🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Agriculture, Environment & Public Service › Pest Control Technician › Courses
Agriculture, Environment & Public Service · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Pest Control Technician

9 courses · 450 clock hours · 2–3 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$4,095 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
9courses
44lessons
450hours
31assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons44 of 44 lesson pages writtenPractice352 practice questionsResources114 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 44 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
AGR-PEST78-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Pest Control Technicians

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips adult learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, technical literacy, digital skills, and professional habits required to work legally and competently as a pest control technician. Topics are anchored in OSHA 10-Hour General Industry standards, first aid/CPR, pesticide label math, and employer expectations drawn from the structural pest control industry. Successful completion prepares learners to engage safely with all subsequent technical courses and to enter externship placements ready to contribute on day one.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips adult learners with the safety knowledge, trade mathematics, technical literacy, digital skills, and professional habits required to work legally and competently as a pest control technician. Topics are anchored in OSHA 10-Hour General Industry standards, first aid/CPR, pesticide label math, and employer expectations drawn from the structural pest control industry. Successful completion prepares learners to engage safely with all subsequent technical courses and to enter externship placements ready to contribute on day one.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10-Hour General Industry for Pest Control; PPE Selection, Donning/Doffing, and Decontamination; First Aid, CPR, and Pesticide Exposure Response; Trade Math: Measurement, Dilution, and Application Rate Calculations; Technical Reading: Labels, SDS, Regulations, and Work Orders; Digital Tools, Documentation, and Electronic Reporting; Career Readiness: Professionalism, Communication, and Job-Entry Portfolio.

What competent looks like. Demonstrate compliance with OSHA 10-Hour General Industry hazard recognition and control standards as applied to pest control worksites, including proper PPE selection and donning/doffing procedures. Perform trade-specific math calculations accurately, including dilution ratios, concentration percentages, area and volume measurements, and label-required application rates, with no more than 5% error on a timed assessment. Read and interpret pesticide product labels, Safety Data Sheets, work orders, and technical service bulletins at a level sufficient to extract actionable safety and application information. Use digital tools common to the pest control industry — including route management software, electronic inspection forms, and online regulatory databases — to complete basic job documentation tasks. Apply first aid and CPR procedures for pesticide exposure scenarios and common worksite injuries, consistent with current American Red Cross or equivalent certification standards. Present a professional job-readiness portfolio that includes a resume, a mock customer communication, and a completed mock inspection report, meeting employer-benchmark standards discussed in class.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Hazard Recognition and OSHA 10-Hour General Industry for Pest Control30theoryStudents identify and categorize the primary workplace hazards encountered in structural pest control — chemical, physical, biological, and ergonomic — and explain the corresponding OSHA General Industry standards that govern each, earning OSHA 10-Hour completion.
  1. Complete all required OSHA 10-Hour General Industry modules (delivered through an OSHA-authorized provider or instructor), including hazard communication, fall protection, electrical safety, and respiratory protection, with built-in scenario discussions specific to pest control settings such as attic entries, crawl spaces, and chemical storage rooms.
  2. Analyze three photo-based case studies of real pest control worksite hazards — an unlabeled chemical drum in a service truck, an unmarked confined-space entry in a crawl space, and improper ladder use on a residential roof — and document the applicable OSHA standard violated and the corrective action required.
  3. Participate in a table-top lockout/tagout exercise in which students practice identifying energy sources (electrical panel access during rodent exclusion, for example), applying LOTO procedures on mock equipment, and verifying zero-energy state before simulated work begins.
OSHA 10-Hour General Industry authorized curriculum and completion cards; OSHA standards quick-reference card (1910 series); photo case-study packet; mock LOTO equipment (padlocks, hasp, tags); student workbooksStudents must pass the OSHA 10-Hour knowledge checks embedded in the authorized curriculum at the provider's required passing threshold, and score 80% or higher on a 25-question hazard-recognition quiz using trade-specific scenarios before advancing to the PPE lesson.
2PPE Selection, Donning/Doffing, and Decontamination18labStudents select the correct PPE ensemble for a given pesticide label requirement or worksite hazard, don and doff each item in the correct sequence without self-contamination, and perform a basic field decontamination procedure.
  1. Using three different pesticide product labels (representing low, moderate, and high toxicity categories), students work in pairs to identify the exact PPE language on each label, select matching items from a PPE inventory bin, and justify each choice in writing by citing the specific label section.
  2. Instructor demonstrates the correct donning sequence for a full chemical-resistant ensemble (coveralls, chemical-resistant gloves and boots, face shield, and half-face respirator with the appropriate cartridge type) and the doffing sequence designed to minimize dermal contact; students then perform the full sequence three times while a partner observes using a printed checklist.
  3. Students practice a simulated pesticide spill decontamination: they contain a mock spill (colored water on a hard surface), remove and bag contaminated PPE, rinse exposed skin areas at a portable eyewash station, complete a mock SDS-guided first-aid step card, and fill out a simulated incident report form.
Assorted PPE inventory: Tyvek coveralls, nitrile and chemical-resistant gloves, rubber boots, safety glasses, face shield, half-face respirator with organic vapor/P100 cartridges; NIOSH respirator fit-check instructions; portable eyewash station; mock spill kit; printed PPE donning/doffing checklist; three pesticide product labels (selected from actual registered products); Safety Data Sheets for those productsInstructor uses a 20-point performance checklist; students must complete the full donning, doffing, and decontamination sequence with no critical errors (defined as self-contamination, reversed doffing order, or skipped decontamination step) and score at least 16 of 20 points to pass.
3First Aid, CPR, and Pesticide Exposure Response16demoStudents demonstrate hands-only and full CPR, use of an AED, and the first-aid response steps for acute pesticide exposure scenarios, consistent with current American Red Cross or equivalent training standards, achieving certification.
  1. Complete a full American Red Cross First Aid/CPR/AED course (or equivalent nationally recognized provider) delivered on-site, including hands-on mannequin practice for adult CPR, two-rescuer CPR, infant CPR, choking response, and AED operation; the course concludes with a skills evaluation and issues a certification card valid for two years.
  2. Using the pesticide toxicity categories and first-aid statements from four actual product labels, students role-play as the emergency caller in a pesticide poisoning scenario: they read the label's first-aid section aloud, relay the active ingredient and EPA registration number to a mock poison control call, and describe the victim's route of exposure (dermal, inhalation, ingestion, or ocular) while a partner acts as the poison control operator and documents the call.
  3. Students practice eye-flush technique at the portable eyewash station for a minimum of 15 continuous seconds, explain why 15 minutes of continuous flushing is the standard for chemical eye contact, and correctly position a conscious pesticide exposure victim in the recovery position while narrating each step.
CPR mannequins (adult and infant); AED trainer unit; American Red Cross First Aid/CPR/AED course materials and certification cards; four actual pesticide product labels with first-aid sections highlighted; National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC) poison control reference card; portable eyewash station; student scenario cardsStudents must pass the American Red Cross (or equivalent) skills evaluation to receive their certification card. Additionally, they must score 80% or higher on a 10-item written quiz covering pesticide exposure routes, label-directed first aid, and poison control protocol.
4Trade Math: Measurement, Dilution, and Application Rate Calculations30practiceStudents accurately solve dilution ratio problems, concentration percentage calculations, area and volume measurements, and label-specified application rate problems typical of structural pest control work, with no more than 5% error on a timed problem set.
  1. Work through a structured problem bank of 40 graded calculations covering: converting between ounces, gallons, and milliliters; calculating the amount of concentrate needed to mix a tank to a label-specified percentage; computing square footage and cubic footage for rooms, crawl spaces, and attics; and determining how many gallons of finished product are needed to treat a structure at a given label rate — students self-check with an answer key and flag errors for group review.
  2. Pair exercise: one student reads aloud a real pesticide label's mixing directions and application rate section while the partner transcribes the numbers, then both independently solve for the total concentrate and water volumes needed for a given job scenario; partners compare answers, identify discrepancies, and reconcile using dimensional analysis.
  3. Timed mock exam of 20 trade math problems under conditions similar to a state pesticide applicator exam (no programmable calculator, 30-minute limit); instructor reviews every incorrect answer individually to diagnose whether the error is a conversion error, a label-reading error, or an arithmetic error.
Scientific calculator (non-programmable); trade math workbook developed for the course; three actual pesticide product labels with mixing and application rate directions; rulers, measuring tape; printed conversion table (US customary to metric and back); student graph paper for sketching floor plansStudents must score 80% or higher (16 of 20 correct) on the timed 20-problem mock exam with no more than 5% numerical error on any individual calculation to demonstrate competency; students below 80% receive targeted tutoring and a second attempt.
5Technical Reading: Labels, SDS, Regulations, and Work Orders20theoryStudents locate and extract required information from pesticide product labels, Safety Data Sheets in the GHS 16-section format, state regulatory bulletins, and commercial work orders, and explain how each document governs legal and safe practice.
  1. Label dissection exercise: each student receives a complete pesticide product label for a common structural pest control product and annotates it using a color-coding system — one color for signal word and toxicity, a second for application sites and use directions, a third for re-entry and pre-harvest intervals, and a fourth for storage and disposal — then completes a structured annotation worksheet that requires them to quote the label verbatim for five specific regulatory questions.
  2. SDS relay: instructor presents each of the 16 GHS sections of an SDS on a projected slide for 90 seconds; students must write down the section number, title, and one piece of information they would use in the field from that section; the class then builds a collaborative 'field use' reference card summarizing the sections most critical to pest control technicians (sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 13).
  3. Students read a sample state pesticide regulatory bulletin and a commercial pest control work order, then answer 10 comprehension questions that require them to identify what the regulation requires (for example, required posting time after a pesticide application in a school), what the work order authorizes, and what a technician should do if the two conflict.
Three full pesticide product labels (different signal words: Caution, Warning, Danger); one complete 16-section SDS for a common pest control product; color highlighters; annotation worksheets; sample state regulatory bulletin (generic language, not citing specific section numbers not verified); sample commercial work order; GHS SDS section reference cardStudents must complete the annotation worksheet with 100% of the five verbatim label quotations accurately transcribed and answer 8 of 10 comprehension questions correctly on the regulatory and work-order reading to demonstrate functional technical reading ability.
6Digital Tools, Documentation, and Electronic Reporting16labStudents use industry-representative digital tools — route management software, electronic inspection report forms, and an online regulatory database — to complete a simulated day's documentation for a structural pest control route.
  1. Using a demonstration account in a route management or field-service software platform commonly used in the pest control industry (such as a training environment for a widely available platform), students enter a simulated service stop: record the pest species observed, pesticide product applied (product name, EPA registration number, application site, quantity used), and technician notes — then generate and review the electronic service record for completeness.
  2. Students complete a mock electronic inspection report for a simulated residential property using a tablet or laptop: they map the inspection findings on a provided floor-plan template, note conducive conditions, recommend corrective actions, and write a customer-facing summary paragraph in plain language that avoids jargon and is appropriate for a non-expert reader.
  3. Students navigate a state pesticide regulatory agency website (using the actual public website for the state where the program is offered) to locate: the list of licensed pesticide applicators, the procedure for reporting a pesticide spill, and the forms required to renew a structural pest applicator license — then write a one-page plain-language summary of what they found.
Laptops or tablets (one per student or shared); demonstration account in a field-service or route management software; electronic inspection form template; floor-plan worksheet; internet access; state pesticide regulatory agency website; student digital documentation workbookInstructor reviews each student's completed electronic service record and inspection report against a 15-point rubric covering accuracy of required fields, completeness, clarity of customer summary, and correct regulatory data retrieval; students must earn 12 of 15 points to pass.
7Career Readiness: Professionalism, Communication, and Job-Entry Portfolio18practiceStudents produce a job-entry portfolio — including a trade-specific resume, a written customer communication, and a completed mock service report — that meets employer-benchmark standards, and demonstrate professional communication skills in a mock customer interaction.
  1. Resume workshop: using a pest control industry job description sourced from a current posting, students draft a one-page resume that highlights relevant coursework, PPE and safety certifications (OSHA 10, First Aid/CPR), any prior experience, and technical skills (label reading, route software); a peer reviews the draft against a provided employer checklist, then students produce a final version incorporating feedback.
  2. Role-play a customer communication scenario in pairs: one student plays a pest control technician who has just completed a treatment and must explain to a homeowner (played by the partner) what was applied, where, any re-entry precautions, and what to expect next — without reading directly from a script; the observing instructor scores the interaction on a professionalism rubric covering accuracy, plain language, courtesy, and completeness.
  3. Students write a professional email responding to a simulated customer complaint about a missed service appointment, following a provided framework (acknowledge, explain, offer resolution, close professionally) and then discuss as a group what escalation steps are appropriate when a complaint cannot be resolved at the technician level.
Sample pest control job postings (printed or digital); peer review checklist; resume template; customer communication scenario cards; professionalism rubric; email response framework handout; student portfolio folderPortfolio is scored on a 30-point rubric (10 points each for resume, customer communication, and service report); students must earn 24 of 30 points overall with no individual section below 7 of 10 to pass; the customer role-play must receive a passing score on all four categories of the professionalism rubric.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
OSHA and Workplace Safety Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% correct (40 of 50 questions)A 50-question multiple-choice exam covering OSHA 10-Hour General Industry hazard recognition, PPE selection and use, lockout/tagout procedures, and pesticide exposure first aid, with questions written in the context of structural pest control scenarios. Students must pass the embedded OSHA 10-Hour provider assessments as a prerequisite to sitting this exam.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Trade Math and Technical Reading ExamWritten exam25%80% correct (32 of 40 questions), with no individual calculation error exceeding 5%A 40-item timed exam (45 minutes, non-programmable calculator permitted) combining 25 trade math calculation problems — dilutions, area/volume, and application rates drawn from actual label language — with 15 technical reading comprehension questions requiring students to locate and apply information from a pesticide label and SDS provided with the exam.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Job-Entry Portfolio ProjectProject25%24 of 30 points overall; no individual section below 7 of 10Students submit a complete job-entry portfolio containing a finalized trade-specific resume, a written customer-facing service summary for a given scenario, and a fully completed mock electronic inspection report with floor-plan annotations; the portfolio is scored by the instructor against a published 30-point rubric emphasizing accuracy, professionalism, and clarity.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Professional Communication Oral DefenseOral / panel25%Pass on all four rubric categories (accuracy, plain language, courtesy, completeness); no single category may be scored FailEach student conducts a five-minute mock customer interaction with the instructor acting as a homeowner, explaining findings from their mock inspection report and responding to two scripted follow-up questions (one about re-entry safety and one about a minor complaint); the instructor scores the interaction live using a four-category professionalism rubric and provides immediate structured feedback.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
AGR-PEST78-02 Trade course

