompts, professional-readiness checklist, CPR/First Aid certification card, ParaPro Assessment registration confirmation, state certification application materials, pen and lined paper for written reflectionDefense scored by both panel members independently on the 25-point rubric: content accuracy and depth (8 pts), evidence of student-centered rationale (5 pts), data interpretation accuracy (5 pts), safety and legal knowledge (4 pts), professional communication (3 pts). Both scores are averaged; pass = 20/25 (80%). A score of 16–19 earns one opportunity to redefend within two weeks on a focused 10-minute follow-up addressing the weak domain. A score below 16 requires an advisor meeting and a remediation plan before a second full defense. Post-defense reflection graded pass/fail on completion and relevance; professional-readiness checklist must show all items complete or have a written resolution plan before the externship begins.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Capstone Instructional Support ProjectProject60%80 percent or higher on each scored component (proposal, four co-planning forms, data display, slide deck); all components must meet the 80% threshold before the oral defense dateThe project is the integrated artifact produced across Lessons 1–3: a needs-assessment-driven proposal, four differentiated instructional-support activities with co-planning forms and reflections, a peer-observed pilot with documented revisions, a spreadsheet data display with written interpretation, and a completed digital portfolio. It demonstrates that the student can plan, teach, document, and analyze instructional support work at the level required for entry-level paraprofessional practice.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Capstone PortfolioPortfolio20%All required documents present and verified at the portfolio-completeness conference; individual scored items within the portfolio must each reach 80% as specified in lesson check-for criteriaThe portfolio is the organized, cumulative record of all capstone work submitted in a labeled digital folder with a printed table of contents: proposal, co-planning forms, activity reflections, safety scenario responses, behavior support record, data spreadsheet and graph, slide deck, post-defense reflection, and professional self-assessment. It serves as the student's primary evidence artifact for state certification applications and future employer review.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Oral DefenseOral / panel20%Average panel score of 20 out of 25 (80%) on the defense rubric; post-defense written reflection submitted same session; professional-readiness checklist complete or resolution plan in placeThe oral defense is a 20-minute structured presentation and question-answer session before a two-person panel—one program instructor and one practicing paraprofessional or cooperating teacher—in which the student explains and justifies every major decision in the capstone project, interprets student data live, and demonstrates current knowledge of safety obligations and credential exam content areas. It is the final gate before the externship and mirrors the professional accountability paraprofessionals exercise in daily school practice.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
AGR-TEAC61-10 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement

243 hr · $970 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 243 supervised hours in a school or educational setting under the direct mentorship of a certified cooperating teacher and a program supervisor, applying all classroom skills to live instructional environments. Placements prioritize agriculture, environment, or public-service classrooms where available, but any K–12 or early-childhood placement is accepted. Performance is evaluated through structured employer rubrics, a reflective log, and a final site-supervisor appraisal.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 243 supervised hours in a school or educational setting under the direct mentorship of a certified cooperating teacher and a program supervisor, applying all classroom skills to live instructional environments. Placements prioritize agriculture, environment, or public-service classrooms where available, but any K–12 or early-childhood placement is accepted. Performance is evaluated through structured employer rubrics, a reflective log, and a final site-supervisor appraisal.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Orientation, Placement Protocols, and Professional Conduct; Supervised Instructional Support and Small-Group Facilitation; Behavior Support, Safety Response, and Emergency Readiness; Final Evaluation, Portfolio Completion, and Exit Conference.

What competent looks like. Implement assigned instructional support strategies under teacher direction with a cooperating teacher rating of 'meets standard' or higher on all rubric domains. Demonstrate professional conduct, punctuality, and mandatory-reporter awareness across the full placement period with zero unexcused absences. Apply behavior intervention and classroom management techniques learned in prior courses to real student interactions, as documented in weekly reflective logs. Support students with diverse learning needs, including IEP accommodations, under teacher supervision in at least three documented instances. Administer and document CPR/First Aid readiness protocols and school emergency procedures as observed and verified by the cooperating teacher. Collect and submit a complete worksite portfolio—including time logs, cooperating-teacher mid-term and final evaluations, and reflective journal entries—earning a composite score of 80% or higher.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Orientation, Placement Protocols, and Professional Conduct20fieldStudents identify worksite policies, mandatory-reporting obligations, FERPA privacy requirements, and daily professional expectations before beginning direct student contact.
