Objective. Students execute the project tasks defined in the Learning Agreement—spanning data ingestion, cleaning, exploratory analysis, and visual output—producing employer-reviewed deliverables that meet professional quality standards.
This lesson, its worked examples and its practice questions has not yet been verified by an industry-certified professional or by a certification or approval body. It is a study draft and may contain errors. Do not use it as instructions for work on a job site or on live equipment. Always follow your instructor, your supervising professional, and current official references and regulations.
VoTechWorks program approval and accreditation are still in progress. Credentials are issued only by the certifying bodies named in each program, after their own exams.
You have moved from planning into doing. The Learning Agreement you signed defines the scope of your work—specific datasets, tools, deliverables, and timelines. During this active project phase you will collect or ingest real data, clean it, analyze it, and produce visual outputs that a supervisor will formally review. Everything you produce must meet professional quality standards, not just class standards. That means accurate results, clear documentation, and responsible handling of any sensitive data.
Treat every worksite day like a professional workday. Arrive on time, clarify your task list at the start of the shift, and close out your work session by committing all code and documentation to the employer's version-control system or shared workspace. A commit that never arrives is work that cannot be reviewed, audited, or built upon by colleagues.
Typical daily tasks may include writing SQL queries against production or staging databases, cleaning CSV or API-sourced files in Python or R, updating Power BI or Tableau dashboards, or running descriptive and predictive analyses. Regardless of the task, apply the same habits every day: comment your code, name files clearly, and log what you did in your externship journal before you leave.
Many worksite datasets contain personally identifiable information (PII) or proprietary business data. You are legally and ethically obligated to protect it.
These are not suggestions—violating data-privacy rules can end a placement, expose the employer to legal liability, and follow you professionally. The Employer Quality Rubric scores adherence to data-privacy policy as one of its five required criteria.
Raw data is almost never analysis-ready. Before you can trust any result, you must document and address data-quality issues. A professional cleaning workflow includes:
1. Profile the data first. Count rows, check column types, identify nulls, and look at value distributions before writing a single transformation.
2. Document every decision. If you drop rows with missing values, record why. If you impute, record the method and rationale.
3. Keep the raw file untouched. Work on a copy or use a pipeline that preserves the original; this supports reproducibility and audit.
4. Validate after each transformation. Row counts, summary statistics, and spot checks catch errors introduced by cleaning steps themselves.
5. Produce a data-quality report. Your mid-point deliverable may be exactly this: a cleaned dataset accompanied by a written summary of what was found and what was done about it.
Exploratory data analysis (EDA) is the process of summarizing the main characteristics of a dataset, usually through statistics and plots, before formal modeling. During EDA you are asking: What does this data actually contain? Are there outliers? What relationships exist between variables?
Record your EDA findings in your journal. Screenshots of distributions, correlation matrices, or pivot-table summaries count as evidence of analytical thinking. Supervisors and credential exam objectives both expect you to distinguish between descriptive statistics (what happened) and predictive or inferential work (what might happen or why).
A visualization that misleads is worse than no visualization at all. Follow these principles:
Power BI and Tableau both support these practices. Your dashboard or chart must be readable by a business stakeholder who is not a data specialist.
You are required to attend and contribute to at least four team meetings, stand-ups, or sprint reviews. Before each one, write a brief status update: what you completed, what is in progress, and any blockers. At each meeting, request feedback on at least one piece of work. Record both the feedback and any action items in your journal. This habit builds the professional communication skills that every credential exam and every employer expects.
At approximately the 160-hour mark, you will present one completed portfolio artifact to your site supervisor for a formal mid-point review. The artifact might be a cleaned dataset with a data-quality report, a functional dashboard with a written user guide, or an analysis memo with visualizations and recommendations.
Your supervisor will score it using the program's Employer Quality Rubric across five criteria: accuracy, documentation, visualization clarity, professional communication, and adherence to data-privacy policy. A passing score is 3 out of 5 or higher on every criterion—not an average, but every single criterion. If any criterion scores below 3, you must revise and resubmit within one week.
Keep the CompTIA Data+ exam objectives, the Google Data Analytics competency checklist, and the IBM Data Science Professional checklist at your workstation (digital or printed). At the end of each week, open your journal and mark which competencies your day-to-day work touched. Gaps you notice now are gaps you can fill before the credential exams, not after.
Answer each question, then check it. Nothing is recorded; this is your own practice.
A free tech program — complimentary, as our commitment to get America working. Help us build VoTechWorks. Tell us what works, what doesn’t, and what you want to learn.