Entomology for Pest Control Technicians

29 hr · $365 COMPLIMENTARY

This course teaches the insect and arthropod biology that underpins every pest management decision a technician makes in the field. Learners study insect anatomy, life cycles, behavior, and taxonomy with direct application to common structural and agricultural pests encountered on the job. Content aligns with the biology and pest identification sections tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam and the NPMA certification.

Outcomes
Course text

This course teaches the insect and arthropod biology that underpins every pest management decision a technician makes in the field. Learners study insect anatomy, life cycles, behavior, and taxonomy with direct application to common structural and agricultural pests encountered on the job. Content aligns with the biology and pest identification sections tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam and the NPMA certification.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Insect Anatomy, Physiology, and Classification; Metamorphosis, Life Cycles, and Population Dynamics; Pest Behavior, Ecology, and Harborage; Arthropod Identification Laboratory — Specimens and Microscopy; Field Entomology — Pest Survey, Collection, and Reporting.

What competent looks like. Identify the major orders of insects and common arthropod pests relevant to structural pest control using morphological characteristics and dichotomous keys. Describe complete and incomplete metamorphosis life cycles and explain how each life stage affects pesticide selection and application timing. Explain insect anatomy and physiology — including the nervous, respiratory, and digestive systems — and relate these systems to the mode of action of major pesticide classes. Recognize the behavioral ecology of common structural pests (harborage preferences, foraging patterns, reproductive biology) and use that knowledge to support inspection and IPM decisions. Collect, preserve, and label arthropod specimens following standard entomological protocols and present accurate field identifications with supporting evidence. Apply entomological knowledge to interpret pest pressure, anticipate life-cycle timing, and communicate findings clearly in a written pest identification report.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Insect Anatomy, Physiology, and Classification6theoryGiven diagrams and preserved specimens, the learner will correctly label the external and internal anatomical structures of a generalized insect and place it in the correct class and order using a dichotomous key.
  1. Guided note-taking lecture covering the three body regions, appendages, wings, mouthpart types (chewing, piercing-sucking, sponging), and internal systems (nervous, tracheal, digestive); learners annotate a blank insect diagram as each structure is introduced.
  2. Dichotomous key exercise: learners work in pairs to key out ten preserved or pinned specimens from the most common structural pest orders (Blattodea, Isoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, Siphonaptera, Hemiptera, Lepidoptera, Psocoptera, Thysanura) and record their identification pathway on a structured worksheet.
  3. Short gallery walk in which labeled specimen trays are displayed around the room; each learner writes one anatomical observation and one behavioral inference on a sticky note posted beside each tray, followed by whole-class debrief.
Preserved or plastinated insect specimens, hand lenses (10×), compound microscopes, blank insect anatomy diagrams, Borror & White 'A Field Guide to the Insects' or equivalent regional field guide, dichotomous key worksheets, whiteboard, projector with annotated slide deckExit-ticket diagram: learner labels a minimum of 15 of 18 designated structures correctly (83% pass) and correctly identifies at least 8 of 10 keyed specimens with a documented key pathway.
2Metamorphosis, Life Cycles, and Population Dynamics6theoryThe learner will compare complete (holometabolous) and incomplete (hemimetabolous) metamorphosis, describe each life stage of at least four structural pest species, and explain how life-stage knowledge determines the most effective timing and method for pest control intervention.
  1. Lecture and discussion on holometabolous vs. hemimetabolous development, including the role of molting (ecdysis), hormone regulation (juvenile hormone, ecdysone concepts at a general level), and the vulnerability of each life stage to control methods; learners complete a comparison chart.
  2. Case-study carousel: four stations, each focused on a high-priority structural pest (German cockroach, bed bug, house fly, subterranean termite); learners rotate every 12 minutes, reading a one-page species profile and annotating a blank life-cycle wheel with stage names, duration ranges, and the control window most recommended in current industry literature.
  3. 'Degree-day' concept introduction: instructor demonstrates how accumulated heat units predict pest emergence using a simple degree-day calculation worksheet with hypothetical temperature data; learners calculate the estimated time to adult emergence for a sample pest scenario and discuss how this changes inspection scheduling.
Life-cycle wall charts (cockroach, termite, fly, bed bug), species profile handouts, blank life-cycle wheel worksheets, degree-day calculation worksheet, projector slide deck, NPMA Field Guide to Structural Pests (current edition) or equivalentLearner completes a life-cycle identification quiz (20 multiple-choice and short-answer items) and scores 75% or higher; instructor also confirms the degree-day worksheet calculation is correct within ±5 degree-days.
3Pest Behavior, Ecology, and Harborage6demoThe learner will explain the behavioral drivers (thigmotaxis, phototaxis, pheromone communication, foraging patterns) of at least six common structural pests and use that knowledge to predict likely harborage locations during a simulated building inspection.
  1. Instructor-led demonstration using a mock structural cross-section model (or physical room setup) to show how cockroach thigmotaxis, rodent neophobia, ant pheromone trails, and bed bug cryptic harborage choices translate into specific hiding spots; learners sketch and annotate the model in their field notebooks.
  2. Video analysis activity: learners watch short, narrated footage clips of German cockroach aggregation behavior, subterranean termite foraging tubes, and carpenter ant satellite colony establishment; after each clip, learners write a one-paragraph behavioral summary and identify the corresponding inspection technique.
  3. Simulated inspection walkthrough: instructor sets up a staged room with planted 'evidence' (shed skins, frass, grease marks, mud tubes, egg cases, gnaw marks); learners conduct a 15-minute solo inspection, record findings on a standard pest inspection form, and present their top three behavioral inferences to the group.
Mock room or structural cross-section display, planted pest evidence (shed skins, frass samples, artificial mud tubes, egg cases), standard pest inspection form, field notebooks, video clips (instructor-sourced from peer-reviewed or trade-association materials), hand lenses, flashlights, probes/screwdrivers for inspection simulationLearner correctly identifies at least 5 of 7 planted evidence items on the inspection form, records a defensible behavioral explanation for each finding, and receives instructor sign-off; minimum 71% accuracy on evidence identification.
4Arthropod Identification Laboratory — Specimens and Microscopy7labUsing a microscope, hand lens, and dichotomous key, the learner will correctly identify to order and common name a set of unknown arthropod specimens and document each identification in a formatted lab log entry.
  1. Proper microscope setup and slide preparation: instructor demonstrates wet-mount preparation of a small arthropod appendage; learners practice focusing at low and high power, measuring body length using an ocular micrometer scale, and sketching what they see at the correct magnification with scale bars.
  2. Unknown specimen identification practical: each learner receives a tray of eight numbered, unlabeled specimens (a mix of insects and non-insect arthropods such as spiders, mites, millipedes, and sowbugs); learners work independently to key each specimen and record order, common name, and two diagnostic features on a standardized lab log form.
  3. Peer verification round: learners exchange trays with a classmate and independently re-key three of the eight specimens; discrepancies are discussed openly with the instructor who provides the answer key and explains any common misidentifications relevant to field work.
Compound microscopes, hand lenses (10×), glass slides and coverslips, forceps, dissecting needles, ethanol (70%) for specimen preparation, labeled specimen reference tray, eight-specimen unknown trays, standardized lab log forms, dichotomous key, NPMA Field Guide or equivalent, safety goggles, nitrile glovesLab log entry is complete with specimen sketch, scale bar, key pathway, order, common name, and two diagnostic features for all eight specimens; learner achieves correct identification on at least 6 of 8 specimens (75%) with all safety and PPE protocols followed (documented by instructor on a lab safety checklist — any PPE violation requires repeat of that segment before sign-off).
5Field Entomology — Pest Survey, Collection, and Reporting4fieldWorking outdoors on or near campus, the learner will collect arthropod specimens using at least two trapping or collection methods, preserve them correctly, and produce a written pest identification report that links findings to structural pest risk and an initial IPM recommendation.
  1. Pre-field safety briefing: instructor reviews personal protective equipment requirements for outdoor fieldwork (long sleeves, closed-toe shoes, insect repellent considerations, awareness of stinging/biting hazards), emergency contact protocols, and the buddy system; learners sign a field safety acknowledgment form before exiting the building.
  2. Field collection exercise: working in pairs, learners deploy sticky trap monitoring cards and conduct a 20-minute active sweep/search of an assigned outdoor zone (building perimeter, landscape beds, dumpster area, or similar); all collected specimens are placed into labeled vials with ethanol and a data label (date, location, collector, habitat note) following standard entomological labeling conventions.
  3. Report writing workshop (conducted immediately after field return): learners compile their field notes and identified specimens into a one-page pest identification report using a provided template — sections include site description, species found, life stage observed, behavioral risk assessment, and one IPM recommendation supported by the entomological evidence; reports are peer-reviewed before final instructor submission.
Sticky monitoring cards, collection vials with 70% ethanol, forceps, hand lenses, data labels, permanent markers, field notebooks, PPE (long sleeves, closed-toe shoes, gloves), pest identification report template, NPMA Field Guide or equivalent, first aid kit (carried in field), buddy-system rosterInstructor evaluates the pest identification report using a rubric (species identified correctly with supporting evidence, accurate life stage, logical IPM recommendation, professional format); minimum score of 75% on rubric; all specimens properly labeled and preserved — any improper chemical handling or PPE non-compliance in the field is a mandatory fail requiring the field session to be repeated.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Entomology Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% (38 of 50 points)A 50-item written exam (multiple choice and matching) covering insect anatomy, metamorphosis types, life cycles, behavioral ecology, and arthropod classification; items are written to mirror the pest biology and identification question domains found on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam and the NPMA certification exam.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pest Identification Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Correct identification with documented key pathway for at least 8 of 10 specimens; all PPE worn throughoutThe learner is given 10 unlabeled specimens and 30 minutes to identify each to order and common name using a dichotomous key and hand lens, recording the diagnostic features that support each identification; the instructor observes technique, use of tools, and adherence to lab safety protocols throughout the demonstration.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab Log PortfolioLog15%All five lesson lab log entries present and complete; overall portfolio score of 75% on the rubricThe learner submits a compiled lab log containing entries from all laboratory and field activities in the course, each entry including date, objective, methods, labeled sketches or specimen data, results, and a one-sentence connection to field pest control practice; entries are scored on completeness, accuracy, and professional formatting.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Field and Lab Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% compliance on all mandatory safety behaviors; any single critical violation (no PPE, improper chemical handling) is an automatic fail requiring remediation before course completionThe instructor completes a standardized safety observation checklist during the Lesson 4 laboratory and the Lesson 5 field session, verifying that the learner consistently wears required PPE, handles preserved specimens and ethanol correctly, follows the buddy system in the field, and responds appropriately to a verbal simulated emergency prompt.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-PEST78-03 Trade course

Pesticides & Integrated Pest Management

29 hr · $365 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn how pesticides are classified, formulated, mixed, and applied in structural pest control settings, with emphasis on label reading as a legal document and dose calculation. The course introduces Integrated Pest Management (IPM) as the professional framework for combining chemical, biological, mechanical, and cultural controls to reduce pest pressure while protecting human health and the environment. Lesson content aligns directly with the pesticide-use and IPM exam domains tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) license and the NPMA certification.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn how pesticides are classified, formulated, mixed, and applied in structural pest control settings, with emphasis on label reading as a legal document and dose calculation. The course introduces Integrated Pest Management (IPM) as the professional framework for combining chemical, biological, mechanical, and cultural controls to reduce pest pressure while protecting human health and the environment. Lesson content aligns directly with the pesticide-use and IPM exam domains tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) license and the NPMA certification.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Pesticide Labels, SDS, and the Regulatory Framework; Pesticide Chemistry: Formulations, Classification, and Resistance Management; Pesticide Math: Dilutions, Rates, and Equipment Calibration; Integrated Pest Management: Principles, Inspection, and IPM Plan Writing; Safe Handling, Mixing, Application, and Emergency Response.

