This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
9 courses · 900 clock hours · 3–6 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.
This foundational course equips entry-level security and law enforcement students with the safety knowledge, applied math, communication skills, and career readiness tools they need before entering specialized trade coursework. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry recognition and CPR/First Aid certification, and build the professional baseline required for the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential pathways. All content is contextualized to patrol, post orders, incident documentation, and security operations scenarios.
OutcomesThis foundational course equips entry-level security and law enforcement students with the safety knowledge, applied math, communication skills, and career readiness tools they need before entering specialized trade coursework. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry recognition and CPR/First Aid certification, and build the professional baseline required for the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential pathways. All content is contextualized to patrol, post orders, incident documentation, and security operations scenarios.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Workplace Safety Foundations and OSHA 10 for Security Professionals; CPR, AED, and First Aid Certification; Trade Math for Security and Patrol; Technical Reading: Post Orders, Policy Manuals, and Legal Notices; Professional Communication: Writing, Radio, and Verbal Skills; Digital Tools for Security and Law Enforcement Work; Career Readiness and Credential Application Preparation.
What competent looks like. Demonstrate OSHA 10-hour general industry safety knowledge and correctly identify and respond to workplace hazards common to security and patrol environments. Perform hands-on CPR, AED use, and basic first aid to American Heart Association or Red Cross standards and earn a recognized certification card. Solve trade-relevant math problems including unit conversion, shift scheduling calculations, perimeter measurement, and basic use-of-force reporting ratios with at least 80% accuracy. Read and extract key information from security post orders, incident report forms, legal notices, and policy manuals using active reading strategies. Compose clear, professional written and verbal communications appropriate to security and law enforcement contexts, including radio protocol, shift logs, and formal email. Develop a career readiness portfolio including a resume, cover letter, professional references list, and a completed mock State Security Guard License application packet.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Workplace Safety Foundations and OSHA 10 for Security Professionals | 12 | theory | Students will identify the rights and responsibilities of workers and employers under the OSH Act and recognize at least six hazard categories commonly encountered in security and patrol worksites. |
| OSHA 10-Hour General Industry student packet (OSHA Publication 3153), OSHA hazard communication standard summary (GHS), sample JHA blank forms, PPE display kit (gloves, high-visibility vest, safety glasses, puncture-resistant footwear examples), whiteboard. | Students score at least 70% on the OSHA 10 end-of-course knowledge check to receive the OSHA 10 completion card; instructor observes correct identification of all six hazard types during hazard hunt debrief. Students who score below 70% review missed content and retake the check before progressing. |
| 2 | CPR, AED, and First Aid Certification | 16 | lab | Students will demonstrate adult CPR with AED use and provide basic first aid for bleeding, shock, and suspected fractures to the standard required by their chosen certification organization (American Heart Association Heartsaver or Red Cross equivalent). |
| Adult CPR manikins (at least 1 per 2 students), AED trainers, pocket masks, nitrile gloves, tourniquets (commercial CAT or similar trainer versions), splinting materials, bandages, AHA Heartsaver or Red Cross First Aid CPR AED student workbook, skills check sheets. | Students must pass the certifying organization's skills check and written test to receive a recognized CPR/First Aid/AED certification card valid for two years; students who do not pass the skills check on the first attempt receive remediation and one additional attempt within the course window. |
| 3 | Trade Math for Security and Patrol | 20 | practice | Students will accurately solve practical math problems drawn directly from security work — including perimeter and area calculations, time and shift arithmetic, currency counting for cash-handling posts, and reading scaled site maps — with at least 80% accuracy on graded tasks. |
| Printed scaled site maps (parking lot, campus, warehouse perimeter), rulers, basic calculators, play money set for cash-handling simulation, blank daily log forms, math practice problem packet (instructor-developed, trade-contextualized), pencils. | Students must score at least 80% (12 of 15 problems correct) on the timed mixed practice problem set; instructor reviews error patterns with students who score below 80% and assigns a targeted remediation set before the unit knowledge exam. |
| 4 | Technical Reading: Post Orders, Policy Manuals, and Legal Notices | 20 | theory | Students will read and accurately extract, summarize, and apply key information from authentic security post orders, use-of-force policies, and legal notices using active reading strategies. |
| Sample hospital campus post order (instructor-developed or sanitized authentic document), two-version use-of-force policy handout, sample trespassing notice, state security licensing statute excerpt (general), SQ3R annotation guide, comprehension guide worksheets, highlighters. | Students answer 8 of 10 comprehension guide questions correctly with specific textual evidence cited; instructor checks plain-language translations for accuracy during class review. Students who miss more than two questions identify and re-read the relevant post order sections before progressing. |
| 5 | Professional Communication: Writing, Radio, and Verbal Skills | 30 | demo | Students will compose a clear and complete security shift log entry and a professional email, and demonstrate basic radio communication protocol using correct phonetic alphabet and 10-code conventions used in the security industry. |
| Handheld radios or radio trainers (2 per pair), phonetic alphabet reference card, common security 10-code reference sheet (generic industry version), shift log blank forms, scenario narrative handout, peer review rubric, email format checklist, computers or tablets with word processing software. | Radio: each student completes a five-exchange scenario with no more than one uncorrected error; shift log entry earns at least 80% on the peer and instructor rubric (must include all 5W+H elements, correct chronological order, and no factual omissions from the scenario); email meets all checklist items for format and professional tone. |
| 6 | Digital Tools for Security and Law Enforcement Work | 20 | lab | Students will use standard workplace digital tools — word processing, spreadsheet logging, basic database search, and a computer-aided dispatch (CAD) simulation — accurately and efficiently for security documentation and records tasks. |
| Computers or tablets with word processing and spreadsheet software (Microsoft Office or Google Workspace), pre-formatted spreadsheet log file, CAD simulation software or printed dispatch card set, incident report template, file naming convention guide, printer or PDF export function. | Word processing: formatted report contains all required fields, no spelling errors, correct file name, and is successfully exported to PDF. Spreadsheet: all 35 data entries are accurate, totals are correct, and the student can demonstrate the sort/filter function on request. CAD: student accurately locates two of two dispatch scenarios on the map and enters a correctly formatted response update. |
| 7 | Career Readiness and Credential Application Preparation | 30 | practice | Students will complete a career readiness portfolio — including a trade-specific resume, cover letter, professional reference sheet, and a fully completed mock State Security Guard License application packet — and deliver a two-minute professional self-introduction. |
| Resume template and checklist (security/LE-specific), peer feedback rubric, sample cover letter, reference sheet template, blank generic State Security Guard License application form, document checklist for licensure, video recording device (phone or webcam), self-evaluation form, computers with word processing software. | Portfolio earns a passing score (80% or higher) on the career readiness rubric, which requires all four components to be present, complete, and free of major errors; the application form must have every required field filled in correctly with no blank mandatory fields. Self-introduction is evaluated as satisfactory if it is two minutes or less, covers all four required content areas, and panel members rate professional demeanor as acceptable. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSHA 10 and Safety Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 70% correct (per OSHA 10 program requirement); CPR/First Aid practical skills check passed to certifying organization standard | A proctored multiple-choice written exam covering OSHA 10 general industry content as required by the OSHA Outreach Training Program, followed by the certifying organization's CPR/First Aid/AED written and practical skills check. Passing both components earns the student the OSHA 10 completion card and the CPR/First Aid/AED certification card, both of which are documented in the student's credential portfolio. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Trade Math and Technical Reading Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% correct on each section; both sections must pass independently | A two-section proctored exam: Section 1 presents 20 trade-contextualized math problems (perimeter, shift arithmetic, unit conversion, cash log) drawn from security scenarios; Section 2 presents a previously unseen two-page post order excerpt followed by 10 comprehension and application questions requiring students to locate, interpret, and apply policy directives. Students who fail one section retake only that section after targeted review. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Career Readiness Portfolio | Project | 25% | 80% on the portfolio rubric with all four required components present and complete; application form must have zero blank mandatory fields | Students submit a complete career readiness portfolio containing a trade-specific resume, a cover letter addressed to a real or realistic security employer, a professional reference sheet with at least two contacts formatted correctly, and a fully completed mock State Security Guard License application packet with a supporting document checklist. The instructor evaluates each component against a detailed rubric covering completeness, accuracy, professional language, and formatting. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
| Professional Communication Oral Defense | Oral / panel | 25% | Satisfactory rating on all three rubric domains: content completeness, professional demeanor, and communication clarity; radio and shift log components must each meet their individual competency marks | Students deliver their two-minute professional self-introduction to an oral panel, then respond to two scenario-based questions from the instructor — one requiring them to demonstrate a radio transmission using the phonetic alphabet and a 10-code, and one requiring them to verbally walk through how they would write a shift log entry for a described incident. The panel scores the student on a three-domain rubric and provides written feedback; students who receive an unsatisfactory rating on any domain complete one additional coached practice and are re-evaluated. Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism |
This course builds the legal foundation security officers and law enforcement candidates need to act lawfully on the job, covering criminal law principles, the limits of private and public authority, constitutional constraints on searches and arrests, and the evidence rules that protect prosecutions. Learners connect statutory and case-law concepts directly to field decisions—use of force, detention, reporting—so every action they take can be justified in writing and in court. Lessons are mapped to both the State Security Guard License exam areas and POST Academy preparation standards.
