🚧 Under construction — VoTechWorks is being built. A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working.
voTechWorksGrade 13 · a vocational technology learning center, by urbanicity
newSchoolWorks.com › VoTechWorks › Agriculture, Environment & Public Service › Law Enforcement / Security › Courses
Agriculture, Environment & Public Service · course plan
⚠ Pending professional review

This course plan, its lessons and its assessments has not yet been verified by a licensed professional in the field or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.

VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.

Law Enforcement / Security

9 courses · 900 clock hours · 3–6 mo full-time. Grading is competency-based: each course requires the written exam, a competent skills demonstration with zero safety faults, a signed log, and a passed safety audit; percentage weights only rank performance above the competency floor.

$8,870 COMPLIMENTARYprogram tuition
9courses
54lessons
900hours
31assessments
Development progressPlanCourses, lessons and assessments written for this tradeLessons54 of 54 lesson pages writtenPractice432 practice questionsResources117 reference entries (study list)Review0 lesson pages reviewed by a licensed professional
Study now: 54 lesson pages are open (lesson titles below are links).
AGR-LAW52-01 Universal core

Universal Core: Safety, Math, Communication & Career for Law Enforcement and Security

148 hr · $1,185 COMPLIMENTARY

This foundational course equips entry-level security and law enforcement students with the safety knowledge, applied math, communication skills, and career readiness tools they need before entering specialized trade coursework. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry recognition and CPR/First Aid certification, and build the professional baseline required for the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential pathways. All content is contextualized to patrol, post orders, incident documentation, and security operations scenarios.

Outcomes
Course text

This foundational course equips entry-level security and law enforcement students with the safety knowledge, applied math, communication skills, and career readiness tools they need before entering specialized trade coursework. Students earn OSHA 10-Hour General Industry recognition and CPR/First Aid certification, and build the professional baseline required for the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential pathways. All content is contextualized to patrol, post orders, incident documentation, and security operations scenarios.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Workplace Safety Foundations and OSHA 10 for Security Professionals; CPR, AED, and First Aid Certification; Trade Math for Security and Patrol; Technical Reading: Post Orders, Policy Manuals, and Legal Notices; Professional Communication: Writing, Radio, and Verbal Skills; Digital Tools for Security and Law Enforcement Work; Career Readiness and Credential Application Preparation.

What competent looks like. Demonstrate OSHA 10-hour general industry safety knowledge and correctly identify and respond to workplace hazards common to security and patrol environments. Perform hands-on CPR, AED use, and basic first aid to American Heart Association or Red Cross standards and earn a recognized certification card. Solve trade-relevant math problems including unit conversion, shift scheduling calculations, perimeter measurement, and basic use-of-force reporting ratios with at least 80% accuracy. Read and extract key information from security post orders, incident report forms, legal notices, and policy manuals using active reading strategies. Compose clear, professional written and verbal communications appropriate to security and law enforcement contexts, including radio protocol, shift logs, and formal email. Develop a career readiness portfolio including a resume, cover letter, professional references list, and a completed mock State Security Guard License application packet.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Workplace Safety Foundations and OSHA 10 for Security Professionals12theoryStudents will identify the rights and responsibilities of workers and employers under the OSH Act and recognize at least six hazard categories commonly encountered in security and patrol worksites.
  1. Complete the OSHA 10-Hour General Industry curriculum delivered through instructor-led modules, covering hazard communication, personal protective equipment, walking/working surfaces, and emergency action plans as they apply to guard posts, parking enforcement, and patrol routes.
  2. Participate in a hazard hunt exercise using photographs of real security worksite conditions — loading docks, hospital lobbies, outdoor perimeter fences, parking structures — and classify each hazard by OSHA category and severity.
  3. In small groups, draft a one-page Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) for a simulated overnight parking lot security post, identifying tasks, associated hazards, and recommended controls using the hierarchy of controls framework.
OSHA 10-Hour General Industry student packet (OSHA Publication 3153), OSHA hazard communication standard summary (GHS), sample JHA blank forms, PPE display kit (gloves, high-visibility vest, safety glasses, puncture-resistant footwear examples), whiteboard.Students score at least 70% on the OSHA 10 end-of-course knowledge check to receive the OSHA 10 completion card; instructor observes correct identification of all six hazard types during hazard hunt debrief. Students who score below 70% review missed content and retake the check before progressing.
2CPR, AED, and First Aid Certification16labStudents will demonstrate adult CPR with AED use and provide basic first aid for bleeding, shock, and suspected fractures to the standard required by their chosen certification organization (American Heart Association Heartsaver or Red Cross equivalent).
  1. Watch and discuss instructor demonstrations of the CPR/AED sequence using adult manikins; each student then practices the full chain — scene safety check, call for help, compressions, rescue breaths (or compression-only as protocol dictates), AED attachment — until they can complete the sequence without prompting.
  2. Rotate through four first aid skill stations: (1) controlling severe bleeding with direct pressure and tourniquet application, (2) recognizing and positioning a patient in shock, (3) splinting a suspected lower-leg fracture using improvised materials, and (4) responding to an unresponsive choking adult — with peer and instructor feedback at each station.
  3. Complete a timed practical scenario in pairs: one student acts as bystander-responder while the other plays a collapsed visitor at a simulated building lobby post; the responder must demonstrate scene safety, activate EMS, perform CPR, and apply the AED correctly within the time limit set by the certifying organization.
Adult CPR manikins (at least 1 per 2 students), AED trainers, pocket masks, nitrile gloves, tourniquets (commercial CAT or similar trainer versions), splinting materials, bandages, AHA Heartsaver or Red Cross First Aid CPR AED student workbook, skills check sheets.Students must pass the certifying organization's skills check and written test to receive a recognized CPR/First Aid/AED certification card valid for two years; students who do not pass the skills check on the first attempt receive remediation and one additional attempt within the course window.
3Trade Math for Security and Patrol20practiceStudents will accurately solve practical math problems drawn directly from security work — including perimeter and area calculations, time and shift arithmetic, currency counting for cash-handling posts, and reading scaled site maps — with at least 80% accuracy on graded tasks.
  1. Work through a guided instructor-led set of scenario problems: calculating patrol perimeter distances from a scaled site map using a ruler and given scale, determining hours worked and overtime thresholds for a posted shift schedule, and converting units (feet to yards, miles per hour to feet per second for incident distance estimation).
  2. Complete a 'Cash Post' simulation in which students count and verify a mock cash deposit bag from a retail site, complete a daily cash log form, and identify discrepancies — mirroring the math skills required at cash-handling security posts.
  3. Use a free online calculator application (or a basic scientific calculator) to check manual calculations and complete a timed 15-problem mixed practice set covering all four skill areas, then self-score against the answer key and flag any problem type needing review.
Printed scaled site maps (parking lot, campus, warehouse perimeter), rulers, basic calculators, play money set for cash-handling simulation, blank daily log forms, math practice problem packet (instructor-developed, trade-contextualized), pencils.Students must score at least 80% (12 of 15 problems correct) on the timed mixed practice problem set; instructor reviews error patterns with students who score below 80% and assigns a targeted remediation set before the unit knowledge exam.
4Technical Reading: Post Orders, Policy Manuals, and Legal Notices20theoryStudents will read and accurately extract, summarize, and apply key information from authentic security post orders, use-of-force policies, and legal notices using active reading strategies.
  1. Use the SQ3R active reading method (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review) to work through a sample five-page security post order for a hospital campus; students annotate the document, underline key directives, and answer a structured comprehension guide covering access control rules, emergency response procedures, and reporting chain.
  2. In pairs, compare two versions of a use-of-force policy — one that is clearly written and one that contains intentional vague or contradictory language — and identify which statements provide clear, actionable guidance and which create ambiguity, then present findings to the class.
  3. Read a sample legal trespassing notice and a state-level security licensing statute excerpt (general terms, no specific code numbers required); students complete a 'plain-language translation' worksheet in which they rewrite three key provisions in their own words as they would explain them to a property owner or a visitor.
Sample hospital campus post order (instructor-developed or sanitized authentic document), two-version use-of-force policy handout, sample trespassing notice, state security licensing statute excerpt (general), SQ3R annotation guide, comprehension guide worksheets, highlighters.Students answer 8 of 10 comprehension guide questions correctly with specific textual evidence cited; instructor checks plain-language translations for accuracy during class review. Students who miss more than two questions identify and re-read the relevant post order sections before progressing.
5Professional Communication: Writing, Radio, and Verbal Skills30demoStudents will compose a clear and complete security shift log entry and a professional email, and demonstrate basic radio communication protocol using correct phonetic alphabet and 10-code conventions used in the security industry.
  1. Instructor demonstrates a radio communication exchange using a pair of handheld radios (or radio trainers), modeling proper phonetic alphabet use, brevity, unit identification, and the standard security industry 10-codes; students then practice transmitting and receiving scripted messages in pairs, rotating roles, until each student completes five exchanges without error.
  2. Students receive a scenario narrative — a shift during which a suspicious vehicle was observed, a visitor was denied entry, and a minor slip-and-fall occurred — and write a complete shift log entry using the 5W+H format (Who, What, When, Where, Why, How), then swap papers for peer review using a provided rubric.
  3. Practice composing a professional email to a site supervisor reporting a near-miss safety incident using correct business email format (subject line, greeting, body, close, signature); instructor provides a model email and a checklist, and students revise their draft after instructor feedback.
Handheld radios or radio trainers (2 per pair), phonetic alphabet reference card, common security 10-code reference sheet (generic industry version), shift log blank forms, scenario narrative handout, peer review rubric, email format checklist, computers or tablets with word processing software.Radio: each student completes a five-exchange scenario with no more than one uncorrected error; shift log entry earns at least 80% on the peer and instructor rubric (must include all 5W+H elements, correct chronological order, and no factual omissions from the scenario); email meets all checklist items for format and professional tone.
6Digital Tools for Security and Law Enforcement Work20labStudents will use standard workplace digital tools — word processing, spreadsheet logging, basic database search, and a computer-aided dispatch (CAD) simulation — accurately and efficiently for security documentation and records tasks.
  1. Complete a hands-on word processing module: type and format an incident report template, use spell-check and grammar tools critically (identifying errors the tools miss), save and name files using a standard naming convention, and print or export to PDF — skills required for electronic report submission at most security employers.
  2. Enter a week of simulated patrol log data into a pre-formatted spreadsheet, use auto-sum to calculate total hours and incident counts by day, and apply basic sort and filter functions to find all entries flagged as 'incidents' — mirroring the log management tasks at mid-size security operations.
  3. Using a CAD simulation tool or a role-play exercise with printed dispatch cards, students practice receiving a dispatch, locating the incident on a digital or printed map, and entering a simulated response update — building familiarity with the workflow used in both security control rooms and law enforcement dispatch environments.
Computers or tablets with word processing and spreadsheet software (Microsoft Office or Google Workspace), pre-formatted spreadsheet log file, CAD simulation software or printed dispatch card set, incident report template, file naming convention guide, printer or PDF export function.Word processing: formatted report contains all required fields, no spelling errors, correct file name, and is successfully exported to PDF. Spreadsheet: all 35 data entries are accurate, totals are correct, and the student can demonstrate the sort/filter function on request. CAD: student accurately locates two of two dispatch scenarios on the map and enters a correctly formatted response update.
7Career Readiness and Credential Application Preparation30practiceStudents will complete a career readiness portfolio — including a trade-specific resume, cover letter, professional reference sheet, and a fully completed mock State Security Guard License application packet — and deliver a two-minute professional self-introduction.
  1. Using a provided resume template and checklist tailored to security and law enforcement employers, students draft a one-page resume that correctly lists relevant skills (CPR/First Aid certification, OSHA 10, any prior experience), then workshop resumes in small groups using a peer feedback rubric focused on clarity, accuracy, and trade-relevant language; instructor provides a final written note on each.
  2. Walk through every field of a generic State Security Guard License application form as a class, with the instructor explaining what documentation is typically required (proof of age, background check authorization, training hours record, fees — amounts vary by state and are confirmed by the issuing authority); each student then completes the blank form with their own information, flagging any fields where they need to gather documentation before the real submission.
  3. Deliver a two-minute recorded professional self-introduction to a mock hiring panel (instructor and two peers acting as panel members) covering name, relevant training, certification status, and why they are pursuing a career in security or law enforcement; students watch their own recording, complete a self-evaluation form, and identify one area for improvement.
Resume template and checklist (security/LE-specific), peer feedback rubric, sample cover letter, reference sheet template, blank generic State Security Guard License application form, document checklist for licensure, video recording device (phone or webcam), self-evaluation form, computers with word processing software.Portfolio earns a passing score (80% or higher) on the career readiness rubric, which requires all four components to be present, complete, and free of major errors; the application form must have every required field filled in correctly with no blank mandatory fields. Self-introduction is evaluated as satisfactory if it is two minutes or less, covers all four required content areas, and panel members rate professional demeanor as acceptable.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
OSHA 10 and Safety Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% correct (per OSHA 10 program requirement); CPR/First Aid practical skills check passed to certifying organization standardA proctored multiple-choice written exam covering OSHA 10 general industry content as required by the OSHA Outreach Training Program, followed by the certifying organization's CPR/First Aid/AED written and practical skills check. Passing both components earns the student the OSHA 10 completion card and the CPR/First Aid/AED certification card, both of which are documented in the student's credential portfolio.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Trade Math and Technical Reading ExamWritten exam25%80% correct on each section; both sections must pass independentlyA two-section proctored exam: Section 1 presents 20 trade-contextualized math problems (perimeter, shift arithmetic, unit conversion, cash log) drawn from security scenarios; Section 2 presents a previously unseen two-page post order excerpt followed by 10 comprehension and application questions requiring students to locate, interpret, and apply policy directives. Students who fail one section retake only that section after targeted review.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Career Readiness PortfolioProject25%80% on the portfolio rubric with all four required components present and complete; application form must have zero blank mandatory fieldsStudents submit a complete career readiness portfolio containing a trade-specific resume, a cover letter addressed to a real or realistic security employer, a professional reference sheet with at least two contacts formatted correctly, and a fully completed mock State Security Guard License application packet with a supporting document checklist. The instructor evaluates each component against a detailed rubric covering completeness, accuracy, professional language, and formatting.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
Professional Communication Oral DefenseOral / panel25%Satisfactory rating on all three rubric domains: content completeness, professional demeanor, and communication clarity; radio and shift log components must each meet their individual competency marksStudents deliver their two-minute professional self-introduction to an oral panel, then respond to two scenario-based questions from the instructor — one requiring them to demonstrate a radio transmission using the phonetic alphabet and a 10-code, and one requiring them to verbally walk through how they would write a shift log entry for a described incident. The panel scores the student on a three-domain rubric and provides written feedback; students who receive an unsatisfactory rating on any domain complete one additional coached practice and are re-evaluated.
Accuracy · Safety · Communication · Professionalism
AGR-LAW52-02 Trade course

