🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Hospitality, Food & Tourism › Restaurant Management › Courses
Hospitality, Food & Tourism · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a certified food-safety manager and industry professional or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Restaurant Management

12 courses · 1,350 clock hours · 9 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$14,070 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
12courses
83lessons
1,350hours
43assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons83 of 83 lesson pages writtenPractice664 practice questionsResources116 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 83 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
HOS-REST26-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Restaurant Management

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips adult learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, communication skills, and career-readiness behaviors required throughout the Restaurant Management program and on the job. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry awareness, practice first aid and CPR fundamentals, and build the numeracy and digital literacy that underpin every subsequent course. Lesson content is directly referenced to ServSafe Manager food-safety principles, NRAEF ManageFirst competency areas, and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor performance standards where applicable.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips adult learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, communication skills, and career-readiness behaviors required throughout the Restaurant Management program and on the job. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry awareness, practice first aid and CPR fundamentals, and build the numeracy and digital literacy that underpin every subsequent course. Lesson content is directly referenced to ServSafe Manager food-safety principles, NRAEF ManageFirst competency areas, and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor performance standards where applicable.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Restaurant Workplace Safety and OSHA 10-Hour General Industry; First Aid, CPR, and Emergency Response in the Restaurant; Trade Math: Measurement, Unit Conversion, and Recipe Scaling; Technical Reading: SDS, Inspection Reports, Equipment Manuals, and Schedules; Digital Tools for Restaurant Managers: Email, Scheduling, and POS Basics; Professional Communication: Writing, Speaking, and Active Listening; Career Readiness: Resume, Cover Letter, and Professional Development Plan.

What competent looks like. Identify and control common restaurant workplace hazards by applying OSHA General Industry hazard-recognition principles and completing the OSHA 10-Hour General Industry card requirements. Demonstrate adult CPR and basic first-aid procedures—including response to choking and burn injuries—to the standard of an approved lay-responder course. Perform restaurant trade calculations—including unit conversion, recipe scaling, food-cost percentage, and tip/tax computation—accurately on paper and with a spreadsheet tool. Read and interpret technical documents used in restaurant management, including SDS sheets, health-department inspection reports, equipment manuals, and employee schedules. Use standard digital tools—email, scheduling software, POS inquiry screens, and word-processing applications—to produce professional workplace communications. Construct a career portfolio containing a resume, cover letter, and a personal professional-development plan aligned to credentialing milestones in this program.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Restaurant Workplace Safety and OSHA 10-Hour General Industry28theoryStudents will identify the top hazard categories in commercial kitchens and front-of-house areas and demonstrate awareness of worker rights and employer duties under OSHA General Industry standards sufficient to satisfy OSHA 10-Hour General Industry completion requirements.
  1. Complete the OSHA 10-Hour General Industry training modules (instructor-led or authorized provider), covering hazard communication, personal protective equipment selection, walking/working surfaces, electrical safety, fire prevention, and lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures—applying each topic to a restaurant scenario (e.g., identifying LOTO points on a commercial mixer or slicer).
  2. Conduct a guided hazard walk of the school's training kitchen: students use a printed inspection checklist to locate and classify at least ten hazards by type (chemical, physical, ergonomic, biological), record corrective actions, and match each hazard to the appropriate SDS or equipment-guard requirement.
  3. Small-group case-study analysis of two real OSHA restaurant inspection citations (sourced from publicly available OSHA records with identifying details removed): groups identify the violated standard in plain language, the likely injury, and the corrective measure, then present findings to the class.
OSHA 10-Hour General Industry authorized curriculum; OSHA publication 'Restaurant Safety' fact sheet; SDS binders for common cleaning chemicals; PPE samples (cut-resistant gloves, slip-resistant footwear, aprons, eye protection); commercial mixer and slicer for LOTO demonstration; hazard inspection checklist (instructor-prepared).Students score 70% or higher on the OSHA 10 post-module quizzes to qualify for the OSHA 10-Hour card; separately, each student's completed hazard-walk checklist must correctly classify at least 8 of 10 identified hazards with an appropriate corrective action noted.
2First Aid, CPR, and Emergency Response in the Restaurant16labStudents will perform adult CPR with an AED, respond correctly to choking in an adult, and provide basic first aid for burns, cuts, and slips to the pass standard of the course's approved lay-responder curriculum.
  1. Hands-on CPR and AED skills stations using adult manikins: each student performs a complete cycle of 30 compressions and 2 rescue breaths, then operates a training AED through full prompts, with an instructor evaluating depth, rate, and hand placement against course skill sheet criteria.
  2. Choking response practice using back-blow and abdominal-thrust technique on a standing partner (with instructor spotting), followed by discussion of modifications for a pregnant or obese victim; students also role-play calling 9-1-1 and staying on the line to relay victim status.
  3. Scenario rotation: teams of three rotate through four restaurant emergency stations—grease burn, deep-cut laceration, slip-and-fall with suspected sprain, and chemical-splash to the eye—selecting correct first-aid supplies from a stocked kit, documenting the incident on a sample employer injury report form, and identifying when to escalate to EMS.
Adult CPR manikins (one per two students); training AED unit; first-aid kit stocked per Red Cross/NSC guidelines; burn dressing samples; eye-wash station; sample employer incident-report forms; approved lay-responder course materials (Red Cross or equivalent).Each student must pass the approved lay-responder skills check (CPR compression depth/rate, AED operation, choking response) per the certifying organization's pass standard; students who do not pass on the first attempt receive one remediation attempt before the end of the lesson block.
3Trade Math: Measurement, Unit Conversion, and Recipe Scaling24practiceStudents will accurately convert between US customary and metric units of weight and volume, scale a standardized recipe up and down by a given factor, and calculate food-cost percentage for a scaled recipe using current commodity prices.
  1. Instructor-led measurement lab: students physically weigh and measure ingredients (flour, water, oil) using a digital portion scale, volume measures, and a metric scale, recording results in a dual-column data table; class compiles results to discuss why weight measurement improves recipe consistency—directly reinforcing NRAEF ManageFirst Controlling Foodservice Costs content.
  2. Recipe-scaling worksheet exercise: working from a standardized recipe for 25 portions of chicken soup, students calculate ingredient quantities for 60 and 12 portions using conversion factors, then cost each scaled recipe using a simulated current-market price list, computing cost-per-portion and food-cost percentage.
  3. Spreadsheet build: each student sets up a basic Excel or Google Sheets recipe-cost card with locked formula cells for yield percentage, scaling factor, cost-per-unit, extended cost, and food-cost percentage; instructor verifies formulas before students enter real data from the scaling worksheet.
Digital portion scales (accurate to 0.1 oz / 1 g); dry and liquid measuring sets; standardized recipe cards; current commodity price list (instructor-prepared from publicly available sources); computers or tablets with spreadsheet software; printed scaling and costing worksheets.Students must complete the recipe-scaling worksheet with no more than one arithmetic error across all scaled quantities and achieve a food-cost percentage calculation within ±0.5 percentage points of the answer key; spreadsheet formulas must produce correct outputs for three instructor-entered test values.
4Technical Reading: SDS, Inspection Reports, Equipment Manuals, and Schedules18theoryStudents will locate required safety and operational information within a Safety Data Sheet, a sample health-department inspection report, a commercial equipment manual, and a weekly employee schedule, demonstrating comprehension by answering targeted questions at 75% accuracy.
  1. SDS literacy drill: each student receives the SDS for a common commercial sanitizer; using a guided question sheet, they locate the signal word, first-aid measures, required PPE, spill-response steps, and storage incompatibilities, then write a plain-language 'quick-reference card' a new employee could post at the cleaning station—reinforcing ServSafe Manager chemical-safety content.
  2. Inspection report analysis: students receive a sample health-department inspection report (instructor-created, modeled on real form formats) showing a mix of Priority, Priority Foundation, and Core violations; they rank violations by regulatory seriousness, identify which correspond to ServSafe Manager active managerial control principles, and draft a 72-hour corrective-action summary memo.
  3. Equipment manual scavenger hunt: teams receive the manual for a commercial convection oven or reach-in refrigerator and must locate installation clearance specs, recommended cleaning cycle, error code for temperature fault, and recommended service interval; teams race to answer eight questions correctly, discussing how this information informs daily opening and closing checklists.
Printed SDS for a common commercial sanitizer (e.g., quaternary ammonium product); sample health-department inspection report; commercial equipment operator manual (convection oven or reach-in refrigerator); sample weekly employee schedule; guided comprehension question sheets.Students answer a 20-question comprehension quiz covering all four document types (SDS, inspection report, equipment manual, schedule) and must score 15 or higher (75%) to demonstrate adequate technical reading ability.
5Digital Tools for Restaurant Managers: Email, Scheduling, and POS Basics22demoStudents will compose a professional workplace email, navigate a simulated employee-scheduling interface to build a one-week schedule within a given labor-hour budget, and perform basic POS inquiry functions including end-of-day sales report and menu-item lookup.
  1. Email etiquette workshop: students review five sample emails ranging from unprofessional to fully professional (instructor-prepared), score each on a rubric covering subject line, salutation, clarity, tone, and closing, then write and send (to the instructor) a professional email requesting a vendor price quote and a separate email declining a job applicant—applying AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor communication competencies.
  2. Scheduling simulation: using a scheduling tool (cloud-based scheduling software trial or printed grid), students receive a staffing matrix with position requirements, employee availability constraints, and a maximum weekly labor-hour budget; they build a full seven-day schedule and then calculate projected labor cost using provided hourly rates, adjusting the schedule if over budget.
  3. POS inquiry lab using a training-mode POS terminal or simulator: students run an end-of-day sales report, identify the top three selling menu items by revenue and by count, void a practice transaction, and look up a menu item's modifier options—recording findings on a structured observation form that mirrors NRAEF ManageFirst POS-management content.
Computers or tablets with email client; cloud-based scheduling software (free trial or school license) or printed scheduling grid; POS training terminal or POS simulator software; scheduling rubric; email rubric; staffing matrix handout.Email is evaluated by rubric (must meet all four categories at 'acceptable' or above to pass); completed schedule must cover all required positions for each shift and fall within the labor-hour budget (±2 hours tolerance); POS observation form must be complete and accurate for at least 4 of 5 tasks.
6Professional Communication: Writing, Speaking, and Active Listening20practiceStudents will produce a clear written shift briefing, deliver a two-minute verbal pre-shift meeting, and demonstrate active-listening behaviors during a simulated guest-complaint interaction, meeting the AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor communication performance standard.
  1. Written shift briefing exercise: given a set of daily specials, an 86'd item, a VIP reservation note, and a maintenance issue, each student writes a concise shift briefing (150–200 words) using correct grammar, bullet formatting, and professional tone; peers provide structured feedback using a provided checklist before the instructor scores the final draft.
  2. Pre-shift meeting delivery: each student stands and delivers a two-minute verbal pre-shift briefing to the class using their written draft as a guide (not a script); classmates score delivery on eye contact, vocal clarity, pacing, and content completeness using a peer-evaluation rubric, followed by one round of instructor feedback.
  3. Active-listening role-play: in pairs, one student plays a guest with a complaint (overcooked steak, long wait, billing error—instructor-assigned scenario cards) while the other plays the manager; the manager must use open questions, paraphrase the concern, offer a resolution, and close the interaction professionally; then roles switch; instructor observes and scores against an AHLEI-aligned listening behavior checklist.
Shift briefing scenario cards (instructor-prepared); peer-evaluation rubric for verbal delivery; AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor active-listening behavior checklist; scenario cards for guest-complaint role-play; printed grammar/style quick-reference guide.Written shift briefing must score 'acceptable' or above on all four rubric categories (accuracy, grammar, format, tone); verbal delivery must score at least 12 of 16 points on the peer/instructor rubric; active-listening role-play must demonstrate at least 4 of 6 target behaviors as observed by the instructor.
7Career Readiness: Resume, Cover Letter, and Professional Development Plan20practiceStudents will produce a job-ready resume and targeted cover letter for an entry-level restaurant management position, and construct a written personal professional-development plan mapping credentialing milestones across the program and three years beyond graduation.
  1. Resume build workshop: using a clean, industry-appropriate template, each student drafts a one-page resume incorporating all prior food-service experience (paid, volunteer, or school-based), quantifying at least two accomplishments (e.g., 'Supervised team of 5 during weekend brunch service'); instructor circulates and provides line-by-line feedback; students revise and submit a final version.
  2. Cover letter writing: students select a real, current job posting for an assistant manager or shift supervisor role (sourced from public job boards during class); they write a three-paragraph cover letter tailored to that specific posting, referencing the program credentials (ServSafe Manager, NRAEF ManageFirst, AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor) as in-progress qualifications; peers review for specificity and professional tone.
  3. Professional development plan: using a provided structured template, each student maps the credential exams in this program (ServSafe Manager, NRAEF ManageFirst, AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor) to target exam dates, identifies two professional associations to explore for networking, lists three management-level roles they are targeting within three years of graduation, and writes a paragraph on how continued education or stackable credentials could advance their career.
Resume template (clean, ATS-friendly format); cover letter format guide; publicly available job postings (printed or on-screen); professional development plan template (instructor-prepared); credential overview one-pagers for ServSafe Manager, NRAEF ManageFirst, and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor.Resume must be free of spelling and grammar errors, one page, and include at least two quantified accomplishments—scored by instructor rubric (pass = meets all three criteria); cover letter must specifically reference the target job posting and at least one program credential (pass = both criteria met); professional development plan must include all three credential milestones with estimated target dates (pass = all milestones present and dated).
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
OSHA and Food-Safety Regulatory Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% (28 of 40 questions correct)A 40-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering OSHA General Industry hazard categories, worker rights and employer duties, SDS section interpretation, PPE selection, and emergency-response procedures in a restaurant context; questions are scenario-based and mapped to OSHA 10-Hour General Industry competencies and ServSafe Manager food-safety regulatory awareness content.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Trade Math and Technical Reading ExamWritten exam25%75% (30 of 40 questions correct)A 40-item exam combining calculation problems (unit conversion, recipe scaling, food-cost percentage, tip and tax computation) with technical-reading comprehension items drawn from SDS excerpts, a sample inspection report, and a schedule; calculators are permitted for the math section, and all answers must show work for partial-credit eligibility.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Career Portfolio ProjectProject25%All four portfolio components scored 'acceptable' or above on the instructor rubric; a single 'not acceptable' rating in any component requires revision before the course grade is finalized.Students submit a complete career portfolio containing: (1) a final, polished one-page resume, (2) a cover letter tailored to a real posted position, (3) a professional development plan with credentialing milestones and three-year career targets, and (4) a one-page reflection connecting the safety and communication skills learned in this course to their intended role as a restaurant manager; the portfolio is evaluated against a four-category rubric (professionalism, accuracy, specificity, and career alignment).
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Oral Professional Competency DefenseOral / panel25%Student must meet 'acceptable' or above on at least 5 of 6 evaluation criteria; any criterion scored 'not acceptable' triggers a single 10-minute remediation interview within one week.In a 10-minute structured oral session, the instructor poses three scenario prompts—one workplace safety emergency (e.g., a coworker with a deep laceration), one communication challenge (e.g., delivering corrective feedback to a tardy employee), and one math/decision scenario (e.g., whether a proposed menu item meets the target food-cost percentage)—and evaluates the student on accuracy of content, clarity of communication, professional composure, and correct identification of relevant credentials or standards; this mirrors the oral-defense component expected in the Capstone Project later in the program.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
HOS-REST26-02 Trade course

Restaurant Cost Control

92 hr · $1,215 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to track, analyze, and manage the primary cost centers in a restaurant operation—food cost, beverage cost, and labor cost—using standard industry formulas, worksheets, and point-of-sale reports. The course builds the numerical literacy and managerial decision-making skills tested on the NRAEF ManageFirst Cost Control credential exam and reinforced throughout the broader program. Emphasis is placed on accurate recordkeeping, variance identification, and corrective action planning in a real-world restaurant context.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to track, analyze, and manage the primary cost centers in a restaurant operation—food cost, beverage cost, and labor cost—using standard industry formulas, worksheets, and point-of-sale reports. The course builds the numerical literacy and managerial decision-making skills tested on the NRAEF ManageFirst Cost Control credential exam and reinforced throughout the broader program. Emphasis is placed on accurate recordkeeping, variance identification, and corrective action planning in a real-world restaurant context.

How the course runs. 8 blocks: The Language of Restaurant Costs: Key Terms, Cost Categories, and the Cost-Control Cycle; Food Cost Percentage: Formula, Calculation, and Standard Targets; Inventory Procedures and Cost of Goods Sold; Standard Recipes, Yield Testing, and Portion Cost; Labor Cost: Scheduling, Wage Calculations, and Labor Cost Percentage; Break-Even Analysis and Contribution Margin; Spreadsheet Cost Reporting: Building and Interpreting a Weekly Cost Report; Integrated Cost-Control Simulation: Full-Week Scenario Analysis and Corrective Action.

What competent looks like. Calculate food cost percentage, beverage cost percentage, and labor cost percentage using industry-standard formulas and actual or simulated operational data. Perform an accurate physical inventory count and extend inventory values to determine cost of goods sold for a given accounting period. Identify and explain the causes of cost variances by comparing actual cost percentages to budgeted targets and standard recipe costs. Apply portion-control and yield-testing procedures to raw ingredients and calculate as-purchased, edible-portion, and as-served costs. Construct a basic break-even analysis and interpret the result to inform pricing, staffing, or purchasing decisions. Use a spreadsheet to produce a weekly food-cost report and a labor-cost report that a manager could present at an operations review.