  1. Attend school district orientation session (or program-led pre-placement workshop) covering site rules, sign-in procedures, emergency exits, and staff introductions; complete a site safety checklist signed by the cooperating teacher
  2. Review the placement handbook and complete a written acknowledgment of FERPA confidentiality, mandatory-reporter duties, and the program's attendance policy, then discuss any questions in a one-on-one meeting with the program supervisor
  3. Shadow the cooperating teacher for the first two days without leading any student interaction; record three observations of classroom routines, transition management, and instructional delivery in the reflective log
Placement handbook, district employee/volunteer orientation packet, FERPA summary sheet (U.S. Department of Education), site safety checklist, reflective log template, CPR/First Aid card (must be current)Signed site safety checklist, signed FERPA/mandatory-reporter acknowledgment, and first two reflective log entries submitted to program supervisor; all three documents must be complete and accurate to advance to direct student contact
2Supervised Instructional Support and Small-Group Facilitation120fieldStudents provide daily, teacher-directed instructional support—including small-group literacy and numeracy activities, one-on-one re-teaching, and materials preparation—accumulating documented hours across a range of subject areas and grade levels.
  1. Lead or co-lead at least two small-group instructional sessions per week (e.g., guided reading circles, math fact fluency drills, or science vocabulary review) as assigned by the cooperating teacher; document session goal, strategy used, student response, and any accommodations in the weekly log
  2. Prepare differentiated instructional materials (graphic organizers, manipulatives, adapted worksheets) under teacher guidance for at least one lesson per week, noting which IEP or 504 accommodations the material addresses
  3. Participate in at least two IEP or student-support team meetings (as an observer unless the teacher grants a participatory role), then write a brief reflection on how the team's decisions connect to prior coursework on special education basics and behavior intervention
Cooperating teacher's lesson plans, district-adopted curriculum materials, graphic organizer templates, manipulatives available on site, reflective log, weekly time sheet, student behavior tracking form (campus-approved)Weekly logs and time sheets signed by the cooperating teacher; mid-term employer evaluation rubric (administered at approximately hour 60) must show 'meets standard' (typically 3 of 4 or equivalent) on all domains including professionalism, instructional support, student interaction, and communication; any domain rated below standard triggers a remediation plan
3Behavior Support, Safety Response, and Emergency Readiness63fieldStudents demonstrate correct application of school-approved positive behavior support strategies and emergency procedures—including first aid/CPR readiness and evacuation protocols—in authentic classroom and campus situations.
  1. Implement at least three documented positive behavior support interventions (e.g., precorrection prompts, behavior-specific praise, structured choice) assigned by the cooperating teacher; for each, record the antecedent, strategy used, student response, and teacher feedback in the log
  2. Participate in at least one campus fire drill or safety drill; debrief with the cooperating teacher on the paraprofessional's specific role (student accounting, supporting students with mobility needs, communication with administration), and record findings in the log
  3. Locate and review the school's posted emergency protocols and first aid kit location on the first placement day; conduct a self-check confirming CPR/First Aid certification is current, and demonstrate to the cooperating teacher where the AED is located and how to summon emergency services
School emergency response plan (site copy), campus-approved behavior support reference (e.g., district PBIS handbook), first aid kit location map, current CPR/First Aid certification card, reflective log, behavior tracking formThree completed behavior intervention log entries with cooperating teacher initials confirming accuracy; written confirmation from cooperating teacher that student correctly located AED and emergency kit and described response steps without prompting; these items are reviewed at the final evaluation
4Final Evaluation, Portfolio Completion, and Exit Conference40fieldStudents compile a complete worksite portfolio, receive and discuss the cooperating teacher's final evaluation, and participate in a structured exit conference with the program supervisor that confirms readiness for independent paraprofessional employment.