Criminal Law for Security and Law Enforcement

88 hr · $1,110 COMPLIMENTARY

This course builds the legal foundation security officers and law enforcement candidates need to act lawfully on the job, covering criminal law principles, the limits of private and public authority, constitutional constraints on searches and arrests, and the evidence rules that protect prosecutions. Learners connect statutory and case-law concepts directly to field decisions—use of force, detention, reporting—so every action they take can be justified in writing and in court. Lessons are mapped to both the State Security Guard License exam areas and POST Academy preparation standards.

Outcomes
Course text

This course builds the legal foundation security officers and law enforcement candidates need to act lawfully on the job, covering criminal law principles, the limits of private and public authority, constitutional constraints on searches and arrests, and the evidence rules that protect prosecutions. Learners connect statutory and case-law concepts directly to field decisions—use of force, detention, reporting—so every action they take can be justified in writing and in court. Lessons are mapped to both the State Security Guard License exam areas and POST Academy preparation standards.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Foundations of Criminal Law: Sources, Structure, and Classification; Constitutional Limits on Authority: Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments; Arrest Law: Authority, Elements, and Liability; Elements of Common Crimes in Security Contexts; Use-of-Force Law and the Reasonable-Person Standard; Evidence Basics and Legally Sound Documentation; Integrated Criminal Law Review and Credential Exam Mapping.

What competent looks like. Distinguish felonies, misdemeanors, and infractions and explain how the classification of an offense determines the lawful response available to a security officer or peace officer candidate. Explain the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment protections and apply those protections to real security and patrol scenarios involving stops, searches, and custodial questioning. State the legal standards for a lawful citizen's arrest and a peace officer's arrest, identify the conditions that justify each, and articulate the civil and criminal liability risks of acting outside those standards. Describe the elements of common crimes encountered in security work—theft, trespass, assault, battery, vandalism, and drug possession—and identify the evidence needed to establish each element. Apply use-of-force law, including the reasonable-person standard and the continuum framework, to written scenarios and justify a chosen response in legal terminology. Prepare a legally sound incident account that documents observed facts, statements, and evidence in a sequence admissible as a contemporaneous record.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Foundations of Criminal Law: Sources, Structure, and Classification12theoryStudents will correctly classify at least ten given offenses as felony, misdemeanor, or infraction and trace each classification to its statutory source in their state penal code.
  1. Instructor-led lecture and slide presentation covering the hierarchy of law (federal constitution, federal statute, state constitution, state statute, local ordinance) and how each level creates or limits criminal liability; students take structured notes using a provided graphic organizer.
  2. Small-group exercise: each group receives a set of 15 offense descriptions and must sort them by classification using the state penal code index, then present their rationale to the class for peer correction.
  3. Individual written reflection: students select one offense relevant to agricultural or environmental security work (e.g., theft of livestock, illegal dumping) and write a one-page summary of its elements and classification with the penal code citation.
State penal code (current edition, physical or official digital version), instructor slide deck, graphic organizer worksheet, whiteboard, markersExit quiz of 15 classification questions; students must correctly classify 12 of 15 (80%) to demonstrate mastery before Lesson 2.
2Constitutional Limits on Authority: Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments14theoryStudents will identify the constitutional amendment implicated in each of eight given law enforcement scenarios and state whether the described government action is likely constitutional, citing the relevant legal standard.
  1. Lecture and discussion of the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable search and seizure, warrant requirements, and the major exceptions—plain view, exigent circumstances, consent, search incident to arrest), with annotated landmark case summaries provided as a reading handout.
  2. Jigsaw activity: student teams each become expert in one amendment (Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth) using instructor-provided case digests, then teach the other teams, with the instructor correcting and reinforcing key points.
  3. Scenario-analysis worksheet: students work individually on eight written field scenarios (e.g., officer smells marijuana through a car window; security guard questions a suspect in a back office) and write a one-paragraph constitutional analysis for each, identifying the amendment, the standard, and the likely ruling.
Annotated case summaries (Terry v. Ohio, Miranda v. Arizona, and state equivalents), scenario worksheet, state POST study guide constitutional-law section, whiteboardScenario-analysis worksheet scored by instructor using a provided rubric; students must correctly identify the amendment and standard in at least 6 of 8 scenarios (75%) to pass.
3Arrest Law: Authority, Elements, and Liability12theoryStudents will state the legal elements required for a lawful citizen's arrest and a peace officer's arrest and explain the civil and criminal consequences of an unlawful arrest in at least four written scenarios.
  1. Instructor presentation comparing private-person (citizen's) arrest authority under state statute with the probable-cause and reasonable-suspicion standards available to sworn officers; students annotate a comparison chart.
  2. Case study discussion: instructor presents three real appellate decisions involving unlawful arrest or false imprisonment by security personnel; students identify what went wrong legally and what the officer or guard should have done instead.
  3. Role-play debrief (verbal, not physical): pairs of students receive a written scenario in which one plays a guard and one plays an observer; the 'guard' explains aloud the legal justification for detaining or not detaining the 'subject,' then the class evaluates the explanation against the statutory standard.
State penal code arrest provisions, state tort code false-imprisonment section, instructor case-study handouts, comparison chart worksheetFour-scenario written response test; students must correctly state the legal standard and consequence in at least 3 of 4 scenarios (75%) with accurate citation to the relevant statute type (not necessarily section number).
4Elements of Common Crimes in Security Contexts14theoryStudents will list all statutory elements of theft, trespass, assault, battery, vandalism, and simple drug possession and identify which elements are or are not present in each of six given incident descriptions.
  1. Lecture using a crime-elements matrix that breaks each offense into its required elements (actus reus, mens rea, attendant circumstances, result where required); students complete a partially filled matrix as the lecture proceeds.
  2. Evidence-spotting lab (tabletop): instructor provides six one-page mock incident reports drawn from agricultural and commercial security contexts (e.g., retail theft of farm equipment, trespassing on a water authority property); students underline facts that satisfy or fail to satisfy each element and annotate the margin.
  3. Group debrief and corrections: each group shares their element analysis for one incident; class votes on whether each element is met and instructor provides the authoritative answer with explanation.
Crime-elements matrix worksheet, six mock incident report handouts, state penal code definitions section, State Security Guard License exam content outlineElements identification quiz using two new incident descriptions; students must correctly identify all elements present and absent in both scenarios with at least 80% accuracy on the scoring rubric to pass.
5Use-of-Force Law and the Reasonable-Person Standard14demoStudents will apply the reasonable-person standard and their state's use-of-force continuum framework to five written scenarios and select and justify a legally defensible force option for each.
  1. Instructor demonstration and lecture: using a projected use-of-force continuum diagram, the instructor walks through the legal escalation and de-escalation requirements, emphasizing that security officer authority is more limited than sworn officer authority; students label a blank continuum diagram.
  2. Video analysis: instructor plays three short training videos depicting use-of-force incidents (sourced from publicly available POST training libraries); after each clip students write a paragraph applying the reasonable-person test and identifying whether the force was legally justified.
  3. Written scenario exercise: individually, students receive five written use-of-force scenarios of increasing complexity (verbal non-compliance to active aggression) and must write a justified force decision for each, using legal terminology from the lecture.
Use-of-force continuum diagram, POST-approved training videos (publicly available), scenario packets, state statute on justifiable use of force, State Security Guard License exam content outlineScored written scenario responses (5 scenarios, 20 points each); students must score at least 75 out of 100, with any scenario recommending clearly unlawful force flagged for mandatory remediation regardless of total score.
6Evidence Basics and Legally Sound Documentation12labStudents will produce a written incident account for a simulated event that includes observed facts, direct quotations, physical evidence descriptions, and a chronological sequence that meets the standards of a contemporaneous record admissible in a legal proceeding.
  1. Instructor lecture on the types of evidence (testimonial, physical, documentary, digital), the hearsay rule in plain terms, and the legal standards that make a security or officer report usable in court—contemporaneity, accuracy, completeness, and objectivity.
  2. Lab exercise: instructor stages a brief mock incident in the classroom (e.g., a confederate student 'finds' a forged ID and attempts to leave the room); students must observe, then immediately write an incident account from memory using a structured report template.
  3. Peer and instructor review: students exchange reports and use a provided legal-documentation checklist to identify missing elements (time, date, exact words spoken, physical evidence description, witness information); instructor provides final feedback and model report for comparison.
Incident report template, legal-documentation checklist, prop items for staged incident (forged document facsimile, envelope), instructor model report, whiteboardCompleted incident account scored against the legal-documentation checklist (12 required elements); students must include at least 10 of 12 elements (83%) with no fabricated facts to pass; fabrication is an automatic failure.
7Integrated Criminal Law Review and Credential Exam Mapping10practiceStudents will answer practice questions drawn from all major criminal-law content areas of the State Security Guard License exam and the POST Academy preparation framework at a passing rate of 75% or higher on a full-length mock exam.
  1. Structured review session: instructor leads a rapid-fire Q&A carousel covering all five prior topic areas (classification, constitutional limits, arrest law, crime elements, use of force and documentation), using index-card questions that students rotate through in groups.
  2. Timed mock exam: students complete a 50-question multiple-choice practice exam built from State Security Guard License content areas and POST Academy criminal-law objectives; exam is completed individually under timed conditions mimicking the real exam environment.
  3. Score analysis and gap review: each student receives a scored answer key broken down by topic area; instructor leads a class debrief on the three most commonly missed topic areas, re-teaching the key concepts and directing students to specific pages in the state penal code and POST study guide for further self-study.
50-question mock exam packet, answer key with topic-area breakdown, State Security Guard License exam content outline, POST Academy study guide criminal-law section, pencils, timerMock exam score of 75% or higher (38 of 50 questions correct); students who score below 75% receive a targeted remediation plan identifying the specific content areas for re-study before the course assessment.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Criminal Law Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% (38 of 50 questions correct)A 50-question multiple-choice examination covering all course content areas—offense classification, constitutional amendments, arrest authority, crime elements, use-of-force law, and evidence documentation—aligned to the State Security Guard License exam blueprint and POST Academy criminal-law objectives. Students complete the exam individually under timed conditions; any student who scores below 75% must complete a documented remediation plan and retest once before the next course begins.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Use-of-Force Scenario Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%75% on rubric (minimum 15 of 20 points per scenario, with no scenario scoring zero for clearly unlawful force recommendation)The instructor presents two new written use-of-force scenarios verbally, and each student individually explains aloud their legal justification for the force level they would choose, citing the reasonable-person standard and the state's continuum framework. The instructor scores each response on a 20-point rubric assessing accuracy of legal standard cited, appropriateness of force level, and quality of justification; any response recommending clearly unlawful force is an automatic failure of this assessment regardless of rubric total.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Incident Documentation Lab LogLog15%10 of 12 required elements present with zero fabricated facts; fabrication is automatic failureStudents observe a second, previously unseen staged classroom incident and produce a complete written incident account using the course report template within 20 minutes, then annotate their own report using the legal-documentation checklist to identify any gaps. The instructor reviews each report against the 12-element checklist and verifies that all facts recorded are consistent with the staged event; the annotated self-assessment and the instructor's checklist together form the lab log that is filed in the student's course portfolio.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Constitutional Authority Safety CheckSafety audit15%All three critical items correct; any critical-item failure requires immediate re-instruction and recheck before the student may advance to Course 3 (Patrol)A brief three-question oral or written check administered by the instructor confirms that each student can correctly state (1) the constitutional standard that limits a security officer's authority to detain a person, (2) the Miranda requirement and who it applies to, and (3) one consequence—civil or criminal—of conducting an unlawful search. These three items are designated safety-critical because acting on a wrong answer in the field creates legal liability for the student, the employer, and potential harm to the public.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-LAW52-03 Trade course

Patrol Procedures for Security and Law Enforcement

88 hr · $1,110 COMPLIMENTARY

Students learn systematic patrol methods used by security officers and entry-level peace officers, including foot and vehicle patrol techniques, perimeter and access control, observation skills, threat recognition, and emergency response protocols. Lessons integrate legal authority, situational awareness, communication with dispatch and the public, and documentation habits that satisfy both employer standards and state security licensing requirements. Content is aligned to State Security Guard License competency areas and POST Academy preparation objectives.