OutcomesThis course builds the legal foundation security officers and law enforcement candidates need to act lawfully on the job, covering criminal law principles, the limits of private and public authority, constitutional constraints on searches and arrests, and the evidence rules that protect prosecutions. Learners connect statutory and case-law concepts directly to field decisions—use of force, detention, reporting—so every action they take can be justified in writing and in court. Lessons are mapped to both the State Security Guard License exam areas and POST Academy preparation standards.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Foundations of Criminal Law: Sources, Structure, and Classification; Constitutional Limits on Authority: Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments; Arrest Law: Authority, Elements, and Liability; Elements of Common Crimes in Security Contexts; Use-of-Force Law and the Reasonable-Person Standard; Evidence Basics and Legally Sound Documentation; Integrated Criminal Law Review and Credential Exam Mapping.
What competent looks like. Distinguish felonies, misdemeanors, and infractions and explain how the classification of an offense determines the lawful response available to a security officer or peace officer candidate. Explain the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment protections and apply those protections to real security and patrol scenarios involving stops, searches, and custodial questioning. State the legal standards for a lawful citizen's arrest and a peace officer's arrest, identify the conditions that justify each, and articulate the civil and criminal liability risks of acting outside those standards. Describe the elements of common crimes encountered in security work—theft, trespass, assault, battery, vandalism, and drug possession—and identify the evidence needed to establish each element. Apply use-of-force law, including the reasonable-person standard and the continuum framework, to written scenarios and justify a chosen response in legal terminology. Prepare a legally sound incident account that documents observed facts, statements, and evidence in a sequence admissible as a contemporaneous record.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foundations of Criminal Law: Sources, Structure, and Classification | 12 | theory | Students will correctly classify at least ten given offenses as felony, misdemeanor, or infraction and trace each classification to its statutory source in their state penal code. |
| State penal code (current edition, physical or official digital version), instructor slide deck, graphic organizer worksheet, whiteboard, markers | Exit quiz of 15 classification questions; students must correctly classify 12 of 15 (80%) to demonstrate mastery before Lesson 2. |
| 2 | Constitutional Limits on Authority: Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments | 14 | theory | Students will identify the constitutional amendment implicated in each of eight given law enforcement scenarios and state whether the described government action is likely constitutional, citing the relevant legal standard. |
| Annotated case summaries (Terry v. Ohio, Miranda v. Arizona, and state equivalents), scenario worksheet, state POST study guide constitutional-law section, whiteboard | Scenario-analysis worksheet scored by instructor using a provided rubric; students must correctly identify the amendment and standard in at least 6 of 8 scenarios (75%) to pass. |
| 3 | Arrest Law: Authority, Elements, and Liability | 12 | theory | Students will state the legal elements required for a lawful citizen's arrest and a peace officer's arrest and explain the civil and criminal consequences of an unlawful arrest in at least four written scenarios. |
| State penal code arrest provisions, state tort code false-imprisonment section, instructor case-study handouts, comparison chart worksheet | Four-scenario written response test; students must correctly state the legal standard and consequence in at least 3 of 4 scenarios (75%) with accurate citation to the relevant statute type (not necessarily section number). |
| 4 | Elements of Common Crimes in Security Contexts | 14 | theory | Students will list all statutory elements of theft, trespass, assault, battery, vandalism, and simple drug possession and identify which elements are or are not present in each of six given incident descriptions. |
| Crime-elements matrix worksheet, six mock incident report handouts, state penal code definitions section, State Security Guard License exam content outline | Elements identification quiz using two new incident descriptions; students must correctly identify all elements present and absent in both scenarios with at least 80% accuracy on the scoring rubric to pass. |
| 5 | Use-of-Force Law and the Reasonable-Person Standard | 14 | demo | Students will apply the reasonable-person standard and their state's use-of-force continuum framework to five written scenarios and select and justify a legally defensible force option for each. |
| Use-of-force continuum diagram, POST-approved training videos (publicly available), scenario packets, state statute on justifiable use of force, State Security Guard License exam content outline | Scored written scenario responses (5 scenarios, 20 points each); students must score at least 75 out of 100, with any scenario recommending clearly unlawful force flagged for mandatory remediation regardless of total score. |
| 6 | Evidence Basics and Legally Sound Documentation | 12 | lab | Students will produce a written incident account for a simulated event that includes observed facts, direct quotations, physical evidence descriptions, and a chronological sequence that meets the standards of a contemporaneous record admissible in a legal proceeding. |
| Incident report template, legal-documentation checklist, prop items for staged incident (forged document facsimile, envelope), instructor model report, whiteboard | Completed incident account scored against the legal-documentation checklist (12 required elements); students must include at least 10 of 12 elements (83%) with no fabricated facts to pass; fabrication is an automatic failure. |
| 7 | Integrated Criminal Law Review and Credential Exam Mapping | 10 | practice | Students will answer practice questions drawn from all major criminal-law content areas of the State Security Guard License exam and the POST Academy preparation framework at a passing rate of 75% or higher on a full-length mock exam. |
| 50-question mock exam packet, answer key with topic-area breakdown, State Security Guard License exam content outline, POST Academy study guide criminal-law section, pencils, timer | Mock exam score of 75% or higher (38 of 50 questions correct); students who score below 75% receive a targeted remediation plan identifying the specific content areas for re-study before the course assessment. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criminal Law Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% (38 of 50 questions correct) | A 50-question multiple-choice examination covering all course content areas—offense classification, constitutional amendments, arrest authority, crime elements, use-of-force law, and evidence documentation—aligned to the State Security Guard License exam blueprint and POST Academy criminal-law objectives. Students complete the exam individually under timed conditions; any student who scores below 75% must complete a documented remediation plan and retest once before the next course begins. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Use-of-Force Scenario Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | 75% on rubric (minimum 15 of 20 points per scenario, with no scenario scoring zero for clearly unlawful force recommendation) | The instructor presents two new written use-of-force scenarios verbally, and each student individually explains aloud their legal justification for the force level they would choose, citing the reasonable-person standard and the state's continuum framework. The instructor scores each response on a 20-point rubric assessing accuracy of legal standard cited, appropriateness of force level, and quality of justification; any response recommending clearly unlawful force is an automatic failure of this assessment regardless of rubric total. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Incident Documentation Lab Log | Log | 15% | 10 of 12 required elements present with zero fabricated facts; fabrication is automatic failure | Students observe a second, previously unseen staged classroom incident and produce a complete written incident account using the course report template within 20 minutes, then annotate their own report using the legal-documentation checklist to identify any gaps. The instructor reviews each report against the 12-element checklist and verifies that all facts recorded are consistent with the staged event; the annotated self-assessment and the instructor's checklist together form the lab log that is filed in the student's course portfolio. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Constitutional Authority Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | All three critical items correct; any critical-item failure requires immediate re-instruction and recheck before the student may advance to Course 3 (Patrol) | A brief three-question oral or written check administered by the instructor confirms that each student can correctly state (1) the constitutional standard that limits a security officer's authority to detain a person, (2) the Miranda requirement and who it applies to, and (3) one consequence—civil or criminal—of conducting an unlawful search. These three items are designated safety-critical because acting on a wrong answer in the field creates legal liability for the student, the employer, and potential harm to the public. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students learn systematic patrol methods used by security officers and entry-level peace officers, including foot and vehicle patrol techniques, perimeter and access control, observation skills, threat recognition, and emergency response protocols. Lessons integrate legal authority, situational awareness, communication with dispatch and the public, and documentation habits that satisfy both employer standards and state security licensing requirements. Content is aligned to State Security Guard License competency areas and POST Academy preparation objectives.