  1. Assemble the full worksite portfolio: all signed weekly time sheets totaling 243 hours, all reflective log entries (minimum one per placement week), the mid-term employer evaluation, the final employer evaluation rubric completed and signed by the cooperating teacher, and a two-page summative self-reflection addressing growth areas and credential readiness
  2. Participate in the cooperating teacher's final evaluation conference at the worksite; discuss specific rubric ratings, ask at least two clarifying questions, and record feedback in the reflective log for use in the program supervisor's exit conference
  3. Attend the program supervisor exit conference (on-site or video call); present the portfolio, respond to supervisor questions about specific placement experiences, and identify one professional development goal to pursue before or after the ParaPro Assessment and state certification application
Complete worksite portfolio binder or digital folder, cooperating teacher final evaluation rubric (program-issued), summative self-reflection template, exit conference agenda, program supervisor scoring sheetPortfolio earns a composite score of 80% or higher across all components (time logs complete and signed, all log entries present, mid-term and final evaluations both 'meets standard' or higher, self-reflection addresses required prompts); program supervisor confirms exit conference completed and professional development goal documented; students who do not meet 80% or receive a 'below standard' on any final evaluation domain must complete a remediation plan approved by the program director
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Cooperating Teacher Final Skills Evaluation (Skills Demonstration)Skills demonstration70%All rubric domains rated 'meets standard' (3 out of 4 or site-equivalent) or higher on the final evaluation; no domain may remain 'below standard' at placement endThe cooperating teacher completes a structured rubric evaluating the student's performance across professionalism and attendance, instructional support techniques, communication with staff and students, behavior support application, and emergency/safety readiness, observed live across the entire placement period. The rating is based on direct daily observation and is the primary evidence of occupational competency for this course.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Worksite Portfolio and Reflective Log (Lab Log)Log30%Composite portfolio score of 80% or higher; all time sheets signed and totaling 243 hours; all required reflective log entries present and substantive (minimum one per placement week)The student submits a complete portfolio containing all signed time sheets, every weekly reflective log entry, both employer evaluations, and a two-page summative self-reflection; the program supervisor scores the portfolio using a rubric that weights documentation completeness, depth of reflection, evidence of skill application, and professional growth over time. Incomplete time logs or missing evaluations result in an automatic incomplete until corrected.
Complete · Verified
AGR-TEAC61-11 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: ParaPro, State Certificate & CPR/First Aid

68 hr · $680 COMPLIMENTARY

This course systematically reviews every content domain tested on the ETS ParaPro Assessment, the State Paraprofessional Certificate examination, and the CPR/First Aid credential, using spaced practice, mapped review lessons, and full-length mock exams. Students identify personal knowledge gaps early, strengthen weak areas through targeted practice sets, and enter credentialing exams with demonstrated test-readiness. Emphasis is placed on reading comprehension, mathematics, and instructional support skills as weighted on the ParaPro, and on practical CPR/first aid skills required for hands-on certification.

Outcomes
Course text

This course systematically reviews every content domain tested on the ETS ParaPro Assessment, the State Paraprofessional Certificate examination, and the CPR/First Aid credential, using spaced practice, mapped review lessons, and full-length mock exams. Students identify personal knowledge gaps early, strengthen weak areas through targeted practice sets, and enter credentialing exams with demonstrated test-readiness. Emphasis is placed on reading comprehension, mathematics, and instructional support skills as weighted on the ParaPro, and on practical CPR/first aid skills required for hands-on certification.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: ParaPro Assessment Domain Review: Reading, Mathematics & Writing; State Paraprofessional Certificate Exam Content Review; CPR, First Aid & AED Skills Certification Preparation; Full Mock Certification Exams & Final Readiness Debrief.

What competent looks like. Score at or above the passing threshold on a full-length, timed ParaPro Assessment practice exam covering reading, mathematics, and writing skills and their classroom applications. Correctly answer questions aligned to state paraprofessional certificate exam content areas, including student rights, IDEA provisions, confidentiality, educator ethics, and instructional roles. Demonstrate CPR and first aid procedures — including adult, child, and infant CPR, AED use, choking response, and wound care — meeting American Heart Association or American Red Cross performance standards. Apply test-taking strategies such as process of elimination, time management, and careful reading of item stems to improve accuracy on selected-response exams. Analyze personal diagnostic results to prioritize study time across ParaPro content domains and state exam topics before sitting for credentialing exams. Complete a full-length, timed mock ParaPro exam and a state-content mock exam under realistic conditions, receiving a scored report used to confirm readiness.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1ParaPro Assessment Domain Review: Reading, Mathematics & Writing24practiceStudents correctly answer practice items from all three ParaPro content domains — reading skills and application, mathematics skills and application, and writing skills and application — achieving at least 70% accuracy on domain-specific practice sets before the mock exam.