Lessons · 8 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Language of Restaurant Costs: Key Terms, Cost Categories, and the Cost-Control Cycle9theoryStudents will correctly define and classify fixed, variable, semi-variable, and controllable costs and explain how each fits into the restaurant cost-control cycle.
  1. Read and annotate Chapter 1 of the NRAEF ManageFirst Cost Control textbook; students highlight every bolded term and write a one-sentence definition in their own words.
  2. Complete a card-sort activity in which 24 laminated cost cards (rent, hourly wages, linen service, utilities, etc.) are grouped into fixed, variable, and semi-variable categories, then teams share and defend their groupings.
  3. Analyze a one-page simplified income statement for a fictional restaurant and label every line item with its cost category; instructor facilitates a whole-class debrief to resolve disputes.
NRAEF ManageFirst Cost Control textbook and competency guide, laminated cost-card sets, sample simplified income statement handout, whiteboardExit quiz of 10 matching and fill-in items covering cost definitions and categories; pass mark 80%. Instructor reviews card-sort groupings for accuracy before students leave.
2Food Cost Percentage: Formula, Calculation, and Standard Targets12theoryStudents will calculate food cost percentage using the cost-of-goods-sold formula and compare results to industry benchmark ranges to judge operational performance.
  1. Work through six progressive instructor-led example problems on the whiteboard, moving from single-item food cost to full-period food cost percentage using the formula: Cost of Goods Sold ÷ Net Sales × 100.
  2. In pairs, complete a 12-problem worksheet using data sets from simulated weekly sales and purchase records; each pair must show every arithmetic step before circling the final percentage.
  3. Engage in a structured discussion comparing three fictional restaurant scenarios (fast casual, casual dining, fine dining) and explain why standard food cost targets differ across segment types, citing the ManageFirst textbook.
NRAEF ManageFirst Cost Control textbook, food-cost percentage calculation worksheet, calculators, whiteboard and markersGraded worksheet: 10 of 12 problems correct (83%) with all calculation steps shown; instructor spot-checks three problems per student for method accuracy.
3Inventory Procedures and Cost of Goods Sold14labStudents will conduct a physical inventory count of a simulated storage area, extend values using unit cost, and calculate cost of goods sold for a one-week period.
  1. Instructor demonstrates proper inventory-count technique in the classroom stockroom or simulated storage area: moving left to right, counting by unit, recording on a two-person count sheet, and dating every entry.
  2. Student pairs conduct a live physical count of a stocked simulation shelf containing labeled food and beverage items with unit costs posted; they record quantities on standard inventory sheets, then extend values (quantity × unit cost) and total each sheet.
  3. Using opening inventory, purchases, and the closing inventory just counted, students calculate cost of goods sold on a structured worksheet: Opening Inventory + Purchases − Closing Inventory = COGS; they then derive food cost percentage against a given sales figure and flag any result outside a provided target range.
Stocked simulation storage shelving with labeled items and unit costs, two-person inventory count sheets, calculator, COGS worksheet, pencilsInventory count sheet is within 2% of instructor key on total extended value; COGS and food cost percentage calculations are mathematically correct with all steps shown. Both criteria must be met to pass.
4Standard Recipes, Yield Testing, and Portion Cost14demoStudents will perform a yield test on a whole raw ingredient, calculate edible-portion cost and as-served portion cost, and update a standard recipe cost card.
  1. Instructor demonstrates a complete yield test using a whole head of romaine lettuce: weigh as-purchased, trim, weigh edible portion, calculate yield percentage (EP weight ÷ AP weight × 100), then calculate EP cost (AP cost ÷ yield %) — students record each step in their lab notebooks.
  2. Student groups each receive a different raw ingredient (potato, chicken breast, or carrot) along with AP weight and AP price; they perform the yield test following the instructor-demonstrated steps, recording all weights and calculations on a provided yield-test form.
  3. Each group uses their yield data to complete a standard recipe cost card for a two-item recipe: list each ingredient, its EP weight per portion, EP cost per unit, and extended cost; sum the card and calculate cost per serving, then compare to a target cost and decide whether the recipe is priced adequately.
Platform scale (accurate to 0.1 oz), cutting boards, knives, whole raw ingredients (romaine, potatoes, chicken, carrots), yield-test forms, standard recipe cost card template, calculators, lab notebooksYield percentage is within ±3 percentage points of instructor's reference value; EP cost and per-portion cost on the recipe card are arithmetically correct with no skipped steps. Instructor initials each form.
5Labor Cost: Scheduling, Wage Calculations, and Labor Cost Percentage12theoryStudents will build a one-week labor schedule to a specified labor cost budget, calculate total labor cost, and compute labor cost percentage against projected sales.
  1. Review a completed model schedule on a posted poster: instructor walks through how daily covers, average check, and projected sales volume drive the number of labor hours needed per station and shift, referencing ManageFirst scheduling principles.
  2. Using a blank schedule template, projected daily sales figures, and a list of employees with hourly rates (including one salaried manager whose weekly cost must be prorated), students build a full seven-day schedule that hits a target labor cost percentage within a ±1.5-point tolerance.
  3. Exchange schedules with another team for a peer review: the reviewing team calculates total labor dollars, labor cost percentage, and identifies any shift that exceeds the posted maximum daily labor-hour cap; findings are presented verbally to the class.
NRAEF ManageFirst Cost Control textbook, blank weekly schedule template, employee wage-rate sheet, projected-sales data handout, calculators, colored markers for schedule codingCompleted schedule must show correct arithmetic on all wage calculations and land within ±1.5 percentage points of the target labor cost percentage; peer-review team must correctly identify any overscheduled shift. Instructor validates both.
6Break-Even Analysis and Contribution Margin10theoryStudents will calculate break-even point in sales dollars for a restaurant scenario and explain what the result means for daily cover targets and pricing decisions.
  1. Instructor presents the break-even formula (Fixed Costs ÷ Contribution Margin Ratio) on the board, defines contribution margin and contribution margin ratio, and solves two example problems while students follow along and ask questions.
  2. Working individually, students receive a one-page scenario with fixed monthly costs, variable cost percentage, and a proposed average check; they calculate break-even sales, translate that figure into required daily covers, and write a two-sentence management recommendation.
  3. Small groups compare their scenarios (each group received slightly different numbers) and construct a single bar chart on chart paper showing break-even sales for each scenario; groups present their chart and explain which restaurant faces the most operational risk and why.
Whiteboard, break-even scenario handouts, calculators, chart paper, markers, NRAEF ManageFirst Cost Control textbookIndividual calculation must produce the correct break-even dollar figure (within $50 of instructor's computed answer) and a logically sound written recommendation; group chart must accurately represent each team's figure. Pass mark: correct calculation and coherent recommendation.
7Spreadsheet Cost Reporting: Building and Interpreting a Weekly Cost Report13practiceStudents will build a functional weekly food-cost and labor-cost report in a spreadsheet application using formulas, and interpret variances to write a corrective-action memo.
  1. Instructor screen-shares a spreadsheet and demonstrates how to set up columns for daily sales, purchases, inventory adjustments, labor hours, and wages; students follow along building the same file on their own computers, entering formulas (not hard-coded numbers) for all calculated fields.
  2. Students enter one full week of provided raw data (daily sales figures, purchase invoices, opening and closing inventory values, employee time-card totals) into their spreadsheet; the spreadsheet must auto-calculate daily and weekly food cost percentage and labor cost percentage.
  3. Students compare their weekly actual percentages to provided budget targets, identify the two largest variances, and write a one-page corrective-action memo addressed to the general manager that names the variance, identifies a plausible cause, and proposes one specific corrective action for each.
Computer lab with spreadsheet software (Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets), weekly raw data packet, sample corrective-action memo format, projector for instructor demoSpreadsheet formulas must calculate correctly on a fresh data set the instructor pastes in during review (no hard-coded answers); memo must address both identified variances with specific, actionable responses. Both elements required to pass.
8Integrated Cost-Control Simulation: Full-Week Scenario Analysis and Corrective Action8labStudents will apply all course skills to a comprehensive one-week restaurant scenario, identifying cost problems and recommending documented corrective actions.
  1. Each student receives a full simulation packet containing one week of sales reports, purchase invoices, inventory sheets, time cards, and a standard recipe cost card; working independently, they calculate food cost percentage, labor cost percentage, COGS, and yield percentage for a specified item.
  2. Students flag every metric that falls outside provided target ranges, then complete a variance-analysis form that requires them to state the actual figure, the target figure, the dollar and percentage-point variance, and a probable cause for each discrepancy.
  3. Students write and submit a one-to-two-page Operations Cost Summary as if presenting to ownership: results table, variance summary, and three prioritized corrective actions with a projected impact for each.
Simulation packet (sales reports, invoices, inventory sheets, time cards, recipe cost card), variance-analysis form, Operations Cost Summary template, calculator, spreadsheet accessAll calculated figures must be arithmetically correct; at least two of three corrective actions must be specific, feasible, and logically tied to an identified variance. Instructor uses a grading rubric; 80% overall required to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Cost Control Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 items)A 50-item multiple-choice and short-answer written exam covering cost definitions, food cost and labor cost percentage formulas, inventory procedures, yield testing, break-even analysis, and variance interpretation, mapped to the NRAEF ManageFirst Cost Control competency areas. Students have 90 minutes and may not use notes.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Yield Test and Recipe Cost Card Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Yield percentage within ±3 points of reference value AND all cost-card arithmetic correct; both criteria requiredEach student independently performs a yield test on an unfamiliar raw ingredient assigned by the instructor, calculates EP cost and as-served portion cost, and completes a standard recipe cost card for a two-ingredient recipe using those results. The instructor observes the full procedure and validates calculations against a prepared answer key.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Weekly Cost Report Lab LogLog15%Formulas produce correct outputs on instructor-supplied fresh data set AND corrective-action memo earns at least 80% on the rubricStudents submit the spreadsheet file built during Lesson 7 along with the corrective-action memo; the instructor replaces the original data with a new data set to verify that all formulas are working correctly rather than hard-coded, and scores the memo on accuracy of variance identification, specificity of corrective actions, and professional format.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Workplace Safety and Food-Handling Safety CheckSafety audit15%All critical-item steps performed correctly; any single critical error requires immediate remediation and recheck before the student may continue in the courseThe instructor observes each student during the Lesson 4 yield-test lab and the Lesson 8 simulation lab for safe knife handling (proper grip, stable cutting board, no blade toward body), correct use of a food-safe scale and cutting surfaces, and appropriate hand-hygiene practices before handling food items; a binary checklist of critical and non-critical steps is used.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-REST26-03 Trade course

Menu Engineering: Design, Pricing, and Profitability

91 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to analyze menu items by popularity and contribution margin, apply menu engineering matrix methodology to classify and reposition items, and design menus that maximize profitability while meeting guest expectations. The course connects recipe costing, layout psychology, and pricing strategy to real-world decision-making used by restaurant managers. Credential alignment covers NRAEF ManageFirst Menu Marketing and Management competencies and supports ServSafe Manager food-cost awareness objectives.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to analyze menu items by popularity and contribution margin, apply menu engineering matrix methodology to classify and reposition items, and design menus that maximize profitability while meeting guest expectations. The course connects recipe costing, layout psychology, and pricing strategy to real-world decision-making used by restaurant managers. Credential alignment covers NRAEF ManageFirst Menu Marketing and Management competencies and supports ServSafe Manager food-cost awareness objectives.

How the course runs. 8 blocks: The Menu as a Management Tool: Purpose, Types, and Trade Math Foundations; Standardized Recipes and Recipe Costing; Contribution Margin and the Menu Engineering Matrix; Menu Pricing Methods and Value Perception; Menu Layout, Visual Psychology, and Descriptive Language; Allergens, Nutrition Disclosure, and Legal Awareness; Digital Menus, POS Integration, and Menu Change Workflow; Capstone Menu Engineering Analysis: Build and Presentation.

What competent looks like. Calculate food cost percentage and contribution margin for individual menu items using standardized recipe costing sheets with at least 90% arithmetic accuracy. Classify menu items into all four quadrants of the menu engineering matrix (Stars, Plowhorses, Puzzles, Dogs) using sales mix and contribution margin data from a provided sales report. Apply menu layout principles—visual hierarchy, eye movement patterns, item placement, and descriptive language—to redesign a single-page or two-panel menu that improves placement of Stars and Puzzles. Set and justify a selling price for a new menu item using at least two pricing methods (food cost percentage and competitive pricing) and document the rationale in writing. Evaluate a current restaurant menu for nutritional transparency, allergen disclosure, and plain-language readability, and produce a written improvement recommendation. Present a complete menu engineering analysis report for a simulated restaurant concept, defending item decisions and projected profitability impact to an instructor panel.

Lessons · 8 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Menu as a Management Tool: Purpose, Types, and Trade Math Foundations10theoryStudents will explain the strategic role of the menu in restaurant operations and perform the arithmetic operations—percentage, ratio, and decimal conversion—needed for menu costing.
  1. Instructor-led gallery walk: students examine printed examples of à la carte, prix fixe, cycle, static, and digital menus, then complete a comparison chart identifying format, target market, and pricing structure for each.
  2. Math drill set: students solve 20 problems covering food cost percentage (food cost ÷ selling price × 100), gross profit, and basic ratio calculations using a calculator and a provided formula sheet, then self-grade with an answer key.
  3. Small-group discussion: groups identify three decisions a manager could make differently if they understood menu profitability data, then share findings with the class.
Printed menu samples (minimum five different formats), formula reference sheet, calculator, whiteboard, ManageFirst Menu Marketing and Management textbook (NRAEF)Exit ticket: five food-cost-percentage problems completed independently; pass mark is 4 of 5 correct (80%).
2Standardized Recipes and Recipe Costing13labStudents will build a complete standardized recipe card and calculate the total recipe cost and per-portion cost for that item to within ±5% of the instructor's verified figure.
  1. Instructor demonstration: walk through a standardized recipe template (ingredient list, quantity, unit, unit cost, extended cost, yield percentage, portion size, portion cost) using a real appetizer recipe projected on screen; students annotate a blank template as the demo proceeds.
  2. Lab exercise: each student selects one of four provided recipe packets (soup, entrée, salad, or dessert), obtains current simulated ingredient prices from a provided price sheet, and completes a full costing spreadsheet in Google Sheets, applying yield percentage adjustments for trimmed produce and cooked-down stocks.
  3. Peer audit: students exchange completed spreadsheets, recheck every calculation using the formula sheet, flag any discrepancy greater than 5%, and return with written feedback before the owner self-corrects.
Standardized recipe template (paper and Google Sheets version), simulated ingredient price list, yield percentage reference table, calculator, ManageFirst textbook Chapter on recipe costing, computers or tabletsCompleted recipe costing spreadsheet submitted; all per-portion costs within ±5% of instructor key; pass mark is all four cost fields within tolerance and yield calculation present.
3Contribution Margin and the Menu Engineering Matrix14theoryStudents will classify a set of ten menu items into the four quadrants of the menu engineering matrix using provided sales mix and contribution margin data, with at least nine of ten items correctly placed.
  1. Lecture and worked example: instructor introduces the Kasavana-Smith menu engineering matrix, defines contribution margin (selling price minus food cost), explains how to calculate average contribution margin and average popularity percentage, and plots two sample items on a hand-drawn matrix on the whiteboard while students follow along.
  2. Individual matrix exercise: students receive a sales report for a simulated 12-item menu showing units sold and food cost per item; they calculate selling price, contribution margin, and popularity percentage for each item, determine the averages, and plot all items on a blank matrix grid, labeling each quadrant (Star, Plowhorse, Puzzle, Dog).
  3. Strategy discussion: in pairs, students propose one actionable management decision for each quadrant—such as featuring Stars, repricing Plowhorses, retesting Puzzles, or removing Dogs—and justify each decision in two written sentences.
Blank menu engineering matrix grid (printed), simulated sales report dataset, calculator, ManageFirst textbook chapter on menu engineering, colored pens for quadrant markingCompleted matrix with all items plotted and labeled; instructor checks against answer key; pass mark is 9 of 10 items in the correct quadrant with contribution margin calculations shown.
4Menu Pricing Methods and Value Perception11theoryStudents will calculate a recommended selling price for an assigned new menu item using the food cost percentage method and the competitive pricing method, then write a two-paragraph justification selecting one price.
  1. Mini-lecture and note-taking: instructor explains four pricing methods—food cost percentage target (dividing portion cost by desired food cost percentage), contribution margin pricing, competitive/market pricing, and psychological pricing (charm pricing, price anchoring)—with a real menu example for each.
  2. Pricing worksheet: students receive a new item's portion cost ($X) and are asked to price it using both the food cost percentage method (assuming a target of 28–32%) and a competitive set of three comparable dishes pulled from printed competitor menus; they record both results on a structured worksheet.
  3. Written justification: students write two paragraphs—one paragraph presenting each method's result and one paragraph selecting a final price and explaining how guest value perception, market positioning, and food cost goal informed the choice.
Pricing methods reference handout, printed competitor menu excerpts, pricing worksheet template, calculator, ManageFirst textbook pricing chapterWorksheet with both prices calculated and written justification; pass mark requires both calculations mathematically correct and justification paragraph addressing at least two of the three decision factors (cost, competition, perception).
5Menu Layout, Visual Psychology, and Descriptive Language12demoStudents will redesign a provided single-page menu by repositioning at least three items and rewriting at least two item descriptions, applying documented layout principles to improve profitability placement.
  1. Instructor demonstration with eye-tracking diagram: show research-based eye movement patterns on a standard single-page and two-panel menu; mark the prime real estate zones and explain why Stars and high-margin Puzzles are placed there; students annotate their own copy of the diagram.
  2. Descriptive language workshop: instructor displays six weak item descriptions ('Chicken Sandwich—grilled chicken, lettuce, tomato, $12') alongside six enhanced versions using sensory and origin language, then students rewrite four assigned weak descriptions from a handout using a provided vocabulary word bank (cooking methods, textures, regional sourcing terms).
  3. Menu redesign activity: each student receives a printed draft menu with item placement marked as problematic; using the eye-movement diagram and a placement checklist, they sketch a revised layout, repositioning items by their engineering quadrant and inserting their rewritten descriptions.
Eye-tracking research diagram (printed), sample menus with poor layout, descriptive language vocabulary bank, blank menu layout template, ManageFirst textbook chapter on menu design, color markersCompleted redesigned menu sketch with a brief annotation note explaining each repositioning decision; pass mark requires at least three repositioning changes with stated rationale and two rewritten descriptions using sensory or origin language.
6Allergens, Nutrition Disclosure, and Legal Awareness10theoryStudents will audit a provided menu for the nine major food allergens recognized under federal labeling guidance and for plain-language readability, then produce a written report identifying gaps and recommending corrections.
  1. Lecture: instructor reviews the nine major allergens identified by the FDA (milk, eggs, fish, shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, soybeans, sesame), explains general menu labeling best practices under federal guidance, and discusses how allergen disclosure connects to ServSafe Manager food-safety responsibilities and guest trust.
  2. Allergen audit exercise: students use an allergen identification checklist to review a printed four-page restaurant menu, highlight each item that contains or may contain a listed allergen, note where disclosures are missing or unclear, and flag any menu language that is difficult for a non-native English speaker to interpret.
  3. Written improvement report: students draft a one-page memo to a simulated restaurant owner listing: (1) three allergen disclosure gaps found, (2) two plain-language readability issues, and (3) a specific recommended correction for each gap, citing FDA allergen guidance in general terms.
Printed four-page sample restaurant menu, FDA major food allergen list (printed reference), allergen audit checklist, ManageFirst textbook food-safety alignment notes, ServSafe Manager study guide allergen sectionCompleted audit checklist and one-page memo; pass mark requires all nine allergens correctly identified from the reference list, at least three genuine disclosure gaps documented, and a correction stated for each gap.
7Digital Menus, POS Integration, and Menu Change Workflow11practiceStudents will update item descriptions, prices, and availability for three menu items in a simulated POS menu management interface and document the change workflow using a standard change-request form.
  1. Guided walkthrough: instructor demonstrates adding a new item, editing a price, and marking an item 86'd (out of stock) in a simulated POS training environment (such as Toast or Square training mode or a printed screen-capture simulation); students follow each step on their own device or printed step card.
  2. Hands-on POS practice: each student logs into the training environment and independently completes a task card requiring them to change the price on one entrée, update the description on one appetizer, and flag one dessert as temporarily unavailable; they capture or print a confirmation screen for each change.
  3. Change-request documentation: students complete a paper menu change-request form (simulating a real workplace approval process) for each of the three changes made, including reason for change, effective date, who requested it, and manager approval signature line.
Computers or tablets with POS training environment access (or printed screen-capture simulation packet), menu change-request form template, step-by-step POS task card, ManageFirst textbook technology integration sectionThree printed or screenshot confirmations of POS changes plus three completed change-request forms; pass mark requires all six documents present, prices and descriptions matching the task card exactly, and each form fully completed.
8Capstone Menu Engineering Analysis: Build and Presentation10labStudents will produce and orally defend a complete menu engineering analysis report for a simulated restaurant concept, including costed recipes, a populated matrix, pricing justifications, and a layout redesign recommendation.
  1. Independent report assembly: students compile all work products from lessons 2 through 7—costing sheet, matrix, pricing worksheet, redesign sketch, allergen audit memo, and POS change documentation—into a single organized binder or digital folder with a cover page, table of contents, and one-page executive summary written in their own words.
  2. Peer review panel: in groups of three, each student presents their analysis in ten minutes while peers use a structured rubric to evaluate accuracy of calculations, clarity of matrix classification, quality of redesign rationale, and professionalism of the written memo; peers provide two written pieces of specific feedback.
  3. Instructor defense: instructor conducts a five-to-seven-minute question session with each student, asking them to explain one calculation, justify one pricing decision, and identify one change they would make to their menu layout based on the matrix results; student must respond without referring to notes.
All prior lesson work products, report binder or digital folder, presentation rubric, cover page and table of contents template, ManageFirst textbook for reference during assemblyComplete report binder evaluated by instructor rubric (calculations, matrix accuracy, pricing rationale, allergen audit, layout redesign, writing quality) plus oral defense; pass mark is 75% overall on the rubric and a satisfactory response to all three oral defense questions.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Menu Engineering Written ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (30 of 40 questions correct)A 40-question closed-book exam covering food cost percentage calculation, contribution margin, menu engineering matrix quadrant definitions and strategies, pricing methods, allergen identification, and menu layout principles; questions are multiple choice and short-answer, aligned to NRAEF ManageFirst Menu Marketing and Management exam content areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Live Menu Engineering Presentation and DefenseSkills demonstration45%75% on the instructor rubric across all six categories plus satisfactory on all three oral defense questionsStudents present their complete menu engineering analysis report for the simulated restaurant concept to an instructor panel in a 15-to-20-minute session that includes a structured oral defense; the rubric evaluates calculation accuracy, matrix classification, pricing justification, allergen audit quality, layout redesign rationale, and professional written communication.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Recipe Costing and Matrix Lab LogLog15%All entries complete and calculations within ±5% of instructor key; minimum score of 80% on the lab log rubricA collected lab log documenting the student's work across all lab and practice sessions: the standardized recipe costing spreadsheet, the completed menu engineering matrix with plotted items, the pricing worksheet with both methods calculated, and the POS change confirmation documents; the log demonstrates progressive skill development and is reviewed for completeness, accuracy, and correct use of formulas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Allergen and Food-Safety Awareness CheckSafety audit15%All nine major allergens correctly listed from memory and at least three of four scenario responses rated correct by instructorA brief practical safety check in which the student (1) lists from memory all nine FDA-recognized major food allergens, (2) reviews a four-item menu excerpt and verbally identifies which allergens are present and which disclosures are missing, and (3) responds to two short guest-scenario prompts describing how they would handle an allergen inquiry or a guest with a stated allergy; this check is aligned to ServSafe Manager food-allergen responsibilities and is a required pass to complete the course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-REST26-04 Trade course