Outcomes
Course text

Students learn systematic patrol methods used by security officers and entry-level peace officers, including foot and vehicle patrol techniques, perimeter and access control, observation skills, threat recognition, and emergency response protocols. Lessons integrate legal authority, situational awareness, communication with dispatch and the public, and documentation habits that satisfy both employer standards and state security licensing requirements. Content is aligned to State Security Guard License competency areas and POST Academy preparation objectives.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Patrol Fundamentals: Purpose, Legal Authority, and Officer Safety; Observation, Situational Awareness, and Threat Recognition; Foot Patrol Techniques and Perimeter Security; Vehicle Patrol, Radio Communication, and Dispatch Procedures; Access Control, Visitor Management, and Crowd Dynamics; Emergency Response During Patrol: Medical, Fire, and Hazmat; Patrol Documentation, Chain of Custody, and Credential Exam Integration.

What competent looks like. Conduct a documented foot patrol of an assigned area using a systematic route, identifying and logging security hazards, access points, and suspicious conditions to a passing standard on a skills rubric. Demonstrate proper vehicle patrol techniques including pre-trip inspection, observation scanning, and radio communication with simulated dispatch, meeting employer safety and POST preparation benchmarks. Apply access control and perimeter security procedures—including visitor logging, credential verification, and barrier checks—in a role-play scenario scored at 80% or higher. Recognize behavioral indicators of criminal activity, medical emergency, and fire or hazardous-material incidents during patrol and select the correct immediate action for each scenario on a written knowledge exam. Use radio communication procedures, phonetic alphabet, and standard reporting codes accurately in simulated patrol exercises, achieving an 80% score on a communication competency check. Complete a patrol log and incident field note that meets chain-of-custody documentation standards, with no critical errors identified by instructor review.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Patrol Fundamentals: Purpose, Legal Authority, and Officer Safety10.5theoryStudents will explain the lawful scope of a security officer's and probationary peace officer's patrol authority, the primary purposes of patrol, and the personal safety practices required before and during any patrol assignment.
  1. Guided reading and class discussion of state security officer authority versus sworn peace officer authority, using the state security licensing statute as a primary reference, followed by a compare-and-contrast chart completed by each student.
  2. Case-study analysis of three real patrol incidents (officer injury, unauthorized entry, medical emergency) in which students identify what went wrong in the pre-patrol safety check or situational awareness phase and propose corrective actions.
  3. PPE selection exercise: instructor presents six patrol scenarios (day/night, indoor/outdoor, warehouse, hospital campus) and students select and justify appropriate PPE and equipment loadout from a provided inventory list, then discuss as a class.
State security officer licensing statute (handout), POST officer safety guidelines reference packet, PPE inventory list, whiteboard, case-study handoutsExit-ticket quiz of 10 multiple-choice questions on legal authority boundaries and safety rules; pass mark is 8/10 correct.
2Observation, Situational Awareness, and Threat Recognition12demoStudents will apply the OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) framework and baseline behavior concepts to identify persons, objects, and conditions that deviate from normal in a controlled environment.
  1. Instructor-led demonstration of the OODA loop using live walk-through of the classroom building: students follow and narrate observations aloud while instructor models professional scanning patterns and articulates reasoning for each decision.
  2. Video observation drill: students watch three short video clips of busy public spaces, complete a standardized observation worksheet listing people, vehicles, objects, and anomalies noticed within a time limit, then compare findings in pairs to discuss omissions.
  3. Behavioral indicator identification role-play: five student volunteers act out scripted scenarios (loitering, pre-attack surveillance, apparent intoxication, medical distress) in the hallway while remaining students observe from a distance and independently record behavioral cues on a structured form, then debrief as a group.
OODA loop reference card, observation worksheet, video clips (pre-approved training content), behavioral indicators reference guide, structured observation formsScored observation worksheet from the video drill; student must correctly identify at least 80% of planted anomalies across all three clips to demonstrate competence.
3Foot Patrol Techniques and Perimeter Security12practiceStudents will execute a systematic foot patrol of an assigned area using a documented route plan, check all designated control points, and accurately record conditions and discrepancies in a patrol log.
  1. Instructor demonstration of a complete foot patrol of the school building perimeter: students shadow and take notes on route selection, lighting checks, door and window inspections, lock checks, and how to physically clear a blind corner safely.
  2. Paired foot patrol exercise on campus: each pair receives a site map with numbered control points, conducts the patrol independently, and completes a real-time patrol log entry at each point, noting conditions, time, and any discrepancy discovered.
  3. Perimeter breach scenario: instructor pre-stages three planted discrepancies (propped door, broken lock, unfamiliar vehicle) before the patrol exercise; students must locate all three, document findings correctly, and verbally brief the instructor as simulated dispatch at the end of the patrol.
Campus site map with control points marked, patrol log forms, clipboards, flashlights, personal protective equipment per earlier lesson, padlocks for inspection, radio or cell phone for dispatch simulationInstructor-scored patrol log rubric with five criteria (route completeness, time accuracy, discrepancy identification, description quality, professional language); pass mark is 80% of total rubric points, and all three planted discrepancies must be documented.
4Vehicle Patrol, Radio Communication, and Dispatch Procedures12labStudents will complete a vehicle pre-trip safety inspection, perform a simulated mobile patrol route with proper scanning technique, and communicate with a simulated dispatcher using correct radio protocol and phonetic alphabet.
  1. Pre-trip vehicle inspection practice: using a standard security vehicle inspection checklist (fluid levels, lights, tires, emergency equipment, first-aid kit, radio function), each student completes a full inspection of the training vehicle and signs off the checklist before driving; instructor observes and corrects technique.
  2. Radio communication drill: instructor plays dispatcher; students take turns transmitting and receiving messages using ten-codes or plain language per POST guidelines, phonetic alphabet for spelling names and plates, and proper unit identification, with errors repeated until correct.
  3. Simulated mobile patrol route: students drive (or, if vehicle access is limited, walk a mapped vehicle route) and narrate observations by radio to the dispatcher, call in a suspicious vehicle plate for a simulated check, report a road hazard, and complete an end-of-shift status report—all logged by the instructor.
Training vehicle or designated route map, vehicle pre-trip inspection checklist, handheld radios or radio simulator, phonetic alphabet reference card, POST radio communications reference, route mapCombined score on pre-trip checklist completion (must have zero missed safety-critical items) and radio communication rubric (clarity, correct protocol, phonetic accuracy); pass mark is 80% overall with no safety-critical checklist item missed.
5Access Control, Visitor Management, and Crowd Dynamics12practiceStudents will apply standardized access control procedures—including credential verification, visitor logging, and denial of entry—and recognize crowd control warning signs requiring escalation, in a series of role-play scenarios.
  1. Access control station setup: students take turns as the officer at a simulated entry checkpoint, processing a line of ten visitors with varying credentials (valid ID, expired badge, no ID, contraband item staged in a bag) while maintaining a visitor log; peers and instructor observe and complete a scoring rubric.
  2. Denial-of-entry scenario: a student playing an agitated visitor refuses to show ID and becomes verbally aggressive; the officer-student must apply de-escalation language, hold the access control line, and call for backup via radio—debrief focuses on tone, legal authority language, and personal safety positioning.
  3. Crowd dynamics lecture and table-top exercise: instructor presents behavioral signs of crowd escalation (clustering, increased noise, hostile gesturing) using real event case studies; student groups then receive a scenario card describing an event going wrong and must write a response action plan identifying when to call law enforcement, how to control ingress/egress, and how to document the event.
Sample ID badges (valid and expired mockups), visitor log forms, props for contraband stage (sealed dummy items), radio, crowd dynamics reference handout, scenario cards, scoring rubricAccess control scenario rubric scored by instructor across six criteria (credential check, log accuracy, de-escalation language, officer positioning, radio use, documentation); pass mark is 80% of rubric points with no critical safety positioning error.
6Emergency Response During Patrol: Medical, Fire, and Hazmat12fieldStudents will demonstrate the correct patrol officer first response to a medical emergency, a fire discovery, and a suspected hazardous material release, including scene safety actions, notification procedures, and patient hand-off to first responders.
  1. CPR and first-aid integration review (building on Universal Core certification): students practice the patrol-specific protocol—radio dispatch first, then begin care—using a CPR manikin and AED trainer, with the instructor timing the sequence and evaluating radio transmission quality simultaneously.
  2. Fire discovery drill on campus: students on patrol encounter a simulated fire alarm activation; they must follow RACE protocol (Rescue/Remove, Alarm, Contain, Extinguish or Evacuate), use a fire extinguisher on a controlled training prop, radio the situation correctly, and guide a simulated occupant to the assembly point.
  3. Hazmat awareness scenario: instructor sets up a simulated chemical spill scene (colored water, placard mockup) in the parking lot; students apply the ERG (Emergency Response Guidebook) awareness-level process to identify the placard, establish a safe approach distance, deny entry, and coordinate with simulated fire department arrival—no entry into the hot zone is permitted.
CPR manikin, AED trainer, fire extinguisher (training unit, dry), RACE protocol reference card, Emergency Response Guidebook (current edition), hazmat placard mockups, radio, personal protective equipment, scenario briefing cardsField performance checklist for all three scenarios scored by instructor; student must achieve pass on every scenario individually (no single scenario below 80%) and must not commit any action that would endanger themselves or a simulated victim; failure of the safety-critical hazmat isolation step requires immediate remediation and re-demo.
7Patrol Documentation, Chain of Custody, and Credential Exam Integration17.5labStudents will produce a complete patrol documentation package—including a shift patrol log, a field observation note, and a preliminary incident report—from a simulated multi-event patrol scenario, meeting chain-of-custody standards and demonstrating readiness for State Security Guard License and POST Academy written exam content.
  1. Multi-event simulation exercise: instructor runs a 90-minute mock patrol shift with six scripted events (suspicious person, minor injury, access control denial, found property, alarm activation, hazmat placard sighted); students patrol in rotating pairs, radio events, and complete all documentation in real time using standard forms—documentation is collected at the end of the shift.
  2. Documentation peer review: each student reviews a partner's completed patrol log and field notes against a chain-of-custody and accuracy checklist, flags errors, and provides written feedback; instructor then reviews both sets of documents and the feedback, scoring each package on completeness, accuracy, chronology, and professional language.
  3. Credential exam area mapping review: instructor leads a structured review session connecting each patrol topic (authority, observation, access control, vehicle patrol, emergency response, documentation) to the specific exam domain areas on the State Security Guard License content outline and POST Academy prep objectives, followed by a timed 30-question practice multiple-choice exam covering all lesson content.
Patrol log forms, field observation note forms, preliminary incident report forms, chain-of-custody checklist, peer review rubric, State Security Guard License exam content outline, POST Academy study guide reference, practice exam question bank, clipboards, pensDocumentation package scored on instructor rubric (completeness, time-stamping accuracy, factual accuracy, professional language, chain-of-custody compliance): pass mark is 80% overall with zero critical chain-of-custody errors. Practice exam pass mark is 75% (23/30) to confirm readiness for the formal knowledge assessment.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Patrol Knowledge ExaminationWritten exam25%75% (38 of 50 questions correct)A 50-question multiple-choice written exam covering patrol purpose and legal authority, observation and threat recognition, radio procedures, access control, emergency response protocols, and patrol documentation standards, mapped to State Security Guard License exam content areas and POST Academy preparation domains. Students who score below 75% receive targeted remediation and may retest once.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Integrated Patrol Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%80% on the instructor rubric across all skill stations, with no critical safety error on any stationA live, instructor-observed practical evaluation in which each student independently conducts a 30-minute foot patrol of an assigned area, processes three access control scenarios at a checkpoint, transmits at least four radio communications to a simulated dispatcher, and produces a patrol log entry—scored on a multi-criteria rubric aligned to State Security Guard License practical competency areas. Any unsafe act that would endanger the student or a member of the public results in immediate failure and mandatory remediation before re-evaluation.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Patrol Log and Documentation PortfolioLog15%80% on the documentation rubric with zero critical chain-of-custody errorsA collected portfolio of all patrol logs, field observation notes, and the preliminary incident report produced during the multi-event simulation in Lesson 7, evaluated by the instructor using a standardized chain-of-custody and accuracy rubric; the portfolio demonstrates the student's ability to create legally defensible patrol records consistent with employer and licensing expectations.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Emergency Response Safety CheckSafety audit15%100% compliance on all safety-critical steps across all three emergency scenarios; no score below 80% on any individual scenario rubricA direct observation safety check in which the instructor verifies that each student correctly sequences scene safety, notification, and isolation actions for medical, fire, and hazmat scenarios without any action that would create additional risk—this check is a prerequisite to passing the course, regardless of scores on other assessments, consistent with the program's safety-first policy.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-LAW52-04 Trade course

Report Writing for Law Enforcement and Security

87 hr · $1,095 COMPLIMENTARY

Students develop the practical writing skills required to produce clear, accurate, legally defensible incident reports, use-of-force documentation, and field notes that meet POST and security-licensing standards. Emphasis is placed on grammar, objectivity, chronological narrative structure, and proper documentation of evidence, witness statements, and officer observations. Competency in these skills directly supports both the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential exam areas related to documentation and professional communication.