OutcomesStudents learn systematic patrol methods used by security officers and entry-level peace officers, including foot and vehicle patrol techniques, perimeter and access control, observation skills, threat recognition, and emergency response protocols. Lessons integrate legal authority, situational awareness, communication with dispatch and the public, and documentation habits that satisfy both employer standards and state security licensing requirements. Content is aligned to State Security Guard License competency areas and POST Academy preparation objectives.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Patrol Fundamentals: Purpose, Legal Authority, and Officer Safety; Observation, Situational Awareness, and Threat Recognition; Foot Patrol Techniques and Perimeter Security; Vehicle Patrol, Radio Communication, and Dispatch Procedures; Access Control, Visitor Management, and Crowd Dynamics; Emergency Response During Patrol: Medical, Fire, and Hazmat; Patrol Documentation, Chain of Custody, and Credential Exam Integration.
What competent looks like. Conduct a documented foot patrol of an assigned area using a systematic route, identifying and logging security hazards, access points, and suspicious conditions to a passing standard on a skills rubric. Demonstrate proper vehicle patrol techniques including pre-trip inspection, observation scanning, and radio communication with simulated dispatch, meeting employer safety and POST preparation benchmarks. Apply access control and perimeter security procedures—including visitor logging, credential verification, and barrier checks—in a role-play scenario scored at 80% or higher. Recognize behavioral indicators of criminal activity, medical emergency, and fire or hazardous-material incidents during patrol and select the correct immediate action for each scenario on a written knowledge exam. Use radio communication procedures, phonetic alphabet, and standard reporting codes accurately in simulated patrol exercises, achieving an 80% score on a communication competency check. Complete a patrol log and incident field note that meets chain-of-custody documentation standards, with no critical errors identified by instructor review.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patrol Fundamentals: Purpose, Legal Authority, and Officer Safety | 10.5 | theory | Students will explain the lawful scope of a security officer's and probationary peace officer's patrol authority, the primary purposes of patrol, and the personal safety practices required before and during any patrol assignment. |
| State security officer licensing statute (handout), POST officer safety guidelines reference packet, PPE inventory list, whiteboard, case-study handouts | Exit-ticket quiz of 10 multiple-choice questions on legal authority boundaries and safety rules; pass mark is 8/10 correct. |
| 2 | Observation, Situational Awareness, and Threat Recognition | 12 | demo | Students will apply the OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) framework and baseline behavior concepts to identify persons, objects, and conditions that deviate from normal in a controlled environment. |
| OODA loop reference card, observation worksheet, video clips (pre-approved training content), behavioral indicators reference guide, structured observation forms | Scored observation worksheet from the video drill; student must correctly identify at least 80% of planted anomalies across all three clips to demonstrate competence. |
| 3 | Foot Patrol Techniques and Perimeter Security | 12 | practice | Students will execute a systematic foot patrol of an assigned area using a documented route plan, check all designated control points, and accurately record conditions and discrepancies in a patrol log. |
| Campus site map with control points marked, patrol log forms, clipboards, flashlights, personal protective equipment per earlier lesson, padlocks for inspection, radio or cell phone for dispatch simulation | Instructor-scored patrol log rubric with five criteria (route completeness, time accuracy, discrepancy identification, description quality, professional language); pass mark is 80% of total rubric points, and all three planted discrepancies must be documented. |
| 4 | Vehicle Patrol, Radio Communication, and Dispatch Procedures | 12 | lab | Students will complete a vehicle pre-trip safety inspection, perform a simulated mobile patrol route with proper scanning technique, and communicate with a simulated dispatcher using correct radio protocol and phonetic alphabet. |
| Training vehicle or designated route map, vehicle pre-trip inspection checklist, handheld radios or radio simulator, phonetic alphabet reference card, POST radio communications reference, route map | Combined score on pre-trip checklist completion (must have zero missed safety-critical items) and radio communication rubric (clarity, correct protocol, phonetic accuracy); pass mark is 80% overall with no safety-critical checklist item missed. |
| 5 | Access Control, Visitor Management, and Crowd Dynamics | 12 | practice | Students will apply standardized access control procedures—including credential verification, visitor logging, and denial of entry—and recognize crowd control warning signs requiring escalation, in a series of role-play scenarios. |
| Sample ID badges (valid and expired mockups), visitor log forms, props for contraband stage (sealed dummy items), radio, crowd dynamics reference handout, scenario cards, scoring rubric | Access control scenario rubric scored by instructor across six criteria (credential check, log accuracy, de-escalation language, officer positioning, radio use, documentation); pass mark is 80% of rubric points with no critical safety positioning error. |
| 6 | Emergency Response During Patrol: Medical, Fire, and Hazmat | 12 | field | Students will demonstrate the correct patrol officer first response to a medical emergency, a fire discovery, and a suspected hazardous material release, including scene safety actions, notification procedures, and patient hand-off to first responders. |
| CPR manikin, AED trainer, fire extinguisher (training unit, dry), RACE protocol reference card, Emergency Response Guidebook (current edition), hazmat placard mockups, radio, personal protective equipment, scenario briefing cards | Field performance checklist for all three scenarios scored by instructor; student must achieve pass on every scenario individually (no single scenario below 80%) and must not commit any action that would endanger themselves or a simulated victim; failure of the safety-critical hazmat isolation step requires immediate remediation and re-demo. |
| 7 | Patrol Documentation, Chain of Custody, and Credential Exam Integration | 17.5 | lab | Students will produce a complete patrol documentation package—including a shift patrol log, a field observation note, and a preliminary incident report—from a simulated multi-event patrol scenario, meeting chain-of-custody standards and demonstrating readiness for State Security Guard License and POST Academy written exam content. |
| Patrol log forms, field observation note forms, preliminary incident report forms, chain-of-custody checklist, peer review rubric, State Security Guard License exam content outline, POST Academy study guide reference, practice exam question bank, clipboards, pens | Documentation package scored on instructor rubric (completeness, time-stamping accuracy, factual accuracy, professional language, chain-of-custody compliance): pass mark is 80% overall with zero critical chain-of-custody errors. Practice exam pass mark is 75% (23/30) to confirm readiness for the formal knowledge assessment. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrol Knowledge Examination | Written exam | 25% | 75% (38 of 50 questions correct) | A 50-question multiple-choice written exam covering patrol purpose and legal authority, observation and threat recognition, radio procedures, access control, emergency response protocols, and patrol documentation standards, mapped to State Security Guard License exam content areas and POST Academy preparation domains. Students who score below 75% receive targeted remediation and may retest once. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Integrated Patrol Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | 80% on the instructor rubric across all skill stations, with no critical safety error on any station | A live, instructor-observed practical evaluation in which each student independently conducts a 30-minute foot patrol of an assigned area, processes three access control scenarios at a checkpoint, transmits at least four radio communications to a simulated dispatcher, and produces a patrol log entry—scored on a multi-criteria rubric aligned to State Security Guard License practical competency areas. Any unsafe act that would endanger the student or a member of the public results in immediate failure and mandatory remediation before re-evaluation. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Patrol Log and Documentation Portfolio | Log | 15% | 80% on the documentation rubric with zero critical chain-of-custody errors | A collected portfolio of all patrol logs, field observation notes, and the preliminary incident report produced during the multi-event simulation in Lesson 7, evaluated by the instructor using a standardized chain-of-custody and accuracy rubric; the portfolio demonstrates the student's ability to create legally defensible patrol records consistent with employer and licensing expectations. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Emergency Response Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | 100% compliance on all safety-critical steps across all three emergency scenarios; no score below 80% on any individual scenario rubric | A direct observation safety check in which the instructor verifies that each student correctly sequences scene safety, notification, and isolation actions for medical, fire, and hazmat scenarios without any action that would create additional risk—this check is a prerequisite to passing the course, regardless of scores on other assessments, consistent with the program's safety-first policy. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students develop the practical writing skills required to produce clear, accurate, legally defensible incident reports, use-of-force documentation, and field notes that meet POST and security-licensing standards. Emphasis is placed on grammar, objectivity, chronological narrative structure, and proper documentation of evidence, witness statements, and officer observations. Competency in these skills directly supports both the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential exam areas related to documentation and professional communication.