Profit & Loss: Reading, Building, and Acting on Restaurant Financial Statements

91 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to read, construct, and interpret a full restaurant profit-and-loss statement—from gross sales through net operating income—using real-world data and industry-standard chart-of-accounts categories. Lessons build from foundational accounting vocabulary through prime-cost analysis, variance investigation, and corrective-action planning so students can make data-driven decisions as shift or unit managers. Content maps directly to the NRAEF ManageFirst Controlling Foodservice Costs competency area and supports the ServSafe Manager exam's cost-control and business-skills sections.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to read, construct, and interpret a full restaurant profit-and-loss statement—from gross sales through net operating income—using real-world data and industry-standard chart-of-accounts categories. Lessons build from foundational accounting vocabulary through prime-cost analysis, variance investigation, and corrective-action planning so students can make data-driven decisions as shift or unit managers. Content maps directly to the NRAEF ManageFirst Controlling Foodservice Costs competency area and supports the ServSafe Manager exam's cost-control and business-skills sections.

How the course runs. 8 blocks: The Language of Restaurant Finance: Accounting Vocabulary and Chart of Accounts; Revenue Lines: Tracking Sales by Category and Calculating Sales Mix; Cost of Goods Sold: Food Cost and Beverage Cost Calculations; Labor Cost: Wages, Benefits, and Prime Cost; Controllable and Non-Controllable Expenses: Building the Full P&L; Variance Analysis: Comparing Actual to Budget and Period over Period; Spreadsheet Automation: Building a Dynamic P&L Template with Conditional Formatting; Management Summary and Corrective-Action Planning: Turning P&L Data into Decisions.

What competent looks like. Construct a complete single-period restaurant P&L statement from raw revenue and expense data, correctly categorizing line items according to industry-standard chart-of-accounts conventions. Calculate prime cost, food-cost percentage, labor-cost percentage, and net operating income percentage, and compare results against stated benchmarks to identify favorable or unfavorable variances. Trace an unfavorable variance on a P&L to at least one plausible operational root cause and propose a measurable corrective action with a target timeline. Interpret a comparative (period-over-period) P&L to identify trends in revenue, controllable costs, and non-controllable costs, and present findings in a written management summary. Use a spreadsheet application to build a dynamic P&L template that auto-calculates percentages and flags out-of-range line items with conditional formatting. Explain the ethical and legal obligation to report financial data accurately, and describe how financial records support health-department, franchisor, and investor reporting requirements.

Lessons · 8 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Language of Restaurant Finance: Accounting Vocabulary and Chart of Accounts8theoryStudents define at least 20 core accounting terms and correctly classify 15 sample line items into the standard restaurant chart-of-accounts categories (revenue, cost of goods sold, labor, controllable expenses, non-controllable expenses, net income).
  1. Guided reading of a one-page sample restaurant P&L; students annotate each line item with its chart-of-accounts category using a color-coded legend provided by the instructor.
  2. Flashcard drill in pairs: one student reads an accounting term aloud (e.g., 'accrual,' 'depreciation,' 'gross profit'), partner gives a definition and a restaurant example; roles rotate every five minutes.
  3. Whole-class sorting exercise using printed line-item cards (food sales, beverage sales, hourly wages, manager salaries, rent, utilities, supplies, depreciation) pinned to a whiteboard P&L skeleton; class debates any disputed placements.
Sample single-unit restaurant P&L (instructor-prepared, figures rounded to whole dollars), National Restaurant Association 'Uniform System of Accounts for Restaurants' (current edition) excerpt, color markers, index cards, whiteboardTen-question written vocabulary quiz; students must score 8/10 (80%) to demonstrate mastery before advancing.
2Revenue Lines: Tracking Sales by Category and Calculating Sales Mix9theoryStudents calculate total net sales, sales-by-category percentages, and a basic sales-mix breakdown from a provided daily-sales report, with all figures accurate to within one cent.
  1. Instructor walks through a live POS end-of-day report projected on screen, identifying food sales, beverage sales, catering revenue, gift-card redemptions, and comps/voids; students take structured notes on a guided-notes sheet.
  2. Students receive a week's worth of simulated daily-sales reports and use a calculator to compute category totals, weekly net sales, and each category's percentage of total sales, then record results in a provided table.
  3. Small-group discussion: groups compare their computed sales-mix percentages and hypothesize how a shift in mix (e.g., higher beverage sales) would affect overall profitability before any cost changes; groups share one key insight with the class.
Simulated POS daily-sales reports (instructor-prepared), scientific calculators, guided-notes worksheet, whiteboard, projectorCompletion and accuracy check of the week's sales-mix table; all percentage calculations must match instructor key within ±0.5 percentage point; instructor initials each completed table.
3Cost of Goods Sold: Food Cost and Beverage Cost Calculations11labStudents calculate actual food-cost percentage and beverage-cost percentage for a simulated accounting period using the opening inventory, purchases, and closing inventory method, achieving results within ±1 percentage point of the instructor answer key.
  1. Instructor demonstrates the formula (Opening Inventory + Purchases − Closing Inventory = Cost of Goods Used) using a simple three-item example on the whiteboard, then connects it to the cost-of-goods-sold line on the P&L.
  2. Students receive a simulated inventory packet (opening count sheets, purchase invoices for four weeks, closing count sheets) and work independently to compute cost of goods used, then divide by net food sales to derive food-cost percentage.
  3. Lab debrief: students enter their computed figures into a shared class spreadsheet on the projector screen; outliers identify and correct their calculation errors with instructor guidance, reinforcing common mistake patterns (forgetting employee meals credit, double-counting a delivery).
Simulated inventory count sheets and purchase invoices (instructor-prepared), calculators, spreadsheet software (Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel), projector, 'Controlling Foodservice Costs' NRAEF ManageFirst textbook (current edition)Completed calculation worksheet submitted; food-cost % and beverage-cost % must each be within ±1 percentage point of key; students who fall outside range must redo the calculation before proceeding.
4Labor Cost: Wages, Benefits, and Prime Cost11labStudents calculate total labor cost (including taxes and benefits loaded onto a provided rate sheet) and prime cost for a simulated four-week period, then express both as percentages of net sales and compare against stated target benchmarks.
  1. Instructor explains the components of total labor cost (hourly wages, salaried management, payroll taxes, workers' compensation, employee benefits) using a sample payroll summary; students annotate which components a manager can control in the short term versus the long term.
  2. Students receive a simulated four-week payroll summary and a benefits-rate sheet, calculate total labor cost, add it to cost of goods sold computed in Lesson 3 to derive prime cost, then express prime cost as a percentage of net sales.
  3. Benchmark comparison exercise: students compare their computed prime-cost percentage against the instructor-provided benchmark range, write a one-paragraph assessment of whether the simulated restaurant is within range, and identify which labor category drove any excess.
Simulated payroll summary sheets, benefits-rate sheet (instructor-prepared), calculators, NRAEF ManageFirst 'Controlling Foodservice Costs' textbook, benchmark reference card (instructor-prepared summary of typical industry ranges for quick-service, casual, and fine dining)Prime-cost percentage calculation must match key within ±1 percentage point; written benchmark paragraph graded on a four-point rubric (accuracy of comparison, correct identification of cost driver, professional language, completeness); minimum 3/4 to pass.
5Controllable and Non-Controllable Expenses: Building the Full P&L12.5practiceStudents assemble all sections of a restaurant P&L—revenue, cost of goods sold, labor, controllable expenses, non-controllable expenses, and net operating income—into a correctly formatted single-period statement that balances and shows accurate line-item percentages.
  1. Instructor models the full P&L build on a projected spreadsheet using a fictional restaurant scenario, narrating each line item and explaining the managerial distinction between controllable costs (supplies, marketing, utilities) and non-controllable costs (rent, insurance, depreciation).
  2. Students receive a data packet containing net sales, COGS figures from earlier labs, payroll figures, and a list of controllable and non-controllable expense amounts; they build their own complete P&L on paper first, then transfer it into a provided spreadsheet shell.
  3. Peer-review pairs exchange completed spreadsheets, check each other's category placements and percentage formulas, and document any discrepancies on a peer-review form; discrepancies are resolved together before instructor spot-check.
Data packet (instructor-prepared), spreadsheet shell (Google Sheets or Excel, pre-formatted with headers), calculators, projector, NRAEF ManageFirst textbook, peer-review formCompleted P&L spreadsheet: all line items in correct category, all percentages calculated by formula (not typed), net operating income figure matches key within ±$1.00; peer-review form must document at least one item checked; instructor spot-checks three random line items per student.
6Variance Analysis: Comparing Actual to Budget and Period over Period12.5practiceStudents identify all line items with variances exceeding a stated threshold on a comparative P&L, classify each variance as favorable or unfavorable, and propose at least one operational root cause per flagged line item.
  1. Instructor presents the concept of variance (actual minus budget, or current period minus prior period) and demonstrates favorable versus unfavorable interpretation for both revenue and expense lines, using two projected P&L columns side by side.
  2. Students receive a two-column comparative P&L (current period vs. budget) for a simulated casual-dining restaurant and complete a variance worksheet: calculate dollar variance, percentage variance, label F or U, and write a one-sentence root-cause hypothesis for any variance exceeding ±3 percentage points.
  3. Class shares root-cause hypotheses aloud; instructor facilitates discussion connecting each hypothesis to a realistic operational scenario (e.g., a spike in food cost traced to a supplier price increase versus over-portioning versus theft), reinforcing that P&L analysis always requires investigation beyond the numbers.
Two-column comparative P&L handout (instructor-prepared), variance worksheet, calculators, whiteboard for class discussion, NRAEF ManageFirst textbookVariance worksheet: all dollar and percentage variances calculated correctly (within ±0.5 pp), all F/U labels correct, and each flagged variance has a plausible written root-cause hypothesis; minimum 80% of items correct to pass.
7Spreadsheet Automation: Building a Dynamic P&L Template with Conditional Formatting12.5labStudents build a fully functional restaurant P&L spreadsheet template from a blank workbook that auto-calculates all percentage fields and highlights any line item outside an instructor-specified benchmark range using conditional formatting.
  1. Instructor demonstrates how to enter formulas for percentage-of-sales calculations and how to apply conditional formatting rules (e.g., food-cost cell turns red if value exceeds a set threshold) in a live coding session on the projected screen; students follow along on their own machines.
  2. Students build their own template from a blank workbook: enter chart-of-accounts labels, write SUM and division formulas, link totals across sections, and apply conditional formatting for at least four benchmark-sensitive line items (food cost, beverage cost, labor cost, prime cost).
  3. Students import a new set of raw data into their finished template, confirm that all formulas populate correctly and conditional formatting triggers as expected, then save and submit the file; students write a two-sentence note explaining what an operator should do when a red-flagged cell appears.
Computers with Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel, instructor demo file for reference, raw data import file (instructor-prepared CSV), spreadsheet-skills reference handout, projectorSubmitted spreadsheet file evaluated on a checklist: correct formulas in all percentage cells (no hard-coded values), conditional formatting active on at least four cells, totals and subtotals balance, new data populates without formula errors; all checklist items must be met to pass.
8Management Summary and Corrective-Action Planning: Turning P&L Data into Decisions14.5practiceStudents write a two-page management summary interpreting a provided P&L, identify the top two financial concerns, and propose a specific, measurable corrective-action plan with assigned responsibility and a target completion date.
  1. Students review a completed two-period comparative P&L for a fictional restaurant that shows an unfavorable prime-cost trend and declining net operating income; in small groups, they identify and rank the top three concerns using a structured prioritization matrix.
  2. Each student independently drafts a written management summary addressed to a general manager that (a) states overall financial performance in plain language, (b) explains the two most critical variances with supporting data cited from the P&L, and (c) proposes a corrective-action plan with a specific metric target, a responsible party, and a timeline.
  3. Paired oral rehearsal: students take turns presenting their summary in under three minutes as if in a manager meeting; partners give feedback on clarity, use of specific numbers, and professional tone using a provided peer-feedback form; students revise their written summary before final submission.
Two-period comparative P&L handout (instructor-prepared), prioritization matrix template, peer-feedback form, word-processing software or lined paper, style guide excerpt (professional memo format)Written management summary graded on a six-point rubric: accurate data citation from the P&L (2 pts), correct identification of top two concerns (1 pt), measurable corrective-action targets (1 pt), assigned responsibility and timeline (1 pt), professional written language (1 pt); minimum 5/6 to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
P&L Knowledge ExaminationWritten exam25%75% (38/50 points)A 50-question written exam covering accounting vocabulary, chart-of-accounts classification, cost percentage formulas, prime-cost concepts, variance interpretation, and the distinction between controllable and non-controllable expenses; questions are multiple-choice and short-answer, drawn from all eight lesson objectives and aligned to the NRAEF ManageFirst Controlling Foodservice Costs competency area.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Full P&L Build Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All six checklist criteria met; net operating income within ±$2.00 of evaluator keyGiven a new, unseen data packet, the student independently builds a complete, correctly formatted restaurant P&L in a spreadsheet within 90 minutes, labels all sections, writes percentage formulas (no hard-coded values), applies conditional formatting, and presents a two-minute verbal interpretation of the results to the evaluator; the evaluator uses a six-criteria rubric covering accuracy, format, formula integrity, conditional formatting, interpretation, and professional communication.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Calculation LogLog15%All five lab submissions scored ≥80% on their respective check-for criteria; no outstanding incomplete submissionsA collected portfolio of the student's completed calculation worksheets and spreadsheet files from Lessons 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (inventory COGS, prime cost, full P&L build, variance analysis, and dynamic template), reviewed holistically to confirm consistent accuracy, correct formula use, and proper documentation across the course's quantitative lab work.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Financial Data Integrity and Ethics Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on all four scenario responses; any response indicating willingness to falsify data is an automatic non-pass requiring remediation before course credit is awardedA four-scenario written check in which the student is presented with realistic pressures to alter, omit, or misrepresent P&L figures (e.g., a supervisor asking to move an expense to the next period to hit a bonus target) and must identify the ethical problem, state the potential legal or regulatory consequence, and describe the correct action; this assessment directly supports the program's professional-standards outcomes and the NRAEF ManageFirst ethics competency.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-REST26-05 Trade course

Staffing for Restaurant Operations

91 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

This course develops the skills restaurant managers need to recruit, hire, schedule, train, supervise, and legally separate employees in a food-service environment. Students apply federal and state employment law principles, labor-cost controls, and performance-management techniques to realistic restaurant scenarios. Lessons are mapped to NRAEF ManageFirst Human Resources Management & Supervision competencies and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor exam domains.