Outcomes
Course text

Students develop the practical writing skills required to produce clear, accurate, legally defensible incident reports, use-of-force documentation, and field notes that meet POST and security-licensing standards. Emphasis is placed on grammar, objectivity, chronological narrative structure, and proper documentation of evidence, witness statements, and officer observations. Competency in these skills directly supports both the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential exam areas related to documentation and professional communication.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Foundations of Law Enforcement Report Writing; Grammar, Vocabulary, and Objective Language; Field Notes: Observation, Documentation, and Memory Aids; Incident Report Forms: Structure and Completion; Use-of-Force and Special-Circumstance Documentation; Witness Statements and Suspect Descriptions; Digital Reporting Tools, Records Management, and Final Integration.

What competent looks like. Write a complete, factually accurate incident report using chronological narrative structure and objective language that meets POST documentation standards. Correctly record witness statements, suspect descriptions, and physical evidence details using standardized field-note formats. Apply correct grammar, spelling, and law enforcement vocabulary to produce reports free of ambiguity or personal opinion. Complete use-of-force, property loss, and missing-person report forms accurately and within simulated time constraints. Identify and correct common report-writing errors including passive voice overuse, vague descriptors, hearsay conclusions, and missing essential elements. Use digital reporting tools and records-management system workflows to submit, store, and retrieve reports in compliance with agency chain-of-custody requirements.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Foundations of Law Enforcement Report Writing10theoryStudents will identify the legal and operational purposes of security and law enforcement reports and list the five essential elements every report must contain.
  1. Lecture and guided discussion on why reports are legal documents: courtroom admissibility, liability, chain-of-custody, and POST documentation standards; students take structured notes.
  2. Small-group analysis of three sample reports (one strong, two flawed) to identify missing elements—who, what, when, where, why/how—and record findings on a provided checklist.
  3. Individual written response: students describe a recent routine event (bus ride, lunch) using only objective, first-person past-tense sentences, then peer-review each other's drafts for opinion words and vague descriptors.
Sample incident reports (sanitized training versions), POST Basic Course Workbook Series (documentation module), report-element checklist handout, whiteboard, student notebooks.Exit quiz: 10 multiple-choice questions covering report purposes, essential elements, and admissibility concepts; pass mark 70%.
2Grammar, Vocabulary, and Objective Language12theoryStudents will apply correct grammar, standard law enforcement vocabulary, and objective language conventions to rewrite flawed report sentences.
  1. Direct instruction on active vs. passive voice, past tense consistency, subject-verb agreement, and commonly confused law enforcement terms (e.g., 'observed' vs. 'noticed,' 'apprehended' vs. 'detained'); students complete a grammar drill worksheet.
  2. Paired editing exercise: each pair receives a one-page report riddled with 15 targeted errors (passive voice, opinion words, hearsay conclusions, missing antecedents) and must identify and correct all errors with written justification.
  3. Vocabulary building activity using law enforcement glossary flashcards; students write one accurate report sentence using each of ten assigned terms and share with the class for group critique.
Law enforcement grammar and vocabulary workbook (instructor-prepared), sample flawed reports, glossary of common security and law enforcement terms, red pens for peer editing.Grammar and vocabulary quiz: 20-item test combining sentence correction and term definition; pass mark 70%.
3Field Notes: Observation, Documentation, and Memory Aids12demoStudents will take accurate, organized field notes during a simulated patrol scenario and use those notes to reconstruct a complete chronological account.
  1. Instructor demonstrates proper field-note format (date/time header, numbered entries, abbreviations key, blank-line spacing for additions) using a projected walk-through of a staged parking-lot incident scenario.
  2. Simulation exercise: instructor plays a short (five-minute) video of a staged disturbance; students take field notes in real time, then compare notes in groups of three to identify observations missed and discuss differences in detail.
  3. Students use only their field notes—no re-viewing the video—to write a full chronological narrative paragraph; instructor reviews for consistency between notes and narrative, flagging any facts that appear in the narrative but not in the notes.
Field-note notebook (standard officer-issue style), pens, projected training video (staged non-violent disturbance scenario), timer, instructor observation rubric.Field-note checklist review: instructor scores notes against a 10-point rubric covering date/time, chronological order, objective language, completeness, and legibility; pass mark 7/10.
4Incident Report Forms: Structure and Completion14practiceStudents will accurately complete standard incident, theft, property-damage, and missing-person report forms using simulated scenario data.
  1. Instructor walks through each section of a standard security incident report form field-by-field using a projected sample, explaining what information belongs in each box, what common errors occur, and what downstream consequences those errors create (court dismissal, liability, lost evidence).
  2. Timed form-completion drill: students receive a one-page written scenario describing a retail theft and must complete the full incident report form within 20 minutes; instructor collects and returns with written feedback before the next session.
  3. Rotation station activity: four stations each contain a different scenario type (property damage, trespassing, medical emergency response, missing juvenile); students spend 12 minutes at each station completing the appropriate form, then rotate; instructor circulates and provides real-time corrective feedback.
Sets of standard security incident report forms, theft report forms, property-damage forms, missing-person forms (all training versions), four written scenario cards, pens, timer.Scored form review: instructor scores each completed form on accuracy of data entry, correct form selection, no blank required fields, and objective language; pass mark 80% aggregate across all four station forms.
5Use-of-Force and Special-Circumstance Documentation12practiceStudents will complete a use-of-force report that documents officer actions, subject behavior, and perceived threat level in objective, chronological, legally sufficient language.
  1. Lecture on the legal and agency requirements for use-of-force reporting: why every application of force must be documented, what elements courts and supervisors look for, and how omissions or subjective language can expose the officer and employer to liability; students outline key requirements.
  2. Case-study analysis: students read two sanitized, real-world use-of-force reports (one that held up legally, one that was challenged) and complete a comparison worksheet identifying specific language choices that strengthened or weakened each report.
  3. Scenario writing exercise: students watch a 3-minute instructor-narrated use-of-force simulation video, then independently write a full use-of-force report narrative from the officer's perspective using only what was depicted; reports are peer-reviewed against a provided checklist before instructor review.
Use-of-force report forms (training versions), sanitized case-study reports, comparison worksheet, simulation video, use-of-force report checklist, POST Basic Course use-of-force documentation reference.Scored narrative report: instructor evaluates against an 8-criterion rubric (chronological order, subject behavior described before officer response, force level documented, no conclusions stated as facts, active voice, complete sentences, no missing elements, objective language); pass mark 6/8 criteria met.
6Witness Statements and Suspect Descriptions12labStudents will conduct a simulated witness interview and transcribe an accurate written statement that distinguishes the witness's words from the officer's observations.
  1. Role-play pairs: one student plays the officer, one plays a witness to a simulated shoplifting; the officer asks open-ended questions, takes field notes, then writes the witness statement in the witness's words, beginning each statement with a standard advisement line; partners switch roles and repeat with a different scenario.
  2. Suspect-description drill: instructor reads a verbal suspect description aloud at normal conversational speed while students write it down; students then complete a physical-description field in a report form using only what they wrote, and compare accuracy against the instructor's master description.
  3. Group critique session: four volunteer pairs share their written witness statements with the class projected on screen; class identifies where the officer's opinion crept in, where direct quotes were lost, and where key identifying information was omitted, recording corrections on a feedback form.
Witness statement forms, scenario cards for role-play, suspect-description drill script (instructor-prepared), projector for group critique, evaluation rubric.Witness statement and suspect-description combined score: rubric covers attribution (witness words vs. officer words), completeness of identifying descriptors, standard advisement line present, and no hearsay conclusions; pass mark 75%.
7Digital Reporting Tools, Records Management, and Final Integration15labStudents will enter, submit, retrieve, and amend a complete incident report using a digital records-management system simulation and produce a final portfolio-quality report package from a multi-part scenario.
  1. Hands-on tutorial: students log into a records-management system training environment (or instructor-simulated equivalent using word-processing templates with structured fields), enter a provided scenario report, attach a witness statement, flag the record with the correct incident code, and practice the submission and supervisor-review workflow; instructor circulates and corrects navigation errors.
  2. Amendment exercise: instructor returns a previously submitted digital report with three supervisor-flagged errors; students must locate each error, amend the record using a proper supplemental-report addendum (not by overwriting original entries), and resubmit; students explain in writing why overwriting original records is prohibited.
  3. Capstone integration exercise: students receive a complex multi-event scenario (trespassing that escalates to a use-of-force with one witness and physical evidence); they write complete field notes, fill out all required forms, compose the narrative report, attach the witness statement, and compile the full package in correct submission order; this package is submitted as the course's primary lab artifact.
Computers or tablets with records-management training software or structured template environment, scenario packet, witness statement forms, incident report forms, use-of-force forms, printer (if paper submission required), digital submission checklist.Final report package scored on a 20-point rubric covering field-note completeness, correct form selection and completion, narrative accuracy and objectivity, witness statement attribution, use-of-force documentation elements, digital submission order, and supplemental amendment procedure; pass mark 16/20.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Report Writing Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%70% (35 of 50 items correct)A 50-item written exam covering report purposes and legal admissibility, essential report elements, law enforcement vocabulary, grammar rules, use-of-force documentation requirements, witness statement standards, and records-management procedures; mapped to State Security Guard License exam documentation competency areas and POST Basic Course writing standards. Items include multiple-choice, true/false, and sentence-correction formats.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Timed Incident Report Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%80% on the 10-criterion scoring rubricUnder examination conditions and a 30-minute time limit, each student receives an unseen written scenario and must produce a complete, correctly formatted incident report narrative plus a companion witness statement form; the instructor scores the submission against a 10-criterion rubric assessing chronological structure, objective language, essential-element completeness, grammar, correct form use, and proper attribution of witness words, mirroring the documentation performance tasks found in POST academy entrance evaluations.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Field Notes and Report Package Lab LogLog15%Pass requires all seven lesson check-for assessments scored at or above their individual pass marks, plus the Lesson 7 final report package scored at 16/20 or higherThe lab log is a compiled portfolio of all graded in-class work products: field-note notebooks, form-completion station outputs, role-play witness statements, use-of-force narrative, digital amendment exercise, and the Lesson 7 capstone report package; the instructor reviews the full portfolio for evidence of skill progression and consistent application of report-writing standards across all scenario types covered in the course.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety and Compliance Check: Records IntegritySafety audit15%Pass requires correct response on all three mandatory compliance behaviors; any single failure results in remediation before course completionA brief practical check in which the instructor presents three scenarios—one requiring a supplemental addendum rather than overwriting an original record, one requiring a mandatory reporting trigger (e.g., use-of-force involving injury), and one requiring chain-of-custody notation for physical evidence—and the student must verbally explain and demonstrate the correct compliant action for each; this check maps directly to the legal-liability and records-integrity competencies tested on both the State Security Guard License exam and POST documentation standards.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-LAW52-05 Trade course

Defensive Tactics for Law Enforcement and Security

87 hr · $1,095 COMPLIMENTARY

This course covers the physical skills, legal boundaries, and decision-making frameworks required for safe and lawful use-of-force encounters in security and law enforcement contexts. Students learn control holds, de-escalation, ground defense, handcuffing, and baton fundamentals, all grounded in use-of-force law and officer safety principles. Lessons map directly to POST academy physical-skills standards and the use-of-force knowledge areas tested on State Security Guard licensing exams.

Outcomes
Course text

This course covers the physical skills, legal boundaries, and decision-making frameworks required for safe and lawful use-of-force encounters in security and law enforcement contexts. Students learn control holds, de-escalation, ground defense, handcuffing, and baton fundamentals, all grounded in use-of-force law and officer safety principles. Lessons map directly to POST academy physical-skills standards and the use-of-force knowledge areas tested on State Security Guard licensing exams.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: Use-of-Force Law, Policy, and the Force Continuum; Officer Safety Principles, De-escalation, and Reactionary Gap; Empty-Hand Control: Escort Holds, Wrist Locks, and Compliance Techniques; Takedowns, Ground Defense, and Disengagement; Handcuffing and Search Procedures; Baton Fundamentals: Grip, Stance, Blocks, and Target Areas; Integrated Use-of-Force Scenarios and Incident Documentation.