What competent looks like. Read and interpret a pesticide label and Safety Data Sheet (SDS) to identify use classification, PPE requirements, REI, PHI where applicable, and first-aid directions before handling any product. Calculate the correct amount of concentrate needed for a target dilution and application area using label rate, area measurements, and calibrated equipment, rounding to safe precision. Classify a pesticide by mode of action (IRAC/FRAC group), chemical family, formulation type, and signal word, and explain why rotating modes of action slows resistance development. Design a written IPM plan for a structural pest scenario that sequences inspection, threshold assessment, non-chemical controls, and targeted pesticide application with documentation. Demonstrate proper mixing, loading, and disposal of a pesticide formulation wearing the label-mandated PPE, following all label directions and applicable federal regulations. Identify the federal and state regulatory framework governing pesticide use in structural applications, including the roles of EPA, state lead agency, restricted-use product (RUP) requirements, and recordkeeping obligations.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Pesticide Labels, SDS, and the Regulatory Framework6theoryGiven a pesticide label and its SDS, the student identifies every required label section, interprets signal words, hazard statements, PPE requirements, and restricted-use status, and explains the chain of federal and state authority governing that product.
  1. Label dissection exercise: students receive three actual pesticide labels (general-use and restricted-use examples) and complete a structured worksheet identifying all federally required label sections — product name, EPA registration number, active ingredient, signal word, precautionary statements, directions for use, storage and disposal, and first-aid. Groups compare findings and the instructor clarifies misconceptions.
  2. SDS scavenger hunt: using the 16-section GHS/OSHA SDS format, pairs locate the acute toxicity data (LD50/LC50), exposure limits, first-aid measures, and spill procedures for the same products, then discuss how SDS and label information complement each other.
  3. Regulatory mapping discussion: instructor guides a whole-class walkthrough of how FIFRA delegates authority to states, what 'restricted-use pesticide' means for a structural applicator, who the state lead agency is, and what recordkeeping a licensed applicator must maintain. Students draft a one-page summary of the federal-to-state regulatory chain for their portfolio.
At least three genuine pesticide labels (one RUP, two general-use) sourced from manufacturer websites; corresponding SDS documents; EPA FIFRA overview fact sheet; state pesticide applicator law reference sheet; student worksheets; whiteboard.Completed label worksheet scored against an answer key; students must correctly identify all required label sections and accurately interpret signal word and PPE requirements on at least two of three labels (80% accuracy) to pass this lesson check.
2Pesticide Chemistry: Formulations, Classification, and Resistance Management6theoryThe student classifies a given pesticide by formulation type, chemical family, target pest mode of action using IRAC groupings, and explains how improper rotation leads to resistance, selecting an appropriate rotation strategy for a described scenario.
  1. Formulation identification lab-lite: students examine labeled containers or photographs of emulsifiable concentrate (EC), wettable powder (WP), soluble concentrate (SC), bait, aerosol, dust, and microencapsulated (ME) formulations, matching each to its characteristics (solubility, PPE considerations, mixing behavior) on a comparison chart.
  2. Mode-of-action card sort: using IRAC group reference cards, students sort a set of 20 pesticide product cards by mode-of-action group (e.g., acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, sodium channel modulators, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists). They then role-play an IPM technician who must choose a rotation sequence for a population showing suspected pyrethroid tolerance, justifying the switch using IRAC guidance.
  3. Resistance case-study reading and discussion: instructor assigns a short, published extension-service article on bed bug pyrethroid resistance; students answer guided questions on what selection pressure is, what cross-resistance means, and list three label-compliant strategies to slow resistance in a structural account.
Pesticide formulation samples or high-resolution photo set; IRAC mode-of-action classification card set (printable from irac-online.org); pesticide product cards; resistance case-study article (university extension source); student comparison chart worksheets.Card-sort accuracy checked by instructor: students must correctly classify at least 16 of 20 products by IRAC group (80%) and correctly name at least four distinct formulation types with one characteristic each to pass.
3Pesticide Math: Dilutions, Rates, and Equipment Calibration6labUsing label rates and field measurements, the student calculates concentrate volumes for target dilutions and total tank mixes, calibrates a hand-pump sprayer output, and adjusts the mix to deliver the label rate per 1,000 sq ft within a 5% tolerance.
  1. Guided practice problem set: working through 15 stepped problems, students calculate ounces of concentrate per gallon for a percentage dilution, gallons of finished spray for a given area, and the number of tank loads needed for a route stop; each problem mirrors a label scenario. The instructor reviews every problem step-by-step before students self-correct.
  2. Sprayer calibration field exercise: each student uses a hand-pump compression sprayer filled with plain water, applies to a marked 1,000-sq-ft area outdoors or in a gymnasium, then measures the water used to determine output per unit area. Students compare output to the label rate, calculate the concentrate needed to hit the label rate exactly, and document their calibration in a field log.
  3. Mock mixing scenario: given a scenario card (pest species, treatment area square footage, label rate in oz/gal, and desired tank size), each student independently calculates all quantities, completes a pre-mix checklist (PPE, label on hand, measuring device, spill kit present), and has their math verified by a peer before any water is measured — no actual pesticide is used.
Hand-pump compression sprayers (one per two students); measuring tape; graduated cylinders; buckets; water; calculator; label rate reference sheets; calibration field log forms; math problem-set handout; outdoor or large indoor space marked in a 1,000-sq-ft grid.Calibration field log reviewed: sprayer output calculation must be within 5% of instructor-measured actual output. Mock mixing math must be 100% correct on the final calculation to pass (one re-attempt allowed with instructor coaching).
4Integrated Pest Management: Principles, Inspection, and IPM Plan Writing6practiceGiven a structural pest scenario with inspection data, the student writes a complete IPM plan that correctly sequences inspection, pest identification, threshold assessment, non-chemical and chemical control options, and documentation, meeting industry IPM plan standards.
  1. IPM framework lecture and diagram build: instructor presents the IPM pyramid (prevention → monitoring → thresholds → non-chemical controls → targeted pesticide use) using real structural pest examples (German cockroaches, rodents, bed bugs). Students build their own annotated diagram and label each tier with at least two concrete tactics used in structural pest control.
  2. Inspection simulation: using a classroom set up as a mock commercial kitchen, students conduct a structured inspection using a clipboard form — they identify and record conducive conditions (harborage, moisture, entry points, food sources), locate simulated pest evidence (prop frass, molted skins, rodent droppings), and photograph findings. Emphasis is placed on documentation quality because inspection records are a legal and business asset.
  3. IPM plan drafting workshop: each student receives a scenario card describing a pest species, facility type, client concerns, and inspection findings. Using a provided IPM plan template, they write a plan that includes: pest ID and life stage noted, action threshold justification, at least two non-chemical controls, one targeted pesticide recommendation with label citation, monitoring schedule, and a follow-up date. Peers cross-review plans against a rubric.
Mock inspection site (classroom set up with props); inspection report forms; IPM plan template; scenario cards; simulated pest evidence props; digital camera or smartphone; magnifier; flashlight; EPA IPM in schools reference (adaptable to structural); NPMA technical reference for IPM.IPM plan graded on rubric: all six required components (pest ID, threshold, non-chemical control, pesticide selection with label cite, monitoring schedule, follow-up date) must be present and internally consistent. Plans scoring below 80% on the rubric are revised and re-submitted within one class session.
5Safe Handling, Mixing, Application, and Emergency Response5demoFollowing label directions and applicable safety standards, the student selects and dons correct PPE, mixes a simulated pesticide product safely, demonstrates spill containment, and correctly describes first-aid steps for dermal and ocular pesticide exposure before any classmate demonstrates independently.
  1. PPE selection and donning demonstration: instructor demonstrates the sequence for selecting PPE from a signal-word and label-specified PPE list, then dons and doffs chemical-resistant gloves, apron, goggles, and respirator correctly. Each student then selects PPE for two contrasting label scenarios (one requiring only gloves and eye protection, one requiring a full-face respirator), dons and doffs under observation, and is checked for proper fit and any contamination errors during doffing.
  2. Simulated mix-load and spill response: students rotate through a mixing station where they follow a pre-mix checklist, measure and add a colored water 'concentrate' to a sprayer using proper container-rinsing technique (triple rinse), then intentionally create a minor simulated spill and contain it using absorbent material and a spill kit. Students document the spill on an incident log form.
  3. Emergency scenario role-play: instructor calls out three pesticide exposure scenarios (ingestion, skin contact, eye splash) one at a time; students verbally walk through the label first-aid steps, then identify the Poison Control Center number (1-800-222-1222), and practice reading the relevant SDS section aloud to a mock dispatcher — reinforcing that the label and SDS are the first references in any exposure event.
Assorted PPE (chemical-resistant gloves in multiple sizes, goggles, face shield, apron, half-face and full-face respirators with appropriate cartridges for demonstration); spill kit (absorbent, waste bags, labels); compression sprayers; colored water as surrogate concentrate; pre-mix checklist; spill incident log forms; SDS documents; first-aid reference card with Poison Control Center number posted visibly.PPE donning and doffing observed by instructor using a pass/fail checklist: zero contamination errors during doffing required to pass. Spill containment steps must be performed in correct sequence. Students who fail either component repeat the demo before the end of the lesson.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Pesticide & IPM Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (30 of 40 items correct)A 40-item multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering pesticide label interpretation, regulatory framework (FIFRA, state authority, RUP rules, recordkeeping), formulation types, chemical classification, mode of action, resistance management, IPM principles and plan components, dilution and rate math, and emergency response procedures. Items are written to match the cognitive level and content domains tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) license exam so students receive practice in that exam format.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pesticide Mixing and Application Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Pass all five critical steps with zero safety violations; no re-attempt with a critical safety errorThe student is given a scenario card with a pest, facility type, and treatment area and must: select correct PPE from the label, perform the dilution calculation correctly, mix a surrogate product using proper technique including triple-rinse, apply to a designated surface using a calibrated sprayer at the label rate, and document the application on a service record form. An instructor evaluates each step against a five-category rubric (PPE selection, math accuracy, mixing technique, application technique, documentation); any critical safety violation (e.g., no gloves, incorrect rate by more than 10%) results in an immediate stop and a required remediation before re-attempt.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
IPM Plan and Inspection Lab LogLog15%80% overall on the rubric; all six plan components must be presentStudents submit the IPM plan written during Lesson 4 plus their inspection field notes and any photographs from the mock inspection exercise, compiled as a single lab log entry. The rubric evaluates completeness (all six components present), accuracy of pest identification and threshold rationale, appropriateness of control tactics, quality of documentation, and correct pesticide label citation. This document represents the type of written record a licensed applicator maintains and defends in a regulatory audit.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
PPE and Spill-Response Safety CheckSafety audit15%Pass/fail — all critical safety behaviors must be demonstrated correctly with zero errors; one coached re-attempt permittedA structured observation conducted during or immediately after Lesson 5 in which the instructor uses a binary (pass/fail per item) safety checklist to verify: correct PPE selected and donned for the given label, zero doffing contamination, spill containment steps in correct sequence, and accurate verbal recitation of first-aid and Poison Control contact steps for an assigned exposure scenario. Any item failed triggers immediate instructor feedback and a re-attempt the same session; persistent failure requires additional supervised practice before the student may continue to Lesson 4 of the next course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-PEST78-04 Trade course

Termite and Wood-Destroying Organism Identification, Inspection, and Control

29 hr · $365 COMPLIMENTARY

This course teaches students to identify, inspect for, and control termites and other wood-destroying organisms (WDOs) found in and around structures in the United States. Students learn the biology, damage signs, inspection protocols, and integrated pest management strategies for subterranean and drywood termites, wood-boring beetles, and wood-decay fungi. Lessons map directly to the wood-destroying organism content areas tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) license exam and the NPMA certification.