Outcomes
Course text

This course develops the skills restaurant managers need to recruit, hire, schedule, train, supervise, and legally separate employees in a food-service environment. Students apply federal and state employment law principles, labor-cost controls, and performance-management techniques to realistic restaurant scenarios. Lessons are mapped to NRAEF ManageFirst Human Resources Management & Supervision competencies and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor exam domains.

How the course runs. 8 blocks: The Restaurant Workforce: Employment Law Foundations; Job Analysis, Job Descriptions, and Recruitment; Legal Interviewing and Selection; Onboarding, Orientation, and Job Instruction Training; Scheduling: Labor Forecasting and Schedule Building; Supervision, Motivation, and Performance Management; Wage and Hour Compliance and Payroll Basics; Employee Separation, Turnover Analysis, and Retention Strategies.

What competent looks like. Write a legally compliant job description and conduct a structured interview that avoids prohibited questions under federal equal employment opportunity law. Build a weekly labor schedule that meets projected guest-count demand while keeping labor cost within a manager-set percentage target. Design and deliver a new-hire orientation and 30-day on-the-job training plan using the four-step Job Instruction Training method. Apply progressive discipline procedures and document performance issues in writing in a manner consistent with at-will employment best practices. Calculate straight-time and overtime pay correctly under the Fair Labor Standards Act and identify common wage-and-hour compliance risks. Demonstrate lawful and respectful separation procedures, including termination documentation and final-pay timing requirements.

Lessons · 8 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Restaurant Workforce: Employment Law Foundations11theoryStudents will identify the key federal employment laws that govern restaurant hiring, pay, and termination and explain how each limits or guides management decisions.
  1. Lecture and guided notes covering Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FLSA, and IRCA I-9 requirements; students complete a federal-law matching chart.
  2. Case-study analysis: students read four short scenarios (each describing a manager action) and identify which law applies, whether a violation occurred, and what the manager should have done instead.
  3. Small-group discussion comparing at-will employment with for-cause termination; each group presents one real-world example of each doctrine to the class.
NRAEF ManageFirst Human Resources Management & Supervision textbook (current edition), U.S. DOL Wage and Hour Division fact sheets (public domain), EEOC 'Know Your Rights' poster, whiteboard, guided-notes handoutExit quiz of 20 multiple-choice questions covering each federal law; students must score 75% or higher to demonstrate baseline legal literacy before moving to hiring practices.
2Job Analysis, Job Descriptions, and Recruitment11practiceStudents will conduct a task-based job analysis for a restaurant position and produce a complete, legally compliant job description that can be posted for recruitment.
  1. Instructor models a job analysis for a line cook role using a task-inventory worksheet; students then conduct a parallel analysis for a server role by observing a video of service tasks and listing duties, KSAs (knowledge, skills, abilities), and working conditions.
  2. Students draft a full job description (job title, FLSA classification, summary, essential functions, qualifications, physical demands, reporting relationship) for the server role using a provided template; peer pairs exchange drafts and flag any language that could create legal exposure.
  3. Recruitment sourcing exercise: students identify five recruitment channels appropriate to their local labor market (job boards, social media, employee referral, community college posting, walk-in application), list the cost and likely applicant pool for each, and rank them by cost-effectiveness for a 15-seat café opening.
Job analysis task-inventory worksheet, sample ADA-compliant job description template, NRAEF ManageFirst textbook Chapter on Staffing, internet-connected computer per student, peer-review rubricInstructor scores completed job description against a 10-point rubric (essential functions present, FLSA status labeled, qualifications job-related, no prohibited criteria, physical demands listed); 8/10 required to pass.
3Legal Interviewing and Selection11demoStudents will conduct a structured behavioral interview using pre-approved questions and correctly redirect or decline to answer questions that would elicit protected-class information.
  1. Instructor demonstrates a 10-minute structured interview for a shift-lead position, narrating choices: use of the same question set for every candidate, note-taking on observable behaviors, and how to politely decline an applicant's volunteered protected information.
  2. Students work in triads (interviewer, applicant, observer) and rotate through three 10-minute mock interviews using a provided question bank; the observer scores the interviewer on the structured-interview rubric and provides immediate feedback.
  3. Whole-class debrief: instructor presents 15 interview questions written on cards; students sort them into 'permitted,' 'prohibited,' or 'permitted if reworded' and explain their reasoning aloud, with instructor correction as needed.
Structured interview question bank (30 behavioral questions), EEOC pre-employment inquiry guidelines handout, structured-interview scoring rubric, role cards for applicant personas, timerObserver rubric score on final mock-interview rotation: student must score 80% or higher across five criteria (consistent question use, behavior-focused follow-up, no prohibited inquiries, appropriate note-taking, professional rapport); instructor reviews all observer sheets.
4Onboarding, Orientation, and Job Instruction Training12labStudents will design and deliver a new-hire orientation agenda and a skills lesson using the four-step Job Instruction Training (JIT) method for a back-of-house task.
  1. Students map a two-hour new-hire orientation agenda for a quick-service restaurant covering company culture, safety rules (including OSHA hazard-communication and lockout/tagout awareness for kitchen equipment), handbook acknowledgment, uniform policy, and I-9 completion timeline; agendas are shared and critiqued in pairs.
  2. Instructor models the JIT four-step method (Prepare the learner, Present the operation, Try out performance, Follow up) using the task of correctly calibrating and reading a bimetallic stem thermometer; students take structured notes on each step.
  3. Each student selects a simple kitchen task (hand-washing procedure, setting a cover, labeling and dating a food-storage container) and delivers a 6-minute JIT lesson to a peer; the peer completes the task and the trainer scores their own delivery on a JIT checklist.
New-hire orientation agenda template, OSHA hazard-communication overview handout, sample employee handbook (provided by instructor), bimetallic stem thermometers, food-storage containers with labels, JIT four-step checklist, timerJIT checklist self-score confirmed by instructor observation; student must demonstrate all four steps in correct order and the peer trainee must perform the task correctly on the first try-out; if the trainee fails, the student trainer must identify the instructional gap and redeliver before passing.
5Scheduling: Labor Forecasting and Schedule Building12labStudents will build a seven-day labor schedule for a full-service restaurant that meets projected guest counts, complies with break and minor-labor rules, and achieves a target labor-cost percentage set by the instructor.
  1. Instructor presents a guest-count forecast for one week (covers by day-part) and the restaurant's labor budget percentage; students calculate the total labor hours and dollars available each day using the formula: labor cost dollars = projected sales × labor cost percentage, then convert dollars to hours using average wage rates.
  2. Students complete a scheduling worksheet assigning FOH and BOH staff to shifts, ensuring minimum staff levels per day-part, noting which employees are minors (applying federal FLSA restrictions on hours and hazardous tasks for workers under 18), and flagging any shifts that would trigger overtime.
  3. Pairs swap completed schedules and perform a compliance audit: they check for missed breaks (using the state example provided by instructor), unintended overtime, undercover day-parts, and any minor-labor restrictions violated; findings are written up as a one-page memo to the 'general manager.'
Guest-count forecast worksheet, scheduling grid template (paper and spreadsheet version), FLSA minor-labor restrictions summary sheet, calculator, sample state break-requirement handout (instructor-selected state), average wage-rate cardCompleted schedule is graded on a rubric: labor cost within ±1% of target (30 pts), no FLSA minor violations (20 pts), no unplanned overtime (20 pts), minimum staffing met every day-part (20 pts), legible and complete (10 pts); 75/100 required to pass.
6Supervision, Motivation, and Performance Management12theoryStudents will distinguish between supervisory leadership styles, select an appropriate style for a given restaurant scenario, and write a corrective-action document that meets progressive-discipline standards.
  1. Lecture on situational leadership applied to restaurant supervision (directing, coaching, supporting, delegating matched to employee competence and commitment levels); students complete a four-quadrant situational-leadership worksheet using eight employee-scenario cards.
  2. Instructor presents a progressive-discipline model (verbal warning → written warning → final written warning → termination) and walks through a sample written warning for repeated tardiness; students then individually write a corrective-action document for a new scenario (employee repeatedly using a cell phone during service) using a provided form.
  3. Role-play in pairs: one student acts as manager delivering a corrective-action conversation following a DESCRIBE-EXPRESS-SPECIFY-CONSEQUENCES structure; the other acts as the employee; roles then reverse; class debrief surfaces common errors (vague language, emotional tone, failure to document).
NRAEF ManageFirst textbook supervision chapters, AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor study guide relevant sections, situational-leadership worksheet, corrective-action form template, scenario cards, role-play observer checklistWritten corrective-action document scored on rubric: specific behavior described with dates and witnesses (25 pts), impact on operation stated (20 pts), expected standard referenced (20 pts), improvement steps listed (20 pts), consequence of non-improvement stated (15 pts); 75/100 required.
7Wage and Hour Compliance and Payroll Basics11practiceStudents will calculate gross pay for tipped and non-tipped restaurant employees — including overtime — and identify at least three common wage-and-hour violations specific to the food-service industry.
  1. Instructor reviews FLSA overtime rule (time-and-one-half for hours over 40 in a workweek), the federal tipped-employee minimum cash wage, and the tip-credit mechanism; students complete a 10-problem pay-calculation worksheet covering regular pay, overtime pay, and tipped-employee scenarios using current federal rates.
  2. Students examine three anonymized DOL investigation summaries (publicly available from DOL.gov) involving restaurants cited for wage-and-hour violations; they identify the violation type, the affected workers, and what payroll practice would have prevented it, then present findings to the class.
  3. Payroll-period simulation: each student receives a mock time card for a five-employee team for one week (including one employee who punched in early multiple days and one tipped server); they calculate each employee's gross pay and flag any compliance issues in a brief written summary.
FLSA Wage and Hour fact sheets from DOL.gov (current, public domain), pay-calculation worksheet, mock time cards, calculator, DOL investigation summary excerpts, current federal minimum wage and tip-credit rate reference cardPay-calculation worksheet graded for arithmetic accuracy and correct overtime identification; students must score 80% or higher (8 of 10 problems correct, with overtime calculated correctly in all applicable problems) to demonstrate payroll competence.
8Employee Separation, Turnover Analysis, and Retention Strategies11theoryStudents will conduct a lawful termination using correct documentation and calculate and interpret a restaurant's annualized turnover rate to recommend at least two evidence-based retention interventions.
  1. Instructor presents the elements of a termination meeting (private location, witness present, brief and factual delivery, collection of company property, final-pay timing overview, unemployment insurance process); students role-play a termination scenario in triads using a checklist, then debrief on what made it lawful and respectful.
  2. Students calculate annualized turnover rate for two provided restaurant scenarios using the standard formula (number of separations ÷ average number of employees × 100) and compare the results to National Restaurant Association industry benchmarks cited in the NRAEF textbook; they identify whether each rate is above or below the industry norm.
  3. Each student writes a one-page retention memo addressed to a restaurant owner that (a) identifies the top two root causes of turnover from a provided exit-interview data set, (b) recommends two specific, actionable retention strategies supported by reasoning from course materials, and (c) estimates one non-monetary and one monetary cost of the current turnover rate.
Termination checklist and documentation form template, separation-meeting role-play scenario cards, turnover-rate formula reference, NRAEF ManageFirst textbook industry-benchmark data, anonymized exit-interview data set (instructor-prepared), retention-memo templateRetention memo scored on rubric: correct turnover-rate calculation with formula shown (20 pts), two root causes supported by exit-interview data (25 pts), two specific and feasible retention strategies with rationale (35 pts), cost estimate attempted with logical reasoning (20 pts); 75/100 required to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Employment Law and Staffing Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% (75/100 points)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering federal employment law (FLSA, Title VII, ADA, IRCA), legal interviewing, progressive discipline, wage-and-hour calculations, and turnover analysis; questions are aligned to NRAEF ManageFirst Human Resources Management & Supervision exam competencies and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor exam domains. Students have 90 minutes and must score 75 or higher to pass.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Structured Interview and JIT Delivery Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%80% on each of two rubrics scored independently by the instructorThe student conducts a 10-minute structured behavioral interview with a role-play applicant, then immediately delivers a 6-minute Job Instruction Training lesson for an assigned kitchen task to a second peer; the instructor scores both performances live using the course rubrics for legal interviewing and JIT four-step method. Both components must reach 80% independently; a failure on either requires a remediation session and one retake.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Scheduling and Payroll Lab LogLog15%75% aggregate across all lab submissionsStudents compile their completed scheduling worksheet (Lesson 5) and payroll-calculation worksheet (Lesson 7) into a lab log with a one-page reflection identifying one error they corrected during peer audit and one real-world consequence that error could have caused; the instructor grades all three components using the lesson rubrics and averages them. An aggregate score below 75% requires the student to redo the lower-scoring component.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Employment Documentation Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on all five critical compliance items; non-critical items at 80%The instructor presents each student with a packet of simulated employment documents (a job description, an interview scoresheet, a corrective-action form, a termination checklist, and a time card with overtime) and asks the student to identify and correct any errors; five items are flagged as critical compliance failures (prohibited interview question, missing I-9 deadline, incorrect overtime calculation, missing witness on termination form, minor-labor violation on time card) and must all be correctly identified and corrected for a pass, reflecting the zero-tolerance standard required for legal and safety compliance in workforce management.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-REST26-06 Trade course

Purchasing for Restaurant Operations

91 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

This course trains learners to manage the complete purchasing cycle for a food-service operation: writing specifications, selecting and evaluating suppliers, issuing purchase orders, receiving and storing deliveries, and controlling inventory to meet cost targets. Students apply trade math—yield factors, unit cost conversions, par levels, and vendor bid analysis—to real purchasing decisions. Lessons map directly to ManageFirst Purchasing and Cost Control competencies and reinforce ServSafe-aligned receiving and storage standards.

Outcomes
Course text

This course trains learners to manage the complete purchasing cycle for a food-service operation: writing specifications, selecting and evaluating suppliers, issuing purchase orders, receiving and storing deliveries, and controlling inventory to meet cost targets. Students apply trade math—yield factors, unit cost conversions, par levels, and vendor bid analysis—to real purchasing decisions. Lessons map directly to ManageFirst Purchasing and Cost Control competencies and reinforce ServSafe-aligned receiving and storage standards.

How the course runs. 8 blocks: The Purchasing Cycle and the Buyer's Role; Writing Product Specifications; Purchasing Math: Yield, Unit Cost, and Bid Analysis; Supplier Selection, Vendor Relationships, and Purchase Orders; Receiving: Inspection, Temperature, and Documentation; Storage, Stock Rotation, and FIFO; Inventory Control: Perpetual Systems, Physical Counts, and Turnover; Safety in Purchasing Operations: Material Handling, PPE, and Hazard Awareness.

What competent looks like. Write a complete product specification for a food, beverage, or supply item that includes grade, pack size, unit of measure, and quality standards. Calculate as-purchased cost, edible-portion cost, and yield percentage using standard food-service formulas accurate to two decimal places. Evaluate competing vendor bids using a weighted scorecard and select the best-value supplier with documented rationale. Execute a receiving inspection—checking invoice, temperature, weight, and product quality—and correctly reject or accept a delivery according to ServSafe and establishment standards. Perform a perpetual and physical inventory count, calculate inventory turnover rate, and identify variance between book and actual figures. Demonstrate compliance with safe material-handling practices, including proper PPE use and OSHA-aligned lifting and storage procedures, throughout all purchasing lab activities.