What competent looks like. Apply a legally defensible use-of-force continuum to scenario-based threat situations, justifying each force level chosen. Execute empty-hand control techniques—including wrist locks, escort holds, and takedowns—with correct body mechanics and without causing unnecessary injury. Demonstrate safe handcuffing and searching procedures on a resisting subject under controlled lab conditions. Perform ground-defense and disengagement techniques to regain a standing position and create reactionary gap. Demonstrate baton (straight or side-handle) grip, stance, blocking, and target-area strikes within agency-approved policy limits. Accurately document a use-of-force incident in a written report that meets POST report-writing standards.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Use-of-Force Law, Policy, and the Force Continuum12theoryStudents will correctly classify at least five scenarios by force level using the agency use-of-force continuum and cite the constitutional and statutory standards that govern each level.
  1. Lecture and guided note-taking on the constitutional reasonable-force standard, relevant federal case law (Graham v. Connor framework), and state statutory authority for security personnel and peace officers
  2. Small-group scenario card sort: students receive 20 written scenario cards and physically sort them onto a continuum poster, then defend their placements to the class
  3. Written case-study analysis: students read two real use-of-force incident reports (with names redacted), identify where policy was followed or violated, and submit a one-page justification
Use-of-force continuum wall chart, scenario card set, Graham v. Connor plain-language summary handout, state security guard statute excerpts, POST use-of-force policy model, pens, lined paperExit quiz of 10 multiple-choice questions covering continuum levels, constitutional standard, and policy limits; passing score 80% correct
2Officer Safety Principles, De-escalation, and Reactionary Gap12demoStudents will demonstrate reactionary-gap positioning, verbal de-escalation scripting, and pre-attack indicator recognition in at least three live role-play scenarios evaluated by the instructor.
  1. Instructor demonstration of reactionary gap (21-foot rule context), interview stance, and bladed body position; students mirror in pairs and receive corrective feedback
  2. De-escalation script workshop: pairs practice a six-step verbal de-escalation model (LEAPS: Listen, Empathize, Ask, Paraphrase, Summarize) using scripted agitated-subject role-play cards
  3. Pre-attack indicator drill: instructor displays a series of photographs and short video clips; students call out each indicator (target glance, blading, fist loading, weight shift) and log findings on an observation worksheet
Measuring tape, scenario role-play cards, LEAPS model reference card, pre-attack indicator photo set, short video clips (academy-approved), observation worksheet, whiteboardInstructor checklist evaluation of each student's reactionary-gap stance, verbal de-escalation execution, and indicator identification across three role-plays; student must score 'satisfactory' on all three checklist categories
3Empty-Hand Control: Escort Holds, Wrist Locks, and Compliance Techniques15labStudents will correctly apply escort hold, wrist-lock, and come-along techniques on a compliant partner, achieving proper mechanical advantage and maintaining verbal control throughout.
  1. Instructor slow-motion demonstration of each technique with anatomical explanation of joint mechanics; students take structured notes in a technique log with labeled diagrams
  2. Paired drilling: students rotate through four stations (escort hold, wrist lock forward, wrist lock rear, come-along transition), practicing each 10 repetitions per side with verbal commands before switching roles
  3. Scenario integration: pairs run a full sequence—contact, verbal command, subject escalates to passive resistance, officer applies appropriate control technique—while a third student observes and completes a peer checklist
Floor mats (crash-pad rated), technique log booklets, peer checklist forms, numbered station signs, PPE (mouthguard, athletic cup optional), long-sleeve training shirts to prevent mat burnInstructor rates each technique on a four-point rubric (grip, mechanics, verbal control, safety); student must score 3 or 4 on every technique to pass; any score of 1 requires immediate remediation and re-check
4Takedowns, Ground Defense, and Disengagement15labStudents will execute a safe takedown, survive a ground-encounter scenario without sustaining simulated strike contact, and regain a standing position with reactionary gap within the time limit set by the instructor.
  1. Falling technique (breakfall) progression: students practice forward roll, side breakfall, and rear breakfall on mats until each can be performed without coaching, logged in technique log
  2. Standing-to-ground control drill: instructor demonstrates single-leg and rear takedown, students drill in pairs with a fully compliant partner, then progress to a slow-resistance partner with instructor supervision
  3. Ground-defense scenario: one student starts in a mounted or side-control position; the other executes buck-and-roll or elbow-knee escape, disengages, stands, and creates reactionary gap—timed and scored on a rubric
High-density crash mats, mouthguards, knee pads, stopwatch, ground-defense rubric, technique log, athletic training shirt/shorts, water stationTimed scenario scored on rubric: escape executed safely (no dropped head), stand-up achieved within 10 seconds, reactionary gap established; pass requires 'satisfactory' on all three rubric items
5Handcuffing and Search Procedures12practiceStudents will apply handcuffs to a standing and prone subject, double-lock both cuffs, and conduct a systematic pat-down search within POST-standard time and safety benchmarks.
  1. Instructor demonstration of standing and prone handcuffing, double-locking, and checking for two-finger gap; students narrate each step back to the instructor (verbal teach-back) before touching equipment
  2. Repetition drill: each student applies handcuffs to a partner (standing, then prone) 15 times per technique, self-timing and logging results; instructor circulates and corrects wrist angle, thumb direction, and voice commands
  3. Combined scenario: student verbally commands a role-play subject, controls arms, applies cuffs, double-locks, checks fit, transitions to pat-down search using a grid pattern, and verbally announces each item found (simulated contraband placed by instructor)
Training handcuffs (one pair per student pair), handcuff keys, double-lock tools, simulated contraband items (plastic replicas), search sequence reference card, technique log, stopwatch, floor markersInstructor times and scores the combined scenario: cuffs applied and double-locked within 60 seconds, two-finger gap verified, pat-down covers all zones in correct sequence; pass requires all three criteria met
6Baton Fundamentals: Grip, Stance, Blocks, and Target Areas12demoStudents will demonstrate correct baton grip, fighting stance, three defensive blocks, and two approved strikes to lawful target areas, distinguishing restricted and prohibited target areas by policy.
  1. Instructor lecture with anatomy chart: approved target areas (common peroneal nerve, brachial plexus, radial nerve sites), restricted areas, and prohibited areas (head, neck, spine, groin unless deadly force justified); students annotate a body-map worksheet
  2. Baton drill progression with training batons: grip check, ready stance, high-outside block, low-outside block, horizontal block—each drilled 20 repetitions with verbal count before moving to strikes
  3. Controlled strike drill on a padded bag: students deliver horizontal and diagonal strikes to marked target-area tape on the bag, instructor calls force-level scenarios and student selects baton or withholds and states justification
Training batons (foam or rubber, one per student), padded strike bag, target-area tape (color-coded), body-map worksheet, anatomy chart poster, PPE (safety glasses, gloves), baton policy handoutInstructor observes five baton draw-and-strike sequences with scenario cues; student must demonstrate correct target selection in all five, proper grip/stance in all five, and state a correct justification; three or more errors requires remediation
7Integrated Use-of-Force Scenarios and Incident Documentation9fieldStudents will complete two full use-of-force scenarios applying skills from all prior lessons and immediately produce a written use-of-force incident report that meets POST documentation standards.
  1. Full scenario run 1 (role-players provided by instructor): student is dispatched to a disturbance, makes contact, de-escalates or escalates force to the appropriate level, controls and handcuffs subject, clears the scene; evaluator scores on integrated rubric without interrupting
  2. Full scenario run 2 with different threat profile (passive resistance escalating to active aggression): student must make an on-the-spot force decision, apply technique, and justify choice verbally to evaluator post-scenario
  3. Immediate documentation drill: within 20 minutes of each scenario, student completes a use-of-force incident report form using only personal notes and memory, following the POST narrative format (chronological, first person, objective language, force justification section)
Role-player padding gear, scenario environment props (desk, chairs, simulated security post), integrated scenario rubric, use-of-force incident report form, pens, stopwatch, audio recorder (for instructor review), POST report-writing standard checklistScenario rubric score 80% or higher across force decision, technique execution, verbal commands, and safety; incident report assessed on POST checklist—must include accurate chronology, objective language, force justification, and injury assessment section with no fabricated facts
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Use-of-Force Law and Policy Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%80% correct (40 of 50 questions)A 50-item multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering the constitutional standard for reasonable force, the use-of-force continuum levels, state statutory authority for security personnel, baton target area policy, and handcuffing legal requirements. This exam maps directly to the use-of-force and legal authority knowledge domains tested on the State Security Guard License exam and POST academy written assessments.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Defensive Tactics Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Satisfactory rating on all six technique categories; any Unsatisfactory rating requires one remediation attempt within five business daysAn instructor-evaluated live demonstration in which each student performs, in sequence: reactionary-gap stance, one escort hold, one wrist lock, one takedown with breakfall, handcuffing with double-lock, and one baton block-and-strike combination. Each technique is rated Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory using a standardized POST-aligned rubric, and the student must also verbally state the force-continuum level and legal justification for the baton strike chosen.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Technique and Scenario Lab LogLog15%All seven lesson entries present and legible; accuracy score of 80% on self-assessment reflections verified against instructor key; no blank required fieldsStudents maintain a cumulative lab log throughout the course, recording technique steps, repetition counts, self-timed results, peer-checklist feedback, and a brief written reflection after each lab or practice lesson. The completed log is submitted at course end and reviewed for completeness, accuracy of technique descriptions, and honest self-assessment; it serves as evidence of progressive skill development aligned with POST academy documentation habits.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Integrated Scenario Safety CheckSafety audit15%Zero critical safety violations; minor deductions allowed up to two, but any single critical violation (striking a prohibited target, dropping a restrained subject's head onto the floor, failing to double-lock cuffs) results in automatic failure and mandatory remediation before course credit is awardedEvaluators observe each student's two integrated use-of-force scenarios from Lesson 7 using a binary safety checklist that flags critical violations (prohibited target strikes, unsafe falls, failure to control a subject's descent) and minor procedural deviations (missed verbal command, grip error self-corrected). This check verifies that students can perform the full skill chain safely under realistic pressure before they are cleared for externship and licensure testing.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-LAW52-06 Trade course

Security Operations

87 hr · $1,095 COMPLIMENTARY

This course develops the core operational competencies of a working security officer: post orders, access control, surveillance, emergency response coordination, and professional conduct under pressure. Lessons integrate legal authority, communication technology, and situational awareness so students can perform safely and lawfully on a real post. Content maps directly to the State Security Guard License examination domains and supports POST Academy Prep readiness in patrol and public-safety response.

Outcomes
Course text

This course develops the core operational competencies of a working security officer: post orders, access control, surveillance, emergency response coordination, and professional conduct under pressure. Lessons integrate legal authority, communication technology, and situational awareness so students can perform safely and lawfully on a real post. Content maps directly to the State Security Guard License examination domains and supports POST Academy Prep readiness in patrol and public-safety response.

How the course runs. 7 blocks: The Security Officer's Legal Authority and Professional Role; Post Orders, Access Control, and Visitor Management; Surveillance Systems, CCTV, and Communication Technology; Situational Awareness, Threat Recognition, and De-escalation; Emergency Response Coordination: Fire, Medical, and Active-Threat Protocols; Security Documentation, Report Writing, and Chain of Custody; Integrated Security Operations Scenario and Professional Conduct Review.

What competent looks like. Execute post orders and access-control procedures in compliance with site-specific instructions and applicable state security regulations. Operate surveillance equipment, two-way radios, and visitor-management logs accurately and in accordance with chain-of-custody documentation standards. Apply situational-awareness and threat-recognition techniques to identify and de-escalate suspicious activity before force becomes necessary. Coordinate emergency response actions—fire, medical, active-threat, and hazmat indicators—using standard notification protocols and the Incident Command System chain of communication. Demonstrate professional and legally compliant conduct including use-of-force continuum awareness, privacy limits, and anti-discrimination requirements during access-control encounters. Produce complete, factual, real-time security logs and incident reports that meet evidentiary documentation standards required by state licensing boards.

