MFG-MECH15-07 · Lesson 10 · 12 clock hours · theory
Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Practices
Objective. Students will distinguish corrective, preventive, and predictive maintenance strategies and create a preventive maintenance schedule for a mechatronic system using manufacturer specifications and inspection intervals.
⚠ Pending professional review
This lesson, its worked examples and its practice questions has not yet been verified by a licensed engineer or certified journey-level tradesperson or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
Preventive and Predictive Maintenance Practices
Maintenance strategy determines whether a plant reacts to failures or prevents them. In a mechatronic or robotic system — where mechanical, electrical, pneumatic, and control elements all depend on each other — the right strategy saves money, protects workers, and keeps production running.
Three Maintenance Strategies
Corrective maintenance (CM) means you fix a system after it has already failed. A conveyor belt snaps, a robot servo alarm fires, or a pneumatic valve sticks — and production stops. CM is unavoidable for truly random failures, but relying on it alone leads to unplanned downtime, rushed repairs, and safety hazards from makeshift fixes.
Preventive maintenance (PM) uses a fixed schedule — based on elapsed time (hours, days, months) or operating cycles — to inspect, clean, lubricate, and replace components before they fail. PM tasks are drawn directly from the equipment manufacturer's maintenance manual. A FANUC robot, for example, specifies grease replenishment intervals for each joint axis in its maintenance documentation. Following those intervals, rather than guessing, is the correct approach. PM is predictable and easy to plan, but it can result in replacing parts that still have usable life, and it does not account for machines that are worked harder or in harsher environments than the baseline.
Predictive maintenance (PdM) monitors the actual condition of equipment and schedules service only when measurements indicate approaching failure. Common PdM techniques include:
- Vibration analysis — accelerometers detect changes in bearing or gear vibration signatures before mechanical failure occurs.
- Thermal imaging (infrared thermography) — an IR camera reveals hot spots in electrical panels, motor windings, and coupling assemblies that indicate loose connections, overload, or lubrication breakdown.
- Oil analysis — fluid samples from gearboxes and hydraulic systems are tested for metal particles, viscosity change, and contamination that signal internal wear.
- Current signature analysis — trending the current draw of a motor over time can reveal developing mechanical or electrical problems.
PdM maximizes component life and avoids unnecessary replacements, but it requires instruments, trained technicians, and data-management systems. It works best for high-value or high-consequence assets.
In practice, most facilities use all three strategies together: CM for minor incidental failures, PM for routine wear items on a manufacturer-defined schedule, and PdM for critical equipment where early warning pays for the monitoring cost.
Building a PM Schedule
A PM schedule is a table that lists every maintainable component, the specific task, the interval, the accept/reject criterion, and any parts that must be stocked. The source for intervals and criteria must always be the manufacturer's maintenance documentation — not guesswork or habit. When you choose to adjust an interval (for example, shortening a lubrication interval because the robot operates in a wet environment), you must document the reason and the section of the manual that was your starting point.
A well-formed PM table row looks like this:
| Component | Task | Interval | Accept/Reject Criterion | Parts to Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axis 1 gearbox | Inspect for grease leakage; re-grease per manual volume | Per robot manual schedule | No visible leakage; correct grease quantity applied | Manufacturer-specified grease |
| Air filter-regulator (FRL) | Drain bowl, inspect element, check regulated pressure | Daily / shift start | Bowl clear; element not cracked; pressure at setpoint | Filter element, bowl seal |
Every accept/reject criterion must be specific enough that any technician reading it reaches the same pass/fail decision. "Looks okay" is not acceptable; "no visible cracks, pressure within ±5 PSI of setpoint" is.
Safety Requirements for Maintenance Work
All maintenance activities — PM and PdM alike — must be performed under the correct hazard controls.
Lockout/Tagout (LOTO): Before any maintenance that requires removing a guard, reaching into a danger zone, or making contact with moving parts or electrical components, you must follow OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 — the Control of Hazardous Energy standard. De-energize the machine, isolate every energy source (electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, gravity), apply your personal lock and tag, and verify the absence of energy before proceeding. This procedure is non-negotiable.
Electrical safety: When work must be performed near energized circuits (for example, taking thermal images with the panel door open), follow NFPA 70E. This includes determining the arc-flash boundary and incident energy level, wearing the appropriate arc-rated PPE, and — whenever possible — working in a de-energized state with an energized-work permit if de-energization is truly infeasible.
Machine guarding: Temporary removal of guards during PM must be followed by immediate reinstallation and verification before restart. OSHA 1910.212 and NFPA 79 govern guarding requirements for industrial machinery.
Robot safety: For any work on or near industrial robots, apply ANSI/RIA R15.06 / ISO 10218. Even a robot in teach mode can move unexpectedly. Use restricted-speed modes, enable safeguards, and never assume a robot is safe because it appears stopped.
Why This Matters for Your Career
The BLS reports that electro-mechanical and mechatronics technicians maintain and troubleshoot automated equipment working alongside engineers. Employers expect you to read a maintenance manual, extract the correct intervals, and build a schedule that prevents costly downtime — not just respond after a machine has already stopped producing.