Lessons · 8 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Purchasing Cycle and the Buyer's Role9theoryStudents will describe each stage of the restaurant purchasing cycle—need identification, specification writing, vendor selection, ordering, receiving, storage, and payment—and explain the buyer's legal and ethical responsibilities.
  1. Annotate a flowchart of the full purchasing cycle for a hypothetical mid-scale restaurant, labeling each stage and naming the employee role responsible at each step.
  2. Read and discuss case vignettes on ethical dilemmas (supplier gifts, sole-source relationships, conflict of interest) and write a one-paragraph policy recommendation for each.
  3. Map purchasing cycle stages to ManageFirst Purchasing exam content areas using the NRAEF ManageFirst competency list, noting which stages appear on the credential exam.
NRAEF ManageFirst Purchasing textbook (current edition), purchasing cycle flowchart handout, case vignette packet, whiteboardExit quiz: 10 multiple-choice questions covering cycle stages, buyer responsibilities, and ethics—minimum 70% correct to proceed.
2Writing Product Specifications12practiceStudents will draft accurate product specifications for at least five commodity categories—protein, produce, dairy, dry goods, and non-food supplies—using USDA grade standards and industry format.
  1. Examine sample specs for USDA Choice beef, Grade A eggs, and a cleaning supply; identify the required fields (item name, grade/brand, pack size, unit of measure, intended use, quality indicators) and critique each sample for completeness.
  2. Working in pairs, write original specs for six assigned items from a provided ingredient list, referencing current USDA Agricultural Marketing Service grade standards for food items.
  3. Conduct a blind spec review: exchange specs with another pair, score them on a rubric (all required fields present, correct USDA grade cited, measurable quality indicators), and give written feedback.
NRAEF ManageFirst Purchasing textbook, USDA AMS grade standards reference sheets, spec-writing template, ruler and scale for package inspection, sample physical products or photographsInstructor grades completed spec set using the class rubric; all six specs must score 80% or higher (all required fields, correct grades, measurable standards) to pass this lesson.
3Purchasing Math: Yield, Unit Cost, and Bid Analysis14labStudents will accurately calculate as-purchased (AP) cost, edible-portion (EP) cost, yield percentage, and cost per edible pound, and use these figures to compare competing vendor bids on a multi-item order.
  1. Complete a structured drill set of 20 AP/EP/yield problems using the formulas EP cost = AP cost ÷ yield % and yield % = edible weight ÷ AP weight × 100, checking answers against an answer key.
  2. Fabricate a whole chicken and a head of romaine in the kitchen lab, weigh AP and EP portions on a digital scale, record results, and calculate actual yield percentages; compare to NRAEF published reference yields.
  3. Receive three simulated vendor bid sheets for the same 10-item order, convert all prices to a common unit (cost per pound or cost per case), apply yield factors to proteins, and complete a bid comparison matrix to identify the lowest true EP cost per item.
Calculators, digital kitchen scale (accurate to 0.1 oz), whole chickens, romaine heads, cutting boards, chef knives, bid comparison matrix worksheet, NRAEF ManageFirst Purchasing textbook yield-factor tablesLab worksheet graded: all 20 drill problems correct within rounding tolerance of ±$0.02; fabrication yield % within ±3 percentage points of reference yield; bid matrix identifies lowest EP cost correctly on at least 9 of 10 items. 90% accuracy required to pass.
4Supplier Selection, Vendor Relationships, and Purchase Orders11demoStudents will evaluate three mock vendor proposals using a weighted-criteria scorecard, select a primary and backup supplier, and complete a formatted purchase order correctly.
  1. Instructor demonstrates a live vendor negotiation roleplay, narrating the decision logic for pricing, delivery frequency, minimum order, credit terms, and reliability—students take observation notes using a structured guide.
  2. Student teams apply a weighted scorecard (price 40%, reliability 25%, delivery terms 20%, service 15%) to three provided vendor profiles for a produce category and produce a written recommendation with supporting math.
  3. Each student completes a blank purchase order form for a 12-item order, including vendor name, item descriptions matching the specs written in Lesson 2, quantities, unit prices from the selected bid, and extended totals; totals are verified with a calculator.
Vendor profile packets, weighted scorecard template, blank purchase order forms, calculators, NRAEF ManageFirst Purchasing textbook chapter on supplier relationshipsPurchase order checked for all required fields and accurate extended totals (zero arithmetic errors allowed); scorecard recommendation must include correct weighted score calculations. Pass = 100% accuracy on PO math and all fields populated.
5Receiving: Inspection, Temperature, and Documentation14labStudents will conduct a complete receiving inspection—verifying invoice accuracy, checking product temperatures with a calibrated thermometer, assessing quality against spec, and completing a receiving log—and correctly reject or accept each item.
  1. Calibrate a dial thermometer using the ice-point method and a digital thermometer using the boiling-point method; record calibration results on a temperature log and identify which thermometer type is preferred for thin products.
  2. Process a simulated 10-item delivery in the kitchen lab: check each item against the purchase order and spec, take product temperatures (proper insertion technique for proteins, using infrared for packaged items), record results, and flag two intentionally out-of-spec items (an above-temperature fish fillet and a bruised produce item) for rejection.
  3. Complete a receiving report that records accepted quantities, rejected items with documented reason, corrected invoice total, and required signatures; role-play a professional conversation with the 'driver' (played by another student) to refuse the rejected items.
Dial and digital stem thermometers, ice bath, calibration log forms, simulated delivery items (proteins, produce, dairy, dry goods), purchase order copies, receiving log forms, ServSafe Manager textbook (receiving and storage chapter)Observer checklist completed by instructor: thermometer calibrated correctly, all 10 item temps recorded within ±2°F of reference thermometer, both out-of-spec items correctly rejected with written reason, receiving log fully completed. All checklist items must be marked correct to pass.
6Storage, Stock Rotation, and FIFO10practiceStudents will organize a multi-category storeroom delivery using FIFO rotation, correct storage temperature zones, and proper shelving sequence to prevent cross-contamination, in accordance with ServSafe standards.
  1. Label and date-mark 20 simulated products (proteins, dairy, produce, ready-to-eat items) using date labels, then arrange them in a mock walk-in cooler display (shelving unit) in the correct ServSafe top-to-bottom order: ready-to-eat on top, whole fish, whole cuts, ground meat, poultry on the bottom.
  2. Conduct a FIFO rotation drill: given a shelf with existing dated stock and a new delivery, move older items forward and place newer items behind; an observer checks that no older item is behind a newer one.
  3. Audit the storeroom for five planted violations (unlabeled container, item stored on floor, cleaning chemical above food, thawing protein at room temperature, expired date label) and write a corrective action for each on a storeroom audit form.
Date labels, permanent markers, shelving unit or mock walk-in display, assorted labeled food containers (simulated), storeroom audit form, ServSafe Manager textbookStoreroom audit form: all five violations identified with correct corrective action (100% required); FIFO rotation drill: observer confirms zero older items behind newer items. ServSafe storage order must be correct top-to-bottom.
7Inventory Control: Perpetual Systems, Physical Counts, and Turnover14labStudents will record transactions in a perpetual inventory log, conduct a physical inventory count, calculate inventory turnover rate and variance, and identify items requiring reorder or investigation.
  1. Using a provided perpetual inventory spreadsheet pre-loaded with beginning balances, enter a week's worth of receiving and requisition transactions for a 15-item storeroom; verify ending balance for each item using the formula: Beginning + Received − Issued = Ending.
  2. Conduct a physical count of a stocked mock storeroom (15–20 labeled containers with actual or simulated quantities), record counts on count sheets, extend each item at its unit cost, and total the physical inventory value.
  3. Compare physical count results to the perpetual ledger ending balances, calculate variance in units and dollars for each item, flag items with variance above an instructor-set threshold (e.g., more than 5% of unit cost), and calculate inventory turnover rate using the formula: Cost of Food Sold ÷ Average Inventory.
Perpetual inventory spreadsheet (Excel or printed), stocked mock storeroom with labeled containers, physical count sheets, calculators, NRAEF ManageFirst Purchasing textbook (inventory chapter)Spreadsheet graded: all 15 perpetual balances accurate (zero arithmetic errors); physical count extensions accurate within ±$0.05 per line; turnover rate calculated correctly; all items above variance threshold flagged. 95% line-item accuracy required to pass.
8Safety in Purchasing Operations: Material Handling, PPE, and Hazard Awareness7fieldStudents will demonstrate safe manual lifting technique, proper PPE selection for receiving and storage tasks, and correct response to a chemical storage hazard in the receiving area, meeting OSHA general industry manual-handling guidelines.
  1. Practice and be observed performing the OSHA-recommended straight-back, bent-knee lift with a 40-lb case: feet shoulder-width apart, load held close to body, no twisting—instructor uses a safety observation checklist to give feedback.
  2. Select the correct PPE (cut-resistant gloves for box cutting, non-slip footwear for wet receiving docks, insulated gloves for freezer entry) from a PPE station for three scenario cards describing different receiving tasks, and explain the hazard each item controls.
  3. Locate the SDS for a sanitizing chemical stocked in a mock receiving area, identify the first-aid section and PPE requirements, and verbally explain what action to take if the chemical spills on skin—then demonstrate the eye-wash station flush procedure.
40-lb case or equivalent, PPE station with gloves (cut-resistant, insulated), non-slip footwear samples, scenario cards, SDS binder, eye-wash station (or demonstration unit), OSHA 10 reference handout on manual handling, safety observation checklistSafety observation checklist: all five lifting-technique criteria checked correct; correct PPE selected for all three scenarios with accurate hazard explanation; SDS correctly interpreted and eye-wash procedure demonstrated correctly. All items must be marked satisfactory to pass (no partial credit on safety).
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Purchasing Fundamentals Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% or higher (42 of 60 points)A 60-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering the purchasing cycle, product specifications, USDA grade standards, vendor selection criteria, purchase order components, receiving standards, FIFO and storage rules, and inventory formulas. Questions are drawn from ManageFirst Purchasing exam content areas and ServSafe receiving/storage competencies to provide direct credential exam alignment.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Integrated Receiving and Inventory Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All critical steps (temperature check, rejection decision, FIFO placement, perpetual log entry) performed correctly; overall checklist score 80% or higherThe student independently processes a 12-item simulated delivery: calibrates a thermometer, inspects each item against a spec and purchase order, records temperatures, accepts or rejects items with documented reason, places accepted items in correct FIFO and storage-order position, and posts receipts to a perpetual inventory log. An instructor scores performance against a step-by-step checklist in real time.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Purchasing Lab LogLog15%Eight of eight lessons documented; all calculations verified accurate within stated tolerances; no safety violations recordedStudents maintain a running lab log throughout the course capturing all calculation worksheets, receiving logs, inventory count sheets, bid comparison matrices, and storeroom audit forms completed in labs and practice sessions. The compiled log is submitted at the end of the course and graded for completeness, mathematical accuracy, and legible professional documentation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety Compliance CheckSafety audit15%100% on all six safety criteria—no exceptions; any missed item requires immediate re-demonstration before course completion is recordedThe instructor administers a direct observation safety check covering: correct straight-back lift technique with a weighted case, appropriate PPE selected and donned for a receiving scenario, correct SDS location and hazard identification for a chemical in the receiving area, proper thermometer calibration, correct refrigeration temperature zone identification, and identification of a cross-contamination risk in a storeroom layout. This check is pass/fail on every individual criterion.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-REST26-07 Trade course

Point-of-Sale Systems in Restaurant Operations

91 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to configure, operate, and troubleshoot modern restaurant point-of-sale systems, connecting POS data to cost control, staffing, and sales reporting. The course covers hardware setup, menu programming, transaction processing, end-of-day reporting, and data security as practiced in full-service and quick-service environments. Lessons map to NRAEF ManageFirst competencies in technology and financial management and support ServSafe Manager awareness of digital food-safety documentation.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to configure, operate, and troubleshoot modern restaurant point-of-sale systems, connecting POS data to cost control, staffing, and sales reporting. The course covers hardware setup, menu programming, transaction processing, end-of-day reporting, and data security as practiced in full-service and quick-service environments. Lessons map to NRAEF ManageFirst competencies in technology and financial management and support ServSafe Manager awareness of digital food-safety documentation.

How the course runs. 8 blocks: POS Landscape: Hardware, Software, and the Restaurant Ecosystem; Menu Programming: Items, Modifiers, and Pricing; Transaction Processing: Dine-In, Takeout, and Payment Methods; POS Data Security and PCI DSS Fundamentals; End-of-Day Reporting and Sales Analysis; Inventory Tracking and Purchase Order Integration; POS Troubleshooting and Hardware Maintenance; POS Data Export and P&L Variance Reporting.

What competent looks like. Operate a restaurant POS terminal to process dine-in, takeaway, and split-check transactions accurately with zero cash-handling errors on a timed skills demo. Program and modify a menu in POS software, including items, modifiers, pricing tiers, and tax rates, producing a printed menu report that matches a supplied specification sheet. Generate and interpret daily, weekly, and shift-level POS sales reports to calculate actual food cost percentage and labor cost percentage within ±1% of instructor-calculated benchmarks. Identify and apply PCI DSS cardholder data security practices and restaurant-specific data privacy responsibilities when processing card transactions at the terminal. Troubleshoot at least five common POS hardware and software faults—including receipt printer jams, drawer failures, and network drops—using manufacturer documentation and a structured fault-isolation method. Export POS report data into a spreadsheet and produce a formatted P&L variance summary that can be presented to a supervisor in a professional written format.

Lessons · 8 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1POS Landscape: Hardware, Software, and the Restaurant Ecosystem9theoryStudents identify and explain the function of each major POS hardware component and the role of cloud-based versus on-premise POS architecture in restaurant operations.
  1. Label a physical diagram of a full POS station—terminal, cash drawer, receipt printer, kitchen display system (KDS), and card reader—and write one sentence on each component's function in daily service.
  2. Compare two restaurant POS platforms (e.g., one cloud-based, one on-premise) using vendor spec sheets; complete a structured T-chart noting cost, reliability, and update implications.
  3. Participate in a guided instructor walkthrough of a live or simulated POS back-office dashboard, taking structured notes on menu, reporting, and user-management sections.
POS terminal (training unit or simulator), manufacturer quick-start guides, vendor comparison handouts, projector, student note-taking template10-question identification quiz on hardware components and architecture types; students must score 80% or higher to proceed.
2Menu Programming: Items, Modifiers, and Pricing13labStudents build a fully functional POS menu from a supplied recipe and pricing specification sheet, including forced and optional modifiers and at least two tax rate categories.
  1. Enter a 30-item sample menu into the POS training software, assigning each item to the correct category, price, and printer routing (bar vs. kitchen), then print a menu report and check it against the spec sheet.
  2. Program a set of forced modifiers (e.g., steak temperature, dressing choice) and optional add-ons (e.g., extra cheese, side substitution) for five menu items, verifying they display correctly on the order screen.
  3. Simulate a happy-hour pricing scenario by creating a time-based price level and confirm that the system switches rates at the scheduled time, documenting each step in a lab log.
POS training software with back-office access (cloud or local training instance), specification sheet packet, printed menu template, lab log workbookInstructor checks printed menu report against the spec sheet; all 30 items must be present and correct with zero pricing errors and all required modifiers present for a pass.
3Transaction Processing: Dine-In, Takeout, and Payment Methods12practiceStudents process a sequence of dine-in, counter, and phone/online takeout transactions—including cash, credit, debit, gift card, and split-check scenarios—with 100% cash-handling accuracy.
  1. Run a timed front-of-house simulation: seat a table, fire courses to the KDS, apply a modifier change mid-order, and close the check with a credit card, completing the full cycle in under four minutes.
  2. Process three split-check scenarios (by seat, by item, and by percentage) using the POS split-payment function, then verify that totals reconcile to the original check in writing.
  3. Count a starting cash bank, process five cash transactions with varied tender amounts, make correct change using the POS-calculated amount, and balance the drawer to zero variance at shift end.
POS terminal (training unit), cash drawer, training cash (play money set), credit/debit card training swipe kit, gift card training cards, server notepadSkills demo graded by instructor checklist: zero cash-variance at drawer balance, all checks closed to correct payment method, split checks reconciled; any cash error greater than $0.00 requires a repeat attempt.
4POS Data Security and PCI DSS Fundamentals8theoryStudents describe the key cardholder data protection responsibilities that apply to restaurant employees and managers under PCI DSS requirements and restaurant data privacy best practices.
  1. Read and annotate a plain-language PCI DSS summary for small merchants; highlight the three actions a restaurant employee must never do with card data and write an explanation in their own words.
  2. Role-play a skimming-detection scenario: inspect a training card reader for signs of tampering using a visual checklist, document findings, and report using a simulated incident form.
  3. Draft a one-page employee data-security reminder (suitable for a break-room poster) covering password hygiene, card reader inspection, and prohibited actions; peer-review and revise based on feedback.
PCI DSS small-merchant summary (official PCI SSC resource), training card reader with instructor-installed cosmetic tamper prop, incident report form template, poster template15-question multiple-choice quiz on PCI DSS employee responsibilities and tamper-detection steps; minimum passing score is 80%.
5End-of-Day Reporting and Sales Analysis14labStudents run POS end-of-day close procedures, generate shift and daily sales reports, and calculate food cost percentage and labor cost percentage from report data within ±1% of instructor benchmarks.
  1. Perform a complete end-of-day close on the training POS: run a Z-report, count and record the cash drawer, enter credit card batch totals, and identify any discrepancy between POS totals and physical count.
  2. Using a provided set of POS daily sales reports (covers, revenue by category, voids, comps, discounts), calculate gross sales, net sales, food cost %, and labor cost % on a structured worksheet, showing all arithmetic steps.
  3. Compare two weeks of simulated daily report data, identify the two highest and two lowest revenue days, and write a three-sentence management note explaining possible causes and one recommended operational adjustment.
POS training software, printed sample Z-reports and daily sales report packets, calculator, structured calculation worksheet, lab log workbookCompleted worksheet reviewed by instructor; all four financial calculations must be within ±1% of the instructor answer key, and the end-of-day close procedure must be completed in correct sequence for a pass.
6Inventory Tracking and Purchase Order Integration10demoStudents demonstrate how POS sales data feeds into inventory depletion reports and use that data to generate a basic purchase order aligned with par levels.
  1. Follow an instructor demonstration of the POS inventory module: observe how item sales auto-deduct from on-hand counts, then replicate the process independently using the training software for a 10-item product list.
  2. Run a low-stock report from the POS, identify items below par, and complete a purchase order form for those items using current prices from a supplied distributor price sheet.
  3. Cross-reference a simulated physical count against POS theoretical usage for the same period, calculate variance for each item, and flag any item with more than 5% variance for a written explanation.
POS training software with inventory module, par-level reference sheet, distributor price sheet (training version), physical count form, purchase order blankInstructor reviews completed purchase order and variance report; par calculations must be correct for all items and variances must be correctly flagged; errors on more than two items require a redo.
7POS Troubleshooting and Hardware Maintenance14practiceStudents isolate and resolve at least five common POS hardware and software faults using a structured fault-isolation method and manufacturer documentation without instructor assistance.
  1. Work through a fault-isolation worksheet for five instructor-staged failures—receipt printer paper jam, cash drawer not opening, terminal screen freeze, network connectivity drop, and card reader not reading—documenting each step taken and resolution in the lab log.
  2. Perform routine preventive maintenance tasks: clean the card reader magnetic stripe slot, replace receipt paper roll, and check and reseat terminal cable connections, following the manufacturer checklist step by step.
  3. Practice the escalation decision tree: for each staged fault, decide whether the issue is user-resolvable or requires a service call, record the decision with a one-sentence rationale, and draft a brief incident ticket.
POS terminal (training unit), receipt printer, manufacturer troubleshooting guide and maintenance checklist, fault-isolation worksheet, spare receipt paper rolls, cleaning cards, incident ticket template, lab log workbookStudents must correctly resolve all five staged faults without instructor hints and complete the maintenance checklist with no missed steps; failure on two or more faults requires a repeat practice session.
8POS Data Export and P&L Variance Reporting11labStudents export POS sales and labor data into a spreadsheet, build a formatted P&L variance summary, and present findings in a brief written management report.
  1. Export a week of simulated POS data (sales by category, labor hours, voids, and comps) using the export function and import it into a spreadsheet template, verifying that all row totals match the POS report totals.
  2. Build a P&L variance summary table comparing actual POS figures to a supplied budget, calculating dollar variance and percentage variance for each line, and applying conditional formatting to flag unfavorable variances in red.
  3. Write a one-page management summary (professional memo format) that identifies the three most significant variances, proposes a plausible operational cause for each, and recommends one corrective action per variance.
POS training software with export function, spreadsheet application (e.g., Microsoft Excel or Google Sheets), P&L template file, budget reference sheet, memo format guide, lab log workbookInstructor reviews spreadsheet for arithmetic accuracy (all variances must be correct) and the memo for professional formatting and logical reasoning; memos with calculation errors or missing variance explanations do not pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
POS Systems Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% correct (38 of 50 questions)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering POS hardware identification, menu programming concepts, PCI DSS employee responsibilities, reporting terminology, and troubleshooting decision logic, mapped to NRAEF ManageFirst technology and financial management competency areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Transaction Processing and Reporting Skills DemoSkills demonstration45%Zero cash variance; all checks closed correctly; all POS report calculations within ±1% of benchmark; completed in allotted timeStudents complete a timed, live simulation requiring them to process a mixed set of dine-in and takeout transactions including a split check, balance the cash drawer, run a Z-report, and calculate food cost percentage from the resulting report under instructor observation using a scored checklist.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
POS Operations Lab LogLog15%All eight lesson lab-log entries submitted; at least six of eight rated Satisfactory or above on completeness, accuracy, and professional presentationStudents maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course documenting every hands-on activity, including menu build steps, transaction records, fault-isolation decisions, maintenance checklists, and data export notes; the log is collected at the end of the course and scored by the instructor for completeness and accuracy.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Data Security and Safe Handling Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% on the prohibited-action checklist; card reader inspection completed in correct sequence with no missed stepsInstructor observes each student inspecting a training card reader for tamper evidence, verbally stating the three actions prohibited under restaurant data-security policy, and correctly completing a mock incident report; any missed prohibited action or skipped inspection step results in an immediate repeat attempt before the student may continue.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-REST26-08 Trade course

Sanitation: Food Safety and Hazard Control for Restaurant Managers

91 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

This course prepares students to manage food safety in a commercial restaurant environment by applying HACCP principles, federal and local sanitation regulations, and cleaning and sanitizing protocols. Students learn to identify biological, chemical, and physical hazards, control them at critical control points, and build a culture of food safety among staff. Content maps directly to the ServSafe Manager certification exam domains and supports the NRAEF ManageFirst Food Safety credential area.