Outcomes
Course text

This course teaches students to identify, inspect for, and control termites and other wood-destroying organisms (WDOs) found in and around structures in the United States. Students learn the biology, damage signs, inspection protocols, and integrated pest management strategies for subterranean and drywood termites, wood-boring beetles, and wood-decay fungi. Lessons map directly to the wood-destroying organism content areas tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) license exam and the NPMA certification.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: WDO Biology, Identification, and Damage Recognition; Termite and WDO Inspection Procedures and Report Writing; Liquid Termiticide Application: Soil Treatment and Barrier Methods; Termite Bait Systems, Borates, and Non-Chemical IPM Strategies; Integrated Review: Inspection to Treatment Plan with Safety and Legal Compliance.

What competent looks like. Identify the major wood-destroying organisms found in US structures—including subterranean termites, drywood termites, dampwood termites, wood-boring beetles, and wood-decay fungi—by species group, life stage, and diagnostic sign. Conduct a systematic WDO inspection of a residential structure using standard inspection tools and document findings on a written inspection report consistent with state licensing requirements. Explain the biology and behavior of Eastern subterranean termites, Formosan subterranean termites, drywood termites, and common wood-boring beetles well enough to select appropriate IPM control strategies. Describe the correct selection, mixing, application, and safety precautions for liquid termiticides, termite bait systems, and borates, referencing the product label as the legal standard. Demonstrate proper personal protective equipment (PPE) selection and use for termite and WDO chemical applications in compliance with label requirements and OSHA standards. Complete and interpret a mock WDO inspection report, identifying deficiencies and recommending corrective actions in language a homeowner can understand.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1WDO Biology, Identification, and Damage Recognition7theoryGiven photographs, physical specimens, and damage samples, students will correctly identify at least eight WDO species groups by distinguishing morphological features and damage sign with 80% accuracy on a written identification quiz.
  1. Lecture and illustrated slide presentation covering the taxonomy, caste structure, life cycles, and geographic distribution of subterranean termites (including Reticulitermes spp. and Coptotermes formosanus), drywood termites (Incisitermes and Cryptotermes spp.), dampwood termites, powderpost beetles (Lyctidae, Bostrichidae, Anobiidae), old house borers, and wood-decay fungi; students take Cornell-method notes and label diagrams
  2. Specimen lab: students examine pinned and preserved insect specimens, frass samples, kick-out holes, mud tubes, and wood-damage cross-sections under magnification, completing a written identification worksheet that requires naming the organism and listing two diagnostic features for each sample
  3. Small-group card-sort activity in which teams match laminated cards bearing photos of damage signs (e.g., frass pellets, mud tubes, stained wood, exit holes) to the correct organism group, then present their reasoning to the class for peer correction and instructor feedback
Pinned insect specimens or quality replica kits, wood-damage display blocks (mud tubes, frass, galleries), dissecting magnifiers, Peterson Field Guide to Insects or equivalent trade reference, NPMA Field Guide to Structural Pests (current edition), projected slide deck, Cornell-note templates, identification worksheetsWritten identification quiz of 20 photographic specimens and damage samples; students must score 16/20 (80%) correct, naming the organism group and one key diagnostic feature for each; instructor reviews any missed items one-on-one before the lesson is marked complete
2Termite and WDO Inspection Procedures and Report Writing7demoStudents will perform a complete WDO inspection of a mock residential structure following a systematic inspection sequence, correctly using all standard inspection tools, and produce a written inspection report that captures all planted evidence items at 100% detection rate.
  1. Instructor demonstration of a head-to-toe WDO inspection on the school's training structure or a designated practice area: students observe proper use of a flashlight, probe/screwdriver, moisture meter, sounding tool, and telescoping mirror while the instructor narrates each zone inspected (foundation, crawl space, sill plates, subfloor, wall voids, attic, exterior wood), explains access limitations, and shows how to record findings in real time on a standard inspection form
  2. Paired practice inspection: each pair of students conducts a full mock inspection of the same structure after the instructor has placed a set of 10 pre-identified evidence markers (mud tube sections, frass deposits, stained wood, damaged probe points); students use the inspection form to document location, organism suspected, and severity, then compare their completed forms against the master evidence list
  3. Report-writing workshop: students draft a homeowner-ready WDO inspection report from their practice findings, then exchange reports with another pair for peer review against a grading rubric that checks for completeness, accurate location descriptions, recommended corrective actions, and professional language; the instructor leads a whole-class debrief on common errors
Flashlight (minimum 200 lumens), flathead screwdriver or steel probe, pin-type moisture meter, rubber mallet, telescoping inspection mirror, knee pads, disposable Tyvek coveralls, nitrile gloves, standard WDO inspection form (state-compliant template), clipboard, pencil, evidence-marker set, peer-review rubric, NPMA inspection reference cardStudents must locate and document at least 9 of 10 planted evidence items (90% detection) and submit a written inspection report that earns a passing score of 75% or higher on the rubric; any student below either threshold repeats the inspection with a fresh evidence set before advancing
3Liquid Termiticide Application: Soil Treatment and Barrier Methods6labStudents will correctly calculate a liquid termiticide dilution, set up application equipment, and apply a simulated soil barrier treatment to a practice trench, demonstrating label compliance and full PPE use throughout.
  1. Label-reading workshop: instructor distributes the full product labels for two representative non-repellent and repellent liquid termiticides; working in pairs, students read the directions for use section, identify the correct dilution rate for a pre-construction soil treatment, and calculate the volume of concentrate needed to treat a hypothetical 1,500 sq ft foundation perimeter at the label-specified rate, showing all unit-conversion math on a worksheet
  2. Equipment setup and calibration lab: students set up a small (2–3 gallon) backpack or pump sprayer with a soil injection rod, check all seals, measure and mix a water-only training solution to the same volume calculated in the previous activity, and confirm output rate by timing a known volume into a graduated container; any sprayer delivering outside the target range is adjusted and re-tested before students proceed
  3. Simulated soil barrier application: in an outdoor practice area or sandbox trench, each student dons full required PPE (chemical-resistant gloves, safety glasses, long sleeves, closed-toe boots as specified on the label), applies the water training solution to the practice trench at the calculated volume, maintains proper rod depth and rod-spacing technique throughout, and then properly decontaminates equipment and disposes of rinse water according to label instructions; instructor observes and scores with a performance checklist
Product labels (two representative termiticides, instructor-supplied copies), backpack pump sprayer with soil injection rod, graduated cylinders, gallon jugs for measuring, outdoor sandbox or trench area, water (training solution), chemical-resistant gloves (label-specified), safety glasses, Tyvek coveralls, closed-toe chemical-resistant boots, math worksheet, equipment-calibration log, performance checklistStudents must (1) calculate the correct volume within ±5% error on the math worksheet, (2) achieve a calibrated output rate within ±10% of target, and (3) score 100% on all PPE and label-compliance items on the performance checklist; any deficiency in PPE compliance is an automatic re-do of that portion before the student may continue
4Termite Bait Systems, Borates, and Non-Chemical IPM Strategies5practiceStudents will select and justify an appropriate IPM treatment strategy—bait system, borate wood treatment, or structural/environmental modification—for at least three distinct WDO infestation scenarios, referencing label requirements and IPM principles.
  1. Comparative technology presentation: instructor leads a structured comparison of in-ground bait station systems, above-ground bait stations, and borate wood treatments, covering active ingredients, mode of action, installation spacing and depth requirements, monitoring intervals, and situations in which each is preferred over liquid soil treatment; students complete a comparison matrix that will serve as a study reference
  2. Scenario analysis in small groups: each group receives a detailed written case study (e.g., a slab-on-grade home with active subterranean termites near a water well setback, a historic log cabin with drywood termite infestation, a crawl-space structure with dampwood termites and ongoing moisture intrusion); groups select and defend an IPM treatment recommendation—including any structural or moisture-management corrective actions—and present it to the class with the instructor providing real-world feedback
  3. Hands-on bait station installation practice: using manufacturer training kits or decommissioned hardware, students stake and install in-ground bait station housings at the correct spacing along a mock foundation line, record station locations on a scaled diagram, and complete a mock monitoring report card for each station as if it had been inspected 90 days after initial installation
Termite bait station training kits or decommissioned bait station hardware, rubber mallet, measuring tape, borate product label and SDS, scenario case-study packets, blank comparison matrix, graph paper for scaled diagrams, monitoring report card templates, NPMA Field Guide to Structural PestsStudents submit a written scenario-analysis response for one assigned case study (different from their group presentation case); responses are graded on a four-criteria rubric (correct organism identification, appropriate treatment selection justified by label or biology, inclusion of IPM non-chemical measures, safety/label compliance); passing score is 75%; responses below 75% are revised once with instructor feedback before the grade is recorded
5Integrated Review: Inspection to Treatment Plan with Safety and Legal Compliance4fieldStudents will complete an end-to-end simulated service call—inspection, written report, treatment plan, and verbal customer communication—demonstrating integration of identification, inspection, treatment selection, safety, and regulatory knowledge at a professional standard.
  1. Full simulated service call: each student independently inspects a prepared mock structure (evidence set not seen before), selects appropriate PPE before entering each zone, documents all findings on a WDO inspection form, and writes a treatment recommendation that references the correct product label, application method, and any required pre-treatment disclosures or state-mandated notification requirements
  2. Verbal customer debrief role-play: student presents findings and recommendations to the instructor playing a homeowner; the instructor asks realistic homeowner questions (cost, safety concerns, how long results take, guarantee language) and grades the student's communication clarity, accuracy, and professionalism on a rubric
  3. Credential exam area mapping review: the class reconvenes for a 30-minute facilitated review in which the instructor maps each lesson topic to the corresponding content domain on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam and the NPMA certification outline; students mark their personal study guides and identify any content area needing further review before the Capstone and Exam Prep courses
Fully prepared mock structure with unseen evidence set, WDO inspection form, treatment-plan template, label copies for two treatment products, PPE (full set as appropriate to each zone), homeowner-debrief rubric, State Pesticide Applicator exam content outline (state-issued), NPMA certification content outline, student personal study guidesInstructor scores the completed inspection report (90% of planted evidence found), written treatment plan (pass/fail on each safety and label-compliance item—all must pass), and homeowner debrief rubric (75% overall); any single failing element must be remediated with a second attempt on a parallel scenario before the course grade is awarded
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
WDO Identification and Biology Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% (30 of 40 questions correct)A 40-question written exam covering organism identification, life cycles, damage signs, inspection methods, treatment chemistry, label interpretation, and IPM principles as addressed in all five lessons. Questions are written in the multiple-choice and short-answer formats used on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam and the NPMA certification, giving students direct practice with credential-style items. Students who score below 75% complete a targeted review and sit an alternate-form exam within one week.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Inspection and Treatment Plan Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Detect 90% of planted evidence; 100% of PPE and label-compliance checklist items; treatment plan rubric 75% overallEach student independently conducts a timed WDO inspection of the practice structure, completes an inspection report, and writes a treatment plan; the instructor observes and scores using a structured performance checklist that mirrors the field competencies evaluated in externship employer reports. All critical safety and label-compliance items are pass/fail with no partial credit; failure of any critical item requires immediate remediation and re-demonstration before the student advances.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Lab and Field Activity LogLog15%All five lesson logs submitted; each log scores 75% or higher on the completeness and accuracy rubricStudents maintain a running lab log throughout the course documenting observations, calculations, equipment readings, and reflective notes from each hands-on lesson; entries must include date, activity, materials used, data recorded, and a one-paragraph reflection on what was learned and how it relates to real field practice. The compiled log is submitted at course end and evaluated for factual accuracy, completeness, and professional documentation habits that will be required in externship and licensed field work.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety and Regulatory Compliance CheckSafety audit15%100% on all critical safety and regulatory items; no deductions permitted on PPE, SDS, or label-compliance line itemsThe instructor conducts a structured observation at the conclusion of the soil-treatment lab, verifying that each student can independently select and don correct PPE, locate and interpret the SDS for an assigned product, identify the required pre-application notification obligations under the product label, and properly decontaminate and store equipment. This check is graded pass/fail on every critical item with zero tolerance for PPE omissions or label violations, consistent with the safety-first standard enforced on the State Pesticide Applicator exam and in licensed field practice.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-PEST78-05 Trade course

Structural Fumigation Basics

29 hr · $365 COMPLIMENTARY

This course introduces the principles, equipment, and regulatory requirements of structural fumigation using gas fumigants, with emphasis on drywood termite and stored-product pest control in occupied and commercial buildings. Students learn tarpaulin placement, gas concentration measurement, aeration procedures, and the strict safety and legal protocols governing fumigation work. Lessons map directly to the structural pest control sections tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam and the NPMA certification.