  1. Students take a 30-item diagnostic pre-test (10 items per domain) drawn from released ETS sample questions, then score and map results to ParaPro domain descriptors to identify priority review areas.
  2. Rotating small-group stations address each domain: the reading station uses grade-level classroom texts and requires students to identify main idea, inference, and vocabulary in context; the mathematics station covers whole numbers, fractions, decimals, algebra, and geometry with calculator and no-calculator sets matching ParaPro conditions; the writing station focuses on sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and revision tasks using sample student writing similar to what appears on the exam.
  3. Students complete two timed 40-item mixed-domain practice sets (one per week), self-score using answer keys, record error patterns on a personal tracking sheet, and write a one-paragraph reflection identifying the two skills they will target before the mock exam.
ETS ParaPro Assessment Study Companion (free download from ETS.org), released ParaPro sample questions, printed and digital practice item sets, graphing/scientific calculator (permitted type per ETS policy), lined paper, personal error-tracking log template, whiteboard markers for station workStudents score 70% or higher on each of the two timed 40-item mixed-domain practice sets; any student below 70% on a domain completes an additional targeted practice set for that domain and conferences with the instructor before advancing.
2State Paraprofessional Certificate Exam Content Review16theoryStudents accurately explain and apply key concepts tested on state paraprofessional certification exams — including IDEA eligibility and IEP roles, student confidentiality under FERPA, paraprofessional scope of practice, educator ethics, and culturally responsive instructional support — scoring at least 75% on a mapped practice quiz.
  1. Instructor-led review sessions cover the major content clusters common to state paraprofessional exams: federal special education law (IDEA, ADA, Section 504 in broad terms), FERPA and student privacy, the paraprofessional's defined role versus the licensed teacher's role, professional ethics and mandatory reporting obligations, and evidence-based instructional support strategies; students take structured notes using a provided outline and discuss two scenario-based cases per topic.
  2. Students work in pairs on a 'scope-of-practice sort' activity: given 20 task cards describing classroom situations, pairs decide whether the task is within the paraprofessional's role, requires teacher direction, or requires immediate escalation, then compare answers with another pair and resolve disagreements by citing course materials or state board guidance language.
  3. Each student completes a 50-item practice quiz mapped to state exam content clusters, reviews the answer rationale for every missed item using the instructor's annotated key, and records three 'I still need to study' items on their tracking sheet for inclusion in the final mock exam review session.
State board of education paraprofessional certification candidate handbook (current edition, downloaded from state agency website), course notes from Courses 2–7 (child development, classroom management, instructional support, special education basics, literacy/numeracy, behavior intervention), IDEA overview summary sheet, FERPA plain-language guide (U.S. Department of Education), scope-of-practice task card set, 50-item mapped practice quiz with annotated keyStudents score at least 75% on the 50-item mapped practice quiz; students who score below 75% identify missed items by content cluster, receive instructor feedback, and complete a targeted re-quiz of 15 items in the weak clusters before the mock exam session.
3CPR, First Aid & AED Skills Certification Preparation12labStudents demonstrate adult, child, and infant CPR with proper rate and depth, correct two-rescuer technique, AED operation, responsive and unresponsive choking response, and basic wound care, meeting the performance checkpoints required for American Heart Association or American Red Cross CPR/First Aid certification.
  1. Instructor demonstrates and narrates each skill sequence — adult CPR, child CPR, infant CPR, AED use, adult and child choking, infant back blows and chest thrusts, bleeding control with direct pressure, and recognition of shock — using a training manikin set, a training AED, and standard first aid supplies; students observe, then immediately practice on manikins in groups of three, rotating roles (compressor, airway, AED operator) every five minutes.
  2. Students complete a timed skills circuit: each student must perform a full adult CPR and AED sequence (assessment, call for help, 30 compressions at correct rate and depth, two rescue breaths, attach and operate training AED) while a peer evaluates them against the AHA or Red Cross performance checklist; the evaluator gives immediate verbal feedback and the pair switches roles.