OutcomesStudents develop the practical writing skills required to produce clear, accurate, legally defensible incident reports, use-of-force documentation, and field notes that meet POST and security-licensing standards. Emphasis is placed on grammar, objectivity, chronological narrative structure, and proper documentation of evidence, witness statements, and officer observations. Competency in these skills directly supports both the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential exam areas related to documentation and professional communication.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Foundations of Law Enforcement Report Writing; Grammar, Vocabulary, and Objective Language; Field Notes: Observation, Documentation, and Memory Aids; Incident Report Forms: Structure and Completion; Use-of-Force and Special-Circumstance Documentation; Witness Statements and Suspect Descriptions; Digital Reporting Tools, Records Management, and Final Integration.
What competent looks like. Write a complete, factually accurate incident report using chronological narrative structure and objective language that meets POST documentation standards. Correctly record witness statements, suspect descriptions, and physical evidence details using standardized field-note formats. Apply correct grammar, spelling, and law enforcement vocabulary to produce reports free of ambiguity or personal opinion. Complete use-of-force, property loss, and missing-person report forms accurately and within simulated time constraints. Identify and correct common report-writing errors including passive voice overuse, vague descriptors, hearsay conclusions, and missing essential elements. Use digital reporting tools and records-management system workflows to submit, store, and retrieve reports in compliance with agency chain-of-custody requirements.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foundations of Law Enforcement Report Writing | 10 | theory | Students will identify the legal and operational purposes of security and law enforcement reports and list the five essential elements every report must contain. |
| Sample incident reports (sanitized training versions), POST Basic Course Workbook Series (documentation module), report-element checklist handout, whiteboard, student notebooks. | Exit quiz: 10 multiple-choice questions covering report purposes, essential elements, and admissibility concepts; pass mark 70%. |
| 2 | Grammar, Vocabulary, and Objective Language | 12 | theory | Students will apply correct grammar, standard law enforcement vocabulary, and objective language conventions to rewrite flawed report sentences. |
| Law enforcement grammar and vocabulary workbook (instructor-prepared), sample flawed reports, glossary of common security and law enforcement terms, red pens for peer editing. | Grammar and vocabulary quiz: 20-item test combining sentence correction and term definition; pass mark 70%. |
| 3 | Field Notes: Observation, Documentation, and Memory Aids | 12 | demo | Students will take accurate, organized field notes during a simulated patrol scenario and use those notes to reconstruct a complete chronological account. |
| Field-note notebook (standard officer-issue style), pens, projected training video (staged non-violent disturbance scenario), timer, instructor observation rubric. | Field-note checklist review: instructor scores notes against a 10-point rubric covering date/time, chronological order, objective language, completeness, and legibility; pass mark 7/10. |
| 4 | Incident Report Forms: Structure and Completion | 14 | practice | Students will accurately complete standard incident, theft, property-damage, and missing-person report forms using simulated scenario data. |
| Sets of standard security incident report forms, theft report forms, property-damage forms, missing-person forms (all training versions), four written scenario cards, pens, timer. | Scored form review: instructor scores each completed form on accuracy of data entry, correct form selection, no blank required fields, and objective language; pass mark 80% aggregate across all four station forms. |
| 5 | Use-of-Force and Special-Circumstance Documentation | 12 | practice | Students will complete a use-of-force report that documents officer actions, subject behavior, and perceived threat level in objective, chronological, legally sufficient language. |
| Use-of-force report forms (training versions), sanitized case-study reports, comparison worksheet, simulation video, use-of-force report checklist, POST Basic Course use-of-force documentation reference. | Scored narrative report: instructor evaluates against an 8-criterion rubric (chronological order, subject behavior described before officer response, force level documented, no conclusions stated as facts, active voice, complete sentences, no missing elements, objective language); pass mark 6/8 criteria met. |
| 6 | Witness Statements and Suspect Descriptions | 12 | lab | Students will conduct a simulated witness interview and transcribe an accurate written statement that distinguishes the witness's words from the officer's observations. |
| Witness statement forms, scenario cards for role-play, suspect-description drill script (instructor-prepared), projector for group critique, evaluation rubric. | Witness statement and suspect-description combined score: rubric covers attribution (witness words vs. officer words), completeness of identifying descriptors, standard advisement line present, and no hearsay conclusions; pass mark 75%. |
| 7 | Digital Reporting Tools, Records Management, and Final Integration | 15 | lab | Students will enter, submit, retrieve, and amend a complete incident report using a digital records-management system simulation and produce a final portfolio-quality report package from a multi-part scenario. |
| Computers or tablets with records-management training software or structured template environment, scenario packet, witness statement forms, incident report forms, use-of-force forms, printer (if paper submission required), digital submission checklist. | Final report package scored on a 20-point rubric covering field-note completeness, correct form selection and completion, narrative accuracy and objectivity, witness statement attribution, use-of-force documentation elements, digital submission order, and supplemental amendment procedure; pass mark 16/20. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report Writing Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 70% (35 of 50 items correct) | A 50-item written exam covering report purposes and legal admissibility, essential report elements, law enforcement vocabulary, grammar rules, use-of-force documentation requirements, witness statement standards, and records-management procedures; mapped to State Security Guard License exam documentation competency areas and POST Basic Course writing standards. Items include multiple-choice, true/false, and sentence-correction formats. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Timed Incident Report Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | 80% on the 10-criterion scoring rubric | Under examination conditions and a 30-minute time limit, each student receives an unseen written scenario and must produce a complete, correctly formatted incident report narrative plus a companion witness statement form; the instructor scores the submission against a 10-criterion rubric assessing chronological structure, objective language, essential-element completeness, grammar, correct form use, and proper attribution of witness words, mirroring the documentation performance tasks found in POST academy entrance evaluations. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Field Notes and Report Package Lab Log | Log | 15% | Pass requires all seven lesson check-for assessments scored at or above their individual pass marks, plus the Lesson 7 final report package scored at 16/20 or higher | The lab log is a compiled portfolio of all graded in-class work products: field-note notebooks, form-completion station outputs, role-play witness statements, use-of-force narrative, digital amendment exercise, and the Lesson 7 capstone report package; the instructor reviews the full portfolio for evidence of skill progression and consistent application of report-writing standards across all scenario types covered in the course. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safety and Compliance Check: Records Integrity | Safety audit | 15% | Pass requires correct response on all three mandatory compliance behaviors; any single failure results in remediation before course completion | A brief practical check in which the instructor presents three scenarios—one requiring a supplemental addendum rather than overwriting an original record, one requiring a mandatory reporting trigger (e.g., use-of-force involving injury), and one requiring chain-of-custody notation for physical evidence—and the student must verbally explain and demonstrate the correct compliant action for each; this check maps directly to the legal-liability and records-integrity competencies tested on both the State Security Guard License exam and POST documentation standards. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
This course covers the physical skills, legal boundaries, and decision-making frameworks required for safe and lawful use-of-force encounters in security and law enforcement contexts. Students learn control holds, de-escalation, ground defense, handcuffing, and baton fundamentals, all grounded in use-of-force law and officer safety principles. Lessons map directly to POST academy physical-skills standards and the use-of-force knowledge areas tested on State Security Guard licensing exams.
OutcomesThis course covers the physical skills, legal boundaries, and decision-making frameworks required for safe and lawful use-of-force encounters in security and law enforcement contexts. Students learn control holds, de-escalation, ground defense, handcuffing, and baton fundamentals, all grounded in use-of-force law and officer safety principles. Lessons map directly to POST academy physical-skills standards and the use-of-force knowledge areas tested on State Security Guard licensing exams.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: Use-of-Force Law, Policy, and the Force Continuum; Officer Safety Principles, De-escalation, and Reactionary Gap; Empty-Hand Control: Escort Holds, Wrist Locks, and Compliance Techniques; Takedowns, Ground Defense, and Disengagement; Handcuffing and Search Procedures; Baton Fundamentals: Grip, Stance, Blocks, and Target Areas; Integrated Use-of-Force Scenarios and Incident Documentation.