Outcomes
Course text

This course introduces the principles, equipment, and regulatory requirements of structural fumigation using gas fumigants, with emphasis on drywood termite and stored-product pest control in occupied and commercial buildings. Students learn tarpaulin placement, gas concentration measurement, aeration procedures, and the strict safety and legal protocols governing fumigation work. Lessons map directly to the structural pest control sections tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam and the NPMA certification.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Fumigants: Chemistry, Mode of Action, and Pest Targets; Pre-Fumigation Preparation: Inspection, Notification, and Structure Sealing; Respiratory Protection and Personal Protective Equipment for Fumigation; Tarpaulin Placement, Gas Introduction, and Concentration Monitoring; Aeration, Clearance Testing, Re-Entry, and Regulatory Documentation.

What competent looks like. Explain the mode of action of common structural fumigants and identify the pest targets, exposure periods, and concentration requirements that produce lethal results. Describe all pre-fumigation steps including structure inspection, occupant notification, food and drug bagging, utility shut-off, and posting of warning signs in compliance with state and federal label requirements. Demonstrate correct donning, use, and doff of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and supplied-air respirators used during fumigant introduction and re-entry. Use a gas detection instrument (colorimetric tube or electronic detector) to measure fumigant concentration and determine when a structure has cleared to the label-required re-entry level. Identify the legal and liability obligations of a licensed fumigation crew: fumigant labeling as law, restricted-use pesticide recordkeeping, secondary containment, and consumer notification requirements. Complete a written fumigation preparation checklist and a clearance log that meet the documentation standards tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Fumigants: Chemistry, Mode of Action, and Pest Targets5theoryStudents will correctly explain how structural fumigants kill target pests, identify which fumigants are in current commercial use for structural applications, and describe the dosage concept of concentration × time (CT).
  1. Guided reading and annotation of the current EPA-registered label for a structural fumigant (e.g., sulfuryl fluoride), focusing on mode of action, target pests, dosage tables, and restricted-use classification; students underline every mandatory safety statement and flag it on a color-coded summary sheet.
  2. Instructor-led lecture with diagrams comparing how fumigants penetrate wood and voids versus how residual contact insecticides work; students complete a fill-in comparison chart and then quiz each other in pairs on CT values and why temperature affects required exposure time.
  3. Case-study analysis of three historical structural fumigation jobs (drywood termite in a single-family home, stored-product pests in a flour mill, and a failed re-treatment requiring a second application); student groups identify what went wrong in the failed case and list the label or procedural steps that were skipped, presenting findings to the class.
Current EPA-registered structural fumigant label (instructor-provided copy), EPA Pesticide Registration documents for sulfuryl fluoride, NPMA Field Guide to Structural Pests (relevant sections), whiteboard, comparison chart handout, case-study packetExit quiz of 10 multiple-choice questions on fumigant chemistry, CT concept, and target pests; students must score 80% or higher to advance to the next lesson.
2Pre-Fumigation Preparation: Inspection, Notification, and Structure Sealing7demoStudents will complete a pre-fumigation preparation checklist—including occupant notification, food and drug removal or bagging, utility isolation, and tarpaulin inspection—following label requirements and state regulatory standards.
  1. Instructor demonstrates a full walk-through of a mock residential structure (training prop or role-played floor plan), narrating each step of the pre-fumigation inspection: locating gas appliance shutoffs, identifying items requiring Nylofume or equivalent gas-impermeable bags, checking for pets, plants, and medications, and marking all points of egress; students follow along with a blank pre-fumigation checklist and complete it in real time.
  2. Students work in pairs to practice bagging a set of food and drug items (training props: canned goods, boxed food, prescription bottles) using the gas-impermeable bag materials referenced on the label, then inspect each other's work against manufacturer sealing instructions and label language; instructor coaches on common errors such as insufficient twist-tie closure.
  3. Role-play exercise: one student acts as the homeowner, one as the lead fumigation technician; the technician student must deliver the consumer notification verbally, hand over written materials (warning sign templates and re-entry timeline), answer three scripted homeowner questions about safety, and correctly document the interaction on a fumigation order form; the class evaluates using a provided rubric.
Pre-fumigation checklist form (state-standard format), gas-impermeable bag samples and twist-ties, food and drug prop items, printed warning sign templates (EPA-required format), fumigation order form, utility shutoff diagram handouts, role-play rubricInstructor evaluates each student's completed pre-fumigation checklist against a master answer key; all 12 mandatory checklist items must be correctly addressed (100% on safety-critical items, 80% overall) before the student proceeds.
3Respiratory Protection and Personal Protective Equipment for Fumigation6labStudents will correctly don, seal-check, use, and doff a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and demonstrate understanding of when each class of respiratory protection is required under fumigation label and OSHA standards.
  1. Instructor demonstrates SCBA components, cylinder pressure checks, positive- and negative-pressure seal checks, buddy-check procedures, and emergency doff; students observe then repeat each step individually on training SCBA units, with the instructor providing corrective feedback before any student is cleared to move to the timed exercise.
  2. Timed SCBA donning drill: students are given a scenario card ('You are entering a tarpauled structure immediately after gas introduction') and must retrieve their SCBA, don it correctly, and perform a seal check within the time frame specified in the equipment manufacturer's guidelines; the instructor records each student's performance on a skills checklist noting any critical errors such as incomplete seal check or wrong regulator setting.
  3. PPE selection decision exercise: students receive six scenario cards describing different stages of a fumigation job (pre-introduction outside the structure, gas introduction, post-introduction monitoring, aeration, clearance testing, post-clearance re-entry) and must select the correct PPE level from a set of labeled equipment cards (SCBA, supplied-air respirator, half-face APF respirator, safety glasses only, chemical-resistant gloves, Tyvek suit); groups compare answers and resolve disagreements using label language and OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134 guidance.
Training SCBA units (one per two students minimum), SCBA instructor demonstration unit, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134 reference sheet, fumigant label PPE section, PPE scenario cards, skills checklist, chemical-resistant gloves, Tyvek coveralls, safety glassesSkills checklist: student must perform a correct SCBA donning and seal check with zero critical errors (critical errors defined on checklist as: cylinder not open, regulator not attached, seal check not performed, buddy check skipped); one repeat attempt allowed with instructor coaching; failure after two attempts requires full lesson repetition before assessment.
4Tarpaulin Placement, Gas Introduction, and Concentration Monitoring6practiceStudents will describe and sequence the steps for tarpauling a structure, gas introduction using cylinder equipment, and in-structure concentration monitoring with a gas detection instrument, explaining how readings are used to confirm lethal CT is achieved.
  1. Instructor-led demonstration using a scaled training structure or large prop frame: tarp deployment, overlap seaming, sand snake or weighted seal placement at the foundation perimeter, probe tube placement for monitoring, and cylinder manifold connection; students diagram each step in a field notebook, noting critical seal points and common failure locations identified by the instructor.
  2. Students practice operating a colorimetric detector tube pump and an electronic fumigant detector (or simulation trainer where live gas equipment is not available); instructor presents pre-recorded or printed concentration readings from various monitoring points in a simulated job and students must determine, using the label dosage table and a thermometer reading, whether the required CT has been met or if additional exposure time is needed; students record decisions with rationale in their field notebooks.
  3. Tabletop sequencing exercise: each student receives a set of 20 laminated cards describing individual fumigation steps (from pre-fumigation inspection through final clearance posting); working alone, students arrange cards in the correct order, then compare sequences with a partner and reconcile differences using the fumigant label and the instructor-provided fumigation job timeline; class debriefs on the three most commonly missequenced steps.
Training structure prop or scaled model frame, tarpaulin material samples, sand snakes or weighted seal props, probe tube samples, colorimetric detector tube pump and tubes (or simulation trainer), electronic fumigant detector (demonstration unit), fumigant label dosage and temperature tables, field notebooks, laminated step-sequencing cardsField notebook reviewed by instructor: student must correctly record the sequential steps of tarpauling and monitoring and show a correct CT calculation for a provided scenario (temperature, target pest, structure volume) with no errors in the label table look-up; 80% of notebook entries must be accurate and all safety-critical steps must be present.
5Aeration, Clearance Testing, Re-Entry, and Regulatory Documentation5theoryStudents will describe the full aeration and clearance procedure, explain the legal re-entry concentration limit requirements stated on the fumigant label, and complete a fumigation log and restricted-use pesticide record that meet state applicator licensing documentation requirements.
  1. Lecture and discussion on aeration sequencing: when and how tarps are removed, ventilation fan placement and run time, the role of the clearance tester in taking readings at multiple locations and heights, the label-required minimum clearance level for re-entry without respiratory protection, and who is legally authorized to declare clearance; students take guided notes and then answer five scenario questions about whether a described structure is cleared or not based on given detector readings.
  2. Document completion workshop: each student receives a blank fumigation log form and a restricted-use pesticide application record form (representative of state licensing requirements) along with a completed scenario packet describing a fictional completed job (address, structure type, fumigant name and EPA registration number, amount used, date, temperature, exposure period, monitoring readings, clearance readings, applicator license number); students complete both forms in full, then trade with a partner for peer review against an answer key.
  3. Regulatory scenario discussion: instructor presents three situations (a technician who enters before clearance is confirmed, a homeowner who breaks the warning seal and re-enters early, and an applicator who fails to keep application records for the required holding period) and students identify which federal and state regulatory provisions are violated, what the potential penalties are in general terms, and what the correct procedural response should have been; discussion is tied back to how these topics appear on the State Pesticide Applicator exam.
Fumigant label aeration and clearance sections, blank fumigation log forms, blank restricted-use pesticide application record forms, scenario completion packet, peer review answer key, EPA restricted-use pesticide recordkeeping guidance summary, state pesticide applicator study guide (relevant regulations chapter)Completed fumigation log and RUP record reviewed against answer key: all mandatory fields must be present and accurate (100% on applicator name, license number, product EPA registration number, and amount used as these are legally required fields); overall form accuracy must be 85% or higher.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Fumigation Fundamentals Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (all questions in the safety and legal sections must be answered correctly regardless of overall score)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer written exam covering fumigant mode of action, CT dosage, pre-fumigation preparation steps, regulatory requirements, aeration and clearance procedures, and label interpretation, mirroring the question style and content areas of the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) licensing exam.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
SCBA and PPE Selection Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Zero critical errors on the SCBA donning and seal-check checklist; 80% accuracy on PPE selection scenariosStudents perform a complete SCBA donning, buddy check, and seal check in front of the instructor and complete a six-scenario PPE selection exercise; performance is evaluated against a standardized skills checklist with clearly defined critical and non-critical error categories.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Fumigation Procedure Lab LogLog15%85% accuracy across all entries; 100% completion of all safety-critical and legally required fieldsStudents submit their field notebook from Lessons 4 and 5, including the tarpauling and monitoring sequence diagram, the CT calculation exercise, and the completed fumigation log and restricted-use pesticide application record; the instructor evaluates accuracy, completeness, and correct use of label references.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Pre-Fumigation Safety Walk-Through CheckSafety audit15%All 12 mandatory safety items on the checklist must be correctly identified and addressed; any missed item rated 'critical' (live animal present, gas not shut off, warning sign not posted) results in automatic failure and required remediation before program continuationStudents independently conduct a pre-fumigation safety inspection of a staged mock structure containing deliberate deficiencies (hidden props representing a caged bird, an unsealed food item, an unposted entry point, and a gas appliance valve in the open position) and must identify and document all deficiencies on the standard pre-fumigation checklist within a set time limit.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-PEST78-06 Trade course

Safety & Law for Pest Control Technicians

28 hr · $355 COMPLIMENTARY

This course covers the federal and state regulatory framework governing pesticide use and pest control operations, OSHA hazard-communication and personal protective equipment requirements specific to the trade, and the legal obligations technicians carry from licensing through record-keeping. Learners connect every safety practice and legal rule to real field scenarios so they can operate lawfully and without injury from day one on the job.

Outcomes
Course text

This course covers the federal and state regulatory framework governing pesticide use and pest control operations, OSHA hazard-communication and personal protective equipment requirements specific to the trade, and the legal obligations technicians carry from licensing through record-keeping. Learners connect every safety practice and legal rule to real field scenarios so they can operate lawfully and without injury from day one on the job.

How the course runs. 5 blocks: Federal & State Regulatory Framework: FIFRA, WPS, and Licensing Law; Pesticide Labels, Safety Data Sheets, and Hazard Communication; PPE Selection, Inspection, Donning & Doffing, and Respiratory Protection; Application Records, Notification, Posting, and Pesticide Storage & Disposal Law; OSHA Hazard Communication, Lockout/Tagout Awareness, Confined Space, and Vehicle Safety.