Outcomes
Course text

This course prepares students to manage food safety in a commercial restaurant environment by applying HACCP principles, federal and local sanitation regulations, and cleaning and sanitizing protocols. Students learn to identify biological, chemical, and physical hazards, control them at critical control points, and build a culture of food safety among staff. Content maps directly to the ServSafe Manager certification exam domains and supports the NRAEF ManageFirst Food Safety credential area.

How the course runs. 8 blocks: Foodborne Illness: Hazards, Pathogens, and the Regulatory Framework; Personal Hygiene and Food Handler Health Policy; The Flow of Food: Receiving, Storage, and Temperature Control; Cooking, Holding, Cooling, and Reheating: Critical Temperatures in Practice; Cleaning and Sanitizing: Chemicals, Concentrations, and Procedures; HACCP: Building and Documenting a Food Safety Management System; Pest Control, Facility Design, and Health Department Inspections; Food Safety Culture: Staff Training, Policies, and Manager Responsibilities.

What competent looks like. Classify biological, chemical, and physical food safety hazards and explain the conditions that allow pathogens to grow to dangerous levels in restaurant food. Develop and document a functional HACCP plan—including hazard analysis, critical control points, critical limits, monitoring procedures, corrective actions, verification, and record-keeping—for a restaurant menu. Select and correctly apply the proper sanitizer type and concentration for food-contact surfaces, and verify effectiveness using a calibrated test kit. Demonstrate safe food-handling practices across the flow of food from receiving through service, including temperature monitoring, cross-contamination prevention, and personal hygiene requirements. Conduct a sanitation inspection of a simulated restaurant using a standardized form and identify violations with corrective actions aligned to FDA Food Code guidance. Train a simulated staff group on a single food safety procedure, using adult-learning techniques, and evaluate whether the training achieved its objective.

Lessons · 8 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Foodborne Illness: Hazards, Pathogens, and the Regulatory Framework11theoryStudents will categorize biological, chemical, and physical food safety hazards and identify the major pathogens—including their sources, symptoms, and associated high-risk foods—referenced in the ServSafe Manager exam.
  1. Students read case summaries of real outbreak investigations (CDC reports) and complete a graphic organizer identifying the pathogen, vehicle food, improper practice, and illness outcome for each case.
  2. Instructor-led lecture with slides covering the Big 6 pathogens (Norovirus, Hepatitis A, Salmonella Typhi, Shigella spp., STEC, Nontyphoidal Salmonella), FAT TOM conditions, and chemical/physical hazard categories; students fill in a structured note template.
  3. Small-group card-sort activity: students match 20 scenario cards (food, handling mistake, symptom set) to the correct pathogen category, then debrief as a class with instructor correction.
ServSafe Manager textbook (current edition, National Restaurant Association), CDC foodborne outbreak summary reports (public domain), FAT TOM reference chart, graphic organizer worksheet, pathogen card-sort deckExit quiz of 15 multiple-choice items covering pathogen identification, FAT TOM conditions, and hazard categories; pass mark 80% correct.
2Personal Hygiene and Food Handler Health Policy10demoStudents will demonstrate correct handwashing procedure and explain manager responsibilities for excluding or restricting food handlers who are ill, consistent with FDA Food Code guidance.
  1. Instructor demonstrates proper handwashing technique step-by-step at a handwashing sink; students each perform the procedure three times and self-score using a posted checklist while instructor circulates and corrects technique.
  2. Students use GloGerm powder and a UV light to reveal missed areas after handwashing, record findings on a personal hygiene observation log, and identify which steps they need to improve.
  3. Role-play scenarios: students take turns acting as manager and sick employee; the manager must apply the correct exclude/restrict decision (vomiting/diarrhea/jaundice = exclude; cuts/sore throat with fever = restrict) using a decision-tree worksheet drawn from FDA Food Code guidance.
Handwashing sink, soap, single-use paper towels, GloGerm powder, UV flashlight, personal hygiene observation log, exclude/restrict decision-tree worksheet, ServSafe Manager textbookSkills checklist observation: student performs a full handwashing cycle and correctly answers two role-play exclude/restrict decisions; all critical steps on checklist must be marked satisfactory (no critical step missed) to pass.
3The Flow of Food: Receiving, Storage, and Temperature Control12labStudents will apply correct receiving inspection criteria and temperature control requirements to food products across all storage areas, using calibrated thermometers and a simulated receiving dock.
  1. Students rotate through a simulated receiving dock stocked with food items (some with deliberate defects: damaged cans, incorrect temperatures, spoilage signs); they use a receiving log to accept or reject each product and document the reason, referencing FIFO and required internal temperatures.
  2. Pairs of students calibrate a bimetallic stemmed thermometer using the ice-point method, then use it to check temperatures of items placed in a walk-in cooler, walk-in freezer, and dry storage area, recording readings on a temperature log and flagging any out-of-range values.
  3. Students organize a mixed pallet of raw and ready-to-eat items into a model storage diagram, arranging shelves in the correct top-to-bottom order to prevent cross-contamination, then justify each placement in a written explanation.
Bimetallic stemmed thermometers, calibration ice bath, thermometer calibration log, simulated receiving dock props (food items, damaged can examples), receiving log form, model walk-in shelf diagram, temperature danger zone reference chart, ServSafe Manager textbookLab log reviewed by instructor: student's receiving log must correctly accept/reject all 10 test items, thermometer calibration must be recorded within ±2°F of 32°F, and storage diagram must have zero critical placement errors; one or more critical errors requires a lab redo.
4Cooking, Holding, Cooling, and Reheating: Critical Temperatures in Practice12labStudents will accurately measure and record internal temperatures for cooking, hot holding, cooling, and reheating of multiple food types, and apply corrective action when temperatures are out of compliance.
  1. Students cook chicken, ground beef, and a seafood item to required internal temperatures (using current ServSafe guidelines), probe each with a calibrated thermometer in at least two locations, record on a cooking temperature log, and flag any undercooking with a written corrective action.
  2. Students practice the two-stage cooling method: they start a batch of cooked rice and chili, use shallow pans and ice-water baths to cool from 135°F to 70°F within 2 hours, then continue to 41°F within an additional 4 hours, logging temperature every 30 minutes and graphing the results.
  3. Students reheat a previously cooled product to 165°F within 2 hours using a steam table, record temperatures, and write a brief corrective action report for a simulated scenario in which the product reached only 155°F at the 2-hour mark.
Commercial range, steam table, sheet pans, ice-water bath containers, calibrated probe thermometers (digital and bimetallic), cooking/cooling/reheating temperature logs, graph paper or spreadsheet template, ServSafe Manager textbook, model menu for referenceInstructor observation and lab log review: all recorded temperatures must be within ±2°F of actual measured values; student must correctly identify and document a corrective action for every out-of-compliance reading; zero uncorrected critical violations to pass.
5Cleaning and Sanitizing: Chemicals, Concentrations, and Procedures12labStudents will prepare chlorine, quaternary ammonium, and iodine sanitizer solutions at correct concentrations, verify them with test strips, and correctly clean and sanitize a food-contact surface using the seven-step procedure.
  1. Students prepare three sanitizer solutions (chlorine, quaternary ammonium, and iodine) by measuring chemical concentrate and water according to manufacturer label directions; they test each solution with the appropriate test strip, record the parts-per-million (ppm) reading, and adjust concentration if out of range, documenting results on a sanitizer log.
  2. Working at a three-compartment sink, students wash, rinse, and sanitize a set of smallwares (cutting boards, knives, mixing bowls) following the complete seven-step procedure; instructor observes and uses a checklist to confirm correct water temperature, detergent use, sanitizer soak time, and air-drying.
  3. Students draft a Master Cleaning Schedule for a simulated restaurant kitchen, assigning tasks (daily, weekly, monthly), responsible employee roles, cleaning products, and procedures for at least 12 surfaces and pieces of equipment, then peer-review each other's schedules using a rubric.
Three-compartment sink, chlorine bleach, quaternary ammonium concentrate, iodine sanitizer, appropriate test strips for each sanitizer type, smallwares (cutting boards, knives, bowls), sanitizer concentration log, seven-step cleaning procedure reference card, Master Cleaning Schedule template, ServSafe Manager textbookLab log and instructor observation checklist: all three sanitizer solutions must test within the acceptable ppm range on the test strip; every critical step of the seven-step procedure must be completed correctly; Master Cleaning Schedule must include correct frequencies and products for all 12 items to pass.
6HACCP: Building and Documenting a Food Safety Management System14practiceStudents will construct a complete seven-principle HACCP plan for an assigned restaurant menu item, including a documented hazard analysis, identified critical control points, written monitoring and corrective action procedures, and a record-keeping system.
  1. Instructor presents a worked HACCP example for a roasted chicken entrée using a process flow diagram; students follow along and annotate a blank HACCP workbook, then in pairs apply the same methodology to a different menu item assigned to their team.
  2. Each team conducts a formal hazard analysis for their menu item—identifying biological, chemical, and physical hazards at each step in the flow of food—and records findings in the hazard analysis column of the HACCP plan template, justifying whether each hazard is significant enough to require a CCP.
  3. Teams finalize their HACCP plan by completing all seven principles (hazard analysis, CCPs, critical limits, monitoring, corrective actions, verification, record-keeping), then present the plan in a 10-minute structured debrief with the instructor, who uses a scoring rubric to identify any missing elements.
HACCP plan workbook template (aligned to FDA HACCP guidance), sample process flow diagram, ServSafe Manager textbook, NRAEF ManageFirst Food Safety module reference, whiteboard or flip-chart paper, markers, printed menu for the assigned itemCompleted HACCP plan scored on instructor rubric: all seven principles must be present; CCPs must be correctly identified relative to the hazard analysis; critical limits must be science-based; plan must score at least 80% of available rubric points to pass.
7Pest Control, Facility Design, and Health Department Inspections11fieldStudents will conduct a simulated health department inspection of a restaurant facility, identify sanitation and facility violations, and write a corrective action report using an industry-standard inspection form.
  1. Guided tour and lecture on integrated pest management (IPM): instructor explains how to identify common restaurant pests (cockroaches, rodents, flies), evidence to look for (droppings, gnaw marks, grease trails), and the manager's role in working with a licensed pest control operator; students complete an IPM identification worksheet.
  2. Students conduct a full walk-through inspection of a simulated or real restaurant space using a standardized sanitation inspection form modeled on a local health department form; they document at least 8 violations (seeded into the space by the instructor), classify each as critical or noncritical, and assign a corrective timeframe.
  3. Students write a formal corrective action report for the top three critical violations they found, specifying the violation, the food safety risk it creates, the required corrective action, the responsible party, and the follow-up verification step; reports are shared and discussed in class debrief.
Simulated or real restaurant inspection space, standardized health department inspection form (local or FDA model form), IPM identification worksheet, pest evidence photo reference sheet, corrective action report template, ServSafe Manager textbookInspection form reviewed by instructor: student must correctly identify and classify at least 7 of 8 seeded violations; corrective action report must include all five required elements for each critical violation; missing more than one seeded critical violation requires a repeat walkthrough to pass.
8Food Safety Culture: Staff Training, Policies, and Manager Responsibilities9practiceStudents will design and deliver a short food safety training module for a simulated employee group, applying adult-learning principles and evaluating whether the training objective was met.
  1. Mini-lecture and discussion on food safety culture: what distinguishes a reactive compliance approach from a proactive food safety culture; students read one industry article and complete a reflection identifying three concrete manager actions that build culture.
  2. Each student selects one food safety procedure (proper handwashing, correct cooling method, or allergen communication) and develops a 5-minute training module including a learning objective, a demonstration or visual aid, and a one-question knowledge check for trainees.
  3. Students deliver their training to a small peer group acting as employees; peers complete a trainee evaluation form, and the instructor scores the delivery on a rubric covering accuracy of content, clarity of instruction, use of demonstration, and whether the stated objective was measurable and met.
Industry article on food safety culture (e.g., from Journal of Food Protection or NRA resources), training module planning template, trainee evaluation form, instructor delivery rubric, visual aid supplies (whiteboard, flip chart, or slide template), ServSafe Manager textbookInstructor rubric score: training content must be factually accurate (zero critical errors); learning objective must be measurable; delivery must score at least 80% of rubric points; any critical content error requires revision and re-delivery to pass.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Food Safety Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (38 of 50 items correct)A 50-item multiple-choice exam covering all ServSafe Manager content domains addressed in this course—foodborne illness hazards, personal hygiene, the flow of food (receiving through service), cleaning and sanitizing, HACCP principles, pest control, and facility sanitation. Items are written in the same style as the ServSafe Manager certification exam to provide direct preparation for that credential.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HACCP Plan and Inspection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%All critical elements present in the HACCP plan; all critical violations correctly identified and classified in the inspection; rubric score of 80% or higher on each componentStudents submit their completed HACCP plan (Lesson 6) and conduct a live 20-minute mock health-department inspection of the simulated facility, identifying and documenting violations on a standard inspection form and verbally explaining corrective actions to the instructor. The instructor scores both the plan and the inspection performance using published rubrics.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Log PortfolioLog15%All eight lesson lab logs submitted; no uncorrected critical violations in any log; overall portfolio score of 80% or higher on completeness and accuracy rubricStudents compile a bound or digital portfolio of every completed lab log, temperature record, sanitizer concentration log, receiving log, cleaning schedule, and corrective action report produced across the course. The instructor reviews each document for accuracy, completeness, and evidence that the student applied correct food safety standards, with particular attention to temperature readings, sanitizer ppm values, and HACCP documentation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Personal Hygiene and Chemical Safety CheckSafety audit15%Zero critical steps missed on either checklist; any critical failure requires immediate remediation and recheck before course completionA binary pass/fail performance check conducted by the instructor: the student performs a full handwashing procedure and correctly prepares and tests one sanitizer solution at the required concentration, both evaluated against a critical-step checklist. This check confirms minimum safe competence directly tied to the ServSafe Manager personal hygiene and cleaning-and-sanitizing exam domains and to the broader program safety standard.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-REST26-09 Trade course

Restaurant Marketing: Guest Acquisition, Retention, and Brand Building

91 hr · $1,200 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn to develop and execute marketing strategies specific to food-service operations, covering digital and traditional channels, brand identity, guest loyalty, and budget-conscious promotion. Lessons integrate real restaurant data, live social media tools, and current hospitality marketing frameworks aligned with NRAEF ManageFirst and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor competencies. Upon completion, students can build a documented marketing plan for an independent or chain restaurant concept.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn to develop and execute marketing strategies specific to food-service operations, covering digital and traditional channels, brand identity, guest loyalty, and budget-conscious promotion. Lessons integrate real restaurant data, live social media tools, and current hospitality marketing frameworks aligned with NRAEF ManageFirst and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor competencies. Upon completion, students can build a documented marketing plan for an independent or chain restaurant concept.

How the course runs. 8 blocks: The Marketing Mix and the Restaurant Guest; Brand Identity: Logo, Voice, and Visual Standards; Digital Presence: Google Business Profile, Website Basics, and SEO Fundamentals; Social Media Marketing for Restaurants; Email Marketing, Loyalty Programs, and Guest Retention; Competitive Analysis and Target Guest Profiling; Promotional Budget, Advertising Channels, and ROI Basics; The Restaurant Marketing Plan: Build, Present, and Measure.

What competent looks like. Identify and describe the core marketing mix elements as applied to a food-service operation and explain how each element affects guest traffic and revenue. Create branded social media content, a Google Business Profile, and an email campaign for a restaurant concept using industry-standard digital tools. Conduct a basic competitive analysis and guest demographic profile using publicly available market data and in-class observation techniques. Calculate a promotional budget as a percentage of projected sales and allocate spending across at least three marketing channels with written rationale. Design a guest loyalty and retention program that addresses repeat visit frequency, complaint recovery, and online review management. Produce a written marketing plan with defined goals, target audience, channel strategy, timeline, and measurable key performance indicators (KPIs) ready for management review.