Lessons · 7 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1The Security Officer's Legal Authority and Professional Role11theoryStudents will correctly identify the scope and limits of a private security officer's legal authority—including arrest powers, trespass authority, and use-of-force boundaries—and distinguish those limits from sworn law-enforcement powers.
  1. Annotated reading: students read a sample state security guard statute excerpt and a site post-order packet, then highlight which officer actions are authorized, which require police notification, and which are prohibited, followed by whole-class debrief.
  2. Case-study analysis: small groups review three written vignettes (shopkeeper's privilege scenario, unauthorized search claim, excessive-force allegation) and present the legally correct officer response with a one-paragraph written rationale.
  3. Role-card quiz game: instructor distributes scenario cards; students hold up 'authorized,' 'call police,' or 'not permitted' paddles and defend answers verbally, with instructor correction in real time.
Sample state security guard licensing statute (redacted teaching copy), generic post-order template, use-of-force continuum chart, whiteboard, role-card setWritten 20-question scenario quiz covering authority limits, arrest powers, and use-of-force continuum; passing score 75% or higher.
2Post Orders, Access Control, and Visitor Management14practiceStudents will process simulated visitor, vehicle, and contractor entries according to written post orders, accurately completing access logs and denying or escalating non-compliant entries without error.
  1. Post-order walk-through: instructor distributes a multi-page simulated facility post-order; students identify the five required steps for pedestrian entry, vehicle entry, and after-hours access and complete a guided worksheet.
  2. Live access-control simulation: using a mock entry station (table, log sheet, ID scanner prop, visitor badge stock, and barrier cone), students rotate through officer, visitor, vehicle driver, and contractor roles, processing fifteen varied entry attempts including one denied entry and one escalation trigger.
  3. Debrief and gap analysis: each student reviews their own completed log against the answer key, identifies any missed fields or incorrect decisions, and writes a two-sentence corrective action note for each error.
Simulated multi-page post-order packet, visitor log forms, badge stock and hole punch, ID-check reference card, vehicle log clipboard, barrier cones, timer, answer keyPractical skills checklist scored by instructor during the simulation: all required log fields completed, correct decision made on every entry attempt, denied-entry escalation protocol followed correctly; 90% of checklist items must be marked satisfactory.
3Surveillance Systems, CCTV, and Communication Technology13demoStudents will operate a basic CCTV monitoring station and a two-way radio, demonstrating proper camera-scan technique, correct radio phonetic-alphabet use, and accurate incident documentation from surveillance footage.
  1. Instructor demo and guided practice: instructor demonstrates camera pan/tilt/zoom on a classroom monitor connected to a webcam array, then each student completes a five-minute structured scan of the classroom perimeter and narrates aloud what they observe, using standardized descriptive language.
  2. Radio procedure drill: working in pairs with handheld radios (or radio-simulator app on tablets), students transmit and receive ten scripted messages using proper call signs, phonetic alphabet, and 'ten-code' alternatives; errors are logged and corrected on the spot.
  3. Surveillance-to-log exercise: instructor plays a short pre-recorded footage clip showing a staged suspicious-behavior scenario; students document a time-stamped surveillance log entry and a one-paragraph incident summary using only observable facts.
Webcam and monitor or department-provided CCTV trainer unit, handheld radios or radio-simulator app, phonetic-alphabet reference card, surveillance log forms, pre-recorded incident video clip, tablet or laptopObservation checklist completed by instructor during scan drill (correct scanning pattern, accurate verbal description, no personal opinion language); radio drill scored on phonetic accuracy and protocol adherence; both must reach 80% satisfactory.
4Situational Awareness, Threat Recognition, and De-escalation14labStudents will apply a structured situational-awareness model to identify pre-incident indicators in realistic scenarios and select a de-escalation response before any physical intervention becomes necessary.
  1. Color-code awareness lecture and discussion: instructor presents a widely used awareness-level model (Unaware → Relaxed Alert → Focused Alert → Action) with real-world security examples; students match ten written scenario descriptions to the correct awareness level on a worksheet.
  2. Behavioral indicator identification lab: students view a set of six short video clips of staged lobby and parking-lot scenes; they complete a structured observation form noting specific behaviors (concealment, unusual loitering, pre-attack indicators) and rate threat level, then compare ratings with a partner.
  3. De-escalation role-play: in pairs, one student plays an agitated person attempting unauthorized entry; the officer student applies a four-step verbal de-escalation sequence (acknowledge, empathize, redirect, offer alternative) while staying outside arm's reach; instructor evaluates tone, positioning, and outcome.
Awareness-level wall chart, scenario worksheet, six short video clips (pre-recorded staged scenes), structured observation forms, role-play scenario cards, room space for 6-foot stand-off practiceObservation forms scored against instructor answer key (minimum 80% accurate threat-level ratings); de-escalation role-play evaluated on a five-item rubric (tone, distance, verbal sequence, non-escalation outcome, professionalism); must pass four of five rubric items.
5Emergency Response Coordination: Fire, Medical, and Active-Threat Protocols15fieldStudents will execute the correct notification, evacuation, and scene-protection steps for three emergency types—fire alarm activation, medical emergency, and active-threat indicator—within the time and accuracy standards of a site emergency action plan.
  1. Emergency action plan (EAP) mapping exercise: students receive a generic facility floor plan and a sample EAP; they mark assembly points, extinguisher locations, AED placement, and primary and secondary evacuation routes, then brief a partner on the plan as if conducting new-employee orientation.
  2. Tabletop scenario rotation: the class runs three sequential tabletop scenarios (fire pull station activated; person collapsed at front desk; report of person with weapon in parking lot); student teams talk through every officer action in sequence, including radio notification, 911 call scripting, ICS chain-of-communication, and scene perimeter; instructor times each scenario and provides immediate feedback.
  3. Full-drill field exercise: on the parking lot or open campus area, students physically execute an evacuation drill from the building: activating a simulated alarm, sweeping assigned zones, directing bystander role-players to the assembly point, confirming headcount, and radioing an all-clear or continued-search update to the simulated dispatch.
Generic facility floor plan, sample emergency action plan, colored markers, ICS notification chain reference card, two-way radios, stopwatch, role-player bystander volunteers or classmates, reflective safety vests, first-aid kit (reference only), AED trainer unitField-drill performance checklist (alarm activation, zone sweep, bystander direction, headcount, radio report) evaluated by instructor in real time; all six checklist steps must be completed in correct sequence; notification radio message must include location, nature, and headcount—any omission requires immediate re-do.
6Security Documentation, Report Writing, and Chain of Custody12practiceStudents will produce a complete, factually accurate, and legally sound incident report and evidence-custody log from a staged security event, meeting the five documentation standards required by most state licensing boards.
  1. Documentation standards lecture and bad-report critique: instructor distributes two sample incident reports—one well-written, one with seven deliberate errors (opinion language, missing time stamps, incomplete descriptions, illegible corrections); students identify and annotate every error, then discuss why each error creates legal or evidentiary risk.
  2. Staged incident documentation drill: instructor conducts a three-minute live scenario in the classroom (simulated shoplifting apprehension with recovered item); students independently write a full incident report from memory using only facts observed, then exchange reports with a partner for peer review against a documentation checklist.
  3. Chain-of-custody form practice: using a prop item (sealed envelope labeled as 'recovered item'), students complete a chain-of-custody form through four transfers (officer to supervisor, supervisor to property room, property room to law enforcement), signing and dating each transfer and noting item condition; errors in any field are flagged for correction.
Sample incident report forms (good and flawed versions), blank incident report templates, documentation standards checklist, chain-of-custody forms, prop 'recovered item' sealed envelope, pen and clipboardCompleted incident report scored against a ten-point documentation rubric (factual accuracy, completeness, time stamps, objective language, legible corrections, proper format); minimum score 8 out of 10 required; chain-of-custody form must have zero missing required fields.
7Integrated Security Operations Scenario and Professional Conduct Review8labStudents will perform a full-shift simulation integrating access control, surveillance monitoring, radio communication, de-escalation, emergency notification, and incident documentation, demonstrating professional conduct and legally compliant decision-making throughout.
  1. Full-shift rotation simulation: class is divided into two groups; each group runs a 60-minute simulated shift at a mock post station where instructor-controlled injects occur every 8–12 minutes (unauthorized entry attempt, medical emergency call, suspicious package report, rowdy visitor requiring de-escalation, end-of-shift log handover); each student handles at least two injects as primary officer.
  2. Peer observer debrief: non-active students serve as observers using a structured observation checklist; after the rotation, observer pairs deliver a two-minute verbal debrief to the officer they watched, noting two strengths and one improvement area with evidence from the checklist.
  3. Professional conduct self-assessment: each student completes a written reflection answering three prompts—one decision they made that was legally sound and why, one moment they would change and the correct action, and one area of ongoing professional development—submitted for instructor review.
Mock post station (desk, access log, radio, monitor or tablet displaying static CCTV feed, visitor badge stock), inject scenario cards, observer checklists, incident report forms, chain-of-custody forms, timer, reflective vestsInstructor-scored performance rubric covering six operational domains (access control, radio communication, de-escalation, emergency notification, documentation, professional conduct); minimum of five of six domains rated satisfactory; unsatisfactory rating in any single domain triggers a targeted remediation activity before the final skills demo.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Security Operations Knowledge ExamWritten exam25%75% or higher (38 of 50 questions correct)A 50-question multiple-choice and short-answer exam covering legal authority limits, access-control procedure, surveillance terminology, emergency response protocols, documentation standards, and situational-awareness concepts, mapped to the State Security Guard License examination domains. Students have 90 minutes; no notes permitted.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Integrated Post Operations Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration45%Satisfactory rating on at least 10 of 12 checklist items; any item marked 'unsafe or unlawful' requires immediate remediation and re-demoInstructor presents each student with a timed 20-minute solo post scenario containing four sequential injects (entry-control decision, radio communication task, de-escalation encounter, and incident documentation); performance is evaluated on a 12-item behavioral checklist aligned to state licensing competency areas and POST Academy Prep patrol standards.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Operational Documentation Lab LogLog15%Score of 80% or higher on the documentation rubric; chain-of-custody form must have zero missing required fieldsStudents submit a complete portfolio of documentation produced across Lessons 2, 6, and 7: two access-control logs, one surveillance incident log, one full incident report, and one chain-of-custody form. Each document is scored on factual accuracy, completeness, objective language, time-stamp integrity, and format compliance using a standardized ten-point rubric.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
Safety and Legal Conduct CheckSafety audit15%All five critical safety and legal items must be marked 'met'; any single 'not met' requires remediation and re-check before course credit is awardedInstructor completes a non-negotiable five-item safety and legal conduct checklist for each student based on cumulative observation across all lab and field activities: (1) never exceeded legal authority in any scenario, (2) maintained safe stand-off distance during de-escalation exercises, (3) used radio to notify rather than self-dispatching emergency response, (4) documented only observable facts with no opinion language, and (5) correctly identified and declined to execute at least one unlawful or out-of-scope action presented in scenarios.
Standard met · Safety · Time · Quality/finish · Documentation
AGR-LAW52-07 Capstone

Capstone Project: Integrated Security Operations Plan

108 hr · $1,080 COMPLIMENTARY

Students design, document, and defend a complete security operations plan for a realistic site scenario, integrating criminal law, patrol procedures, report writing, defensive tactics protocols, and security operations into one cohesive professional deliverable. The capstone simulates the full scope of entry-level security and law enforcement support work, requiring students to apply every program competency under instructor evaluation. Successful completion demonstrates job-ready readiness for state licensing and POST-aligned employment.

Outcomes
Course text

Students design, document, and defend a complete security operations plan for a realistic site scenario, integrating criminal law, patrol procedures, report writing, defensive tactics protocols, and security operations into one cohesive professional deliverable. The capstone simulates the full scope of entry-level security and law enforcement support work, requiring students to apply every program competency under instructor evaluation. Successful completion demonstrates job-ready readiness for state licensing and POST-aligned employment.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Site Survey, Threat Assessment, and Post Orders Drafting; Simulated Incident Response and After-Action Reporting; Capstone Plan Integration, Revision, and Portfolio Assembly; Oral Defense and Panel Presentation.