What competent looks like. Identify the federal statutes and regulations—including FIFRA and the Worker Protection Standard—that govern pesticide purchase, storage, application, and disposal, and explain the technician's personal legal liability under each. Select, inspect, don, doff, and maintain the correct PPE for each pesticide formulation type and exposure route, demonstrating compliance with pesticide label requirements and OSHA Hazard Communication standards. Interpret a Safety Data Sheet and a pesticide label, extract emergency first-aid instructions, and respond correctly to a simulated dermal, inhalation, or ingestion exposure scenario. Describe the required contents of a pesticide application record and complete an accurate mock record that meets state licensing board documentation standards. Explain the rights and responsibilities established by the EPA Worker Protection Standard for both agricultural and non-agricultural pest control settings, including re-entry intervals and posting requirements. Apply lockout/tagout principles, confined-space awareness, and vehicle/equipment safety rules that apply to structural pest control operations.

Lessons · 5 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Federal & State Regulatory Framework: FIFRA, WPS, and Licensing Law6theoryGiven a set of pest control scenarios, the learner correctly identifies the federal law, regulation, or state licensing rule that applies and states the technician's legal obligation in each case.
  1. Lecture and guided notes walk learners through FIFRA's key provisions—pesticide registration, labeling as law, restricted-use versus general-use classifications—using a current registered pesticide label as the primary document; learners annotate the label to locate the EPA registration number, use classification, and precautionary statements.
  2. Small-group case-study analysis: each group receives a one-page scenario (e.g., technician applies an RUP without a license; employer mixes pesticide beyond label rate; re-entry interval is ignored) and must identify which law or rule is violated, the potential penalty tier, and the corrective action, then presents findings to the class.
  3. Individual written response: learners are given five short regulatory questions drawn from published state pesticide applicator study guide categories (laws and regulations section) and must answer each in two to three sentences, citing the specific rule; instructor reviews answers against the answer key and clarifies misconceptions before the next lesson.
Current EPA-registered pesticide label (general-use and restricted-use examples), EPA FIFRA summary fact sheet, state pesticide applicator laws and regulations study guide (state department of agriculture publication), OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1200 Hazard Communication overview handout, whiteboard, projectorExit ticket: ten true/false and multiple-choice questions on FIFRA provisions, RUP rules, and licensing requirements; learners must score 80% or higher; those below 80% complete a targeted re-read and retake before Lesson 2.
2Pesticide Labels, Safety Data Sheets, and Hazard Communication6labThe learner accurately extracts first-aid instructions, PPE requirements, signal words, and emergency contact information from a pesticide label and its corresponding Safety Data Sheet for at least four different product types.
  1. Hands-on label dissection lab: each learner receives four actual pesticide labels (representing different formulation types—emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, aerosol, and bait) and a structured worksheet; they locate and record the signal word, active ingredient, EPA Reg. No., required PPE, first-aid measures, environmental hazards, and storage/disposal instructions for each product.
  2. SDS scavenger hunt: using the same four products' Safety Data Sheets (Sections 1–16), learners identify the GHS hazard category, exposure limits where listed, first-aid measures by route, firefighting media, spill cleanup procedure, and Poison Control Center number; pairs compare answers and resolve discrepancies using the SDS text.
  3. Simulated exposure drill: instructor announces a scenario (e.g., 'concentrate splashed in eyes during mixing'); learners must locate the correct SDS first-aid section within 60 seconds, read the instruction aloud, and identify the nearest eyewash station on the classroom floor plan; rotate through three scenarios covering dermal, inhalation, and ingestion routes.
Four current pesticide labels (printed or projected), corresponding SDSs, SDS scavenger-hunt worksheet, GHS pictogram reference card, EPA pesticide label how-to read guide, simulated eyewash station or photo, timerCompleted label/SDS worksheet reviewed by instructor against answer key; learner must correctly identify all required PPE items and all first-aid steps for at least three of four products (75% accuracy across all data fields) to pass; any incorrect first-aid answer triggers immediate correction and a second product review.
3PPE Selection, Inspection, Donning & Doffing, and Respiratory Protection6demoThe learner correctly selects, inspects, dons, and doffs the full PPE ensemble required by a given pesticide label—including the appropriate respirator—without contaminating clean areas, as observed against a standardized checklist.
  1. Instructor demonstration: using a chemical-resistant coverall, gloves (inner and outer), chemical splash goggles, face shield, chemical-resistant footwear, and a half-face air-purifying respirator with organic vapor/P100 cartridges, the instructor performs a full donning and doffing sequence in real time, narrating each decision and pointing out common errors (e.g., removing gloves before coverall, touching face during doffing); learners observe and record the sequence on a sequencing worksheet.
  2. Paired practice: each learner performs a complete donning and doffing sequence while the partner scores each step on the OSHA-aligned PPE inspection and donning/doffing checklist; roles are then reversed; instructor circulates and corrects technique in real time, paying particular attention to glove removal without skin contact and respirator seal check procedure.
  3. Respirator fit-check exercise: each learner performs a negative-pressure and positive-pressure user seal check on a half-face APR per manufacturer instructions; learners record results and complete a brief respirator care log entry covering inspection date, cartridge type, condition findings, and next cartridge change trigger point based on the pesticide SDS or label guidance.
Chemical-resistant coveralls (Tyvek and higher-rated), nitrile inner gloves, chemical-resistant outer gloves (various), chemical splash goggles, full-face shield, chemical-resistant boot covers, half-face air-purifying respirators with OV/P100 cartridges, PPE inspection and donning/doffing checklist (OSHA-aligned), respirator care log formsInstructor scores each learner's donning/doffing performance on the standardized checklist; all critical steps (glove removal without skin contact, respirator seal check, and correct sequence) must be completed correctly; a score of 80% overall on the checklist with zero critical errors on contamination-prevention steps constitutes a pass; any critical error requires immediate correction and a full repeat.
4Application Records, Notification, Posting, and Pesticide Storage & Disposal Law5practiceThe learner completes a fully accurate pesticide application record and a customer notification document for a simulated service call, meeting the minimum content requirements established in published state licensing guidance.
  1. Direct instruction and model: instructor displays a completed application record for a fictional residential termite treatment, walking through each required field (date, site address, pest targeted, pesticide name, EPA Reg. No., formulation, mix concentration, total amount applied, application method, applicator name and license number, re-entry interval if applicable); learners identify which fields are missing in a deliberately incomplete record and explain the legal consequence of each omission.
  2. Record-completion practice: learners receive a scenario packet describing a commercial cockroach account (product label, site description, pest sighted, mix rate calculated in a prior course); each learner independently completes a blank application record form and a customer notification/posting notice, then exchanges with a partner for peer review against the checklist before instructor final review.
  3. Storage and disposal case study: using the EPA's pesticide storage and disposal guidance and a set of three scenario cards (improper storage near food, triple-rinsing procedure for empty containers, unlabeled leftover pesticide), learner groups identify the legal requirement violated, the correct procedure, and the agency that would investigate; groups report out and instructor corrects any misconceptions.
Blank pesticide application record forms (state-required format), customer notification/posting form, completed model application record, scenario packet with pesticide label and site data, EPA pesticide container disposal guidance, state pesticide applicator study guide (record-keeping section), penCompleted application record and notification document are scored against a ten-field checklist; all required fields must be present and accurate; a score of 90% or better (nine of ten fields correct) is required to pass, because record errors carry direct legal consequences; any incomplete critical field (product name, EPA Reg. No., amount applied, applicator license number) must be corrected and resubmitted the same day.
5OSHA Hazard Communication, Lockout/Tagout Awareness, Confined Space, and Vehicle Safety5fieldThe learner correctly applies OSHA hazard-communication obligations and identifies lockout/tagout, confined-space, and vehicle safety hazards in a simulated pest control workplace walkthrough, producing a written hazard identification and corrective-action report.
  1. Workplace walkthrough simulation: instructor sets up a mock pest control service vehicle bay and storage area with deliberate hazards (unlabeled container, missing SDS binder, energy source not locked out on a piece of equipment, unmarked confined space entry point, unsecured chemical containers in vehicle); learners conduct a paired walkthrough using a structured hazard identification form, recording each hazard, the OSHA standard it violates, and the corrective action required.
  2. Lockout/tagout awareness exercise: using a non-energized demonstration prop (a circuit breaker panel mockup and a lockout hasp kit), instructor demonstrates the six steps of a lockout/tagout procedure; learners then sequence the steps from a shuffled set of laminated cards and explain why each step protects the technician; discussion covers how LOTO applies when treating electrical voids and attic spaces.
  3. Permit-required confined space identification drill: using photographs of real pest control work locations (crawl spaces, utility vaults, grain bins, attic hatches), learners classify each as permit-required or non-permit confined space using the OSHA definition criteria, then state the entry requirement for each; learners also complete a three-question vehicle safety review (load securing, chemical segregation in truck, PPE accessible during transport) and correct a supplied driver checklist that contains three errors.
Mock service vehicle bay setup or photo set of hazards, hazard identification form, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 LOTO summary card, lockout hasp and tag demonstration kit (de-energized), confined space identification photo set, OSHA confined space definition reference card, driver pre-trip checklist with errors, OSHA 10 reference materialsCompleted hazard identification and corrective-action report: learner must identify at least eight of ten planted hazards and provide a correct corrective action for each identified hazard; a score of 80% on identified hazards with 100% accuracy on corrective actions for the two LOTO hazards constitutes a pass; any missed LOTO hazard is reviewed and the learner must verbally explain the correct procedure before leaving.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Regulatory & Safety Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%Score of 75% or higher (matching the passing threshold used by most state pesticide applicator licensing exams for the laws and regulations category)A 40-question written exam covering FIFRA provisions, pesticide labeling requirements, RUP rules, state licensing law obligations, WPS rights and responsibilities, record-keeping requirements, OSHA Hazard Communication, and storage and disposal law; questions are drawn from the same content domains tested on the state pesticide applicator (structural) licensing exam and reviewed NPMA certification study areas.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
PPE and Pesticide Exposure Response Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Completion of all critical steps on the standardized checklist with zero critical errors (contamination of skin during doffing, incorrect first-aid response) and an overall checklist score of 80% or higherThe learner performs a full PPE donning and doffing sequence for a label-specified scenario, conducts an APR seal check, and then responds verbally and physically to a simulated exposure incident by locating the SDS, reading the correct first-aid instruction, and identifying the Poison Control Center contact—evaluated live by the instructor against the standardized checklist.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Application Record and Notification Documentation Lab LogLog15%Nine of ten required fields completed accurately (90%), with all four legally critical fields—product name, EPA Reg. No., amount applied, and applicator license number—correctUsing a provided scenario packet, the learner independently completes a pesticide application record and a customer notification/posting document; the instructor scores both against a field-by-field checklist aligned to state licensing record-keeping requirements, and the learner receives written feedback identifying any deficient fields and the legal consequence of each omission.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Workplace Hazard Identification Safety CheckSafety audit15%Identification of at least eight of ten planted hazards with a correct corrective action cited for each, and verbal demonstration of the correct LOTO sequence with zero steps out of orderIn the simulated pest control service bay and storage area used in Lesson 5, the learner conducts an independent walkthrough, completes the hazard identification form without partner assistance, and orally explains the LOTO procedure to the instructor; this assessment verifies that the learner can proactively recognize and correct OSHA-regulated hazards before beginning field work.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-PEST78-07 Capstone

Capstone Project: Integrated Pest Management Plan Development and Defense

54 hr · $540 COMPLIMENTARY

Students design, document, and defend a complete, site-specific Integrated Pest Management plan for a realistic structural pest scenario, drawing on all prior coursework including entomology, pesticide selection, termite/WDO assessment, fumigation considerations, regulatory compliance, and safety protocols. The capstone requires students to produce professional-grade inspection reports, treatment recommendation documents, and a pesticide application record set, then present and defend their work before an evaluator panel. Successful completion demonstrates job-entry readiness and directly maps to both the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam content areas and NPMA certification competencies.

Outcomes
Course text

Students design, document, and defend a complete, site-specific Integrated Pest Management plan for a realistic structural pest scenario, drawing on all prior coursework including entomology, pesticide selection, termite/WDO assessment, fumigation considerations, regulatory compliance, and safety protocols. The capstone requires students to produce professional-grade inspection reports, treatment recommendation documents, and a pesticide application record set, then present and defend their work before an evaluator panel. Successful completion demonstrates job-entry readiness and directly maps to both the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam content areas and NPMA certification competencies.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Site Assignment Briefing and Inspection Planning; Mock Structural Inspection and Pest Identification; IPM Plan Development and Professional Documentation Package; Capstone Oral Defense and Professional Readiness Reflection.