  3. Students review the written knowledge component of the CPR/First Aid credential by answering 25 multiple-choice questions covering recognition of cardiac arrest, stroke warning signs (FAST), when to call 911, universal precautions and glove use, and documentation of an incident; the class reviews all items together, with the instructor clarifying any misconceptions about PPE use (gloves required before contact with blood or bodily fluids) and when not to move an injured person.
Adult, child, and infant CPR training manikins (one set per three students), training AED device, gloves (nitrile, disposable), CPR barrier masks, AHA BLS Handbook or Red Cross First Aid/CPR/AED Participant Manual (current edition), first aid training kit (bandages, gauze, tape), skills performance checklist (AHA or Red Cross format), 25-item written practice quizEach student must pass the AHA or Red Cross hands-on skills evaluation checklist (all critical steps marked satisfactory) and score at least 80% on the 25-item written quiz; students who do not meet either standard receive remedial one-on-one practice and are re-evaluated the same day before leaving the lab.
4Full Mock Certification Exams & Final Readiness Debrief16practiceStudents complete a full-length, timed mock ParaPro Assessment and a full-length state-content mock exam under simulated testing conditions, then use scored results and instructor feedback to confirm credential readiness or finalize a targeted study plan before scheduling official exams.
  1. Students sit a full-length mock ParaPro exam — 90 items across reading, mathematics, and writing domains — under timed, silent, exam-room conditions (no notes, permitted calculator only); after submission students receive a domain-by-domain score report and review every missed item against the ETS content descriptions to determine whether errors were content gaps, misread stems, or time-management issues.
  2. Students sit a 60-item state paraprofessional content mock exam covering IDEA roles, FERPA, scope of practice, ethics, instructional support, and behavior intervention, again under timed conditions; scored results are mapped to state exam content clusters and compared with the student's running error-tracking log from Lessons 1 and 2 to confirm whether targeted review improved performance.
  3. Instructor leads a structured 90-minute debrief: students share one skill they improved and one remaining concern; instructor reviews the most-missed items class-wide using a document camera; each student writes a personalized readiness statement identifying their mock scores, whether they meet estimated passing benchmarks, which credential they will schedule first, and any final study actions they will complete in the days before the official exam.
Full-length mock ParaPro exam (90 items, constructed from ETS sample questions and practice materials), domain score report template, 60-item state-content mock exam with answer key and cluster score report, ETS ParaPro Assessment Study Companion, state candidate handbook, personal error-tracking logs from previous lessons, calculator (ParaPro-permitted type), quiet exam room with individual seating, timer or clock visible to all studentsStudents score at or above the program's readiness benchmark of 70% overall on the mock ParaPro exam and 75% overall on the state-content mock exam; students meeting both benchmarks are documented as exam-ready; students below either benchmark receive a written instructor feedback form identifying specific content clusters to review, a revised study schedule, and a recommended retake date for the mock before sitting the official exam.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Full-Length Timed Mock Certification Exam BatteryMock certification exam100%70% or higher overall on the 90-item mock ParaPro Assessment AND 75% or higher overall on the 60-item state paraprofessional content mock exam; CPR/First Aid skills checklist passed with all critical steps marked satisfactory and 80% on the written quiz (completed in Lesson 3).Students complete the full mock ParaPro Assessment and state-content mock exam back-to-back under silent, timed, exam-room conditions with no notes and only permitted materials, then participate in a scored debrief that produces a documented readiness determination. Students who meet all three passing standards (ParaPro mock, state mock, CPR/First Aid) are certified as program-ready to schedule their official credentialing exams; students who do not meet a standard receive a targeted remediation plan and instructor sign-off before sitting the official exam.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: CPR/First Aid; ParaPro Assessment (ETS); State Paraprofessional Certificate

Students sit the ParaPro Assessment administered by ETS, which tests reading, writing, and mathematics skills along with the ability to apply those skills in the classroom; students also pursue their State Paraprofessional Certificate through the applicable state licensing or education board. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Teacher Aide / Paraprofessional · How the school gets authority to award these credentials