What competent looks like. Apply a legally defensible use-of-force continuum to scenario-based threat situations, justifying each force level chosen. Execute empty-hand control techniques—including wrist locks, escort holds, and takedowns—with correct body mechanics and without causing unnecessary injury. Demonstrate safe handcuffing and searching procedures on a resisting subject under controlled lab conditions. Perform ground-defense and disengagement techniques to regain a standing position and create reactionary gap. Demonstrate baton (straight or side-handle) grip, stance, blocking, and target-area strikes within agency-approved policy limits. Accurately document a use-of-force incident in a written report that meets POST report-writing standards.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Use-of-Force Law, Policy, and the Force Continuum | 12 | theory | Students will correctly classify at least five scenarios by force level using the agency use-of-force continuum and cite the constitutional and statutory standards that govern each level. |
| Use-of-force continuum wall chart, scenario card set, Graham v. Connor plain-language summary handout, state security guard statute excerpts, POST use-of-force policy model, pens, lined paper | Exit quiz of 10 multiple-choice questions covering continuum levels, constitutional standard, and policy limits; passing score 80% correct |
| 2 | Officer Safety Principles, De-escalation, and Reactionary Gap | 12 | demo | Students will demonstrate reactionary-gap positioning, verbal de-escalation scripting, and pre-attack indicator recognition in at least three live role-play scenarios evaluated by the instructor. |
| Measuring tape, scenario role-play cards, LEAPS model reference card, pre-attack indicator photo set, short video clips (academy-approved), observation worksheet, whiteboard | Instructor checklist evaluation of each student's reactionary-gap stance, verbal de-escalation execution, and indicator identification across three role-plays; student must score 'satisfactory' on all three checklist categories |
| 3 | Empty-Hand Control: Escort Holds, Wrist Locks, and Compliance Techniques | 15 | lab | Students will correctly apply escort hold, wrist-lock, and come-along techniques on a compliant partner, achieving proper mechanical advantage and maintaining verbal control throughout. |
| Floor mats (crash-pad rated), technique log booklets, peer checklist forms, numbered station signs, PPE (mouthguard, athletic cup optional), long-sleeve training shirts to prevent mat burn | Instructor rates each technique on a four-point rubric (grip, mechanics, verbal control, safety); student must score 3 or 4 on every technique to pass; any score of 1 requires immediate remediation and re-check |
| 4 | Takedowns, Ground Defense, and Disengagement | 15 | lab | Students will execute a safe takedown, survive a ground-encounter scenario without sustaining simulated strike contact, and regain a standing position with reactionary gap within the time limit set by the instructor. |
| High-density crash mats, mouthguards, knee pads, stopwatch, ground-defense rubric, technique log, athletic training shirt/shorts, water station | Timed scenario scored on rubric: escape executed safely (no dropped head), stand-up achieved within 10 seconds, reactionary gap established; pass requires 'satisfactory' on all three rubric items |
| 5 | Handcuffing and Search Procedures | 12 | practice | Students will apply handcuffs to a standing and prone subject, double-lock both cuffs, and conduct a systematic pat-down search within POST-standard time and safety benchmarks. |
| Training handcuffs (one pair per student pair), handcuff keys, double-lock tools, simulated contraband items (plastic replicas), search sequence reference card, technique log, stopwatch, floor markers | Instructor times and scores the combined scenario: cuffs applied and double-locked within 60 seconds, two-finger gap verified, pat-down covers all zones in correct sequence; pass requires all three criteria met |
| 6 | Baton Fundamentals: Grip, Stance, Blocks, and Target Areas | 12 | demo | Students will demonstrate correct baton grip, fighting stance, three defensive blocks, and two approved strikes to lawful target areas, distinguishing restricted and prohibited target areas by policy. |
| Training batons (foam or rubber, one per student), padded strike bag, target-area tape (color-coded), body-map worksheet, anatomy chart poster, PPE (safety glasses, gloves), baton policy handout | Instructor observes five baton draw-and-strike sequences with scenario cues; student must demonstrate correct target selection in all five, proper grip/stance in all five, and state a correct justification; three or more errors requires remediation |
| 7 | Integrated Use-of-Force Scenarios and Incident Documentation | 9 | field | Students will complete two full use-of-force scenarios applying skills from all prior lessons and immediately produce a written use-of-force incident report that meets POST documentation standards. |
| Role-player padding gear, scenario environment props (desk, chairs, simulated security post), integrated scenario rubric, use-of-force incident report form, pens, stopwatch, audio recorder (for instructor review), POST report-writing standard checklist | Scenario rubric score 80% or higher across force decision, technique execution, verbal commands, and safety; incident report assessed on POST checklist—must include accurate chronology, objective language, force justification, and injury assessment section with no fabricated facts |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Use-of-Force Law and Policy Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 80% correct (40 of 50 questions) | A 50-item multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering the constitutional standard for reasonable force, the use-of-force continuum levels, state statutory authority for security personnel, baton target area policy, and handcuffing legal requirements. This exam maps directly to the use-of-force and legal authority knowledge domains tested on the State Security Guard License exam and POST academy written assessments. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Defensive Tactics Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Satisfactory rating on all six technique categories; any Unsatisfactory rating requires one remediation attempt within five business days | An instructor-evaluated live demonstration in which each student performs, in sequence: reactionary-gap stance, one escort hold, one wrist lock, one takedown with breakfall, handcuffing with double-lock, and one baton block-and-strike combination. Each technique is rated Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory using a standardized POST-aligned rubric, and the student must also verbally state the force-continuum level and legal justification for the baton strike chosen. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Technique and Scenario Lab Log | Log | 15% | All seven lesson entries present and legible; accuracy score of 80% on self-assessment reflections verified against instructor key; no blank required fields | Students maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course, recording technique steps, repetition counts, self-timed results, peer-checklist feedback, and a brief written reflection after each lab or practice lesson. The completed log is submitted at course end and reviewed for completeness, accuracy of technique descriptions, and honest self-assessment; it serves as evidence of progressive skill development aligned with POST academy documentation habits. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Integrated Scenario Safety Check | Safety audit | 15% | Zero critical safety violations; minor deductions allowed up to two, but any single critical violation (striking a prohibited target, dropping a restrained subject's head onto the floor, failing to double-lock cuffs) results in automatic failure and mandatory remediation before course credit is awarded | Evaluators observe each student's two integrated use-of-force scenarios from Lesson 7 using a binary safety checklist that flags critical violations (prohibited target strikes, unsafe falls, failure to control a subject's descent) and minor procedural deviations (missed verbal command, grip error self-corrected). This check verifies that students can perform the full skill chain safely under realistic pressure before they are cleared for externship and licensure testing. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
This course develops the core operational competencies of a working security officer: post orders, access control, surveillance, emergency response coordination, and professional conduct under pressure. Lessons integrate legal authority, communication technology, and situational awareness so students can perform safely and lawfully on a real post. Content maps directly to the State Security Guard License examination domains and supports POST Academy Prep readiness in patrol and public-safety response.
OutcomesThis course develops the core operational competencies of a working security officer: post orders, access control, surveillance, emergency response coordination, and professional conduct under pressure. Lessons integrate legal authority, communication technology, and situational awareness so students can perform safely and lawfully on a real post. Content maps directly to the State Security Guard License examination domains and supports POST Academy Prep readiness in patrol and public-safety response.
How the course runs. 7 blocks: The Security Officer's Legal Authority and Professional Role; Post Orders, Access Control, and Visitor Management; Surveillance Systems, CCTV, and Communication Technology; Situational Awareness, Threat Recognition, and De-escalation; Emergency Response Coordination: Fire, Medical, and Active-Threat Protocols; Security Documentation, Report Writing, and Chain of Custody; Integrated Security Operations Scenario and Professional Conduct Review.