What competent looks like. Conduct a simulated structural pest inspection and accurately identify at least three pest species or pest-evidence types using standard entomological and WDO diagnostic criteria. Produce a written IPM plan that selects and justifies pesticide products, application methods, and non-chemical controls appropriate to the identified pests, site conditions, and applicable label requirements. Complete a full set of professional pest control documentation—including an inspection report, treatment proposal, pesticide application record, and client communication letter—that meets state regulatory recordkeeping standards. Demonstrate correct PPE selection, pesticide label interpretation, and safety protocol adherence during a simulated or live treatment scenario evaluated against OSHA and EPA Worker Protection Standard criteria. Verbally defend all plan decisions, respond to examiner questions about pest biology, product chemistry, and legal requirements, and self-identify any corrections needed, achieving a score of 80% or higher on the oral rubric. Reflect on professional readiness gaps and produce a targeted career-development action plan referencing credential exam areas still requiring study before the State Pesticide Applicator exam.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Site Assignment Briefing and Inspection Planning10practiceStudents will receive their assigned capstone scenario, review all relevant background materials, and produce a written pre-inspection plan that identifies target pests, inspection zones, required PPE, and applicable regulatory considerations before entering the site.
  1. Instructor distributes individualized scenario packets (each describes a different structural type—single-family residence, restaurant, or light commercial—with a unique pest pressure profile); students read scenario, highlight unknown terms, and compile a pest-identification reference list using their Entomology course notes and a standard field guide such as the Mallis Handbook of Pest Control.
  2. Students draft a pre-inspection checklist specifying inspection zones, likely harborage and entry points for scenario pests, tools needed (flashlight, moisture meter, screwdriver, magnifier, collection vials), and PPE requirements, then peer-review a classmate's checklist against a provided rubric and give written feedback.
  3. Instructor-led group debrief using a projected example scenario; students compare their checklists to the model, identify gaps, revise their own document, and submit a final pre-inspection plan for instructor sign-off before advancing to the mock inspection lesson.
Scenario packets (instructor-prepared), Mallis Handbook of Pest Control (current edition), state pesticide applicator candidate handbook, inspection checklist template, peer-review rubric, pencils/highlighters, course notes from Courses 2–6Instructor reviews submitted pre-inspection plan against a 10-point rubric: correct pest identification targets (2 pts), complete zone list (2 pts), accurate PPE specification matching scenario hazards (3 pts), regulatory notes present (2 pts), professional written format (1 pt). Pass = 8/10.
2Mock Structural Inspection and Pest Identification14labStudents will perform a hands-on simulated structural inspection of the assigned scenario site (using a mock-up room, a partner's supervised real structure, or an instructor-staged training space), collect evidence, and accurately identify all pest species or indicators present using standard diagnostic methods.
  1. Students conduct the mock inspection individually, working through each zone on their pre-inspection checklist; they document findings in real time on a standardized inspection report form, noting pest evidence (frass, galleries, shed skins, live insects, conducive conditions), exact locations, and estimated infestation severity ratings (light/moderate/heavy) consistent with industry practice.
  2. For each pest evidence type collected or photographed, students complete a pest ID worksheet requiring common name, scientific name, pest category (insect order or family, WDO type, rodent, etc.), life stage observed, and a brief note on the biology relevant to treatment timing—instructor circulates and asks probing identification questions during this activity.
  3. Students photograph or sketch at least five pieces of documented evidence, label each image or sketch with location and pest association, compile them into a site evidence log, and compare findings with a partner to resolve any disagreements using the field guide before finalizing their inspection report.
Mock inspection site or instructor-staged training space with planted pest evidence (dead specimens, frass samples, simulated WDO damage, rodent droppings), inspection report form, pest ID worksheets, flashlight, moisture meter, flathead screwdriver, magnifying loupe, collection vials, digital camera or smartphone, Mallis Handbook, WDO inspection reference sheetInstructor scores completed inspection report and pest ID worksheets on a 20-point rubric: all planted evidence items found and recorded (6 pts, 0.5 per item up to 12 items staged), correct identification of each evidence type (6 pts), severity ratings reasonable and justified (4 pts), professional report format and legibility (4 pts). Pass = 16/20.
3IPM Plan Development and Professional Documentation Package20practiceUsing inspection findings, students will draft a complete, site-specific IPM plan that selects appropriate chemical and non-chemical controls, justifies every decision by citing the product label or an IPM principle, and assembles a professional documentation package meeting state pesticide recordkeeping requirements.
  1. Students write the IPM plan narrative in three sections: (1) pest assessment summary referencing inspection findings; (2) recommended control strategy for each pest, specifying non-chemical controls first (sanitation, exclusion, monitoring), then chemical controls with product name, EPA registration number, formulation, target pest per label, application site per label, application method, and required PPE; (3) follow-up monitoring schedule and threshold criteria for retreatment—instructor provides a sample professional IPM plan as a format model and requires students to use only products whose labels are available for citation.
  2. Students complete a simulated pesticide application record for each proposed chemical treatment as required under federal FIFRA and state structural pesticide regulations, including applicator name, license number field (students insert 'candidate'), date, time, site address, target pest, product name, EPA registration number, application rate, total amount applied, and application method—instructor reviews a completed sample record to clarify required fields before students begin.
  3. Students write a one-page client communication letter in plain language (no jargon without explanation) describing findings, the recommended IPM approach, any preparation required by the client before treatment, safety re-entry intervals, and next-steps—letter is self-edited for reading level using the Flesch-Kincaid readability checker available in standard word processors, with a target grade level of 8 or below.
IPM plan template, sample professional IPM plan (instructor-provided), current product label printouts for commonly used structural pesticides (instructor-provided packet), pesticide application record form, sample completed application record, client letter template, word processor with spell-check and readability tool, state pesticide applicator candidate handbook (regulatory reference), EPA label requirement reference sheetInstructor evaluates the complete documentation package on a 30-point rubric: IPM narrative covers all pests from inspection with non-chemical controls addressed (6 pts), chemical selections are on-label for site and pest (6 pts), application records contain all required fields (6 pts), client letter is accurate and meets readability target (6 pts), overall professional presentation and absence of safety errors (6 pts). Pass = 24/30. Any on-label compliance error requires immediate revision before the oral defense.
4Capstone Oral Defense and Professional Readiness Reflection10practiceStudents will present their completed IPM plan and documentation package to an evaluator panel, defend all decisions under questioning, and produce a written self-assessment that maps remaining knowledge gaps to specific credential exam content areas.
  1. Each student delivers a 10-minute structured oral presentation of their IPM plan to an evaluator panel of at least two reviewers (instructor plus one additional evaluator such as a guest industry professional or program director); the presentation must cover: site description and pest findings, IPM strategy rationale, product and safety decisions, and documentation summary—students may use printed materials but no unseen notes, and must speak to the evaluator rather than read aloud.
  2. Evaluators conduct a 10-minute question period covering at least one question from each of the following areas: pest biology and identification, pesticide label interpretation and legality, safety and PPE, WDO or fumigation relevance to the scenario, and state regulatory requirements—students respond without reference materials; evaluators score responses live on a structured rubric.
  3. Following the defense, students complete a one-page written self-assessment identifying: two areas where their plan or responses were strongest (with evidence), two knowledge areas where they made errors or felt uncertain, and for each gap, the specific State Pesticide Applicator exam content area or NPMA competency domain it falls under, plus a concrete study action (chapter, resource, or practice question set) they will pursue before the certification exam.
Completed IPM plan and documentation package (student's own), oral defense scoring rubric, evaluator question bank (instructor-prepared, covering all major course topics), self-assessment worksheet, state pesticide applicator candidate handbook (for exam content area reference), NPMA certification competency outlineOral defense scored on a 25-point rubric across five question areas (5 pts each): pest identification and biology, pesticide label and product selection, safety and PPE, WDO/fumigation knowledge, regulatory and recordkeeping compliance. Pass = 20/25. Self-assessment is scored pass/fail: pass requires identification of at least two genuine knowledge gaps mapped to a named credential exam area with a specific corrective action listed.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Capstone IPM Plan and Documentation PackageProject60%Combined score of 70/80 across the inspection report rubric (20 pts) and the documentation package rubric (30 pts), plus 8/10 on the pre-inspection plan, with zero on-label compliance errors remaining uncorrected at time of submissionStudents submit the complete set of written deliverables produced across Lessons 1–3: pre-inspection plan, inspection report with evidence log, IPM narrative, simulated pesticide application records, and client communication letter. The package is evaluated holistically for accuracy, regulatory compliance, professional quality, and integration of all major course content areas from the program.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Professional Documentation PortfolioPortfolio20%All five required document types present, each individually scored pass on its domain rubric, and no uncorrected safety or on-label error anywhere in the setThe portfolio collects one exemplar from each major document category a working structural pest control technician produces: inspection report, IPM plan, pesticide application record, client letter, and the self-assessment reflection linking gaps to credential exam areas. The portfolio is assessed for completeness, accuracy, and professional presentation, and is intended to serve as a job-application writing sample the student retains after program completion.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Capstone Oral DefenseOral / panel20%Score of 20/25 on the structured evaluator rubric, with no single domain score below 3/5, and a written self-assessment scored passThe oral defense before a two-person evaluator panel tests the student's ability to explain, justify, and critique their own work in real time under professional conditions. Evaluators probe all major knowledge domains—pest biology, product and label law, safety, WDO/fumigation, and recordkeeping—and the defense score is combined with the self-assessment to confirm the student is ready to advance to the externship and, ultimately, to the State Pesticide Applicator licensing exam.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
AGR-PEST78-08 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement

81 hr · $325 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 81 supervised hours at a licensed pest control company, applying classroom knowledge under the direct oversight of a licensed commercial pesticide applicator. Rotations cover inspection, treatment, customer communication, and recordkeeping across residential and/or commercial accounts. A mid-term employer check-in and a final employer evaluation form document professional growth and readiness for entry-level employment.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 81 supervised hours at a licensed pest control company, applying classroom knowledge under the direct oversight of a licensed commercial pesticide applicator. Rotations cover inspection, treatment, customer communication, and recordkeeping across residential and/or commercial accounts. A mid-term employer check-in and a final employer evaluation form document professional growth and readiness for entry-level employment.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Orientation, Safety Protocols & Site Expectations; Supervised Inspection & Service Rounds — Weeks 1–3; Supervised Inspection & Service Rounds — Weeks 4–7; Final Employer Evaluation & Reflection Portfolio Submission.