What competent looks like. Conduct a site security survey and produce a written threat and vulnerability assessment that meets professional documentation standards. Draft a site-specific post orders package including emergency action procedures, patrol routes, use-of-force policy references, and incident reporting protocols. Demonstrate lawful and tactically sound responses to at least three simulated incidents — one involving a medical emergency, one a criminal trespass, and one a use-of-force decision point — with written after-action reports for each. Apply applicable criminal law concepts, constitutional limitations on detention, and use-of-force continuum principles correctly in both written documentation and verbal defense. Present and orally defend the completed security operations plan to a panel, answering scenario-based questions drawn from all prior course areas. Self-evaluate performance using a structured rubric, identifying at least two areas for continued professional development before externship.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Site Survey, Threat Assessment, and Post Orders Drafting28labGiven a detailed fictional site profile, students will complete a written threat and vulnerability assessment and draft a full post orders package that correctly addresses access control, patrol schedules, emergency contacts, and reporting requirements.
  1. Students receive a multi-page fictional site packet (a commercial agricultural storage facility with a security office, vehicle yard, and public access points) and individually walk through a structured site-survey checklist, identifying physical security gaps, lighting deficiencies, access control weaknesses, and potential criminal threats; findings are recorded on a standard security survey form.
  2. Using their survey data, students draft a threat and vulnerability assessment memo addressed to a fictional site manager, categorizing each identified risk by likelihood and consequence, and recommending at least one countermeasure per finding; instructor provides written feedback mid-draft and students revise before finalizing.
  3. Students compose a post orders package of no fewer than five sections — officer responsibilities, patrol route map with checkpoints, emergency action procedures for fire and medical emergencies, chain-of-command contact list, and a prohibited-conduct policy — using a provided style guide aligned to professional security industry formatting standards.
Fictional site packet with floor plan and photographs, security survey checklist form, threat-assessment memo template, post orders style guide, word-processing software, campus printer for hard-copy submission, AHJ-referenced emergency action plan samples, State Security Guard License study guide (access control and patrol sections)Instructor scores the threat assessment memo and post orders package against a 25-point rubric covering accuracy of risk categorization, completeness of required sections, correct legal references to detention and trespass statutes (general terms, no invented code numbers), grammar and professional formatting; passing score is 18 out of 25 (72%). Any section missing entirely must be resubmitted within 48 hours before the student may advance.
2Simulated Incident Response and After-Action Reporting36practiceStudents will respond to three instructor-facilitated scenario role-plays — a medical emergency, a criminal trespass, and a use-of-force decision — and produce a complete, factually accurate written incident report for each scenario that meets the documentation standards taught in Report Writing.
  1. Scenario 1 (Medical Emergency): A role-player collapses with simulated unresponsiveness in the vehicle yard; students must assess scene safety, call for EMS using a standard radio format, initiate CPR with an AED trainer unit, and document the response chronologically in a narrative incident report using the who-what-when-where-why-how structure; a classmate acts as the dispatcher and provides radio traffic the student must log accurately.
  2. Scenario 2 (Criminal Trespass): A role-player presents as an unauthorized individual in a restricted area who refuses initial verbal direction; students apply verbal de-escalation techniques, make a lawful citizen's observation consistent with their limited authority as a private security officer (non-sworn), contact simulated law enforcement via radio, and document the encounter including exact words used, subject description, and disposition, while correctly noting constitutional limits on their detention authority.
  3. Scenario 3 (Use-of-Force Decision): A role-player presents an escalating threat requiring the student to articulate a use-of-force continuum response in real time, demonstrate at least two empty-hand control options taught in Defensive Tactics without live contact on the role-player (controlled demonstration format), justify the force level chosen verbally to the instructor, then complete a use-of-force report citing the continuum level, justification, and outcome; students debrief as a group reviewing what legal and procedural standards governed each decision.
AED trainer unit, CPR manikin, radio trainer handsets, scenario role-player instruction cards, incident report blank forms (same format used in Report Writing course), use-of-force continuum reference card, POST study guide (patrol and use-of-force sections), defensive tactics protective gear (if any contact is used in demonstration), scenario props (simulated access badge, warning signage for restricted area)Each of the three incident reports is scored on a 20-point rubric (accuracy of facts as observed in scenario, correct chronological narrative structure, professional language, absence of opinion or editorializing, correct identification of legal authority used); passing is 14 out of 20 per report. The use-of-force report requires an additional instructor sign-off confirming the student correctly identified the appropriate continuum level; any report scored below passing is rewritten once under instructor supervision before the portfolio is assembled.
3Capstone Plan Integration, Revision, and Portfolio Assembly20labStudents will compile all capstone deliverables into a professionally organized security operations plan portfolio, incorporate instructor and peer feedback from prior lessons, and complete a written self-evaluation identifying personal strengths and areas for growth.
  1. Students organize all completed documents — site survey form, threat assessment memo, post orders package, and three incident reports — into a tabbed professional binder or digital PDF portfolio using a required table of contents; instructor circulates to verify all required sections are present and legible before the student may proceed to revision.
  2. Students exchange portfolios with a peer reviewer who uses the same rubrics from Lessons 1 and 2 to provide written marginal feedback on at least three specific items per document; authors then make final revisions incorporating valid peer suggestions and note in a revision log which changes were made and why, modeling the professional quality-control process used in law enforcement documentation.
  3. Students complete a two-page written self-evaluation using a structured prompt that asks them to rate their own performance on each program-level outcome (criminal law application, patrol planning, report writing, defensive tactics decision-making, and security operations design), cite specific evidence from their portfolio for each rating, and identify two measurable professional development goals they will pursue during externship.
Binder or PDF assembly software, tabbed dividers, revision log form, peer-review instruction sheet with rubrics, self-evaluation structured prompt, all documents from Lessons 1 and 2, printer/scanner accessInstructor verifies portfolio completeness using a 10-item checklist (all required documents present, table of contents accurate, revision log complete, self-evaluation two full pages addressing all prompts); all 10 items must be marked present — this is a completion gate, not a scored rubric — before the student is cleared to schedule the oral defense. Self-evaluation is scored pass/incomplete: pass requires evidence cited for every outcome rated and two specific, measurable development goals stated.
4Oral Defense and Panel Presentation24fieldStudents will present their completed security operations plan to a two-person evaluation panel and correctly answer scenario-based follow-up questions covering criminal law, patrol procedure, report writing standards, use-of-force principles, and security operations, demonstrating integrated professional readiness.
  1. Each student delivers a structured 10-minute oral presentation of their security operations plan to the panel (composed of the lead instructor and one additional program faculty member or invited law enforcement or security professional); the presentation must cover the site threat profile, three key post-orders decisions, and lessons learned from the incident scenarios, using the portfolio as a visual reference — no slides required, professional verbal communication is the assessed skill.
  2. Panel members conduct a 15-minute question period drawing from a bank of scenario-based questions mapped to all six program courses; questions may include topics such as lawful grounds for detaining a suspect under state law (general principles), the correct use-of-force continuum response to a specified threat level, what patrol documentation must include, and how to write a legally defensible report; students may refer to their portfolio during the session to locate specific language they wrote.
  3. Following dismissal of the student, the panel scores the defense using a shared rubric, reconciles any scoring differences, and delivers written feedback to the student the same day; students who do not pass are given one opportunity to re-defend within five business days after addressing identified deficiencies with the lead instructor in a minimum two-hour tutoring session.
Completed capstone portfolio (student's own), oral defense rubric (panel copy and student copy), scenario question bank (instructor-controlled), evaluation score sheets, optional: whiteboard or flip chart for student use during presentation, invited industry evaluator schedule coordination formPanel scores the defense on a 30-point rubric: content accuracy across credential exam areas (12 points), clarity and professionalism of communication (8 points), ability to support answers with documented evidence from the portfolio (6 points), and professional demeanor and terminology (4 points). Passing is 21 out of 30 (70%). A student who scores below 21 may re-defend once; a second failure requires remediation plan review with the program director before progression to externship.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Security Operations Plan ProjectProject60%Combined score of 72% or higher across the threat assessment memo rubric (25 points) and all three incident report rubrics (20 points each), with every required section present and no incomplete use-of-force report; incomplete sections must be resubmitted and approved before the portfolio gate.The project is the full written deliverable — threat and vulnerability assessment, post orders package, and three scenario incident reports — produced across Lessons 1 and 2. It is evaluated holistically as the primary evidence that the student can perform integrated security documentation work at an entry professional level, directly mapped to the post orders, patrol, and report writing competency areas tested in the State Security Guard License exam.
Meets specification · Within estimate · Workmanship · Safety · Documentation
Capstone PortfolioPortfolio20%All 10 checklist items marked present, revision log complete with rationale entries, and self-evaluation rated pass (evidence cited for each outcome and two measurable development goals stated); no numerical score — this is a completion and professionalism gate required before the oral defense is scheduled.The portfolio is the organized, revised, and self-evaluated compilation of all capstone project documents assembled in Lesson 3. It demonstrates the student's ability to apply professional quality-control habits — peer review, revision, and reflective practice — that are expected in both security and law enforcement support environments and that the POST Academy Prep credential recognizes as indicators of workplace readiness.
Completeness · Organization · Evidence quality
Oral DefenseOral / panel20%21 out of 30 points on the panel rubric (70%), with no single category scored at zero; one re-defense opportunity is permitted within five business days with documented remediation.The oral defense is a 25-minute panel presentation and scenario-based question session in which the student presents their security operations plan and demonstrates the ability to apply and verbally articulate knowledge across all program competency areas. It directly mirrors the oral-board component of POST academy candidate evaluations and tests the integrated professional communication skills required for both the State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep credential pathways.
Explains decisions · Answers technical questions · Professional communication
AGR-LAW52-08 Externship / clinical

Externship / Worksite Placement

162 hr · $650 COMPLIMENTARY

Students complete 162 supervised hours at an approved law enforcement or private security worksite, applying patrol, report writing, defensive tactics, and security operations skills under the direct oversight of a licensed field supervisor. Each student maintains a detailed field journal and is formally evaluated by their site supervisor at the midpoint and end of the placement. Competencies observed on-site are mapped to both the State Security Guard License performance standards and POST Academy Prep employer-recognition criteria.

Outcomes
Course text

Students complete 162 supervised hours at an approved law enforcement or private security worksite, applying patrol, report writing, defensive tactics, and security operations skills under the direct oversight of a licensed field supervisor. Each student maintains a detailed field journal and is formally evaluated by their site supervisor at the midpoint and end of the placement. Competencies observed on-site are mapped to both the State Security Guard License performance standards and POST Academy Prep employer-recognition criteria.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Pre-Placement Orientation and Site-Safety Briefing; Supervised Operational Shifts – Patrol, Access Control, and Incident Response; Mid-Placement Evaluation and Reflective Conference; Final Evaluation, Field Journal Submission, and Program Debrief.

What competent looks like. Demonstrate professional conduct, punctuality, and adherence to site-specific post orders across all scheduled externship shifts. Apply patrol techniques, access control procedures, and incident response protocols learned in coursework to real worksite conditions under supervisor direction. Complete accurate, legible incident and shift reports that meet the documentation standards required for State Security Guard License compliance. Perform basic first aid and CPR, and follow OSHA general-industry safety protocols, correctly when required or prompted during the placement. Receive a passing composite score on the employer mid-term and final evaluation rubric, demonstrating job-entry readiness. Maintain a reflective field journal with one entry per shift that connects observed worksite practices to specific course concepts and credential exam areas.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Pre-Placement Orientation and Site-Safety Briefing10theoryStudents correctly identify site-specific hazards, emergency procedures, chain of command, post orders, and legal scope-of-authority requirements before their first operational shift.
  1. Review and sign the student externship agreement, site confidentiality form, and OSHA hazard-communication acknowledgment with the program coordinator and site supervisor.
  2. Walk the physical worksite with the field supervisor, identify emergency exits, defibrillator locations, fire extinguisher classes, first-aid kit locations, and any site-specific PPE requirements; record findings on a pre-placement safety checklist.
  3. Read and verbally summarize the site's post orders, radio communication protocols, and the boundaries of security officer authority under the applicable state statute, then complete a short written orientation quiz requiring 80% or higher to begin operational shifts.
Site post orders binder, student externship agreement packet, OSHA Hazard Communication standard summary card, site emergency action plan, state security officer scope-of-authority reference sheet, pre-placement safety checklist formStudent scores 80% or higher on the written orientation quiz covering post orders, emergency procedures, radio protocols, and legal scope of authority; supervisor initials the safety checklist confirming the site walk was completed.
2Supervised Operational Shifts – Patrol, Access Control, and Incident Response100fieldStudents execute assigned patrol routes, access-control duties, and initial incident-response actions under continuous or periodic field-supervisor oversight across a minimum of 100 documented hours.
  1. Conduct scheduled interior and exterior patrol tours using the site's designated checkpoints; log each checkpoint time and any observations in the shift log, with the supervisor spot-checking at least one patrol per week for technique and situational awareness.
  2. Staff an access-control post (vehicle gate, lobby desk, or perimeter entry) and process visitor credentialing, package inspection, and vehicle logging according to post orders; supervisor evaluates a minimum of two access-control scenarios per evaluation period using the site rubric.
  3. Respond to at least two simulated or actual minor incidents (e.g., unauthorized-access attempt, medical assist call, or property damage discovery) during the placement; complete a full written incident report for each within one hour of the event, reviewed and signed by the field supervisor.
Duty belt and PPE as required by site, site radio or communication device, patrol checkpoint log sheets, access-control visitor log, incident report forms (site-standard and program-standard), field supervisor shift observation formField supervisor rates each observed patrol and access-control performance at 'Meets Standard' or higher on the site rubric (4-point scale, minimum score of 3); incident reports are reviewed by supervisor and program instructor and must be factually complete, grammatically acceptable, and submitted on time to pass.
3Mid-Placement Evaluation and Reflective Conference6practiceStudents demonstrate measurable progress on all rubric domains at the midpoint, identify at least two professional development goals, and adjust their worksite performance plan based on supervisor feedback.
  1. Field supervisor completes the formal mid-placement evaluation rubric covering professionalism, patrol technique, report quality, communication, safety compliance, and teamwork; student reviews each scored domain and signs the form.
  2. Student and supervisor conduct a structured 30-minute feedback conference using the program's mid-placement conference guide; student records specific corrective actions or growth targets in their field journal.
  3. Student submits a one-to-two-page written self-assessment comparing their mid-placement rubric scores to their pre-placement goals, citing specific shift examples and connecting at least three observations to State Security Guard License or POST Academy Prep exam content areas.
Mid-placement evaluation rubric, program mid-placement conference guide, student field journal, State Security Guard License exam-area reference list, POST Academy Prep competency overviewStudent achieves an average score of 2.5 out of 4 or higher across all rubric domains at mid-placement (a score below 2.5 in any single domain triggers a written improvement plan); written self-assessment is submitted within three business days of the conference and receives instructor sign-off for completeness.
4Final Evaluation, Field Journal Submission, and Program Debrief46labStudents complete remaining operational shifts, submit a complete and reflective field journal, and receive a final employer evaluation score that meets the program's passing threshold for externship completion.
  1. Complete all remaining assigned operational shifts, ensuring total documented hours reach 162; supervisor verifies and signs the cumulative hour log at the final shift.
  2. Compile and submit the complete field journal containing one reflective entry per shift; each entry must identify: (a) the primary task performed, (b) the safety or legal consideration involved, (c) the relevant credential exam area, and (d) one thing the student would do differently—instructor grades the journal using the field journal rubric.
  3. Attend the program debrief session (on-campus or virtual) where students present a five-minute verbal summary of their placement experience to classmates and the instructor, highlighting one critical incident, one skill they strengthened, and one area they plan to continue developing before sitting their credential exams.
Cumulative hour log form, field journal (physical or approved digital format), final employer evaluation rubric, field journal grading rubric, debrief session agenda, credential exam-area crosswalk chartFinal employer evaluation rubric average must be 3.0 out of 4.0 or higher across all domains, with no individual domain below 2.0; field journal must contain a complete entry for every shift with all four required elements present (graded pass/fail by instructor); verbal debrief must be completed to receive externship credit.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Employer Evaluation Skills DemonstrationSkills demonstration70%Composite score of 3.0 out of 4.0 or higher on the final employer evaluation rubric, with no single domain (professionalism, patrol, reporting, communication, safety, teamwork) scored below 2.0; mid-placement score of 2.5 average is the interim gate.The site supervisor completes a standardized four-point rubric at mid-placement and again at the end of the externship, scoring the student on six performance domains observed directly during operational shifts. Scores below the passing threshold at the final evaluation require the student to complete a remediation plan and, if the program calendar permits, additional supervised hours before the course is marked complete.
Competency · Safety · Attendance · Conduct · Initiative
Field Journal Lab LogLog30%All shifts documented with a complete four-part entry (task, safety/legal consideration, credential exam-area connection, and self-improvement note); no more than two entries may be returned for revision, and all revisions must be resubmitted within five business days; final journal accepted by instructor pass/fail.The field journal serves as the documentary record of the student's 162-hour placement, functioning as a lab log that traces applied skill development across every shift. The program instructor reviews the complete journal at submission for accuracy, professional language, and meaningful connection to credential content areas, and returns entries that lack required elements before issuing a final pass.
Complete · Verified
AGR-LAW52-09 Exam prep