What competent looks like. Execute post orders and access-control procedures in compliance with site-specific instructions and applicable state security regulations. Operate surveillance equipment, two-way radios, and visitor-management logs accurately and in accordance with chain-of-custody documentation standards. Apply situational-awareness and threat-recognition techniques to identify and de-escalate suspicious activity before force becomes necessary. Coordinate emergency response actions—fire, medical, active-threat, and hazmat indicators—using standard notification protocols and the Incident Command System chain of communication. Demonstrate professional and legally compliant conduct including use-of-force continuum awareness, privacy limits, and anti-discrimination requirements during access-control encounters. Produce complete, factual, real-time security logs and incident reports that meet evidentiary documentation standards required by state licensing boards.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Security Officer's Legal Authority and Professional Role | 11 | theory | Students will correctly identify the scope and limits of a private security officer's legal authority—including arrest powers, trespass authority, and use-of-force boundaries—and distinguish those limits from sworn law-enforcement powers. |
| Sample state security guard licensing statute (redacted teaching copy), generic post-order template, use-of-force continuum chart, whiteboard, role-card set | Written 20-question scenario quiz covering authority limits, arrest powers, and use-of-force continuum; passing score 75% or higher. |
| 2 | Post Orders, Access Control, and Visitor Management | 14 | practice | Students will process simulated visitor, vehicle, and contractor entries according to written post orders, accurately completing access logs and denying or escalating non-compliant entries without error. |
| Simulated multi-page post-order packet, visitor log forms, badge stock and hole punch, ID-check reference card, vehicle log clipboard, barrier cones, timer, answer key | Practical skills checklist scored by instructor during the simulation: all required log fields completed, correct decision made on every entry attempt, denied-entry escalation protocol followed correctly; 90% of checklist items must be marked satisfactory. |
| 3 | Surveillance Systems, CCTV, and Communication Technology | 13 | demo | Students will operate a basic CCTV monitoring station and a two-way radio, demonstrating proper camera-scan technique, correct radio phonetic-alphabet use, and accurate incident documentation from surveillance footage. |
| Webcam and monitor or department-provided CCTV trainer unit, handheld radios or radio-simulator app, phonetic-alphabet reference card, surveillance log forms, pre-recorded incident video clip, tablet or laptop | Observation checklist completed by instructor during scan drill (correct scanning pattern, accurate verbal description, no personal opinion language); radio drill scored on phonetic accuracy and protocol adherence; both must reach 80% satisfactory. |
| 4 | Situational Awareness, Threat Recognition, and De-escalation | 14 | lab | Students will apply a structured situational-awareness model to identify pre-incident indicators in realistic scenarios and select a de-escalation response before any physical intervention becomes necessary. |
| Awareness-level wall chart, scenario worksheet, six short video clips (pre-recorded staged scenes), structured observation forms, role-play scenario cards, room space for 6-foot stand-off practice | Observation forms scored against instructor answer key (minimum 80% accurate threat-level ratings); de-escalation role-play evaluated on a five-item rubric (tone, distance, verbal sequence, non-escalation outcome, professionalism); must pass four of five rubric items. |
| 5 | Emergency Response Coordination: Fire, Medical, and Active-Threat Protocols | 15 | field | Students will execute the correct notification, evacuation, and scene-protection steps for three emergency types—fire alarm activation, medical emergency, and active-threat indicator—within the time and accuracy standards of a site emergency action plan. |
| Generic facility floor plan, sample emergency action plan, colored markers, ICS notification chain reference card, two-way radios, stopwatch, role-player bystander volunteers or classmates, reflective safety vests, first-aid kit (reference only), AED trainer unit | Field-drill performance checklist (alarm activation, zone sweep, bystander direction, headcount, radio report) evaluated by instructor in real time; all six checklist steps must be completed in correct sequence; notification radio message must include location, nature, and headcount—any omission requires immediate re-do. |
| 6 | Security Documentation, Report Writing, and Chain of Custody | 12 | practice | Students will produce a complete, factually accurate, and legally sound incident report and evidence-custody log from a staged security event, meeting the five documentation standards required by most state licensing boards. |
| Sample incident report forms (good and flawed versions), blank incident report templates, documentation standards checklist, chain-of-custody forms, prop 'recovered item' sealed envelope, pen and clipboard | Completed incident report scored against a ten-point documentation rubric (factual accuracy, completeness, time stamps, objective language, legible corrections, proper format); minimum score 8 out of 10 required; chain-of-custody form must have zero missing required fields. |
| 7 | Integrated Security Operations Scenario and Professional Conduct Review | 8 | lab | Students will perform a full-shift simulation integrating access control, surveillance monitoring, radio communication, de-escalation, emergency notification, and incident documentation, demonstrating professional conduct and legally compliant decision-making throughout. |
| Mock post station (desk, access log, radio, monitor or tablet displaying static CCTV feed, visitor badge stock), inject scenario cards, observer checklists, incident report forms, chain-of-custody forms, timer, reflective vests | Instructor-scored performance rubric covering six operational domains (access control, radio communication, de-escalation, emergency notification, documentation, professional conduct); minimum of five of six domains rated satisfactory; unsatisfactory rating in any single domain triggers a targeted remediation activity before the final skills demo. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security Operations Knowledge Exam | Written exam | 25% | 75% or higher (38 of 50 questions correct) | A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering legal authority limits, access-control procedure, surveillance terminology, emergency response protocols, documentation standards, and situational-awareness concepts, mapped to the State Security Guard License examination domains. Students have 90 minutes; no notes permitted. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Integrated Post Operations Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 45% | Satisfactory rating on at least 10 of 12 checklist items; any item marked 'unsafe or unlawful' requires immediate remediation and re-demo | Instructor presents each student with a timed 20-minute solo post scenario containing four sequential injects (entry-control decision, radio communication task, de-escalation encounter, and incident documentation); performance is evaluated on a 12-item behavioral checklist aligned to state licensing competency areas and POST Academy Prep patrol standards. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Operational Documentation Lab Log | Log | 15% | Score of 80% or higher on the documentation rubric; chain-of-custody form must have zero missing required fields | Students submit a complete portfolio of documentation produced across Lessons 2, 6, and 7: two access-control logs, one surveillance incident log, one full incident report, and one chain-of-custody form. Each document is scored on factual accuracy, completeness, objective language, time-stamp integrity, and format compliance using a standardized ten-point rubric. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
| Safety and Legal Conduct Check | Safety audit | 15% | All five critical safety and legal items must be marked 'met'; any single 'not met' requires remediation and re-check before course credit is awarded | Instructor completes a non-negotiable five-item safety and legal conduct checklist for each student based on cumulative observation across all lab and field activities: (1) never exceeded legal authority in any scenario, (2) maintained safe stand-off distance during de-escalation exercises, (3) used radio to notify rather than self-dispatching emergency response, (4) documented only observable facts with no opinion language, and (5) correctly identified and declined to execute at least one unlawful or out-of-scope action presented in scenarios. Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation |
Students design, document, and defend a complete security operations plan for a realistic site scenario, integrating criminal law, patrol procedures, report writing, defensive tactics protocols, and security operations into one cohesive professional deliverable. The capstone simulates the full scope of entry-level security and law enforcement support work, requiring students to apply every program competency under instructor evaluation. Successful completion demonstrates job-ready readiness for state licensing and POST-aligned employment.
OutcomesStudents design, document, and defend a complete security operations plan for a realistic site scenario, integrating criminal law, patrol procedures, report writing, defensive tactics protocols, and security operations into one cohesive professional deliverable. The capstone simulates the full scope of entry-level security and law enforcement support work, requiring students to apply every program competency under instructor evaluation. Successful completion demonstrates job-ready readiness for state licensing and POST-aligned employment.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Site Survey, Threat Assessment, and Post Orders Drafting; Simulated Incident Response and After-Action Reporting; Capstone Plan Integration, Revision, and Portfolio Assembly; Oral Defense and Panel Presentation.