What competent looks like. Conduct a supervised pest inspection of a residential or commercial structure, identify pest evidence, and document findings on a standard inspection report. Mix, load, and apply pesticides to label directions under direct supervision of a licensed applicator, demonstrating correct PPE selection and safe-handling procedures throughout. Complete legally required service records, Material Safety Data Sheets references, and customer communication logs accurately for each supervised service visit. Demonstrate professional conduct—punctuality, uniform standards, respectful customer interaction, and equipment care—sufficient to earn a passing rating on the employer mid-term evaluation. Perform an integrated pest management site assessment, recommend a control strategy, and explain the recommendation to a customer or supervisor in plain language. Safely operate and maintain common pest control equipment (compressed-air sprayer, rodent bait station tools, inspection tools) following employer and OSHA safety protocols.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Orientation, Safety Protocols & Site Expectations8fieldThe student correctly recites employer emergency procedures, confirms PPE inventory, and demonstrates proper vehicle and equipment inspection before departing on a service route.
  1. Employer-led site orientation tour covering chemical storage room, secondary containment, spill kit location, first-aid station, and emergency exit procedures; student completes a written orientation checklist.
  2. Supervised walk-through of the company vehicle: ladder tie-down, chemical segregation in the service vehicle, pesticide storage compliance, and daily vehicle inspection log completion.
  3. PPE fit-check exercise: student selects appropriate gloves, respirator, and eye protection for the day's scheduled service types, explains the hazard basis for each choice to the supervising applicator, and logs selections in the daily field journal.
Employer safety manual, company vehicle inspection log, PPE inventory checklist, SDS binder, daily field journal (student-supplied composition book or digital equivalent), OSHA Hazard Communication standard referenceSupervising applicator signs off on the orientation checklist; student scores 100% on a 10-item verbal safety quiz covering emergency contacts, spill response steps, and PPE selection rationale before riding on a service call.
2Supervised Inspection & Service Rounds — Weeks 1–330fieldThe student completes a minimum of 12 supervised service visits, writing a legible, accurate inspection report and service record for each visit with no more than two supervisor-corrected errors per report by the end of week three.
  1. Shadow the licensed applicator on residential and commercial accounts; for each visit the student fills out an inspection report (pest evidence, conducive conditions, entry points) before the applicator reviews and confirms or corrects findings.
  2. Under direct supervision, mix and apply at least three different product formulations (e.g., liquid concentrate, granular bait, dust) to label rate and label directions, documenting product name, EPA registration number, application site, and volume used on the service record.
  3. Mid-placement employer check-in meeting (scheduled at the end of week three): student self-evaluates using the employer evaluation rubric, supervisor completes the mid-term section of the same rubric, and both parties discuss a written improvement plan for the remaining weeks.
Company service record forms, inspection report templates, calibrated measuring cylinders, pesticide labels and SDS documents for all products applied, employer mid-term evaluation rubric, daily field journalMid-term employer evaluation rubric: student must achieve a rating of 'meets expectations' or higher in at least four of five competency areas (safety, inspection accuracy, application technique, recordkeeping, professionalism) by the end of week three; any area rated 'below expectations' triggers a written corrective action plan.
3Supervised Inspection & Service Rounds — Weeks 4–735fieldThe student independently drafts a complete IPM-based service recommendation for at least three distinct account types and successfully communicates that recommendation to the supervising applicator, who confirms its accuracy and appropriateness.
  1. Student leads the inspection phase of service calls while the supervisor observes silently; after each inspection the student verbally presents findings and proposes an IPM control strategy (sanitation, exclusion, monitoring, chemical control selection) before the supervisor provides feedback.
  2. Equipment maintenance rotation: student performs end-of-day cleaning and maintenance on compressed-air sprayer, rodent bait station tools, and power duster following manufacturer instructions, and records maintenance actions in the equipment log.
  3. Customer communication practice: for at least five service visits the student delivers the post-service verbal summary to the customer, including what was found, what was done, any follow-up actions required, and relevant re-entry interval information, while the supervisor evaluates using a structured observation checklist.
IPM planning worksheet, equipment maintenance logs, manufacturer equipment manuals, customer communication observation checklist, pesticide labels, daily field journal, NPMA Field Guide to Structural Pests (reference)Supervisor observation checklist for customer communication: student must score 'satisfactory' on all four elements (accuracy, clarity, re-entry interval disclosure, professional demeanor) for at least four of the five evaluated visits; IPM recommendations must be confirmed as label-compliant and site-appropriate by the supervisor for all three required account types.
4Final Employer Evaluation & Reflection Portfolio Submission8fieldThe student submits a complete externship reflection portfolio—including all service records, the mid-term evaluation, and a written self-assessment—and achieves a passing score on the final employer evaluation rubric.
  1. Student assembles the reflection portfolio: collates all inspection reports and service records from placements, writes a two-page reflective summary describing three specific situations where classroom knowledge was applied in the field, and identifies two skill areas for continued development.
  2. Final employer evaluation meeting: supervising applicator completes the full employer evaluation rubric across all competency areas (safety, inspection, application, recordkeeping, IPM reasoning, professionalism), discusses results with student, and signs the evaluation form.
  3. Program coordinator review call or site visit: coordinator reviews signed evaluation rubric with student, confirms total hours logged in the hour-tracking log match 81 hours, and obtains employer signature on the externship completion verification form submitted to the school.
Reflection portfolio folder or digital submission platform, all collected service records and inspection reports, employer final evaluation rubric, externship hour-tracking log, externship completion verification form, program coordinator contact informationFinal employer evaluation rubric: student must achieve 'meets expectations' or higher in all five competency areas with no 'below expectations' rating remaining; reflection portfolio must include a minimum of 12 service records, the completed mid-term evaluation, and the two-page written reflection to be accepted by the program coordinator.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Final Employer Evaluation (Skills Demonstration)Skills demonstration70%Student must be rated 'meets expectations' or higher in all five competency areas on the employer evaluation rubric, with no 'below expectations' rating in any area at the conclusion of the 81 hours.The supervising licensed applicator completes the program's standardized employer evaluation rubric assessing the student's demonstrated competency in workplace safety, pest inspection technique, pesticide application under supervision, service recordkeeping, and professional conduct. The signed rubric is submitted to the program coordinator as the official skills demonstration record.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Externship Field Journal & Service Record Log (Lab Log)Log30%The submitted log must contain entries for all 81 placement hours, include at least 12 legible and complete service records co-signed by the supervising applicator, and include the two-page written reflection; the program coordinator must accept the portfolio as complete before the student may advance to Course 9.The student maintains a daily field journal throughout the placement documenting service visit details, products applied, IPM observations, equipment maintenance actions, and personal reflective notes, then compiles this with all co-signed service records into a final reflection portfolio. The portfolio serves as the verifiable log of worksite learning hours and is reviewed by the program coordinator alongside the signed externship completion verification form.
Complete · Verified
AGR-PEST78-09 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) & NPMA

23 hr · $230 COMPLIMENTARY

Students systematically review every domain tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) license exam and the NPMA certification, using timed practice sets, gap analysis, and full-length mock exams. Emphasis is placed on accurate recall of pesticide law, label interpretation, IPM decision-making, safety protocols, and pest identification so students enter testing centers with demonstrated readiness. No new content is introduced; all review is anchored to material covered in courses 1–8.

Outcomes
Course text

Students systematically review every domain tested on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) license exam and the NPMA certification, using timed practice sets, gap analysis, and full-length mock exams. Emphasis is placed on accurate recall of pesticide law, label interpretation, IPM decision-making, safety protocols, and pest identification so students enter testing centers with demonstrated readiness. No new content is introduced; all review is anchored to material covered in courses 1–8.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Domain Mapping & Diagnostic Assessment; Targeted Domain Review: Law, Labels, Safety & Pest ID; Targeted Domain Review: IPM, Application Equipment, Math & Environmental Protection; Full-Length Mock Examinations & Final Readiness Review.

What competent looks like. Correctly answer practice questions from each State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) exam domain at or above the minimum passing threshold established by the state licensing board. Correctly answer practice questions from each NPMA certification domain at or above the NPMA passing standard. Interpret a pesticide label and SDS to answer regulatory, PPE, mixing, and disposal questions without error. Identify common structural pest species, their biology, and appropriate IPM strategies from descriptions, images, or scenarios. Demonstrate test-taking strategies—time management, question elimination, and flagging—across two full-length timed mock exams. Produce a personal exam-readiness plan that targets each domain where practice scores fall below the passing threshold.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Domain Mapping & Diagnostic Assessment4practiceStudents identify their weak and strong domains across both credential exams by completing a scored diagnostic and mapping each question to its exam content area.
  1. Complete a 60-question untimed diagnostic covering all major exam domains (pesticide law and regulations, label and SDS reading, pest identification, pesticide safety and PPE, application equipment, IPM, and environmental protection); score and record results by domain.
  2. Use the state licensing board's published candidate handbook and NPMA's exam blueprint to build a personal domain map, marking each domain as strong (≥80% correct), developing (60–79%), or needs work (<60%).
  3. Draft a written exam-readiness plan listing the three lowest-scoring domains, specific topics to review, and a study schedule for lessons 2 and 3.
Diagnostic question bank (instructor-prepared from EPA core manual topics and NPMA study guide domains), state pesticide applicator candidate handbook, NPMA exam blueprint, graph paper or spreadsheet for domain tracking, pencils, calculatorsDomain map is complete and accurate for all exam areas; student can verbally explain which two to three domains are lowest-scoring and name at least two specific topics to address. Diagnostic scores are recorded but not used as a pass/fail gate — the plan itself is the deliverable.
2Targeted Domain Review: Law, Labels, Safety & Pest ID8theoryStudents accurately explain pesticide law requirements, correctly interpret label and SDS information, describe required PPE and first-aid responses, and identify structural pests from images or written descriptions.
  1. Work through instructor-led Q&A on the four domains most heavily weighted on both exams: federal and state pesticide law (FIFRA requirements, licensing, record-keeping, restricted-use rules), label and SDS interpretation (signal words, precautionary statements, REI, PHI, disposal instructions), PPE selection and first-aid/emergency decontamination procedures, and structural pest identification (cockroaches, termites, bed bugs, rodents, ants, stored-product pests, wood-destroying beetles, mosquitoes, flies). For each domain, instructors model answering an exam-style question aloud, naming the reasoning process.
  2. In pairs, students quiz each other using 40 domain-specific flash cards (pest images on one side, ID details and control options on the other; law or label statements on one side, correct interpretation on the other); rotate cards until each partner answers all 40 at ≥80% accuracy.
  3. Each student completes a 30-question timed section (45 minutes) covering only the domains reviewed today, scores it immediately, and updates the domain map from lesson 1.
EPA Pesticide Applicator Core Manual (current edition), state structural pest control law summary sheet, sample pesticide labels (at least three products covering different signal words and pest types), sample SDS documents, pest identification flash cards with color images, NPMA QualityPro study guide sections, timer30-question timed section scored at ≥75% correct overall and ≥70% correct in each individual domain reviewed; students who score below threshold on any domain complete a targeted 10-question re-practice set before lesson 3.
3Targeted Domain Review: IPM, Application Equipment, Math & Environmental Protection6practiceStudents solve pesticide calculation problems without error, match application equipment to pest and site scenarios, apply IPM decision-making steps, and answer questions about environmental and groundwater protection requirements.
  1. Work through 12 pesticide math problems of the types found on licensing exams: converting concentration (percent active ingredient, ppm, oz/gal), calculating dilution volumes, determining area and volume of treatment spaces (linear feet, square feet, cubic feet), and computing equipment output; check answers step by step using dimensional analysis and confirm with a calculator.
  2. Use scenario cards describing a structural pest situation (e.g., German cockroach in a restaurant kitchen, subterranean termite activity along a foundation, bed bug infestation in a multi-unit residence) to practice the full IPM decision sequence: inspection findings → pest ID → threshold assessment → least-toxic control selection → application method → monitoring plan → documentation; write one complete scenario response in 15 minutes.
  3. Complete a 25-question timed practice set (35 minutes) covering pesticide math, equipment calibration, IPM scenarios, and environmental/groundwater protection; score and enter results into the domain map.
Pesticide math worksheet set (instructor-prepared), dimensional analysis reference card, sample scenario cards (instructor-prepared), application equipment diagrams (sprayers, dusters, bait stations, rodent traps), EPA environmental protection guidance summaries, calculator, updated domain maps from lessons 1 and 2All 12 math problems answered correctly (100% required; any error is corrected immediately with instructor guidance); 25-question practice set scored at ≥75% overall. Students who score below threshold on the math sub-set redo an alternate 6-problem set before the mock exam.
4Full-Length Mock Examinations & Final Readiness Review5practiceStudents complete two timed, full-length mock exams under realistic testing conditions and use scored results to confirm readiness or identify any remaining gaps before scheduling their credential exams.
  1. Sit Mock Exam 1 (structured to mirror the format and domain weighting of the State Pesticide Applicator Structural exam as described in the state candidate handbook): timed, no notes, no collaboration; score immediately upon completion and record domain-by-domain breakdown.
  2. Sit Mock Exam 2 (structured to mirror NPMA certification exam domain weighting): timed, no notes, no collaboration; score immediately and record domain-by-domain breakdown.
  3. In a 30-minute group debrief, review the five most commonly missed questions across both exams; each student updates the readiness plan with final notes on any domain still below passing threshold and records a target date for scheduling each credential exam.
Mock Exam 1 question set (instructor-prepared, 100+ questions, state structural exam domains), Mock Exam 2 question set (instructor-prepared, NPMA exam domains), answer sheets, timers, state candidate handbook (for reference during debrief only), NPMA exam blueprint (for reference during debrief only), updated domain mapsMock Exam 1 scored at ≥75% overall (or the actual state passing threshold if published and higher); Mock Exam 2 scored at ≥75% overall (or NPMA passing threshold if published and higher). Students scoring below threshold on either mock exam receive a mandatory individual review session with the instructor before scheduling the live credential exam.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Dual Mock Certification ExamMock certification exam100%≥75% on each mock exam, or the published passing score for each credential if higher; all pesticide math items answered correctly on the in-lesson check; completed, accurate domain map and readiness plan submitted.Students sit two full-length, timed mock exams—one modeled on the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) licensing exam and one modeled on the NPMA certification—under realistic, closed-book, no-collaboration conditions. Scores are broken down by domain and compared against the diagnostic from lesson 1 to confirm measurable growth; any student who does not meet the passing threshold on either mock exam completes a mandatory individual remediation session with the instructor before being cleared to schedule the live credential exams.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: NPMA Certification; State Pesticide Applicator (Structural)

Students prepare for and sit the State Pesticide Applicator (Structural) licensing examination administered by their state lead pesticide regulatory agency, and the NPMA certification examination administered by the National Pest Management Association. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Pest Control Technician · How the school gets authority to award these credentials