Certification Exam Preparation: State Security Guard License & POST Academy Prep

45 hr · $450 COMPLIMENTARY

This 45-hour course systematically reviews every tested domain of the State Security Guard License exam and the POST Academy Prep credential, using diagnostic practice, targeted content review, and full-length mock exams to identify and close individual knowledge gaps. Students develop test-taking strategies, reinforce legal and procedural knowledge from earlier coursework, and demonstrate readiness to sit both credentialing exams with confidence. Lessons are sequenced from diagnostic to comprehensive, mirroring the cognitive load and format of the actual licensing and POST prep assessments.

Outcomes
Course text

This 45-hour course systematically reviews every tested domain of the State Security Guard License exam and the POST Academy Prep credential, using diagnostic practice, targeted content review, and full-length mock exams to identify and close individual knowledge gaps. Students develop test-taking strategies, reinforce legal and procedural knowledge from earlier coursework, and demonstrate readiness to sit both credentialing exams with confidence. Lessons are sequenced from diagnostic to comprehensive, mirroring the cognitive load and format of the actual licensing and POST prep assessments.

How the course runs. 4 blocks: Diagnostic Assessment & Exam Domain Mapping; Targeted Content Review: Legal Authority, Use of Force & Criminal Law; Targeted Content Review: Patrol, Report Writing, Emergency Response & Security Operations; Full Mock Credential Exams & Final Readiness Review.

What competent looks like. Demonstrate mastery of all major State Security Guard License exam content domains—including law, use of force, emergency response, access control, and professional conduct—by scoring 80% or higher on a full-length mock licensing exam. Demonstrate readiness for POST Academy Prep assessment areas—including criminal law, patrol procedures, report writing, and defensive tactics concepts—by scoring 80% or higher on a full-length POST prep mock exam. Apply test-taking strategies such as eliminating distractors, managing time per question, and flagging uncertain items to improve accuracy under timed exam conditions. Analyze personal diagnostic data to identify weak content domains and direct self-study resources accordingly before sitting the credentialing exams. Accurately recall legal authorities, officer powers, reporting requirements, and use-of-force continuum principles as tested on both credentials without reference materials. Complete both a simulated State Security Guard License exam and a POST Academy Prep mock exam within the prescribed time limits, achieving passing scores on each.

Lessons · 4 blocks
#LessonHrTypeObjectiveActivitiesMaterialsCheck
1Diagnostic Assessment & Exam Domain Mapping8practiceStudents complete a timed diagnostic covering all State Security Guard License and POST Academy Prep content domains and use scored results to build a personal study plan prioritizing weak areas.
  1. Complete a 100-question timed diagnostic test divided proportionally across all exam domains for both credentials—legal authority, use of force, access control, emergency response, criminal law, patrol concepts, report writing, and professional conduct—under simulated exam conditions.
  2. Receive a domain-by-domain score breakdown and, using a provided mapping table that links each domain to the program courses covering it (e.g., Criminal Law course for arrest authority questions, Patrol course for observation and response questions), annotate which areas fell below 80% and require focused review.
  3. Draft a written personal study plan listing the three lowest-scoring domains, the specific program materials and textbook chapters to re-read, the number of additional practice questions to complete per domain, and a daily study schedule for the remainder of the course.
100-question diagnostic exam packet (instructor-developed, aligned to published state security guard exam content outlines and POST academy preparation guides), domain mapping table linking exam areas to program courses, score report template, blank personal study plan form, pencils, scratch paper, a quiet testing environment with a wall clock or timer.Student produces a completed, realistic personal study plan with all three lowest domains identified and specific remediation steps listed; instructor reviews each plan for accuracy of domain identification and feasibility—pass requires correct identification of weak domains matching the score report and at least five concrete remediation actions documented.
2Targeted Content Review: Legal Authority, Use of Force & Criminal Law12theoryStudents review and correctly apply the legal and use-of-force principles most heavily weighted on the State Security Guard License exam and the criminal law domain of the POST Academy Prep assessment, achieving at least 80% on a domain quiz.
  1. Work through an instructor-led review of key legal concepts tested on both credentials—lawful authority of a security officer versus peace officer, citizen's arrest standards, trespass and detention authority, use-of-force continuum levels, proportionality requirements, and liability for excessive force—using case scenario slides; students annotate a guided notes outline and raise questions after each scenario block.
  2. Complete a 40-question domain-specific practice quiz covering legal authority, use of force, and criminal law in the multiple-choice format used on the actual exams; after scoring, students pair up to discuss each question they missed, explain the correct reasoning aloud to their partner, and mark the governing rule in their notes.
  3. Participate in a 'rapid-fire' oral review where the instructor reads a brief scenario aloud and individual students state the correct legal classification or officer action within ten seconds, followed by whole-group confirmation of the answer and the underlying rule; the round cycles through at least 30 scenarios.
State security guard licensing exam content outline (published by the relevant state licensing board), POST Academy Prep study guide (state POST commission version in use), program Criminal Law course notes and textbook chapters, instructor-prepared scenario slides, guided notes outline handout, 40-question domain quiz packet, answer key, whiteboard and markers.Students score 80% or higher on the 40-question domain quiz; any student below 80% receives a targeted question list corresponding to missed items and must re-attempt an alternate 20-question version of the lowest-scoring sub-domain before the next lesson—pass threshold is 80% on the original or alternate quiz within the lesson block.
3Targeted Content Review: Patrol, Report Writing, Emergency Response & Security Operations12practiceStudents review patrol procedures, report writing standards, first-aid and emergency response actions, and security operations concepts tested across both credentials, then correctly answer at least 80% of domain practice questions under timed conditions.
  1. Complete three 20-question timed mini-quizzes—one each on patrol and observation procedures, report writing elements and legal requirements for documentation, and emergency response actions including first aid priorities and incident reporting protocols—with a strict eight-minute time limit per quiz to simulate actual exam pacing; students self-score immediately using the provided answer key and annotate each missed question with the correct rule.
  2. Work in small groups of three to collaboratively write a one-page incident report for a complex instructor-provided scenario (unauthorized person on premises, minor injury, property damage, law enforcement notification required); groups compare their reports against the documentation standards checklist from the Report Writing course, identify missing elements, and correct the report—this reinforces report writing as a tested POST Academy Prep domain.
  3. Rotate through four instructor-prepared review stations (one per domain: patrol, report writing, emergency response, security operations), spending about 12 minutes at each; each station contains a laminated scenario card, five written practice questions with answer rationales on the reverse, and a short checklist of key facts and definitions most commonly missed on licensing exams—students complete all questions independently, then check answers before rotating.
Three 20-question mini-quiz packets with answer keys, incident report scenario sheet, documentation standards checklist from the Report Writing course, four laminated station scenario cards with practice questions and rationale sheets, first aid reference card (consistent with the CPR/first aid training from the Universal Core course), patrol procedures reference summary from the Patrol course, security operations concept summary from the Security Ops course, timer.Each student scores 80% or higher averaged across all three mini-quizzes (60 questions total); for the incident report, every mandatory element identified in the documentation checklist must be present in the final corrected group report—groups with missing elements rewrite until complete; students below 80% on mini-quizzes complete an additional 10-question targeted quiz on their weakest sub-domain before the next lesson.
4Full Mock Credential Exams & Final Readiness Review13practiceStudents complete one full-length simulated State Security Guard License exam and one full-length POST Academy Prep mock exam under timed, proctored conditions, then analyze results to confirm readiness and identify any final preparation steps before sitting the official exams.
  1. Sit the full-length State Security Guard License mock exam under strict proctored conditions—no notes, no phones, timed to match the official exam's allotted time—followed immediately by a 15-minute break; then sit the full-length POST Academy Prep mock exam under the same proctored conditions; both exams use multiple-choice questions proportioned to match the domain weighting in each credential's published content outline.
  2. Receive a complete scored report for both mock exams broken down by domain; individually complete a 'readiness reflection' worksheet identifying any domain still below 80%, listing three specific resources (textbook page ranges, course notes sections, or practice question sets) to review before the official exam date, and writing one paragraph describing confidence level and any remaining concerns to share with the instructor.
  3. Participate in a whole-class debrief where the instructor projects aggregate data showing the most commonly missed questions across both mock exams (without identifying individual students), explains the reasoning and governing rule for each high-miss item, and answers student questions; students then practice three test-taking strategies—eliminating two obviously wrong distractors before choosing an answer, re-reading the question stem for qualifier words such as 'always,' 'never,' 'most likely,' and flagging and returning to uncertain questions—using a 10-question timed drill to apply all three strategies before the session ends.
Full-length State Security Guard License mock exam packet (instructor-developed, aligned to state licensing board exam content outline), full-length POST Academy Prep mock exam packet (aligned to state POST commission published exam domains), answer keys, domain score report template, readiness reflection worksheet, projector for debrief data display, whiteboard and markers, a proctored room with separated seating, wall clock or timer, pencils—no notes or reference materials permitted during the mock exams.Students achieve 80% or higher on both the State Security Guard License mock exam and the POST Academy Prep mock exam; any student below 80% on either exam receives individualized written feedback identifying the specific domains to remediate and recommended resources, and the instructor schedules a one-on-one review session before the student sits the official credentialing exam—the 80% threshold on both mock exams is the course completion standard for this lesson.
Assessments
AssessmentTypeWeightPass standardMethod & rubric
Dual Credential Mock Certification ExaminationMock certification exam100%A score of 80% or higher on both the full-length State Security Guard License mock exam and the full-length POST Academy Prep mock exam, both completed within the designated time limits under proctored conditions without reference materials.Students sit two full-length, timed mock exams—one mirroring the State Security Guard License exam's domain weighting and format, and one mirroring the POST Academy Prep assessment—under proctored conditions identical to the official testing environment; each exam is scored by domain, and the combined results determine whether the student has demonstrated the knowledge and test readiness required to sit the official credentialing exams. Students who do not achieve 80% on either exam receive a written remediation plan and a targeted re-review session addressing identified weak domains before being cleared to schedule their official state licensing and POST prep credential exams.
Score · Time management
Program completion

External credential: POST Academy Prep; State Security Guard License

Students prepare for and sit the State Security Guard License exam administered by their state's licensing authority, and complete preparatory requirements aligned with their state Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) commission standards for academy entry. Pass standard: Credential issued by the body.

Back to Law Enforcement / Security · How the school gets authority to award these credentials