What competent looks like. Conduct a site security survey and produce a written threat and vulnerability assessment that meets professional documentation standards. Draft a site-specific post orders package including emergency action procedures, patrol routes, use-of-force policy references, and incident reporting protocols. Demonstrate lawful and tactically sound responses to at least three simulated incidents — one involving a medical emergency, one a criminal trespass, and one a use-of-force decision point — with written after-action reports for each. Apply applicable criminal law concepts, constitutional limitations on detention, and use-of-force continuum principles correctly in both written documentation and verbal defense. Present and orally defend the completed security operations plan to a panel, answering scenario-based questions drawn from all prior course areas. Self-evaluate performance using a structured rubric, identifying at least two areas for continued professional development before externship.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Site Survey, Threat Assessment, and Post Orders Drafting | 28 | lab | Given a detailed fictional site profile, students will complete a written threat and vulnerability assessment and draft a full post orders package that correctly addresses access control, patrol schedules, emergency contacts, and reporting requirements. |
| Fictional site packet with floor plan and photographs, security survey checklist form, threat-assessment memo template, post orders style guide, word-processing software, campus printer for hard-copy submission, AHJ-referenced emergency action plan samples, State Security Guard License study guide (access control and patrol sections) | Instructor scores the threat assessment memo and post orders package against a 25-point rubric covering accuracy of risk categorization, completeness of required sections, correct legal references to detention and trespass statutes (general terms, no invented code numbers), grammar and professional formatting; passing score is 18 out of 25 (72%). Any section missing entirely must be resubmitted within 48 hours before the student may advance. |
| 2 | Simulated Incident Response and After-Action Reporting | 36 | practice | Students will respond to three instructor-facilitated scenario role-plays — a medical emergency, a criminal trespass, and a use-of-force decision — and produce a complete, factually accurate written incident report for each scenario that meets the documentation standards taught in Report Writing. |
| AED trainer unit, CPR manikin, radio trainer handsets, scenario role-player instruction cards, incident report blank forms (same format used in Report Writing course), use-of-force continuum reference card, POST study guide (patrol and use-of-force sections), defensive tactics protective gear (if any contact is used in demonstration), scenario props (simulated access badge, warning signage for restricted area) | Each of the three incident reports is scored on a 20-point rubric (accuracy of facts as observed in scenario, correct chronological narrative structure, professional language, absence of opinion or editorializing, correct identification of legal authority used); passing is 14 out of 20 per report. The use-of-force report requires an additional instructor sign-off confirming the student correctly identified the appropriate continuum level; any report scored below passing is rewritten once under instructor supervision before the portfolio is assembled. |
| 3 | Capstone Plan Integration, Revision, and Portfolio Assembly | 20 | lab | Students will compile all capstone deliverables into a professionally organized security operations plan portfolio, incorporate instructor and peer feedback from prior lessons, and complete a written self-evaluation identifying personal strengths and areas for growth. |
| Binder or PDF assembly software, tabbed dividers, revision log form, peer-review instruction sheet with rubrics, self-evaluation structured prompt, all documents from Lessons 1 and 2, printer/scanner access | Instructor verifies portfolio completeness using a 10-item checklist (all required documents present, table of contents accurate, revision log complete, self-evaluation two full pages addressing all prompts); all 10 items must be marked present — this is a completion gate, not a scored rubric — before the student is cleared to schedule the oral defense. Self-evaluation is scored pass/incomplete: pass requires evidence cited for every outcome rated and two specific, measurable development goals stated. |
| 4 | Oral Defense and Panel Presentation | 24 | field | Students will present their completed security operations plan to a two-person evaluation panel and correctly answer scenario-based follow-up questions covering criminal law, patrol procedure, report writing standards, use-of-force principles, and security operations, demonstrating integrated professional readiness. |
| Completed capstone portfolio (student's own), oral defense rubric (panel copy and student copy), scenario question bank (instructor-controlled), evaluation score sheets, optional: whiteboard or flip chart for student use during presentation, invited industry evaluator schedule coordination form | Panel scores the defense on a 30-point rubric: content accuracy across credential exam areas (12 points), clarity and professionalism of communication (8 points), ability to support answers with documented evidence from the portfolio (6 points), and professional demeanor and terminology (4 points). Passing is 21 out of 30 (70%). A student who scores below 21 may re-defend once; a second failure requires remediation plan review with the program director before progression to externship. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security Operations Plan Project | Project | 60% | Combined score of 72% or higher across the threat assessment memo rubric (25 points) and all three incident report rubrics (20 points each), with every required section present and no incomplete use-of-force report; incomplete sections must be resubmitted and approved before the portfolio gate. | The project is the full written deliverable — threat and vulnerability assessment, post orders package, and three scenario incident reports — produced across Lessons 1 and 2. It is evaluated holistically as the primary evidence that the student can perform integrated security documentation work at an entry professional level, directly mapped to the post orders, patrol, and report writing competency areas tested in the State Security Guard License exam. Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation |
| Capstone Portfolio | Portfolio | 20% | All 10 checklist items marked present, revision log complete with rationale entries, and self-evaluation rated pass (evidence cited for each outcome and two measurable development goals stated); no numerical score — this is a completion and professionalism gate required before the oral defense is scheduled. | The portfolio is the organized, revised, and self-evaluated compilation of all capstone project documents assembled in Lesson 3. It demonstrates the student's ability to apply professional quality-control habits — peer review, revision, and reflective practice — that are expected in both security and law enforcement support environments and that the POST Academy Prep credential recognizes as indicators of workplace readiness. Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality |
| Oral Defense | Oral / panel | 20% | 21 out of 30 points on the panel rubric (70%), with no single category scored at zero; one re-defense opportunity is permitted within five business days with documented remediation. | The oral defense is a 25-minute panel presentation and scenario-based question session in which the student presents their security operations plan and demonstrates the ability to apply and verbally articulate knowledge across all program competency areas. It directly mirrors the oral-board component of POST academy candidate evaluations and tests the integrated professional communication skills required for both the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential pathways. Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication |
Students complete 162 supervised hours at an approved law enforcement or private security worksite, applying patrol, report writing, defensive tactics, and security operations skills under the direct oversight of a licensed field supervisor. Each student maintains a detailed field journal and is formally evaluated by their site supervisor at the midpoint and end of the placement. Competencies observed on-site are mapped to both the State Security Guard License performance standards and POST Academy Prep employer-recognition criteria.
OutcomesStudents complete 162 supervised hours at an approved law enforcement or private security worksite, applying patrol, report writing, defensive tactics, and security operations skills under the direct oversight of a licensed field supervisor. Each student maintains a detailed field journal and is formally evaluated by their site supervisor at the midpoint and end of the placement. Competencies observed on-site are mapped to both the State Security Guard License performance standards and POST Academy Prep employer-recognition criteria.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Pre-Placement Orientation and Site-Safety Briefing; Supervised Operational Shifts – Patrol, Access Control, and Incident Response; Mid-Placement Evaluation and Reflective Conference; Final Evaluation, Field Journal Submission, and Program Debrief.
What competent looks like. Demonstrate professional conduct, punctuality, and adherence to site-specific post orders across all scheduled externship shifts. Apply patrol techniques, access control procedures, and incident response protocols learned in coursework to real worksite conditions under supervisor direction. Complete accurate, legible incident and shift reports that meet the documentation standards required for State Security Guard License compliance. Perform basic first aid and CPR, and follow OSHA general-industry safety protocols, correctly when required or prompted during the placement. Receive a passing composite score on the employer mid-term and final evaluation rubric, demonstrating job-entry readiness. Maintain a reflective field journal with one entry per shift that connects observed worksite practices to specific course concepts and credential exam areas.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pre-Placement Orientation and Site-Safety Briefing | 10 | theory | Students correctly identify site-specific hazards, emergency procedures, chain of command, post orders, and legal scope-of-authority requirements before their first operational shift. |
| Site post orders binder, student externship agreement packet, OSHA Hazard Communication standard summary card, site emergency action plan, state security officer scope-of-authority reference sheet, pre-placement safety checklist form | Student scores 80% or higher on the written orientation quiz covering post orders, emergency procedures, radio protocols, and legal scope of authority; supervisor initials the safety checklist confirming the site walk was completed. |
| 2 | Supervised Operational Shifts – Patrol, Access Control, and Incident Response | 100 | field | Students execute assigned patrol routes, access-control duties, and initial incident-response actions under continuous or periodic field-supervisor oversight across a minimum of 100 documented hours. |
| Duty belt and PPE as required by site, site radio or communication device, patrol checkpoint log sheets, access-control visitor log, incident report forms (site-standard and program-standard), field supervisor shift observation form | Field supervisor rates each observed patrol and access-control performance at 'Meets Standard' or higher on the site rubric (4-point scale, minimum score of 3); incident reports are reviewed by supervisor and program instructor and must be factually complete, grammatically acceptable, and submitted on time to pass. |
| 3 | Mid-Placement Evaluation and Reflective Conference | 6 | practice | Students demonstrate measurable progress on all rubric domains at the midpoint, identify at least two professional development goals, and adjust their worksite performance plan based on supervisor feedback. |
| Mid-placement evaluation rubric, program mid-placement conference guide, student field journal, State Security Guard License exam-area reference list, POST Academy Prep competency overview | Student achieves an average score of 2.5 out of 4 or higher across all rubric domains at mid-placement (a score below 2.5 in any single domain triggers a written improvement plan); written self-assessment is submitted within three business days of the conference and receives instructor sign-off for completeness. |
| 4 | Final Evaluation, Field Journal Submission, and Program Debrief | 46 | lab | Students complete remaining operational shifts, submit a complete and reflective field journal, and receive a final employer evaluation score that meets the program's passing threshold for externship completion. |
| Cumulative hour log form, field journal (physical or approved digital format), final employer evaluation rubric, field journal grading rubric, debrief session agenda, credential exam-area crosswalk chart | Final employer evaluation rubric average must be 3.0 out of 4.0 or higher across all domains, with no individual domain below 2.0; field journal must contain a complete entry for every shift with all four required elements present (graded pass/fail by instructor); verbal debrief must be completed to receive externship credit. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employer Evaluation Skills Demonstration | Skills demonstration | 70% | Composite score of 3.0 out of 4.0 or higher on the final employer evaluation rubric, with no single domain (professionalism, patrol, reporting, communication, safety, teamwork) scored below 2.0; mid-placement score of 2.5 average is the interim gate. | The site supervisor completes a standardized four-point rubric at mid-placement and again at the end of the externship, scoring the student on six performance domains observed directly during operational shifts. Scores below the passing threshold at the final evaluation require the student to complete a remediation plan and, if the program calendar permits, additional supervised hours before the course is marked complete. Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative |
| Field Journal Lab Log | Log | 30% | All shifts documented with a complete four-part entry (task, safety/legal consideration, credential exam-area connection, and self-improvement note); no more than two entries may be returned for revision, and all revisions must be resubmitted within five business days; final journal accepted by instructor pass/fail. | The field journal serves as the documentary record of the student's 162-hour placement, functioning as a lab log that traces applied skill development across every shift. The program instructor reviews the complete journal at submission for accuracy, professional language, and meaningful connection to credential content areas, and returns entries that lack required elements before issuing a final pass. Complete · Verified |
This 45-hour course systematically reviews every tested domain of the State Security Guard License exam and the POST Academy Prep credential, using diagnostic practice, targeted content review, and full-length mock exams to identify and close individual knowledge gaps. Students develop test-taking strategies, reinforce legal and procedural knowledge from earlier coursework, and demonstrate readiness to sit both credentialing exams with confidence. Lessons are sequenced from diagnostic to comprehensive, mirroring the cognitive load and format of the actual licensing and POST prep assessments.