Key terms8
Corrective Maintenance (CM)Repair or restoration of a system after an unplanned failure has already occurred.
Preventive Maintenance (PM)Scheduled inspection, cleaning, lubrication, and part replacement performed at fixed time or cycle intervals defined by the manufacturer to prevent failure.
Predictive Maintenance (PdM)Condition-based monitoring strategy that uses measurements such as vibration, thermal imaging, or oil analysis to forecast failure and schedule service only when needed.
Vibration AnalysisA predictive maintenance technique that uses sensors to measure and trend vibration signatures in rotating machinery, detecting bearing or gear degradation before mechanical failure.
Infrared ThermographyUse of an infrared camera to detect abnormal heat in electrical connections, motor windings, or mechanical assemblies, indicating a developing fault.
Accept/Reject CriterionA specific, measurable standard written into a PM schedule that allows any technician to objectively determine whether a component passes inspection or must be serviced or replaced.
Lockout/Tagout (LOTO)The procedure required by OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 to de-energize and physically isolate all hazardous energy sources before maintenance begins, verified before touching the equipment.
ANSI/RIA R15.06 / ISO 10218The industrial robot safety standard governing safeguarding, restricted-speed modes, and safe work practices when personnel are in or near a robot's operating envelope.
Worked examples4
1. A robot cell operates two shifts per day, 8 hours each, 5 days per week. The manufacturer specifies a lubrication task every 3,840 operating hours. How many weeks will pass before that PM task is first due?
- Step 1 — Calculate operating hours per week: 2 shifts × 8 hours × 5 days = 80 hours per week.
- Step 2 — Divide the manufacturer interval by the weekly hours: 3,840 hours ÷ 80 hours/week = 48 weeks.
Answer: The lubrication task is first due after 48 weeks of operation at that schedule.
2. A packaging plant records three unplanned robot stoppages in one quarter, each lasting an average of 4 hours. The plant's documented downtime cost is $1,200 per hour. What is the total downtime cost for that quarter?
- Step 1 — Find total downtime hours: 3 events × 4 hours/event = 12 hours.
- Step 2 — Multiply by the hourly cost: 12 hours × $1,200/hour = $14,400.
Answer: Total downtime cost for the quarter is $14,400.
3. A PM schedule lists an air filter element inspection every 500 hours. The system runs 6 hours per day. A technician also knows the environment is unusually dusty and decides to halve the interval as a conservative adjustment. On what day number should the first adjusted inspection occur?
- Step 1 — Apply the interval reduction: 500 hours ÷ 2 = 250 hours.
- Step 2 — Divide by daily run time: 250 hours ÷ 6 hours/day ≈ 41.7 days, rounded down to day 41 for a conservative (earlier) inspection.
Answer: The first adjusted inspection should be scheduled no later than day 41 of operation.
4. A technician uses an infrared camera and records a junction box connection at 74 °F ambient and 113 °F at the suspect terminal. The plant's PdM threshold is: inspect and repair any connection running more than 35 °F above ambient. Does this connection require immediate action?
- Step 1 — Calculate the temperature rise: 113 °F − 74 °F = 39 °F above ambient.
- Step 2 — Compare to threshold: 39 °F > 35 °F threshold.
Answer: Yes. The connection exceeds the threshold by 4 °F and requires inspection and repair. Follow LOTO per OSHA 29 CFR 1910.147 and NFPA 70E before opening the panel.
The math in this lesson2
Learners compute downtime cost at $1,200 per hour and temperature rise above ambient against a threshold.
7.RP.3N-Q.1
In class: Lecture and comparison chart: corrective (fix after failure), preventive (time- or cycle-based inspection and replacement), and predictive (condition-based monitoring — vibration, thermal imaging, oil analysis); students fill in a T-chart of advantages and limitations for each strategy as the lecture proceeds. · Case study analysis: students read a two-page maintenance log from a fictional packaging plant showing three unplanned robot downtime events in six months; they identify which events a PM schedule would have prevented, which required predictive methods, and calculate the approximate cost of downtime using a given $/hour figure. · Schedule-creation exercise: using a FANUC robot maintenance manual excerpt and a pneumatic system component manual, each student produces a one-page PM schedule table (component, inspection task, interval in hours or days, accept/reject criterion, parts to stock) and justifies two interval choices in writing.
Materials: Maintenance log case study packet, FANUC robot maintenance manual excerpts, pneumatic component maintenance manual excerpts, PM schedule template (spreadsheet), whiteboard, projector
Check: PM schedule reviewed against instructor answer key: schedule must include at minimum eight components with correct intervals and accept/reject criteria sourced from the provided manuals; written justification for two intervals must cite the manual page or section; 80% accuracy to pass.
Practice check8
Answer each question, then check it. Nothing is recorded; this is your own practice.
Record this lesson on my transcript. Sign in with your key and enrollment email to record lessons (enroll free if you have no key). This page stays open to read and practise.