Lessons · 8 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Marketing Mix and the Restaurant Guest10theoryStudents define the four Ps of marketing, apply each to a restaurant scenario, and explain how guest perception of value drives purchase decisions.
  1. Annotated case-study analysis: students read two short real-world restaurant brand profiles (one independent, one chain) and label where each of the four Ps appears, then present findings to the group.
  2. Guest-journey mapping exercise: pairs trace a fictional diner from awareness through post-visit review and mark every marketing touchpoint on a printed template.
  3. Class discussion comparing how price positioning (value vs. premium) shapes menu language, décor descriptions, and advertising tone, using printed menu excerpts as evidence.
NRAEF ManageFirst Hospitality and Restaurant Management textbook, printed restaurant case studies, four-Ps worksheet, guest-journey map template, whiteboardStudents complete the four-Ps annotation on a new, unseen restaurant scenario and correctly label at least 12 of 16 marked elements (75 % accuracy).
2Brand Identity: Logo, Voice, and Visual Standards10demoStudents identify the components of a restaurant brand identity system and produce a one-page brand standards sheet for a fictional concept.
  1. Instructor live demonstration: build a mood board in Canva for a fictional taco concept, selecting color palette, typeface pair, and logo mark, narrating design rationale aloud while students observe on projected screen.
  2. Students replicate the mood-board process for their own assigned concept (each student receives a different restaurant type) and present the resulting one-page brand standards sheet to a partner for peer critique.
  3. Brand voice writing drill: students write three Instagram captions for the same menu item — one in a casual/fun voice, one in an upscale/refined voice, one in a family/comfort voice — then class votes on which voice matches each brand standard sheet.
Canva (free education account), brand standards template (instructor-created), printed examples of real restaurant brand guidelines (publicly available), projector, laptops or tabletsBrand standards sheet includes all five required elements (logo, primary and secondary colors with hex codes, two typefaces, three sample caption tones) and earns a passing score of 75 % on the instructor rubric.
3Digital Presence: Google Business Profile, Website Basics, and SEO Fundamentals12labStudents set up and fully populate a Google Business Profile for a practice restaurant account and explain three on-page SEO practices that improve local search ranking.
  1. Lab setup: using a shared practice Google account provided by the instructor, students step through every section of a Google Business Profile (hours, categories, menu link, photos, Q&A, services) following a printed checklist and capture screenshots of each completed section.
  2. Instructor-led walkthrough of a real restaurant website, identifying title tags, meta descriptions, keyword use in menu page copy, mobile responsiveness, and load speed using Google PageSpeed Insights (free tool), with students filling in an observation worksheet.
  3. Students write a 150-word 'About Us' page draft for their fictional concept, intentionally incorporating three target local-search keywords identified during the walkthrough activity, then swap with a partner for keyword verification.
Laptops or tablets, shared practice Google account, Google PageSpeed Insights (free, browser-based), printed Google Business Profile completion checklist, SEO keyword worksheet, projectorGoogle Business Profile checklist shows 100 % completion of all required fields; SEO writing draft contains all three identified keywords used naturally in context — instructor spot-checks both before marking complete.
4Social Media Marketing for Restaurants12practiceStudents create a seven-day social media content calendar for a restaurant concept and produce three platform-ready posts with images, copy, and hashtags.
  1. Platform comparison exercise: students complete a structured comparison chart covering Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and Yelp — documenting typical audience demographics, content formats, posting frequency norms, and advertising options — using current platform business help pages as sources.
  2. Content calendar build: using a provided spreadsheet template, each student plans seven days of posts across two platforms for their assigned concept, specifying date, platform, post type (photo, reel, story, text), copy draft, and three to five hashtags per post.
  3. Students photograph a plated dish prepared in the school's kitchen (or use a supplied food photo set), edit the image in Canva or Snapseed (free tools), write final caption copy, and submit the three finished posts as a PDF or image set for instructor review.
Smartphones or tablets with cameras, Canva and/or Snapseed (free apps), content calendar spreadsheet template (instructor-created), plated food prop or supplied food photo set, platform business help pages, printed hashtag research worksheetContent calendar covers all seven days with no blank fields; three submitted posts each contain a properly sized image, caption of 50–150 words, and 3–5 relevant hashtags — scored on a 10-point rubric with 7.5 (75 %) required to pass.
5Email Marketing, Loyalty Programs, and Guest Retention12practiceStudents build a three-email welcome sequence in a free email marketing platform and design a points-based loyalty program outline with defined earn and redeem rules.
  1. Students create a free Mailchimp account (or instructor-designated alternative), import a sample contact list provided by the instructor, and build three templated emails: a welcome email, a birthday reward offer, and a re-engagement email for lapsed guests — each reviewed against a provided copy checklist.
  2. Loyalty program design workshop: working from a printed framework, students define earn rate (points per dollar), redemption thresholds, tier names (if applicable), expiration policy, and one complaint-recovery perk (e.g., complimentary dessert on next visit), then calculate the cost per redeemed reward as a percentage of the item's menu price.
  3. Online review response practice: instructor provides five fictitious one-to-four-star Yelp/Google reviews (negative, mixed, and positive); students write a professional management response to each within a 75-word limit, then class evaluates two samples against a response-quality rubric.
Mailchimp free account (or approved alternative), laptops or tablets, sample contact list CSV (instructor-created, no real PII), loyalty program design worksheet, five printed fictitious reviews, review-response rubricAll three Mailchimp emails are built, previewed, and submitted as screenshots with no broken images or placeholder text; loyalty program outline is complete with cost-per-reward calculation shown — 75 % rubric score required on both components.
6Competitive Analysis and Target Guest Profiling11fieldStudents conduct an on-site competitive analysis of two local restaurants and produce a written guest demographic profile for their own fictional concept supported by observable data.
  1. Guided field visit: student pairs visit two pre-approved nearby restaurants (different cuisine segments) during a scheduled class period, completing a standardized competitive analysis form covering menu price range, ambiance descriptors, observed guest demographics, digital presence score (based on a pre-built rubric), and service style — instructors accompany or students work in supervised pairs with signed permission/liability acknowledgment on file.
  2. Back in class, students compile field notes into a two-page comparative competitive analysis report, identifying one marketing strength and one marketing gap for each competitor observed.
  3. Target guest profile creation: using their competitive data plus free US Census Bureau community profiles and local chamber of commerce restaurant data (where publicly available), students write a one-page demographic and psychographic profile for their fictional concept's ideal guest, including estimated age range, income tier, dining occasion, and digital platform preference.
Printed competitive analysis form, clipboards, smartphones (for photo documentation where permitted), US Census Bureau QuickFacts (free, browser-based), laptop for report write-up, signed field visit acknowledgment formCompetitive analysis report addresses all eight form categories for both restaurants with specific observable evidence; guest profile references at least two external data sources — instructor scores report on a rubric with 75 % required to pass.
7Promotional Budget, Advertising Channels, and ROI Basics12theoryStudents calculate a promotional budget from a given sales projection, allocate it across three channels, and explain how return on investment (ROI) is estimated for a restaurant promotion.
  1. Budgeting math drill: instructor provides three restaurant sales scenarios at different volume levels; students calculate a marketing budget using a given percentage-of-sales guideline, then allocate the total across social media advertising, print/local advertising, and events/promotions using instructor-supplied allocation percentages as a starting point, showing all arithmetic.
  2. Channel comparison lecture and note-taking: instructor presents the cost structures, typical reach, and measurability of five advertising channels (paid social, Google Ads, direct mail, local print, influencer/food-blogger partnerships) using publicly available rate cards and case examples; students complete a structured note template.
  3. ROI estimation exercise: students are given a fictional lunch promotion scenario (discounted entrée, target cover count increase, food cost percentage, advertising spend) and calculate whether the promotion generates a net positive contribution margin, presenting their arithmetic and a go/no-go recommendation in writing.
Calculator or spreadsheet software, promotional budget worksheet, ROI estimation worksheet, printed channel comparison note template, sample rate card examples (instructor-compiled from public sources), NRAEF ManageFirst textbookBudget calculation and ROI estimation worksheets are both submitted with all arithmetic visible and correct to within rounding; final go/no-go recommendation is supported with a written rationale — 75 % of total points required.
8The Restaurant Marketing Plan: Build, Present, and Measure12labStudents assemble all prior lesson outputs into a complete written marketing plan for their fictional restaurant concept and present a five-minute executive summary to the class.
  1. Document assembly workshop: students organize outputs from lessons 1–7 (brand standards, Google Business Profile screenshots, content calendar, email sequence, loyalty program, competitive analysis, budget) into a structured marketing plan document following a provided six-section template (Situation Analysis, Target Guest, Brand Identity, Channel Strategy, Budget, KPIs and Measurement).
  2. KPI goal-setting activity: using the budget and channel strategy already developed, students define three measurable 90-day KPIs (e.g., Google Business Profile views, email list size, social media follower count) with baseline assumptions stated and a simple tracking method described.
  3. Executive summary presentations: each student delivers a five-minute verbal summary of their marketing plan to the class using their brand standards sheet and one-page budget table as visual aids; classmates complete a structured peer feedback form; instructor scores presentation on a rubric covering clarity, accuracy, and use of trade vocabulary.
Word processor or Google Docs, marketing plan six-section template (instructor-created), all prior lesson deliverables, peer feedback form, instructor presentation rubric, projector or large monitor for displayCompleted marketing plan document contains all six required sections with no placeholder text; five-minute presentation stays within 4–6 minute window and earns at least 75 % on the instructor rubric covering content accuracy, organization, and professional communication.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Marketing Concepts Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75 % (38 of 50 points)A 50-question exam covering the four Ps, brand identity components, digital marketing terminology (SEO, CTR, engagement rate), social media platform characteristics, email marketing best practices, loyalty program design principles, promotional budgeting, ROI estimation, and competitive analysis methodology — all drawn from lesson content and the NRAEF ManageFirst hospitality management curriculum area. Questions are multiple choice and short answer; the exam is taken individually, closed notes, in a single class period.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Marketing Plan Presentation Skills DemoSkills demonstration45%75 % on the instructor rubric (30 of 40 points across four categories: content accuracy, organization, professional language, and response to two instructor follow-up questions)Each student presents their complete restaurant marketing plan to the instructor and a minimum of two classmates in a 7-to-10-minute session, fielding two instructor-posed scenario questions (e.g., 'Your social media budget was cut 50 % — how do you adjust?'). The demo assesses the student's ability to apply marketing concepts to real operational decisions, mirroring the applied management competencies tested in NRAEF ManageFirst and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor credentialing.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Marketing Lab Portfolio LogLog15%All eight lesson deliverables submitted and at least six of eight score 75 % or higher on their individual rubricsStudents maintain a running digital portfolio folder containing dated screenshots and documents from every lab and practice lesson: the brand standards sheet, Google Business Profile completion screenshots, content calendar, three social media posts, three Mailchimp email screenshots, loyalty program outline with cost calculation, competitive analysis report, and final marketing plan document. The portfolio demonstrates the progression of work and is reviewed by the instructor at mid-course (after lesson 4) and at course end.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Digital Tool and Data Safety CheckSafety audit15%Pass — all five checklist items confirmed; any single fail item requires correction and re-check before the student may submit final marketing planBefore submitting the final marketing plan, each student completes a five-item safety and compliance checklist verified by the instructor: (1) no real personal identifying information appears in any practice platform account or submitted document, (2) all images used in posts and emails are either self-created, licensed under Creative Commons, or from the instructor-supplied photo set — no unattributed copyrighted images, (3) Google Business Profile practice account is confirmed closed or transferred per instructor instructions, (4) Mailchimp practice list contains only the instructor-supplied dummy contacts, and (5) student can verbally explain why truth-in-advertising standards prohibit false or misleading promotional claims. This check aligns with responsible digital citizenship requirements emphasized in NRAEF ManageFirst program standards.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
HOS-REST26-10 Capstone

Capstone Project: Restaurant Management Plan Build & Defense

162 hr · $1,620 COMPLIMENTARY

Students design, document, and defend a complete, investor-ready restaurant management plan for a realistic concept of their choosing, integrating cost control, menu engineering, P&L forecasting, staffing, purchasing, sanitation protocols, POS configuration, and marketing strategy into one coherent package. The project culminates in a formal oral defense before a panel of instructor(s) and an industry evaluator, simulating a real-world business presentation. All deliverables are mapped to ServSafe Manager, NRAEF ManageFirst, and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor competency areas so students demonstrate credential-level mastery in context.

Outcomes
Course text

Students design, document, and defend a complete, investor-ready restaurant management plan for a realistic concept of their choosing, integrating cost control, menu engineering, P&L forecasting, staffing, purchasing, sanitation protocols, POS configuration, and marketing strategy into one coherent package. The project culminates in a formal oral defense before a panel of instructor(s) and an industry evaluator, simulating a real-world business presentation. All deliverables are mapped to ServSafe Manager, NRAEF ManageFirst, and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor competency areas so students demonstrate credential-level mastery in context.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Concept Definition, Scope Planning, and Integrated Outline; Section-by-Section Plan Development: Operations, Finance, and Safety; Portfolio Assembly, Peer Review, and Revision; Oral Defense: Presentation, Panel Q&A, and Reflection.

What competent looks like. Produce a complete written restaurant management plan that integrates food-safety procedures, cost targets, a costed menu, a 12-month pro-forma P&L, a staffing model, a purchasing program, a POS workflow, and a marketing plan. Apply OSHA-recognized hazard controls and ServSafe-aligned sanitation procedures throughout all operational sections of the plan, justifying each decision with a cited standard or regulatory basis. Use industry-standard spreadsheet and POS simulation tools to calculate food cost percentage, labor cost percentage, break-even volume, and contribution margin for the proposed concept. Construct a professional portfolio that documents the planning process, revisions, peer-review feedback, and final deliverables in a format suitable for employer or investor review. Deliver a timed oral defense of the management plan before a panel, responding to examiner questions about financial decisions, sanitation controls, staffing choices, and marketing strategy with evidence drawn from the plan. Evaluate a peer's draft management plan against a structured rubric, providing written feedback that identifies specific gaps in safety, financial accuracy, and operational feasibility.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Concept Definition, Scope Planning, and Integrated Outline30practiceGiven a chosen restaurant concept, the student will produce an approved project scope document and annotated outline that maps every required section of the management plan to at least one credential competency area.
  1. Complete a structured concept worksheet covering concept type, target market, estimated seat count, service style, and price point; trade the worksheet with a peer for a 30-minute structured critique using a provided checklist of feasibility questions.
  2. Build a full annotated outline in a word-processing template that labels each planned section with the credential exam area it addresses (e.g., 'Menu Engineering section → NRAEF ManageFirst: Controlling Foodservice Costs; Menu Planning') and submit it for instructor approval before proceeding.
  3. Draft a project timeline using a simple Gantt chart (spreadsheet) that assigns every major deliverable to a specific lesson period, identifies dependencies between sections, and flags which sections require lab time or research outside the classroom.
Concept worksheet handout, project scope template, annotated outline template, credential exam blueprints for ServSafe Manager / NRAEF ManageFirst / AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor (instructor-provided summaries), spreadsheet software (Google Sheets or Excel), word-processing software.Instructor reviews the annotated outline for completeness: all 8 required plan sections must be listed, each mapped to at least one named credential area, and the Gantt chart must account for all 162 project hours. Outline earns approval (pass) or is returned with required revisions within one class session; student may not advance to Lesson 2 without an approved outline.
2Section-by-Section Plan Development: Operations, Finance, and Safety80labWorking from the approved outline, the student will draft, revise, and finalize all eight required management plan sections — sanitation/HACCP, menu with food-cost analysis, 12-month pro-forma P&L and break-even, staffing model and labor cost, purchasing and vendor specs, POS workflow documentation, marketing plan, and facility safety program — each meeting the section rubric standard.
  1. Complete each of the eight sections in sequence using discipline-specific lab activities: (a) Sanitation/HACCP — build a HACCP flow chart for two signature menu items, identify critical control points, set critical limits, and write corrective action procedures aligned with ServSafe Manager food-safety principles; (b) Costed menu — cost at least 12 menu items using standardized recipe cards, calculate food cost percentage for each, and engineer the menu into stars/plowhorses/puzzles/dogs using a contribution-margin matrix; (c) Pro-forma P&L and break-even — enter projected revenue, cost of goods, and labor into a multi-tab spreadsheet, calculate monthly and annual net operating income, and determine the weekly covers needed to break even; (d) Staffing model — write a sample weekly schedule for peak and off-peak weeks, compute labor cost percentage for both, and draft job descriptions and a training outline for two key hourly positions mapped to AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor supervisory competencies; (e) Purchasing program — write product specifications for five high-cost ingredients, draft an order guide with par levels, and outline a receiving inspection procedure; (f) POS workflow — diagram the ticket flow from order entry through kitchen display to close-out and describe the daily sales report the manager would review; (g) Marketing plan — define target customer profile, select two promotional channels with a 30-day content calendar and estimated cost, and explain how ROI will be tracked; (h) Facility safety program — list the five highest OSHA-recognized hazards for the concept's kitchen environment, specify the required PPE and engineering control for each, and include a lockout/tagout procedure for at least one piece of powered equipment.
  2. Submit each completed section for a peer review: reviewer uses the section rubric to score completeness, accuracy, and internal consistency with other sections already submitted; reviewer provides written comments and returns the draft within the same lab session; author revises before instructor sign-off.
  3. Attend two scheduled instructor check-in conferences (one after sections 1–4 are drafted, one after sections 5–8 are drafted) in which the student walks the instructor through the spreadsheet models, explains one financial decision and one safety decision, and receives written feedback that must be addressed before the portfolio is assembled.
HACCP flow-chart template, standardized recipe card template, menu engineering matrix spreadsheet, P&L and break-even spreadsheet template, staffing schedule template, job description template, product specification template, order guide template, POS workflow diagram template (Lucidchart free tier or hand-drawn), marketing calendar template, facility safety program template, OSHA General Industry standards summary (instructor-provided reference sheet), ServSafe Manager textbook (National Restaurant Association), NRAEF ManageFirst: Controlling Foodservice Costs and Hospitality and Restaurant Management textbooks, AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor reference materials.Each section is graded individually on its rubric (completeness, accuracy, internal consistency with the rest of the plan) on a 100-point scale; each section must score 75 or higher to be accepted into the portfolio. Sections scoring below 75 must be revised and resubmitted within the next scheduled lab session. The P&L spreadsheet must produce a correctly calculated break-even figure verified by the instructor; a mathematical error in break-even is an automatic hold until corrected.
3Portfolio Assembly, Peer Review, and Revision22practiceThe student will compile all approved plan sections into a professionally formatted, tabbed portfolio document, incorporate written peer-review feedback, and produce a final version that meets the portfolio rubric standard of 80 percent or higher.
  1. Assemble the eight approved plan sections into a single bound or digital document using a provided formatting guide: cover page with concept name and logo, executive summary (one page maximum), table of contents, tabbed sections in required order, and appendices for all spreadsheets and supporting templates; format headers, fonts, and page numbers consistently throughout.
  2. Exchange complete portfolios with a different peer than the one used during drafting; reviewer uses the full portfolio rubric to evaluate cross-section consistency (e.g., does the staffing model's labor cost percentage match the P&L?), professional presentation, and completeness of credential-area coverage; reviewer submits a written feedback memo of at least 400 words within the scheduled session.
  3. Address all peer-review feedback items in writing using a revision log (a two-column table listing each feedback point and the author's response — either describing the change made or explaining why no change was warranted); submit the revised portfolio and revision log to the instructor for final acceptance.
Portfolio formatting guide (instructor-provided), full portfolio rubric, peer-review feedback memo template, revision log template, printer or PDF export capability, binding supplies or shared digital folder (Google Drive or equivalent).Instructor scores the final submitted portfolio against the portfolio rubric; the portfolio must score 80 out of 100 or higher to pass this lesson and qualify the student for the oral defense in Lesson 4. The revision log must be complete — every peer-review point must have a response entry — or the portfolio is returned for completion before scoring.
4Oral Defense: Presentation, Panel Q&A, and Reflection30fieldThe student will present the key findings of the restaurant management plan in a structured 15-minute presentation followed by a 15-minute panel question-and-answer session, scoring 75 percent or higher on the oral defense rubric and submitting a written self-reflection.
  1. Deliver a 15-minute slide or poster presentation (maximum 12 slides or one tri-fold poster) covering concept overview, three financial highlights (food cost %, labor cost %, break-even), two critical HACCP control points, the staffing model rationale, and the marketing strategy; the presentation must stay within the time limit (a visible timer is used) and be directed to the panel as a business audience, not as a class recitation.
  2. Respond to a minimum of five panel questions drawn from a standardized question bank covering financial decisions, sanitation controls, staffing choices, purchasing rationale, and marketing ROI measurement; responses are scored in real time on a panel scoring sheet by each panelist, then averaged; students may reference their portfolio during Q&A.
  3. Complete a 500-word written self-reflection submitted within 48 hours of the defense that identifies the two strongest sections of the plan, the two areas that would require the most revision before actual implementation, and two specific credential exam topics the project helped the student understand more deeply.
Presentation slides or poster, laptop and projector or display screen, panel scoring sheet (oral defense rubric), standardized question bank (held by panelists, not released to students in advance), timer, student copy of completed portfolio for reference during Q&A, self-reflection submission form.Each panelist scores the presentation on a 100-point oral defense rubric covering content accuracy, financial literacy, sanitation/safety knowledge, professionalism, and responsiveness to questions; scores are averaged across panelists. A score of 75 or higher is passing. The self-reflection must be submitted within 48 hours and must address all three required prompts; failure to submit the reflection by the deadline reduces the final capstone grade by one letter grade regardless of defense score.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Restaurant Management Plan — Final Submitted DocumentProject60%Each of the eight required sections must score 75/100 or higher on its individual rubric; the assembled portfolio must score 80/100 or higher on the portfolio rubric; the revision log must be complete.The complete written management plan, including all eight operational and financial sections, supporting spreadsheets, and the revision log documenting responses to peer feedback, is evaluated by the instructor against section rubrics and the overall portfolio rubric. This project assessment verifies that the student can integrate every major competency area of the program into a single, internally consistent, investor-ready document.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Process Portfolio with Peer-Review DocumentationPortfolio20%Portfolio scores 80/100 or higher on the portfolio rubric; revision log includes a written response to every identified peer-review point; all instructor check-in feedback items are addressed and documented.The portfolio assessment evaluates not only the final document but the documented development process: peer-review memos received and given, instructor check-in notes, and the revision log demonstrating the student's ability to apply critical feedback. This mirrors the continuous-improvement documentation practices expected of a working restaurant manager and aligns with NRAEF ManageFirst professional development competencies.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Oral Defense — Presentation and Panel Q&AOral / panel20%Averaged panel score of 75/100 or higher on the oral defense rubric; presentation delivered within the 15-minute time limit; self-reflection submitted within 48 hours of the defense and addresses all three required prompts.The oral defense requires the student to present the management plan to a panel that includes at least one industry evaluator and respond to questions about financial, sanitation, staffing, and marketing decisions with evidence drawn from the plan. This assessment verifies the communication and analytical skills measured by the AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor and NRAEF ManageFirst credentials and prepares students for investor pitches, job interviews, and operations review meetings in the field.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
HOS-REST26-11 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement

243 hr · $970 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 243 supervised hours in an approved restaurant or foodservice operation, applying the management, sanitation, cost-control, and guest-service skills built across the program. A site supervisor evaluates performance against industry standards, and the student documents competencies in a structured field log reviewed by the program instructor. This course bridges classroom learning and full professional practice in a real workplace environment.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 243 supervised hours in an approved restaurant or foodservice operation, applying the management, sanitation, cost-control, and guest-service skills built across the program. A site supervisor evaluates performance against industry standards, and the student documents competencies in a structured field log reviewed by the program instructor. This course bridges classroom learning and full professional practice in a real workplace environment.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Externship Orientation and Site Readiness; Supervised Shift Practice — Front-of-House and Back-of-House Operations; Applied Management Projects at the Worksite; Final Evaluation, Exit Interview, and Reflective Portfolio Completion.

What competent looks like. Perform opening, mid-shift, and closing management duties under live-operation conditions with no more than one prompted correction per shift. Apply ServSafe food-safety protocols—temperature monitoring, sanitation schedules, and allergen procedures—consistently throughout every observed shift. Demonstrate cost-control and basic P&L awareness by reading daily sales reports and communicating variance observations to the site supervisor. Lead or support at least two pre-shift staff briefings, applying scheduling and communication skills to coordinate a service period. Resolve a minimum of three documented guest-service situations using professional complaint-handling techniques, as verified by the site supervisor. Complete a reflective field log for every placement week that links on-site experiences to specific program competencies and credential exam areas.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Externship Orientation and Site Readiness15fieldGiven the worksite orientation, the student will identify the operation's policies, safety procedures, chain of command, and daily management routines before the first independent shift.
  1. Shadow the site supervisor through a full opening sequence—walk-ins, line setup, POS activation, and pre-shift meeting—and take structured notes on the facility's standard operating procedures.
  2. Review the operation's HACCP plan, emergency-action plan, and employee handbook with the site supervisor, then complete a written site-specific safety checklist that the supervisor signs off on.
  3. Meet with the program instructor (on-site or virtually) to review the field-log template, externship agreement, evaluation rubric, and the schedule for mid-point and final check-ins.
Externship agreement packet, site-specific HACCP documentation, employee handbook, field-log template, program evaluation rubric, mobile device or laptop for digital log entrySupervisor initials on the completed site-safety checklist; student submits Day-1 field-log entry describing three management routines observed; both items required before solo shift hours begin.
2Supervised Shift Practice — Front-of-House and Back-of-House Operations120fieldOver a series of supervised shifts, the student will execute front-of-house guest flow, back-of-house sanitation and prep coordination, and POS transaction handling, meeting the site supervisor's performance standards on each rated task.
  1. Complete scheduled shifts in both front-of-house and back-of-house roles as assigned by the site supervisor, including table turns or counter service, expo coordination, line-readiness checks, and temperature log entries for every cold- and hot-holding unit at the start of each shift.
  2. Conduct or co-conduct at least two pre-shift briefings per week—communicating the day's specials, 86'd items, labor goals, and any food-safety reminders—and record the content and team response in the field log.
  3. Review the prior day's end-of-day sales report with the site supervisor at least once per week, identify any food-cost or labor-cost variances, and document observations and the supervisor's explanation in the weekly log entry.
POS terminal (operation-specific), food-probe thermometer, sanitizer test strips, temperature log forms, field-log template, ServSafe Manager certification card (student's own), pen and clipboardSite supervisor completes the mid-point performance rubric (Week 6 target) rating each task area Unsatisfactory / Developing / Proficient / Exemplary; student must achieve Proficient or Exemplary on at least 75 % of rated items to continue without a remediation plan.
3Applied Management Projects at the Worksite88fieldThe student will complete at least two employer-assigned management projects—such as a scheduling draft, a waste-tracking log analysis, a cost-reduction recommendation, or a marketing promotion idea—producing a written deliverable the supervisor reviews.
  1. Draft a one-week staff schedule for an assigned station or shift using the operation's scheduling tool or spreadsheet, ensure it meets projected labor-cost targets discussed with the supervisor, and submit it for feedback before it would go live.
  2. Track food-waste or over-production for a minimum of five consecutive shifts using the operation's count sheets or a paper tally, then write a one-page summary identifying the top two waste sources and one actionable reduction strategy, presented verbally to the supervisor.
  3. Design and submit a one-page guest-engagement or upselling brief—such as a table-card concept, a social-media post draft, or a server talking-point card for a new menu item—incorporating the marketing principles from Course 9, then incorporate the supervisor's written feedback into a revised final version.
Operation's scheduling software or spreadsheet, waste-tracking count sheets, word processor, site-specific menu and pricing data, field log, program marketing course notesSupervisor provides written feedback on each deliverable using a simple rubric (Needs Revision / Acceptable / Strong); all deliverables must reach Acceptable or Strong; any Needs Revision deliverable must be revised within five business days and re-evaluated.
4Final Evaluation, Exit Interview, and Reflective Portfolio Completion20fieldThe student will compile a complete externship portfolio, participate in a final evaluation meeting with the site supervisor and program instructor, and articulate specific connections between worksite experiences and each major credential exam domain.
  1. Assemble the full field log—one entry per week for every week of placement—into a portfolio organized by competency area (food safety, cost control, staffing, guest service, marketing), ensuring each entry cites a specific program lesson or credential exam area it demonstrates.
  2. Participate in a structured exit interview conducted by the site supervisor using the final evaluation rubric; the supervisor rates performance on all task categories and provides verbal feedback, which the student summarizes in a one-page written reflection submitted to the program instructor.
  3. In a virtual or in-person debrief with the program instructor, the student presents three specific workplace situations—one involving food-safety decision-making, one involving a cost or labor issue, and one involving guest or staff communication—explaining what was done, why, and what credential-area knowledge was applied.
Completed weekly field logs, final employer evaluation rubric, portfolio binder or digital folder, credential exam content outlines (ServSafe Manager, ManageFirst, AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor), word processorProgram instructor verifies that all 243 hours are logged and signed by the supervisor; final employer evaluation rubric must show Proficient or Exemplary on at least 80 % of all rated items; portfolio is reviewed by the instructor and must include one substantive entry per week — any missing entries require the student to complete additional approved hours before the externship grade is awarded.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Site Supervisor Skills Evaluation (Skills Demonstration)Skills demonstration70%Proficient or Exemplary rating on at least 80 % of all rubric items on the final employer evaluation form; no Unsatisfactory rating left unresolved.The site supervisor completes the program's standardized final evaluation rubric assessing the student's live performance across food safety, sanitation compliance, guest service, team communication, cost-awareness behaviors, and professional conduct observed throughout the placement. This rubric-based skills demonstration is the primary evidence that the student can perform management-level tasks in a real foodservice environment.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Externship Field Log and Portfolio (Lab Log)Log30%All 243 hours documented with supervisor signatures; one substantive entry per week; all employer-assigned management-project deliverables rated Acceptable or Strong; instructor's portfolio review rates the overall submission Complete and Competent.The student submits the full set of weekly field-log entries and management-project deliverables assembled into a portfolio, which the program instructor evaluates for completeness, reflective depth, and explicit mapping to ServSafe Manager, ManageFirst, and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor exam domains. The portfolio serves as the official record of hours and competencies earned during the externship and is retained in the student's academic file.
Complete · Verified
HOS-REST26-12 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: ServSafe Manager, ManageFirst & AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor

68 hr · $680 COMPLIMENTARY

This course systematically reviews every domain tested on the ServSafe Manager, NRAEF ManageFirst, and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor credentialing exams through targeted lessons, gap analysis, and timed full-length mock exams. Students practice the exact question formats, vocabulary, and decision-making processes required to pass all three credentials. Emphasis is placed on connecting exam content to real workplace situations encountered throughout the program.

Outcomes
Course text

This course systematically reviews every domain tested on the ServSafe Manager, NRAEF ManageFirst, and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor credentialing exams through targeted lessons, gap analysis, and timed full-length mock exams. Students practice the exact question formats, vocabulary, and decision-making processes required to pass all three credentials. Emphasis is placed on connecting exam content to real workplace situations encountered throughout the program.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Diagnostic Assessment and Exam Domain Mapping; ServSafe Manager Deep-Dive Review; ManageFirst and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor Deep-Dive Review; Full-Length Timed Mock Certification Exams and Debrief.

What competent looks like. Accurately answer questions in all ServSafe Manager exam domains — including foodborne illness prevention, personal hygiene, time-temperature control, cleaning and sanitizing, and HACCP — at or above the passing threshold. Demonstrate command of ManageFirst competency areas including hospitality and restaurant management fundamentals, controlling foodservice costs, and human resources management as assessed by multiple-choice scenario questions. Apply AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor principles — including employee motivation, training, scheduling, communication, and legal compliance — to supervisory scenario questions at a passing level. Identify personal knowledge gaps across all three credential domains using diagnostic practice-test data and direct study effort accordingly. Manage exam-day time effectively by completing timed full-length mock exams within each credential's allotted window while maintaining accuracy. Interpret and explain rationale for both correct and incorrect answer choices, reinforcing transferable workplace judgment beyond test-taking.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Diagnostic Assessment and Exam Domain Mapping10theoryStudents will complete baseline diagnostic practice tests for all three credentials and map their individual score by domain to identify priority study areas.
  1. Complete a 40-question ServSafe Manager diagnostic covering foodborne pathogens, personal hygiene, purchasing and receiving, temperature control, cleaning and sanitizing, and HACCP; record percent correct by domain on a personal gap-analysis chart.
  2. Complete a 30-question ManageFirst diagnostic covering hospitality business fundamentals, cost control, purchasing, human resources, and legal compliance; annotate each wrong answer with the textbook chapter or program course where that content was taught.
  3. Complete a 25-question AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor diagnostic covering supervisory roles, motivating employees, training and development, communication, and legal issues; review answer rationales as a class using the AHLEI study guide and discuss how each scenario maps to externship experiences.
ServSafe Manager 7th-edition textbook and online practice test platform (National Restaurant Association), NRAEF ManageFirst Hospitality and Restaurant Management textbook and competency guide, AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor study guide and practice questions, printed gap-analysis tracking worksheet, pencils, calculators.Each student produces a completed three-credential gap-analysis chart showing percent correct in every domain; instructor reviews charts and confirms students have correctly categorized every wrong answer — all charts must accurately reflect diagnostic scores before advancing.
2ServSafe Manager Deep-Dive Review18practiceStudents will review all major ServSafe Manager exam domains and correctly answer domain-specific practice questions at 75 percent or above in each area.
  1. Work through instructor-led case studies on the Big Nine allergens and the major foodborne illness risk factors (improper holding temperatures, inadequate cooking, contaminated equipment, poor personal hygiene, food from unsafe sources); for each risk factor, students write one real-world restaurant scenario and the corrective action a manager must take.
  2. Complete a HACCP plan exercise using a sample menu item: identify biological, chemical, and physical hazards at each step, set critical limits, establish monitoring procedures, and document corrective actions on a HACCP worksheet — mirroring the applied-management questions on the ServSafe exam.
  3. Rotate through six timed 10-question domain quizzes (receiving and storage, personal hygiene, time-temperature control, cross-contamination, cleaning and sanitizing, facilities and pest control) using ServSafe online practice questions; after each quiz, pairs of students explain wrong answers aloud before checking rationales.
ServSafe Manager 7th-edition textbook, ServSafe Manager online practice question bank, HACCP plan worksheet templates, food-safety poster set, dry-erase board for group problem-solving, thermometer cards for temperature-limit reference.Students must score at least 75 percent on each of the six domain quizzes; any domain below 75 percent triggers a required re-study session with the instructor before the next lesson begins.
3ManageFirst and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor Deep-Dive Review20practiceStudents will review all tested competency areas for the ManageFirst and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor credentials and correctly answer scenario-based practice questions at 70 percent or above across both exams.
  1. Work through ManageFirst competency stations in small groups: Cost Control station (food-cost percentage calculations, beverage-cost control, labor scheduling math), Purchasing and Receiving station (vendor evaluation, purchase orders, invoice reconciliation), and Human Resources and Legal Compliance station (at-will employment, anti-harassment policy, disciplinary documentation); each group presents one real-world restaurant example per station to the class.
  2. Use AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor study guide chapters to role-play supervisory scenarios in pairs: one student plays a new shift supervisor, the other plays a challenging employee situation (performance issue, call-out, guest complaint escalation); the class evaluates the supervisor's response against AHLEI principles of communication, motivation, and legal boundaries.
  3. Complete a 30-question combined timed practice set mixing ManageFirst and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor question styles; students use answer-rationale cards to self-score and then rank their top three remaining weak areas on their gap-analysis chart, adjusting their final independent study plan accordingly.
NRAEF ManageFirst Hospitality and Restaurant Management textbook, ManageFirst competency guide and practice question sets, AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor study guide, role-play scenario cards (instructor-prepared), calculators, gap-analysis tracking worksheet (updated from Lesson 1), dry-erase board.Students must score at least 70 percent on the 30-question combined practice set; students who do not meet this threshold complete a structured 2-hour guided review session with the instructor targeting their documented weak domains before sitting the mock exams.
4Full-Length Timed Mock Certification Exams and Debrief20labStudents will complete full-length, timed, proctored mock exams for all three credentials under conditions that replicate the actual testing environment and score at or above each credential's published passing threshold.
  1. Sit a full-length ServSafe Manager mock exam (90 questions, 2-hour time limit) under proctored conditions — no notes, no phones, one scratch sheet — replicating authorized exam-day rules; immediately after, complete a structured written debrief identifying every wrong answer by domain and writing the correct rule or principle in plain language.
  2. Sit a full-length ManageFirst mock exam and a full-length AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor mock exam on consecutive days under the same proctored conditions; for each exam, students complete a timed debrief comparing their mock scores to their Lesson 1 diagnostic scores and document improvement or continued gaps on their final gap-analysis chart.
  3. Participate in a whole-class exam-debrief discussion facilitated by the instructor: review the most-missed questions across all three exams as a group, discuss test-taking strategies (eliminating obviously wrong answers, managing time across question blocks, flagging and returning to uncertain items), and each student sets a specific study action for any domain still below the passing threshold before sitting the real credentialing exams.
Printed full-length mock exams for all three credentials (ServSafe Manager, ManageFirst, AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor) or proctored online equivalents, scratch paper, No. 2 pencils, calculators (where permitted by credential rules), wall clock or proctor timer, final gap-analysis tracking worksheet, answer-key rationale packets for instructor-led debrief.Students must score at or above the published passing threshold for each credential on at least one mock attempt (ServSafe Manager currently requires 75 percent; ManageFirst and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor passing scores follow current publisher standards); any student below threshold on any credential receives a documented remediation plan with additional instructor-supervised study time before the official exam date.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Three-Credential Full Mock Exam SuiteMock certification exam100%Students must meet or exceed the current published passing score for each of the three credentials on the proctored full-length mock exams: ServSafe Manager (currently 75 percent), ManageFirst (per current NRAEF published standard), and AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor (per current AHLEI published standard); students who do not pass all three mocks complete a documented remediation plan and a second attempt before the official credentialing exams are scheduled.Students complete all three full-length, timed, proctored mock exams under conditions that replicate the official credentialing environment, then participate in a structured individual and group debrief that connects every wrong answer to a specific exam domain and a corrective understanding of the underlying principle. Scores, gap-analysis charts, and remediation plans are placed in each student's program portfolio as evidence of exam readiness.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: AHLEI Hospitality Supervisor; NRAEF ManageFirst; ServSafe Manager

Students sit the ServSafe Manager exam administered by the National Restaurant Association, the NRAEF ManageFirst credential exams administered by the National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation, and the Hospitality Supervisor certification exam administered by the American Hotel & Lodging Educational Institute (AHLEI). All three credentials are portable industry certifications recognized by employers nationwide, independent of the school that provided the training. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Restaurant Management · How the school gets authority to award these credentials