OutcomesThis 45-hour course systematically reviews every tested domain of the State Security Guard License exam and the POST Academy Prep credential, using diagnostic practice, targeted content review, and full-length mock exams to identify and close individual knowledge gaps. Students develop test-taking strategies, reinforce legal and procedural knowledge from earlier coursework, and demonstrate readiness to sit both credentialing exams with confidence. Lessons are sequenced from diagnostic to comprehensive, mirroring the cognitive load and format of the actual licensing and POST prep assessments.
How the course runs. 4 blocks: Diagnostic Assessment & Exam Domain Mapping; Targeted Content Review: Legal Authority, Use of Force & Criminal Law; Targeted Content Review: Patrol, Report Writing, Emergency Response & Security Operations; Full Mock Credential Exams & Final Readiness Review.
What competent looks like. Demonstrate mastery of all major State Security Guard License exam content domains—including law, use of force, emergency response, access control, and professional conduct—by scoring 80% or higher on a full-length mock licensing exam. Demonstrate readiness for POST Academy Prep assessment areas—including criminal law, patrol procedures, report writing, and defensive tactics concepts—by scoring 80% or higher on a full-length POST prep mock exam. Apply test-taking strategies such as eliminating distractors, managing time per question, and flagging uncertain items to improve accuracy under timed exam conditions. Analyze personal diagnostic data to identify weak content domains and direct self-study resources accordingly before sitting the credentialing exams. Accurately recall legal authorities, officer powers, reporting requirements, and use-of-force continuum principles as tested on both credentials without reference materials. Complete both a simulated State Security Guard License exam and a POST Academy Prep mock exam within the prescribed time limits, achieving passing scores on each.
| # | Lesson | Hr | Type | Objective | Activities | Materials | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diagnostic Assessment & Exam Domain Mapping | 8 | practice | Students complete a timed diagnostic covering all State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep content domains and use scored results to build a personal study plan prioritizing weak areas. |
| 100-question diagnostic exam packet (instructor-developed, aligned to published state security guard exam content outlines and POST academy preparation guides), domain mapping table linking exam areas to program courses, score report template, blank personal study plan form, pencils, scratch paper, a quiet testing environment with a wall clock or timer. | Student produces a completed, realistic personal study plan with all three lowest domains identified and specific remediation steps listed; instructor reviews each plan for accuracy of domain identification and feasibility—pass requires correct identification of weak domains matching the score report and at least five concrete remediation actions documented. |
| 2 | Targeted Content Review: Legal Authority, Use of Force & Criminal Law | 12 | theory | Students review and correctly apply the legal and use-of-force principles most heavily weighted on the State Security Guard License exam and the criminal law domain of the POST Academy Prep assessment, achieving at least 80% on a domain quiz. |
| State security guard licensing exam content outline (published by the relevant state licensing board), POST Academy Prep study guide (state POST commission version in use), program Criminal Law course notes and textbook chapters, instructor-prepared scenario slides, guided notes outline handout, 40-question domain quiz packet, answer key, whiteboard and markers. | Students score 80% or higher on the 40-question domain quiz; any student below 80% receives a targeted question list corresponding to missed items and must re-attempt an alternate 20-question version of the lowest-scoring sub-domain before the next lesson—pass threshold is 80% on the original or alternate quiz within the lesson block. |
| 3 | Targeted Content Review: Patrol, Report Writing, Emergency Response & Security Operations | 12 | practice | Students review patrol procedures, report writing standards, first-aid and emergency response actions, and security operations concepts tested across both credentials, then correctly answer at least 80% of domain practice questions under timed conditions. |
| Three 20-question mini-quiz packets with answer keys, incident report scenario sheet, documentation standards checklist from the Report Writing course, four laminated station scenario cards with practice questions and rationale sheets, first aid reference card (consistent with the CPR/first aid training from the Universal Core course), patrol procedures reference summary from the Patrol course, security operations concept summary from the Security Ops course, timer. | Each student scores 80% or higher averaged across all three mini-quizzes (60 questions total); for the incident report, every mandatory element identified in the documentation checklist must be present in the final corrected group report—groups with missing elements rewrite until complete; students below 80% on mini-quizzes complete an additional 10-question targeted quiz on their weakest sub-domain before the next lesson. |
| 4 | Full Mock Credential Exams & Final Readiness Review | 13 | practice | Students complete one full-length simulated State Security Guard License exam and one full-length POST Academy Prep mock exam under timed, proctored conditions, then analyze results to confirm readiness and identify any final preparation steps before sitting the official exams. |
| Full-length State Security Guard License mock exam packet (instructor-developed, aligned to state licensing board exam content outline), full-length POST Academy Prep mock exam packet (aligned to state POST commission published exam domains), answer keys, domain score report template, readiness reflection worksheet, projector for debrief data display, whiteboard and markers, a proctored room with separated seating, wall clock or timer, pencils—no notes or reference materials permitted during the mock exams. | Students achieve 80% or higher on both the State Security Guard License mock exam and the POST Academy Prep mock exam; any student below 80% on either exam receives individualized written feedback identifying the specific domains to remediate and recommended resources, and the instructor schedules a one-on-one review session before the student sits the official credentialing exam—the 80% threshold on both mock exams is the course completion standard for this lesson. |
| Assessment | Type | Weight | Pass standard | Method & rubric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dual Credential Mock Certification Examination | Mock certification exam | 100% | A score of 80% or higher on both the full-length State Security Guard License mock exam and the full-length POST Academy Prep mock exam, both completed within the designated time limits under proctored conditions without reference materials. | Students sit two full-length, timed mock exams—one mirroring the State Security Guard License exam's domain weighting and format, and one mirroring the POST Academy Prep assessment—under proctored conditions identical to the official testing environment; each exam is scored by domain, and the combined results determine whether the student has demonstrated the knowledge and test readiness required to sit the official credentialing exams. Students who do not achieve 80% on either exam receive a written remediation plan and a targeted re-review session addressing identified weak domains before being cleared to schedule their official state licensing and POST prep credential exams. Score · Time management |
Students prepare for and sit the State Security Guard License exam administered by their state's licensing authority, and complete preparatory requirements aligned with their state Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) commission standards for academy entry. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.
Back to Law Enforcement / Security · How the school gets authority to award these credentials
A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working. Help us build VoTechWorks. Tell us what works, what doesn’t, and what you want to learn.